EZEKIEL

and YHWH’s

Judgment

for the

Good News

PEOPLE

VOLUME XXIX

Amalekite Conspiracy

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

Judgment for the

Good News People

Volume XXIX--Amalekite Conspiracy

by

an unworthy servant

And you shall know the truth,

and the truth will make you free.

(John 8:32)

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.

Contents

Volume XXIX--Amalekite Conspiracy

CHAPTER PAGE

- Cover Page 1

- Title Page 2

- Contents 3

- Publisher’s Preface 5

Part KKKK--Judges 9

449 Judges 9 6

450 Media Control 14

451 Amalekites in Many Places 25

452 The Early Amalekite Push to Rule 29

453 Some Amalekite Successes 33

Part LLLL--The Amalekite Internationalists

454 The Amalekite Conspiracy 43

455 The Modern State of Israel 50

456 Control of the Israeli Government 58

457 Israeli Politics and Peace 61

458 The Amalekites Versus Religious Jews 73

459 The Secularization of Religious Jews 87

460 Israeli Intelligence Organizations 97

461 Amalekite Control in the West 99

Part MMMM--The Cunning Amalekites

462 Amalekite Plotting in the West 105

463 The Amalekites Call the US Shots 111

464 Yes, Amalekites Control US Politics 118

465 Clannish Edomites 129

466 Double Crosses and the Amalekites 136

467 Amalekite Sabbatianism 151

468 Amalekites, in Conclusion 161

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

Publisher’s Preface

Greetings! The following presentation is volume twenty-nine of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site.

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

Chapter 449--Judges 9

Abimelech

Along the same line of thought from the previous chapters on the allegorical meaning of the word "tree" in the Scriptures, the book of Judges (chapter 9) has an interesting parable about a man named Abimelech who decided that he would take charge and rule over other people at a very early time. He actually came to be one of the OT judges (a usurper), who ruled Yisrael for three years (Jud 9:22).

The Judges 9 parable concerns the olive tree, the fig tree, the vine, the bramble bush and seemingly others. As the story goes, the olive tree was too busy to rule over the other trees; also, the grape vine was too busy; and the fig tree was too busy.

But the bramble bush stepped forward and arrogantly asserted that he would rule the trees (Jud 9:1-57). And he would have continued to do so were it not for YHWH’s apparent act to intervene and cause problems for Abimelech, evidently after three years (Jud 9:22-23). This sounds much like an ante-type of the age end Beast.

In explaining the Judges parable, the point was conveyed that Abimelech, an evil man, who killed 70 of his half brothers, was the bramble bush, which Young's "Analytical Concordance" says is a low thistle or thorn bush. As a person can quickly discover in an assessment of this prophecy, it is profoundly important in the scheme of things if correctly understood.

Identity of the Trees

Elsewhere, in other Scriptures, the identity of the various trees are stated and made plain. For example, Yisrael, possibly in her unified sense, is the olive tree (Ps 52:8; 128:3; Jer 11:16; Hos 14:6). On this, it is also true that sometimes Yisrael prophetically, is, or will be in the future, a "green" olive tree--implying one that is fresh and flourishing (per Young's).

In fact, this olive tree symbol probably is referring to not only Israelites generally, but more precisely to Israelites who have been transformed to the true Hebrew religion or will be so changed in the future with the reality of the coming New Covenant.

In the way of preliminary support for this thesis, Moshe wrote that the children of Yisrael were to be a kingdom of priests and a separated and set apart (Hebrew kodesh) nation (Ex 19:3-6). With this background, the Apostle Shaul’s opening remarks on the olive tree allegory (mentioned in prior chapters) also referred to the olive tree in the context of being "kodesh" and consecrated (Rom 11:16).

Manifestly, the words of Moshe and Shaul combine to add a definite religious dimension to the racial factors associated with the olive tree. Obviously too, in this context, individual Israelites are olives or olive trees, as the Book also states (Zech 4:3-12; Rev 11:4).

Consequently, in these cited examples of the "olives," all of the persons involved in the descriptions are not only Israelites, but they are undoubtedly, more correctly, Israelites of the true religious faith of YHWH, as observed by Avraham, Moshe and certain others throughout history. This fact substantiates Shaul’s just mentioned remarks.

The Vine

Going on, one finds that the vine is clearly identified as the House of Yisrael (Jer 6:9; Hos 9:10; 10:1; Joel 1:7).

Again, the prophet Yirmeyahu had some more perceptive comments when he actually went so far as to say that the House of Yisrael was not only a vine, but one planted as a choice vine. This choice vine had went on to become one with degenerate shoots of a wild, strange (nokri) vine--evidently because of a subsequent transition into a melting pot of various humans/humanoids (Jer 2:21).

Here, please note that even though they were degenerate shoots of a wild vine, they still remained a vine. Therefore, if one follows the same analogy with the olive tree, which must be done, then it follows that the wild olive shoots outlined by Shaul are Israelites, regardless of the fact that they are wild and cut off from the good stem.

