EZEKIEL

and YHWH’s

Judgment

for the

Good News

PEOPLE

VOLUME XXX

War on Terrorism

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

Judgment for the

Good News People

Volume XXX--War on Terrorism

by

an unworthy servant

And you shall know the truth,

and the truth will make you free.

(John 8:32)

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.

Contents

Volume XXX--War on Terrorism

CHAPTER PAGE

- Cover Page 1

- Title Page 2

- Contents 3

- Publisher’s Preface 5

Part NNNN--Babylon and the Beast

469 Babylon and the Beast 6

470 War Means Profits 16

Part OOOO--War on Terrorism

471 War on Terrorism I 26

472 War on Terrorism II 36

473 War on Terrorism III 43

474 War on Terrorism IV 58

475 War on Terrorism V 70

476 Buying Allies 76

Part PPPP--More on 9-11

477 After 9-11 80

478 The Real Why for 9-11 90

479 More Plans for Tyranny 104

Part QQQQ--Iraq

480 Hitler of the Week 111

481 The Iraqi War I 117

482 The Iraqi War II 120

483 The Iraqi War III 127

484 The Iraqi War IV 133

485 The Iraqi War V 137

486 The Iraqi War VI 142

487 The Iraqi War VII 151

Part RRRR--Unplanned Trouble?

488 What May Happen 157

489 Some Views on the Bush War 165

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

Publisher’s Preface

Greetings! The following presentation is volume thirty of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site.

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

Chapter 469--Babylon and the Beast

The Most Important Scriptural References

The Book has an enormous number of references pertinent to both Babylon and the Beast (in the prophetic sense). The sheer number of these remarks and the inherent personal limitations of this writer combine to make it extremely difficult to begin to cover these two supposedly separate parties or actors in any responsible and coherent way.

Actually, as will be shortly shown, it is a misnomer to address these two entities in a separate vein. Because, in fact, they are very close or almost one and the same.

Of course, Babylon, in its historic beginnings, was apparently a geographical reference to an area founded by the beast, rebel Nimrod--just after the flood.

Over the centuries, and despite its many ups and downs, Babylon gained some fame and notoriety in the 6th century BCE when Nebuchadnezzar came to power over the kingdom and began his conquest of the world--to include Palestine where the House of Yehudah was in power in Jerusalem.

After approximately a century of power and influence, Babylon passed off of the stage to be replaced by the Medeo-Persian empire. The Book seems to describe both the prophetic destruction of Babylon and the later actual event--at least, in an ante-typical fashion (Isa 47-48; Jer 50-51; Dan 5).

The End of Babylon?

Jeremiah 50:39 is especially relevant on this idea because it powerfully declares that Babylon, in her destruction, “shall be no more inhabited for ever.” For long centuries, Christian scholars and commentators looked upon this text as the historic end of Babylon. Many felt that Babylon could never be rebuilt.

In the 1930s and 1940s, radio preacher Herbert W. Armstrong (who was no scholar, but a very persuasive advertising man) seized upon Jeremiah 50:39 and some of the prevailing ideas to begin preaching that Babylon could never be rebuilt. Armstrong even used the concept as a proof of the Scriptures.

Well, the years passed, and sure enough, Armstrong and the many other procrastinators, who looked upon the end of Babylon, were themselves proven wrong when the modern nation of Iraq began to rebuild Babylon (primarily since 1980). This rebuilding process has intensified in the last several years because the former Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, likened himself to the historic ruler Nebuchadnezzar.

Interestingly, Armstrong and his Christian associates and colleagues should never have assumed the end of Babylon around 500 BCE. After all, there are an abundance of Scriptures describing its presence in the age end (like Rev 17-18). Assuredly, Babylon will one day end (when YESHUA returns and crushes it totally and completely). It just hasn’t ended yet (at least, not by early 2003).

More Than Just Land Area

Part of the difficulty in assessing Babylon is that Scripturally Babylon is more than just a geographical land area in the Middle East. True, the modern nation of Iraq occupies some part of the old Babylonian land area. But there is still more to the question. As discussed elsewhere herein, Babylon involves a system--a system made up of land, people, politics, commerce, trade, money, sociology, culture, etc.

Take, for instance, the former Babylonian people. The Scriptural evidence is that about the time of Nimrod, the kingdom was inhabited by Sabeans (or Sabines), who descended from Seba, the son of Cush, or possibly from Sheba, the grandson of Cush (“Young’s Analytical Concordance,” p. 829). The kingdom of Cush evidently started at the Euphrates (where the Cushite Nimrod lived) and extended West to Ethiopia.

With the fall of Babylon to the Medes and Persians, it seems that these Sabines left the area and moved West in the great disruption of kingdoms and movements of people out of the Middle East toward Europe (as discussed earlier herein).

In time, the Sabines settled Central Italy and eventually amalgamated (in the 3rd century CE) with surviving Romans (the Romans were apparently not Hamites, but evidently Shemites, possibly Israelites) and other peoples to become the modern Italians (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 740). But that’s only part of it.

Babylon was to become more than just a land area and people. Over the years, it evolved to encompass almost all facets of human existence--as found today in the present Western Christian civilization (just as Christianity has evolved, as discussed in former chapters).

In the 6th century BCE, the despot Nebuchadnezzar had almost the entire system put together; but not completely, since he did not totally rule the very minds, thoughts and thinking of people, as is happening in our time (with the new attention being placed on the thought police and thought crimes, as enunciated by Eric Blair in “1984”).

The Image

In any case, Nebuchadnezzar had a vision of his system and how it would evolve in the form of the great image of a humanoid character, as depicted in Daniel 2. This image had a head of gold, breast of silver, belly and thighs of brass and legs of iron and feet of a mix of iron and miry clay. The image was illustrative of all of the world’s governing kingdoms to persist until YESHUA returns to end man’s misrule of earth.

The head of gold was indicative of the Babylonian monetary system which was built on the use of gold (and silver to a lesser extent). Clay tablets found by archeologists readily confirm the obvious, as perceived from the Scriptures. The ancient Babylonian system was a capitalist system (similar in many ways to the modern US). Muscle and might were supplied by the military (an army of conquest and control).

Importantly, the kingdoms following ancient Babylon kept the essential system in tow and merely added to it or modified it slightly (thus, it has been evolving over the years). Certainly, the Medes and Persians used their military power to conquer and subdue other nations and to continue what Nebuchadnezzar had begun.

In the 4th century BCE, the Greeks came to power under Alexander the Great. The Grecian rule saw several new innovations. First, the ideas and concept of a democracy were introduced to the world (since the ancient Greeks had used this political system), although Alexander and his succeeding generals were imperial dictators who ruled by military might.

Next, though Nebuchadnezzar had successfully changed much of the thinking of the Jews when he conquered Jerusalem in his day (in money, commerce and economics; and in the use of Babylonian names and words to pay homage to the Babylonian gods), he really never accomplished much of anything with the Jews, in terms of their basic religion.

The Greek Push

But the Greeks had a new slant on religion with their many polytheistic gods. With the death of Alexander, his successors began an active campaign to force the conquered territories and peoples to adopt the Grecian language, names, culture, religion, policies, sociology, economics, commerce and trade (global), corporations, monetary practices, etc (in the form of the Western civilization).

While the Jews in Palestine didn’t submit to this Greek push (primarily because of the work of Judas Maccabees and the Hasmonian revolt which laid the groundwork for Hanukkah), the Greeks had much success elsewhere. Manifestly, the succeeding Roman Empire picked upon much of the thinking of the Greeks.

Rome adopted the role of gold, silver and capitalism (from Babylon) and global commerce and trade (to include the use of corporations, from the Greeks), culture, and language (from the Greeks). However, Rome offered a slight twist on the religion question. Imperial Rome never tried to force a particular religious belief on the empire (this would change with the later Roman Catholic Church).

Imperial Rome seemed to allow some measure of religious freedom--but always, in the vein that whatever religion prevailed, it had to exist on the premise that all of the diversified religions were valid and proper expressions of worship. It was this Roman system which has become the model now being followed in the religious world of ecumenicalism (as noted earlier and to be further addressed below).

The Beast

Importantly, Daniel 7 broaches the subject of the Beast governments and system in some detail. Daniel 8 follows up with another definition of governmental powers and rulership. Though Daniel does not directly link his various beasts to the four divisions of the image outlined in Daniel 2, this reality has become manifest with the passage of the years and the ensuing record of human history.

In other words, the various beasts of Daniel can be linked to the image seen and all of them can be identified upon an analysis of world history and the various succeeding world governments.

In looking at these beasts, it must be noted that their heads add up to seven (the lion, bear and indescribable fourth one have one each and the leopard has four). By tying this seven heads to the stipulated ten horns (Dan 7:7), one has a unique set of definitions which seem to reappear in Revelation 12:3; 13:1; and 17:3.

Not only does the Revelator Yohanan report upon the numbers seven and ten, but he goes further in Revelation 13:2 by linking the beasts of Daniel to the beast coming up from the sea at Revelation 13:1. Thus, as the “Concordant Commentary of the New Testament” (p. 396) concludes, Yohanan’s beast from the sea is a composite of the beasts of Daniel. This source also links the sea to the abyss (Rev 9).

The book of Revelation seems to connect the whole system together in chapters 17 and 18 where Yohanan ties Mystery Babylon to a beast--specifically a scarlet colored one (Rev 17:3). In “The Greek Testament” (v. 4, p. 706), Dr Henry Alford makes the case that the description of this beast in Revelation 17 makes it plain that it is the same one as in Revelation 13:1 which reflects the indescribable fourth beast of Daniel 7.

As pointed out earlier herein, the woman sits over many waters (people) and on the beast. Revelation 17:5 suggests that the woman is “Mystery Babylon the Great,” although Revelation 18 carries the context forward in the sense that the subject is the historic “Babylon the Great.” Possibly, the answer here is that the woman is virtually synonymous with “Babylon the Great,” at least as Yohanan saw her in vision.

The point of this seems to be that the image seen by Nebuchadnezzar, the beasts of Daniel 7-8, the beast of Revelation 13 and 17 and the harlot woman and her whore daughters of Revelation 17 all tie to Scriptural Babylon as she has been manifested over the years (in Isa, Jer and Rev 18). Again, Revelation 18 proves that her destiny is still in progress as these lines are being written in 2003.

The Role of Religion

The importance of this conglomeration is that the miry clay in the toes of the image seen by Nebuchadnezzar and present with the woman riding the beast in Revelation 17 is religion.

Yes, it is religion which holds the whole system together (as was commented upon in preceding chapters). The beast is a confederation of activities (political, economic, monetary, social, cultural, etc), but the whole mass is held together by religion.

Manifestly, the old, capitalistic sun cults, persisting in the Babylonian, Medeo-Persian, Grecian and Roman civilizations, have been carried forward into world dominating Christianity for at least the last 1,700 years (if not the last 1,960 years, since her inception by Simon Magus and Apollonius of Tyana in the first century CE).

With the evolution of this system, all of the wrongs introduced by ancient Babylon, Medeo-Persia, Greece and Rome have been perpetuated by Adamic man. And now, in the early 21st century CE, the role of thought crimes has been added to top off the multitude of depravity this system promotes. Yes, this Babylonian system has reached the pinnacle of success in attempting to control the very thoughts of people.

Of course, religion has not been the only ingredient holding the system together. From the time of Nebuchadnezzar forward to our times, the system has always had military power and muscle to employ on the conquered nations and peoples, if necessary. Even under the rule of the old Holy Roman Empire, the pope routinely and regularly had the military forces of his subordinates to clamp down on any dissidents.

The extreme importance of religion in this system was brought out by A. E. Knoch in his “Concordant Commentary on the New Testament” (p. 396). As Knoch wrote, worship, rather than rule, is the dominant note here. Knoch went on to conclude that these beasts bring a confederation bound by a common religion.

There is no need for expensive standing armies if a governing power has the benefit of a cohesive, powerful, ruling religion. So religion has been the focus, certainly since the fall of old, pagan Rome and its successors in the vein of the Holy Roman Empire. Obviously, the system Yohanan beheld in Revelation 17 and 18 will use religion extensively in exercising dictatorial control over the peoples of the world.

More on the Evolution of this System

As this system seems to be evolving, there have been some very interesting modifications which need to be recalled here. As commented upon in the previous chapters on the “The Murderers of YESHUA,” there seems to have been a development of a plutocratic money power even in the old Roman Empire. The evidence is that it was in Amalekite hands from day one.

When the Holy Roman Empire came on the stage after Constantine, and until its demise during the Protestant Reformation, it’s hard to say to what extent the plutocrats ruled. The Roman Church may have allowed some of them to be present, but only if they toed the line with Rome (and made many bribes and payoffs to the Catholic Church).

For sure, the Amalekite bankers had a hard road to travel in those days because many European countries either ran the Jews out or they imposed enormous restrictions on Jews. However, by the time of the Protestant Reformation, things began to loosen up considerably for the Amalekite plutocrats. Clearly, in the 18th century, the Rothschilds had emerged as a source of great power in Germany.

Corporations

While the corporate form of business organization started in ancient, sun worshipping Greece, the world was not totally obsessed in ancient times with huge multi-national and conglomerate corporations (as has happened today).

Again, when the Catholic Church ruled the roost, she wouldn’t tolerate any competition from giant corporations, which might have impeded upon her rule. If any existed, they had to make large pay-offs to Rome to stay in business.

But ever since the days of Nebuchadnezzar, the world has been plagued with the greed, get and acquire mentality of the capitalist society. While the question of private ownership of property is clearly a Scriptural teaching, the role of giant, greedy businesses (whether incorporated or however organized) is simply not Scriptural.

Now though, in the 20th and 21st centuries, there has been some modifications in this arrangement. For instance, the 20th century saw the rise of Fascism and Nazism where capitalism has been allowed to exist, but under strict government control and supervision. For the super rich plutocrats (who owned the giant corporations and also controlled the governments), this was no problem.

Another ism arising in the late 19th century and early 20th century has been Communism where government takes over everything--business, people, education, etc. Whether Communism is totally out or not is debatable (this writer suspects it will still have a limited, short-term comeback). Anyway, it has been important historically.

Socialism

Moreover, there has been the surfacing of a number of various socialist parties-- primarily in Europe; but also, de-facto in America and the rest of the White British Commonwealth countries. This socialist movement seems to be progressing in the context of International Socialism (which may be the ruling political belief in the future).

Through the years, and especially in the US, Fascism has been increasingly added to this International Socialism mix (though few, if any, political scientists would admit it). Thus, modern Socialism seems to be allowing capitalism to exist (in the form of giant, multi-national corporations), but almost all other activities are being placed into the hands of socialistic, government bureaucrats.

The sociology of the US, White British Commonwealth and much of Europe is plainly in the hands of socialists--in education, schools, entertainment and media institutions, etc. Even religion is taking a turn toward Socialism in the vein that all religions are equally proper and good (as apparently happened somewhat in the old Roman Empire).

Though there are dedicated socialists, super rich plutocrats, misinformed humanists, greedy businesses and corporations, ruthless gangsters and so forth all around and all busy trying to impose the new world order; surely, this coming world government system will not become reality unless and until religion makes it possible. Religion must and will lead the way--as Revelation 17 suggests.

The Religion Dilemma

For at least 1,700 years, the Catholic Christian Church tried to impose a one world religious system on Adam man by the use of sheer strength and force. Military armies, police and the powers of secular states were available and called upon by Rome to try to make everyone toe the line. In her greatest act of tyranny, Rome imposed the Catholic Inquisition to torture and murder millions in an effort to keep them in line.

