EZEKIEL

 

and YHWH’s

 

 Judgment

 

 

for the

 

Good News

 

PEOPLE

 

 

 

VOLUME XXXIV

 

Coming Judgment

 

 

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

 

 

Judgment for the

 

 

 Good News People

 

 

 

 

Volume XXXIV--Coming Judgment

 

 

 

 

 

by

 

an unworthy servant

 

 

 

 

 

 

And you shall know the truth,

 

and the truth will make you free.

 

(John 8:32)

 

 

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho.  The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States.  Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

 

 

Volume XXXIV--Coming Judgment 

 

 

CHAPTER or APPENDIX                                                        PAGE

 

 

      -                  Cover Page                                                                                                         1

 

      -                  Title Page                                                                                                             2

 

      -                  Contents                                                                                                              3

 

      -                  Publisher’s Preface                                                                                           5

 

 

Part EEEEE--The Christian Dilemma 

 

      541             The Christian Dilemma I                                                                                   6

 

      542             The Christian Dilemma II                                                                                14

 

      543             The Christian Dilemma III                                                                               24

 

      544             The Christian Dilemma IV                                                                              29

 

 

Part FFFFF--Why Christianity is Bad 

 

      545             The Why for the Christian Failure I                                                               42

 

      546             The Why for the Christian Failure II                                                              55

 

      547             The Why for the Christian Failure III                                                             65

 

      548             The Why for the Christian Failure IV                                                            75

 

      549             The Why for the Christian Failure V                                                             87

 

 

Part GGGGG-Conclusion 

 

      550             The Present Crisis                                                                                           97

 

      551             Christians on the End                                                                                   104

 

      552             Watch!                                                                                                              117

 

      553             Some Conclusions                                                                                        125

 

 

Part HHHHH--Addendum 

 

      A                 Why Bush Was Elected                                                                                138

 

      B                 Some Scriptures                                                                                             155

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

 

 

Publisher’s Preface

 

Greetings!  The following presentation is volume thirty-four of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site. 

 

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world.  In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one. 

 

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material.  It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message! 

 

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1.  It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins:  left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers). 

 

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope. 

 

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers.  May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him.  Shalom (peace) to you and yours! 

 

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 541--The Christian Dilemma I

 

 

YHWH Requires True Worship 

 

In prior chapters, some powerful Scriptural evidence was presented and commented upon which establishes that YHWH The ELOHIM requires (actually demands!) that His true followers must worship Him in truth (Jo 4:24).  He will not accept or be pleased with homage that is founded upon lies, deceptions and pagan sun worship; and regardless of the attitude and “good” emotional feelings of the sun worshipper. 

 

If there is any doubt whatsoever about this need for truth, then all one has to do is spend a little time in research with a good concordance.  For this project, the student of truth should concentrate his/her attention on the question of prayers which was briefly mentioned before. 

 

What does it take for The ELOHIM to answer a prayer?  Does He automatically listen to each one (as sun worshippers believe) and then decide upon an answer of yes or no? 

 

Probably, the most profound verse in the Book on this theme was written by Shlomo when he said that “He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law (the Torah), even his prayer shall be abomination” (Prov 28:9).  Now, Christians generally have proclaimed that the law was done away with, and they turn their ears from it.  Will YHWH listen to their abominable prayers? 

 

As discussed in a prior chapter, the Scriptures communicate (repeatedly, over and over) that The MOST HIGH will not even listen to or attend to the prayers (of petition) of people in sin and that He does listen to the prayers of the persons obeying His commandments (II Chron 7:14-15; Job 8:5-6; 35:12-13; Ps 9:10; 10:17; 34:15-17; 66:18; Prov 15:8-9, 29; Isa 1:15; 59:1-3; Mic 3:4; Zech 7:12-13; Jo 9:31; Jas 4:3; 5:16; I Pet 3:12; I Jo 3:22). 

 

Another most extraordinary text was written by the Psalmist when he declared that YHWH is “nigh unto all them that call upon Him, to all that call upon Him in truth” (Ps 145:18).  Is anyone so stupid to believe that people can call upon The ELOHIM in lies and false worship and expect that He will be near to them? 

 

 

Sun Worship Involves Customs, Practices and Beliefs 

 

Previous chapters in this production have established that Christianity and the modern, Western, Christian culture are just full of sickening sun worship.  Many people erroneously assume that sun worship consists only of those situations where the worshipper assumes a prostrate position to bow before the sun. 

 

Of course, some sun worshippers do bow and pray to the sun, especially facing the rising sun (as Christians do at their Easter sunrise services, and as Yechezkel testified at Ezekiel 8:16), but most of the practices and customs of sun worship are substantially more subtle, discreet, advanced, sophisticated and acceptable in today’s civilized sun worship society than merely bowing and praying before the rising sun. 

 

For example, Christmas is certainly a sun worship custom (as was described earlier in this work) since it is the sun (not The SON) that is born at the winter solstice.  In fact, most all of the historic sun gods were born on December 25th (like Mithra, Chrishna, etc). 

 

In the Christian West, in the lands of the House of Yisrael, everything stops on Christmas day (and often the day before and the day after).  Even the wild, fanatical Christmas parties, orgies and celebrations usually take a break on Christmas day.  Beyond an occasional siren, there is little to disrupt the Christmas day stoppage. 

 

Conversely, in the modern state of Israel, everything stops on Yom Kippur.  As is true in the Christian West, it is possible to hear an occasional siren.  But generally, Yom Kippur is quiet, peaceful and a set apart day for fasting and worship.  In this contrast, who is obeying The HIGHEST--the Israelites in the Christian lands (like in the Christian Identity movement) or the Jews in Palestine?  

 

Other sun worship practices include observing Easter in preference to YHWH’s Passover, Sunday in contrast to YAH’s Sabbath and using names, titles and words linked to the sun god like “God, Lord, Jesus, Christ, Church and Holy,” in difference to using Hebrew names and titles found in the Book. 

 

Truly, most Christians dismiss these sun worship customs out of hand, as being unimportant and irrelevant to their supposed good deeds, feelings, faith and salvation.  But are these things unimportant and irrelevant?  Can they be dismissed out of hand? 

 

 

Not Only What But How! 

 

The reader can answer those questions by checking Deuteronomy 12:30-31 where The HIGHEST not only condemns the worship of false deities; but also, the matter of “how” the pagan peoples worshipped those deities.  “How” certainly includes, among other things, the observation of Christmas, Easter and Sunday, and using words in worship linked to the sun god. 

 

The Prophet Yirmeyahu likewise had some perceptive ideas along this same line when he wrote his famous condemnation of Christmas trees.  Yirmeyahu opens his very clear indictment with a charge to The ELOHIM’s people of the House of Yisrael to “learn not the way of the heathen” (Jer 10:2). 

 

Verse three in this presentation (Jer 10:3) is more explicit in telling the Israelites that the customs of the heathen are vanity (worthless, useless and empty pride and certainly nothing which should be adopted by followers of Truth).  The “Soncino Books of the Bible” correctly interpret this word customs as “religious practices and beliefs.” 

 

Yirmeyahu also had another most extraordinary observation about the customs of the women of Yehudah to burn incense to the Babylonian Queen of Heaven (Ishtar or Easter) and bake cakes for her (hot cross buns).  These women did this evil in Yehudah and proceeded to continue the practice in Egypt where they had fled for supposed safety (Jer 44:14-19). 

 

The importance of this indictment is that these sins were done by the women with the tacit approval of their husbands, as manifested in their apathy and indifference toward the whole question (Jer 44:19).  In other words, the charge was against both the women and their men. 

 

Though the men were not directly involved, they still carried guilt for standing by and indifferently allowing the evil to proceed.  The men had a moral duty to exercise leadership and dominion over their women and to intervene and stop the false worship practices.  But they ignored their duty and responsibility. 

 

 

They Wouldn’t Quit 

 

This presentation by Yirmeyahu also brings out another fascinating fact.  The women said that they were not about to stop their evil practices because they enjoyed the fat of the land while they were following these evil customs in Yehudah.  When they temporarily stopped this sin, they lacked every thing (Jer 44:17-18). 

 

When judgment falls upon the US from Russia and an Islamic alliance and Americans have to abandon Easter worship, will they then recall the years of prosperity that they enjoyed while keeping Easter?  Will they thereupon lament over how wonderful things used to be? 

 

Or will they then be able to put two and two together and realize that it has been the Easter keeping (and other sun worship practices) which has brought on the judgment?  Will they then repent for having kept Easter all of those years?  Maybe, they won’t initially see their wrongs.  But Yakov’s Trouble of seven years will ultimately make the survivors repent.  In time, they will understand! 

 

And of course, there was furthermore the previously mentioned remark by YESHUA that true believers must worship The SOVEREIGN in spirit (by the mind, heart, attitude, mental faculties and intellect, etc., as opposed to physical acts done for the sake of pride, show off or something similar where the worshipper’s heart just isn’t in it) and in truth (Jo 4:24).  People can’t please The EL with false worship. 

 

 

The Secular State 

 

Today, the United States is a secular state.  The historic sun worship society is essentially a secular society and culture; at least, in a generic sense. 

 

Admittedly, Americans claim to be Christians while they practice and believe in the historic, Christian, sun worship ideas.  Though not being particularly religious, the sun worship culture and civilization does allow and promote sun worship practices and customs. 

 

Thus, while the whole culture and civilization function on the basis of historic sun worship, it exists as a largely secularist state.  Therefore, the secularist sun worshippers just about all observe or keep Easter, Christmas, Sunday and the sun worship calendar, and have attitudes of sun worship in their social, economic, educational, political and governmental dealings. 

 

But the present Christian sun worship practices and rituals are all for show purposes with no substance in terms of the heart.  Religion has been largely removed as a focus for the hearts and minds of the collective people. 

 

A paradox then ensues because the people are “supposedly” not religious.  Yet, their whole culture, life and civilization (in terms of social, economic, educational, political and governmental attitudes and practices) are totally sun worship and based upon the practices of the old sun cults (which theoretically were motivated and inspired by the sun worship religion).  Hence, the peoples in both cases react and live the same way. 

 

Persons today not only ignore The True YHWH YESHUA and His Torah, but they even largely ignore their own sun god, the effeminate, long-haired Gee-Zeus, and the teachings attributed to him by false Christianity.  This indifference and apathy toward their sun god extend to their human mediators chosen to interface between them and him. 

 

Consequently, some Mormons are beginning to ignore the words of their prophet Joseph Smith, some Seventh day Adventists are starting to disobey Ellen White and the same thing is happening for some followers of other human prophets and charismatic leaders. 

 

Historically, the Christian suckers may have ignored Gee-Zeus, but they sure tried to obey their modern prophets and human leaders.  By rebelling against their church prophets and leaders, obvious confusion then surfaces for Mormons, Seventh day Adventists and similar persons devoted to some fake Christian founder or big shot. 

 

 

Even the Feasts Ignored in Tanakh History 

 

Based upon this present backdrop, it is evident that there are problems within Christendom on the question of set apart times and festivals.  Somehow, Christian and secularist Israelites have always liked pagan sun worship festivals, instead of Scripturally appointed times. 

 

Actually, one of the things that some modern people have found, as they search the Scriptures, is a need to start obeying YHWH’s annual festivals--Passover, Pentecost, Tabernacles, etc (Lev 23), as elsewhere discussed herein.  At a first impression, one would suppose that surely the ancient Israelites observed those feasts.  Well not so, or at least, not much so. 

 

During the days of the good king Yoshiyahu, he and the people held a Passover festival in his 18th year.  And YHWH’s Word is careful to tell us that this type of Passover was the first one kept by the people since the days of the Judges (II Kg 23:22-23). 

 

In the days of Nechemyah and Ezra, the people kept Sukkot and dwelt in booths, per the Word.  This was the first time for such worship since the time of Yehoshua, almost 1,000 years earlier (Neh 8:17). 

 

Assuredly, the point of all this is that the Israelites never did make any effort collectively to properly worship The SOVEREIGN.  Whatever worship they did do was typically mixed in with pagan sun worship, just as it is today in Christian Yisrael lands.  Nothing has changed in the last 3,500 years. 

 

 

Ezekiel 8:16 

 

In an article on Sukkot (“Prophecy Flash,” p. 31, Nov-Dec 1997, previously cited), William F. Dankenbring, apparently quoting Alfred Edersheim and the Talmud, said that in YESHUA’s day, the priests would march in procession to the East Gate and turn and face the Temple to the West while proclaiming “Our fathers who were in this place stood with their backs to the Temple and their faces eastward and worshipped the sun, but our eyes are unto” YHWH. 

 

This ceremony took place at the dawn of each day during Sukkot in Second Temple times.  It apparently was based upon a form of confession of the sins of ancestors (Lev 26:39-42; Jer 16:19) and repentance over the event in Ezekiel 8:16 (that probably did happen in Yechezkel’s day, but which was evidently prophetic of a coming, Christian, sun worship, Easter, sun-rise ceremony to defile the future Third Temple, as noted earlier). 

 

Though the Jews in Second Temple days may not have fully understood the ultimate significance of this ritual that they were following, the truth is that the real, typical Ezekiel 8:16 appears to be still future here in 2003. 

 

The actual prophecy will one day take place in a Third Temple when real Israelites will worship the rising sun to the East.  The people will likely be Christians--who have come to Jerusalem from their judged House of Yisrael nations.  The whole context of Ezekiel 8 concerns these sun worshipping Christians who bring their abominable sun worship practices into the Temple of YHWH, either at Sukkot or Passover time. 

 

If Christian Israelites would have been observing Sukkot throughout the years, and if they had any appreciation at all for Second Temple Judaism and repentance over the described sun worship in Ezekiel, maybe they could have followed this ritual from Second Temple days, annually, like the Jews used to do--in order to offer a form of regret over the evil sun worshipers, mentioned in Ezekiel. 

 

If this ceremony of repentance would have been going on at Sukkot (or ideally, at Passover), maybe some of these Christian sun worshippers of the lost tribes would have awaken and realized how incredibly wicked and depraved their Christian religion is and how evil Christians will one day in the future defile the Temple--just as Yechezkel describes. 

 

Both Yechezkel’s prophecy and the ancient Second Temple ritual are most profound with far reaching teachings and admonitions.  What a shame it is that the Jews used to follow the repentance ritual--all the while that Israelites of the lost tribes could care less about something which one day they will fulfill. 

 

Yes, evil Christian Israelites will seemingly come to the Third Temple in the future and defile it with their Christian sun worship paganism and by actually facing the rising sun in a ceremony (evidently near Passover, in an Easter, sun-rise ritual). 

 

Moreover, one day in the millennium, when the descendants of these sun worshippers keep Sukkot or Passover, they probably will perform the Second Temple ritual done by the Jews when they turned their backs to the rising sun and repented over the sun worship evil of their ancestors.  Manifestly, in the millennium, it’s highly likely that saved Israelites will follow that Jewish ritual to the letter (as described in the Talmud). 

 

 

Acts 7:42, Revisited 

 

With this history, one can now begin to appreciate and grasp the enormous import of Stephen’s charge at Acts 7:42 (mentioned before).  What happened was that because of sin, YHWH gave upon and abandoned the House of Yisrael to the worship of the host of heavens, when He divorced her during the Assyrian conquests in the 7th and 8th centuries BCE.  This “how” involves both practices and beliefs. 

 

The House of Yisrael (not the non-divorced Jews, however bad and however wretched they have been) has followed this established pattern of sun worship ever since its inception, unto this very day in 2003 CE.  Of course, Stephen would be aware of this situation since the New Testament was written to, about, and for the House of Yisrael. 

 

The prophet Yeshayahu must have also had this Israelite transition to sun worship in mind when he wrote about The ELOHIM’s abandonment of the House of Yakov because “they are full of the practices from the East” (Isa 2:6-8).  “Soncino Books of the Bible” (p. 11) identifies this East, as being East of Canaan, in the lands of Syria and Babylon, where historic sun worship flourished. 

 

Former Christian Darrell W. Conder makes the case that the end time Israelites (of the ten lost tribes) would be worshipping at the feet of the sun god Baal.  He declares that Christianity perfectly fulfills the prophecies of end-time, Israelite, Baal worship (“Mystery Babylon and the Ten Lost Tribes in the End Time,” p. 1). 

 

 

Christian Reactions 

 

Despite what The ELOHIM clearly states in His word, Churchianity regularly chooses to substitute her ideas and concepts of righteousness for YHWH’s laws and Words which establish and define righteousness.  This is the real world of Christian faith, over and over.  Earlier, mention was made of the situation regarding Cain and Abel. 