The whole thrust of this reference by Shaul is that the grafting in process has to address Israelites (who had been divorced and/or cut off from YHWH and thence "wild"), whomever they might be, and wherever they might be located (in a new wilderness land). There is just no way that any other persons could be involved in this message.

The Fig Tree

As the Scriptures assert, the fig tree is clearly the Jews and/or the House of Yehudah (broached earlier), as Yirmeyahu so correctly observed--many centuries ago (Jer 24:1-10). Please note, again, that by Yirmeyahu's perception, there were both good figs-Jews, as well as bad figs-Jews.

And also, as mentioned earlier, it could be that The MESSIAH’s outline of the parables of the sheep and goats (Matt 25:32-33) and of the wheat and tares (Matt 13:24-30) both address the situation with the Jews (as well as with Yisrael generally).

Perhaps it is because of this exact situation (of good figs and bad figs being present together) that the fig tree symbolizes the House of Yehudah and/or the Jews, collectively. After all, the Jews have undergone a process of miscegenation with nokri/nekar aliens over the centuries, coupled with an outright amalgamation of numbers of Kenites and Amalek-Edomites. Truly, the racial Jews are a product of good and bad.

It is no wonder then that YESHUA would so often refer to the fig tree when He sojourned among us (Matt 21:19-21; 24:32; Mk 11:13, 20, 21; 13:28; Lu 13:6-7; 21:29; John 1:48, 50). Not only did He make these frequent references about the fig tree; but in one instance, He even placed a curse upon it, as outlined previously (Matt 21:19-20; Mk 11:13-14, 20-21; Lu 13:6-9).

A question can surface here on "why" for the curse? Assuredly, the fig tree has had some "bad" qualities and features (perhaps the just noted presence of the nokri/nekar Amalekites) to probably justify the condemnation and curse. Yet, despite this fact, YESHUA does allow for its ultimate rebirth and blooming in the age end (Matt 24:32; Mk 13:28). Incidentally, did this curse end in 1948 or 1967? It could be!

James 3:12

Additionally, on this theme, Yakov (Jas 3:12) elsewhere observes that a grape vine cannot bring forth figs (so the House of Yisrael could never be the Jews), nor can a fig tree bear olive berries (hence, the wild olive shoots cannot be Jews from the House of Yehudah). Here, one might pause to refresh his/her thinking with the earlier citation of YHWH's act of pruning off some of the natural, olive branches (Rom 11:23).

Paradoxically, if a fig tree cannot produce olives, as Yakov clearly said, then it seemingly cannot bear wild, olive shoots or even natural, olive branches to be pruned off, as indicated by Shaul. The answer to this enigma is obviously complex and this writer would dare not attempt to be dogmatic in interpreting it.

However, the solution to this dilemma probably lies in the definition of the trees. Perhaps both the vine and fig tree are addressed from a strictly fleshly viewpoint; while evidently, the olive tree involves both fleshly and spiritual dimensions, as noted above and as will shortly be elaborated upon.

Consequently, it might well be that the broken or pruned off olive branches constitute "good" Jews, both from a religious and racial perspective. So the place one can come to here is that the House of Yehudah, collectively (the fig tree), is not responsible for the production of the good Jews (from both a religious and racial context).

Bad Figs

Incidentally, on this idea that there was something wrong with the House of Yehudah which did act to preclude her from totally producing "good" Jews (figs), one only has to consider Yirmeyahu’s remarks (Jer 24), cited earlier, in conjunction with Shaul’s comments about the pruning of the olive tree, as discussed earlier.

Indeed, it is evident that the House of Yehudah has been extremely responsible for sin and miscegenation, coupled with her outright acceptance, assimilation and integration of numbers of Amalek-Edomites and other nokri/nekar strangers into what should be the true, recognized, legitimate remnant of Yisrael.

Manifestly, the overall House of Yehudah and/or the collective Jews have been grossly damaged; though certain, individual, true Jews could maintain their own personal integrity and religion and remain good figs.

In support of this possibility, there are a host of good reasons to believe that the stem and/or root system of the olive tree not only goes back to the patriarchs and their ability to fleshly produce seed; but also, to them in terms of their personalities, characters and their true, Scriptural, Hebrew religion (which played a role in establishing the character of their progeny).

To be sure, the House of Yehudah, on her own merit, seems to have produced many "bad" figs and therefore cannot bring forth olives, as Yakov asserted (Jas 3:12).

The good (racial and religious) figs found in the remnant of the House of Yehudah might be there--not because of the leadership, policies, actions and thinking of the collective Jews or the House of Yehudah; but rather, are there in spite of such adversities.

Hence, it is possible that the Jewish branches, which were broken off of the olive tree by YHWH, were, in fact, both racially and religiously, good ones drawing upon their ancestry and the Hebrew religion for sustenance. Truly, it is this Israelite racial and religious system which has produced the good Jews and not the corrupt practices of the fig tree House of Yehudah or the Jews collectively.