But because of the work of John Huss, Martin Luther and numerous other reformers, whole populations of people in Northwest Europe began to wake up and realize that they were on a wrong ship (in the Roman Catholic Church). Multitudes were ready and willing to die in order to experience religious freedom.

The Catholic Church lost the battle to keep the people in line and especially as the Scriptures were translated into the vernacular in a number of countries. But despite this loss, Rome has always been in the background, working and pulling strings, in an effort to bring the daughter churches back to mother Rome. So far, this effort too has failed, though progress is being made today with the Christian ecumenical motion.

Since all of these systems and activities on-going at all levels are being directed and managed from behind the scenes by Satan and his demonic helpers, it is clear that something different from torture racks and burning people at the stake was needed to bring about a one world state.

Apparently, to deal with the problems, the present motion for world government has turned to the old, pagan Rome model where the state was fairly tolerant of all religions--if they treated each other as equals and paid homage, where necessary, to the state approved gods and deities.

And that’s precisely what is now unfolding on the global religious scene. All faiths are acceptable and can exist--providing that they toe the line on toleration toward other faiths and acceptance of all of the state approved social gods (which have been defined previously herein in the vein of racial integration and amalgamation, homosexuality, feminism, abortion on demand, etc).

Of course, the difficulty here surfaces for those sects and groups which actually have some measure of faith and belief in their religions. Essentially, these groups might be classified as the more fundamentalist types. Thus, we have sincere Christians, Jews, Muslims, etc who take their religions seriously and in the vein that their faith is the only way for morality and an after-life.

Yes, Fundamentalism

Manifestly, this type of religious fundamentalism surfaces regularly as news items in newspapers and on TV from time to time. Here, the focus has been on the Branch Davidians, most of the Sardis types (the Sacred Namers and much of the fall out from the old Church of God, Seventh Day), most of the Christian Identity movement, and even segments of other churches and groups that tend to be fundamentalists.

These fundamentalists believe that their faiths alone have the answers to morality and the afterlife and that other faiths and beliefs are lacking and/or are false. Also, many of these groups are not going to willingly accept all of the social gods being forced upon the people by the dictatorial state. Hence, there are problems within Christianity.

The same thing can be said for the Jews in the development of Ultra Orthodox sects and groups which are extremely dedicated and sincere in their faith. These people are not going to compromise their faith and belief without a fight (as discussed earlier).

Moreover, the same thing is happening among other religions and particularly in the Moslem world. Islamic fundamentalists are surfacing with regularity (involving people like Osama bin Laden, the Taliban in Afghanistan and the clerics in Iran and Pakistan). These people, too, seem to be extremely sincere and uncompromising in their faith.

One of the primary features of most of these fundamentalists is their unwillingness to compromise their individual faiths in order to have fellowship and goodwill with the developing ecumenical one world religion and its social gods (now coming together in all of the world’s major religions).

Coming Trouble

Many of these fundamentalist groups might could exist for awhile (in the New World Order) if they maintain an extremely low profile and keep their faith secret (if that is possible). But once the word is out that one of these groups is “different” and refuses to accept all of the New World Order gods and refuses to be acceptable and tolerant of other faiths, they are in trouble.

Previous chapters have mentioned the situation with the Ultra Orthodox, Christian Identity, Branch Davidians and Taliban in Afghanistan. The thing that has hurt all of these groups is that they have refused to accept the politically correct social gods of the New World Order. Too, they have not shown a willingness to worship/agree with the mainstream religions.

There is no point now in (re)addressing the Branch Davidians for wanting to own guns, the Ultra Orthodox Jews for refusing to pay homage to the so-called Holocaust, or the Christian Identity sects for being paranoid over the Jews. The situation with the Taliban in Afghanistan was only briefly cited a few times in terms of some of their beliefs.

These Taliban Muslim fundamentalists got themselves into trouble in several areas. First, they removed women from power and authority over men and made women wear veils (both of these actions are consistent with the Scriptures). Next, they expressed their disdain for queers and faggots (which was a very good Scriptural move).

Finally, they tore down some ancient statutes of Buddha (which, by the way, just happens to coincide with a mitzwah in the Torah). Frankly, this writer has a great love for history and ancient things (artifacts, remains, monuments, etc). However, there is a mitzwah commanding the destruction of these pagan gods. So it is difficult to condemn or criticize the Taliban over their religious efforts.

Yes, Trouble for the Non-Conformists

As already described heretofore, all of these groups and their allies and cousins in the generic fundamentalist motions have been in trouble with the secular states and the move to impose the New World Order. More trouble is coming for all religious beliefs which do not toe the line on religious ecumenicalism.

“The Tzemach Letter” (p. 10 for Oct 2001) had an article by Ken Garrison on “America under Attack or War between Principalities?” which focused upon the dilemma facing people who are serious and committed on their religions. Garrison suggested that the coming beast anticipated in the book of Revelation will be “religious in nature.”

He said that he believed that “it is very likely that such a religious beast will emerge from this present crises. Religious expression will be acceptable as long as it only deals with questions of moral lifestyle and the afterlife. Any religious expression which has geographical, political implications will be forbidden. The immediate application of this will be toward Fundamentalist Islam, however, Fundamentalist Christians and Jews will be close behind...”

Frankly, the writer of this study has some agreement with Garrison. Possibly, Garrison may not have it all right, but he makes some good points.

His primary problem area probably surfaces in his conclusion that a religion can be acceptable as long as it deals with questions of moral lifestyles. Actually, the evidence so far seems to suggest that certain fundamentalists are in conflict with the New World Order social gods precisely on morality and lifestyle issues. And this really gets them into trouble with the New World Order crowd.

Most all of these fundamentalist groups are strongly opposed to homosexuality and perversion, in all of their sordid forms. Once a group speaks out and condemns the prevalent sin found in the secular society, the New World Order people are then ready to pounce on the group and destroy it.

Scriptural Morality Is Under Assault

Scriptural morality, righteousness and human lifestyles are all under enormous assault with the new social gods defined as being politically correct in the various secular states. Any person or any group which refuses to accept any or all of these definitions are automatically enemies of the state and are marked for destruction.

Of course, most secularized religions (i.e. the Roman Catholic Church, most of the Protestants, mainstream Islam, Reform Jews, etc) will gladly compromise their faiths on all of these issues (actually, they have already compromised their faiths with the acceptance of these social gods producing social sin).

Mainstream religions, right and left, are not only accepting the New World Order social gods (racial integration and amalgamation, sexual perversion, feminism, abortions on demand, etc) but they have gone even further by showing a willingness to participate in joint religious worship ceremonies. Ecumenicalism, toleration and acceptance are the norms for today’s religious people.

Obviously, true fundamentalists of whatever kind are not going to go along with this trash and Satanic evil being forced upon the world. Many groups will fight first. And this idea opens the door to the reality that the state will murder and destroy them (with no discrimination, since Fundamentalist Christians, Jews, Muslims and so forth will all have to toe the line or face destruction).

Manifestly, the Christian Identity people, many of the Sardis groups, Ultra Orthodox Jews and Muslim fundamentalists all face trouble and trying days over their faiths.

Chapter 470--War Means Profits

The Need for War

It goes without saying that enormous pressures have been building up over the years for more and more wars, military conflicts and political intrigues to bring about world government. Surely, Satan and his demonic assistants have been at this business for quite some time now. Religious leaders, misinformed humanitarians and super rich plutocrats have all been making their plays to rule the world.

For the dark ages, it was mad Catholic monks and leaders who used military forces to conquer and subdue others in the vein of religion. With the Protestant Reformation, the plutocrats moved on stage to become the primary agency for conquest and domination. The Amalekite Jew bankers/masters have risen to the top in the Christian West to exert most of the influence in this arena since WWII.

Marine General Smedley Darlington Butler was quoted earlier when he outlined his personal knowledge of the plutocratic use of the US military in the 20th century, up until WWII. In his book “War is a Racket” (p. 1-2), he noted that only a small group of people on the inside understand what it is all about.

Butler (p. 8, 12-13) said that war “is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.” As the general noted, some 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in America in WWI. While soldiers on the front lines might be making $20 a month, American business men were making vast profits of 20% to 1800%.

Profits

With this opportunity to make such huge profits and gains, US businessmen (who own the factories, businesses, etc that will provide the means to conduct the war) are always anxious, per Butler, for another war. When one war ends, these fat cats begin making plans for the next one. It is clear why these big shots are so anxious to make patriotic speeches and spur the nation on to war.

Actually, the same motion has been underway since the so-called war to end all wars (was that WWI or WWII? In truth, both of these wars were fought to supposedly end all future wars).

But since WWII, the role of war has increased dramatically. And the plutocrats clearly have found since 1945 their greatest ambitions in using the US military to make money and dominate the world. Naturally, prostitute politicians have gladly went along with this effort to gain political contributions which insure their reelection at the next voting time.

In terms of the US preparation for a war against Iraq, the Jan 6 & 13, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 1) had a story by Ken Nichols O’Keefe on “Anti-War Protesters Risk Lives to Block Bombing of Baghdad” which focused upon O’Keefe and others who said that they would go to Iraq to be human shields against incoming US bombs.

O’Keefe added: “Those who suffer the most will be the innocent men, women and children in Iraq. Their crime? Simply being the powerless citizens of an oil-rich nation with a leader who no longer fulfills the needs of the Western powers that supported and armed him in the past.” Yes, that’s what it is all about. The US-Iraqi war development will be covered in future chapters.

Without taking the time to go over the multitudes of past wars, military activities and engagements since WWII (some of these have already been written on at length), one of the more recent US wars (before Iraq) will be highlighted and discussed in the following presentation to demonstrate how things can happen.

Reasons for the 1999 US War in the Balkans

Here, Clinton’s US war, on the Serbs, in the Balkans, in the spring of 1999, needs mention. The US launched her attack on March 24, 1999, and pushed it to the extreme until the plutocrats’ immediate goals and objectives were largely met.

Apparently, several things seem to have come together to precipitate the Clinton decision to commence acts of war against Yugoslavia. First, Yugoslavia was a small, insignificant country with no means to defend itself against a vastly superior US attack (hence, victory seemed certain--the US plutocrats love such wars against nations which cannot defend themselves).

Another key reason was that the war would help Slick’s legacy and his desire to emulate Franklin Roosevelt and WWII. Clearly, a Balkans war might could help fuel WWIII as the US pressed the Serbs and their Russian allies.

One more primary reason was the recent revelations of Red China’s penetration of the US defense establishment and the US White House--for campaign contributions to Slick Clinton in 1996.

Slick seemed to use acts of war against others as diversionary actions to take the gullible public’s mind off of him and his scandals and focus them on some external foe, like Saddam Hussein, and then on Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic (who he had labeled as another Hitler).

Too, acts of war benefit the bankers and industrialists in the military industrial complex (each cruise missile fired costs the US $1 million). As was discussed by Major General Smedley Butler, quoted above and earlier, US wars have traditionally been fought to make money for American businessmen. Wars can be enormously profitable!

More Reasons

Next, Amalekite plutocratic bankers have had their eyes set upon taking over Eastern Europe and exploiting and stealing everything possible there for quite some time now. Obviously, they have had their eyes set upon Yugoslavia where Yugoslavian President Milosevic had not cooperated in their take-over. With his consistent refusal to surrender to the Amalekite bankers, he had to go!

After some bombing and killing of people, the bankers can more easily move in and take over and particularly as they accompany NATO peace-keepers (Amalekite parasites and carpetbaggers have been following conquering armies into defeated nations for over 2,500 years--starting with the Babylonian entrance into Jerusalem in 554 BCE, into the American South with Grant’s army in the Civil War, into Germany and Japan after WWII and so forth).

There are a lot of valuable mineral deposits in the Balkans and particularly Kosovo which could be exploited by the fat cats if Milosevic would have been disciplined to accept the plutocrat takeover. If he wouldn’t agree to the banker take-over, there was always the option of taking him out completely (which is what ultimately happened).

Race

There was another important reason for Slick’s war against the Serbs. Howbeit, it is more subtle than some of the others. There is a racial dimension in that the attack would benefit the Albanian cousins (from Esau and Eliphaz) of America’s ruling Amalekites.

Edomites from Eliphaz are extremely clannish people and try to stick together. The racial factor is the reason why Irish Phoenicians (like conservative, radio talk show host G. Gordon Liddy) supported Slick’s war against the Serbs.

The Media

Since the US Amalekite-controlled media was pro-Albanian, the poor Serbs never had a chance to have their view presented.

Daily, the American people were told how evil the Serbs were and how Yugoslav President Milosevic was another Hitler (when, in fact, Slick has far more in common with Adolf Schicklgruber than anyone else in modern times). If NATO bombed and murdered dozens of Albanian women and children, the pro-Edomite media would bombard the airways with stories of how the Serbs caused the deaths.

Importantly, the just cited Adolf Schicklgruber discovered years ago that if a lie is told repeatedly to gullible people--soon the people will believe the lie and regardless of how stupid it is.

This happened daily with Slick’s press releases and press statements and how the media told lies, over and over, to make out that Milosevic was a war criminal guilty of gross atrocities (when, in truth, it was really Slick Clinton and Britain’s Tony Blair who were committing the atrocities).

Still More Reasons

There is one more profound reason for Clinton’s war on Yugoslavia--although it did not immediately become manifest to the public.

The April 1999 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 4) quoted Dr John Coleman and the Wall Street Journal of September 9, 1985, with remarks on the movement of 25-40% of the US heroin supply from Turkey through the Balkans to Albanian Mafiosi gangsters in New York.

With the prevailing racial factor, it is clear that the Edomite Albanians would be working with Edomite Turks, Edomite Sicilian gangsters and Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters to operate the heroin pipeline. Reportedly, Milosevic had been trying to clean the drug problem up in Kosovo. So the drug running Edomite Albanians there had been trying to break free of his control.

As the article noted, the Clinton plan of partial autonomy for the Kosovo Albanians (with their KLA revolutionaries) all but guaranteed that the province “will find itself controlled by the gunmen of an international drug-dealing Mafia masquerading as an idealistic liberation army.” Apparently, the Milosevic efforts to close this drug pipeline down was motivated by Serbian defense considerations.

The “Washington Times” (Jun 7-13, 1999, p. 22) had an AP story by Jerry Seper on “KLA buys advanced arms with illicit funds, report says.” This story focused on a NATO report which revealed that the KLA was pushing Middle East heroin on the US and Western European markets in order to raise large sums of drug money to buy advanced weapons for its war against Yugoslavia.

As established in former comments herein, the druggy Slick Clinton had close ties to the US drug trade while Governor of Arkansas and after he was in the White House. It was entirely logical that he would act militarily to keep the drug flow intact.

The Opportunity Was Clear

Since Milosevic was bogged down in a war of nationalism with Edomite, Albanian, Muslim separatists in his Kosovo province, here was the perfect opportunity for the plutocrats to attack Yugoslavia, destroy Milosevic and install a president who would conform to the New World Order. Several advantages were clear--viz:

First, the plutocrats would be able to move in on Yugoslavia like a bunch of leeches to steal everything that they have had their eyes set upon. Next, the Albanian Edomite drug traffickers would be able to continue moving Edomite heroin from out of the Middle East to markets in Europe and North America. Since Milosevic had the gall to try to shut this drug pipeline down, he could be shutdown.

Because the plutocrats are virtually all internationalists and since they have been working overtime to bring in the New World Order, the destruction of Milosevic and his Serbian power base would bring extra benefits. The Serbs are fierce nationalists and much of the conflict with the Edomite Albanians has been predicated upon Serb nationalism (involving racial, ethnic and religious dimensions).

