Sheerit Yisrael—www.age-end.com
PO Box 473
Calder, Idaho 83808, USA
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
With
a Different Approach to the Questions of
Religion,
Philosophy, Faith, Hope and the Future
All in the Context of a Coming World Government under Man’s
Control
2009-03-Siwan-News
May 24, 2009 There is Growing Dissatisfaction/Rebellion in America
Dprogram.net had this report on the Backdoor Draft which said:
“As
of March, 2009 orders had been issued to 26,954 members of the IRR since
September, 2001. These numbers only reflect that of the Army, not the other
services. Only 48% of those recalled have actually reported for duty.
“In 1940, President Roosevelt signed into law the Selective Training
and Service Act of 1940. This established the country’s first peacetime draft
and established the Selective Service System at the federal level. Men had been
drafted from 1948 to 1973 in both peacetime and during conflict in order to fill
positions that could not be filled with volunteers. The last time a military
draft was active in the U.S. the Vietnam War was in full swing. A ‘lottery
draft,’ the first since 1942, took place on December 1, 1969 and determined the
order in which men would be drafted in the 1970 calendar year. Lottery drafts, a
method of selecting 18 — 26 year old men by birth date, were also conducted in
1970, 1971 and 1972 for the years following.
“These drafts caused outrage amongst the general populace and for
good measure. According to the Selective Service over 10 million men were
drafted during World War II, 1.5 million were drafted during the Korean War, and
1.8 million were drafted during the Vietnam War. These numbers add up to roughly
2/3 of all service members during World War II and Korea and 1/5 during Vietnam.
Those are staggering numbers to anyone.
“Many intense protests and riots took place during the Vietnam era
and the draft was the central controversy surrounding these. In 1973, President
Nixon wisely ended the draft due to public outrage. According to the influential
John Locke a person has the natural right to life, liberty, and property. These
rights are not given by any government; they are inherent and as natural as your
right to breathe. Any way one may attempt to construe this, a draft is a direct
violation of all the above. Forced service strips one of his life, if even for a
short period. It is a violation of his liberties as he is not able to choose for
himself what he will do, and it is a violation of his property as one’s body is
the ultimate form of private property. No property or possession is more
important than that. Any draft is an egregious act against a person’s natural
rights and liberty and should only be viewed as that.
“In a time of conflict a citizenry will naturally gravitate toward
military service, so long as the people feel that it is in line with their
values and that their service is justified. As such, it is a general indication
of the level of support of the country. If enlistment levels drop during this
time it should be viewed as a lack of support and belief regarding said
conflict. Support amongst the people is always the telling tale of military
intervention. Currently less than 3 million or fewer than 1% of Americans are
serving in the military (active duty and reserves). If those numbers were to
drop steadily over the course of a few years we could conclude that on average
Americans do not support the cause, hence they do not join and serve. You can
easily see why the draft has been a hotly debated topic throughout the past
several decades, servitude has never been popular.
“We’ve been fortunate to have avoided a draft in the U.S. since the
early 70’s (if you consider not having forced servitude fortunate). The federal
government and white house take great pride in the fact that today we have an
all-volunteer military. Well. . . sort of. All members of the Armed Forces upon
enlistment join for a period of 8 years. The amount of time served in active
duty or the reserves is subtracted from that time and, unless that individual
reenlists, the remainder of those eight years is served in the Individual Ready
Reserve, otherwise known as the IRR. The standard length of a military contract
is four years, so someone who serves four years is still in the ‘IRR pool’ for
four more years. According to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command website:
“Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) Soldiers are a group of trained,
experienced military professionals who stand ready to individually augment Army
units. IRR Soldiers live, work and study in the civilian community, but they are
military members with an existing service obligation. The Army accesses the
forces and capabilities of the IRR as necessary to fight and win our nation’s
wars. What that basically means is
that for the remainder of 8 years these individuals can be recalled and forced
to serve again for a period of up to 24 months. This is covered under U.S. Code
12302.