 

The first Sabbath day in creation week, YAH seemingly instructed Adam and Eve on His laws (the Torah).  Apparently, the next day (Sunday), Satan called on them to present his teachings.  When Adam and Eve sinned, and when they were exposed, as being “naked” from that sin, an interesting thing took place. 

 

YHWH had evidently instructed them on the requirement of a blood sacrifice and offering to pay for sin.  And that’s the apparent symbolism one can find in the reference to the coats of skins which provided a “covering” for them (Gen 3:21).  The covering was surely the sin offering of blood.  The reader knows what later happened.  Abel obeyed The SUPREME and offered blood (Heb 9:22). 

 

Cain substituted his own wisdom and wishes (was he one of the first ascetic, animal rights advocates?) and offered some produce from his garden (Gen 4:2-4).  Is it not quite manifest that Kain justified in his heart and mind his offering and attempt at worship?  Never mind what YHWH said, Cain meant well didn’t he?  Or did he?  Wasn’t he sincere?  Or was he? 

 

Of course, Christians are just like Kain.  They will always spout off their mouths about having good hearts and attitudes.  Most Christians proudly think that they have good hearts--all the while that they are in utter contempt and rebellion toward YHWH and His Torah.  The truth is that one cannot have a good heart or good attitude if he or she is rolling in sin by being rebellious toward YAH’s Torah. 

 

In the just completed discussion of YHWH’s condemnation of not only pagan sun worship; but particularly, of the practices, customs and activities of sun worshippers in terms of “how” they worshipped (Deut 12:30), the point surfaces that Adam man is not free to establish his own worship procedures. 

 

Not only should Adam worship The HIGHEST, but he must worship The HIGHEST as The HIGHEST specifies.  Consequently, The MOST HIGH’s worship practices were not set aside or compromised in order to meet the wishes of animal rights activists and political liberals in the days of the operation of the Temple on Mount Moriah. 

 

Thus, it is not Adam man who has received authority to determine “how” to worship.  Adam man can never decide the question of how.  Instead, It is The ELOHIM, in person, Who makes those decisions and establishes them as immutable laws.  The only issue or option facing Adam man is whether he is willing to read, study and learn of those laws (in the Torah) with a view of obeying them or not. 

 

 

YHWH Sets the Standards of Truth 

 

YHWH has decided upon what constitutes true worship.  He has defined and established what is righteousness in the context of His Torah. 

 

For another aspect of this reality, man is in no position to look over those mitzwot and attempt to pick and choose which ones constitute righteousness and which are deserving of his obedience. 

 

Christians, in particular, to include almost all of the Seventh day Sabbath keeping groups, like to pick and choose which of YHWH’s laws that they wish to obey.  They then like to brag and show off over the few laws that they do obey.  A preceding discussion on pride focused upon an elderly, gentlemen friend of this writer and how he obeys several of YAH’s law, but then disobeys others that do no appeal to him. 

 

This rebellious and wicked practice of picking and choosing, by particularly Christian Israelites, is wrong.  Clearly, this type of mix can never constitute and be acceptable as true worship--despite its popularity and acceptance by the global mass of sun worshippers.  A different approach is called for.  In other words, Israelites must worship in truth, as decided by The ELOHIM (Jo 4:24). 

 

In short, it’s not just a matter of totally what is in the heart (although that factor is important, as John 4:24 indicates).  But it’s also a primary stipulation that such worship must be done in a physical, procedural sense, as YHWH has ordained.  If a man is unwilling to obey the physical instructions of worship, manifestly, his heart is in the wrong place. 

 

Thus, if YAH says for Israelites to stand on their heads and look cross eyed at the sky, then all Israelites should do that precisely and not attempt to substitute some other action on the premise of human judgment and that their hearts mean well. 

 

This writer has heard heathen Christians for decades justify and support their pagan, sun worshipping, Christmas celebrations on the basis that they mean well and that their hearts are in the right places, despite the evil features of Christmas and their other sun worship customs.  How utterly stupid and ridiculous this is.  One’s heart can’t be in the right place when he/she is acting contrary to YHWH’s Word. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 542--The Christian Dilemma II

 

 

The Christian Gospel of Killing, Murder and Torture 

 

Beyond the discussion in the previous chapters on the evil in the contemporary Christian civilization, there is one more incredible fallout of the Christian world.  For 2,000 years, Christians have been murdering and killing each other, all over Christian Europe, in wars, intrigues, conflicts and hate and often under the leadership of Christian priests and preachers. 

 

In the 1500s, Spanish and English Christians killed each other.  In the 1800s, French and British Christians killed each other.  In the 1900s, American and German Christians killed each other.  It goes on and on and never ends--just like it was among the sun cults which murdered and hated each other for centuries.  

 

 

The US Civil War 

 

One of the greatest of Christian tragedies is the American Civil War where over 600,000 young Christian men (and some Christian women) slaughtered each other on the battlefields.  There never was a good reason for this slaughter--other than stupid Christians allowed themselves to be manipulated by evil, behind the scenes, Amalekite bankers. 

 

Now, a strange paradox arises which makes no sense whatsoever in the context of the Christian religion. 

 

As briefly pointed out in previous comments herein, the South was generally led by very Christian men who were honorable and deeply religious--Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson and so forth.  Just as is true today, the South was the “Bible Belt” and the world’s center of Christianity (true, there were Christians in the North, but not like the South).  

 

Also, as cited earlier, the North was led by a band of scaly-wags, occultists and evil men.  If there was an exception to this charge, it would surely apply to General George McClellan who Lincoln fired for not aggressively attacking the South.  McClellan was a man of honor and integrity and perhaps hoped for a political solution which could be had without the need for brothers to kill brothers.

 

Mrs Abe Lincoln was a Spiritualist and the supposedly non-religious Abe participated in her occultic contacts with the demon world (to include putting a “hex” on the Southern army, as noted earlier). 

 

General U. S. Grant was a drunkard (and may have also tried to put a hex on the Southern Army, as some now claim) and any number of other leading Unionists were atheists, agnostics, whore-mongers, rapists and derelicts of the worse kind (excepting McClellan, as noted above). 

 

Lee and his generals were constantly praying themselves and advocating and encouraging prayer and Christian worship among their officers and men. There seems to be no like outpouring of the Christian religion at all in the Union forces. 

 

Moreover, anyone trying to condemn the South for slavery should take a few minutes and read about slavery in the Scriptures (and then check upon Northern morals from the Word). 

 

 

The Christian Side Lost 

 

Despite the sincerity and devotion of numbers of honest, Christian men of some integrity in the South, the Confederacy lost the war and was virtually destroyed in those days.  They were punished incredibly so.  With their devotion to Christianity (as opposed to the North), the question must be asked--why?  In the American Civil War, the more Christian side and people lost.  The less Christian side won. 

 

Incidentally, many people support the North’s war against the South on the premise that it was over the just mentioned slavery and the end of slavery.  Actually, nothing could be further from the truth.  The Civil War was about states rights under the 10th amendment to the Constitution, as discussed in a previous chapter.  The subject of states rights covered a multitude of issues which included slavery, taxation, etc. 

 

The Northern states and the Radical Republicans wanted to do then what the Democrats have particularly wanted to do since FDR.  The cry has always been one between those who wanted a limited, central, federal government (with the states having power over all issues not outlined in the Constitution), as opposed to those who wanted an all powerful government in Washington calling all of the shots. 

 

Correctly, this is the issue in the abortion question and Roe versus Wade.  Abortion is clearly a topic for the states (states rights) and not for the federal government under the Constitution.  However, the Supreme Court, as has been its practice now for years, abolished the states’ rights of deciding yes or no on abortion.  The court said that the federal government has a right to dictate this issue to the entire nation. 

 

 

Christian Hate, Torture and Cruelty 

 

Beyond the obvious qualities of Christian hypocrisy (as discussed in the previous comments), the tragedy about the vast majority of Christian humanists, liberals and collective peoples is that they are in a state of rebellion toward The MOST HIGH and His Words of righteousness. 

 

The same thing was true of thousands of Catholic leaders and priests in the days of the famous (or infamous) Catholic inquisition in which they murdered and slaughtered millions of people who would dare try to stand up for religious liberty and conscience. 

 

The Catholics used to have various kinds of torture instruments and methods of punishment and pain to be put on the backs of poor people who would dare want religious freedom (per Ralph Woodrow, in “Babylon Mystery Religion”).  Literally, these methods were incomprehensible to the average, civilized man. 

 

Take the rack which they used to bind a person in two directions and began to pull the subject apart in the two different directions.  Or take the iron coffin with its many stakes, knives, needles and prongs to slowly inflict torture on a victim as it was closed.  And of course, one must bring to remembrance the multiplied thousands that were burned alive at the stake in the name of religion (per “Foxe’s Book of Martyrs”). 

 

As these many thousands were being tortured and put to death, Catholic priests would stand by and cheer the executioners and authorities on in their great murderous and evil actions against innocent people who only wanted and sought religious liberty for conscience sake. 

 

In fact, the Catholic priests and leaders were the chief accusers and witnesses against the innocent people being slaughtered during the Roman Catholic Church’s rule of the civilized world, from c313 CE until the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century. 

 

In fact, the whole problem facing those people, being slaughtered by the millions, was over religion and their desire to have religious liberty, in contrast to a Catholic dictatorship.  Effectively, the involved secular authorities were working for and serving the Catholic religious authorities in their actions. 

 

In those days, the Catholic religious people were sincere (sincerely wrong) and would have argued to no end that their hearts were all in the right place.  They really believed in what they were doing.  They took pleasure in it (and thought that they were serving their “Gawd”).  Yes, they ignorantly thought that their evil and murder was the Gospel message. 

 

 

Protestants as Well 

 

While the torture and murder of innocent people, because of their religious beliefs, can normally be attached to the Roman Catholic Church, Rome has not had an exclusive possession of these tactics.  Strangely enough, some of the early Protestant Churches attempted to follow suit, especially when they tried to establish a church-state linkage. 

 

The famous theologian and physician Michael Servetus was one (among many innocent people) who was murdered by the early Protestants.  Servetus’ crime was that he refused to believe in the Christian trinity.  Consequently, he was arrested, tried and burned at the stake in Geneva, Switzerland in 1553, per the order of the famous reformer, John Calvin. 

 

While Catholic authorities have killed and tortured people by the millions over their history; in fairness, the Protestants have never begun to reach those proportions.  With the arrival of the 17th century and the peace of Westphalia in 1648, most of the civilized Western world gave up on religious persecutions (at least, for a while). 

 

 

Salem 

 

There was a notable exception to this motion of peace in 1692 and in Massachusetts colony of all places.  It seems that a bunch of emotional and hateful teenage girls in the town of Salem began accusing their enemies of being witches of sorts.  This list of accusers included the daughter and niece of the local Puritan preacher. 

 

Of course, none of the local, ignorant Christians would dare speak out against such supposedly innocent, young girls.  Assuredly, the preacher and religious authorities became the leaders in the emotional hype to try and execute such people (quite naturally, to include murdering some people who were their religious enemies). 

 

The people got all worked up over these ridiculous charges and arrested and tried the accused persons for Witchcraft or being servants of the Devil. 

 

If the parties confessed their sins, they were released.  If they maintained their integrity and innocence, they were convicted and hung.  Yes, it was easy for some to say that they were a witch and be freed, while those who denied the charges were hung as being unrepentant.  Some 19 died on the gallows before some measure of sense and fairness returned to the society. 

 

 

Pat Robertson on Murder 

 

Television evangelist Pat Robertson was in the news in August 1999 with some of his views.  Robertson is not only a big voice in Christianity as a Christian pastor, preacher and leader, but he is big in the Christian media with his own television network and programming.  Plus, he has founded and is current president of the Christian Coalition, a Christian political movement in American politics. 

 

“Spotlight” paper (p. 2) of Aug 23, 1999, quoted Robertson--who has went on record that the assassination of certain world leaders offers a good solution to the world’s problems.  Specifically, Robertson focused upon the Arab leader Osama bin Laden, the head of North Korea, Yugoslavia President Slobodan Milosevic and Iraq’s Saddam Hussein. 

 

The evil Pat Robertson said that it may sound “Machiavellian or evil to think that you could send a squad in to take out” such persons, but isn’t it better to do that than having to spend billions of dollars on wars that harm innocent people. 

 

US President George W. Bush manifestly heeded the advice of the Christian leader Robertson because he quickly put out a CIA murder contract on Saddam Hussein. 

 

But apparently, this CIA murder effort did not succeed so Bush Jr decided to proceed with his war and invasion on Iraq to supposedly get rid of Saddam (as of early summer of 2003, the born again George still had not succeeded in killing Saddam and even after spending billions of dollars in his murder effort--though Saddam was later captured after the US offered a reward of $25 million). 

 

As “Spotlight” perceptively noted, even the evil Amalekite Adolf Schicklgruber opposed assassinating enemy leaders. 

 

Incidentally, Christian leader Pat Robertson may also be in on the horse racing racket.  The May 6, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news report that the “man of God” Robertson was expected to run a race horse in the 2002 Kentucky Derby.  The so-called “reverend” explained to his contributors that he don’t bet on horses. 

 

Like the ”American Free Press” asked--isn’t this like the drug pusher saying that he don’t inhale or the saloon owner saying that he don’t drink.  It is unclear to this writer what happened to Robertson’s horse.  If entered at the Derby, Pat’s horse did not win.  

 

 

Iraq and Christian Missionaries 

 

The Mar 26, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A7) had a story from Jordan on “Evangelical missionaries poised near border of Iraq” which reported on the plans of two key Christian missionary groups--the Southern Baptist Convention and “the reverend” Franklin Graham’s Samaritan’s Purse of  Boone, NC. 

 

As the story goes, these two, war hungry, Christian missionary groups were poised in Jordan, waiting for the US bombs to quit falling on Iraq so that they could rush into the bombed out nation (where 98% of the people are Moslems) and provide some humanitarian supplies and then evangelize the terrorized and bombed out Muslims (at least those that survive the US attacks). 

 

Ken Isaacs, International Director of the Graham project said that “We do not deny the name of Christ.  We believe in sharing him in deed and in word.” 

 

The Southern Baptists have spent money on blankets and baby formulas.  Much more will follow, along with a more overt spiritual emphasis.  Mark Kelly, a spokesman for the International Mission Board of the Southern Baptists, noted that “Conversation about spiritual things will come about as people ask about our faith.” 

 

In one more report, the Apr 2003 “Maoz Israel” newsletter (p. 3) suggested “Let us pray for a spiritual army of dedicated men and women, full of love for the Iraqi people, to invade that land with the Gospel.”  This group is a Pentecostal-Charismatic type of Messianic Jews who fully supported the Bush war on Iraq (as is commented upon elsewhere herein). 

 

 

The Paradox 

 

But there is quite a paradox about the evangelizing efforts of these two Christian groups.  Most of the solid Bush support for the Iraqi war and for the bombing and slaughter of thousands of Iraqis have come from evangelical Christians.  While Christians often love war, the evangelical Christians have been particularly noteworthy about supporting this Bush war. 

 

As discussed elsewhere herein, any number of leading evangelical Christians have spoken out to condemn and criticize the Islam religion and connect it to the work of the Devil.  Per the story under discussion, “the reverend” Franklin Graham called Islam “a very evil and wicked religion.” 

 

“The reverend” Jerry Vines, former denominational president of the Southern Baptists, says that Islam’s Allah is not the same deity as the “God” worshipped by Christians.  Vines adds “I will tell you Allah is not Jehovah, either.  Jehovah’s not going to turn you into a terrorist.” 

 

Both the Franklin Graham and Southern Baptist groups have close ties to the war hungry George W. Bush and are perhaps his primary block of political supporters (much like the Blacks are/were the primary people in support of the diabolical Slick Clinton).  Yet, interestingly, the born again Bush has come out and called Islam a “religion of peace.” 

 

So Bush and his primary supporters for war need to get together and decide whether Islam is good or bad.  They logically can’t have it both ways--in that Islam is a religion of evil/terrorists and also a religion of peace. 

 

Therefore, it’s quite a paradox that these Gawd loving Christians, who are such lovers of war and haters of the Islamic world (and who have been some of the primary people pushing for the killing of the Iraqis), were poised on the borders of Iraq, preparing to rush into that war torn and devastated country to try to convert those innocent people to pagan, sun worship Christianity. 

 

 

Yes, the Christian Push for War 

 

The gist of the presentation in the former commentary is that Christian preachers and leaders are just as depraved, sick, warped and evil as the political leaders have been who have pushed and prodded the US into wars, conflicts and intrigues, all on the premise of so-called righteousness and morality. 

