EZEKIEL

 

and YHWH’s

 

 Judgment

 

 

for the

 

Good News

 

PEOPLE

 

 

 

VOLUME XXIX

 

Amalekite Conspiracy

 

 

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

 

 

Judgment for the

 

 

 Good News People

 

 

 

 

Volume XXIX--Amalekite Conspiracy

 

 

 

 

 

by

 

an unworthy servant

 

 

 

 

 

 

And you shall know the truth,

 

and the truth will make you free.

 

(John 8:32)

 

 

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho.  The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States.  Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

 

 

Volume XXIX--Amalekite Conspiracy

 

 

CHAPTER                                                                              PAGE

 

 

      -                  Cover Page                                                                                                         1

 

      -                  Title Page                                                                                                             2

 

      -                  Contents                                                                                                              3

 

      -                  Publisher’s Preface                                                                                           5

 

 

Part KKKK--Judges 9 

 

      449             Judges 9                                                                                                              6

 

      450             Media Control                                                                                                   14

 

      451             Amalekites in Many Places                                                                            25

 

      452             The Early Amalekite Push to Rule                                                                29

 

      453             Some Amalekite Successes                                                                           33

 

 

Part LLLL--The Amalekite Internationalists 

 

      454             The Amalekite Conspiracy                                                                             43

 

      455             The Modern State of Israel                                                                             50

 

      456             Control of the Israeli Government                                                                 58

 

      457             Israeli Politics and Peace                                                                               61

 

      458             The Amalekites Versus Religious Jews                                                       73

 

      459             The Secularization of Religious Jews                                                          87

 

      460             Israeli Intelligence Organizations                                                                  97

 

      461             Amalekite Control in the West                                                                       99

 

 

Part MMMM--The Cunning Amalekites 

 

      462             Amalekite Plotting in the West                                                                     105

 

      463             The Amalekites Call the US Shots                                                              111

 

      464             Yes, Amalekites Control US Politics                                                           118

 

      465             Clannish Edomites                                                                                        129

 

      466             Double Crosses and the Amalekites                                                          136

 

      467             Amalekite Sabbatianism                                                                               151

 

      468             Amalekites, in Conclusion                                                                           161

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

 

 

Publisher’s Preface

 

Greetings!  The following presentation is volume twenty-nine of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site. 

 

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world.  In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one. 

 

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material.  It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message! 

 

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1.  It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins:  left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers). 

 

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope. 

 

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers.  May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him.  Shalom (peace) to you and yours! 

 

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 449--Judges 9

 

 

Abimelech 

 

Along the same line of thought from the previous chapters on the allegorical meaning of the word "tree" in the Scriptures, the book of Judges (chapter 9) has an interesting parable about a man named Abimelech who decided that he would take charge and rule over other people at a very early time.  He actually came to be one of the OT judges (a usurper), who ruled Yisrael for three years (Jud 9:22). 

 

The Judges 9 parable concerns the olive tree, the fig tree, the vine, the bramble bush and seemingly others.  As the story goes, the olive tree was too busy to rule over the other trees; also, the grape vine was too busy; and the fig tree was too busy. 

 

But the bramble bush stepped forward and arrogantly asserted that he would rule the trees (Jud 9:1-57).  And he would have continued to do so were it not for YHWH’s apparent act to intervene and cause problems for Abimelech, evidently after three years (Jud 9:22-23).  This sounds much like an ante-type of the age end Beast. 

 

In explaining the Judges parable, the point was conveyed that Abimelech, an evil man, who killed 70 of his half brothers, was the bramble bush, which Young's "Analytical Concordance" says is a low thistle or thorn bush.  As a person can quickly discover in an assessment of this prophecy, it is profoundly important in the scheme of things if correctly understood. 

 

 

Identity of the Trees 

 

Elsewhere, in other Scriptures, the identity of the various trees are stated and made plain.  For example, Yisrael, possibly in her unified sense, is the olive tree (Ps 52:8; 128:3; Jer 11:16; Hos 14:6).  On this, it is also true that sometimes Yisrael prophetically, is, or will be in the future, a "green" olive tree--implying one that is fresh and flourishing (per Young's). 

 

In fact, this olive tree symbol probably is referring to not only Israelites generally, but more precisely to Israelites who have been transformed to the true Hebrew religion or will be so changed in the future with the reality of the coming New Covenant. 

 

In the way of preliminary support for this thesis, Moshe wrote that the children of Yisrael were to be a kingdom of priests and a separated and set apart (Hebrew kodesh) nation (Ex 19:3-6).  With this background, the Apostle Shaul’s opening remarks on the olive tree allegory (mentioned in prior chapters) also referred to the olive tree in the context of being "kodesh" and consecrated (Rom 11:16). 

 

Manifestly, the words of Moshe and Shaul combine to add a definite religious dimension to the racial factors associated with the olive tree.  Obviously too, in this context, individual Israelites are olives or olive trees, as the Book also states (Zech 4:3-12; Rev 11:4). 

 

Consequently, in these cited examples of the "olives," all of the persons involved in the descriptions are not only Israelites, but they are undoubtedly, more correctly, Israelites of the true religious faith of YHWH, as observed by Avraham, Moshe and certain others throughout history.  This fact substantiates Shaul’s just mentioned remarks. 

 

 

The Vine 

 

Going on, one finds that the vine is clearly identified as the House of Yisrael (Jer 6:9; Hos 9:10; 10:1; Joel 1:7). 

 

Again, the prophet Yirmeyahu had some more perceptive comments when he actually went so far as to say that the House of Yisrael was not only a vine, but one planted as a choice vine.  This choice vine had went on to become one with degenerate shoots of a wild, strange (nokri) vine--evidently because of a subsequent transition into a melting pot of various humans/humanoids (Jer 2:21). 

 

Here, please note that even though they were degenerate shoots of a wild vine, they still remained a vine.  Therefore, if one follows the same analogy with the olive tree, which must be done, then it follows that the wild olive shoots outlined by Shaul are Israelites, regardless of the fact that they are wild and cut off from the good stem. 

 

The whole thrust of this reference by Shaul is that the grafting in process has to address Israelites (who had been divorced and/or cut off from YHWH and thence "wild"), whomever they might be, and wherever they might be located (in a new wilderness land).  There is just no way that any other persons could be involved in this message. 

 

 

The Fig Tree 

 

As the Scriptures assert, the fig tree is clearly the Jews and/or the House of Yehudah (broached earlier), as Yirmeyahu so correctly observed--many centuries ago (Jer 24:1-10).  Please note, again, that by Yirmeyahu's perception, there were both good figs-Jews, as well as bad figs-Jews. 

 

And also, as mentioned earlier, it could be that The MESSIAH’s outline of the parables of the sheep and goats (Matt 25:32-33) and of the wheat and tares (Matt 13:24-30) both address the situation with the Jews (as well as with Yisrael generally). 

 

Perhaps it is because of this exact situation (of good figs and bad figs being present together) that the fig tree symbolizes the House of Yehudah and/or the Jews, collectively.  After all, the Jews have undergone a process of miscegenation with nokri/nekar aliens over the centuries, coupled with an outright amalgamation of numbers of Kenites and Amalek-Edomites.  Truly, the racial Jews are a product of good and bad. 

 

It is no wonder then that YESHUA would so often refer to the fig tree when He sojourned among us (Matt 21:19-21; 24:32; Mk 11:13, 20, 21; 13:28; Lu 13:6-7; 21:29; John 1:48, 50).  Not only did He make these frequent references about the fig tree; but in one instance, He even placed a curse upon it, as outlined previously (Matt 21:19-20; Mk 11:13-14, 20-21; Lu 13:6-9). 

 

A question can surface here on "why" for the curse?  Assuredly, the fig tree has had some "bad" qualities and features (perhaps the just noted presence of the nokri/nekar Amalekites) to probably justify the condemnation and curse.  Yet, despite this fact, YESHUA does allow for its ultimate rebirth and blooming in the age end (Matt 24:32; Mk 13:28).  Incidentally, did this curse end in 1948 or 1967?  It could be! 

 

 

James 3:12 

 

Additionally, on this theme, Yakov (Jas 3:12) elsewhere observes that a grape vine cannot bring forth figs (so the House of Yisrael could never be the Jews), nor can a fig tree bear olive berries (hence, the wild olive shoots cannot be Jews from the House of Yehudah).  Here, one might pause to refresh his/her thinking with the earlier citation of YHWH's act of pruning off some of the natural, olive branches (Rom 11:23). 

 

Paradoxically, if a fig tree cannot produce olives, as Yakov clearly said, then it seemingly cannot bear wild, olive shoots or even natural, olive branches to be pruned off, as indicated by Shaul.  The answer to this enigma is obviously complex and this writer would dare not attempt to be dogmatic in interpreting it. 

 

However, the solution to this dilemma probably lies in the definition of the trees.  Perhaps both the vine and fig tree are addressed from a strictly fleshly viewpoint; while evidently, the olive tree involves both fleshly and spiritual dimensions, as noted above and as will shortly be elaborated upon. 

 

Consequently, it might well be that the broken or pruned off olive branches constitute "good" Jews, both from a religious and racial perspective.  So the place one can come to here is that the House of Yehudah, collectively (the fig tree), is not responsible for the production of the good Jews (from both a religious and racial context). 

 

 

Bad Figs 

 

Incidentally, on this idea that there was something wrong with the House of Yehudah which did act to preclude her from totally producing "good" Jews (figs), one only has to consider Yirmeyahu’s remarks (Jer 24), cited earlier, in conjunction with Shaul’s comments about the pruning of the olive tree, as discussed earlier. 

 

Indeed, it is evident that the House of Yehudah has been extremely responsible for sin and miscegenation, coupled with her outright acceptance, assimilation and integration of numbers of Amalek-Edomites and other nokri/nekar strangers into what should be the true, recognized, legitimate remnant of Yisrael. 

 

Manifestly, the overall House of Yehudah and/or the collective Jews have been grossly damaged; though certain, individual, true Jews could maintain their own personal integrity and religion and remain good figs. 

 

In support of this possibility, there are a host of good reasons to believe that the stem and/or root system of the olive tree not only goes back to the patriarchs and their ability to fleshly produce seed; but also, to them in terms of their personalities, characters and their true, Scriptural, Hebrew religion (which played a role in establishing the character of their progeny). 

 

To be sure, the House of Yehudah, on her own merit, seems to have produced many "bad" figs and therefore cannot bring forth olives, as Yakov asserted (Jas 3:12). 

 

The good (racial and religious) figs found in the remnant of the House of Yehudah might be there--not because of the leadership, policies, actions and thinking of the collective Jews or the House of Yehudah; but rather, are there in spite of such adversities. 

 

Hence, it is possible that the Jewish branches, which were broken off of the olive tree by YHWH, were, in fact, both racially and religiously, good ones drawing upon their ancestry and the Hebrew religion for sustenance.  Truly, it is this Israelite racial and religious system which has produced the good Jews and not the corrupt practices of the fig tree House of Yehudah or the Jews collectively. 

 

Admittedly, in time, and perhaps during the Babylonian exile or later, the true Hebrew or Israelite faith was contaminated by a few unscriptural Talmudic factors, probably traceable to the bad figs who had become so entrenched in the House of Yehudah.  But can one condemn the whole religion of Judaism over the pollution which had crept in?  This question was assessed in former chapters. 

 

 

The Thorns 

 

However, in returning to the Judges 9 prophecy, please observe that the bramble bush, under discussion, is a low life, thorn bush (obviously, producing thorns and briers).   Of most importance for interpretation, the Canaanite inhabitants of the land of Yisrael and apparently other nokri/nekar aliens (including the Edomites, who crossed with the line of Cain) were clearly called thorns (Num 33:55; Jud 2:3). 

 

Moreover, these very thorns (Amalek-Edomites and/or Canaanites) could well have been the precise thorn in the flesh which bothered Shaul and possibly others in New Testament times as well (II Cor 12:7).  As a matter of information, the idea of someone being a thorn in the side of another person is a very old figure of speech which is still used today.  

 

For example, the April 8, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 19) had a news report by Douglas Waller on “The Thorn in His Side, Part II” with a photograph of President George W. Bush and his long standing opponent, Senator John McCain.  Nothing needed to be said beyond the headline and the photograph; because, for some years now, McCain has been one of the primary opponents and critics (yes, a thorn in the side) of GWB. 

 

Manifestly, it would be easy to see that this expression had some recognition and use in ancient times.  Of course, by letting the Scriptures define themselves, it is clear that the thorns and briers were certain racial/ethnic peoples who did cause much trouble and concern to the various Scriptural people of Yisrael. 

 

Someday, some, many or all of these thorns and briers will meet their YHWH ordained fate and judgment--they will be eventually burned up, as was described earlier (Isa 9:18; 27:4). 

 

 

A Tree is Known by its Fruit 

 

In the NT, there is an interesting text which also seems relevant here.  On this, YESHUA said that you can know men by their fruits and that men cannot pick grapes from thorns (thorn bushes) or figs from thistles (Matt 7:16).  Moreover, a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, nor can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 

 

Every tree that does not bring forth good fruit will be cut down and cast into the fire--in judgment by YHWH (Matt 7:17-19).  Manifestly, grapes (which are House of Yisrael Israelites) cannot come from a thorn bush; nor can figs (at least true, Jewish, Israelite figs) come from thistles. 

 

Therefore, persons of Canaanite, Amalekite and/or Satanic ancestry cannot possibly be Israelites.  Since they cannot be Israelites, they seemingly cannot be converted or become a part of Yisrael in any definition.  They are corrupt and evil and will one day be judged by YHWH. 

 

Of course, this whole discussion on the thorns and bramble bush has to be significant because it may tie in some way to the genealogy of the Jews, as was discussed elsewhere in this study in terms of YESHUA's commission which seemingly omitted the Jews (Matt 10:5-6). 

 

 

“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” Revisited 

 

This linkage of thorns to the Amalek-Edomites has support from the Sabbath teachings of ancient Jewish synagogues.  Specifically, Piska 2 has a commentary on Proverbs 15:19 in the context of a slothful man being like a hedge of thorns.  The slothful man is supposed to be Esau (in allegory, the Jews evidently thought that this was Rome in Second Temple days). 

 

Thus, the Amalek-Edomites are like a prickly hedge to keep jabbing at a man to bring on the head tax, general tax, agriculture tax, animal tax, etc.  When the man cannot pay the excessive taxes, Esau exacts heavy fines and imposes drastic penalties (“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” p. 23). 

 

Does this sound familiar in terms of the modern House of Yisrael nations, now being controlled and heavily taxed by Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters? 

 

 

Edomite Thorns Tie to Idolatry 

 

“The Book of Legends Sefer Ha-Aggadah,” with legends from the Talmud and Midrash, links thorns to idolatry in two amazing ancient stories (p. 43). 

 

An item number 53 offers some comments upon Genesis 25:22, in the vein of Rebekah’s pregnancy.  The story is that when she would pass a synagogue or house of study, the unborn Yakov was scurrying in his eagerness to get out.  And when passing houses of idolatry, the evil Esau was scurrying in his eagerness to get out. 

 

In a commentary on Genesis 25:27, and the remark on the growth of the two boys, Yakov and Esau, an item number 55 quotes R. Levi, who said that (at first) the boys were like a myrtle and a wild rose growing side by side.  As they grew up, the former (Yakov) would yield its characteristic fragrance (reho) and the latter (Esau) its thorns (hoho). 

 

Going on, the boys studied and went to school until age 13.  At the end of the 13 years, one son (Yakov) went to houses of study and the other (Esau) went to shrines of idolatry. 

 

 

Abimelech From Cain? 

 

In going back to Abimelech and the parable from Judges, please recognize that though Abimelech was a son of Gideon, he also was a mixed blooded son of a slave woman from Shechem (Jud 8:31; 9:18).  The question now surfaces--was this woman a Canaanite or Edomite, so that Abimelech was a nokri/nekar racially? 

 

Well, as a matter of fact, the Book does link in tandem the presence of the Canaanite men of Hamor to Shechem, the home and base of support of Abimelech.  Possibly, his mother and some or even all of the other peoples of Shechem were Canaanites and thus nokri/nekar thorns. 

 

Additionally, on this, an article in the Winter 1992 "Radical Reformation" (p. 30), by Wayne S. Nelson, on the Book of Judges, discusses this issue and concludes that the author of Judges “implicitly identifies Abimelech as morally and spiritually a descendant of Cain and therefore of the seed of the serpent.” 

 

Though Nelson does not attempt to link Abimelech to Kain on physical, racial grounds, this condition must not be overlooked.  If Naamah was the wife of Ham, as Jewish tradition has it, then the Canaanites (to likely include Abimelech through his mother) were surely of the lineage of both Kain and Kain’s father (Gen 3:1-4, 12; II Cor 11:3; I Jo 3:12). 

 

Regardless of Abimelech's true racial background, the writer of this study would have to agree with Mr Nelson.  And this might all have something to do with why the Jews were not enumerated in YESHUA’s commission, which was discussed in preceding chapters. 

 

The very mention of Shechem is relevant because the Talmud says that Shechem is the place where bad things happen and the place “set aside for punishment” (Sotah 11a, Jan-Feb 2001 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 9).  As noted earlier, Jewish tradition has it that Eliphaz lurked after Yakov at Shechem.  And per Ben Sira, the evil Edomites dwelt at Shechem.  Shechem is further addressed in other remarks elsewhere herein. 

 

 

Yeshayahu's Perception 

 

This presentation on the thorns creates a need here to mention a very important prophecy by Yeshayahu--which he interestingly saw fit to repeat.  Early on, he realized and said that in a coming time of doom for the House of Yisrael, the vine of Yisrael would be removed from its inhabited land and only thorns and briers would remain (Isa 5:6; 7:25; 32:13). 

 

It would appear here that, in effect, these words by Yeshayahu would apply at least to the ancient House of Yisrael, if not to the ultimate age ending House of Yisrael.  And what remained in the land (Samaria) after the fall of Yisrael in the 7th and 8th centuries BCE?  Why, nokri/nekar Cutheans, Canaanites, Edomites and others who took the land over (all of whom appear to be thorns and briers, symbolically in the Book). 

 

Obviously, Yeshayahu, in prophecy, was not allowing for the Samaritans, Canaanites, Edomites and other mamzer peoples in the land to be linked to the vine of Yisrael which was removed.  Assuredly, as Yeshayahu saw it, all of these persons were not Israelites; but were, in fact, thorns and briers.  The essence of this is that the Samaritans and the others are not of Yisrael, contrary to the wishes of some who would so argue. 

 

There is a final consideration on these amazing prophecies by Yeshayahu.  Since prophecy is dual and repetitive in fulfillment and since the House of Yisrael faces a second, coming period of punishment from YHWH for sin (Ezek 4-7), it is evident that when the House of Yisrael is once more thrust into captivity for the last time, only thorns and briers will remain in her then existing land (Isa 5:6; 7:25; 32:13). 

 

 

The Bramble Bush 

 

Going back to the Judges allegory under discussion, the bramble bush is clearly linked to Abimelech.  But there has to be more to this parable than just a focus on Abimelech.  Frankly, it would appear that the whole story is one of far reaching prophetic implications--if one could but understand it. 

 

Both Mattityahu (Matt 7:16) and Luke (Lu 6:44) say that a tree is identified by its fruit and that neither grapes or figs, racially, come from the bramble bush (which produces thorns, as noted above).  Consequently, it must be surmised that the bramble bush is categorically not of true Yisrael. 

 

Who then, ethnically or genetically, is the bramble bush?  Elsewhere, in the Word, it is useful to note that at a described fall of Edom, thorns and brambles surfaced therein (Isa 34:13). 

 

Thus, could brambles be linked in some way to the Edomites?  Evidently, the answer is yes--in view of their links to Kain (from Esau’s marriages with Canaanite women and possible other ties to the Kenites) and the bramble bush’s arrogance of power, as suggested in the Abimelech prophecy. 

 

Hence, this likelihood intensifies as one considers the situation in the first centuries BCE and CE when the Herods (Amalek-Idumeans) ruled over the Jewish remnant, the Temple and part of the Palestine area.  One of the several complaints about Herod’s rule was his devotion to high taxation upon the common people (“Judaism From Cyrus to Hadrain,” p. 336, 364). 

 

High and oppressive taxation was also one of the things mentioned about the Edomites in Piska 2, cited above.  Truly, the same thing has happened today.  Thus, in more modern times, Amalekite Khazars, using their great riches and wealth, are in enormous positions of strength and influence over the House of Yisrael and other portions of the globe at large.  They still love high taxes. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 450--Media Control

 

 

The Amalekite Media Power Base 

 

If there is one single definition that has materially contributed to the incredible success of the Amalekite Jews to literally steal the Christian West and implement fantastic control measures (right and left) which are and will utterly destroy Adam in the Christian West (and particularly, in the House of Yisrael nations and peoples), it is the media and entertainment industries. 

 

Literally, on the surface, there would seem to be an incomprehensible array of thousands and thousands of newspapers, magazines, Internet sources, movie studios, radio and television companies and so forth in the Christian West.  At a first glance, many observers would believe that this mass of businesses and activities is totally divided and competitive to the last drop.  But that belief is not the truth. 

 

The December 27, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 12-13) had an article by Michael Collins Piper on “Handful of Families, Corporations Controlling the Global Media Monopolies,” previously cited, which got to the heart of the problem by laying out most of the major firms and interconnections and owners (most of which involve evil Amalekite Jews). 

 

Since whole books have been and can be written on this theme, the comments herein will be limited.  But a few names and connections will be outlined to prove the point. 

 

 

AOL-Time-Warner, Revisited   

 

Previous comments herein on Amalekite crime briefly mentioned the situation with the AOL-Time-Warner Company and several of its major Amalekite owners, players and controllers over the years (like the previously described Bronfman family and its vast holdings). 

 

While some persons could lose sight of the Amalekite presence by becoming impressed with Ted Turner and his ties to AOL-Time-Warner (actually, Turner’s former ties because the Amalekites moved in on him and removed him from power in AOL-Time-Warner, as pointed out earlier), the fact remains that AOL-Time-Warner’s major bosses are largely Amalekite Jews. 

 

How big is AOL-Time-Warner?  It is enormous (a $350 billion company)--owning many movie and video companies, various cable franchises, Turner Broadcasting (including CNN), numerous magazines (Time, People, Sports Illustrated for Kids, Life, Fortune, Money, etc), many major book publishers, AOL (America On-line, the giant Internet service provider--with the early 2000 merger) and on and on. 

 

The Seagrams (liquor) Company, mentioned in a prior chapter, is (or has been) also owned and/or controlled by the Bronfmans.  It is another big player in the media and entertainment industries.  Seagrams is a major stockholder in AOL-Time-Warner--plus Universal Studios, the Universal Music Group, Polygram and other major music and television companies across Europe. 

 

 

More Media Control 

 

The previously mentioned Rupert Murdoch (Amalekite?) owns or controls a whole assortment of media enterprises all over the world, through his News Corporation--including the New York Post, the Weekly Standard and Fox Television. 

 

Another likely Amalekite Jew, Michael Eisner, runs Disney Corporation; which in turn, owns or controls ABC radio and television, Miramex Films (under the leadership of the two evident Amalekites named Harvey and Bob Weinstein) and a whole host of newspapers, other publishers, television companies, etc (locally and globally). 

 

The VIACOM Company is one more of the huge media and entertainment companies with major holdings in Paramount Pictures, MTV and the Blockbuster video chain.  It is also in the process of acquiring CBS radio and television from Westinghouse. 

 

VIACOM is headed by Sumner Redstone (whose name doesn’t sound like an Amalekite name; but since he has close ties to the Israelis and looks like an Amalekite, he probably is one). 

 

General Electric controls NBC, CNBC, the Bravo cable channel, Arts & Entertainment, the History Channel and Court TV.  It is unclear as to how much of General Electric is in Amalekite hands.  But one can be sure that much of it is owned/controlled by Amalekites. 

 

SONY is another large media and entertainment giant, ostensibly controlled by Japanese billionaire Oboyki Idei (who is thought to be a front man for the behind the scenes Rockefellers--per “Spotlight”).  As pointed out elsewhere herein, SONY seems to be an acronym for Standard Oil of New York. The Rockefellers seem to be Christian Amalekites as well (as noted earlier and to be addressed in the following chapters). 

 

The German media company Bertelsmann (established in 1835) is the next major media player.  This company owns Random House Publishing and many other publishing enterprises scattered all over the world. 

 

 

Still More From “Spotlight” 

 

As is true for General Electric, “Spotlight” did not spell out the Amalekite ownership and/or control of Bertelsmann.  But it is a certainty that Ashkenazi Amalekites are heavily involved.  That’s why WWII was fought--so that the plutocrats could steal much of Germany and Japan. 

 

The “Spotlight” article said that there were eleven major companies which controlled the bulk of the American media industry in 1989.  Today, there are the nine powers, as described above.  As the “American Free Press” noted in a 2002 article, two of these nine power centers are owned by one family.  This source also noted that every single supermarket tabloid is owned by just one, single, super-rich, Wall Street firm. 

 

The “what is happening here” question can be simply stated.  Media power is being centralized into fewer and fewer hands (mostly Amalekite Jews), which is the same phenomenon happening in all businesses all over the world. 

 

If all of that wasn’t enough, it is interesting that the Bush people have a plan afoot which will further centralize media power into fewer and fewer hands.  This story was brought out by Michael Collins Piper on “Media Giants Crave Absolute Control” in the Dec 16 & 23, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 20). 

 

Per Piper, the Federal Communications Commission (the FCC, under the chairmanship of Colin Powell’s son Michael) is considering a plan to loosen or do away entirely with regulations that limit the number of newspapers and radio and television outlets that a single company can own.  This will open the door for a handful of Amalekite Jew bankers/masters to completely take over the whole industry. 

 

Amalekite big shots like Mort Zuckerman, S. I. Newhouse, the Bronfmans and others will quickly move to consolidate their media powers once the industry is deregulated.  They then can more easily control the political future of the US. 

 

Incidentally, a former chapter briefly mentioned the situation in Russia where the Amalekite Khazars have been attempting to take control of the Russian media business.  The billionaire Zionist leader and evident Amalekite, Vladimir Gusinsky (or Gushinsky), has owned much of the Russian economy, plus one important Moscow TV station (which he may have lost or is losing). 

 

 

Vivendi 

 

While the above cited nine major media players have and still seem to control the essence of the media and entertainment businesses in modern America, another development surfaced temporarily in the early 21st century to further complicate the question of centralization into a few hands. 

 

The basis of this new development was a Frenchman named Jean-Marie Messier who controlled Vivendi, the world’s largest drinking water company in France. 

 

Within the last couple of years (in 2000-2001), Messier and his colleagues branched out into the US media and entertainment market in a big way to form another media giant, appropriately called Vivendi.  Vivendi’s story was told in the April 29, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 50-51), in an article by Daren Fonda. 

 

Apparently, the method that Messier used to get into the US media and entertainment markets was through a major acquisition of some of the stock of the liquor company Seagram, which was controlled by the super rich Bronfmans (in a stock trade of Vivendi stock for Seagrams, which allowed Edgar Bronfman Jr to become the Vice-Chairman of Vivendi). 

 

Thus, Messier moved in on Seagrams; and in turn, the process allowed him to take temporary control of various publishing, music, telecom and Internet operations (in the form of the Vivendi media empire, per “Time”).  In total, this conglomeration is or was a $55 billion global giant which certainly puts it in the operations of the other media power houses. 

 

The entire article in “Time” (“The French Rejection,” by Daren Fonda) failed to clarify at least a couple of relevant points of concern.  Obviously, in 2000-2001, there had to be a question of the continuing role of the Bronfmans and AOL-Time-Warner.  Was the Bronfman power block still directly involved with Universal Studios or did they exit the Hollywood scene with the arrival of Messier? 

 

As 2002 developed, Messier allegedly didn’t do very well in running the Vivendi media empire or something else happened to place him at odds with the real Vivendi controllers (who, as it turns out, were the Bronfmans).  So Messier was kicked out.  Another Frenchman named Jean-Rene Fourtou took over Vivendi as Chairman. 

 

The Jul 15, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 37-41) had a follow-up story by Daren Fonda on the intrigue in a story on “French Fiasco.”  Apparently, Messier put together the Vivendi media giant and Edgar Bronfman Jr and some of his colleagues later joined forces to kick Messier out and replace him with Fourtou (this action proved who really was running Vivendi). 

 

The essence of these stories from “Time” seems to be that the Bronfmans were the power players behind the scenes pulling the strings at the new media giant Vivendi and that people like Messier and Fourtou have been only front men.  In other words, the Bronfmans and their AOL-Time-Warner giant may still run things, but in the background and with a much lower profile. 

 

The second big issue that one must broach in this new look is whether Messier and the later Fourtou were Amalekite crooks or not.  Reportedly, Fourtou’s real name is Jean Bernard Levy, suggesting that he is indeed an Amalekite Jew who has changed his name (Jul 21, 2003, “American Free Press,” p. 1).  The situation with Messier still remains unclear.  But he too could be an Amalekite Jew crook. 

 

The fact that that both of the Frenchmen are probably in the billionaire class makes one be very suspicious that both of them are Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in order to play games with the super rich Bronfmans.  In which case, it only means that some new Amalekite faces have arrived on the media block. 

 

 

More on the Newspapers 

 

The Washington Post Company is another major media company in alleged Amalekite hands (the Meyer-Graham group).  The Post not only controls the newspaper and Newsweek magazine, but a 50% interest in the International Herald Tribune and the Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News Service, plus numerous other publications and TV stations. 

 

The famous Reuters news service of Europe was created by and owned by the Rothschild family  (“The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 21). 

 

Some eight more major media companies own and/or control almost all other major newspapers in the US, plus a large number of radio and television companies, magazines, book publishers, etc. 

 

This list includes the New York Times Co. (owned or controlled by the apparent Amalekite Sulzberger family), Advance Publications (which includes 26 newspapers, plus the weekly Parade magazine--owned or controlled by the likely Amalekite Newhouse family), Gannett Co., Cox Enterprises, E. W. Scripps Co., Hearst Corp., Times Mirror Co. and Knight-Ridder, Inc. 

 

Besides this list of traditional newspapers, all of the major super-market tabloids are owned by one single Wall Street firm (as noted above).  

 

“Spotlight” also quoted a prominent media analyst and critic named Ben Bagdikian who says that some 50 men and women (who are chiefs of their corporations) control more than half of the ideas and information reaching all Americans daily.  No wonder it is called the controlled media. 

 

How many of these 50 are Amalekites was not stated.  As already noted, most of the American media and entertainment industries are in Amalekite Jew hands.  So clearly, many of the 50 are Amalekites (who also are likely bankers/masters and leaders within the Amalekite Jew community).  Obviously too, the Rockefellers also still retain some media power (but not much in comparison with the European based Rothschilds). 

 

The tragedy of this centralized control of the media means that a handful of people (apparently all or most all of them are Amalekites racially or at least janissaries, as cited earlier and to be further defined below) decide what is and what is not news.  They decide which politicians are acceptable for rule and which are not.  They decide which wars are good and which are not.  They decide what is truth and what is not. 

 

Since this combine is so limited in numbers and tightly controlled, it is clear that this small group of people can sit around a table and decide the future of the United States and much of the world.  They are so powerful that the gullible people (whose source of news, information and thinking comes from this cabal) is completely mesmerized and controlled by them. 

 

This Amalekite led group almost completely controls the thinking in the United States and the White British Commonwealth nations (like Australia, Canada, etc).  They are also extremely powerful in South America and Africa.  Though they do have enormous power in continental Europe, they do not control all of the European media sources yet.  Perhaps their weakest area is Asia where there is some independence. 

 

 

More on the Media Stranglehold 

 

The April 1, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. A-1 and A-2) had a lead story on “The Media is the Enemy” which illustrated how far this stranglehold has gone.  Previous chapters and the above presentation have already mentioned the enormous Amalekite Jew power over the media and there is little need to repeat those lines. 

 

The “American Free Press” said that “In the old Soviet Union, the government controlled the media.  Not a word of substance would be published without prior approval from the Bolshevik commissars.  Today, in the United States, the situation is starkly similar.  But most Americans--most sheeple--don’t even know it. 

 

“In the United States today, it is a select handful of superrich families and tightly-knit financial interests--a plutocratic elite--who own the Big Media and who control the government through their ownership of that media. 

 

“Every single one of the major media outlets is controlled by this powerful interlocking combine...ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago-Tribune--even such ‘regional’ giants as The New Orleans Times-Picayune, The Miami Herald, the San Diego Herald Tribune... The list goes on and on. 

 

“And these media powerhouses control dozens--actually thousands--of other daily and weekly newspapers, magazines, and radio and television outlets across America (and around the globe.)  Did you know that every single supermarket tabloid is owned by just one, superrich Wall Street banker? 

 

“To consolidate their influence, the Masters of the Media and their international corporate allies reward obedient lapdog journalists with membership in the Council on Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission where they rub shoulders with others in the international policy-making networks.  A handful get promoted to the higher rank of the secret Bilderberg Group. 

 

“The so-called ‘mainstream’ media is very much a ‘closed shop’ and only those willing to do the bidding of the global power elite need apply.  Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather and Peter Jennings and other phonies are just the public faces that the American people see. 

 

“Behind the scenes are the shadowy owners and corporate power brokers who dictate what you will (or will not) see in your daily newspaper or on the evening news. 

 

“The average American has no idea that superrich predators with names like Rockefeller, Rothschild, Bronfman, Newhouse, Murdoch and Redstone are making vast profits and achieving immense power through their stranglehold on the American media (and increasingly, on media around the globe.) 

 

“These shadowy media controllers decide which politicians are ‘in’ and which politicians are ‘out.’  (They made Bill Clinton overnight.  They also broke Richard Nixon overnight.) 

 

“The Masters of the Media decide which issues can--or cannot--be debated.  (Imagine a public debate over the Federal Reserve system on Ted Koppel’s Nightline.  It will never happen!) 

 

“The Masters of the Media promote the perverse, anti-Christian Cultural Communist ideology that permeates publishing and broadcasting today.  The Masters of the Media decide which are the ‘good wars’ and which are the ‘bad wars.’  The Masters of the Media decide who is the ‘hero’ and who is the ‘villain.’ 

 

“If the Big Media decides that you will be the patsy, then the patsy you will be.  It’s that simple.  Ask Lee Harvey Oswald or James Earl Ray or Gordon Kahl or Randy Weaver or the victims of Waco.  As we said:  THE MEDIA IS THE ENEMY.” 

 

 

Bernie Sanders 

 

The Jul 15, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1) had an article on the controlled US media which quoted US Congressman Bernie Sanders of Vermont.  Sanders said: 

 

“One of our best-kept secrets is the degree to which a handful of huge corporations control the flow of information in the United States.  Whether it is television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books or the Internet, a few giant conglomerates are determining what we see, hear and read. 

 

“And the situation is likely to become much worse as a result of radical deregulation efforts by the Bush administration and some horrendous court decisions. 

 

“Television is the means by which most Americans get their ‘news.’  Without exception, every major network is owned by a huge conglomerate that has enormous conflicts of interest.” 

 

Of course, Sanders is on the mark in his remarks.  The only thing that he left out is that most of this control is exercised by a handful of Amalekite Jewish bankers/masters. 

 

 

Harold Wallace Rosenthal, Revisited 

 

Some years ago, US Senator Jacob Javits of New York (a certain, Amalekite Jew) reportedly had a young, Jewish, administrative assistant named Harold Wallace Rosenthal (a likely Amalekite, who was discussed in preceding chapters).  Rosenthal, age 29, was killed on Aug 12, 1976, in an alleged sky-jacking incident on an Israeli airliner in Istanbul, Turkey. 

 

In 1976, just before Harold’s death, Walter White Jr, editor of the “Western Front” magazine, interviewed Rosenthal for a story (per a pamphlet on “The Hidden Tyranny, the Rosenthal Document,” p. 1-18).  Before publishing the report, Rosenthal was dead and White, himself, was badly beaten.  White thinks Rosenthal was murdered by his own people (the Mossad?) because he had a big mouth.

 

In the interview with White, Harold was most revealing.  For instance, he said:  “We Jews continue to be amazed with the ease by which Christian Americans have fallen into our hands.  While the naive Americans wait for Khrushchev to bury them, we have taught them to submit to our every command” (ibid, p. 1). 

 

In terms of the US money given annually to Israel, Harold noted that “The naive politicians in Washington are gullible.  Most of them are not too bright so the powerful Jewish lobbyists influenced this practice years ago and there is no one strong enough to stop it” (ibid, p. 6). 

 

On anti-Semitism, Harold suggested that it “does not signify opposition to Semitism.  There is no such thing.  It is an expression which we Jews use effectively as a smear word--used to brand as a bigot like you guys--anyone who brings criticism against Jews.  We use it against hate mongers” (ibid, p. 6-7). 

 

Regarding why Jews change their names when moving into various countries--Rosenthal said that “Jews are the most intelligent people in the world so if it benefits them to change their names they do so.  That’s all there is to it” (ibid, p. 8). 

 

 

More From Harold 

 

Going on, Harold noted that “...We would all have better understanding between each other--Jews and gentiles--if we spoke out more openly.  Your people don’t have guts.  We establish your thinking--we even place within you a ‘guilt complex’ making you afraid to criticize Jewry openly” (ibid, p. 11). 

 

On Jewish control of money, Rosenthal said that “At first, by controlling the banking system we were able to control corporation capital.  Through this, we acquired total monopoly of the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television media.  The printing industry, newspapers, periodicals and technical journals had already fallen into our hands.  The richest plum was later to come when we took over the publication of all school materials.  Through these vehicles we could mold public opinion to suit our own purposes.  The people are only stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them, whether they be truth or lies” (ibid, p. 15). 

 

Regarding the silent majority, Harold pointed out-- “There is no such thing as the silent majority because we control their cry and hue.  The only thing that exists is an unthinking majority and unthinking they will remain, as long as their escape from our rigorous service is the opiate of our entertainment industry.  By controlling industry, we have become the safety valve of momentary pleasure.  The television and movie industries furnish the necessary temporary distraction.  These programs are carefully designed to appeal to the sensuous emotions, never to the logical thinking mind.  Because of this, the people are programmed to respond according to our dictates, not according to reason.  Silent they are; unthinkable they will remain” (ibid, p. 15-16). 

 

In a comment on religion, Harold said “With our control of the text book industry and the news media, we have been able to hold ourselves up as the authorities on religion.  Many of our rabbis now hold professorship in supposed Christian theological seminaries.  We are amazed by the Christians’ stupidity in receiving our teachings and propagating them as their own... These deluded children of the Church defend us to the point of destroying their own culture... Through our influence of religion we were able to involve the ignorant white Christians in war against themselves which always impoverished both sides while we reaped a financial and political harvest.  Anytime truth comes forth which exposes us, we simply rally our forces--the ignorant Christians.  They attack the crusaders even if they are members of their own families” (ibid, p. 18). 

 

 

Jack Bernstein, Revisited 

 

A preceding chapter quoted an American Jew named Jack Bernstein.  Jack went to the state of Israel before 1970 as an immigrant.  Bernstein, an Ashkenazi, married a Sephardi girl and started a family.  In time, he became disillusioned over the gross evil and wickedness that he found in the Israeli state.  He returned to the US and began a program to inform Americans about conditions in the Israeli state. 

 

Jack published at least a couple of writings to discuss his findings.  One of them, “My Farewell to Israel, The Thorn in the Mideast,” was quoted extensively in a prior chapter on the Modern State of Israel.  One of the subjects which Bernstein brought up in his Farewell booklet is the issue of the media and how the Ashkenazi Zionists control it. 

 

In the first place, Jack charges that the Zionists and the Zionist oriented international bankers control the American media, TV, radio, magazines, newspapers, etc.  With this control, they paint a false picture about the Israeli state which is designed to get America into one of their planned wars in the Mideast (ibid, p. 2). 

 

Subsequent chapters and Appendix D will address the 2002 and 2003 moves of the George W. Bush administration to do precisely this very thing--as the drums of war have been sounding quite loudly for more Bush wars in the Middle East.  For sure, Jack Bernstein’s prediction could have much merit. 

 

 

Jack and the Protocols 

 

Jack Bernstein quoted the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” extensively (which will be more fully broached herein in a succeeding chapter).  While many Jews argue the validity of the Protocols, Jack wrote in the vein that they represent truth and the efforts of Zionist and Zionist oriented international bankers to control the world. 

 

As already noted earlier herein, whether the Protocols are a Jewish writing or not matters little in the long run--because they have been coming true in the last 100 years. 

 

The most important Protocol quotations from Bernstein was the 7th and 12th Protocols which addressed Ashkenazi Jewish control of the media (ibid, p. 14-15). 

 

In the 7th Protocol, Jack noted that it cited the power of the Jewish controlled press to stimulate public opinion and force the goyim governments to adopt measures which support the Jewish plans for world conquest.  Jack says that since the Zionists control the press, they give out the news they wish--tell the truth, distort it, or omit it.  He goes on to say that they found out the power of controlling the press. 

 

Protocol number 12 also tackles the media question by focusing upon Jewish control over the news media and publishing only what the Jews allow.  This Protocol also asserts that the Jews already dominate the minds of the goyim and only allow them to see world affairs through colored lenses, which the Jews place before their eyes. 

 

Jack says yes that the Zionists manipulate the minds of the stupid goyim and the average stupid Jew as well.  He charges that goyim and Jews will continue in this vacuum as long as they read the Washington Post, New York Times and other Zionist owned publications. 

 

 

The Effect of This Media Control 

 

The above comments of Rosenthal and Bernstein bring up another subject.  A previous chapter discussed the Doctor Laura program and how incredibly deceptive it has turned out to be for the whole American conservative movement--involving both Christians and Jews.  As outlined heretofore, Laura is either a racial-ethnic Amalekite; or she, as a minimum, is a janissary robot. 

 

As reported earlier, a man named Richard Hoskins of Lynchburg, Virginia used (and defined) this janissary term in some of his writings long ago--which evidently focused upon Amalek-Edomite Jews or at least upon the controlled media and entertainment industries and how Amalekite Jews and government authorities have been able to completely change American values and beliefs in the last 70 years. 

 

In the context of its use, a janissary is a person who is not an Amalekite racially or ethnically.  But he or she has been trained, brainwashed, mesmerized and indoctrinated to blindly believe in, support, teach, advocate and push the Amalekite agenda for the destruction of true Israelites with the same dedication, purpose, resolve and commitment as a real Amalekite.  

 

As established in the previous chapters on this line, a janissary is a robot or zombiized individual who has no mind of his own, but only functions in a state of confusion and daze of blindly following the Amalekites and their agenda--without the foggiest notion of what the result will ultimately be for him and his people. 

 

A preceding chapter on media control, in the context of humanism, assessed more of the several factors at work in the modern House of Yisrael nations to turn the generic Israelite population into janissary robots who blindly follow the evil Amalekites down the road to Israelite destruction.  These remarks do not need to be repeated here. 