“As of March, 2009 orders had been issued to 26,954 members of the
IRR since September, 2001. These numbers only reflect that of the Army, not the
other services. Only 48% of those recalled have actually reported for duty.
“The rest face punitive measures ranging from downgrading of
discharge status to imprisonment. Technically, since we are in a time of
‘national emergency’ they are considered deserters and are also subject to the
death penalty. This is important to note because all of these individuals are
veterans, many of whom have served overseas and in combat. This is not a group
of naïve college kids protesting the war, these are our young men and women who
have served and who now refuse to take part in our military interventionism.
This should lend even greater clarity to the idea that America does not support
this war. When our own veterans are against military intervention, maybe we
should consider that.
“The fallacy that we maintain an all-volunteer service should be
blown apart. Recalling veterans is a ‘backdoor draft,’ a hushed way of coercing
more people into service without publicly declaring a draft. Yes, all service
members sign a contract upon enlistment and this provision is included. How many
18 year olds would decide not to serve due to this clause though? If you expect
a kid to understand the implications of their actions, especially when joining
the military, you are sorely mistaken. Had this been a civilian contract you can
bet that it wouldn’t stand, people would simply sue for entrapment and they
would win. Fat chance of a soldier being able to sue the government though.
“The honest truth is that most soldiers don’t even know what the IRR
is and how it may affect them. If you were to ask a soldier a few years ago or
even today about the IRR you would probably get one of two replies: ‘What’s the
IRR?’ or ‘My recruiter told me I would only be recalled if World War III
happened.’ The latter is a pretty common answer. Thank God World War III hasn’t
happened!
How do I now all of this you might ask? Because I am one of those
recalled soldiers. I served on active duty for five years and was honorably
discharged in June, 2007. Less than a year later I received orders recalling me
to service with one month’s notice and I am currently deployed in the Middle
East. I was definitely not alone, serving with me are more than 70 others who
were recalled. All had been honorably discharged and most had been out of
service for two to four years. All of us were hesitant to come back and only did
so through fear of imprisonment, loss of civilian jobs, or simply guilt. I can
speak with authority when I say this IS a draft. A very convenient one in which
veterans who no longer wish to serve can be discredited and their lives turned
upside down if they fail to comply with ‘federal wisdom.’ This is how we treat
our vets? Maybe we should consider the level of support for this intervention
before coercing veterans, of all people, to serve again.
“For anyone that may declare; ‘You knew what you were signing up
for,’ the point is missed. For those who feel that mandatory service is a great
thing, the notions of personal liberty and property are lost. For those who
would say; ‘Better you than me,’ ignorance is their only haven. Let’s recognize
this for what it is and starting holding our government accountable. Call it a
backdoor draft, call it entrapment, call it obligation, but don’t call it an
all-volunteer military.”
Analysis: The above was written by a
soldier serving in the Middle East.
His story hits a home run in terms of the dilemma we face as a nation.
Should American citizens be made to serve in a Rothschild directed war
for profit and gain as declared by a US president outside the purview of a
Congressional declaration of war as stipulated by the US Constitution?
Frankly, I served in both the Korean and Vietnamese wars—neither of which
were legal and right by the US Constitution.
As illegal as those conflicts were by the US Constitution, they were
petty compared with the war adventures today.
May 24, 2009 Trouble Brewing over the Temple Mount
A7 News from
Israel had this story by Tzvi ben Gedalyahu on Peace Plan:
Iran to Share Rule over Temple Mount.
It said:
“Israel
may find Iran as one of the administrators of the Temple Mount, according to a
new Palestinian Authority plan reported Thursday by the Hebrew-language
newspaper Haaretz. PA sources said
giving up claims to the Temple Mount and handing over control to the 57-member
Saudi-based Islamic Conference Organization is conditional on Israel’s agreeing
to a final status agreement. Iran,
which is classified as Persian and not an Arab country, is part of the Islamic
group…
“Sovereignty over the Temple Mount, based in Jerusalem, has been one of the
foundations for a new Arab country that the PA wants following the proposed
expulsion of more than half a million Jews from Judea and Samaria, as well as
from Jerusalem neighborhoods that were established after the 1967 Six-Day War.