Manifestly, the plutocrats and their prostitute politician, Bill “Slick” Clinton, must have licked their lips when they saw an opportunity to rush in and kill several birds with one stone. The destruction of Milosevic and his Serbian power base would fulfill the greatest of ambitions on Wall Street and in London and Switzerland (plus, it would be a shot in the arm for Clinton and his struggles over the Monica Lewinsky affair).

Clinton Attacked

The US launched her 1999 air assault against Yugoslavia in an attempt to ostensibly force Yugoslavia to accept US and NATO “peace-keeping” forces in her internal province of Kosovo, to join US “peace-keeping” forces in Bosnia and elsewhere in the Balkans.

The US attack on the Serb military seems to have resembled the situation in 1941 when the Japanese conducted an air assault on the US military at Pearl Harbor. In typical Christian fashion, Christian Americans began bombing and killing their fellow Christian Serbs.

The Serbs responded by increasing their attacks upon the revolutionary Moslem Albanians in Kosovo, who had been attempting to break off from Yugoslavia. The Kosovo rebellion was led by the 100,000 man Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) which was and is allied with the Arab terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and other Middle East terrorist groups (May 1999 “McAlvany Intelligence Advisor,” p. 3).

The US action placed America in league with her sworn enemy Osama, the accused bomber of the US embassy in Africa and the later assaults on September 11, 2001, on the Pentagon and World Trade Center (which will be discussed in detail in the succeeding chapters).

And More

Though Russia has a huge Assyrian population in its White Russian-Germanic segment, she is essentially a Slavic-Orthodox-Cyrillic-Japheth nation. Thus, she was and is strongly pro-Serb (which is also a Slavic-Orthodox-Cyrillic-Japheth entity) and has been much opposed to the continuing US actions in the Balkans that are anti-Serb.

Russian President Boris Yeltsin in the spring of 1999 warned of a possible global war. Prime Minister Primakov (who later lost his job on May 12, 1999) canceled a trip to the US and instead went to Yugoslavia.

Soon, Russia began her own deployment of ships to the Adriatic Sea and limited support operations for the Serbs (although she was restrained and held back by the IMF and big banks because of having to re-negotiate much of her international debt in April 1999). When America is under later attack, will Americans be able to understand why?

Greece and the other Orthodox nations were and are pro-Serb. Will the Balkans’ problem and the US presence there eventually throw Greece into the Russian sphere of influence? Will Greece be encouraged to eventually become one of the horns in the Russian led age end alliance against the US?

Will the Balkans’ war also precipitate new conflicts between Greece (from Japheth-Javan) and Turkey (from Esau-Eliphaz), like in Cyprus?

Even many Italians (most modern Italians are racially Hamitic Babylonians, although Sicilians and some Southern Italians seem to be Edomites from Eliphaz) disapproved of the attack. Will this US-British aggression ultimately bring on a split in NATO and pave the way for NATO to be dissolved (with its European fragments being consolidated into a new United Europe army)?

Anti-US protests and violence soon commenced in Macedonia, Russia, Greece, Italy and other parts of the world. WWI started in the Balkans in 1914. Will history repeat itself at some point in time?

More Adverse Fall-Out

News reports said that Yugoslavia coordinated her defense tactics against the US attacks with Iraq, which had had much experience over the last several years (discussed on the Rush Limbaugh program). This means that the Arab Moslems of Iraq had far more in common with the Orthodox Serbs than they did with their Muslim Albanian friends.

In other words, the enemy of Serbia was the enemy of Iraq--which meant that the two nations could be friends against their common enemy. Since Russia has been the power broker behind both Serbia and Iraq, it is no surprise that these three powers were and are coming together. No wonder hate against Americans is spreading worldwide.

The US attacks on Kosovo, coupled with the efforts of the Serbs to expel ethnic Albanians from Kosovo, created a condition where hundreds of thousands of Muslim Albanians fled the province for nearby Macedonia, Montenegro and Albania, completely flooding those countries with people.

To relieve the burden, the US and some of her European allies agreed to accept thousands of displaced Albanian refugees. This whole situation appears to be extremely prophetic for the people of the US and White British Commonwealth.

Yes--Prophetic

Per the Tanakh, the days are coming (in Yechezkel’s 32d-33d years) when multitudes of ethnic Anglo-Saxon-Celtic peoples will be forced from their lands to go into exile (and slavery) throughout the world. Since President Slick Clinton created the whole dilemma in Kosovo and since the American people sat back and allowed him to cause the crisis, the chickens will soon come home to roost.

American people (those that survive WWIII) will be expelled from their lands similar in some ways to what the Muslims and later the Serbs have experienced in Kosovo. The primary difference between the expulsions is that the Anglo-Saxon-Celtics will go into another Egyptian servitude and bondage.

Just as American war planes on several occasions attacked and killed Albanian Edomites trying to escape Kosovo, the same thing will apparently happen to Americans trying to escape their doomed land. They will be attacked and murdered by enemy air strikes.

During the Balkans’ war, on April 15, 1999, the FBI warned the US military and other sensitive federal installations that the Serbs may launch terrorist attacks against them in the US, based upon a memo circulated in the US Serbian Orthodox Church urging Serbian Americans to respond violently to the American attacks in the Balkans (Apr 15, 1999, “Spokesman-Review,” p. A13).

The same possibilities also exist with the Russians and Greeks and especially as the US presence in the Balkans drags on.

More US Trouble

On May 8, 1999, the US bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, killing three and injuring many others. Chinese citizens retaliated by attacking the American embassy in Beijing for days. This US attack on the Chinese will not be forgotten. The Chinese have a long memory span. Will Americans understand when Chinese missiles start falling on American cities? There is a cause and effect relationship in matters like this.

The following May 27, 1999, the US and Britain pushed the International Criminal Tribunal in the Hague, Netherlands, to indict Yugoslavia President Milosevic and certain other leading Serbs as war criminals (eventually, Milosevic was arrested and shipped off to Holland to stand trail for his alleged war crimes).

While Slick Clinton and Tony Blair murdered far more innocent people in their aggression against Yugoslavia, it is interesting that the Hague decided to indict the Yugoslavians who have done little or nothing comparatively. Whether many of the Serbs will ever be arrested and tried remains questionable (beyond Milosevic).

As a follow-up, in order to do Milosevic in, the US offered a $5 million dollar reward for him in conjunction with using the CIA to commence student unrest in Belgrade in late June and July of 1999.

In any case, Slick and Tony made a mistake because when the conquering Russians, Chinese, etc arrive in Washington and London, they will arrest American and British politicians, right and left, and try and execute them for war crimes and crimes against so-called humanity. The chickens will surely come home to roost with both Slick and Tony Blair (and George W. Bush will face these same problems as well).

Russia, Boxed In

This strange turn of events made some ask why Russia would effectively abandon her Serb allies to essentially support the last NATO ultimatum on Kosovo (which was considerably changed from its first ultimatum). The answer seemed to lie in Russian attempts to re-negotiate outstanding IMF and big bank loans which were due in April 1999.

It appears that the Amalekite international financiers held Russia in hostage, preventing her from doing much in open support of the Serbs, and tied the loan re-negotiations into Russia’s role of forcing the Serbs to accept the NATO demands--although denied by US officials and super rich Amalekite bankers (this option was mentioned by Thomas Omestad and Alan Cooperman in their article on “ A minuet with Moscow, then a yes in Belgrade,” in the Jun 14, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 33).

But Moscow will not forget her humiliation and being blackmailed by the super rich bankers. Thus, the whole US role in the Balkans is not helping relations with Russia and the East. With US troops in Bosnia and now Kosovo, coupled with Russian troops also now in Bosnia and Kosovo, the stage is set for a major power conflict.

Clearly, it seems that the US-British attacks and partisanship in the Balkans will be one of the catalysts to bring on the Russian-Third World destruction of the US and her Anglo-Saxon-Celtic cousins in WWIII.

The Cease Fire

Based on Russian and Finnish negotiations with Milosevic on June 8, 1999, and the secret behind the scenes maneuvering of international financier Peter Castenfelt (discussed heretofore), the G-8 nations (the largest and most powerful, including Russia) met in Germany and agreed on a format to end the US led bombing assault upon Yugoslavia if the Serbs would accept an international peace-keeping force (not just NATO, as was originally stipulated) which would move into Kosovo with the departure of the Serbian forces.

On June 9, 1999, Serb and NATO representatives met and signed an agreement for the Serb army to withdraw from Kosovo and for the UN to approve a peacekeeping force to enter Kosovo. The peace-keeping force turned out to be an international force, including Russian soldiers.

By June 10, 1999, the Serb withdrawal from Kosovo commenced and the NATO bombing was halted.

Since the US had expended many of her cruise missiles and other key armament inventories in attacks upon Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq (reportedly, with only limited new production schedules in the pipeline), what will she do when WWIII strikes and she no longer has a large defense arsenal (and particularly, if the dollar tanks in the coming days)?

Not only did Slick Clinton draw down the US military in his years in office, but also, he steadily used up US defense armaments in his various military excursions around the world without replacements (61 Clinton wars involving US forces occurred by early 1999). Morale plummeted in the US military and experienced people wanted out. Too, the Clinton penchant for war has continued with GWB to add to the problem.

Another Possibility

The efforts of the US and Britain to enter Kosovo on the ground, and the reality that much of their cruise missile and bomb inventories were used up without replenishment (and especially, in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in 2001-2003), brought up another interesting possibility.

Instead of continuing to surrender, what if some of the Yugoslavians choose to fight the US and British peace-keeping forces as guerrillas and snipers over the coming months? Actually, the Serb forces have kept a low profile since the US war. So far, they have not attempted any attacks on US peace-keepers (as of early 2003). But this option remains on the table in future days (as is happening in Afghanistan and Iraq).

There is also the problem of the KLA which will probably never disarm, nor will NATO require them to do so since the Amalekite bankers/masters are in control of NATO forces and are very much pro-Edomite (for their drug running operations, among other reasons).

In any case, the armed Kosovo Edomites did assuredly begin attacking and killing unarmed Serb people (to force them out of Kosovo) and NATO never stopped it. What if Russia (with their forces also on the ground in Kosovo) eventually intervenes on the side of the Serbs? Or what will happen if Russian and US-British forces get into some other confrontation in the Balkans?

Coming Judgment

What then will the US and Britain do in later years if and when they face a superior Russian, Chinese and Third World force which clearly has YHWH on their side?

When WWIII comes, guess who the good guys will be and who the bad guys will be? What a shock it will be to apathetic and indifferent Americans and Britons when they learn that YHWH is against them and has chosen to execute judgment upon them for their sins and wretchedness.

Chapter 471--War on Terrorism I

The Revelation

The Bush War on Terrorism is another recent war needing mention (as suggested in the prior chapters). It will be addressed at this time.

As will be covered in comments to follow, there were a series of events which preceded the so-called terrorists attacks in Washington and New York on September 11, 2001. Later, various magazines and newspapers will be quoted on this interplay preceding 9-11. One of these reports was a May 27, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 27) story on “How the U.S. Missed the Clues” by Michael Elliott.

In an incredible revelation, Elliott says that the CIA prepared a plan before September 11, 2001, to attack al Qaeda in Afghanistan with heavy support from the Northern Alliance (the Russian allies). Actually, as things worked out, this is precisely what happened (for some strange reason--as if the US-Afghan war was scripted in advance).

The word from “Time” magazine is that this plan for war was on the desk of the president on September 10, 2001, awaiting his return from his trip to Florida (where he was when the attacks took place).

It is inconceivable to this writer that the CIA would, on its own initiative and without some direction from the White House, arbitrarily make plans to attack the sovereign nation of Afghanistan. There is no way to approach this subject other than to automatically assume that the president had ordered this plan and the accompanying attack order to be prepared.

Accordingly, it was made--obviously much earlier than 9-11 (as will be shortly established below in later revelations).

Manifestly, the US White House (which is a puppet agency of America’s ruling plutocrats) began making plans to attack Afghanistan (along with Iraq) quite early in the GWB administration. The only thing needed to launch this attack was the cause or motivation which would unite the American public against the Taliban.

This very situation could have a close parallel to what the plotting and conniving Franklin Roosevelt faced in 1941 when he was doing everything possible to goad the Japanese into an attack so that America could enter WWII. Something had to occur to unify the American people and push them forward into war (which many Americans simply opposed in 1941).

Inevitably, one must pause and take note of the situation in America in August of 2001. Was there a similarity to the situation in America in 1941?

Moreover, there is the reality of the sinking of the battleship Maine in Havanna on Feb 15, 1898, and the Lusitania on May 7, 1915, in the Atlantic (both incidents are discussed elsewhere herein). These events were used by the war hawks to get the US into war with Spain and later WWI. Is it possible that the 9-11 incidents were scripted to precipitate the so-called war on terrorism and invasion of Afghanistan?

Later Revelations

More revelations were forthcoming in August 2002 which revealed that indeed the US government started making preparations to attack al Qaeda, evidently in Afghanistan, under the Clinton administration in 2000 (per the Aug 16, 2002, “The Week,” p. 5). The Clinton people decided that the plan should be deferred to the incoming Bush people in January 2001.

The GWB team conducted an eight months review of the plan and George W. Bush approved the plan on Sep 4, 2001. Evidently, the actual US secret attack order was prepared by the CIA and put on GWB’s desk before Sep 11, 2001, while the president was in Florida. Presumably, he was to approve it on his return to Washington (as actually happened).

Now, the So-called US-Bush War on Terrorism.

Anyway, the US War on Terrorism, as launched by George W. Bush in the fall of 2001, is another war involving months of planning and one which offered an opportunity to accomplish a whole series of objectives to benefit the ruling plutocrats and to help pave the way for the installation of world government.

These two goals are clearly involved in the sense that there are gigantic oil and natural gas deposits in the Caspian Sea area (to include much of Afghanistan). The Jun 3, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 18) had a story on “War for Profit: The Awful Truth” which said that there are possibly $35 billion in gas and oil reserves in just the Kazakhstan area (more than even in Saudi Arabia).

Fat cat oil company people have paid the Kazakhstan government some $3 billion to secure those rights and have invested some $35 billion in plant and equipment assets to recover those resources (ibid, p. 18). Surely, these investments could mean fantastic returns from later oil and gas sales in the hundreds of billions of dollars.

Too, there seems to be large deposits of uranium, gold, silver, lead, zinc and beryllium across Afghanistan, according to geologist and anthropologist Bonita Chamberlin (Dec 17, 2001, “American Free Press,” p. 2).

The previously discussed Enron Corporation (with former ties to almost all important American politicians, including Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, the Amalekite Chucky Schumer and on and on) has long had its eyes set upon Afghanistan and the huge oil and gas deposits in the Caspian Sea area (and still has, following the Enron bankruptcy).

The Feb 11, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 10) had a story by C. Parvin Foner on “Global Perfidy of Enron/Anderson Coming to Light” which noted the mineral deposits and Enron’s planning efforts to build a pipeline from Central Asia, across Afghanistan, and on to India, to move natural gas to markets in India. Whether this effort by Enron will proceed or not is still not clear (although some other firm may do it).

A report by Christopher Bollyn, on “Mainstream Media Avoids Questions of 9-11,” in the Jun 24, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 3), quoted investigative journalist Tom Flocco that Enron had 20 active CIA agents on its payroll before its demise. Apparently, the CIA and Enron were jointly working on global projects of some sort. Possibly, the situation in Afghanistan was one of those joint efforts.

The Jul 15, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 10-11) had a follow-up on the CIA-Enron links in a related story by Tom Flocco on “Mounting Evidence of Larger Conspiracy Begs More Questions Regarding 9-11 Insider Trading.”