 

Of course, historically, the Roman Catholic popes were the principle people who dreamed up and schemed wars and murders of people--all done as a part of the Christian Gospel.  Nothing has changed within Christianity in the last 2,000 years.  It still is a sun worship religion, closely tied to sun worship priests and politicians (who now serve the ruling Amalekites). 

 

The NT has a number of comments from YESHUA which show His utter contempt toward politicians, doctors, lawyers and religious leaders.  His greatest condemnations of all were directed at these evil people (who are just as depraved and wicked today [or more so] as they were 2,000 years ago). 

 

 

The Preachers Are the Most Guilty of All 

 

Otherwise, the Tanakh has a host of long presentations on wicked preachers (obviously, in reference to Christian preachers in the context of the various Christian Israelite nations).  Over and over, YHWH says that He never sent them.  Yet, they have went forth to spew out their brands of evil sun worship. 

 

This study has discussed a whole array of very serious problems and issues which have acted to maim, destroy and hurt dumb people for most of the last 2,000 years (in the context of pride, greed, environmental pollution, food, health, sexual relations, cultural issues and on and on). 

 

It has to be significant that all of this sun worship evil in the culture and civilization in the modern House of Yisrael nations has always been acceptable and even respected and admired by the collective Christian society.  The Christian preachers, above all other persons, have had a moral duty to teach the Torah and instruct the people under their care about the evils of the present culture. 

 

But the preachers have not said a word about true righteousness (in the generic sense).  They have sat back for 2,000 years and allowed the greatest of evils to become entrenched in the Christian West.  They have done little or nothing of benefit for their people.  Assuredly, YHWH holds the preachers accountable for the evil which they have taught and imposed on the people. 

 

This writer has wanted, searched for and tried to have available clean food and water (in difference to the poisoned and nutritionally inferior products now available in the contemporary sun worship society).  We all have a need to walk the extra mile and try our level best to avoid defiling the temples of our bodies (so that The RUACH HA KODESH might one day dwell in them). 

 

But the whole culture is against letting people have clean and nutritionally beneficial food for human consumption.  Of course, the food issue is just one among thousands, as outlined in this production.  Others (like tyrannical and oppressive governments) are just as profound and pressing in importance.  As discussed earlier, the preachers have sat back and allowed this tragedy to happen. 

 

They have not stood in the gap to preach and teach against the evils of this present sun worship system.  Absolutely, YHWH will hold them accountable and punish them the most of all.  As quoted earlier, Dr Stan Monteith said--the man who does not oppose evil becomes an accomplice in it.  Is it not manifest that Christian preachers and leaders are accomplices in the evil in the land? 

 

 

11th Hour Remnant Messenger   

 

On Nov 13, 1999, the previously quoted R. Vincent Bertollini, of the 11th Hour Remnant Messenger in Sandpoint, Idaho, wrote a very revealing, open letter of six pages to Christian pastors, teachers and ministers at large (as published in issue #12, 1999, of “Calling Our Nation” magazine). 

 

This letter really indicted the Christian leadership for its gross failures and apathy.  Without attempting to cover his many excellent points, a few remarks will be extracted to demonstrate that indeed Christianity has failed the people. 

 

Bertollini wrote:  “Our Government, by illegal and unconstitutional military action, has murdered tens of thousands of innocent men, women and children in Iraq, Somalia, the Sudan, Haiti, Panama, Granada (sic), Bosnia and Yugoslavian Kosovo.  Where is the outcry for those atrocities?  None exists.  Shame on you! 

 

“Our President is a traitor, murderer, adulterer and a liar of the vilest sort and there is no outcry from the Church.  Shame on you! 

 

“We have watched you stand silent while our Tyrannical Government murdered men, women and children at Waco.  Our demonic possessed Attorney General stated recently that she would do the same thing again!  Shame on you! 

 

“We have watched you stand silent when our Tyrannical Government minions murdered the wife and child of Randy Weaver at Ruby Ridge.  Shame on you! 

 

“We have watched you stand silent as nearly two million fetuses are aborted each year because of promiscuity.  Shame on you! 

 

“We have watched you stand silent as in-your-face-homosexuality permeates our society; our universities, our streets, your churches and the media.  Shame on you! 

 

“There is more violence and sex and in the movies as never before in the history of the United States.  Pornography is rampant everywhere in this country and permeates the Internet.  Why is there no outcry from the Church?  Shame on you! 

 

“We have watched you embrace integration, multi-culturalism and diversity.  Most of you encourage and even perform mixed race marriage ceremonies.  You will answer for this most outrageous violation against God’s desire and commandment to separate when you stand before Him on That Day!  (Like kind after like kind).  You are contributing to the destruction of the Adamic White Aryan Israelite peoples of this planet.  Shame on you! 

 

“We have watched you stand silent as you accept strangers in our midst who bring their paganistic religions into our race and culture; Buddhism, Islam, Zoreastrianism, Taoism, Confucianism, Catholicism, New Age and many others.  False Gods and Idolatry are an abomination to God the Father and He always punishes His people for allowing it and practicing it.  God will judge you as self-proclaimed shepherds of your flocks.  Shame on you! 

 

“You stand silently by as the greatest nation that has ever existed on planet earth, founded as a Christian nation with Christians principles, allowed atheist Madeline O’Hara and a small minority of followers petition the Supreme Court of this land to take prayer from the schoolroom and public forum.  Shame on you! 

 

“Now, the strangers that live in our land and our second generation now in the public schools who have no knowledge of the God of the universe hold all Christian principles in disdain.  You wring your hands and wonder from your pulpits what went wrong and silently pray for Father God to handle it!”  

 

 

“The Herald of Truth” 

 

The Seventh Day Church of God of Caldwell, Idaho publishes a small bi-monthly religious magazine called “The Herald of Truth.”  Like other Christian publications, this one is so shallow, false and lacking that it makes me want to think of it as “The Herald of No Truth” because that really is about what it is all about. 

 

In any case, the January 2002 issue (p. 2-4) had an editorial which focused upon so-called drifters drifting “from God.”  The points were made that a drifter is a person who moves aimlessly from one place to another, and that the “church must begin to realize that there is no place in God’s Kingdom for one to drift along with the world and it’s ways.” 

 

Thus, the argument was advanced that one cannot drift his way into “the Kingdom of God.”  Next, the editorial focused upon three things that characterize the drifter.  First, the drifter “finds it hard to do battle so he begins to give in on little things.”  Next, the drifter “thinks he is alright with God and in good standing even though he my (sic) be deceiving himself.” 

 

There wasn’t anything significant one way or the other on these several comments.  But the one remark which really stands out is the third and last thing about a drifter. 

 

The editorial said:  “Third, a drifter is able to miss church services and not feel any thing is wrong.  People give all kinds of reasons why they can miss church and remain loyal to God, but the bottom line is they have become lean in their souls and no longer have a burden for the lost as they did when they first yielded their lives to the Lord.” 

 

Going on, the editor noted that the Sep 11, 2001, terrorist attack was a warning call “to the church” to remind her that drifting is an unstable position to be in. 

 

The point of mentioning this editorial is that of the profound sins in America and in the American Christian Church, it is indeed a paradox that this Christian leader has to focus on almost nothing except the usual and typical Christian whining about “the Lord,” missing “church” services, and the need to have a burden “for the lost.”   

 

Actually, this editorial is not unique or different from the bulk of what the leaders of almost any of the 32,000 Christian denominations would write.  Their whole lives and beings are devoted to the need to get the Christian suckers (the dumb sheep, as they are either called or thought of) to come to the pagan worship services; and of course, to fork over some money (though the money appeal was not cited in the editorial). 

 

And those few remarks sum up the feelings and attitude of most Christian Church leaders.  Surely, there must have been a thousand things which could have been cited and which were far more important and profound than whether the gullible Christian suckers come to weekly church services or not. 

 

 

One of My Idols 

 

This writer used to have a deep fascination and indeed, even an idolatrous obsession, over working on my personal genealogy.  It was stupid and sin, but i was hooked on it.   One of my great-great grandfathers lived near Lenoir, North Carolina in the late 1840s and early 1850s.  As his family were virtually all Baptists, he had his membership at one of the local Baptist Churches (the Lower Creek Baptist Church). 

 

One day in the 1970s, the old church minutes came to my attention and the decision was made by me to read and abstract a few of the references in those minutes, as applying to my family.  It was very interesting to find several remarks about my grandfather. 

 

But all of them were focused in one and seemingly in only one direction in regards to him.  It seems that he occasionally (or frequently) missed sun worship church services.  Whenever a member failed to show up for Sunday worship, the church leadership would note the absence and failure in the church minutes. 

 

With a couple of consecutive misses, the response was to send a church delegation to the missing member and find out why he was not in church.  It seems that one of these delegations visited my grandfather on more than occasion.  Apparently, he always had some excuse to pacify them and keep them from kicking him out of the church because of his poor attendance record. 

 

And that tragically is the essence of Christianity.  Almost the entire Christian focus is to get the suckers to come to the sun worship services where they can fork over some money and be told what they supposedly need to know in order to live this life in an acceptable Christian fashion.  For sure, these services rarely cover anything in the way of truth or what is needed.  Oh, what a waste! 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 543--The Christian Dilemma III

 

 

Former President Slick Clinton, Revisited 

 

In terms of the presentation in the former chapters on the Christian dilemma, there are still some more interesting observations about Christians, the Christian Church and Christian leaders which need some further highlighting at this point in time. 

 

Tragically, in the last 2,000 years, Christians have slaughtered and killed more people, including other Christians, than any other force in world history, as discussed in the previous chapters.  But even these Christian murdering campaigns must be put into the right perspective. 

 

Perhaps Christian Bill Clinton best illustrates this whole discussion.  The former Christian president of the Christian United States, Slick Clinton, proved to be one of the most war mongering and hateful Christian leaders in world history--certainly since the times of the madman Nero and more so than even the wicked Christians, Franklin Roosevelt and Adolf Schicklgruber.  

 

To demonstrate the best view of Slick, it would be well to quote longtime Bill Clinton friend Ralph Forbes.  He said that Clinton had been plotting and planning WWIII ever since 1998.  This reality with Slick Clinton reminds one of Psalms 55:21 where an evil party spoke words that were smoother than butter (slick), but war was in his heart.  This text sure sounds like Clinton (as well as George W. Bush). 

 

Both Slick and Hillary have wanted to emulate Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt’s years in the White House.  As noted elsewhere herein, FDR began plotting war almost from the very beginning when he entered the White House.  For sure, WWII made FDR famous. 

 

So Slick wanted to gain fame and recognition with a WWIII which he tried to commence in the Balkans and in the Middle East with his constant military attacks and aggressions against innocent people who largely lacked the military means to defend themselves against the so-called super power, the United States. 

 

FDR served over twelve years.  With Roosevelt, America had a president for life who was in no mood to give up the presidency--even after winning four elections. 

 

Clinton is in the same ballpark and is making plans right now to regain power (so he can commence WWIII--if it does not start with George W. Bush).  While the Constitution now limits Clinton to two elected terms, there is the possibility of a new Constitution, as previously described herein (or following the election of Hillary Clinton as president or vice-president). 

 

 

And Bush As Well 

 

While the evils of the diabolical and depraved Clinton exceed almost anything any one could ever imagine and perceive for any other US leader, one must not ignore that other leaders, like George W. Bush, could and would also be incredibly evil and depraved--perhaps not as much as Bill “Slick” Clinton, but still quite significantly. 

 

As pointed out in the Prologue of this study, the Bush clan members are not exactly “saints,” to use a popular Christian expression.  Yes, the Bush people are manifestly quite evil and diabolical; though admittedly, the Bush family members are probably in the minor leagues in comparison with Slick Clinton, who is a master of evil. 

 

Anyway, George W. Bush has decided that he too can get in on the act of trying to emulate Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his success at propelling the US into war.  Like Bill Clinton was constantly going around the world to create wars of all sorts, George Junior has proven that he too can travel the world in searching out means and opportunities to pursue war. 

 

Of course, the so-called terrorist attacks of 9-11-2001 have given GWB a perfect excuse to launch wars of liberation upon various nations.  Thus, Bush rushed into Afghanistan and Iraq and bombed huge numbers of innocent women and children into oblivion. 

 

As noted elsewhere herein, the bombing and murder of huge populations of innocent women and children in Afghanistan and Iraq have pleased the Bushes, the Rockefellers, the Standard Oil elements, Halliburton business interests, the Amalekite Jews, and the Amalekite plutocrats on Wall Street.  These wars have and will put a lot of profits and money into the pockets of these various entities. 

 

Moreover, these wars allow young George to prove that he too is a leader of the same caliber as Slick Clinton and the diabolical Franklin Roosevelt.  Hence, there seems to be all kinds of supposedly good reasons for George W. Bush to proceed with his wars of destruction, murder and evil. 

 

 

Some Reality 

 

However, there are some more interesting issues in the discussion on the Bush war on Iraq.  Bush has advertised himself extensively as a “born again” Christian (whatever that means).  He declared long ago that his favorite person was “Jesus Christ.”  Repeatedly, George comes out and makes a proclamation about his evangelical Christian faith. 

 

On March 6, 2003, George Junior had a press conference and some 22-23 times he declared how evil Saddam Hussein was and what a threat that Saddam Hussein was to peace.  Almost as many times, George went on to affirm that he would very soon give an attack order to bomb Saddam and his Iraqi people into oblivion. 

 

In his press conference, George tried to convey the image that he daily gets down on his knees and prays to the sun god for guidance and direction.  He even tried to say that he prays or will pray for the American soldiers and the people of Iraq who would be murdered and slaughtered by the thousands of incoming US bombs, missiles and shells. 

 

Now, is there anything wrong in these contrary positions offered by George at his press conference?  Is it possible that he is preparing to order the bombing of the people of Iraq all the time that he is on his knees praying for his murdering soldiers and the murdered Iraqi people? 

 

 

Who Gets Hurt 

 

As is always true, the fat cats who cause wars will never be hurt from the incoming bombs.  When China, Russia and the Third World move against the US, the Rockefellers, the Rothschild agents and other plutocrats will all get in their private jets or on their private yachts and motor away from the US before death and destruction fill the skies. 

 

Of course, it goes without saying that the rulers in almost all states have built themselves underground bunkers and places of safety so that when the bombs fall they will be protected.  The US has been doing this for decades now in the mountains of Western Virginia and Western Maryland. 

 

So, when the bombs start falling, the only people who will be bombed into oblivion will be the poor, to include multitudes of innocent women and children. 

 

People like the Rockefellers, the Bushes, the Rothschilds, the Cecils, the DuPonts, the Harrimans, the Bronfmans, the Roosevelts, etc will never face the incoming bombs (although these workers of evil are the most deserving of punishment of all, instead of a bunch of innocent women and children who have no money or means to escape the incoming bombs and terror). 

 

 

More History 

 

During WWII, the German fat cats (and particularly Jews like the Warburgs and Rothschilds) all fled before the US and British bombing runs began obliterating German cities.  Too, Adolf Schicklgruber took refuge in his underground bunker while multitudes of innocent German women and children were being killed by allied bombs. 

 

The Mar 14, 2003, “The Week” (p. 15) told what happened to Germany while Adolf was in his bunker and the Christian US and British bombers were bombing Christian Germany into a pile of heap.  Firestorms covered whole neighborhoods (while the maniac Adolf was drinking champagne and copulating with the lovely Eva Braun in the security of his bunker). 

 

From 1943 to 1945, some 160 German cities were bombed--killing 600,000 mostly Christian people, including 80,000 children.  Hamburg saw the death of 40,000 civilians killed from one fire bombing attack.  Pforzheim saw the death of one in every three persons (even Nagasaki only had the death of one in eight persons after the US dropped the A bomb on that city). 

 

The infamous US-British firebombing of Dresden, Germany (cited elsewhere herein) produced at least 35,000 deaths and perhaps as many as 160,000 deaths (Mar 24, 2003, “American Free Press,” p. 11). 

 

One allied bomber, British bomber pilot Richard Mayce, looked back on his firebombs falling on Germany and said that “Even the water was on fire.  Hell must look like that.”  At that moment, Mayce became a pacifist (Mar 14, 2003, “The Week” (p. 15). 

 

Quite naturally, the same analogy applies to the Bush enemies in the Middle East.  Bush and his thousands of high performance aircraft, armed with numbers of uranium enriched bombs, will bomb, murder and destroy tens of thousands of innocent women and children.  If there were any fat cats in Iraq or wherever, they would escape (because of their money). 

 

Moreover, leaders, like Saddam Hussein, would hide out in underground bunkers and never personally face the incoming bombs like innocent, unprotected civilians. 