“The PA's official website as far back as 2005 rejected the Jewish connection
with the Western Wall (Kotel), the remains of the wall that surrounded the Holy
Temple area. Muslim legend claims that Mohammed tied his horse to the wall
before ascending to heaven, even though the city of Jerusalem is not even
mentioned in the Koran…
“The Israeli government initially ignored the PA propaganda campaign, but Rabbi
Chaim Richman, director of the International Department of the of the Temple
Institute in Jerusalem, warned in 2005 that the PA claims have ‘far reaching
implications’ for Israel. Rabbi
Richman said that the PA’s denial of the Jewish Temple's existence ‘is part of a
campaign to totally eradicate, erase, and destroy all Jewish connection to the
Temple Mount, Jerusalem and the land of Israel.’
The PA incitement against Israel, which violates the American Roadmap
plan, also attributes the 1929 Arab pogrom to Jewish efforts to claim ownership
of the Western Wall.
“The Islam Online website Wednesday re-asserted long-standing accusations that
archaeological excavations at the Temple Mount are designed to cause a ‘real and
immediate’ danger to the Al Aqsa mosque. The latest charges were attributed to
Sheikh Ra'ad Salah, leader of the Islamic Movement’s Galilee branch and who has
been arrested several times for incitement against Israel.
Sheikh Salah told the website he is certain Israel has a ‘diabolical
plan’ to destroy Al-Aqsa Mosque ‘in a way that would appear as is happening as a
result of natural causes, such as an earthquake.’
“According to Islam Online, ‘The Israeli government, in coordination with
powerful settler groups, began digging an extensive tunnel network throughout
the Old City. Israel describes the tunnels as tourist projects that pose no
threat to Islamic holy places, [bu Palestinians and some Israeli organizations,
including the Israeli Committee against House Demolition, believe that the
ultimate goal is to create a subterranean access route to attack Al-Aqsa and
other Islamic shrines in the area.’”
Analysis: The question of the Temple
Mount is profoundly important in terms of the future.
Of course, there will be no peace between Israel and the Palestinians
until the issue is settled. As
Richman notes above, ownership of the Temple Mount affects the whole question of
the existence of Israel as a state.
May 24, 2009 Poison in Plastic Drinking Bottles?
London Mail on
Line had report on Gender bending fear over plastic drinks bottles by Jenny Hope
which said: “Drink
from plastic bottles can raise the body’s levels of a controversial
‘gender-bending’ chemical by more than two thirds, according to tests.
Experts have been concerned about the
possible health effects of bisphenol A (BPA) - an everyday chemical used in many
plastic food and drink containers and tins as well as clear baby bottles - which
is officially classified as toxic in some countries.
“A study found that participants who drank for a week from
polycarbonate bottles showed a 69 per cent increase in their urine of BPA, which
mimics the female sex hormone oestrogen. Risk:
Bisphenol A, found in plastic, mimics the female sex hormone eostrogen.
Researchers did not say how much liquid was drunk per day.
Researchers from Harvard School of Public
Health studied 77 students, who had first undergone a seven-day ‘washout’ phase
in which they drank all cold beverages from stainless steel bottles in order to
minimise BPA exposure. They were then
given two polycarbonate bottles and asked to drink all cold beverages from them
during the next week.
“Previous studies have suggested that high levels of BPA consumption
are linked to birth defects, growth problems and an increased risk of heart
disease and diabetes. In particular there
are fears that heating the bottles, as parents would do when warming their
baby’s milk, causes the chemical to leak in potentially dangerous quantities
into the liquid contained within.
“The senior author of the latest study, Karin B. Michels, associate
professor of epidemiology at HSPH and Harvard Medical School, said: ‘We found
that drinking cold liquids from polycarbonate bottles for just one week
increased urinary BPA levels by more than two-thirds.
If you heat those bottles, as is the case
with baby bottles, we would expect the levels to be considerably higher.