Admittedly, in time, and perhaps during the Babylonian exile or later, the true Hebrew or Israelite faith was contaminated by a few unscriptural Talmudic factors, probably traceable to the bad figs who had become so entrenched in the House of Yehudah. But can one condemn the whole religion of Judaism over the pollution which had crept in? This question was assessed in former chapters.

The Thorns

However, in returning to the Judges 9 prophecy, please observe that the bramble bush, under discussion, is a low life, thorn bush (obviously, producing thorns and briers). Of most importance for interpretation, the Canaanite inhabitants of the land of Yisrael and apparently other nokri/nekar aliens (including the Edomites, who crossed with the line of Cain) were clearly called thorns (Num 33:55; Jud 2:3).

Moreover, these very thorns (Amalek-Edomites and/or Canaanites) could well have been the precise thorn in the flesh which bothered Shaul and possibly others in New Testament times as well (II Cor 12:7). As a matter of information, the idea of someone being a thorn in the side of another person is a very old figure of speech which is still used today.

For example, the April 8, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 19) had a news report by Douglas Waller on “The Thorn in His Side, Part II” with a photograph of President George W. Bush and his long standing opponent, Senator John McCain. Nothing needed to be said beyond the headline and the photograph; because, for some years now, McCain has been one of the primary opponents and critics (yes, a thorn in the side) of GWB.

Manifestly, it would be easy to see that this expression had some recognition and use in ancient times. Of course, by letting the Scriptures define themselves, it is clear that the thorns and briers were certain racial/ethnic peoples who did cause much trouble and concern to the various Scriptural people of Yisrael.

Someday, some, many or all of these thorns and briers will meet their YHWH ordained fate and judgment--they will be eventually burned up, as was described earlier (Isa 9:18; 27:4).

A Tree is Known by its Fruit

In the NT, there is an interesting text which also seems relevant here. On this, YESHUA said that you can know men by their fruits and that men cannot pick grapes from thorns (thorn bushes) or figs from thistles (Matt 7:16). Moreover, a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, nor can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

Every tree that does not bring forth good fruit will be cut down and cast into the fire--in judgment by YHWH (Matt 7:17-19). Manifestly, grapes (which are House of Yisrael Israelites) cannot come from a thorn bush; nor can figs (at least true, Jewish, Israelite figs) come from thistles.

Therefore, persons of Canaanite, Amalekite and/or Satanic ancestry cannot possibly be Israelites. Since they cannot be Israelites, they seemingly cannot be converted or become a part of Yisrael in any definition. They are corrupt and evil and will one day be judged by YHWH.

Of course, this whole discussion on the thorns and bramble bush has to be significant because it may tie in some way to the genealogy of the Jews, as was discussed elsewhere in this study in terms of YESHUA's commission which seemingly omitted the Jews (Matt 10:5-6).

“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” Revisited

This linkage of thorns to the Amalek-Edomites has support from the Sabbath teachings of ancient Jewish synagogues. Specifically, Piska 2 has a commentary on Proverbs 15:19 in the context of a slothful man being like a hedge of thorns. The slothful man is supposed to be Esau (in allegory, the Jews evidently thought that this was Rome in Second Temple days).

Thus, the Amalek-Edomites are like a prickly hedge to keep jabbing at a man to bring on the head tax, general tax, agriculture tax, animal tax, etc. When the man cannot pay the excessive taxes, Esau exacts heavy fines and imposes drastic penalties (“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” p. 23).

Does this sound familiar in terms of the modern House of Yisrael nations, now being controlled and heavily taxed by Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters?

Edomite Thorns Tie to Idolatry

“The Book of Legends Sefer Ha-Aggadah,” with legends from the Talmud and Midrash, links thorns to idolatry in two amazing ancient stories (p. 43).

An item number 53 offers some comments upon Genesis 25:22, in the vein of Rebekah’s pregnancy. The story is that when she would pass a synagogue or house of study, the unborn Yakov was scurrying in his eagerness to get out. And when passing houses of idolatry, the evil Esau was scurrying in his eagerness to get out.

In a commentary on Genesis 25:27, and the remark on the growth of the two boys, Yakov and Esau, an item number 55 quotes R. Levi, who said that (at first) the boys were like a myrtle and a wild rose growing side by side. As they grew up, the former (Yakov) would yield its characteristic fragrance (reho) and the latter (Esau) its thorns (hoho).

Going on, the boys studied and went to school until age 13. At the end of the 13 years, one son (Yakov) went to houses of study and the other (Esau) went to shrines of idolatry.

Abimelech From Cain?

In going back to Abimelech and the parable from Judges, please recognize that though Abimelech was a son of Gideon, he also was a mixed blooded son of a slave woman from Shechem (Jud 8:31; 9:18). The question now surfaces--was this woman a Canaanite or Edomite, so that Abimelech was a nokri/nekar racially?