Flocco quoted a Washington insider who said that Enron’s CIA members used “info gleaned from a satellite project called ‘Echelon,’ which intercepted emails, phone calls and faxes with detailed business information,” adding that “pure and simple, (taxpayer-funded) U.S. intelligence agents were involved in corporate espionage.”

Great Profit Potentials

For certain, the Western plutocrats have had their eyes set upon the possibility of exploiting the whole area of South Central Asia for profit and gain (just like they have had their eyes set upon Eastern Europe, as noted in the prior chapters). The primary holdback in Afghanistan had been the ruling Muslim fundamentalists.

As most persons know, the ruling Muslims had been the Taliban fundamentalist sect. This group had been making the headlines regularly for the past couple of years as they had been placing restrictions on women and queers and on destroying the images and statues of the Buddha god. None of this stuff set well with liberals and Socialists in Europe and North America.

So all that was needed was the right opportunity and/or excuse to go in and bomb these people to oblivion and to steal their country (by installing a puppet government which would answer to the plutocrats and internationalists busy building the New World Order). That opportunity came on Sep 11, 2001, when some alleged Muslim terrorists flew some captured airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Following the destruction of Afghanistan and the Taliban, the Western plutocrats selected Hamid Karzai as the new Afghan leader. Karzai (with a very obvious Edomite-Hittite nose) once worked for UNOCAL, the huge US oil conglomerate (per BBC, quoted in the Jan 21, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2). Clearly, the plutocrats’ man is now in dictatorial power in Afghanistan.

With the September 11th attack, US politicians were quick to name Arab fundamentalist Osama bin Laden as the alleged mastermind behind the assaults in New York and Washington. Though no proof was ever publicly stated of this linkage, the public was expected to believe GWB that it was Osama. Of course, the public believed it, as they were programmed to do by the secret plutocratic rulers.

Moslem Views

Alternatively, Osama repeatedly said that he did not order the 9-11 attacks; although a later alleged Osama video, released by the US, suggested that he either did it or knew about it in advance. Supposedly, this tape was the smoking gun proving Osama ordered the September 11th attack (but if he only knew about it in advance, does this fact alone make him guilty of ordering the attack?).

Reportedly, the tape was unexpectedly found by the CIA in a vacant house in Jalalabad in Eastern Afghanistan. Later, when the role of the CIA with the tape became suspicious, the story was changed to read that the United Front (the US Afghan allies) accidentally found the tape.

But this tape easily could have been altered or even fraudulently produced by the CIA, using Hollywood type technology (as will be discussed in later comments herein). The Dec 28, 2001, “Week” (p. 12) had a report on the possibility or likelihood that the Osama video was a hoax.

This story noted that Bin Laden is a multimillionaire who had before used high-quality videos to spread his message to the world. Why would his personal home movies be of such bad quality that you can barely make out his face? It is easy to get a good camera from Japan. And why was the sound suddenly crystal clear whenever the Saudi sheikh speaks, but muffled and obscure whenever Bin Laden speaks?

Quoting a leading Muslim, “The Week” noted that “If this tape is the strongest evidence with Washington, then it is really a problem.”

Another questioning story, entitled “The Bin Laden Video: Smoking Gun or CIA Production?,” by Christopher Bollyn, appeared in the Dec 31, 2001, “American Free Press” (p. 3). It quoted Sean Broughton, director of the London-based production company “Smoke and Mirrors,” who said that it would be relatively easy for a professional to fake a video of Bin Laden (this capability was discussed earlier herein).

Bollyn specifically singled out the reality that this apparently CIA video of Osama shows him to be a very different person than what other video tapes show of him that were distributed by him.

For example, Bin Laden is known to be very thin and frail. He suffers from kidney problems and uses a cane. Yet, the “CIA” tape seemed to show him to be much heavier and actually a jolly person. Being of Yemenite parentage, Osama has a long neck and long narrow head. In the CIA tape, he had a husky body and a smaller head in proportion to his body.

In this “supposedly revealing” video, Bin Laden appeared to be wearing a ring on his right hand. In previous tapes, he wore no jewelry except a watch. In this subject tape, Bin Laden was “gesticulating excessively” with his right hand. In truth, Bin Laden is left-handed and speaks in a slow and deliberate manner.

The February 4, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news report involving Bin Laden’s mother who said that she did not believe that her son was behind the attack on the US. She said that the alleged video of him was “doctored.” She added that there were too many gaps and statements made which were not like him.

Osama’s mother denied that he called her before the attack and said something big was about to happen. She noted that she had not talked to him in six years. Thus, was this report more CIA lies?

A Iraq-Bin Laden Tie?

For months on end, in 2002 and early 2003, the George W. Bush people tried to build a case that there was a link between Bin Laden/al Qaeda and Iraq/Saddam Hussein (to justify a US war against Iraq).

Interestingly, in early Feb 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell went before the UN to offer some so-called proofs on the evils of Saddam. First, Powell produced some aerial photographs of some trucks--allegedly, of decontamination trucks made recently (supposedly decontaminating chemical, biological or radiological sites).

The problem with this smoke and mirrors production (surely from the CIA) was that the alleged dates and definition (that the trucks were decontamination trucks) were only asserted by Powell and not proven (and even if they were decontamination trucks--so what? With UN inspectors combing the entire nation looking for any evidence of the remains of chemical, biological/radiological weapons, the Iraqis would surely want to decontaminate all places where any chemicals had been stored--to include aspirins and medicine of all forms, as well as the chemical agents supplied by the US back in the 1980s to use against Iran, to be later assessed).

Many or most nations in the world simply ignored Powell’s charges and placed them in the category of unproved allegations. The UN weapons inspector, Hans Blix, discounted them completely, as noted elsewhere herein.

In his UN appearance, one of the big allegations which Powell made was that there is a tie between al Qaeda/Bin Laden and Iraq/Saddam Hussein. Powell offered no proof (although Hussein had publicly denied any such linkage for months before). As always, Powell did just as his boss does. Both Bush and Powell make charges but never provide any proof (the reason is because their charges are generally lies).

On Feb 11, 2003 (the following week), the US announced that it then, all of a sudden, had obtained an audio tape in which Bin Laden allegedly said that he and al Qaeda were in “partnership” with Saddam Hussein and Iraq. Sometime after Powell said that he had a transcript of this mysterious tape, an Arab radio station produced the tape and played it on the air.

While there was no mention of any alleged partnership, the so-called Osama did speak of the need for Muslims worldwide to come to the aid of Iraq when Bush launched his war in the coming days. Since al Qaeda and Iraq are both religious Muslims and since both of them are Arabs racially, it makes sense that Osama would be in support of Iraq in her confrontation with the so-called Great Satan.

As a matter of information, the tape charged that Saddam Hussein was an infidel himself (Saddam apparently is not a religious Muslim; or at least, not much of one). Osama had criticized Saddam in previous remarks; so this remark was not unique. But certainly, it did not sound like the two men were in any partnership arrangement as alleged by Powell.

The writer of this study cannot be sure of the real source of this tape. But it clearly could be another production of an outright fraud or smoke and mirrors (which the CIA is notorious for producing). Or alternatively, it could be genuine from the real Bin Laden.

As discussed elsewhere herein, Bin Laden had been on the US payroll for years. If he did produce such a tape, he very well could have done so on behalf of his employer and at the opportune time of Powell’s need for some proof. Or maybe, Osama was simply a dupe or fool who was unconsciously working for the US. Or alternatively, maybe Osama didn’t make the tape at all, but that it came entirely from the CIA.

About the same time that this tape surfaced, the US announced a pending terrorist attack and put the nation on a “Orange” alert status (which is just below the “Red” condition of an attack). But the thing missed by almost everyone is that this alleged threat was based on information that was “fabricated” (Feb 15, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. A1). It’s hard to believe anything that Washington says.

The Mossad?

For sure, a number of Muslims have stepped forward and claimed that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were engineered by the Israeli Mossad (which, like the CIA, works for the New World Order Amalekite plutocrats).

In fact, as late as March 2002, Gallup opinion polls among 10,000 Muslims in nine Islamic countries show that 61% of the Muslims do not believe that Arabs were responsible for the New York and Washington attacks; 22% of them have a favorable opinion of the US; some 48% of Pakistanis believe that the Jews were responsible; and 5% of the Pakistanis held a favorable opinion of the US (Mar 22, 2002, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 16; May-Jun 2002 “Bible Light International JPM News & Prayer Requests,” p. 3).

Since the favorable opinion levels of Muslims for Americans is quite low, one must assume that most Muslims don’t have a favorable opinion of the US (i.e. 78% of Muslims in general and 95% of Pakistanis). One must then ask why is it and how is it possible for the US to have Muslim allies in the Middle East? Those questions will be broached in some detail in the succeeding chapters.

An Israeli Production?

In regards to the popular Muslim feeling that the terrorist attacks in Washington and New York were Israeli productions, it is interesting that just after the attack, US authorities arrested five Israelis at a New Jersey airport (as briefly cited earlier). Importantly, they were illegal immigrants and were found to be carrying box cutters, multiple passports and $4,000 in cash (“Forward,” Nov 23, 2002, p. 5).

Of the more than 1,500 people arrested and detained following September 11th, some 100 of them were Israelis. Some 60 Israelis are still being held by US authorities (Dec 24, 2001, “American Free Press,” p. 1). In fact, the December 24, 2001, “American Free Press” paper (p. 1, 3, 10-11) went on record to name a host of leading American officials who have implicated the Israelis in the attack.

Importantly, this newspaper, in a lead story on “Israel Knew,” reported that the FBI has compiled information, suggesting that Israel had advance knowledge about the impending September 11th attack on the US and that some of the Arab attackers were actually Mossad agents.

More Israeli Ties

The March 18, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 3-4) had two stories by Michael Collins Piper which addressed the Israeli aspects of the September 11th attack. Along with the work of this paper, a number of media sources had run stories on this subject in early 2002 (including the very pro Israeli “Washington Post”).

In the first story, Piper quoted from some of these reports. Reportedly, Carl Cameron of Fox News was one of the primary reporters gathering information on the Israeli connection. Cameron had been on the Fox News channel telling about his findings. In essence, US authorities did arrest a huge number of Israelis here in America illegally.

Accumulated evidence suggests that some or many of these Israelis are/were a part of a gigantic Israeli spy operation (although one must question this allegation since the Israelis automatically have access to virtually whatever they want in America without the need to operate a spy network--unless the spy network was/is used to supplement data that is given to Israel outright by the US government).

Some of the information shared by Cameron is that there has been a large US investigation into this matter. Some of it, which supposedly linked the Israelis to the 9/11 attack, is classified.

Otherwise, information has came from the French “Le Monde” paper that one-third of the Israelis (which involve over 100 people) were stationed in Florida. Some five of them lived in Hollywood, Florida, where the alleged terrorist leader Mohammad Atta and four of his henchmen lived.

More From Piper

The second Piper story in the March 18, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 4) was co-authored with Christopher Bollyn. It was entitled “Odd Coincidence or Conspiracy?” and focused upon one passenger who was on American Airlines Flight 11 which crashed into the World Trade Center.

This man was Daniel C. Lewin, who was born in the US but raised in Israel. Lewin was a former member of the Israeli Defense Special Forces.

This Piper-Bollyn story quoted the March 2, 2002, “Washington Post” which mentioned that the FAA on Sep 11, 2002, had reported that there was a shooting incident on Flight 11. Reportedly, a passenger shot the occupant of seat number 9B, who was supposedly Lewin. Lewin was just a seat away from one of the hijackers.

Later, the FAA repudiated this report on Lewin (although the reference could have been to just a weapon that could include a knife). Now, it seems that the FBI position is that Lewin was stabbed to death, along with the pilot and co-pilot of the flight (possibly by the Arab hijackers).

Anyway, one of the conclusions from these stories about an Israeli link seems to focus on the possibility that the Israeli spy ring knew about the pending Muslim terrorist attack and chose to not report it to US authorities.

Interestingly, the Jan-Feb 2002 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 6) had an AP report of September 21, 2001, which noted that some 4,000 Israelis worked at the World Trade Center. Yet, there was only one Israeli victim in the attack that killed some 3,000 persons. Per the story, there is evidence suggesting that the Israelis were warned in advance of the pending attack.

This reality prompted Black poet Amiri Baraka to write this poem: “Who knew the World Trade Center was gonna get bombed? Who told 4,000 Israeli workers at the Twin Towers to Stay home that day? Why did Sharon stay away?” After the poem, the ADL got mad at Baraka and demanded that New Jersey fire him from his job as poet laureate of the state. The NJ governor joined in on the attack on Baraka.

More From the “American Free Press”

In the April 8, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 10-11), Michael Collins Piper followed up with another powerful story on “Confirmed Exclusive: Mossad Front Companies Operating In, Around City on 9-11.” The focus of this Piper report was on several Israeli owned “moving companies” which seemed to have had connections to the 9-11 attacks.

Some of the companies were Urban Moving Systems, Moving Systems Incorporated, Advance Moving System, AAA Van Lines, State to State Van Lines, America’s Best Movers and Quality Moving Storage. Allegedly, some or all of these companies employed young Israeli men who might be connected to the Mossad.

Following the 9-11 attacks, some of the dark skinned Israelis were taken into custody by the FBI. Some of them were seen compiling information on the Sears Tower in Chicago and others joked on the day of the attacks that Americans would find out what Israelis have had to go through.

One of the most fascinating things that happened in New York on 9-11 was that five dark Middle-Eastern men were seen with video equipment near the World Trade Center. They were busy videotaping the attacks on that facility.

On David Letterman’s “Late Show” on September 11, 2001, CBS’s anchorman Dan Rather appeared to discuss the attacks. He said that a cell of America hating Arabs had been spotted videotaping the World Trade Center tragedy and celebrating on the roof of a nearby building. As it now turns out, Rather had it wrong.

The five celebrants were not Arabs at all; but were Israeli men, apparently working for one of the Israeli moving companies operating in the New York and/or New Jersey areas. Piper quoted the Mar 15, 2002, “Forward” (the popular New York Jewish newspaper) which confirmed that the men were Israelis.

“Forward” also admitted that after the Israeli government was confronted with these stories that Israel admitted that the Urban Moving Systems operation was a Mossad front.

Apparently, per “Forward,” there were two groups involved in these latest moving company operations. One was a legitimate Israeli group and the other was possibly a non-Israeli group.

Piper asked if this suggestion (of some Middle Easterners posing as Israelis) raises any questions about the prospect that there have been some Israeli groups in America posing as Arabs or Muslims? Anyway, “Forward” claimed that the problem arose because the Israelis failed to advise US authorities that they were in the US spying on Arabs and/or Muslims.

More on These Movers

The May 27, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 3) had a story by Christopher Bollyn on “Suspicious Israeli Activity at Military Base” that demonstrated some of the apparent work of at least one of these Israeli moving companies. On May 7, 2002, two Israelis were arrested in the middle of the night in a speeding Budget rent-a-truck near the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station at Oak Harbour, Washington.

One of the Israelis had an international driver’s license and an expired visa and the other one had no ID at all. As it turned out, the first one was still here, though his visa had expired, and the second one was an illegal alien.

The two Israelis claimed to be movers who were merely innocent people just doing their job. Police became suspicious and brought in a bomb sniffing dog which established that the truck had been used to haul TNT and plastic explosives. The Budget Rental Company said that the truck had not previously been used to haul explosives (suggesting that the Israelis had been using it for that purpose).

The case was turned over to US immigration people. Thus, the two Israelis will be likely deported and nothing more will be said or done about the incident. By all means, the controlled media will implement a news blackout on this incident.

Chapter 472--War on Terrorism II

More May 2002 Revelations

Two important stories broke in May 2002 which were most fascinating because they revealed either a deliberate plot at the top levels of the US government to carry these terrorist attacks off, or incredibly gross incompetence at the highest levels of the US government. At the time of this writing, this writer is unclear of exactly which option represents reality.