 

 

The Liars 

 

Of course, the first basic problem with Bush and indeed with all of so-called humanity is that all men tell lies.  Yes, Franklin Delano Roosevelt regularly and often lied to the American people and to the world.  The same was true with his presidential predecessors and successors.  They all have told lies whenever the occasion warranted it in their view. 

 

There is no arguing that Bill “Slick” Clinton was the master liar of all.  But this reality from history does not alter the fact that George H. W. Bush and his George Junior son have also been extraordinarily big liars. 

 

While George Senior made his mark in lying when he said to read his lips on no new taxes (and then he went on to support more taxes), George Senior also told enormous lies in order to get the United States involved in all kinds of intrigue and skullduggery in the Middle East--which eventually culminated with the George H. W. Bush war on Iraq. 

 

Perhaps George Senior’s primary use of lies against Saddam was the constant atrocity stories.  Americans can easily be whipped into a state of hate and war when their leader constantly lies to them and tells them atrocity stories--over and over.  Whether the stories have some elements of truth or are totally made up and false matters not at all.  They can be used very successfully to cause a war! 

 

Poor Saddam was propelled into the spotlight once he invaded the US ally Kuwait (which just happened to be heavily in debt to the international bankers in London--with the Iraqi invasion, the bankers’ loans were in peril and might not be repaid--thus, necessitating a US war against Iraq and a rescue of the Kuwaitis). 

 

This whole thing gave GHWB a fantastic opportunity to go in and bomb Iraq to oblivion in order to save the bankers and simultaneously allow the Bush and Rockefeller families and certain huge multi-national corporations to make much, much money on the side. 

 

The various lies, the atrocity stories and the money and plunder that the Bush family stole from the 1991 Gulf War have all been described and commented upon earlier herein and need no particular explanation now.  Suffice to say, these things happened. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 544--The Christian Dilemma IV

 

 

And Now, the Liar GWB 

 

Quite naturally, George W. Bush learned from his dad and the master liar Bill Clinton (as described in the former chapters).  While George Junior talks constantly about “Jesus Christ,” his Christian religion and being born again, these words have not held GWB back from telling lies.  Like other men, George the second has lied and does tell lies about a number of things. 

 

In some of the commentary from Stan Johnson of the Prophecy Club, Johnson addressed the 9-11 terrorist attacks and said that he didn’t know what happened to cause the attacks, but he did know that the Bush administration did not tell the American people the truth about them.  Thus, Bush and his people lied to the American people about these attacks--as well as numerous other things. 

 

But perhaps George W. Bush hit his stride in talking about Iraq and Saddam Hussein.  That Saddam is evil, there is no denying (the same indictment is true about GHWB, BC and GWB as they all are lairs as well).  However, George W. Bush made it his purpose in life to constantly bombard the public with lies about Saddam being the Hitler of the week (after tiring of focusing upon Osama bin Laden). 

 

Obviously, if Saddam was the Hitler of the week (as George consistently berated him), then it stood to reason that he must be destroyed.  And George Junior made that his goal at some point in time--perhaps in 2002 (because of the US Jewish influence and because the Bushes, Rockefellers and other ruling American plutocrats saw a golden opportunity to make gobs and gobs of money from the Iraqi oilfields). 

 

In order to put the idea over on how bad Saddam was, George Junior resurrected the old GHWB atrocity stories which could be charged to Saddam.  Constantly, we were told that Saddam gassed the Kurds (with the gas which the US furnished Iraq to use against the Iranians) and murdered babies (with false stories from the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the US). 

 

Never mind that these atrocity charges were totally and completely false (as proven in former commentary herein); young George proceeded to repeat them over and over again (after all, GWB has brains enough to understand the lesson taught by Adolf Schicklgruber that a lie told, over and over, will soon be believed by the gullible public). 

 

Like the Mar 21, 2003, “The Week” (p. 2) noted in a quote from writer David Corn in “The Nation,” Bush made up his mind for war against Iraq long ago.  To justify his plans to oust Saddam, Bush repeatedly “hyped” the case against Iraq with “half-truths and lies,” such as the nonexistent link between Iraq and al Qaeda.  Bush never offered an alternative to war because he did not believe or allow that one existed. 

 

 

The UN Charter 

 

In order to support his desire for war against Saddam and Iraq, George W. Bush consistently argued that he had authority for an invasion against Iraq based simply upon the existing UN resolutions. 

 

The fact that UN resolutions say that Iraq must disarm its so-called weapons of mass destruction (as largely furnished by the United States back in the 1980s) and allow UN weapons inspectors in to verify the disarmaments (although Iraq maintained that she had no weapons of mass destruction) came to mean that Bush and the US had UN authority to launch a war and invasion of Iraq. 

 

Even UN Secretary General Kofi Annan was prompted to go on record and warn Bush that the United States would be violating the UN charter if Iraq was invaded. 

 

Annan said “If the United States and others would go outside the council (the UN Security Council) and take military action, it will not be in conformity with the (UN) charter.  The legitimacy and support of any such action will be seriously impaired” (Mar 11, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. A4). 

 

George W. Bush countered that the US would be within her rights to attack Iraq without UN support because Saddam represented a direct threat to America (ibid, p. A4).  Continuously, Bush maintained that the US had authority to launch a war and invasion against Iraq based upon present UN resolutions--though no one else believed this nonsense. 

 

In other words, Bush was following one of the favorite tactics of the modern liberals (after all, Bush is a part of this same Greek sun worship and Sabbatian philosophical confluence, as described in previous chapters on Christian Church history). 

 

This philosophy says to say something totally contrary to truth and claim that it is truth.  This procedure is how people get around the US Constitution and the Scriptures--they read interpretations into them which are simply not present.  Modern Christianity (with its philosophical basis in Greek sun worship and Amalekite Sabbatianism) can say black is white and evil is good. 

 

 

Confused or a Liar? 

 

There once was a day in America when a man’s word was his bond.  But all of this has changed because men today say things which are not true and/or will never be true.  All of us (and this writer must confess this sin historically as well) say things that we really don’t mean.  We make promises and simply don’t deliver on the promises.  In other words, our words mean nothing. 

 

It’s too bad for America and the evil people here, but George W. Bush has also fallen into the same trap.  Literally, his word is not worth anything.  He says things and then completely ignores or contradicts his own words (is this telling a lie or what is it?). 

 

In George Junior’s case, this problem of saying things and making promises and then not delivering started with his dad (as noted in the previous chapter, GHWB made promises on taxation and then reneged, thinking that the voters would forget the promises--politicians do this regularly because they well understand that the mental recall ability of voters is about three months). 

 

In early March 2003, George W. Bush and his British colleague in deception, Tony Blair, said that they would introduce a new UN resolution to be voted upon just after the March 7, 2003, report by the UN weapons inspectors.  Bush set the date for this vote on March 11, 2003.  This was an effective declaration of war and nothing more.

 

Repeatedly, in speeches to Americans, George said that there would be no slippage on this date and that he insisted (actually demanded) that the UN Security Council vote upon his resolution--yes or no or up or down as he put it.  Bush added that “no matter what the whip count is.  It’s time for people to show their cards” (Mar 14, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. A4). 

 

But the Bush and Blair team could not get the votes that they wanted for passage.  So they changed the resolution to give Saddam until March 17, 2003, to prove that he had disarmed his weapons of mass destruction (except Saddam said that he had nothing to disarm and the UN weapons inspectors had found nothing in the way of weapons of mass destruction.  However, Iraq did destroy some missiles which allegedly exceeded the maximum range allowable under a previous UN declaration). 

 

 

Slipping the Dates 

 

However, once more, Bush and Blair could not get the votes to support the war plan.  So the leader of the pair, George W. Bush, said that the UN voting date would slip to March 13, 2003. 

 

Since Blair is a lap dog for Bush, Blair received authority to amend the resolution to set some so-called bench marks to prove that Saddam had disarmed (one bench mark set by Blair required Saddam to confess that he had weapons of mass destruction and would now destroy them--obviously, this was an impossible demand because Saddam had consistently said that he had no such weapons.  As noted elsewhere herein, tyrants, like Bush and Blair, like to impose impossible demands on others, fully realizing that the impossible demands cannot be met). 

 

As the week of March 9, 2003, progressed, and as it became obvious that Bush and Blair did not have the votes in the UN, George W. Bush slipped the UN vote date to the end of the week (or March 14, 2003). 

 

And once more, the votes for passage were simply not out there.  So Bush said that he was willing to wait a few more days.  The UN voting date was slipped to March 17, 2003, which was the cut off date.  Both Bush and Blair offered to further amend the cut off date from March 17th to something still later if that idea would be acceptable by members of the security council. 

 

 

The Bush Problem 

 

Ultimately, the UN would not cave in to the Bush demands.  So new strategy was called for to deal with the UN problem.  Accordingly, on Mar 16, 2003, Bush, Blair and the Bush Spanish lackey (the Prime Minister of Spain) met in the Azores to map out further strategy.  Apparently, at this secret meeting, the Bush team simply gave up on any hope of having the UN vote positively for the proposal for war. 

 

All along, any of the permanent members of the security council could call for a vote.  And in the Bush words to the American people, Bush said that he would demand a vote of yes or no from each security council member who would have to “show his cards.”  Yet, Bush never called for this up or down vote.  He reneged on his own word (just like his dad did years ago on taxation). 

 

The only reason that Bush never called for the vote was because the US didn’t have enough votes to win in the show down.  Rather than make his word good (in demanding the up or down; yes or no vote), Bush and his colleagues gave up at the Azores meeting and decided to go to war without UN support. 

 

 

The Liar 

 

Instead of merely proceeding to demand the vote and keep his pledged word to the American people, Bush did some backtracking by simply ignoring his own words.  Thus, the born again Christian leader became a liar to his own people, as well as to the world. 

 

The way the lying Bush people handled this dilemma was that he and his team started a spin that they had eight votes on the security council and that they only needed one more (to make the necessary nine). 

 

Per this spin, they hoped to get either Mexico or Chile (however, this allegation of eight votes had to be lies since six nations had already publicly disapproved of the Bush calls for war--so six plus eight plus Mexico and Chile equaled sixteen nations which simply would not stack up to the reality that the council only had fifteen members--obviously, the Bush people were lying). 

 

Anyway, faced with an embarrassing defeat in the security council, the born again Christian Bush simply abandoned his word and proceeded to say that the needed votes could not be obtained because of the threatened veto of France. 

 

In other words, the Bush people blamed France because France indicated that she would veto any resolution supporting war.  Thus, the Bush position was that France had thwarted the will of the UN and now Bush had to step forward and impose the UN will in a war against Iraq. 

 

 

The UN Vetoes 

 

Almost from the beginning of the latest flaps at the UN, on the efforts of Bush and Blair to get a new UN resolution allowing war, President Jacques Chirac consistently said that France would not allow such a resolution to pass.  On many occasions, Chirac stated that France would veto any such resolution if necessary to insure that the resolution did not pass. 

 

As just cited above, the UN Security Council has fifteen members.  Five are permanent and the other ten rotate among the various nations.  The US, Britain, Russia (the old USSR), France and China are the five permanent members. 

 

The five permanent members have exclusive veto rights which completely override all other factors before the UN Security Council.  Since the US, under Franklin Roosevelt, created the UN (to bring in world government), the Security Council and the veto privilege, the truth is that this whole system is a US invention. 

 

The Mar 11, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A4) had a recap outline on the use of vetoes by the five permanent members of the UN historically.  The old USSR and her Russian successor have used the veto 120 times.  The US is next with 76 vetoes.  The United Kingdom is third with 32 vetoes; France is fourth with 18; and China is last with five. 

 

In addition, the US has, on 25 other occasions, killed draft resolutions which would condemn Israel.  And in fact, the last veto rendered came from the US in December 2002 when the UN Security Council tried to criticize Israel.  Apparently, many or most of the 76 US vetoes involved Israel in some way. 

 

While the old USSR freely used the veto at the UN, the same charge can be laid to the US with her bully of the block attitude of trying to force the UN to do as the US plutocrats demand.  

 

 

More on France 

 

But interestingly, one of the most important states to rarely use the veto has been France.  Manifestly, no one can criticize the French over using their veto prerogatives at the UN. 

 

So Jacques Chirac and France took a stand in February 2003 that France would use her veto powers if necessary to prevent a UN sanctioned war against Iraq.  Of course, this position upset the war mongering Bush and his lying helpers (like Powell, Rice, Rumsfeld, etc). 

 

Bush regularly spoke against France and tried to ridicule France for daring to say that she would use her veto.  Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld even made a fool out of himself by trying to define both France and Germany as being “Old Europe.”  This stupidity did not set well with the French. 

 

Many Americans then said that they would quit buying French wine (since the US pays for the wine with fiat money/IOUs, this move would not hurt the French--thus, at some point in time, thinking Frenchmen logically should stop selling their wine to the US in exchange for fiat money). 

 

The point of this is that we have the veto welding US (who has been the bully of the block for years at the UN and elsewhere as a matter of fact) trying to make fun of and criticize the French for daring to talk about using their veto powers.  Is this being hypocritical or what? 

 

 

And More 

 

Too, George W. Bush regularly charged that Saddam and Iraq had not obeyed some of the UN resolutions passed to contain the Iraqi people.  The interesting thing is that far more UN resolutions have been passed against the state of Israel (that is those that the US has allowed to pass--usually, the US will not allow any resolution condemning the Israelis).  And Israel, almost without exception, simply ignores the UN resolutions. 

 

Frankly, this writer is not siding against Israel for ignoring UN resolutions.  She should.  And indeed, other nations also should have a right to ignore the UN (to include Iraq).  But the point of it is that George W. Bush is a total hypocrite on this question.  He simply is not a man of any honor or integrity. 

 

The hypocrite Bush has whined and complained about the various Hitlers of the week since he took office in January 2001 (Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein).  Virtually everything that Bush has charged to his enemies (who will not immediately cave in and obey America’s ruling plutocrats) can be laid to the US or her allies (like Israel, Britain, etc). 

 

The essence of these remarks is that Bush and his whole team are hypocrites.  The very things that this group of evil and lying people charge Iraq with can be laid against themselves. 

 

 

Authority? 

 

The last Bush spin happened when the US President said that the US already had authority under existing UN resolutions to go to war and invade Iraq.  While it is true that the UN did have a resolution on the table specifying that Iraq disarm, nothing in that resolution set a date, defined what disarmament meant (beyond the work of the inspectors to verify the fact) or stipulated what action would be taken. 

 

As a minimum, the US clearly had absolutely no authority to arbitrarily step up and be the bully of the block by stating that she would “enforce” a UN resolution which was before the UN Security Council.  So, what right did Bush have to decide that he would enforce a UN resolution without authority from the UN?  For certain, he had no such right. 

 

Of course, the answer to that question was really simple enough.  As outlined in former chapters herein, there is the issue of security for the state of Israel (thus, prompting many American Jews and Amalekite plutocrats to demand a war against Iraq); and of course, the opportunities for Exxon, Halliburton, the big banks, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, the Bushes, and so forth to make a lot of money. 

 

 

Changy-Changy

 

The point here is that the Christian Bush (and Blair too--but since Blair is only a lap dog for George, the blame must be placed effectively upon Bush and not upon Blair) changed his position almost daily from March 1 and on forward. 

 

The lying Bush would come out in public and take a firm stand and set dates on one day.  Then, the next day, he would change his position.  He was constantly running around in a state of confusion.  Obviously, all along, Bush and his lap dog Blair would not let a vote take place at the UN if they would lose the vote (despite the fact that Bush had earlier demanded a vote and regardless of the outcome). 

 

Anyway, by March 17, 2003, the Bush team had decided to proceed with a war against Iraq--right or wrong. 

 

 

Dave Barley 

 

In the Mar-Apr 2003 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 3-4), editor Dave Barley offered his assessment of the Bush war against Iraq in an article entitled “All’s Not Fair in Love & War.” 

 

Barley asked-- “What if the President of the United States and the federal government were subject to the same rules and UN policies that Saddam Hussein and his government is being subjected?  I’m just curious, I really wonder how they would react, if the proverbial ‘shoe’ was on the other foot. 

 

“What if the nations of the world joined together in a United Nations effort making the same demands against the United States of America, demanding that we disarm all of our nuclear missiles and provide full disclosure of their whereabouts?  You might say, ‘Well that’s ridiculous, and that would never happen.’  Well, humor me, please.  I really do not think it is a ridiculous question at all! 