 

Of course, this motion is propelled primarily by the media and entertainment industries (which today, are essentially in Amalekite Jew hands, as outlined above).  However, there are other influences at work as well to also push and prod this condition into being.  These were assessed in the former chapters and/or will be addressed in the following presentations. 

 

 

Dan Israel 

 

In his book on “Christianity Unmasqued” (p. 233), writer Dan Israel quoted a 1928 statement to Americans made by an apparent Amalekite Khazar Jew named Marcus Eli Ravage.  Marcus said “You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces.  Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. 

 

“But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws, and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day.”  Ravage was an honest and perceptive Jew who understood the reality of America--even as early as 1928.  Imagine how this influence has accelerated in the early 21st century. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 451--Amalekites in Many Places

 

 

A Surprise 

 

While the economic might and political strength of numerous Jews (like the Rothschilds and Lazards, who are evident Amalek-Edomites) are well known in New York, London and Hollywood, not much of the general public has been cognizant of the fact that many leading, supposed Christians are also Jews of sorts, like the popular Roosevelt (or correctly the Rosenfelds) family as well as George W. Bush and Slick Clinton, all cited earlier. 

 

Even much evidence has surfaced indicating that the original Christian Rockefellers were Jews (if so, clearly Amalek-Edomites because of their great propensity for evil, money and power). 

 

This Amalekite possibility has been borne out in the fact that in his early years old John D. Rockefeller was an agent and partner of the super rich Rothschild in 19th century America (“The Elite Serial killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 76). 

 

Messianic Jew Len Horowitz of Sagle, Idaho (while on a Prophecy Club speaking tour) is quite precise on this linkage in saying that the Rothschilds provided the initial funding for old John D. Rockefeller in his early years. 

 

Manifestly, there was an early connection between the two families. 

 

However, at some point in time, the Rockefellers and Rothschilds drifted apart and actually became opponents and competitors of sorts (as described earlier and as will be further addressed in later comments)--although they may be coming back together here in the age end (as elsewhere discussed herein in the merger of Rockefellers’ Chase Manhattan Bank and the Rothschilds’ Morgan Bank). 

 

 

A Revisit to Adolf Schicklgruber 

 

And most surprising of all people, the hated Adolf Hitler fooled almost all of the world as to his true racial origin.  As noted earlier, the well known and hated Adolf Hitler was not, racially, a German named Hitler at all. 

 

As pointed out several times earlier herein, Adolf was a Jew (a Catholic Jew) whose real name was reportedly Adolf Schicklgruber (per articles in the “Encyclopedia Britannica,” the “Universal Jewish Encyclopedia” and other authoritative biographical sources).  As noted, there are several reasons to believe that Adolf was totally a Jew with so-called Jewish blood from all directions. 

 

There are manifest reasons to believe that Schicklgruber was an Amalek-Edomite as well and not a true Yehudi at all.  He certainly had the marks, signs, fruits and works of the wicked Amalekites.  So he must have been one of them.  Yes, when something walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck; it must be a duck. 

 

And while it might be impossible for a person to try to ascertain the motives that were present and lurking behind the scenes in the twisted mind of Adolf Schicklgruber to propel him on in his quest for domination over others, the fact of his racial ancestry could be material.  What a tragedy it is that the world has come to believe that this "kook" was a German man. 

 

Along with Adolf’s Jewish ancestry, it is fascinating that his personal astrologer, Erik J. Hanussen, was an (Amalekite, ed) Jew who was born in 1889 in Vienna, Austria as Hershel Steinschneider (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 208).  Evidently, he, like the Schicklgrubers, decided to change his name (which is a common Amalekite trick, as noted in former chapters herein). 

 

 

More Surprises 

 

For years, the number two man in George Lincoln Rockwell’s American Nazi Party was a Jew (actually a secret Amalekite). 

 

A number of leading Ku Klux Klan officials have been Jews (correctly Amalek-Edomites)--like the Klan group in Bristol, Virginia in the 1980s and more recently, the neo-Nazi Knights of Freedom, headed by Davis Wolfgang Hawke, who is really an Amalekite Jew named Andy Greenbaum (many Klansmen are also federal agents as a matter of fact). 

 

The Jul 19, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1. 8) had a story by Seamus McGraw on “Supremacist With a Secret Named in Boston Bomb Plot.”  The focus of this report was upon the trial of Leo V. Felton, an alleged “White supremacist,” who had spent considerable time in mental hospitals.  He was arrested in Boston in 2001 on allegations that he and his girlfriend “conspired” to blow up Jewish targets. 

 

As it turned out, Felton was a son of a Negro man (who must have had many White genes) and a supposedly White Catholic nun who had turned to lesbianism.  Besides being part Negro, the “Forward” story revealed that his lesbian mother was part Jewish (surely Amalekite, ed).  Poor Felton was born into this world with many curses from his mixed genes--Negro, Amalekite and perhaps even some White majority genes. 

 

This strange presence of evil Amalekites in the American right wing movements was addressed in previous chapters and/or will be further assessed in the following comments.  In the case of these persons, just mentioned, one must remember the grant of rulership made to Yehudah’s line many centuries ago, to be assessed in succeeding chapters (Gen 49:10). 

 

 

Another Surprise 

 

Yuri Vladiminovich Andropov (previously mentioned) was another interesting person who spent much of his life in hatred and persecution of Jews.  Andropov was head of the Soviet KGB for years and always seemed to be one of the important people in the USSR to be feared. 

 

In November 1982, the ailing Leonid Brezhnev died as head man (General Secretary) of the Soviet Union.  He was succeeded by the sinister Andropov who had made his mark as one of the primary opponents and persecutors of Soviet Jewry over many, many years.  The primary benefit to the USSR Jews, on this succession, was that Andropov was old and in failing health. 

 

He died on February 9, 1984--not really having the time in power to cause serious trouble for the Jews, as was anticipated.  However, one of the fascinating features of Andropov’s profile paralleled that of Adolf Schicklgruber.  Like Adolf, Andropov was ethnically a (supposed) Jew or more correctly an Eastern European, Khazar, Amalek-Edomite. 

 

 

Arabs or Amalekites? 

 

Beyond the Roosevelts, Rockefellers, some Bushes, Andropov and Schicklgruber, it is also most interesting that Yasser Arafat could correctly be called a Jew--actually a Moslem Jew (as pointed out earlier).  Reportedly, Arafat’s mother was Jewish.  Hence, by Jewish law, her son would legally be a Jew (at least genetically), but he took the Islamic religion of his Arab father. 

 

Somehow, Arafat has maneuvered the Israeli government into paying him a personal grant of $8 million monthly that is deposited into his personal account with Bank Leumi which transfers it to Paris (Oct 29, 1999, “Forward,” p. 1).  The Israelis are not exactly stupid.  If they are paying Arafat $8 million monthly, one can be sure that they are getting something in return. 

 

Is it possible that Arafat is double-crossing his Arab colleagues with this Israeli payoff?  It could be!  Also, despite his recent marriage to a Muslim woman, he is alleged to be a homosexual pervert (besides a first rate terrorist).  All of this suggests that he is really an Amalekite, posing as a Muslim. 

 

In 1972, athletes from all over the world congregated in Munich, Germany for the Twentieth Olympiad.  While the games were in progress, the Arab terrorist group “Black September” seized some nine Israeli athletes and held them for 21 hours before eventually murdering them when they saw that Israel would not meet their demands and the Germans were moving against them. 

 

The significant thing about this Arab terrorist group is that the head man of the involved team was correctly a Jew of sorts (that is--his mother was a Palestinian Jew and his father was a Moslem Arab).  Of course, he identified with his Arab father with a passionate hatred toward the Jews. 

 

Otherwise, serious questions over the Saudi Arabian royalty appear in an article by Vendyl Jones on “Who Was His Majesty King Hussein,” in the Jan-Mar 2000 “Petah Tikvah” magazine (p. 55-57).  Mr Jones alleges that the Faisal family of Saudi Arabia was originally Edomite slaves in the ancient Hashemite kingdom which took over the Trans-Jordan in the 20th century. 

 

Jones claims that when Lawrence of Arabia tied with the Arabs, the British created the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and gave it to the Emir Faisal I, who was a slave to the Hashemite ruler, Sharif Hussein bin Ali, Emir of Mecca. 

 

In another interesting observation, Jones suggests that many of the Palestinian people now in the refugee camps are a mixture of the Ishmaelites (Arabs) and Amalekites.  He adds that Jordan’s King Hussein knew how treacherous they were.  Jones did not explain how or when this mixture took place.  Presumably, it could go all of the way back to Second Temple days or it could have surfaced in more modern times. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 452--The Early Amalekite Push to Rule

 

 

Amalek-Edomite Quest to Rule 

 

Having mentioned the Amalek-Edomites’ madness to rule and exercise power over Yisrael, it would be well to review a little history of how incredibly evil that they can be.  Manifestly, their genetic makeup translates to the motivation and thinking which propels and pushes them forward to destroy true Israelites at all costs.   

 

Manifestly, they are racially part Canaanite, as previously described.  In this sense, they have many of the same genes as Abimelech, the classic bramble bush, as well as those of Kain and his father Nachash (Satan).  To appreciate their mad, crazy mentality prodding them on to rule over Yisrael, it is needful to revisit their power over Yehudah in the first century CE. 

 

Previous chapters offered remarks on how crafty, deceptive, dishonest and treacherous Amalek-Edomites have been and can be.  Simple words cannot begin to describe their genetic depravity.  However, one can see this wickedness in their dominion over Yehudah and now the modern House of Yisrael nations. 

 

As also noted in earlier comments, the evidence is most persuasive that the so-called Jewish community in Jerusalem, in the early first century CE, was largely dominated and controlled (but not completely) by Amalek-Edomites with the ruling Herods and their Herodian lackeys. 

 

Assuredly, these very people seem to have sold out the historic Jewish nation to the Romans and Roman rule (which paved the way for the Herods to gain power over Yehudah).  Yet, the days did come when these Amalek-Edomites evidently reversed themselves and provided much or all of the impetus for the Jewish-Roman War of 66-70 CE. 

 

Perhaps the Amalek-Edomites believed that they might lose some of their power, control and banking profits by 66 CE.  Certainly, something motivated them to promote or at least join in with other Zealot Jews (which probably included some or many Jewish Amalekite proselytes, as noted previously) in the early days of the revolt against Rome. 

 

 

Amalek-Edomite Treachery 

 

In an article on “Treacherous Edom,” in the Nov 1997 “New Beginnings” (p. 7), Josephus was quoted on his remarks on how the Edomites slew thousands of their Jewish colleagues (evidently true Jewish Israelites) during the Roman siege in order to continue the revolt and their control over the true Jews. 

 

Suffice to say, the last two years of the Jewish-Roman war saw the Amalek-Edomites oppressing, fighting and killing true Jews for the control of the Temple and the citadel.  The evil Simon bar Giora was leader of the primary faction at that time, which certainly included the Idumeans.  It eventually came out on top in this struggle for control. 

 

Josephus is largely unclear on this Simon, other than noting that he was from Gerasa, a large Hellenistic city in Transjordan (“Encyclopedia Judaica,” v. 4, p. 220).  Judaica notes that the word “giora” means proselyte in Aramaic.  So he likely was an Amalek-Edomite (who was a Jewish proselyte) and particularly so since the Idumean forces would later join in with him. 

 

Another estimation is that he could have been Simon, a leader in the initial Idumean attack, also mentioned by Josephus (“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p. 318).  Josephus said that this first Edomite attack was upon the (true) Jews in control of the Temple. 

 

The Edomites rushed into the city and looted houses and killed all of the Jewish Israelites which they came into contact with (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” p. 319).  The Edomites spared none and the dawning day saw the site covered with 8,500 corpses of true Jews. 

 

In this assault, the Amalek-Edomites were allied with the Zealots (which probably also included numbers of Amalekite Jewish proselytes, as noted above and as discussed earlier herein).  In fact, it was this Zealot alliance which supposedly prompted the Edomites to initially attack and murder the thousands of true Jews. 

 

Later, these Idumeans and their Zealot allies murdered another 12,000 young Jews (“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p. 319).  After these two murdering campaigns, many of the Idumeans seem to have withdrawn temporarily.  However, some of them evidently remained in the city to initially ally with the Zealots, before finally double crossing them as well.   

 

 

Simon Bar Giora 

 

Shortly thereafter, the above cited Simon bar Giora (whether the same as the earlier Idumean leader mentioned by Josephus or a different Simon) assumed command of an army of Jews, who were probably a group of essentially Jewish Edomite proselytes from Judea (perhaps with a mix of a few true Jews). 

 

Very early thereafter, he seemed to have been involved in attacking some of his enemies in Idumea, while in league with some of his Edomite friends in Idumea (“Encyclopedia Judaica,” v. 4, p. 221).  The purpose of this Idumean invasion was unclear.  But apparently, it was to put down any opposition which Simon may have had from some of his fellow Edomite leaders in that area. 

 

Later, as the Roman War progressed, the Idumean armed forces (especially those still in Jerusalem) came under bar Giora’s direct command.  Simon and his army of mainly Edomites (from Idumea and/or Jewish proselytes) turned on and double crossed the Zealot defenders in the city, and murdered them as well as other true Jews (“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p. 326).  

 

Josephus described the three main factions opposing the Romans, but fighting each other inside the city in a civil war (all the while that the Romans were patiently waiting outside to strike). 

 

Simon bar Giora had an army of 10,000 plus another Idumean contingent of 5,000.  The Zealots numbered 2,400 and the main Jewish force of 6,000 men was under the command of a man named John (“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p. 339). 

 

This force under John may have largely involved true Jewish Israelites; whereas the other two groups may have had any number of Edomite proselytes--plus the obvious 5,000 Edomites from Idumea under Simon. 

 

 

Proselytes or Not?

 

Probably, most scholars would suppose that the Idumean contingent consisted of converts to Judaism.  But this writer has some reservations about that theory.  Perhaps the soldiers of the Idumean group were not Jewish proselytes. 

 

Although not stated by Josephus, there are reasons to believe that he referred to the Edomite proselytes to Judaism with other definitions.  Likely, many of the Edomite proselytes were Zealots in the beginning of the conflict--before joining in with the first mentioned Simon (who made the initial attack on true Jews) or the later Simon bar Giora. 

 

As the Roman siege proceeded, some five of the leading Edomite chiefs met secretly and decided to send delegates to Titus to discuss a secret plan whereby they and some of their Edomite colleagues would surrender to Titus in exchange for his protection.  Simon found out about it and killed the emissaries and threw the five chiefs into prison (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” p. 364). 

 

Apparently, many Edomites did eventually surrender, however, before the final fall of the city.  Desertions were high and many people (including many Edomites) fled to the Romans for protection.  Josephus says that Titus received them, freeing some and selling the rest as slaves (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” p. 364). 

 

When Titus finally conquered the Temple, he found Simon standing in the Temple wearing purple robes (“Who Wrote the New Testament?  The Making of the Christian Myth,” p. 148).  By then, the Idumeans controlled most of the city.  It is unclear to what extent that there was still a Zealot presence in Jerusalem when the Romans finally took the city.  Maybe, the Edomites were in total control. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

The point of this first century CE history is that the Amalek-Edomites have the Canaanite genes.  And as bramble bushes, they are dedicated to ruling over the trees of Judges 9.  In the Roman War of 66-70 CE, they went mad in trying to rule, much like other later Amalekites (i.e. Adam Weishaupt, Adolf Schicklgruber and Franklin Roosevelt). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 453--Some Amalekite Successes

 

 

The Scepter Phenomenon 

 

In terms of the descendants of Yehudah, Yakov Yisrael had some particularly far reaching prophecies about them when he foretold the future for each of his children--just before his death in Egypt. 

 

The essence of Yisrael’s words was that the collective Israelites would praise Yehudah’s line and bow down before it, and the scepter of rule and the lawgiver’s power and authority would not depart from under Yehudah’s feet until SHILOH comes (Gen 49:8-12).  The best view is that SHILOH is a reference to The Coming MESSIAH.  Thus, this prophecy is profound. 

 

What it says is that Yehudah would gain the rulership over his brethren in Yisrael and maintain that rulership until The MESSIAH comes.  Of course, some persons might try to suppose that this reference to SHILOH was to His coming in the first century CE.  However, the prophecy plainly implies that Yehudah’s rule will continue over Yisrael until The MESSIAH establishes His government on earth (which is still future in 2003). 

 

Even when YESHUA’s government is established, Yehudah’s rule will effectively continue because The MESSIAH is of the lineage of Yehudah.  Therefore, once Yehudah took over rulership of Yisrael, that rulership would continue. 

 

This same idea was inherent in the context of the enormous prophecies to David (of Yehudah’s line) that his descendants would always rule over Israelites (as discussed in prior chapters herein). 

 

With the elevation of David as King over Yisrael, the rulership of Yehudah continued, certainly over portions of Yisrael (until the fall of the House of Yehudah to the Babylonians).  A former chapter discussed the prophecies from Yechezkel and Yirmeyahu over Yirmeyahu’s role of removing David’s throne to another land which contained Israelites.  Hence, it has had a continued existence until modern times. 

 

Actually, Yisrael’s prediction was far more than even Yehudah’s rule over Yisrael or parts of Yisrael.  As described in former chapters, the evidence from history is that descendants of David eventually became the kings and queens of Europe (which, by the way, are all related and interconnected, as is well known by students of genealogy and history). 

 

Thus, the line of Yehudah-David was to become the royal line of kings over Adamites at large as well as Israelites.  This is a most extraordinary fulfillment of the future for the fleshly people of Yehudah, per Moshe’s writings in the Torah. 

 

 

Another Strange Reality   

 

It has to be significant that not only has Yehudah produced lines of kings all over Europe (as outlined in a prior chapter), but that the Jews historically have always risen to the top at whatever they become involved in.  In almost any endeavor that man has pursued in the Western, Christian civilization in the past 2,000 years, Jews have often been at the top and on both sides of an issue. 

 

Thus, Jewish liberals (under Sabbatian influence, as will be later established) have led the way in establishing liberalism in America.  But one of the most notable opponents of this Jewish effort was the Jew Barry Goldwater, who became the father of modern conservatism.  It was Goldwater’s efforts which propelled Ronald Reagan into the spotlight in the 1960s-1980s. 

 

Unquestionably, Jewish doctors and leaders have contributed enormously to the modern medical profession and the focus on drugs and poisons for healing (like in the case of Dr Simon Flexner and others, as was addressed in preceding chapters herein). 

 

Jews have also led the way in the depravity of the modern petro-chemical fertilizers and pesticides--which are not only producing poisonous foods, but destroying agricultural farm land.  Conversely, some of the biggest proponents of organic farming and natural healing methods have been Jews--like the Rodales of Pennsylvania. 

 

A person could go on and on for hours with this enigma of bad Jews doing much evil and good Jews trying to oppose them and bringing good upon man.  Truly, the Jewish fig tree has produced both good and bad figs. 

 

This contrast is all around us.  It brings to mind Yisrael’s word that the descendants of Yehudah would rule over Yisrael.  Manifestly, this rule has been more than just the line of kings.  It has been in government leaders (elected politicians, discussed above) and into almost every facet of man’s existence in modern times.  Jews seem to be in charge of virtually everything of importance--both for good or for bad. 

 

 

Now, a Twist 

 

While true Jews genetically have had the preparation, push and prod to excel and rise into leadership roles over Israelites and indeed man at large, there is another fascinating aspect of this issue which ties back to the bramble bush Abimelech, who was described in Judges 9, discussed in the previous chapters. 

 

Abimelech typified and seemed to assume a prophetic role for the evil, mongrel Amalekite descendants of Cain who have come along later and have been usurpers and workers of evil for thousands of years.  In Judges 9, Abimelech comes forward as a usurper and takes over Yisrael for three years--obviously, in a way to nullify or destroy the prophetic destiny of Yehudah and his charge to rule over Yisrael. 

 

Thus, the Amalekite children of Satan and Kain have been busy for 3,500 years doing their level best to destroy Yisrael and Yehudah.  These Amalekites have typically posed as Jews, although large numbers of them also pretend to be Christians and people of other faiths. 

 

By linking in with the real Jews (as they did starting 2,100 years ago and even until the Khazar conversion in the 8th century CE), the Amalekite thorns have been in a position to share in the general rulership and power of Jews over other Israelites.  The evil Amalekites have fully exploited this course.  And today, here in 2003, the Amalekites are in essential control of all Yisrael. 

 

Therefore, many of them have been leading doctors, lawyers, popes and you name it.  Of course, they have assuredly risen to political power, as is evident with evil people--like the apparent Amalekites Schicklgruber, Roosevelt, Andropov and Weishaupt.  Thus, in WWII, Amalekite leaders in Germany, Russia, England and the US did their level best to destroy Europe. 

 

Virtually, all important political motions have come under Amalekite power or influence.  Nazism (both in Germany and the US) and Communism (worldwide) were not only founded by Amalekites, but have largely been led by Amalekites. 

 

Several neo-Nazi and Ku Klux Klan groups in the US have been taken over by federal agents and/or Amalekite Jews, as mentioned in prior chapters. 

 

 

More Amalekite Treachery

 

Some persons have even suggested that the evil Amalekites have secretly financed and supported the Aryan Nations sect (previously mentioned) in North Idaho so that they could have a bogie man to constantly attack and demean in the Amalekite controlled media.  As long as the media concentrates upon the Aryan Nations, more of the goals of Amalekite domination will occur in America. 

 

In the first century CE, the evil Amalekites moved into roles of power over the good Jewish Israelites.  In more modern times, they have also assumed power roles over the House of Yisrael Israelites.  They are working full time to destroy these House of Yisrael Israelites--just as they tried to do with the Jewish Israelites of some 2,000 years ago. 

 

As part of their destruction plans, they have gone after the true Jewish kings in Europe.  With a diabolical hatred and frenzy, they have instigated rebellions and coops all over Europe in the last 400 years to try to destroy all of the kings from Yehudah--in France, Germany, Russia, Greece, and on and on. 

 

Perhaps the most notable overthrow of a kingdom happened in France in the late, 18th century, French Revolution which saw the royal family murdered by a crazy mob infuriated and led by Amalekites who were organized and motivated by Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati, founded a few years earlier in Germany. 

 

 

1917 

 

The next major overthrow came in Russia in 1917, under the leadership of the evident Amalekite Khazars Leon Trotsky (whose real name was Laiber Davidovich Bronstein) and Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (who seems to have been a half breed Amalekite Khazar, whose real name was Vladimir Ulyanov). 

 

Lenin was married to a Khazar/Amalekite Jewess.  He and his revolutionary Amalekite comrades proceeded to murder the Russian Czar Nicholas II and his wife and children in cold blood and commence a blood bath that raged for years in Russia (ultimately killing millions).  

 

The Czar was  a descendant of Yehudah and David and a relative of Britain’s monarchy.  He and Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany were relatives of Queen Victoria.  Through intermarriages, most or all of Europe’s royal families were related in one way or another, making them not only descendants of Yehudah, but also of David with but few exceptions, if any. 

 

The only major throne of importance now left is Britain’s monarchy, presently headed by Elizabeth II.  Were it not because of YHWH’s promises to David, undoubtedly, this throne would have likewise ended years ago. 

 

For sure, the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters will make a move toward destroying the British throne here in the age end.  If YHWH allows this motion to succeed (to a point), it will pave the way for YESHUA to come and to take this throne, as discussed elsewhere herein. 

 

 

Other Factors 

 

Manifestly, the evil Amalekite Jews are proceeding on all fronts to take over rulership and control of all aspects of the House of Yisrael nations.  They are moving their theories and practices of evil into all facets of national Yisrael from medicine, to law, to politics, to government, to entertainment, to the media and on and on. 

 

Surely, the story of Abimelech in Judges 9 must be one of enormous prophetic significance.  The evil Amalekites are doing their level best to rule collective Yisrael here in the age end--just as Abimelech so ruled Yisrael many ages ago.  This time, they are having just as much or more success than did Abimelech in his days. 

 

The interesting thing about this situation is that just as the trees in Judges 9 did not step forward to provide leadership and rule (which therefore created a vacuum of leadership in Yisrael--thus, allowing Abimelech to make his move for power), the same thing has now been happening in the House of Yisrael nations, as the typical fulfillment of Judges 9. 

 

Instead of true Yehudahites coming forward to provide leadership, as was their destiny (like Britain’s royal family), they and the other Israelites have all taken a back seat and allowed the diabolical Amalekites to rise up to fill that vacuum and usurp authority over Yisrael.  It’s happening on all fronts and in all Israelite activities. 

 

It’s not to say that all leadership in all areas is now in Amalekite hands.  But much of it is and especially in the House of Yisrael nations.  And if some non-Amalekite does come forward, he will meet a wall of opposition, not only from the controlled Amalekite media, but even from his own Israelite brethren (who are janissary robots).  Truly, the Amalekites are trying to take over everything and destroy Yisrael in the process. 

 

And how can a person recognize an Amalekite usurper, in lieu of a legitimate Yehudahite or other descendant of Yisrael?   As discussed elsewhere herein, the key is in one of works and deeds.  Men can be known by their fruits, deeds and actions.  When one sees a worker of evil, the first most logical suspicion must be that he is an Amalekite, whether posing as a Jew or Christian and by whatever name he goes by.  

 

 

Far Reaching Evil 

 

As cited earlier, YESHUA seems to have said that these evil Amalek-Edomite people bear the guilt for the murder of all of the righteous--past, present and future (Matt 23:35).  Surely, they bear responsibility for all or almost all wars, revolutions and bloodlettings.  Amalekite leaders like Schicklgruber and Roosevelt caused WWII. 

 

Amalekite bankers/masters caused WWI, the US Civil War, the Russian Revolution and the French Revolution and will be behind the coming WWIII (in the slaughter of billions).  In short, the bramble bush thorns, in the form of the Amalek-Edomites, have had a tremendous measure of success in fulfilling the Abimelech prophecy, cited earlier from Judges (Jud 9:1-57). 

 

Furthermore, the Abimelech prediction could have some connection with the age ending "Beast" man who is to come onto the scene and rule the world under Satanic power for 3 1/2 years (Rev 13).  We'll just have to wait and see. 

 

The point being from all of this is that one must be careful about interpreting these tree symbols in the Book.  Categorically, they are quite complex and fraught with much difficulty without due care, study, concern and attention.  In short, one must let the Scriptures do the interpretations. 

 

 

YHWH’s Curse on Yehudah Ended 

 

Despite the great evil of the bad Edomite, Amalekite, and/or Kenite figs, this writer categorically believes that The MOST HIGH has been extremely involved in Zionism and the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948 and the Jewish conquest of old Jerusalem in the Six Days War of 1967, as was assessed in former chapters herein. 

 

In fact, in my chronology, the period of 1966-67 (fall to fall reckoning) seems to be a Jubilee year which gives the Jews a lot of credit.  The things going on in the Middle East for the past 60 years are happening there with the authority and blessing of YHWH. 

 

There are no accidents going on there (or anywhere else for that matter).  While some might be sympathetic with the Arabs with the loss of their lands, the truth is that they are usurpers trying to occupy land which does not belong to them.  That land belongs to Yisrael--to include every person of true Yehudah, as well as the lost tribes. 

 

At the proper time, The ELOHIM will separate the Kenites, Canaanites and Amalek-Edomites (the goats and tares, as suggested previously) from Yehudah.  He will do this in His good time.  So, for now, a believer in YHWH YESHUA must just have some patience and allow The HIGHEST to fulfill His purpose.  He will execute judgment on the bad figs in His good time. 

 

 

Amalekite Depravity is Unparalleled in History 

 

Just as Abimelech planned, plotted and schemed on how he could take over and rule the trees in Judges 9, there is manifestly no doubt whatsoever that the Amalek-Edomites genetically spend their whole lives, beings, minds, hopes and ambitions on how they can take over and rule over Israelites in a scheme designed to forever destroy Yisrael from the face of the earth. 

 

Since these depraved people are totally evil, they will pull out all of the stops, tell all of the lies, murder all of the people necessary and on and on--if they perceive that it will help in their overall objectives.  Their agenda is always first and foremost in whatever tasks they undertake.  As they are totally evil (genetically), there is nothing they won’t do to further their cause. 

 

 

The Herods 

 

The cases for the murder of the righteous (by Herod and Herod Antipas) and for some of the sexual depravity and sickness of the Amalekite Herods have been addressed in former chapters.  As outlined, it was Herod, who murdered the innocent babies at Bethlehem, just after the birth of YESHUA (Matt 2:13-18), and Herod’s son, Herod Antipas, who murdered Yohanan the Baptist (Matt 14:1-12). 

 

But there are some more features of these people which need mentioning in the context of how crafty, foxy and wretched Abimelech was in his objective of ruling over the people. 

 

Just as the bramble bush (Abimelech) was brutal, ruthless and murderous in attempting to rule over and dominate Israelites, the same charge can be laid to the Herods generally and to Herod the Great in particular. 

 

Either because old Herod (the Great) was simply insane and nuts for power or because he thought some members of his family were plotting against him or because members of his family were plotting against him, something set him off on several occasions to go on murdering campaigns against his own family, close colleagues and others (like the babies at Bethlehem). 

 

For example, Herod murdered his wife Mariamne, her mother, her 80 year old grandfather, one of her brothers named Costobarus (in c25 BCE) and one more of her brothers, 17 year old Aristobulus in c36 BCE (“Oxford Companion to the Bible,” p. 281).  He then turned his attention to his own children.  He murdered at least three of his own sons--Alexander, Aristobulus and Antipater. 

 

Before being murdered by his father, this Antipater supposedly accused his aunt Salome and two of his own brothers (Archelaus and Philip) falsely of plotting against Herod (Antipater may also have been one of the accusers against his brothers Alexander and Aristobulus). 

 

But before murdering Salome, Archelaus and Philip, Herod decided that his son Antipater was lying to him.  So he ordered him executed instead (“Davis Dictionary of the Bible,” p. 317).  

 

Otherwise, old Herod seems to have murdered any and all persons who dared to speak against him in any fashion--like the 45 friends of his enemy Antigonus (ibid, p. 317-318) and the two “rabbis” just before he died (as mentioned in a former chapter herein).  From history’s viewpoint, it meant certain death to be an enemy of Herod the Great.  He was ruthless in murdering his opponents. 

 

 

More on Old Herod 

 

In c46 BCE, Herod was summoned to come before the Sanhedrin to stand trial for executing people without the Sanhedrin’s permission.  Herod came.  But he came with an armed body guard which intimidated the council (“Davis Dictionary of the Bible,” p. 317).  Needless to say, all charges were dropped against him. 

 

But that was not enough to pacify the diabolical Herod.  He immediately had the council members all murdered; and then, he appointed a new Sanhedrin (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 391).  From that point forward, old Herod ruled the priesthood and the Sanhedrin (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 365, 386).  No one could or would dare speak out against him in public. 

 

In “The Life and Times of Jesus The Messiah” (p. 165), Alfred Edersheim has it that thereafter, Herod packed the Sanhedrin with Sadducees (including many Herodians) and priests of his choice.  Manifestly, the collective rulers marched to his tune or they were in trouble.  Edersheim described Herod’s rule by saying that the people hated him. 

 

They “detested his semi-heathen reign; they abhorred his deeds of cruelty.”  He surrounded himself with “foreign councillors, and was protected by foreign mercenaries.”  As long as he lived, “no woman’s honour was safe, no man’s life secure.”  Moreover, he employed an “army of spies” to spy upon the people (as elsewhere commented upon herein). 

 

Upon Herod’s initial assumption of power over Jerusalem (c46-37 BCE), some, many or most of the Pharisees (evidently in Judea) refused to swear an oath of loyalty to him after he had made such demands (either because of religious or political reasons). 

 

In “Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian” (p. 483), writer Lester L. Grabbe notes this event and suggests that Herod’s reaction against them was unclear.  

 

However, this time frame (mentioned by Grabbe) did set the stage for a great religious revival among the Pharisees, producing the theological schools of Shammai and Hillel (as described earlier and to be further noted in subsequent commentary)--perhaps because of Herod’s terror against the Pharisees. 

 

While not discussed by Grabbe, it is evident in the NT (Matt 23, discussed earlier herein) that the Amalekite Jews took control of the Shammai Pharisees--certainly by the first century CE.  Probably, the Amalekite control began happening as early as Herod’s days (despite the fact of Shammai’s alleged nationalistic feelings which conflicted with Herod’s reign and ideology). 

 

 

The Shammai People Goofed 

 

In fact, it is a good bet that as the Shammai Pharisees were developing (after Herod took over) that they allowed Amalekite Jews in the area into leadership positions because of fear of Herod (or maybe, because Herod commanded that the Pharisees appoint an Amalekite leadership as a condition to not murder them and destroy their religious movement). 

 

Perhaps Herod’s clannish connections to these Amalekites pacified him somewhat and motivated him not to murder all of the Pharisees (or at least the Pharisee leaders in Jerusalem), as could have otherwise happened with his mentality and brutality.  Obviously, something happened with the ruling Pharisees in the Jerusalem area (the Shammai Pharisees) to save them from destruction from Herod. 

 

When a man is facing torture and death, he will normally go to any extreme to save his own hide.  In the American military’s code of conduct, it was treason to aid and assist an enemy with military information (beyond name, rank and serial number).  In the Vietnam war, many captured Americans publicly committed treason in order to save their own lives (including Arizona Senator John McCain). 

 

Likely, the Shammai Pharisees did the same thing.  They turned their leadership offices over to Amalekite bankers/masters in the area.  The only question about this exercise is whether Herod commanded it (as a condition), or they thought up the idea on their own as a means of survival. 

 

As a minimum, at some point in time, Herod did successfully impose a loyalty oath upon some part of the Pharisee definition (“Hillel and Jesus,” p. 141).  It is unclear which and/or now many Pharisees were subjected to this process and finally succumbed to Herod’s pressures and threats. 

 

It would be easy to speculate that Herod certainly focused upon the Shammai leadership in the Jerusalem area.  They either marched to his tune or they were in trouble.  It was the Pharisees in the outlying areas who refused to take the oath to Herod and who suffered the most from his actions (as allowed by Lester Grabbe, mentioned above).  Likely, these Pharisees were of the Hillel school. 

 

Since the priesthood was or almost was synonymous with the Sadducees (in the Jerusalem area), it is manifest that Herod also exercised enormous control over the Sadducees (and may have required a loyalty oath from them as well).  For all purposes, Herod and his Amalekite allies in the Herodian political sect, controlled much of Judaism in Jerusalem--but probably not all of it. 

 

While the Hillel Pharisees obviously still had some influence, there was an internal struggle within Judaism to see which philosophy would survive--that based upon the true historical faith of the people or that of the Amalekite usurpers who had moved in on Yehudah like flies.  Significantly, the Amalekite evil did not capture “all” of Judaism at that time, despite the efforts displayed (as allowed in former chapters). 

 

 

More on the Herods 

 

When Herod was almost 70 years old, he came down with his final illness.  While on his death bed, some young religious Jews (conscious of the Torah) heard that he was dead and went to the Temple and tore down a large, golden eagle put over the gate of the Temple by Herod in contempt for YHWH and His Temple.  The men were arrested in the act and brought before Herod.  He ordered the ringleaders burned alive. 

 

Josephus dates this event on the day of an eclipse of the moon  (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” by Paul L. Maier, p. 252).  Maier has a footnote which says that this occurred on March 13, 4 BCE (which, of course, places YESHUA’s birth before this date).  Josephus went on to note that Herod wanted the people to be sad and show grief upon his pending death. 

 

Accordingly, he ordered all of the men of distinction in the land arrested and held captive inside the hippodrome that he had built.  He then instructed his sister Salome that when he died, all of these captive people were to be killed so that there would be appropriate grief throughout the land (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” p. 252).  On his death, Salome reneged on his wishes and freed the captives. 

 

As discussed in former comments, Herod was known for high and excessive taxation efforts which were imposed upon the common people. 

 

When Herod died and the likelihood that his rule over Judea would continue with his surviving sons (those that he didn’t murder), a delegation of Jews (probably real Jews) went to Caesar Augustus to ask for direct Roman rule over Judea, as noted earlier (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 419). 

 

This happened in 6 CE.  With direct Roman rule under a Roman Governor, it is unclear how much independence the Sanhedrin exercised (as elsewhere shown herein, the Sanhedrin had very little independence from the evil Amalekites).  While Rome took over direct rule of Judea, other provinces in Palestine were turned over to the sons of Herod to rule.  So the Amalekite Herods were ever around to influence decisions. 

 

 

Still More Herods 

 

Old Herod’s grandson Marcus Julius Agrippa I (who was popularly called Herod Agrippa) seems to have been a close friend of the Roman Emperors Caligula and Claudius.  In about 41 CE, he was given a kingdom in Palestine that even exceeded what Herod the Great ruled (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 432).  This grant included Judea and Samaria (thus, temporarily ending direct Roman rule in Judea). 

 

Probably, Agrippa began to exercise personal control over the Sanhedrin at that time.  But his rule was limited because he died in 44 CE.  Judea once more came under direct Roman rule.  However, Agrippa’s son, Herod Agrippa II, was allowed to continue the Herod control of the appointments of the Jewish high priest and the Sanhedrin (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 436). 

 

There is much evidence to suggest that from the time of Herod the Great forward to the fall of Jerusalem to the Romans in 70 CE that the Amalek-Edomites (usually, in the form of the Herod family) exercised general control of the Jewish priesthood and the Sanhedrin.  This point is extremely important in the vein of the murderers of YESHUA (as discussed in a former chapter). 

 

Old Herod’s son Herod Antipas (who was one-half Edomite and one-half Samaritan [“Davis Dictionary of the Bible,” p. 318], and who ordered the murder of Yohanan the Baptist) was referred to as that “fox” by YESHUA (Lu 13:32).  So it is clear that this family was clever and cunning.  Antipas’ brother Herod Agrippa murdered Yakov (Acts 12:1-2) and imprisoned Kefa (Acts 12:3-5). 

 

Herod the Great’s brother, Pheroras, was accused several times of plotting the murder of old Herod (ibid, p. 316).  So evil, plotting and conniving was par for the course for this diabolical family of Amalekites. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 454--The Amalekite Conspiracy

 

 

Amalek-Edomite Masters 

 

Though the generic Amalekites are collectively masters or experts at sin and evil, as elaborated upon in former chapters, this is not the theme of this and the next several succeeding chapters.  Masters have been and will be assessed herein in the sense of being the visible leaders and bosses of events, organizations and people. 

 

Over the years, a host of students of internationalism and the quest for world government have looked at the world’s Amalek-Edomites and have concluded that they operate in a cabal (or more correctly, a Cabala because it is occultic in nature) and/or conspiracy led by powerful masters who are largely front men for the more powerful Amalekite bankers and super rich who often operate in secret in the background (of course, many of the bankers are themselves the masters who are visibly out front; but some of them do operate in more clandestine ways). 

 

This was the situation with the Illuminati, as elsewhere outlined herein.  The Amalekite Rothschild international bankers put up the money, directed and used any and all benefits from the Illuminati; despite the fact that other Amalekites, like Adam Weishaupt, visibly organized, managed and publicly ran the organization. 

 

Weishaupt was not a banker.  But he was an Amalekite master working for the less visible, behind the scenes, Amalekite bankers. 

 

The same is true with international Communism.  It was largely founded, organized and directed by Amalekites--like Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky and perhaps Vladimir Lenin (depending upon his ancestry, as previously discussed).  These were the front men, directing the motion, which was secretly financed and run by Amalekite bankers (like the Warburgs and Jacob Schiff of NY’s Kuhn Loeb & Co, who put up $20 million). 

 

 

Correctly Sons of Satan 

 

Manifestly, the masters have common goals of world rule that seem to be established by the Amalekite bankers, secretly calling the shots.

 

Mistakenly, many observers think that the cabal or Cabala is Jewish because so many Amalek-Edomites pretend to be Jews. But correctly, they are not Jews at all, but are usually publicly professed atheists and/or real Satanists, operating from behind the scenes in true beliefs and actions. 

 

On this topic of discussion, please understand that many Amalek-Edomites also pretend to be Christians.  When they change their historic Edomite names to Western names, they fool the general public as to their true identity.  But the best way to distinguish a Christian Edomite is to appreciate NT words which say that evil people, like the Edomites, are known by their deeds, fruits or works. 

 

In the case of Christian, Muslim, Hindu or whatever religious persuasion an evil Amalek-Edomite may have adopted (and they do adopt all kinds of faiths, but always maintaining the evil and wickedness of their father Satan), their deeds effectively distinguish or identify them to the careful and observing student of truth. 

 

YESHUA put it well by saying that the evil Amalek-Edomites (always) do the deeds of the Devil, their father (Jo 8:41, 44). 

 

Therefore, when one observes a person plainly doing the works of Satan, a suspicion should immediately surface that the wicked individual could be a racial Amalek-Edomite; or at least, have some Edomite ancestry (Slick Clinton is a perfect example of this reality--as will be discussed at length with some fascinating proof in a later appendix). 

 

 

Another Feature 

 

There is another facet of identification of the actual Edomites, by recalling the words of Ovadyah, discussed heretofore, in the context of them being on high and exalted as an eagle over the stars of Yisrael (Oba 1:3-4).  The point the prophet has made is that Edomites will be in charge, over the Yisrael nations, in the age end--at least, as secret rulers from behind the scenes. 

 

There is a third identifying feature of “some” Edomites, but certainly not all of them.  Some Edomites are distinguished physically by their distinctive Hittite noses, described previously. 

 

One must be careful about drawing conclusions on this attribute, however, since numbers of ethnic groups, besides Edomites, have the Hittite noses.  Also, some Edomites have had the Hittite noses bred out of them through years of miscegenation with other peoples. 

 

A fourth possible identifying attribute is that Amalek-Edomites generally seem to have character shortcomings.  They are big mouthed extroverts, pushy, forward, arrogant, often rude and have a strong propensity for sexual perversion and depravity.  In mentioning these qualities, one must again be careful because other peoples also have some of these problems--particularly the behemah humanoids. 

 

Hence, there are several primary methods of identifying actual, racial Amalek-Edomites in the House of Yisrael nations.  They will be doing the works of their father Satan; will be leaders and bosses in charge of the House of Yisrael peoples; “may” have the famous Hittite noses; and tend to be big mouthed, pushy, forward, rude, arrogant and sexually demented. 

 

 

The Conspiracy 

 

One of the things which the gullible Christian Israelites in the West has been unable to grasp is the presence of a genuine, real conspiracy among the Amalekite super rich to not only exploit the goyim for profit and gain purposes presently, but also to destroy them ultimately, as discussed in a former chapter herein in the context of the theology of Balaam. 

 

Popular radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh typifies this stupidity.  Not only does he refuse to even consider the possibility of a conspiracy, but he ridicules and makes fun of those persons who do have that perception.  The tragedy with Limbaugh is that his stupid thinking dominates the right wing motion.  Otherwise, the left wing thinking is mute anyway since left wingers can never understand the word conspiracy. 

 

Winston Churchill, despite his gross confusion and shortcomings, at least had some perception of the presence of a Jewish conspiracy because he wrote about it in his book “Zionism Versus Bolshevism.”  Churchill said that it had steadily grown “From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States).” 

