EZEKIEL

 

and YHWH’s

 

 Judgment

 

 

for the

 

Good News

 

PEOPLE

 

 

 

VOLUME XXXVI

 

The Ending

 

 

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

 

 

Judgment for the

 

 

 Good News People

 

 

 

 

Volume XXXVI--The Ending

 

 

 

 

 

by

 

an unworthy servant

 

 

 

 

 

 

And you shall know the truth,

 

and the truth will make you free.

 

(John 8:32)

 

 

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho.  The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States.  Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.Com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

 

 

Volume XXXVI--The Ending 

 

 

APPENDIX                                                                              PAGE

 

 

      -                  Cover Page                                                                                                         1

 

      -                  Title Page                                                                                                             2

 

      -                  Contents                                                                                                              3

 

      -                  Publisher’s Preface                                                                                           5

 

 

Part JJJJJ--Still Further Addendum 

 

      F                 Clinton, Gone?                                                                                                   6

 

      G                 Clinton Evil                                                                                                        13

 

      H                 Clinton Plans                                                                                                    25

 

      I                   Clinton and the Amalekites                                                                            34

 

      J                  Clinton and Survival                                                                                        46

 

      K                 More Views on Clinton                                                                                    56

 

      L                 The 666 Clintons                                                                                              60

 

      M                Clinton Comes Back                                                                                        75

 

      N                 Clinton and Custer                                                                                          81

 

      O                 Corrupt Leaders and Corrupt People                                                           89

 

 

Part KKKKK--The Terminus 

 

      -                  Epilogue                                                                                                            99

 

      -                  Bibliography                                                                                                   117

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

 

 

Publisher’s Preface

 

Greetings!  The following presentation is volume thirty-six of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site. 

 

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world.  In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one. 

 

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material.  It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message! 

 

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1.  It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins:  left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers). 

 

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope. 

 

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers.  May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him.  Shalom (peace) to you and yours! 

 

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix F--Clinton, Gone?

 

 

US Politics, Revisited 

 

This publication has presented what may seem to be an inordinate amount of data on oppression and wrong being committed by the “liberal” federal government against its own citizens.  Some readers may try to second guess this outline on the assumption that it has little or nothing to do with the subject of Ezekiel or the people of the Good News.  At least, much of Christendom sees no connection. 

 

The inclusion decision was made on the premise that the present US government is a Christian government; and in particular, a Christian, sun worship government, which is precisely what one finds in much of the so-called, Christian West (as first promulgated centuries ago by Greek sun worshippers). 

 

After all, the US Supreme Court ruled that the “United States of America” is a “Christian Nation” in 1892--the first and only nation ever founded as a Christian nation (“The 11th Hour Remnant Messenger,” newsletter, p. 6, undated).  This reality is relevant and especially so for people in the very elect classification.

 

While the American nation and its government will assuredly not last long into the future (because world enemies and events are now in process to terminate this nation and the status quo, per YHWH’s judgment--as outlined herein), it is prudent for believers to draw a parallel between the present US government (now organizing for the New World Order) and the world government which will ultimately succeed it. 

 

The New World Order government will be effectively a religious, sun worship government--similar to the present one in Washington, but far more dictatorial and oppressive.  It’s not too far fetched to see the parallels and understand the coming similarities.  The very elect need to be informed on such tactics and operations for their own benefit. 

 

Beyond the obvious in the above comments, it should likewise be noted that this whole theme plays a role in the question of the pride of life possessed by sun worshipping Christians (as described in preceding chapters).  The pride of life is a bad thing which the very elect particularly need to address and deal with in their focus upon carnality and the flesh. 

 

As believers deal with this pride of life feature in their lives and conduct, it is inevitable that they will become politically incorrect; at least, in terms of beliefs, opinions and thinking. 

 

There is just no way that a believing person of faith can stand by and approve of what has been occurring in the Western, Christian, sun worship culture since WWII with the government approved gods of racial amalgamation, feminism, homosexuality, etc. 

 

Assuredly, honest persons living by the Scriptures will quickly disapprove of what has been happening, although quietly/passively since the Word teaches them to be apolitical.  This is not to say that the very elect will, all of a sudden, become political and involved in politics, as they become politically incorrect in the secular state. 

 

 

The Opposition is to Sin  

 

Of course, the apolitical believers become politically incorrect by being opposed to the sin and wickedness present in the politically correct culture and society with the worship of state approved social gods (feminism, racial integration and amalgamation, homosexuality, etc) and not because they are active in politics. 

 

In other words, if a religious person takes a stand, in contrast to the blatant immorality, wickedness and sin prevailing and present in the politically correct culture and civilization, that person is immediately adjudged to be a politically incorrect enemy of the state.  Thus, people are being forced to believe in, worship and serve government approved, social gods (just as Parmenides, Hegel and others have espoused). 

 

To refuse this worship means becoming an enemy of the state.  Since the very elect will be judged, condemned and persecuted by the secular sun worship society, as being politically incorrect for their religious beliefs, it is clear then that they need to have a good understanding of government and what all is going on in terms of oppression toward politically incorrect people, like themselves. 

 

Based just upon the actions of the Tanakh prophets, it is manifest that people who are totally apolitical must righteously speak out and condemn the evil and wickedness present in the secular state and culture, even though it is being controlled and promoted by government.  The OT is full of such examples. 

 

Perhaps Dr Stan Monteith put it best when he said that the person who fails to oppose evil and wrong becomes an accomplice to it (per video, “Secrets of the Illuminati”).  This is a far reaching conclusion and one which each of us should keep in mind.  However, that factor alone has not been the only reason for the direction chartered herein. 

 

 

The Current American Perspective 

 

This backdrop on politics then suggests a further clarification over the many critical remarks herein against so-called liberal leaders (who are often Democrats) and liberal government actions, as opposed to the few comments condemning conservatives (supposedly Republicans). 

 

This writer is no fan of Democrats or Republicans alike, nor of Liberals or Conservatives, and has maintained a stance of being apolitical in continental US elections since 1968.  But in the need to speak out and condemn sin and wretchedness, it has been necessary to particularly focus upon the evils of the modern liberals and their humanist colleagues (who tend to be Democrats). 

 

It is true that Republican conservatives are bad and evil, as well as liberal Democrats.  But there is a difference in degrees.  The liberal Democrats lead the pack in depravity.  Perhaps the primary reason for this is the basic philosophy underlying liberal thinking, as opposed to conservative thinking.  As pointed out previously, liberals believe that there is inherent good in man, while conservatives are not quite so sure about it. 

 

This reality was illustrated in “The Washington Times” of Jan 24-30, 2000 (p. 12), which quoted Republican House Majority Whip Tom DeLay as issuing a call to arms that only conservatives can guide the nation from the cultural abyss to which it is headed.  Going on, DeLay said that the “presidency has been debased and the political dialogue has been poisoned.” 

 

Liberals tend to more quickly follow the Amalekite leadership into permissiveness and wretchedness, while conservatives are more likely to be more serious Christians (especially fundamentalist Christians) and truly religious Jews who are not quite so apt to jump into the moral degeneracy being advocated and pushed by the Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters. 

 

Since liberals themselves are fairly immoral and dishonest in philosophy, they have no problem with the Amalek-Edomite wretchedness being pushed upon the generic, American population.  In this sense, liberals lean more in the direction of immorality and depravity, as opposed to conservatives.  Both groups are evil.  It’s just that one is far more wicked than the other one. 

 

In the “Come Lord Jesus” video, Catholic priest John O’Connor makes the case that the Ashkenazi Jews are in total control of the US Democrat party.   While O’Connor made his reference in the vein of Ashkenazi Jews, the truth is that his words really focused upon degenerate, Ashkenazi, Amalekite Jews.  Truly, they own and control the Democrat party and even the Republican party to some extent.  

 

In previous comments, the need to watch and be alert was assessed to show that the person of faith can and indeed must have some perception about what all is going on around him, without jumping in to participate in the depravity and evil. 

 

In order to watch and be alert, the student of truth is obligated to have some perception about current politics, politicians and government operations--not because of any interest in those subjects, per se; but rather, because of the need to evaluate, measure and judge how those actions are occurring to impact upon a believer and his family and the fulfillment of prophecy (as discussed earlier). 

 

 

Getting Elected 

 

The modern American political process requires large sums of money--which comes from the plutocrat bankers and masters (mainly Amalekites, who are committed to the destruction of Israelite believers and who, secretly, behind the scenes, call the shots).  With these large gifts of money, the politicians can go out and influence voters (through media power); and if necessary, buy votes (as can be done with Blacks). 

 

Once in power in the democratic society, the elected politicians take control of the government--to use it for their own selfish purposes and to further advance their causes.  It is manifest that with the assumption of political power over the government (which possesses power), the elected politician typically will pay back those who elected him and put him into power. 

 

The pay back can come in many, many different forms.  If it does not come back in direct payments and benefits, it can come back to family members or to corporations controlled by the person putting up the money.  A good illustration of this occurred in 1992 in the presidential election involving George H. W. Bush of the Republicans, Bill Clinton of the Democrats and Ross Perot of the Reform party. 

 

Almost all observers on the sidelines agree that the presence of Perot and the Reform party hurt the Republicans most of all and probably insured the election of Clinton.  The same thing can be said for 1996. 

 

But 1992 was unique for still one more reason.  Perot entered the race and was doing real well in the polls.  All of a sudden, he withdrew, claiming that his family was under some kind of threat (presumably from George H. W. Bush and the Republicans).  Still later, Perot reentered the race; but bombed out, in comparison with how well he was doing before he flip-flopped. 

 

Now, the above is what is commonly known or believed about the 1992 election.  But there are some fascinating peculiarities associated with the 1992 election that are not commonly known.  For example, Larry Patterson, one of Slick Clinton’s Arkansas state police guards, has confirmed that Clinton held two or more secret meetings with Perot in 1992.  This is strange for two men opposing each other in an election. 

 

 

Doing Business 

 

Next, it is fascinating that much of Ross Perot’s business in his controlled computer corporation has been coming from the US government.  This “doing business” continued under Clinton (or in fact, it went up substantially under Clinton?). 

 

Perot was out millions of dollars from his own pocket to set up and establish the Reform party in 1992.  Is it possible that Clinton paid him back with huge government contracts to his computer corporation after the election?  This is one of the prime methods used to pay off big contributors or supporters in an election.  It comes back in government contracts to a corporation controlled by the contributor or his colleagues. 

 

This election phenomenon means assuredly that the politician must deliver whatever the plutocrats want who put up the money and effectively put him into power (since money buys votes).  Therefore, when the chips are down, the plutocrats ultimately have their way, not only in American elections; but more importantly, in using the government as their own, private, puppet agency after the election. 

 

It goes without saying that bloc voters, like the Blacks and Hispanics, must be provided for in some things--to include a lot of words of support (from the politicians) for their part in delivering the votes. Thus, the whole philosophy of politicians has become a support first of the plutocrats and their needs and second a support of bloc voters and special interest groups. 

 

Accordingly, as was known in former days, whenever the voting population in a democracy discover that they can vote themselves a largess of benefits from the government (via the politicians), they will do so.  Therefore, politicians in a democracy deliver and so use their governmental powers--to pay off their benefactors. 

 

The point of this is that it matters not one whit whether a Republican or a Democrat is in the White House.  The ruling plutocrats behind the scenes will continue to call the shots--regardless of the political profile of the leaders, Republican or Democrat.  Therefore, the election of George W. Bush changes little or nothing in terms of the coming New World Order.  It will come with Bush, Clinton or whomever. 

 

 

Thus, Have Things Changed? 

 

The above presentation on the political dilemma in the United States necessitates a more careful look at Bill “Slick” Clinton and his possible future. 

 

Now that Bill Clinton is no longer president (in early 2003), there is an assumption that all of the evil and depravity of the president in the Oval Office at the White House is now over.  Supposedly, America survived Bill Clinton and the nation can go about its business with a much more honorable George W. Bush.  But have things really changed? 

 

“The Week” of Jun 22, 2001 (p. 16), had a short news item on how Clinton has been conducting himself--now that he is “retired.”  According to “New York Daily News” reporter Mitchell Fink, Bill was attending game three of the NBA finals/play offs in New York.  Slick had brought his binoculars and was sitting in his skybox (while Hillary was politicking in Washington). 

 

The story that Fink told was that Slick never used his binoculars at all to watch any of the basketball play on the court.  But he did use them on two other occasions.  During one of the time outs, the scantily clad girls of the Sixers Dance Team were performing.  Bill raised his binoculars and took a careful look at the girls.  At one more time when the girls were strutting around, Bill again raised his binoculars to survey the court. 

 

On a summer 2001 speaking engagement in Scandinavia, an attractive, 19-year-old girl presented Slick with a tulip as a gesture of hospitality.  The Jul 2001 “Internet Vortex” (p. 6) had a news report that noted that Slick put his arms around the teenager and told her “You’re too beautiful to only get a hug” (suggesting that he’d like to do more). 

 

Now, the latest news following the former president around is that he broke up the lesbian marriage of Melissa Etheridge and Julie Cypher (Aug 3, 2001, “The Week,” p. 10).  Per the story, Bill Clinton broke the queer lovers apart when he moved in on Melissa’s turf and started courting Julie (by sending her flowers, e-mails and surely engaging in sex with her). 

 

For sure, Slick Clinton has not changed one iota since he left the White House.  Bill is a politician and a power hungry politician.  He is not finished on the global or US political scenes.  He is still a man to be concerned about--as mentioned in the Prologue. 

 

 

Does Truth Matter? 

 

By trying to be apolitical and yet be watching and focusing upon government evils (particularly against her own citizens), there has to be a recognition of the importance of truth.  As the Word says, let YHWH The ELOHIM be true, though every man be a liar (Rom 3:4).  Or as noted earlier, YHWH YESHUA is the personification of TRUTH. 

 

Suffice to say, there must be some concern, appreciation for and ascertaining of truth in the vein of politics.  Ultimately, there has to be a question of truth and whether or not a believer should be informed on truth.  Hence, how relevant is truth in today’s world? 

 

On this, popular radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh posed the question “does truth matter any more” in his program on December 12, 1996.  Limbaugh was agonizing over the American electorate who stupidly had supported Bill Clinton, irrespective of Clinton’s character and morals (or rather lack of them, since it is doubtful that Slick has any character or morals). 

 

While Limbaugh has had and does have several things wrong on his program (like his constant support for the super rich), he generally has had it right on Clinton.  Truly, Clinton is a deliberate, pathological liar; dishonest, immoral philander; cheat; sodomite; pot smoker; cocaine sniffer; draft dodger; and an outright crook of the worst kind (to certainly include murder), as pointed out in this work. 

 

This writer does not want to be the pot calling the kettle black, since i, too, have lied, cheated and abused a number of innocent young girls over forty years ago when i was a teenager and evil young man.  Too often, i was a philander after marriage and an immoral sinner who brought abuse, hurt and pain on my loved ones because of the presence of wicked pride and vanity in my evil heart (as noted in prior chapters). 

 

It worked out that i sinfully destroyed my family and hurt the wife of my youth and my son greatly.  And i am immensely sorry, humbled and ashamed for my great sins and wickedness.  As it has worked out over the years, i have paid a terrible price for my wretchedness.  The ELOHIM, blessed be His name, has seemingly punished me severely for my sins over most of the last 60 years or so. 

 

YHWH never let me get away with my wickedness (and i thank Him and praise Him for His mercy to me).  Sin exacts a terrible price, if and when The HIGHEST commences His corrective punishment (and i pray and hope that my punishment has been corrective and has come from Him). 

 

However, i was not president of anything, nor in any position of influence or power over anyone beyond my immediate family and myself.  Clinton was in a different position.  It isn’t only that his sexual immorality, dishonesty, lying, cheating and sinning hurt his wife and daughter.  They have.  His family has paid and will pay a terrible price for his wickedness. 

 

But more importantly, he is also a mature fifty year old man (and not a foolish young boy) and was/is the leader and role model for 280 million Americans, including something over 100 million children and young people.  His wretchedness was far reaching in terms of moral damage to the United States.  As i destroyed my family of three persons, Slick was destroying this nation of 280 million people. 

 

In a sense, my lying and womanizing was in the minor leagues compared to Clinton--who seems to have been in the major leagues on depravity for his entire, adult life.  This is no justification for my evil and wickedness.  But it does put his lying and womanizing wickedness in a far more reaching perspective for America. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix G--Clinton Evil

 

 

Clinton--A Professional Liar and Cheat, Revisited 

 

Actually, in truth, Bill Clinton seems to act with foreknowledge and deliberate intent to deceive and mislead others in many, many areas of his life which make his evil and depravity even worse than if it was an isolated occurrence. 

 

He is the classic spin-master who manipulates the gullible, American, sun worshipping public for his own purposes.  He deliberately obstructed justice in the US courts and has used his power and influence to have other persons lie and obstruct justice for him. 

 

He lied as he spied upon his political enemies (as in file-gate).  He lied as he falsely accused staff people in order to have them fired (as in travel-gate).  He lied as he sold out the national interests of the United States to the Chinese and other foreign powers for donations to his political campaigns (with treason).  He lied about selling plots in Arlington Cemetery.  He lied about his sexual immorality and on and on. 

 

Clinton is so smooth and so committed to lying, he not only has lied to the gullible American public, but he has lied to members of Congress in official statements.  For example, in Slick’s State of the Union address to Congress and the nation in January 2000, he repeatedly lied. 

 

 

Mike Blair on Clinton 

 

The “Spotlight” paper of Mar 6, 2000 (p. b-8), had a story by Mike Blair on “Clinton Lies to Push Anti-Gun Agenda,” which focused upon the lies told by Bill in his 2000 state of the union speech to Congress about guns and crime.  This story outlined a number of precise lies and distortions emanating from the evil Clinton.  Without attempting to cover all of them, a few will be highlighted to prove the point. 

 

He claimed that the Brady Act had kept firearms out of the hands of 500,000 criminals, while ignoring the fact that half of the Brady Act gun purchase denials was because of administrative errors (plus the fact that the Clinton Administration prosecuted almost none of these alleged criminals for anything).  In other words, Slick’s words were all lies designed to fool his gullible listeners. 

 

Anyway, any criminals unable to buy guns legally in a gun store can obtain them in a thousand other ways.  In fact, Slick, himself, signed an exemption allowing Chinese assault rifles into the US, which reached gangs on the West coast.  So Slick has helped criminals get guns--rather than hindering them in any fashion.  

 

 

More Clinton Lies 

 

In going on to Congress, Clinton claimed that he was able to put 100,000 new cops on the streets and asked Congress for funds for 50,000 more. 

 

The truth is no one knows for sure if any new police were hired from the granted federal funds (evidently few, if any, American police were hired; but some foreign police were brought here with this federal money).  Some estimates were that there could have been 40,000 new ones (and this includes the foreign policemen brought in with federal funds).  But most agencies receiving the money used it for other purposes. 

 

In another matter, Slick lied and deceived the public regularly with his economic and monetary statistics.  This reality has been discussed in former chapters herein.  He consistently painted a rosy picture of good that simply was not out there in the real world.  When the truth of his lies eventually becomes manifest, there will be an utter crisis in America beyond description. 

 

On Nov 8, 1999, Clinton told the “Washington Post,” in a White House interview, that he had always been interested in and supportive of the US military.  He added that he wished that he would have been a part of it (Nov 15-21, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 4).  In view of Clinton’s former hate and opposition to the military and his draft dodging and anti-war acts during the Vietnam war, his remarks were obvious lies. 

 

 

Clinton Lies in Order to Kill 

 

Some of Slick’s most fantastic and successful lies were carried out in 1999 when he repeatedly lied and deceived the American public about what all was happening in the Balkans (specifically Kosovo) to try to get America into a war there on almost any pretext. 

 

As discussed on the Rush Limbaugh program on July 1, 1999, Clinton used exaggerated and misleading statistics and alleged facts to build a case that the Serbs were murdering almost the entire Albanian population in the vein of genocide. 

 

For instance, Clinton told a veterans group that 100,000 male Albanians had been murdered and another 600,000 Albanians were stranded in Kosovo without food as they fled from the evil Serbs--rather than be captured and murdered and have to dig their own graves. 

 

Most or all of the reports told by Clinton and his Secretary of Defense Cohen were lies or exaggerations at best--exaggerated to the tune of over 900%, per an article by Ben Barber on “U.S. inflated casualties in Kosovo, E. Timor, officials say” in the Nov 15-21, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 24). 

 

The “Spotlight” of Dec 6, 1999 (p. 6), said that only a total of 2,100 grave-sites had been found in Kosovo.  Since these graves included people dying from natural deaths and the multitudes murdered by Slick Clinton’s air assaults in the Balkans, it is apparent that the Serbs killed very, very few Kosovars (and these deaths seem to have largely occurred in the Serb military action against the terrorist Kosovars). 

 

The most accurate final count of dead Kosovar Muslims seems to be less than 200, based upon autopsies and examinations of the dead bodies by the FBI.  A Spanish investigation team only found 187 deaths which might have been due to the military actions of the Serbs in their war against the Kosovo Liberation Army (“The Birth of World Government,” p. 45). 

 

Regardless of the actual count of Muslim deaths, the case can be made that Clinton’s air attacks killed more Albanians than the Serbs. 

 

Even the ultra liberal “Washington Post” got into the act on Jan 17, 2000, in a story by Peter Finn, which acknowledged that the Western reported stories of Serb atrocities, rape camps, mutilations of the dead and living, etc were all “bunk” (Jan 31, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2). 

 

 

The Lies Were Needed 

 

But the lies were needed to justify Clinton’s bombing of the Serbs.  So they were told to the public, who believed them.  As Dr Stan Monteith mentioned in his video on the “Secrets of the Illuminati,” alleged atrocity stories have been used several times to get America into a war planned by the plutocrats.  Monteith said that it happened in WWI, in WWII, in Desert Storm (the Gulf War) and in Clinton’s war against the Serbs. 

 

When the controlled media starts telling the atrocity stories and bombarding the people daily with them, the public finally cries out for war and vengeance.  The same thing happened in prior wars and other conflicts as well.  As Monteith noted, a lie told often enough is finally believed.  And this is what has happened regularly with the atrocity stories. 

 

The Serbs were engaged in a civil war in Kosovo with the revolutionary Kosovo Liberation Army of 100,000 fighters, armed with the latest weapons (as described and profiled elsewhere herein). 

 

Per “Spotlight” (p. 2, Mar 27, 2000), it is true that the Serbs may have killed up to 10,000 of these armed fighters in open warfare between the two armies in a raging civil war (although less than 200 possible Muslims were killed by the Serbs, per the FBI and Spanish investigators, as noted above). 

 

But Clinton’s spin operation of lies and deceits reported an alleged 100,000 Serb murders.  This was all false.  Moreover, the story about the 600,000 stranded Albanians in Kosovo was totally a fabrication. 

 

 

Microsoft and Bill Gates 

 

Most of the first several months of 2000 were obsessed with Bill Gates and the Clinton Administration’s efforts to break up Microsoft.  It seems that the controlled media loves to promote stories of little importance for days, weeks and months on end.  They bombarded the public for months about O. J. Simpson.  In 1999, the situation with the Cuban boy Elian Gonzalez totally took over the US media. 

 

After months and months of Elian, all of a sudden Microsoft was placed in the spotlight by the controlled media.  Of course, the idea was to mesmerize and further zombiize the American population with frivolous remarks about little or nothing.  In the case of Microsoft and its breakup, it seems that no one in the media or in US leadership understood the essence of the problem (if there was one). 

 

“Newsweek” of June 19, 2000, typified the controlled media approach.  That issue had Bill Gates’ picture on the cover and several lead stories about Microsoft and the breakup.  One article, by Jared Sandberg, was on “Microsoft’s Six Fatal Errors” (p. 23).  The only thing about this story was that it talked on and on about a lot of things.  But it never addressed the problem. 

 

The story behind Microsoft seems fairly obvious.  First, there were apparently some grounds for the monopoly charges against Microsoft.  Actually, this is a common condition in many of the large, multi-national corporations of today.  And when one looks at the owners and rulers of these corporate giants from behind the scenes, the collusion and conspiracies of corruption and dishonesty are very manifest. 

 

Since the plutocrats own or at least control this maze of corporate powers, no politician will dare take a stand against them.  After all, the plutocrats elect and control the politicians in both parties.  Thus, there is no independent force to question their operations.  So, why did the classic liar, crook, cheat and manipulator Bill Clinton decide to destroy the Microsoft force? 

 

 

The Missing Reasons 

 

There seems to be two primary reasons on Microsoft which have escaped being discussed in present times (although some few people have skirted around one of the reasons).  Perhaps the most important reason of all is the one missed by almost everybody. 

 

Bill Gates and a handful of his close colleagues built the Microsoft empire and became extremely wealthy because of it.  Apparently, none of the founders of this giant were Amalekites (though Christian preacher Texe Marrs claims that Gates is a Jew).  Or at least, they didn’t seem to be the Amalekites who pull most of the strings in modern America. 

 

Obviously, the breakup of Microsoft would benefit the Amalekite run computer companies and put a serious hole in the goyim influence at Microsoft.  Who knows, the breakup might even be pulled off in such a way that conniving Amalekite masters and bankers could move in on the broken up pieces and exploit and plunder them for profit reasons (particularly, when crooked politicians will oversee the breakup). 

 

While Gates and many of his senior colleagues were probably not Amalekites, in Microsoft’s early days, this profile may have changed since Slick Clinton went after Microsoft.  In January 2000, Microsoft appointed a Jew named Steve Ballmer as its president.  Possibly this move was prompted by the troubles that Gates and company had with Clinton.  With Ballmer on board, Microsoft may be able to survive the Amalekite assault. 

 

 

The Second Reason 

 

There is a second reason which has whet the appetite of a few people.  Some persons understand that Bill Gates and his colleagues did not donate enough money to Bill Clinton or the Democrat National Committee.  Certainly, Slick Willy was unhappy with this situation from day one.  He had his sights set upon this empire. 

 

Though “Newsweek” focused upon six alleged errors, some persons perceptively note that the initial Clinton attack on Microsoft was a shake-down operation.  If Gates would have laid out some money in the right places early on in 1999, the whole Clinton assault would have been avoided.  Slick would have called off his attack dogs at the US Justice Department.  But Gates balked. 

 

Since Gates and company failed to put up some money in the right places, he was doomed.  All Clinton had to do was coordinate his thinking and wishes with his ruling plutocrat Amalekites.  Since they too didn’t like the Washington state enterprise, Slick got the green light to proceed. 

 

There is no question about it whatsoever.  This whole Justice Department undertaking was a Clinton operation from day one.  It went forward on his word.  Obviously, with Bush, things changed (Bush backed off and dropped the pursuit of Microsoft).  After all, Bush and his liberal Republican colleagues do like big businesses--like Microsoft. 

 

All Americans by now must understand that Bill Clinton is not interested in US laws, justice or what’s right.  His decision to attack Microsoft was not fueled by his integrity, honesty, character or truthfulness (since he has none of these qualities).  He had only one goal in his presidency.  It was to use the US government and US government forces and powers to further his own political plans for the future. 

 

 

Slick Gets Away With His Evil 

 

Furthermore, it is manifest that Clinton is so smooth about lying, cheating and deceiving that he largely gets away with it--with his family, with the media, with the Congress (which had a moral duty to remove him) and with the gullible, American public which continued to vote for him knowing full well that he is dishonest and an immoral crook. 

 

In the 1992 election campaign, Clinton repeatedly lied to the voting public with his constant denials about an affair with Gennifer Flowers (and many others).  Then on Jan 17, 1998, in a deposition in the Paula Jones case, he finally admitted the Flowers affair which conclusively established that he lied to the public in 1992. 

 

He followed up with more lies about Monica Lewinsky which he eventually admitted on August 17, 1998.  He lied to the public about the sale of Arlington Cemetery plots.  And when his lies were later exposed, he still got away with them. 

 

One big Clinton contributor (an Amalekite named Larry Lawrence) was even dug up and moved to another cemetery, when his illegal Arlington burial was exposed.  Slick also promised (and later was forced to cancel) former Surgeon General Koop an Arlington plot for help on the Clinton health care plan. 

 

 

Slick Lied to Bibi 

 

Clinton even lied to former Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin “Bibi” Netanyahu which is most interesting.  Netanyahu is writing his memoirs and will reportedly tell how Slick lied to him and used a classic bait and switch technique to get him to sign the Wye Peace Accord with PLO leader Yasser Arafat (Nov 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 15). 

 

According to Bibi, Clinton promised to free the apparent Amalekite Jonathan Pollard, who was caught stealing US secrets some years ago and giving them to Israel.  Pollard was convicted and went to jail in the 1980s.  Ever since then, Israeli officials have tried to persuade various American presidents to pardon Pollard and release him. 

 

Netanyahu and Clinton agreed that Pollard would be released and allowed to immigrate to Israel.  Clinton then double crossed Netanyahu at the last minute and said that he would not release Pollard.  Reportedly, Netanyahu turned pale.  But he was already committed to the peace accord and couldn’t back out. 

 

Since Netanyahu was a conservative and at some odds from Clinton’s liberal, internationalist ideology, Clinton conspired with the Amalekite bankers/masters and his army of liberal Amalekite aides to get rid of Netanyahu.  This paved the way for the election of Ehud Barak, a man who would be more in tune with the powerful Amalekite internationalists calling the shots in America. 

 

The role of Slick Clinton and his Amalekite aides has been commented upon in a former chapter herein on the ruling plutocrats.  There is no need to repeat what has already been said, in the context that Clinton rushed a team of evil people into Israel (all Amalekites or Amalekite janissary robots) to be sure that Netanyahu was defeated.   

 

While it was true that these media manipulators and crooks were able to con the Israeli people, it came with trouble for Barak.  A former chapter discussed how the Barak administration had been caught with their hands in the cookie jar for dishonest and crooked election practices.  Heavy fines have been imposed and some members of the Barak team may go to jail.  Truly, it is dangerous to get too close to Bill Clinton. 

 

 

The Hypocrite 

 

Slick gets away with his lies because the media and his political cronies act to cover them up, coupled with the fact that most of the immoral and depraved, American, sun worshipping people simply don’t care (but they will be judged accordingly by YHWH for not caring.  In other words, they should have cared when they voted for Slick and allowed him to remain in office). 

 

Clinton cannot ever be depended upon to tell the truth or be honest in virtually any situation.  At the Ron Brown funeral in 1997, a television cameraman caught Slick and some aides leaving the building from a side door.  As mentioned in a previous chapter, he was laughing and cutting up with his assistants. 

 

Upon spotting the photographer, he completely changed his demeanor to a sad, depressed appearance with tears coming from his eyes, though his aides were still laughing.  The camera picked upon this immediate change, accomplished by Slick in less than one step, while never losing his stride.  Later, that same day, Slick had a sodomite encounter with his girl friend Monica Lewinsky. 

 

Three months before he told a Washington grand jury that he and Monica did not have sex (as he defined it), Clinton issued an executive order which blatantly contradicted his own definition of sex (Nov 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 9). 

 

On May 27, 1998, Slick issued EO 13086 to amend the Manual for Courts Martial for the military services.  In this order, a definition of sex was included which plainly took in all forms of sodomy, plus natural sex.  The definition specifically covered so-called oral sex.  Lewinsky’s statement about the affair included some four of the eight precise situations covered in the EO. 

 

Yet, on Aug 17, 1998, Clinton appeared before the grand jury and said that his acts with Monica did not constitute sexual acts.  He called his sodomy with the girl an “inappropriate relationship.”  In the Paula Jones case, he categorically denied having sex with Monica. 

 

 

The Hypocrite and the Blacks 

 

From day one of his political career, Clinton has used and has manipulated the Black vote.  For him, it has paid off since most Negroes routinely support him and his depravity without question or concern.  As discussed in former chapters, he doled out a few benefits and payoffs to the many Africans who blindly followed him (but not much in comparison with what he bestowed upon the Amalekite Jews).   

 

This then becomes one more illustration of the gigantic hypocrisy associated with this man (just as was true with the segregationist Abraham Lincoln, who hypocritically supported Negroes in political actions, per a discussion heretofore).  Slick publicly cries, moans and groans about the poor Blacks and how they have been discriminated against, oppressed and hurt by the White majority. 

 

Yet, in private, Slick routinely laughs at them and refers to many of them as “Niggers.”  Former Arkansas State Trooper Larry Patterson has confirmed Clinton’s use of the “n” word on more than one occasion.  One of the classic illustrations of Clinton’s hypocrisy is over the Black leader Jesse Jackson. 

 

When the heat built upon Slick in 1998 and 1999 over Monica Lewinsky, the hypocrite Clinton brought Jackson into the White House to ostensibly “pray” with him.  This choice of Jackson to pray with him is interesting in view of the fact that in 1992, Slick called Jackson a “Nigger” --as he especially uses the “n” word to refer to Negroes he doesn’t like (Oct 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 20).

 

Slick’s brother Roger Clinton has also confirmed that Bill uses the “n” word in private to refer to Black people (in the “New Clinton Chronicles” video).  Dolly Kaye Browning of Dallas, Texas, another one of the many reported Clinton girl friends, also confirmed that Slick has used the “n” word to refer to Black people in her presence (Nov 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 7). 

 

 

Slick and Al Sharpton 

 

While Slick has had the Blacks in his back pocket for years, the point must be made here that in 2002-2003 some of that automatic Negro support came under trouble--primarily from “the reverend” Al Sharpton, a New York Black preacher/leader of some notoriety (as was told in the Apr 2003 “NewsMax.com,” p. 1-28, formerly the “Internet Vortex”). 

 

Somehow and someway, “the reverend” discovered that the Black support for the Democrats for over a half-century had netted them practically nothing.  Accordingly, Al decided to become a wild card to supposedly teach the Democrats “a lesson.” 

 

In the New York City Mayor’s election in 2002, Al bolted the party and refused to endorse or support the Democrat mayoral candidate Mark Green (who also just happened to be the Clintons’ man).  Bill “Slick Clinton tried to repair the damage and get Sharpton on board by promising nothing of substance.  Al refused to budge.  Green lost the mayor’s contest to the Republicans. 

 

Thereupon, Al wrote a book outlining his problems with the Democrats.  Sharpton was particularly critical of Bill Clinton.  Al said that Clinton’s “style ingratiated him with blacks and the media.  But in many ways his style betrayed black America because his substance and his policies really did not serve our needs.”  Al added that Black people were duped by Clinton. 

 

“The reverend” entered the 2004 presidential race--not particularly to win the White House (because Al understands that this was not possible), but to teach the Democrats that they automatically cannot count on the Black vote. 

 

Since Al did choose to speak out, he became an enemy of the Clintons.  At once, the Democrat National Committee (which is controlled by the Clintons) persuaded the Black woman Carol Mosely-Braun to also enter the presidential race in order to try to offset and oppose Sharpton.  Actually, this Clinton tactic may backfire and cause a split in the Black vote. 

 

In any case, it is clear that all of a sudden Bill Clinton does not have the total Black vote in his pocket--or at least, that portion of the vote which can be influenced by Al Sharpton. 

 

 

He is Totally Corrupt  

 

In any case, the evidence is most convincing that Slick does not have an ounce of honor or integrity in his entire character.  He appears to be totally corrupt and sorry.  Of most significance, he is an absolute hypocrite of the worst kind.  

 

As unbelievable as it is, Clinton issued a presidential proclamation that the week of Oct 17-23, 1999, would be known as “National Character Counts Week” (Nov 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 2). 

 

Slick’s statement started by saying “The character of our citizens has enriched every aspect of our national life and has set an example of civic responsibility for people around the world.”  Yes, Clinton proclaimed those words.  And this has to be one of the most incredible things he has done or could do.  The man with no character talked about character. 

 

 

But Slick is Smart 

 

As commented upon elsewhere in this study, it would be easy to get entrapped into believing that Slick Clinton is a stupid, Arkansas hick--only interested in snorting cocaine and sodomizing young girls.  But that’s not the true Bill Clinton (despite the appearance).  Slick is really a man of some intelligence, cunning and conniving (of evil). 

 

The “Spotlight” newspaper (p. 19) of Feb 28, 2000, had a reader’s letter which perceptively noted that the letter writer had finally figured out why “our beloved president” bites his lip so often.  The solution--he bites his lip to keep from laughing on camera in the faces of the American people

 

Assuredly, the Christian Israelite Americans are extremely ignorant, uninformed, mesmerized and gullible.  It takes no particular skill to fool and deceive the American electorate (as has been proven many times over in US elections).  Perhaps this “Spotlight” reader has it right. 

 

While most of us thought that Slick was biting his lip because he was lying, the truth may be that he does it to keep from laughing at the gullible, goyim public.  There is no question but that Clinton and his Amalekite aides and colleagues laughed behind the backs of the American voting public. 

 

 

Chuck Youngbrandt, Revisited 

 

In his Apr 20, 2000, “Staff and Sword” newsletter, the previously discussed Christian spokesman Chuck Youngbrandt offered his assessment of Bill Clinton in several comments. 

 

He noted that his mind understood on Nov 5, 1992, that Clinton is “considered a suitable vessel by Lucifer, one he preferred over Bush and Perot.  This man is weak in moral character and easily swayed by what is expedient in any situation.  Clinton will be more than a disaster for this nation, he will lead America to destruction.”  Youngbrandt claimed that this word came from his Gee-Zeus. 

 

In a focus upon Clinton on Jan 4, 1994, Youngbrandt said that he tried to pray for Clinton, but was unable to do so.  In any case, an idea popped into Youngbrandt’s head (that he thought was another message from The MOST HIGH), which told him that many pray for Clinton in a way that they become accomplices with him in his sin and rebellion. 

 

Finally, in an April 2000 assessment, Youngbrandt indicated that “The anti-Christ spirit that directed Hitler is the same one driving-leading Clinton and it will just move from one vessel to the next, the names change but the spirit behind the actions of those men will not change.” 

 

 

The Most Evil People of All 

 

The writer of this study at hand has repeatedly made reference to the great evil and wretchedness of Bill Clinton.  While diabolical Amalekites (like Franklin Roosevelt, Adolf Schicklgruber, Adam Weishaupt and Karl Marx) have been some of the most vile and corrupt men in history, Slick Clinton must be put into the same class (or rather, at the top of the list).  He, too, is profoundly evil and rates right up there with the others. 

 

Of course, this writer has repeatedly expressed this reality about Slick, who is so incredibly depraved and wicked.  But in fairness, it must be observed that many other people share an almost similar view that this writer has expressed. 

 

Per an article by Mike Blair on “Bill Clinton’s Theme Song: Hail to the Creep,” appearing in the December 6, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 7), the “New York Post” newspaper conducted an Internet generated survey of its readers to determine the 25 most evil persons in the ending millennium (the last 1,000 years).  Some 19,184 people responded. 

 

As might be expected, Adolf Hitler (correctly Schicklgruber) was number one.  Guess who number two was?  Yes, Bill “Slick” Clinton was number two in the poll (not far behind Adolf).  Josef Stalin was three; Cambodian killer of millions Pol Pot was four; and Nazi doctor Joseph Mengele was five.  Now, another surprise is in order.  Hillary Rodham Clinton came in number six. 

 

The rest of the runner ups, in sequence, were:  Saddam Hussein, Adolf Eichmann, Charles Manson, Idi Amin, Genghis Khan, Jeffrey Dahmer, Benito Mussolini, Ayatollah Khomeini, Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, Ivan the Terrible, Fidel Castro, Jim Jones, Vlad the Impaler, Tim McVeigh, Slobodan Milosevic, the Marquis de Sade, Mommar Khadafy and Jack the Ripper. 

 

Hillary had the honors of being the only woman on the list of the 25 most evil people in the last 1,000 years.  Please understand that this was a New York poll in a very liberal state.  And Hillary was elected a senator from New York (reportedly, with the help of Bill Clinton and Democrat generated vote fraud).   

 

Interestingly, the “New York Post” provided a list of candidates for the 25 most evil people of all.  All of the vote getters were on this list but Bill and Hillary Clinton.  Thus, all of the votes cast for Bill and Hillary came from write-in voters.  This makes the whole exercise most astounding.  If they would have been on the list, they would have received even more votes--perhaps enough to allow Slick to be in first place. 

 

 

Tom and Daisy Buchanan 

 

Back in the roaring 20s, and in the quieter 30s, one of the great American authors was a man named F. Scott Fitzgerald (1896-1940).  Perhaps Fitzgerald’s most notable work was a book on “The Great Gatsby.”  It was so well known and acclaimed that Hollywood made at least two film versions of the book (first with Alan Ladd and later with Robert Redford) and a more recent TV miniseries. 

 

“The Great Gatsby” had a couple of characters named Tom and Daisy Buchanan who lived out on Long Island in New York.  There was some wealth in the family.  So apparently, Tom never worked, but liked to pass his time playing polo. 

 

The one word which describes this pair of characters is “evil.”  They were incredibly wicked, deceitful, abusive, inconsiderate, immoral, adulterous and on and on. 

 

The writer of this study at hand often thinks of the characters Tom and Daisy Buchanan in the context of the two Clintons.  They are so much alike.  If there is one paramount difference between the two pairs, it is only that Fitzgerald’s Tom and Daisy are too petty and low keyed in their depravity.  After all, Tom was not into politics as Bill is.  Clearly, the Clintons are substantially more depraved and pathetic. 

 

 

Achav and Jezebel 

 

But there is another interesting observation about the two Clintons.  A former chapter outlined the enormous parallel between Bill and Hillary Clinton and the incredibly corrupt and evil Achav and Jezebel in the ancient House of Yisrael (I Kg 21:25).  In terms of evil and depravity, it is hard to match Achav and his Edomite wife Jezebel (although the Clintons correctly are a match). 

 

Many people reading the Scriptures lose sight of the fact that the books of Kings are prophetic books.  People and events described in them in the historic vein can be ante-types of later people and events which will be even more profound than the Scriptural accounts. 

 

Certainly, the Clintons’ duplication of Achav and Jezebel is totally prophetic.  Much of the life of Achav and Jezebel has been and is being fulfilled in the modern pair of Bill and Hillary Clinton.  Of the two couples, it is questionable which pair is the more evil and wretched. 

 

In any case, one must ask if the terrible deaths of Achav and Jezebel (in the form of YHWH’s curse and judgment) will be repeated in some manner with the Clintons?  Were those historic deaths prophetic of what will ultimately happen to the diabolical Clintons? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix H--Clinton Plans

 

 

The Coming Clinton Dictatorship 

 

But there is still more on the liar and crook Slick Clinton.  Even now, there is every evidential reason to believe that he is making plans and preparations presently to either regain power in America or achieve power in the UN (which will grant him a renewed source of power over the US).  This will really be a shock to gullible Americans who have stood by him repeatedly. 

 

The ignorant American voters have thought that they would have a shot at being rid of Slick when they installed a Clinton presidential successor.  But this option looks out of the question from the Scriptural perspective.  Not only is Slick the type of person who would plan and scheme on how he can gain power as a dictator, but the world situation will also contribute to it (as the confused 2000 elections demonstrated). 

 

Back in 2000, former Clinton friend, Larry Nichols, told the “Spotlight” in an interview that Clinton “has no intention of leaving the oval office when his term is over” (Jun 26, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 6).  Another former Clinton ally, Dick Morris, has expressed similar sentiments that Bill and Hillary would do anything to stay in the White House. 

 

These “Spotlight” remarks came from a story on “Will Slick Bill & Hill Leave the White House?” (p. 6), by Mike Blair, which concluded that indeed the Clintons were planning on staying in power past January 2001.  Blair quoted several scenarios which were outlined by Nichols, as allowing for this eventuality.  Nichols said that one option was a martial law takeover by Clinton (in a situation that would not truly warrant marital law). 

 

Nichols charged that Hillary Clinton’s run for the US Senate in New York (which she won) was nothing but a cleverly designed ruse--because her real target was and is the presidency.  He added that the Federal Election Commission had Hillary listed as a presidential candidate (despite Al Gore’s run).  By running for the Senate, Hillary would keep her name in the headlines to eclipse Gore. 

 

 

A Double Cross on Gore? 

 

Larry Nichols furthermore suggested that a scandal could have erupted to force Gore out at the last moment (which would have allowed Hillary to take over the Democratic nomination). 