This would be of concern since infants
may be particularly susceptible to BPA’s hormone gland-disrupting potential.’
Canada banned the use of BPA in
polycarbonate baby bottles last year and some manufacturers have voluntarily
eliminated it from their products.”
Analysis: I have mentioned this
problem before. And why for the plastics instead of glass?
I explain this in the Goldsmiths, part XXIX (at www.analysis-news.com).
It’s simple. It’s the problem
of inflation and how to cut costs.
Plastic is far cheaper than glass.
May 24, 2009 Government Spying on Citizens Intensifies
Rense.con had this story on Internet threatened by censorship, Secret
Surveillance and Cybersecurity laws by Stephen Lendman which said:
“…George
Bush institutionalized lawless spying invasions of privacy on Americans and
others. Barack Obama continues the
practice under the same federal agencies, including the FBI, CIA, Pentagon and
NSA. On April 15, The New York Times headlined: ‘Officials Say US Wiretaps
Exceeded Law.’
“It cited the NSA's practice in recent months of intercepting private emails and
phone calls of Americans ‘on a scale that went beyond the broad legal limits
established by Congress last year....’ Briefed
intelligence officials and lawyers called it significant and systematic....overcollection"
in violation of the law.
“The Justice Department acknowledged the problem but said it was resolved. For
its part, the NSA said its ‘intelligence operations, including programs for
collection and analysis, are in strict accordance with US laws and regulations.’
The Office of the Director of National
Intelligence, in overall charge, downplayed the The Times story, referred to
‘inadvertent mistakes,’ and claimed efforts were immediately implemented to
correct them.
“Nonetheless, the issue remains unsettled, and new details reveal earlier
domestic surveillance, including wiretapping a congressional member without
court approval, and systematically doing it against many American citizens.
“Tom Burghardt writes often on these issues for various publications, web sites,
and his Antifascist Calling blog....’Exploring the shadowlands of the corporate
police state.’ In calling ‘Spying on Americans: Business as Usual under Obama,’
he reported that working cooperatively with private corporations, the NSA
collects vast amounts of ‘transactional data such as credit card purchases, bank
transactions and travel itineraries....sold to (the agency) by corporate
freebooters.’ It's then data-mined for
‘suspicious patterns,’ a practice begun pre-9/11 but expanded greatly since
then.
“More than just financial transactions are monitored. According to investigative
journalist Christopher Ketchum, ‘as many as 8 million Americans are now listed
(as) secret enemies....who could face detention under martial law (and
subjected) to everything from heightened surveillance and tracking to direct
questioning" and possible internment.
“Nothing under Obama has changed in spite of serious privacy, civil liberties,
and other constitutional issues. Director Rod Beckstrom of DHS' Cyber Security
Center resigned in March because of NSA's ‘greater role in guarding the
government's computer systems’ and its concentrated power without checks and
balances.
“According to Electronic Frontier Foundation's senior staff attorney Kevin
Bankston: Obama's ‘Justice Department (is continuing) the Bush administration's
cover-up of the National Security Agency's dragnet surveillance of millions of
Americans, and insisting that the much-publicized warrantless wiretapping
program is still a secret that cannot be reviewed by the courts....’ because
doing so would harm national security.
“Worse still is the DOJ's assertion that the US government is immune from
illegal spying litigation even when in violation of federal privacy statutes, an
unprecedented claim exceeding the Bush administration citing ‘sovereign
immunity.’ Obama is going Bush one better
by saying the Patriot Act immunizes the government from being sued under
surveillance provisions of the Wiretap Act, Stored Communications Act, and
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act's (FISA) enhanced warrantless wiretapping
powers in cooperation with complicit telecom providers. In other words, Obama's
DOJ absolves itself and its corporate allies of accountability under existing
federal statutes that prohibit illegal spying on Americans.