Well, as a matter of fact, the Book does link in tandem the presence of the Canaanite men of Hamor to Shechem, the home and base of support of Abimelech. Possibly, his mother and some or even all of the other peoples of Shechem were Canaanites and thus nokri/nekar thorns.

Additionally, on this, an article in the Winter 1992 "Radical Reformation" (p. 30), by Wayne S. Nelson, on the Book of Judges, discusses this issue and concludes that the author of Judges “implicitly identifies Abimelech as morally and spiritually a descendant of Cain and therefore of the seed of the serpent.”

Though Nelson does not attempt to link Abimelech to Kain on physical, racial grounds, this condition must not be overlooked. If Naamah was the wife of Ham, as Jewish tradition has it, then the Canaanites (to likely include Abimelech through his mother) were surely of the lineage of both Kain and Kain’s father (Gen 3:1-4, 12; II Cor 11:3; I Jo 3:12).

Regardless of Abimelech's true racial background, the writer of this study would have to agree with Mr Nelson. And this might all have something to do with why the Jews were not enumerated in YESHUA’s commission, which was discussed in preceding chapters.

The very mention of Shechem is relevant because the Talmud says that Shechem is the place where bad things happen and the place “set aside for punishment” (Sotah 11a, Jan-Feb 2001 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 9). As noted earlier, Jewish tradition has it that Eliphaz lurked after Yakov at Shechem. And per Ben Sira, the evil Edomites dwelt at Shechem. Shechem is further addressed in other remarks elsewhere herein.

Yeshayahu's Perception

This presentation on the thorns creates a need here to mention a very important prophecy by Yeshayahu--which he interestingly saw fit to repeat. Early on, he realized and said that in a coming time of doom for the House of Yisrael, the vine of Yisrael would be removed from its inhabited land and only thorns and briers would remain (Isa 5:6; 7:25; 32:13).

It would appear here that, in effect, these words by Yeshayahu would apply at least to the ancient House of Yisrael, if not to the ultimate age ending House of Yisrael. And what remained in the land (Samaria) after the fall of Yisrael in the 7th and 8th centuries BCE? Why, nokri/nekar Cutheans, Canaanites, Edomites and others who took the land over (all of whom appear to be thorns and briers, symbolically in the Book).

Obviously, Yeshayahu, in prophecy, was not allowing for the Samaritans, Canaanites, Edomites and other mamzer peoples in the land to be linked to the vine of Yisrael which was removed. Assuredly, as Yeshayahu saw it, all of these persons were not Israelites; but were, in fact, thorns and briers. The essence of this is that the Samaritans and the others are not of Yisrael, contrary to the wishes of some who would so argue.

There is a final consideration on these amazing prophecies by Yeshayahu. Since prophecy is dual and repetitive in fulfillment and since the House of Yisrael faces a second, coming period of punishment from YHWH for sin (Ezek 4-7), it is evident that when the House of Yisrael is once more thrust into captivity for the last time, only thorns and briers will remain in her then existing land (Isa 5:6; 7:25; 32:13).

The Bramble Bush

Going back to the Judges allegory under discussion, the bramble bush is clearly linked to Abimelech. But there has to be more to this parable than just a focus on Abimelech. Frankly, it would appear that the whole story is one of far reaching prophetic implications--if one could but understand it.

Both Mattityahu (Matt 7:16) and Luke (Lu 6:44) say that a tree is identified by its fruit and that neither grapes or figs, racially, come from the bramble bush (which produces thorns, as noted above). Consequently, it must be surmised that the bramble bush is categorically not of true Yisrael.

Who then, ethnically or genetically, is the bramble bush? Elsewhere, in the Word, it is useful to note that at a described fall of Edom, thorns and brambles surfaced therein (Isa 34:13).

Thus, could brambles be linked in some way to the Edomites? Evidently, the answer is yes--in view of their links to Kain (from Esau’s marriages with Canaanite women and possible other ties to the Kenites) and the bramble bush’s arrogance of power, as suggested in the Abimelech prophecy.

Hence, this likelihood intensifies as one considers the situation in the first centuries BCE and CE when the Herods (Amalek-Idumeans) ruled over the Jewish remnant, the Temple and part of the Palestine area. One of the several complaints about Herod’s rule was his devotion to high taxation upon the common people (“Judaism From Cyrus to Hadrain,” p. 336, 364).

High and oppressive taxation was also one of the things mentioned about the Edomites in Piska 2, cited above. Truly, the same thing has happened today. Thus, in more modern times, Amalekite Khazars, using their great riches and wealth, are in enormous positions of strength and influence over the House of Yisrael and other portions of the globe at large. They still love high taxes.

Chapter 450--Media Control

The Amalekite Media Power Base

If there is one single definition that has materially contributed to the incredible success of the Amalekite Jews to literally steal the Christian West and implement fantastic control measures (right and left) which are and will utterly destroy Adam in the Christian West (and particularly, in the House of Yisrael nations and peoples), it is the media and entertainment industries.