 

On this option, it is interesting that in June 2000, the Justice Department (under Clinton’s supervision) did announce that there were some problems with Gore’s actions of raising money in 1996 (like from the Buddhist monks and nuns, discussed earlier). 

 

Furthermore, the controlled media began to talk about Gore’s sleazy campaign practices in 1996 (clearly, this motion was fueled by Amalekite Jew bankers/masters who controlled Bill Clinton).  There was even talk coming from various Democrats that an independent prosecutor might be needed to investigate Gore.

 

It was always possible that something could have knocked Gore out and Hillary could have stepped in to become the presidential nominee (but things never fell into place for her in 2000--perhaps because the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters were in no mood for a Hillary Clinton presidency in 2001.  After all, they may have wanted Bush to win, so he could be blamed for a crisis which they would set up and implement. 

 

Actually, unbeknown to a lot of people, the tension and confrontation between Clinton and Gore built-up, particularly in 2000, during Gore’s run for the presidency. Actually, Al went to great efforts to try to distance himself from Slick Clinton and the Clinton administration.  This separation manifested itself regularly in that Gore purposely seemed to go out of his way to not even be seen in the presence of Clinton. 

 

Many people speculated that Gore was trying to break all ties with Bill Clinton--because of fears that too much association or contact with Clinton would act detrimentally in Gore’s campaign.   The view of many was that Clinton’s sexual depravity in the White House would upset a lot of potential Gore voters. 

 

So Gore tried to separate his campaign totally from Clinton.  This allowed Gore and his Amalekite running mate Lieberman to talk about family values and morality (though they both are basically immoral and evil men). 

 

 

The 2001 Revelations 

 

A CBS news report on the night of Feb 6, 2001, offered quite a bit of insight on an actual confrontation and increasing hostility between Gore and Clinton, starting during the presidential campaign and accelerating after the November elections. 

 

While neither Gore nor Clinton would officially comment upon this conflict, the news was obviously leaked by someone (the best guess here is that Clinton purposely leaked the news to try to further damage and/or destroy his friend Gore for political purposes in 2001 and in later years as well). 

 

The essence of this story is that indeed, there was conflict between the Gore campaign organization and Clinton, during the presidential campaign.  After the election and after it became apparent that Gore had lost, this conflict increased and reached a state where there is now reportedly some open hostility between Gore and Clinton, on a personal basis.  Gore and Clinton are virtually not even on speaking terms. 

 

After the election, the report is that Gore blamed Clinton for his loss, while Clinton blamed Gore and Gore’s failure to link himself to the “achievements” of Bill Clinton and the Clinton administration for eight years. 

 

Though there was no mention of the possibility that Clinton had purposely set his so-called friend Gore up to lose the election (after winning the popular vote), as was offered in a discussion in a prior chapter, this course of events must not be ruled out.  If there is merit in this option, is it possible that Gore knew and understood how his buddy Clinton had double crossed him? 

 

For sure, the Clinton-Gore feud is serious and has spilled over into the lives of their wives.  The Aug 2001 “Internet Vortex” (p. 7) had a report from “Vanity Fair” magazine that called the feud between the women “a catfight.”  Hillary Clinton has called Tipper Gore an “unintellectual, nice lady who doesn’t have a brain in her head.”  Tipper thinks that Hillary is “an ambitious, rather uncoordinated, grasping, difficult woman.” 

 

 

Gore is Now Out 

 

Though Gore should be the theoretical head of the Democrat party (in the aftermath of the 2000 elections), this is certainly not true in 2000, 2001, 2002, or in early 2003 (as will be covered below).

 

As these words are being written, it seems that indeed Slick has been laying the groundwork to eliminate his friend Gore totally from the national political arena. This means that slowly Gore is being removed from the limelight and is being replaced with Hillary (who has her sights set upon the years 2004, 2008 and/or 2012, as being the Democrat candidate for president). 

 

While Gore had been a stupid sucker, supporting Slick during the Clinton presidency (like so many others, Clinton took advantage of him for benefits and then ended up double crossing him at the first opportunity), Slick was no true friend of Gore (although he “allegedly” supported Gore in the 2000 presidential campaign).  Hence, he was more than ready to double cross his supposed friend Gore when the time came for it. 

 

As allowed above and in a prior chapter, it well could be that Slick purposely engineered the 2000 election crisis so that Gore would lose in a close election.  This motion may have been prompted, in part, by promises to Hillary that he would support her in the future and with agreements with ruling Amalekite Jew bankers/masters to cause a 2000 election crisis to bring on a new constitution and the New World Order. 

 

Historically, in US politics, the presidential candidate of a party became the titular head of the party (and irrespective of whether he won or lost the presidential election).  In this context, Gore should have been and remained the visible and principle leader of the Democrat party throughout 2000 and later until 2004 (and the choice of a new Democrat leader in the form of the then presidential candidate). 

 

However, Sick has been in the background, working to undercut his alleged ally. 

 

 

Clinton is Still in Charge--Not Gore! 

 

The Dec 13, 2000, “New York Times” set the pace for the future--when it suggested that Bill Clinton alone would continue to lead the Democrat party, which clearly was a blow to the leadership mantle that supposedly should be with Al Gore (Jan 2001, “Internet Vortex,” p. 28).  This prediction soon came true! 

 

In late December 2000, it came time for the Democrats to choose a new Democrat National Chairman.  This choice has traditionally been done by the titular head of the party (the last presidential candidate).  However, in 2000, Gore was shut out and Clinton made the decision alone--proving that he is still the prevailing boss of the Democrat party (and not Gore). 

 

Though Gore tried his level best to be completely linked to the evil Amalekite bankers/masters, it really always was Clinton in the shadows who was the man most connected to the plutocratic Amalekites (the likely reasons for this tie will be covered in the succeeding appendices).  For sure, Clinton is still the Amalekites’ man. 

 

It has to be significant that when president elect Bush made his primary selections of potential cabinet people in December 2000 and early January 2001, he chose Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and majority Whites.  Manifestly, he did no favors for the ruling Amalekites, as presidential nominees usually have done.  For sure, both Clinton and his Amalekite handlers will be working full time to plan their take over of the US. 

 

 

The Revealing Clinton 

 

After leaving office in January 2001, Slick Clinton was at Andrews Air Force Base, where a group of admirers were assembled to greet him.  One sign in the crowd read-- “Don’t Go.”  He responded “I’m still here, we’re not going anywhere.”  He then added-- “Now that I have left the White House, perhaps I shall be in the driver’s seat as never before” (May-Jun 2001 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 67). 

 

A later news report from Jul 2001 said that Slick spoke to the United Federation of Teachers (the school teachers’ union).  Per the Jul 2001 “Internet Vortex” (p. 8), Bill told them “Maybe someday I’ll run for something again” (which indicated that he will not stay on the sidelines forever). 

 

 

A Constitutional Convention? 

 

Since Hillary did not get on the presidential ballot in November 2000 and since 2004 or 2008 are so far away, the Clintons have always had other options on the table.  Bill has already went on record that he favors an amendment to the constitution to allow a president to serve more than two terms, as is now the restriction (Jun 13, 2003, “The Week,” p. 19).  Clearly, Slick would support this idea in a constitutional convention. 

 

Certainly, if the Amalekite Jews pull the plug on George W. Bush and the US economy and financial markets, prevailing conditions can very easily pave the way for a constitutional convention (as discussed earlier). 

 

Only 34 states need to make a call for a constitutional convention and one will be assembled.  Already, 32 states have made such a call.  So only two more are needed.  An economic collapse could easily produce the call. 

 

Once a convention is assembled, it could do all kinds of things--to even amend the present constitution or produce a brand new one.  A new one has been on the drawing boards for years.  Moreover, most of the US states have already called for a convention over the flag burning issue and other questions which could never muster Congressional support for an amendment. 

 

The best guess is that Bill Clinton and his Amalekite handlers jointly agreed that the year 2000 was not quite ready for marital law.  Accordingly, the decision reached was to produce further dissatisfaction with the present constitution that would generate discontent over the electoral college.  If economic troubles surface, a constitutional convention will soon surface. 

 

 

The Clintons Are Here to Stay--For Awhile

 

Once a convention writes a new constitution or amends the old one, the way can be paved for Bill Clinton to return to the presidency.  Also, the case must be allowed that a liberal convention could even choose Hillary Clinton as president.  This would be a very plausible option if Bill Clinton should get to be UN Secretary General (which he is also working on). 

 

Hillary would be a very likely candidate for US president--although there has to be some questions about whether the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters would support her or not.  While she seems to have Amalekite Jewish roots (to be profiled in later comments), she has upset a lot of the Amalekites by being friendly to Mrs Arafat and the Arabs. 

 

As a matter of fact, the Apr 2003 “NewsMax.com” (p. 55), formerly the “Internet Vortex,” had an article on “Hillary Tainted by bin Laden Cash” which may prove to be very damaging to Hillary’s assumed Amalekite support.  This article said that the Clinton household was blessed (or cursed) with $750,000 in donations from three Arab terror nations--including $267,000 from the Bin Laden family. 

 

In addition to this $750,000 picked up by Bill in speaking fees, the Clinton library will be enriched by a $1 to $20 million donation from Saudi Arabia.  Former Clinton advisor Dick Morris suggests that the moneys collected for the Clinton library will be used to fund Hillary’s presidential campaign. 

 

Thus, many Amalekites do not like Hillary and it is hard to fathom that they would allow her to be president.  But anything is possible.  And who knows what kind of an agreement or deal that can be brokered by Bill, Hillary and the Amalekite bankers/masters in a smoke-filled back room. 

 

For sure, once Bill, Hillary, Colin Powell or whomever is in power (when the Amalekite plutocrats decide on the New World Order), a dictatorship with martial law will be declared. 

 

Frankly, my guess has long been that Bill Clinton will return to power with a new constitution or with a step-up to the UN (or with the election of Hillary).  In either case, he will impose the New World Order on the American people, as fast as possible. 

 

Certainly, in American politics, the Clintons are not about to willingly fade away from the circles of power.  They like being bosses and every indication is that they intend on regaining power for an indefinite period.  Even now, there is talk that Slick is thinking about running for Mayor of New York City (Jan 2001 “Internet Vortex,” p. 5).  Assuredly, he has his eyes set on the UN and world power, to be shortly addressed. 

 

Thus, for Bill, Hillary, Powell or whomever to become the first American dictator, there will surely be a need for some acceptance of the dictatorship in some quarters.  Manifestly, there would have to be some willingness by the public which will make the dictatorship legitimate.  

 

 

Current Events Which Will Help the Clintons 

 

As things are currently building up (in 2003), any number of events can start occurring soon to supposedly allow someone to declare a “national emergency” (economic collapse, Moslem terrorist attack, etc).  Surely, the earlier noted voting mess in 2000 is alone sufficient cause for Slick to come back.  Importantly, he has tried to present an appearance of being above all of the political conflict over the November election.  

 

The 2000 conflict between Gore and Bush completely polarized the American public into two opposing camps (of about one-half of the people in each group).  Hostility and hatred have been surfacing between the two factions.  With such animosity, Clinton has looked like a peace-maker, as he maneuvers events to regain power.  Certainly, the 50% of Americans in support of Gore would support this Clinton maneuver. 

 

Thus, it looks like Slick will ultimately make a comeback in the US or at the UN.  But surely, the Amalekite bankers/masters must be concerned about Slick and especially since their man Lieberman has temporarily lost out (although they likely engineered the whole 2000 election debacle in order to get a new US Constitution and/or speed up the imposition of the New World Order). 

 

The world situation is building up to such a momentum that a catastrophic escaton event seems waiting off stage for a grand entrance (as described by Dr Rod Lewis and elaborated upon in preceding comments herein).  It’s likely that the Amalekite fat cats must be suspicious that they could loose control of a crook like Clinton or be unable to maneuver the American public when he does regain power and impose martial law. 

 

Some students of the conspiracy have suggested that there is a powerful force at work presently (clearly, under the supervision of the Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters) to deliberately undercut the United States government and its leaders and to destabilize it, as a prelude to the imposition of the New World Order (assuredly, the 2000 election mess seems to fuel such a possibility).  This well could be why Bush won. 

 

 

The Issue Is Trust 

 

Manifestly, Slick has become the object of jokes both in the US and internationally and has virtually destroyed the office of the US presidency.  He has grossly hurt the image of the United States (just as GWB has followed suit with his war against Iraq). 

 

A 1998 Pew Research Center poll showed that only one in three American persons actually trusted their government and that the lowest percentage of voters in history turn out for elections (Oct 1998 “McAlvany Intelligence Advisor,” p. 26).  So, if the Amalekite fat cats have been trying to demoralize the American public, they are succeeding. 

 

These advocates believe that as the public gets fed up with their democracy and the corruption in high offices, they will assuredly be quite happy to accept the New World Order to theoretically bring in some sense of stability and perhaps even honor to corrupt human institutions of government.  While this option must be considered, there are still other alternatives to account for current events. 

 

The only problem is that when Slick comes on TV to say that he has regained power and is imposing a dictatorship, will the collective American people believe him?  And the answer is in doubt--because he is such a gross liar and cheat and everybody knows it.  So, when this day arrives, how much support can Slick muster?  Who will believe him? 

 

 

The Amalekites Know 

 

Slick is such a total liar, cheat and double crosser.  Can he be wholly depended upon as the first American dictator to continue to take orders from the Amalekite Jew power structure (if he regains power)? 

 

The Amalekite Jew bankers are not exactly stupid.  They know that Slick is such a liar and cheat that a question will inevitable surface making them wonder if he can be completely trusted once he declares himself to be the first American dictator.  Certainly, they know what he did to former Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu over Jonathan Pollard, previously discussed.  This surely must put fear in their hearts. 

 

The Amalek-Edomite Jews have been stung three times previously by presidents who double crossed them.  In the American Civil War, they elected Lincoln and promoted the Civil War, only to have Lincoln turn against them and their money lending practices.  They chose to then assassinate him in 1865. 

 

Later, after electing Kennedy, JFK turned against them in 1963.  So they acted to murder him.  After electing Richard Nixon, he double crossed them as well (certainly, the Amalekite Jew segment of the international bankers).  So they decided to get rid of him.  They used their media powers to completely destroy the evil Nixon.  Therefore, when the time came for impeachment and removal, Tricky Dick never had a chance. 

 

Too, there is the remaining question of Clinton’s public approval ratings (even in light of his soaring polls in 1998 and later).  The interesting thing about Slick is that he doesn’t have the real acceptance and popularity which the conniving Amalek-Edomite FDR enjoyed. 

 

Many people supposedly like Bill, but they all know that he is a liar and a cheat with no character or morality.  Assuredly, this condition must concern the ruling plutocrats planning a take-over of the US, if they decide on putting Bill back in power. 

 

 

The Amalekite Double Cross 

 

There is a third issue which is most profound.  The fall of modern Ephraim-Yisrael will parallel the previous falls of the House of Yehudah (first to the Babylonians and next to the Romans). 

 

In both of those terminations, the evil Amalekites played major roles.  Clearly, the Amalek-Edomites largely took over the Jewish government in the Roman War (precipitating a civil war) and probably attempted a similar task in the Babylonian war; although details of such seem lacking. 

 

In any case, the die is cast if Slick does regain US power from a new constitution, from a Hillary presidency, or from an elevation to the UN.  At some point in time, the Amalek-Edomite Jew masters (under the supervision and leadership of Amalekite Jew bankers) will logically attempt a removal of Clinton and his replacement by a reliable, (more) genetic Amalek-Edomite Jew (to cause another US civil war?). 

 

The records from the Scriptures and from history demand this option.  It will assuredly happen.  The issue is not whether, but only of how and when.  Whether this US civil war comes from Clinton acts or the Amalekites is unclear. 

 

But whomever sits in the White House in the coming dictatorship (Bill, Hillary, Colin Powell or whomever), the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters will be ready to double cross him or her to place a more genetic Amalekite Jew in power. 

 

 

The Rockefeller Concern 

 

While there is evidence of an eventual Amalekite Jew assault upon Slick, the next concern has been over the role of the Amalekite Christian Rockefellers who have been declining and are on the way out, in their long war with the Amalekite Jew Rothschilds. 

 

The Rockefellers have likely understood that they will be totally crushed and destroyed by the eventual Amalekite Jew victors when they make their move to take over the US and Christian West. 

 

With this future staring them in the face, the fading Rockefellers and their Eastern Establishment allies would appear to have been a part of the faction critical of Slick in the last three years.  Surely, the Rockefellers were happy to see him gone and the rise to power of their man George W. Bush. 

 

With this backdrop, it is interesting that some of the powers that be began to question Bill at least six years ago.  Mark Helprin, in an editorial in the Oct 10, 1997, “Wall Street Journal,” called Clinton “the most corrupt, fraudulent and dishonest president we have ever known.”  Other portions of the media, especially some Rockefeller friendly newspapers, also began to criticize Bill. 

 

But one must remember that the Rockefeller power over the media is extremely limited.  Almost all media power is held by plutocrat Amalekite Jews in today’s America.  Certainly, the Amalek-Edomite Jews control the television industry and leading newspapers and magazines (apparently, to include the “Washington Post” and “Newsweek”). 

 

The likely Rockefeller dissatisfaction with Clinton led some analysts to suggest that the fat cats were in the process of trying to duplicate the change in government that happened with the demise of Spiro Agnew and Richard Nixon in the 1970s and the elevation of Gerald Ford and Nelson Rockefeller.  Such an eventuality could have paved the way again for another un-elected president and/or vice president. 

 

This background then takes one to the Monica Lewinsky and the Bill Clinton sodomite scandal that erupted in the media on January 20, 1998.  Maybe, this was the very thing which the Rockefeller bankers were looking for to get rid of Slick!  Bill’s efforts to have her obstruct justice and commit perjury in the Paula Jones case were most serious (discussed formerly). 

 

Otherwise, the evil Clinton offered a host of other good reasons for his removal--like selling the White House, Arlington Cemetery and indeed the United States for campaign contributions (principally, from the Chinese Communists). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix I--Clinton and the Amalekites

 

 

The Amalek-Edomite Dilemma! 

 

Not only would the Rockefellers have more than enough causes to see Slick go (as noted in the previous appendix), but the Christian right and any semblance left of morality in America wished to see him gone as well. 

 

But there also was the question of which way the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters would lean.  With the Amalekite Jewish control of the media and entertainment industries, they are the most powerful faction of Amalekites in modern America. 

 

Thus, the early 1998 question was whether Slick had double crossed the Amalek-Edomite Jews in some way; or rather, could they just trust him (if and when a crisis stage develops to allow implementation of the New World Order). 

 

Clearly, Clinton is untrustworthy and who knows what he might do as a US dictator.  Could the Amalekite Jew power structure keep US dictator Clinton loyal and supportive of their goals--all the while that he is busy sniffing cocaine, chasing young girls and telling lies?  Of course, everyone understands that he is a liar, par excellence.

 

Also, as pointed out before, Slick’s brother Roger Clinton has verified Bill’s long standing pursuit of both women and cocaine (per the “New Clinton Chronicles” video).  Roger has said that “My brother has a nose like a vacuum cleaner.”  “Spotlight” of Feb 21, 2000 (p. 2), notes that Bill’s nose gets bigger and redder, but experts are divided if it is caused by decades of cocaine use or something else. 

 

Even Monica Lewinsky has allowed for both cocaine and women in the Linda Tripp tapes (Jun 1999 “Idaho Observer,” p. 16).  The Starr investigation has likewise revealed both.

 

Pictures of him plainly suggest that he is a druggy.  Sometimes, his eyes are glassy or glossy and his face (especially his nose) shows puffiness and signs of cocaine use.  Even during his confession speech on Aug 17, 1998, one of the TV camera angles of his nose suggested something wrong with the nostrils being extra large and protruding (as a friend of mine once pointed out). 

 

Could the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters always count on a man like him? 

 

 

Plutocrat Concern 

 

As a minimum, the Amalekite Jew internationalists in the US would have to be concerned over whether the American public would be docile and willing to accept a Clinton dictatorship (if they choose to return him to power with a new constitution or however). 

 

Everyone knows that Slick is a pathological liar and an immoral, dishonest and totally corrupt bum who cannot be trusted.  If he came on TV and tried to present a case for martial law (because of an alleged emergency), who would believe him? 

 

Surely, the Amalekite Jew rulers would prefer to have someone more credible and reliable in a crunch as the American dictator.  Someone more loved and respected (than Clinton) by the gullible public would and could better put over the need for martial law.  A person like Franklin Roosevelt would have been first choice and he almost reached that pinnacle, before death cut him down in 1945. 

 

 

Slick Has Served the Amalek-Edomites 

 

It’s not that the Amalek-Edomite Jew super rich haven’t been served by Slick.  They have and especially as he was surrounded by Amalek-Edomite Jew cabinet members, lawyers and aides in the presidency.  The “Jubilee” paper of Jan/Feb 1998 (p. 7) quoted columnist Morton Kondracke (of Jan 18, 1998) as saying that Clinton was regarded as one of the most pro-Israeli presidents in history. 

 

In his video on “Come Lord Jesus,” Catholic Priest John O’Connor, previously quoted, noted from an Israeli newspaper that all of Clinton’s appointments to the Federal Reserve Bank and the Supreme Court have been of Jews (actually Amalekites).  Clinton even said that his next Supreme Court appointment would also be a Jew (clearly, George W. Bush has not and will not equal that position). 

 

Slick placed Amalekite Jews in charge of much or all of US intelligence and police capabilities.  Amalekite Jews ran the FBI and CIA.  In fact, again, per the Israeli paper cited by O’Connor, Jews were (and probably still are) in all key management positions within the CIA.  To top all of this off, this same source said that five or six out of the seven key advisors to Clinton were Jews. 

 

 

Slick Learned 

 

Some years ago, Clinton’s political mentor, Arkansas Senator William Fullbright said that the Jewish lobby controlled 70 of the 100 votes in the US Senate.  There was an outcry of horror at Fullbright’s alleged anti-Semitism.  Quite naturally, Fullbright was defeated the next time he ran for reelection.  Slick evidently learned from this history (to be sure that he gives the Amalekite Jews everything possible). 

 

Knowing where his bread is buttered and understanding the enormous power of the ruling Amalekite Jews over the entire American society today, Clinton chose to surround himself with these Amalek-Edomite Jews and turn almost the entire United States government and establishment over to them for plunder and exploitation (if they would just use their powers to keep him in the presidency). 

 

Though Slick had a reputation of being the first Black president of the US, he was far more subservient and obedient to the ruling Amalekite Jews.  As noted, his first two Supreme Court appointments were of apparent Amalekites.  African Americans could not crow over any such achievements on their behalf (other than Betty Curry, Clinton’s personal secretary, who ranked awful low, as compared to Supreme Court justices). 

 

Slick’s entire foreign policy agenda was in the hands of high ranking Amalek-Edomite Jews who ostensibly were pro-Israeli (although they also were so deceitful that they could and did double cross the state of Israel at the drop of a hat and particularly in the context that they were very liberal, while the Israeli government had been in the hands of conservatives for most of Clinton’s early presidency). 

 

While the Amalek-Edomite Jews will pretend to be Slick’s friends and supporters (if he should return to power), it would not take much in the way of provocation for them to turn on him and do him in.  Please remember that Stalin was pro-Amalekite for ages.  But in the end, it was reportedly an Amalek-Edomite doctor who murdered him to end his career. 

 

 

General Shabtai Ziv 

 

In April 2000, Israeli General Shabtai Ziv retired from government service.  Ziv was a former military judge who served as general counsel for the Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security services.  The “Spotlight” paper (p. 1, 3) of May 29, 2000, had an article by Martin Mann on “Israeli Admits Assassination is National Policy” which covered Ziv’s farewell address. 

 

Ziv said “As a jurist, I had to distinguish between hostile elements within the territory of the state of Israel and those who act outside the state and cannot be arrested or brought to trial.  As for the latter (enemies abroad), it is perfectly legitimate to strike at anyone who is a danger to the state’s security... I will authorize a liquidation of someone like that anywhere, provided I get a clear and specific order from the political level.” 

 

In terms of assassinations, Mann noted the situation with the spiritual leader of the Ultra Orthodox Shas group in Israel--Ovadia Yosef (mentioned in a former chapter).  Besides angering the Ashkenazim, he is under criminal investigation for publicly urging the murder of an Israeli official who has been participating in the current Mideast peace talks which involve giving land back to the Arabs. 

 

 

Tom Hoskins 

 

In this environment, Lt. Col. Tom Hoskins, a US Marine counterterrorist expert, said “Trouble is, the real promoters of these controversial Mideast settlement talks are Clinton and his top people.  If Zionist fanatics want to kill their own leaders for going along with Clinton, who can tell when they will turn their attention--and hit squads--toward Washington?” 

 

Hoskins has made a good point.  If certain Israeli terrorists had gotten fed up with Clinton’s constant meddling in Israeli affairs, would they target him for liquidation?  This is not far fetched at all.  True, Clinton gave Amalekite Jews most of the United States to plunder, exploit, abuse and steal from.  But whatever he did, it was never enough. 

 

Too, Slick is such a classic double-crosser.  He can’t be trusted for anything (as Binyamin Netanyahu discovered, as discussed earlier).  If Slick needs a scapegoat in the future (if he gets back into power in the US or UN), he could offer up the Jews (just as Adolf Schicklgruber did in the early 1930s).  If and when this happens, will the Israelis assassinate him?  This option will be explored in later remarks. 

 

These remarks from Israel also bring up the situation with George W. Bush.  For sure, his position is awful precarious.  If he upsets the ruling Amalekite Jew power structure, the Mossad could do him in at the drop of a pin.  And when the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters are ready for the New World Order, they may do just that--by assassinating Bush, Clinton or whomsoever they choose to eliminate. 

 

None of this is far fetched at all--because it is now public knowledge that the Israelis employed hit squads to liquidate a number of Arab dissidents in Palestine in 2000, 2001 and subsequently (Mar 5, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 12). 

 

 

More on Clinton’s Maneuvers 

 

As just noted, and as also pointed out in previous comments, Clinton has already double crossed former Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.  Moreover, there was in motion Clinton’s push of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak into corruption.  Now, there is another related story to this Clinton maneuvering in the Middle East. 

 

A follow-up report on the practice of Slick Clinton to meddle in Israeli politics appeared in the Feb 25, 2000, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 3) in a report by David Zev Harris on “Likud MK tells Clinton to stop interfering.”  The essence here is that Likud Knesset member Uzi Landau called upon Clinton to stop interfering in the coming referendum on Israeli peace with Syria. 

 

In revelations of Clinton’s involvement in the Israeli-Syrian peace process, Landau wrote him a letter and said that if the information was correct, that “this would constitute an unprecedented and intolerable act of gross interference in Israel’s internal affairs.”  Of course, the US Embassy spokesman, Larry Schwartz (a likely Amalekite), denied everything. 

 

In any case, Lt. Col. Hoskins’ remarks, cited above, on the possibility of the Israelis assassinating Slick (now, or in the future, if he regains US power) and/or George W. Bush or whomever else in US power is not far fetched at all and even in the vein that Bill meddled too much in their internal affairs.  Something could easily set them off. 

 

However, this writer believes that the probabilities are great that Slick will regain power and survive for a time.  As will be covered in later comments, his life could be in danger if he does not fully march to the Amalekite Jew tune being piped or if he tries to double cross them.  Surely, he has enough brains to understand that he must be very careful in his dealings with the Amalekite Jews and the modern state of Israel. 

 

 

A Later Development 

 

While one must wonder why and how it is that Slick was able to completely dominate the Middle East peace negotiations, a news report in the Nov 20, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 1, 6) by James Harrer on “UN Peacekeeping Forces--Next Stop:  Israel” may reveal the answer. 

 

The gist of the story was that Saudi Arabia and certain other oil rich Arab countries had offered a one billion dollar bribe to Slick (as briefly cited earlier), if he would promote an Arab acceptable peace in Palestine--to include the presence of a UN force to oversee it between the Palestinians and the Israelis. 

 

Per Harrer, Sandy Berger, Slick’s Amalekite aide, was the middle man negotiating the deal.  Maybe, this was one of the reasons that Slick worked so hard on this motion in 2000 (plus, it would benefit his legacy and help him in resuming power in the future). 

 

Reportedly, one aspect of the bribe plan called for some 350 UN observers and an international reaction force of 2,000 to 5,000 troops to be interspersed between the warring factions.  Yasser Arafat had been talking about this course of action in November 2000.  Even the US proposed at one time that the UN Security Council assume sovereignty over the Temple Mount. 

 

The fact that Slick’s Amalekite Jew aides and helpers were involved in this motion spells out that Ehud Barak may have been also involved, as noted earlier. 

 

Or alternatively, it could suggest that Slick and his Amalekite Jew buddies were in the process of taking this $one billion for themselves and then double-crossing Barak and the state of Israel.  It is very plausible that Slick and his Amalekite Jew aides would double cross the Israelis!  

 

 

The Essence Here 

 

The point is that Bill Clinton undertook peace in the Middle East as one of his primary goals.  Apparently, he even sided more with the Arabs than with Israel on occasion and this upset some of the Israelis.  There is no question about it whatsoever.  Slick had his eyes set upon a Nobel peace prize and the restoration of his image by promoting peace in the Middle East. 

 

Obviously, if he could give all parties involved enough US dollars, he would achieve something.  And if he was successful, it could pave the way for him to have a major role in international politics at the UN (which is one of his ambitions, as noted earlier and as will be assessed in a following appendix). 

 

As a follow-up on this story, Slick did not get his peace treaty.  Nevertheless, his efforts for a Nobel peace prize did not end.  In January 2001, Slick dispatched an aide to Norway to contact a member of the Norwegian parliament, asking for his help in getting the Noble peace prize for Clinton (Jan-Feb 2001 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 36). 

 

Two Norwegian public relations officials were offered money (in the range of six figures) for their help in getting the Nobel prize for Slick.  The Nobel committee has long held that such tactics were unethical (Jan-Feb 2001 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 36). 

 

 

Amalekite Possibilities 

 

During the Clinton presidency, some said Gore would get kicked out first--to be replaced possibly with Alan Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve), Secretary of State Madeleine Albright or Robert Rubin (former Secretary of the Treasurer).  Once Rubin, Albright or Greenspan was in as VP, Slick would then either be forced out or be removed. 

 

Another alternative was to have Slick pressured out with Gore temporarily succeeding him and naming Rubin, Greenspan or some other trustworthy Amalekite soul as VP.  Later Gore could be removed, leaving the fat cats’ real choice in charge. 

 

A 1998 “Proclaim Liberty Hot Sheet” quoted a January 30, 1998, report of the Jewish “Forward” that if Clinton goes, Gore would pick Gloria Steinem as his VP choice.  The reaction was that she is the grande dame of California politics and would hence be the ideal choice for US vice president.  Another option for Gore would have been Diane Feinstein, who also would be eagerly received by the Amalekites. 

 

 

The Amalekite Future? 

 

Any of these scenarios had merit--at least, from the perspective of planning (and even now, in the context of Clinton regaining power and choosing a new vice-president).  The fact that Clinton survived the Senate trial for his removal is no reason to suppose that the Amalekite Jews won’t ever move against him (if he regains power).  At some point in time, they will.  The only questions are when and how--not whether. 

 

Certainly, the Amalek-Edomite Jew power structure and media in the US would like to see an Amalekite Jew agent of the Rothschilds in the presidency anyway possible and especially since it is doubtful that an obvious Amalek-Edomite Jew could ever be elected as president by the voters at the polls.  Possibly, Joseph Lieberman is now in the running seat for this option (in view of his 2000 success in the polls). 

 

Not only would some White Christians have reservations about voting for a Jewish Amalekite, but more importantly, Louis Farrakhan and the Black Muslims could incite and ignite the whole African American population to get out and vote against one.  Gore’s choice of Connecticut Senator Lieberman, as his running mate, was interesting to watch in terms of the Blacks. 

 

It could have been a disaster for Gore.  But Lieberman was quickly dispatched to meet privately with Farrakhan and pacify the Blacks that Lieberman was really no threat.  Apparently, Lieberman’s words somewhat pacified Farrakhan (because Louis did not attack the Gore-Lieberman team, as he could have done so). 

 

After the meeting, Lieberman publicly declared that he was now in favor of affirmative action.  So this helped.  However, this willingness of Lieberman to change and his meeting with Farrakhan did not give the Democrats the full Black turn-out that they wanted.  Some Negroes were upset over Lieberman and did revolt. 

 

Despite the Amalekite Jewish power over Clinton, it is certain that they would like to have one of their own more trustworthy, racial cousins in the US president’s office. 

 

One must recall what happened to the Jewish Israelite authorities in control of Jerusalem--just before the Roman conquest in 70 CE, as Amalek-Edomites cunningly murdered them to take almost full and complete control of Jerusalem (described in prior comments). 

 

 

The Question Why? 

 

From the very beginning of the Lewinsky flap, there always was some concern (and there still is, even after the Senate’s acquittal on Feb 12, 1999) over whether the Amalekite masters-bankers would join into the fray to try to remove Slick or would they support and protect him against the developing threats.   

 

It must be relevant that Monica (a probable Amalek-Edomite) and certainly her first lawyer, William Ginsburg (another probable Amalekite), both always seemed to be more interested in protecting Slick than any thing else.  Since Monica herself called Clinton the creep and smuck-o, it was evident that she really didn’t like the man. 

 

Yet, she and Ginsburg went the extra mile to protect Clinton.  It is true that with her later lawyers, Monica eventually caved in and decided to cooperate (to a point).  But it has to be significant that she initially did seem to do her best to protect Slick (and did so, even to the end, when she testified at the Senate trial). 

 

Why then did Monica, Ginsburg and her later lawyers work so hard to insulate and protect Bill?  Was it possible that Ginsburg, Lewinsky and the others were running scared about all of the mysterious deaths associated with Clinton over the years (discussed in a previous chapter)?  This seems doubtful.  But Monica reportedly expressed some concern over this possibility. 

 

As discussed previously herein, there is some possibility that Monica was a Mossad agent on a Mossad mission to compromise and control the evil Clinton (making him susceptible to Mossad blackmailing).  The student of truth cannot even rule William Ginsburg out.  He, too, well could be a Mossad agent since many Jews worldwide are Mossad assets. 

 

Otherwise, in a late January 1998 Israeli news report, Ginsburg said that both he and Monica were Jews who appreciated what all Clinton had done for the Jews.  Could this statement be important in view of Clinton’s 1998 planned assault on Iraq?  Did the ruling Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters choose to try to keep Slick in power for at least the time being? 

 

If there is a conscious decision to dump Clinton or Powell later (if either gain power), it is likely that the “Washington Post” will play a key role.  So their actions must be watched carefully.  The “Washington Post” and their “Newsweek” subsidiary are both under alleged Rothschild control and will probably lead any real, deliberate, Amalekite attack upon Slick, Bush, Rice, Powell or whomever. 

 

 

Amalekite Media Power Stayed With Slick 

 

All the way through the Lewinsky affair, the “Washington Post” and the liberal Amalekite Jew controlled media stayed with Clinton.  They protected him to the point of being absurd. 

 

They were the sources of favorable polls and news coverage reports and events which helped Clinton immeasurably.  As late as February 11, 1999, Rush Limbaugh noted on his program that the “Washington Post” had continuously fed “media intelligence” to the Clinton White House--all through the fracas. 

 

The late July 1998 turn by Monica Lewinsky to begin cooperating with the special prosecutor similarly proved to be irrelevant in terms of the future of Slick.  Clearly, her cooperation simply was a matter of her own self interests to avoid prosecution?  She never turned on him, despite her obvious dislike for the man.  Her father, Barnard, also continued to support him, even after being threatened, as noted previously. 

 

As late as August 19, 1998, just after Slick went on national television to make his limited confession, an Iranian newspaper blamed the whole Monica affair on a Zionist conspiracy.  Surely, one must doubt this projection in view of how the Amalekite Jews treated the matter in the US.  Manifestly, the Amalekite Jews never got on the bandwagon to do Slick in. 

 

They stayed on his side to the time of the Senate’s acquittal.  On this, it must be important to note that one of the top, leading, Republican Senators, Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania (an evident Amalekite), spoke out for Clinton and announced his plans to acquit Clinton (even before the Senate vote). 

 

Specter gained fame as the counsel for the Warren Commission, investigating the JFK murder, discussed formerly.  He invented the famous, magic bullet theory that a Carcano bullet from Oswald gyrated in the air in several different directions to hit Kennedy twice and Connally three times, before mysteriously falling on a Parkland hospital stretcher in its almost original, pristine condition. 

 

Although the US House did vote out a bill of impeachment against Slick on December 19, 1998, the handwriting on the wall made it clear that a Senate removal would be out of the question, unless the Amalekite Jew plutocrats and their controlled media powers went to work on Slick. 

 

 

Some More Clinton Lies and Hypocrisy 

 

While the US controlled media was essentially on the side of Bill Clinton from day one of the Monica-Bill sodomy revelations, there was some evidence of a few Republican newspapers questioning Bill’s actions.  Perhaps the primary paper in this category was the “Washington Times,” which Slick labeled as being a “vast right-wing media conspiracy” against him (May 13, 2002, U.S. News & World Report,” p. 8). 

 

This claim by Slick Clinton was much like the one emanating from Bill’s wife Hillary when she was on the NBC TV “Today Program” on January 27, 1998, to claim that there was a vast right wing conspiracy responsible for the revelations of the Clinton-Lewinsky sodomite scandal (as noted above and as discussed in a prior chapter). 

 

Of course, Achav Bill and his Jezebel wife both knew that these charges of right wing conspiracies were totally false, but the lying hypocrite pair went on to make them.  Not only were the Clintons devious, but the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters who own and/or control the bulk of the US media were well aware that the words coming from the Clintons were all lies.  The Amalekite Jew bankers/masters are not exactly stupid. 

 

The liberal, leftist, controlled media, quite naturally, spun the Clinton lies and deception throughout the whole the Clinton sodomite scandal (after all, the controlled media is controlled by the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters and Clinton was their man). 

 

The controlled media (excepting for the minority “Washington Times” and maybe a few other papers loyal to the leftist Rockefeller empire, as discussed earlier in this appendix) blindly supported Bill all the way through the crisis.  Therefore, it was clear that Bill would survive (because of the enormous power that the controlled media has over the gullible, Christian goyim in America). 

 

 

Amalekite Controlled Hollywood 

 

One of the most important Hollywood contributions to liberalism occurred during the Clinton administration as a weekly television drama called “The West Wing.”  It started off with two apparent goals--one, to promote liberal policies and two, to glorify Bill “Slick” Clinton.  The March 8, 2002, “The Week” (p. 10) called it the “Left Wing.”  And it consistently has been a left wing, Amalekite production of evil. 

 

The weekly show has been built around the West Wing of the US White House. “The West Wing” laid out the Clinton White House with a string of actors, playing the different people associated with Slick in his first term.  The ultra leftist Martin Sheen (a Hispanic) plays Josiah Bartlet, the Democrat US president (who was originally supposed to be a copy of Slick Clinton). 

 

The program regularly features speeches and diatribes about the loves of the leftists--like gun control and high taxes.  The business community is held in low esteem. 

 

“The Week” quoted journalist Jonah Goldberg (from “National Review Online”) that when conservative ideas are presented on the show, they are things to be ridiculed, mocked, or simply ground into the dirt by the great heroes of the leftist, liberal, US White House (led by the leftist Josiah Bartlet/Martin Sheen).  Goldberg’s conclusion was that the West Wing was a “one-hour commercial for the Democratic Party.” 

 

Of course, the Amalekite Jew controlled entertainment industry in Hollywood and New York were Clinton people from day one.  So it was no wonder that they would create and promote a program designed to elevate and lift up the greatness of the Clinton presidency and the leftist programs Slick promoted.   

 

 

John Podhoretz 

 

The liberals loved Slick from day one.  They stayed with him through thick and thin--even to the point of being ridiculous and appearing stupid, as illustrated in an article on “The Liberal Imagination” by John Podhoretz in the March 27, 2000, “Weekly Standard” (p. 23-27). 

 

Podhoretz’s work was focused upon the above cited popular weekly television drama, “The West Wing,” which was supposedly a reference to the Clinton White House during its early years. 

 

As John Podhoretz sees it, “The West Wing” is the ultimate Hollywood fantasy (an escapist fantasy) and incorporates the epitome of the liberal imagination--actually, to the point of being ridiculous and perhaps even stupid. 

 

He notes that the president, himself, in the weekly drama is nothing like the real Clinton and that “The West Wing” is nothing but political pornography for liberals--made up of equal parts unrequited longing for and rage at Hollywood’s not so obscure object of desire--Bill Clinton.  

 

As the review indicates, the show simply is not realistic.  There is no Monica Lewinsky, no Kathleen Willey, no four-way phone-sex calls with Dick Morris, no bouts of (the Clintons’) foul temper and no jokes about dating the mummified corpse of a 14 year-old Inca girl (as Bill once suggested--he wished he could have dated the long dead girl, based upon her mummified remains). 

 

In the film, personnel in the White House are not even allowed to curse.  The president is one of the boys who makes chili for the staff and plays poker with them.  He is, per Podhoretz, immensely thoughtful, infinitely wise, deeply caring, thoroughly monogamous and unambiguously principled Nobel-Prize winning economist.  He is the epitome of what the liberals have wanted for Bill Clinton. 

 

The write-up notes one extraordinary case of the liberal mentality, in citing one instance of where one of the staff people gets involved with a high priced call girl.  Rather than be indignant about the incident and the irresponsibility of the staff person (who was supposed to be George Stephanopoulos), the press secretary (supposedly Dee Dee Myers) is upset over the intrusion into George’s personal life. 

 

John Podhoretz correctly points out that Clinton has seduced and abandoned and then seduced and abandoned again (always with another promise of another seduction) the Hollywood elite (who have stayed with him in loyalty, as much as Monica Lewinsky). 

 

Like Monica, the Hollywood liberals have nothing to show for their loyalty (all the while that Clinton was pocketing millions in campaign contributions from them).  Yes, Slick continuously milked millions of dollars in donations from the leftist Hollywood people and they got little in return (other than more in the way of the destruction of the United States, which probably pleased most of them). 

 

 

More From the West Wing 

 

In early 2002, the West Wing moved into a new stage in promoting the Democrat position on liberalism as creating an election in which the loving leftist Bartlet is involved in an election battle with the Republican Governor of Florida.  The Republican is illustrated as being dumb and deceptive and supported by money donations from special interests groups. 

 

The attempt to strike an image of the great loving liberal Bill Clinton in opposition to a so-called conservative Republican named Bush cannot be missed.  And in the presentation, the Bush character receives no favors from the program.  The West Wing paints a bad picture for Republicans and the Bush people. 

 

The bottom line of this TV program is that it is a total fabrication of what all Clinton is not (as John Podhoretz concluded in his comments in the Mar 27, 2000, “Weekly Standard”).  It seems to be the liberals’ attempt to erase Clinton from their minds with a fictional character that is totally removed from the real world of Bill Clinton. 

 

 

And Now, the Latest 

 

If anything could be added to the “West Wing” to enhance the power of the Clintonians over America, it would have to be a news item in the May 13, 2002, “U.S. News & World Report” (p. 11) indicating that Slick has been in contact with NBC executives. 

 

The story said that Slick and NBC are in the discussion stage on a plan that would allow Slick to have his own weekly talk show for a reported $50 million the first year.  This possibility would definitely be something that the evil Slick Clinton would find beneficial in order to keep his face and name before the credulous American public. 

 

Talk show personality Maury Povich said on CNN that Clinton should not do it because he would “fail miserably” (ibid, p. 11). 

 

The May 10, 2002 “The Week” (p. 17) quoted Jonah Goldberg (previously cited herein) from “National Review Online.”  Goldberg said that when Clinton speaks in an unscripted setting, he reveals himself as smarmy, superficial, and deceitful.  Per Goldberg, “putting Clinton on TV will prove that we Clinton-haters were right.” 

 

 

Some Likely Answers 

 

Any of the serious charges against Clinton or something new (which regularly surfaces with Slick) could have been sufficient to motivate the Amalekite Jew plutocrats to decide to get rid of him.  No one else had that power. 

 

Since the ruling Amalekite Jews had some obvious reasons why they should have joined into the fray and helped to remove Slick, they did not pursue that option.  The question must be asked--why? 