“On April 26, Burghhardt reported that "The Pentagon's Cyber Command Formidable
Infrastructure arrayed against the American People" will be headed by the NSA's
director, Lt. General Keith Alexander, to protect the military's networks from
hacker attacks, especially from countries like China and Russia. How this will
‘affect civilian computer networks is unclear. However, situating’ it alongside
NSA at Fort Meade, MD ‘should set alarm bells ringing (because of NSA's)
potential for (greater) abuse....given (its) role in illegal domestic
surveillance....(and its) tremendous technical capabilities.;
“As a Pentagon agency, NSA has positioned itself to seize near total control
over the country's electronic infrastructure, thereby exerting an intolerable
influence--and chilling effect-- over the nation's political life." Recent
history shows that "NSA and their partners at CIA, FBI, et. al. have targeted
political dissidents, including anti-war protesters, environmentalists, and
others for their activism and beliefs. Greater NSA powers will ‘transform
'cybersecurity' into a euphemism for keeping the rabble in line (and) achieving
'full spectrum dominance' via 'Cyberspace Offensive Counter-Operations.' "
“Directed against ordinary Americans, democratic freedoms will be severely
compromised. No matter as ‘the Obama administration (prepares) to hand control
of the nation's electronic infrastructure over to a (rogue) agency’ - with
General Alexander telling the House Armed Services subcommittee that America
needs a digital warfare force for defensive and offensive cyber operations. More
resources are required to do it, not for public security, but for imperial
conquest and containing dissent at home - in violation of constitutional
freedoms and international law.
“In a follow-up May 4 article, Burghardt explored the secret, unaccountable
world of FBI data mining through its Investigative Data Warehouse (IDW)
containing over a billion documents, including many on US citizens. They come
from our personal records and history, including what's obtainable online
through illegal spying.
“According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation's (EFF) Kurt Opsahl, ‘The IDW
includes more than four times as many documents as the Library of Congress, and
the FBI has asked for millions of dollars to data-mine this warehouse, using
unproven science in an attempt to predict future crimes from past behavior.’
This illegal spying violates our constitutional right to privacy and endangers
our freedom by generating unsubstantiated threats based on pure supposition.
“Besides the FBI, it's virtually certain that other, perhaps all 16, government
intelligence agencies conduct similar spying illegally, and as such, endanger
everyone's freedom.
“Earlier on July 14, 2008, an ACLU press release headlined: ‘Terrorist Watch
List Hits One Million Names’ based on government reported figures. They include:
‘Members of Congress, nuns, war heros and other 'suspicious characters' (like
anti-war and environmental activists)....trapped in the Kafkaesque clutches of
this list, with little hope of escape.’
“According to the ACLU's Technology and Liberty Program director, Barry
Steinhardt, this data base represents ‘what's wrong with this administration's
approach to security: it's unfair, out-of-control, a waste of resources, treats
the rights of the innocent as an afterthought, and is a very real impediment in
the lives of millions of (people) in this country. Putting a million names on a
watch list is a guarantee (it) will do more harm than good’ besides being
ineffective to catch real criminals.
“Given the current scope and intent of FBI data mining, with millions under
surveillance, its potential for abuse far exceeds where it stood less than a
year ago - because the Obama administration supports it. No longer is anything
about us private, including:-- all our financial transactions and records; --
every check written; -- every credit card or other electronic purchase; -- our
complete medical history; -- every plane, train, bus or ship itinerary; -- our
phone records and conversations; and -- every computer key stroke.
Our entire private world is now public -
if spy snoops decide to invade it.
“Key Internet-based companies, like Google, do it routinely - the company
UK-based Privacy International ranked worst in its September 2007 ‘Race to the
Bottom’ report. It stated: ‘....throughout our research we have found numerous
deficiencies and hostilities in Google's approach to privacy that go well beyond
those of other organizations.’ It tops them all ‘as an endemic threat to
privacy. This is in part due to the diversity and specificity of Google's
product range and the ability of the company to share extracted data between
these tools, and in part due to Google's market dominance and the sheer size of
its user base.’