Literally, on the surface, there would seem to be an incomprehensible array of thousands and thousands of newspapers, magazines, Internet sources, movie studios, radio and television companies and so forth in the Christian West. At a first glance, many observers would believe that this mass of businesses and activities is totally divided and competitive to the last drop. But that belief is not the truth.

The December 27, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 12-13) had an article by Michael Collins Piper on “Handful of Families, Corporations Controlling the Global Media Monopolies,” previously cited, which got to the heart of the problem by laying out most of the major firms and interconnections and owners (most of which involve evil Amalekite Jews).

Since whole books have been and can be written on this theme, the comments herein will be limited. But a few names and connections will be outlined to prove the point.

AOL-Time-Warner, Revisited

Previous comments herein on Amalekite crime briefly mentioned the situation with the AOL-Time-Warner Company and several of its major Amalekite owners, players and controllers over the years (like the previously described Bronfman family and its vast holdings).

While some persons could lose sight of the Amalekite presence by becoming impressed with Ted Turner and his ties to AOL-Time-Warner (actually, Turner’s former ties because the Amalekites moved in on him and removed him from power in AOL-Time-Warner, as pointed out earlier), the fact remains that AOL-Time-Warner’s major bosses are largely Amalekite Jews.

How big is AOL-Time-Warner? It is enormous (a $350 billion company)--owning many movie and video companies, various cable franchises, Turner Broadcasting (including CNN), numerous magazines (Time, People, Sports Illustrated for Kids, Life, Fortune, Money, etc), many major book publishers, AOL (America On-line, the giant Internet service provider--with the early 2000 merger) and on and on.

The Seagrams (liquor) Company, mentioned in a prior chapter, is (or has been) also owned and/or controlled by the Bronfmans. It is another big player in the media and entertainment industries. Seagrams is a major stockholder in AOL-Time-Warner--plus Universal Studios, the Universal Music Group, Polygram and other major music and television companies across Europe.

More Media Control

The previously mentioned Rupert Murdoch (Amalekite?) owns or controls a whole assortment of media enterprises all over the world, through his News Corporation--including the New York Post, the Weekly Standard and Fox Television.

Another likely Amalekite Jew, Michael Eisner, runs Disney Corporation; which in turn, owns or controls ABC radio and television, Miramex Films (under the leadership of the two evident Amalekites named Harvey and Bob Weinstein) and a whole host of newspapers, other publishers, television companies, etc (locally and globally).

The VIACOM Company is one more of the huge media and entertainment companies with major holdings in Paramount Pictures, MTV and the Blockbuster video chain. It is also in the process of acquiring CBS radio and television from Westinghouse.

VIACOM is headed by Sumner Redstone (whose name doesn’t sound like an Amalekite name; but since he has close ties to the Israelis and looks like an Amalekite, he probably is one).

General Electric controls NBC, CNBC, the Bravo cable channel, Arts & Entertainment, the History Channel and Court TV. It is unclear as to how much of General Electric is in Amalekite hands. But one can be sure that much of it is owned/controlled by Amalekites.

SONY is another large media and entertainment giant, ostensibly controlled by Japanese billionaire Oboyki Idei (who is thought to be a front man for the behind the scenes Rockefellers--per “Spotlight”). As pointed out elsewhere herein, SONY seems to be an acronym for Standard Oil of New York. The Rockefellers seem to be Christian Amalekites as well (as noted earlier and to be addressed in the following chapters).

The German media company Bertelsmann (established in 1835) is the next major media player. This company owns Random House Publishing and many other publishing enterprises scattered all over the world.

Still More From “Spotlight”

As is true for General Electric, “Spotlight” did not spell out the Amalekite ownership and/or control of Bertelsmann. But it is a certainty that Ashkenazi Amalekites are heavily involved. That’s why WWII was fought--so that the plutocrats could steal much of Germany and Japan.

The “Spotlight” article said that there were eleven major companies which controlled the bulk of the American media industry in 1989. Today, there are the nine powers, as described above. As the “American Free Press” noted in a 2002 article, two of these nine power centers are owned by one family. This source also noted that every single supermarket tabloid is owned by just one, single, super-rich, Wall Street firm.

The “what is happening here” question can be simply stated. Media power is being centralized into fewer and fewer hands (mostly Amalekite Jews), which is the same phenomenon happening in all businesses all over the world.

If all of that wasn’t enough, it is interesting that the Bush people have a plan afoot which will further centralize media power into fewer and fewer hands. This story was brought out by Michael Collins Piper on “Media Giants Crave Absolute Control” in the Dec 16 & 23, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 20).

Per Piper, the Federal Communications Commission (the FCC, under the chairmanship of Colin Powell’s son Michael) is considering a plan to loosen or do away entirely with regulations that limit the number of newspapers and radio and television outlets that a single company can own. This will open the door for a handful of Amalekite Jew bankers/masters to completely take over the whole industry.