 

Perhaps there were several causes at work which motivated the Amalekite Jews to decide to wait to the future for their take over attempts of the United States (thus, allowing the presidency of George W. Bush and the possible resurfacing of Bill in the presidency, in the future). 

 

First, the 1998 election results (supporting Slick) must have persuaded them to temporarily abandon or delay such hopes.  This mid-term election showed remarkable support for Slick among the American people.  This same support was in evidence in most all of the polls for the 13 months of Slick’s trial. 

 

Effectively, the American people said that they loved the scoundrel Slick because he was one of them.  Surely, the 1998 elections and subsequent polls made the Amalekite Jews choose to stay on Slick’s side and largely defuse any serious trouble he could have faced over the Lewinsky sodomy. 

 

To a lesser extent, it was clear that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters understood that Slick had been on their team from day one.  So while there is a risk with him in a future dictatorship, the Amalekite Jews chose to wait on his possible removal until later times.  Be assured that when the Amalekites are ready, they will strike and get rid of him. 

 

Of course, he will not be the first American leader who has worked for and faithfully served the international bankers (particularly the Amalek-Edomite Rothschilds) to be later destroyed by them.  As noted above, Abe Lincoln, John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon have all been down that road before for various and sundry reasons--usually, for double crosses, as discussed previously. 

 

Otherwise, other presidents who never served the bankers in the first place were eventually destroyed by them as well--like James Garfield and William Howard Taft.  Being enemies of the Amalek-Edomite bankers, one can perhaps understand why Garfield and Taft were hated so much.  But it’s hard to appreciate that they will ever turn against a faithful servant like Clinton. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix J--Clinton and Survival

 

 

Slick’s Power Over His Enemies 

 

Former chapters have discussed the practice of the Slick Clinton White House to obtain and use over 900 FBI files of Clinton’s opponents.  This list of files obviously included many prominent members of Congress.  These files became enormously important to future events, as will shortly be illustrated. 

 

But there was another force at work to allow Slick to have a decided advantage over his enemies.  This one was brought out by Margaret Newsham, who was a guest on the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio talk show program on March 2, 2000 (as was discussed in a former chapter). 

 

Margaret formerly worked for Ford Aerospace and Lockheed which did contract work for the National Security Agency on a spying effort (which is now known as Project Echelon, discussed earlier).  The project is now focused upon the interception of all communications in America and around the world (telephone lines, cell phones, faxes, computer e-mail, the Internet, etc). 

 

Anyway, Ms Newsham expressed her view that the Clinton White House has been using the NSA and NRO (and to presumably include the FBI, CIA, IRS and all other federal agencies) to particularly focus their attention upon Clinton’s enemies.  Margaret’s suggestion was made in the context of 1998 and his war with the Republicans for survival. 

 

 

Of Course, Clinton Would! 

 

But it is manifest that a person like Slick Clinton would use all federal agencies for his own purposes.  Clinton is personally so depraved, evil and diabolical that he would think nothing about using the enormous spy agencies of the US government to spy upon and entrap his political opponents. 

 

Of course, this practice has been going on in a smaller scale for many years, going back to the Amalekite Franklin Roosevelt. 

 

Regardless, in late 1998, when it became obvious that the Republicans would try to impeach Slick over his sodomite debasement of the apparent Amalekite girl Monica Lewinsky, Slick turned to his FBI files and his control over the US government spy agencies and capabilities to produce data on his Republican opponents. 

 

Very quickly, the White House started leaking information to friendly liberal reporters on the alleged improprieties and misconduct of various members of the US House of Representatives--like Dick Armey, Bob Livingston, Dan Burton, Bob Barr, Helen Chenowith and Henry Hyde (as discussed earlier).  Some of these people went down the tubes, while others survived. 

 

So it became quite obvious to persons in Congress and in the Senate that Bill Clinton had files on all of them and was busy compiling even more detailed information which could forever destroy them, if it became public knowledge.  Of course, many people in the House and Senate backed off and refused to vote against Slick, for fear that they would be destroyed in the process. 

 

 

Slick Survived 

 

The House did temporarily delay its impeachment proceedings one day (with Slick’s attack on Iraq), but then went on with the effort on December 18, 1998.  On December 19th, the House followed up and did its duty by voting out a bill of impeachment on Slick. 

 

With the House’s vote for impeachment, the issue then went before the US Senate where Slick was acquitted (with even Jay Rockefeller voting for Slick, perhaps when it was apparent that Bill had won the fight and Rockefeller’s vote meant nothing). 

 

What this seems to suggest is that Slick Clinton used the powers of the presidency to blackmail, intimidate, threaten and coerce members of Congress to do his bidding.  With his alliance with the Amalekite controlled media, there was no way that Congress would do its duty and remove the diabolical Slick Clinton. 

 

Even though there was some remaining clamor against Slick from time to time, as these lines were first being written in the late 20th century, the ball game isn’t over until the final out.  True, he survived.  Importantly, Slick has had public opinion on his side to temporarily delay and defuse the little opposition which he has faced (and as he makes his move to return to power and declare martial law). 

 

The only thing that will do him in is if the Amalekite bankers/masters eventually turn on him.  If they turn against him, they will turn the controlled, liberal media against him to utterly destroy him in the eyes of the gullible public.  Surely, this has to be the most dangerous threats that any politician faces. 

 

The writer of this study would lean in the direction that Slick will survive all the way until the Russian and Islamic conquerors do the US in.  Perhaps a few days before their ultimate invasion and conquest, the Amalekites will attempt and succeed in a take over of the US government (and do Clinton in, if he is in power then), as they did in Jerusalem in 70 CE. 

 

 

Slick and His Start a War Card 

 

Clinton used the Iraqi war card three times in 1998 to try to stave off his troubles over Monica.  Obviously, some of his pro-Israeli Amalek-Edomite handlers were pushing him hard for a US attack on Saddam Hussein and Iraq in early 1998 because of apparent fear that Saddam possessed chemical and biological agents to upset the previously discussed balance of power. 

 

Slick knew that Christian Americans love war and that his popularity would go up in the polls with an attack on Iraq (the later GWB had the same understanding).  Such a Clinton assault against the hated Saddam (whose name appropriately means “one who confronts,” per J. R. Nyquist in “Origins of the 4th World War,” p. 160) would focus the American people’s minds away from Slick’s sex scandal. 

 

But this option was temporarily defused with the actions of the UN Secretary General to get a new agreement with Saddam on inspections (which subsequently broke down in late 1998 through a “slick” maneuver of Slick Clinton, as will shortly be shown). 

 

Thus, it appears that while Clinton’s desire for war and an attack upon Iraq in early 1998 backfired, the conflict with Saddam was far from over.  Just as the US House Judiciary Committee was getting ready to open hearings on the impeachment of the president on November 19, 1998, Slick once again used Iraq as a whipping boy to enhance his public image. 

 

About a week before the hearings, Slick started in on Saddam and Iraq with new complaints and charges.  To counter Iraq’s alleged evil, he commenced a new buildup of thousands of soldiers and aircraft in the Persian Gulf with a view that they would be ready to strike Iraq--just about the time Congress opened the impeachment hearings. 

 

Again, the UN Secretary General came to the rescue and announced a new agreement with Saddam that temporarily defused the hostile situation. 

 

 

The Foxy Slick 

 

But Slick kept an ace up his sleeve on the Iraq problem.  He used this one on December 16, 1998, a day before the House was preparing to vote out the bill of impeachment.  Slick pulled out the stops to try to head off the House vote with a new Saddam pretext.  In desperation, he turned to the military option against Iraq, just before the vote. 

 

News reports discussed on the Rush Limbaugh program on December 16 and 17 of 1998 noted that Richard Butler, an Australian in charge of the UN inspection team in Iraq, had reportedly been in contact with Sandy Berger, an evident Amalek-Edomite and close Clinton aide, on December 13th.  

 

The report said the Clinton White House encouraged (or forced--who knows?) Butler to begin a new series of inspections in some strange Iraqi areas (like in Saddam’s palace, where he lived, and at the political headquarters of Saddam’s political party) which Saddam would assuredly oppose and not permit.  So the team followed upon the Clinton request and tried to inspect those areas.  As anticipated, Saddam said no! 

 

Butler fired back a message to the UN on or about December 14th that he could not inspect those areas.  Clinton sat on the whole affair until the 16th, the day before the impeachment vote. 

 

He then launched a massive US air attack on Iraq in an obvious effort to stop the impeachment vote (which must have pleased some of his Amalek-Edomite handlers who had been pushing him for an Iraqi strike).  The interesting thing about this US attack is that it was carried out with almost worldwide opposition and particularly from Russia, China, France and various Muslim states. 

 

 

Yisrael Stands Alone 

 

Only Britain joined in with the attack and essentially only Canada, New Zealand, Australia and the state of Israel truly supported it.  The die was cast in 1998 that the US, Israel and White British Commonwealth were being postured against the rest of the world. 

 

So, in 1999 and 2000, Clinton and his Amalekite aides continued to heap condemnation and criticism upon Saddam (after concluding the US war in the Balkans).  Thereafter, the US assault and embargo on the Iraqi people intensified. 

 

Finally, even high ranking UN officials began criticizing the US for the sanctions against Iraq which had caused the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi people (Nov 15, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 4, in a story by James Harrer on “UN Heads Reject Iraq Sanctions”).  This posturing at the UN was further evidence that very soon, the US and her Anglo-Saxon-Celtic allies will stand with Israel against the world. 

 

All along, Iraq was on America’s drawing board.  For years, there were some feelings that “Clinton could be envisioning himself and his place in history to do what Bush failed to do--complete the task of pushing Iraq farther back into the Stone Age and getting rid of Saddam” (Jan 24, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 3).  Since Slick wasn’t able to destroy Iraq, George W. Bush decided that he would take Iraq on as a whipping boy. 

 

In January 2001, Bush began making threats against Saddam.  On Feb 16, 2001, Bush launched another US bombing assault on Iraq.  Then, on Mar 20, 2003, Bush began a more terrifying war and invasion of Iraq.  Attacking Iraq (or Afghanistan or some other state) helps young George’s image--because both GWB’s father and Clinton used wars to support their purposes. 

 

Even if GWB does subdue Iraq (for the time being), US wars of aggression against other nations are not over (like North Korea, Iran or Syria).  The US wars of aggression, by Bush or whomever (like a later Clinton if he can make a comeback), are always on the horizon to whet the appetite of the US president. 

 

At some point in time, it is almost a certainty that the US will commence further military aggression against some other nation on some pretext.  When this happens, there can be a response.  The American people should have brains enough to realize that by continuously attacking foreign nations, a day of reckoning will assuredly come.  The chickens will surely come home to roost at some point in time. 

 

 

Muslim Retaliation 

 

Therefore, every time the US attacks the Moslems worldwide (like in Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, etc) to further a political agenda and the wishes of the behind the scenes, ruling, Amalekite plutocrats, America is being forced into a day of judgment from the Muslims.  Someday, they will retaliate (perhaps this explains the Muslim terrorist attacks in Washington and New York on Sep 11, 2001)! 

 

The same is true with the Russians, vis-à-vis Slick’s attacks on Yugoslavia, as commenced in late March 1999.  Americans need to pull their heads out of the sand and understand that judgment day is coming just like it did for John F. Kennedy and his attempts to murder Castro. 

 

One of the ways which the Russians or other US enemies can retaliate is to launch an internal biological counterattack on selected US cities, described elsewhere herein.  This is a very plausible option.  If so, Big Brother will quickly declare martial law. 

 

For certain, this writer leans in the direction that something will happen (perhaps another Middle East confrontation, continuing problems in the Balkans, natural disaster, terrorism, an economic and monetary crisis or something else) to allow the president (Bush, Powell, Rice, some other Republican, or maybe even Slick if he regains power) to declare an emergency and martial law, as discussed above. 

 

Nevertheless, this eventuality would only be a prelude to the final collapse and end of the US government and people from a conquering external force (because of international debts and the historic support of the state of Israel).  In either case, disaster waits in the wings.  Of course, the real reason for judgment on America will be because of the sins of the American people--as illustrated by their choice of leaders. 

 

 

Clinton on War 

 

While it is true that Bill Clinton was a draft dodger and anti-war activist during the Vietnam War, one should not be naive and stupid enough to suppose that his reaction in those days was because he was a pacifist, ascetic or anti-war person, in reality, who loved people and human life. 

 

No!  Slick Clinton is no pacifist or conscientious objector.  And he certainly is not anti-war.  He initiated action to thrust the United States into more foreign wars, conflicts, separate attacks and murdering campaigns on independent nations and peoples (outside of a formal declaration of war) in his eight years in office, more so than other American president in history. 

 

Anyway the die is cast, Slick is a man of war and not a man of peace (although he tried to project a peace image in the Middle East by trying to push the Arabs and Israelis into a peace settlement there).  Under his rule, the FBI unilaterally murdered more American people than at any other time in American history. 

 

In his own personal life and history as a politician, more of his friends, enemies, associates and colleagues have died mysteriously (suggesting that they were murdered) than with any other known, major, American politician.  No!  Bill Clinton is not a pacifist.  Murdering, killing and death do not upset him at all.  He is perfectly at home in those situations. 

 

While Bill Clinton was totally uninterested in serving in the US armed forces, he has not been a anti-war activist in terms of Israel.  The Aug 19, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news item which quoted Clinton as saying that if the Iraqi or Iranian armies were at the Jordan River, Clinton would grab a gun and fight them and die.  Of course, per the report, Slick would never do that for America. 

 

 

Clinton’s Profanity and Hate 

 

The Sep 2000 “Internet Vortex” (p. 7) had an article on Clinton as seen by insiders who worked with him at the White House.  For example, the article quoted Clinton staffers, confidants and others who know him as being an incredibly profane and angry man who wants to inflict as much pain as possible on his enemies. 

 

During the Somalia crisis, George Stephanopoulos quoted Clinton as saying “We’re not inflicting pain on these f-ck-rs” and “when people kill us, they should be killed in greater numbers.”  Leaning on aide Tony Lake, Clinton added: “I believe in killing people who try to hurt you.” 

 

Clinton staffers also say that he cusses like a sailor, has temper tantrums and uses the word “kill” often to describe what he wants to do to his enemies.  At the end of the House impeachment investigations, Clinton told colleagues that he would like to kill all of these sons of b-tch-s and be done with it. 

 

Former Clinton political worker Samuel Wilson said that in the 1996 campaign, Bill encountered a critic who called him nothing but a two-bit politician and walked away.  Clinton told an aide to “Write down the name of that mother f-ck-r.  When I’m back in office, he’s a dead man.”  Wilson said he recalled Clinton’s look-- “it was cold!” 

 

This same source (ibid, p. 26) had some data on people near Clinton the past several years (discussed earlier).  Some 31 of them died in strange deaths--suicides, airplane or automobile accidents, murders, died while in federal custody or simply died from unexplained causes.  This 31 compares with the 30 Northern Mafia killings in its peak period of 1968-1978 and 156 Dixie Mafia killings (while Bill was in Arkansas). 

 

 

He Believes in Killing 

 

These observations should make everyone realize that Clinton is not an anti-war, anti-killing or pacifist president.  He believes in killing!  So his stance on the Vietnam war has to be traceable to some other reason than pacifism (as many voters have been incorrectly led to believe). 

 

Yet, Slick was a Vietnam draft dodger.  Why?  Was it because he was a personal coward or was there still something else to motivate him to choose this path of action in a day when it logically would hurt his chances in politics?  As it turned out, his draft dodging didn’t hurt him politically. 

 

But thirty years ago, who could have seen or anticipated his ability to lie, deceive and fool the state of Arkansas and later the American public sufficiently to be elected and reelected to the highest possible offices in Arkansas and the US. 

 

Assuredly, blaming cowardliness on Clinton won’t work either.  Actually, the only plausible explanation lies in his political ideology and the nature of the Vietnam war.  Bill Clinton is a classic internationalist.  But he is more.  He is a Socialist.  So, in essence, he is an international Socialist.  This makes him very close in ideology to a Communist. 

 

 

Bill’s Record and History 

 

With this backdrop, is it possible that Clinton is secretly a Communist at heart?  Well, this writer doesn’t know the answer to that question.  Maybe he is and maybe he is not. 

 

According to Arkansas State Trooper Larry Patterson, Clinton has been known to refer to at least one Arkansas State Policeman as  a “g--d d-mn-d  pig.”  So it is possible that indeed Slick is a Communist, or perhaps just a leftist anarchist of the most gross kind. 

 

As a minimum, he is an international Socialist.  His political record and history conclusively prove that reality, beyond a shadow of a doubt.  And this fact of his political persuasion has meant that he has been willing to walk the extra mile to be a friend, colleague and benefactor of the Communist Chinese and whatever semblance of Communism remaining in the old, broken-up USSR. 

 

In this context, he has went out of his way to be good to Communist China--in transferring the very latest American nuclear, missile and computer technology to China in exchange for evidently nothing, beyond millions of dollars in campaign funds.  Would he commit treason for some campaign money?  Yes, he would.  But still, one must wonder about Bill and the massive support that he has given China in all cases. 

 

On September 9, 2000, Rusty Humphreys, on “Saturday Night America,” discussed a news report about recent evidence surfacing which showed that Bill Clinton and the Democrats also took large sums of money from the Russians.  In view of US support for massive US contributions and loans and IMF loans to Russia in the 1990s, one must wonder if these payments had something to do with payments to Bill. 

 

Previous chapters discussed the situation involving the Amalekites in the pipeline of Western money into the former Soviet Union.  This money comes ostensibly for aid and help to the people.  But the Amalekites at all levels from Washington to New York to Moscow have been stealing $billions of this money.  The Russian people are being left with massive debts to pay. 

 

Exactly who in Russia made the campaign contributions to Clinton and the Democrats in 1992 and/or 1996 is not clear presently (although the enormous ties which the Gore family had with the Amalekite Armand Hammer and the Soviets must whet the appetite, as will be described below). 

 

But the Russian bribes and payoffs could have been either from the Russian Amalekites themselves or the Khazars, who may have prevailed upon the Russian government to make the payments.  In any case, the Amalekite cousins in the West also helped to arrange the loans so that Amalekites in both East and West could steal plenty. 

 

 

Slick’s Ally Gore Had Russian Connections 

 

The famous Amalekite capitalist Armand Hammer (now deceased) was head of the huge Occidental Petroleum Company and all of its various subsidiaries.  For years, Armand was a close confidante and associate of Stalin and other Communist leaders.  Since the breakup of the old USSR, information has come out of Moscow indicating that Armand was a paid agent for Soviet intelligence. 

 

In the days when Al Gore Sr was a member of the US Senate, Hammer lined up with Gore (as discussed in a prior chapter). 

 

The pair became close friends and Gore supported Hammer’s needs in the US Senate.  What all Gore got from Hammer (who was working for the Soviets) is unclear.  However, upon being defeated in an election, Gore was made chairman of the board of one of Hammer’s companies at a salary of $500,000 annually (as noted earlier). 

 

Gore and the Gore family became important stockholders in Occidental Petroleum.  So contact and linkage between the Clinton-Gore team went back many years to Hammer and the Russians--just after WWII. 

 

With the ties already established, it would have been easy for the Clinton-Gore people to continue them in the 1990s (yet, Gore regularly condemned George W. Bush in 2000 for his involvement in the oil industry). 

 

 

The Blackmail Possibility 

 

Beyond the campaign contribution probability, there is another option on why Slick treats the Russians and Chinese so well.  This course was laid out in a couple of articles in the Nov 2000 “Internet Vortex.”  A page one story in this source reported on the recent revelations of former Russian President Boris Yeltsin that the Russians knew about the Clinton-Monica Lewinsky affair as early as late 1996. 

 

Apparently, the Russians had a large amount of critical information on Clinton which could have been used to blackmail Slick, as suggested in the second “Internet Vortex” article (p. 28-29).  The essence of this second story focused upon the question of how much bad information that Russia and indeed other countries may have had on Bill Clinton. 

 

Vortex noted the strange reality of Clinton’s silence about various Russian evils and support for China.  Because of these events, the article raised the question of whether Slick was being blackmailed by the Kremlin or not. 

 

Some time ago, a Russian ship (with all kinds of antennas and communications and monitoring equipment aboard) was in the Puget Sound area off Washington state.  One of the US Ohio class submarines put to sea from the Bremerton area.  The Russian trawler followed it.  A Canadian Naval helicopter, with a Canadian officer and a US Naval officer on board, moved close to observe the Russian ship. 

 

The Russians fired a laser beam at the chopper which blinded the two observing officers (as briefly mentioned in a former chapter).  If the pilot had been watching, he would have also been blinded and the chopper would have crashed. 

 

Immediately, Naval authorities issued an order to detain the Russian ship and determine what it was doing in US waters.  In Washington, Clinton learned of the problem and countermanded the detention order.  The ship was allowed to go to sea without US interference.  The Clinton Administration said nothing publicly about the incident. 

 

Truly, Bill Clinton’s whole focus has been upon helping and assisting the Chinese and the Russians.  About the only Communists that he has not been chums with is Fidel Castro and the Cubans (who are still on the list of US enemies).  But this attitude soon changed as Clinton tried to cozy up to Cuba over Elian Gonzalez. 

 

 

Bill Visited the Communists 

 

Certainly, it is interesting and perhaps extremely relevant that during the Vietnam conflict and while Bill Clinton was “studying” at Oxford in England, Clinton took a month long trip behind the Iron Curtain to visit Russia and one other Warsaw pact country.  Why did he go? 

 

Well, Clinton doesn’t speak Russian and he had no background in Russian history, geography or the people.  So a month long trip to the Eastern Communists back in those days was a most questionable event and particularly so since he had no authority for the trip from the US State Department. 

 

There are also questions on why the USSR allowed him in.  Normally, Westerners could not readily go to the Soviet Union and travel in that country without special clearance and authorization.  Did the authorities in the Kremlin know things about Bill Clinton which were not known and understood by American authorities then or the later American people? 

 

Beyond Clinton’s contacts with the Soviets in the old cold war days, it has to be significant that in November 2000 (during the US elections), Slick made a state visit to Communist Vietnam. 

 

Slick spend several days in Hanoi and Ho Chi Min city (to pay homage to Ho Chi Min, who defeated the US in the Vietnam war).  While Clinton tried to claim that he was promoting trade, the question must remain about his love for the Communists. 

 

On April 5, 2001 (while the Chinese Communist government was holding 24 American prisoners on Hainan Island for spying), former President Slick Clinton traveled to Hong Kong to show his solidarity and appreciation for the Chinese people.  Reportedly, Slick picked up $200,000 for the trip.  So it was successful from his point of view. 

 

 

CIA Assets? 

 

Over the years, the “Spotlight” newspaper has run some stories suggesting that in the Vietnam war days, both Bill and Hillary Clinton were CIA assets.  In this context, Bill was supposedly on a secret CIA spying mission when he visited the USSR.  But if so, would the Soviets be so stupid to allow him in or did they permit him to come in because he had a reputation as a US draft dodger? 

 

Perhaps the better option on this theme is that both Bill and Hillary Clinton will be or rather will pretend to be whatever is beneficial at a given moment in time to further their own ambitions and desires.  In that vein, they could pretend to be Communists, Capitalists or secret CIA agents if they stood to gain something personally in the deal.  Like genetic Amalekites, neither of them have any morals or scruples on anything. 

 

So rather than serving the Communists or the CIA, the better option is that Bill and Hillary have been doing things to benefit and serve their own interests.  Probably, the CIA, US and Communists have all been losers in dealing with the Clintons.  For sure, both Bill and Hillary would gladly double cross whomever and whatever is necessary to further their own selfish goals of power and rule. 

 

Both the CIA and Communists may have thought they were benefiting someway from the actions of Bill Clinton.  One or both parties may have been suspicious that he was a double agent.  However, even that definition leaves something to be desired.  The truth is clear enough that Slick really was never interested in serving anyone or anything--but himself. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

The essence of these comments is that there are major questions about the political ideology and thinking of President Bill “Slick” Clinton.  For sure, he is not an American nationalist or populist. 

 

The last things on his mind are the future of the US or the American people.  Logically, the most important thing dominating his thoughts is himself.  He is a very selfish and ambitious man. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix K--More Views on Clinton

 

 

David P. Schipper’s Summary on Bill 

 

The Oct 20, 2000, “Staff & Sword”  (p. 11) quoted author David P. Schipper’s assessment of Bill Clinton.  He says-- “This is the man of whom it is rightly stated, out of overwhelming evidence, was involved in a conspiracy to obstruct justice, lie, suborn perjury, tamper with witnesses, bribe, threaten, falsify documents, and abuse the power of the Presidency to deny Paula Jones her constitutional right to her day in court. 

 

“A man who committed a known brutal assault (rape) of a woman, who sexually assaulted a married woman in the Oval Office (Kathleen Willey), who has a history of sexual harassment of women in general, a man who openly violated the Federal Privacy Act, a man who gave false testimony to a Federal Investigative Committee of the Congress, a man who lied under oath in a civil deposition and lied under oath in a criminal grand jury,

 

“who lied to the American people, who lied to his cabinet, who lied to his top aides and who lied under oath to the Congress of the United States, a man who added obstruction of an inquiry and an investigation before the Legislative Branch to his obstructions of justice before the Judicial Branch of our constitutional system of government. 

 

“A man who is sworn to uphold the Office of President as the chief law enforcement officer in the U.S. did anything necessary to stay in office, even if it meant destroying the legal un(der) pinnings of our political system (and this Great Republic)... 

 

“Can you imagine dealing with such a person in any important matter?  You would never know his secret mental reservations or the unspoken redefinition of words.  Even if you thought you had solved the enigma, it wouldn’t matter--he would just change the meaning to suit his purposes.” 

 

 

Internet Vortex’s Summary on Bill 

 

These words were first written in the late summer of 2000.  The Arkansas lawyer-discipline committee had just filed suit in court to disbar lawyer Bill Clinton from practicing law in the state of Arkansas.  This committee had almost a 100% track record of successes in seeking disbarment of lawyers for bad conduct. 

 

So the future didn’t look good for Slick at that time (but Slick ultimately beat this rap, just like he did with all of the others). 

 

This background prompted the Aug 2000 “Internet Vortex” (p. 2) to produce an article on Clinton which reported on all of his “firsts” over the years.  For example, he was the first elected president in history to be impeached (Andrew Johnson, in the 1860s, was not an elected president). 

 

Bill was the first president to be found guilty of a criminal act while in office (for leaking the private correspondence of Kathleen Willey, in violation of the Privacy Act).  He was the first one to be accused of forcible rape and the first to approve the sale and transfer of sophisticated weapons technology to a hostile power (while receiving campaign contributions from them). 

 

He was the first president to be accused by a host of witnesses of using cocaine and the first to be accused of sexual assault while on White House property.  He was the first to order a paramilitary assault on a television camera crew to keep them from broadcasting live video coverage (the crew was kicked and forced at gunpoint to the ground to keep them from broadcasting). 

 

Clinton was the first president to be sued in a sexual harassment lawsuit and the first to be held in contempt of court (for lying under oath).  He was the first to be named in a federal criminal referral as a possible witness to and beneficiary of fraudulent financial activity (in Whitewater). 

 

And he was the first to hold telephone consultations with members of the US Congress about the deployment of troops into battle while he simultaneously was getting an oral sex, sodomy job from Monica Lewinsky. 

 

He was also the first president to launch an unprovoked missile attack of war upon two sovereign, independent nations which he didn’t like (Afghanistan and Sudan). 

 

Finally, He was the first president to have a whole string of witnesses, colleagues and acquaintances (who knew him and knew of his activities) die under mysterious circumstances (as outlined herein in a former chapter). 

 

 

“Spotlight” on Bill 

 

The Dec 18, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 2) offered these remarks on Clinton’s legacy:  “President Clinton keeps grasping for a ‘legacy’ in the twilight of his administration.  But he already has a legacy:  the only president ever impeached strictly on grounds of personal malfeasance, most number of cabinet officials under criminal investigation and the most number of convictions and guilty pleas. 

 

“Forty-seven individuals and businesses connected to the Clintons have been convicted of crimes, including drug trafficking, extortion, kickbacks, money laundering and perjury. 

 

“Sixty-one individuals have faced indictments and misdemeanor charges.  Fourteen people are currently serving prison sentences as a result of their convictions.  And 122 witnesses have pled the 5th amendment, fled the country or refused to be interviewed by investigators.” 

 

 

Lee Bellinger’s Assessment 

 

The Jun 2001 “American Sentinel” (p. 1) offered editor Lee Bellinger’s assessment on Bill Clinton on a comment upon the change in the White House in 2001.  Bellinger said that Bush’s low-key, common-sense approach to governing is a refreshing departure from the nauseating antics of the corrupt, sociopath who occupied the White House for eight long years. 

 

 

“Prophecy Flash” and Slick 

 

The May-Jun 2000 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 85) had a reader’s letter from Las Vegas, NV which addressed Bill Clinton by saying that “This president is the most evil-inclined president we have ever had.  Can you imagine the number and magnitude of deals that cross his desk every day, that if one would have a dishonest inclination, one could do enormous harm. 

 

“Yet our bubble-headed citizens say that character doesn’t matter.  From an investment analyst point of view, management of a company is more important than numbers.  Numbers can change, but a dishonest or inept management can kill a company (case in point:  When Xerox became led by a bunch of lawyers instead of entrepreneurs). 

 

“If bad or dishonest management can kill a company, imagine the same effect on the biggest ‘company’ of all:  the United States of America?...” 

 

 

Joe Klein’s View 

 

Even political journalist Joe Klein, a leftist/liberal on his own right and really a very pro-Clinton person, described Bill Clinton’s personal behavior at times as “outrageous and pathetic” (Mar 15, 2002, “The Week,” p. 23). 

 

 

Judicial Watch 

 

A May 2002 letter from Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch (p. 3) said:  “The fact that Bill Clinton has never been charged with any crime is an outrage. 

 

“Bill Clinton has left the White House--but he is still in charge of the Democratic Party.  His Attorney General, Janet Reno, is running for Governor of Florida.  Four other Clinton Administration cabinet secretaries are running for governor of their states.  And clearly, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is preparing to run for President...possibly with her disgraced husband as her vice presidential running mate!” 

 

As a follow-up on the success of the Clinton team in the 2002 elections, it appears that most or all five of them cited by Judicial Watch were defeated.  This writer was unable to learn of the status of all of them, but those that could be verified were defeated.  Importantly, Janet “Butch” Reno was wiped out in the Florida primary. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix L--The 666 Clintons

 

 

The Clinton WWIII Option 

 

Previous comments in this presentation have outlined the very obvious Clinton planning and maneuvering to stay in power--ideally, as the US president.  Clinton has subtly mentioned a number of times to a number of different people that he wished he could run a third time.  He has repeatedly said that his agenda for the US is incomplete and that he will need more time to see it to its fruition. 

 

Despite his wishes to be the dictator of first the US and later the UN, the cards were stacked against him in late 2000--evidently, when the ruling Amalekites decided that Bush should take over (so that Bush, the Republicans, the Rockefellers and the Christian right can be blamed for the coming economic collapse.  This can then bring on a new constitution and the New World Order--under Clinton or whomever). 

 

Not only did Clinton have his eyes set upon being America’s first dictator and president for life, but he has even had more extraordinary ambitions for dictatorship, as will be assessed shortly in later comments herein at the UN.  In any case, Big Brother (Clinton or whomever) will lie the US into a WWIII. 

 

As outlined in a former chapter, Clinton has been plotting and planning WWIII ever since the summer of 1998, per Ralph Forbes, a Clinton friend since 1974 (Aug-Sep 1999 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 42).  As described earlier, Slick has evidently had this thinking in mind in his numerous attacks against various foreign nations around the world (perhaps the same thing can be said for GWB). 

 

These Clinton launched US military assaults against people around the world (like the Iraqis, the Serbs, etc) are interesting for another reason.  A document in the Dead Sea Scrolls, possibly commenting upon Numbers 14:40-45, concluded that one should not start a war unless The ELOHIM is with him (“The Dead Sea Scrolls, A New Translation,” p. 404). 

 

 

The Coming Disaster 

 

Slick and the American people should have followed this advice!  At some point in time, one of these Big Brother initiated aggressions (by Clinton, Colin Powell, Condi Rice, George W. Bush or whomever) against foreign powers will spell an absolute disaster for the United States. 

 

The Jul-Aug 2000 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 33) quoted writer Richard Mayberry who said:  “All eyes are focused upon Clinton’s latest sex scandals and the stock market.  When will Slick Willy leave office?  When will the stock bubble burst?  Far more important is the question:  when will we be hit by a surprise attack from a secret coalition of the enemies Clinton has created?” 

 

Previous chapters and comments have assessed one of the catalysts bringing on this collapse and destruction of especially the United States.  It is the flooding of US dollar bills worldwide as give-aways on behalf of the plutocrats and to purchase foreign consumer goods (since Americans produce little or nothing to support their present levels of consumption).  This writer has held this belief for years. 

 

While it is true that America’s decades old conflict with China and Russia, the US aggression in the Balkans and the Middle East, the outright support of Israel, meddling in the internal affairs of foreign states, support of foreign dictators and on and on will all contribute to this coming war and destruction, this writer has held onto the money issue as perhaps being the single, most important one. 

 

 

Other Options 

 

While a WWIII would be Big Brother’s most plausible scenario for the declaration of martial law and the establishment of the president as a US dictator (Clinton, Bush, Rice, Powell or whomever), there are a host of other possibilities also on the immediate horizon.  Many of these have been assessed in prior chapters (i.e. a financial meltdown, economic problems, terrorist attacks, etc). 

 

Even now, Big Brother has plans in place for a dictatorial take-over for all kinds of reasons (as discussed in previous chapters).  The government early on moved full force in preparation for a dictatorship in 2000 over Y2K, if nothing else would have happened to precipitate the event (Y2K did largely fizzle out; thus, opening the door for something else later by Yechezkel’s 31st or 32d year). 

 

In the future, Americans need to be alert because if anything happens to allow Big Brother to declare martial law, he will do so for any number of reasons.  In terms of Clinton (if he regains power), he will declare marital law for his own self perpetuation purposes. 

 

With acquittal in the Senate, Slick was ruthless after his impeachment and will be even more ambitious if he can successfully get back into power.  His enemies had better watch out and particularly during the days following his return (if he does return, either in the US or at the UN). 

 

In issue 21 of the “AIPL Communiqué,” Dr Rod Lewis had an article on “Mumbo Jumbo” (p. 10), which quoted MI 6 of the British Intelligence Service.  Some years ago, they profiled Clinton as a dangerous personality, who if cornered, would likely take down the whole country, rather than face his personal demise alone. 

 

Assuredly, Clinton is far more dangerous than the Amalekites Adolf Schicklgruber and Franklin Roosevelt (and their evil and deceptions, discussed earlier).  Clinton has no plans to leave the halls of power.  He is making plans and preparations right now for resuming power over the American people, via the US or the UN.  He will pull out all the stops to insure his continued exercise of that power in the future.   

 

 

Is Clinton 666? 

 

If and when Clinton launches his massive, brutal attack upon politically incorrect persons (from the US or the UN), outlined above and earlier, some thinking people will perhaps sit up and take notice of some interesting facts about this man.  The basis for the next several comments is some research done by William F. Dankenbring for two articles in the Jan-Feb 1999 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 3-21). 

 

Dankenbring tried to obtain some definite information on Clinton’s genealogy for his Clinton articles.  But for some strange reason, Slick’s genealogy records are much like his medical and draft records.  All of them are sealed and hid from public scrutiny. 

 

However, Dankenbring did find some data that is most fascinating--particularly, in view of some previous comments herein raising the question that Clinton must have some Amalekite blood in his mongrel genes, since he is so totally depraved.  Dankenbring’s work, quoting various authorities, seems to confirm this suspicion. 

 

While Clinton’s line “may” connect in some way to some blue-bloods and people like William Henry Harrison and Benjamin Harrison, the most significant thing about Slick appears to be that he is a relative of the Rothschild banking family--just as Hillary Rodham has links to the Rothschild’s banking empire in Germany. 

 

Hillary has suggested that she has Jewish ancestors in her forays into New York state, seeking support for her Senate campaign (Oct 1999 “Internet Vortex.” p. 20).  Hillary’s Jewish links are true, per Christian leader Texe Marrs, who says that Hillary’s Rodham name was originally Rosenberg, before a name change.  Also, Bill Clinton is known to call her a dirty Jew when he gets mad, as will be shortly discussed. 

 

So while Hillary tries to make a Jewish connection to Bill (when she likewise calls him a dirty Jew, as will be described in comments to follow), the probability is great that she (like Slick) also does indeed have Amalekite genes since she is so incredibly wicked. 

 

An interesting feature of Dankenbring’s work was his illustration of the names of William Jefferson Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton in Hebrew numerics.  Both names add to 666 in Hebrew (Jul-Aug 2000 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 57-58). 

 

This 666 linkage for Bill Clinton has to be very intriguing--especially, in view of his Voodoo and black magic ties (as outlined in a prior chapter).  “Prophecy Flash” (in both its Jan-Feb 1999 and Jul-Aug 2000 issues) proceeded with a question asking if Clinton will indeed be the predicted Beast man or the “Antichrist?”  The conclusion was that time will tell! 

 

 

The Clinton-Rothschild Ties 

 

The Clinton articles in the “Prophecy Flash” suggest that Clinton, along with Mayer Amschel Rothschild, were both descended from an earlier 13th century “Rabbi Meir” (also spelled Meyer or Mayer) of Rothenberg, Germany. 

 

If this connection has merit, it could go a long way in explaining why the Amalekite Jew bankers-masters chose to leave him in the White House after the Lewinsky scandal exploded, as described previously. 

 

It may also disclose the wisdom of Hillary Clinton when she gets mad and starts cussing Bill out for some of his depraved escapades.  Just as he commonly calls her dirty Jew names (as noted above), she responds in the same fashion with him (as also noted above). 

 

Hillary’s favorite epithets for Bill are that he is a “Jew b-st-rd” and/or a “Jew mother f-ck-r” (Aug 2000 “Internet Vortex,” p. 1).  Maybe, Hillary knows things about Bill not commonly known by the public. 

 

In the same, just cited, Jul-Aug 2000 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 52), editor William Dankenbring quotes J. R. Church, who had information from a descendant of the Rothschilds that Bill Clinton was a Rothschild relative and did attend some of the family functions as a boy (while wearing a Jewish skullcap). 

 

Certainly, Clinton has worshipped with Jews in synagogues on more than one occasion.  He has demonstrated his pro-Amalekite stance for many years and could very well be part Jewish (interestingly, the same thing seems true for rock n’ roll king Elvis Presley, whose maternal great-great grandmother, Nancy Burdine Tackett, was Jewish, April 19, 2002, “Forward,” p. 12). 

 

 

The Royal Boy Chosen 

 

Church claims that at the Rothschild get-togethers, the “rabbis” present would kiss Bill Clinton’s hand and call him the “Segulah Yeled Eklatosh” (which reportedly means “the royal-boy-chosen”). 

 

According to the Rothschild family, old Mayer Amschel Rothschild had a heavenly visitor in 1773 (which was just about the time that Mayer was working with Adam Weishaupt on organizing the Illuminati) who informed him that the NT YESHUA was not The MESSIAH and that his own family would produce The MESSIAH in the last half of the 20th century. 

 

Apparently, some of the Rothschild insiders have looked upon the modern Bill “Slick” Clinton, as this anticipated “Segulah Yeled Eklatosh.”  Maybe, this is the reason that they seem to have sided with him for his eight years in the presidency.  Too, this could be part of the reason why the Amalekites allowed George W. Bush to win the 2000 elections--so that Bush can be blamed for the coming collapse (instead of Clinton). 

 

Maybe, in their due time, the Amalekite bankers/masters intend on bringing Bill Clinton back into power (as the royal boy chosen)--either in America or at the UN.  For sure, Slick still has a future and his role in history is not over in 2003.  Manifestly, Bill Clinton absolutely shows evidence of Amalekite ancestry, based simply on his deeds of evil.  Yes, Slick Clinton must be an Amalekite (and the same thing applies to Hillary). 

 

 

More on the Edomite Tie 

 

While it would be easy to laugh at this whole report, a prudent man should back off and be careful.  It is not as far fetched as it seems on the surface.  There are some more peculiarities about Bill which do indeed suggest that he has Amalekite Jewish ancestry. 

 

Slick seems to be very passionate about liberal, left wing, red causes--as is genetically true with the typical Amalekite.   Like the Amalekites, Bill has consistently supported Edomites and Edomite causes around the world.  Specifically, he has joined in to place hate on one of the most important enemies of the Amalekites of all--namely, Saddam Hussein of Iraq. 

 

Next, Clinton sided with Edomite gangsters to bring Yugoslavia and President Milosevic down.  As outlined elsewhere herein, Edomites around the world hated and opposed the Serbs.  The Irishman G. Gordon Liddy illustrates the extremely irrational hatred that Edomites have had for the Serbs in the Balkans’ war.  Clearly, Slick pursued and pushed this conflict to appeal to the Edomites. 

 

There is still one more illustration of Clinton’s Edomite propensities.  Three times he went to Britain/Ireland to “allegedly” try to bring peace to the Catholic-Protestant confrontation in Northern Ireland (the last time was on Dec 11, 2000).  While many gullible Americans have supposed that Bill was impartial in this conflict, the truth is that he was not. 

 

Clinton used the power and influence of his office to regularly and routinely support the Irish (Edomite) revolutionaries and not the WASPs in Northern Ireland or in Britain.  For a man who was supposed to be a White, Anglo-Saxon Protestant (of the Southern Baptist Church), this was most unusual.  Why should he have regularly and routinely sided with the very people who were doing their level best to destroy his own kind? 

 

The Protestants in Northern Ireland do not like Clinton because they believe that he is their enemy and that he used the powers of the US presidency to support the Irish Revolutionary Army (the IRA). 

 

There is only one plausible answer here.  Bill Clinton is a genetic Amalekite cousin of the Irish Catholic Edomites trying to destroy the WASPs in Northern Ireland.  He has been as committed to the IRA and the destruction of the White Protestant Union people in Northern Ireland--as much as any other Edomite in power and influence in the US. 

 

 

Clinton-Nero Similarities 

 

The above cited Dankenbring articles go on to suggest that this just mentioned “Rabbi Meir family” descended from the sexual pervert Nero, discussed in prior comments herein.  Nero was not only a 666, but he surely was one of the most evil men in recorded history.  According to Talmudic tradition, Nero was a proselyte to Judaism at one time (Git. 56a, quoted in the Jul-Aug 2000 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 53). 

 

A reader’s letter from a man named Thompson in Texas, in the November 8-14, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 39), pointed out some more aspects of the strange correlation between Clinton and Nero--viz: 

 

Both made history because of women.  Nero caused his own mother to be murdered to please his mistress.  In order to marry the mistress, he divorced his first wife and had her put to death.  He kicked his second wife so badly that she died of injuries.  He wanted to marry a third woman, but she refused.  So he had her put to death.  He married a fourth woman after murdering her husband. 

 

The decadent people of Rome knew and understood the facts about Nero.  Yet, they loved the scoundrel--just as the same situation prevails with Clinton.  The decadent people of America know and understand his wickedness.  But they love him for it. 

 

When two-thirds of Rome was burning in flames (evidently, from fires that Nero had set), he watched and recited poetry.  When he was accused of the fires, he turned the blame around and allegedly placed it upon the Christians and began a state persecution of them.  He neglected the military.  So they turned against him and he had to flee Rome. 

 

What the letter did not mention was the serious charges of Nero’s sexual perversion (he was reportedly a homosexual or correctly a bisexual and even Clinton is a known sodomite).  Clinton has had much in common with Nero.  Both have been wicked beyond description and both have had some brains (as illustrated earlier for Nero in how he handled Simon Magus). 

 

In any case, it might be that Nero’s horrible and terrible persecution and oppression of the early Christian followers of Simon Magus may have been a type or demonstration of what Clinton will now do with the politically incorrect people in America (if he regains power in the US or at the UN). 

 

While the Dankenbring articles in question never focused on Nero’s genealogy, one must pause and wonder if he too could have been a secret Amalekite?  This is very plausible. 