 

It is amazing that people can sit on the sidelines and watch and observe meetings, discussions and agreements between the super rich at the periodic Bilderberger and Trilateral Commission sessions and never call the result a conspiracy.  The simple truth is that anytime two people get together and agree on anything, they have entered into a conspiracy. 

 

Though most persons try to understand conspiracy in the sense of something done in secret and involving an evil act, the dictionary definition also includes just the “acting together” of any two parties (Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary,” p. 136). 

 

The oppressive federal state is so hot in pursuit of alleged conspiracies in crimes against the state that she pulls out all of the stops and goes after people who merely talk about committing some illegal act.  Whether the parties ever do anything or not is quite irrelevant from the standpoint of federal prosecutions.  The very fact of discussion is sufficient to bring on an arrest, trial and imprisonment. 

 

Any person gullible and stupid enough to believe that fat cats at all levels don’t get together and discuss things of mutual interest (which they can collaborate upon) has lost touch with reality.  This writer has had some exposure to the business world and believe me there are all kinds of conspiracies on-going constantly among business people (to include cartels, price fixing, avoiding taxes and so forth). 

 

 

Psalms 2:1-2, Revisited 

 

Nevertheless, the Psalmist carefully outlined the conspiracy of the Amalekite bankers/masters some 3,000 years ago by saying that the kings of the earth and the rulers take counsel together (conspire) against YHWH and His ANOINTED, or correctly--The MESSIAH (Ps 2:1-2). 

 

Samson Raphael Hirsch’s commentary on the “Psalms” (v. I, p. 7-9) offers a translation which says that the kings agree with the rulers (who are obviously separate persons), “together” against YHWH’s MESSIAH.  Moreover, Hirsch’s commentary makes the case that the indictment applies to the nations and their rulers in the generic sense. 

 

In any case, this happened 2,000 years ago when the Amalekite bankers/masters conspired with the Jewish religious and secular leaders (like the Amalekite Herod and the Herodians) and the Roman Caesar (the King?) and his governor Pilate against YESHUA The ANOINTED ONE.  This involved an Amalekite conspiracy.  There is no question about it whatsoever and certainly in this one single event. 

 

But Hirsch makes the case that the conspiracy (in Ps 2:1-2) does not involve a single act.  Instead, the great Jewish scholar implies that the conspiracy actually involves an on-going effort of the evil nations and their rulers to emancipate themselves from the sovereignty of the Torah in many actions over time.  Probably, Hirsch has it right or almost right. 

 

Not only did it involve the single act of the kings of the earth and the rulers (the Amalekite bankers/masters), operating in collusion against YESHUA some 2,000 years ago (as allowed in prior chapters), but it also has consisted of continuing actions by the kings of the earth and the Amalekite bankers/masters in collusion against the purpose of YHWH YESHUA ever since then as well. 

 

 

Detailed in the NT 

 

Manifestly, the New Testament describes this conspiracy in some detail.  It started with the efforts of the Amalekite King Herod (who was given power in Judea by the Roman government) when he began murdering the innocent babies in the Bethlehem area in an effort to kill YESHUA. 

 

Clearly, Herod must have conspired even then with the Amalekite bankers and masters in the Herodian and Shammai Pharisee sects (when he decided to begin his murdering campaign in Bethlehem).  As the Word says, he was troubled and all Jerusalem with him (including the Amalekite bankers/masters).  So he consulted with the chief priests and scribes  (Matt 2:3-4). 

 

The conspiracy continued on when the Roman governor Pilate succumbed to the wishes of the Amalekite bankers and rulers and killed YESHUA.  Assuredly, it continued on in the rest of the NT as Amalekites periodically used their power and influence to persecute and oppress the election (Phil 3:2).  As Revelation 17:6 demonstrates, it has continued on for the succeeding 1,950 years. 

 

Surely, this option spells out an Amalekite conspiracy for the last 2,000 years.  And upon an examination of Western history for the last 2,000 years, this prophecy has certainly come true.  The Amalekite bankers/masters have conspired with kings and politicians alike (i.e. American presidents since Woodrow Wilson) to thwart and destroy YHWH YESHUA’s ultimate purpose for Yisrael. 

 

 

Some History 

 

In Second Temple times (before and after the days of Herod the Great), Jewish government was largely in the hands of the Sanhedrin--which consisted of the great bet din (court of justice) of 71 scholars and lesser courts of 23 judges (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 14, p. 839-840).  These people were the “public” masters or leaders of the Jews (to include the Amalekite children of Satan) in their day. 

 

In the main, this body was diametrically opposed to YESHUA and His disciples (Matt 26:59; Jo 11:47-57; Acts 4:5-18).  However, the actual order for His execution surely came from the local, Amalekite bankers (as established in a former chapter herein).  In other words, the secret rulers were the bankers.  But the visible, public rulers (leaders or masters) were members of the Sanhedrin and the priesthood. 

 

While the Sanhedrin was apparently composed of Amalekite masters and some of their Jewish lackeys (as appointed and controlled by the Herods and the Herodians), in the main, there is some reason to believe that there may have been a few true Jews and secret followers of YESHUA in this body or its subdivisions--like Yosef of Arimathea (“Oxford Companion of the Bible,” p. 383). 

 

The Sanhedrin was organized after the exile and probably addressed religious, cultural and political questions (since all three issues were combined into the one government).  Manifestly, the evidence is that by the first century CE, this governing council had been pretty well taken over by Amalekites.  This was clearly the problem with the Jews and Judaism in the Jerusalem area. 

 

But the fall of Jerusalem did not spell out the end of a centralized Jewish government to dictate rules and conduct for Jews throughout the Diaspora.  A secret, unseen Jewish government continued, as will now be shown. 

 

 

The Cahilla 

 

The continuity of a Jewish government over the worldwide dispersion of the Jews was brought out in a book by Colonel Edwin M. Hadley on “The Cahilla Unmasked.”  Hadley says that instead of destroying this power, the last Roman dispersals in 135 CE set it (the Kahilla or Cahilla) on a new and firmer foundation which has continued to exist. 

 

In 1492, Chemor, Chief Rav of Spain, wrote a letter to the Grand Sanhedrin (the Cahilla), which then had its seat in Constantinople, asking for advice on how to handle the pending persecution and expulsion of Jews from Spain as a part of the then Catholic Inquisition (per a letter found in the Toledo Spanish Archives, as reported by Henry Ford, previously cited). 

 

The Jewish ruler in Constantinople wrote back and said that the Spanish Jews should obey the King of Spain and become Christians.  This leader went on to suggest that the Spanish Jews should teach their children to be merchants (to despoil the Christians), doctors (to take Christian lives), canons and clerics (to destroy Christian Churches) and lawyers (to put the Christians under a yoke). 

 

Apparently, the advice of this leader in Constantinople became the basis for the later Marranoes, who were public Christians but secret Jews.  Moreover, it is evident that the Amalekite Jews have carefully heeded the admonition to become merchants, doctors and lawyers in order to destroy Christianity. 

 

Though the primary leader in the Cahilla is not publicly known among non-Jews, it has come to light from time to time.  Hadley suggests that in the late 19th century in Odessa, Russia, some documents were found which were signed by Asher Ginsberg as the Ahad Ha’am.  “Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v. 2, p. 440-442) says that Ginsberg (1856-1927) was the leader of the “Hibbat Zion movement,” discussed earlier. 

 

Per Judaica, Ginsberg adopted the pen name of Ahad Ha’am (meaning one of the people) to write his essays and articles under.  Hadley did not indicate whether Ginsberg signed the documents as Ha Ahad Ha’am (meaning the number one of the people, as opposed to just one of the people).  But if he signed them as the number one leader, it might suggest that the words were a title (as Hadley maintains)

 

Whether succeeding Zionist leaders used Ahad Ha’am as a title or not is unclear.  Though Ginsberg was a Jewish leader in Russia in the Zionist movement (and an evident Amalekite), it is unclear whether he was in a leadership role in the ruling Cahilla or not and whether he signed the documents in such a capacity or not. 

 

A previous discussion mentioned the apparent Amalekite Walter Rathenau who said in 1909 that “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves” (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 61).  This band of rulers were likely all Amalekites. 

 

If so, it suggests that the total masters and leaders then in Europe perhaps numbered around 300--which is a much larger figure than just the 71 members of the likely Cahilla.  Perhaps the power of the 300 leaders mentioned by Rathenau was restricted to economic and commercial areas--while the Cahilla was a more limited organization in numbers, but with broader powers over the entire Jewish community.  

 

This 300 number is interesting for at least one more possibly important reason.  As indicated in prior chapters, the evil Amalekite Haman had 300 followers or colleagues in Shushan who were eventually destroyed by the Jews (Est 9:15).  It is unclear whether all of these 300 were Amalekites, although that is plausible.  After all, they seemed to be a part of the Haman operation to kill the Jews. 

 

 

More on the Kahilla 

 

In 1946, a Jewish man named Henry H. Klein published a book on “A Jew Exposes The Jewish World Conspiracy” which reported upon the still present Cahilla, directing Jews worldwide in a cohesive conspiracy.  Klein suggested that the ruling Cahilla is the real power and that it exercises that power through the money lords throughout the world.  

 

In a sense, one could logically support the idea that the Cahilla rules supreme and that the bankers are lackeys under them.  However, based upon the NT remarks on the death of YESHUA, discussed previously, it would seem that the Cahilla answers to the international Amalekite Jew bankers, like the Rothschilds.  In other words, the men with the money call the shots. 

 

Of course, in some instances, the bankers are masters themselves, in being the visible leaders out in front of the pack.  Alternatively, many of the masters are not bankers, per se, but are merely the front men who work for and obey the behind the scenes bankers (who often operate in secret). 

 

It’s questionable how much of a presence true Jews have had in the Cahilla since YESHUA’s time.  Likely, it has continued to be firmly in the hands of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters over the years just as it was in NT times.  But that condition could change here in the age end--as will shortly be discussed. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 455--The Modern State of Israel

 

 

Overview 

 

Subsequent chapters herein will address the state of Israel in some detail in regards to the political and religious situations there and the Zionist movement (consisting of both political and religious features) which has influenced the state of Israel extensively. 

 

The most important thing to understand is that the state of Israel has been under the control of Amalekite Jew masters/bankers in North America and Britain.  Consequently, the governing political parties there have typically been controlled by external Amalekites; and in fact, the political leadership in Israel has consisted largely of Israeli Amalekites (Ariel Sharon may or may not fit into this mold). 

 

But with the Amalekite control, there is much present depravity in the state of Israel--just as there is much depravity and wickedness in the United States (where the Amalekite masters/bankers rule supreme).  The purpose of this chapter and the following comments is to address some of that depravity and understand the source of power behind it. 

 

 

More From Jack Bernstein 

 

While previous presentations have already described some of the sexual depravity in Palestine, there is more that needs to be said.  Of course, various observers, including Jewish persons of some intelligence and honesty, have pointed out many of the problems in Jewish Palestine.  But perhaps the most pungent and sharpest criticism has come from an American Jew named Jack Bernstein, as quoted earlier. 

 

Bernstein immigrated to Israel (this process is called making “aliyah”) before 1970.  He initially went to a kibbutz to live for six months and to learn Hebrew.  While at the kibbutz, Bernstein met a Sephardic Jewess from Iraq named Ziva.  In time, Jack married Ziva and had two children.  It was this marriage which first alerted him to the problems in the state of Israel.  In his words, he says that his eyes were opened. 

 

Jack’s problems, in trying to find suitable employment, will be cited below.  Suffice to say, this condition led him to eventually open his own tour-guide service.  But Jack was different from the other tour operators.  He had a tendency to show his clients the real world in the Israeli state--the world of gross problems, as will be shown below. 

 

Perhaps this exposure made Jack an enemy of the Israeli state and created still more problems for him in trying to live and exist in that environment. 

 

After six and a half years of disillusionment and despair over conditions in Israel, Jack returned to the United States and began an effort to educate and inform Americans over the depravity that he had discovered in the Israeli state.  He became a leader in a pro-American work which eventually published at least two writings from Jack which described his reaction to the Jewish state in Palestine. 

 

Jack’s second work came out in a small booklet entitled “My Farewell to Israel, the Thorn in the Mideast.”  The following presentation will summarize Jack’s conclusions about the Israeli state. 

 

 

The Marxist, Socialist and Communist Tie 

 

Early on, in his booklet, Jack Bernstein makes the charge that the modern Israeli state is a Marxist-Socialist-Communist state (“My Farewell to Israel, the Thorn in the Mideast,” p. 2). 

 

This same feeling was echoed by a Jack Bernstein relative from South Africa, named Brian Singer.  In Israel, Singer found it to be a Communist state.  He said “I didn’t come to Israel to live with a bunch of Commies” (ibid, p. 4). 

 

In the Israeli state, Jack says that every one of the 150 kibbutzim present are affiliated with one of the Communist or Socialist parties (ibid, p. 25).  The linkage of the Amalekites to the left wing Socialist and Communist movements has already been established by this writer.  Jack only confirms the reality. 

 

In talking one day to a couple of East European Jews, one of them told Jack that Soviet Russia was their ally and that in 1949 Golda Meir (Ambassador to the old USSR) had made an agreement with Moscow that Israel would talk peace but would never agree to settle the Palestinian problem or discontinue her Communist policies. 

 

In return, this Jew told Jack that the Soviets would adopt a pro-Arab stance to camouflage their true intentions.  In 1967, following the Six-Day war, diplomatic relations between the Soviets and Israelis were severed.  But this was all a screen because conditions have continued as before.  As proof, this Jew said to check the Israeli stores and note the Communist goods (ibid, p. 25-26). 

 

While the Amalekite ties to the left are well established (in the color red), this remark that Jack picked upon is interesting.  After all, it brings to mind the situation in the last 20 years where Amalekite Jews in Israel and North America have shipped vast quantities of technology and military hardware to Communist China.  Is it not clear that these Amalekites are still Communists? 

 

The reasons why the Amalekites have been so closely linked to Communism and other left-wing motions have been or will be explained in some detail in various other chapters herein.  In particular, a subsequent chapter will address an Amalekite Jewish movement, called the Sabbatians (as cited earlier herein), which has had a profound effect upon the Jews, and of course, world history for the past four centuries. 

 

 

Discrimination and Racism 

 

The first big clue on the outright discrimination and racism practiced by the Ashkenazi Jews in Israel arose when Jack married Ziva.  Since he was an Ashkenazi Jew and she was a Sephardi Jew, it brought problems to Jack.  He could not get work and experienced some of the same discrimination that she and her Sephardic colleagues faced. 

 

As discussed elsewhere herein, the Ashkenazi Jews are European in background while the Sephardi are mainly from the old Spanish and Portuguese countries. 

 

There is a third category of Jews which are technically known as Oriental Jews (their source is from the Moslem world of North Africa and the Middle East).  However, over time, both of the Sephardim and the Oriental Jews have been merged into one definition.  They are both now called Sephardim. 

 

Many of the Sephardi Jews are somewhat darker in color than the ruling Ashkenazi Jews, and actually have a considerably different culture (interestingly, the Sephardi culture is closer to the original Jewish culture; and thus, more Scriptural).  Along with Ashkenazi hatred and discrimination towards the Arabs, the Ashkenazi leaders show the same hostility towards the Sephardi Jews. 

 

Per Jack, in Israel, Sephardic Jews are called “kooshim” (the Hebrew word for “niggers”) because they are of darker skins (ibid, p. 4). 

 

While this Ashkenazi discrimination against the Sephardim has been great over the years, there are a couple of points worth mentioning.  First, some of it is changing.  The present President of Israel is a Sephardic Jew from North Africa named Moshe Katsav.  While his wife is an Ashkenazi Jew, one must wonder how this important post slipped from Amalekite control. 

 

The next big issue which must be highlighted is that the discrimination against dark-skinned Jews is nothing like the religious discrimination against the Ultra Orthodox Jews-- both Sephardim and Ashkenazim.  The Ultra Orthodox are extremely religious people who walk the extra mile to try to obey The ELOHIM.  While they may not be perfect, they are wonderful examples which Christians could learn much from. 

 

But just like there is much persecution and discrimination against small Christian fundamentalist sects in the United States, the same thing is true in Israel with the Ashkenazi hatred and opposition to the Ultra Orthodox.  This problem will be discussed in detail in a later chapter on this subject. 

 

 

Sexual Licentiousness and Perversion 

 

The sexual licentiousness and perversion among the Amalekites have been already outlined by this writer in former chapters.  It is now almost redundant to begin to cover those problems of moral decay and sickness.  However, this reality is one of the key issues raised by Jack Bernstein. 

 

He charges that in the modern state of Israel, prostitution is rampant.  Because there is so much Ashkenazi persecution and discrimination against the Sephardic Jews, many young Sephardic girls (as young as age 14) are forced into prostitution (ibid, p. 16). 

 

Even more tragic and sickening, the state of Israel has significant homosexual, transvestite and pornography problems (ibid, p. 16, 19).  AIDS is also becoming more of an issue-- perhaps largely because of the fact that Israel has a “large” homosexual population (ibid, p. 19). 

 

 

Other Social Problems 

 

With its Marxist orientation, it is clear that the Israeli state would be a welfare state just as is true with the United States, Canada, Britain and much of Europe.  Jack makes this welfare state connection and charges that Israel is kept afloat by the billions of US dollars supplied Israelis each year by the US taxpayers (ibid, p. 2). 

 

Apparently, the Israeli Mafia (organized crime) is powerfully present in much of the Israeli state (ibid, p. 16)--as is true in America.  Extortion is bad and many cafe owners have to make pay-offs to the Mob, police and government leaders to stay in business.

 

Comments heretofore have already described the power of the Amalekite Mob in the United States.  Manifestly, that same Amalekite controlled Mob dominates in Israel and indeed in other parts of the world. 

 

 

The Israeli Police State 

 

Before coming to Israel, Jack Bernstein, like other Americans, believed that the Israeli state was a democracy.  But Jack suggests that that impression is false because, in fact, the Israeli state is a police state (ibid, p. 5). 

 

Bernstein proves his allegation with a statement of how prisoners are treated in Israel (ibid, p. 30-31). 

 

Prisoners are forced to stand long periods of time (in order to exhaust them); are refused toilet privileges to the point of having to urinate on themselves; have thick bags put over their heads and their arms handcuffed and tied behind them to put pressure on their wrists; have their stomachs stomped on and repeatedly kicked; have their testicles squashed and are beaten on their genitals; have their hair pulled, their heads beaten against the wall and are left hanging with heads down; have sticks pushed up their anuses; have cigarette butts put out on their bare skin; have their relatives brought in and subjected to abuse in front of the prisoners; have ball point pens forced into prisoners’ penises; and are kept in cells 28 inches wide by 6 feet long for weeks at a time. 

 

 

Israeli Influence Overseas 

 

One of the most damaging charges against Israel is Jack Bernstein’s charge that she “has been instrumental in aiding the establishment of dictatorships in Africa and to a degree elsewhere in the world” (ibid, p. 2). 

 

The Israeli support for Communist China is mentioned above and elsewhere herein.  Suffice to say, the Israelis, under Amalekite control, are doing about the same thing internationally that the Americans are doing.  Both states exist for and serve the Amalekite plutocrats who really call the shots in both areas and much of the world (as will be described at length in later chapters herein). 

 

 

Satan’s Playground 

 

As Jack Bernstein wrote it-- “No country could become as corrupt and sinful as has Israel through a normal chain of events.  It would seem that there had to be some evil force at work. 

 

“It would be well to note the evil history of the leadership of Israel and their followers.  For centuries, they (the Bolshevik Jews) practiced atheistic Socialism/Communism in various European countries, especially Russia. 

 

“These Bolshevik (Ashkenazic) Jews, along with the Zionist oriented Jewish International Bankers, succeeded in overthrowing the Czar of Russia and imposing communist rule on the Russian people.  With the aid of Bolshevik Jews who had migrated from Russia to America, they have been able to spread their evil, satanic influence throughout America and extending it world-wide. 

 

“Many of these communist Jews from Russia and other European countries, who migrated to Israel, took with them the socialist/communist plans of Karl Marx.  With the help of American Bolshevik Jews, they were able to take control of Israel and impose the socialist/communist plans of Karl Marx. 

 

“Running parallel to the Bolshevik movement was the Zionist movement, which had basically the same goals--world domination.  At some point after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the Bolsheviks and Zionists meshed together and became one.  They are now commonly referred to as Zionists. 

 

“During Biblical times, God promised the Jews of those days to be His messengers and He gave them special privileges--if they would obey His word.  The Bible tells how these Jews disobeyed the word and began adoring idols.  Frustrated over the disobedience of the Jews, God said, ‘Ye are of the Synagogue of Satan.’ 

 

“The atheistic Zionist leaders of Israel and their followers have apparently adopted the ‘Synagogue of Satan’ and through their leadership have made Israel a virtual ‘Satan’s playground.’”

 

 

The Talmud and Protocols 

 

The Farewell booklet lists two major sources of literature which has influenced the Ashkenazi Jews more than anything else.  Jack identifies these two as the Talmud and the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” (ibid, p. 6-11, 17). 

 

As outlined previously herein, the Ashkenazi Jews largely stem from the Khazar kingdom in Asia when the king there, King Butan, wanted a national religion.  Both Islam and Christianity were ruled out.  Accordingly, Butan selected Judaism and imposed it upon his people (in hopes that it would instill some measure of morality and integrity in his corrupt people--as discussed elsewhere herein). 

 

Jack says that these Khazars were forced West and became eventually the Ashkenazi Jews of Europe (ibid, p. 6).  One of the most important writings affecting them was the Talmud, per Bernstein (ibid, p. 6).  Jack believes that the Khazars stem from Japheth and not Shem at all (the writer of this study at hand disagrees with this conclusion and maintains that they are Amalekites, as noted earlier). 

 

The “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” was the second major writings affecting the Ashkenazi Jews (ibid, p. 11).  Bernstein actually quotes portions of the Protocols and indicates how they have influenced the modern Ashkenazi Jews. 

 

Mr Bernstein believes that much of the racial discrimination found among the Ashkenazim can be traced to both the Talmud and the Protocols.  For sure, these two writings look down upon all non Jews as goyim cattle and dogs. 

 

This study at hand will discuss both the Talmud and the Protocols in some detail in later chapters herein.  There is no intent to try to cover those writings at this time.  While Jack is surely correct on the Protocols, he apparently has missed the point on the Talmud, as was communicated in prior chapters herein and as will be further addressed in later chapters. 

 

 

Follow-Up on Jack in America 

 

Jack Bernstein’s booklet on “Farewell to Israel” offered some remarks on the after-effect of his first writing on conditions in Israel.  He says that after reading Jack’s words, two Jews contacted the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith (which is more extensively covered in various other chapters of this study) and asked questions about the findings of Jack. 

 

The immediate reaction of the ADL was not to attempt to repudiate Jack’s message.  Instead, the ADL started asking intimidating questions of the two Jews who had contacted them (ibid, p. 1).  The ADL wanted to know-- What’s your name?  What’s your address?  Where do you work? 

 

Naturally, the two Jews became fearful and hung up the phone without supplying answers to the ADL intimidation.  They were fearful that the ADL would begin a program of harassment, and that they might lose their jobs and face other troubles from the ADL. 

 

In another follow-up issue, the booklet on Farewell had a picture of Jack Bernstein (ibid, on the back cover).  He had large sun glasses on--obviously to hide his eyes and some part of his face.  Like other people, who have spoken out, one must be very careful to avoid being murdered.  For sure, the Mossad, the ADL and other Amalekite Jew hate groups would easily murder a man like Jack without much provocation. 

 

 

This Writer’s Views 

 

The findings of Jack Bernstein are important to address at this time in connection with the conditions in the Israeli state.  Frankly, the evidence is massive that indeed the words of Bernstein have credible support.  After all, the Amalekites rule the United States just as they rule the state of Israel.  Much of the evil Jack cited in Israel is present in the US. 

 

But in fairness, this writer does have a few minor differences with Jack’s findings--as pointed out above and in previous chapters. 

 

While the Bernstein linkage of the Ashkenazi Jews to Marxism and later their transformation to Zionism seems clear enough, there is really more to it. 

 

Zionism correctly involves two separate features.  There is political Zionism and a religious Zionism where deeply religious Jews (who probably are by and large true Israelite Jews) love the idea of aliyah and living in Israel on religious grounds.  Bernstein does not recognize this distinction. 

 

Actually, much of the political Zionist movement to Palestine from 1869 to 1948 involved political Zionists who were Marxists (as pointed out above).  But since 1948, there has been a decided shift to religious Zionism. 

 

 

YAH is in Charge 

 

But there is a strange feature which escapes almost every person who tries to look at this theme.  The evidence is massive that The ELOHIM has been directly in charge of both movements. 

 

True, the political movement has been inspired and led by extremely bad Amalekite Ashkenazi Jews (who are really gross workers of evil).  Howbeit, people loose sight of the fact that if it was necessary The MOST HIGH could and would raise up stones to do His will.  While others may have lagged behind in establishing a Jewish state, the evil Amalekites were willing to do it. 

 

Obviously, the entire and totality of religious Zionism hangs upon religious faith and the oversight of The HIGHEST.  Per YHWH’s Word, the people called the Jews (yes, both good Israelite Jews and evil Amalekite pretenders) have a job to do in Palestine. 

 

Racially, the Arabs could never have performed the work of righteousness there as demanded in the Scriptures.  Only the Jews, good or bad, could do this work.  And YHWH is now and will in the future use these Jews for this work of righteousness and truth in the Middle East. 

 

Subsequent chapters herein will spell out the Scriptural reasons on why the Jews had to go to Palestine and establish a Jewish state.  The reader is asked to be patient because everything will come together on this theme in the later chapters. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 456--Control of the Israeli Government

 

 

Surely the Kahilla Exists Today

 

Surely, the Kahilla or Cahilla (as described in a former chapter) is in existence today somewhere and perhaps under the management of a modern Ha Ahad Ha’am (logically, in New York City, London or perhaps even in the state of Israel).  If it is in Israel, its status must be open to question because there is an Israeli government there with a parliament and a Prime Minister (and recently, a modern religious Sanhedrin, as will be discussed in later comments herein). 

 

It’s hard to fathom that some other secret Jewish organization could be directing the Israeli government from behind the scenes (but it seems to be true, as is manifested in the US and Britain). 

 

Too, the Israeli government has been largely in the hands of secularist Ashkenazi Amalekites since 1948.  Since the Amalekite Ashkenazim have controlled the Israeli government, there may be little need for any Amalekite secret government directly present in Israel (as it is in the Christian West and especially in North America and Britain). 

 

 

Barry Chamish 

 

The previously quoted Israeli author Barry Chamish may have the right insight on the government of Israel, vis-à-vis the (Amalekite, ed) internationalists calling the shots in Britain, North America and parts of Europe.  Chamish was on the “Dreamland” program on Feb 4, 2001, to offer his insight on several questions (like the Knights Templers and the brethren of YESHUA, as discussed earlier herein). 

 

Barry believes that the globalists and internationalists in North America and Europe are calling the shots in Israel, as well as in America and Europe.  He specifically names the Bronfmans, some other important US Jews, the bankers and the Council on Foreign Relations (the Rothschilds, Warburgs and Lazards and by all means George Soros must be added to the mix). 

 

Chamish suggests that these fat cats control both the Democrats and Republicans in the US and the Labor and Likud parties in Israel.  Thus, whoever wins in either state answers to the globalists. 

 

“The Jerusalem Post” of Feb 23, 2001 (p. 6), inadvertently admitted this control when it acknowledged that the Israeli media has long been seen as a bastion of the left.  The US controlled media has been discussed in former chapters in the vein that powerful Amalekite Jew bankers/masters control the Western, Christian press and use it to promote their agenda on the New World Order (as manifested in the leftist motions). 

 

Obviously, these same powerful Amalekite Jew internationalists (some of whom were named by Barry Chamish, as noted above) do the same thing in the state of Israel, where they control the media and even much of the population and government. 

 

Per Barry’s view, the globalists are behind the present Middle East peace efforts--which will surely become reality in time (as late as Nov 9, 2001, plutocrat Edgar Bronfman has called for the dismantling of Israeli settlements and unilateral separation from the Palestinians--per Nov 9, 2001, “Forward,” p. 1). 

 

Barry says that the globalists need this Middle East peace to proceed with their plans for world rule.  He notes that this was the very issue which caused the assassination of former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin (as briefly reported in a prior chapter). 

 

Chamish charges that the Israeli intelligence people pulled the plug on Rabin when it appeared that he was going against them in the peace talks (specifically, Barry says that Shin Bet agents pulled the trigger).  They then set up the patsy who took the fall and was convicted for the murder (apparently, the Rabin killing was similar to the John F. Kennedy killing in the US in 1963, where the patsy Oswald took the fall). 

 

 

Secret Rulers over the Israeli Government 

 

If Barry Chamish is correct, as quoted above. it means that the Israeli government itself (which Chamish says is “corrupt”) is not calling the shots worldwide. 

 

Instead, powerful internationalists in Europe and North America are the people calling the shots and trying to run the world.  Though Chamish did not use the word Amalekite, he did name some of the Jews involved (like the Bronfmans), who all seem to be Amalekite bankers/masters. 

 

If Chamish is right on this, the global Amalekite conspiracy ruling the US, Britain and certain other nations also rules in Israel.   This option opens the door that the controlling Amalekite Kahilla is located in New York or London and not in Palestine at all (as some right wingers want to believe). 

 

Frankly, from this writer’s assessment, Barry Chamish seems to be essentially correct.  The same Amalekite Jew bankers/masters living in and calling most of the shots in North America and Europe call most of the shots in Palestine.  But importantly, these bankers/masters do not call all of the shots in all of these places.  There could be some streaks of local independence (not many, but perhaps some). 

 

 

More Views 

 

There is a prevalent opinion among many American right-wingers that the Israeli government actually rules the United States.  Even some intelligent Jews share this thinking.  For example, the Jewish activist Jeffrey Blankfort claims that instead of Israel being a client state of the US, it is clear that it is the other way around (Oct 7, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 11). 

 

While this idea from Blankfort is interesting, the writer of this study takes the view that the US is not a client of the state of Israel, nor is Israel a client of the US.  Actually, the evidence is massive that both the US and Israel (plus the White British Commonwealth) are puppet states of the super rich Amalekite plutocrats, largely in North America and Britain.  This seems to be the thinking of Barry Chamish, as well. 

 

That there is some power or influence over Israeli politics and politicians, there is no doubt.  This option was brought out in terms of the Likud party by Ayoub Kara, one of the Likud members of Parliament. 

 

Per Kara, “There are senior people in the Likud who are sick of all this, but they are afraid to speak out because of the police investigation.  If they’re scared to speak, they must have something to hide.  We have to rid the Likud of the forces that have taken it over, so that this party doesn’t become a mafia.” 

 

Kara’s words were presented merely as a remark in a column entitled “Quote-Unquote” in the January 13, 2003, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 53).  The quotation offered no explanation of what Kara may have had in mind.  Obviously, he raised questions of the possibility of an Israeli police state managed by someone other than the Israeli Knesset. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 457--Israeli Politics and Peace

 

 

The Temple Mount, Revisited 

 

The political ramifications on-going in Israel are closely connected to religious conflicts which will be addressed in the succeeding chapters.  This condition invokes a need to revisit the question of building a Third Temple on Moriah. 

 

When religious Jews gain access to the Temple Mount (discussed earlier) and start rebuilding the Temple, there really will be some major explosions among the Israelis.  Just as Christians passionately hate the idea of animal sacrifices and a rebuilt Temple, the evil Amalekites share the same disposition.  They, too, are bitterly opposed to the Temple and the resumption of the daily sacrifice. 

 

To demonstrate how incredibly opposed Jewish Amalekites are to the idea of a new Third Temple on Mount Moriah, all one has to do is spend some time looking at the record of events over the past few years, as associated with the peace negotiations between Ehud Barak, Yasser Arafat and President Bill Clinton. 

 

The peace negotiations in Washington and in the Middle East have been or will be detailed elsewhere herein.  There is no need to cover those presentations at this stage.  

 

Suffice to say, there are some subtle features of the negotiations which conclusively prove how the liberal, leftist Amalekites are utterly opposed to religious Jews and Judaism (the Judaism, as in evidence in the Orthodox establishment, to be covered in the following chapters). 

 

As will be elaborated upon in a later chapter, one of the key negotiating points back in July 2000 was the question of sovereignty over the Temple Mount.   Religious Jews wanted some Jewish access to the Temple Mount.  Barak and his liberal allies could have cared less.  Barak was even quoted as effectively saying that he didn’t care whose flag flew over the Dome of the Rock. 

 

 

Arafat Was Offered Much 

 

In the July 2000 negotiations, Barak was prepared to offer sweeping concessions if Arafat would just agree to a peace treaty (Oct 23, 2000, “Time”).  Hindsight has proven that Arafat and his Arab buddies were stupid for turning down the several liberal offers from Barak. 

 

All along, the Israelis could have followed the advice, wisdom and perception of some intelligent and perceptive Israeli leaders and completely liquidated the Arabs (as will be further discussed in subsequent comments).  In fact, if the Arabs keep messing with the Israelis, this very thing may happen in the coming days.  They may all be expelled or killed. 

 

As a minimum, the liquidation of the Palestinian Arabs would have opened up some land that Americans and other House of Yisrael Israelites could have fled to when their nations are destroyed in WWIII.  Regardless, as elsewhere discussed herein, the Palestinian Arabs are not going to last long in that land.  When YESHUA comes, they are on the way out (to make room for the return of the House of Yisrael). 

 

As things turned out, following Arafat’s blunders, the Intifada surfaced to really disrupt the peace discussions.  But Clinton was on the sidelines pushing for more negotiations and a final peace settlement (assuredly, he was following the dictates and wishes of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters, who ruled his administration). 

 

Despite this push, religious Jews also were dissatisfied with the prospects of losing access to the Temple Mount (as noted earlier).  So the Amalekite bankers/masters calling the shots had rebellion on their hands from religious Jews in Israel--as well as the Palestinians.  There were prospects of a total collapse of the so-called peace talks. 

 

 

The Fox 

 

But Barak cleverly entered the arena to play the role of a cunning fox.  Seeing trouble on the horizon on his sell out of the Temple Mount and religious Jews, he resigned and called for new Prime Minister elections on Feb 6, 2001.  He had three potential opponents to deal with--Ariel Sharon, Binyamin Netanyahu and Shimon Peres (in his own left wing, Labor party). 

 

With his resignation and call for new Prime Minister elections, it meant that Netanyahu could not run against him--unless the Knesset changed the law (which didn’t happen, since candidates were limited to Knesset members).  Netanyahu was not only a popular, local politician, but he was somewhat of a supporter of religious Jews and Jewish access to the Temple Mount.  He would never agree to a sell out of the mount. 

 

Peres was a liberal leftist.  But he could not get support of sufficient left wing Knesset members to run.  It is unclear what events took place to eliminate the Netanyahu and Peres opposition, but it is highly likely that Barak and his colleagues were behind the moves. 

 

In any case, this paved the way for Barak to only be faced with Ariel Sharon (who some believed was a real, hard-line right winger and a person who was not liked among many of the secular Israelis).  Because Sharon was thought to be unpopular, Barak thought that he could easily defeat him and get a new mandate for his policies.  The outcome of the election will be addressed shortly below. 

 

 

The Clinton Plan 

 

With the end of the year and term facing Clinton and the Amalekite bankers/masters in late 2000, Slick proposed a new initiation in Dec 2000 to Barak and Arafat (and one which surely met with the approval of the Amalekite bankers/masters in league with Slick).  Clinton’s plan involved several features viz: 

 

A new Palestinian state would be finalized on the West bank of the Jordan, Gaza and East Jerusalem (including almost all of the Old City--except for the Western Wall, the Jewish quarter and a part of the Armenian quarter in the Southwest).  Jerusalem could be the capitol of both the Jewish and Palestinian states in the vein of a divided Jerusalem--East Jerusalem for the Arabs and West Jerusalem for the Israelis. 

 

In the land deal, the Arabs would get all of Gaza and around 95% of the West bank (with land links between the two portions).  The US would give both the Arabs and the Jews massive new sums of money and federal recognition and support (to include placing two US embassies in the new capitols in Jerusalem--one for the Jews and one for the Arabs). 

 

The former Jewish spy Jonathan Pollard would be released from jail and allowed to emigrate to Israel.  Furthermore, Israel was to receive a new surge of US military technology, including data on the development of the anti-missile defense system. 

 

Part of the 800,000 displaced Arab refugees could emigrate to the Palestinian state, but could not return to the Jewish state.  However, the US and her European and Japanese allies would give these people (who choose to not return or could not return to the Palestinian state) vast sums of money to pacify them. 

 

Finally, the Slick plan called for the Muslim Palestinians to have sovereignty over the Temple Mount, and the Jews would have guaranteed rights to the Western Wall.  In time, this would be the most profound point in the whole deal. 

 

 

The Secret Agreement 

 

According to the Jan 15, 2001, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 5), Slick and the Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak entered into a private agreement (apparently a secret understanding) that Israel would accept the plan.  Per the secret plan--Barak, Clinton and Arafat were scheduled to hold a high profiled ceremony and sign the agreement on Jan 10, 2001, at the US White House with many Arab dignitaries present.

 

Political pressure was to build up and force or induce Arafat and the Muslims to accept the new peace plan which Barak and Clinton had agreed upon.  Presumably, some of the other Arab states would endorse the plan and also put pressure upon Arafat (as did happen in the succeeding days). 

 

Just after the pagan Christmas, Barak went on Israeli television and said that he was prepared to accept Slick’s latest proposal and that he and the Israeli nation would have to move forward with some new dramatic concessions.

 

This was an unprecedented surrender to Arafat and gave him virtually everything he wanted, except for the full rights of all dispersed Palestinians to return to the land areas of Israel (that were evacuated by the Arabs in the 1948 war).  This became a point of disagreement for the Palestinians (although Arafat finally came out and said that he could accept the basic plan). 

 

Obviously, religious Jews (primarily the Orthodox) were being sold out in order for Barak to get a peace treaty with the Palestinians.  Of course, the secular Amalekites, both in Israel and out in the world, could have cared less about the Temple Mount.  They were perfectly happy and content to see it given away.  After all, these Amalekites hated the very idea of a new Jewish Temple. 

 

But many religious Jews did not sit back and allow Barak to give the mount away.  A NPR news report on Dec 31, 2000, noted that some Ultra Orthodox said that Barak was a traitor and that his administration was a criminal government.  Much Jewish opposition arose in Jerusalem, as details of the plan leaked out. 

 

 

Barak Vacillated 

 

Barak became a hated man (his popularity plunged in Israeli polls), as many right wing Jewish protests surfaced to cause him and the secret plan enormous difficulties--including 400,000 protesting Jews near the Temple Mount on Jan 8, 2001. 

 

Perhaps religious Jews were able to create such a storm of opposition to the planned give-away, so much so, that within a few days after saying that he would accept the Clinton plan, Barak back-stepped and reversed himself by saying that “no,” he had some problems with the Clinton plan (one report even suggested that he would also have some opposition to Arab sovereignty over the complete mount). 

 

Actually, a reversal like this was almost par for the course for Barak.  He had a reputation for being very indecisive and bouncing around on issues.  For example, upon losing the February 2001 Prime Minister election (to be shortly assessed), Barak said that he was quitting politics. 

 

However, in later discussions with Ariel Sharon on serving in a national unity government, Barak initially agreed to become Defense Minister. 

 

Subsequently, Barak reversed himself once more and said that he would not serve with Sharon and that he was “retiring” from politics and government service (as a matter of information, a national unity government with Likud and Labor did surface in 2001, but it fell apart in Nov 2002 and forced new elections in Jan 2003). 

 

 

Why? 

 

Ultimately, the question must be asked why would Barak enter into a secret agreement with Slick to give up the Temple Mount.  For sure, Barak was and is a politician.  The whole idea that he was willing to sell out so many of the Israelis (at least, all of those who were religious) to simply get a peace treaty made no sense at all.  For sure, they were voters who could cause him some trouble.  Something was afoot. 

 

Perhaps the case can be made that Barak and his Labor colleagues were, by and large, Amalekites with no sense of honor, integrity or religion.  This option could be just one more manifestation of the Amalekite assault upon truth.  Surely, the Amalekite bankers/masters in America and Britain would be pleased with the sell-out (as indeed, their spokesman Slick Clinton would, as well, since it could help his legacy). 

 

But the whole thing was still questionable for Barak to be pursuing.  It was such a bad decision that one must take a second look at what might be behind the why.  A subsequent appendix, discussing the depravity and wickedness of Slick Clinton, opens the door to some evidence of the payment of a billion dollar bribe to Slick and his Amalekite handlers by the oil rich Arab states. 

 

The very mention of a billion dollars opens the door to who all might could share in this giant pay off.  As will be asked later, is it possible that Barak or some of his leftist colleagues in Palestine were offered part of this money?  Actually, “Spotlight” of Jan 1 & 8, 2001, had a front page story by George Nichols on “Secret Slush Fund Buys ‘Peace’?” which suggested this very thing (to be discussed later). 

 

In any case, the late Dec 2000 developments made it clear that Barak and his liberal colleagues ruling the modern state of Israel had no love or appreciation for the Jewish religion or Jewish religious people.  Barak was clearly not on the side of The ELOHIM.  He was a key player who was actually working to destroy Judaism and its roots here in the age end. 

 

 

Barak, Clinton and Rich 

 

A former chapter discussed the Slick Clinton pardon actions in January 2001 just before he left office.  Among the 190 or so pardons (140 of them on Slick’s last full day in office), Clinton pardoned an Amalekite crook, swindler, con-man, double crosser and tax evader ($150 million from the United States alone) named Marc Rich (who was then hiding out with his billions of dollars in Switzerland). 

 

As outlined in the previous discussion on Rich, the point was made that a number of influential Amalekite Jews wrote letters to Slick on behalf of Rich (who had never served a day in jail for his many alleged crimes).  In the March 1, 2001, congressional hearings, information came forth that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak made a personal telephone call to Slick to urge the Marc Rich pardon. 

 

The Mar 12, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 11) had a story by Michael Collins Piper on “Clinton ‘Friend’ Links Blackmail to Rich Affair” which reported that the Israeli Mossad had highly critical information on Clinton’s illegal activities in the Whitewater scandal and used it to blackmail Slick into pardoning the Amalekite Marc. 

 

Piper quoted Clinton friend and former Under Secretary of the Treasury Roger Altman, who publishes the “National Enquirer.”  In his paper of Feb 27, 2001, Altman charged that the Mossad actually blackmailed Slick into making the pardon.  Altman (a probable Amalekite Jew) is a colleague of the Israelis and the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters who rule America.  So this charge is interesting. 

 

Some support for this option came from a “New York Times” report of recent which suggested that Rich had once been a Mossad agent or colleague in some manner.  Actually, this is not unusual because almost all Jews worldwide work for and support the Mossad whenever they are asked or needed.  So surely, the Amalekite big shot Rich would collaborate with (or be a boss of) the Mossad. 