Amalekite big shots like Mort Zuckerman, S. I. Newhouse, the Bronfmans and others will quickly move to consolidate their media powers once the industry is deregulated. They then can more easily control the political future of the US.

Incidentally, a former chapter briefly mentioned the situation in Russia where the Amalekite Khazars have been attempting to take control of the Russian media business. The billionaire Zionist leader and evident Amalekite, Vladimir Gusinsky (or Gushinsky), has owned much of the Russian economy, plus one important Moscow TV station (which he may have lost or is losing).

Vivendi

While the above cited nine major media players have and still seem to control the essence of the media and entertainment businesses in modern America, another development surfaced temporarily in the early 21st century to further complicate the question of centralization into a few hands.

The basis of this new development was a Frenchman named Jean-Marie Messier who controlled Vivendi, the world’s largest drinking water company in France.

Within the last couple of years (in 2000-2001), Messier and his colleagues branched out into the US media and entertainment market in a big way to form another media giant, appropriately called Vivendi. Vivendi’s story was told in the April 29, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 50-51), in an article by Daren Fonda.

Apparently, the method that Messier used to get into the US media and entertainment markets was through a major acquisition of some of the stock of the liquor company Seagram, which was controlled by the super rich Bronfmans (in a stock trade of Vivendi stock for Seagrams, which allowed Edgar Bronfman Jr to become the Vice-Chairman of Vivendi).

Thus, Messier moved in on Seagrams; and in turn, the process allowed him to take temporary control of various publishing, music, telecom and Internet operations (in the form of the Vivendi media empire, per “Time”). In total, this conglomeration is or was a $55 billion global giant which certainly puts it in the operations of the other media power houses.

The entire article in “Time” (“The French Rejection,” by Daren Fonda) failed to clarify at least a couple of relevant points of concern. Obviously, in 2000-2001, there had to be a question of the continuing role of the Bronfmans and AOL-Time-Warner. Was the Bronfman power block still directly involved with Universal Studios or did they exit the Hollywood scene with the arrival of Messier?

As 2002 developed, Messier allegedly didn’t do very well in running the Vivendi media empire or something else happened to place him at odds with the real Vivendi controllers (who, as it turns out, were the Bronfmans). So Messier was kicked out. Another Frenchman named Jean-Rene Fourtou took over Vivendi as Chairman.

The Jul 15, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 37-41) had a follow-up story by Daren Fonda on the intrigue in a story on “French Fiasco.” Apparently, Messier put together the Vivendi media giant and Edgar Bronfman Jr and some of his colleagues later joined forces to kick Messier out and replace him with Fourtou (this action proved who really was running Vivendi).

The essence of these stories from “Time” seems to be that the Bronfmans were the power players behind the scenes pulling the strings at the new media giant Vivendi and that people like Messier and Fourtou have been only front men. In other words, the Bronfmans and their AOL-Time-Warner giant may still run things, but in the background and with a much lower profile.

The second big issue that one must broach in this new look is whether Messier and the later Fourtou were Amalekite crooks or not. Reportedly, Fourtou’s real name is Jean Bernard Levy, suggesting that he is indeed an Amalekite Jew who has changed his name (Jul 21, 2003, “American Free Press,” p. 1). The situation with Messier still remains unclear. But he too could be an Amalekite Jew crook.

The fact that that both of the Frenchmen are probably in the billionaire class makes one be very suspicious that both of them are Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in order to play games with the super rich Bronfmans. In which case, it only means that some new Amalekite faces have arrived on the media block.

More on the Newspapers

The Washington Post Company is another major media company in alleged Amalekite hands (the Meyer-Graham group). The Post not only controls the newspaper and Newsweek magazine, but a 50% interest in the International Herald Tribune and the Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News Service, plus numerous other publications and TV stations.

The famous Reuters news service of Europe was created by and owned by the Rothschild family (“The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 21).

Some eight more major media companies own and/or control almost all other major newspapers in the US, plus a large number of radio and television companies, magazines, book publishers, etc.

This list includes the New York Times Co. (owned or controlled by the apparent Amalekite Sulzberger family), Advance Publications (which includes 26 newspapers, plus the weekly Parade magazine--owned or controlled by the likely Amalekite Newhouse family), Gannett Co., Cox Enterprises, E. W. Scripps Co., Hearst Corp., Times Mirror Co. and Knight-Ridder, Inc.

Besides this list of traditional newspapers, all of the major super-market tabloids are owned by one single Wall Street firm (as noted above).

“Spotlight” also quoted a prominent media analyst and critic named Ben Bagdikian who says that some 50 men and women (who are chiefs of their corporations) control more than half of the ideas and information reaching all Americans daily. No wonder it is called the controlled media.

How many of these 50 are Amalekites was not stated. As already noted, most of the American media and entertainment industries are in Amalekite Jew hands. So clearly, many of the 50 are Amalekites (who also are likely bankers/masters and leaders within the Amalekite Jew community). Obviously too, the Rockefellers also still retain some media power (but not much in comparison with the European based Rothschilds).