 

 

Another Clinton Possibility 

 

To set the stage on what all has been happening with Bill Clinton, as discussed above and in former chapters, it would be well to note a few more strange things about his background, as brought out in some editorial comments to a reader’s letter in the Jun-Jul 1998 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 94). 

 

This issue of the “Prophecy Flash” magazine had some articles on the actions of angels or messengers to leave their estate and come to earth to copulate with the daughters of Adam, resulting in the production of “nephilim” or demon seed, as editor William Dankenbring characterized it. 

 

This angelic history was put into the perspective of possible similar, end time miscegenation, involving angels and human women in the context of UFO abductions and reported sexual encounters.  The question was asked if Satan would make one final stab at reproducing seed in his own spiritual likeness and image. 

 

Editor Dankenbring noted that it is interesting in this light that one current world leader was apparently born out of wedlock, took the name of a later step father, and there appears to be some confusion or disagreement as to who his real father might have been; although his mother was a well known party girl who enjoyed a good time and probably had many lovers. 

 

Evidently, Dankenbring was writing in a light mood.  But his words certainly were very well chosen and most appropriate--at least, in application to the then President of the US--Slick Willy Clinton.  Certainly, among world leaders today, Slick stands out as being the most evil and Satanic of all. 

 

Though it is logical to discount Dankenbring’s hypothesis on the demon seed theory, the point he makes is very pungent and pregnant with enormous possibilities in the context of the evil and depraved Clinton.  Thus, he may not directly be the seed of a fallen angel.  But his background is such that one must wonder where his paternal genes really came from. 

 

 

Who Knows? 

 

Since his mother is now deceased, no one probably alive today can state with any certainty about who his genetic father might have been.  In this sense, the possibilities of him having strong Amalekite ancestry gains considerable credibility.  He certainly is as evil and wretched as any Amalekite alive today. 

 

One more interesting Clinton link to the Amalekites surfaces because of his propensity for name changes (just as the Amalekites change their names with regularity).  Early in life, Bill abandoned his birth name and chose the name of his step father (Clinton).  As he matured, he realized that his then name of William Jefferson Davis Clinton would be a political handicap; so he dropped the Davis. 

 

 

A Revisit to the Prologue 

 

The Prologue mentioned a number of supposed Christians who are actually Amalekites.  People like the Roosevelts and Bill and Hillary Clinton were cited.  From commentary presented heretofore, it is plain enough that the persons defined as Amalekites all have Amalekite Jewish ancestry.  Yes, the Roosevelts and Clintons are all Jews and more particularly Amalekite Jews. 

 

 

Clinton and the Nazis 

 

Another view of Clinton also came out in a news report in the same Jan-Feb 1999 “Prophecy Flash” magazine (p. 33).  This one compared Clinton with Adolf Hitler (correctly the Amalekite Schicklgruber).  It noted that one of the first things the Nazis did in 1934 was to spout the line that Adolf, as the Fuhrer, was above criticism. 

 

Therefore, the US military was programmed to display loyalty to Clinton personally, so much so, that all criticism about him was being formally squashed.  Manifestly, if and when Slick resumes power and declares martial law (in the first US dictatorship), it will become illegal to criticize Clinton.  Publications, like this study, will become illegal at once and will have to go underground to survive. 

 

With an army of federal agents and spies busy monitoring all conversations and the very thoughts of people (the thought police), this will not be hard to enforce.  Many will go to prison and be persecuted for being anti-Clinton.  While Clinton will be clearly one of the most hated people in America (in time, if he regains power), few Americans will be bold enough to make their feelings known, under penalty of federal arrest. 

 

The next Nazi effort was to limit private gun ownership.  Slick followed the exact same Nazi MO during his eight years in authority in the US.  On Mar 18, 1938, the Nazis enacted a “Law on Weapons” which made it illegal for Germans to own guns--except for government officials (Jan 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 8). 

 

Clinton, his cronies and his Big Brother colleagues have been trying to establish the same gun control laws in the US for years now. 

 

The excuse the Nazis used is the same one Big Brother has been using today.  As the story goes, gun control laws are necessary to curb gang activity and to preserve democracy.  Big Brother is pulling out all of the stops to take the guns away from the people.  At some point in time, he will succeed to pave the way for a Big Brother dictatorship. 

 

 

The Clintons--Anti-Jews? 

 

Although the writer of this present study does not believe at all that Clinton will be the ultimate Beast man, Dankenbring’s work deserves merit and particularly so since both Bill and Hillary refer to each other using dirty Jew names when they get mad, as discussed in previous comments (Oct 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 20).  Hillary’s Jewish connections have been discussed above. 

 

But there is something else which should shock the American Jewish community.  Both Bill and Hillary like to tell Jew jokes, besides calling each other dirty Jew names.  Dick Morris, a Jew and likely Amalekite, said that Hillary has told “anti-Semite” jokes in his presence.  Once, she accused him of being obsessed with money because he was a Jew (Dec 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 6). 

 

Bill Clinton is known to be both a student and an admirer of Adolf Hitler--correctly Schicklgruber, as discussed above (Oct 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 20).  This Clinton fascination with Schicklgruber should scare the daylights out of the Jews, but evidently not so far (after all, Amalekite Jews have been too busy stealing the US Treasury).

 

 

A Double Cross? 

 

If Bill is part Jewish (or correctly Amalekite, which has to be correct), he may eventually try to copy what Adolf did in attacking and accusing the Jews/Israel (as noted earlier, in the context of Isaiah 7:3-8). 

 

When the US financial house of cards completely collapses, as it will very soon, and if Slick gets back into power, he could do what Adolf did and in time try to accuse the Jews (and especially, if the troubles continue after he finishes blaming and persecuting the right wing and politically incorrect people). 

 

If he should turn against the Jews (when he needs another scapegoat for the coming economic troubles), it would set the stage for them to try to later take him out.  Thus, it might be that the Amalekites are snug and comfortable with him for now.  But when the troubles continue or increase, he will look for more people to accuse.  And the Jews (or Israel) could well fit his needs.  Again, he is a classic double crosser! 

 

This Jewish link is something to think about and particularly so if Clinton resumes power and does launch his hateful and diabolically wicked assault upon the right wing and politically incorrect people (to include some part of the ultimate Philadelphia definition).  Religious persons may suppose that he is the 666 to come, as this persecution and punishment unfolds. 

 

For sure, Clinton has had no plans to permanently vacate US power in 2001, as many Americans now suppose. 

 

True, he did seem to voluntarily step down from the presidency to allow George W. Bush in, but there has to be an untold story behind this event (like that he was ordered to step down by the Amalekite bankers/masters because they intend to blame Bush, the Republicans, the Rockefellers and the Christian right for the coming collapse--which they may purposely cause in order to usher in a new constitution and the New World Order). 

 

 

Something More Profound  

 

Finally, in the context of 666, Clinton appears to have ideas right now on becoming the world’s first global governor, dictator or leader.  This is an ambitious scheme.  But he is an ambitious man.  It is likely that this thinking has been in his mind for some time and that it has been one primary motivational reason for his strong support for internationalism and the demise of the United States. 

 

Manifestly, Clinton is jockeying himself into position to become the UN Secretary General or ideally, the world’s first governor (dictator) if things break just right for him (and especially, if for some reason he does not return to the US presidency with a new constitution). 

 

Quoting the Nov 4, 2002, “New American,” the Jan-Feb 2003 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 28) noted that Bill Clinton advertised himself as being a “citizen of the world” in a speech at the British Labor Party’s annual conference in Blackpool, England on Oct 3, 2002.  At this meeting, he repeatedly called for an “integrated global community” which would result if all nations would join together to make the UN more meaningful. 

 

The article said that “Perhaps Bill Clinton is campaigning to become president of the world, maybe secretary-general of a beefed up UN.  If so, he should deliver his October 3rd speech worldwide.  Its ‘America Last’ theme would win him friends among the many who both despise national independence and hate the United States.” 

 

 

The International Court 

 

A previous chapter herein mentioned the new International Criminal Court UN treaty which Bill Clinton signed on Dec 31, 2001.  As pointed out, whether Congress approves this treaty or not, it has become effective in America on July 1, 2002, because of its provisions and other actions taken by Clinton while he was in power. 

 

A discussion by William F. Dankenbring about this treaty in the May-Jun 2001 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 50) mentioned some of the specifics going on behind the scenes.  This new treaty provides that the Assembly of States Parties will elect 18 judges, who will serve for nine years each. 

 

The presidency of the court will be composed of three judges, who will exercise administrative power over the court.  This presidency will consist of a first president and two inaugural vice presidents.  The G-7 economic bloc of nations has plans to nominate Mikhail Gorbachev as president and Margaret Thatcher and Bill Clinton as the two vice presidents. 

 

If Slick should successfully maneuver himself into a leadership position on this court, it may temporarily defuse or delay current efforts to try him as an international criminal (as allowed in preceding remarks herein).  But at some point in time, “Clinton’s luck” will definitely run out and he will meet YHWH’s justice. 

 

 

Future UN Leaders 

 

And of perhaps even more significance, Kofi Annan’s term was up in 2001, as UN Secretary General.  He was re-elected for another five years (per an NPR news report on Jun 29, 2001).  There has been some question about whether he would succeed himself and how long he will stay on.  He could die, quit or be forced out very easily.   

 

Such an option on the horizon opens the door for the selection of Bill “Slick” Clinton as the UN Secretary General.  Certainly, Slick has been going all over the world for the past five years in trying to drum up support for this eventuality. 

 

A reader’s letter (from Arnold Flick of San Diego, CA) in the Jun 29, 2001, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 9) suggested that Clinton has been condemning Israeli Prime Minister Sharon for the Palestinian Intifada (when Sharon went on the Temple Mount in 2000, as discussed in a prior chapter).  Flick perceived that Bill is maneuvering to succeed Kofi Annan at the UN.  For this move, Clinton will need the support of the Arab states. 

 

Mr Flick perceptively zeroed in on the Clinton mentality when he said that “Clinton’s pattern of behavior, for essentially his entire life since adolescence, is to plan early and set the stage well in advance for this next move; twisting the truth as needed has been part of this.”  Manifestly, Flick understands Slick Clinton. 

 

By the way, the Mar-Apr 2003 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 28) had a news item which said that Kofi Annan is under pressure to resign his post at the UN before his term is up in 2006.  There is growing support (or a “fix”) that Bill Clinton will succeed him.  Reportedly, Slick has already lined up support from several states in Europe, Africa and South America.  Even the Russians, Chinese and Indians would accept him. 

 

 

Hillary Clinton’s Plans 

 

Just like Bill has had ambitions for a higher office, Hillary, likewise, is a very ambitious woman who has her sights now set upon being the US president (or maybe, the first lady of the world--if she cannot obtain the US presidency). 

 

She has suggested or implied this thinking on at least one or more times in her life (per a discussion on the Rush Limbaugh program of Dec 7, 1999).  All of the talk about her wanting to be a US Senator from New York is just talk.  She won, but her sights are much higher.  Hillary definitely wants to be president (or at least, vice-president). 

 

“The Week” (p. 16), of Oct 18, 2002, had a news item on the Clintons.  This story quoted Maureen Dowd from the “New York Times” with a story that Hillary is already making preparations to run--presumably, in 2008 (although this writer would just wonder if Hillary would willingly wait that long).  Hillary has started toning her speeches down and away from controversial statements that might hurt her run. 

 

The Oct 15, 2002, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A3) had the results of a fascinating Marist Institute poll which reported that 69% of Americans believe Hillary should not run for president while some 26% suggest that she should run some day.  In March 2001, an earlier similar poll found some 30% saying that she should run.  So her favorable numbers were down--for whatever that condition meant at that time. 

 

 

Time/CNN Poll 

 

A December 2002 poll of public approval or support of registered Democrats for the various potential Democrat candidates for president in 2004 was most revealing (as reported in the Dec 30, 2002, “Time,” p. 24). 

 

The percentage of each candidate was as follows:  John Kerry--13%, Joseph Lieberman--13%, Dick Gephardt--9%, Tom Daschle--7%, John Edwards--4%, Wesley Clark--3% and Howard Dean--2%.  The most interesting thing about this poll is all of the above cited names have been people who have announced their candidacy for president or have made it clear that they would be running in 2004. 

 

But it was absolutely fascinating that Hillary Clinton (who supposedly is not running) came in with 30% of the registered Democrats saying that they were for her to run now.  This finding was in a sharp conflict with the above cited, earlier, Marist Institute poll which suggested that she should wait. 

 

It is unclear how much of a sample the Time/CNN poll had.  But it must be a shock or surprise to the various candidates that non-candidate Hillary outscored all of them in Democrat support. 

 

Manifestly, the evidence is falling into place that Hillary will be running in 2004--perhaps as a write-in candidate in the primaries or maybe not even formally in the primaries, but at the Democrat national convention as a presidential or vice-presidential candidate. 

 

Take, for example, some uncertainty at a Democrat national convention in 2004 (over the president or vice-president--is it possible that Hillary could emerge victorious without ever having to run in the primaries?  For certain, Slick will be running her campaign from behind the scenes (in order for him to regain power).  The Hillary Clinton autobiography in 2003 was surely a Clinton maneuver for her to gain power. 

 

With the Clintons pulling strings from behind the scenes, they may purposely set up a very divided Democrat convention with a view that Hillary could emerge as a winner without having to run.  This would pull the strings out from under all of her opponents--including any Amalekites who may have reservations about Hillary.  If Hillary does not make it in 2004, she definitely has plans to run in 2008. 

 

 

Yes, Hillary is Popular 

 

Almost paralleling the above Time/CNN poll, a Gallop poll came out in late December 2002 (as reported in the Dec 29, 2002, Spokane “Spokesman-Review”).  This poll was an attempt to find the most popular man and most popular woman in America. 

 

In terms of the men, President George W. Bush was number one.  Other most popular males included Secretary of State Colin Powell, Pope John Paul II, “the reverend” Billy Graham; and of all people, former president Bill “Slick” Clinton. 

 

However, the big shock came on the women.  US Senator Hillary Clinton from New York came in number one (with seven percent of the vote).  Number two was a tie between first lady Laura Bush and Ophra Winfrey at six percent.  Other popular women were the Puerto Rican entertainment and sex symbol Jennifer Lopez, NC Senator Elizabeth Dole and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. 

 

Yes, the evidence is falling into place that Bill and Hillary Clinton are both still much beloved in America. 

 

This means that a vast number of Americans continue to approve of lying, cheating, and sodomy; and either being stupid or just outrightly slandering the conservative right wing (as Hillary did in her talk show and morning TV show appearances to attack the right-wing as liars and conspirators in exposing Bill’s sodomite encounters in the US White House). 

 

The bottom line here is that Hillary will soon be running for president (or perhaps vice-president)--possibly in 2004, perhaps as a write-in candidate or otherwise at the Democrat national convention level if a divided convention surfaces.  If she gets the nod, she will undoubtedly scrap all plans on completing her New York Senate tour. 

 

 

Why Bill Sold the US Out 

 

For the prospects of being the world’s leader, Bill Clinton totally sold the US out.  This is why the New World Order, outlined by George H. W. Bush years ago, is now fast becoming a reality.  Clinton has been ready and eager for the New World Order.  He pushed globalism and world government with a vengeance--obviously, for his own purposes, since he is totally selfish in all of his undertakings. 

 

By constantly pushing and advocating the globalist program (being endorsed and pushed by the plutocrats), Bill Clinton surely figured that the fall-out for him would be beneficial in his later plans to move on the UN.  Consequently, the national interests of the US were never of any concern to him. 

 

In the vein of Revelation 13:3 and 13:12, discussed in a prior chapter, Clinton also seems to have the marks necessary to be the Beast man who is wounded to death and then is restored in the context of his 390 days wounding when his sodomite encounters with the likely Amalekite girl Monica Lewinsky became public.  Many persons thought that this scandal doomed Clinton. 

 

 

The Wounds 

 

But Clinton is not called “Slick” for nothing.  He survived and his wound was healed when the Senate acquitted him in early 1999.  As outlined earlier, the best that can be said for him in this context is that it represents an interesting ante-type of what will happen to the real Beast man. 

 

Another apparent wounding to death occurred in January 2001 when he gave up the US presidency to George W. Bush.  At that point in time, it looked like any further political future for Clinton is now officially over. 

 

But as this writer notes herein, there are powerful reasons and motions underway to restore him to the US presidency with a new constitution, a Hillary presidency, or maybe to the UN as Secretary General or Supreme Governor. 

 

The early 2001 scandals over Slick’s acceptance of bribes/payoffs to make a number of pardons also seem to have upset Clinton’s apple cart (as discussed in preceding chapters).   Even Jimmy Carter came out and condemned Slick for his actions (which is a fluke in itself). 

 

While Slick Clinton never regretted anything in his life (except getting caught in his lies, evil and depravity), the former president did tell a “Newsweek” reporter in March 2002 that the pardon of Marc Rich (discussed in preceding chapters) wasn’t worth the damage to his reputation (Apr 5, 2002, “The Week,” p. 5). 

 

Apparently, Slick was implying that the millions of dollars in bribes he collected from Rich wasn’t worth the damage to his reputation. 

 

While Rich was convicted of all kinds of crimes in US courts and was a fugitive who fled US justice, Slick’s position was that “there wasn’t a shred of evidence” that he’d done anything wrong (ibid, p. 5).  Though Slick was concerned with his reputation, he exhibited no concern over the US justice system which he had personally trashed or any questions of right and wrong. 

 

This scandal over the pardons appeared to be another death blow to Slick’s ambitions and plans.  But this writer holds that this wound will be healed like the others.  After all, Slick is slick (with Voodoo anointing!). 

 

However, the pardon problem over bribes has not hindered Slick in his quest to move back into power.  The Apr 16, 2001, “US News & World Report” (p. 8-9) had a news item which said that Clinton is already auditioning for his hoped for new role--international leader in chief.  Slick has been adding stamps to his passport.  Former aide Sandy Berger says that Bill been active from an international perspective. 

 

 

More on 666 

 

As time seems to draw nearer and nearer to the end, William F. Dankenbring’s comments, suggesting that Clinton could be 666, the Beast man and so-called Antichrist (discussed above), seem more plausible. 

 

At least, it appears likely that many people in the Christian right wing may look upon him in that context if he regains power and unleashes his assault and persecution upon them in the coming days. 

 

 

Clinton, the Man of Peace? 

 

It also must be interesting to look at the coming Beast man in the context of Daniel 11.  Clinton tried hard to be a so-called man of peace for his efforts in trying to broker and push a Israeli-Arab peace treaty and a peace settlement in Northern Ireland (as discussed earlier). 

 

In order to try to promote peace in the Middle East conflict, Slick stood ready to give all participants vast sums of free US money, if they would but agree to peace. 

 

For example, the US was expected to pick up the tab and pay off both parties in the Israeli-Syria conflict.  Bill offered billions of dollars to both parties in an effort to induce them to agree to peace, per a Jan 17, 2000, “Spotlight” story (p. 1), by Martin Mann, on “Latest Syria-Israel Deal Costs You $100 Billion.”  Please understand that this $100 billion was to only cover the Israel-Syria peace. 

 

Otherwise, the Jul 10, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 6) also talked about a peace treaty between Israel and the PLO.  Apparently, those discussions focused upon a US (or European) payment of perhaps another $100 billion to those two antagonists.  The PLO, under Yasser Arafat, announced on Jul 6, 2000, that it wanted $40 billion (of the $100 billion) to establish its government on the West bank (per a news report). 

 

 

His Failure 

 

The whole package with all of the other Israeli and Arab parties (Jordan, Egypt, etc) would cost the US even more money.  But even with this much free US money at stake, Clinton failed to achieve peace.  However, his efforts supposedly did promote his image and legacy as a man of peace. 

 

Bill Clinton certainly is a man who is vile, corrupt and deceitful, as outlined by Daniel (Dan 11:21-23).  If in power, he will be a persecutor of people (like the right wing, discussed above, and perhaps he may even eventually turn upon the Jews or Israel at the last moment in desperation to find a scapegoat for the US’s economic troubles). 

 

Manifestly, Clinton exhibits many of the attributes which one could expect to find with the coming real Beast, world governor. 

 

While Slick certainly could succeed in becoming the US dictator, this writer cannot fathom that he would ever be acceptable in the global arena as a world dictator (despite the fact that his sights are clearly set upon it)--although one must be prudent and allow that he could sucker the UN general assembly into choosing him as the next UN Secretary General. 

 

If he gets to the UN, he will be, at the most, only an ante-type of the coming Beast dictator.  But the reality that he will fail globally is of little importance in the long run because his evil efforts will bring on the total destruction of the United States wherever he is and in whatever position he is in. 

 

In essence, the US is the pawn in the game to further Slick’s own selfish ambitions.  Manifestly, he earlier sold out the defense of the United States for campaign contributions from the Red Chinese.  Don’t think at all that he would hesitate one minute to sell America out again if he anticipated some benefit for his own selfish ambitions. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix M--Clinton Comes Back

 

 

Slick Has Been Trained and Educated for Power 

 

Something overlooked by many people is that Clinton is intimately familiar with the political ideology and thinking of Dr Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University.  Quigley’s most revealing insights on global politics and power were outlined in some detail in his 1,348 page production on “Tragedy and Hope,” A History of the World in Our Time” (which was analyzed in some detail in former chapters herein).  

 

The importance of this thinking was briefly alluded to in former comments.  Clinton went to college at Georgetown and was Quigley’s student.  In his presidential acceptance speech at the 1992 Democratic National Convention, Clinton paid public tribute to his mentor--Carroll Quigley. 

 

Make no mistake about it, Clinton is totally familiar with how global politics works and the enormous push for a world government and a world dictator.  Clinton has far more substance than his usual appearance as a Arkansas hick--busy sniffing cocaine, smoking marijuana and sodomizing young girls. 

 

As a prelude to becoming the world’s leader, the most pressing issue facing Slick was the upcoming US elections in November 2000 and the prospects of a George W. Bush presidency (which seemingly has wounded Clinton to death, as noted in preceding commentary). 

 

While this threat was real, circumstances have helped Bill in the vein of a come-back, as discussed earlier (whether Slick was behind the election crisis or not is unclear at this time).  There was so much election conflict between Bush and Gore that Slick looked good as a man of honor and statesmanship, as he stood above all of the political bickering and infighting between the Bush and Gore peoples. 

 

Therefore, in late 2000 and early 2001, time was urgent to force Slick to take some dramatic initiatives to try to maintain a position of power in America.  He took those steps in late 2000 to firm his position up, when he formally took control of the Democrat party and nudged Gore out of Democrat leadership (as commented upon in prior remarks). 

 

America, of necessity, would continue to be and must be his power base to move into international politics.  If he should lose this base, his chances of being a global ruler are out.  He fully understands this reality.  In this context, Slick has been making most of his preparations for a take over of the US first (in the form of a Big Brother government). 

 

 

The Foreign Military and Police Presence 

 

As a part of those preparations, he carefully worked up a scheme with political leaders around the world to swap military and police forces, as discussed in prior chapters. 

 

Thus, whatever else may exist, there is purpose in the way that the US Armed Forces and policemen are now scattered around the world.  Conversely, foreign nations now have large numbers of people here (including Gurkhas from Asia). 

 

A prior chapter mentioned the work of Colonel Jim Ammerman, now retired.  In his 1997 video on the “Imminent Military Takeover of the USA II,” he put the total of foreign military forces at 400,000 to over a million at any one time.  But that was in 1997.  The numbers have been steadily going up since then, plus the deployment of large numbers of civilian, police forces.  Certainly, today, the count must be over a million. 

 

George H. W. Bush started this effort in allowing foreign military forces into the US (and perhaps for some innocuous and unimportant reason).  But the numbers in those days were limited and they were very much like child’s play to what has been happening since 1993. 

 

 

Huge Numbers 

 

Now, there are enormous numbers of foreign military and police forces here--some of which apparently are being employed in the US (like at Waco).  It is highly unlikely that George W. Bush will alter or change this motion that has been underway for the past years (especially, since his dad started it and young George may also want to use those forces himself in the coming days with his own Big Brother state). 

 

In terms of the foreign forces, many of them are being maintained and isolated in US forest lands, national parks and wilderness areas; so that they cannot be detected and known about in the contemporary US society.  That’s one of the reasons why these US lands are being so carefully monitored to keep American people out.  In other words, these forces are nearby on public lands and ready to be used at a moment’s notice. 

 

Since most Americans could rise up in an election and vote Big Brother and/or his plans out, there would be obvious problems if these foreign people became open commodities in US cities and in enforcing US laws.  This situation has created the need for a focus upon clandestine operations, ski masks, black uniforms and swat team thinking in law enforcement in America. 

 

By being camouflaged and physically hidden in ski masks, most Americans never understand that a local raid (like--say the one at the Branch Davidian Church) was actually carried out, in part, by foreigners, rather than by Americans.  If some of these so-called law enforcement and military people have an occasion to talk, their foreign accents often become readily manifest.  

 

So the foreign military forces and policemen are here and here in numbers, complete with guns, tanks, equipment, bullet proof uniforms and ski masks.  There is no question about it, Big Brother brought these forces into America for a reason.  And with the evil and deceptive Bush and Clinton teams, that reason is not for the benefit of the American people. 

 

 

A Possible Scenario 

 

Hypothetically, let us suppose that Slick Clinton does regain power and declares martial law and a take-over of the US as dictator by Yechezkel’s 31st or 32d year.  As elaborated upon in numerous presentations herein, there are a host of reasons right now on the horizon to prompt him to declare his dictatorship. 

 

Admittedly, there is presently, in early 2003, a different president in office in the form of George W. Bush.  Too, Bush has other successors lined up with Cheney, Powell, Rice, etc.  But this situation could quickly change.  For sure, the stage is set for a new constitution or an amendment and a Bill Clinton come-back or even an ushering in of Hillary (who can be as dangerous as Bill). 

 

In terms of Bush, elected in the year 2000, he faces the phenomenon of the deaths of American presidents elected every 20 years since 1840, as noted in a former chapter herein.  William Henry Harrison was elected in 1840 and died in office.  Abraham Lincoln, elected in 1860, was assassinated.  James Garfield, elected in 1880, was assassinated. 

 

William McKinley, elected in 1900, was assassinated.  Warren Harding, elected in 1920, died in office.  Franklin Roosevelt, elected in 1940, died in office.  John F. Kennedy, elected in 1960, was assassinated.  Ronald Reagan, elected in 1980, broke the curse.  He was wounded in an assassination attempt, but survived.  Bush faces that legacy. 

 

 

Bush Problems? 

 

And in fact, there is some evidence that already George W. Bush is generating some opposition which could lead to his death.  A young man fired shots near or into the White House on Feb 7, 2001.  The Secret Service shot the man in the leg and he was arrested.  But it comes very soon in the GWB administration and does not bode well for the future. 

 

If Bush was to go (from a Clinton, Democrat or Amalekite assassination or for whatever reason), Dick Cheney is a questionable person to take over (after all, Cheney has had four heart attacks and one as recent as Nov 22, 2000).  It’s hard to be sure of who will be number three in line.  But right now, it looks like Colin Powell will be the man (he would be readily welcomed by the Amalekites and the general public). 

 

However, Powell does not seem to be very swift.  So, if he should come into power during an economic or political crisis, it will only intensify (because he simply is not a competent person able to handle major problems).  He probably would install some dictatorial measures.  But he simply won’t bring about recovery. 

 

If the US does not have a constitutional convention and a new constitution by then, it will happen soon.  Once a new constitution is in place, the liberals, obviously, would do their level best to find a way for Slick to come back to power in the White House--ostensibly, to restore prosperity and the good economy, which supposedly existed while Slick was in office. 

 

Thus, the immediate US future could still belong to Clinton.  Therefore, with a new constitution or an amendment, a constitutional convention could turn to Slick for him to resume the presidency.  With the stroke of a pen, Clinton could implement his various Executive Orders, allowing a dictatorial take-over (as outlined in a former chapter).  Congress and the Constitution would both be suspended. 

 

 

The Gun Problem 

 

The first, major problem Big Brother faces (with Slick or whomever is in power) is the guns in the hands of private citizens.  Certainly, the government will make a call on all guns--perhaps under penalty of death for those who do not turn their guns in.  As gullible and mesmerized as the American people are, it is estimated that of the perhaps 70 million or so gun owners, some 90% will readily turn their guns in. 

 

The primary concern here will be with those persons in the militias and right wing groups who do not turn their guns in.  This condition will be one of the several reasons why Big Brother’s persecution and tribulation will start on the right wing--perhaps in real earnest when he declares martial law. 

 

Since the state has been busy compiling computerized lists of gun owners, it will move quickly against all such persons in non-compliance from these turn-in orders.  The government will need massive military and police forces to bring those persons into compliance.  And that is one of the several, logical reasons for the foreign presence. 

 

Big Brother can use these people to knock on doors in the middle of the night to seize guns and murder potential opponents and threats to his dictatorship. 

 

Yes, people like Rush Limbaugh will go the same way as the Ku Klux Klan and the militias.  Big Brother (particularly under the Clintons) is going to promptly wipe them all out; or as a minimum, send their participants off to concentration camps. 

 

 

The Take Over 

 

In fact, it might be that Big Brother completely uses foreign military and police people for his take over.  Maybe, there will be no other need for them beyond the takeover.  After all, there remains some question about the US military and police forces in persecuting and killing American citizens. 

 

But alternatively, let us suppose that a US dictator takes another course.  Perhaps the coming scenario might work out with Big Brother calling up the US military reserves and national guard.  Possibly, the US military will assume primary charge of the American population. 

 

All local police authorities either come under federal control; or if they do not submit to the government dictatorship, they will be disbanded.  In this context, suppose the foreign forces are on standby for use in supplemental roles. 

 

For such an eventuality, suppose rebellious Americans do not submit and surrender to the state, as theoretically will happen (after all, many will still have guns).  Suppose the people just ignore the turn in orders (as they largely ignored Clinton during his eight years in office).  Suppose the military and federal police powers also refuse to take orders and will not fire on their fellow Americans (but are in sympathy with them). 

 

Suppose anarchy, riots and a US civil war break out (and especially, if the state turns on the Jews).  Is it conceivable that the president would call for UN or foreign military forces (many of which are right now present here) to put down the rebellion and restore his control over the population?  This option must not be overlooked.  However, there are a couple of flaws in this ointment--in terms of  planning. 

 

 

America’s Enemies 

 

While Slick, Bush, Rice, Powell or whomever is in the US White House may think of himself as a global power broker, please be assured that the Russians, Chinese, Muslims and Third World persons hate the US president and other US leaders passionately, just as they hate Americans in general. 

 

At some point in time, these powers will move against the US.  Perhaps the foreign forces now in the US will actually assist in the Russian led takeover.  For sure, America will fall to foreign conquerors. 

 

In time, as far as Clinton and many of his Amalekite cronies and Bush and his allies may be concerned, the Russians will execute most or all of them if they get their hands on them (or assassinate many of them earlier from infiltrated assassination teams), as pointed out in former comments. 

 

Regardless of who might be in the US presidency at her final demise (Bush, Powell, Rice or whomever), Slick Clinton must take and should take much of the blame for this final demise of the US.  Truly, his eight years in the White House laid the grounds for it, as much as any other single person or action. 

 

However, it must be understood that the ultimate reason for the catastrophe coming on America is because of her sins, evil and depravity (as exhibited by the American people).  The people have been evil and they have demonstrated their evil when they elected and supported Slick for something near eight years.  Really, the people are to blame! 

 

 

America is in Trouble 

 

Mahdi Bray, the national political director for the Muslim Public Affairs Council, attended a Washington rally supporting the Palestinian people on April 20, 2002.  Bray said that America is wrong to aid and abet the state of Israel to kill Palestinian children, and added that he had weighed America in the balance of the Koran and found it wanting (May 2002 “Endtime News,” p. 1). 

 

While the Koran has many problems, truly the US is in trouble and not for supporting religious Jews in the Israeli state.  America is in trouble for electing and supporting people like Bill “Slick” Clinton.  Per the Judeo-Christian Scriptures, America has indeed been weighted in the balances and found wanting.  Judgment is soon coming. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix N--Clinton and Custer

 

 

George Armstrong Custer, Revisited 

 

Former chapters mentioned the extremely proud and arrogant British Lord Chelmsford (in Zululand in 1879) and the famous American General George Armstrong Custer (in the context of pride, vanity, arrogance, and stupidity).  In particular, there are a whole host of teachings ascertainable in a study of Custer’s life, beyond just the paramount presence of pride and vanity in his mental make-up. 

 

Since there also seems to be some unusual parallels between the arrogant Custer and the former US President, Slick Clinton, it would be well to revisit Custer’s life here for some brief comments. 

 

Custer was born in 1839 in Ohio.  Somehow, he obtained entrance to West Point where he had numerous disciplinary problems and run-ins with authorities.  However, he eventually graduated in 1861, just as the American Civil War was commencing. 

 

While Custer did not do well in school, he made up for his shortcomings by rapidly moving up through the ranks to be a Brevet Major General in 1865--allegedly, because of his gallantry and heroism in combat (though he routinely hung captured Confederate prisoners and mistreated and abused his own soldiers). 

 

Armstrong was proud, arrogant, cocky, aggressive, daring, reckless, bold, unpredictable, irresponsible and supposedly brave and courageous.  He had several horses shot out from under him during the various times that he led cavalry charges into Confederate lines in the Civil War.  Furthermore, he was the youngest general officer in the history of the US Army.  His rise to the top was exceptional. 

 

 

Custer and the Indian Wars 

 

With the end of the Civil War, Custer reverted back to a permanent rank of Lieutenant Colonel and was given command of the US Seventh Cavalry Regiment in Kansas.  Since he was only 26 years old, this was still a very prestigious position for a young man. 

 

The proud, flashy George Armstrong gained fame on the plains by slaughtering Indians wherever and whenever possible (i.e. whenever his forces outnumbered the Indians and/or could easily prevail over their primitive weapons and defense means). 

 

Custer was totally dedicated to Custer’s glory, recognition and acclamation (with obvious ambitions to move up in US government service, like the presidency, which he coveted).  The newspapers loved him and gave him favorable coverage (he even wrote some anonymous stories about his own supposed glory to surreptitiously pass along to his favorite reporters). 

 

By and large, most of his soldiers and fellow officers hated him--because of his arrogance and overbearing demeanor, coupled with his outright and frequent abuse of his troopers, all done in the vein of discipline and correction.  But there was more to it in that he practiced outright nepotism and favoritism in his regiment. 

 

In the early 1870’s, Custer was court-martialed for being AWOL (absent without leave) and for the mistreatment of alleged deserters--including the death of one needing medical care and without trial.  The 7th Cavalry of over 700 men had some 500 desertions in one two-year period--evidently, because the men hated Custer so passionately. 

 

Armstrong was found guilty in his trial, but received virtually no punishment (only a one year’s suspension with full reinstatement back in command of the Seventh).  In early 1876, Custer testified to Congress and told of the corruption in the U. S. Grant administration and how bad the Bureau of Indian Affairs was. 

 

This angered Grant, so he temporarily suspended George once again.  But the newspapers loved Custer, so much so, that their pressure made Grant back off and re-instate Custer once more. 

 

As the officers and soldiers in the 7th Cavalry mused, there was a thing called “Custer’s luck,” in the vein of the incredible series of ups and downs that he faced.  As Major Reno and Captain Benteen (two of Custer’s subordinates) remarked, nothing held Custer down for long. 

 

 

Custer’s Folly 

 

Then the summer campaign against the Sioux and Cheyenne Indians commenced in June 1876.  Custer was glory bound and determined to shine in front of the press--obviously, with his sights set upon higher office in the United States. 

 

After learning of a camp of several thousand Indians on the Little Big Horn River in Central Montana, Custer marched his men all night in a forced march to try to reach them, as fast as possible, so that he could make his attack.  He ignored the warnings of his scouts and information from the Indian agents on the strength of the hostiles he faced. 

 

He ignorantly divided his regiment into three groups (actually four with his pack train) and charged the Indians with two of the groups.  The result was that Custer and five companies (some 263 men) died that day from Custer’s arrogance, recklessness and attempts at achieving man-made glory. 

 

It was bad enough that Custer was so willing to throw away his own life and the lives of four members of his own family (who were tragically accompanying him), but he went even further.  His quest for pride and glorification prompted him to irresponsibly throw away the lives of some 260 US soldiers who were cursed to be under his command. 

 

The why for this irresponsible, reckless and careless loss of men must be asked?  The why, of course, was that Custer was bent on achieving glory and recognition and a promotion.  Like he said at Fort Abraham Lincoln, ND, just before the start of his fateful campaign in 1876--he wanted a star or a coffin. 

 

 

The Clinton-Custer Parallels 

 

Now, what about Slick Clinton, whose history has amazingly paralleled Custer’s story.  Though Clinton was a Rhodes scholar, he really did not graduate from Oxford, nor was his academic history anything to brag about.  Clinton went to some big name schools like Georgetown and Oxford, while Custer went to West Point. 

 

In a similar way to Custer, Slick spent many of his school years facing disciplinary problems and/or acting in opposition to establishment authorities (like dodging the US draft, promoting anti-war causes and going to the Soviet Union). 

 

Quickly, Bill succumbed to drugs in school (which has continued over the years).  He became a man of no conscience or integrity--either in school or out, he was that way for all of his life, much like Custer. 

 

Also, like Custer, Slick has had a history of pride, vanity, greed, selfishness, arrogance, recklessness, boldness, hatefulness (to people, not in his click) and wickedness in general.  And in truth, neither Slick or Custer could be called stupid; although they both were quick to do stupid things. 

 

The one thing which has pushed and propelled Slick Clinton to the top has always been his quest for glory and power--just like Custer.  In going to the top, Slick has never cared about whom he walked upon or hurt. 

 

Early on, Slick learned how to manipulate and use the American press for his own purposes--just like Custer did.  And like Armstrong, Slick has had a series of ups and downs, since he achieved the top--including facing two events which seemed like deadly wounds (the Monica Lewinsky scandal and his departure from the presidency in January 2001, as discussed earlier herein).  

 

Many people might call it “Clinton’s luck” --because nothing seems to hold him down long.  The word “slick” was apparently never attached to Custer.  But it could have been because he was slick just like Clinton. 

 

In 1868, Custer attacked a small camp of largely defenseless Cheyenne Indians on the Washita River in Oklahoma and successfully slaughtered most of them--except for a few Indian women and children whom he captured.

 

Among the captive women, Custer proceeded to violate one of them and get her pregnant.  This taking advantage of a helpless woman (under his authority) sounds like a Clinton tactic as well.  All women at large need to be careful when thrust into the presence of Slick.  He has used, abused and misused so many women over the years that no one can keep track of them. 

 

Just as Custer liked to attack and murder largely defenseless people, Slick similarly bombed and killed largely innocent and defenseless people--like in Iraq, Sudan, Afghanistan, Somalia and Yugoslavia--without regard for decency and the US future. 

 

 

The Foolishness of Both 

 

Despite his years of breaks, advantages and opportunities and of having things go extraordinarily well for him (even in the context of his carelessness, recklessness and irresponsibility), Slick Clinton may face (if he regains US power) the situation that Custer faced at the Little Big Horn in June 1876.  The Russians and their allies are now much stronger and better prepared to meet a weaker US. 

 

Like Custer charged in without regard to his subordinates and the prevailing situation, Clinton will do the same this time.  There is no question about it.  Slick’s irresponsible actions have already and will in the future (if he gets back into power) lead America down the path of destruction in a coming WWIII. 

 

However, George Custer himself had to ultimately pay the price for his foolishness.  Likewise, it seems like a good guess that the conquering Russians, Chinese and their Third World allies will arrest and execute Clinton and his cronies (plus, large numbers of other Americans). 

 

So Clinton, too, will likely pay the price for his foolishness.  Otherwise, many innocent Americans will die because they were foolish followers of Slick--just like the soldiers who innocently followed Custer.  What a paradox this will be when many, many American people will die simply because they voted for Slick and worked to keep him in the US presidency. 

 

There used to be a joke which US soldiers would say among themselves whenever the hype and lies of top people would come down the chain of command promising a great future (usually in writing).  The joke was-- “Gentlemen, everything will be all right once we reach the valley of the Little Big Horn, signed G. Custer.”  This has been Clinton’s pitch for the last several years and will continue to be as things deteriorate. 

 

 

Robert Patterson 

 

A Jan 2003 promotion letter from Thomas S. Winter, editor-in-chief of Human Events, quoted Lt Col Robert “Buzz” Patterson, USAF Retired.  Patterson was a decorated former pilot who flew missions for the US in various parts of the world. 

 

For two years, Patterson worked in the Clinton White House and carried the “nuclear football” attaché case which contained information on presidential options and plans in a nuclear emergency.  The military officer who carries this attaché case is never more than forty feet away from the president at any time. 

 

As Patterson later wrote, he approached the president at 3:21 PM one Friday afternoon and said:  “Sir, the bombers are ready and waiting for your command...”  His reply destroyed Patterson’s faith in him as Commander in Chief and convinced Patterson that the greatest security risk in the US was none other than...the president himself. 

 

Moreover, the retired officer noted that at one time Clinton lost the most important and powerful military codes in history and then shrugged it off with “I’ll track ‘em down, guys.”  The codes were never found. 

 

At another time, stealth fighter-bombers were ready on the tarmac--the jet engines were lit and the pilots were in their cockpits--while President Clinton was brushing off his national security advisor so that he could finish a round of golf.  The cover was lost and a mission against Saddam Hussein was aborted. 

 

On one more occasion, US intelligence officers had triangulated the position of Osama bin Laden where he could be struck.  The military was ready to say to Clinton, “we’ve got him!”  But where was Clinton?  He was unavailable and Osama escaped the trap.  Yes, per Patterson, Clinton was totally irresponsible and incompetent as a national leader.  But there is more to follow on Slick. 

 

 

More Interesting Realities 

 

In January 1993, Bill Clinton breezed into Washington with three big messages.  He came claiming that he was not one of the Washington beltway insiders; that he was bringing new ideas and a new direction to the nation; and that his administration would be one of the cleanest and most professional in American history.  

 

But any person with brains above the moron level should have known immediately that Slick was lying through his teeth on all points.  There were two reasons to have this understanding at once.  First, his record in Arkansas was not one of the best, but actually the worst in Arkansas history.  And second, Slick came to town in tow with a league of Amalekite masters and lawyers.  The die for evil was cast. 

 

Sure enough, in Slick’s eight years, an honest observer can characterize and describe his Washington administration with several choice adjectives and nouns--like:  dishonest, corrupt, murder, bribery, extortion, thefts, lies, cheat, fraud, adultery, sodomy, homosexuality, lesbianism, fornication, immorality, deceptive, occultic, seances, Voodoo, drugs, cocaine, marihuana, pills and on and on. 

 

The interesting thing about this description is that it started at the White House with both Bill and Hillary.  But it didn’t just end at the White House.  Because it extended to the hundreds and hundreds of White House employees, staff members and senior people in all departments of government. 

 

Some of those descriptions even apply to Clinton’s former vice president, Al Gore (who Bill has been double crossing).  For example, Gore admitted some marijuana abuse up through 1972.  He called it “infrequent and rare.”  Later, a witnesses came forth to indicate that it was frequent and lasted for six years into the mid 1970s (Feb 7-13, 2000, “Washington Times,” p. 6). 

 

In his book “Unlimited Access,” former FBI agent Gary Aldrich (who was detailed to the White House in the early Clinton years) laid out some of the gross sexual improprieties involving Clinton.  In other comments, Aldrich said that the “Clinton-Gore Administration demonstrated an easy going attitude towards drug use that was shocking and dangerous.” 

 

 

All Crooks? 

 

Frankly, this writer is uncertain that there was even one person of integrity, honesty, character and morality in all of the Clinton appointments.  It’s hard to fathom that of the vast numbers of people hired and appointed by Clinton that they all could be of the same general caliber as him and Hillary.  There may have been one or two good people in this mass, but there weren’t many--if any. 

 

There is one more amazing thing about this whole exercise.  The Amalekite Jew controlled media has been on Slick’s side from day one. 

 

The public only learned of a few of the many acts of corruption, dishonesty and lying which went on.  Most of this stuff was hid from the public’s eyes by the controlled media (like the deceptive economic statistics being fed to the public.  When the truth finally comes out on this, it will be a bombshell). 