 

 

The Pay-Offs

 

Since it is now public knowledge that Rich paid Clinton and the Democrats at least $2 million (actually, the bribes were probably substantially greater than this, if the truth ever comes out), one must ask what Rich paid Barak and the other Amalekite Jews to enlist their help in insuring the pardon.  Obviously, Rich was a billionaire who could and would gladly shell out some money to benefit himself. 

 

In any case, billionaire Marc Rich clearly appears to be one of the powerful, global, Amalekite masters who pull the strings and make governments and politicians jump.  Either he had power over Barak and his other Amalekite supporters or he bribed them, along with Clinton, in order to insure their support for his pardon. 

 

While logically, the money payoffs (bribes) to Slick Clinton would probably have been enough of a motivation for Slick to have made the pardon, it must be noted that there was opposition from Clinton aides on pardoning Rich.  Apparently, many of Slick’s White House associates opposed the Rich pardon (per testimony of Clinton aides at the congressional hearings on March 1, 2001). 

 

Furthermore, many or most of the Slick pardons were done without going through the US Justice Department (as is supposed to be the correct procedure).  Above all else, per Justice, no person is to be pardoned, unless he has done some jail time and shown evidence of rehabilitation (which Rich never faced since he was a fugitive who completely fled US justice). 

 

 

The Israeli Elections   

 

As discussed above, Ehud Barak tried to play the fox in arranging for new elections on Feb 6, 2001--which would end up pitting him against the supposedly unpopular Ariel Sharon.  But things didn’t work out as Barak planned. 

 

Actually, it turned out that Sharon was far more popular than Barak imagined (or rather, it was that the Israeli people hated Barak more than he allowed).  In any case, Sharon won the election and became the man in charge in 2001. 

 

Barry Chamish, quoted earlier, suggests that the globalists ruling Barak would also rule Sharon.  So either way, the status quo would continue and nothing would change (in terms of the later Jan 2003 elections, Barry would have surely said exactly the same thing). 

 

The 2001 election spelled out a couple of fall outs which may prove to be especially significant.  First of all, Sharon made it clear that the Arab-Israeli peace talks were back to step one and presumably would not be resumed until the Arabs stop the violence.  He also suggested that he would be the hard-liner which identified him in the past. 

 

The “Washington Post” of Feb 7, 2001, noted that a day after his election victory, Sharon donned a skullcap and went to the Western Wall to say prayers which sent an unmistakable signal that there would be no more Jewish concessions to the Palestinians on the control of the old city of Jerusalem. 

 

Sharon told reporters that “I am visiting Jerusalem, the capital of the Jewish people for the past 3,000 years and the united and indivisible capital of Israel--with the Temple Mount as its center--for all eternity” (Mar 2001 “End Time News,” p. 2).  But if he was controlled by powerful Amalekite bankers/masters outside of Israel, Sharon’s stance on the Arab-Israeli peace talks would change dramatically (as it did somewhat). 

 

In the coming days, the powerful Amalekite plutocrats in North America and Europe must have put pressure upon him to be more receptive to peace (which is what the bankers/masters want because of their push for world government, as discussed in a former chapter).  Students of truth will have to sit on the sidelines and continue to watch events as they unfold (and especially, after the Jan 2003 elections). 

 

Sharon also talked about and eventually was able to obtain a national unity government with Labor.  In the new government, Labor and some of the other parties have shared power. 

 

Labor’s leader Shimon Peres was the new Foreign Minister (until Labor pulled out of the coalition in Nov 2002).  Certainly, Peres is a man in league with the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in the Diaspora to help push the peace plan in the new government. 

 

 

Joel Skousen

 

Joel Skousen will be further quoted in a later chapter herein.  As will be pointed out, this man seems to have a very good grip on what is happening internationally.  In this vein, he is editor of the World Affairs Brief on the Internet. 

 

The June 2002 “Believer’s Advocate” (p. 10-11) had an article on Joel Skousen’s perception, as translated from a Hebrew article in Israel in early 2002 on “B. USA Against Sovereignty--Ammon Lord in Major Rishon,” pp 10,11-26.10.2001.  The article said: 

 

“What are we fighting for?  Not for Greater Israel but to ensure that Israel remains an independent state.  We are struggling for the continuation of Israel as an independent state-- ‘the third Jewish Commonwealth’, as described by journalist Rino Rzur in his column in Hair. 

 

“Joel Skousen, an American friend of Israel and editor of the Internet newspaper, World Affairs Brief, is sure that Israel’s sovereignty is in danger.  His recent visit to Israel was to warn us of the risk of losing our sovereignty.  Skousen is an expert on the political connections to terrorism.  He told me in the lobby of the Crown Plaza Hotel in Jerusalem that ‘The war in Afghanistan is a false war against terrorism’.  He continued, ‘This does not look like a real war.  America has another agenda, which is connected to the oil in the region and throughout the Muslim areas to the south of Russia’. 

 

“Skousen is very cynical of America under the leadership of President George W. Bush.  He is no less cynical of Israel under the leadership of Ariel Sharon and, for that matter, of his rival, Binyamin Netanyahu.  Skousen says that Sharon also has another agenda that is not always in the national self-interest of Israel.  He is working in cahoots with the international community.  Sharon is conducting the war against terror only half-heartedly.  It is not clear how much he is involved with the international community, but Skousen suspected Sharon as soon as he asked Ehud Barak to become his Defense Minister and then when he made Peres his Foreign Minister.  Peres is the most prominent representation of the European Globalists.  According to Joel Skousen the most important goal of the New World Order is to break down national sovereignty.  The most recent and powerful example of this came during the Yugoslavian war when all of Kosovo was placed under international authority.  Joel Skousen says it will be hard to do the same in Israel but that is the goal, even though he does not believe that they will succeed. 

 

“I asked Joel Skousen how the war against terror should be undertaken here in Israel.  Joel Skousen:  ‘Israel must go into Area A and confiscate all the terrorists’ weapons.  That is the main objective.  The PA must be stripped of all its weapons and its armaments industry must be destroyed.  There is no difference between the PA and other terror groups.  After all the arms have been collected there will be an interim, a period in which we have to go after everyone possessing illegal guns.  After that, a new PA will rise without connections to terrorist groups.  Only then will there be a possibility for the implementation of the peace process’. 

 

“Skousen is convinced Sharon is not moving in this direction and neither did Netanyahu. 

 

“When asked how the USA could put pressure on Israel, Joel Skousen said:  ‘The USA could affect the shipment of arms and parts to Israel.  But even more effective than that, would be to bring down the government.  This was done successfully twice in the past, when the USA brought down the governments of Shamir and Netanyahu’.  Skousen says that it is important that the Israeli public understands that, although the USA seems to be a big promoter of Israel, this is not really so.  The US government represents international interests whose purpose is to support a global [worldwide government], where national governments will be supplanted by local authorities.  Although it seems as though the US is working for the good of Israel, in fact it is actually servicing the interests of the globalists.  The globalists target is that no nation will be completely independent.  No nation will have the right of self-defense, and thus Israel’s fate will be decided in Brussels.  Skousen believes that President Bush is a conservative and as such he should be anti-globalist.  However, it seems that it is easier for him to achieve the interests of the globalists without opposition.  [Sentence not clear in Hebrew.] 

 

“The most important influence on George Bush is George Schultz, seen to be best suited for involvement in the globalist agenda.  What is more, Schultz is Condeelezza (sic) Rice’s mentor. 

 

“The Americans are using the Israeli Right to achieve the Globalist agenda in the Middle East.  When Ehud Barak negotiated under fire, there was a great outcry.  But when Sharon negotiates under fire there is almost no opposition.  In Skousen’s opinion, the Americans want to weaken Israel to such an extent that it will be forced to beg for UN intervention to protect Israeli citizens from Arab genocide--which is what they are now achieving through Palestinian terrorism.  According to Joel Skousen, Israel will be irreparably weakened if the US succeeds in removing Israel from the Golan Heights.  However, this could only happen when all Arab nations request help from the international community. 

 

“The American demand that Israel withdraw from Area A--and not go back--is seen by Skousen, as an American de facto recognition of Palestinian sovereignty.  Joel Skousen is very much afraid, that Israeli politicians are being manipulated by the Americans. 

 

“Skousen foresees Israel facing a difficult war within the next 2 or 3 years.” 

 

This article goes on to quote Skousen’s advice for Israel.  Among several suggestions, Skousen says that the Israelis must find a new type of political leader (presumably, one not beholden to the internationalists--ed). 

 

 

Some Comment 

 

The above article from Israel with Joel Skousen’s views is important because it seems to be on track, in terms of the Jewish state.  Manifestly, the globalists are the people calling the shots.  They rule America; and per Skousen, and the earlier comments of Barry Chamish, they are largely in control in Jewish Israel. 

 

Since this present “globalist” power in America, Canada, and Britain is essentially in the hands of Amalekite Jewish bankers/masters (although Amalekites in the Roman Catholic Church and other definitions in continental Europe and at the UN are slowly displacing the Western Amalekite power structure as the move to world government progresses), a paradox or state of confusion over who is running things may seem to result. 

 

The earlier question about how or to what extent the Amalekites in North America and Britain control the Israeli state seems to largely be answered in the above comments from Barry Chamish and Joel Skousen (although Skousen did not identify these globalists as Amalekite Jews, per se). 

 

The Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in control of Canada, the US and Britain are internationalists.  They do not care presently one whit about an independent Jewish state in Palestine (although they have cared in the past).  Their whole motion and energy is now directed at the establishment of world government (obviously, these leaders hope to be the world’s governor when that one world state becomes reality). 

 

True, these bankers/masters do control the US, Britain and much of the Christian West.  And they have exercised much control over Jewish Israel.  However, there are questions remaining on the extent of their control of the Israelis.  Probably, the Mossad and most Israeli governments have answered to the bankers/masters.  But there are possibilities for nationalism and independence among many Israelis. 

 

At least, this writer sees some eventual independence and even a turn to religion on the part of many of the Israelis.  These will be good motions--if and when they take place.  For sure, the Amalekite bankers now trying to take over the world will not totally succeed with the Israelis. 

 

For one more comment on Joel Skousen’s perception, it is interesting that Sharon has apparently been trying to get rid of the guns in the West Bank with the Israeli invasions in the spring of 2002.  At one point in time, Bush demanded that Israel withdraw.  Sharon largely ignored him and proceeded on with his task.  This event implies that maybe Sharon did have some independence from the globalists (who rule GWB). 

 

 

More on Sharon 

 

But to whatever extent the Israeli government does or doesn’t do, the fact remains that the Arabs are not going to get as much from the Likud, as they would have from Barak.  In other words, Barak was ready to give them almost everything.  Now, this “everything” is off the table.  The Palestinian Arabs have been crying about a new Middle East war.  Howbeit, this option seems out of the question. 

 

For sure, Sharon (or Netanyahu and/or the Likud in general) has had some links with and will have even more ties to the religious right in Israel.  This reality spells almost a certainty that the religious Jews are not going to give up the Temple Mount without some serious intervention by the Roman Catholic Church or international political powers. 

 

Ariel and his government may ultimately bow to the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in North America and Europe.  But with his attachment to the religious right, he may also try to protect their interests as well.  Clearly, it is not cut and dried that Sharon will automatically sell religious Jews out in Palestine.  He may tread carefully on this plan. 

 

So while Barry Chamish and Joel Skousen project that nothing has changed or would change under Sharon (as opposed to Barak), this may not be true at all.  Manifestly, Sharon did show some sense of dedication to the religious Jews in Palestine (maybe not a lot, but at least more than Barak). 

 

For sure, with Sharon and/or Netanyahu in 2003, religious Jews may be a step closer to a new Temple on Moriah. 

 

Moreover, it is possible that the 2001 Israeli election was somewhat of a set back for the internationalist Amalekites in North America and Europe who are trying to establish the New World Order (although Skousen seems to believe that the Israeli right wing will now support the peace motion).  Barak was the globalists’ man--but perhaps not Sharon or, at least, not Sharon fully and completely. 

 

 

The Possibilities 

 

This push by the internationalist Amalekites upon the state of Israel may have an unplanned fallout.  Of course, any number of things can develop in the Israeli state to upset the plans for global rule. 

 

The January-February 2000 “Tzemach Letter” (p. 1) said that “No one knows what the end of this ‘peace accord’ will be but it is certainly possible that Israel could easily degenerate into chaos and civil war. 

 

“If this occurs, a new Israeli government could be established which would not be democratic in nature.  A military government suited to meet the rising military emergency is most likely.  In Israel, a theocracy controlled by the leading Rabbis is also possible.  In either case, Israel will have departed from the democratic process.” 

 

This last option by “Tzemach” might seem highly unlikely, but it must be put on the table and discussed.  Zekharyah the prophet lays out evidence of a very religious Yehudah in the age end and certainly preceding the time that the Beast power intervenes in Jerusalem and defiles the coming Third Temple.  The early 21st century is seeing a move to a more serious approach to religion by a number of modern Israelis. 

 

While it is inconceivable that the United States and the other House of Yisrael nations can break free of the power and control of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in the foreseeable future (before all of these nations are totally and completely destroyed nationally), the House of Yehudah in Palestine may do so in the coming days. 

 

As the Palestinian Jews become religious, they may break completely free of the globalist Amalekite bankers/masters.  Whether the “rabbis” or the military will take over or something else, the Word seems clear enough that the state of Israel will become more religious; and importantly, many of the Israelis do not seem to toe the line with the internationalists running things in Europe or elsewhere. 

 

 

A Final Word 

 

The Jun 3, 2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 32) had an article by Petter-Georg Levin on “Neutrality on Trial,” as quoted in a former chapter.  The essence of this story was an observation of what is happening in much of continental Europe in terms of media play over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 

 

In the presentation, a cartoon was shown as taken from the tabloid “Dagbladet.”  It showed a brutal, evil-looking Ariel Sharon with a small Bush in his pocket and a small Arafat as a concentration camp inmate.  While this perception is generally held in much of Europe and especially in parts of the Christian right-wing in America and Britain, it is far removed from the truth. 

 

True, Sharon has a reputation for toughness and as a bulldozer.  But in the real world, all three of these parties (Sharon, Bush and Arafat) are peons in the hands of far more powerful people--the globalist plutocratic bankers/masters, now largely in North America and Britain.  These plutocrats are mainly Amalekite Jews at present. 

 

But the tide is turning and other Amalekites (like in the Catholic Church and European political movements) are beginning to flex their muscles and assume center stage. 

 

In any case, this cited cartoon is simply not the real world in 2003.  In truth, Sharon, Bush, Arafat, Tony Blair and many other world leaders are jointly, at present, in the pockets of the Amalekite bankers/masters out in the Diaspora. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 458--The Amalekites Versus Religious Jews

 

 

The Sephardi-Ashkenazi Conflict 

 

The growing conflict which the Israeli government (led by Amalekite usurpers) is promoting with sincere, good, religious Jews (probably true Israelites) will be assessed in subsequent comments and chapters.  However, this presently developing situation actually has its origin much earlier in the state of Israel, in the sense of a battle between the Ashkenazim and Sephardim. 

 

The Ashkenazim were European Jews with a heavy presence of Amalekites while the Sephardim were Spanish and Middle Eastern Jews with roots back to Second Temple days.  The Sephardim have always been the more religious Jews and particularly in the context of Orthodox Judaism (though some Ashkenazim are also Orthodox). 

 

In any case, the Oct-Dec 2000 “Petah Tikvah” (p. 46) had a reader’s letter from Danny and Hadara Levine, Messianic Jews of Jerusalem.  The Levines gave some of the history of the Ashkenazi-Sephardi conflict by noting that when hundreds of thousands of Sephardic Jews came to Israel in the 1950s from Arab lands, the elite power mongers of the secular Ashkenazic Jews saw this immigration as a threat to their rule. 

 

The Levines say that they tried to forbid contact from the incoming Sephardim with the established religious Jews.  They took Yemenite Jews from their religious parents and put them in the HaShomer HaTzair (the Secular Young Guard).

 

The “Forward” paper of Nov 9, 2001 (p. 5), had a story on this event and cited the popular Israeli belief that the Yemenite children were kidnapped and placed with childless families in Israel and abroad (evidently secular Ashkenazim). 

 

Per the Levines, the Ashkenazi authorities began changing the Sephardim to be secularists. The anti-religious institutions (controlled by Ashkenazim) took away the morale that maintained the high moral standards of the Sephardim.  But the Sephardim have big families (which was a problem for the Labor and One Israel power mongers in the Barak government). 

 

The Aug 5, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-4) quoted R. Yisroel Weiss of the Ultra Orthodox Neturei Karta group who said that in the Zionist movement to settle Israel, 95% of its leaders and supporters were irreligious and formed a path for Jews to leave their faith and that the Zionists strove to make “religious God-fearing Jews, and especially the youth, into non-religious, secular Jews.” 

 

Weiss added that “they were wildly successful.  They wanted to transform Judaism from a spiritual, Godly entity, into a secular, political entity--with its goal, a land, materialism, etc., acquired through military means.”  R. Weiss and the Neturei Karta will be further addressed in comments hereafter. 

 

 

The New Immigrants 

 

Also, many of the Russian immigrants to Palestine in the early 21st century are moving to the right, which means that some of them are becoming religious. 

 

While it would be easy to suppose that supposed Ashkenazi Amalekites from Europe and especially Russia can never become truly religious or convert to truth, this very thing is happening in Israel and even in portions of the US and the rest of the world in terms of the Messianic Jewish motion. 

 

Yes, it is plainly happening in our time.  This writer has thought much about this strange process in an effort to try to grasp why it is happening. 

 

At the moment, the best explanation for this movement (which is a very good one) is that some of the Amalekite Khazars in Europe have interbred so much with good Adamic stock (from Shem and Japheth) that the evil and depravity of the Amalekite genes have been largely bred out of some of them over the years. 

 

 

Lauren Gelfond 

 

The Nov 15, 2002, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 22-24) had an in-depth story by Lauren Gelfond on “The New Israelis’ which discussed this phenomenon.  The story took note of the fact that some 890,000 immigrants from the old Soviet Union poured into Israel during the years 1990-1999, under the law of return (that is those persons who had a Jewish parent or grandparent). 

 

Besides those Russians who have come to Israel on the basis of Jewish ancestry, some number of them have come on the basis of being married to Jews.  Sometimes, these marriages broke up after immigration and the non-Jewish spouses simply stay.  Other Russian immigrants have apparently come to Palestinian Israel without any Jewish connections at all. 

 

Of this 890,000 immigrants, some 240,000 of them did not even identify themselves as Jews.  The Israeli Interior Ministry estimates that there are some 400,000 non-Jews from the FSU in Israel today.  Many or most of these 400,000 are actually Christians or Messianic Jews who believe in YESHUA (the “Maoz Israel Report,” elsewhere cited herein, mentions some of them). 

 

The story by Ms Gelfond discusses the problems which these non-Jewish Israelis face once they arrive in Palestine--in trying to bounce around between being Christians or Jews.  Many have searched for Russian speaking Christian Churches but have been unsuccessful (although some number of them end up in Messianic Jewish congregations, as just noted above). 

 

The “Jerusalem Post” report by Lauren said that “For the first time, the State of Israel and the Orthodox Christian Church are being overworked with practicing Christians who have Jewish ancestry.”

 

Many of these new immigrants say that they suffered from anti-Semitism in the old Soviet Union; and now, in Israel, they encounter hatred and prejudice here from the local Jews. 

 

The story cited the case of a woman named Victoria Vakhnisky, age 34, of Arad.  She immigrated with her Jewish husband in 1994 and later separated from him.  She said that more than 50% of the people in Arad are Russians and many of them are Christians (as she is). 

 

She adds that while her Jewish neighbors ask her about the Christian cross she wears, most are accepting.  She notes that religious Jews are especially accepting.  Apparently, per Victoria, the problem surfaces with secular, non-religious Jews, who sometimes have a problem with her and her Christian cross.

 

These comments by Ms Vakhnisky may be particularly relevant in the present discussion herein.  As the point is made throughout this publication, it is many of the secular Ashkenazi Jews who are Amalekites.  There are many good reasons to believe that many religious Jews (especially Orthodox and Ultra Orthodox) are correctly Jewish Israelites  (and particularly among the Sephardim). 

 

The point is that Jewish Israelites are more accepting of the Russian Christians than atheist Amalekites.  This is an utterly fascinating correlation. 

 

In any case, an unbiased observer must be impressed with the increasing numbers of Russian and European Ashkenazi Jews, who have been coming to Israel and who appear very much like majority type Europeans.  Many have blond hair and blue eyes and attractive noses and faces and well-proportioned bodies (substantially different from the Hittite noses and Golda Meir bodies of many Amalekites). 

 

 

Another Blow to the Amalekites 

 

Another major set back for the Amalekite bankers/masters came in the summer of 2000 when the Israeli Knesset chose Moshe Katsav, a Sephardi, to be the new president (as pointed out earlier herein).  The Ashkenazi Shimon Peres fought hard for this post, but lost out.  Surely, the Ashkenazim have their hands full in trying to rule Israel with the growing focus on religion. 

 

 

The Divisions in Judaism, Revisited

 

As discussed in former chapters, Orthodox Judaism sprang from the old Pharisee sects.  But what is not readily known by the public at large is that even the contemporary Orthodox faith is extremely divided and diffused (just as there were 24 Jewish sects in Second Temple days). 

 

First, there is the reality that most Jews (assuredly most Amalekites) are secularists with no interest in religion at all (the ultra-secularists are in the Shinui political definition).  In general terms, almost all Jews (both religious and secularists) can be classified in the broad definitions of Sephardi (to include most Oriental Jews from the Middle East and Jews of Spanish origin) and Ashkenazi (European Jewry). 

 

Within the Ashkenazi religious definition, there are the major divisions in Judaism--the Orthodox, Reform (which also has numbers of Amalekites, since the Reform don’t believe in much of anything) and Conservative.  Religious/observant Sephardim are usually Orthodox, although some are Karaites (who seem to be closely akin to the old Essenes). 

 

The two major Orthodox segments (Sephardi and Ashkenazi) both have a number of Ultra Orthodox sects that have deviated from the mainline Orthodox faiths.  The case of the Haredi communities, the Hasidim and the Ultra Orthodox Shas party have been or will be discussed below and in other commentary herein. 

 

 

Ultra Orthodox Differences 

 

While the differences and hard feelings between the general Sephardi and Ashkenazi populations might be expected (after all, the Sephardim are mostly true Jewish Israelites while many of the Ashkenazim are Amalekite pretenders), there is quite some difference between the Sephardi Ultra Orthodox and the Ashkenazi Ultra Orthodox. 

 

These two communities logically should be close because they do have much in common.  However, that’s not the way things are in Israel.  Generally, the ruling Ashkenazim practice gross discrimination against the Sephardim (as described in a prior chapter discussing Jack Bernstein and his findings in the Israeli state).  And this condition spills over into the Haredim communities. 

 

The Dec 21, 2001, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 25-27) had a story by Larry Derfner on “Not Quite Black and White” which assessed the problem. 

 

Derfner described the situation in the Bukharan Quarter where many Sephardi Ultra Orthodox live, along with many Ashkenazim.  Sephardi Ultra Orthodox frequently speak of the discrimination, patronization, racism and apartheid emanating from the Ashkenazim and even from the Ashkenazi Ultra Orthodox.  The Ashkenazim are accused of being worse than the Nazis. 

 

Reportedly, 90% of the Ashkenazim don’t even see the Sephardim as equal to so-called human beings.  The Ashkenazim Ultra Orthodox have been known to say that while the Sephardi Ultra Orthodox have grown powerful under the Shas movement, this does not justify them as being worthy of respect.  Israel’s poorest neighborhoods are inevitably Sephardi Ultra Orthodox. 

 

The Sephardim indicate that the conflict is strong in the case of interfaith marriages.  The story is that an Ashkenazi would not let his son marry an Sephardim, unless his son was mentally retarded or crippled.  Then it would be all right for the boy to marry a “frenkina” (which is an ethnic slur for a Sephardi girl). 

 

Sephardi leader Avraham Cohen sent his daughter to an Ashkenazi school in his neighborhood.  He said that the Ashkenazi girls would not let her play with them because she was a Sephardi. 

 

In this world of discrimination, at the hands of the ruling Ashkenazim, the Sephardim have developed an interesting philosophy to get along in life.  They say “Everyone under his own fig tree.” 

 

Bar-Ilan University’s Professor Menachem Friedman, previously quoted, asserts that in the Diaspora, religion was a unifying factor.  But in modern Israel, it is religion which has made the communities divisive.  The Ashkenazi world of Torah study dealt with abstract concepts more so than the Sephardi style.  Supposedly, the Ashkenazim were more sophisticated. 

 

Traditionally, the Ashkenazi Ultra Orthodox has controlled the Ultra Orthodox world.  In this vein, they controlled the schools and would limit Sephardi attendance.  But all of this has been changing since the early 1980s and the rise of the Shas movement and the fact that the Sephardim have large families.   

 

 

Unity in Diversity? 

 

The Sep 1, 2000, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 30) had a story on “Diversity in conformity” which discussed some of the problems and realities of division within the Ashkenazi Orthodox community.  This article noted several of the Ashkenazi divisions--the Hassidic, Yeshivish, Sgtuebek Orthodox, Young Israel Orthodox, Chabad Orthodox and Zionist Orthodox. 

 

The Sephardi community also has a host of divisions and sects--many of which are Ultra Orthodox (like the Shas people, as just noted above).  Truly, there seems to be no end in division within Judaism--both in Second Temple days and in contemporary times. 

 

Finally, there are Messianic Jewish congregations (now in Israel and indeed around the world, as discussed in a former chapter) which don’t seem to fit into any of the Jewish modules because organized Jewry generally treat all religious Messianic Jews as outcasts. 

 

However, the Sep 1, 2000, “Jerusalem Post” article under discussion made a good point about one facet of unity (which goes to give religious Jews some binding together).  Per the Post, they are all bound together by “belief in the divinity of the Torah and the unwavering faith in Jewish history and destiny as presented to us in Jewish tradition.” 

 

So while there are these enormous differences and conflicts between the sects, there is also a factor of unity which can make them come together on important points, affecting all of them (especially, in the vein of religion). 

 

 

More on the Secular Jews 

 

This same “Jerusalem Post” article also went on to note the attitude of non-Orthodox Jews. 

 

The non Orthodox have always held a prime axiom that Jews, the Jewish people and the Jewish state could never succeed in the modern world if it was burdened by the commandments (in the Torah), strictness and customs of the Torah and Jewish tradition.  Most of these non Orthodox are secularists or Reform Jews who believe in little or nothing. 

 

Consequently, there is a basis for a conflict in the modern state of Israel between the Orthodox and the non Orthodox.  This division will soon surface its head prominently, as numbers of Orthodox Jews undertake the resumption of the daily sacrifice and the building of a Third Temple on Mount Moriah (described in previous chapters). 

 

The Amalekite bankers/masters calling the shots around the world and in the state of Israel will have a conflict on their hands that they cannot win.  The Amalekites (which are heavily present among the secularists and Reform Jews) hate the idea of animal sacrifices and a new Temple, just as they hate the idea of the authority of YHWH’s mitzwot in the Torah and traditional, Jewish, religious customs. 

 

For sure, the Amalekites will not prevail against the Orthodox community, as these issues unravel.  They are powerful.  But their power is not so strong in the Israeli state, as many Westerners might suppose. 

 

 

The Orthodox Religious Power 

 

Furthermore, on this theme, there is the religious question in Israel where Orthodox Judaism is extremely influential and powerful today.  As will be broached in subsequent remarks, many or most of the secularist Jews in Israel (like the Amalekites, who are actually secret sons of Satan) are much afraid of the Orthodox leadership. 

 

When the chips are down, the Amalekites are generally reluctant to challenge the Orthodox leadership (the Sephardi Orthodox is probably made up of true Jews, though the Ashkenazi Orthodox may have some Amalekite presence in it). 

 

As noted earlier, a Jew in Israel refused some years ago to obey the Torah and marry the widow of his deceased brother and raise up a son and name him after the dead brother (Gen 38:8; Deut 25:5-10).  

 

The woman demanded the right to remove his shoe and spit in his face in public (Ru 4:7-8, to acquire the property of the dead brother, per the “Soncino Chumash,” p. 1113).  He refused.  The issue went to the Israeli courts and the courts upheld the Orthodox authorities and the Torah.  The widow won the right to obey the Torah. 

 

As late as September 2000, there was a flare-up in Israel over the insistence of many Orthodox (especially Ultra Orthodox) that Jewish farmers observe the Seventh year land rest, which commenced in the fall of 2000 (Arab farmers would be unaffected, so they could continue to raise and sell produce).  The secular government (mainly Amalekites) and many Jewish farmers were absolutely opposed to this prospect. 

 

But the Orthodox (to include the Ultra Orthodox, which only numbers about 20-30% of the population of Jerusalem, as noted earlier) have been very dominant in Israel.  Historically, the Orthodox and especially the Rabbinic leaders have proven to be so strong that the Amalekite secularists have been unable to successfully oppose them. 

 

So there has been a continuing fight over the Sabbath land issue during the summer and early fall of 2000, although an article in the Sep 15, 2000, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 5) suggested that Rabbinic authorities have authorized the status quo to continue with the farmers “selling their lands to non-Jews for the Sabbath year.”  When the Sabbath year ended (fall of 2001), the non-Jews sold the land back to the Jews. 

 

 

Secular Jews Are Afraid 

 

Events like these, as just described, tell the tale in terms of the modern Israeli state.  Secular authorities are usually afraid to take on the Orthodox leadership. 

 

That’s why Amalekite Jews may holler and complain about human rights, women’s rights, feminism, minority rights and racism, homosexual rights, gun ownership and so forth in America; but they largely keep their mouths shut in the state of Israel.  There are no affirmative action programs in Israel.  There is no talk of minority rights in Israel.  There are no gay rights programs in Palestine. 

 

There is no feminism (women in Israel learn to keep their mouths shut and play a subordinate role to men) or miscegenation with the Arabs.  Schools are segregated.  And in many of them, there is a segregation of the sexes.  Jews own guns and there is no talk of gun laws. 

 

American Amalekite Jews (like Charles Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, and Ruth Ginsberg) may be big leaders and big mouths in the United States; but in Israel, they learn to keep their mouths shut or they could be in trouble. 

 

In many areas in modern Israel, there is even a strict observance of the Sabbath days and festivals (things not to be found in the Christian West).  There are religious expressions in the modern state of Israel which are simply unheard of in the Christian culture and civilization. 

 

Hence, it has to be very questionable to what extent the former Cahilla exists in Israel.  If it is there, it may pull the strings behind the scenes on the politicians (on political, social and economic issues); but assuredly, it does not take on the Orthodox leadership in religious affairs (at least, not in frontal confrontations in 2003). 

 

 

The Haredim, Revisited  

 

While the Amalekite secularists seem hesitant or reluctant to take on the prevailing Orthodox religious authorities, it is interesting that they have not shown this hesitancy in dealing with the Ultra Orthodox sect at Mea Shearim in Jerusalem.  The previously discussed article, by Daniel Klaidman on “The New Defectors” (Dec 13, 1999, “Newsweek,” p. 52-54), focused upon a man named Noam who abandoned the sect. 

 

However, there was a twist in Klaidman’s article which is both interesting and sorrowful.  Per Klaidman, the Israeli government has taken action to try to undercut and hurt Mea Shearim in very positive actions.  The government has a program in place to actively help and assist people like Noam who wish to leave the Ultra Orthodox world. 

 

Since these people have been largely born and raised in the sheltered, Ultra Orthodox, Haredi community, they are very naive and limited in trying to move into the secular Israeli society and exist.  Apparently, to encourage Ultra Orthodox people to abandon their religions and people, the government has adopted this new plan. 

 

Klaidman suggests that the government works closely (by providing money and funding) with a private agency called “Hilel” to supply defectors with everything needed from “psychological help to a temporary home with a foster family.”  In the case of Noam, he was placed in a kibbutz in Southern Israel and later enrolled at Hebrew University to study the classics. 

 

Some Israelis have suggested that with the prospects of a peace treaty with the Arabs, the government can turn its attention to the wide cultural differences within the existing Jewish community.  Evidently, they have chosen to commence with a focus on the Haredi people who are extremely sincere in their faith. 

 

The insanity of this motion plainly suggests that it is probably the brain child of evil Amalekites.  In fact, the Hilel leader is a possible Amalekite named Ami Dolev, who was a “passionate liberal” at Berkeley back in the 1960s.  It appears that Dolev has taken his ideas to Palestine to try to destroy the Ultra Orthodox sects.  What a tragedy it is that his group uses the respected name of “Hilel.” 

 

A former chapter herein mentioned the work of Yaron Yadan; who, in 1998, organized a group called “Da’at Emet” (True Wisdom) with a specific outreach to the Ultra Orthodox in an effort to have them abandon their faith.  It is unclear how much support, money and pay offs Yadan is getting from the government, but surely some money is coming to him as is also happening with “Hilel.” 

 

Thus, it now appears that the Israeli government will try to destroy the Ultra Orthodox sects.  As discussed elsewhere herein, the destruction of fundamentalist religious groups (Christian, Jewish, Islamic and so forth) is a primary goal of the New World Order (in order to bring on a one world religious state).  Just as the US murdered the Branch Davidians, the Israeli state is opposing the Ultra Orthodox. 

 

 

More Opposition 

 

Incidentally, the presence of the deeply religious people at Mea Shearim has caused a number of problems over the years with the more secularist government authorities.  On Sabbath days, everything stops in Mea Shearim.  The streets are closed and no automobiles are allowed to be driven into the area.  The Ultra Orthodox are so committed that when cars drive near their area, they come out in force and stone them. 

 

The Feb 11, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A3) had an AP follow-up on the Ultra Orthodox passion in a story on “Israeli mailman attacked for un-Orthodox deliveries.”  Per this report, residents at Mea Shearim attacked a mailman because he was delivering brochures which had a photo from the Israeli government showing a woman without a head covering in information on civil defense in Israel. 

 

Actually, there have been a number of confrontations over the years between the Ultra Orthodox and the secular police and authorities; perhaps in part, because the Ultra Orthodox do not recognize the Israeli government, as discussed earlier.  Possibly, this is one of the contributing reasons to motivate the government to try to destroy the Haredi community. 

 

The very secular and obvious Ashkenazi run “Jerusalem Post” regularly runs cartoons and stories which belittle, ridicule and make fun of the Haredi community and especially its religious leaders.  Manifestly, the Post treats the Haredim in a very pronounced disrespectful, contemptible and hateful manner.  Probably, this Israeli media view represents the position of most secular Israelis. 

 

While the honorable and sincere Ovadia Yosef (surely a modern Reb, of the Shas group, to be further discussed below) is frequently ridiculed and made fun of on a personal basis in the controlled Jewish media.  Tragically, the media attacks upon the Ultra Orthodox are often more general attacks upon all Ultra Orthodox and not just one person or segment of the definition. 

 

A good illustration of this general indictment happened in the April 5, 2002, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 18-19) in a story of “Going beyond the pale,” by Eeta Prince-Gibson.”  The apparent aim of the article was to ridicule the Haredim and to make out that many of them want to leave their traditional religious paths to now go into the Israeli army. 

 

Much of Gibson’s report hung on the so-called wisdom of an alleged Ultra Orthodox social critic named Tzvia Greenfield (a photo of her must question her alleged religious status and invite the possibilities that she is actually a butch lesbian Amalekitess). 

 

Greenfield says that Ultra Orthodox Jews are taught to accept the rulings of their “rabbis.”  She adds that that kind of education “does not provide anyone with the basic tools for the most basic and natural introspection or self-critique.”  Thus, she says, “most haredi Jews simply don’t learn to think for themselves--they just trust what the rabbis tell them is right.”  Few question their “rabbis.” 

 

 

Israeli Government Reaction 

 

Israel’s third largest party is the just noted Ultra Orthodox Shas party.  For years, it was headed by a charismatic leader named Aryeh Deri.  Probably, much of the growth of Shas can be traced to the hard work and determination of Deri.  When the Labor government under Ehud Barak came to power, it was done so with a coalition government involving Shas and some of the other, right wing, religious parties. 

 

In the coalition, Deri became the Interior Minister.  In time, he was prosecuted and convicted for corruption (in apparently trying to promote his party, using government resources and funds).   He entered prison in early September 2000 to begin serving his time (Sep 8, 2000, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 1). 

 

However, his supporters claim that the government prosecution was discriminatory since his actions were of the same caliber as those routinely done by other Israeli ministers for their parties.  They claim that he was singled out and persecuted because of his Haredi connections. 

 

In any case, Shas and the other Haredi people have been able to motivate and influence thousands of people to protest the jailing of Deri.  Regularly, while he was in jail, there were protests and demonstrations on his behalf (he was released in July 2002). 

 

It is possible that the Israeli government’s actions against Deri may backfire and actually make him a martyr and even more of an influential figure in Israeli politics. 

 

Though haters of Judaism (consisting of almost all of the world of Christianity--to include the modern Christian Identity movement) may laugh, cut up and be happy over this Israeli persecution upon Ultra Orthodox Jews, the truth is that these people are much like the Davidians and various other small sects in the Christian West. 

 

Government authorities all over the world (who are trying to bring in a one world religion) hate these small, non-conforming, religious entities. 

 

This writer is certainly not endorsing all of the views of the Ultra Orthodox.  But there are some very good reasons to support them and allow them religious freedom to choose their views without government interference. 

 

Surely, in the vein of decency and religious liberty and freedom (which multiplied millions died for in the Protestant Reformation), the Ultra Orthodox people are entitled to practice their faith--just as the Davidians should have been afforded this same basic decency.  In both cases and thousands more like them, there are powerful Satanic forces which are out to destroy non-conformists. 

 

Whether anyone agrees or disagrees with these various small religious sects (like the Davidians and the Ultra Orthodox), they should be allowed religious freedom.  And when governments take on the stance of oppressing and hurting small non-conforming groups, one can be sure that all similar small sects can receive the same treatment.  No wonder secular governments will hate the very elect so passionately. 

 

 

Orthodox Power 

 

As discussed above, the Orthodox religious authorities do carry a big stick in the state of Israel.  While many or most Jews in the state of Israel today are totally secularists (and of this number, many are surely depraved Amalekites), all Jews (even including the Amalekites) are significantly afraid of the Orthodox religious system and people. 

 

There are not many Jews who will dare try to take on the Orthodox power structure.  Amalekite Satanists may hate Judaism and true Jews passionately (as they do), but they are careful about making any frontal attacks upon religious/observant Jews.  This is a strange paradox (just as it is phenomenal that Judaism could retain so much good--with all of the prevailing power present of the Amalekite children of Satan). 

 

In any case, the essence of the cited “Jerusalem Post” stories is that a confrontation is building up between the Orthodox power structure and the secularist Jews (mainly Ashkenazi Amalekites--ed) in the coming days.  Certainly, the present Ultra Orthodox push for recognition of the Sabbath year, as noted above, will contribute to it. 

 

 

More on Moves by Shas 

 

The year 2002 also saw a surfacing of a desire and push by religious Jews (especially the Ultra Orthodox) for a religious state in Israel (Aug 12, 2002, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 12-13). 

 

The honorable and respected Ovadia Yosef and other Shas leaders have derided the Israeli court system which does not always rule according to Jewish religious law (ibid, p. 12).  Yosef the Reb is working on a halakhic code which could, in time, replace the secular legal apparatus (ibid, p. 13). 

 

Professor Hillel Weiss of Bar-Ilan University has proposed a presidential system with a religious court, a Sanhedrin, which guides all branches of government (ibid, p. 13). 

 

This plan could be taking shape since the previously noted Jewish religious Sanhedrin was launched in Tiberias, Isarel on Oct 13, 2004.  The new group meets monthly and will play a key role in the coming Third Temple.  The 71 members each serve temporarily with the understanding that he will step down when a better qualified and more knowledgeable person comes forward to take his place. 

 

Knesset member Druckman would like to see Israel run by Jewish law, but says that it can only come about by democratic processes.  He expects it to eventually happen--because “we are living in the age of the messiah” (ibid, p.13). 

 

While the controlled Jewish media in Israel hates and opposes the Ultra Orthodox and especially Ovadia Yosef, the Shas leader, Ovadia does carry a big stick.  Indeed, his plans for the implementation of a halakhic code of law on Israel may move forward (though the secularist Amalekites will fight it tooth and nail). 

 

A powerful demonstration of Shas power was outlined in a story from Israel on “Arab, Gay, Rabbi Blocked From Jerusalem City Council” in the Nov 15, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1).  The essence of this report was that the three cited people were selected by local Jerusalem interests to represent the three different factions in question. 

 

The Arab was an Israeli Arab, the faggot was Jerry Levinson, head of the Jerusalem Open House and the so-called “rabbi” was David Lazar, a Conservative “rabbi.”  However, the Jerusalem mayor’s office and the Israeli Interior Ministry are both controlled by the Shas Ultra Orthodox people.  Thus, they came out and said “no” to all three proposed council members. 

 

The nixed three said that they would go to court over the matter since they all three supposedly meet the qualifications outlined in the city by-laws.  But the point of this story is that Shas does carry a big stick in Israeli politics.  Shas wields that big stick whenever necessary in order to promote its religious agenda (which does not include queers, Arabs or non-Orthodox people). 

 

The present Mayor, Ehud Olmert, apparently is not Ultra Orthodox.  But the Deputy Mayor, Uri Lupolianski is (Dec 2, 2002, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 14).  If Olmert should go to the Knesset (the Parliament) or otherwise leave the mayor’s office, there is a good chance that Lupolianski will take over (actually, this happened in 2003).  If this happens, the mayor may force city residents to be more respectful of Jewish law. 

 

Another illustration about the attitude of Shas toward its elected leaders was outlined in the Dec 27, 2002, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 5) in a news report about a sermon Shas spiritual leader Ovadia Yosef had just delivered (respecting the coming Jan 2003 elections).  Ovadia declined to offer Minister-without-Portfolio Eli Suissa a slot on the Shas list for parliament. 

 

Yosef claimed that “Suissa is from the world of laziness, not from our world of action.”  Thus, Ovadia believes that Suissa is a lazy person and should not represent Shas in the Knesset. 

 

 

Still More From “Forward”

 

The Oct 26, 2001, “Forward” had a page one story which demonstrated the growing antagonism between observant (religious) Jews and secularist Jews (who are mainly Ashkenazi Amalekites that either practice no religion or label themselves Reform).  This “Forward” story by Ami Eden noted that a leading Reform “rabbi” activist has publicly compared the Orthodox to the Islamic fundamentalists. 

 

The activist said that “There are vicious (Orthodox) attacks on Reform Judaism, demonizing us as the devils of the Jewish world.”  In 1996, Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron, a former Chief Orthodox Rav, compared the OT account of Pinchas killing an Israelite sinner as being the justifiable murder of the first Reform Jew.  Orthodox call Reform and Conservative Jews “criminals, destroyers of religion and enemies of ‘God.’” 