 

“Justice should not be supposition or conjecture.  President Bush often uses the word ‘fairness,’ implying that he and the federal government are truly seeking to be fair.  Great, then let’s be fair and equally apply fairness to all nations.  Treat all nations with the same scrutiny and suspicion that we are presently treating Iraq with, and then we will really see some political fireworks. 

 

“But someone will argue, ‘Well, Saddam Hussein deserves this.  He invaded Kuwait.  He has behaved aggressively towards neighboring countries.  He is a dictator and has murdered people.’  Well, so has Cuba’s dictator Castro, China’s dictator Jiang Zemin, and Korea’s dictator, Pyongyang.  In fact, Pyongyang recently warned the United States that ‘any attack on its restarted nuclear reactor would result in full-scale nuclear war.’ 

 

“So where’s the ‘fairness’ in Bush singling out Iraq as the main ‘axis of evil’?  Saddam Hussein hasn’t made as near as threatening remark or demand against the United States of America as the ones Pyongyang has made.” 

 

In the view of the writer of this study, Bush is, of course, no more fair than any of the other dictators and government leaders mentioned by Barley.  Manifestly, it’s a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black.  And in the case of Bush, there is much hypocrisy involved with his constant cries about prayers and being a born again Christian. 

 

 

Bush in Florida 

 

Bush launched his war against Iraq on March 20, 2003.  On March 26, 2003, he spoke to the military people and their descendants at the US CINCOM headquarters at McDill Air Force Base in Florida.  Just the night before, US bombs had attacked and killed some thirty Iraqi civilians and wounded many more in a residential area in Baghdad. 

 

In Florida, Bush said nothing about the US attack on women and children in Iraq, but he was quick to point out that we (meaning him and presumably other Americans) were praying for the US military and we (again meaning him and perhaps others) were “thanking God” for defending the Americans in their war against Iraq.  So here we have the born again Bush talking about prayer and morality. 

 

In this speech to the US military, Bush ended his comments with his familiar close-- “May God bless America!”  Actually, Bush is not the lone ranger on this remark as it is also very popular with American hypocrites and frauds of all types. 

 

Incidentally, though ignored by the born again Christian Bush, there was an interesting fall out in some comments from senior US officials on Mar 27, 2003, regarding this attack on innocent civilians.  US reporters (like NPR) went to the scene and said it had to be a huge US missile/bomb since the area destroyed covered almost two city blocks (yes, it was a US weapon of mass destruction--which are never condemned). 

 

Rather than admit the attack on the civilians, US officials claimed that the Iraqis bombed their own people and were trying to blame the attack on the American forces.  The thought this writer had on these US allegations was that any person believing such nonsense is still at the idiot level and surely still believes in the tooth fairy.  Of course, the Bush people believe that the typical American is just that stupid. 

 

Tragically, two days later (on March 28, 2003), another apparent US missile fell on a market area in Baghdad (killing 68 mostly women and children and wounding many more), and on Apr 1, 2002, US forces machine gunned a car containing Iraqi women and children (killing seven of them). 

 

US authorities said that they would investigate this bombing and shooting incident.  As was his usual MO, the born again Christian Bush ignored these apparent US attacks on women and children in his various speeches and comments to the media. 

 

 

More on the Hypocrite Bush

 

There is no question about it, the born again Christian Bush is a gross hypocrite (as was outlined in former comments).  Naturally, he is not the lone range on this issue.  After all, being a hypocrite is a common problem in man.  And certainly, Christians are the same as other people on being hypocrites. 

 

As discussed elsewhere herein, the United States invented most of the weapons of mass destruction that Bush is now crying about and blaming Iraq for having (although some of the gas came from Britain). 

 

The US not only invented the applicability of nuclear weapons in warfare, but the US has been the only nation in history which has used nuclear weapons against others--like the A bombs on Japan and uranium enriched bombs on numerous nations in the Balkans, the Middle East, etc in the various US wars of liberation (and wars for profit) for the last 20 years. 

 

Not only has the US used chemical weapons (and likely biological weapons as well), certainly in Vietnam, but the US has even used chemical weapons upon her own people (as Clinton used chemical weapons to murder the Branch Davidians, as discussed in former chapters). 

 

So, in the 1980s, the Americans sold or gave Iraq huge quantities of these so-called weapons of mass destruction to use upon the enemies of the American plutocrats (the Iranians).  While there is some question about how much of this US supplied stuff was used on Iran, some of it allegedly remained.  Whether Iraq destroyed it all or not was open to question. 

 

In view of the fact that the US made it, supplied it and sold some or all of it to the Iraqis for money, the case can be made that the Iraqis would not want to give it up.  So, if they did successfully hide it or move it out of the country (to avoid detection by the UN weapons inspectors), it would be understandable in the context of what is a hypocrite. 

 

 

The Morality of War 

 

All along, the war mongering George W. Bush proclaimed that his war effort against Saddam Hussein and the Iraqis was a “moral” and righteous undertaking (as suggested in previous chapters on the Christian culture and military service and war, the case can be made that Iraq is acting righteously in defending herself while the US aggressors have no moral grounds to stand on). 

 

At one time, George W. Bush took note of the Russian plans to vote against or veto the Bush plans for war against Iraq. 

 

George said:  “The president (in reference to Russian President Putin) would look at this as a missed opportunity for Russia to take an important moral stand to defend freedom and to prevent the risk of a massive catastrophe taking place as a result of Saddam Hussein’s development of weapons of mass destruction” (The Mar 11, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. A4). 

 

The essence of these words from the Christian Bush was that he was criticizing Russia’s Putin (who was against the Bush war on Iraq) on the question of morality.  Because Putin would not support George’s cries for war, Putin was immoral.  So, per Bush, Putin would be a moral man if he would support war and death for thousands of women and children. 

 

 

More Bush Morality 

 

On Mar 22, 2003, the BBC visited a Baghdad hospital which was treating innocent Iraqi civilians, mainly women and children, who had been bombed the night before by US bombs, ordered in by the born again Christian George W. Bush (some civilians were killed and over 200 injured by the Bush attacks the night before). 

 

The BBC reporter talked briefly to a Iraqi surgeon who had just worked on a five-year-old girl who was bombed and severely injured by the supposedly moral Bush. 

 

The girl had a serious spinal injury.  The doctor said that she would never walk again.  In all of the Bush ventilating (and lying) about his morality and his plans to “liberate” the Iraqi people from the evils of Saddam Hussein, one must wonder how the attack upon this five-year girl fits into the plans of the Christian Bush. 

 

While GWB has argued how righteous and moral he is to bomb thousands of innocent women and children into oblivion, some Christian Church leaders around the world took exception to his charges. 

 

For example, the pope consistently had spoken against the Bush war as being immoral.  The Mar 3 & 10, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news item that 49 European Christian Church leaders had also met to oppose the Bush plans with a peace vigil in Washington. 

 

Though some of Bush’s evangelical colleagues had supported the war plans, many of the more traditional Christian Churches had spoken out against the Bush war. 

 

So while Bush kept talking about his morality in murdering innocent people and paralyzing little five-year-old girls, it appeared that some ignorant and evil sun worshipping Christians had brains and common sense enough to speak out against the Bush plans for war. 

 

 

Now, the Paradox 

 

So here we have a Christian US president, who on the one hand was involved in all of those Christian prayers, talking about morality and speaking supposedly good words about Gee Zeus, faith, belief and so forth. 

 

And yet, on the other hand, the same Christian president constantly talked about fairness as he was preparing to order the slaughter and murder of tens of thousands of innocence women and children who simply had no money and no means to escape the incoming US bombs. 

 

Naturally, young Bush continually made mention of the Iraqi danger to the US.  Bush told so many lies about Saddam that it was totally impossible to keep track of them.  Almost everything Bush charged to Iraq could be charged to the United States (creating the reality of great hypocrisy). 

 

Bush did this at his Mar 6, 2003, press conference when he tried to build a case that the handful of camel herders in the Iraqi desert were somehow a threat to the US with their sticks, stones and other primitive methods of defense (which is nothing in comparison with the size, population, technology and sophistication of the US, which uses her assets to be the bully of the block). 

 

This writer can only say that any person who believed those Bush words are at the idiot level and certainly still in the tooth fairy business. 

 

So here we have the Christian Bush, who does all of this daily Christian praying, telling repeated lies, and practicing repeated deception.  Admittedly, he does not lie as much as Bill Clinton, but young George is indeed a liar (as is true with the rest of so-called humanity). 

 

Thus, one must come to the place of how is it possible that a Christian man, who ostensibly obeys the Scriptures and prays daily (supposedly), could also be the man who tells lies and is constantly plotting on how he can murder and kill huge numbers of innocent women and children who cannot escape his incoming bombs and supersonic airplanes? 

 

How can the two diverse positions be reconciled?  Is this a paradox or what? 

 

 

The Problem in Christian America 

 

Clearly, America and Americans have problems.  Former President Slick Clinton regularly told the gullible voters how wonderful everything was in their lives.  But he is a pathological liar as many now understand (and young George W. Bush is also a liar, despite all the praying and public show of his Christian faith).  This is reality in the early 21st century. 

 

Otherwise, the importance of this presentation is that judgment is knocking at the door.  The United States is not going to get off scot free for her depravity and evil.  There is a price to pay for sin. 

 

The point of these findings is that Christianity (and modern Christianity, in particular) is sadly lacking.  This religion has grossly failed to lead its people in any motion upward toward righteousness (YHWH’s Torah).  Instead, under Christian leadership, the US and its citizens have degenerated closer and closer to the animal level. 

 

And truly, the United States is a Christian nation (as the US Supreme Court ruled in 1892).  Yes, most supposedly loving Christians in the United States do believe that this nation is a Christian nation.  There is little or no dispute on this condition. 

 

 

Some Polls 

 

The May 6, 2002, “U.S. News & World Report” (p. 42-43) had an article by Jeffrey L. Sheler on “Faith in America” which really revealed the reality of how Christian modern America is (as briefly mentioned in a prior chapter).  Sheler’s work cited an early 2002 poll which asked the American public several revealing questions. 

 

In terms of religious identification, some 84.2% of the American people say that they are Christians.  The other 15.8% either did not give an answer or was of other religions or atheists/agnostics.  While in earlier days, probably the percentage of Christians in the American population was substantially larger that 84.2%, this figure is still quite impressive and certainly does not deter from the fact that America is a Christian nation. 

 

In terms of importance of religion in a person’s life, some 69% of responding Christians said that religion is very important and another 24% said it is somewhat important.  In terms of church attendance, some 52% of Christians go to their (sun worship) church services at least one or more times weekly. 

 

One more significant question asked how often the subject Christian “experienced God’s presence or a spiritual force that felt very close.”  Some 40% of responding Christians said that they have had this experience several or many times in their lives.  Only ten percent said “never.” 

 

The June 2002 “Bible Review” (p. 14) had a news report on “Religion in America,” which focused upon some recent Pew Research Center polls. 

 

Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in Washington and New York, 78% of Americans (in a November 2001 poll) said that they detected a increase in the role of religion in American life.  By March 2002, another poll found that that number had dropped to 37%. 

 

The Pew polls found that 63% of Americans claim religion is important in their lives.  This figure did not change appreciably from November 2001 to March 2002.  Some 67% of people believe that the United States is a Christian nation and 84% believe that people can be good Americans even if they have no religious faith. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

The point of these surveys and Sheler’s remarks is that the United States is a very Christian country.  For sure, the Christian people think that they are very religious people.  Yet, iniquity and depravity now abounds across this nation as never before in her history. 

 

All the while that the nation and its people are falling apart in sin and iniquity, Christian preachers and leaders are preaching more and more and raising more and more money for their so-called evangelistic efforts. 

 

In their view, they have been taking their so-called “gospel” to the world for the last 390 years (clearly, in the last 70 years) and one can easily see what has happened with this spread of the “Christian gospel.”  Undoubtedly, the Christian leader George W. Bush believes that he is taking the “gospel” to the world with his thousands of high performance aircraft and uranium enriched bombs. 

 

The Apr 2003 “Maoz Israel” newsletter (p. 1) offered its view on “God’s plan for Iraq” which said that “God wants a spiritual awakening in Iraq.”  To obtain this goal or reason, “God has raised up a righteous leader, George W. Bush.  For this reason, God has given him an extraordinarily brave and courageous ally in Tony Blair, who, when asked by a BBC reporter, said, ‘Yes, I am a Christian.’” 

 

By the way, after the Christians George W. Bush and Tony Blair had bombed the Iraqi people into oblivion and killed thousands more of them (beyond the hundreds of thousands already killed from 1991 to 2003), the Iraqi people would supposedly be ready for the Christian flood of missionaries, as was described in a former chapter herein. 

 

The US has went from bad to worse.  No one seems to know why and most liberal, Christian humanists could care less one way or the other.  Their religion is mainly one of talk and hype.  Deeds and works are mysteriously absent from it.  Truly, Americans and their leaders, in general, are in a gross state of blind ignorance and confusion. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 545--The Why for the Christian Failure I

 

 

The Christian Failure, Revisited 

 

Previous chapters herein have detailed the enormous failure of the Christian Church over the past 2,000 years--since its inception in the first century CE.  While the pathetic mess is manifest and not subject to debate, it would be useful to assess the “why” for such failure.  This chapter and the following chapters will offer this writer’s assessment of the problem. 

 

In any assessment of the sickness, moral depravity and sin so proliferate in Christianity, one can draw several conclusions on the “why.”  Though this study will not attempt to begin to cover the multitude of possibilities on this theme, at least a few will be cited herein. 

 

Manifestly, in the Word, The ELOHIM places a great deal of condemnation upon the pagan, false preachers and teachers who have led the Israelites astray and away from truth.  Yirmeyahu, Yeshayahu, Yechezkel and the other prophets are especially hard on the preachers for their evil and sins in misleading the people. 

 

As YHWH says, He didn’t send these charlatans.  Yet, they have gone forth and pretended to represent Him (pretending to be messengers of light and of truth).  In so doing, these actual representatives of Satan (in the form of Christian preachers and leaders) have led people into rebellion, sin and iniquity. 

 

Of course, it goes without saying that The ELOHIM will judge preachers and teachers more severely in the world tomorrow (Jas 3:1).  Surely, the height of their rebellion reaches into the highest heavens.  They are pathetically sick and depraved.  To broach this issue of the depravity of these charlatans, several examples of great evil from Christian leaders will be cited below and in the following chapters. 

 

 

First--Billy Graham, Revisited 

 

Billy Graham has been cited several times earlier in this production.  There is no intent now to dwell on this man.  Suffice to say, he, like virtually all other Christian preachers, is a very proud and vain man.  Yes, the pride problem affects everyone, including Christian preachers, teachers and leaders (as described in former chapters herein). 

 

Probably, it is the pride and vanity issue which tends to make Christian preachers and leaders such gross frauds and hypocrites (like the Baptist preacher that my friend Bill ran into by chance in Ohio--as will be discussed in comments to follow, below). 

 

Anyway, Billy Graham and former President Richard Nixon were having a discussion in the Oval Office of the US White House one day in the early 1970s.  As pointed out previously, this discussion was on the power and evil of the Jews in Christian America.  As Graham said--the “Jewish stranglehold on the media has got to be broken or this country’s going down the drain.” 

 

Nixon agreed with him and cautioned him to be careful and not let them (the Jews) know how he feels.  Neither of the words of these two important Christian leaders was ever revealed publicly to the American people until the year 2002 (thirty years later).  Nixon, of course, is now dead.  But Graham is still alive and still teaching his evil sun worship to the gullible Christians. 

 

When this conversation became public in 2002, the first thing that the Christian leader Billy Graham did was to apologize to the Jews for his remarks.  With all of the public silence of both Nixon and Graham and now Graham’s apology, the subject now crystallizes into some real revelations about the character (or lack of character) of both men. 

 

 

The Essence 

 

The May-Jun 2002 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 2) noted this situation and asked if Graham believed back in the 1970s that America was going down the drain, why didn’t he “publicly warn the American people?”  Of course, this is a valid question. 

 

Billy Graham was one of the primary Christian leaders of Christian America.  Did he not have a moral duty as the watchman selected by them to warn them of future destruction from their own stupidity and evil?  As pointed out in other comments herein, Ezekiel 33 covers this express situation where the people select one of their own (like Graham) to be their watchman. 

 

Graham had a moral duty to warn the Christian sheep.  Or otherwise, their blood would be on him.  Yet, he did not warn the people over the next 30 years--the reason why is exactly because of his pride and vanity and understanding that the Jews (the Amalekites, ed) would use their media and other powers to destroy much of his following in America.  He was not prepared to give up this source and pride and vanity. 