 

Even when some major acts of corruption and dishonesty surfaced, it was downplayed in the media.  Moreover, the Clinton controlled prosecutors (in the office of the Attorney General) generally acted to hide it and refused to prosecute it in court.  So again, the gullible goyim only heard of a very little portion of what all was going on. 

 

If a department head is Black and is caught stealing part of the government and misusing his office for personal gain and if, by chance, the Justice Department should allow an independent prosecutor, the guilty African will never be convicted by a Black Washington, DC jury.  So effectively, it didn’t matter whether Clinton’s Black people got prosecuted or not.  They walked free. 

 

Please understand that the gullible goyim only learned of bits and pieces of the depravity and corruption in the US White House.  Little or nothing was said about the drugs, cocaine, adultery, fornication, sodomy, homosexuality, lesbianism, Voodoo, seances with the dead, other occult activities and so forth.  For most of this stuff, the public cared less about it.  They said that such activities were private, personal acts. 

 

However this corruption was to be classified, it was enormous. 

 

A news report in the Aug 21, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 2) said that a computer consultant working on the White House computer system in 1999 found that massive amounts of pornographic video files and pictures had been downloaded from the Internet by the presidential staff.  The material included sex acts of farm animals (and humans?), teenagers and homosexuals.  

 

 

The Trade Off 

 

Again, much of the blame for Slick’s evil can be placed with the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters calling the shots (who control the media).  Amalekite Jews surrounded Clinton from day one. 

 

In return for allowing him to have favorable media coverage and a presence in the White House (with all of the pride, benefits, power and prestige so offered), Clinton allowed the super rich Amalekite Jew bankers in turn to come in and steal and plunder billions and billions of dollars from the American taxpayers (yes, this was the reason why Clinton allowed the Amalekite Jews in the Treasury and the Fed to operate the stock market control unit, discussed earlier). 

 

This was quite a trade off.  The Amalekite Jews backed Clinton and allowed him to turn the White House into a symbol of disgrace and depravity. 

 

They allowed him and his aides to steal and plunder as much as they could, which was in the millions--like for selling the Lincoln bedroom, getting campaign contributions from China (i.e. for treason), selling plots in Arlington cemetery and ripping off the public wherever possible. 

 

In return for giving Slick and his corrupt appointees favorable media coverage and a type of license to steal all that they could, the only thing which the Amalekite Jew bankers and masters had insisted upon was the US money supply and control of the Federal Reserve and the Treasury.  So the Amalekites were busy stealing billions (or trillions), while Clinton and his appointees were actively stealing millions. 

 

 

A Limited Future 

 

While Clinton (with his Voodoo anointing, occult charms and black magic) may stage a come-back as president or boss at the UN (until the US is finally terminated and destroyed), his future is likely limited. 

 

For sure, there probably will be an Amalekite Jew move against the president (whomever he is) and the present government just before it ends in conquest in the early summer of Yechezkel’s 33d year (as noted above and earlier; and particularly, if the president turns against them and tries to use them as scapegoats for continuing economic and monetary problems). 

 

Based upon the history of the Amalekite attack upon true Jews in the late Second Temple days and their success at finally seizing the government, the same thing seems plausible in the US.  Perhaps just before the Russian, Chinese, etc conquerors actually take over, the Amalekites will do Clinton or whomever in and take over themselves momentarily. 

 

Finally, the Aug 2001 “American Sentinel” newsletter (p. 3) had a Jul 6 statement from 41-year old Bruce Reed, a Clinton advisor--viz:  “There are seven presidential elections until I’m Don Rumsfeld’s age (the current Secretary of Defense).  We’re not has-beens.  We’re retreads in waiting.” 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix O--Corrupt Leaders and Corrupt People

 

 

Corrupt Leaders 

 

With the election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1932, the future destruction of the US and indeed the world was assured.  This man, next to Bill “Slick” Clinton, was one of the most vile and evil men of all time. 

 

Certainly, Clinton has brought great hurt on this nation and indeed the world (and this condition is not to deny the realty that George H. W. Bush and his son George W. Bush also are evil men who likewise have brought great hurt upon America.  In difference to George Junior, part of his problem is that he seemingly is far more stupid than evil.  Thus, his stupidity has hurt America).  

 

Virtually all of America’s leaders since Herbert Hoover have been grossly corrupt and evil.  They have generally taken actions and steps to further destroy this nation.  Along with the political leaders, it goes without saying that the whole society is corrupt and sorry and particularly as led and influenced by doctors, lawyers and religious leaders (all three of whom were greatly condemned by YESHUA in the NT). 

 

Here, in the early 21st century, evil, corruption and depravity are the primary ways of life of almost the entire US population.  No one today cares much at all about truth, righteousness and morality, as enunciated in YHWH’s Torah. 

 

Not even the American Jews care one whit about the Torah; though they should be role models of obedience and integrity.  Instead, they (at least, in the form of the Amalekite bankers/masters) have been the primary leaders in the push for depravity and wickedness to completely envelop this nation. 

 

 

Clinton is the Most Evil of All 

 

This writer is now an old man and it has been disquieting to look at the occult and the utter hypocrisy of Abraham Lincoln, at the drunken Useless Grant (while his appointees were busy stealing and plundering much of the government), at the evil Woodrow Wilson (who willingly sold the US out to be elected), at the naive Dwight Eisenhower (for appointing the crook Earl Warren), at the conniving and deceptive Franklin Roosevelt (who only worked for and served the international money interests) and the stupid and incompetent George W. Bush (and his foolishness to pursue useless and catastrophic wars on behalf of the Amalekite bankers/masters). 

 

However, as bad and sorry as all of these people were, they were all in the minor leagues and child’s play compared to Slick Clinton.  For years, this writer lived under the delusion that Franklin Roosevelt would go down in history as America’s worst president.  True, FDR was bad.  But Bill Clinton has far exceeded the wildest ambitions of the evil FDR. 

 

Though FDR was a liar and crook, this label cannot be laid on all of his White House staff aides and departmental appointments.  Some of those persons seem to have had some integrity and honesty.  But it is not possible presently to believe that condition existed with anyone in the Clinton Administration (although there may have been one or two good people in it). 

 

 

The Essence 

 

The essence on this is that America has reached the bottom of the barrel in government leaders (yes, even worse than Achav and Jezebel, if that is imaginable).  And while it is possible to stand and complain about the evil Amalekites who have played a major role in this depravity, they cannot really bare the blame for what has happened.  For sure, the problem is with the American people. 

 

After all, the Christian people voted for this evil (yes, America is a Christian nation).  The people have always had an option of demanding that people in Congress do their duty and remove the sickness from the US White House.  Tragically, the people themselves are so immoral, dishonest, corrupt, sick, depraved, etc that they have had no interest in cleaning up the government.  They love the status quo. 

 

In looking at His people Yisrael (in the US and White British Commonwealth), The MOST HIGH is not stupid.  He is not a pushover who is going to sit back and allow this depravity to continue much longer.  His Word gives the student of truth not only a map of the future for the US, but even the dates when the trouble comes.  America is about to be judged! 

 

One more word is needed on Clinton.  The reader should not get mad and fault this writer for frequently referring to Clinton by using his nickname “Slick.”  In the NT, the MESSIAH referred to the Amalekite Herod as “that fox” (Lu 13:32).  The name Fox was a nickname for Herod which was used for him by many of the people--just as “Slick” is a popular nickname for Bill Clinton. 

 

 

Edmund Burke, Revisited 

 

So, how did the Americans in George Washington’s day and forward get here to this point of total depravity and social sickness?  Where did America’s ancestors, grandfathers and fathers fail the nation in this motion?  And indeed, where have individual Americans failed? 

 

The thinking of the famous, British, conservative writer and statesman Edmund Burke (1729-1797) was outlined in a former chapter on apathy.  Burke said-- “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing” (back cover, “The Hidden Tyranny”). 

 

And that pretty well tells the tale for America.  Supposedly good people have sat back and done nothing. 

 

 

JoAnn, Revisited 

 

The previously discussed case of JoAnn McGuckin clearly illustrates this incredible apathy, don’t care and hypocrisy.  Most Americans were far more concerned with what’s on TV tonight, or buying some land, or watching the stock market go up (hopefully), or what’s on the menu at the local restaurant, or simply enjoying the “good” life (whatever that is); in contrast to worrying about poor JoAnn. 

 

Sure, there were many people who would have been very much on the side of JoAnn if they knew the facts.  But their apathy and lethargic don’t care were so great that virtually all of them would not dare waste one minute of their precious time to become acquainted with the facts.  You can bank on it that even the few who knew the facts were far too lazy and indifferent than to do anything positive to help JoAnn. 

 

The possibility of a like situation coming to an Ultra Orthodox Jewish group was mentioned earlier. 

 

For sure, if Big Brother in the US or in Palestine tried to oppress a Haredi person, in a situation like JoAnn, you can bank on it that thousands of them would have gotten up off their duffs and staged a protest and march to Washington, Boise (the Idaho state capitol) and/or Sandpoint (the county seat of Bonner County).  Literally, there would have been riots in the streets and “Hades” to pay on the part of somebody. 

 

But the Christian American Israelites simply don’t care.  Their hearts, minds and attention are all focused in other directions. 

 

 

And More Hypocrisy 

 

Besides the hypocrisy of Americans over how they treated JoAnn McGuckin, there is still one more great case of hypocrisy in America; which too, is tinged with incredible apathy and don’t care. 

 

This second great instance deserving mention is the reality of the tens of thousands of small children which are abducted annually in the US--by pedophiles and other deviants (besides one of their parents, in the case of a divorced parent who steals his/her children).  Tragically, many of these children are not only sexually abused, but end up being murdered. 

 

This social sickness has been commented upon in prior chapters in this presentation.  There is no particular need to beat it in the ground.  But the whole thing represents the incredible world of the evil and hypocritical American leaders and their support among the American people. 

 

Virtually all Americans say that they care about these children.  But do they really care?  They talk a good tune in uttering words about caring.  However, nothing ever happens in terms of deeds and actions proving that they care (except to pass more dictatorial laws which take away our freedoms and which do nothing to solve the problem). 

 

Of course, the Scriptural solution is to start executing the pedophiles and child molesters.  This would solve the problem.  Too, it would not hurt if the national leaders just began to express some real concern and care, rather than largely ignoring the dilemma. 

 

 

The US Health Problem 

 

A news item on NPR on Mar 31, 2003, said that the US Congress was concerned about the health care of US citizens and would address new legislation to grant more health benefits to Americans (one can be sure that the present evil American medical establishment--MDs, drugs and surgery--will be the recipients of this burst of congressional interest and nothing in the vein of preventing health problems in the first place). 

 

Now, on the surface, this piece of propaganda sounded good to a lot of ignorant people.  Certainly, it supposedly demonstrated the concern and care of the people in Congress.  But do they really care? 

 

The news report cited the fact that sky-rocketing health care costs are making it impossible for the system to deal with the dilemma.  Couple this reality with the huge array of problems associated with hospitals (many going broke, or at least, on the broke borderline), and an alleged health crisis faces almost all Americans. 

 

In all of the hype coming forth, not one word was heard by this writer in terms of what the real problems are with health (in terms of prevention).  Previous chapters herein have outlined the mess that the AMA, the politicians, the evil sun worship religious leaders and the system has brought about in the health of the American people.  The problem is simply that no one in authority understands the problem. 

 

Consequently, all of the talk from the political, religious, social and media leaders is thoroughly fused with great hypocrisy and evil (though many of them are so ignorant that they simply don’t understand it). 

 

Besides the hypocrisy, there is, of course, the huge presence of apathy, indifference and don’t care.  The leaders are simply not going to make any effort to really look at the problem and attempt to deal with real solutions.  Thus, they will end up by throwing multiplied billions of dollars down the drain which accomplish nothing but bringing on further hurt and injury on the people and the system. 

 

 

A Solution? 

 

American politicians are not exactly stupid.  They may be evil and hypocrites, as they are, but they are not all inherently dumb (besides people like Gerald Ford and George W. Bush).  Yet, the people are in ignorance and grossly locked in apathy and don’t care.  That’s why these same evil politicians keep getting elected and reelected to public office to rule the nation. 

 

Since the politicians themselves are not totally stupid, they do and can get the message if millions of people poured out on the streets and demanded some action along the lines of truth, righteousness and justice.  Of course, the people should not even have to go this far.  In reality, if the people cared, these corrupt sorry politicians would not even be elected in the first place. 

 

And if elected, they would be quickly impeached and removed (which is the ultimate solution by the people).  But again, in order to impeach and remove a crooked politician, someone has to put some pressure upon the setting legislature. 

 

While legislators would not pay much attention to one insignificant voter, they would get the message if hundreds of thousands or millions of voters poured forth some anger and righteous indignation.  The public could spend some time making phone calls and writing letters to their political leaders. 

 

If this doesn’t work, then millions of people can pour out on the street to protest.  Again, multitudes of protesting people will eventually wake up some very evil and depraved politicians.  But the problem is that the public simply doesn’t care.  They will sit back and do “nothing!” 

 

 

Where Were Your Ancestors? 

 

Perhaps this backdrop takes one to the question of where were your ancestors when the evils came upon this nation?  And importantly, where were you when your presence, input, care, concern and money were needed?  Certainly, money in the right place can do wonders! 

 

Can you imagine where the United States would be today if people in 1788 really cared about turning our national money over to evil Amalekite bankers?  Or how about the whole immigration dilemma that could have been and should have been addressed in 1788?  Where were your ancestors back then? 

 

Or how about the dictatorial seizure of the United States by Abe Lincoln in 1861?  Where were your ancestors when the evil Lincoln came to power and began the outright destruction of this nation? 

 

In 1913, when the bankers took over, where were your ancestors?  And in 1932, when the diabolical Roosevelt came to power and launched his efforts to destroy the US and the entire world, where were your ancestors and what were they doing when this happened? 

 

Probably, most of your ancestors were like my ancestors.  They were too busy eating, sleeping and enjoying the good life to care about any of this stuff--even if they were aware of its significance. 

 

 

Where Were You? 

 

When George H. W. Bush directed or allowed the federal alphabet police to come to the mountain home of Randy Weaver and machine gun his small boy in the back and shoot his wife in the head as she held the Weavers’ small baby, the question must be asked--where were you? 

 

Did you write your editor or call your politician to demand that corrective action be taken?  When the Weavers were under attack for days, did it occur to you to get up off your duffs and drive to North Idaho to protest the evil actions of the feds in murdering this poor family?  While one or two people couldn’t accomplish much, what do you think Washington would have done if millions showed up? 

 

When these same murdering federal agents illegally attacked the Branch Davidians (under the leadership of Slick Clinton), where were you and what were you doing?  Did you complain to anyone?  Did you contact your representatives in Washington?  Did you drive to Waco to protest?  Again, one person would not have made much of an impact.  But millions would have changed things. 

 

Frankly, there were plenty of things wrong with Koresh and the Davidians.  This writer certainly doesn’t endorse their operation.  After all, his views and mine have been in totally different ball parks.  But when Big Brother came in and murdered him and his dumb followers, and got away with it, the die was cast.  Big Bother can now come in and murder any body and get away it (including both you and me). 

 

And when Big Brother comes for us, there won’t be anyone around for us to turn to.  The reason is simply because no one cares.  The situation with Martin Niemoller was mentioned in a prior chapter on apathy.  As Martin said, when the state moved against its opponents, he sat back and did nothing.  Finally, when the state moved against him, it was to late because there were no opponents left. 

 

 

Somewhere 

 

Somewhere, people of some integrity and character have to start standing up and caring and taking some steps to be counted for righteousness.  Supposedly, good people cannot simply sit back and continually do nothing--other than worry about what restaurant to eat at or what TV programs to watch.  There must be more important issues in life. 

 

Somewhere out there, people must start caring.  And sitting at home and “just caring” is not the answer.  No!  Some positive action is required by people who care. 

 

Back in the 1950s, if people would have cared and done something positive in the way of writing their congressmen, pushing for the impeachment of Earl Warren, sending money to the citizens councils in the South and so forth, the nation would not have lost the public schools back then.  But no one cared!  Or at least, those who cared didn’t do anything positive to turn the tide.  They sat back and did nothing. 

 

 

Apolitical?   

 

Next, in raising these questions of “where were you?” and “what did you do?,” this writer is not attempting to reverse earlier comments on the need to be apolitical.  But the truth is that almost all of our ancestors and almost all of us have been political for virtually our entire lives.  The issue of voting and writing letters to people in Congress has been an American way of life. 

 

For those persons who are political, they must learn to accept responsibility for their decisions, right or wrong.  This point was made in previous comments along this line.  In the vein of responsibility, we become co-conspirators in the evil and sin the sorry politicians impose upon their subjects.  Thus, we seem to bear moral responsibility for our mistakes and the evils of the leaders chosen. 

 

There is a tendency in Christendom to refuse to accept this responsibility.  Christians want to suppose that since they didn’t make the mistake with malice aforethought that they are innocent and didn’t do anything wrong. 

 

True, they bear some innocence which means that they can be forgiven.  But the acts still represent sin and will still require an act of repentance at some point in time in the future before reconciliation arrives.  Of course, there is a difference between premeditated murder and accidental and unintentional manslaughter.  But both involve sin and still involve responsibility and an ultimate need for repentance.  

 

Anyway, for the truly conscientious apolitical person, who does not vote and who does not write his congressman, he or she can still have done some things when these various issues arose (as cited above).  For sure, the world needs some education along the line of real truth. 

 

Everyone can spend some money or invest some money in trying to teach others about the problems and mistakes being made.  Everyone can write letters to the editors of newspapers and promote a view or concept that supports truth and righteousness. 

 

 

Taking a Stand for Righteousness  

 

For sure, everyone, both political and apolitical, could have gone to North Idaho (when Randy Weaver was under assault) or to Waco (when the Davidians were under attack).  This doesn’t mean that the apolitical person would agitate or cause the evil authorities any trouble. 

 

But it does mean that the apolitical person could have showed up and demonstrated some moral support and encouragement to Weaver and the Davidians. 

 

Following the machine gunning in the back of the small Weaver boy by federal agents as he ran from them (and he was small because both his mother and father were very small people in size) and the murder of Vicki Weaver, as she was holding her small baby, what should the brothers and sisters of Randy and Vicki Weaver do as the federal siege continued? 

 

Should they have come to Ruby Ridge and at least taken a public stand with Randy or should they have set back and said--well, it’s not their problem. 

 

There is a Scriptural command for the next of kin to see that justice is done in the case of a killer of a relative.  It’s a Scriptural demand.  While no public official was interested in justice for these federal murderers, how about the Weaver next of kin?  Did they do anything to try to push for justice as this issue drug on? 

 

Randy was allegedly involved with Aryan Nations and the Christian Identity people (who were his religious brethren), did any of them do anything once the siege started?  Bo Gritz and a number of people did show up to give Randy some moral and public support.  But the several who arrived were far too few to impact upon anything. 

 

If millions of Americans would have showed up and shown their support for the victims under attack, George H. W. Bush, Bill “Slick” Clinton and Janet “Butch” Reno would have gotten the message and backed off from their murderous plans.  It may have saved the lives of many innocent men, women and children. 

 

 

The Jews? 

 

As noted earlier in comments on Ultra Orthodox Jews, one can bank on it that if some of their people were under siege (by the US, Israel or any other government), they would fall out in mass and protest to no end. 

 

In recent years, the son of one of the leaders of the Ultra Orthodox Neturei Karta was reportedly “kidnapped”  and held as a prisoner by the Israeli military (for some reason, possibly to do with the fact that the Ultra Orthodox refuse to serve in the military). 

 

In comments on this case, in the previously quoted Aug 5, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-2), Mark Lane wrote that the leaders of Neturei Karta said at a press conference that the several thousand members of the community would march to the military base and free the young man.  The then Prime Minister, Menachem Begin, got the message and released the man to avoid a showdown with the Ultra Orthodox. 

 

The whole community of Ultra Orthodox will never sit back and allow oppression to their people without some positive response from the collective community (at least, as long as they are in a reasonably free society which would allow some protest).  If the state arrested all of them, they might back off.  But as long as there is a semblance of freedom, the Ultra Orthodox will not stand idly by while their people are murdered. 

 

In the case of the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem, the Israeli government has consistently opposed the efforts of religious Jews to commence this project. 

 

Thus, huge numbers of religious Jews do demonstrate and attempt to gain entrance onto the Temple Mount (in order to start work on the Temple).  Should these religious Jews continue to protest and hold demonstrations near the Temple Mount to push for righteousness and justice to prevail or should they just go home and forget about it? 

 

 

The Most Important Need of All  

 

Having now mentioned the need for people to care and get up off of their duffs and do something positive about the evil and sin all around them that is totally and completely destroying them and their families (yes, YHWH’s people Yisrael are to be destroyed for a lack of knowledge--Hos 4:6), mention must be focused upon the need for our teachers and leaders to teach us YHWH’s Words and mitzwot. 

 

Of course, this is our primary need.  We need to do something positive about producing knowledge and understanding about truth and righteousness for our own lives and beings, and for the lives and beings of our children and others.  Surely, YHWH’s Word and truth are the most profoundly important themes of all that need some passion, care and concern from people. 

 

Yet, people don’t care--about themselves or even their own children, much less the neighbor or rea next door or the man down the street. 

 

While maybe a few of these lethargic and could care less people might sit at home and muse about how evil Big Brother was for the criminal acts made against the Weavers, Davidians and McGuckins (they might think about these things, but they won’t do anything positive about them), the last thing in the world that they want to address is the need for Scriptural study and dissemination of truth and righteousness. 

 

Those that go to a weekly sun worship church or listen to sun worship sermons on TV or radio suppose that they get a dose of truth and righteousness from their lying and evil Christian preachers.  With all of this supposed truth and righteousness, they simply cannot understand that they are still lost, evil sinners and still in bad need of the truth and righteousness of the Book, and not the lies told to them by Christian preachers. 

 

As cited earlier, poor JoAnn McGuckin goes to weekly sun worship mass put on by her local Catholic Church.  This poor woman cannot possibly perceive what a source of evil and wickedness that her local church represents.  She will get nothing from these people except more demonic control, influence and hurt. 

 

 

Abe Lincoln 

 

In an address before the Young Men’s Lyceum in Springfield, Illinois, on January 27, 1838, Abraham Lincoln said:  “At which point shall we expect the approach of danger?  By what means shall we fortify against it? 

 

“Shall we expect some Trans-Atlantic military giant, to step in the ocean and crush us at a blow? 

 

“Never! 

 

“All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined,... could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years. 

 

“At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? 

 

“I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us.  It cannot come from abroad. 

 

“If destruction be our lot, we Ourselves must be its author and finisher.  As a nation of Free men, we must live though all times, or die by suicide” (quoted in the inside back cover of the Radio Liberty catalogue of books, videos, etc). 

 

 

The Prophet Yechezkel, Revisited 

 

Interestingly, the prophet Yechezkel seems to have preceded Lincoln’s perception by about 2,400 years when he wrote YHWH’s judgment that fire had gone out of the rod of the branches of the House of Yisrael which has devoured her fruit.  The “Soncino Books of the Bible” for Ezekiel (p. 119) says that “The fire which consumed the nation originated in its rulers.”  Yes, the corrupt leaders have insured the fall of the nation. 

 

With the election and choice of the people of some of the most vial and corrupt national leaders to ever befall a nation (like Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Slick Clinton, the Bushes, etc), the seeds for the destruction of the United States have been sown--internally, as allowed by Yechezkel and Lincoln.  There is now no turning back from the fate prophesied for America. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

The bottom line was well stated by Hutton Gibson, father of actor Mel Gibson, at the Fourth International Conference on Authentic History in Washington, DC in June 2003. 

 

Gibson, in a presentation on US tyranny, said:  The (US) rot is country-wide; responsibility lies at the top.  To recover our freedom we must circumvent the misgovernment.  Will this suffice?  Should all states secede, no federal taxes could be extorted.  If the federal government was left stateless, who would owe the national debt? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Epilogue

 

 

What Is Truth? 

 

Does truth matter anymore in America?  There is certainly an abundance of evidence that the answer to that question is “no;” if it has, in fact, ever mattered.  When one examines history, there seems to be good reasons to wonder if truth has ever been of much concern before or not. 

 

Of enormous importance, on this theme, there is also the question of “what is truth”?  Pilate asked this one of The MESSIAH when He was before Pilate, while on trial for His life (Jo 18:38).  Perhaps that question is the crux of the issue.  What is truth and have the people ever really had it or wanted it? 

 

Based on this work’s findings on how extensive and pervasive sun worship has been in the entire, Western culture for the past 2,000 years, one has to wonder whether people have any concept at all about truth.  While ignorance and confusion over truth is a hefty part of the problem, the dilemma is actually far more complex because so many people simply don’t care, as discussed in prior chapters. 

 

 

Apathy, Indifference and Don’t Care in Christendom 

 

The very first draft of this study at hand was prepared several years ago in an extremely abridged form of about 30 pages or so.  It was short, concise and to the point.  Howbeit, it covered the main thesis (on the commission) and a brief mention of a few of the major proofs now illustrated in this expanded edition of some 6,000 pages in 36 volumes. 

 

This writer was in Southern Idaho at the time and had an acquaintance at one of the Sardis’ church headquarters then in Meridian, Idaho.  One day, at their facility, this writer had a chat with the editor of the monthly periodical of that Sardis group.  The editor was a big, fat, Pentecostal, Sabbath keeper who also served as pastor at one of the local Sardis churches in the Boise River valley. 

 

Realizing that their church paper was extremely dead with little or no presentations of truth (and certainly nothing in regards to “new” truth), this writer prepared a copy of this study’s first effort and gave it to the Sardis editor with a request that he read it.  He seemed to affirm that he would do so. 

 

The offer to him furthermore was that he was welcome to publish it in his church paper if he thought it had merit.  Over the next several months, this writer had an opportunity to visit with this Sardis church leader and paper editor on several other occasions and always in a friendly fashion, without attempting to emphasize our differences. 

 

He was periodically asked whether he had read the study in order to get his perspective on it.  His reply was always the same.  No--he had always been “too busy” to take the time to read it.  For a Christian preacher, editor of a church paper and supposedly a student of truth, is this an example of incredible apathy, indifference and don’t care?  If not, what is it? 

 

 

Problems in Wenatchee, Washington 

 

A few years later, this writer was in Wenatchee, Washington where he was visiting with a friend who proceeded to invite his cousin, a local Christian preacher (who also was a local school teacher), over to share in the conversation.  This writer mentioned the fact that The MESSIAH’s commission was only to the lost House of Yisrael (together with a few of the relevant Scriptures). 

 

The sun worshipping preacher immediately argued that while the texts mentioned were true, the commission was “changed” later on in the New Testament to cover all so-called human beings all over the world.  As this preacher saw it, The HIGHEST does change things (even after His Testament was sealed at His death as YESHUA) and there are no “absolutes” in the Book. 

 

So the discussion proceeded on to the Greek ethnos (which the preacher was using for his justification and wrong conclusions).  This writer pointed out that the Greek ethnos could and often did pertain to Israelites.  The sun worshipping preacher would never accept this reality, regardless of the evidence. 

 

He proudly proclaimed that he was an “expert” on the Greek language and that the plural of ethnos, and the Hebrew goy as well, never applied to Israelites in any situation or circumstance.  He was proud, arrogant, hard headed, stubborn, unreasonable and clearly no student of truth (as many of his own local acquaintances were well aware).   Did truth really matter with this man? 

 

 

Apathy on Saipan Island 

 

On a still later occasion, this writer took a later draft of this study (of around 60 pages or so) and gave it to one of the leading, sun worshipping, Christian preachers on Saipan Island.  He seemed to be a friendly man and a person who “might” have some interest in truth and a new or different approach to his life’s work. 

 

Over time, this Christian sun worshipper, too, never could get around to reading it.  Or if he did, then he must have been in such a quandary and state of shock that he would not dare admit to having read it.  Or if he was really honest and had not read it, then is it just plausible that he, too, was an individual who was filled with lethargic apathy and a could care less attitude? 

 

This writer is convinced that a copy of this study could be turned over (given, because it’s highly questionable that any of them would spend much of their own money in buying a copy--certainly not a hard copy, but some might could be motivated to buy a computer disk/CD-ROM copy) to the leaders of every major Christian Church in America and it’s doubtful that many, if any, would even read much of this work at all. 

 

Surely, even a fewer number of them would do any study on it.  And it remains even more questionable that any of those few would ever entertain the idea of sharing these findings with their congregations with a view of perhaps changing some of their false beliefs or start obeying some of the righteousness found in the Torah. 

 

Is it conceivable that any of them would exhibit the personal courage and integrity to stand up and admit that he or she had been wrong?  There aren’t even many so-called human beings out in the world who will do that in their secular lives and much less so among Christian preachers. 

 

 

Some Shortcomings 

 

This writer acknowledges that this writing effort may not be articulate, polished, smooth, sophisticated and/or charismatic because of obvious limitations in the communication abilities of its writer and editor.  It is also true that some of the comments may seen to be repetitious. 

 

However, some repetition is often the Scriptural approach where any number of ideas in the Psalms are repeated verbatim at least twice in that single book alone.  Sometimes, other messages are found in two or more books in the Word.  The reason for this duplication is that man learns through repetitious teachings.  Too, some remarks are relevant to more than one topic or discussion and need to be repeated. 

 

But beyond the certainty of some repetitious presentations and apparent shortcomings of this writer as a communicator, the overriding and relevant issue must always be on the verity and truth of the Scriptures cited and the gist of the message outlined. 

 

If the message is true, what difference does it really make on how well the writing has been done.  Truth is the crucial question on this whole theme.  If the Scriptures cited are telling the truth, as argued in this production, the student of truth then should wake up and get hot and passionate for that truth. 

 

Incidentally, this incredible apathy, indifference and don’t care in Christendom has been reported by any number of observers over the years.  A previous chapter herein discussed the problem at some length as well. 

 

Albert Einstein once said: “weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character” (Jan-Feb 1999 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 75).  Does this demonstration of apathy in Christians (in the form of weakness of attitude) reflect weakness of character in Christians? 

 

In an editorial in the Oct-Nov 1997 “Restitution Herald” (p. 2), Jeffrey Fletcher lamented about how the people of his church would get fired up at their general conference and then go home where more than a few would be frustrated by the apathy and boredom in their local churches. 

 

 

Modern Idols, Revisited 

 

An article on “Idols of Our Day,” by Richard J. Foster in the Aug-Sep 2000 “Restitution Herald” (p. 16-17), outlined a summary of the three primary idols facing modern peoples today.  Foster summarized them as idols of personal autonomy, idols of pleasure and idols of efficiency. 

 

Personal autonomy focuses upon self will for people to do as they please and take care of number one (themselves). 

 

The efficiency idol is concerned with modern technology, science and man’s abilities.  This one is really a sum up of the previous discussion herein on the pride of life where people respect, love, cherish and adore the man-made systems of government, business, health, etc. 

 

While all three of these forms of idolatry are enormous and firmly entrenched, perhaps the most glaring one of the three is the matter of pleasure.  Today’s man seems to be totally pleasure driven.  In a sense, this is part of self will in that man wants to do his thing, regardless of all other considerations.  And on this, man’s heart is usually focused upon personal satisfaction, pleasure and entertainment. 

 

 

Christians and Hobbyists 

 

If Christians, in general, were factually interested in truth and dedicated to getting and understanding truth (and true reconciliation); then they would emulate “some” aspects of the mentality and actions of pleasure driven people--like most of the dedicated hobbyists and others with great loves (idols) in their lives. 

 

On this idea, one should watch many of the hobbyists who are out in the secular world of today.  Please consider the typical person involved in antique cars.  They will spend most, much or all of their money, time and resources on their automobiles (which become idols and great sources of pride and vanity).  Even if they work at a job, their primary purpose in life is to buy old cars and parts needed to restore them. 

 

In terms of the time factor, everything else (particularly the family; and of course, any hypothetical religion) is secondary.  They will devote every spare minute they have, apart from the job, to the cars and especially work on them in restoration.  Such people will give everything possible to the pride and love of their lives.  

 

Beyond cars, there are, of course, any number of other hobbies and interests which are just as possessive and demanding.  Many people living near a lake and owning a boat can be just as fanatical about fishing and water sports.  Their whole interest and love is focused upon the water. 

 

Tragically, many parents are just as insane over their children which become the pride of their lives (just as Yitzhak became an idol to Avraham, requiring his great test).  While parents should love their children and give them some time and attention, it is also true that both fathers and mothers have an obligation to give The MOST HIGH some of their time, attention and love. 

 

In fact, all of us are commanded to love YHWH first and most.  Yet, it has to be one of the great tragedies of history that man collectively never seems to have time for The ELOHIM or to pursue truth.  There are any number of other things going on in people’s lives that are always more important.  There is no limit to our fleshly abilities to cook up all kinds of idols to serve with our hearts, time, money and resources. 

 

The prophet Yeshayahu clearly must have had the age ending Christian House of Yisrael in mind when he proclaimed that none of them (the Israelites, in the general sense) plead for truth (Isa 59:4, as fully quoted in a previous presentation).  Truth is just not on their agenda.  Their hearts, minds and attentions are manifestly focused in other directions--rather than on truth. 

 

 

No Passion for Truth in Christendom 

 

If secular people can be totally committed and dedicated with all their hearts, souls and mights to worldly, fleshly interests; why can’t so-called religious people and believers have the same dedication, purpose and resolve over their religious faith?  Why should there be a difference? 

 

Why can’t Christians seek the kingdom of heaven like a treasure hid in a field?  YESHUA taught that upon learning of the treasure, the true believer would sell all of his goods and go and buy the field (Matt 13:44). 

 

The MESSIAH also advocated that believers should pursue the kingdom (and the truth about it) as they would seek for a pearl of great price.  They should be willing to sell all they own in order to buy the pearl (Matt 13:46). 

 

Why can’t Christians get on fire to know and understand truth and righteousness?  Why are they so incredibly apathetic, lethargic and don’t care?  When Christians read the Word, why don’t they take those instructions to heart? 

 

Why do so many of them constantly pause between being neither hot or cold, but pathetically lukewarm--as condemned by YESHUA (Rev 3:16)?  Why is it that there is no passion, zeal, dedication, purpose, resolve and commitment for truth in Christendom? 

 

If Christian people (to include their pastors, preachers, teachers, priests, elders, overseers, leaders, etc) are the election, as they claim to be, why is it that they have no passion, zeal or diligence for truth?  Instead, why are they so filled with apathy, indifference and don’t care, as prompted by religious pride? 

 

The most obvious answer to these questions must be that Christians are not the very elect, as many of them falsely claim to be.  After all, it is truth that sets the very elect apart, as noted beforehand. 

 

If Christian preachers, teachers, leaders and people are apathetic, lethargic and could care less one way or the other on a subject as vital and profound as truth is, how then could they ever be the very elect or even in the election.  Of course, they couldn’t be--because the very elect has a passion and commitment to truth. 

 

As amply established in previous chapters of this publication, it is truth and people’s reception and response to it which identifies the very elect.  In other words, the very elect and true representatives of The ELOHIM can be recognized by truth and how they handle it. 

 

 

Dishonest Christians? 

 

This whole dilemma brings to mind a quote in the Jan-Feb 1999 “Prophecy Flash” magazine (p. 78).  It is:  “When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken, or cease to be honest.”  Perhaps this idea comes to the forefront in the context of the above mentioned Christians who simply aren’t interested in truth.  Maybe, their problem all along is that they are fundamentally dishonest. 

 

Assuredly, wide is the gate leading to destruction and many go therein; while narrow is the gate that leads to life and few will enter therein (Matt 7:13-14).  Manifestly, the billions of Christians now alive or alive since 70 CE over the globe do not suggest any “few” in number. 

 

So ultimately, their eyes would have to be opened by YHWH for them to ever understand truth (Matt 13:11).  Obviously, YHWH has not opened the eyes of Christian sun worshippers.  That’s the most apparent reason why Christians are so incredibly rebellious, uninformed, mis-informed and pathetically ignorant about the Word. 

 

True, they may be able to quote a few New Testament texts, which they largely don’t understand.  But that’s about the extent of it.  For the most part, most Christians don’t know, don’t care and don’t want to know anything about the Scriptures (most like to have their ears tickled with lies, deceptions and fantasies). 

 

 

Pride, Revisited 

 

So, why is it that people do not care?  This answer has been covered in prior chapters in the context of pride and vanity.  Yes, pride and vanity create apathy, indifference and don’t care.  And how can this effect be caused in so-called believing Christians? 

 

The problem with the vast bulk of Christendom is that their eyes and ears are closed by YHWH (from understanding) because of the pride, carnality and self righteousness in their wicked lives, over coming to believe that Christianity is the religion of the Scriptures and that they have stood up in a pagan, sun worship ceremony and said the words “I believe in Gee-Zeus” or some other meaningless act of work supposedly granting them salvation with no further needs or obligations. 

 

As elaborated upon in preceding chapters, this closure of the eyes and ears of the bulk of the Israelites brings to mind the several Scriptures where people have eyes to see and ears to hear; yet they cannot see or hear (Isa 6:9-10; Matt 13:14-15; Mk 4:12; Lu 8:10; Acts 28:26-27). 

 

The point of this is that YHWH, Himself, has hardened their hearts, blinded their eyes and made them deaf so that they cannot see or hear (Jo 12:40; Rom 11:8).  The next question is--why would He do this?  The answer is most fascinating, as outlined previously, when a conquering king would blind or sear the eyes of his conquered foe (as happened with Tzidkiyahu--II Kg 25:7). 

 

These ancient kings were all very proud and stubborn.  The searing of their eyes humbled and crushed them, which seems to have some parallel with YHWH’s goal for His people Yisrael.  You see, by the promises made to Avraham and repeated to the patriarchal fathers, great blessings of prosperity, wealth and abundance were to come upon Yisrael.  And these blessings have been on Yisrael for the last 200 plus years. 

 

But the bad feature of blessings, wealth and abundance is that we humans in the flesh really can’t handle them.  Inevitably, we attribute such blessings to our own merit and abilities and not to YHWH Who gave them.

 

We then become inflated, lifted up, fat, sleek, stubborn, proud and vain and filled with self love, self adoration and self glorification (Deut 32:13-42; Ps 10:2; 52:7; Prov 21:4; 30:9-10; Ezek 16:49; Neh 9:25-26; Hos 13:5-9; Lu 16:15; Rev 3:17). 

 

As described in previous chapters, it appears that in judgment for our pride and vanity, YHWH closes our eyes and ears to understanding (Ps 14:2; Isa 42:19-20; 59:1-2; Jer 5:4-5, 21; Ezek 12:2; Acts 17:30; II Cor 3:13-15; Eph 4:17-18). 

 

In other words, this closure is a type of punishment for our wicked, evil sins of pride and vanity.  We act like drunken people at the head of a valley of fatness and prosperity (Isa 28:1-8; Rom 11:7-10; I Cor 15:34).  None understand (Ps 14:2; 53:2-4; Mk 9:32; Rom 1:31; 3:11). 

 

 

The Amalekite influence

 

But there is another fallout over this presence of pride and vanity which interferes in the needed understanding.  Because of pride and vanity, most people are very susceptible to demonic influence from mental telepathy, as well as to the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters who are right now in virtual control of America and the rest of the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic Christian West. 

 

The Amalekite Jew leadership uses their owned and controlled media and entertainment industries to completely mesmerize, zombiize, mislead and “fool” the gullible, proud, vain Israelites (which make them janissary robots); and uses their control of subservient governments to carry out ruthless oppression against politically incorrect dissidents and opponents. 

 

The Amalek-Edomite Jew bankers/masters of the synagogue of Satan also employ the traditional Amalek approach of dealing with their enemies (that is, their enemies who quote facts and truths in opposition to their race mixing and other schemes of destruction for Yisrael). 

 

This means that if someone comes along and uses facts, statistics, data, information and verifiable truths to oppose their Satanic methods of evil, they counter with attacks upon the personalities of persons daring to speak out and oppose the Amalekite agenda.  This is the normal practice of liberals to silence their opposition. 

 

Thus, if Amalekite Jew opponents attempt to bring into discussion in the public arena the Scriptural truths and secular reasons on why racial integration, miscegenation and amalgamation are wrong, as described in previous chapters, the Amalekite Jews respond by using their media powers to label such persons as White supremacists and racists. 

 

Amalekites are totally uninterested in dealing with facts.  Perhaps the reason for this is because they have no facts to support their Satanic agenda.  Lacking truth, they respond with an attack upon the person trying to talk about facts, data and reality.  They resort to name calling--like White supremacist, neo-Nazi and racist (just like they did in NT days--Lu 7:34). 

 

Most gullible, ignorant, proud, blind, Christian Israelites under a demonic assault of mental telepathy quickly accept these media catch words of hate, without any investigation into truth. 

 

 

More Amalekite Evil 

 

Wherever possible, the Amalekite Jews next use their prostitute politicians and government servants to oppress, persecute, imprison, murder and hate such people with the full force of law and the powers of the state, under the guise of genocide and hate crime laws. 

 

The same problems likewise surface in any attempt to deal objectively and honestly with the questions of the role of women in society or the allowability of infanticide, sodomy, homosexuality and/or other deviant forms of perverted sex. 

 

Anyone who tries to discuss these social issues will be immediately attacked, condemned and ostracized for daring to speak out (even in the context of the first amendment to the US Constitution which theoretically allows free speech).

 

Secular governments now controlled by Amalekite Jew bankers/masters will come down hard on anyone attempting to oppose the worship of the present, Amalek-established, state, social gods of homosexuality, feminism and racial integration and amalgamation. 

 

This methodology of liberal Amalekite Jew bankers/masters to motivate and impress upon the gullible, Christian Israelite population is well established. 

 

Once the mental telepathic powers of demons enter the arena to mentally reinforce the Amalekite Jew Satanic message, most gullible, ignorant, proud, janissary robot, Christian Israelites will quickly succumb and attack, hate and persecute their own brethren for daring to try to oppose the Amalekite Jew plutocrats on the basis of facts, logic and truth. 

 

Even this study at hand will undergo the usual Amalek attack.  The writer, editor, publisher, collaborators, supporters and believers of this effort will be branded as racists, White supremacists, sexists and homophobes.  The Amalekite Jews will use their media and government powers to oppress anyone who will seriously entertain the truths contained in this publication. 

 

The tragedy is that the Amalekite Jews will never use Scriptural or secular truths in their assault.  They will focus their attack upon the personalities behind this publishing effort, rather than upon the facts and truths outlined (because they have no factual truths to oppose the report herein).  Anyone seriously considering this message can expect to be called a racist, White supremacist, etc. 

 

 

YHWH Can Intervene 

 

Now, is there any solution?  No--not unless and until YHWH intervenes to change people.  We humans can’t do it on our on.  Does He intervene?  Generally no, in this age; except He does act to grant sight, hearing and understanding to the election. 

 

YHWH doesn’t do this because of the merits of the elect (none of us have any merits--only sin and wretchedness).  He does it to fulfill His will and purpose.  He grants the called out ones the gifts of true faith and repentance, as discussed in a prior chapter. 

 

On this closure theme, it is useful to recall that the real election in this age end evidently will only consist of 144,000 males (and probably a comparable number of females), and the very elect will surely be a smaller number of perhaps 7,000 males (Rom 11:4--likely 14,000 males and females). 

 

Too, collective Christianity’s linkage to sun worship and the power of its guiding, demonic spirits (ruling over each of the denominations, discussed earlier) probably has had something to do with the ensuing apathy and indifference, emanating from the various Christian Churches and their leaderships. 

 

Of course, people could moreover solve some of their problems if they were just willing to conscientiously study the Scriptures, as they are commanded to do, in order to be approved (as discussed in the Prologue).  But they will not spend much, if any, of their money on study books, nor will they devote any real time or effort to beneficial study. 

 

So, how does this relate to YHWH’s act of searing our eyes and ears as punishment for our sins.  How can this be humbling (which is the actual process needed for true reconciliation and circumcision of the heart, as described in a former chapter)? 

 

It appears, in part, that as our minds, hearts, eyes and ears are opened to understanding and comprehension, we then are humbled and brought down by the realization of how evil and wicked we have been and were it not for unmerited grace, we would remain in that state of wretchedness, death and destruction. 