 

A former chapter quoted Anat Hoffman, executive director of the Reform’s Israel Religious Action Center in Jerusalem.  As pointed out, Anat says that Orthodox compare Reform Jews with the Nazis and suicide bombers.  She has declared that she will fight the “growing radicalization among the Orthodox.”  It was unclear in the “Forward” article what measures Anat will adopt in her war against the Orthodox. 

 

 

More on the Haredi 

 

The Haredi communities (Ultra Orthodox) also carry a great deal of local autonomy.  Hence, they pretty well do about whatever they want to do, as outlined in the previous comments.  They rope off and control their areas (where they live).  Other Jews are hard pressed to try to enter their compounds and exercise any authority over them (as noted above, they stone moving cars in their areas on the Sabbaths). 

 

The Haredim have another little peculiarity which just does not set well with the other Israelis.  The Haredim refuse to allow their young people to be conscripted into the Israeli military.  Other Jews dislike this position and especially since the Ultra Orthodox people get away with it.  The Ultra Orthodox argue that their people are involved in religious studies and cannot be drafted by the state. 

 

Actually, this Haredi assertion has merit because most Ultra Orthodox males do devote their lives to the study of Torah (Sep 10, 2001, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 45).  Shas has a particular effort devoted to the use of schools and charities, designed to bring Sephardi Jews back to a seriousness on religion.  With this work and the large families that Sephardi Jews produce, Shas will have a roll to play in Israel in the coming days. 

 

The previously quoted Aug 5, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-2) had some remarks from Mark Lane on the formerly mentioned Neturei Karta Ultra Orthodox sect in Jerusalem.  He said that they “do not recognize the state of Israel, pay no taxes to it, do not attend its schools, do not register their children at birth with the Israeli regime and above all, refuse to serve in its military.”  Obviously, the government hates this group. 

 

In any case, perhaps some of this reality has motivated the government to launch its attack upon the Ultra Orthodox, as described above, in the “Newsweek” article on Noam (who was assisted by the government to abandon and leave the Ultra Orthodox community at Mea Shearim) and with the prosecution and conviction of Aryeh Deri. 

 

 

Views of Secular Jews on the Ultra Orthodox 

 

The “To Eliminate the Opiate” (v. II, p. 273) had a quotation from the Dec 21, 1999, “Jerusalem Post” which offered the following comments from a letter from Alan Freishtat of Jerusalem to the Post: 

 

“General (Res.) Sholomo Gazit said in a public speech that the knitted kippot on the heads of IDF soldiers remind him of the Iron Cross worn by Nazi soldiers. 

 

“Meretz founder Shulamit Aloni described the haredi (religious) population as ‘sucking from the same sinister passions which nurtured the Nazis.’ 

 

“‘We have to storm Mea She’arim with machine guns and mow them down,’ recommends left-wing darling Uri Avnery. 

 

“‘I would take all those weird people from Shas, Aguda, and Degel HaTorah, tie their beards together and light a match,’ says Amnon Dankner. 

 

“Yonatan Gefen announces his willingness to cast the first stone in the intifada against haredim, and Professor Uzi Amon tells a Kol Ha’ir interviewer, ‘Haredim should be suspended from an electric pole.’ 

 

“And let’s not forget the rally in favor of the Supreme Court at Sacher Park in which you (“you” here evidently refers to the editor of the “Jerusalem Post” --ed) personally were an active participant, where the words of ‘war’ and ‘killing’ were used against the haredim.” 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 459--The Secularization of Religious Jews

 

 

An Israeli Constitution? 

 

In another matter, the “Jerusalem Post” (p. 1) of Aug 25, 2000, had a front page story on “Barak seeking secular constitution within a year” by Amotz Asa-El.  It laid out how serious the move to secularism is in the modern state of Israel--as is rapidly evolving among many of the Jews. 

 

Therefore, the next catalyst to set off a major confrontation between religious and secular Jews may be the just noted government plan for an Israeli constitution within the next year or so (as enunciated by former Prime Minister Barak). 

 

Though it might seem that this new constitution is now off of the table (with the election of Likud), such may not be the case at all (if the globalist Amalekite plutocrats in North America and Europe rule both the Labor and Likud parties in Palestine, as they rule divided parties in the US and in other Anglo-Saxon lands).  Again, Barry Chamish says that these rich Diaspora Jews call the shots in Israel for both major parties. 

 

When the state of Israel was established in May 1948, there was a promise of a coming Israeli constitution to govern the state.  Despite this promise and the repeating of it subsequently, the fact is that no government has taken any steps to implement it.  Perhaps the realties of the conflict with the Arabs has acted to motivate leaders to back off from the constitution idea. 

 

Maybe Barak was trying to gain some popular support presently by bringing up the matter for discussion at that time.  His meetings with Arafat and the steps taken to adopt a Middle East peace treaty made some enemies for him and his administration (as noted previously). 

 

Consequently, the constitution talk may have been pressed to hopefully give him a boost in the polls which he supposedly needed at that time (although it didn’t help him much because he lost the later Prime Minister elections). 

 

 

The Details 

 

Per the “Jerusalem Post” report, Barak’s plan would permanently abolish the Religious Affairs Ministry (which was arbitrarily closed by Barak during his rule), the institution of universal civil service for all conscription-age Israelis (including Ultra Orthodox), legitimatize civil marriages, and impose English, math and citizenship studies on the entire educational system (including the Haredi schools). 

 

Manifestly, Barak’s plan would be a disaster for Judaism and the Orthodox and especially Ultra Orthodox people now in Israel.  Presently, the Orthodox controls part of the government through the Religious Affairs Ministry and its Minister.  The civil marriage question is a reflection upon the power of Orthodox authorities, who control all Jewish marriages and divorces. 

 

The secular Israelis don’t like this religious control of marriages and divorces.  Israeli feminists, in particular, have frequently tried to oppose Orthodox religious authorities on marriage and divorce questions.  So far, they have not been given the time of day on their wishes.  This infuriates Amalekite feminists. 

 

 

The Move to Secularization 

 

As briefly touched upon above, the Israeli government announced plans to arbitrarily close down the Religious Affairs Ministry (at the end of September 2000).  Plans were also afoot to allow public transportation on the Sabbath (including the resumption of El Al airline flights, which have not flown on the Sabbaths for the past 18 years). 

 

Moreover, in preparation for the new secularized constitution (cited above) and the adoption of government practices to separate religion from government, Barak played up to his opposition party (the Likud) and cut his ties with the religious parties, which helped give him government control (Sep 15, 2000, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 1). 

 

Even the so-called national unity has continued under Likud and Sharon (as noted above--before finally breaking apart in Nov 2002). 

 

National Religious Party leader Shaul Yahalom said that Barak was fast establishing himself as the most anti-religious prime minister in Israeli history (Sep 15, 2000, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 1). 

 

Other right wing religious groups were also angry at the direction Barak chartered for the government.  Quite naturally, the Amalekite children of Satan were all excited and happy over what Barak was doing to sincere religious Jews. 

 

 

Nissim Dahan and Eli Yishai, Revisited 

 

A former chapter discussed some comments from Nissim Dahan and Eli Yishai, leaders of the Ultra Orthodox Shas party.  Without repeating those comments, the point these men made was that there is a move in Israel to make the Israeli state a completely secular state.  Yishai blamed Shinui head Yosef Lapid and Labor leader Amram Mitzra (Jan 3, 2003, “Forward,” p. 4). 

 

For sure, if Shinui succeeds, things will change for religious Jews, like the Ultra Orthodox (Shinui wants to knock out the present provisions for Ultra Orthodox people to avoid military service, the rabbinate monopoly on marriage and divorce, and the ban on public transport on the Sabbaths--Feb 10, 2003, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 17). 

 

According to Yishai, if this secularist motion succeeds, there will be an outburst of pork, Christmas trees and Christian Churches (Jan 3, 2003, “Forward,” p. 4). 

 

Nissim Dahan expressed his view that non-religious (non-observant) Jews should not be allowed to immigrate to Israel (ibid, p. 4).  In other words, all incoming Jews have to be religious (in the vein of the Orthodox and Ultra Orthodox). 

 

Both of the Shas leaders ran into a wall of resistance among many of the Amalekites who are the big promoters of the secularist ideas.  While the future of this Shas push will not likely succeed, it is fascinating that there are some deeply religious Jews willing to speak out. 

 

 

A US Rally 

 

The February 15, 2002, “Forward” (p. 4) had an article by Nacha Cattan on “Chasidic Rally in N.Y. Charges Israel With Waging ‘Secular Intifada.’”  The title of this story pretty well tells the tale.  Per Cattan, 5,000 Hasidic Ultra Orthodox Jews lined up on the streets near the Israeli Consulate in Manhattan to protest Israel’s maltreatment of religious Jews. 

 

The protesters carried signs saying that “We are Jews not Zionists.”  One speaker accused the Israeli government of conducting a “secular intifada” against Orthodox Jews.  Several specific incidents were highlighted in the confrontation. 

 

The Hasidim were particularly incensed at the death in Israel of Rav Yehuda Samer who tried to stop a fight between a vendor of pornographic material and religious Jews in Jerusalem while the Israeli police stood by.  Concern was also expressed over present Israeli plans to make Ultra Orthodox yeshiva students serve in the military. 

 

One rav told the crowd that “We are here to protest the State of Israel for its vicious desecration of the Orthodox Jewish religion.”  Another protester, Michael Lebowitz, said that the protest was in Israel’s best interest since “So many attacks happen to Jews all over the world because we don’t follow the Bible, especially in Israel.” 

 

Please understand that these charges were made against the present Sharon government--which means that the secularization campaign started under Barak is going full blast under Sharon.  This evil has involved both major Israeli parties and not just the liberal Labor party. 

 

 

Reducing the Role of Religion 

 

Regardless of whether the planned constitution is adopted or not, the fact remains that the Israeli government is trying to reduce the role of religion in its society (which both the Likud and Labor parties generally support).  Assuredly, serious religious people are quickly becoming enemies of the state--just as is true in the Christian West. 

 

Barry Chamish’s observations about the plutocratic control of Israel and both of her major parties has been borne out by the after-effects of Sharon’s take over of the Israeli government.  A good example of this condition surfaced in the Jan 11, 2002, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 6) which reported that Sharon is the first Israeli Prime Minister to meet with the Israeli lesbian-gay-transsexual community. 

 

Both Sharon and the President of Israel Moshe Katsav have met with representatives of the Political Council for Gay Rights.  So, like their counterparts in America, even so-called conservative Israelis are ready to compromise everything in order to march to the tune of the globalist plutocrats. 

 

 

More Secular Opposition to Righteousness 

 

There is another fall out on this subject.  As outlined in former chapters and in the above comments, everything is moving into place for religious Jews to gain access to the Temple Mount and build an altar there (and later the Third Temple) and re-institute animal sacrifices.  This will be a profound event which will have an exceptional impact upon the whole world. 

 

Many Jews and especially Amalekites will oppose this eventuality.  Maybe Barak was (consciously or unconsciously under Satanic motivation and guidance) trying to head it off with his secularization attempts. 

 

But this secularization effort will not succeed in stopping the Third Temple because The ELOHIM is in charge of this eventuality.  It will go forward and cannot be stopped by man. 

 

The essence here is that there seems to be a growing problem on religion in the modern state of Israel.  It’s extremely possible that there is a basic, behind the scenes conflict between the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters and the true Israeli Jews, in terms of governing the modern state of Israel (as manifested in the religious conflict). 

 

Despite the present attacks upon the Ultra Orthodox earlier and now the whole Orthodox religious community, the evidence is overwhelming that YHWH is preparing the state of Israel in a right way for a work of righteousness here in the age end. 

 

Whether The ELOHIM will allow the government to crush the Ultra Orthodox and their beliefs and reduce the role of the Orthodox is still open to question. 

 

If He does, it might ultimately work for good because even the Ultra Orthodox (as obedient and faithful as they are) do have some problems.  Amalekite persecution of the Ultra Orthodox will help clean them up--just as the Amalekite persecution of the Christian right wing will help to clean them up in America. 

 

Otherwise, The ELOHIM might could over time purge the evil Amalekites and their wickedness from the Israeli leadership.  And if so, this will be a wonderful motion when YHWH works out His will among the Israelis.  This is not far fetched at all. 

 

Certainly, Germany was under the grip of wicked Amalekites before, during and after WWI.  Under the evil Schicklgruber, this power ended (although it returned with the American military occupation).  In his persecution of Jews, Adolf clearly destroyed a lot of evil Amalekites (along with some innocent Jews).  This view has support from many modern religious Jews.  

 

 

The Ultra Orthodox on the Holocaust

 

As outlined in a former chapter, many of the Ultra Orthodox Jewish entities look upon the so-called Holocaust against Ashkenazi, Secular Jews in Europe as a destruction of evil people.  Actually, this feeling seems to predominate among many of the Ultra Orthodox.  It is not a rare belief at all. 

 

The Haredi press in Israel regularly charges that the WWII Holocaust was a punishment for Reform Judaism’s religious innovations (Oct 26, 2001, “Forward,” p. 10).  Haredi Jews are simply not obsessed with the so-called Holocaust, as is true with Ashkenazi Amalekites (who are mainly atheists, agnostics or Reform Jews). 

 

The highly respected Rav Ovadia Yosef, spiritual leader of the Ultra Orthodox, Sephardi, Shas sect in Israel has been more specific by offering his belief that the Jews who died in the Holocaust were reincarnations of sinners (Aug 11, 2000, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 1).  Yosef’s statement evoked a huge protest in Israel from the Ashkenazi Jews (many Amalekites). 

 

The “Jerusalem Post” (p. 13) of May 26, 2000, had an article by Naomi Regan on “A haredi Holocaust museum?” which noted that Haredi leader Menachem Mendel Taub believes that the Haredi community should have its own alternative to Vad Vashem, the Israeli Holocaust museum (which was established in 1953). 

 

As Regan wrote, the Haredi people do not visit or have any interest in the Vad Vashem museum (dedicated to Ashkenazi Jews, who died in Europe in WWII).  The Haredi claim that their opposition to the museum stems from the presence in it of pictures of women without their clothes on.  Haredi youth know little about the WWII Holocaust.  Holocaust victims are not even honored in the Haredi communities. 

 

Naomi Regan concluded that “The desire of the haredim to even remember and mourn separately, and to deny their children the experience of sharing in the Jewish people’s collective memory, is unforgivable.”  Obviously, the Haredi people do not see the WWII Holocaust in the same way that Ashkenazi, secular Jews (mostly Amalekites) view it. 

 

A story on “It’s Cold Outside,” in the Apr 7, 2003, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 14), addressed the 700-student Ultra Orthodox Derekh Tvunah Talmud Torah school in Jerusalem.  At this school, Israeli Independence Day is not celebrated and the students do not stand still during the memorial sirens for fallen soldiers or Holocaust victims (as happens with Israeli students at other schools). 

 

 

More on the Modern Haredim, Zionism and the Holocaust 

 

The previously discussed Neturei Karta sect in Brooklyn, New York and in Jerusalem, Israel speaks of a Zionist conspiracy as the archenemy of the Jewish people (as it is against Jewish tradition and law).  The group adds that the WWII Holocaust was punishment upon the Jews for pushing their ideas of a Jewish state in Palestine.

 

As discussed earlier, Neturei Karta leader R. Yisroel David Weiss says that most people who claim to be Jews are not Jews (apparently, Rav Weiss quoted from Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 of the NT). 

 

One of the recently important turn of events with this Ultra Orthodox group was their decision to link in with the Nation of Islam in opposition to the state of Israel (Mar 20, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2). 

 

The Jul 8, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-2) had a report on the 2002 “Barnes Review International Conference on Authentic History and the First Amendment.”  Rav Weiss spoke to this group and said:  “...Ironically, the Zionist state was supposedly created to protect Jews from anti-Semitism, yet they are the greatest and main creator of anti-Semitism worldwide.” 

 

In a follow-up report, the Aug 5, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-4) had another story by Rav Weiss on “An Orthodox Rabbi Speaks Candidly On the Legitimacy of the State of Israel” which said that “Zionism encourages Jews to lord over all non-Jews.  This results in endless Jewish confrontations with all people.” 

 

The Oct 28, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 3) had another report on Rav Weiss and the Neturei Karta Ultra Orthodox (from an article by M. Raphael Johnson, as headlined-- “‘Christians’ Attack Anti-Zionist Jews at Rally”). 

 

In background, the Christian Coalition held a rally in Washington on Oct 11-12, 2002, in support of the state of Israel.  Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Oliver North, Pat Boone, Roy Innis, former Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Phyllis Schlafly, Ken Starr and House Speaker Dennis Hastert and other members of Congress showed up (along with members of Neturei Karta to protest against Israel). 

 

At the meeting, Rav Weiss said:  “Zionism is not traditional Judaism.  This secular ideology requires that Jews lord it over non-Jews, attempting to control their foreign policy and media in the interests of this bandit state (of Israel).  True, Orthodox Judaism says that we must be loyal and patriotic citizens of whatever nation we reside in.” 

 

 

Teaching English, Revisited 

 

A previous chapter quoted an article on “Teaching English on Mars” by Caley Ben-David in the Jul 6, 2001, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 27).  This work concerned a book by Gerry Albarelli, a Roman Catholic, brought in by the Satmar community of Brooklyn, New York to teach English to Ultra Orthodox boys at the Yeshiva. 

 

Apparently, the children ask their teachers from the outside world about the state of Israel.  On starting to work, Albarelli was told “No talk about Israel... If the boys ask you about Israel, tell ‘em to see the rabbi.  That’ll be the end of that question forever.”  The Satmar sect is very anti-Zionist and much opposed to the state of Israel. 

 

 

More Jewish Thinking 

 

The well respected and honest Rav Ovadia Yosef (mentioned several times earlier herein) continues to receive publicity from time to time because he is a person of integrity and will speak out on important issues without fear of political correctness or incorrectness. 

 

In early 2001, Ovadia received much press when he came out and suggested the genocidal liquidation of the Palestinian Arabs (as briefly cited earlier).  Yosef’s conclusions caused quite an uproar and even in Israel. 

 

Importantly, it would appear that his beliefs are shared by some Americans.  GOP House leader Dick Armey says that the Palestinians should be removed (expelled) from Palestine to another country (May 13, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).  Surely, this would constitute a form of genocide. 

 

A prominent Orthodox Jewish lawyer in Washington named Nathan Lewin has urged that family members of suicide bombers be executed (Jun 7, 2002, “Forward,” p. 1).  Lewin has been mentioned as a candidate for a federal judgeship.  He is also noted as a Jewish community leader and legal advisor to several Orthodox organizations.  The death of Palestinians is definitely on the minds of some prominent Jews. 

 

Actually, if the Israelis do kill them all (per Yosef’s solution) or move them all out (as Armey has suggested), it would only go to help the many Americans who soon will have to flee to safety in Palestine (when America is destroyed in WWIII).  The removal of these Palestinians will open up land for the coming Americans. 

 

Too, when YESHUA returns, the Palestinians will become a subject of history only.  As pointed out in previous comments, they will either be killed or relocated.  For sure, the Palestinian Arabs are on the way out in old Canaan land.  Therefore, it would seem that whatever actions the present Israelis take in this direction will only mean that there will be less problems in Palestine for YESHUA when He comes. 

 

 

The Wise Yosef 

 

However, there is still more to come on Ovadia Yosef which many Jews refuse to recognize. 

 

He clearly is a man of honor, character and integrity.  He surely is a true Israelite, worthy of respect and support.  Incidentally, this writer would never try to anticipate YHWH’s actions in selecting His people for a work in the age end.  But likely, Yosef the Reb must be a candidate for the age end high priest, who helps to restore true worship (as elsewhere described herein). 

 

As observed in the above comments on the feelings of Ovadia Yosef on the Ashkenazi Jews in the European Holocaust, there is a sharp distinction between the Sephardi and Ashkenazi Jews.  Many or most (maybe not 100% of all) Ashkenazim seem to have their ancestral roots with the Amalekite Khazars (as cited in previous chapters).  Accordingly, they are very different people from the Sephardi Israelite Jews. 

 

Yosef seems to be cognizant of these differences.  In a possible illustration of the wisdom and incisive understanding that Ovadia has on this theme, the Dec 13, 2002, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 19) quoted Yosef and other Shas leaders in a story by Larry Derfner on “Over the hill.”  The essence of Derfner’s article was an assessment of the role of Shas in the January 2003 Israeli elections. 

 

One of the important findings Derfner offered was some advice from Yosef (whom, as elsewhere described herein, the controlled Israeli media generally dislikes and takes every opportunity to ridicule and demean). 

 

Perhaps the most interesting words of Yosef was that whomever votes for Shas will go to heaven; and whomever doesn’t vote for Shas is collaborating with Amalek.  The “Wikipedia.org” website on the Internet also notes that Ovadia often quotes Obadiah 1:18 on the evil Edomites as linking to his Jewish opponents in the state of Israel. 

 

In other words, it would seem at a first glance that Yosef links some of the other Israeli political parties and people (evidently Ashkenazi) with Amalek (which is precisely what this publication asserts herein).  This is just one more proof that Yosef sees an Amalek-Edomite linkage to certain Jews. 

 

This same Internet source also relates that Ovadia accuses the Ashkenazi Jews of being the source of all evil: “all troubles from the Ashkenazim... You the Jewish Ashkenazim, you have been in the West, in hell.  Why did you come here?  What you say or do is little importance.”  Since many or most of the Amalekite Khazars identify as Ashkenazim, it  is important to note Ovadia’s tie of the two together. 

 

Yes, some of the people called Jews worldwide are not really Jews; but are, instead Amalekites.  The writer of this study thinks that these Amalekite Jews are centered in America and the White British Commonwealth nations.  While surely some of them are in the state of Israel (as acknowledged by Yosef), the better option is that many or most of the Israeli Jews are not of Amalek. 

 

But the tragedy surfaces here in Israel in that the few or several Amalekites (pretending to be Jews) in the Israeli state are in positions of power in the government and the controlled media (just as is true in America).  So while there perhaps aren’t great numbers of Amalekite Jews in Palestine, there are some there as concluded by Yosef.  Truly, Yosef has great wisdom and insight on this subject in Palestine. 

 

 

The Religious Yosef 

 

If there is a Jewish religious figure worthy of being called Reb (meaning a sincere, religious and pious individual) today, it is Yosef.  Among the Sephardim in Israel, Yosef has also been given the honorary title of “Maran,” meaning “Our Master.” 

 

Therefore, in May 2001, the honest Ovadia once more arose to the occasion to state his wisdom and perception as to reality.  This Ovadia outcry concerns the situation in the Israeli military.  Though many of the Ultra Orthodox do not serve in the Israeli army (like the Sephardi Shas people), some do. 

 

Yosef, like some of the other Sephardi leaders, has been concerned about the situation with Sephardi Jews--in having to worship and religiously associate with the Ashkenazim (who are very different people).  Thus, the May 11, 2001, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 4-5) had a news report over one more important schism within organized Judaism and Jewry. 

 

Ovadia Yosef the Reb has publicly called for separate Sephardi “rabbis,” prayers and worship practices for the Israeli military.  He disapproves of the integrated Sephardi and Ashkenazi worship procedures now followed in the Israeli military.  He wants the Ashkenazim and Sephardim separated.  Rav Meir Azari, chairman of the “Israeli Council of Progressive Rabbis,” has endorsed Yosef’s views. 

 

Israeli President Moshe Katsav (who is a Sephardi in background, but worships with both Jewish divisions) says that Yosef is entitled to his opinion, but he disagrees.  He adds that the Israelis need to get rid of things that divide them. 

 

The point of this is that there is a sharp demarcation between the Sephardim and the Ashkenazim, and it is coming into focus, more and more, here in the age end. 

 

 

More From Shas 

 

As outlined earlier, secular Jewish (correctly Amalekite, ed) sexual depravity and perversion have been publicly criticized by the wise, honest and perceptive Shlomo Ben-Izri, a Member of Parliament with the Ultra Orthodox Shas party (in his comments upon an Israeli trans-gender person, as discussed in a prior chapter). 

 

A previous chapter noted the situation at the mountain-top grave site of first century mystic and festival patron, Shimon Bar Yohai.  Pilgrims were segregated by gender at the site, but could walk up the mountain together. 

 

The above cited Ovadia Yosef of Shas took note of the people coming there “dressed in a licentious manner” and said that the chastity of the Shas Ultra Orthodox could be offended (May 18, 2001, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 7). 

 

So Yosef urged that corrective action be taken.  The government responded by ordering that separate paths up the mountain be created for men and women.  Of course, many of the butch type Ashkenazi feminists hollered like stuck pigs over the ruling.  The leftist “Jerusalem Post” didn’t do Yosef any favors with the story (they regularly print cartoons of him and write words to ridicule and demean Yosef). 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

From 1917 forward, the USSR was ruled by Amalekite masters.  But then, in the late 1940s and early 1950s, this vice was largely broken in the old Soviet Union.  So it can happen today in the modern Israeli state (as is happening in the growing conflict between secular and religious Jews)--as well as in the US (when its national government is destroyed in WWIII).   

 

Yet, despite the presence of a limitation or restriction in Amalekite Cahilla power in Palestine, the evidence seems most persuasive that the Cahilla exists in some form and with perhaps a modern Ha Ahad Ha’am in some framework of rule over much of the goyim, Christian West (at least, in the Diaspora, in Anglo-Saxon-Celtic lands). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 460--Israeli Intelligence Organizations

 

 

Israeli Intelligence Services 

 

On Amalekite hatred and evil, one must take note of the Mossad and the Shin Bet (the Israeli intelligence services).  These are the world’s best intelligence operations because Jews worldwide (whatever their supposed nationalities) generally support Israel and her intelligence operations.  Both the Shin Bet and Mossad usually serve the state of Israel well and especially in her conflict with the Arabs. 

 

But it is also true that the Amalekite Jew bankers use particularly the Mossad for evil--just as they use the CIA and several other worldwide intelligence services (as noted earlier and to be further covered in later chapters). 

 

This is a tragic reality of the real world and especially in the sense that both the Mossad and the Shin Bet do often serve the Israeli state for good (but not always, as will be established in the following remarks). 

 

It is manifestly clear that many of these Israeli intelligence agents are genetic Amalekites.  Being Amalekites, they tend to fulfill their roles in life as children of Satan (yes, many of them are homosexual queers and perverts--per priest John O’Connor, in his video on “Come Lord Jesus”).  With this genetic and Satanic predisposition, they are like other Amalekites in the US and other parts of the world. 

 

They are clannish and have a natural tendency to support the global Amalekite plans for world rule and the destruction of true Yisrael. 

 

The Feb 3, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 6) had a story by Joe Sansone on “Israeli Military Advocates Terrorism on U.S. Soil.”  The essence of this report was that the Mossad has a sub-unit organized called the Kidon which directs assassination squads around the world to assassinate so-called enemies of Israel (correctly--to assassinate enemies of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters). 

 

Reportedly, plans are underway for Kidon to assassinate people in the US. 

 

 

Sometimes There Are Differences 

 

Thus, the ultimate loyalty of the Israeli intelligence services is not always to the Israeli state (unless the work/objectives of the Israeli state are in harmony and conformity with the goals of the plutocratic Amalekite Jews in North America and Europe.  These objectives are often the same, but not always). 

 

Of course, the internationalist Amalekite Jew bankers/masters “usually” support the Israeli state.  But they do have their own agendas for world rule and destroying true Yisrael.  So while the intelligence agents theoretically support the modern Israeli state, some of them actually uphold the globalist Amalekites first (as addressed elsewhere herein, in other chapters on the International Amalekites). 

 

In this regard, the agents are much like the Amalekite Jews in the US government, the CIA, the FBI, etc.  Many naive people actually suppose that these Amalekites serve the US government.  No, not so at all.  Their first loyalties are always to the globalist Amalekite Jew power structure.  This reality is important to note as it was pointed out in prior chapters on the John F. Kennedy assassination. 

 

Anyone wishing to criticize the Israelis for allowing the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters to use the Mossad need to back off and realize that this is not unusual since the Amalekites also use various and sundry other governments and government agencies to do their will over much of the globe (certainly in Britain and the US).  This use is not limited to Jewish Israel.  People living in glass houses should not throw stones. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 461--Amalekite Control in the West

 

 

More on the Bankers/Masters and Their Organizations 

 

Whatever the number might be of the Amalekite bankers/masters, it is clear enough that they have worked through various and sundry organizations and entities to accomplish their goals for world government (like the Illuminati, Communism, etc, as discussed earlier). 

 

Likely, the super rich Edgar Bronfman Sr (discussed earlier), as head of the World Jewish Congress, is one of the masters and perhaps even the head man. 

 

Besides the World Jewish Congress and various Zionist organizations, it is plain to see that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters are intimately involved in directing powerful Amalekite hate groups--like the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Defense League, as described and commented upon in preceding chapters.  Truly, no one can hate like an Amalekite can hate. 

 

The previously discussed Southern Poverty Law Center, another well known hate group (headed by Morris Dees), evidently receives a lot of Amalekite money. 

 

The racial and religious status of its leader Morris Dees is largely uncertain, though some observers think that he is a Christian Amalekite (he does seem to have an Amalekite-Hittite nose).  Manifestly, he regularly exhibits the works, fruits and deeds of the evil and diabolical Amalekites. 

 

When something walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it must be a duck.  Seemingly, Dees is an Amalekite.  But regardless of his actual status, it appears that he does do the work of the Amalekites and Satan.  If he is an Amalekite, then surely he is very near the masters in directing things in the US. 

 

 

In Yehudah 

 

The situation with the House of Yehudah and her evident remaining presence among modern Jews was discussed in previous chapters.  Suffice to say, the Amalekites took over Yehudah over 2,000 years ago.  They still today have a stranglehold on the true Israelite Jewish people (as was established in the preceding chapters). 

 

Furthermore, as discussed in previous chapters on the Amalekite conspiracy, the evidence is massive that the Amalekite globalists in the Christian West rule all of the House of Yisrael and House of Yehudah nations (the US, Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the modern state of Israel in Palestine, South Africa, etc). 

 

At least, well informed Jewish researcher and analyst Barry Chamish (previously quoted herein) has made this charge and it seems to have merit.  Joel Skousen (also quoted earlier herein) seems to support it as well (at least, in terms of what has happened with Ariel Sharon). 

 

In Barry Chamish’s view, it doesn’t matter which party in Israel gains power.  The party leaders will and have sold out to the internationalists.  On the surface, Barry’s perception seems to carry a great deal of weight.  Manifestly, powerful strings are being pulled from behind the stage to control the Israeli government.  It’s very questionable to what extent the Israeli government really serves the Israeli people. 

 

 

Amalek-Edomite Control 

 

Just as the Amalek-Edomites took over control of the House of Yehudah, they have successfully done the same thing with the House of Yisrael.  Surely, this control extends over both secular and religious leaders. 

 

Of all people, former US President Richard Nixon had much insight into the mentality and thinking of Amalekites in America, which he incorrectly referred to as Jews (Oct 18, 1999, “Newsweek,” p. 30). 

 

Nixon charged that the Jews are all over the government and that the only way to control them is to put someone in charge who is not Jewish.  He also said that most Jews are disloyal and can’t be trusted and that they will turn on you.  Nixon’s chief of staff, H. R. Haldeman, added that their whole orientation is against you and that they are smart. 

 

 

The Nixon-Graham Conversation 

 

In a meeting with Christian leader Billy Graham, both Nixon and Graham had some major complaints over the Jews.  An AP news report in the March 18, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) outlined one session between Graham and the president (as revealed from some of the Nixon tapes). 

 

In reference to the Jewish domination of the US media, Graham said: “This stranglehold has got to be broken up or this country’s going down the drain.”  Nixon replied-- “I can’t ever say it but I believe it.”  Billy noted that “They swarm around me and are friendly to me because they know that I am friendly to Israel.”  Nixon warned Billy that “You must not let them know.” 

 

The “American Free Press” news report quoted the present Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.  Reportedly, Sharon said:  “You don’t have to worry about what America thinks, we totally control it.” 

 

While this AP news item was focused upon the Jews, this editor must make the point that the evil comes primarily from the Amalekites rather than the collective Jews. 

 

While all of America’s leaders (Christians, Jews or whatever) are not personally Amalekites, most all of them must march to the Amalekite tune to stay in power.  Even Nixon caved into them, despite his personal feelings.  He appointed a number of Jews (actually Amalekites) into high offices and consistently gave the state of Israel a priority one in assistance. 

 

 

What Happened? 

 

However, Nixon apparently made his mistake by trying to side with the Rockefellers in their war with the Rothschilds, as discussed previously.  This single act, more than anything else, might have cost him his presidency.  Nixon tried to get the Amalekite Henry Kissinger to protect him.  But even Kissinger couldn’t help (perhaps because Kissinger was ostensibly allied with the Rockefellers).

 

Finally, Billy Graham even caved into the Jews and apologized to them in 2002 when his conversation with Nixon was revealed. 

 

The revelation of these comments from Graham and Nixon in 1972 brings up another most fascinating point.  The April 8, 2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 50) had a book review assessing Henry Ford and his works of alleged evil against the Jews.  For some reason, this story mentioned the Graham-Nixon dialogue on the Jewish control of the US media in the 1970s. 

 

Per this report, the Graham-Nixon discussion focused upon the stranglehold which the Jewish media has over America and that this media control and power needed to be broken.  The word from this story was that an effort would be made in Nixon’s second term (starting in 1973) to do just that--break the Jewish stranglehold over the American media. 

 

While it is questionable that any single American politician could break the Amalekite hold over the American media and Americans, in general, it is interesting that Nixon actually entertained this idea.  The importance of these remarks in 1972 is that at that time there was no issue over Watergate. 

 

In fact, Nixon went on to be reelected in the fall of 1972 without a hitch.  It was in 1973 that the Amalekite controlled “Washington Post” pulled out all of the stops and went after Tricky Dick full blast.  There is no arguing that this effort pitted the Amalekite Rothschilds against the Rockefeller man Nixon.  In this war, Nixon had to go (and particularly when he tried to close the window on sending US gold to Europe). 

 

 

Did the Amalekites Know?   

 

But the Graham-Nixon interview raises the question--is it plausible that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters found out about Nixon’s hatred and plans to move against them and their evil in his second term?  Possibly, they found out in 1973 and decided to use the Watergate fiasco as the excuse to literally destroy Tricky Dick.  Once the Amalekite press started in on him, he was doomed. 

 

Incidentally, there seems to be reasons to believe that the famous “Deep Throat” informer in the Nixon White House (who secretly tipped off “Washington Post” reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein and informed on Nixon) was Jewish with a deep, gravelly voice (Jun 24, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).  Some informed people believe that the informer was the Amalekite Henry Kissinger. 

 

In any case, the way the “Jerusalem Report” story and indeed the rest of the media handled the Graham-Nixon dialogue was that the Jews were surprised when the revelation of this conversation was made known.  But is it possible that the powerful Amalekite rulers of America had no inkling of Dick Nixon’s views before 2002 and the revelation of his talk with Graham?  Surely, they knew earlier. 

 

So while it is possible to appreciate that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in 1973 decided to do Nixon in because of their long standing battle with the Rockefellers, there is also reason to believe that they had some knowledge of Nixon’s plans to do them in (or at least to do something about their control of the US media). 

 

Of course, all of this is speculation in an attempt to understand precisely what brought Nixon down.  Certainly, the few, petty lies which he told were not enough to excite anyone in America.  After all, America’s political leaders have been grossly lying for ages before Nixon came along. 

 

If this speculation has any merit, there is a good possibility that the background on the murder of John F. Kennedy was precisely the same thing that brought on the destruction of Richard Nixon.  The Amalekite Jew bankers/masters were afraid of both men and the possibility that either of them could have initiated action to curtail Amalekite Jew power over America. 

 

Kennedy wanted to go after the Amalekite control of the Federal Reserve and maybe Nixon wanted to focus upon the Amalekite control of the media.  In both the Kennedy and Nixon cases, there also was the interplay behind the scenes with other issues involving the plutocrats and the ability of the plutocrats to make money from the gullible American people. 

 

The Amalekite control of the US and British media has been discussed at length in a previous chapter.  Suffice to say, it is the real world out there.  Even people like Kennedy, Nixon and Graham could not withstand it. 

 

 

Christian Amalekites 

 

Otherwise, the evidence fully suggests that Presidents Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt, the Bush presidents and Vice President Nelson Rockefeller were Christian Amalek-Edomites.  Manifestly, Catholic John F. Kennedy was likely a Phoenician Irish Edomite. 

 

Too, one must be careful and prudent to not lose sight of other wicked leaders like Abraham Lincoln (who, by the way, was apparently baseborn or illegitimate in the Western Rutherford County, NC area--from Nancy Hanks and a man named Abraham Enloe.  This must have been the first of his problems, which intensified with his deformed, physical growth that suggested a genetic or disease difficulty). 

 

Could Abe Lincoln have had “some” Edomite genes in his strange background--and particularly in view of modern allegations that he was a homosexual pervert (allegations which were suggested in the Jul 5, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 8). 

 

As a minimum, the alleged “Honest Abe” was an occultist or at least tampered with the occult and was mentally retarded with Mercury poisoning--while he was in the White House, as noted earlier. 

 

Even the present joke, Slick Clinton, an alleged Southern Baptist, must not be completely ruled out.  In addition to his Indian ancestry, it is highly likely that he has “some” Amalekite blood in his mongrel veins since he is so incredibly depraved and corrupt (this option will be assessed in some detail in a later appendix). 

 

Any number of these evil Western Christian leaders could have some Edomite genes (as their deeds suggest they were/are children of the Devil).  It is ludicrous for right wing Christians to whine and complain about evil Jews when there are Christian Amalekites out there who are just as evil or perhaps even more evil. 

 

 

And Christian Church Leaders 

 

The same reasoning applies in the case of a host of Christian leaders, preachers and popes.  The situation with Pope Paul VI was elsewhere commented upon.  Christian sun worship leaders like Robert Schuller, Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker, Oral Roberts, the just quoted Billy Graham and others must not be overlooked. 

 

Conceivably, all of these sun worshipping, Christian leaders may not have Edomite genes.  But the evidence is persuasive that many of them do have (coupled with a lot of miscegenation) simply because of the wicked deeds of Satan that characterize their lives and teachings and their leadership roles in America.  Just think of how much harm, hurt and pain these charlatans have imposed upon the American people. 

 

If these sun worship leaders are not Edomites, they have certainly been just as evil as any Amalek-Edomite could possibly be.  In fact, many Americans would be suspicious and a little hostile toward Amalekite Jews.  But they willingly will close their eyes and believe in and stupidly follow the teachings of these evil Christian sun worshippers. 

 

 

Follow the Amalek-Edomites 

 

The point of these remarks on Amalek-Edomite Jew bankers/masters is that one must be careful about getting all excited and filled with Jew hatred since there are Edomite Christians, out in the world, who are just as evil or more so and who are just as dedicated to fulfilling the will and guidance of the bankers/masters in the context of the destruction of the House of Yisrael peoples (they are janissary robots, as a minimum). 

 

The problem with almost all of the Amalekites involved in the Amalek-Edomite conspiracy is that the impetus is genetic and racial.  Therefore, all the Amalekites involved really don’t consciously understand and comprehend why they have such incredible hatred in their hearts for Scriptural Yisrael and Israelites. 

 

Consequently, most of them willingly fall into line behind the bankers/masters--just to fulfill this overriding hatred.  While the Jewish Amalek-Edomites are more conscious of the bankers/masters (which appear to be essentially Jewish) and are more likely to follow their lead, the Christian Edomites also follow them, although often without the awareness of what all that they are doing. 

 

Moreover, one must remember that there are now multitudes of people who listen to and obey the Amalek-Edomite power structure, but who themselves may not be racial Edomites at all (i.e. true Jews and Christian Israelites).  Many persons are janissary robots, as noted above.  This is true in the House of Yisrael nations and even still true somewhat in the remnant of the House of Yehudah.  Yes, all Jews are not Edomites! 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

The point is that actual, racial Amalekites will be both evil and in charge. 

 

Thus, it is plausible that many of the West’s secular and religious leaders are Amalek-Edomites since their deeds manifest themselves in the leadership, teaching and promotion of Satanic wickedness.  Probably, most of the masses are not Edomites--just dumb followers of Amalekite leaders. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 462--Amalekite Plotting in the West

 

 

The Protocols, Revisited 

 

Some years ago, adherents of the Amalek-Edomite conspiracy belief uncovered a book from Russia called “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” mentioned elsewhere herein, which was first written possibly as early as the 1770s (with a rewriting or editing of it in the late 1890s).  It purported to be a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world. 

 

Whether this book was legitimate and valid or not has been hotly debated and especially by Jewish scholars.  Interestingly, the previously mentioned Henry A. Klein asserts that the Protocols are valid and true.  So this is an interesting twist from an insider who knew and wrote about a Jewish conspiracy. 

 

The only thing that can be said for the Protocols book is that the objectives and goals stated in it have been coming true for the last several decades in the sun worshipping, Christian West.  In other words, it has proven to be a complete and accurate blueprint of succeeding world history.  It’s hard for an honest person to argue against evidence like this. 

 

It is also interesting that most of these so-called Protocols have become part and parcel of various national and international programs.  In other words, a statement of the goals of the American Communist, Democrat and Republican parties all reflect a number of the Protocols. 

 

Last, if this work is valid (as the evidence suggests), one can be sure that it is not Jewish, per se; but rather, that it is a production of evil Amalekite minds out to destroy the House of Yisrael nations and peoples, as noted in previous comments. 

 

Some students of this alleged Cabala have suggested that the obvious Amalek-Edomite power structure, allowed in the Protocols, represents a portion of the Illuminati and international banking communities.  In other words, the Protocols are a work of the Illuminists or bankers.  This is essentially the view presented by a Prophecy Club spokesman named Jeff Baker on “Cheque Mate:  Game of Princes,” discussed before. 

 

 

Support for the Protocols 

 

There is some interesting support for the validity of the Protocols as being a Jewish (correctly Amalekite) conspiracy.  It comes from a letter written many years ago by Baruch Levy (an apparent Amalekite) to the Amalekite Karl Marx.  Earl Jones, in the Sep-Oct 1999 “Intelligence Newsletter” (p. 1) quoted Levy’s letter--viz: 

 

“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own messiah.  It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. 

 

“In this new world order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition.  The government of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. 

 

“It then will be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state.  Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” 

 

While Levy used the words Jews and Jewish in expressing his views, it must be noted that in reality his real focus was upon the diabolical Amalekites and not the Jews, per se.  His remarks can only have a legitimate status and possibility in the context of the evil Amalekites who have held these views for ages. 

 

 

The Historic Amalekite Position  

 

As commented upon in the above presentation, there has been a genuine and dedicated effort by Jewish Amalekites to claim that the Protocols are, in fact, fraudulent compositions by alleged anti-Semitic Russians, during the reign of the czars in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.  The Amalekites even forced the issue into a European court and was able to get a court judgment that the Protocols were false. 