 

And of course, things got worse as the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters and their controlled media, entertainment and educational powers took the nation into more and more moral depravity and evil. 

 

So, what does the fraud and hypocrite Graham do in 2002 when his words become public?  Why he apologizes (obviously, he is still afraid of the Jews [correctly the Amalekites] and their powers).  Thus, the point must be made that much of America’s problem has to be laid on the shoulders of Billy Graham and other religious leaders like him.  These workers of evil have brought much harm to this nation. 

 

 

On Nixon 

 

Now, on Nixon, he too must bare some guilt because he failed to publicly speak out in his lifetime (although his words have now become public through the tape recordings made in the White House).  But in fairness to Nixon, his intent was to someday move against the Amalekite Jews. 

 

Of course, he was disgraced and removed from power before he could take action.  Once he was out of the White House, he could never have publicly spoken out thereafter because the Amalekite media would have only further crucified and destroyed him, if that was possible.  So, in a sense, Richard Nixon was simply not as guilty as the lying and deceiving Graham was in this event. 

 

Even when Nixon’s tapes and records for history did become public knowledge in 2002, they made little or no impact on Americans because people here have already experienced great moral decay--partly because of the power and evil of the Amalekites (coupled with their own sins because of the evils taught to them by their Christian preachers and leaders). 

 

 

The Roman Catholic Example 

 

There is no intent or need to rehash previous comments herein on the extensive presence of sodomites and pedophiles in the Roman Catholic Church.  Actually, this is not totally a Roman Catholic problem as some of the other false Christian Churches likewise have numerous internal sex problems of various sorts. 

 

The sex problem is probably more prevalent in the Catholic Church because of its celibate priesthood.  But the other Christian Churches are not to be ignored or exempted from criticism. 

 

But even after all of the bad publicity and the incredibly gross sickness within Catholicism over this pathetic mess in 2002, some Catholics still don’t get it. 

 

For example, some comments in the media upon the Catholic Church scandal over homosexual and pedophile priests noted that there is some feeling in the church that the media had taken an adversarial position on the scandal to oppose the Christian religion (12/2002, “The Sacred Name Broadcaster,” p. 11). 

 

Because of this motivational approach, reporters have supposedly went out of their way to dig up material on the scandal and to publicize it extensively.  This view seems to have it that society should just close its eyes and look the other way--as is the traditional Catholic approach on such allegations.  In other words, it is no big deal that many sexually demented Catholic priests prey upon small children. 

 

 

More From Spokane 

 

In another classic illustration of Catholic mentality, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Spokane, Washington conducted a public forum on Dec 16, 2002, to discuss the recent sex revelations and what Spokane Catholics should do about it. 

 

The Dec 17, 2002, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. B1-B2) had a story by Virginia De Leon on “Catholics speak out at forum” which assessed this meeting and offered some of the alleged “wisdom” and thinking of area Catholics. 

 

While most of the comments and remarks were so grossly stupid and ridiculous that there is nothing to be gained by mentioning them, there was one observation by a man named Paul Barret, a parishioner at St Francis Xaxier.  Barret said:  “Christ never promised a perfect church... Our priests are human.  They are no different than we are.  They need our prayers.” 

 

Barret must have been completely sold on his advice so much so that he began organizing a Catholic group called “Prayers for Priests.”  However, poor Barret seems to have missed some of the crucial things about this whole subject. 

 

In the first place, it probably is alright to pray for these sodomites and pedophiles--but the correct reaction is that all of them should be arrested, prosecuted and executed at the hands of the state if found guilty. 

 

But more importantly, the bigger issue is the IQ level of this man in defending these sodomites and pedophiles with his words that his church is not perfect and this conduct can be expected from the Catholic priesthood since the priests are no different from the rest of us. 

 

Of course, Mr Barret is manifestly correct on the Catholic Church and Catholic priesthood.  But he simply has little or no conception about what the Scriptures are all about.  Maybe, he knows some things about Catholicism.  But he needs to do some study of the Word otherwise. 

 

For sure, he is far removed from YHWH.  While this conduct can be found among sun worshippers, it is not what YESHUA organized in the vein of the Apostolic Assembly.  The point of this is that with the understanding and IQ level of people like Barret, it is clear that sun worshipping Christianity has been doomed to failure from day one. 

 

 

Another Example 

 

There is still one more useful sample to address here on the problems in Christendom.  This one concerns a Sardis Sacred Name group in Portland, Oregon, and its publication of a periodical called “The Believer’s Advocate.” 

 

While most of the Sacred Namers are dedicated to the word “Yahweh” or some close variation of it, this Oregon group is much devoted to the word “Yahvah,” which seems to have surfaced back in the 1930s or 1940s from the works of a former Church of God (7th Day) preached named L. D. Snow in Tulsa, Oklahoma. 

 

It is unclear whether Snow invented the name Yahvah or someone else created it and merely passed it along to him.  In any case, Snow became the promoter of this name and had a limited amount of success with it.  There seems to be two or three Yahvah Sacred Name groups in Texas and Alabama, plus this one in Portland, Oregon. 

 

The Oregon group is headed by a man.  But the backbone of his periodical is the work of two women “Staff Writers” who prepare the articles.  The role of women in trying to teach and exercise authority over YHWH’s people (including men) has been discussed at length in former remarks herein.  Thus, there is no intent to pursue that question in any detail presently. 

 

Beyond the use of women as teachers in this operation, the Apr-Jun 2002 “Believer’s Advocate” (p. 1-3) introduced Dr Donald H. Garrett, as a “new Staff Writer” to the Yahvah program.  The periodical then offered a one page letter from Garrett to supposedly tell about himself.  

 

Of course, the letterhead had Dr. Donald H. Garret (in Greek letters) and a listing of his degrees and his mailing address at the top of the page (which was a prison in Texas).   It was accompanied at the top of the page with two feminine Christian angels (with wings and long gowns and blowing horns), a star of David symbol and a Christian cross symbol.  The letter then reads:  “Introduction. 

 

“Grace, mercy, and peace from YaHVaH to all. 

 

“By now you have read several articles written by me, but you may have wondered who is this Doctor Donald H. Garrett? 

 

“Wonder no more my friends.  Since I have accepted a position as an additional Staff Writer for the Believer’s Advocate I will introduce myself to you all. 

 

“I was born in Seattle, Washington in 1962.  I do not know much about it though because we moved to Missouri, then Illinois, and then to North East Texas where I was raised.  I graduated High School in 1980 with a 3.13 G.P.A.   Special courses of study were:  French, General Electricity, Typing, and Vocational Agriculture where I earned a certificate in Horticulture.  I then joined the U.S.A.F. Auxiliary where I served for 10 years in Search & Rescue at various capacities.  I earned several awards and my last rank was 1st Lt.  As a Communications Officer.  During the same time I also owned my own landscaping/lawn maintenance company for several years as well as doing typesetting and computer work at a Computer Club for two years. 

 

“I married my first wife in 1983, but we were divorced in 1986.  It was around 1986 that I became saved through the leading of one of my landscape customers.  I had went to Baptist churches since I was 11 years old, but my attendance was sporadic.  After I was saved I went to an Interdenominational church for about a year or so.  After that I began attending Methodist churches. 

 

“I married my second wife in 1989 and we moved to Houston, Texas where my son was born in 1990.  I had been taking firefighting training and Paramedic training (with a 3.5 G.P.A.), so I went to work as a Firefighter/Paramedic until 1994.  I worked at the Fire Department, in the Hospital E.R., and for Private Ambulance services.  I bought my own truck in 1994 and started delivering freight in Texas & Louisiana until 1997.  I became disappointed with the Methodist church in 1994 and stopped going in 1996.  My second wife left in 1996 and we were divorced. 

 

“In 1997 YaHVaH called me to the ministry, so I started studying and going to Non-denominational churches and I was baptized.  In 1998 I started serving a 20 year sentence for a crime back in 1996, so I was slowed down in my efforts.  I did not let it stop me though and since then I have become an Ordained Minister, earned an Associates of Theology degree from CBI (3.8 G.P.A.), and a Doctorate of Divinity degree from ULC. 

 

“I have learned several languages including:  Greek, Hebrew, Spanish and Tagalog.  I am not fluent in them yet, but I keep learning.  I am currently working on several other degrees including Biblical Studies, Social Sciences, Theology, and more. 

 

“My interests are in Aviation, History, Languages, and Religion.  My hobbies are listening to AP Radio, philately, reading, watching football & NASCAR, and collecting pictures (l like pictures of airplanes, angels, birds, nature, oversees people & places, and more). 

 

“Other ministries I am affiliated with or partners with are:  Jewish Jewels, KCM, Lamb & Lion Ministries, and St. Bonaventure Indian Mission & School.  I look forward to continue providing useful information for all of the believers.  You may write me at any time and send pictures...Shalom, Shalom, Dr. Don H. Garrett (signature) Dr. Donald H. Garrett (typed).” 

 

 

Some After Words 

 

Tagalog is a local Filipino dialect used on Luzon Island in the Philippines.  As discussed previously herein, inmates in modern prisons have much time on their hands.  Accordingly, some of them turn to study from correspondence schools.  Religion also becomes very popular because it always helps in getting an early parole.  It’s not to say that this motive belongs to Garrett, however. 

 

Otherwise, the above letter and the work of the “Believer’s Advocate” in having the two girls and Garrett as Staff Writers are most interesting in explaining what is wrong with this group.  While it is supposedly a Sacred Name group and not subject to the gross paganism of the usual sun worshipping Christian Churches, it does have many of the same problems (as for example with Garrett’s pagan symbols).  

 

Too, even the most simplistic moron or idiot surely has enough brains in reading the above letter to perceive that here is a man who is totally devoted to himself in pride and vanity.  With all of this paganism and pride and vanity, it does not spell well for the articles appearing in the “Believer’s Advocate.”  When one adds in the use of women for instructors, the Portland group definitely has problems. 

 

 

Bill, Another Illustration 

 

About 25 years ago this writer had a friend named Bill (briefly cited above) who was from Eastern Kentucky.  At that time, in the 1970s, Bill was an older man, perhaps 60 years of age or so.  On one occasion, he related a story to me about his experience as a young man in Eastern Kentucky (evidently, in the 1930s, based on Bill’s then age). 

 

As happens with young people, the time came for Bill to get married and he selected one of the local girls and they made the preparations.  To complete the effort and make the bind between them, they chose the local Baptist preacher (this was a likely choice since most people in Eastern Kentucky in those times were Baptists anyway). 

 

So they went to the church and the preacher did his duty (for a fee, of course) and the happy couple took off on their honeymoon.  They decided to go up into Ohio for this joyful occasion.  In those days, Kentucky was  a dry state and Ohio was wet, in terms of alcoholic beverages.  After all, there were a lot of “good” Baptists in Kentucky and they were generally tee-totalers in terms of booze. 

 

As Bill was a drinker, of sorts, he and the new wife had a few drinks in Ohio.  With the days of honeymoon pleasure over, the couple headed back toward Eastern Kentucky.  But just before crossing the Ohio River, the pair decided to stop at one more Ohio bar for a last shot or two before entering Kentucky. 

 

They walked into the bar; and sure enough, their Baptist preacher from Eastern Kentucky (who married them) was seated at the bar drinking.  Of course, the couple were obligated to walk up to him and speak.  When they approached the preacher, he turned pale and entered a state of shock and/or panic.  Bill and his wife said “hello,” and chatted for a minute. 

 

Just as they were saying good-by, the preacher, still in his pale state of shock, pleaded with Bill and the woman--  “when you get back home, please don’t tell anyone you saw me up here drinking?” 

 

So Bill and his wife found a cozy booth where they could be alone and the loving Baptist preacher left the bar, presumably for home.  This story of a real event needs no further explanation.  It is the real world out there. 

 

 

Some Background on Another True Story   

 

Back in WWII, the US built and used a huge number of so-called liberty ships to move men and material to the overseas military theaters of operations (in the Pacific or Europe).  These large ships were operated by the US Merchant Marine and not the Navy, as one may first suppose.  In terms of hauling people, some 2,000 or more soldiers could be packed into most of them. 

 

In May 1951, this writer was a peon soldier in the Army and had shipped out of San Francisco on one of these ships (the USS General Hase) headed for Yokohama, Japan.  Being in compartment C7 (which is down in the hull of the ship and up forward toward the bow), my experience was not good. 

 

Not only did the ship pitch, buck and roll on its three weeks journey, but soldiers were packed in like sardines in rows of bunks, placed side by side and several vertically.  To add to the problem of the smell and general poor living conditions (enlisted soldiers on a troop transport live in a very terrible state), this writer became seasick which made the whole experience pretty bad. 

 

 

Another Ocean Voyage (Actually My Third Ocean Trip) 

 

In 1965, this writer made another trip across--this time from New York to Bremerhaven, Germany, on a troop transport.  In this one, things were considerably different for me.  i lived in a state room and got to spend much of my time on the main deck.  However, something happened on this trip which was to introduce me to the world of Christian preachers and give me a whole new perspective on things. 

 

While the US Merchant Marine ran these ships (the ship’s captain was not a military man, but was in the Merchant Marine), the US Navy had a military department on board to coordinate things between the military passengers and the ship’s crew. 

 

There was a naval officer who was the Commander of the Military Department.  He had a Naval Chaplain, some administrative assistants (who took care of manifests), maybe a bursar and some other helpers who supervised various things.  In terms of work, these ships relied upon the use of the passenger soldiers to be the workers to scrub the facilities and otherwise perform needed details. 

 

Besides this superstructure, these ships had a Commander of Troops and a subordinate Commander of Army Troops and presumably a Commander of Navy, Air Force or Marine people if they were on board.  On my trip across the Atlantic, there was only the Commander of US Army Troops (along with the overall Commander of Troops) as there were no Navy, Marine or Air Force troops on board. 

 

Since there was a Commander of Army passengers, he took care of most of the daily problems and the higher ranking officers had little to do--other than make some daily inspections. 

 

One of the biggest issues on a transport like this, with almost 2,000 army passengers, is the question of discipline.  Inevitably, some soldier will create some trouble and present the need for some disciplinary action. 

 

Our trip had a couple of incidents which required action by the Commander of Army Troops (who was directly in charge of army personnel).  While this writer was not directly involved in this discipline by the Army Commander, i was in a position to have complete knowledge and understanding about what all was involved. 

 

One of these incidents has completely left my mind, but the second one has stayed with me these many years.  It is this second event which needs mention here on the sickness and depravity among Christian preachers. 

 

 

The Navy Chaplain 

 

One of the disciplinary problems actually was quite petty and arose primarily because of the push and desire of the navy chaplain on board.  Apparently, this chaplain was primarily focused on providing weekly sun worship services and attempting to provide for some occasional entertainment for the passengers. 

 

In the main, there were something a little less than 2,000 enlisted army people living in the quarters below deck.  There were a handful of officers and a number of military dependents and a few retired people on a vacation, mainly in state rooms on the main deck and first one below. 

 

While the chaplain may have (or may not have since that point was in question) provided a minimum of attention on the army enlisted people below deck, his primary focus seemed to be on the dependents who were largely on the main deck in state rooms.  He was frequently to be found during daily duty hours in their day room doing something ostensibly for them. 

 

Besides being tasked to provide all of the work details, army enlisted people had an opportunity to provide some of the entertainment, both below deck to the enlisted people and above deck to the dependents and officers.  So some enlisted army people did occasionally gain access to the better facilities and offerings on the main deck--but this was not the normal lot of the typical GI. 

 

One day, there was a work detail doing some work at the dayroom area used by the dependents.  As best as my memory now serves me, one of the soldiers stayed on the main deck and watched a movie or something else going on (after his work was finished and when he was supposed to return below deck). 

 

The navy chaplain caught him and ordered him below deck.  Either at this first encounter or shortly thereafter on another run-in on the main deck with the boy (a teen age private soldier), the chaplain became very angry and ordered the soldier below (the boy complied and went below--it is now unclear to me whether the chaplain ordered him below once or twice). 

 

Anyway, the chaplain became very angry and upset and proceeded to try to cause the boy some great trouble. 

 

 

Some Background on Military Chaplains 

 

Whatever can be said for military chaplains, they are almost always extremely familiar and on friendly terms with lower ranking enlisted people.  Though they are officers and can hob-knob with the brass, they almost always maintain strong relations with enlisted persons.  When a soldier gets into trouble or has a problem, his first line of defense and help is usually the chaplain. 

 

Because of this relationship, chaplains don’t normally cause problems for enlisted people.  They go out of their way to cultivate a good relationship and be a buddy of sorts.  In my many years of service, no incident of trouble from a chaplain ever came to my attention other than with this navy chaplain on this one cruise. 