 

As YHWH reconciles us (the election in this age end and others at the time of their ultimate judgment), we are humbled and brought down from our perches of pride and vanity.  Once we are humbled and abased from our lofty peaks of pride and vanity, we then can receive the free gifts of salvation and life. 

 

 

Knowledge-Destruction Link 

 

The Word has some more interesting things to say about Scriptural knowledge, understanding and wisdom.  The most important remark was directed by the prophet Hosea to the Israelites of the House of Yisrael when he told them that they would/will be destroyed for lack of knowledge; because they had rejected knowledge and forgotten YHWH’s law (Hos 4:6). 

 

Hosea’s prediction looms closer and closer to reality with every passing day.  This condition was illustrated in early 2000 when the “Southern Party of Texas” was organized to ostensibly secede from the United States. 

 

The “Spotlight” newspaper (p. 7) of Mar 20, 2000, had a story by Vance Beaudreau on “New Political Party Demands Texas Secede” which assessed this motion.  One of the organizers, Jaye Curtis, said:  “We are not interested in attempting to reform the United States federal government because we believe that to be a lost cause.” 

 

This statement by Curtis should not be taken as being radical.  After all, the state constitutions in 34 US states declare that “the people... have at all times... a right to alter, reform, or abolish their government in such manner as they think proper” (Mar 20, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 17).  But today, these words are just wishful thinking.  That’s not the way the real world is set up today in America.  So Curtis is right! 

 

The May-June 1997 “Jubilee” paper (p. 3) quoted noted journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard as saying “I would hesitate to describe America as a nation at all in 1997, because it is becoming something very different; a polytechnic federation administered by a single ruling class... the accumulated rot in America has now reached a point where the pillars of society itself are failing.” 

 

And that’s the essence of the problem facing Ephraim Yisrael in the context of America.  Sin is so massive and prevalent that nothing now can stop the depravity.  The people will not repent and change.  Accordingly, The MOST HIGH will execute His judgment upon this sick nation and soon.  There will be no reform motions.  There will only be destruction, so that YHWH can build a new order under YESHUA in the millennium. 

 

 

The Need for Knowledge 

 

Shlomo perceptively said that the ear of the wise seeks knowledge and the heart of the prudent gets knowledge (Prov 18:15), that the prudent was crowned with knowledge (Prov 14:18), and that the just would be delivered through knowledge (Prov 11:9). 

 

Going on, Shlomo declared that wisdom is better than gold and understanding is better than silver (Prov 16:16); get understanding and wisdom and forget them not (Prov 4:5, 7); and call wisdom your sister and understanding your kinsman (Prov 7:4).  Yet, Shlomo would add that knowledge increases sorrow and wisdom increases grief (Eccl 1:18). 

 

Of course, knowledge is the acquisition of information, data and facts.  As discussed earlier, understanding is a big step up when a person can put this knowledge of information, data and facts together into meaning and comprehension. 

 

Also, as outlined in a former chapter, wisdom is still a further step up when one uses this knowledge and understanding to make decisions and be a guide to one’s life.  Tragically, man gets this wisdom by eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.  What a tragedy it is that we are so stubborn and rebellious that we refuse to get wisdom from the tree of life. 

 

Again, the situation with the people of the House of Yisrael is that they are impudent, stubborn, rebellious, hard hearted, desperately wicked and will not listen to the various Scriptural prophets’ call for them to repent and change (Isa 6:8-10; 29:13; 30:8-14; Jer 3:12-13; 5:3, 11-14; 6:10, 16-21; 7:22-28; 17:23; 18:12-13; 18-23; 20:3-4, 23-33; 22:21; 23:8-9; 25:4-7; 32:33; 44:4-5; Ezek 2:3-8; 3:5-9, 27; 12:2, 22-25, 27-28; 20:3-4, 23-33; 23:8-9; Hos 4:11-16; 9:7; 11:1-2, 7; Amos 2:11-12; 5:10; 7:10-13; Mic 2:11). 

 

With this environment, the modern Israelites will face destruction, as Hosea promised.  The handwriting is on the wall.  It can come very soon.  When it starts in earnest, probably in 2004-2010, it will accelerate and be over very quickly. 

 

Because of the Scriptural predictions of coming destruction and why it will happen, it seems useless to prepare a publication like this one (if it does, in fact, present any appreciable truth).  Israelites are apathetic, indifferent and could care less--because their hearts and minds are totally dedicated to the loves and idols of their lives.  They will not change. 

 

 

The Purpose Here 

 

Consequently, the purpose of this effort is not really to reach this vast reservoir of could care-less people.  But there is hope that the facts and information put together herein might be of benefit to a select group of people--like the election, in general, and the very elect, in particular. 

 

If there is one person out there (hopefully, more than one) who can have a new appreciation for where we are in time, the need to take the Scriptures serious, and spend some time and effort on study; then this work has succeeded. 

 

Christian sun worship preachers can continue their lies and false assurances that everything is all right.  Christian sun worshippers can continue (for now) to believe that they are saved and can continue their heathen, Christian sun worship without fear of consequence or retribution, for the time being. 

 

But they are very close to a rude awakening.  YHWH is not going to put up much longer with the rebellious, Christian sun worship in the House of Yisrael which has been continuing on and on for thousands of years.  It’s about to end! 

 

The above critical comments on Christendom and other faiths, as well, in other places in this study, have not been made lightly or irresponsibly.  Certainly, there are many, many, very dedicated, devoted and well meaning individuals in Christianity. 

 

Some Christians are extremely sincere people.  It’s just that they are sincerely wrong.  There is no intent in this publication to necessarily take a slap at such people.  But their theology is all wrong and assuredly contrary to the Scriptures.  There is absolutely no reason to white-wash this reality.  Let the chips fall where they may. 

 

If these many, supposedly dedicated and devoted Christians would work half as hard to find truth from the Word, as they have worked to spread their false teachings, lies and beliefs throughout the world; then maybe there would be a fantastic explosion of verity throughout planet earth which could only serve to help Churchianity clean up some of her pagan acts. 

 

 

The Christian Reality 

 

In a tract, “Secrets,” of Marshall, Arkansas, wrote: “Considering the meaninglessness and worthlessness of Church doctrine, considering the Clergy’s total lack of knowledge of what the Bible actually tells (purposely and otherwise), and considering the overall way in which so-called Christianity is carried on--its total ineffectiveness--it is no wonder that non-church-going Gentiles find the whole business of Christianity and the Bible unpalatable, abrasive, unacceptable--even obnoxious.” 

 

Because the United States is a Christian nation and because of the verity of the just mentioned remarks from “Secrets,” on the deplorable reality of Christianity, America is in a sad state and pathetic mess in terms of spirituality. 

 

This condition was powerfully demonstrated in an early 2003 George Gallup Jr poll, as reported in the Feb 15, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. E3), in an article by Helen T. Gray on “Gallup survey;  Americans believe, but they’re not sure what.” 

 

Gallup found:  “(1) Americans are experiencing an intense search and hunger for the spiritual and an unprecedented desire for religious and spiritual growth.  (2) Many Americans seem not to know what they believe or why.  And many hold traditional and nontraditional beliefs at the same time.  (3) Religious faith is broad but not deep, with many Americans holding strong beliefs but see little impact that religious faith has on individual lives and society.  (4) God is popular but is not first in many people’s lives.  ‘Belief in God’ does not necessarily translate into ‘trust in God.’” 

 

In other words, it might be said that Christian Americans’ faith, belief and worship involve show and pretense (smoke and mirrors) and nothing in the sense of heartfelt reality, meaning, truth or righteousness.  Manifestly, something is grossly lacking in the religion, belief and faith of the American people.  In a word, Christianity has been a colossal “failure” in America. 

 

The Apostle Yohanan wrote a most fascinating statement when he quoted YESHUA as saying to His followers that “you shall know the truth and the truth will set you free” (Jo 8:32).  For sure, this truth has not and cannot come from Christendom.  Conversely, this extensive work at hand is a production with possibly some “new” truth, which might can set people free from religious confusion, uncertainty and bondage. 

 

 

This Work Does Speak Out--Revisited 

 

In the vein of the previously discussed lashon hara, focus was directed at the presence of some criticism herein of various Christians and public leaders.  There is no intent to repeat all of that message.  But some of the points made will now be recalled here in the Epilogue in order to emphasize them, since they are so relevant and important. 

 

Because Christianity and its fragments (to include the Holy Roller, Identity and Sardis elements) are so pathetically evil, sick and lacking, this writer has freely criticized them and their leaders.  In today’s modern, tolerant society, almost no one criticizes anyone over anything (unless someone does speak out against the new social gods of racial amalgamation, homosexuality, feminism, etc). 

 

Anyone speaking out or criticizing these social gods (which are politically correct and are being pushed by all leaders--political, social, religious, economic and so forth) can expect to be immediately branded with names of hate and arrested and murdered by the state, if possible.  Otherwise, the current society is fairly apathetic and could care less about most everything. 

 

In any case, this work does criticize the leaders of this motion for their great evil and wretchedness.  The prophets in the Tanakh and YESHUA, Himself, freely criticized practitioners of evil (as noted earlier).  They called a spade a spade, without fear of upsetting someone or of saying the wrong words.  Tact was not always in their thinking!  This writer has freely done the same thing. 

 

People in leadership roles (in government, in religion and so forth) automatically open up their lives to criticism and condemnation (for their mistakes and shortcomings).  It goes with the turf, so to speak.  Anyone wanting to avoid condemnation should stay out of the fire (and decline trying to be a political or religious leader).  Sinning leaders are deserving of criticism.  This includes both Amalekite and non-Amalekite leaders. 

 

This writer has not attempted to necessarily embarrass any individual person.  Therefore, in most instances, this work follows the Scriptural example by freely criticizing and condemning many of the people responsible for the evil, but generally without naming them. 

 

 

Names Can Be Appropriate 

 

Of course, in some instances (in the case of leaders), names are appropriate and are cited (like with Clinton, the plutocrats and various evil Amalekites).  Condemnations in the Word also sometimes used names of especially the leaders and big shots who were primarily responsible for the direction of sin being charted. 

 

Preachers, teachers and leaders in the Christian Church are particularly guilty of evil and wretchedness.  After all, they are some of the primary agents responsible for much of the great wickedness across modern America and Britain.  The Christian leaders have failed the people.  YHWH will hold them accountable--surely, most of all, since they had a duty to teach righteousness (and they didn’t). 

 

There has been no intent to attack with words and condemnations individual peons and people of no authority or influence over the events going on in this corrupt society.  It’s not that the little people aren’t guilty.  They are.  We all are!  It’s just that the first guilt must be placed upon the leadership.  This includes all of society’s leaders and spokesmen (with an obvious need to first focus upon the religious leaders). 

 

 

Some Personal Words 

 

The primary writer of this work is (believed to be) an Israelite racially (of the lost tribes) and an observant (Orthodox) Jew religiously (of the Nazarene, Second Temple variety), with a belief in A Jewish MESSIAH named YESHUA (not a Christian Gee-Zeus).  No apology will be offered for either definition.  The ELOHIM made me the way i am.  And i thank Him for the blessings He has bestowed upon me. 

 

It would be absolutely marvelous if this writer could say that YESHUA or one of His representatives had openly contacted me with a conscious, formal, clear commission for this publication.  In truth, it never happened.  Yours truly is well aware of the great condemnation which YHWH bestows upon false prophets (which seem to be usually Christian preachers, teachers and leaders).  Why would i be any different? 

 

Without a formal commission, there was some hesitancy on my part about putting this work out publicly.  After all, i well know The ELOHIM’s Words about non-commissioned people doing things without authority.  Literally, many of the OT prophets’ sharpest criticisms are directed at these charlatans (to include modern Christian leaders and spokesmen).  YHWH says that He didn’t send them, yet they went and preached (lies). 

 

However, in time, some Scriptures came to my mind to grant me authority to put this effort out.  Interestingly, Israelites are YHWH’s servants (Lev 25:55; Neh 6:1; Isa 41:8-10; Jer 2:14), we can make ourselves servants of others (I Cor 9:19; Eph 6:5-8), and we are servants of whom we obey (Isa 56:6; Rom 6:16-20).  To have great rewards in the future Kingdom, one must learn to be a servant of others in this life (Matt 20:26). 

 

In I Peter 5:1-2, there is a need for elders (older men, like myself?) to feed YHWH’s people (with truth?); and in Daniel 12:3, those who know truth will turn many to righteousness.  Certainly, speakers of truth are not against YHWH; and thus, must be for Him (Lu 9:48-50).  Does this work effectively speak the truth or Christian lies? 

 

Importantly, The HIGHEST declares that “whosoever” (this must include anyone and everyone) shall obey the least of YHWH’s mitzwot and teach others to obey the least shall be great (with rewards) in His coming kingdom (Matt 5:19). 

 

This injunction opens the door for any person to have a commission--if they obey and teach others the least of His mitzwot (since the least is not identified, per se, it has to mean all of His mitzwot with no exceptions; to encompass “the least,” however the least is to be defined).  This writer does make a genuine effort to obey “all” of His mitzwot and certainly teaches “all” of them in the generic sense. 

 

Finally, the world is on the threshold of the emergence of something good, in the vein of the coming Philadelphia congregation (Rev 1-3).  It has to be significant that this entity will be number six in a sequence.  Number six is the number of man.  Will YHWH form this group or will man produce it?  Hopefully, this study will make a contribution to the development of the age-ending Philadelphia. 

 

 

The Good in Judaism 

 

Because of my vast mountains of sin (Shaul said he was the chief sinner, but i have been right up there at the top in violating YHWH’s righteous laws), i appreciate grace and The ELOHIM’s wonderful mitzwot.  Furthermore, i respect the Jews, who have preserved His Word and correctly taught some truths to me and others. 

 

It will be wonderful when other Israelites of the lost tribes (my racial brethren) can also see the benefits of having some knowledge and appreciation for Second Temple Judaism and change their minds toward that religion and indeed the Jews generally. 

 

This hope should not be taken with any view that true believers should abandon the truth of YESHUA or the NT in order to now convert to modern Judaism.  On the contrary, modern Judaism hates and persecutes true, Messianic believers; just like Christians hate and persecute practitioners of true Judaism. 

 

There is a prevailing belief among many Christians, especially Christian Identity types, that Judaism is the epitome of evil.  This pathetic ignorance of the Scriptures and truth was broached in a former chapter.  Of course, it is a Satanic belief.  But ignorant Christians have held on to it for 2,000 years. 

 

Even the few Messianic believers, who take hold of the Torah to some extent, try to separate themselves from Judaism--as if there was great evil in Judaism.  Some such persons try to suppose that the Scriptures offer up a religion which might be termed the Hebrew or Israelite faith which is supposed to be miles from Judaism. 

 

During the time of the judges and kings, the people collectively were always in absolute rebellion and contempt for this true religion.  While it is verity that some few Israelites did practice this true faith, most were far afield from it.  Regardless, the truth is that the Word does not name a Hebrew or Israelite religion, per se.  But in the context of the NT, there is something in the Book called the Jews’ religion (Judaism). 

 

Historically, there was no time when the collective peoples of Yehudah or Yisrael did much in the sense of obeying (although there were some revivals with a little interest in the days of certain judges and kings--like Hizkiyahu, Yoshiyahu, David, etc) before the eventual Babylonian conquests. 

 

 

Yes, Israelites Are Rebellious 

 

In that vein, the people in ancient Yisrael were much like the modern House of Yisrael Israelites.  They generally were extremely rebellious and evil (in both the Houses of Yehudah and Yisrael).  They profaned YHWH’s Sabbaths at will and could have cared less about the Torah.  However, there were some few persons who were obedient, to some extent, as just noted.  The same is true today. 

 

There are modern Israelites who do take YAH’s Sabbath laws seriously and do try to obey some portions of the Torah (this reality has been found somewhat in the Sacred Name movement in the last 60 years or so).  Assuredly, the contemporary Christian Identity motion does not qualify for this description.  Like other Christians, the Identity motion has historically been very much locked in heathen sun worship. 

 

However, despite the great evil in the overall Christian Identity movement (because the Christian Identity preachers are extremely evil and rebellious and teach much wickedness), there is some hope for some of the people in the movement.  Once Big Brother arrests/murders/destroys the Christian Identity leaders, many of the potentially good people can break free of them and find truth. 

 

If there was ever a time when the collective people of Yisrael took YHWH’s Sabbaths (the sign of identification) and portions of the Torah seriously, it was the Judaism after the Babylonian exile, during the days of Ezra and Nechemyah.  This Second Temple Judaism, promulgated by Ezra, was a good institution (despite some shortcomings).  It was a revival or reinstitution of the true faith of the Torah (particularly under Hillel). 

 

Hence, there is a gross need to wake up and realize that Second Temple Judaism was the religion of YESHUA, Kefa, Shaul and the Apostolic Assembly.  It is too bad that in the late first century CE, Judaism underwent the change which it did, as described in this study.  If modern Judaism was like Second Temple Judaism, the true believer would be right at home in the synagogue every Sabbath. 

 

 

Learning from Judaism? 

 

Nevertheless, there is much to be learned from the Jews and particularly in the context of what Second Temple Judaism believed, taught and acted upon in the sense of religion and culture.  Second Temple Judaism was fundamentally a good religion or the Apostolic Assembly would never have been a sect or part of it, as it was in the vein of the Messianic or Nazarene fragment of the Hillel Pharisees. 

 

By all means, anyone with any appreciation for the Word must come to grips with the two Hebrew words (hesed, meaning loyalty, and rea, meaning thy racial kinsman) that were introduced early on in this study.  While the Christian world and indeed the world of Adamites are totally lost on these two words, at least the Jews have some appreciation for them. 

 

When the modern state of Israel was set up, it was established to be a haven or place of safety for any Jew, worldwide, who was/is subject to arrest, trial or trouble in any country in the world.  Of course, Amalekite pornographers, gangsters and criminals loved this little provision and they have regularly used it to their advantage for the last 60 years.  Even Israel will not extradite Jews to the US for criminal acts. 

 

But one of the things overlooked on this theme is that even good, religious Jews support this measure, as well as the evil Amalekites.  The reasons are simple--because of hesed and rea.  The Jews are clannish and they will flat stick together against outsiders. 

 

One sees this same condition commonly present among almost all Colored peoples against the White man in the Christian West.  When Whitey has a controversy against a Colored in the US or Britain, he doesn’t have a chance in court facing a Colored judge or Colored jury. 

 

Conversely, the only people on planet earth who seem to emotionally and mentally oppose their own kind are White Adamic people and especially White Christians (who know absolutely nothing about hesed or rea).  When a politically incorrect White man goes into a courtroom in the US, he probably will find that not only do the Coloreds hate him, but the same situation applies with the White Christians present. 

 

A previous chapter noted the situation with Eric Rudolph of Western NC.  Here was a man who laid it on the line to try, in his way, to be righteous and to oppose the works of Satan (as evidenced in abortion clinics, in queer joints and in open interracial and promiscuous sex).  In a sense, he was, right or wrong, fighting for his own people in the “Bible Belt” of the South. 

 

Rudolph was raised in Western Carolina and must have had those persons in mind in his actions to try to support righteousness and truth, in his way.  You would think that if those White Christians had any concept of hesed and rea at all, they would have fully protected him, provided for him and never would have allowed him to be taken in custody by anyone (not even by their own local police). 

 

Certainly, if Rudolph would have been a Jew, Jews in Israel and Jews wherever they held government control would have never allowed him to be arrested and turned over to an oppressive, dictatorial, evil, governmental system which has no concept at all of righteousness or truth. 

 

Christian right wingers can cuss and complain all they want to about the evils of Jews; but they, themselves, and the culture and civilization they have spawned have become some of the most evil, vile realties in all of history.  What a tragedy it has been and is that Christian White people know absolutely nothing about the great Hebrew words hesed and rea. 

 

 

Jerusalem 

 

Finally, Jerusalem is clearly the destination for the very elect, right now  This writer is a full fledged Zionist and my heart yearns for Jerusalem; just like the election in Babylon, who sang:  “If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning.  If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth; if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy” (Ps 137:5-6). 

 

A remark from the Talmud says-- “Ten portions of beauty descended to the world, of which Jerusalem took nine while the remaining tenth was distributed to the rest of the world.”  In one more text from the Talmud-- “There is no beauty like the beauty of Jerusalem.”  The Psalmist said “Beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth is Mount Zion, on the sides of the north, the city of the great King” (Ps 48:2). 

 

Another Psalm says to teach it from generation to generation-- “Walk about Zion, go around her, count her towers, consider well her ramparts, view her citadels, that you may tell of them to the next generation.  For this ELOHIM is our ELOHIM, for ever and ever; he will be our Guide even to the end” (Ps 48:12-14). 

 

In II Chronicles 6:6, The MOST HIGH declares “But now I have chosen Jerusalem for My Name to be there; and I have chosen David to rule My people Israel.” 

 

Finally, “Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, they will prosper who love you” (Ps 122:6).  And contrary to the warped thinking of Christian Identity preachers, the subject is Jerusalem in Palestine and not Washington, DC. 

 

If it is YHWH’s will, this writing effort will help in some way to hasten the coming movement of the election of Yisrael to Jerusalem, in the context of the Day of YHWH and the establishment of The ELOHIM’s wonderful, millennial kingdom on earth (II Pet 3:12). 

 

May YHWH YESHUA, The MESSIAH, bless you richly as you study to be approved (II Tim 2:15).  Thank you very much for this privilege of service. 

 

 

THE END 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

 

 

Books By Author, Translator and/or Editor 

 

1.  Abegg, Martin, Jr., Peter Flint and Eugene Ulrich, “THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS BIBLE,” San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins Publishers, 1999. 

 

2.   Albarelli, Gerry, “TEACHA!  STORIES FROM A YESHIVA,” New York: Glad Books, 2001. 

 

3.   Aldrich, Gary, “UNLIMITED ACCESS,” 1996. 

 

4.   Alford, Henry, “THE GREEK TESTAMENT,” Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1968. 

 

5.   Allen, Gary, “NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY,” Rossmoor, CA: Concord Press, 1971. 

 

6.  Allen, J. H., “JUDAH’S SCEPTER AND JOSEPH’S BIRTHRIGHT,” Merrimac: MA, Destiny Publishers. 

 

7.  Antelman, Marvin, “TO ELIMINATE THE OPIATE,” Vol. II, Jerusalem, Israel: Zionist Book Club, 2002. 

 

8.  Ariel, Yisrael and Chaim Richman, “ODYSSEY OF THE THIRD TEMPLE, The.” 

 

9. Armstrong, Herbert W., “THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF HERBERT W. ARMSTRONG,” Pasadena, CA: Ambassador Press, 1973. 

 

10. Armstrong, Herbert W., “MYSTERY OF THE AGES,” New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1985. 

 

11. Armstrong, Karen, “A HISTORY OF GOD,” New York: Alfred A Knopp, 1993. 

 

12.  Asimov, Isaac, “ASIMOV’S GUIDE TO THE BIBLE.” 

 

13. Asimov, Isaac, “THE CLOCK WE LIVE ON,” London and New York: Abelard-Schuman, 1965. 

 

14.  Bainton, Roland H., “HUNTED HERETIC,” Boston; Beacon Press, 1953. 

 

15. Ballou, Robert O., “THE NATURE OF RELIGION,” New York and London: Basic Books, Inc., 1968. 

 

16.  Bamford, James, “BODY OF EVIDENCE,” 2001. 

 

17. Barkun, Michael, “RELIGION AND THE RACIST RIGHT, THE ORIGINS OF THE CHRISTIAN IDENTITY MOVEMENT,” Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1994. 

 

18. Bauer, W., and Arndt, W. F., and Gingrich, F. W., trans, “A GREEK ENGLISH LEXICON OF THE NEW TESTAMENT AND OTHER EARLY CHRISTIAN LITERATURE,” Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1957. 

 

19.   Bell, Art, and Whitley Strieber, “The COMING GLOBAL SUPER STORM,” 1999. 

 

20.   Benson, Ivor, “THE ZIONIST FACTOR.” 

 

21.  Berry, Gerald L., “RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD,” New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 1956. 

 

22.  Bernard, R. W., “APOLLONIUS THE NAZARENE,” Mokelumne Hill, CA: Health Research, 1956. 

 

23.  Bernard, Raymond, “FROM CHRISHNA TO CHRIST,” Mokelumne Hill, CA: Health Research, 1966. 

 

24. Bialik, Hayim Hahman and Yehoshua Hana Ravnitzky, eds, “THE BOOK OF LEGENDS SEFER HA-AGGADAH,” New York: Schocken Books, 1992. 

 

25.  Bishko, Herbert, “THIS IS JERUSALEM,” Tel Aviv, Israel: Heritage Publishing, Ltd., 1973. 

 

26.  Bishop, Jim, “THE DAY KENNEDY WAS SHOT,” New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1968. 

 

27.  Blaiklock, E. M., “ZONDERVAN PICTORIAL BIBLE ATLAS, The,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1969. 

 

28.  Blodgett, Terry, “PHONOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES IN GERMANIC AND HEBREW.”

 

29.  Blumrich, Josef F., “THE SPACESHIPS OF EZEKIEL,” New York, Bantam Books, Inc., 1972. 

 

30. Bonnefoy, Yves, “GREEK AND EGYPTIAN MYTHOLOGIES,” Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 

 

31. Botterweck, G. Johannes and Ringgren, Helmer, eds., “THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1975. 

 

32.  Bowden, Malcom, “THE RISE OF THE EVOLUTION FRAUD.” 

 

33.  Bowers, G. M., “FAITH AND DOCTRINES OF THE EARLY CHURCH,” Altadena, CA: Triumph Publishing Co, 1978. 

 

34. Braude, William G., and Kapstein, Israel J., “PESIKTA DE-RAB KAHANA,” Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1975. 

 

35. Brauer, Gerald C., ed, “THE WESTMINISTER DICTIONARY OF CHURCH HISTORY,” Philadelphia: The Westminister Press, 1971. 

 

36.  Bridger, David, ed, “THE NEW JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA,” New York: Behirman House, Inc., 1962. 

 

37.  Brown, Colin, ed, “THE NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT THEOLOGY,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1971. 

 

38.  Brown, Francis; Driver, S. R.; and Briggs, Charles A., eds., “A HEBREW AND ENGLISH LEXICON OF THE OLD TESTAMENT,” Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974. 

 

39.  Brown, Hugh Auchincloss, “CATACLYSMS OF THE EARTH,” New York: Twayne Publishers, Inc., 1967. 

 

40. Brown, Lester R., “THE TWENTY NINTH DAY,” New York; W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1978. 

 

41.  Bruce, F. F., “THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE,” 1988. 

 

42.  Brydon, George M, “ESSAYS ON SEGREGATION--UNITY OF THE CHURCH.” 

 

43.  Budge, E. A. Wallis, “THE EGYPTIAN HEAVEN & HELL,” LaSalle, IL: Open Court Publishing Co, 1905. 

 

44. Bulfinch, Thomas, “BULFINCH’S MYTHOLOGY,” New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1855. 

 

45.  Bullinger, E. W., ed, “THE COMPANION BIBLE,” London: Samuel Bagster & Sons, Ltd., 1970. 

 

46. Butler, Smedley D. Butler, “WAR IS A RACKET,” New York: Round Table Press, Inc., 1935. 

 

47. Canney, Maurice, “AN ENCYCLOPAEDIA OF RELIGIONS,” Detroit, MI: Gale Research Co, 1970. 

 

48.  Carr, William Guy, “PAWNS IN THE GAME.” 

 

49.  Carson, Jake, “THE ULTIMATE PRIVACY PROTECTION GUIDE,” Charlotte, NC: American Lantern Press, Inc., 2001. 

 

50.   Carson, Rachel, “SILENT SPRING,” 1962. 

 

51. Cassirer, Heinz W., “GOD’S NEW COVENANT, A NEW TESTAMENT TRANSLATION,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1989. 

 

52. Charlesworth, James H. and Loren I. Johns, eds, “HILLEL AND JESUS,” Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1997. 

 

53. Chavel, Charles B., trans, “MAIMONIDES THE COMMANDMENTS,” London & New York: The Soncino Press, 1967. 

 

54.  Churchill, Winston, “ZIONISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM.” 

 

55. Coffman, Michael S., “THE BIRTH OF WORLD GOVERNMENT,” Bangor, Maine: Environmental Perspectives, Inc, 2001. 

 

56.  Cohen, Abraham and Jacob Neusner, “EVERYMAN’S TALMUD,” New York: Shocken Books, 1995.  

 

57.  Colson, F. H., et al, trans, “PHILO,” Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1949. 

 

58.  Comfort, Philip Wesley, “EARLY MANUSCRIPTS AND MODERN TRANSLATIONS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT,” Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1990. 

 

59.  Conder, Darrell W., “MYSTERY BABYLON AND THE LOST TEN TRIBES IN THE END TIME,” Salt Lake City, UT: Commonwealth Publishing, 1996. 

 

60. Conder, Darrell W., “MYSTERY BABYLON THE GREAT THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH,” Salt Lake City, UT: Commonwealth Publishing, 1993. 

 

61. Costas, Procope S., “AN OUTLINE OF THE HISTORY OF THE GREEK LANGUAGE, “ Chicago, IL: The Ukrainian Academy of Sciences of America, 1937. 

 

62.  Crenshaw, Charles, “JFK:  Conspiracy of Silence,” 1992. 

 

63.  Cumont, Franz, ”MYSTERIES OF MITHRAISM.” 

 

64.  Cumont, Franz, “ORIENTAL RELIGIONS IN ROMAN PAGANISM.” 

 

65.  Dana, H. E., and Mantey, Julius R., “A MANUAL GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT,” New York: The MacMillan Company, 1955. 

 

66. Danby, Herbert, trans, “THE MISHNAH,” Translated From The Hebrew With Introduction and Brief Explanatory Notes, Oxford, London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1933. 

 

67.  Darwin, Charles Robert, “ON THE ORIGIN OF THE SPECIES,” 1859. 

 

68.  Davidson, Benjamin, “THE ANALYTICAL HEBREW AND CHALDEE LEXICON,” London: Samuel Bagster & Son, Ltd., 1967. 

 

69.  Davidy, Yair, “LOST ISRAELITE IDENTITY,” Jerusalem, Israel: Russell-Davis Publishers, 1996. 

 

70.   Davis, J. D., “DAVIS DICTIONARY OF THE BIBLE,” Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1972. 

 

71.  Deal, Colin, “CHRIST RETURNS BY 1988,” Rutherford College, NC. 

 

72.  Delph, Wallace, “BIBLE TREES,” Corbin, KY; Wallace Delph, n.d. 

 

73.  Deyo, Stan, “COSMIC CONSPIRACY.” 

 

74. Douglas, J. D., gen ed, “THE NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1974. 

 

75.  Dowling, Dr., “HISTORY OF ROMANISM.” 

 

76.  Dugger, A. N., and C. O. Dodd, “A HISTORY OF THE TRUE RELIGION,” Salem, WV: The Bible Advocate, 1936.  

 

77. Duncan, Homer, “SECULAR HUMANISM,” Lubbock, TX: Missionary Crusader, 1979. 

 

78.  Durant, Will, “THE RISE OF CIVILIZATION.” 

 

79.  Eban, Abba, “HERITAGE--CIVILIZATION AND THE JEWS,” New York: Summit Books, 1984. 

 

80. Edersheim, Alfred, “SKETCHES OF JEWISH SOCIAL LIFE,” Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994. 

 

81.  Edersheim, Alfred, “THE LIFE AND TIMES OF JESUS THE MESSIAH,” Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1993. 

 

82.  Edersheim, Alfred, “THE TEMPLE: ITS MINISTRY AND SERVICES,” Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994. 

 

83.  Ehrman, Bart D., “THE NEW TESTAMENT, A HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION TO THE EARLY CHRISTIAN WRITINGS,” New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. 

 

84. Ehrman, Bart D., “THE NEW TESTAMENT AND OTHER EARLY CHRISTIAN WRITINGS,” New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. 

 

85. Ehrman, Bart D., “THE ORTHODOX CORRUPTION OF SCRIPTURE,” New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 

 

86.  Einstein, Albert, and  Infeld, Leopold, “EVOLUTION OF PHYSICS.” 

 

87. Emry, Sheldon, “DRUGS IN PROPHECY,” Phoenix, AZ: America’s Promise Ministries, 1990. 

 

88. English, E. Schuyler, “A COMPANION TO THE NEW SCOFIELD REFERENCE BIBLE.” 

 

89.  Eringer, Robert, “THE GLOBAL MANIPULATORS.” 

 

90. Etheridge, J. W., trans, “THE TARGUMS OF ONKELOS AND JONATHAN BEN UZZIEL ON THE PENTATEUCH WITH THE FRAGMENTS OF THE JERUSALEM TARGUM FROM THE CHALDEE,” New York: KTAV Publishing House, 1968. 

 

91. Fagnani, C. P. and A. B. Davidson, “HEBREW PRIMER AND GRAMMAR,” Wilmington, DL: Associated Publishers and Authors, 1903. 

 

92.  Falk, Harvey, “JESUS THE PHARISEE; A NEW LOOK AT THE JEWISHNESS OF JESUS,” New York: Paulist Press, 1985. 

 

93. Fausset, A. R., ed, “FAUSSET’S BIBLE DICTIONARY,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1972. 

 

94.  Fenton, Ferrar, trans, “THE HOLY BIBLE IN MODERN ENGLISH,” Merrimac, MA: Destiny Publishers, 1966. 

 

95.   Ferguson, John, “THE RELIGIONS OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE.” 

 

96.   Ferguson, Marilyn, “THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY,” 1980. 

 

97.  Field, Frederick, “NOTES ON THE TRANSLATION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT,” Hendrickson Publishers, Inc., 1899. 

 

98.  Flusser, David, “JEWISH SOURCES IN EARLY CHRISTIANITY,” Jerusalem: Sfriat Poalim, 1979. 

 

99. Flusser, David, “JUDAISM AND THE ORIGINS OF CHRISTIANITY,” Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, The Hebrew University, 1988. 

 

100.  Flusser, David, “THE SPIRITUAL HISTORY OF THE DEAD SEA SECT,” Tel Aviv, Israel: MOD Books, 1989. 

 

101.  Forlong, J. G. R., “ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RELIGIONS.” 

 

102.  Fox, Everett, “THE FIVE BOOKS OF MOSES,” New York: Schocken Books, 1997. 

 

103.  Friedman, Richard Elliott, “COMMENTARY ON THE TORAH,” San Francisco: Harper-Collins Books, 2001.  

 

104. Frost, S. E., Jr., “THE SACRED WRITINGS OF THE WORLD’S GREAT RELIGIONS,” New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1943. 

 

105. Garrison, Jim, “ON THE TRAIL OF THE ASSASSIN,” New York: Sheridan Square Press, 1988. 

 

106. Garrison, Ken, “HEBRAIC ROOTS,” Casselberry, FL: Tzemach Institute for Biblical Studies, 1999. 

 

107. Gayman, Dan, “DO ALL RACES SHARE IN SALVATION?,” Schell City, MO: The Church of Israel, 1985. 

 

108.  Gayman, Dan, “THE TWO SEEDS OF GENESIS 3:15,” Schell City, MO: The Church of Israel, 1977 and 1994 (revised). 

 

109.  Golb, Norman, “WHO WROTE THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS,” New York: Scribner, 1995. 

 

110.  Gorenberg, Gershom, “THE END OF DAYS,” Fundamentalism and the Struggle for the Temple Mount, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Singapore: The Free Press, 2000. 

 

111.  Grabbe, Lester L., “JUDAISM FROM CYRUS TO HADRIAN,” Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1992. 

 

112.  Griffin, Des, “FOURTH REICH OF THE RICH.” 

 

113. Grose, Captain, compiler, “1811 DICTIONARY OF THE VULGAR TONGUE,” London: C. Chappel, 1811, Reprint edition, Northfield, IL: Digest Books, Inc., 1971. 

 

114.  Grossfeld, Bernard, editor, “THE TARGUM TO THE FIVE MEGILLOTH,” New York: Hermon Press, 1973. 

 

115. Grun, Bernard, “THE TIMETABLES OF HISTORY,” New York: Simon and Schuster, 1982. 

 

116. Haberman, Frederick, “TRACING OUR ANCESTORS.” 

 

117.  Hadley, Edwin M., “CAHILLA UNMASKED.” 

 

118.  Hamaker, John D., and Donald A. Weaver, “THE SURVIVAL OF CIVILIZATION,” Potterville, MI: Hamaker-Weaver Publishers, 1982. 

 

119. Hannay, J. B., “SEX SYMBOLISM IN RELIGION,” London: H. A. Oakeshoff, 1922. 

 

120. Hannay, James Ballantyne, “THE RISE, DECLINE & FALL OF THE ROMAN RELIGION,” Mokelumne Hill, CA: Health Research, 1972. 

 

121.  Hansen, Richard, “THE SEARCH FOR THE CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE OF GOD,” Scotland (Presbyterian), 1980. 

 

122. Harris, R. Laird; Archer, Gleason L., Jr.; and Waltke, Bruce K.; “THEOLOGICAL WORDBOOK OF THE OLD TESTAMENT,” Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1980. 

 

123. Harrison, Everett F., “INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TESTAMENT,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1971. 

 

124. Harrison, R. K., “OLD TESTAMENT TIMES,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1970. 

 

125.  Hastings, James, “THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RELIGION AND ETHICS.” 

 

126. Hastings, James, “DICTIONARY OF THE BIBLE, A,” New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1902.  

 

127.  Hastings, James, “DICTIONARY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT.” 

 

128. Heck, Gene, “THE WEEKLY SABBATH WHEN?,” Athol, ID: Bible Research Institute, 1995. 

 

129.  Heckethorn, Charles William, “THE SECRET SOCIETIES OF ALL AGES AND COUNTRIES,” London: George Redway Publishing, 1897. 

 

130.  Hemenway, Harold, “BIBLICAL ASTRONOMY AND THE CALENDAR,” Seattle, WA: Universal Church of God, 1990. 

 

131.  Herrell, V. S., “FORBIDDEN TRUTH,” Kodak, TN: Herrell Brothers Publishing House, 1992. 

 

132.  Herrnstein and Murray, “THE BELL CURVE,” 1994. 

 

133. Hersh, Seymour M., “THE DARK SIDE OF CAMELOT,” New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1997. 

 

134. Hertz, J. H., ed, “THE SONCINO EDITION OF THE PENTATEUCH AND HAFTORAHS,” London: Soncino Press, 1969. 

 

135.  Heshel, Abraham J., “THE PROPHETS.” 

 

136. Higgins, Godfrey, “ANACALYPSIS,” London: Longman, Paternoster Row, 1836. 

 

137. Hirsch, Samson Raphael and Levy, Isaac, trans, “THE PENTATEUCH,” London: L. Honig & Sons, Ltd., 1967. 

 

138. Hirsch, Samson Raphael, “THE PSALMS,” New York: Philipp Feldheim, Inc., 1960. 

 

139. Hislop, Alexander, “THE TWO BABYLONS,” Neptune, NJ: Loizeaux Brothers, 1959. 

 

140.  Hopson, J. A., “IMPERIALISM.” 

 

141. Hoeh, Herman L., “COMPENDIUM OF WORLD HISTORY,” Pasadena, CA: Ambassador College Graduate School of Education, 1966. 

 

142. Holladay, William L., ed, “A CONCISE HEBREW AND ARAMAIC LEXICON OF THE OLD TESTAMENT,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1971. 

 

143.  Hosty, James P., Jr., “ASSIGNMENT: OSWALD,” New York: Arcade Publishing, 1996. 

 

144. Hunter, George G., III, “HOW TO REACH SECULAR PEOPLE,” Nashville, TN: Abandon Press. 

 

145. Israel, Dan, “CHRISTIANITY UNMASQUED,” Pawtucket, RI: SOS Press, 1998. 

 

146.  James, E. O., “COMPARATIVE RELIGION,” London: Methuen & Co Ltd., 1961. 

 

147. Jamieson, Robert; Fausset, Andrew Robert; and Brown, David; “COMMENTARY ON THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1970. 

 

148. Jeansonne, Glen, “GERALD L. K. SMITH, MINISTER OF HATE,” New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1988. 

 

149. Jenkins, Philip, “HIDDEN GOSPELS;  HOW THE SEARCH FOR JESUS LOST ITS WAY,” New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. 

 

150. Johansen, R. W., “THE LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATES OF 1858,” New York: Oxford University Press, 1965. 

 

151. Johnson, Paul, “A HISTORY OF THE JEWS,” New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1987. 

 

152. Jones, Steve, “THE LANGUAGE OF GENES,” New York: Anchor Books Doubleday, 1993. 

 

153. Jones, Thomas, “THE ELECT; WHO ARE THEY?--A SCRIPTURAL VIEW,” Taylor, ND: Uriel Publications, 1979. 

 

154. Josephson, Elmer A., “GOD’S KEY TO HEALTH AND HAPPINESS.” 

 

155. Justice, Gene, “THE ISRAEL IDENTITY SYNDROME,” Pasadena, CA: Foundation for Biblical Research, 1984. 

 

156. Kasher, Menachem M., “ENCYCLOPEDIA OF BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION,” New York: American Biblical Encyclopedia Society, 1970. 

 

157.  Klein, Henry H., “A JEW EXPOSES THE JEWISH WORLD CONSPIRACY,” 1946. 

 

158. Klein, Isaac, “A GUIDE TO JEWISH RELIGIOUS PRACTICE,” New York: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1979. 

 

159.  Keirsey, David, and Bates, Marilyn, “PLEASE UNDERSTAND ME,” Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Book Company, 1984. 

 

160.  Kennedy. Randall, “NIGGER:  THE STRANGE CAREER OF A TROUBLESOME WORD,” Pantheon, 2002. 

 

161.  King, Marie Gentert, ed, “FOXE’S BOOK OF MARTYRS,” Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H Revell Co, 1968. 

 

162.  Kittel, Gerhard, ed, “THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1967. 

 

163.  Kloss, Jethro, “BACK TO EDEN.” 

 

164.  Knoch, A. E., compiler, “CONCORDANT LITERAL NEW TESTAMENT,” Saugus, CA: Concordant Publishing Co, 1966. 

 

165. Knoch, A. E., “CONCORDANT COMMENTARY ON THE NEW TESTAMENT,” Saugus, CA: Concordant Publishing Co, 1968. 

 

166. Koestler, Arthur, “THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE. THE KHAZAR EMPIRE AND ITS HERITAGE,” New York: Random House, 1976.   

 

167. Koster, C. J., “COME OUT OF HER MY PEOPLE,” Randburg, RSA: Institute of Scripture Research, 1996. 

 

168. Koster, C. J., “THE FINAL REFORMATION,” Sunnyside, RSA: The Believers, n.d. 

 

169. Kristian, Hans, “MISSION: POSSIBLE.”

 

170. Lambert, O. C., “CATHOLICISM AGAINST ITSELF,” Shreveport, LA: Lambert Book House, 1963. 

 

171.  Lammerts, Walter E., “WHY NOT CREATION.” 

 

172. Lamsa, George M., “THE HOLY BIBLE FROM ANCIENT EASTERN MANUSCRIPTS,” Philadelphia, PA: A. J. Holman Company, 1957. 

 

173.  Lamsa, George M., “GOSPEL LIGHT,” Philadelphia, PA: A. J. Holman Company, 1939. 

 

174. Langer, William L., ed., “ENCYCLOPEDIA OF WORLD HISTORY, An,” Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1972. 

 

175.  Lavin, Daniel, “AMERICA’S REAL WAR.” 

 

176.  Lasky, Victor, “IT DIDN’T START WITH WATERGATE,” New York: The Dial Press, 1977. 

 

177. Lauterbach, Jacob Z., trans., “MEKILTA DE-RABBI ISHMAEL” (Midrash), Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1976. 