 

Yet, the predictions and discussions in the Protocols have proven to be incredibly true over the span of the 20th century.  It was easy for the Amalekite bankers/masters to claim that they were false.  But in the real world, they have proven to be true. 

 

Moreover, evidence has surfaced in the past several years indicating that indeed, the Protocols were not originally written in the late 19th century, but were actually first composed back in the 18th century by the Amalekite Adam Weishaupt and his financial supporter, the Amalekite Mayer Rothschild (as mentioned above and in previous chapters). 

 

This seems to be the better explanation for what happened on the Protocols historically.  Admittedly, there is evidence suggesting that some Amalekites probably reworked them and edited them in Russia in the late 19th century.  But evidently, they already were an established reality before then. 

 

In any case, conspiracy researcher Jim Marrs was on the Coast to Coast AM radio program on Sep 5, 2000, with host Ian Punnett.  At one point in time, the discussion was allowed to get onto the Protocols (which is a fluke in itself because the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters and bosses don’t want any discussion being made about any Jewish Amalekite conspiracy to rule the world). 

 

But somehow Punnett allowed Marrs to make some comments about the Protocols--perhaps because Marrs’ words were in his book which had been read by Punnett and he understood that Marrs had taken the position to steer any discussion about the Protocols away from the Jews.  So Marrs proceeded to offer his latest interpretation on what happened.  

 

Hurriedly, he proclaimed that indeed the Protocols were real, but that they were not written by Russian Jews.  Instead, he traced them back to Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati (founded by Weishaupt and the Rothschilds) in the late 18th century.  In terms of identifying the conspirators, Marrs only talked about the super rich and the Illuminati, but never about the racial or ethnic background of the conspirators. 

 

The truth is that Weishaupt (though a convert to Catholicism), the Rothschilds and the primary conspirators in the Illuminati were all Amalekite Jews.  As discussed in a former chapter, it is verity that the Illuminati allowed some janissary goyim robots into the organization over the years.  But these goyim were never in any positions of power or influence. 

 

Instead, they were janissaries being manipulated by Amalekite Jew bankers/masters from behind the scenes to further serve the Amalekite goals of world rule.  As a minimum, the non Amalekites have been in a minor and inconsequential role over the years.  Essentially, from day one, the Illuminati was created by evil Amalekite Jews and designed to serve evil Amalekite Jews. 

 

 

The Latest Amalekite Twist 

 

Anyway, Jim Marrs’ mention of the validity of the Protocols (but placing them in a non-Jewish context) probably is the latest twist and effort of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters to deal with this sensitive subject. 

 

In the old days, the bankers/masters simply said that the Protocols were false.  But competent researchers and analysts kept proving them to be true (and especially, in the vein of the unfolding of history). 

 

So maybe the Amalekites have switched their tactics by allowing that the Protocols are true, but are not the work of diabolical Amalekite Jews out to rule the world.  The Amalekites are experts at deception.  So it is plausible that they would change their tactics, if things were going astray with their arguments (which simply could not hold water upon any careful study and analysis). 

 

But regardless of whether the Protocols are true or not, the overwhelming evidence is that there is a collusion or conspiracy among many of the top Amalekite bankers/masters to impose their secret goals and objectives upon the rest of the world’s population--which is supported by most Jewish and Christian Edomites in the general population. 

 

Certainly, many true Jews are not a part of this conspiracy and indeed some Edomites are probably not consciously a part of it (although it’s doubtful that they would publicly oppose it or speak against it). 

 

 

A Real Amalekite Cabala 

 

Despite arguments on the validity of the Protocols and confusion over identifying the involved leaders, the better view is that indeed there is an Amalekite Cabala, involving Amalek-Edomite Jew bankers/masters.  It is seemingly directed, supervised and controlled by Amalekite international bankers backstage and from behind the scenes. 

 

In fact, it is evident that key Amalek bankers are sometimes themselves the masters (as noted in prior comments) who call the shots out front and publicly for the Jewish and Christian Edomite populations.  In whatever case, the Amalekite Jew money power is clearly in charge of much of the overall Edomite community in the West, as also seems to have been true in NT times, described previously. 

 

There are daily examples that demonstrate the power of the collective Amalek-Edomites to rule over the United States and the other White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations (including Great Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand).  South Africa and Rhodesia used to be a part of this system.  But Black Nationalists have taken over in those nations to change the definition somewhat. 

 

In the case of the US, the Amalekite control of the population has certainly been in place since the days of Woodrow Wilson and the establishment of the Federal Reserve Banking system (in 1913). 

 

 

More 

 

In April 1963, an alleged Texan sent a paper to some Cuban exiles in Miami.  This flyer said that the Zionists had been in control of the US since 1905 (“Contract on America,” p. 187).  While the writer of that document used the word “Zionists,” he may have confused that definition with the real Amalekite bankers/masters.  Certainly, some of the bankers/masters are Zionists, but not all of them. 

 

If they were true Zionists, they would pack their bags and immediately move to Israel.  But they don’t.  Their only visible sign of Zionism surfaces whenever they push and prod the US to send money to the Israeli state.  The bankers/masters are totally committed to that issue (evidently not because of any concern for the Jews there; but rather, for themselves to have a refuge or hide out in case of trouble in the US). 

 

While Amalek-Edomite Jew bankers/masters are largely in control of the US, the other White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations, the state of Israel and some parts of Europe, it must be noted that the Amalek-Edomite Jews do not presently control all of the world and evidently will not control all of the world in the future. 

 

If they exercised global control right now, the planet would be faced with an immediate world government.  The Amalek-Edomite Jew power structure is presently just one part of the overall global power community.  Perhaps it is one of the most important power blocs in the world.  But it is not the only one. 

 

As elsewhere discussed herein, the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters share power with the Roman Catholic Church, European royalty, Communist and Socialist ideologists, some parts of organized crime (principally among the Hispanic and Asian gangs, many of which do not answer to Edomite ganglords), some portion of international banks and businesses (primarily in Asia where the Edomites have not had extensive influence), etc. 

 

 

Presence of the Masters in the West 

 

The situation in the largely White, Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations, mentioned earlier, is that they are all virtually under the control of ruling Amalekite Jew masters who seem to operate totally in league with or subservient to the just noted Amalek-Edomite Jew international bankers. 

 

In the US, there is the power faction of the Rockefellers who originally were evidently Jewish Amalek-Edomites, as discussed elsewhere herein.  If they once were Jewish Amalekites, it appears that the family has broken somewhat from the Jews over the years and perhaps cannot be legitimately linked with them at this time, although they surely have the Amalekite hatred for Yisrael in their genes and hearts. 

 

Beyond the Rockefellers, most of the rest of the United States and the White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations are essentially under the control of Amalekite Jew bankers/masters.  But that condition is not necessarily true in the balance of the world, except for Western Europe and the state of Israel where Amalek-Edomite Jew power is somewhat prevalent. 

 

 

Czarist Russia 

 

The situation in Czarist Russia (before 1917) was discussed in a previous chapter.  The Amalekites generally constitute a state within a state wherever they live.  This was manifestly the condition in Czarist Russia around the start of the 20th century, just after the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” were discovered and made public in Russia. 

 

Most or virtually all of the Amalekite Khazars in Russia were Marxist revolutionaries and anarchists who were bent on destroying the Czar and his government.  The Czar was not exactly stupid.  He knew and understood who his enemies were that were working full time to destroy him and the Russian monarchy. 

 

As Catholic priest John O’Connor points out in his video on the “Synagogue of Satan,” whatever action the poor Czar took against these revolutionaries was immediately labeled as being anti-Semitic.  O’Connor says that the Czar was not anti-Semitic.  But he was anti-revolutionary and against his political opponents out to destroy him. 

 

 

The Old USSR Empire 

 

In any case, the revolutionary Amalekites in old Russia succeeded.  They ultimately did take over the government and murdered the Czar and all of his family (including his small children). 

 

Hence, for years, the Amalekite bankers/masters founded, organized and controlled the old USSR before Russian nationalists eventually took over after WWII.  Eastern Europe, Asia, Black Africa and the Muslim world do not all seem to be directly ruled by Amalekite bankers/masters, as is true in the Christian West. 

 

However, many of these so-called Third World nations have been significantly under indirect Amalekite power because the Amalek-Edomites have used foreign aid, give-aways and the military power of the West to force, make or encourage them to accept the rule of Western Amalekite bankers/masters. 

 

The supposed breakup of the Eastern European, Communist empire has seen Amalekite bankers/masters rush into those countries with both armies (as in the Balkans) and aid money (from the stupid US and Western European taxpayers) to try to take over direct control of Eastern Europe. 

 

In the case of the on-going financial crisis in Asia, elsewhere described herein, it is evident that Amalekite bankers are attempting to take over there as well.  So far, they have not succeeded, although they have made some obvious inroads with the money give-aways from the IMF and various nations and central banks.  Prostitute politicians can always be bought with money. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 463--The Amalekites Call the US Shots

 

 

More on Amalekite Political Power 

 

The “Spotlight” of Mar 6, 2000 (p. 15, 17), had a book report, “Special Interests Charted Course of 20th Century” by Raphael Johnson, on Ivor Benson’s recent book on “The Zionist Factor.”  It focused upon how the Rothschild family vied for control of the world’s finances and reshaped the political environment of the globe. 

 

One of the important conclusions in Benson’s work was that while financial capital was divided, local and politically conservative, in the early years of the 19th century, that profile was to change, later in the West.  Apparently, there was a battle over the years on Wall Street.  It started with a conflict between the J. P. Morgan people and the Rothschilds, which saw the Morgan interest being absorbed in time by the Rothschilds. 

 

The writer of this study at hand has long held the position that the Morgan interests were almost always linked to the European Rothschilds and that the real conflict was between the US Rockefellers, as opposed to the European Rothschilds. 

 

Regardless, it is interesting that Benson saw an early conflict between Morgan and the Rothschilds before the Morgan opposition collapsed, as it became a part of the Rothschild empire. 

 

Per Johnson’s remarks, it would seem that any opposition Morgan had to the Rothschilds ended early on.  So it would be correct to say that within a limited time frame, the Morgan banking interest was absorbed by the Rothschilds. Thereupon, Morgan became a US front organization for the European Rothschilds.   Of course, there has been the continuing conflict between the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds. 

 

In any case, the report suggests that the money conflicts between the bankers continued on Wall Street for some years.  In time, the Rothschild international bankers finally emerged victorious in the United States (which is where we are at, here in 2003). 

 

The above cited “Spotlight” story suggested that there has been a preponderance of Jews within the radical leftist movements which found common cause with the power of the Rothschild led international banking community.  With the power over money, it was not long before the Rothschilds began to dictate policy to the leftist political factions. 

 

Per Johnson’s view, the internationalism of the Zionist banking houses (versus the nationalism of the older banking powers) is the material backdrop to what is now colloquially called the “New World Order.”  It is the control emanating from one central source of the world’s economy through the control of a global currency (which is more powerful than all other factors). 

 

 

A Revisit to More of the Amalekite Powers 

 

Preceding chapters have outlined the wide presence of the Amalekite bankers/masters over much of the world, in the context of pulling the strings and providing the leadership and direction to the gullible, ignorant goyim in a whole host of enterprises and activities--all the way from organized crime to international banks and to the heads of Western governments. 

 

In the exercise of power over the Israelite goyim, the Amalekites have completely taken over the media and entertainment industries in the House of Yisrael nations.  This takeover has been demonstrated in prior chapters and needs no further explanation here beyond acknowledging its presence. 

 

 

The Early 1998 Planned Attack on Iraq 

 

The best example of the Amalek-Edomite control phenomenon surfaced in a look at the strange situation that arose when the bankers/masters in the US and the White British Commonwealth were standing almost alone in trying to oppose Iraq in early 1998 (as elsewhere described herein).  Other nations in the world were not quite so anxious to attack Saddam. 

 

The point of this is that in the early 1998 US conflict with Iraq, the US and White British Commonwealth nations stood virtually alone--along with Israel.  Except for France (which is increasingly more pro-Moslem) and Russia, the rest of Europe appeared to be largely neutral and not trying to side with either of the two main players. 

 

However, Russia, China, most of the Muslim World, Black Nationalists, Communists around the world and on and on were more on the side of Saddam than they were on the side of the US. 

 

This suggests that the Amalekite bankers/masters ruling the US and other White, Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations are finding that they don’t have the clout and power over the Third World which they have enjoyed in past years (just as they have been losing their grip over Black Americans--to be shortly profiled below). 

 

Part of the dilemma, which the Amalek-Edomites face, is that they depend to a degree upon aid to foreign countries, as noted earlier (financed by American and European taxpayers), to dominate and influence those countries.  As the sun worshipping US and Christian West face economic problems and bankruptcy, there is little or no money to give away to benefit the super rich. 

 

In any case, it is significant that as this problem with Iraq proceeds, it appears that Iraq, Russia, Iran and Syria will ally in the context of types of the four horns of Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome (discussed elsewhere in this production).  The US, Israel and White British Commonwealth will stand alone in opposition to this hostile alliance. 

 

Assuredly, Europe (and particularly a United Europe) will walk the extra mile to try to stay neutral in this opposing confrontation.  But in view of Clinton’s conflict in the Balkans, even parts of Europe (like Greece or even Germany) may join the Russian sphere.  Certainly, the continuing US presence in the Balkans is paving the way for an American confrontation with Russia and China, which are both allies of the Serbs. 

 

What it boils down to is that as the Amalekite bankers/masters push and prod the US and her few racial allies, in opposition to those four horns, the coming day of judgment from those horns is fast approaching.  And it appears that it will be the Amalek-Edomites and their power over the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations which propel those states into a war that they will lose (as judgment from YHWH). 

 

It might be that those four horns, in collaboration with Japan and various Third World nations (like China, Muslim, Latin American and Black African), will be the primary adversaries of those Western nations in the age end, although they collectively may be a part of a larger UN configuration--since the whole world will (or have) come to hate Israel and the racial Anglo-Saxon-Celtic peoples. 

 

 

The Anglo-Saxon-Celtic Nations Stand Alone 

 

This is a most interesting scenario when one also looks at the international debts of these same Western Christian nations in terms of the rest of the world (commented upon in a prior chapter) and the likely focus of a coming WWIII which will spell the national end of the historic Anglo Saxon-Celtic nations, while the Israeli state survives with YHWH’s help. 

 

Please understand that as the United States and her White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic cousins are destroyed nationally, the rest of the world will then be in a better position to proceed with real unification which has been a goal of Satan and the internationalists for ages. 

 

While the Amalekite masters/bankers ruling the Christian West have led the way in this internationalism, they may lose a lot of their power and influence, as the US and White British Commonwealth nations are crushed and destroyed.  Thus, when the final pecking order is established among the fat cats, it likely will not be under the direct control of Amalekite Jews, as an observer may first suppose at this time. 

 

One must understand that while the White, sun worshipping Christians in the US and British Commonwealth have been quite happy to subject themselves to ruling Amalekite bankers/masters, other parts of the world have not shared this enthusiasm (except as the Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters can use money and armies to impose their wills upon the rest of the world). 

 

Black nationalists in Africa, mixed Latinos in South America, Muslims in the Middle East and Mongolians in Asia are not exactly as stupid as are White Britons and Americans on this issue.  True, they have lacked the power to formally oppose the ruling Amalek-Edomite structure in the West.  But these Colored persons hate the Amalekite Jews, along with Whites in general. 

 

White Europeans have ruled over and dominated the Colored world for centuries.  But with Amalekite pushing and prodding since WWII, the Colored world has gained independence and broken free of European domination.  The Coloreds passionately hate Whitey and this includes so-called White Edomites.  Given a chance (which YAH will give them), these Colored persons will turn upon the supposed White Edomites. 

 

 

Black Muslims, Revisited 

 

The situation with Negroes in the United States is most interesting.  As discussed in prior comments, the Amalek-Edomites were the original slavers and some of the people who have historically oppressed, hurt and harmed Black people the most of all.  While many Africans have tried to blame collective Whitey for their problems, some (like the Black Muslims) have finally woken up to some extent. 

 

It has been too bad that the Black Muslims have not correctly understood heretofore that the Amalekites are the primary people of evil causing them trouble--along with problems for Whites, Asians, Arabs, Indians and all other peoples in the world.  Like so many persons (Whites, Asians, etc) have mistakenly done over the years, the Black Muslims are now trying to blame the collective Jews. 

 

As elsewhere demonstrated in this publication, the problem of Satanic evil in this world cannot be laid to the doorsteps of the collective Jews.  It should be placed where it precisely belongs--with the diabolically evil and Satanically directed Amalek-Edomites who have worked hard for ages to destroy Yisrael first and oppress all other peoples second, in their quest for world rule. 

 

Racial integration and amalgamation (promoted in recent years by the Amalekites) have hurt Black people--just as much as it has hurt White people.  Perhaps this reality has in some ways acted to motivate the Black Muslims to preach and teach racial separation and their desires for their own Black nation. 

 

In any case, the Black Muslims have broken from the Jews and have, in modern times, demonstrated an enormous hatred for the Jews (although there is now an alliance of sorts by the Black Muslims and Brooklyn’s Ultra Orthodox, in opposition to the Israeli state, as noted earlier). 

 

One of the Black Muslim leaders has called Jews “Blood Suckers,” even as late as their youth march in New York City on September 5, 1998. 

 

In late 2001, the new Black Panther leader, Malik Zulu Shabazz, called the US and Israel the number one and number two terrorist nations in the world (Jan 7-14, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).  Zulu also assailed the Anti-Defamation League and C-SPAN for collaborating in unfair news coverage.  So the Black Panthers have joined with the Black Muslims in attacking the Jews. 

 

As trouble (secretly brought on and caused by the Amalekites) mounts in the United States, the Black hatred for the Jews will likely accelerate.  Accordingly, the Negroes will persecute the generic Jews given a chance (which will eventually come for sure when the Russian, Chinese, Iranians and Third World conquerors take over the US at the end of WWIII). 

 

 

Martin Luther King Jr, Revisited 

 

Having mentioned the growing break between the Negroes and the ruling Amalekite bankers/masters, some further remarks are necessitated about the famous and US beloved Martin Luther King Jr.  Though the revolutionary and trouble making King was turned into a Black hero by the Amalekite controlled media after his death, there are reasons to believe that while he was alive, he was turning against the Jews. 

 

Several books and authors have attempted to ascertain who killed King and why.  This question has also been discussed herein in a previous chapter (in the vein that the patsy, James Earl Ray, was possibly a brainwashed zombie who was set up to be the patsy by the real assassins). 

 

Like the JFK and RFK killings were somewhat befuddled by the establishment, the same is true with the King killing.  One thing for sure, the King family itself and numbers of other informed people have come forward to express doubt that James Earl Ray was the gunman; or if he was involved, that he acted alone. 

 

In “Final Judgment” (p. 580-584), Michael Collins Piper briefly assessed the King murder and offered some of his thinking.  Essentially, Piper raises serious questions about Ray’s involvement and completely discounts any role for the Ku Klux Klan or any other right wing group.  Piper clearly believes that the King killing was an establishment murder and probably decided by the Jewish power structure. 

 

To support his beliefs, Piper mentions some little known facts about King which the establishment leaders and media never seem to mention when they go wild every year celebrating King’s birthday and bragging and boasting upon what a great man and humanitarian King was (when, in fact, he was a man of evil--ed). 

 

 

King--Pro Arab? 

 

Piper mentions that just as King had sided with the Vietnamese in the US Vietnam war, King was also becoming pro-Arab in terms of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East.  If this motion would have materialized and became public knowledge, it would have been an extraordinary event which would have left the King supporters in a quandary (like Charlton Heston and the other Hollywood liberals). 

 

While many Americans understand that the FBI and federal spy agencies were extremely interested in every motion, movement, word and sexual encounter that the so-called “reverend doctor” had (including his homosexual encounter with an aide, as discussed in earlier chapters herein), most of us never understood how extensive that the Anti-Defamation League was involved in spying upon the “reverend doctor.” 

 

This ADL link to King was covered in “Final Judgment.”  Actually, Michael Piper mentions one of the strange facts largely missed by a lot of people.  King’s push for Black assertion and elevation in the US-African communities meant that a confrontation was immediately building up between his leadership and the US Mob, led by Meyer Lansky (and other Amalekite big shots). 

 

Organized crime was making a bundle of bucks from drugs, prostitution, gambling and other rackets controlled by the Mob in the Black communities.  Obviously, King’s talk, about Black pride and Blacks taking over, spelled trouble down the road if the Negroes became aware of their subservience to Jewish (Amalekite) crime operations. 

 

In support of Piper’s evidence linking the MLK murder to the Jews (correctly the Amalekites--ed), the Apr 21, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 15) had a story also questioning the King murder.  This AFP report quoted author William E. Pepper who said that the New Orleans crime boss Carlos Marcello laid on a contract killer from the Memphis Police Department to kill King (under obvious orders from Meyer Lansky). 

 

Though not mentioned by Piper, it is also a truism that the Amalekite controlled, liberal wing of the Democrat party (under Amalekite control) must have been concerned, as well.  Imagine what could have happened if the Blacks began to independently think on their own, instead of automatically voting for the liberal Democrat candidates. 

 

The point is that the Amalekites had many reasons to be concerned with the “reverend doctor” and his push of Black pride and rights.  Thus, the best candidate for the murder decision on King is the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters. 

 

While questions have to be asked about how the Amalekite bankers/masters carried this murder out, the truth remains that their extraordinary control of the US media, Mob, government, etc, would have made it very easy. 

 

 

GWB As Well 

 

Since the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters have long controlled the US government, it can be expected that both Democrat and Republican politicians are in their pockets.  Actually, because they control the US media, no American politician can successfully oppose the Amalekite Jews. 

 

Anyone of influence trying to stand up to them will be murdered (as happened with JFK) or crushed in the controlled media (as with Richard Nixon). 

 

A Jewish man named David Rosenberg of New York wrote a letter to a Mr Rense on Dec 12, 2001 (the Rense website is at www.rense.com).  It became an effective open letter when it apparently came out on the Internet.  Perhaps Mr Rosenberg or Mr Rense released the letter which may have first went out as e-mail on Dec 13, 2001, at 1:21 PM from Rosenberg to Rense. 

 

The basis of Rosenberg’s letter was a photo of President George W. Bush in front of an Israeli flag, evidently at a news conference (per Rosenberg, this thing was shown on the Internet as “http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/p/nm/20011211/ts/mdf99013.html”). 

 

Mr Rosenberg was outraged by the photo which was obviously prepped.  The flag was standing and carefully unfolded to show the so-called star of David.  Rosenberg said that that was the first time that he had seen the star of David on the flag when it was not being blown in a breeze.  The way the flag was positioned, Mr Rosenberg allowed that the revealed star was being held in place by a piece of cardboard behind it. 

 

Another problem with this photo, per Mr Rosenberg, was that it seemed to show the US president swearing to the flag.  Reportedly, Bush gave a four-minute speech during which all one could see on the video clip was his head and the star of David. 

 

The conclusion from David Rosenberg was that the message was that “the shadow elite and zionists” are in total control of America.  He added that the image was done intentionally by the White House to accelerate hatred by Moslems around the world against America and to stimulate a Third World War. 

 

Rosenberg was concerned over possible anti-Semitism against American Jews over this vulgar display.  He added that the “Jewish lobby” totally controls our Congress and Senate and manipulates America.

 

This email was an excellent presentation by a concerned American Jew over how the Jewish lobby controls America.  Of course, he is correct (though he suggested that it was an invention of elements in Israel--the writer of this study at hand believes that the Israelis are victims of this power along with Americans and that both are controlled by powerful Amalekite bankers and the super rich). 

 

By the way, the Feb 14, 2003, “The Week” (p. 24) had a cartoon of a US flag with a display of some of its stars.  Among the several pentagrams, there was a lone hexagram/star of David. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 464--Yes, Amalekites Control US Politics

 

 

The 2000 US Elections, Revisited 

 

Former chapters discussed various aspects of the 2000 election crisis or mess (depending upon how one might wish to characterize it).  Previously, the point was made that Slick Clinton and his Amalekite bankers/masters/handlers probably had a major role to play in what happened during the November debacle.  That likely reality will now be assessed. 

 

First, it must be recognized that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters completely own and control the US Democrat party.  They also have enormous influence over the Republican party and share some control there with the internationalist Rockefellers and other Eastern Establishment elites. 

 

But these two parties have been virtually the same for the last several decades.  So it was academic to try to talk about differences.  Hence, whichever of the two parties has been in power at a given moment in time has always worked to install the ideology of the New World Order (which both the Amalekite Jews and Eastern Establishment Rockefellers wanted). 

 

Before the year 1960, there were some possible questions about which party could win in a given election.  And it probably did not matter which party won because the internationalists would gain either way. 

 

However, by the time of Kennedy (and the stuffing of votes in Chicago in 1960), the Amalekite Jews were beginning to be the more powerful faction in their long conflict with the Rockefellers (the merger of the Rockefeller banking flagship [Chase Manhattan] with Rothschilds’ J. P. Morgan is a giant clue that the Rockefeller-Rothschild war is over and the Rothschilds have won). 

 

True, Ronald Reagan won the US elections based upon sheer charisma, personal strength and ability to influence voters in the 1980s.  But otherwise, Nixon and George H. W. Bush were clear Rockefeller people who were allowed to win because both internationalist factions (the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds) were satisfied with them.  Young George W. Bush fits into this same profile. 

 

But the election of Bill Clinton in 1992 laid the groundwork for enormous changes in the American electorate.  The Amalekite Democrats were in the driver’s seat with Clinton (who fully and completely supported the Amalekites, surrounded himself with them and seems to personally have some racial and genetic connections to them [along with Hillary], as will be addressed in later appendices). 

 

The evidence suggests that with Clinton, the Amalekites could instantly declare a dictatorship and martial law.  Frankly, this writer looked for it to occur in late 2000 to insure the continued presidency of Slick Willy.  But it never happened.  And why not?   Without attempting to be dogmatic, the following presentation will offer some possibilities (indeed, probabilities) to account for what did happen. 

 

 

Slick Clinton 

 

The most important factor has to be Bill Clinton himself.  Surely, he played a pivotal role.  And why would Slick agree to a George W. Bush presidency, instead of his supposed friend and supporter Al Gore?  Well, there are probably several reasons for this phenomenon.  First, there is the situation with Hillary. 

 

Surely, Bill must have made many promises and pledges to her for her support during the Monica Lewinsky crisis in 1998-2000.  It’s very possible that he promised her that he would take political steps to elevate her into the presidency.  As it worked out, she needed a political win in New York and Bill and the Democrats arranged this (they now control the NY votes). 

 

Obviously, Hillary would be in no mood to wait for eight years before running for president.  This condition dictated that Al Gore must lose (if he had won, he would be the Democrat nominee in 2004 and Bill would have had to support him).  Thus, Bill was forced to double cross his friend and colleague Gore in order to pave the way for Hillary.  This is no big deal, as double crossing is a common Amalekite tactic. 

 

And as things have turned out, Gore not only lost in 2000, but as things developed in 2002 Gore found that he had few allies and little hope for 2004.  Consequently, he had to withdraw for 2004.  Effectively, this move seems to spell out the end of Gore in US politics.  So the Clinton double-cross has destroyed Gore and left Bill clearly in charge of the Democrat party (with Amalekite oversight). 

 

There are also reasons to believe that Bill himself wants more of the US presidency.  Short of declaring a dictatorship in 2000 (which his backers, the Amalekite bankers/masters, were not prepared for in 2000), Bill had to back off and agree to wait until a future time. 

 

Thus, if he did make an agreement with Hillary, he will soon double cross her, as well; so that he can regain power (the why and how on this will be shortly discussed below). 

 

 

The Reality 

 

Consequently, Bill had to arrange things, as they worked out.  While one might try to argue that the 2000 elections were so diffused that Slick could not have manipulated the total vote sufficiently to cause the crisis which arose, it must be addressed and allowed as a possibility (though remote) in the real world.

 

Logically, from the typical American voter’s perspective, the first explanation for the US election mess in 2000 would likely be due to sheer chance. 

 

But one must remember that while Slick (and certainly, the Amalekite bankers/masters who controlled him) could not totally manipulate the vote, be assured that he (or they) could manipulate the vote results that were finally announced to the American people (like Stalin said--he who votes decides nothing, while he who counts the votes decides everything). 

 

Of course, the case can always be made that YHWH oversaw the developments occurring--regardless of what the cause could have been.  However, this writer would not write Slick off.  Slick was and is not nicknamed “Slick” for nothing.  The truth is that he is very slick. 

 

 

More on Slick 

 

Some time ago, Slick installed two super computers in the White House basement.  With polling data from all of the states during all of 2000, he had a pretty good grip on how the voters would respond on Nov 7, 2000.  Even on election day, he had access to the same voter exit polls which the news networks had.  He knew precisely how things were progressing for each of the candidates by state. 

 

If he deliberately wanted to create a crisis, the best way would have been to see that the popular vote went one way and the electoral vote the other way.  Surely, from his viewpoint, the best scenario was the one that developed with Bush getting the electoral vote.  If Gore won both votes outright, Slick could not deny him and his Amalekite colleague the presidency (since the Democrats would demand it). 

 

But with Bush, Slick could work in the background to motivate and push the Democrats to precipitate a crisis with continued strife among the media and public and a call for a constitutional convention (over the shortcomings of the electoral college).  Manifestly, strife in the US would cause reactions overseas which likewise would give Slick the opportunity to regain power (with him as a symbol of stability and public acceptance). 

 

While the Democrats and Republicans were fighting it out, Slick could remain in the public spotlight as the man of stability and statesmanship and as the president who gave the US a good economy (supposedly).  This spin could pave the way for him to regain power under a new constitution. 

 

Importantly, in any case, Slick and/or his allies and agents could, with time, begin pushing for a new constitution--which also would assuredly pave the way for him to regain power.  The unpopularity of the electoral college would be a powerful motivating force for a new constitution. 

 

Regardless of what role Slick may have played in the November 2000 election crisis, the fact remains that this whole thing has marvelously fell into his hands to allow him several methods of altering history in some manner and regaining the presidency on some pretext.  For sure, Slick has plans for the future (either in the US or at the UN).  The election debacle has played directly into his hands.  He was the winner! 

 

 

The Bankers/Masters Really Called the Shots 

 

Beyond the possibility that Slick and his lieutenants engineered the election crisis in November, one must be prudent and allow that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters must have also planned and implemented the crisis (and particularly so, if they assuredly worked in league with Slick for the event). 

 

It would be easy to perceive that the bankers/masters would want their man Lieberman or some other Amalekite in power.  With Gore, this may or may not have developed (though they theoretically could assassinate him after the election, which would have allowed Lieberman to become president). 

 

Furthermore, there is the question about whether the bankers/masters could successfully impose their dictatorship without a major US crisis. 

 

As discussed in previous chapters, there are clear reasons to believe that the Amalekites foresee a coming economic collapse in the US.  In fact, they either see it coming or they are planning to cause it.  Frankly, the evidence is massive that they will pull the plug and cause it--precisely so that their hoped for New World Order can be implemented in the US first, before going global later. 

 

Maybe, in their wisdom, the best option was to create a constitutional crisis in the 2000 elections, which would see the destruction of the present Constitution and the implementation of a new US Constitution suitable and compatible with the New World Order. 

 

Perhaps later, the bankers/masters can reinsert Clinton or allow Lieberman or some other Amalekite to take over.  While the Amalekite bankers/masters may tolerate and put up with Slick further in a later day, he logically can’t be more than a stepping stone to usher in an eventual Amalekite dictator (which is their ultimate goal).  This means that they will ultimately double cross him (to be described in later comments). 

 

 

The Beginning Political Crisis  

 

Author Jim Marrs was on the “Dreamland” radio program on Dec 3, 2000.  He suggested that the secret rulers of the US engineered the Florida vote mess in order to set the stage for a flare up over the electoral college which would ignite calls for a constitutional convention and a new constitution.  He added that the whole process is just a manifestation of the Hegelian dialectic in operation (elsewhere noted herein). 

 

Per the Hegelian thinking, there is the thesis, then the antithesis (the opposite) and finally the synthesis (the real objective).  Per Marrs, the plutocrats wanted a new constitution (which would get rid of the Bill of Rights).  This was the desired synthesis.  Bush and Gore were merely the thesis and antithesis opposites set up to bring about the synthesis. 

 

A few days after the Florida crisis developed, another clue on the thinking of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters surfaced when their point man, Senator Charles Schumer, an Amalekite, announced that he will submit to Congress new legislation calling for the establishment of mandatory computer machines using two-way modems inside to record the votes automatically and instantaneously, as the voter makes his choice (Nov 27, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 1). 

 

Many US voting precincts seem to already be using such machines (as noted earlier).  However, all do not (as in the case of Florida). 

 

Per “Spotlight,” this Schumer plan would allow the global establishment to control elections more simply from a central location by computer fraud.  Hence, the bankers/masters calling the shots could manipulate the computer processing instantly, as votes are cast, to report the results that they want. 

 

Add these new computer voting methods in with a new constitution and it means that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters will completely control all facets of the United States--lock, stock and barrel.  In this situation, Amalekite Jew leaders will take over total political control of America at all levels.  Then, their man Lieberman (or whomsoever) can be installed as president. 

 

 

Putting This Together 

 

These possibilities can be put together into some semblance of a plausible whole and one which makes an awful lot of sense in the vein of what has happened in 2000 and the desires and wishes of both Clinton and the Amalekite bankers/masters. 

 

As will be covered in later appendices herein, there are reasons to think that Clinton could be an Amalekite with a special purpose in life.  For sure, he devoted himself fully to the Amalekite cause during his presidency.  He is either one of them or one of their most trusted goyim agents.  In this vein, it is hard to understand why they might have engineered events to see him leave the US White House in January 2000. 

 

The Amalekite Jew bankers/masters control the Democrat party and even the Republican party and US elections somewhat, as noted above and earlier. 

 

The Bush family and indeed the present Bush administration are clearly linked to the left wing Republican element led by the US Rockefellers.  It’s hard to see how the Amalekite Rothschilds and their colleagues could gain much with a Republican-Rockefeller presidency at this point in time (unless one realizes that indeed the Rockefeller-Rothschild war is over and the Rothschilds have won). 

 

But as outlined in the Prologue and in former comments on the stock market control unit, maybe the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters see that everything is about ready to collapse and/or maybe they are ready to collapse the entire financial structure in America which can be blamed upon Bush and the US right-wing (with a view of bringing on a new constitution and/or the New World Order). 

 

 

Another Aspect 

 

Along with the planned collapsing of the US economy to blame on a naive George W. Bush and the right wing of a very gullible American public, there is another real reason on why the US Amalekite Jew bankers/masters have found it expedient to allow the election of GWB in 2000.  This one is also most fascinating because it involves the so-called terrorist attacks of Sep 11, 2001. 

 

As a minimum, the terrorist attacks of Sep 11, 2001, could well be events staged, scripted or set-up events by the US-British Amalekite Jew bankers to also purposely complete the imposition of tyranny upon the American people (and pave the way for world government).

 

As will be discussed in later chapters, there is a good possibility that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters are the real power behind the alleged Muslim terrorist attacks in 2001. 

 

In this vein, the major fall-out over these attacks has been the passage of vast, new, draconian laws which take away the remaining vestiges of freedom in America.  The passage of some of these laws would have been virtually impossible under the tutelage of a liberal Democrat, like Slick Clinton. 

 

Back in the 1970s, when the New World Order crowd decided to open the door to Communist China, the so-called “conservative,” right-winger, Communist fighter Richard Nixon was chosen to do the deed.  A left-wing Democrat could never have successfully carried this ploy off, as happened with Richard Nixon. 

 

Possibly, this is the exact same scenario with George W. Bush and the new tyrannical laws that have been coming down the pike since Sep 11, 2001, and the terrorist attacks.  Thus, George W. Bush has purposely been allowed into the US presidency precisely so that he, as a so-called conservative Republican, could force a whole series of tyrannical laws upon the American people (which a Democrat could not do). 

 

 

Another Amalekite Conspiracy 

 

Another giant Amalekite conspiracy was revealed in the Dec 30, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 7), in a story by Christopher Bollyn on “America ‘Pearl Harbored,’” which focused upon some of the background and intrigue involved in the Sep 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the after-play in terms of the Bush wars and military pushes in the Middle East and South-Central Asia. 

 

The Bush wars in those parts of Asia will be addressed in some detail in later chapters and Appendix D.  There is no intent to presently cover them--beyond pointing out this strange Amalekite conspiracy and how GWB has completely engineered things to place this Amalekite conspiracy into effect. 

 

Christopher Bollyn’s report notes the presence of a “neo-conservative, Washington-based organization known as the Project for the New American Century (PNAC, as cited earlier), funded by three foundations closely tied to Persian Gulf oil and weapons and defense industries.” 

 

As Bollyn outlines, the PNAC (founded in 1997) drafted a US war plan for global domination (starting with the Middle East and South-Central Asia) through military power. 

 

Per the AFP story, the PNAC is a part of something called the New Citizenship Project (NCP) which is a “non-profit educational organization whose goal is to promote American global leadership.”  From the information available in the AFP report, it is clear that both the PNAC and NCP have been founded by the Amalekites to promote their rule in a global outreach (starting in Southern Asia and the Middle East). 

 

PNAC was founded by the Amalekites Robert Kagan and William Kristol (who owns the “Weekly Standard”).  NCP’s chairman is also William Kristol. 

 

Per the AFP report, the Amalekites Richard Perle (known as the Prince of Darkness), Paul Wolfowitz, and Christopher Meletz have or do play key roles in overseeing PNAC within the Department of Defense (all three are or have been top officials of DOD--although Perle was forced to resign on Mar 27, 2003, as chairman of the Defense Policy Board [but he stayed on the Board], when it was revealed that he had a conflict of interest with his private businesses.  Also, later information developed showing that Perle had received top secret DOD briefings and had used the information to profit from in his private business interests and with the Amalekite-Rothschild firm of Goldman-Sachs--May 7, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. A7). 

 

The Amalekite Paul Wolfowitz and the janissaries/lackeys Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Jeb Bush all signed a PNAC statement of principles on June 3, 1997, which essentially demanded an increase in US defense spending to challenge regimes hostile to US interests.  A similar outreach for the Middle East occurred in Sep 2000 (as will be described in later chapters). 

 

The essence of these two Amalekite founded and led organizations seems to be a plan to increase defense spending (which had been going down under Bill Clinton) and exercise hegemony over much or all of the Middle East and Southern Asia in the guise of US national security (while making vast new profits for the Amalekite plutocrats). 

 

 

The Early PNAC Revelations 

 

The scheme of US military domination was outlined in the PNAC Statement of Principles which said:  “As the 20th century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world’s preeminent power... we need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.  Such a Reaganite policy of military strength is to build on the successes of this past century, and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next” (quoted in the Mar 2003 “Radio Liberty” newsletter, p. 1-2). 

 

It would be appropriate here to next look at a 90-page document prepared by the PNAC in Sep 2000 which set forth its plans for the Middle East and South-Central Asia. 

 

It said:  “The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security.  While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein. 

 

“Even should Saddam pass from the scene,” the plan noted that US military bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait would remain, despite domestic opposition in the Gulf states to the permanent stationing of US troops.  Iran may well provide as large a threat to US interests as Iraq.  A core mission for the transformed US military is to “fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars.” 

 

Going on, the strategic transformation of the US military into an imperialistic force of global domination would require a huge increase in “defense spending... The process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event-- like a new Pearl Harbor” (as quoted by Christopher Bollyn in the Dec 30, 2002, American Free Press, p. 7). 

 

Although not stated by PNAC, the essence of the PNAC plan was a motion in support of the New World Order, but one which would provide for a world government to be ruled by the US-British Amalekite plutocrats.  In other words, the US (in league with Israel and the White British Commonwealth) would become a world ruling empire which was completely owned and controlled by the Amalekite plutocrats. 

 

Of course, world rule has always been on the burner for the Amalekites.  While they have made much progress in that direction with their ownership and control of money, there has been some opposition (and particularly in the UN, as established elsewhere herein).  But by using US military power to completely dominate the world, the Amalekites will be in the driver’s seat in terms of world government. 

 

 

Putting It Over   

 

To set the stage for what was to follow, PNAC wrote President Clinton on Jan 26, 1998, and said:  “We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding... The policy of ‘containment’ of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months... Given the magnitude of the threat, the current policy...is dangerously inadequate.  In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power.  That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy” (Mar 2003 “Radio Liberty” newsletter, p. 2). 

 

But for whatever reason, Bill Clinton and the Democrats were not the means of putting the PNAC plan into operation. 

 

Apparently, to put this scheme over, the Amalekites decided to use the Republican party and its image of neo-conservatism and US defense concern to sell this project to the American people (Bill Clinton, Al Gore and/or the Democrats could not have successfully put this plan over to the nation because of the push by the Blacks and Hispanics [who are strong in the Democrat party] for increased welfare spending and the dove image associated with Clinton, Gore and the liberal Democrats). 

 

Obviously, the Bush clan and several of the leading goyim war hawks were included in the PNAC scheme as lackeys or janissaries (of course, with the promise that these goyim would be allowed to share in the wealth to be plundered and stolen in the undertaking). 

 

The Mar 2003 “Radio Liberty” newsletter (p. 1) also quoted Ted Koppel of “Nightline” who said on Mar 5, 2003 that “A secret blueprint for U.S. global domination reveals that President Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure regime change even before he took power in January 2001.” 

 

Koppel added that “It has been called a secret blueprint for U.S. global domination... A small group of people with a plan to remove Saddam Hussein long before George W. Bush was elected president... And 9/11 provided the opportunity to set it in motion.  Not since Mein Kampf has a geopolitical punch been so blatantly telegraphed years ahead of the blow.” 

 

On Sep 17, 2001, just after 9/11, Bush signed a Top Secret document outlining US plans to go to war in Afghanistan as a part of a global campaign against terrorism.  This document also directed the Pentagon to begin planning military options for an invasion of Iraq (ibid, p. 3, quoting the “New York Times”). 

 

On Sep 20, 2001, PNAC sent a letter to Bush which said:  “We write to endorse your admirable commitment to ‘lead the world to victory’ in the war against terrorism... We agree that a key goal, but by no means the only goal, of the current war on terrorism should be to capture or kill Osama bin Laden, and to destroy his network of associates... We agree with Secretary of State Powell’s recent statement that Saddam Hussein ‘is one of the leading terrorists on the face of the earth’... even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the (9/11) attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq” (ibid, p. 3). 

 

On Jan 23, 2003, PNAC wrote Bush again and said:  “We write to endorse the bold new course you have charted for American national security strategy... American strength is key to building the new world you have envisioned.  The victory over the Taliban in Afghanistan was an essential first step in stabilizing that chaotic country... The international community and an overwhelming military coalition are now ready to end the threat of Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq... Removing Saddam is but the first step toward reconstructing a decent government in Iraq and carrying out your strategic vision for the Middle East.  Other rogue states remain a major problem.  Even as we deploy forces for war against Iraq, North Korea has abrogated its agreement to terminate its nuclear weapons development and threatens war... The third member of the ‘axis of evil,’ Iran, has likewise stepped up its nuclear efforts” (ibid, p. 3-4). 