A bombshell of sorts came forth on May 14, 2002, when the FBI released a memo written in July of 2001 urging that the FBI conduct an investigation of Middle Eastern men who were in the US enrolling in and attending flight schools. The memo specifically mentioned Osama bin Laden and said that his followers could use the schools for terrorist activities (May 15, 2002, “Spokesman-Review,” p. 1).

This memo was prepared by an FBI agent in Phoenix, Arizona based upon his discovery of some Middle Easterners involved in flight training in Arizona. The memo writer said that this training could be a first step to place Islamic militants into the aviation industry around the world as pilots, security guards or aircraft maintenance workers.

On May 15, 2002, news reports said that there was an acknowledgment that President Bush was personally briefed before September 11, 2001, on a possible terrorist attack from Muslims using airplanes. But the briefing reportedly did not suggest that terrorists would use the airplanes for suicide missions against US buildings.

Some Chronology on the Early Information

The May 27, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 26-27) had a story by Michael Elliott on “How the U.S. Missed the Clues” which focused on what America’s leaders knew, and when they knew it. This story laid out the early warnings which came during the Clinton years in power.

First, in 1993, there was the World Trade Center bombing (involving a US sting operation that went astray, as discussed in a prior chapter). Even then, the al Qaeda linked perpetrators were known to be planning attacks on New York bridges and tunnels.

In 1995, a plot to blow up 12 airliners over the Pacific was foiled. An accomplice of the ring-leader Ramzi Yousef, a Pakistani named Abdul Hakim Murad, confessed that he had learned to fly at a US flying school and was planning on crashing an airplane into CIA headquarters.

Apparently, the revelations on this 1995 plot came to light because of investigations in the Philippines where the Muslims were in training. The Jun 3, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 3) had a story by Christopher Bollyn on “FBI, CIA Knew of ‘Kamikaze’ Attacks in 1995” which focused upon the Philippines story (called “Project Bojinka”).

Bollyn indicated that some European news agencies had reported on the arrest of the Muslims and had said that the plan was to fly airplanes into the CIA headquarters and the World Trade Center (US media sources acknowledged the CIA headquarters’ plans, but never mentioned the plans to fly planes into the World Trade Center).

It is unclear how far these Muslim plans in the Philippines went in scope.

But interestingly, Bollyn made the point that information surfaced (from Robert I. Friedman, in the Aug 3, 1993, “Village Voice”) suggesting that Yousef had an associate named Ahmad Ajaj who was believed to be a Mossad informer or agent. If so, the Israeli Mossad knew back in 1993 of the Kamikaze plans.

After the 1998 embassies’ bombings in Africa, authorities learned that participants testified that Osama bin Laden was sending agents to the US to attend flight training and to acquire airplanes.

In 1999, there was the foiling of the “millennium plot” to blow up the Los Angels airport and hotels in Jordan. The Algerian Ahmed Ressam was arrested when he tried to enter the US and sneak explosives into the country. He told about the “millennium plot” (to be further discussed shortly below).

The May 27, 2002, “U.S. News & World Report” (p. 20) had a presentation on what was known in Washington. A timeline on “ A Web of Hints” outlined the following: In 1994, Algerian terrorists hijacked a plane with a view of crashing it into the Eiffel Tower in Paris. In December 2000, US intelligence sources reported a jump in tips about coming terrorist plots.

More Recent Chronology--Under Bush

The just quoted May 27, 2002, “U.S. News & World Report” (p. 20) also followed up in its chronology on events during the George W. Bush presidency.

In June 2001, testimony in the millennium bombing plot revealed al Qaeda threats to attack the US. On June 22, 2001, the FAA warned airlines that al Qaeda could attempt bomb attacks on airliners. On June 26, 2001, the State Department issued a “Worldwide Caution” due to increased reports on threats overseas.

On July 2, 2001, the FAA included plans of the millennium plot to blow up an airport terminal. On July 5, 2001, the above noted memo from an FBI agent in Phoenix was prepared. On July 6, 2001, the White House suspended nonessential travel of counter-terrorism people because of suspected plots in Turkey and Rome. In mid-July 2001, reports surfaced about a plot against the G-9 summit.

In late July 2001, the FAA warned that terrorists might be training for hijackings. On Aug 8, 2001, the CIA briefed Bush that al Qaeda might be planning hijackings or other attacks.

More on the Moussaoui Story

The Zacharias Moussaoui case was touched upon in a prior chapter in connection with the efforts of Moussaoui to try to obtain justice in a US court (this case is in a US court in the summer of 2003, as these lines are being written). But the case is interesting and deserves some further comment.

On Aug 15, 2001, per the controlled US media, Zacharias Moussaoui, a Muslim, was arrested in Minneapolis after he allegedly raised suspicions at a flight school (after he allegedly told instructors that he wanted to learn to fly a huge super-liner but not to land it). A note from an FBI agent said that Moussaoui might be planning to fly a plane into the World Trade Center.

Though this story on Moussaoui was widely reported in the controlled US national media, there is an interesting follow-up about it. The Jun 3, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 4) had a front page report by Michael Collins Piper on “Media Lied About 9-11 Conspirator,” which was most revealing.

Piper said that this story about wanting to learn to fly, but not wanting to learn to land a jet, received wide publicity (which it did). But the truth was that this was not what happened.

The May 22, 2002, “New York Times” said that Moussaoui was described at the school of demonstrating “suspicious behavior” and not the story about not wanting to learn to land a jet. Actually, according to school officials, he did want to learn to land the jet as well as fly it.

Michael Piper than asked if the “NY Times” report was true, how then did the original story get to the media? Who in the government released it? Why is it that Secretary of Transportation Norman Maneta seemed to still lie and support the original story about Moussaoui.

Thus, if this Moussaoui story was a pre-fabricated lie in the first place, one must wonder how many more of the government and/or media stories about the alleged Muslim terrorists are true or how many are false? If this one story was a lie (as now claimed by the “NY Times”), there might be more lies floating around in the controlled media.

Based upon this story from Piper and the “New York Times,” one must pause and ask if this whole subject concerns a massive disinformation campaign at the highest levels of the US government and/or the national controlled media?

Regardless of how true these various US reports are on the anticipated terrorist attacks, it is fascinating that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak has now publicly stated that his intelligence warned the US one week before 9-11 of the pending al Qaeda attacks (Jun 14, 2002, “The Week,” p. 7). It is unclear how the US people reacted on these Egyptian warnings, but they now claim that they were not received.

The NRO

In a bombshell of a report, the Nov 11, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 14) had a story by Christopher Bollyn on “Spy Drill Simulated 9-11-Style Attacks” which focused upon some of the work of the super-secret National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). The director of this intelligence agency reports directly to the Secretary of Defense and the Director of the CIA.

The NRO is in charge of the secret spying satellites in earth orbit that spy upon various countries around the world and on certain global communications.

Bollyn quoted a recent Associated Press story which said that on 9-11 of 2001 (the day of the terrorist attacks), the NRO had an simulation exercise to determine US reactions and emergency response if a large airliner crashed into a US building. Government officials said that the conduct of this drill versus the actual terrorist attack was merely a “bizarre coincidence.”

Yes, Washington Knew

The May 20, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news item that the “Atlanta Journal-Constitution” conducted an on-line poll which showed that half of Americans believe that the government knew of the 9-11 attacks in advance. With these findings, the paper promptly removed the poll results from its news releases.

Although the details have not been forthcoming, one must be suspicious that Israeli spy agents (operating illegally in the US) may have known about the coming terrorist attacks in some detail.

With the US-Israel ties, it would seem incredible that the Israelis would not have told US authorities something about the pending attacks (maybe they would not reveal everything they knew, but surely something--unless they had a positive reason to not tell the US).

The conclusion here has to be that there were massive pieces of intelligence available suggesting that something big was in the works from Muslim terrorists, and US leaders simply ignored the warning; or alternatively, chose to sit back and do nothing in order to allow the attacks to proceed on schedule.

Or Negro Incompetence?

With the heavy Negro presence and leadership in the White House National Security Office and at the US State Department, the idea of simply gross incompetence makes more sense than anything else.

The Bush National Security Advisor is a Black woman, named Condoleezza Rice, previously mentioned herein. Condoleezza is beloved by the American people and particularly Republicans (the Republicans even have present plans to run her in California for the US Senate; or better yet, for president against Hillary Clinton in 2008--per the Nov 8, 2002, “The Week,” p. 12).

On May 17, 2002, the Bush administration spokesperson Rice declared: “I don’t think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center...that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile” (per Dr Stan Monteith, in the Oct 2002 “Radio Liberty” newsletter, p. 2).

Monteith’s newsletter went on to detail a list of pieces of intelligence which was available to the Bush administration which offered evidence that indeed this very thing would happen. Many of these clues or threats are outlined above in this presentation. So the truth is that there were a host of clues and implications available which indicated that the airplane attacks were coming.

Maybe, there were some legitimate reasons to be uncertain of the exact date and even some question over the exact targets. But there were massive pieces of intelligence suggesting that an attack was coming and coming in 2001. It’s just that Bush and his Black team didn’t have enough brain power to figure out the possibilities.

Bush Took the Blame

Since the controlled media and the gullible American people could not dare criticize the Black people running things for Bush, the criticism has been directed at Bush, himself. Certainly, Bush is not very swift and deserves some blame.

But in fairness, the president supposedly has a team of experts (like Rice) around him to keep him advised on things exactly like 9-11. So Bush has taken the flak actually due Rice and the other Negro leaders whom he elevated into leadership rolls over America. Of course, it is easy to see that the Bush team will have more problems and goof-ups in the future.

The Stock Trades

One of the interesting features of the September 11th attack on the US was that some party or parties made vast stacks of money off of these attacks by working the US stock markets regarding the two airline companies involved--American Airlines and United Airlines.

The “American Free Press” has had several stories on the sale of stock or put options that were traded by someone in the know during the period of September 6 to 10, 2001.

The most revealing story was by Christopher Bollyn on “Revealing 9-11 Stock Trades Could Expose The Terrorist Masterminds,” in the May 13, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 3). As discussed in this article, the stocks of both United and American plummeted on September 11th with the attacks. Obviously, people who sold these stocks short or who bought put options on selling them made huge profits.

From Sep 6th to Sep 10th, there was a 9,000% jump in United Airlines put/sell options (with a spike of being 285 times higher than average on Sep 10th). American Airlines saw a 6,000% jump in her sell options during the same period. There were no other stock trades those days that even began to reflect the activity in those two stocks. Surely, someone on the inside knew something.

Interestingly, two brokerage houses (Merrill-Lynch and Morgan Stanley) both also experienced large purchases of put options between Sep 7-10. Both of these firms had offices in the World Trade Center in New York.

In the spring of 2003, it still is unclear who initiated all of this activity in these stocks. It could have been either Israeli/Mossad or Muslim agents with inside information on what was coming down the pike. For sure, someone knew something.

Tom Flocco, Revisited

The formerly cited Jun 24, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 3) had a story by Christopher Bollyn on “Mainstream Media Avoids Questions of 9-11” which mentioned investigative journalist Tom Flocco’s views on some of these trades.

Per Flocco (who was previously quoted herein on CIA links to Enron), an investment bank company formerly headed by Alvin B. “Buzzy” Krongard, the current executive director at the CIA, traded these put options and made big bucks from them. Thus, did the CIA know in advance that something big was coming down the pike on 9-11?

In a follow-up, the Jul 15, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 10-11) had a story by Flocco on the “Mounting Evidence of Larger Conspiracy Begs More Questions Regarding 9-11 Insider Trading.” This previously quoted story addressed some of the CIA-Enron links, as broached earlier herein.

Flocco’s article raised the question if some of the CIA agents (who knew what was going to happen from gathered intelligence) were involved themselves in placing some of the stock sales orders; or alternatively, tipping off selected stock traders on what was coming down the pike.

For example, Citigroup is headed by a gang of Amalekites who were former US government leaders--like Robert Rubin, former Secretary of the Treasury and close friend of Enron Corporation’s Chairman Kenneth Lay, and John Deutch, former Director of the CIA.

Is it possible that some of the Amalekite crooks working with the CIA and/or Enron tipped off Deutch or Rubin?

Chapter 473-War on Terrorism III

This Writer’s View

The prior chapters discussed much of the background on the 9-11 terrorist attacks and who could have been behind them. Several possibilities were discussed and especially the Moslem view that the entire operation was a Mossad undertaking.

Frankly, this writer doubts just the single Mossad cause or basis for the attacks (without any involvement of others), but it must be mentioned as a possibility. After all, the Mossad and CIA have engineered many things singularly or together to help bring on world government (and one or both agencies could now be operating in the background on this thing).

For sure, one has to be suspicious that the Mossad knew in advance about the coming of the attack. If the Mossad knew, did it notify US authorities? Logically, the answer is yes--unless some Mossad agents were the people who entered the stock market to reap some fantastic returns on the attacks or had some other reason for silence. Surely, Arabs and Israelis were involved in some way on this thing.

PNAC and NCP, Revisited

A former chapter quoted the work of Christopher Bollyn in uncovering a massive new Amalekite conspiracy to make vast new profits and extend US (correctly Amalekite) influence and control over the Middle East and South-Central Asia in the context of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and the New Citizenship Project (NCP), as put together in 1997 by a team of Amalekite Jew bankers/masters (per the Dec 30, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 1, 7).

Without repeating that presentation, a couple of points need to be made here in the vein of 9-11. Bollyn’s story-title was “America ‘Pearl Harbored.’” It also carried a sub-title which added: “Sept 11 Was ‘Catastrophic Event’ Necessary to Transform America.” While it is perhaps difficult to now claim that PNAC and/or NCP were totally behind 9-11, it must be placed on the table.

Manifestly, 9-11 has paved the way for many of the goals and plans made by the Amalekites in PNAC/NCP to now become a reality (as outlined earlier and to be further covered in later chapters on the planned Iraqi war). Consequently, one must conclude that there is some very strong evidence that indeed Amalekite Jew bankers/masters were behind the 9-11 attacks in some way.

In a remarkable linkage, the 1999 Phase I Report of “Rebuilding America’s Defense: Strategy in the 21st Century” said: “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event--like a new Pearl Harbor” (Feb 2003 “Radio Liberty” newsletter, p. 1). Here, the question must be asked--was this prediction the cause of 9-11?

In a preceding discussion on PNAC, this document was also addressed by Christopher Bollyn in the Dec 30, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 7). In this article, the AFP may have uncovered the whole reason for the 9-11 attacks.

In terms of this Pearl Harbor remark, AFP asked Christopher Meletz, current assistant director of PNAC, what the phrase meant. Meletz said: “Without some disaster or catastrophic event, neither the politicians or the military would have approved.” As Bollyn concluded, the 9-11 terror attacks provided the Pearl Harbor needed to put the global plans of PNAC into effect (ibid, p. 7).

Mossad Arabs/Muslims?

In the vein that the North American and British Amalekites control both the CIA and Mossad, it is highly plausible that both of these agencies carried out the 9-11 attacks. And if so, why were Muslim Arabs seemingly involved?

Frankly, this writer has long had a gut feeling that the Mossad has infiltrated many of the radical Islamic movements (maybe not all of them, but certainly some, many or most of them--like Hamas and the work of the Sabbatians to motivate and lead the Islamic Marxists and Sufists).

This option received some credible support from filmmaker and investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker, who was interviewed by Tom Valentine in the Jan 6 & 13, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 14-15). Hopsicker said that the Mossad had a long documented record of infiltrating Arab terrorist organizations with Arabic speaking Jews who pose as Arabs.