“It's also unmatched in ‘its aggressive use of invasive or potentially invasive
technologies and techniques.’ It's
able to ‘deep-drill into the minutiae of a user's life and lifestyle choices’
irresponsibly. Its attitude toward privacy is blatantly hostile at worst and
benignly ambivalent at best. Specifically:
“-- Google retains a large amount of user information with no limitation on its
subsequent use or disclosure and with no chance for users to delete or withdraw
it;
“-- it retains all ‘search strings and associated IP-addresses and time stamps
for at least 18 to 24 months (retention) and does not provide users with an
expungement option;’
“-- it has other personal information, including hobbies, employment, addresses,
phone numbers, and more, and retains it even after users delete their profiles;
“-- it ‘collects all search results entered through Google Toolbar and
identifies all Google Toolbar users with a unique cookie that allows Google to
track the user's web movement;’ it also retains information indefinitely with no
expungement option;
“-- it doesn't follow OECD Privacy Guidelines and EU data protection law
provisions;
“-- users have no option to edit or delete obtained records and information
about them; and
“-- they can't access log information generated through various Google services,
such as Google Maps, Video, Talk, Reader, or Blogger.
“In 2004, Google also acquired the CIA-linked company Keyhole, Inc., that has a
worldwide 3-D spy-in-the-sky images database. Its software provides a virtual
fly-over and zoom-in capability to within a one-foot resolution. It's supported
by In-Q-Tel, a venture capital CIA-funded firm that "identif(ies) and invest(s)
in companies developing cutting-edge information technologies that serve United
States national security interests."
“In 2003, its CEO, John Hanke, said: ‘Keyhole's strategic relationship with
In-Q-Tel means that the Intelligence Community can now benefit from the massive
scalability and high performance of the Keyhole enterprise solution.’
In 2006, former CIA clandestine services case officer, Robert Steele, said:
‘I am quite positive that Google is
taking money and direction from my old colleague Dr. Rick Steinheiser in the
Office of Research and Development at CIA, and that Google has done at least one
major prototype effort focused on foreign terrorists which produced largely
worthless data....I think (Google is) stupid to be playing with CIA, which
cannot keep a secret and is more likely to waste time and money than actually
produce anything useful.’
“On April 29, Willem Buiter's Maverecon site headlined ‘Gagging on Google’ and
said: ‘Google is to privacy and respect
for intellectual property rights what the Taliban are to women's rights and
civil liberties: a daunting threat that must be fought relentlessly by all those
who value privacy and the right to exercise, within the limits of the law,
control over the uses made by others of their intellectual property.’
“This company should be rigorously regulated, ‘and if necessary, broken up or
put out of business.’ With about half the
global internet search market, it threatens enhanced "corporate or even official
Big Brotherism."
“For example, Google Street View, an addition to Google Maps, ‘provides
panoram(ic) images visible from street level in cities around the world. The
cameras record details of residents' lives’ on all sorts of personal matters
that no one should be able to snoop on, then save, without permission, for
whatever purposes.
“The company also invades our privacy through tracking cookies or ‘third-party
persistent cookies’ to assist interest-based advertising, a practice known as
behavioral targeting. In the wrong hands, this information can be used ‘to put a
commercial squeeze on people, but also to extort and blackmail them.’ And in
government hands, it enhances ‘a pretty effective and very nasty police state.’
“Can Google be trusted to use this information responsibly? ‘Of course not.’
It's a business run by ‘amoral capitalists,’ out to make as much money as
possible by any means necessary. Google and other Internet search engines
‘should not be trusted because they cannot be trusted.’ However, because of its
size and dominance, Google is ‘the new evil empire of the internet,’ a
‘Leviathan’ that must be tamed.
“Cybersecurity Legislation On April 1,
two bills endangering a free and open Internet were introduced in the Senate:
“-- S. 773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009 ‘to ensure the continued free flow of
commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through
secure cyber communications, to provide for the continued development and
exploitation of the Internet and intranet communications for such purposes, to
provide for the development of a cadre of information technology specialists to
improve and maintain effective cybersecurity defenses against disruption, and
for other purposes.’
“S. 773 was then referred to the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
and thus far not voted on.