 

 

More on the Navy Chaplain 

 

With his anger and surely some emotional display, this chaplain (who was a navy lieutenant) immediately went to his boss, the Military Department Commander, and reported the incident and demanded that the boy be court-martialed and thrown in the brig on bread and water.  The  navy commander referred the chaplain to the Commander of Troops and the Army Commander. 

 

As it worked out, the chaplain apparently briefed all or almost all of the hierarchy on board and demanded that harsh disciplinary action be taken against the soldier.  He was determined to contact everyone possible that could side with him and go after the soldier with a vengeance. 

 

The Army Commander was a young, inexperienced lieutenant who had the task of dealing with the problem.  In his discussions with the Military Department Commander and Commander of Troops, there was some agreement that the incident was hardly as earth-shattering as the chaplain built it up to be. 

 

The Army Commander did take some disciplinary action and i have now forgotten exactly what he did.  But he did not throw the boy into the brig to be fed on a reduced diet as the chaplain wanted.  Anyway, the chaplain was terribly upset and he went to great length to have the book thrown at this soldier (which is something that chaplains just don’t customarily do because of their role with enlisted personnel). 

 

Anyway, i do now remember personally discussing the issue with some of the hierarchy.  In so doing, i found out that the chaplain had some problems of his own.  Possibly, he cussed like a sailor (which is really rare for a military chaplain as they normally are real prudes), was extremely arrogant and had a temper (maybe, he was a little irrational as well). 

 

But the real revelation came when it was brought to my attention that the chaplain spent most of his time around the military dependents because there was on board the wife of a military officer stationed in Europe.  The woman was traveling alone.  And come to find out, she seems to have traveled this ship on a number of other occasions to go back and forth to the states. 

 

The word was that the chaplain was committing adultery with this married woman and he spent his time with the dependents in order to look after and be around her.  Whatever it was, she liked it because she went out of her way to periodically traverse the Atlantic, just to be with the chaplain. 

 

One of the things that mused some of us was concern that maybe the young solder had flirted with this woman in some way; and the chaplain, in a rage of jealousy, became angry and tried to take his hate and venom out on the soldier.  This is something that was in my mind as i thought of this incident for this writing. 

 

For sure, the chaplain was a very vindictive and hateful man--as well as an adulterer and bum of the worst kind. 

 

The point is that these Christian preachers, who run around and try to be pious and righteous, often are nothing but hypocritical frauds.  In any assessment of the problems in Christianity, one must always assess the evils of the Christian preachers and leaders (who are so much at fault). 

 

 

Another Sample--Jimmy and Jerry, Revisited 

 

A former chapter discussed the story of Jerry Lee Lewis and his cousin Jimmy in Ferriday, Louisiana, as the two boys used to sneak around a Black beer joint and watch the frolicking and sexually promiscuous Blacks eat chitterlings, shoot craps, dance, have fun, and wildly fornicate (much like one would expect from a cat in heat in an urban city with a throng of nearby tom cats). 

 

There seems to be one good reason why Jerry Lee Lewis used to peek in and spy upon these vulgar Blacks as they fornicated and carried on like animals.  Certainly, Jerry Lee liked the Black music.  He surely thrilled at listening and must have been engrossed and delighted to see the expert Black pianist pump out a tune. 

 

But why did Jerry’s cousin Jimmy willingly go to this Negro night spot since he was a Christian prude and above all of this depravity?  Well, the first time this writer watched the film on “Great Balls of Fire” and the identity of Jimmy was revealed, the why quickly fell into place. 

 

Just like Jerry was captivated into stardom and national recognition, the same thing was to happen with Jimmy--although it took him a few more years to make the grade.  You see, Jerry’s cousin Jimmy was none other than the famous (or infamous) television evangelist Jimmy Swaggart. 

 

The hypocrite and fraud Swaggart was mentioned earlier in how he has been repeatedly caught with prostitutes whom he performed with in some manner.  These continuing sex sins must be given credit for the destruction of the powerful influence that the world renowned, tele-evangelist Jimmy Swaggart enjoyed. Jimmy was in tall cotton on the Christian racket until he got caught several times in sex sins.  

 

So, why did Swaggart go to watch the Black fornication and promiscuity in Louisiana long ago?  Since he didn’t like the music (he called it the Devil’s music), is it possible that he went in order to watch and view the Blacks fornicating like dogs and cats in heat?  Frankly, this writer is suspicious that this was the reason why Jimmy was there. 

 

Years ago, the great Bluegrass team of Lester Flatt and Earl Scruggs had a live performance at Vanderbilt University.  One of their songs was about Sister Mary and the hypocrite shoes.  As Lester would sing it, Sister Mary has hypocrite shoes on from the Devil and don’t put them hypocrite shoes on him (or on me, as Lester sang it). 

 

In order for yours truly to avoid those shoes, it must be noted that one time this writer and a friend went to a Negro nightclub to specifically watch the wild, animal-like Blacks.  There was no reason for me to go to hear the music (most of which i didn’t like). 

 

But there was a reason to go and watch the wiggling, shaking, humping, pumping and rocking of Black women who act like animals in heat.  That’s why i went. 

 

 

Picking Up Demons? 

 

With all of Jimmy Swaggart’s sex sins, it is perfectly logical that that was why Jimmy used to watch the Negroes.  And since sex demons can become attached to a person in sin, is it possible that Jimmy picked up some sex demons while he was watching the fornicating Blacks? 

 

And maybe, my own problems over women and sex can be traced to some of the same things on my part (of either watching or reading about the sexually promiscuous Blacks). 

 

The point of these remarks is that young Jerry and Jimmy should not have been peeking in on those wild animal-like Blacks as they were frolicking and having fun.  Though the case can be made that Jerry’s interest was only in the music, this is not the reason for Swaggart to have been there. 

 

By the way, in slowly moving to the top of the Christian preaching racket, Jimmy started small.  In time, he was a sidewalk evangelist.  He used to compare himself with the then better known Jerry Lee Lewis.  Jimmy’s pitch was that he traveled the narrow path to “Jesus” and salvation while his cousin Jerry went on the wrong road. 

 

One day, in about 1957, on a Louisiana sidewalk, Jimmy was blasting Jerry and his sins when up rolled Jerry in a brand new Oldsmobile 88.  After Jimmy hit Jerry verbally a few times over his sins, Jerry threw the keys to the car to Jimmy and noted that Jimmy needed a new car.  Jimmy started in on that “Thank you Jesus stuff.”  Jerry told him to thank Jerry not “Jesus.” 

 

So while Jimmy could condemn Jerry and the way he earned his money with the Devil’s music, Jimmy took the keys and was glad to have the new car.  Therefore, who was the hypocrite--Jerry or Jimmy? 

 

 

One More Example--Ernest Martin, Revisited 

 

The former Dr Ernest Martin of Portland, Oregon has been cited from time to time herein. 

 

Martin was a former preacher, elder and leader of the old Worldwide Church of God.  In the old days, when Herbert W. Armstrong was alive, the old man ruled the Worldwide group with a iron hand.  No one could question the old man or his theories. 

 

At some point in time, Martin found some things wrong with Worldwide theology and made the mistake (or blessing, depending upon how one may view it) of speaking out.  Thereupon, Martin was fired and kicked out of the church (either that or he resigned and left the church under pressure).  In any case, he was gone. 

 

While Martin had a tendency to go off in a wrong direction with evidence of tremendous demonic influence, he also was a good student of the Book and did do a massive amount of study.  Sometimes, he was able to come up with some points of knowledge (far exceeding the scholarship levels of most of the Worldwiders).  But he was also handicapped in apparently being demonized with some bad understanding. 

 

 

My Letter to Martin 

 

Anyway, a case came up where Martin really demonstrated his problem in trying to understand and grasp what all was happening to man in 1999. 

 

The writer of this study at hand posed a question to Martin in a communication in 1999.  Martin was asked if he had any knowledge of an Ezekiel witness or message which would involve Messianic Judaism and a racialist motion (while not defined, racialist here meant racial awareness and identification and understanding of the different races). 

 

Ernest Martin (in the usual Christian stupidity and mode) became very indignant and hateful and responded to this writer that “he pays no attention to nor does he endorse any kind of racist groups period.  That once people know who they are, all racism will go by the wayside.” 

 

Obviously, Christian Martin knew very little about one of the most important topics in the Scriptures (or perhaps he just failed to differentiate between racialist and racist). 

 

It’s too bad.  But in the modern politically correct society, where people have grown up and matured learning outcome based education, most of them are totally unable to handle the word race in any discussion.  Whenever the word is mentioned, they become paranoid and go to pieces.  And yet, the Scriptures and history are full of the importance of race. 

 

Not only did Martin have apparent problems in understanding, but it is clear that he was largely ignorant of the incredible role that Ezekiel (the Scriptural book or otherwise) may play in the age end in some context or in some manner. 

 

Of course, as was illustrated in the above remarks, Martin didn’t believe man is in the age end in the current situation.  Perhaps this is the reason that he was unable to appreciate Ezekiel. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 546--The Why for the Christian Failure II

 

 

Some Background on Another Christian Case 

 

A former chapter on the Holy Roller problems noted the terrible reality of how gross hurt, harm and sin entered into the life of a friend of mine, his family and his “Christian Church” group that he had devoted his life to build. 

 

My friend was a Sardis Sabbathkeeper and feast day observer.  And in terms of the confused Sardis movement, he was substantially more advanced than many or most of them.  This means that he was extensively closer to righteousness than the millions of pagan Christians who are still wallowing in pesha sins. 

 

Yet, he was pathetically limited in that he still maintained his belief and trust in “Jesus” and “Christianity.”  He apparently never came to any understanding of how false, pagan and evil (in sun worship) Christendom is in reality.  Tragically, he seemingly never accepted the moral standards of the Torah as his guide to right and wrong. 

 

The person involved made a further mistake in not properly assessing the Holy Roller movement for its demonism.  In time, one or more Holy Rollers infiltrated his religious organization (which he had worked to build up over many years).  One of the Holy Rollers (a nokri/nekar appearing man, with an appreciable genetic evidence of descendancy from both Kain and the behemah) successfully moved in on my friend. 

 

With the assimilation of the demonic Holy Rollers, it wasn’t long before my friend’s very Adamic (actually, she was a very fair, Nordic, Shemite woman and quite beautiful) fell prey to the nokri/nekar Holy Roller.  She mistakenly fell for his gift of the gab and charm.  She married him and her line became defiled. 

 

In fact, given some years, my friend’s religious work also became defiled as he died and the Holy Roller son-in-law took over and introduced demonic teachings and beliefs to the group.  Obviously, the group deteriorated and further spiritual growth was greatly imperiled or destroyed.  As almost always happens, when Holy Rollers move in, my friend’s work and family were virtually destroyed. 

 

 

Curses and Blessings Revisited 

 

In a way of looking at the tragedy that came upon my friend’s family and work (actually somewhat while he lived, but profoundly more so after his death), the case can be built that his line became cursed.  The problem of the curses and blessings in the Torah was highlighted in a former chapter (discussing the New Covenant). 

 

Thus, there are some powerful curses and blessings in the Torah for obedience and disobedience (Ex 20:5; Lev 26:1-46; Deut 23:2; 28:1-68).  As discussed earlier, this writer has struggled with these pronouncements for years in an effort to understand their application to modern people. 

 

In the case of my friend, the evidence is massive that he sinned by allowing the Holy Rollers into his house and work.  Surely, my friend was in state of ignorance and lacked Scriptural understanding of the threat which came upon him, his family and his associates in the form of the Holy Roller infiltration.  He acted foolishly.  And now, his lineage is being destroyed (for his and their lack of knowledge--Hos 4:6). 

 

In trying to relate these curses which have come upon his line and the wording of the second mitzwah in the Decalogue, this writer could easily build the case that my friend’s descendants should be blessed extensively, rather than cursed.  Yet, in realty, part of his descendants are now cursed and are being destroyed--precisely, for a lack of knowledge. 

 

That my subject friend had some obvious shortcomings (by remaining a Christian and failing to accept the totality of the Torah to establish moral right and wrong), there is no denying. 

 

But he was significantly ahead of much of the rest of the world in righteousness.  As noted above, he kept the Sabbaths and the feast days and evidently lived a moral life by Christian standards.  Yet, his line seems to have been cursed, rather than blessed. 

 

While not being fully satisfied in an attempt to answer this dilemma, this writer will repeat a question raised in the former discussion on this theme.  Is it possible that the application of the curses and blessings in the Torah only come into play when a person is in a covenanted relationship with YHWH? 

 

While the generic House of Yisrael is still cut off from YHWH and still existing in a divorced, non-covenanted relationship, is it possible that the called-out, very elect persons (described in former chapters) may, at some point in time, voluntarily accept YESHUA, the provisions of the Covenant and the totality of the Torah to establish morality (thereby rejecting the sins of pesha, maal or awon). 

 

In so voluntarily accepting the Covenant’s demands and the applicability of the Torah (meaning that pesha, maal and awon sins end and the person begins obeying the Torah totally and completely), would this action bring a very elect person under the curses and blessings in the Torah? 

 

Would this motion open the door to the certainty of having blessed descendants?  Would this behavior bring on answers to prayers (like in healings)?  Would this action produce some or all of the blessings outlined in Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28?  Would this eventuality make it possible for an afflicted widow woman and orphan children to be able to receive vengeance when they are oppressed by evil people? 

 

And possibly, as a minimum, the very elect could enter into a covenanted relationship with The MOST HIGH at the time of the dispensing of the true Baptism of The RUACH HA KODESH (which may occur late in the life of Philadelphia--as was discussed in a previous chapter, and as will be further covered in Appendix E). 

 

For sure, there is always the relevancy of Romans 8:28--in that all things work together for good to those who love The ELOHIM and are called according to His purpose.  

 

 

More Trouble Came 

 

In any case, more trouble came to the woman who married the above mentioned, mamzer Holy Roller.  In later years, she was diagnosed with cancer (in 2000).  It is unclear whether, when, and how often the Holy Roller husband prayed for her.  But in view of his beliefs in miraculous healings, it seem a certainty that he prayed often for her to the sun god (whom he worships and serves). 

 

in any case, the woman (and/or her husband) turned to the human doctors for treatment.  Within a year, she submitted to surgery and chemotherapy for healing of the diagnosed cancer (her husband was to later write and say that “the Lord” led her to the right doctor for surgery and that “GOD is Good!--to all those who fully put their trust in Him”). 

 

In describing her plight in one of his newsletters, the husband acknowledged the many prayers for her and the need for “intercessory prayer,” evidently for him (and/or his family) and “the Church.”  In the same newsletter, he cited a number of other prayer requests for other sick persons involved in his ministry. 

 

Being somewhat acquainted with these people and knowing full well of the great evil, wretchedness and demonization which have taken over this family and the religious group my friend worked so hard to develop, the following letter was written to the husband pastor and two of his primary assistants (who are related to his wife). 

 

 

My Letter

 

“Dear Christian Workers:  This letter has been prompted because of the crisis which your personal family faces over the question of miraculous healings from The HIGHEST and my years of friendship with....  Like you, it would please me greatly if The ELOHIM would heal... and indeed, the other sick people you mentioned in your news letter. 

 

“As you and your church members probably all believe, The MOST HIGH is The HEALER of His covenanted people.  This same basic belief underlies my faith as well.  Some contemporary Christian denominations now parrot the identical basic theology - and particularly within the Pentecostal and Charismatic motions, despite enormous different doctrinal positions on thousands of things (in a virtual world of Babylonian confusion). 

 

“Of course, much of Christendom totally ignores the question while the Pentecostals and Charismatics give it some lip service--but with qualifications and limitations.  For example, most so-called faith healers and believers immediately stipulate that miraculous healings are ‘possible’ based upon the will of The SOVEREIGN or upon the muster of faith on the part of the sick person. 

 

“In other words, the question of whether one is healed or not does not depend upon the so-caller human healer or Christian denomination (or instrument or intermediary); but rather, upon the faith of the actual sick person (or of YHWH’s will).  In other words, when the sick go to a Christian preacher, like Oral Roberts, any resulting healing will be ultimately dependent upon their personal individual faith.  In this context, if they are not healed, their personal faith can be blamed for the failure and not the alleged ‘healing’ ability of the preacher.  Always, the elevation and status of the preacher are maintained and protected (and this is important within Christendom). 

 

“Thus, per this prevalent theory - if you,..., should pray for the healing of your wife or one of your church members and if they are not healed, the problem would not be because of you or your church or beliefs; but rather, everybody would jump up and down and blame your poor wife or the sick person for not having the necessary faith to be healed.  Categorically, this belief is all bunk and is not Scriptural.  Even the theory that a believer not healed can be charged to the will of the ELOHIM is essentially bunk as well. 