Hopsicker went on to say that even many Arabs have had doubts that Ramzi Yousef, previously mentioned herein, was even an Arab (Yousef was supposedly the man who organized the World Trade Center bombing in 1993). Also, per Daniel, Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch has been trying to connect Yousef and Saddam Hussein to the Oklahoma City bombing (as discussed in a former chapter).

Of course, there were a number of reports of John Doe #2, #3 and so forth who were involved in the OC affair. These John Does were thought to be dark-skinned Middle Easterners. Rather than being Arabs, this writer must ask instead if they could have been Mossad agents posing as Arabs?

Too, there was the situation with the so-called German named Andreas Strassmeir (who just happens to have ties with Israel and speaks Hebrew). Strassmeir has been mentioned in prior chapters on his role in the OC bombing. The Hopsicker interview with Valentine opened the door that maybe Strassmeir was a Mossad agent (or alternatively, a US government agent of some sort).

As cited elsewhere herein, the one single politician (Charles Schumer) and the one single piece of legislation that he was pushing (the anti-terrorism bills) all succeeded because of the so-called terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in 1993, the OC bombing and the 9-11 incidents.

Therefore, is it not likely that Mossad agents (like the previously cited Ahmad Ajaj and the above mentioned Ramzi Yousef), posing as Arabs/Muslims, infiltrated the Muslim groups and planned all of these US attacks to benefit the Amalekite point man Charles Schumer (the US Senator from New York who leads the Amalekite work in the Senate for tyranny in the US and establishment of world government)?

Gullible Arabs Following Amalekite Bankers/Masters

In opening the door to this possibility, this writer is not naive enough to suggest that the Arabs who died in the suicide attacks were actually Mossad agents. Surely, these persons were Arabs--but Arabs who had been set up, encouraged and promoted to die because of infiltrated Mossad agents who did all of the planning for the incidents.

It has to be very questionable that the naive and incompetent Muslims could have ever planned and pulled the 9-11 attacks off on their own. They simply lack the intelligence and expertise and probably even the money for such an operation. But this condition does not negate the involvement of many Arabs. The evidence is massive that numbers of Arabs were involved.

However, the problem remains that the Muslims themselves simply lacked the brains, ability and means to lay this thing on and carry it out successfully (actually, the post 9-11 events suggest that indeed the Muslims have not had the ability to carry off any subsequent attacks in the US, though they certainly hate the so-called Great Satan sufficiently and would carry off further attacks if they could. But they have not had the IQ, ability or means for further terrorist attacks to date; although this condition may change in the future. In the post 9-11 world, it seems that every time low-level incompetent Muslim agents try to do something on their on own in the US, without Mossad oversight and involvement, they get caught. All of this points to the Mossad as engineering the 9-11 events).

Since the Muslims have a fanatical belief in dying for Allah and going to paradise to enjoy women, drink and food, it probably was a very easy task for cunning Mossad agents to motivate and push the stupid Arabs into the direction of committing suicide. Even much of the Muslim leadership, though incompetent, has willingly accepted credit for 9-11 for the most part--either because of pride or some other motivation.

With involvement from the CIA (which has almost unlimited amounts of money to funnel wherever desired; and thus, probably financed the whole operation), and the presence of the internal Nesher group in the US government (to hide and cover-up the truth behind the effort), the Mossad and her coconspirators could easily have carried this work off without a hitch.

It is no wonder that no one in the US government power structure has been interested in finding out the truth about the OC bombing or the 9-11 terrorist attacks--beyond blaming the designated patsies.

Since Amalekite Jews and federal agents (especially the FBI) have infiltrated and exploited much of the Christian right wing effort in the US in various ways over the last several decades (in organizing and creating acts of discontent and violence, as established in prior chapters), why not the same with the radical Muslim movements?

Mossad Manipulated Muslims

So while these ignorant and fanatical Muslims may actually think that they are pulling off various operations, the truth well could be that Mossad agents have infiltrated their organizations and are working behind the scenes and in a low profile to encourage, promote, plan and pull off the various events being blamed on the Muslims to further the goals of the American and British Amalekite bankers/masters.

In other words, maybe the planners of these operations (who could be intelligent, tough and professional Mossad agents) may only involve a limited number of people while most of the soldiers carrying out the work involve a huge number of set-up Arabs (this was precisely the situation in the South in the 1960s when a few FBI entrappers set up a larger number of gullible Whites/Ku Klux Klanners to carry out the work and take the blame).

In this instance, perhaps the smart Mossad people even let the Arabs think and believe that they are the ones planning and running the operations (and of course, taking credit for the operations). If true, maybe Osama bin Laden believes that he is the boss running things; when, in fact, maybe some of his aides or close advisors are actually Mossad agents who do the real planning and directing of events.

In WWII, the stupid Japs thought that they were making plans for war; when, in fact, the Amalekite deceiver Franklin Roosevelt was manipulating them from behind the scenes to do what he and the plutocrats wanted. The same thing has been true with the Ku Klux Klan and various right wing groups in the US which have thought to bomb Black Churches. These operations were all inspired and laid on by federal entrappers.

The point is that there is a body of evidence out there which would allow that the Mossad has infiltrated and taken over some part of the Muslim fundamentalist movement. With the evidence on the stock trades and the plans of the Amalekite led PNAC and NCP efforts in progress, it is highly plausible that the Mossad (probably working in cahoots with the CIA and other American agencies) pulled this scam off.

The Hegelian Dialectic

Of course, this whole operation on September 11th could be just one more action (possibly a combined CIA and Mossad conspiracy) involving the Hegelian dialectic (as described in previous chapters).

This option also gained some credible support from a December 2001 Berlin, Germany TV documentary which addressed the 1986 terrorist bombing of a Berlin disco which killed two American service men.

Though the incident was blamed on Arab terrorists, this new TV production furnished some evidence demonstrating a linkage between the terrorists and the Mossad and CIA (Dec 17, 2001, “American Free Press,” p. 1, 3).

The 1986 incident was blamed on Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi. Accordingly, US President Ronald Reagan responded by attacking Libya. The US attack killed 30 people, including an infant child of the Libyan leader (and Americans continue to wonder why the Arabs hate us so much).

In 2001, the big boys calling the shots have wanted a further move to US totalitarianism and they succeeded with this September 11th attack (since it occurred, most Americans quickly forgot about any sense of the Constitution and Constitutional rights).

As noted elsewhere herein, the Moslems have had a capability for terrorist attacks for quite some time now. Yet, something has restrained them (at least, until September 11, 2001, and afterwards to the fall of 2003).

As some observers noted, that something might have been the ruling plutocrats who simply were not quite ready for a major Islamic terrorist attack in the US. Perhaps when the plutocrats gave Osama and/or his Muslim colleagues the green light, they proceeded with the September 11th attack.

It’s hard to say what all was going on behind the scenes to promote the 9-11 assault. But something was happening.

Prophecy Club Views

In the Jan/Feb 2002 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 2-7), Stan Johnson offered the Prophecy Club view on why the evidence suggested a possible US operation in the September 11, 2001, attacks. Johnson gave fifteen compelling reasons--viz:

1. A news report (possibly Fox television) noted that an anonymous letter was sent to a radio station in the Caribbean which said that before the attack took place, two men discussed a plan to crash an airplane into the World Trade Center. The letter was turned over to the FBI with no follow-up action.

2. Before the attack, the Israeli Mossad reported to the CIA that a cell of 200 terrorists (with possible ties to Iraq) were planning a major operation on highly visible targets.

3. The FBI had prior knowledge that two known terrorists entered the US (al-Midhar and Nawaq Alhamzi, who were on flight 77 that hit the Pentagon). Yet, the FBI took no action.

4. Thousands of “Puts” (sell options on American Airlines and United Airlines, as noted previously) were traded on the US stock exchanges just before the 9/11 attacks

5. The Oklahoma City bombing took place on the anniversary of the Waco incident, allegedly because of the work of the FBI and ATF in the murder of the Branch Davidians. Yet, by some strange quirk, all the FBI and ATF agents were mysteriously absent from their offices on the day of the attack. Question, who was absent on Sep 11th (reportedly, many Amalekite Jews were missing from their work in the World Trade Center on Sep 11th--thus, did they know something in advance about the coming attack--ed)? Interestingly, the terrorists circled past the Pentagon and came back to crash into a specific part of the Pentagon (which curiously was under renovation and largely vacant of people, ed).

6. In 1995, the Philippine police found a laptop computer that belonged to a terrorist. It contained data indicating a plan to hi-jack commercial airliners and crash them into US structures (including the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the White House and the Transamerica Tower in San Francisco).

7. The FAA had been pre-warned about the dangers of a terrorist attack. Concerned pilots had went on record on how easy US airliners could be seized. Reportedly, some of the terrorists had been under FBI surveillance and the FBI intercepted messages from them saying that “There’s a big thing coming; They’re going to pay the price; and We’re ready to go” (Oct 1, 2001, “Newsweek”). Yet, no action was taken.

8. This same “Newsweek” said that US and Russian agents planned a military action against Afghanistan in June 2001 for oil profits. The Internet “Indiareacts.com” had a report out on Jun 26, 2001, that India and Iran would “facilitate” US and Russian planes for “limited military action” against the Taliban if new economic sanctions failed to bend Afghanistan’s fundamentalist Muslim regime (this report would confirm other such reports and suggest that the US and Russia had been collaborating for months on an attack on Afghanistan--ed).

9. On Nov 2, 2001, the French daily “Le Figaro” said that Osama bin Laden met with the CIA station chief while he was in the US hospital in Dubai in July 2001 for treatment of his chronic kidney infection (by Dr Terry Callaway). This secret meeting took place, despite the fact that Osama was allegedly a fugitive for the bombings of two US embassies and the USS Cole. A French Secret Service report on Sep 7th, given to the CIA, claimed that an attack would come on Afghanistan.

10. In May 2001, the US gave the Afghans $43 million in a grant (to be described below).

11. BBC on Sep 18, 2001, and the “Guardian” newspaper of Sep 22, 2001, both reported that Taliban officials held a secret meeting in Berlin with three US officials--Tom Simmons (former US Ambassador to Pakistan), Karl Inderfurth (former Assistant Secretary of State), and Lee Coldren (former State Department expert on South Asia). The Taliban were told (or threatened--ed) that the US planned a military assault against them in Oct 2001 if the Taliban did not agree to demands of the US (as will be further discussed in later comments).

12. In June 2001, German intelligence (the BND) warned both the US and Israel that Mid East terrorists planned on hi-jacking commercial aircraft and using them as weapons to attack important symbols of the American and Israeli cultures.

13. In the summer of 2001, a Iranian man notified US authorities of a planned attack on the World Trade Center the week of Sep 9th (Sep 14, 2001, German news agency “online.ie”).

14. A Sep 13, 2001, report from Reuters said that the FBI arrested an Islamic militant in Boston in Aug 2001 who had been taking flying lessons and was in possession of technical information on Boeing aircraft and flight manuals.

15. In the summer of 2001, Russian intelligence officials told the CIA that 25 terrorist pilots had been specifically trained for suicide missions. Yet, the US did nothing.

More From Johnson

In some follow-up reports, Johnson cited several other factors which seem most intriguing. First, he noted that the World Trade Center was designed as heat resistant and able to withstand crashing airplanes.

Yet, something happened to very quickly collapse both towers. Was it a bomb or bombs? There is some belief among Europeans that indeed bombs were used inside the buildings to help collapse them (Jul 8, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 3). Supposedly some explosions were heard inside the twin towers before or during the airplane crashes.

The Jul 15, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 3) had a follow-up story by Christopher Bollyn on “Foreign Media Shows Object Heading for WTC” which opened still one more possibility. Reportedly, some video footage was made showing the World Trade Center on 9-11 at the time of the airplane impacts. In some of the stills, something is seen streaking toward the building.

European news sources have showed this film and raised questions about what the object could be--like perhaps a missile of some sort?

Christopher Bollyn had one more relevant story on “New York Firefighters’ Final Words Fuel Burning Questions About 9-11” in the Aug 19, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1). This report discussed a recent revelation from a 78 minute audio tape made of the words of the firefighters who were in the building and died in the collapse of the South Tower.

Actually, some of the firefighters reached the 78th floor of the South Tower where the first plane struck. There were two pockets of fire and nothing suggesting panic or any inkling that the steel girders of the building were in any danger (especially since some engineers argue that fire has never caused a steel constructed building to collapse).

To collapse the girders, it would take temperatures of 1,700-2,000 degrees Fahrenheit which were doubtfully present (per the conversation from the firefighters).

Still More From Stan Johnson

Stan Johnson next quoted a BBC report of Sep 21, 2001, that noted in the communications from the passengers of American Airlines flight 11 (which crashed in PA) to Boston air traffic control, the names and seat numbers of four of the terrorists were identified.

Yet, when the FBI released the names of the alleged terrorists, none of the four were cited. In fact, four other people were named. BBC raised the question that maybe some of the alleged terrorists were not involved at all (but are still alive in some location).

The Prophecy Club report then delved into the money angle and noted that this war on Afghanistan has been in the planning stages for months. The goal was oil profits, to include plans for a huge oil pipeline to traverse across or adjacent to Afghanistan to reach Southeast Asia.

Next, Johnson cited James Bamford’s book on “Body of Evidence.” Per Bamford, there had been a secret plan for US intelligence people to commit acts of terrorism against American targets for US political gain (as happened when the Nazis burned the Reichstag building in 1933 and successfully blamed it on the Communists).

Apparently, this practice started under John F. Kennedy when the Joint Chiefs of Staff authorized “Operation Northwood” which was designed to blame Cuba for terrorist acts that would foment US public opinion against Cuba. Allegedly, Kennedy rejected this operation; which, per Johnson, may have contributed to his assassination.

The Oil Link

In some final remarks, Johnson quoted the June 4, 1992, “Houston Chronicle” with stories attempting to follow the Bush oil investment trail only to discover that the Bush family has financial ties to Osama bin Laden, of all people. Per the story, a CIA operative named James R. Bath guided money from Saudi investors to Bush oil firms in hopes of influencing US policy under George H. W. Bush.

As Johnson wrote-- “So here we are. Poised to unleash our military might in a war for profits which was planned months before the 9/11 terror. You and I would have never supported a war on the Taliban before the air attacks.

“But someone knew that. Someone calculated that in order to get you and me to sign off in the name of American pride and loyalty, and perhaps in the name of revenge and blood lust, it would require an extremely catastrophic and horrific event (as a matter of fact, this precise MO was followed in 1941 by the conniving Franklin Roosevelt to get Japan into a war that she could not win, as discussed earlier, ed).

“Someone calculated that to get Pakistan to risk civil war would require some super compelling event which would justify their aid to the U.S. (and huge payoffs to crooked Pakistani officials, as well, ed). Someone figured out that to get Iran to remain soft on U.S. actions in their backyard would require such an event, as well.

“What I fear, is that someone figured out what such an event might should best be. They next figured out how to engineer it, to fund it, and to execute it--in a way that made profits. Did Osama Bin Laden act alone? Was he the architect? Follow the money. Look who benefits. Look at whose fingerprints are on the war plans.”

Johnson’s perception received much confirmation from a BBC report which said that George W. Bush made his first $million in oil in a company named “Arbusto Energy” (Jan-Feb 2002 “America’s Promise,” p. 6). Arbusto was partly owned by Salem bin Laden, half-brother of Osama. Thus, it would seem that GWB has links both to Mid East oil and the Bin Laden family.