The tragedy of this centralized control of the media means that a handful of people (apparently all or most all of them are Amalekites racially or at least janissaries, as cited earlier and to be further defined below) decide what is and what is not news. They decide which politicians are acceptable for rule and which are not. They decide which wars are good and which are not. They decide what is truth and what is not.

Since this combine is so limited in numbers and tightly controlled, it is clear that this small group of people can sit around a table and decide the future of the United States and much of the world. They are so powerful that the gullible people (whose source of news, information and thinking comes from this cabal) is completely mesmerized and controlled by them.

This Amalekite led group almost completely controls the thinking in the United States and the White British Commonwealth nations (like Australia, Canada, etc). They are also extremely powerful in South America and Africa. Though they do have enormous power in continental Europe, they do not control all of the European media sources yet. Perhaps their weakest area is Asia where there is some independence.

More on the Media Stranglehold

The April 1, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. A-1 and A-2) had a lead story on “The Media is the Enemy” which illustrated how far this stranglehold has gone. Previous chapters and the above presentation have already mentioned the enormous Amalekite Jew power over the media and there is little need to repeat those lines.

The “American Free Press” said that “In the old Soviet Union, the government controlled the media. Not a word of substance would be published without prior approval from the Bolshevik commissars. Today, in the United States, the situation is starkly similar. But most Americans--most sheeple--don’t even know it.

“In the United States today, it is a select handful of superrich families and tightly-knit financial interests--a plutocratic elite--who own the Big Media and who control the government through their ownership of that media.

“Every single one of the major media outlets is controlled by this powerful interlocking combine...ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago-Tribune--even such ‘regional’ giants as The New Orleans Times-Picayune, The Miami Herald, the San Diego Herald Tribune... The list goes on and on.

“And these media powerhouses control dozens--actually thousands--of other daily and weekly newspapers, magazines, and radio and television outlets across America (and around the globe.) Did you know that every single supermarket tabloid is owned by just one, superrich Wall Street banker?

“To consolidate their influence, the Masters of the Media and their international corporate allies reward obedient lapdog journalists with membership in the Council on Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission where they rub shoulders with others in the international policy-making networks. A handful get promoted to the higher rank of the secret Bilderberg Group.

“The so-called ‘mainstream’ media is very much a ‘closed shop’ and only those willing to do the bidding of the global power elite need apply. Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather and Peter Jennings and other phonies are just the public faces that the American people see.

“Behind the scenes are the shadowy owners and corporate power brokers who dictate what you will (or will not) see in your daily newspaper or on the evening news.

“The average American has no idea that superrich predators with names like Rockefeller, Rothschild, Bronfman, Newhouse, Murdoch and Redstone are making vast profits and achieving immense power through their stranglehold on the American media (and increasingly, on media around the globe.)

“These shadowy media controllers decide which politicians are ‘in’ and which politicians are ‘out.’ (They made Bill Clinton overnight. They also broke Richard Nixon overnight.)

“The Masters of the Media decide which issues can--or cannot--be debated. (Imagine a public debate over the Federal Reserve system on Ted Koppel’s Nightline. It will never happen!)

“The Masters of the Media promote the perverse, anti-Christian Cultural Communist ideology that permeates publishing and broadcasting today. The Masters of the Media decide which are the ‘good wars’ and which are the ‘bad wars.’ The Masters of the Media decide who is the ‘hero’ and who is the ‘villain.’

“If the Big Media decides that you will be the patsy, then the patsy you will be. It’s that simple. Ask Lee Harvey Oswald or James Earl Ray or Gordon Kahl or Randy Weaver or the victims of Waco. As we said: THE MEDIA IS THE ENEMY.”

Bernie Sanders

The Jul 15, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1) had an article on the controlled US media which quoted US Congressman Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Sanders said:

“One of our best-kept secrets is the degree to which a handful of huge corporations control the flow of information in the United States. Whether it is television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books or the Internet, a few giant conglomerates are determining what we see, hear and read.

“And the situation is likely to become much worse as a result of radical deregulation efforts by the Bush administration and some horrendous court decisions.

“Television is the means by which most Americans get their ‘news.’ Without exception, every major network is owned by a huge conglomerate that has enormous conflicts of interest.”

Of course, Sanders is on the mark in his remarks. The only thing that he left out is that most of this control is exercised by a handful of Amalekite Jewish bankers/masters.

Harold Wallace Rosenthal, Revisited

Some years ago, US Senator Jacob Javits of New York (a certain, Amalekite Jew) reportedly had a young, Jewish, administrative assistant named Harold Wallace Rosenthal (a likely Amalekite, who was discussed in preceding chapters). Rosenthal, age 29, was killed on Aug 12, 1976, in an alleged sky-jacking incident on an Israeli airliner in Istanbul, Turkey.