 

This whole operation clearly suggests that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were set up by the Amalekites precisely to implement the goals of PNAC and NCP.  This option will be discussed in detail in later chapters herein.  For sure, it is very possible that the above cited Bollyn article lays out one of the key reasons to understand why GWB and the Republicans won the White House in 2000. 

 

 

So Maybe 

 

Maybe this backdrop has created the environment for the Amalekite Jews to decide to bring the Rockefeller linked Bush on board--so that first, the US Amalekite Jew bankers/masters can extend US hegemony over the Middle East and make a barrel of new profits; and second, when things do collapse (the inevitable US economic collapse), the US right wing and conservatives can be blamed. 

 

With the new tyrannical laws in place, this would certainly pave the way for a giant religious persecution of the Christian Identity people and other right wing sects (as discussed in former chapters herein) and a complete take-over by the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters (either through one of their agents, like Joe Lieberman, or their cousin, Bill Clinton). 

 

And by all means, this event would forever destroy Rockefeller power over America (if the Rockefeller power still exists and is in a different framework from the Rothschilds--although maybe the Rockefellers have now been conquered completely by the Rothschilds, as noted above and earlier) and allow the Rothschilds to finally rule supreme (in league with their clannish Amalekite cousins). 

 

In other words, it could be that Bush has been purposely set up by the Amalekite Jews (working in league with Clinton) to be the fall guy who is to be blamed for the collapse of the system (which can be engineered directly by the Amalekites).  Bush will thus be the Herbert Hoover sucker and will take the fall while Clinton and the leftist liberals (who primarily caused it, as they pulled the plug on George) will skate free. 

 

Certainly, whenever the collapse comes, many Americans will cry for a new constitution and a dictatorship.  Probably, a constitutional convention will already be underway--simply because of dissatisfaction over the 2000 elections.  Clinton can work hand in glove with the bankers/masters and the media to bring this new constitution into play.  It will then be a simple task for him to step forward and take over. 

 

In this scenario, it appears that Clinton double crossed Gore first.  Next, he might promote a Hillary presidency and then later double cross her in some manner if she won’t obey him and the Amalekites.  For sure, Bill will either control Hillary in a Hillary presidency or a new constitution will arrive to allow him to simply regain power in his own right. 

 

Once Bill is back in power, the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters will eventually double cross him, if he does not toe the line correctly (and maybe, he will not perform correctly, if it develops that he later tries to blame the Jews for the continuing economic problems). 

 

In any case, this seems to be where the US is at in early 2003.  A tremendous motion is now underway to force a constitutional convention and one which could get carried away with a new constitution and a Clinton return to power--especially if Bush and Cheney are removed (by death or assassination) and/or if serious economic problems develop/continue. 

 

 

Colin Powell 

 

Colin Powell is a New World Order man fully supported by both the Amalekites and the Eastern Establishment liberals.  Powell has been playing with the super rich for years now (the proof lies in the fact that he is now a multimillionaire with $18.5 to $67.9 million in assets, Jan 29, 2001, “US News & World Report,” p. 6.  Powell didn’t get this money from his army career where he spent his entire adult life of work). 

 

With Bush and/or Cheney dead, it might be that the Big Boys choose to move Colin into the presidency (after all, he has been on their payroll for some time, as just noted).  He certainly will be a force to contend with and may get the White House for a spell.  But the better option is that the Amalekites have by now or will soon gain complete control of the Rockefellers and bring Bill Clinton back to power. 

 

Though Powell has been groomed to be an important cog in the New World Order, the Amalekite internationalists may have developed some second thoughts since he has gained political prominence with George W. Bush.  There could be a parting of company between the Amalekites and Powell if he is not careful--and especially since he is actually incompetent (though incompetents do make good robot followers). 

 

“Spotlight” (p. 18) of Feb 12, 2001, had a story by Michael Collins Piper on “Israeli Lobby Fearful of Secretary of State” which noted that some of the (Amalekite pro) press has offered some reservations about Powell.  The “Washington Post” of Jul 23, 2000, and the Jewish “Forward” paper of Jan 19, 2001, were quoted with messages about Powell and isolationism (which Amalekite internationalists bitterly oppose).  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 465--Clannish Edomites

 

 

Yes, Clannish Edomites 

 

In another matter, Edomites are extremely clannish--especially the Amalekites among themselves. 

 

Interestingly, this propensity extends further to encompass even the overall Edomite definition.  Thus, New York’s Phoenician Irish, Zepho’s Sicilian gangsters and Esau’s Hollywood moguls all have gotten along well with the Amalek power structure which completely dominates organized crime and the media and entertainment industries. 

 

Next, the overall definition of the descendants of Eliphaz are likewise clannish in their racial clique. 

 

For instance, the Ottoman Turks were always on good terms with the Amalek Jews.  Even today, Turkey maintains some distance from the other Moslems who are more opposed to the Jews.  The US dominated Amalek power structure and media has been in total support of their Albanian cousins in the conflict with the Serbs in old Yugoslavia. 

 

Edomites may appear to be divided among themselves on issues of little or no importance.  But they typically offer a solid front against outsiders on significant themes.  Apparently, the Cahilla and bankers/masters allow some disagreement and nonconformity on matters of little importance.  But it is consequential issues which are stressed and which most Edomites support (because of genetic factors). 

 

If the Amalekites, in particular, cannot personally agree on something being promoted by their bankers/masters, then those disagreeing tend to keep their mouths shut.  They maintain silence to not interfere in the work of their leaders.  Thus, some truly religious Edomites might disapprove of the collective Amalek push of sexual perversion.  But they won’t fight the bankers/masters over it. 

 

It’s not to say that Amalekite bankers/masters automatically promote their positions on all political and social issues in the contemporary sun worship society.  Apparently, they only do so on major issues affecting the overall Amalekite goals (i.e. world rule, the destruction of Yisrael, etc). 

 

But again, if the bankers/masters do take a position, the generic Edomites tend to all get on board or be quiet about it.  One sees this regularly in US politics, the US media, the Anti-Defamation League, the militant Jewish Defense League, etc. 

 

When the Amalek-Edomite leaders in these arenas speak out, there is little or no Edomite opposition.  The few, non-Edomite Christians trying to oppose them are rendered ineffective by being branded as right wing extremists, racists, anti-Semites and/or White supremacists. 

 

 

A Clarification 

 

A point of clarification is needed at this stage in the context of the above discussion on the clannish nature of the Edomites and the tendency of the generic Edomite people to go along with the bankers/masters/visible leaders.  While it is verity that the Amalekite bankers/masters have enormous power over the Amalekites and even much influence over the generic Edomites, there are other issues involved in this power. 

 

First, Edomites generally seem to have a genetic, passionate hatred of racial Yisrael and Israelites, as discussed above and in former chapters.  This hatred is genetic and all Edomites seem to automatically have it.  In this sense, they want to always choose the worst for Yisrael and Israelites (in a democracy).  And they are very prejudiced with this preconceived motivation to destroy Yisrael. 

 

Next, there is the reality of Satan and his associated demonic hosts to use mental telepathy upon Edomites generally and Amalekites particularly to choose specific methods to harm, hurt and destroy Yisrael and Israelites and Adamites in the generic sense. 

 

Therefore, if a question of gun control comes up in one of the House of Yisrael nations, the Amalekites are always guided by Satan and his powers to choose gun control, as a prelude for the establishment of a world dictator who can really go to work on destroying Yisrael and Adam. 

 

Obviously, since the days of Balaam and his advice on how to destroy Yisrael, discussed in former chapters, the prevalent and powerful Satanic force has directed, influenced, guided and motivated the Amalekites--especially in their management and direction of promoting racial integration and amalgamation of White Israelites with the behemah humanoids. 

 

Satan has always pushed and prodded his Amalekite sons in providing leadership on the racial amalgamation issue. 

 

The same thing can be said about the sexual perversion and homosexual subjects.  Many, many Amalekites are queers, as outlined in chapters heretofore.  It’s hard to say how much of this perversion is genetic and how much of it is Satanic.  Perhaps there is a mix in the Amalekite profile. 

 

For sure, the queer Satan has pushed and prodded his sons (descendants of Kain, to include the Amalek-Edomites) in this same direction.  Ever since the days of the Exodus, as discussed in previous chapters, the perverted and warped Amalekites have been anxious to spread the same perversion and depravity among the racial Israelites. 

 

With this prevailing predisposition for genetic hatred and continuous mental telepathic messages from Satan and his demon forces, the Amalekite bankers/masters automatically have part of their battle already won.  Naturally, Amalekites in particular are going to go along with anything which points in the direction of their fleshly ideas and thinking (regulated by their genes and the Devil). 

 

 

More Specific Leadership 

 

Otherwise, the Amalekite masters/leaders are available to provide leadership on other more complicated issues which the typical Edomite may not readily understand.  The masters are very active in providing direction in support of the Amalekite bankers and their quest for world government and control. 

 

So, back in 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was under discussion, the masters (in an effort to promote world rule, Amalekite profits and satisfy the Amalekite bankers) went to work to persuade and influence--first, all of the Amalekites to support this legislation; next, all of the other Edomites; and finally, many or most of the collective peoples of America as well. 

 

The twelve-year war against Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi people has been essentially guided, directed and managed by Amalekite bankers/masters.  Of course, there could be questions of genetics and Satanic influence even in the conduct of this war.  But in the main, the leadership and push has been provided by the bankers/masters.  More aspects of this conflict will be addressed in later comments. 

 

There is no question about it whatsoever.  The 1999 Clinton war against the Serbs in the Balkans was prompted by Amalekite leaders to benefit the super rich Amalekite bankers (who have been trying to take over Eastern Europe).  As discussed above and in a prior chapter, there were serious economic and profit issues at stake in Kosovo for the Edomites.  Obviously, Amalekite bankers/masters pushed this war. 

 

 

Alan Greenspan 

 

The selection and push for the acceptance and approval of specific Amalekite persons for key government positions within the House of Yisrael nations has had Amalekite input from day one.  Thus, there is little doubt; but that a clear Amalekite, like Alan Greenspan, was selected by the Amalekite bankers.  The same is true with the selection and approval of the various Amalekite jurists chosen for the Supreme Court.  

 

This mention of Alan Greenspan brings up another fascinating fact of reality.  As pointed out in a prior chapter, the Amalekite bankers/masters pretty well call most of the shots in the US.  Clearly, the Rockefeller empire is on a dramatic decline (possibly with the absorption of Chase Manhattan Bank by powerful Amalekite Jew bankers). 

 

As noted in former presentations, the Bush family (though formally servants of the Rockefeller power bloc) have had to toe the line with the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters or face utter destruction.  Thus, a strange event unfolded in the early summer of 2001, which proved how manifestly true that observation is with young George W. Bush in the presidency. 

 

“The Week” of Jun 29, 2001 (p. 37), had a short news report which read “No dissent allowed in Greenspanland.”  The essence of the report was that Bush was prepared to nominate Country Bank CEO Terry Jorde to the Federal Reserve Board.  According to columnist Robert Novak, “She was vetoed by the supremely powerful Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.” 

 

Apparently, Bush is in the awful position of having his nominations to the Fed cleared in advance with Alan Greenspan.  Since Greenspan is a leading Amalekite (and works closely with the Amalekite bankers/masters), it is absolutely a certainty that the Amalekite bankers are calling the shots on who can be a member of the Fed.  So Bush is following the precedent already set in place by Clinton, in terms of Amalekite rule. 

 

 

John Deutch 

 

As outlined in former chapters, the Amalekites have completely taken over the national US law enforcement and intelligence operations here in the early 21st century.  One of the CIA’s recent directors, under Bill Clinton, was an apparent Amalekite Jew named John Deutch. 

 

He gained some notoriety when he took classified CIA computer files and down loaded them into his personal computer at home (which was totally unsecured).  While it is not clear how much of this information was stolen by foreign powers by reading Deutch’s harddrive (through the Internet or however), it could be staggering. 

 

This possible compromise of US security information received quite an uproar in Washington when it was discovered in the summer of 2000.  There was a Justice Department investigation into it, but nothing came of it because the Amalekite Deutch had powerful political support from the Amalekites in control of the US government. 

 

Even Deutch’s confirmation in the US Senate was pushed through by Amalekite Senators like Arlen Specter (R, PA) and Joseph Lieberman (D, CT).  Since Slick Clinton was surrounded by Amalekite aides and assistants, it was manifest that the Amalekite Deutch was not about to suffer for his incompetence and likely treason. 

 

The investigation into the activities of Deutch revealed that the former Director of the CIA was a close confidant and colleague of the Israeli Ambassador Eliahu Ben-Elissar; who, in time, turned out to be a high ranking member of the Mossad, instead of a career diplomat (Sep 11, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 1, 11). 

 

Apparently, Deutch shared US classified information with Ben-Elissar.  Again, nothing was done about this treason since Deutch was a part of the clannish Amalekite cabal.  Clearly, the clannish Amalekites share information and nothing will be done about it because they are so powerful in the US government.  The Clinton Administration worked hard to protect the Amalekite Deutch.  Ultimately, Slick pardoned him. 

 

In September 2000, US Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk was also found to have mishandled classified documents and allegedly allowed security breaches, corruption and bribery at the US Embassy (Oct 9, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 1).  Indyk was suspended.  As Indyk was an Amalekite Jew, nothing further was done and he was soon exonerated. 

 

However, these cover-ups of Amalekite misdeeds and corruption were a hard task for the Slick Meister and especially since the US Justice Department chose to arrest, jail and prosecute the Chinese scientist, Wen Ho Lee, from Los Alamos in 2000 (as discussed earlier).  Lee’s record was certainly similar to that of John Deutch.  Possibly, Lee was spying for China, while Deutch was spying for Israel. 

 

The only thing that the government successfully hung on Lee was his supposedly irresponsible handling of classified information (as discussed earlier herein).  As a minimum, this same charge certainly applies to the deceitful Deutch (who was pardoned). 

 

 

Ultimate Amalekite Control

 

Though it probably is true that the electability futures of various Amalekite politicians (like the crafty Joseph Lieberman) depend somewhat upon their personal attributes and abilities, it is also true that if and when the bankers/masters come out in support of Amalekite candidates, they get a big boost (as has occurred with Lieberman). 

 

The decisions of the Israeli state to bring the Falashas to Palestine and to give identity cards to the Black Hebrews, discussed in a former chapter, surely came from the Amalekite bankers/masters/leaders.  Likely, there was some serious Jewish opposition to these schemes in the state of Israel.  So the bankers/masters would have had to push and prod the population into accepting the plans. 

 

Literally, there are hundreds of issues and things happening from time to time which require input from the bankers/masters to provide leadership to the generic Amalekites first, the collective Edomites second and the general population third.  It is these issues that capture the attention of the bankers/masters. 

 

On the basis of freedom and free will, some Amalekites may theoretically choose to go against the bankers/masters on some of these issues.  But if they do, they still have the power and influence of their genes and the Satanic motivation to push them into the direction of destroying Yisrael and Adam. 

 

 

The Amalekite Presence in 2003 

 

The Amalekites are especially involved in several things--like in the international and central banks, organized crime, Satanic groups, the Illuminati, the Roman Catholic Church and others.  Additionally, Amalekite Jews have frequently worked with the Anglophiles in both England and the US (pretending to support their goals, yet be working secretly to destroy them forever because of genetic hate). 

 

Often this Amalekite presence is recognized in some of these groups in the sense that the participants can be identified as historic Amalekite Jews.  Thus, Catholic Cardinal Lustiger of France, previously discussed, and others in a similar position are so clearly identified with their Jewish heritage that it is not difficult to perceive their true genetic ancestry and linkage to the evil and depravity of the Amalekites.  

 

In any case, in those instances where the connection can be clearly made to the Amalekites, there is no reason for total confusion and uncertainty in understanding the Amalekite presence and evil. 

 

However, because of their propensity for name changes, adoption of different religions (supposedly) and other clever acts of deception, the Amalekite definition can be extremely difficult to recognize and evaluate.  For instance, one key, likely, Amalekite agent is the popular Geraldo Rivera (with his own TV program).  What few understand is that Rivera is not a true Hispanic, as he pretends.  He is something else. 

 

Otherwise, some Amalekites have adopted Christianity or some other non-Jewish faith and changed their Amalekite names so many years ago that their Amalekite ancestry is more complicated.   In such situations, it can be awful difficult to identify the subjects as Amalekites. 

 

Examples of this deception can be found among persons like Giovanni Battista Montini (Pope Paul VI), Adolf Schicklgruber, the Roosevelts (Rosenfelds), the Rockefellers, the Bushes and Bill and Hillary Clinton (to be described in later comments), etc.  If there is a key to identifying the true Amalekite, it is the matter of his deeds, works and fruits.  In other words, a person’s actions, if evil and depraved, suggest Amalekite genes. 

 

 

Using Others 

 

Also, as elsewhere discussed herein, it is true that some Amalekites are so powerful that they use janissary robots to do their will.  This is particularly true in the US and Britain where the Amalekites virtually own and control the media and entertainment industries.  Therefore, they are constantly affecting the beliefs and thinking of any number of local citizens. 

 

Even people like Billy Graham and Christian preachers and politicians, in general, whom are not technically a part of the Amalekite Jew definition, become willing agents to help the Amalekite Jews and to work with them. 

 

Many of these Anglophiles in the Eastern Establishment still believe that they are in charge and calling the shots in the US--never understanding that they have been slowly losing out in the past 60 years. 

 

Even when Amalekites themselves lack personal power over an international group, they often are able to wield power through other entities that they do control.  Hence, the Amalekites are not a power in the UN themselves.  But they control the US and Britain which are powerful agencies to work for and serve the Amalekite purpose in the UN. 

 

Of course, the case can be made that the Amalekites personally are not a big factor in the Roman Catholic Church, the New Age Movement, the World Council of Churches and on and on (at least, not in numbers, in terms of the total membership). 

 

But once an Amalekite person or persons gain some power and control in these groups, they can push the Amalekite agenda throughout the organization.  Thus, an Amalekite pope or a few Amalekite cardinals can prevail over the generic Catholic Church (as has happened historically). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 466--Double Crosses and the Amalekites

 

 

Innocent Jews Suffer 

 

The Jewish dilemma discussed in the former chapters seems to be a repeat of what happened in Nazi Germany in the 1930s.  Innocent Jews were--in the past, and will be, in the future--oppressed, persecuted, tried and murdered for the diabolical evil and wickedness of the Amalek-Edomites.  This is a real tragedy that has happened before and will surely happen again. 

 

When will the world wake up and realize that there is no problem with the collective Jews or the Jewish religion?  The problem is with a select group of evil Amalekite bankers/masters, who infiltrated and took over the circles of power within the Jewish community. 

 

Yes, through the centuries, good, true Israelite Jews have had to suffer the scourge of Amalek because their ancestors in Second Temple days allowed the Amalek-Edomites to become proselytes (just as the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic peoples have allowed Amalekite bankers/masters and workers of evil to immigrate to their lands and literally take over their governments in the last several hundred years).  

 

To demonstrate how the evils and depravity of the Amalekites have hurt true Jews, there are any number of illustrations which could be outlined.  But for purposes of discussion, a few will be described to drive home the point. 

 

 

Amalekite Merchants  

 

First, Amalekite Jew merchants have developed a reputation for being incredibly tight, stingy and evil in commercial dealings.  In short, the typical, gullible, goyim Christian is still in bed asleep while the Amalekite merchants are up plotting and conniving about how they will rip off, steal, cheat, plunder and exploit the stupid goyim (whom they hate so passionately). 

 

Since the Amalekites are extremely intelligent people, they are very swift at bargaining, whether they are buyers or sellers (it is genetic with them since they are descendants of Cain.  They have been programmed to be merchants and dealers in goods, as discussed in a former chapter). 

 

The Torah was broached in former chapters in that the true follower of YHWH is dedicated to reaching a fair exchange, whether in a selling or buying profile.  This thinking is totally foreign to the depraved Amalekite mind. 

 

This Amalekite Jew expertise at bargaining has created a saying in the Christian West about Jewing somebody down.  When a buyer starts pushing and prodding the seller to a ridiculous low price, the normal expression to denote this case is that the buyer Jewed the seller down. 

 

Now comes the really sad feature of this “bargaining process.”  Tragically, the expression is tied to the collective Jews and is made in the sense of Jewing down or Jew down.  In other words, the critical remark is made in the context of the Jews and not just the wretched Amalekites who are posing as Jews and who are the usual people noted for this ability and conniving. 

 

 

Real Depravity! 

 

The Nov 18, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 6) had a tragic story of how far the Amalekite evil and depravity extends.  This one-- “Top Holocaust Industry Officer Fired for Embezzling” --was by Michael Collins Piper. 

 

Per Piper’s report, a so-called Jew named Neal Sher was chief of staff in the Washington office of the International Commission on Holocaust Era Insurance Claims (ICHEIC).  This issue of “American Free Press” showed the evil Sher in a photo with President Bill Slick Clinton and the then Israeli leader Shimon Peres at a meeting of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. 

 

While the ICHEIC was ostensibly in the business of providing for and helping Holocaust survivors, the Amalekite Sher decided that he would misappropriate some of this money intended for Holocaust survivors.  The article was not clear on how much money Sher stole before his acts became known and he was fired.  Presumably, the organization will make further investigations to see how much he stole in total. 

 

As the AFP reported, Sher was one of the leading stars of the ICHEIC.  Supposedly, he was busy hunting Nazis and protecting the interests of Israel (while at ICHEIC, and before, when he worked in the Office of Special Investigations inside the US Justice Department). 

 

What a shock it must have been to the multitudes of Jews who have contributed money to this group to learn that its boss was ripping off the organization.  But this is the way the evil Amalekites operate.  They have no conscience or concern at all--not even for each other.  Certainly, any stupid goyim entrapped by one of these Amalekites can expect to be ripped off totally and completely. 

 

 

Bringing Hate Upon Good Jews 

 

Next, the Amalekite money power (masters, bankers, merchants and fat cats) are so incredibly evil that this propensity for treachery, dishonesty, cheating, lying and evil is so prevalent that the general goyim population has mistakenly labeled it as a Jewish trait--never understanding that it is not a problem with the collective Jews, but something genetically associated with the wicked Amalekites. 

 

This was clearly the situation in Germany in the 1920s and early 1930s which allowed the evil Adolf Schicklgruber to come to power on a platform of hating Jews.  It appears that most of the pogroms and campaigns of evil against the collective Jews are because of this precise reason. 

 

Previous comments herein quoted Rav Yisroel David Weiss on how the state of Israel was supposedly set up to protect Jews against anti-Semitism.  Yet, per Weiss, the Jews themselves are the greatest and main creators of anti-Semitism worldwide (Jul 8, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. B-2).  Manifestly, Weiss is right! 

 

Evil Amalekites (as parasites) bring great harm and hurt upon a goyim population.  The goyim get mad at the hurt which they suffer and blame the collective Jews for the wickedness and treachery of the Amalekites.  The goyim get so fed up with what has happened to them that they turn their wrath against a lot of good Jews.  This whole exercise is indeed tragic. 

 

 

Amalek-Edomites Double Cross Their Own Peoples 

 

Moreover, it’s quite feasible that some of the ruling Amalek-Edomite bankers can willingly turn on their own cousins and particularly true Jews (whom they continue to hate as much as they do the people of the House of Yisrael).  Historically, Amalekite bankers have been quite willing to persecute and sell out Jews at large (to include other Amalekite Jews), as happened in the above mentioned Schicklgruber days. 

 

This is not as far fetched as some may first suppose.  There are many proofs that the Amalekites can turn on their own without much provocation.  The best illustration of this occurred in 1997 when Amalekite internationalists and Bill Clinton jointly worked together to get rid of the conservative government of Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and replace it with a liberal government (to be described in a later appendix). 

 

Clinton had been and was surrounded by Amalekite aides--manifestly, in his national security, defense and foreign affairs offices.  It would seem that these Edomites would always look out for the interests of the Israeli state.  But in fact, they did not do so.  Since they were so anxious to sell the Israeli state and people out to get an Arab peace treaty, a suspicious person would have to ask why? 

 

Perhaps the argument can be made that they have been selling Israel out in order to merely obey Slick.  But this doesn’t make sense, since Slick himself had been and is totally subservient to the plutocratic money power and especially the Amalek-Edomite super rich.  It is clear that the Amalekite aides, surrounding Slick, actually took their orders from the bankers/masters and influenced, motivated and led Slick to follow suit. 

 

Obviously, the Amalek-Edomites surrounding Slick had been and were working to meet the international agenda, as established and dictated by Amalekite international bankers.  Thus, it would seem that the bankers were not overly concerned about the future of the Israelis, as opposed to their own futures, power and world influence. 

 

Previous comments noted how clannish the Edomite Ottoman Turks were toward their Amalek-Edomite cousins in organized Jewry.  The Edomite Turks seem to have generally treated the Amalekite Jews well. 

 

Yet, when the Amalekite bankers decided that they wanted to buy Palestine and their Turkish cousins wouldn’t sell it, the Amalekite bankers/masters in the West created and directed WWI to bring about the complete collapse of the old Ottoman empire and the Turkish loss of Palestine. 

 

 

George Soros, Revisited 

 

The supposed Amalekite Jew, George Soros, has been discussed in prior chapters.  There is no intent to rehash those presentations--beyond noting that he is closely tied to the Rothschild family (specifically Jacob Lord Rothschild) and numbers of clannish Amalekites in the US Federal Reserve, the US Treasury and key government posts in a number of Western, Christian nations. 

 

Per the Jan 1 & 8, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 1, 4-5), Soros was born in 1930 in Budapest, Hungary, the son of an upper middle class Jewish family.  Soros survived the Nazi war on the Jews by assuming a double personality, as he tells it. 

 

He says that his father gave him Nazi credentials which showed that he was one Janos (or Sandor) Kis, the pretended godson of a local Hungarian government official whose job it was to “deliver deportation notices to Jews and take possession of their property,” as they were shipped off to Nazi concentration camps.  Thus, Soros helped loot and apparently share in the possessions of these Jews. 

 

The Nazi pretender Soros came to the US in 1956 and became an American citizen some five years later.  He graduated to the big leagues in 1969 when he began raising money from rich Europeans for stock investments.  Today, Queen Elizabeth is one of his clients. 

 

The “Spotlight” story with this biographical information suggested that initially Soros had trouble trying to decide whether he was an American, a Jew or a Hungarian.  This remark opens the door that he may not publicly identify with the Jews (although he seems to have Amalekite financial ties to the Rothschilds and other leading Jewish Amalekite bankers/masters). 

 

The point of these remarks is that Soros would appear to be a classic Amalekite, who is fully capable of double crossing and selling the Jews out for money.  As discussed earlier, he already has a reputation for certain criminal dealings.  With his Nazi background, it appears that he will do anything for personal gain.  Likely, the coming work of the Amalekites to bring trouble upon the US will involve Soros. 

 

 

More Sell Outs   

 

The super rich Amalekite Jew Marc Rich was discussed in previous chapters.  Billionaire Marc was able to bribe and payoff the crooked US President Slick Clinton and get a pardon for all of his criminal activities in January 2001. 

 

Importantly, fat cat Marc had been working for years on finding a scam and method which would keep him out of jail.  As described in a former chapter, one of Rich’s schemes was to squeal upon and double cross his supposed friend and fellow fugitive Tom J. Billman. 

 

As pointed out earlier, Marc was prepared to tell US authorities where Billman was hiding out, if a deal could be worked out on the charges against Marc and one which would go on to keep Marc out of jail (Mar 12, 2001, “US News & World Report,” p. 32). 

 

The record is plain that Marc is a very evident Amalekite.  It is unclear what the racial/ethnic status is of Billman.  But the fact that Billman allegedly stole $25 million in a fraud maneuver (a very common type of a criminal action by a cunning and clever Amalekite) and successfully fled the US, suggests that Billman is likewise an Amalekite racially. 

 

The point of this whole discussion is that probably both of these fugitive fat cats were Amalekite crooks.  And being Amalekites, it was no big deal if one of them (like Marc Rich) would step forward and enter into secret negotiations with US prosecutors to double cross his so-called friend and fellow fugitive Billman. 

 

This very sell out by Rich of his colleague Billman brings to mind the situation with the Al Gore and Joe Lieberman Democrat ticket in 2000.  The goyim Gore chose the deceptive and evil Amalekite Lieberman to be his running mate (against all logic).  The stupid Gore went all out to try to tie in with the Amalekite bankers/masters ruling America (Gore even married one of his daughters off to one of the Amalekite Schiffs). 

 

For awhile, the diabolical Lieberman acted like he would never run against his partner in evil, Al Gore.  But then, in 2002, Lieberman came out and started his own campaign for president in 2004, by-passing his former ally.  The Aug 9, 2002, “Forward” had a story by Eli Kintisch on “Dems Fret Bickering Between Gore, Lieberman.” 

 

The essence of this report by Kintisch is that the evil Lieberman has double-crossed his former friend and colleague Gore.  Already, there is a noticeable squabble between the two former friends.  The point is that an Amalekite will gladly double-cross, cheat and swindle anyone--including his own closest friends and relatives. 

 

When push comes to shove, Amalekites simply have no honor.  They will gladly double cross and cheat each other, as well as anyone and everyone else.  Manifestly, in world history, Amalekites are the most immoral, dishonest, vile, corrupt, depraved, deceptive and criminal people of all time.  They are unmatched in evil. 

 

 

A Paradox for the Amalekites 

 

In other sections of this production, mention was made of the role of the Amalekites in the destruction of Yehudah at the hands of the Babylonians in c554 BCE, in support of the Syrians/Greeks in the Antiochus Epiphanies oppression (c168-163 BCE), and in the destruction of Jerusalem at the hands of the Romans in 66-70 CE (per Josephus).  Amalek-Edomites participated in all of this oppression against true Jews. 

 

Thus, the Amalekites have historically had an incredible amount of success in gaining and sustaining their evil rule and exploitation of good, innocent, true Jews.  They started this in earnest in the second century BCE. 

 

Also, they have had amazing success in completely taking over the House of Yisrael nations in the last 350 years.  So here, in the early 21st century, the Amalekites rule Yisrael in the generic sense. 

 

But now, a strange paradox surfaces whenever assessing their roles and efforts to conquer and rule over other peoples.  Frankly, their record hasn’t been good over other nations in the long term.  True, they have had limited success for some years and even decades over non Israelite peoples.  But this domination has always proved to be temporary. 

 

Perhaps this strange reality has materialized and continued--because the Scriptures have been very precise in indicating that it is the Israelite people who will be subjected to eventual Amalekite oppression.  YHWH allows and in some instances brings on this Amalekite cruelty and hardship, due to the sins of the Israelites. 

 

This was the backdrop on the first Amalekite attack during the Exodus.  It has continued to be the exact reason for the subsequent Amalekite persecutions against the Israelites.  It has been the sins and wretchedness of the Israelite people which have brought on and caused the oppression that they are now under in the early 21st century. 

 

 

Some Amalekite Failures 

 

But other than Yisrael, the Amalekites have had a string of failures over the ages.  They linked in with Rome in the first century BCE.  Rome repaid them by allowing the Herods to take over rulership of much of Palestine.  However, in time, the Romans, under Nero, turned against them, as happened in the Jewish-Roman War of 66-73 CE. 

 

Many Amalekites were killed or went into captivity from this Roman judgment.  If Nero actually had Amalekite genes, as will be addressed in later comments herein, this would seem most unusual that one racial Amalekite would turn against other Amalekites.  However, one should not be too surprised because Amalekites have this propensity to double cross their own kind, as noted above. 

 

In the early 1930s, the Amalekite bankers financed and set up their Amalekite cousin Adolf Schicklgruber to take over Germany.  Adolf double crossed them and started a campaign to wipe them out in Europe. 

 

 

The Colored Approach 

 

In the 20th century, Amalekite bankers/masters linked up with Black people in America to promote racial integration and amalgamation (as was their purpose since the days of Balaam). 

 

But the Africans eventually woke up and began to understand how evil the Amalekites are to Blacks as well as to Whites (as noted in a preceding chapter).  So the Blacks double crossed their Amalekite benefactors when the Black Muslims rose up and began attacking and condemning Jews. 

 

In their evil quest to destroy White Christian Israelites in the House of Yisrael lands, the Amalekites began the just noted push on racial integration and amalgamation.  As pointed out in a prior chapter on immigration, the Amalekites have used their money, power and influence to bring about massive Colored immigration into the White Christian nations of Europe and North America. 

 

The stupid, decadent, gullible goyim in Europe and North America quickly joined hands with the evil Amalekite bankers/masters and opened their borders to Colored immigrants from around the globe. 

 

The stupid goyim have even adopted expensive welfare programs to encourage and promote this immigration (and have even willingly turned their own White daughters over to the Colored immigrants to miscegenate with to produce mongrel, mixed off-spring).  This whole process was thought up by the Amalekites who have provided the money and leadership to bring it into fruition. 

 

 

Now, the Colored Double Cross 

 

After spending vast sums of money (by the Amalekites, stolen from the stupid, White, Christian goyim) to promote racial integration and amalgamation, the Blacks have woken up and have led the way in understanding the evils of the Amalekite Jews.  In a sense, the Blacks have been and are now double crossing their former benefactors. 

 

Actually, this whole paradox is surfacing all over the White, Christian West.  With the flood of Colored immigrants, visitors, etc into the White nations, obviously multitudes of mongrel Colored Arabs and Muslims have also come to the White, Christian West. 

 

Much of France, Germany, Britain and even the US, which were once owned outright by the Amalekite bankers/masters, are beginning to have huge Colored populations.  Like the Blacks in America, these Coloreds (and particularly the Colored Arabs) profoundly hate Jews. 

 

While the ignorant, gullible, White goyim have been too stupid to see or do anything about their own destruction at the hands of the Amalekite bankers/masters, many of these Coloreds passionately hate the Jews who brought about conditions and circumstances for them to migrate to the White nations where they could have and enjoy White welfare and White women. 

 

Now, these Colored immigrants are turning against their benefactors.  Numerous attacks upon Jews and Jewish synagogues are surfacing all over Europe.  In the previously quoted March 2002 letter from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, mention was made that the Arab promoted “anti-Semitism” is spreading hate not only across the Middle East, but also into Europe and beyond. 

 

Another prime example of this phenomenon surfaced in the April 5, 2002 “Forward” paper in a story on “N.Y. Lubavitchers Attacked in Berlin.”  A NY Hassidic Jew was visiting in Berlin when he and his Hasidic friends were accosted and attacked by six to eight men who appeared to be Arabs. 

 

With their great hatred of White Germans, the Amalekites pushed for the flood of Coloreds into Germany.  Now, these same Arabs are turning against innocent, religious Jews (like the Lubavitchers) to take their wrath out on them.  What a shame it is that innocent Jews must pay for the evil of the Amalekite bankers/masters. 

 

 

The Real Paradox Here 

 

But there is another real paradox that surfaces in this present discussion.   Of course, it is quite clear and certain that the flood of the Colored immigrants from the Third world into White Europe and North America was fueled and promoted by the evil Amalekites who want to see Whitey thoroughly destroyed (per the theology of Balaam, as discussed in former chapters). 

 

These Colored immigrants rushing into White Europe and North America, by and large, passionately hate the Jews above all people.  This is a paradox because the Amalekite Jews have purposely brought this immigration and the resulting racial integration and amalgamation on precisely to forever destroy the White inhabitants in the former White countries in Europe and North America. 

 

One of the most fantastic flukes of all happened in France in her presidential elections on April 25, 2002.  In a stunning upset, the French people chose the right wing nationalist candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen in the second place on the balloting.  Le Pen faced the present president Jacques Chirac on May 5, 2002.  No one gave Le Pen any chance of any success in this run off election. 

 

One of the platforms of Le Pen was for the return of all illegal aliens to their home countries (in France, this mostly involves Colored Muslims from North Africa).  Surely, Le Pen would like to have seen all of these African Coloreds sent back home and be out of France.  Actually, this whole motion would work for good for the state of Israel and the Jews. 

 

So, what happened with Le Pen’s temporary victory?   The Amalekite controlled media in the US went to work on how evil and vile Le Pen was for his alleged anti-Semitism. 

 

Though Le Pen said nothing about the Jews in his campaign, the Amalekites discovered that a few years ago he had raised questions about the so-called Holocaust.  In Amalekite eyes, this is one of the greatest crimes of all history.  Poor Le Pen was portrayed as an anti-Semite in the US press as well as in much of Europe. 

 

Of course, the Israelis would benefit with the election of Le Pen.  But his election would not fit the Amalekite agenda for the destruction of Whitey.  Thus, the Amalekites have used their media powers to try to destroy Le Pen because of his alleged anti-Semitism. 

 

For sure, the Colored immigrants in much of Europe and America all hate the Jews.  Yet, the White populations being destroyed in Europe and America have generally loved or at least put up with the Jews (not with Judaism because Christians everywhere hate Judaism, but most gullible Whites are much in favor of the Jews). 

 

 

More From Europe 

 

The situation of the Jews in Europe has been under a strain in 2003 because of the way the Israelis have invaded and attacked the Palestinians on the West Bank and in Gaza, as noted earlier.  In reacting to this European backlash, the May 6, 2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 32-33) had a story by Eric Silver on “Target:  Jews” which assessed the latest developments in the West in the vein of so-called “anti-Semitism.” 

 

Silver mentioned a recent case in Belgium where dozens of North Africans attacked a Jewish synagogue in Antwerp and tried to burn it down.  In the Ukraine, a synagogue was attacked in Kiev on April 13th and there was some provocation against the Israeli Embassy in Norway.  In Britain, the “Observer” paper called the Israeli army “the Zionist SS.”  In Paris, a Jewish soccer team was attacked by 15 Muslim youths. 

 

In Australia, a synagogue in Sidney was attacked and in Western Canada, a fire bomb destroyed the library at a Conservative synagogue. 

 

The story took note of the fact that the attacks in Western Europe were almost exclusively the work of Arabs of North Africa and other Muslim immigrants.  As Silver charged, there was no involvement of the “radical right racists, who hate the Arabs even more than they hate the Jews.”   Even in this acknowledgment, the Amalekites could not resist charging the right wing people of being “racists.” 

 

A Feb 2003 letter from Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center went on to outline the latest attacks on Jews in Europe. 

 

Hier noted that some 1,000 incidents have occurred in France since Oct 2000; Belgium says that she can no longer guarantee the safety of her Jews; newspapers in Greece have turned to stereotypes and Nazi imagery (one paper had a cartoon portraying two Nazi-like Israeli soldiers, with the star of David on their helmets, slaughtering Palestinians with knives); in Britain, Muslim leader Sheikh Abu Hamza equated Jews with Satan and said it is OK to kill them; and in Russia, high profile hate rallies to skinhead attacks occur. 

 

 

Friends? 

 

As noted in the above discussion on Le Pen, any number of right wing Europeans have been and would be friends of the Jews against the Arabs, if given a chance.  So, how does the controlled Amalekite media powers treat the right wing?  They attack the right wing and call them names and go on to encourage more and more Colored immigration into the White countries. 

 

The evil Amalekites cannot perceive that their destruction of the White people in France, Germany, Britain, America or wherever (and particularly through the flow of Colored immigrants into those nations) spells the end to the gullible Whites who have historically supported the Jews. 

 

The new Coloreds taking over in Europe hate the Jews more than anything conceived of from White people (who always hated the religion of Judaism and not racial Jews). 

 

 

The American South 

 

Also, one can take the example of the American South which has been historically populated with White Protestant Christians, most of whom can be characterized as fundamentalists or evangelicals.  These persons by and large think that the Jews are “God’s chosen people.” 

 

In terms of United States politics, these people are some of the biggest supporters of Zionism and the Jewish state in Palestine.  Of all Americans, some of these Christian evangelicals or fundamentalists have led the way for the payment of billions of dollars annually to the state of Israel.  They are very dedicated to the support of Jews and the state of Israel. 

 

Yet, the evil Amalekite bankers/masters have hated White people and especially White Southerners the most passionately of all.  In the American South, the Amalekites have spent huge sums of money and made enormous efforts to integrate the White and Black populations there expressly so that the gullible, White goyim in the American South can be fully and completely destroyed forever.  Amalekite Jews have done this. 

 

 

The McKinney Case 

 

While it probably is difficult to understand, but evil Amalekite Jews have worked overtime in the American South to destroy the gullible White goyim in the “Bible Belt” who actually have been some of the biggest supporters of all of Israel and the Jews, as noted above. 

 

In order to destroy White Southerners, the Amalekites have pushed for integration and miscegenation with the huge Negro population in the South.  Along with the integration, the Amalekites have worked diligently to promote Black politicians in the South into leadership roles over the gullible goyim.  A perfect illustration of this push happened in 1992 DeKalb County, Georgia. 

 

The Jul 19, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1, 4) had a story by Eli Kintisch on “Leftists Rallying Behind Georgia’s Rep. McKinney.”  Per Kintisch, Jewish liberals, like Atlanta’s Jules Stine, used their money and influence to elect a left-wing Negro woman named Cynthia McKinney to Congress.  After arriving in Congress, Cynthia turned against her Amalekite benefactors and started supporting the Palestinians/Arabs. 

 

Now, in 2002, these same Amalekite bankers/masters were tripping all over themselves trying to get rid of Cynthia and replace her with a more favorable Black woman who would support the Jews and Israel.  While the Amalekites were pouring money into Georgia to defeat Cynthia, the Arabs were pouring money in to help Cynthia.  This whole thing represented quite a paradox. 

 

 

Another “Forward” Report 

 

The earlier June 14, 2002, “Forward” had an article by Nacha Cattan on “Shoah Revisionists Feel Emboldened As Anti-Zionist Rhetoric Gains in the U.S.” (p. 1, 8) which asserted that “anti-Semitism” is on the rise in America.  As proof for this charge, the article cited a nationwide poll released by the Anti-Defamation League on June 11, 2002. 

 

Per the ADL survey, 17% of the 1,000 Americans polled hold “hardcore” anti-Semitic views (presumably, this number includes all Americans--White, Black and Hispanic).  In 1998, the figure was 12%, allowing that indeed the percentage is up.  This poll also indicated that the anti-Semitic numbers for both Black and Hispanic Americans is substantially higher at 35% for each group. 

 

Since the 17% figure for all Americans includes the 35% high figures for Blacks and Hispanics, it suggests that very few White Americans hold these alleged views.  It was unclear in the article what percentage or proportion of the sample included Blacks and Hispanics as opposed to Whites. 

 

But in order for “Forward” to make its charges, it would seem likely that substantially less than 17% of Whites polled held those views (in order to offset the 35% figure for Blacks and Hispanics that were included in the 17% data).  Thus, it might be that only 10% of White Americans have that thinking. 