Cynthia McKinney

While the plutocrats and their Bush team people seem to have successfully pulled off a perfect scam over at least a cover-up of what happened and why for the September 11, 2001, terrorist activity, there are a few people around who have not willingly accepted the politically correct pitch from the White House and the controlled national media.

Of all people, a Black Congresswoman from Georgia named Cynthia McKinney seemed to be the most important public official who came forward to question the official line being spoon fed the American public by the plutocrats and their owned and/or controlled media powers and prostitute politicians.

In April 2002, McKinney came out with a public proclamation that there were some unanswered questions about the September 11th attack and she wanted a full scale congressional investigation into the matter.

The April 29, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 10) had a story by Sanford Griffith on “Representative’s 9-11 Accusations Earn Irate Attacks from Colleagues” to assess McKinney’s position.

The Congresswoman suggested that President George W. Bush and other persons in high places may have had some advance knowledge of the impending September 11th attacks and allowed them to take place for reasons which had not been made public so far. She noted that there were numerous warnings of the events to come on 9-11. So, what did the Bush people know and when did they know it?

Although McKinney did not name the Mossad as a player in the intrigue associated with the attacks, Griffith says that she hinted that she was aware of the allegations surrounding the Mossad and other Israeli intelligence people and their possible involvement or pre-knowledge.

Ms McKinney really got into deep water when she charged that “persons close to this administration are posed to make huge profits off of America’s new war.”

She particularly mentioned GWB’s father George H. W. Bush and his association with the earlier cited Carlyle Group (a $16 billion, Washington elite, investment firm, involving the Amalekite David Rubinstein and the Saudi Arabian Bin Laden family [thus, further tying the Bush family to Osama bin Laden]. Carlyle has widespread investments in the defense and energy industries--ed).

McKinney’s Own Words

In an article in the same “American Free Press” (p. 11), and in her own words calling for a congressional investigation, the Black Congresswoman said that “I am not aware of any evidence showing that President Bush or members of his administration have personally profited from the attacks of 9-11. A complete investigation might reveal that to be the case.

“For example, it is known that President Bush’s father, through the Carlyle Group had--at the time of the attack--joint business interests with the bin Laden construction company and many defense-industry holdings, the stocks of which have soared since Sept. 11th.

“On the other hand, what is undeniable is that corporations close to the administration have directly benefited for the increased defense spending arising from the aftermath of Sept. 11.

“The Carlyle Group, DynCorp, and Halliburton certainly stand out as companies close to this administration. Secretary Rumsfeld maintained in a hearing before Congress that we can afford the new spending, even though the request for more defense spending is the highest increase in 20 years and the Pentagon has lost $2.3 trillion.

“All the American people are being asked to make sacrifices. Our young men and women in the military are being asked to risk their lives in our war against terrorism while our president’s first act was to sign an executive order denying them high deployment overtime pay.

“The American people are being asked to make sacrifices by bearing massive budget cuts in the social welfare of our country, in the areas of health care, Social Security, and civil liberties for our enhanced military and security needs arising from the events of Sept. 11. It is imperative that they know fully why we make these sacrifices.

“If the secretary of defense tells us that his new military objectives must be to occupy foreign capital cities and overthrow regimes, then the American people must know why. It should be easy for this administration to explain fully to the American people in a thorough and methodical way why we are being asked to make these sacrifices and if, indeed, these sacrifices will make us more secure.

“We deserve to know what went wrong on Sept. 11 and why. Why then does the administration remain steadfast in its opposition to an investigation into the biggest terrorist attack upon our nation?

“If the administration cannot articulate these answers to the American people, then Congress must.

“This is not a time for closed-door meetings and this is not a time for secrecy. American credibility, both with the world and with her own people, rests upon securing credible answers to these questions.

“The world is teetering on the brink of conflicts while the administration’s policies are vague, wavering and unclear.

“Major financial conflicts of interest involving the president, the attorney general, the vice-president and others in the administration have been and continue to be exposed.

“This is a time for leadership and judgment that is not compromised in any fashion. This is a time for transparency and a thorough investigation.”

In her presentation, McKinney took note of a news report indicating that the United States government broke the communications code of Bin Laden before September 11th. Therefore, it would seem that the US was privy to the inside communications of the Bin Laden people for some time.

This seems to be a precise repeat of what happened in WWII when the Roosevelt people knew almost everything in advance on what the Japs were planning to do. While Roosevelt and his helpers knew, the US military people out in the field did not know. Thus, the December 7, 1941, Japanese attack was carried off without the US doing anything to prevent it.

More From Sanford Griffith

While McKinney’s remarks and calls for an investigation evoked contempt from the woman’s fellow congressmen and senators and from the US White House, the controlled media generally refused to even give her words the time of day (although the Apr 12, 2002, “Washington Post” called them “partisan”). Thus, her calls for an investigation fell on largely deaf ears.

Sanford Griffith’s article in the “American Free Press” (p. 10) went on to outline the reaction in Washington. Political leaders of both parties tried to make fun of her words. The White House spokesman Ari Fleischer (an apparent Amalekite) said “all I can tell you is the congresswoman must be running for the hall of fame of the Grassy Knoll Society” (in reference to the JFK murder conspiracy, as mentioned earlier).

The Washington leadership of both parties also made reference to the Grassy Knoll in Dallas. Some people with the Carlyle Group even tried to laugh at her and tie her remarks into the continuing concern from UFO bluffs over the Roswell situation.

In other words, the ruling plutocrats outlined the politically correct and approved position on the Kennedy assassination and the Roswell incident (both of these subjects have been discussed earlier herein). When the controlled national media parrots these approved positions to the gullible people, the people are simply expected to immediately believe and accept the official positions without question.

Obviously, if any person tries to go against the approved line (of lies), then the ruling authorities and media pundits will attack that person as being a “nut.”

It would seem that the current way of ridiculing and making fun of opponents who think for themselves is to refer to the Grassy Knoll in Dallas or Roswell (both of which locations have created some interest in people that the US government has deceitfully lied to the American people).

More on Cynthia

Actually, this was not the first time that Congresswoman McKinney angered and upset the Amalekite plutocrats ruling America. She had spoken out before. She said that Democrat Al Gore’s Negro tolerance has never been too high. She contended that many people “prefer to have black people seen and not heard” (Apr 26, 2002, “The Week,” p. 10).

She also hits Jews on occasion--which really upsets the US apple-cart. Naturally, the Anti-Defamation League has labeled her an anti-Semite for daring to question US policy toward Israel and the Arab world (American Amalekites went all out in the summer of 2002 to use vast sums of money to defeat Cynthia in the 2002 primary elections. So she is now out of the Congress).

As McKinney indicated, the George W. Bush administration had steadfastly opposed any idea of an investigation into what happened on September 11, 2001. Of course, the ruling plutocrats through their owned and/or controlled national media sources had fought the idea from day one. Probably, Cynthia’s words were destined to die on the vine and nothing would ever be done.

Still More From Cynthia

Just a few days after Ms McKinney made her calls for a genuine investigation into the activities of George W. Bush and the Muslim attacks on 9-11 (and the efforts of the plutocrats, politicians and controlled media to ridicule and demean her for daring to raise a question about the spin of what happened on 9-11), a series of FBI, CIA and other reports began surfacing that showed that the Bush Administration did have advance knowledge of what was coming down the pike (as elaborated upon herein).

The unfolding of these revelations made Congresswoman McKinney repeat her earlier call for a legitimate investigation of the Muslim attacks and the reaction or involvement of the George W. Bush administration.

This renewed calling for an independent and impartial investigation was spelled out in the June 10, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 3) in a report by McKinney on “McKinney Rebukes 9-11 Cover-Up.”

McKinney charged that in her previous call for a Congressional investigation, she was derided as a conspiracy theorist by the White House, right-wing talk radio hosts (i.e., Rush Limbaugh is a known George W. Bush asset who almost never sees anything wrong coming from the Bush administration), and spokespersons for the military-industrial complex.

Even McKinney’s patriotism was questioned because she dared to call for an investigation into the most disastrous intelligence failure in American history. McKinney’s colleague from Georgia, Senator Zell Miller, called her “dangerous, loony and irresponsible.”

Cynthia went on to charge that the Bush Administration had been engaged in a conspiracy of silence. If some committed people had not pushed for the present disclosures on US intelligence failures, the new revelations would have continued to be hid from the public’s eyes.

This same “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news report that the “Los Angeles Times” had joined with McKinney and the “American Free Press” in demanding an independent outside investigation over 9-11. While Congress may do some investigating, the reality seems established that the truth will never be told.

An After Report

As an after-math of Cynthia’s efforts to have a Congressional investigation into 9-11, Cynthia was defeated in the Democrat primary in Georgia for re-election to Congress (as noted above). A more loyal Democrat team player (another Black woman) was chosen by the Negroes in the heavy Democrat district.

With growing pressures over the 9-11 incident, President Bush was eventually forced into doing something. So he appointed a so-called investigative panel to look into the 9-11 attacks. GWB chose the Amalekite master crook Henry Kissinger to head up the panel. One thing for sure, there wouldn’t be any unscripted findings with people like Henry in charge (though Henry resigned before he could pay back GWB).

In Henry’s work and the work of his successor and colleagues, it’s possible that the panel involved may find that a few low-level flunkies in the CIA and/or FBI made some mistakes. But we can be sure that these people will never find anything wrong with the efforts of Bush and his Black national security team, nor would the panel ever touch upon “why” the attacks took place. So America will never know the truth.

Gore Vidal

The highly successful and well known left wing writer Gore Vidal was quoted by Fred Lingel, in a story on “Author Says Bush Knew” in the Nov 11, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 17). Lingel’s article in the AFP was prompted by a 7,000-word commentary by Vidal on “The Enemy Within” which claimed a “Bush junta” in using the 9-11 attacks as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and abuse civil liberties at home.

As late as November 2002, Vidal said that “We still don’t know by whom we were struck that infamous Tuesday, or for what true purpose. But it is fairly plain to many civil libertarians that 9-11 put too much (of a strain) on our fragile Bill of Rights and our envied system of government.”

Thus, per Vidal, the real reason for the war on terrorism was to control the gateway to Eurasia and Central Asia’s energy riches. In order to accomplish these objectives, both Republican and Democrat administrations were aware that the American public would resist any war in Afghanistan without a widely perceived, massive external threat.

Vidal adds that “Osama (bin Laden) was chosen on aesthetic grounds to be the frightening logo for our long-contemplated invasion and conquest of Afghanistan... the administration is convinced that Americans are so simple-minded that they can deal with no scenario more complex than the venerable, lone, crazed killer who does evil just for the fun of it ‘cause he hates us because we’re rich ‘n ‘free ‘n he’s not.”

In going on, the popular author noted that the actions of Bush on the day of the attack were, in themselves, suspicious. Bush was in a school classroom in Florida and remained there (and even after being told of the first airplane hit on the World Trade Center) until after the second plane hit the twin towers in New York.

Of course, it is very possible that Vidal is on the right track in his analysis. Subsequent chapters herein will address the oil question and the after-effects of 9-11 from the standpoint of the numerous new tyrannical laws that were put on the books because of 9-11 and the supposed threat of terrorism.

Jon Basil Utley

The above quoted June 10, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had another interesting news report. This one was on the feelings of Jon Basil Utley, a fellow at the libertarian Ludwig von Mises Institute and a former correspondent for Knight/Ridder news service. Utley asks one short question-- “Cui Bono,” or who benefited from 9-11?

In offering an answer, Utley zeroed in on three possibilities--the neoconservative warhawks, the military-industrial complex and the Israeli lobby.

Robert Baer

In the Sep 2002 “Radio Liberty” newsletter (p. 1), Dr Stan Monteith quoted author Robert Baer, as follows: “The other day a reporter friend told me that one of the highest ranking CIA officials had said to him, off the record, that when the dust finally clears, Americans will see that September 11 was a triumph for the intelligence community, not a failure.”

It is strange that Baer would quote a CIA official with those words--unless the CIA official knew some things about the Sep 11, 2001, terrorist attacks which were not commonly known by the public?

If the attacks were actually a success and not a failure, is it possible that they were planned and schemed in advance to accomplish some hidden agenda of America’s rulers?

Chapter 474--War on Terrorism IV

Some History

To further appreciate why the Muslims may have accomplished the attack on September 11th, it is imperative to review some history.

Significantly, the US has steadfastly supported the state of Israel since 1948 and during the continuous Muslim-Jewish conflict in the Middle East. The merits of this support have been argued from time to time by different factions.

But the Amalekite controlled media has successfully spun it as a necessary thing--right or wrong! Frankly, this writer supports much of that support (for my part, it would have been well to send US troops to Jerusalem to insure the safety of religious Jews and particularly to help them if it would bring on the new Third Temple).

This US-Israeli linkage has made virtually the entire Muslim world hate Americans (as noted previously with the US attack on Libya). The US has become “the Great Satan” in Moslem eyes. As discussed in a preceding chapter, a March 2002 Gallup Poll found that most Muslims don’t like America (contrary to what the controlled media tells the gullible American voters).

Prominent Americans

Former Congressman Pete McClosky of California has charged that Israel no longer deserves its special relationship with the United States, and that Israel is making a deliberate effort to make her enemies the enemies of America (Jun 3, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 11).

Former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan blames the 9-11 attacks on “compulsive intervention” by the United States. He adds that “We finally got bit...we must stop stepping on rattlesnakes” (ibid, p. 11).

Bin Laden’s View

The Dec 16 & 23, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 22) had a story on the “U.S. Media Suppression of News is Criminal” which broached an alleged Nov 2002 letter from Bin Laden (as reported in Arabic on the Internet) on why he and his colleagues are fighting and opposing the US and what are they calling on America to do (or what do they want from America).

Osama’s answer to the first question was simple-- Because America attacked them first and continues to attack them.

The second question was more complex. But Bin Laden offered several reasons--like: America must stop its oppression, lies, immorality and debauchery. America must be a people of manners, principles, honor and purity. America must reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling and trading with interest.

America should not permit usury (interest), as a result of which “the Jews have taken control of your economy, through which they have taken control of your media, and now control all aspects of your life making you their servants and achieving their aims at your expense.”

America is a nation that “permits the production, trading and usage of intoxicants.” America is a nation that “permits acts of immorality.” Noteworthy is the behavior of President Clinton whom “you did not bring to account, other than that he ‘made a mistake,’ after which everything passed with no punishment.”

America is a nation that permits “gambling in all its forms.” Companies practice this in making investments, enabling “criminals to become rich.” America trades in sex and exploits women “like consumer products or advertising tools calling upon customers to purchase them,” and then allegedly supports the “liberation of women.”

America has used its “forces to destroy mankind more than any other nation in history; not to defend principles and values, but to hasten to secure your interests and profits. You who dropped a nuclear bomb on Japan, even though Japan was ready to negotiate an end to the war.”

And America has a “duality in both manners and values” and “hypocrisy in manners and in principles. All manners, principles and values have two scales; one for you and one for the others.”

Bin Laden also states that the US, while claiming to be the vanguard of human rights, has taken thousands of Muslims and Arabs into custody with neither reason, court trial, nor even disclosure of their names (this practice will be more fully discussed in a later chapter).

The Real World

Since most of the political states in the Muslim Middle East are under dictatorships, some of the dictators have pretended to be US friends in the interest of collecting money from America.

On behalf of the ruling plutocrats, US politicians have gladly shelled out huge sums of the American taxpayer’s money to these dictators. Many of the governments there have been on the US payroll for years (like Egypt and Jordan, and even the Palestine Liberation Authority, under Yasser Arafat).

As is true with US paid dictators around the world, the dictators get to steal much of the money and sock it away in Swiss banks. After all, most of these dictators fully understand that their future power positions are limited, and one day they will have to flee for their lives. When fleeing, it will be good to have a secret Swiss bank account stashed away.