“-- S. 778: A bill to establish, within the Executive Office of the President,
the Office of National Cybersecurity Advisor (aka czar). The bill was referred
to the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and not yet voted
on.
“Accompanying information said Senators Jay Rockefeller and Olympia Snowe
introduced the legislation to address: ‘our country's unacceptable vulnerability
to massive cyber crime, global cyber espionage, and cyber attacks that could
cripple our critical infrastructure.’ We
presently face cyber espionage threats, they said, as well as ‘another great
vulnerability....to our private sector critical infrastructure - banking,
utilities, air/rail/auto traffic control, telecommunications - from disruptive
cyber attacks that could literally shut down our way of life.’
“ ‘This proposed legislation will bring new high-level governmental attention to
develop a fully integrated, thoroughly coordinated, public-private partnership
to our cyber security efforts in the 21st century’ through what's unstated -
government affecting our private lives by threatening the viability of a free
and open Internet.
“During a March Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee hearing,
Senator Rockefeller said that we'd all be better off if the Internet was never
invented. His precise words were: ‘Would it have been better if we'd never have
invented the Internet and had to use paper and pencil or whatever!’ Left unsaid
was that without a free and open Internet, few alternatives for getting real
news and information would exist, at least with the ease and free accessibility
that computers can provide.
“The Electronic Frontier Foundation's Jennifer Granick expressed alarm about the
risk of ‘giving the federal government unprecedented power over the Internet
without necessarily improving security in the ways that matter most. (These
bills) should be opposed or radically amended.’
“Here's what they'll do:
“-- federalize critical infrastructure security, including banks,
telecommunications and energy, shifting power away from providers and users to
Washington;
“-- give ‘the president unfettered authority to shut down Internet traffic in
(whatever he calls) an emergency and disconnect critical infrastructure systems
on national security grounds....;’
“-- potentially "cripple privacy and security in one fell swoop" through one
provision (alone) empowering the Commerce Secretary to "have access to all
relevant data concerning (critical infrastructure) networks without regard to
any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access...."
“In other words, the Commerce Department will be empowered to access ‘all
relevant data’ - without privacy safeguards or judicial review. As a result,
constitutionally protected private information statutory protections will be
lost - guaranteed under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the Privacy
Protection Act, and financial privacy regulations.
“Another provision mandates a feasibility study for an identity management and
authentication program that would sidestep ‘appropriate civil liberties and
privacy protections.’ At issue is
what role should the federal government play in cybersecurity?”
Analysis: This is a great recap of
how our lives are being turned into the horrors of 1984 by George Orwell.
It’s going to get worse instead of better.
The amazing thing is that the evidence is conclusive that the Rothschild
Cabal set up the present state of terror over the last 15 years by creating
incidents which have allowed dictatorial laws and illegal actions by the Cabal
elected US presidents.
As I have already stated, the so-called Muslim terrorist groups have been
heavily infiltrated by the Mossad with agents who look like and speak Arabic as
a native. Using CIA money they have
financed and promoted numerous so-called Muslim terrorist attacks—like the
Oklahoma City bombing, the 9-11 attacks and on and on.
It was this 9-11 thing which allowed GWB to proclaim his war on terrorism
which opened the door for the Cabal and its neo-con US players to enter Iraq to
steal the wealth of that country.
Afghanistan was conquered so that the drug trade could resume (because the
Taliban had stopped it) and to get a oil pipeline across the country (which the
Taliban would not allow). Pakistan
is now under attack and Iran is still on the
drawing boards.
Along with making money for the Cabal, the process has allowed/promoted
dictatorial laws in the US to further the move to world government.
Without the Bush war on terrorism, most of this stuff would never have
happened.
In a backdrop, the US in 1970s began opening her borders to both legal and
illegal immigration from all over the world.
Millions are here illegally.
Today, we have huge Muslim populations and Muslim mosques which were unheard of
in America and Britain forty years ago.
These Muslims can and will one day strike to really bring trouble to
America. That’s one more reason why
the government is responding with dictatorial and unconstitutional laws.
To go to the Home Page, please click here: www.age-end.com.