Sheerit Yisrael—www.age-end.com
PO Box 473
Calder, Idaho 83808, USA
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
With
a Different Approach to the Questions of
Religion,
Philosophy, Faith, Hope and the Future
All in the Context of a Coming World Government under Man’s
Control
2009
Oct 25, 2009 Will the FCC Allow Network providers to Limit or Restrict Internet
Use?
Reuters had a story that the FCC commissioners support open Internet rule in
view of plans by network providers
like AT&T Inc (T.N), Verizon Communications Inc (VZ.N) and Qwest Communications
International Inc (Q.N), to block internet content.
Per the story, the FCC would allow reasonable net management by the
providers. Public comments are being
accepted by Jan 14 before the FCC issues its rule.
Comment: Alternative news sources are hurting the Cabal moves to control things and bring on a world government. Thus, it is only a question of time before the Cabal takes full control of the Internet. Already, a world body is surfacing to control the Internet. Too, nations like the US are wanting to exercise control. A site like this one at www.analysis-news.com will soon not be allowed to use the Internet.
Nov 5, 2009 No Respect, No Morals, No Trust, Welcome to Modern Britain
The London Telegraph had an article by Jeff Randall which showed how far the
British people have fallen in the last 60 years.
The article cited a BBC broadcast which showed the social decomposition
by showing a Sheffield student relieving himself on a war memorial while BBC had
news bulletins that covered the murder of five British soldiers in Helmand.
It's hard to think of a more offensive
image than booze-fuelled urine flowing over poppies, on a day when courageous
servicemen are being slaughtered in order, the Government claims, to keep the
rest of us safe.
Randall cited
the corrosion of deference in our schools, the abandonment of manners on our
streets and the death of respect for civility and integrity. He said that the
British are close to the point where ethical behaviour is regarded as an
affliction to be pitied, a loser's burden.
In a summary of what
went wrong, Britain's “Chief Rabbi,” Lord Sacks, concludes: "Concepts like duty,
obligation, responsibility and honour have come to seem antiquated and
irrelevant. Emotions like guilt, shame, contrition and remorse have been deleted
from our vocabulary, for are we not all entitled to self-esteem? The still,
small voice of conscience is rarely heard these days. Conscience has been
outsourced, delegated away."
Randall noted:
“As the banking crisis and MPs' expenses
scandal revealed, there is barely a distinction between legality and morality.
Freedom means pursuing that with which it is possible to get away. If everyone
else is gaming the system, only a mug would choose to do otherwise. When caught,
the perpetrators point shamelessly to a failure by regulators.”
He added that after
becoming prime minister, “Tony Blair offered a fresh start for a modernised
Britain. It was an attractive vision. He did not want, he said, his children
brought up in a country where gangs of teenagers hung around street corners,
doing nothing but abusing passers-by. ‘I tell you: a decent society is not based
on rights,’ he said. ‘It is based on duty… the duty to show respect.’
“No quibbles there,
except that after 12 years of his New Labour project, the respect to which Mr
Blair referred is in the sewer. Teachers who seek to reprimand offensive pupils
are attacked by yobbish parents; train drivers who ask unruly gangs to get off
are beaten up. A vulnerable mother kills herself and her disabled daughter after
years of brutal abuse from thugs. This, I'm afraid, is the reality of
contemporary Britain, a sprawling no-respect zone.
“According to a study
by the Institute for Public Policy Research, Britain's teenagers are among the
most badly behaved in Europe. It paints a
picture of adolescents immersed in consumerism, who are drunk more often and
involved in more fights than their Continental counterparts.
The IPPR's explanation for our dismal
record is a collapse in family and community life. In Italy, 93 per cent of
15-year-olds eat regularly with their parents; in Britain, it is just 64 per
cent. We should not be surprised.
The British state rewards unmarried
mothers with a level of benefits most would be unable to earn in legal
employment. They are incentivised to go
solo.”
Randall added the
immigration fall—out by saying “When Labour forced through its disastrous policy
of mass immigration, what respect did it show to the millions of indigenous
working-class voters whose communities would come under serious strain as a
result? Did anyone explain the true consequences, rather than just the bogus
benefits?
““And when David
Cameron gave us a cast-iron guarantee that we would be able to vote on the
ratification of a European Constitution (for that is what the Lisbon Treaty is)
did he consider how disrespectful it would be to renege? Apparently not. Up his
sleeve was the metaphorical small print.
“As bleak as it seems,
Lord Sacks's prognosis is unavoidable: ‘Parliamentary reform and financial
re-regulation will treat the symptoms, not the cause. Without conscience there
can be no trust. Without a shared moral code there can be no free society.
Either we recover the moral sense or we will find, too late, that in the name of
liberty, we have lost our freedom.’”
Comment: Just like sickness and despair
is throughout Britain, the same is true in the US.
There is no mistake about it.
Judgment from The HIGHEST is on the way.
To go to the Home Page, please click here: www.age-end.com.