 

178. Lee, Leonard C., “CLOUDS OVER AMERICA,” Washington, DC: Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1948. 

 

179.  Lee, Robert W., “THE UNITED NATIONS CONSPIRACY,” Belmont, MA: Western Islands, 1981. 

 

180.  Legge, Francis, “FORERUNNERS AND RIVALS OF CHRISTIANITY,” New York: University Press, 1964.  

 

181. Levey, Judith S. and Greenhall, Agnes, eds., “THE CONCISE COLUMBIA ENCYCLOPEDIA,” New York: Avon Books, 1983. 

 

182.  Lewis, Ron, “FLASHBACK.” 

 

183. Lifton, David S., “BEST EVIDENCE,” New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1980. 

 

184.  Liddell, Henry George; and Scott, Robert; and Drissler, Henry, ed, “A GREEK-ENGLISH LEXICON,” New York: Harper Brothers, 1846. 

 

185. Lightfoot, John, “A COMMENTARY ON THE NEW TESTAMENT FROM THE TALMUD AND HEBRAICA,” Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1979. 

 

186.  Lilienthal, Alfred M., “WHAT PRICE ISRAEL.” 1953. 

 

187. Lilienthal, Alfred M., “THE ZIONIST CONNECTION, WHAT PRICE PEACE?” New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1978. 

 

188.  Lindsey, Robert L., “JESUS, RABBI & LORD; THE HEBREW STORY OF JESUS BEHIND THE GOSPELS,” Oak Creek, WI: Cornerstone Publishing, 1990. 

 

189. Lindsey, Robert L., “THE JESUS SOURCES: UNDERSTANDING THE GOSPELS,” Tulsa, OK: HaKesher, 1990. 

 

190.  Lockyer, Herbert, “ALL THE MEN OF THE BIBLE,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1958. 

 

191. Lunev, Stanislav, “THROUGH THE EYES OF THE ENEMY,” Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1998. 

 

192. Maccoby, Hyam, “REVOLUTION IN JUDAEA: JESUS AND THE JEWISH RESISTANCE,” London: Orbach and Chambers, 1973, Reprint Edition, New York: Taplinger, 1981. 

 

193.  Mack, Burton L., “WHO WROTE THE NEW TESTAMENT? THE MAKING OF THE CHRISTIAN MYTH,” San Francisco: Harper Collins Publishers, 1995. 

 

194.  MacPherson, Dave, “THE UNBELIEVABLE PRE-TRIB ORIGIN,” 1976. 

 

195.  Male, Emile, “GOTHIC IMAGE, The,” New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1958. 

 

196.  Maier, Paul L., “JOSEPHUS, THE ESSENTIAL WRITINGS,” Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1988. 

 

197.  Manhattan, Avro, “VATICAN IMPERIALISM IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY.” 

 

198.  Manhattan, Avro, “THE VATICAN BILLIONS.” 

 

199.  Mailer, Norman, “OSWALD’S TALE,” An American Mystery, New York: Random House, 1995. 

 

200. Martin, Rose L., “FABIAN FREEWAY, HIGH ROAD TO SOCIALISM IN THE U.S.A.,” Santa Monica, CA: Fidelis Publishers, Inc., 1968. 

 

201.  Marx, Karl, “DAS KAPITAL,”  Hamburg, Germany, 1848. 

 

202.  Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels, “THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO,” London, 1867. 

 

203. McClintock, John, and James Strong, “CYCLOPEDIA OF BIBLICAL, THEOLOGICAL, AND ECCLESIASTICAL LITERATURE,” Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1970. 

 

204.  McGhee, Mildred, “SECRETS UNCOVERED:  J. EDGAR HOOVER--PASSING FOR WHITE?,” Rancho Cucamonga, CA: Allen-Morris, 2000. 

 

205.  McGowan, William, “COLORING THE NEWS,” 2001. 

 

206.  Mead, G. R. S., “SIMON MAGUS,” Kila, MT: Kessinger Publishing Company, n.d. 

 

207.  Melton, J. Gordon, “ENCYCLOPEDIA OF AMERICAN RELIGIONS.” 

 

208. Metzger, Bruce M., “A TEXTUAL COMMENTARY ON THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT,” London and New York: United Bible Societies, 1971. 

 

209.  Metzger, Bruce M., and Michael D. Coogan, “THE OXFORD COMPANION TO THE BIBLE,” New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 

 

210.  Moffatt, James, “A NEW TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE CONTAINING THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS,” New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1954. 

 

211. Mohr, Jack, “THE EFFECTS OF THE TALMUD ON JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY.” 

 

212. Morgan, Kenneth O., ed., “OXFORD ILLUSTRATED HISTORY OF BRITAIN, The,” New York: Oxford University Press, 1984. 

 

213. Morton, Andrew, “THE WEALTH OF THE WINDSORS,” New York: Arcade Publishing, 1993. 

 

214. Moseley, Ron, “YESHUA, A GUIDE TO THE REAL JESUS AND THE ORIGINAL CHURCH,” Baltimore, MD: Leaderer Publishers, 1996. 

 

215.  Mosheim, Johann, “ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY.” 

 

216.  Murray, Arnold, “KENITE GENEALOGY,” Gravette, AR: n.d. (unpublished). 

 

217. Murray, David and Joel Schwartz and S. Robert Lichter, “IT AIN’T NECESSARILY SO,” 2001. 

 

218.  Myers, C. V., “SILVER.” 

 

219. Neusner, Jacob and William Scott, editors, “DICTIONARY OF JUDAISM IN THE BIBLICAL PERIOD,” Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1996. 

 

220. Nicholls, William, “CHRISTIAN ANTI-SEMITISM.” 

 

221.  Nicoll, W. Robertson, “THE EXPOSITOR’S GREEK TESTAMENT,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1970. 

 

222. Nida, Eugene A., “TOWARD A SCIENCE OF TRANSLATING.” 

 

223. Nock, Albert Jay, “OUR ENEMY, THE STATE,” The Christian Common Law Institute, 1946. 

 

224. Nudelmann, Judi, “SHARANSKY: WITHOUT THE MASK,” Negev, Israel: Negevpress, 1999. 

 

225. Nyquist, J. R., “ORIGINS OF THE 4TH WORLD WAR,” Arkansas City, KS: Gilliland Printing, 1998. 

 

226.  Ogilvie, John, “THE COMPREHENSIVE ENGLISH DICTIONARY.” 

 

227. Orr, James, gen ed, “THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BIBLE ENCYCLOPEDIA,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1939. 

 

228.  Orwell, George, “1984,” 1948. 

 

229. Patterson, James, and Peter Kim, “THE DAY AMERICA TOLD THE TRUTH,” 1991. 

 

230. Pearce, Gordon Keith, “ISRAEL IDENTITY,” Vancouver, BC, Canada: Assembly of Yahowah, The Eternal, n.d. 

 

231. Pearce, Gordon Keith, “JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES,” Vancouver, BC, Canada: Assembly of Yahowah, The Eternal, 1983. 

 

232. Peloubet, F. N., ed, “PELOUBET’S BIBLE DICTIONARY,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1970. 

 

233. Perschbacher, Wesley J., ed, “THE NEW ANALYTICAL GREEK LEXICON,” Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1990. 

 

234. Phillips, J. B., “THE FOUR PROPHETS, A TRANSLATION INTO MODERN ENGLISH,” New York: The MacMillan Company, 1963. 

 

235.  Phillips, J. B., “THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN ENGLISH,” New York: The MacMillan Company, 1958. 

 

236.  Pike, Albert, “MORALS AND DOGMA.” 

 

237. Piper, Michael Collins, “FINAL JUDGMENT,” Fifth Edition, Washington: The Center for Historical Review, 2000. 

 

238.  Plato, “REPUBLIC, The,” c 400 BCE to 347 BCE. 

 

239.  Podrabinek, Alexander, “PUNITIVE MEDICINE.” 

 

240. Price, Randall, “THE COMING LAST DAYS TEMPLE,” Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 1999. 

 

241. Quigley, Carroll, “TRAGEDY AND HOPE, A HISTORY OF THE WORLD IN OUR TIME,” New York: The MacMillan Company, 1966. 

 

242. Ragano, Frank, and Selwyn Rabb, “MOB LAWYER,” New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1994.

 

243. Ramsay, William M., “ST. PAUL THE TRAVELLER AND THE ROMAN CITIZEN,” Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House. 

 

244. Rausch, David, “MESSIANIC JUDAISM,” Lewiston/Queenston/Lampeter: The Edwin Mellon Press, 1982. 

 

245. Ramsay, William M., “THE CITIES OF ST. PAUL,” Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1960. 

 

246.  Reid, James, “GOD, THE ATOM AND THE UNIVERSE.” 

 

247.  Ritmeyer, Leen and Kathleen, “SECRETS OF JERUSALEM’S TEMPLE MOUNT,” Washington, DC: Biblical Archeological Society, 1998.   

 

248. Roberts, Craig, “KILL ZONE,” Tulsa, OK: Consolidated Press International, 1994. 

 

249.  Robinson, Matt, “MOBOCRACY,” 2001. 

 

250.  Ross, Robert Gaylon, Sr, “THE ELITE SERIAL KILLERS OF LINCOLN, JFK, RFK & MLK,” Spicewood, TX: RIE, 2001. 

 

251.  Ross, Robert Gaylon, Sr, “WHO’S WHO OF THE ELITE,” Spicewood, TX: RIE, 2000. 

 

252. Roth, Cecil, ed in chief, “ENCYCLOPAEDIA JUDAICA,” Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House, Ltd., 1971. 

 

253. Rotherham, Joseph Bryant, “THE EMPHASIZED BIBLE,” Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1959. 

 

254. Runes, Dagobert D., “CONCISE DICTIONARY OF JUDAISM,” New York: Philosophical Library, Inc., 1959. 

 

255. Rupert, G. G., “THE YELLOW PERIL,” Britton, OK: Union Publishing Co., 1911. 

 

256. Rushton, J. Philippe, “RACE, EVOLUTION, AND BEHAVIOR,” New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1995. 

 

257. Rusk, Roger, “THE OTHER END OF THE WORLD,” Knoxville, TN: Plantation House, Inc., 1988. 

 

258. Sadler, John, “RIGHTS TO THE KINGDOM.” 

 

259. Saxon, William Norman, “THE MASK OF EDOM,” Merrimac, MA: Destiny Publishers, 1985. 

 

260. Scheim, David E., “CONTRACT ON AMERICA,” New York: Shapolsky Publishers, Inc., 1988. 

 

261. Schiffman, Michael, “RETURN OF THE REMNANT,” Baltimore, MD: Leaderer Publishers, 1996. 

 

262. Schurer, Emil, “A HISTORY OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE IN THE TIME OF JESUS CHRIST,” Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1890. 

 

263. Scofield, C. I., “SCOFIELD REFERENCE BIBLE.” 

 

264. Shanks, Hershel, “UNDERSTANDING THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS,” New York: Random House, 1992. 

 

265. Shem Tob ben Isaac ben Shaprut, author, and Dr George Howard, trans, “HEBREW GOSPEL OF MATTHEW,” Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1995. 

 

266. Shelton, Herbert M., “THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM--ORTHOTROPHY,” San Antonio, TX: Dr. Shelton’s Health School, 1963. 

 

267. Simon, George T., “THE BIG BANDS,” New York: Schirmer Books, 1981. 

 

268. Stafford, Greg, “JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES DEFENDED,” Huntington Beach, CA: Elihu Books, 2000. 

 

269. Stern, David H., “COMPLETE JEWISH BIBLE,” Clarksville, MD: Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc., 1998. 

 

270. Stern, David H., “JEWISH NEW TESTAMENT COMMENTARY,” Clarksville, MD; Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc., 1996. 

 

271. Stern, David H., “MESSIANIC JEWISH MANIFESTO,” Clarksville, MD: Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc., 1997. 

 

272.  Stevenson, G. T., “TIME AND ETERNITY,” Victoria, Australia: Champion Press. 

 

273. Strong, James, “THE EXHAUSTIVE CONCORDANCE OF THE BIBLE AND DICTIONARIES OF THE HEBREW AND GREEK WORDS,” McLean, VA: MacDonald Publishing Co, n.d. 

 

274.  Sutton, Anthony, “WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER.” 

 

275. Tenney, Merrill C., gen ed, “THE ZONDERVAN PICTORIAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE BIBLE,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1975. 

 

276. Tennyson, E. T., “DELIVERANCE IN THE WHIRLWIND,” Jefferson City, MO: Harvest Publishers, 1959. 

 

277. Tennyson, E. T., “THE SERPENT’S BELLY,” Jefferson City, MO: Harvest Publishers, 1966. 

 

278. Tennyson, E. T., “THE TIME OF THE END,” Jefferson City, MO: Harvest Publishers, 1969. 

 

279. Tennyson, E. T., “UNSPEAKABLE WORDS,” Jefferson City, MO: Harvest Publishers, 1961. 

 

280. Thayer, Joseph Henry, “GREEK-ENGLISH LEXICON,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1970. 

 

281. Thiede, Carsten Peter, and Matthew D’Ancona, “EYEWITNESS TO JESUS,” New York: Doubleday, 1996. 

 

282.  Traina, Angelo, “THE HOLY NAME BIBLE,” Irvington, NJ: The Scripture Research Association, Inc., 1963. 

 

283. Tregellus, Samuel Prideaux, trans, “GESENIUS’ HEBREW AND CHALDEE LEXICON,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1969. 

 

284. Troki, Isaac, “FAITH STRENGTHENED,” New York: Hermon Press, 1970. 

 

285. Tucker, Ruth A., “NOT ASHAMED,” Sisters, OR: Multnomah Publications, 1999. 

 

286. Vacca, Roberto, “THE COMING DARK AGE.” New York: Doubleday Company, Inc., 1973. 

 

287.  Vaughan, Curtis, gen ed, “THE NEW TESTAMENT FROM 26 TRANSLATIONS,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1967. 

 

288. Vaughan, Curtis, gen ed, “THE WORD THE BIBLE FROM 26 TRANSLATIONS,” Gulfport, MS: Mathis Publishers, Inc., 1993. 

 

289. Velikovsky, Immanuel, “WORLDS IN COLLISION,” 1950. 

 

290. Velikovsky, Immanuel, “EARTH IN UPHEAVAL.” 

 

291. Verkuyl, Gerrit, ed in chief, “THE MODERN LANGUAGE BIBLE, THE NEW BERKELEY VERSION,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1969. 

 

292. Vermes, Geza, “THE COMPLETE DEAD SEA SCROLLS IN ENGLISH,” New York: The Penguin Press, 1997. 

 

293.  Vine, W. E. and Merrill F. Unger and William White, Jr., eds., “VINE’S COMPLETE EXPOSITORY DICTIONARY OF OLD AND NEW TESTAMENT WORDS,” Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers, Inc., 1984. 

 

294. Waddell, L. A., “THE MAKERS OF CIVILIZATION IN RACE & HISTORY,” Hollywood, CA: Angriff Press, 1929. 

 

295. Walker, Barbara G., “WOMAN’S ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MYTHS AND SECRETS, The,” San Francisco, CA: Harper Publishers, 1983. 

 

296. Walker, William J., “REMNANT MESSAGE TO MODERN ISRAEL,” Opportunity, WA: The Remnant of Israel, n.d. 

 

297. Walsh, Mary E., “THE WINE OF ROMAN BABYLON,” Nashville, TN: The Southern Publishing Association, 1945. 

 

298.  Watkins, Leslie, “ALTERNATIVE 003,” 1979. 

 

299. Weisman, Charles A., “THE ORIGIN OF RACE and CIVILIZATION,” Burnsville, MN: Weisman Publications. 

 

300. Wells, H. G., “THE OUTLINE OF HISTORY,” New York: Doubleday, 1956. 

 

301. Westcott, B. F., “THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1971. 

 

302. Weymouth, Richard Francis, “THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN SPEECH,” New York: Harper and Row Publishers. 

 

303. Wharey, James, “SKETCHES OF CHURCH HISTORY,” Presbyterian Board of Publications, 1840. 

 

304. Whiston, William, trans, “JOSEPHUS COMPLETE WORKS,” Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1969. 

 

305. White, Lew, “FOSSILIZED CUSTOMS,” Louisville, KY: Fossilized Customs, 1999. 

 

306. Wilson, Marvin R., “OUR FATHER ABRAHAM.”

 

307. Wilson, Walter Lewis, “WILSON’S DICTIONARY OF BIBLE TYPES,” Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1957. 

 

308. Wilson, William, “OLD TESTAMENT WORD STUDIES,” Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1978. 

 

309.  Wise, Michael and Martin Abegg, Jr., and Edward Cook, “DEAD SEA SCROLLS, The,” A New Translation, San Francisco: Harper, 1996

 

310. Woodrow, Ralph, “BABYLON MYSTERY RELIGION,” Riverside, CA: Ralph Woodrow Evangelistic Association, Inc., 1966. 

 

311.  Woodrow, Ralph, “SHOULD WOMEN WEAR JEWELRY?” 

 

312.  Yaffe, James, “THE AMERICAN JEWS,” 1968. 

 

313.  Yonge, C. D., trans., “THE WORKS OF PHILO,” Hendrickson Publishers, 1993. 

 

314. Young, Robert, “ANALYTICAL CONCORDANCE,” Grand Rapids, MI: Associated Publishers, n.d. 

 

315. Young, Robert, “YOUNG’S LITERAL TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE,” Grand Rapids, MI; Baker Book House, 1898. 

 

316. Zacchello, Joseph, “SECRETS OF ROMANISM,” Neptune, NJ: Loizeaux Brothers, 1949. 

 

317. Zimmerman, J. E., “DICTIONARY OF CLASSICAL MYTHOLOGY.” 

 

318. Zirbel, Craig I., “THE TEXAS CONNECTION,” New York: Warner Books, 1991. 

 

 

Books, Others, By Title   

 

319. “AID TO BIBLE UNDERSTANDING,” Brooklyn, NY: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society. 

 

320. “AINSWORTH’S LATIN DICTIONARY.” 

 

321. “AMPLIFIED BIBLE, The,” Containing the Amplified Old Testament and the Amplified New Testament, Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1965. 

 

322. “ANALYTICAL GREEK LEXICON, The” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1970. 

 

323.  “ANTE-NICENE FATHERS.” 

 

324.  “ANTICHRIST, The.” 

 

325. “BEN-YEHUDA’s POCKET ENGLISH-HEBREW HEBREW-ENGLISH DICTIONARY, New York: Washington Square Press, 1964. 

 

326.  “BIBLE IN LIVING ENGLISH.” 

 

327. “BIBLE RESEARCH HANDBOOK,” London: Covenant Publishing Co, 1946. 

 

328.  “BISHOP HEFELE’S HISTORY OF THE COUNCILS,” Canon 29. 

 

329.  “BOOK OF JASHER,” New York: M. M. Noah & A. S. Gould, 1840. 

 

330.  “CATHOLIC ALMANAC,” 1980. 

 

331.  “CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA.” 

 

332.  “COMPLETE BOOK OF FOOD AND NUTRITION,” Rodale Press. 

 

333. “CONCORDANT VERSION OF THE SACRED SCRIPTURES,” Saugus, CA: Concordant Publishing Company, 1955. 

 

334. “CORPUS JURIS CIVILIS,” v. 2, Code of Justinian. 

 

335. “DAKE’S ANNOTATED REFERENCE BIBLE.” Lawrenceville, GA: Dake Bible Sales, 1963. 

 

336.  “DICTIONARY OF CHRIST & THE GOSPEL.” 

 

337. “EMPHATIC DIAGLOTT NEW TESTAMENT,” Brooklyn, NY: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, 1942. 

 

338. “ENCYCLOPEDIA AMERICANA,” New York: Americana Corporation, 1972, 1997. 

 

339. “ENCYCLOPEDIA OF AMERICAN RELIGIONS.” 

 

340. “ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA,“ 1882, 1911, 1914, 1929, 1937, 1938, 1953, 1973 and 1993 editions. 

 

341. “ENGLISHMAN’S HEBREW AND CHALDEE CONCORDANCE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT,” London: Samuel Bagster and Sons, Ltd., 1963. 

 

342. “FACTS, TRUTH, EVIDENCE,” Booklet II, The Prophecy Club, PO Box 750234, Topeka, KS 66675, 1997. 

 

343. “FUNK & WAGNALLS’ STANDARD DESK DICTIONARY,” New York: Funk & Wagnalls Publishing Co, Inc., 1974. 

 

344. “HOLY BIBLE, The, Containing The Old and New Testaments,” Authorized King James Version, Chicago, IL: George W. Ogilvie & Co, 1892. 

 

345. “INFORMATION PLEASE ALMANAC--1990 to 1997.” 

 

346. “JERUSALEM BIBLE.”

 

347. “JESUS AND HIS TIMES,” Readers Digest. 

 

348.  “JEWISH ALMANAC,” 1980. 

 

349. “JEWISH CHUMASH” (Jewish Pentateuch). 

 

350. “JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA, The,” 1905, 1909 and 1925 editions. 

 

351. “KINGDOM INTERLINEAR TRANSLATION OF THE GREEK SCRIPTURES,” as associated with the “New World Translation of the New Testament,” Brooklyn, NY: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, 1969. 

 

352. “LIVING BIBLE, The,” Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 1971. 

 

353.  “MIDRASH TANHUMA.” 

 

354. “NEW AMERICAN ROGET’S COLLEGE THESAURUS, The,” NY: Signet Books, 1958. 

 

355. “NEW BIBLE DICTIONARY.” 

 

356. “NEW ENGLISH BIBLE WITH THE APOCRYPHA, The,”  Oxford: Oxford University Press and Cambridge University Press, 1970. 

 

357. “NEW ENGLISHMAN’S GREEK CONCORDANCE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT, The,” Wilmington, DE: Associated Publishers, Inc., 1972. 

 

358.  “NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION” (of the Scriptures). 

 

359.  “NEW REVISED STANDARD VERSION” (of the Scriptures).  

 

360.  “OFFICIAL ASSOCIATED PRESS ALMANAC, The,” Maplewood, NJ: Hammond Almanac, Inc., 1974. 

 

361. “OFFICIAL WARREN COMMISSION REPORT ON THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY, The,” Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., 1964. 

 

362.  “OLD FARMER’S ALMANAC, The.” 2001, 2002, 2003, 2003, 2004. 

 

363. “OXFORD CLASSICAL DICTIONARY,” Second Edition. 

 

364. “QUALIFIED TO BE MINISTERS,” Brooklyn, NY: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. 

 

365. “OUR WONDERFUL WORLD.” 

 

366. “PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION.” 

 

367. “PULPIT COMMENTARY.” 

 

368.  “QUASTEN’S PATROLOGY.” 

 

369. “SACRED SCRIPTURES,” Bethel, PA: Assemblies of Yahweh, 1981. 

 

370.  “SAMARITAN PENTATEUCH,” c 400 BCE. 

 

371.  “SCHAFF-HERZOG ENCYCLOPEDIA.” 

 

372. “SEPTUAGINT VERSION OF THE OLD TESTAMENT, The,” Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1970. 

 

373.  “SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST DICTIONARY.” 

 

374. “SONCINO BOOKS OF THE BIBLE, The,” London, New York, & Jerusalem: The Soncino Press, 1969. 

 

375.  “TALMUD, The.” 

 

376.  “TANAKH THE HOLY SCRIPTURES,” The New JPS Translation According to the Traditional Text, Philadelphia--Jerusalem: The Jewish Publication Society, 1985. 

 

377.  “TOO LONG IN THE SUN,” Charlotte, NC: Partakers Publications, 2000. 

 

378. “UNIVERSAL JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA, The,” New York: 1939. 

 

379. “WEBSTER’S NEW COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY.” 

 

380. “WEBSTER’S NEW TWENTIETH CENTURY DICTIONARY.” 

 

381. “WEBSTER’S NEW WORLD DICTIONARY,” New York: Popular Library, 1971. 

 

382. “WEBSTER’S NEW WORLD DICTIONARY OF THE AMERICAN LANGUAGE,” Encyclopedia Edition, Cleveland and New York: World Publishing Co, 1959. 

 

383. “WEBSTER’S THIRD INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY.” 

 

384. “WEBSTER’S UNABRIDGED NEW TWENTIETH CENTURY DICTIONARY,” New York: World Publishing Co, 1972. 

 

385. “WHAT THE GREAT RELIGIONS TEACH,” Mokelumne Hill, CA: Health Research, 1958. 

 

386.  “WHO WAS HE?,” Saipan, CM: servants of MESSIAH, 1982. 

 

387.  “WORD TO THE LITTLE FLOCK, A,” 1847. 

 

388.  “WORLD’S POPULAR ENCYCLOPEDIA.” 

 

389. “WORLD ALMANAC,” 1999, 2002, 2003. 

 

 

Home Videos 

 

390.  “ABOVE TOP SECRET,” Bob Fletcher, Militia of Montana Home Video, 1995. 

 

391. “AIDS, EBOLA AND VACCINATIONS,” Dr Len Horowitz, The Prophecy Club Home Video, 1996. 

 

392. “AIR AMERICA,” Live Home Video, 1990. 

 

393. “ALIEN AUTOPSY.”

 

394. “AMERICA IN PERIL 1,” Christian Underground Hotline Video, Adrain, MI., 1994. 

 

395. “AMERICA IN PERIL 3,” Christian Underground Hotline Video, Adrian, MI., 1996. 

 

396. “AMERICA 2000 EDUCATION,” James Patrick, Christian Underground Hotline Video, 1993. 

 

397. “AMERIKA,” Starmaker Home Video. 

 

398. “AMERICAN HOLOCAUST,” David Wegener, The Prophecy Club Home Video, 1999. 

 

399. “ANTHRAX, SMALL POX, VACCINATIONS & THE MARK,” Len Horowitz, The Prophecy Club Home Video, 2002. 

 

400. “ARRIVAL, The,” Live Home Video, 1996. 

 

401. “BACK DOOR TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER,” Barry Smith, The Prophecy Club Home Video, 2001. 

 

402. “BRIDGE ON THE RIVER KWAI,” Columbia Tristar Home Video, 1957. 

 

403. “CASABLANCA,” MGM/UA Home Video, 1943. 

 

404. “CHEQUE MATE: GAME OF PRINCES,” Jeff Baker, The Prophecy Club Home Video, 1996. 

 

405. “CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND,” RCA/Columbia Pictures Home Video, 1985. 

 

406. “COME LORD JESUS,” Priest John O’Connor, Catholic Counterpoint Video, 2000. 

 

407. “COMING OCCUPATION OF AMERICA,” Chuck Youngbrandt, The Prophecy Club Home Video, 1999. 

 

408.  “CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN AMERICA,” Texe Marrs Home Video. 

 

409.  “CONSPIRACY OF 9/11. The,” David Wegener, The Prophecy Club Home Video, 2002. 

 

410. “CRUEL DOUBT,” Starmaker Home Video, 1992. 

 

411. “DOCTOR ZHIVAGO,” Home Video, 1965. 

 

412. “DOUBLE CROSSED, The True Story of Barry Seal,” Warner Home Video, 1992. 

 

413. “ECSTASY,” 1933. 

 

414. “ENIGMA OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS, The,” Biblical Productions Home Video, EO International, POB 4694, Jerusalem, Israel, 1990. 

 

415.  “ENROUTE TO GLOBAL OCCUPATION,” Gary Kah, MOM Home Video, 1994. 

 

416. “EXPOSING THE ILLUMINATI FROM WITHIN,” Bill Schnoebelen, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1997. 

 

417.  “EXECUTIVE ACTION,” Warner Brothers Home Video, 1973. 

 

418. “FIELD OF DREAMS,” MCA Universal Home Video, 1989. 

 

419. “FORT APACHE,” RKO Pictures, Turner Home Entertainment Home Video, 1948. 

 

420. “FRAUD AND CORRUPTION IN AMERICAN COURTS,” Charles Key, Prophecy Club Home Video, 2002. 

 

421. “GHOSTS OF MISSISSIPPI,” Castle Rock Home Video, 1997. 

 

422. “GLOBALISM: THE PROGRAM,” General Benton K. Partin, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1997. 

 

423. “GREAT BALLS OF FIRE,” Orion Home Video, 1989. 

 

424. “GREAT PYRAMID, The,” Ancient Mysteries Series, A & E Home Video, 1994. 

 

425. “HALLOWEEN, TRICK OR TREAT,” Jeremiah Films, 1990. 

 

426. “HAWAII,” CBS/Fox Home Video, 1966. 

 

427. “HOW ANY IDIOT CAN BEAT A RADAR SPEEDING TICKET,” Christian Underground Hotline, Adrian, MI, 1996. 

 

428. “IMMINENT MILITARY TAKEOVER OF THE U.S.A. II,” Jim Ammerman, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1997. 

 

429. “INCIDENT AT OGLALA,” The Leonard Peltier Story, Live Home Video, 1992. 

 

430. “IDENTITY,” Saxon Productions, Home Video, 1997. 

 

431. “INDEPENDENCE DAY,” Fox Home Video, 1997. 

 

432. “J. EDGAR HOOVER,” Forum Home Video, 1988. 

 

433. “JFK,” An Oliver Stone Film, Warner Home Video, 1991. 

 

434. “JFK ASSASSINATION, The,” (the Jim Garrison Tapes), Vestron Video, 1992. 

 

435. “JFK CONSPIRACY, The,” BMG Video, 1992. 

 

436. “JFK, HOFFA AND THE MOB,” PBS Home Video, 1993. 

 

437. ”JULIUS CAESAR,” MGM/UA Home Video, 1953. 

 

438. ”JULIUS CAESAR,” Republic Pictures Home Video, 1970. 

 

439. “LAST DAYS, The,” produced by John Anderson. 

 

440. “LEE OSWALD, JFK & ME,” Ron Lewis, Video Lab, 1995. 

 

441. “LI’L ABNER,” Paramount Pictures Home Video, 1959. 

 

442. “LUCIFER’S CHILDREN,” Milan Martin, Prophecy Club Home Video, 2002. 

 

443. “MAGICAL MONEY MACHINE, The,” Eustace Mullins Interviewed by Bobby Lee, PO Box 1077, Boynton Beach, FL 33425. 

 

444. “MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE, The,” MGM/UA Home Video, 1962. 

 

445.  “MANHATTAN MELODRAMA,” MGM/US Home Video, 1934. 

 

446. “MARJOE,”  Columbia Pictures Home Video, 1972. 

 

447. “MARK OF THE BEAST: THE FINAL CONNECTION!” Michael Bunker, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1999. 

 

448. “MCLINTOCK,”  MPI Home Video, 1963. 

 

449. “MEN IN BLACK,” Video, 1997. 

 

450. “MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY, The,” A&E Home Video, 1995. 

 

451. “MENA COVER-UP, The,” Citizens for Honest Government, 1996. 

 

452. “MESSAGES IN HOLLYWOOD MOVIES, SERIES 1 AND 2, The,” John Ankerberg Show Home Video, PO Box 8977, Chattanooga, TN 37414, 1993. 

 

453.  ”MOONRAKER,” MGM/UA Home Video, 1979. 

 

454.  “MORITURI,” Fox Home Video, 1965. 

 

455. “NEW CLINTON CHRONICLES, The,” Citizens Video Press, 1996. 

 

456. “NINE/ELEVEN (9/11) CONTRIVED,” Dr Stan Monteith, Propehcy Club Home Video, 2002. 

 

457. “NOWHERE TO HIDE!  IRIDIUM SATELLITES,” Michael Bunker, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1999. 

 

458. “NOT WITHOUT MY DAUGHTER,” MGM/UA Home Video, 1990. 

 

459. “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE,” Integrity Films, 1996. 

 

460. “OKLAHOMA,” Fox Home Video, 1955. 

 

461. “OUTBREAK,” Warner Home Video, 1994. 

 

462. “PARADISE LOST,” Cabin Fever Home Video, 1997. 

 

463. “PATRIOT, The,” Columbia Pictures Home Video, 2001. 

 

464. “ROMERO,” Vidmark Home Video, 1990. 

 

465. “SAMSON AND DELILAH,” 1950. 

 

466. “SANDPEBBLES, The,” CBS Fox Home Video, 1966. 

 

467. “SECRET FILE ON J. EDGAR HOOVER,” PBS Home Video, 1993. 

 

468. “SECRET SIXES: SUBLIMINAL IMBEDS IN THE MOVIES,” James Lloyd, 2000. 

 

469. “SECRETS OF THE ILLUMINATI,” Dr Stan Monteith, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1999. 

 

470. “SHACKLES OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER,” Rod Lewis, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1997. 

 

471.  “SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN,” Priest John O’Connor, Catholic Counterpoint Video, 2000. 

 

472. “SOVIET WAR PLANS FOR AMERIKA,” J. R. Nyquist, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1999. 

 

473. “STAGECOACH,” Vestron Home Video, 1939. 

 

474. “STAR WARS,”  Fox Home Video, 1977. 

 

475. “STAR WARS WEAPONS & END TIMES WARFARE,” Len Horowitz, Prophecy Club Home Video, 2002

 

476. “STRAIGHT FROM THE JOINT CHIEFS,” Al Cuppett, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1998. 

 

477. “TECHNOLOGY AND THE MARK OF THE BEAST,” Walt Myers, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1997. 

 

478. “TED GUNDERSON CHRONICLES II,” Ted Gunderson, Prophecy Club Home Video, 1996. 

 

479. “TEN COMMANDMENTS, The,” Paramount Home Video, 1956. 

 

480. “TOWN LIKE ALICE, A,” Starmaker Home Video, 1994. 

 

481. “TREASURE OF THE SIERRA MADRE,” MGM/UA Home Video, 1948. 

 

482. “TRUTH ABOUT KILLING OF GORDON KAHL,” Lord’s Covenant Church Home Video, Scottsdale, AZ. 

 

483. “VANISHING JOBS,” US Awareness Productions Home Video, 1997. 

 

484. “WACO: A NEW REVELATION,” Home Video 1999. 

 

485. “WACO: THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT,” Home Video, 2000. 

 

486. “WACO:  THE FLIR PROJECT,” Home Video, 2001. 

 

487. “WAKE ISLAND,” MCA Universal Home Video, 1942. 

 

488.  “ZULU,” Charter Home Video, 1963. 

 

 

Television 

 

489. “ABC PRIME TIME,” Diane Sawyer and Sam Donaldson, 1999. 

 

490. “ALTERNATIVE 003,” British Broadcasting Company, 1977 (Documentary). 

 

491.  “AMERIKA” Television Miniseries, 1987. 

 

492. “C-SPAN,” 2002. 

 

493.  “DAY AFTER, The,” An ABC Television Drama, 1983. 

 

494. “FOX NEWS.” 

 

495.  “DAVID LETTERMAN’S LATE SHOW,” CBS. Sep 11, 2001. 

 

496.  “DISCOVERY CHANNEL,” 2001. 

 

497.  “FRONTLINE,” 1993. 

 

498.  “GOOD MORNING AMERICA” Program, ABC, Apr 25, 1997. 

 

499.  “GUNSMOKE,” CBS, 1956. 

 

500.  “LARRY KING LIVE,” CNN, Dec 23, 1999. 

 

501.  “NEWS HOUR,” PBS, Dec 4, 1997. 

 

502. “NBC NIGHTLY NEWS,” Tom Brokaw, Aug 22, 1997. 

 

503. “OPRAH WINFREY TV TALK SHOW,” 1997. 

 

504. “SEVEN HUNDRED (700) CLUB,” 2000, 2001, 2002. 

 

505.  “SIMPSONS, The,” 2002. 

 

506. “SIXTY (60) MINUTES,” CBS, 1994, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003. 

 

507. “STEVE ALLEN SHOW,” 1957. 

 

508. “TODAY” Program, NBC, New York, May 22, 1997. 

 

509. “WEST WING, The,” NBC, weekly television drama. 

 

510. “WORLD NEWS TONIGHT,” Peter Jennings, ABC News, May 11, 1998. 

 

 

Radio 

 

511. “ART BELL’s COAST TO COAST AM TALK SHOW PROGRAM.” 

 

512. “ART BELL’s DREAMLAND,” Whitley Strieber substituting. 

 

513. “BIBLE PROPHECY PROGRAM,” with David J. Smith. 

 

514. “CBS NEWS.” 

 

515. “DR BOB MARTIN TALK SHOW PROGRAM.” 

 

516. “DR LAURA SCHLESSINGER TALK SHOW PROGRAM.” 

 

517. “G. GORDON LIDDY TALK SHOW PROGRAM.” 

 

518. “KGA MORNING NEWS EXPRESS,” Spokane, WA. 

 

519. “LAURA LEE TALK SHOW PROGRAM.” 

 

520. “MICHAEL REAGAN TALK SHOW PROGRAM.” 

 

521. “MIKE GALLAGHER TALK SHOW PROGRAM.” 

 

522. ”NPR,” National Public Radio 

 

523. “RUSH LIMBAUGH TALK SHOW PROGRAM.”

 

524. “RUSTY HUMPHREYS’ SATURDAY NIGHT AMERICA.” 

 

525. “SAVAGE NATION” Radio Talk Show. 

 

 

Periodicals 

 

526. Benson, Ezra Taft, “ENSIGN,” Salt Lake City, UT: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Aug 1992. 

 

527. Bivin, David and Magnuson, Jeffrey, eds., “JERUSALEM PERSPECTIVE,” Jerusalem: Jerusalem School of Synoptic Research, Oct 1987, Mar, Nov 1988, Mar, Apr, Nov/Dec 1989, Mar/Apr, May-Jun, Jul/Aug, Sep/Oct, Nov/Dec 1990, Mar/Apr, Jul/Oct, Nov/Dec 1991, Nov/Dec 1993, Jan/Jun 1994. 

 

528. Buzzard, Anthony F., “The Christian Hope: Life in the Land of the Promises Made to Abraham,” THE RADICAL REFORMATION, Morrow, GA: Church of God General Conference, Summer, 1993. 

 

529. Cleveland, Sydney ed. and Royce E. Mitchell, Jr., ed., “THE SABBATH SENTINEL,” Fairview, OK: The Bible Sabbath Association, Jan-Feb, Nov-Dec 1996, Mar-Apr 1997; Jan-Feb 1998; Sep-Oct 2000; Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 2002.   

 

530. Dankenbring, William F., ed, “PROPHECY FLASH MAGAZINE,” Altadena, CA: Triumph Prophecies Ministries, Aug, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec, 1994; Nov-Dec, 1996; Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec, 1997; Jan-Feb, Mar, Apr-May, Jun-Jul, Aug-Sep, Oct-Nov, Dec, 1998; Jan-Feb, May, Jun-Jul, Aug-Sep, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 1999; Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Nov-Dec 2000, Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 2001; Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 2002; Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr, Sep-Oct 2003. 

 

531. Field, Bernard, ed, “BULLETIN OF ATOMIC SCIENTISTS.” 

 

532. Fletcher, Jeff, “THE RESTITUTION HERALD,” Atlanta, GA: Church of God General Conference, Apr-May, Jun-Jul, Oct-Nov 1997; Feb-Mar, Aug-Sep 1998; Dec-Jan 1999; Aug-Sep 2000; Jun-Jul 2001. 

 

533. Flurry, Gerald, “THE PHILADELPHIA TRUMPET,” Edmond, OK: Philadelphia Church of God, Mar/Apr, Aug 1998; Jul, Aug 1999; Mar-Apr, May, Jul, Aug, Dec 2000; Mar-Apr, Jul 2001; Feb, Mar-Apr, Nov 2002; Mar-Apr, May 2003.  

 

534. Gritz, Bo, “Christianity Before Christ,” CENTER FOR ACTION, Mesa, AZ, Jun 94.  

 

535. Hale, John T., ed, “THE OMEGA TIMES,” Solid Rock Bible Church, HC 62, Box 372, Smithville, OK 74957, Fall 1997. 

 

536. Hall, Paul, ed, “THE JUBILEE,” Midpines, CA: Paul Hall, publisher, Jan-Feb 1992; Jan-Feb, May-Jun, Nov-Dec, 1997; Jan-Feb, Jul-Aug, 1998; Jul-Aug, Sep-Dec 1999; Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr 2000. 

 

537. Harkins, Don, ed, “THE IDAHO OBSERVER,” PO Box 457, Spirit Lake, ID 83869, Aug, Sep, Dec 1997; Aug, Sep, Oct, Dec 1998; Jan, May, Jun 1999; Jan, Apr, Aug 8, 2001; Jan 4, 2002. 

 

538. Herrill, V. S., “CHRISTIAN SEPARATIST,” Box 188, Kodak, TN 37764: Herrell Brothers Publishing House, Jul -Aug 1992. 

 

539. Hutchings, Noah W., “PROPHETIC OBSERVER,” Oklahoma City, OK: Southwest Radio Church, May, Jul, Dec 1997; Jun, Aug 1998; May, Jul, Sep, Oct, Nov 1999. 

 

540. Johnson, Stan, “THE PROPHECY CLUB NEWSLETTER,” Topeka, KS: The Prophecy Club, PO Box 750234, Topeka, KS 66675, May/Jun, Jul/Aug, Sep/Oct, Nov/Dec 1997; Jan/Feb, Mar/Apr, Sep/Oct 1998; Jan/Feb, Mar/Apr, May/Jun, Jul/Aug, Sep/Oct, Nov/Dec 1999; Jan/Feb, Mar/Apr, May/Jun, Sep/Oct 2000; Jan/Feb, Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug 2002. 

 

541. Jones, Dennis and James Tabor, eds., “JEZREEL’S CALL,” Av 5754, Nisan 5755, Kislev, 5755. 

 

542. Jones, Earl F., ed, “INTELLIGENCE NEWSLETTER,” Deming, NM: Christian Crusade For Truth, Jan-Feb, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct 1997; Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 1998; Jan-Feb, May-Jun, Sep-Oct 1999; Jan-Feb, May-Jun 2000; Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug 2001. 

 

543. Klassen, Frank and Glenda, pub, “Does YAHWEH Allow You to Believe a Lie?,” THE OVERCOMER, Fort Davis, TX, Jan 1, 1992; Dec 1, 1996. 

 

544. Lovel, Vada, pub, “KINGDOM DIGEST,” Irving, TX 75017, Jan, Feb, Jul, Aug 1999; May 2000; Jun 2001; Apr, May 2002; Mar 2003. 

 

545.  Malkmus, George H., pub, “BACK TO THE GARDEN,” PO Box 2388, Shelby, NC 28151, Winter-Spring, Spring, Summer/Fall 98. 

 

546. Marrs, Texe, ed, “FLASHPOINT,” Jun 1997. 

 

547. Martin, Ernest L., ed, “ASK COMMUNICATOR,” Portland, OR, Mar 1994; Jul 1995; Mar, Aug 1999. 

 

548. Marrs, Roy A., Burrell, Calvin, et. al., ed. “BIBLE ADVOCATE,” Denver, CO: Church of God (Seventh Day), PO Box 33677, Denver, CO 80233, Dec 1981; May, Sep, Dec 1997; Jul-Aug 1998; Mar, Nov 1999; Mar, Apr, Jul-Aug 2000; Jan-Feb, Jun, Jul-Aug 2003. 

 

549. Meyer. Jacob O., ed, “THE SACRED NAME BROADCASTER,” Assemblies of Yahweh, Bethel, PA, May, Oct 1997; 2/2000, 6/2000, 12/2002. 

 

550. Meyer, Walter H, ed, “THE BELIEVER’S ADVOCATE,” Portland, OR, Feb, Sep/Oct 1997; Mar/Apr, Jul/Aug 1998; Jul/Aug 1999; May/Jun; Sep/Oct 2000; Jan/Feb, May/Jun, Jul/Aug 2001; Apr-Jun, Jun, Oct-Dec 2002. 

 

551. Missler, Chuck, publisher, “PERSONAL UPDATE,” Koinonia House, PO Box D, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83816, Sep, Nov, Dec 1997; Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Sep, Oct 1998. 

 

552. Moore, Ed, “THE LAST TRUMP,” Jan-Feb 1991. 

 

553. Nelson, Wayne Stuart, “I Sam 16; 17; Appearance or Reality,” THE RADICAL REFORMATION,” Morrow, GA, Church of God General Conference, Winter 1992. 

 

554. Perkins, William T., Jr., Publisher, “COMPASS,” 460 Canfield Ave, Suite 1000, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815, Winter 1997. 

 

555. Peters, Peter J., ed, “SCRIPTURES FOR AMERICA WORLDWIDE” Newsletter (now called “The Dragon Slayer”), LaPorte Church of Christ, Box 766, LaPorte, CO, Vol 3, 4, 5, 6, 1997; Vol 1, 2, 1998; Vol 2, 1999; Vol 3, Vol 6, 2001; Vol 1, Vol 4, 2002; Vol 1, Vol 2, Vol 3, 2003. 