 

This means that for every White person with those views, there could be up to three or more Blacks and Hispanics with those views--depending upon the actual proportions of these groups that were in the ADL sample.  In any case, the application of those percentages to the overall US population does spell out huge numbers of Coloreds who simply don’t like Jews, Zionism or the state of Israel. 

 

This whole thing represents quite a paradox because the Amalekite controlled media and power structure almost never say anything negative about Blacks and Hispanics.  The whole focus and effort of the Amalekites is to whine, cry and complain about anti-Semitic White people.  In the real world, the gullible Whites love Jews.  It is primarily Blacks and Hispanics who hate or distrust Jews. 

 

This reality shows the incredible hatred that the Amalekites have had for the White, Christian, Israelite population in America.  The Amalekites have attacked and done their level best to destroy forever the best friends and supporters of Jews and Israel.  Yet, they fully support the real enemies of Jews and Israel (namely the Blacks and Hispanics). 

 

This whole Amalekite motion to destroy the White goyim will, of course, ultimately backfire for the Amalekites.  Once they destroy the White goyim (who love Jews) and the only people left in the world are Blacks, Hispanics and other Coloreds (who hate Jews), guess what will happen to the state of Israel and the collective Jews?  The Colored peoples will rise up and destroy the Jews (including Amalekite Jews). 

 

While it is almost a certainty that the diabolical Amalekites actually believe that by destroying the White Adamic people they will be left in the driver’s seat to dominate and rule over the Coloreds of the world, this is not the way it would work out.  At some point in time, the Blacks, Browns, Hispanics and Muslims would all join together to completely destroy everything called Jew in the world (including the Amalekites). 

 

 

And South Africa 

 

Assuredly, the same thing has happened in the Republic of South Africa.  The gullible, White, Christian Israelites there were largely supporters of the Jews and the state of Israel.  So, what did the Amalekite bankers/masters do?  They rushed in to completely destroy White rulership in South Africa. 

 

The present Black Marxists passionately hate the Jews and the state of Israel (as was described in a prior chapter on the Durban conference on racism).  While the super rich Amalekite plutocrats and bankers will be able to steal much of the wealth of South Africa (for awhile), with the present Black Marxist rulers, their days will be limited.  Given some time, the Blacks will wake up and begin an intense persecution of Jews. 

 

Anyway, the essence of the present Amalekite evil work of destroying the Whites spells out an absolute crisis for Jews in the coming days if YESHUA does not come soon to terminate the power of the evil Amalekites and man’s mis-rule of this planet.  The present trend is that the world and its UN governing power is becoming darker and darker with people who hate Jews. 

 

Were it not for the remaining White presence and influence, the Coloreds would rise up and totally destroy the Jews (as they would ultimately do one day once Whitey is completely destroyed).  Even in Israel, the Ethiopian Blacks are there for economic and personal considerations and not for any love of Jews or Judaism.  These Blacks will ultimately join in with the other Coloreds to destroy Jews and Judaism. 

 

 

The Russian Problem, Revisited   

 

In 1917, Amalekite bankers financed a band of evil Amalekites (Trotsky and Lenin, if Lenin was part Amalekite, as suggested heretofore) to take over Russia.  From 1917 to around 1950, the Amalekites were in tall cotton in ruling Russia and international Communism.  But then, Stalin turned against them and Russian nationals took over their nation.  The Amalekites were double crossed once more. 

 

In later years, an evil Amalekite named Yuri Vladiminovich Andropov took over the USSR.  Some would suppose that at last he would restore the Amalekite rule in Moscow.  But Andropov was much like Karl Marx and Adolf Schicklgruber.  He passionately hated the Jews.  The Amalekite Khazars were not wiped out in Russia by Andropov, only because he died first. 

 

When Mikhail Gorbachev came along in the USSR in the 1980s, Amalekite Khazars saw their chance to perhaps regain power, since Gorbachev was ready to scuttle the USSR for a more lucrative future in the New World Order.  Amalekite gangsters began taking over Russia and other parts of the USSR as it divided. 

 

Boris Yeltsin came to power in the Russian Federation.  He, like Slick Clinton, was the answer to Amalekite prayers and/or dreams.  He was a crook, par excellence, who could be bought and paid for with Amalekite money.  Since 1992, the Amalekite bankers/masters in Russia worked and supported Yeltsin all the way, as they were busy stealing every thing possible. 

 

However, just as they have been double crossed in the past, that seems to be their fate once more in the old Soviet Union. 

 

As things stand now, with Yeltsin gone, it seems inevitable that his eventual successor (maybe Vladimir Putin presently) will probably launch a new wave of cruelty and persecution upon Amalekite Jews at some point in time.  Surviving Amalekite Khazars will have to flee Russia for Israel and the West. 

 

 

Hamas 

 

In a bombshell report, the Jul 8, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 12) had a story on “UPI Terrorism Expert Confirms AFP Exclusive:  Israel Helped Create, Funds Hamas Terror Group,” by Michael Collins Piper.  Piper reported upon a recent revelation from UPI correspondent Richard Sale, which has confirmed an earlier AFP story that the Israelis have a history of funding Arab terrorist groups for their own reasons. 

 

This is precisely what happened with Adolf Schicklgruber and the Nazi movement, which was founded, organized, funded and promoted by evil Amalekites.  Per Sale and the AFP, apparently some of the same allegations can now be laid against the Israelis (based upon data Sale obtained through the freedom of information act and from the CIA). 

 

The background on Sale’s allegation goes back to the late 1970s when the Israelis were anxious to create a movement to divide and dilute Arab support for the strong PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization).  In 1978, Hamas was organized as an Islamic social and religious entity in Israel (with direct or indirect support of apparently Amalekite Jews). 

 

Reportedly, Jewish interests funded and funneled money to Hamas to get it off the ground to divide and oppose the PLO and Yasser Arafat. 

 

Of course, in time, this Amalekite effort totally backfired because Hamas has become one of the leading terrorist organizations in the Middle East.  It has subsequently brought great harm and hurt upon innocent Jews as well as the PLO.  Thus, it appears that the chickens have come home to roost.  The Hamas Palestinians have now double crossed the Amalekite hands that were feeding them. 

 

 

Yes, Amalekites Don’t Fare So Well With Non-Israelites 

 

For sure, there is a most fascinating phenomenon in this present discussion (as touched upon in the preceding comments). 

 

Amalekites have done real well in gaining and holding power over White Israelites and even over other White people somewhat.  Their primary problem has been in trying to maintain power over non-Whites and particularly non-Israelites.  Historically, their ability to rule over and exploit others (other than Whites/Israelites) has always seemed to be limited. 

 

This same paradox will surely continue here in the age end.  They have been playing a major role in the implementation of world government, in the form of the New World Order.  They may even have some appreciable input into the selection and choice of the Beast man who eventually takes over.  Now, the paradox occurs because this coming ruler will turn against them and hate them. 

 

Actually, this condition is already on the drawing boards.  As noted in a former quote from the May 20, 2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 7), there is now some Israeli concern that the UN International Criminal Court will indict Ariel Sharon and some of the Israeli Army leaders for genocide in the way that they have handled the Palestinians. 

 

This court came into effect on July 1, 2002.  In time, it will assuredly focus on alleged war crimes and crimes against so-called humanity.  People like Ariel Sharon, other Israelis, George W. Bush, and many Americans very easily can be indicted and tried by this court. 

 

One must remember that the 174-member UN has 26 Arab votes.  Combine this 26 with the other Muslim and Colored members and it is easy to see that the state of Israel and the US are vastly outnumbered. 

 

Because of this strong Muslim influence at the UN, the Simon Wiesenthal Center says that the UN blocks any discussion on anti-Semitism and “has unfortunately become part of the problem and not the solution” (Nissan/Iyar 5763 “Jerusalem Prayer Mandate,” p. 1). 

 

The May 10, 2002, “The Week” (p. 2) had some remarks from Ron Rosenbaum of “The New York Observer.”  Rosenbaum notes a trend in Europe to liken the Israelis to the Nazis.  Surely, there will be an international move against some of the Israelis in the future. 

 

Thus, a paradox arises in that powerful Amalekite Jews (like the Rothschilds, Lazards, and Bronfmans) have set the UN up.  And now the UN will turn against innocent Israelis and possibly other innocent Jews in the future. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 467--Amalekite Sabbatianism

 

 

A Question 

 

At this point, in this presentation, the student of truth may want to ask a seemingly incredible question--but yet, one which will be fantastically revealing once truth is understood and comprehended. 

 

Question--What does all of the major forces of evil now present over the globe have in common, besides the obvious implications of the involvement of Satanic and demonic powers and forces? 

 

In other words, is there a common thread, link, or connection which will go on to tie together all of the wicked forces of the Amalekites, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Bronfmans, Henry Kissinger, and other workers of evil--to include all forms of Internationalism (or Globalism), Communism, Socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Humanism, Rosicrucianism, the mother-earth religion, the brotherhood of man, racial amalgamation (through integration and miscegenation), sexual permissiveness and licentiousness, homosexuality, feminism, the destruction of the family, the British Round Table Groups, the Rhodes Trust (that funds and promotes the so-called international scholarship program at Oxford which produces people known as Rhodes scholars), the Skull and Bones Society, the US Council on Foreign Relations, the Illuminati, the Mafia, the liberal (non-fundamentalist) Christian Churches (which consists of almost all of the Christian Churches in today’s modern world), Neoplatonism, Christian Gnosticism, anti-Torah advocates of all forms (which again includes almost the totality of Christianity), Reform Judaism, Reconstructionist Judaism, Kabbalists, B’nai B’rith (to include its organic Anti-Defamation League), the Jewish Defense League, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Satanists, New Agers, Occultists of all forms, the United Nations, promoters of the “Learned Elders of Zion” (or Sion, as Messianic Jew Len Horowitz of Sagle, Idaho suggests), and on and on? 

 

And the answer is--yes, there is as will now be established in this chapter. 

 

 

R. Marvin S. Antelman, Revisited 

 

That question brings up a most fascinating book by R. Marvin S. Antelman, on “To Eliminate the Opiate,” published in Jerusalem by the Zionist Book Club and cited in the Prologue and previous chapters.  Rav Antelman seems to bring most of the sources of evil together into some sense of understanding. 

 

The focus of Marvin Antelman’s work was on a so-called Jew named Shabbetai Zevi (1626-1676) who started a Jewish secret and mystic society, in the old Ottoman empire, known as Shabbatianism (or more popularly Sabbatianism, as anglicized in English speaking lands). 

 

While this man’s name and his movement are close in pronunciation to the Hebrew word Shabbat, the two ideas are totally different and have absolutely nothing in common. 

 

 

Shabbatianism 

 

“Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v. 14, p. 1219-1247) discusses the Shabbatian movement in some detail and suggests that it was a messianic and mystic motion founded by Shabbetai Zevi based on the rise of the new (Lurianic) Kabbalah in the 17th century. 

 

Shabbetai was born in Smyrna (Ismir), Turkey.  His father was believed to be of Ashkenazi origin (ibid, p. 1222); which would make Zevi an Ashkenazi Jew, despite the fact that he lived in a possible Sephardi area.  Early in life, he became an ascetic and studied the Kabbalah.  Allegedly, he was pleasant to look at and had some musical abilities which gave him some popularity and acceptance. 

 

Judaica says that he attracted some followers and lived in semi-seclusion with periods of cyclothymia or manic-depressive psychosis (ibid, p. 1222).  These mental problems continued on until his death--meaning that he was a nut and reportedly had enormous demonic contact. 

 

 

But With Success 

 

By 1658, Zevi had wandered over Greece, Thrace and Turkey and was expelled from the Jewish congregation because of his reported misdeeds.  In 1664, he married an Ashkenazi girl from Italy of questionable virtue (bid, v. 14, p. 1224).

 

By 1665, he was in Gaza in Palestine.  There, on May 31, 1665, Shabbetai declared himself to be the coming Jewish Messiah and set June 18, 1666, as the day of the Jewish redemption. 

 

Soon, this crazy man had quite a following in the old Ottoman empire and in various parts of Europe (like Holland, Germany and Poland).  Important leaders throughout Europe were known to send ambassadors and agents to visit with Shabbetai to get his latest advice and revelations (he was known to levitate in their presence, per Milan Martin, in his video on “Lucifer’s Children”). 

 

With his date failure in 1666, Zevi developed several other dates for the final revelation (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 14, p. 1239). 

 

Despite his ascetic and often strange behavior, he violated much Jewish halakhic law, causing himself to be an outcast from traditional Jews and Judaism (modern Jew haters would have loved him though truly religious Jews have disdained him).  He was known to advocate sexual license and perversion (which would set him up well with most modern peoples who are infected with this thinking). 

 

Regardless of his many problems, he did acquire quite a following which continued and grew in Europe, and even subsequent to his death in 1676. 

 

By 1756, in the Old Ottoman empire, a Shabbatian Jew named Jacob Frank (1726-1791) arrived on stage to become one of the primary leaders of the extreme faction of the mystical Shabbatians.  This Jacob Frank was born a Leibowitz (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 92).  But his Amalekite colors quickly came through and he changed his name to Frank (to better deceive the gullible goyim). 

 

In time, Frank claimed to be a prophet and a reincarnation of Shabbetai.  The surfacing of Frank caused some Shabbatians to re-label themselves as Frankists or Shabbatian Frankists. 

 

Judaica says that when Jacob Frank arrived on stage a large number of his followers converted to Catholicism (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 14, p. 1252).  Judaica concludes by saying that by the early 19th century Shabbatianism had allegedly disappeared and had been absorbed into Jewish liberalism (ibid, p. 1253). 

 

Though “Encyclopaedia Judaica” makes this claim, Marvin Antelman offers some comments suggesting that Shabbatianism still exists today as a viable entity (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 269).  In fact, there has recently been a Sabbatian Frankist web site on the Internet (ibid, p. 270).  Otherwise, there remains a host of spin out and related motions and groups, as allowed above. 

 

So while most or all of the early Shabbatians were so-called Jews, the movement soon branched out and tolerated and/or encouraged other religious faiths and peoples (and especially, under Frank, in his outreach to Catholics).  Directly or indirectly, today, many Ashkenazi Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus and others are all Shabbatians--at least in mentality, thinking and philosophy. 

 

However, in fairness, it must be said that most of the big promoters of Shabbatianism remain the Amalekites and particularly Amalekite Jews.  Many of the other promoters or advocates are merely duped and ignorant janissaries who are blindly following Amalekite bankers/masters down the primrose lane of destruction. 

 

 

More From Marvin Antelman 

 

As allowed by Judaica and as substantiated in detail by Marvin Antelman in “To Eliminate the Opiate,” Shabbatianism or Sabbatianism was far from over in the early 19th century (though it may have “publicly” passed off the visible stage then). 

 

Tragically, as pointed out above, the movement survived in the sense of other movements, groups, people, ideas, literature and thinking which developed in the 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. 

 

Probably, the biggest feature of Sabbatianism was the reality that the movement was extremely anti-Torah (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 14, p. 1219-1253; v. 15, p. 1246), anti-Judaism and anti-religion of all types, and was given over to gross sexual licentiousness, perversion, adultery, homosexuality, lesbianism, wife swapping and you name it (per Antelman). 

 

The wife swapping and depravity among the Sabbatian Frankists in Poland became known, and they were excommunicated from Judaism by the Supreme Rabbinic Court of Europe on Siwan 20 of 1756 (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, back cover).  The Rabbinic Court said that their “women are whores and their children are bastards to the tenth generation.” 

 

Antelman quotes various sources to show that wife swapping and other forms of kinky sex were common among the Sabbatians.  Reportedly, a person could become very brilliant by watching the act of sexual intercourse (evidently, even in cases involving one’s own wife).  Watching interracial sex was supposedly even more valuable--allegedly going all the way back to Moshe (ibid, p. 112). 

 

Anti-religion and sexual promiscuous attitudes have characterized almost all of the fall out groups and people of Sabbatianism--as found in other forces at work from the 17th century on forward.  While some of them may have pretended to be religious and even moral people on occasion, in their hearts and minds, they were both anti-religious and anti-morality. 

 

 

In Russia 

 

A previous chapter discussed the Ahad Ha-am, who was apparently one of the early leaders of the Cahilla in Russia in the 19th and early 20th centuries.  While it is not clear to this reader that the Ahad Ha-am was definitely a member of the Sabbatian sect (to the extent that it existed in Russia in his day), as a minimum, the Ahad Ha-am held Sabbatian views. 

 

Judaica says that the Ahad Ha-am called for the Torah to be in one’s heart and for this practice to replace the Torah of Moshe and the “rabbis” (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 15, p. 1246).  This nonsense sounds like something coming from Christianity, rather than Judaism.  But it appears to be a product of the thinking of very evil Jews (surely Amalekites). 

 

Manifestly, there is no denying that the Sabbatian philosophy and thinking greatly affected the Khazar Amalekites and the people behind Russian Communism (like Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, etc). 

 

The early Communist leadership (influenced by Sabbatian philosophy) was so anti-Judaism that it organized a Jewish Affairs department within the Communist Party (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 61). 

 

This section was so successful that huge numbers of former Khazar Jews abandoned all forms of religion to become outright atheists (actually, this was no big change for them since they were never true Jews anyway, but always were sons of Satan). 

 

For sure, the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” (or Sion) represent a work of Sabbatian thinking.  Since the best evidence is that the Protocols were developed by Adam Weishaupt and his illuminist colleagues, based on a commission and financing from the Rothschilds, it becomes crystal clear that the Protocols represent a Sabbatian blueprint for the destruction of Adam under a coming world government. 

 

Of course, Weishaupt, the Rothschilds and much of both the Illuminati and Communism have historically involved Sabbatian Jews (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 55-56).  In this vein, the Protocols are assuredly a Sabbatian production (and a very accurate presentation of Sabbatian plans to destroy Yisrael/Adam and rule the world). 

 

 

And More From Antelman 

 

Antelman builds the case that the Sabbatians were also heavily influenced by Platonic philosophy (ibid, p. 75. 97) and Gnosticism (ibid, p. 73-75, 80).  In this sense, it is easy to see why the anti-Torah position would be one of their primary marks of identification (just as the same condition explains traditional Christianity, which is very anti-Torah [called anomos and anomia in the Greek NT], based upon Greek philosophy and Gnosticism). 

 

Marvin Antelman not only ties the Jewish Sabbatian sects to Christian Gnosticism, but he goes on to identify a whole host of modern evil forces which directly descend from Gnosticism--like Satanism, Dualism, Orgiastic sex rites, Witchcraft, Esotericism, Self Immolation, Reincarnation, Astrology, Demonology, Necromancy, Asceticism, Use of Hallucinogens, Renunciation of property ownership, Self-deification, New Ageism, etc (ibid, p. 80). 

 

The implications of the linkage of all these works of evil with Christian Gnosticism is obvious.  They all tie back in some way to Sabbatianism. 

 

And in a surprise move, Antelman goes on to tie both the Jewish Defense League and the B’nai B’rith organization to Sabbatianism (ibid, p. 16, 93, 225). This means that Sabbatianism is the motivational force behind the entire work of the Anti-Defamation League, which is a sub-component of B’nai B’rith. 

 

With this Sabbatian tie to the JDL and the ADL, it should not take too many brains to understand that the Southern Poverty Law Center also belongs to this same crowd. 

 

Because of its profound anti-Torah and anti-Judaism positions, the remains of the Sabbatian movement has enormous Jewish hatred and opposition to Orthodox and especially Ultra Orthodox people and institutions (ibid, p. 273). 

 

The Sabbatian movement is not only powerful and prevalent among virtually all Christians, but it has had enormous success among Reform (to obviously include Reconstructionist) Jews--and perhaps some significant portion of Conservative Judaism is also right at home in the context of Sabbatianism (ibid, p. 100). 

 

 

More on Christianity and Other Religions 

 

The Sabbatian tie to Christianity was mentioned above.  Not wanting to lose out on any possible source of support, Antelman says that the Sabbatians would circumcise their children to be good Jews; and then, on the same day, the children were secretly baptized into the Christian Church (ibid, p. 202). 

 

Evidently, either way, the child could be a Christian or a Jew--whichever option offered the most advantages (the evil Amalekites have traditionally followed this methodology to destroy Yisrael and Adam for generations). 

 

Along with the fact that many Sabbatians are now Jews, Christians, Buddhists or something else, it is also fascinating that many of the Sabbatian mystics became Islamic Sufi mystics in the past and Islamic Marxists during the years 1910-1919 (ibid, p. 64, 117). 

 

“The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia” (p. 815) notes that Sufism arose in the 10th century as a philosophical and literary movement among the Shiite Muslims by borrowing from Neoplatonism, Buddhism and Christianity.  Although not mentioned by this source, the later 17th century Sabbatianism was influenced by these same motions--thus, tying the whole conglomeration together. 

 

The terrorist Hizbullal group (run by the Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran) was established by Sabbatians (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 64).  Even the Amalekite Yasser Arafat and some element of the Palestinian establishment are Sabbatians or exhibit Sabbatian thinking. 

 

This strange background then opens the door to the possibility or likelihood that some portion of the modern Islamic fundamentalist motion has ties, directly or indirectly, back to the Sabbatians. 

 

 

The Spin Out Movements

 

Manifestly, Sabbatianism was the backbone of the early Marxist-Communist movements in Eastern Europe, as pointed out above and proven by Marvin Antelman (ibid, p. 251).  Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin both had links to the Sabbatians.  This demented Sabbatian thinking was strong in Poland, Russia and Eastern Europe which had large Amalekite Ashkenazi populations. 

 

Per Antelman, the Sabbatian thinking motivated, inspired, pushed and/or established early Illuminism (ibid, p. 16, 189, where Antelman calls Sabbatianism the precursor of Illuminism); secular or socialistic Zionism (ibid, p. 162)--not religious Zionism which is another subject; internationalism, the UN and world government (ibid, p. 42, 91); Socialism (ibid, p. 251); Nazism (ibid, p. 75-93); Satanism (ibid, p. 16, 256); New Ageism (ibid, p. 80); atheistic pantheism (ibid, p. 117); Rosicrucianism (ibid, p. 177); modern Gnosticism (ibid, 73); Kabbalism (ibid, p. 103); asceticism (ibid, p. 80); the Gorbachev Foundation in San Francisco (ibid, p. 208); and all forms of sexual perversion. 

 

The Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Warburgs, Schiffs, Henry Kissinger, Adolf Schicklgruber, Eric J. Steinschneider (Adolf’s personal astrologer, cited earlier), Karl Marx, Moses Hess (one of the mentors of Karl Marx--ibid, p. 29) and the historic Esau and many of his Edomite descendants (ibid, p. 108) were/are all Sabbatians--or at least, they have been people who have expressed Sabbatian teachings and beliefs. 

 

Antelman states unequivocally that the Sabbatian Frankist motion is particularly tied to Communism, the US Council on Foreign Relations (ibid, p. 244, 248)), the Illuminati and the One World Government-UN circle, per correspondence of the House of Rothschild (ibid, p. 44). 

 

As noted earlier, Wall Street financed the Sabbatian Hitler/Schicklgruber and the Sabbatian Warburg family specifically helped Adolf in his rise to power (ibid, p. 155).  Actually, this Warburg support for Adolf makes perfect sense.  Adolf’s genealogy is detailed in a prior chapter.  Suffice to say, it seems to have involved Amalekite Jews from all directions. 

 

However, more specifically, all or most all of these so-called Jews were, in fact, Sabbatians. 

 

In his book, Marvin Antelman makes the case that Adolf’s alleged Jewish father and Jewish maternal great-grandfather both were Sabbatians (ibid, p. 207).  Supposedly, Adolf was conceived on the 9th of Ab (July 20, 1888, with Adolf born the next Apr 20, 1889).  Per Antelman, the 9th of Ab was a special Sabbatian holiday where incest and adultery prevailed. 

 

For sure, Adolf and the entire Nazi movement he directed were manifestly Sabbatian and occultic to the core. 

 

 

Disfellowshipping Sabbatians 

 

Like his earlier fellow believer, Shabbetai was kicked out of the Jewish synagogues.  Therefore, it is interesting that the Amalekite and Sabbatian Henry Kissinger has also been disfellowshipped from Judaism (ibid, p. 1).  Religious Jews don’t like Marx or Kissinger any more than modern right wing Christians like Marx and Kissinger. 

 

There is even a desire on the part of many good Jews to also get rid of the wicked Joseph Lieberman, as noted elsewhere herein.  Manifestly, the works and positions of Lieberman clearly suggest that he is a Sabbatian Amalekite--thus, a gross worker of evil and a son of Satan. 

 

 

Sabbatian Works of Evil 

 

Many of the modern social gods and motions which true conservatives hate so much owe their origins, motivations or push from Sabbatian Jews--like abortions on demand (ibid, p. 155), open homosexuality and shame (ibid, p. 155), feminism (ibid, p. 155), the planned population reduction schemes (ibid, p. 208, discussed elsewhere herein), and the historic blood libel allegations against true Jews (ibid, p. 208, 262). 

 

This reference to the blood libel allegation against Jews in the Middle Ages is important to highlight.  The complaints that Jews sacrificed Christian children were, of course, totally ridiculous, as pointed out in previous comments.  It is ludicrous to believe that a religious Jew would ever engage in such conduct.

 

However, Antelman allows that Sabbatian Jews (surely Satanists) were the very people guilty of these outrages.  Therefore, it is entirely logical that Sabbatian Amalekites would be some of the primary people supporting the population reduction and genocide plans for the future (as elsewhere described herein). 

 

Marvin Antelman also suggests that the next big burnt offering program of the Sabbatians will be the murder of religious Jews and fundamentalist Christians (ibid, p. 208). 

 

Although apparently not directly addressed by Antelman, one must include some fundamentalist Muslims in this mix as well (at least, those fundamentalist Muslims not controlled by the Sabbatians)--since they too are much hated and opposed by the developing New World Order motion founded on Christian Gnosticism and Jewish Sabbatianism. 

 

Surely, it will be these religious people who will be eliminated first in the planned population reduction programs.  As Antelman correctly reports, one of the big thrusts of the Sabbatian movement has been an opposition to all religion (certainly any sense of a genuine form of real religion, and not necessarily the watered-down fake religion known as Reform Judaism and most of the liberal Christian groups). 

 

 

The Incredible Connection 

 

There is another facet of this whole discussion which completely blows the mind of a thinking person.  Previous chapters have outlined the reality that much of the Roman Catholic Church has been in the hands of Amalekite leaders over the years. 

 

While almost no thinking person could or would dare suggest a tie between Catholic leaders and the Jews, there seems to be some strange connections (some of which have been noted earlier herein on the murderers of the righteous). 

 

In view of the fact that both the Jews and the Catholic Church have been led and controlled by various Amalekite bosses over much of the last 2,000 years, it is entirely plausible that indeed both entities or groups of leaders are actually one and the same. 

 

The Amalekite linkage to the various and sundry conspiratorial groups pushing for world government is discussed above.  And truly, it is fascinating that the Amalekites (who control America, Britain, the Israeli state and many of the modern Jews and Jewish groups) also control many of the groups pushing for globalism and world government. 

 

But what is missed by many analysts is the fact that almost all of these groups also come together under the umbrella of the Roman Catholic Church in some form or the other. 

 

The situation with Adam Weishaupt is discussed above.  As noted in those remarks, the Amalekite Jew Weishaupt was allegedly a convert to Catholicism.  Importantly, he was a leader in the German Catholic Church because he was a professor of canon law at a Catholic university.  Furthermore, Weishaupt was also a Sabbatian Frankist and a Gnostic (ibid, p. 75). 

 

This interesting history ties Catholicism, Christian Gnosticism, Jewish Sabbatianism, Illuminism, Communism, Internationalism, and the Rothschilds (who were Sabbatian Amalekites) generally into one big ball of wax which seems to be held together by the secret rulers--the Amalekites generally (many of whom are known as Christians as well as Jews) and Amalekite bankers particularly. 

 

Incidentally, previous comments have already noted the ties between the Roman Church and the Illuminati-Masonic orders.  So this network is undoubtedly quite vast and extensive. 

 

 

A Perceptive Californian 

 

Further insight into this whole conglomeration was brought together in some comments made by an unidentified person in California in a reader’s letter found in the Nov-Dec 2002 “Prophecy Flash” magazine (p. 73).  This reader wrote about the work of author Tupper Saussy (in his book “Rulers of Evil”). 

 

Saussy suggests a tie between the Catholic Church and the Masonic order (which is brought out heretofore in this production).  In fact, Saussy argues that Rome has directed the Masonic order since the time that she (Rome) tortured and killed Jacques De Molay in 1314 CE. 

 

But more importantly, Saussy shows a connection between the Catholic Church and the Jews.  Saussy apparently goes on to cite “Encyclopaedia Judaica” on the fact that the Rothschilds are listed as “Guardians of the Vatican Treasures.” 

 

Thus, per Saussy, the Sabbatian Amalekite Rothschilds are the bankers and treasurers of the Vatican (the Rothschilds and other leading Sabbatian Amalekite bankers are also the treasurers and bankers for the British royal family and assuredly other members of the elite in Europe and North America--ed). 

 

What this amounts to is that the Sabbatian Amalekite Rothschilds have had their hands in the pie in Rome--along with their hands in a number of other places in Britain, North America and continental Europe. 

 

 

Makes Sense 

 

Actually, all of this makes perfect sense.  Since much of the leadership of the Roman Catholic Church has been in Amalekite hands (as allowed in preceding chapters and to be further described in still later chapters on Christian history), it is totally logical that very early Rome would have become linked in close ties to the Amalekite bankers pulling the strings in Europe. 

 

The obvious here is just further evidence and proof that the Sabbatian Amalekite bankers have consistently shown their hatred and opposition to innocent Israelite Jews over the centuries.  These very Amalekites have a (behind the scenes) hand in the terrible persecution, hurt, oppression and murder that the Catholics have heaped upon innocent Israelite Jews over the centuries. 

 

It looks like modern Israelite Jews would wake up and realize how profoundly evil the Amalekites have been--as found in the very midst of the modern Jewish people.  Yet, they have not done so!  Their eyes seem to have been blinded for most of the last 2,000 years (although one must be suspicious that a few very wise Jews, like Marvin Antelman, may have properly put two and two together). 

 

Along with the blinding and confusion persisting among sincere religious Jews, it is also tragic that fundamentalist Christians are similarly functioning under the same cloud of confusion and ignorance.  What a tragedy it has been that fundamentalist Christians (like the right-wing Christian Identity movement) have been so pathetically hostile and filled with hate toward religious Jews. 

 

These Christians simply don’t understand what it’s all about.  Instead of working for truth and righteousness to prevail (which is a goal of many of truly religious Jews--not fakes like Joseph Lieberman), these fundamentalist Christians join hands with the Sabbatians and Gnostics to oppose truth and righteousness. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 468--Amalekites, in Conclusion

 

 

Tying the Evil Together, Revisited 

 

Preceding chapters have outlined and discussed a vast array of evil people, organizations and activities on planet earth--historically and in modern times. 

 

It is certainly no problem to identify, recognize and list many of these workers of evil--like the Christian Churches (particularly the Roman Catholic Church and the liberal, leftist Protestant Churches), Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism, Islam, all pagan religions of all types, all racial Edomites, and on and on, as listed in the preceding chapters. 

 

Many informed people in the world today would agree on the evil with most or perhaps even all of these stated people, organizations and activities.  However, the one thing that ultimately escapees the mentality and thinking of most students of truth is how to tie this mass of gross evil and depravity together into some meaningful whole.  Can it be done and how can it be done (aside from the Satanic overview)? 

 

 

Answer 

 

The apparent answer to this enigma was described in the previous chapter in the vein of Sabbatianism--which was originated, codified and prescribed in the 17th century by very depraved Amalekite workers of evil.  Manifestly, Sabbatianism has been one of the major forces for evil in the last four centuries (as described in the preceding chapter). 

 

Although some persons would be reluctant to put all of the forces of evil into the same pot with the Sabbatianists, it can be done. 

 

The reason is simply that though the founders and promoters of Islam and many or most of the rest of the world’s bad religions were surely not Sabbatianists, the truth is that all of these pagan religions have come to life and obtained some measure of success in the 20th and early 21st centuries simply because the Sabbatianists have taken control of almost the entire world--its people and its ideas, motivations and thinking. 

 

Of course, the same problem arises in addressing the presence of Gnosticism, Neoplatonism, the Catholic Church, humanism, etc among the Sabbatians.  Many of these motions are thousands of years old and were in force long before Shabbetai Zevi and the Sabbatian movement were ever heard of.  So, how can this reality be reconciled to the findings outlined in this study. 

 

The answer on this dilemma is the same as is true with the situation with Islam and the other worldly pagan religions.  True, these ideas were in existence before Shabbetai Zevi came along.  But Zevi and the movement he founded have become the source of new energy and revitalization of all of these old forms of paganism which were diametrically opposed to Yisrael particularly and Adam generally. 

 

Thus, Sabbatianism has consolidated this mass of evil from thousands of years ago and combined it with newly created Sabbatian forces and motions for evil (like Illuminism, Communism, liberalism, Reform Judaism, etc) in order to put together a whole new system of evil in a modern giant conglomeration which has been sold to the gullible, ignorant world as a good thing. 

 

Clearly, Christianity in the 20th and early 21st centuries has become a primary component of this system of evil.  Even many of the so-called Christian fundamentalists have joined into the same motion, never understanding that the plans of the Sabbatians have always been in existence to destroy all religion in the vein of destroying Yisrael particularly and Adam generally. 

 

It has been pathetic that right wing groups like the Christian Identity movement and many of the Orthodox and Ultra Orthodox Jews have failed to comprehend their common bonds and how the Sabbatian workers of evil are out to destroy both of these religious forces in the modern world of today. 

 

 

But the Crux 

 

But the issue really is not just Sabbatianism, although this explanation is almost correct.  The problem more correctly is Amalekite Sabbatianism particularly and the Amalekites generally.  The Amalekites are extremely evil people.  It is entirely logical that they could and would conceive of the evils of Sabbatianism; and then, using their vast powers of money and resources, put this evil over.  And they have done so. 

 

 

Historically 

 

The simplistic approach is merely to say that this mass of evil and depravity is strictly from Satan and his host of demons.  Of course, no one can deny this ultimate obvious source, motivation and direction of the numerous groups and movement to evil in our time.  But there is more to it than this obvious explanation. 

 

In New Testament days, YESHUA was more precise when He identified a certain racial group of people as being the murderers of all of the righteous persons who have ever lived from the time of Adam to the age end when sin is eventually abolished.  The MESSIAH did this in Matthew 23, as was commented upon in some detail in previous chapters. 

 

Yet, the problem comes up in how the student of truth can move from the first century CE explanation to modern times here in the early 21st century and ascertain if and how this mass of evil can be tied together in one coherent motion. 

 

Based on Matthew 23 and the historic record of the evil Amalekite Khazars of Europe, it also becomes very easy to say that the Amalekites are behind all of it.  And that is generally true or clearly true in the generic sense. 

 

But that still doesn’t tell the student of truth how this mass of evil historically came together and what binds the various factions and divisions together in one meaningful whole today.  And the inevitable answer to this enigma always falls upon the evil, genetic Amalekites.  Directly or indirectly, they have had their hands in virtually all forms of evil (one way or the other) in the last 3,800 years. 

 

 

The Essence Here 

 

As discussed in previous chapters of this production, it is easy to see that Satan has used the Amalekites and the other descendants of Kain as his primary source of people set up to destroy Yisrael first and Adam second.  This motion started 3,800 years ago in earnest and has continued through the years. 

 

In NT days, the Herodians and certain Shammai Pharisees and Kenite scribes were the most notable persons in this category of evil and wretchedness. 

 

Based upon the outstanding research of Rav Marvin Antelman (as outlined in the preceding chapter), the evidence is massive that the Ashkenazi Jewish Amalekites in the 17th century organized and promoted the Sabbatian Jewish movement which was to become Satan’s primary organization to promote evil and wickedness in the age end. 

 

By the 18th and 19th centuries, this group of evil people had greatly increased its outreach to Christians, Whites, Blacks, pinks, greens, Asians and you name it in order to become a source of power and strength all over the world.  From there, the original movement has hatched and birthed a huge number of other related movements and activities, all of which have the same common goals (of destroying Yisrael and Adam). 

 

It now appears that Marvin Antelman’s research (found in his book) opens the lid on this once secret society and reveals what all it is doing (in its various manifestations and presentations) to impose world government and destroy Adam generally and Yisrael particularly. 

 

 

Qumran Revisited 

 

Earlier chapters herein addressed the believed Essene community at Qumran and its strong opposition to the Judean Jewish power structure which the Essenes identified as sons of darkness or children of the Devil (just as the NT also repeatedly calls the same people sons of Satan or of the synagogue of Satan, as described previously). 

 

Clearly, these sons of Satan are the Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters who are in control of the House of Yisrael nations here in the age end.  As described before, the Qumran people were anticipating the establishment of YHWH’s kingdom in their day. 

 

They saw this transition to His kingdom (correctly the Messianic kingdom for the millennium) as involving a great time of trial in which the children of darkness would persecute the children of light.  The Qumran people actually expected the conflict to turn into war between the two factions (the sons of light and the sons of darkness). 

 

In time, the sons of light would prevail and the power of the sons of darkness would be broken for ever.  While this writer certainly could not anticipate any open conflict between the very elect (alluded to as the sons of light) and the wicked Amalekite bankers/masters (clearly the sons of darkness) in the present environment, these Essene beliefs have to be considered. 

 

It is possible that this interpretation is considerably wrong, although it may have some later relevance.  Of course, there was another earlier mentioned Qumran writing which suggested that The MESSIAH, Himself, might take the action to expel the Canaanites (probably to include their Edomite cousins) from Jerusalem, which could clarify the “who” in this coming conflict between light and darkness. 

 

Since it seems likely that the totality of the Amalekite power will not be destroyed by the Assyrians and Persians (the Russians and the Iranians) in their conquest of America and the Anglo-Saxon West, some will be around (probably in Europe and in the state of Israel) until YESHUA does return with His election (the sons of light) for the commencement of the millennium. 

 

Perhaps, this is the time when the Qumran interpretations will be fulfilled.  What a wonderful day it will be when the Amalekite power is finally broken. 

 

 

Coming Judgment Upon the Amalekites 

 

Repeatedly, the Tanakh prophets proclaim a coming punishment upon the Edomites for their evil acts against both Yehudah and the House of Yisrael, as outlined earlier.  It is quite manifest that the Edomites have played a major part historically in the previous destructions of Yehudah and certainly the case is now being built for the Edomites to have a primary role in the demise of the House of Yisrael nations. 

 

Without attempting to be dogmatic on this coming Edomite judgment, it is highly plausible that the coming WWIII may spell the end of much or all of the present power structure of Amalekite bankers/masters over the US and White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations. 

 

This won’t mean the total end of the Amalekites.  But it will be a major set back for them.  The eventual New World Order may not be very friendly to the collective, Jewish Amalekite structure.  Surely, groups like the Anti-Defamation League and Jewish Defense League will quickly pass into history. 

 

In offering this possible assessment, it must be observed that some input on the world’s governors in the future could possibly involve some Amalekites, as things appear to now be developing.  But it is doubtful that they will have the influence which they now enjoy in the West.  Probably, their influence will be in the sense of being Roman Catholics, Jesuits, or something else (in contrast to being Jews). 

 

The surviving Amalekite bankers/masters will just as quickly turn on their own people (to oppress and hurt them) as they will on true Jews and Israelites (if it will further their own agenda in the New World Order, as noted in other comments herein).  In other words, when the chips are down, the Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters have no loyalty for anyone--but to themselves. 

 

Regardless of the exact “who,” the best view might be that YHWH will raise up some power or force on earth to crush and totally destroy the Amalekite bankers/masters and their power and control over Yisrael in the age end--likely in three or more motions and certainly just before the millennium is ushered into existence. 

 

This eventuality might partly become reality when the House of Yisrael nations fall to intensify the seven years of Yakov’s Trouble.  Sometime during the tribulation, the Beast man (as the Assyrian) may turn against those persons in Europe. 

 

Finally, any remnant of Amalek-Edomites and Canaanites in Jerusalem could be destroyed by YESHUA when He enters Jerusalem to defeat the Beast power and commence the millennium. 

 

 

The Demise of the Amalek-Edomites 

 

A preceding chapter on the Edomites focused on the ultimate demise of the Edomites and especially the Amalekites in the context of the role the Assyrians and Persians will play in the age end (Num 24:22; Isa 9:18; Lam 4:21-22; Oba 1:7-9). 

 

If the age ending Russians (at least the White Russians and their colleagues in the Baltic states) constitute the age ending Assyrian power, it could well be that Assyria and Persia (Iran) deal the major blow to the Jewish Amalekite descendants of Esau (with their Kenite and Canaanite presence)--all in the context of their conquest of the House of Yisrael nations where these sons of Satan now rule supreme in the early 21st century. 

 

Of course, in fairness, it seems highly plausible that as the evil Amalekites bring on the Anglo conflict and confrontation with Russia and her Colored allies, some Amalekites with money will not stay around long to suffer the consequences of the national destruction of the United States and the other White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations. 

 

Obviously, when it becomes manifest that these Western nations are going to be destroyed, a portion of the ruling Amalekite bankers/masters and their henchmen will flee to the state of Israel to be admitted there in the context that they are innocent Jews making Aliyah to their homeland, under the current Israeli law of return. 

 

Alternatively, many of them also have residences in foreign countries around the world and can find a hide-out in most any of these places, although they obviously will lose much of their power and influence once America and her racial cousins are crushed.  Perhaps this is a part of the meaning of the various prophets’ words about the end of the Amalek-Edomite power in the age end. 

 

To whatever extent the American and Western Amalekites do successfully flee this coming destruction in WWIII, it might be that they are later punished and destroyed by the age ending Beast man and power to eventually come on the scene as the world ruler.  In that case, perhaps their demise might be at the hands of “the Assyrian” person (Isa 10:5-6), discussed formerly. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

Significantly, it is factual that the Amalekite Jews are currently proving to be the most single, powerful force of internationalism, now present in the early 21st century in America and the White British Commonwealth nations (Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand).  But they do not carry such a big stick all over the globe (especially in Asia, Muslim countries and even in parts of Europe and Africa). 

 

It’s not to say that Amalekite Jew bankers/masters control the totality of the US money power and organized crime (as discussed in prior chapters), but they control most of it.  Very clearly, here in the early 21st century, the Amalekites have almost total control of the media and entertainment industries and they are working full time to seize control of everything else in the form of the New World Order with Amalekite world rulers. 

 

Obviously, if any one person or group of people controlled everything right now, so-called humanity would face an immediate implementation of world government.  Hence, there still is a lot of division and conflict out there and especially among the fat cats; although they are slowly establishing the pecking order. 

 

In the final analysis, it is extremely doubtful that, as a group, the Amalekite Jews will ever attain world rule, per se, in the vein of an Amalekite Jew dictatorship.  Of course, this does not deny the presence of evil Amalekites in the Roman Catholic Church and the United Nations, who will exercise power through those entities, as seems likely to be the case in the future.