The realities of this simple truth goes on to explain why and how so many of the Middle Eastern countries linked in as allies with the US in the Gulf War as promoted by George H. W. Bush in the 1990s. As noted in an earlier chapter, each one of these allies has been or will be handsomely paid off in vast US, European or IMF moneys to get them to at least publicly give support to the plutocratic objectives.

Although many of these dictators pretend to be friends and allies of Washington, the truth is that they and their peoples all collectively hate the US. For sure, if a true democracy was installed in any of these nations, the dictators would be immediately kicked out and the new rulers would break all ties to the US.

The Plutocrats

Besides the Israeli support, there is another pressing issue which also has contributed to this Muslim hate of the US. As cited above, and in previous chapters, US plutocrats have successfully used US politicians, dollars, military, assassinations, student unrest (as fomented by the CIA), etc to impose their wills around the world in order to make more profit and gain.

The ruling plutocrats have been extremely busy in the oil rich Middle East. For a long time now, the plutocrats and US government officials have worked closely with the Saudi Arabian royal family (which just happens to be Edomites, instead of Arabs, as previously discussed) and tin horn dictators (like the Emir of Kuwait) to get their share of this oil money.

A Very Specific Example

Some years ago, the US government and ruling plutocrats tied in with the Shah of Iran to exploit Iranian oil and minerals. Things went well for some time and particularly with the Shah’s use of his secret police (the Slavak, as briefly mentioned earlier) to brutally torture, murder and suppress the people.

While it is unclear how much of a role the CIA played in establishing the Shah’s secret police powers, one can be sure that the agency was ever in the background assisting, helping and advising the Shah and his colleagues on how to brutally rule the people. Thus, in time, the people came to hate the Americans and their ties to their hated dictator.

The opportunity for action came in 1979 when the exiled Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and his Muslim fundamentalist allies seized power. One of the first steps of the militants was the seizure of American hostages which were held for some time before finally being freed during Ronald Reagan’s administration (in Jan 1981).

The 1980s then saw a war of sorts develop between Iran and Iraq. The US quickly rushed in to supply aid and assistance to Iraq since its leader, Saddam Hussein, had apparently been marching to the tune of the US plutocrats (also, as discussed earlier). This war ended in a stalemate.

Another Example

Then, in the early 1990s, Saddam turned his attention to the plutocrat’s ally--the Emir of Kuwait (allegedly because Kuwait was slant drilling and stealing oil from Iraq, as cited in a prior chapter). Reportedly, Saddam thoughtfully checked in with his US advisors to see if it would be all right for him to proceed with an invasion and conquest of Kuwait (as briefly commented upon in a preceding chapter).

The story is that the US Ambassador (April Glaspie) gave him the green light (as mentioned in the former chapter). So he proceeded. To his surprise, the plutocrats designated him enemy number one for trying to steal the Kuwaiti oil wells.

General Butler, Revisited

This double crossing and changing of allies (as illustrated in the Middle East) was mentioned by the previously cited General Smedley Butler, in his book “War is a Racket” (p. 7-8).

Butler noted that when the Russian-Japanese war erupted in 1904, the US kicked out her Russian allies and sided with Japan. Why? Because US international bankers were financing Japan and America had to side with the banker’s friends (yet, within 35 years, the US changed allies once more--by defining Japan as an enemy).

In terms of WWI, Butler (ibid, p. 46-48) gave this assessment: “Woodrow Wilson was reelected president in 1916 on a platform that he had ‘kept us out of war’ and on the implied promise that he would ‘keep us out of war.’ Yet, five months later he asked Congress to declare war on Germany.”

On this change of strategy, the question must be asked as to why? The general then answered the why with one word-- “money.” For the background on this reality, Butler outlined the results of an allied commission which called on the President just before he made his war declaration. This group told Wilson:

“There is no use kidding ourselves any longer. The cause of the allies is lost. We now owe you (American bankers, American munitions makers, American manufacturers, American speculators, American exporters) five or six billion dollars.

“If we lose (and without the help of the United States we must lose) we, England, France and Italy, cannot pay back this money...and Germany won’t.” Obviously, Wilson responded the right way. He called for war.

Incidentally, most people in the know realize and understand that the average American only has a memory span of three months.

When Woodrow Wilson called for war some five months after he had won the previous election as the peace candidate, he fully understood that the American people had already forgotten his pledges in the campaign. He was free to go ahead with the plutocratic calls for war.

George H. W. Bush’s Gulf War has been discussed above and in a previous chapter (where some of the same intrigue took place). There is no need to rehash that presentation. Suffice to say, Muslim hatred toward America has steadily gone up over the years since the Gulf War.

The Focus on Afghanistan

Also, as commented upon in previous remarks, the US turned her attention to the situation in Afghanistan (per orders/direction of the US plutocratic rulers). There, the Soviets were allied with the ruling government. But again, there was a Muslim fundamentalist motion underway to bring down the government. The US rushed in on the side on the dissidents--the Mujahedin (who the Soviets called terrorists).

The story is told that the CIA tried to get a Saudi prince to come to Afghanistan and provide some leadership to the rebel army. The Saudi royal family members were not interested, but they suggested Osama bin Laden. Evidently, Osama agreed, became a paid asset of the CIA, moved to Afghanistan, and eventually became linked to the Taliban in the Mujahedin rebel group.

Besides being linked in with the CIA, the Jan 7-14, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 17) had a story that Osama was also closely connected to the FBI. As early as the spring of 1986, Bin Laden and an associate came to the US and had a meeting with CIA people and a former top FBI official on the role of the US in Afghanistan. Osama was reportedly traveling under the alias “Tim Osman.”

This meeting took place at the Hilton Hotel on Ventura Blvd in Sherman Oaks, California.

People present included former FBI official Ted Gunderson, a scientist named Michael Riconosciuto, businessman Ralph Olberg (who worked the State Department’s Afghan desk), newsman Orlin Grabbe, two representatives of the Afghan rebels, Tim Osman and possibly others (Feb 11, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 13).

Apparently, after returning to Afghanistan, the US (on behalf of her ruling plutocrats) began supplying money, aid, arms and assistance to the Mujahedin and other rebel groups (including the Taliban) fighting the established government and the Soviets. CIA agent Osama was on the US payroll for years. His family, back in Saudi Arabia, continued to get huge US construction contracts and pay offs.

In his Sep 2002 “Radio Liberty” newsletter (p. 3), Dr Stan Monteith tells how the US tied in with the Saudis and Pakistanis to fund and promote the Taliban in Afghanistan. Stan quoted author John Cooley, who wrote: “...two Islamic powers, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, allied with the ‘world’s only remaining superpower,’ the United States, had by 1994 hatched a monster of Islamist extremism, the Taliban movement.”

More

As late as May 2001, US Secretary of State Colin Powell met with the Taliban and doled out a US grant of $43 million (per the May 22, 2001, “Los Angeles Times”) to ostensibly help Afghanistan farmers (who mainly grow opium for export to the West--meaning that the grant was probably made on behalf of the Amalekite Mafia to keep the drug flow coming, ed).

As a matter of information, one of the fall-outs of the US war against so-called terrorism in Afghanistan was that the drug flow was back on line in the fall of 2002.

As cited earlier, a news item in the Nov 8, 2002, “The Week” (p. 16) said that Afghanistan was once again the world’s largest opium producer--production would reach 3,400 tons in 2002, up from the 185 tons produced under the Taliban regime (evidently, the 185 tons was the maximum or total produced before the Taliban successfully eliminated the production).

A later news report in the Mar 28, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A4) put the actual 2002 opium production in Afghanistan at 3,750 tons and noted that it was totally wiped out under the Taliban. Obviously, opium production has exploded up under the US control over the nation in 2002. Now, it becomes more clear on why this war had to be fought and why the Taliban had to be removed from power.

In another side issue here, the earlier quoted Jan/Feb 2002 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 6) had a report from the Center for Public Integrity that drug money was used in the successes of Halliburton during the five years that Dick Cheney was in charge there. The Brown & Root subsidiary (cited earlier) of Halliburton and Dick Cheney, himself, connect to the international drug trade on more than one occasion.

In any case, the US financed and supported rebels in Afghanistan succeeded in running the Soviets out. After a brief power play under the Mujahedin, the Taliban rebels eventually took over and Osama was given a place of refuge by the Taliban. This was very logical and made sense because both he and they were Muslim fundamentalists. They enjoyed much common ground on the religious question.

The Balkans, Revisited

It was just after the rise to power of the Taliban and her ally Osama bin Laden that the US called upon this same crowd to help her in the Clinton declared war on Milosevic and the Yugoslavians (as noted in the prior chapters).

Of course, CIA agent Osama and his Muslim fundamentalists were anxious to join in with the Albanian Edomites and their US allies in their efforts to keep the drug trade intact. Hence, more US money went to Osama and the Taliban.

Too, there was another profoundly important factor at work in the Balkans which has proved to be most fantastic.

Along with the drug flow in Kosovo, another development surfaced in May 2002 when three former Muslim security officials in Bosnia (a part of old Yugoslavia) were arrested for working with Iranians on setting up terrorist training camps in Bosnia in 1995 (May 24, 2002, “The Week,” p. 6). The three men were top officials of the Party of Democratic Action.

If the Muslims in Bosnia were involved in training local Muslims in terrorist activities (in the sense that Bosnia was a terrorist training area, much like the one allegedly in Afghanistan), is it not highly certain that the same type of terrorist training was going on in Kosovo? Of course, Osama bin Laden would have been anxious to keep this effort going. So he had another reason to support the Muslims there.

The peculiar fall out of this training is that it would appear that the United States (under Slick Clinton) joined in with Osama bin Laden in not only keeping the drug flow flowing, but in keeping terrorist training camps in operation in the Balkans. Certainly, this happened in Bosnia and probably nearby Kosovo as well.

Yet, in 2001-2002, George W. Bush came along and declared a war of sorts against the Muslims in Afghanistan for allegedly allowing terrorist training camps to exist in her territory. Was this being hypocritical or not?

A Lover’s Quarrel?

However, sometime after the Taliban take-over and Clinton’s war in the Balkans, Osama and his CIA handlers possibly got mad at each other and had a falling out. Or at least, this is the impression that has been conveyed in the past few years with America’s war of words about him and his evils (as well as the US missile attacks by Clinton against Afghanistan on Aug 20, 1998, to supposedly take Osama out).

Smoke and Mirrors?

There was still another event in 1998 which provided some more powerful evidence that Osama and the plutocratic money power in America (possibly through its agents in the CIA or the White House) had a falling out.

A May 2002 money appeal letter from B’nai B’rith, signed by International Director Daniel S. Mariaschin (p. 1), quoted Bin Laden as saying in 1998 that “We--with God’s help--call upon every (one) who believes in God and wants to be rewarded...to comply with God’s order to kill Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it.”

Of course, this reported quote could be merely some window dressing or smoke and mirrors that was engineered by the CIA to make people believe that Osama was truly an enemy of the US (when, in fact, maybe he was still on the US payroll). Thus, this quote may not be the indictment that the public was led to believe.

To this day, the reason for this supposed US and Osama fall-out (if it actually occurred) has never been made public. Though this writer is uncertain as to what happened between the two bed partners, something supposedly happened and they allegedly became enemies (just as Manuel Noriega and the US broke their long friendship after a fall-out/lover’s quarrel).

Possibly, Osama wanted more money and payoffs from America or perhaps he rebelled in some way and refused to take US plutocrat orders or perform some ordered function.

More on Osama

In any case, the two allies possibly became enemies in the late 1990s and Osama was soon designated a terrorist and accused of various terrorist attacks. However, a question must be asked here--did the former two bed partners become real enemies? Or is it possible that Osama is still on the CIA payroll and still works for and serves the ruling US plutocrats?

The Sep 16, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 14) had a story by Christopher Bollyn on some reports from France (fueled by a writer named Thierry Meyssan) which indicated the possibility that a military faction in the US government used remote control to guide two aircraft into the twin towers and that a US cruise missile smashed into the Pentagon (the remote control view was shared by the previously quoted Hutton Gibson, parent of the famous screen star Mel Gibson, in Hutton’s perception that anybody can put up a passenger list [of Arabs, to supposedly prove their involvement]--May-Jun 2003 “America’s Promise Newsletter,” p. 7).

This Bollyn story noted that the US government had in its possession some pictures from a Pentagon TV camera which seemed to show evidence of a missile streaking toward the Pentagon on 9-11. This film was given a high security classification and was hidden from the public. Apparently, in the summer of 2002, CNN obtained a copy of this film and actually showed it.

If this 9-11 operation was a set-up (for whatever reason--like maybe to provide an incident to allow the US to attack and demolish the Taliban in Afghanistan, as was being planned), then the case can easily be made that Osama is indeed still on the US payroll. It is always fascinating that Osama and most of his chief aides were never killed or captured in the US war against Afghanistan, to be discussed below.

Thus, one can build the case that the two colleagues (the US and Osama) never had a falling out at all. In fact, Osama might still be on the US payroll, as just allowed. Thus, it is very conceivable that the US used Osama as a lackey, stooge or inside entrapper to set the Taliban Muslim fundamentalists up for liquidation (since they are/were clearly opponents of the plutocrats and the coming New World Order).

US Spies in Al Qaeda?

Besides the possibility that Osama has been on the CIA payroll all along, another most fascinating news items surfaced in the Jun 3, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2). Per the report, the CIA had an Afghan person in the al Qaeda camp on its payroll for two years. This Afghan spy was paid nearly $50,000 for his services (per the “Los Angeles Times”).

A later follow-up news report in the May 26, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 2), quoting “USA Today,” noted that US intelligence had “agents,” in the plural, inside al Qaeda and reportedly heard something about a coming terror operation against the US.

Regardless of how many CIA spies were on the US payroll inside the al Qaeda network (both in or out of Afghanistan), the official US position is that the Muslim terrorist attack plot for September 11, 2001, in Washington and New York, was not discovered in advance. Apparently, the spies accomplished nothing of value (and if so, why were they on the payroll?).

In support of the possible CIA involvement, the Dec 24, 2001, “American Free Press” paper (p. 2) had a news report quoting Wayne Madsen, Washington correspondent for “Elsevier Science.”

Apparently, some evidence has even surfaced suggesting that American Taliban fighter John Walker Lindh might even conceivably have been a CIA agent, informer or colleague in some manner at some point in time. If Lindh was not on the US payroll, there is always the possibility that the CIA did try to recruit him for undercover work among the Muslims.

While it appears that the US did proceed with prosecuting Walker for his involvement (and the judge gave him a twenty years sentence), one must be careful about concluding what the true status of Lindh might have been in reality.

Besides Lindh, the Jun 10, 2002, “U.S. News & World Report” (p. 17) had a story by David E. Kaplan on “Made in the U.S.A.” which suggested that “hundreds” of Americans have fled to Middle Eastern countries to join the Muslims in fighting their jihad against the West. Hundreds of young Americans means something greater than 199 of them.

As a minimum, it clearly demonstrates that something is fundamentally wrong in America to cause this flight of young Americans to abandon their country and roots and go to a foreign land to fight against Americans and/or American ideals. Of course, many of the these people could be secret CIA agents. So it might not be as shocking as it first sounds.

Objectives Met?

It might well be significant that the plutocratic objectives were met on 9-11. After all, one must be curious that the entire Taliban operation was bombed into oblivion in Afghanistan.

Yet, Osama bin Laden and his alleged terrorist network (al Qaeda) were largely undamaged and continue to function. The May 10, 2002, “The Week” (p. 7) had a news report that both Osama and his top lieutenant and deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has been seen recently in Pakist