 

556. Purvis, Tom and Purvis, Nancy, editors, “NEW BEGINNINGS,” PO Box 228, Waynesville, NC, 28786; Jan, Dec 1993; Apr, Oct 1995; Feb, Mar, Jun, Jul, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec 1997; Jan, Mar, Apr, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov 1998. 

 

557. Robertson, Wilmont, ed, “INSTAURATION,” Howard Allen Enterprises, Inc., Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920, Jul 1983. 

 

558.  Shanks, Hershel, ed, “BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY REVIEW,” Washington, DC: Jul/Aug 2001, Jan/Feb, Mar-Apr, May/Jun 2002. 

 

559.  Smyth, Bill, ed, “TRADE N’ SAVE” Newspaper, LaClede, ID, Mar 7-20, Sep 5-18, 1997; Apr 3-16, Apr 17-30, Jun 19-Jul 2, Jul 3-16, Jul 17-Aug 6, Aug 7, 1998. 

 

560. Wheelock, Dean and Susan, “HEBREW ROOTS,” Box 400, Lakewood, WI, May/June 1996; Oct-Dec 1999; Jan-Mar, Jul-Sep 2000; Apr-Jun, Jul-Sep, Oct-Dec, 2001; Jan-Apr, Aug-Oct, Nov-Dec 2002. 

 

561.  Woods, Paul, “HERALD OF TRUTH, The,” Box 804, Caldwell, ID 83606, Jan 2002; Jan 2003. 

 

562.  Woodworth, R. T., “THE PATHFINDER,” Box 291, Spokane, WA: Feb 1997. 

 

 

Other Magazines, By Title 

 

563. “AIPL COMMUNIQUÉ,” 10878 Westhiemer #293, Houston, TX 77042, issue 21.

 

564. “AWAKE,” Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY, May 22, 1982. 

 

565. “BIBLE LIGHT ON THE NEWS,” Bible Light International, PO Box 370, Ottawa, KS 66067, V. 5, No. 7; V. 7, No. 2, No. 5; V. 8, No. 3, No. 4; V. 9, No. 2, No. 3; V. 9, No. 6. 

 

566. “BIBLE REVIEW,” Bible Archaeology Society, 4710-41st St, Washington, DC 20016, Feb, Jun, Oct 2002. 

 

567. “CALLING OUR NATION,” Hayden Lake, ID, issue #12, 1999. 

 

568. “CHRISTIANITY TODAY,” The Pope Uses Masonic Scandal to Stiffen Traditional Stance--Historical churchlodge rivalry behind Italian government fall, Jun 26, 1981. 

 

569. “CRIMINAL POLITICS.” 

 

570. “EDUCATION REPORTER,” Oct 1990. 

 

571. “ELIJAH MESSENGER,” Jan-Jul 1981. 

 

572. “EUROPEAN, The,” May 7, 1997. 

 

573. “EVANGELICA,” Sep 1981. 

 

574. “FORBES.” 

 

575. “FOREIGN AFFAIRS,” Jun 1923; Oct 1969; Jan/Feb 2003. 

 

576. “FREE AMERICAN NEWSMAGAZINE,” Box 2943, Bingham, NM 87832. 

 

577. “FREEMAN.” 

 

578. “GATES OF EDEN,” PO Box 2257, Peoria, IL 61611, Sep-Oct 2000; Jan-Feb, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep 2001; Sep-Oct 2002. 

 

579. “IMPACT,” Mar 1982. 

 

580. “ISRAEL TODAY,” PO Box 10010, Jerusalem, Israel, Oct 2002. 

 

581. “ISSUES,” Summer 1990. 

 

582. “JERUSALEM REPORT, The,” Feb 1, Jun 21, 1999; Jan 15, 29, Feb 12, 26, Mar 12, Apr 23, May 7, Jun 4, 18, Aug 13, Sep 10, Dec 17, 2001; Jan 14, Mar 11, Apr 8, 22, May 6, 20, Jun 3, 17, Jul 29, Aug 12, 26, Sep 9, Nov 4, 18, Dec 2, 2002; Jan 13, Feb 10, Apr 7, 21, Jun 2, 16, 2003. 

 

583. “JEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY,” v. xxvii, 3. 

 

584. “JEWISH CHRONICLE, The,” May 2, 1879. 

 

585. “JYSKE BANK PRIVATE BANKING GAZETTE,” Jyske Bank, Vesterbrogade 9, DK-1780, Copenhagen V, Denmark, Autumn/Winter 2002. 

 

586. ”LANCET, The,” 1999. 

 

587. “LONDON ECONOMIST,” Apr 3, 1999, article-- “Victims of Serbia--or NATO?.”  

 

588. “LOOK” Magazine, Jan 13, 1970. 

 

589. “NEW AMERICAN,” Feb 2001; Nov 4, 2002. 

 

590. “NEWSWEEK,” Jan 26, 1981; Jun 14, Jul 12, 19, Aug 23, Sep 6, Oct 4, 11, 18, Nov 1, 8, 15, 29, Dec 6, 13, 20, 1999; Jan 1, 10, 17, Feb 28, Mar 6, 13, 20, 27, May 22, Jun 5, 19, 26, Jul 17, 31, Aug 7, 28, Sep 4, 11, 2000; Apr 30, May 7, 21; Jun 11, 25, Jul 2, 9, 16, Aug 27, Sep 24, Oct 1, 2001. 

 

591. “OMNI,” Dec 1989. 

 

592. “PETAH TIKVAH,” 165 Doncaster Road, Rochester, NY 14623, Oct-Dec 1999; Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Jul-Aug, Oct-Dec 2000; Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Jul-Sep, Oct-Dec 2001; Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Oct-Dec 2002; Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Jul-Sep 2003. 

 

593. “PLAYBOY,” 1999. 

 

594. “READER’S DIGEST,” Jun 1982. 

 

595. “REVIEW AND HERALD SUPPLEMENT,” Aug 14, 1883. 

 

596. “SECOND LOOK,” May-Jun 1980. 

 

597. “SPIRITUAL COUNTERFEITS PROJECTS JOURNAL,” Winter 1980-81. 

 

598. “TIME” Magazine, Sep 15, 1980; Jan 26, 1981; Jul 20, 1992; Jul 5, Aug 6, 1999; Oct 23, 2000; Dec 3, 2001; Jan 14, 21, Feb 25, Mar 25, Apr 8, 29, May 6, 13, 20, 27, Jun 17, Jul 15, Aug 19, Sep 2, Oct 21, Nov 4, 11, 18, 25, Dec 16, 23, 30, 2002; Jan 6, 13, 20, Mar 10, 17, 24, Apr 7, 28, May 12, Jun 2, Jul 7, 2003. 

 

599. “TV GUIDE,” Nov 15-21, 1997. 

 

600. “UNITED ISRAEL BULLETIN,” April 1951. 

 

601. “US NEWS & WORLD REPORT,” 1970s; Jun 7, 14, Jul 5, 26, Aug 9, 16-23, 30, Sep 6, 13, 20, Oct 4, 11, 25, Nov 8, 15, 22, 29, Dec 6, 1999; Dec 11, 2000; Jan 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, Feb 5, 12, 19, Mar 12, Apr 9, 16, May 14, 21, 28, 2001; Apr 1, 22, 29, May 6, 13, 27, Jun 3, 10, Jul 22, Sep 9, 2002. 

 

602. “VANITY FAIR.” 

 

603. ”VOJSKA,” Russian Defense Magazine. 

 

604. “WEEK, The,” May 4, 11, Jun 1, 15, 22, 29, Jul 6, 13, 20, 27, Aug 3, 17, 31, Sep 7, 21, Oct 5, Nov 30-Dec 7, 2001; Dec 21-Jan 10, 11, 18, 25, Feb 8, 15, 22, Mar 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, Apr 5, 12, 26, May 3, 10, 24, 31, Jun 7, 14, Jul 5, 19, Aug 2, 16, 23, Sep 6, 20, Oct 4, 11, 18, 25, Nov 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, Dec 6, 13, 20, 2002; Jan 17, 24, 31, Feb 7, 14, 28, Mar 7, 14, 21, 28, Apr 4, 11, 18, 25, May 23, Jun 6, 13, 27, 2003. 

 

605. “WEEKLY STANDARD, The,” Feb 28, Mar 27, 2000; Apr 9, 2001.

 

606. “WORD FROM JERUSALEM,” International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, 20 Rachel Imeinu, POB 1192, Jerusalem 91010, Israel, Nov-Dec 2001. 

 

607. “WISDOM AND POWER,” Sep 1989. 

 

 

Other Newsletter, By Title 

 

608. “ADULT VIDEO NEWS,” Mar 2000. 

 

609. “ALTERNATIVES,” Jun 1992; May 1993. 

 

610. “AMERICAN SENTINEL, The,” 10660 S. Tryon St, Suite 16, Charlotte, NC 28273, Jan 2000; Apr, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Dec 2001; Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May 2002. 

 

611. “AMERICA’S PROMISE,” PO Box 157, Sandpoint, ID 83864, Apr, May-Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, 1998; Jan, Mar, Apr, Jul-Aug, Nov-Dec 1999, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct 2000; Mar-Apr, Sep-Oct 2001; Jan-Feb, May-Jun 2002; Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr, May-Jun 2003. 

 

612. “ARIAN CONDITIONLIST NEWSLETTER,” Summer 1984. 

 

613. “AUXILLIUM CHRISTIANORUM.” 

 

614. “BIBLE LIGHT INTERNATIONAL JPM NEWS & PRAYER REQUESTS,” Box 370, Ottawa, KS 66067, Jun, Sep 2001; Jan, May-Jun, Aug 2002. 

 

615. “BREAKTHROUGH” Newsletter, Global Education Associates, Fall 1983. 

 

616. ”BRIDGES FOR PEACE,” Israel Teaching Letter, Clarence H Wagner, Jr., editor, PO Box 1093, Jerusalem, Israel, Aug, Sep 2000. 

 

617. “CHANGES,” Oct 1982. 

 

618. “CHRISTIAN MEDIA,” v. viii, n. 1, Box 448, Jacksonville, OR 97530. 

 

619. “CHURCH OF GOD PROGRESS JOURNAL,” Church of God General Conference, PO Box 100,000, Morrow, GA 30260, Jul-Aug, Nov-Dec 1999; Nov-Dec 2000; Mar-Apr 2001, May-Jun, Nov-Dec 2002. 

 

620. “CITIZEN’S FREEDOM FOUNDATION NEWS,” PO Box 86, Hannacroix, NY 12087, Jun-Jul 1983. 

 

621.  “DAILY NEWS DIGEST,” Jun 23, 1982. 

 

622. “DESTINY EDITORIAL LETTER,” PO Box 177, Merrimac, MA 01960, Sep 1998; Jul, Aug, Dec 1999; Sep 2000; May 2001. 

 

623. “DISCOVERING THE BIBLE,” Believers Word Center, PO Box 79, Cleburne, TX 76033-0079, No 5 1993; No 1, No. 3, No. 4, No. 6, No. 7, No. 8, No. 9, No. 10 1999; No. 1, 2, 2000; No. 4, 2001; No. 15, 2003. 

 

624.  “DON BELL REPORT,” Jun 6, 1980. 

 

625.  “EAOY NEWSLETTER,” PO Box 488, Fulton, MO 65251, Jan/Feb 2000, Nov/Dec 2001, Mar/Apr, Jul/Aug 2002, Jan/Feb, May/Jun 2003. 

 

626.  “ELEVENTH/11th HOUR REMNANT MESSENGER,” PO Box 1887, Sandpoint, ID 83864. 

 

627. “END TIME NEWS,” PO Box 455, Rutherford College, NC 28671, May/Jun 1983; Dec 1999; Jan, Feb, May, Oct 2000; Jan/Feb, Mar, Apr, Jul, Aug, Dec 2001; Jan, May, Jul/Aug, Oct, Nov, Dec 2002; Mar, Sep/Oct 2003. 

 

628. ”EVANGELICAL NEWSLETTER,” Mar 19, 1982. 

 

629. “FOUNDATION FOR INTERCESSION,” God’s Kingdom Ministries, 6269 University Ave, NE, Suite 1, Fridley, MN 55432, Dec 2001; Jan 2002. 

 

630. “HATIKVA” Newsletter, PO Box E, Nederland, TX 77627; Spring, 1998; Winter, Fall, 1999. 

 

631. “HOUSE OF DAVID HERALD,” PO Box 700217, Saint Cloud, FL 34770. 

 

632.  “INTELLIGENCE DIGEST,” Apr 1949; Jan 16, 1998. 

 

633. “INTERNET VORTEX/NEWS MAX.COM,” Box 20989, West Palm Beach, FL 33416, Oct, Nov, Dec 1999; Jan, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec 2000; Jan, Feb, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep 2001; Aug 2002; Apr, Jun 2003. 

 

634. “JAMES COOK MARKET UPDATE,” Investment Rarities Inc, 7850 Metro Parkway, Minneapolis, MN, Oct 2002. 

 

635.  “LAST TRUMPET NEWSLETTER,” Feb, Nov 1999. 

 

636. “LEDERER” Letter, Messianic Jewish Ministries, 6204 Park Heights Ave, Baltimore, MD 21215-3600, Summer 1998. 

 

637.  “MAOZ ISRAEL REPORT,” PO Box 53788, Grand Prairie, TX 75053-5788, Jul, Sep, Dec 2002; Mar, Apr, Jun 2003. 

 

638. “McALVANY INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR,” PO Box 84904, Phoenix, AZ 85071, Oct, 1998; Jan, May 1999. 

 

639. “MINISTRY LETTER,” Noah W. Hutchings, Southwest Radio Church, PO Box 1144, Oklahoma City, OK 73101, Sep 1997. 

 

640. “HEW HAMPSHIRE GAZETTE,” Oct 2002. 

 

641. “NEWSLETTER OF THE CLUB OF ROME,” Nov 9, 1983. 

 

642. “NOTES FOR BIBLE STUDENTS,” David Opel, 658 Highline Drive, E. Wenatchee, WA 98801, # 24. 

 

643. “PROCLAIM LIBERTY MINISTRY HOT SHEET,” Adrain, MI, undated issue and issue dated Jul 23, 1998. 

 

644.  “RADIO LIBERTY,” Dr Stan Monteith, PO Box 969, Soquel, CA 95073, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec 2002; Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May 2003. 

 

645. “RELIGIOUS NEWS SERVICE, The,” Jun 21, 1979. 

 

646. “REVELATION FILE NEWS SERVICE,” Wally Wood, Bureau Chief, PO Box 42005, Houston, TX 77242, Nov 18, 1999.  

 

647. “SCHOOL REFORM NEWS,” Feb 2001. 

 

648. “SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES,” PO Box 32, Clarksville, AR 72830; Feb; Mar, Jun-Jul 1998; Jun, Nov-Dec 1999; Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct 2002; Jul-Aug 2003. 

 

649. “SECOND OPINION,” Dr William Douglas, editor, Oct 1999. 

 

650. “SHEKINAH,” Waco, Texas, Apr-Jun 1982. 

 

651. “SOIL AND HEALTH NEWS,” May 1980. 

 

652.  “SPIRAL MOBIUS,” Feb, Jun 1984. 

 

653. “SPIRAL REPORT,” Mar 31, 1981; Dec 30, 1983. 

 

654. “STAFF AND SWORD,” Ministry Newsletter, Mar 29, 1999; Apr 20, Oct 20, 2000. 

 

655. “STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, The,” Newsletter, Dec 17, 1997. 

 

656. “TAKING AIM,” MOM, PO Box 1486, Noxom, MT 59853, Feb, Jun, Jul, Aug 1999. 

 

657. “TRUTHLINE,” Aug 1981. 

 

658. “TZEMACH LETTER, The, ”PO Box 181191, Casselberry, FL 32718, Jan-Feb 2000; Jun-Jul, Oct, Nov-Dec 2001; Mar-Apr, Jul-Aug 2002. 

 

659. “VENDYL JONES RESEARCH INSTITUTES RESEARCHER,” Box 120366, Arlington, TX 76012-0366, Mar, Sep 2002; Feb 2003; v. I, No 3, 2004. 

 

660. “YAVOH,” PO BOX 720968, Norman, OK 73070, Aug, Dec 2000; Feb, May, Dec 2001; Jan, Apr, Sep, Oct, Nov 2002; Feb 2003. 

 

 

Newspapers 

 

661. “AMERICAN FREE PRESS,” Aug 20, Nov 19, Dec 3, 10, 17, 24, 31, 2001; Jan 7-14, 21, 28, Feb 4, 11, 18, Mar 4, 11, 18, 25, Apr 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, May 6, 13, 20, 27, Jun 3, 10, 17, 24, Jul 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, Aug 5, 12, 19, 26, Sep 9, 16, 23, 30, Oct 7, 14, 21, 28, Nov 4, 11, 18, 25, Dec 2, 9, 16 & 23, 30, 2002; Jan 6 & 13, 20, 27, Feb 3, 10, 17, 24, Mar 3 & 10, 17, 24, Apr 7, 14, 21, 28, May 5, 19, 26, Jun 2, 23, Jul 7, 21, 2003. 

 

662.  “ASIA TIMES, The,” Nov 15, 2002. 

 

663. “CHARLOTTE (NC) OBSERVER,” May 10, 2000. 

 

664. “CHRISTIAN CONNECTION,” Christians for Israel, PO Box 20295, Washington, DC 20041, Nov 2002. 

 

665. ”CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR.” 

 

666. “DAILY BEE, The,” Coeur d’Alene, ID, Aug 11, 1996. 

 

667. “DAILY OKLAHOMAN,” Oklahoma City, OK, Jun 19, 1991. 

 

668. “DEARBORN (MI) INDEPENDENT,” 1920. 

 

669.  “DENVER POST,” Denver, CO, Aug 18, 1996. 

 

670.  “DISPATCH FROM JERUSALEM,” Clarence H. Wagner Jr., Editor, PO Box 1093, Jerusalem, Israel, Special Issue for 2000, Nov-Dec 2000. 

 

671.  “LE FIGARO,” French daily, Nov 2, 2001. 

 

672.  “FINANCIAL TIMES,” London, England, Apr 2, 2002. 

 

673.  “FORWARD,” New York, NY, Jan 30, 1998; Sep 17, 24, Oct 15, 22, 29, 1999; Jan 19, Oct 26, Nov 9, 23, 30, Dec 14, 28, 2001; Jan 25, Feb 15, 22, Mar 1, Apr 12, 19, 26, May 17, 24, 31, Jun 7, 14, Jul 19, Aug 9, 16, Sep 6, 27, Oct 4, Nov 1, 8, 15, Dec 20, 27, 2002; Jan 3, 10, 17, 2003. 

 

674.  “GRAINGER COUNTY NEWS,” Jan 15, 2000. 

 

675.  “GUARDIAN WEEKLY,” London, England, Dec 21, 1997; Mar 1, May 17, 1998; Sep 22, 2001; Feb 14, 2002. 

 

676.  “HAITI OBSERVATEUR,” Mar 29, 1995. 

 

677.  ”HOUSTON CHRONICLE,” Houston, Texas, Jun 4, 1992. 

 

678.  “IDAHO SPOKESMAN-REVIEW, The,” Coure d’Alene, ID, Apr 2, Dec 21, 23, 31, 2002; Jan 9, 16, Feb 6, 22, May 27, Jun 6, 7, 11, Jul 15, 16, 2003. 

 

679.  “INDIANAPOLIS NEWS,” Indianapolis, IN, Dec 23, 1961. 

 

680. “ISRAELI & GLOBAL NEWS,” Nov 17, 1997. 

 

681. “JERUSALEM POST,” Jerusalem, Israel, Apr 6-12, 1980; Dec 21, 1991; Dec 21, 1996; Jun 28, 1997; Feb 7, Feb 28, Apr 18, May 23, Jun 27, Sep 12, 1998; Feb 11, 18, 25, Mar 10, 24, 31, Apr 14, 28, May 26, Jun 9, 16, 30, Jul 14, 21, 28, Aug 4, 11, 18, 25, Sep 1, 8, 15, 22, Dec 8, 22, 2000; Feb 23, Mar 30, Apr 6, May 11, 18, 25, Jun 22, 29, Jul 6, 27, Aug 24, Dec 7, 21, 28, 2001; Jan 4, 11, Feb 8, 22, Mar 15, 22, Apr 5, 19, May 16, Nov 1, 15, Dec 13, 27, 2002; Jan 10, May 23, Jul 11, 2003. 

 

682.  “KANSAS CITY TIMES,” Nov 19, 1957. 

 

683. “LABOUR LEADER,” UK, Dec 19, 1891. 

 

684. “LONDON SUNDAY TELEGRAPH,” London, England. 

 

685. “LONG ISLAND NEWSDAY,” New York, NY. 

 

686. “LOS ANGELES TIMES,” Los Angeles, CA, Jul 11, 1977; May 16, 1999; Apr 5, 1994; Jan 5, 2003. 

 

687.  “MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE, The,” Minneapolis, MN, Mar 23, 2001. 

 

688.  “MONROE EVENING NEWS,” Monroe, NC, Mar 22, 1997. 

 

689. “NATIONAL ENQUIRER,” Jul 22, 1975; Feb 27, 2001. 

 

690. “NATIONAL LIBERTY JOURNAL,” 1971 University Blvd., Lynchburg, VA 24514, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec 1999; Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Sep, Nov 2000. 

 

691.  “NEW SOLIDARITY,” Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., ed., Aug 13, 1981; Aug 27, 1982. 

 

692.  “NEW YORK HERALD,” Apr 1868. 

 

693. “NEW YORK TIMES,” New York, NY, Jan 20, 1970; Feb 15, 1997; Dec 29, 1998; Dec 13, 2000; Jun 12, 14, Sep 12, 2001; May 22, Nov 9, 2002. 

 

694. “OKLAHOMA CITY TIMES,” Oklahoma City, OK, Nov 6, 1975. 

 

695. “OREGONIAN, The,” Portland, OR, Aug 10, 1997. 

 

696. “PACIFIC DAILY NEWS,” Agana, Guam, Apr 3, 1980; Nov 2, 1983; Dec 9, 1990; Oct 29, 1991; Apr 2, 1993.   

 

697. “PORTUGAL NEWS,” Jul 13, 2002. 

 

698. ”PRESS, The,” Coeur d’Alene, ID, Dec 16, 2001. 

 

699. “ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS,” Denver, CO, Aug 4, 1981. 

 

700. “SHOSHONE NEWS-PRESS,” Kellogg, ID, Jun 30, Aug 10, 2001. 

 

701. “SPOKESMAN-REVIEW,” Spokane, WA, Dec 20, 1998; Jan 6, 8, 9, 28, Feb 3, 5, 7, 9, 14, 15, 17, 23, 28; Mar 2, 11, 15, 17, 18, 21; Apr 1, 15, 17, 1999; May 29, Jul 26, Sep 14, Oct 12, 1999; Jan 20, Aug 17, 2000; Mar 23, Jun 4, Sep 23, 2001; May 15, Jul 9, 10, Sep 14, Oct 14, 15, 18, 24, 28, 29, 31, Nov 7, 11, 12, 15, 25, 26, 29, Dec 5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 18, 21, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31, 2002; Jan 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 17, 18, 22, 25, 27, 28, Feb 1, 11, 15, 24, 26, 27, 28, Mar 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 19, 20, 22, 26, 27, 28, 31, Apr 1, 2, 3, 10, 13, 16, 18, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, May 1, 2, 7, 13, 17, 21, 29, 2003. 

 

702. “SPOTLIGHT,” Washington, DC, Aug 14, 1978; Oct 13, 1982; Jan 16, 1984; Jan 15, 1996; Jan 13, Jun 9, 1997; Mar 6, Mar 23, May 4, May 11, 1998; Apr 12, Jun 21, Jun 28, Jul 5, 19, Aug 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, Sep 6, 13, 20, 27; Oct 4, 11, 18, 25, Nov 1, 22, 29, Dec 6, 20, 27, 1999; Jan 3 & 10, 17, 24, Feb 7, 14, 21, 28, Mar 6, 13, 20, 27, Apr 3, 10, 17, May 8, 15, 29, Jun 5, 12, 19, 26, Jul 3, 10, 24, 31, Aug 7, 21, Sep 4, 11, 18, Oct 9, 23, 30, Nov 6, 12, 20, 27, Dec 4, 11, 18, 25, 2000; Jan 1 & 8, 15, 22, 29, Feb 12, 19, 26, Mar 5, 12, 19, 26; Apr 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, May 28, Jun 4, 11, 18, 25, Jul 2, 9, 2001. 

 

703. “ST. MARIES GAZETTER RECORD,” St Maries, ID, Apr 17, 2002. 

 

704. “SUNDAY TIMES, The,” London, England, Nov 16, 1997. 

 

705. “USA TODAY,” Jun 12, 20, 1991; Jan 8, 1992; Jun 12, Jul 22, Dec 8, 1992; Jan 8, 14, 1993; May 29, Sep 15, 1997; Jul 7, 2000; Jun 4, Oct 29, 2001. 

 

706.  “VILLAGE VOICE, The,” Aug 3, 1993. 

 

707. “WALL STREET JOURNAL,” New York, NY, Oct 10, 1997; Feb 2, Mar 10, 1998. 

 

708.  “WASHINGTON POST,” Washington, DC, Oct 30, 1993; Sep 18, 1995; Dec 21, 1998; Jan 17, Jul 23, 2000; Feb 7, 2001; Mar 2, Apr 12, 30, Oct 22, 2002. 

 

709. “WASHINGTON TIMES,” Washington, DC, Feb 12, 1997; Nov 9-14, 1998; Jun 7-13, 14-20, 28-Jul 4, 5-11, 19-25, 26-Aug 1, 2-8, 16-22, 23-29, 30-Sep 5, 13-19, 20-26, 27-Oct 3, 4-10, 11-17, 18-24, 25-31, Nov 1-7, 8-14, 15-21, 22-28, 29-Dec 5, 6-12, 13-19, 20-26, 1999; Dec 27-Jan 2, 3-9, 10-16, 24-30, 31-Feb 6, 7-13, 14-20; Apr 3-9, 2000; May 11, 2001. 

 

710. “WORLD TRIBUNE,” Aug 9, 1999. 

 

 

Miscellaneous 

 

711.  “ABC NEWS.COM SCI/TECH,” Dec 4, 1997 (Internet). 

 

712. “AL-QAEDA’S REVENGE:  ITS METHODS AND NATION-STATE ALLIES,” by David N. Bossie and Christopher M. Gray, Citizens Public Policy Review, 109 Carpenter Drive, Suite 210, Sterling , VA 20164, 2002 (Article). 

 

713. “AMERICA,” Living Waters Publications, Box 1172, Bellflower, CA 90706 (Tract). 

 

714. “AMERICAN SENTINEL, The, Bonus Report,” 10660 S. Tryon St, Suite 16, Charlotte, NC 28273, Apr 2001 (Letter). 

 

715. “AMERICA’S TOTAL DEBT REPORT,” by Michael Hodges, Grandfather Economic Report Series, Dec 31, 2002, http://mwhodges.home.att.net (Internet). 

 

716. “ANALYSIS OF THE F.B.I.’S ‘PROJECT MEGIDDO, An,” Anti-Demonization League (Report). 

 

717. “ANATOMY OF A CHURCH,” Associates for Scriptural Knowledge, PO Box 25000, Portland, OR 97298 (Article--ASK Doctrinal Report). 

 

718. “ARE YOU A CAFFEINE DRUNKARD,” Religious Liberty and Tract Society (Tract). 

 

719. “ARE YOU A HOLY TEMPLE,” Orlando J. Smith, Milan, TN (Article) 

 

720. “ARTICLES OF FAITH AND DOCTRINE,” Church of Israel, PO Box 62 B3, Schell City, MO 64783 (Church Pamphlet). 

 

721.  “ASSOCIATED PRESS” (News Service). 

 

722.  “AT PLAY IN THE FIELDS OF THE LORD” (Book and Movie). 

 

723.  “BBC” (British Broadcasting Corporation). 

 

724.  “BLACKBOARD JUNGLE,” by Evan Hunter (Book and Movie). 

 

725. “CODE OF THEODOSIUS,” Book 8, Title 8, Law 3 (Roman Law). 

 

726. “COLOR PURPLE, The,” by Alice Walker, 1982 (Book and Movie). 

 

727. “COMMONWEALTH BOOKS,” PO Box 11476, Salt Lake City, UT 84147-0476 (Book List). 

 

728. “CONGRESSIONAL RECORD” (Official Record of the US Congress). 

 

729. “CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES” (Document). 

 

730. “CONVERSATIONS WITH MSGR. ESCRIVA DE BALAGUER” (Booklet). 

 

731. “DEFENSE NEWS EDITORIAL,” 4-5-98 (News Report). 

 

732. “DEUTSCHEN LANDEN,” Bihl 1953-69 (German Writing). 

 

733. “DISCOVER THE ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS IN YOUR BODY,” Dr. Stephen E West, International Academy of Lymphology, PO Box 1954, Orem, UT 84059 (Audio Tape). 

 

734. “DOES GOD REALLY HAVE ANY RIGHTS?,” by Fred De Aryan, Christian Citizens Initiative, PO Box 1541, Glenwood, AR 71935 (Article). 

 

735. “DONATION OF CONSTANTINE,” signed by the Emperor Constantine in the 4th century CE (Document). 

 

736.  “DRUDGE REPORT, The,” Matt Drudge (Internet). 

 

737.  “EARLY CHURCH, The,” Dean Wheelock, 1999 (Audio Tape). 

 

738. “ELEPHANT WALK,” by Robert Standish, 1954 (Book and Movie). 

 

739.  “EMAIL LETTER,” from David Rosenberg to Mr. Rense, Dec 12, 2001 (Letter). 

 

740.  “ENCARTA ENCYCLOPEDIA,” 1999 (Internet). 

 

741. “ENEMY WITHIN, The,” Commentary by Gore Vidal (Article). 

 

742. “EVIDENCE AGAINST THE SPRING PASSOVER RULE EVIDENCE FOR THE OBSERVED CALENDAR RULES OF THE SECOND TEMPLE,” by Wayne L. Atchison, 2001 (Article). 

 

743.  “F.D.R. MY EXPLOITED FATHER-IN-LAW,” by Curtis B. Dall, Liberty Lobby, Washington, DC (Booklet). 

 

744. “FIVE PILLARS OF JUDAISM,” Jim Myers, Center for Biblical Analysis, Cleburne, TX (Article). 

 

745. “FLAVIUS PHILOSTRATUS’S LIFE OF APOLLONIUS” (Document). 

 

746. “FOCUS ON THE FAMILY,”  Dr James Dobson (Religious Ministry Publication). 

 

747. “FORCE X,” Intelligence Digest (Study). 

 

748. “FOUNDATIONS OF OUR FAITH,” 5th National Conference at ORU, Tulsa, OK, Oct 9-12, 1991 (Audio Tapes). 

 

749. “FRIENDLY PERSUASION” (also known as “Except for Me and Thee”), Jessica West (Book and Movie). 

 

750. “FROM SABBATH TO SUNDAY,” Bible Sabbath Association (Tract). 

 

751. “FRUIT OF THE WOMB,” The, by Fred De Aryan, Christian Citizens Initiative, PO Box 1541, Glenwood, AR 71935 (Article). 

 

752. “GANNETT NEWSPAPERS” (News Service). 

 

753. “GHOST OF MARCION, The” Daniel Botkin, Gates of Eden, Box 2257, East Peoria, IL 61611 (Booklet). 

 

754. “GREAT GATSBY, The,” F. Scott Fitzgerald (Book and Movie). 

 

755. “GULF WAR SYNDROME, BIOLOGICAL WARFARE CONDUCTED ON U.S. MILITARY MEMBERS, AND CORPORATE BIO-GENOCIDE LEVIED ON THE PLANETARY POPULATION,” lecture by Captain Joyce Riley in Houston, Texas, Jan 15, 1996, transcript by Leading Edge Research Group, PO Box 7530, Yelm, WA 98597, May 8, 1997 (Lecture Transcript from Internet).  

 

756. “HERITAGE OF THE ANGLO-SAXON RACE, The,” Covenant Publishing Company, Ltd., London, England (Writing). 

 

757.  “HIDDEN TYRANNY, The, The Rosenthal Document,” published by Charles A. Weisman, 1992 (Pamphlet). 

 

758. “HORRORS OF TOBACCO SMOKING,” Religious Liberty & Tract Society (Tract). 

 

759. “HOW TO WIN: A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR DEFEATING THE RADICAL CHRISTIAN RIGHT IN YOUR COMMUNITY,” National Jewish Democratic Council, Washington, DC (Document). 

 

760. “HYMN OF THE SUN, ELEUSINIAN AND BACCHIC MYSTERIES” (Document). 

 

761. “I’D CLIMB THE HIGHEST MOUNTAIN,” by Corra Harris (Book and Movie). 

 

762. “IDOLATRY OF CIVIL RELIGION,” Randy Lee & Nicholas Arthur, Christ’s Assembly, general post office, Piru, California (Audio Tape). 

 

763. ”INDIAREACTS.COM,” Jun 26, 2001 (internet). 

 

764.  “IRANMANIA.COM,” Oct 12, 2002 (Internet). 

 

765. “IS ADAM THE FATHER OF ALL?,” Colin H. Deal, End Time News, PO Box 455, Rutherford College, NC 28671 (Article). 

 

766. “IS CHRISTIANITY A FRAUD? A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE CONDER THESIS,” Eric V. Snow, PO Box 220, Charlotte, MI 48813 (Article). 

 

767. “IS CHRISTIANITY A FRAUD? ROUND TWO,” Eric V. Snow, Servants’ News, PO Box 220, Charlotte, MI 48813 (Article). 

 

768. “ISRAELINSIDER.COM,” Oct 25, 2002 (Internet). 

 

769. “JAPHETH,” Ernest L. Martin, Association for Scriptural Study, Portland, OR (Audio Tape). 

 

770. “JEROME’S LETTER 123” (Letter). 

 

771.  “JERUSALEM PRAYER MANDATE,” Bible Light International, Box 370, Ottawa, KS 66067, Iyyar 5761, Tevet, Nissan/Iyar 5763 (Letter). 

 

772. “JOHNNY RENO,” story by Steve Fisher and Andrew Craddock, 1966 (Story and Movie). 

 

773. “JONAH IN THEOLOGY AND HISTORY,” Ernest L. Martin, Association for Scriptural Study, Portland, OR (Audio Tape). 

 

774. “KEEP WHAT MOSES SAYS!,” Ross Nichols, 1997 (Article from Internet). 

 

775. ”KNIGHT-RIDDER” (News Service). 

 

776. “LA LIGUE FEMININE ANTI-COMMUNISTE DE MONTREAL,” Canadian Publications, Gooderham, Ontario, Canada (Document). 

 

777. “LAST WARNING TO MAN, The,” James Griffin (Religious Pamphlet). 

 

778. “LETTER,” and enclosures, Mrs Judy Myers, Lord’s Harvest International, Church of God General Conference, Box 100, Oregon, IL 61061, March 2002 (Letter). 

 

779. “LETTER,” Church of Jesus Christ Christian, PO Box 362, Hayden, ID 83835, Mar 8, 2001 (Letter). 

 

780. “LETTER,” from “Bible Light International,” Chris Josephson, editor, Aug 2002 (Letter). 

 

781. “LETTER,” from B’nai B’rith Foundation of the US, Aug 8, 2001; May 2002 (Letter). 

 

782. “LETTER,” from Don McAlvany, editor of the “McAlvany Intelligence Advisor,” May, Aug 2002 (Letter). 

 

783. “LETTER,” from Hershel Shanks, editor of the “Biblical Archaeology Review,” 2001 (Letter). 

 

784.  “LETTER,” James Lloyd, editor of “Christian Media,” PO Box 448, Jacksonville, OR 97530, Nov 2002 (Letter).  

 

785.  “LETTER,” from James Bruggerman to supporters, Nov/Dec 2002 (Letter). 

 

786.  “LETTER,” from Larry Klayman, Chairman of Judicial Watch, May 2002 (Letter). 

 

787. “LETTER,” from Monte Judah, Lion and Lamb Ministries, Apr 2002 (Letter). 

 

788. “LETTER,” from Robert T. Woodworth of “Christ & Country,” Jun 16, 2001 (Letter). 

 

789.  “LETTER,” from a Sardis Church of God which is cited but not further identified in the study, dated Dec 14, 2001 (Letter). 

 

790.  “LETTER,” from Thomas S. Winter, editor-in-chief of Human Events, Jan 2003 (Letter). 

 

791. “LETTER FORUM,” Associates of Scriptural Knowledge, Box 25000, Portland, OR 97298, May 1997 (Religious Tract). 

 

792. “LETTERS,” from Lee Bellinger, editor of the American Sentinel magazine (PO Box 12497, Charlotte, NC 28220), undated, issued in 1999; Jul, Sep 2001; Mar, May, Oct 2002; Mar 2003 (Letter). 

 

793. “LETTERS,” from Marvin Hier, dean and founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Mar 2002; Jan 2003 (Letter). 

 

794. “LIMITS OF GROWTH, The,” The Club of Rome, 1972 (Study). 

 

795.  “LITTLE PUPPET, The,” Children’s Record Guild (Record). 

 

796.  “MANUAL OF DISCIPLINE,” Dead Sea Scrolls (Scroll). 

 

797. “MODERNIZING THE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM: AN ACTION AGENDA,” The Progressive Policy Institute, Feb 2002 (Plan). 

 

798. “MY FAREWELL TO ISRAEL, THE THORN IN THE MIDEAST,” by Jack Bernstein, as told to Len Martin, Pro American Education Foundation, PO Box 628, Mandan, ND 58554 (Booklet). 

 

799. “NASA’s BLUE BEAM PROJECT,” Serge Monest, published by the 11th Hour Remnant Messenger, Box 1887, Sandpoint, ID 83864, 1995 (Audio tape). 

 

800.  “NATIONAL REVIEW ON ONLINE,”  Ann Coulter, 2001 (Internet). 

 

801.  “ONLINE.IE,” German News Agency. Sep 14, 2001 (Internet). 

 

802. “ON WINGS OF EAGLES,” Fundraising letter from R. Yechiel Eckstein, 309 W. Washington Blvd., 8th Floor, Chicago, IL 60606 (Letter). 

 

803. “OPEN LETTER” to the Christian ministry, from R. Vincent Bertollini, 11th Hour Remnant Messenger, PO Box 1887, Sandpoint, ID 83864 (Letter). 

 

804. “OPENING HEAVENS, The,” May 8, 1846 (Religious Tract). 

 

805. “OPERATION CICERO,” also known as “Five Fingers,” by L. C. Moyzisch, c1950 (Book and 20th Century Fox Movie). 

 

806.  “PANIC IN THE WHITE HOUSE,” by Martin D. Weiss, Mar 2003 (Article). 

 

807.  “PBS” (Public Broadcasting System). 

 

808. “PLACE OF SAFETY,” An A.S.K. Prophetic Report, Ernest L. Martin, A.S.K., PO Box 2000, Portland, OR 97298 (Article). 

 

809. “POISONOUS DRUGS,” Dr Alice Chase (Article). 

 

810. “POPULATION CONTROL AGENDA,” Dr. Stan Monteith (Article from Internet). 

 

811. “RACIAL PROGRAM FOR THE TWENTIETH CENTURY, A,” Israel Cohen, 1912 (Article). 

 

812. “RADIO LIBERTY” Catalogue of Resources, PO Box 969, Soquel, CA 95073 (Catalogue). 

 

813. “READER’S LETTER,” from Walter H. Meyer, Editor of the Believer’s Advocate, PO Box 31031, Portland, OR 97231, Dec 31, 1996 (Letter). 

 

814. REBIRTH OF ISRAEL,” Andrew N. Dugger, Mount Zion Reporter, Jerusalem, Israel (Tract). 

 

815. “REUTERS” (News Service). 

 

816. “SATAN’S DOOR TO AMERICA,” Ed Decker, Saints Alive in Jesus, Box 1076, Issaquah, WA 98027, May 11, 1997 (Letter from Internet). 

 

817.  “SECRETS,” Marshall, AR (Religious Tract). 

 

818. “SEPTUAGINT” Research Study, Worldwide Church of God, 1994 (Paper). 

 

819. “SPECIAL ALERT FOR OVERCOMERS,” Pete J. Peters, Scriptures for America, PO Box 766, LaPorte, CO 80535 (Article). 

 

820.  “SPIRIT IN MAN OR ELECTRICITY IN MAN,” article by Danish writer Poul V. Krag, undated (Article). 

 

821.  “ST. PAUL AND THE LAW,” C. Cranfield (Article). 

 

822.  “STOCKHOLM TO RIO: A Journey Down A Generation,” by Maurice Strong (Essay). 

 

823.  “STRATEGY FOR SURVIVAL PROJECT,” The Club of Rome, Progress Report on Sep 17, 1973, by Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel (Report). 

 

824. “SUPPRESSION OF THE DIVINE NAME, The,” Dr Ernest L. Martin, Associates of Scriptural Knowledge, PO Box 25000, Portland, OR 97298 (Religious Booklet). 

 

825. “SYNAGOGUE,” Michael Lebowitz, 913-26 Rd, Grand Junction, CO (Audio Tape). 

 

826. “TEMPLE MOUNT ERETZ YISRAEL FAITHFUL MOVEMENT-JERUSALEM,” PO Box 18325, Yohanan Harkanos #4, Jerusalem, Israel, Web Site, Nov 28, 2001 (Internet). 

 

827. “TERRORIST ORGANIZATION DATABASE” Information, Anti-Defamation League, Oct 2002 (Flyer). 

 

828. “THORN BIRDS, The” (Book and Movie). 

 

829. “TIME OF THE END,” Charles W. Dodge, 4155 Deep Lake Boundary Road, Colville, WA 99114, Apr 23, 2000 (Booklet). 

 

830. “TOBACCO, TEA AND COFFEE,” Simon Pauli, 1746 (Article). 

 

831. “TOXICITY OF CAFFEINE,” USDA, 1917 (Booklet). 

 

832. “TRAINING MANUAL NO. 2000-25,” US War Department, Washington, DC, Nov 30, 1928 (Manual). 

 

833. “UNABOMBER MANIFESTO,” Dr Theodore Kaczynski, 1995 (Statement). 

 

834. “UNITED PRESS, INTERNATIONAL” (News Service). 

 

835. “UNITED STATES AND THE BRITISH EMPIRE FORETOLD IN THE BIBLE, The,” Harold Hemenway, Box 88401, Tukwila, WA 98138 (Booklet). 

 

836.  “VOICE OF THE TEMPLE MOUNT FAITHFUL, The,” The Temple Mount and Land of Israel Faithful Movement, PO Box 18325, Yochanan Horkanos 4, 91182 Jerusalem, Israel, Winter 5763 2002/2003 (Booklet). 

 

837. “WAS JESUS A HILLELITE PHARISEE?,” Harold Hemenway, Box 88401, Tukwila, WA 98138 (Booklet). 

 

838.  “WAS JESUS A QUMRAN ESSENE?,” Harold Hemenway, Box 88401, Tukwila, WA 98138 (Booklet). 

 

839.  “WERE THE FEAST DAYS ABOLISHED?”, Harold Hemenway, Box 88401, Tukwila, WA 98138 (Booklet). 

 

840.  “WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO ‘TURN THE OTHER CHEEK’?,” Harold Hemenway, Box 88401, Tukwila, WA 98138 (Booklet). 

 

841. “WHAT HAPPENED AT THE WORLD HEADQUARTERS OF JEHOVAH WITNESSES IN THE SPRING OF 1980,” Randall Watters, Drawer CP-258, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (Article). 

 

842. “WINE OR GRAPE JUICE,” Assemblies of Yahweh, Bethel, PA (Article). 

 

843. “WORLD NET DAILY NEWS” (Internet). 

 

844. “WORLD WILDLIFE FUND,” Living Planet Report 2002, dated Jul 9, 2002 (Internet). 

 

845. “WWW.CONTINUITYOFGOVERNMENT/ORG/ABOUT/ABOUT.HTML” (Internet). 

 

846. “XINHUA NEWS AGENCY,” Beijing, China (News Service).