 

“The Scriptures are convincing to me that YHWH is first and always The HEALER of HIS covenanted people (II Chron 16:12).  In the NT, the ‘commissioned’ persons always healed all and not just one here and there.  The only exception to this process arose when a person was hostile with a bad attitude.  Every person with a good attitude was healed in the NT--including even stark sinners and people who had no conception of The MESSIAH (like at Acts 3:1-10). 

 

“There was a so-called Charismatic healer in NE Washington (whom you may know of).  For years, he bragged and boasted about having the gift of healing.  Yet, his own young step daughter died of cancer several months ago and even after he reportedly prayed for her with his alleged gift of healing.  Without being dogmatic on the stipulated explanation for his failure in healing her, the view seems to be that it was not The ELOHIM’s will or that she simply did not have the necessary faith.  Few people would have the brains enough to blame him or his assembly organization (and their multitude of sins, confusion and problems).  Most would prefer to blame her or The MOST HIGH. 

 

“Anyway, the essence of this letter is that it is time for Christians to quit accusing and blaming YHWH and the sick people when healings do not surface (similarly, it can be a mistake to attribute all miraculous healings to The HIGHEST - after all, people can be healed at Voodoo and Witchcraft ceremonies and in Satan’s name.  Why, because as you believe, so be it [Matt 8:13; 17:20; Mk 9:23].  The human mind has great power over the human body). 

 

“Instead, the focus should be upon the preacher and the Christian denomination when healings do not arise.  And in making this charge, i would be more precise and suggest that the problem is one of doctrinal beliefs by the preacher and the group.  In other words, the group and its leader are not in truth.  Somewhere, their theology is false and they teach lies and bad information. 

 

“Now, this charge is not complicated.  After all, the Christian world is a pandemonium of division, confusion (Babylonian) and often outright hate and animosity.  While you may not initially accept that condition, it is the real world out there.  Even your own church theology is a world apart from much of the rest of Christendom (and you surely perceive many of the differences).  Obviously, The MOST HIGH is not The AUTHOR of this Christian world of confusion.  It comes from some other source. 

 

“The point that surfaces is - the question must be asked if your group theology and beliefs are right per the Book?  Surely you would immediately say yes.  And the same response would likely come from the other 31,999 Christian denominations (there are now a reported 32,000 Christian groups in operation). 

 

“But of these 32,000, how many of them are constantly open to new thinking or are spending any effort and time at a continuous re-examination of their theology and beliefs with a view that maybe something is basically wrong.  Frankly, there are not many around which would have the guts and courage to stand up and allow that something could be wrong in their faith.  Most will lie and deceive about reality (yes, the human heart is deceitful above all things--Jer 17:9). 

 

“Anyway, years ago, i concluded that they are all wrong.  Therefore, i am an independent and am always open to new thinking and new ideas about truth.  Of course, it goes without saying that i try to hold firm things already proven conclusively. 

 

“For example, there is no issue over keeping the Sabbath.  But there can be problems or questions over how to keep the Sabbath.  The Scriptural luni-solar calendar and festivals are firm with me.  But i am always open to further consideration on how to keep those festivals or how to calculate the calendar (although after 30 years of study on the calendar, my position has essentially crystallized in the last couple of years). 

 

“Years ago, it became apparent to me that there were problems with my personal beliefs and theology (which were in those past days, based upon traditional Christian ‘theories’ that have now been proven wrong over the years) and i have had to study much over time trying to determine their validity and to repent where appropriate.  Repentance involves a self examination and can take years and years (for me, i am still recalling and repenting of sins done 30 years ago).  Importantly, i have found that all of the so-called healers are patently false and fraudulent (just as the 32,000 Christian denominations are likewise all wrong). 

 

“This is not to say that i alone am right and the others all wrong.  Because there are likely problems still in my theology, i am having to continue to study, repent and change my thinking.  Simply stated, i don’t have it all yet; nor do i know of anyone else who has it all (despite the many Christian claims of having the truth).  While i am still uncertain about what all i may have wrong, i am assured that the 32,000 Christian groups are all wrong (since i have conclusively proven them all wrong by the Book). 

 

“So, maybe your church could ‘possibly’ have some bad teachings and you workers be guilty of disseminating them to innocent people.  As we know, YHWH will judge teachers far more severely than others (the reasons are obvious--teachers can be guilty of teaching others to sin).  In the vein that you might wish to examine some of your theology from a different and new perspective, this letter offers something which may interest you. 

 

“i am in possession of a 30 volume, 4,200 page study (later additions increased the count to some 36 volumes and some 6,000 pages, ed) which is a compendium of problems in Christianity.  You would find several hundred items you probably never heard of before and things which might make you re-examine your position on. 

 

“Enclosed is an IBM formatted computer (PC) floppy disk of volumes one and two in this study (Vol. I-III are on the Internet at the www.ezekiel-goodnews-people.com web site).  It should open your eyes to some of the more important issues facing Christians that have been sadly neglected.  It is set in Helvetica type, single line spacing (1.5 lines on Contents), and readable with either Macintosh (systems 5.0 or later) or IBM compatible computers with Windows using Microsoft Word software.  This disk is yours free to either read and contemplate or laugh at and toss in the garbage can (but for... sake, i hope you will at least read these volumes one and two before judging it). 

 

“If you read it and want to read more, let me know and send a self addressed, long, stamped (with 57 cents postage) envelope and i will send you disks with volumes III to VI-- gratis.  If you wish you may announce this same offer to your US church members and readers.  Send me a request and a long, self addressed, 57 cents stamped, return envelope and i will send volumes one and two and/or later volumes upon request. 

 

“Alternatively, you may copy this disk and/or print hard copies to share with your church members (also please mention its presence on the Internet at the www.ezekiel-goodnews-people.com web site).  Since the issues are revolutionary and can be controversial, you could open the door to some expanded interest and discussion in your group about serious issues which are simply misunderstood or not understood in Christendom. 

 

“There you have it!  i sincerely hope that apathy and indifference won’t take over and that all of you will take this offer seriously.  By all means, maybe you and your group (and me and others as well) should be constantly studying and considering new and different approaches on issues from the Book.  Maybe there are things which have been overlooked or not understood before that could revolutionize one’s thinking and approach to study.  Shalom!...”  

 

 

The Reply 

 

While most Christian big shots won’t give you the time of the day (when you disagree with them or don’t send them money), to his credit, the head man of this Christian group (the so-called Pastor) did write back--viz: 

 

“Dear Bro... Greetings to you in the mighty and precious name of Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God who takes away our sins. 

 

“Thank you for taking the time to write us. 

 

“Yes, we do believe that God is our Healer in all instances and we are trusting in Him for... healing. 

 

“If I read your letter correctly, you believe that the reason that some do not receive healing is because of doctrinal error by the person or church that is praying for that person.  If that is the case, then how could anyone be healed, as you yourself state that no one has all the truth?  I do not believe that our healing is contingent upon our doctrinal correctness, but rather in a heart that believes in the power of God--one that believes that the blood of Jesus has covered it all for us.  In the New Testament, Jesus healed ‘all who came to Him.’  Jesus is the great Physician.  Peter, John, and Paul all had the gift of healing because of their relationship with the great Physician and through the power of the Holy Spirit.  We are not healed because we have earned healing through our doctrinal correctness, but rather because of our faith in the power and mercy of a great God.  If doctrine entered into it, then Peter and/or Paul would not have had the gift of healing as they disagreed on a few subjects. 

 

“I cannot tell you why some are healed instantly, others are healed over a period of time, and others are not healed until death comes.  Evidently the Apostle Paul did not receive the healing he desired, although it evidently was not something that was life threatening.  Healing does not come because one is more deserving than another.  But through faith we believe that God has all things under His control and He sees the whole plan, while we only see the present.  We must have the faith of the three Hebrew children when they told the king that their God was well able to deliver them, and He would, but if He didn’t, their faith in God would not diminish (my paraphrase). 

 

“Our faith in Jesus holds strong and we are abiding in him and His sustaining power.  His Word is strength and life to all who believe. 

 

“May the Lord bless and keep you in His loving care.  In Jesus,...  P.S. I have received instant healing.  Also, I was raised from deat’h (sic) when I was 3 months old.” 

 

 

Some Comment 

 

It would be easy for me to completely take this reply apart because it is rift with confusion, errors and words which completely by-pass my remarks and the gist of the letter sent him.  He simply never got it and never answered it.  Accordingly, he went off on an irrelevant tangent to discuss things that were not even at issue or things he simply never understood. 

 

But his reply does graphically illustrate the confusion in Christianity and why Christendom has gross problems.  Therefore, it is appropriate to print his letter and my letter to him, both in full.  Only the names of the parties have been deleted to avoid any inappropriate embarrassment to some of the people involved. 

 

However, there are a few items which must be highlighted, as they are profoundly important to consider in this assessment of the failure of Christianity. 

 

First, there is no reason at all to believe that this nokri/nekar, mamzer, Holy Roller man has ever been healed or raised from death or the dead by The MOST HIGH.  Frankly, i don’t believe any of these assertions.  In fact, i don’t even believe that he was ever raised from death or the dead--through the power of anyone or any force. 

 

While his alleged healing may or may not have happened, i don’t believe it came from The HIGHEST.  It either came from the Devil or from his own mind power over his body to believe that he was healed (of whatever the problem was that he faced). 

 

So, if he was healed or raised from the dead, it seems highly plausible that the actions came from Satan.  Satan can clearly heal and may possibly raise someone from death or the dead (in order to later serve him).  The questions of healing, the power of the human mind over the body and the power of Satan have been assessed in former chapters and need no further comment now. 

 

Next, this so-called pastor actually is so Scripturally illiterate that he speaks of miraculous healings as being either immediate, or requiring some time to slowly become reality or that sick persons (prayed for by a Christian preacher) have to wait until they die before the hoped for healings occur.  This is crazy.  But it represents this man’s mentality and even a feeling found in other parts of Christendom. 

 

Surely, there are no such healings described in the Scriptures--the OT or the NT.  When YHWH’s commissioned representatives prayed for the sick, they were always healed instantly.  There is no record that they had to wait and be healed later or slowly over time.  And it is patently ludicrous to associate a miraculous healing from a true representative of YHWH as occurring in death. 

 

 

More 

 

Thirdly, the man truly did not read my letter carefully.  My focus was entirely upon the faith, belief, theology, works, sin and legitimacy of the preacher or the group attempting to dispense healings.  My very point was that when healing failures occur, the preachers will not accept credit for the failure.  But instead, they will inevitably blame the failure on the sick person or The ELOHIM. 

 

And that is exactly what is happening in this reply.  The mamzer man involved goes into a dissertation acknowledging that The MESSIAH healed “all” and that various NT apostles had the gift of healing. 

 

Then the reply letter asserts that we are not healed because of our doctrinal correctness or the reality of earning healing.  Despite the pagan names and his ignorance of truth, these statements seem true.  But my letter never contradicted those truths.  His remarks here were not even under question. 

 

The problem is not with the faith, works, deeds or doctrinal beliefs of the sick person.  This was my very point.  Yet, in the reply, he attaches those ideas to the position outlined in my letter (and even after he effectively repeated and correctly stated my focus on the preachers and groups involved in attempting to dispense healings).  Clearly, the intelligence of his reply demonstrates the IQ level of his behemah genes. 

 

The problem is with the preacher and his religious entity, attempting to dispense healing.  Are they false or in truth?  If they are false, they are in sin and are involved in teaching other people to sin (which is the point of my letter).  Rather than deal with these issues, the reply focused upon the sick person and the irrelevancy of their faith, doctrines and deeds. 

 

Fourth, it would seem to be a little hypocritical to speak about believing in The MOST HIGH for healing and trusting in Him when one turns to human doctors and submits to surgery and chemotherapy.  Yet, this is what the preacher has done.  He turned his wife over to human doctors and now talks about belief and trust in The HIGHEST.  Of course, this is what Asa did when he turned to human doctors (II Chron 16:12). 

 

Next, this reply is full of the stark paganism and false beliefs of not only Christendom at large; but also, the Holy Roller movement in particular.  This man is a Pentecostal Holy Roller.  So it is logical that he would launch into a Holy Roller tirade of confusion and words about the “blood of Jesus” (Gee-Zeus) and the “power of God” (Gawd). 

 

Last--if the life of my wife was on the line, if i truly loved her and wanted her to live, and if i believed in faith healing from YHWH, i would be very open on any question about what the problem could be on why she wasn’t healed. 

 

Yes, i would continually (re)examine my own life, deeds, works and doctrinal beliefs to see if i am falling short in some way (after all, a husband does Scripturally bear much responsibility for the well being of his wife).  If someone did write me and allow that maybe the problem was with me, i would certainly entertain the idea and not dare go on the defensive immediately in an attempt to defend myself and my beliefs. 

 

 

The Real Problem

 

While it is very easy and appropriate to blame the Christian mess upon the preachers (where surely much of the cause does exist), there really is one more over-riding issue.  In effect, the real problem with Christianity has been her people.  The Christian people are fundamentally evil and depraved. 

 

It is precisely because the people are evil which accounts for the fact that they have sat back and allowed very diabolically spiritual and physical sons of Satan to become their religious leaders. 

 

The Christian people could have always put their feet down and said no.  But they have refused to take a stand for righteousness.  They have loved the lies and smooth things told to them by the false Christian preachers and leaders. 

 

 

The Holy Roller Preacher, Revisited 

 

In the case of the demon inspired Holy Roller preacher, who moved in on my friend’s religious group and family, as described above, there is an important point about this whole operation which must be acknowledged. 

 

He was successful with my friend, the family and congregation because they themselves were all weak in faith, knowledge and understanding and surely demonized to some extent (perhaps with Holy Roller demons).  Yes, they were extremely shallow on what the Scriptures say. 

 

Because of this sad state of affairs in this group of people, it means that a very evil worker for Satan did enter into their midst and actually promoted his doctrines of demons quite successfully. 

 

For example, regarding his letter to me, he could say those very words to his congregation and they would believe them.  It’s doubtful that there would be even one person in the group who would question his lies and deception. 

 

Of course, this demonized apathy, indifference and don’t care (all caused by pride and vanity that they have salvation and have no further problems) will spell the ultimate destruction of all of them.  After all, YHWH’s people will be destroyed for a lack of knowledge. 

 

Just as the mamzer preacher has destroyed the life of the one (older) girl in my friend’s family, he very likely will do the same thing with another younger daughter of my friend, if things work out to allow him this opportunity.    

 

The mamzer Holy Roller’s wife has a very beautiful, Nordic sister still at home and still unmarried.  If the preacher’s wife does die, as is very plausible, the mamzer preacher will most likely move in on the surviving sister to place her under his spell (as she is already demonized with the Holy Roller demons, it won’t be hard for him to ruin her life as he has ruined her sister’s life). 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 547--The Why for the Christian Failure III

 

 

The Church of God Abrahamic Faith, Revisited 

 

The Church of God Abrahamic Faith group has been discussed at some length in previous chapters (and especially, in the sense that from this group something good may possibly develop in the age end--in terms of the coming Philadelphia assembly).  The incredible sickness and pathetic evil of this group offer another powerful illustration of how Christendom has failed. 

 

This American Christian Church was always wretched and lacking, just as is true with the rest of Christendom and Christian America.  This writer would not waste time on this pagan group were it not for the fact that they seem to have a unique role to play in producing something good in the age end (as discussed in the prior chapters on Philadelphia). 

 

But in this state of sun worship wickedness, there was historically a certain presence of sexual prudence (in 19th century America, many of the Christian Israelites were somewhat prudish on sex) which kept these Abrahamic Faith people in line from denigrating into behemah animals (where sexual promiscuity and perversion grossly prevail). 

 

It’s not to say that the Church of God Abrahamic Faith was ever good--it wasn’t.  However, in fairness, one can say that from its inception in the 1850s to the 1980s, it had not deteriorated to the sexual or racial miscegenation levels of the behemah humanoid class. 

 

With its attitude on sexual prudence, its rural country bearing and its isolation from much of the rest of pagan sun worship America, the Church of God Abrahamic Faith was essentially a White Israelite church during its history up to the 1980s. 

 

However bad the pagan sun worship was (and it was bad), at least the Abrahamic Faith people had some capacity for righteousness on racial grounds (because they had not profoundly miscegenated to the behemah level, as started happening with most of the other Christian Churches in the 1950s.  But all of this was to change in the 1980s and later for the Abrahamic Faith people.