In 1976, just before Harold’s death, Walter White Jr, editor of the “Western Front” magazine, interviewed Rosenthal for a story (per a pamphlet on “The Hidden Tyranny, the Rosenthal Document,” p. 1-18). Before publishing the report, Rosenthal was dead and White, himself, was badly beaten. White thinks Rosenthal was murdered by his own people (the Mossad?) because he had a big mouth.

In the interview with White, Harold was most revealing. For instance, he said: “We Jews continue to be amazed with the ease by which Christian Americans have fallen into our hands. While the naive Americans wait for Khrushchev to bury them, we have taught them to submit to our every command” (ibid, p. 1).

In terms of the US money given annually to Israel, Harold noted that “The naive politicians in Washington are gullible. Most of them are not too bright so the powerful Jewish lobbyists influenced this practice years ago and there is no one strong enough to stop it” (ibid, p. 6).

On anti-Semitism, Harold suggested that it “does not signify opposition to Semitism. There is no such thing. It is an expression which we Jews use effectively as a smear word--used to brand as a bigot like you guys--anyone who brings criticism against Jews. We use it against hate mongers” (ibid, p. 6-7).

Regarding why Jews change their names when moving into various countries--Rosenthal said that “Jews are the most intelligent people in the world so if it benefits them to change their names they do so. That’s all there is to it” (ibid, p. 8).

More From Harold

Going on, Harold noted that “...We would all have better understanding between each other--Jews and gentiles--if we spoke out more openly. Your people don’t have guts. We establish your thinking--we even place within you a ‘guilt complex’ making you afraid to criticize Jewry openly” (ibid, p. 11).

On Jewish control of money, Rosenthal said that “At first, by controlling the banking system we were able to control corporation capital. Through this, we acquired total monopoly of the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television media. The printing industry, newspapers, periodicals and technical journals had already fallen into our hands. The richest plum was later to come when we took over the publication of all school materials. Through these vehicles we could mold public opinion to suit our own purposes. The people are only stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them, whether they be truth or lies” (ibid, p. 15).

Regarding the silent majority, Harold pointed out-- “There is no such thing as the silent majority because we control their cry and hue. The only thing that exists is an unthinking majority and unthinking they will remain, as long as their escape from our rigorous service is the opiate of our entertainment industry. By controlling industry, we have become the safety valve of momentary pleasure. The television and movie industries furnish the necessary temporary distraction. These programs are carefully designed to appeal to the sensuous emotions, never to the logical thinking mind. Because of this, the people are programmed to respond according to our dictates, not according to reason. Silent they are; unthinkable they will remain” (ibid, p. 15-16).

In a comment on religion, Harold said “With our control of the text book industry and the news media, we have been able to hold ourselves up as the authorities on religion. Many of our rabbis now hold professorship in supposed Christian theological seminaries. We are amazed by the Christians’ stupidity in receiving our teachings and propagating them as their own... These deluded children of the Church defend us to the point of destroying their own culture... Through our influence of religion we were able to involve the ignorant white Christians in war against themselves which always impoverished both sides while we reaped a financial and political harvest. Anytime truth comes forth which exposes us, we simply rally our forces--the ignorant Christians. They attack the crusaders even if they are members of their own families” (ibid, p. 18).

Jack Bernstein, Revisited

A preceding chapter quoted an American Jew named Jack Bernstein. Jack went to the state of Israel before 1970 as an immigrant. Bernstein, an Ashkenazi, married a Sephardi girl and started a family. In time, he became disillusioned over the gross evil and wickedness that he found in the Israeli state. He returned to the US and began a program to inform Americans about conditions in the Israeli state.

Jack published at least a couple of writings to discuss his findings. One of them, “My Farewell to Israel, The Thorn in the Mideast,” was quoted extensively in a prior chapter on the Modern State of Israel. One of the subjects which Bernstein brought up in his Farewell booklet is the issue of the media and how the Ashkenazi Zionists control it.

In the first place, Jack charges that the Zionists and the Zionist oriented international bankers control the American media, TV, radio, magazines, newspapers, etc. With this control, they paint a false picture about the Israeli state which is designed to get America into one of their planned wars in the Mideast (ibid, p. 2).

Subsequent chapters and Appendix D will address the 2002 and 2003 moves of the George W. Bush administration to do precisely this very thing--as the drums of war have been sounding quite loudly for more Bush wars in the Middle East. For sure, Jack Bernstein’s prediction could have much merit.

Jack and the Protocols

Jack Bernstein quoted the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” extensively (which will be more fully broached herein in a succeeding chapter). While many Jews argue the validity of the Protocols, Jack wrote in the vein that they represent truth and the efforts of Zionist and Zionist oriented international bankers to control the world.

As already noted earlier herein, whether the Protocols are a Jewish writing or not matters little in the long run--because they have been coming true in the last 100 years.

The most important Protocol quotations from Bernstein was the 7th and 12th Protocols which addressed Ashkenazi Jewish control of the media (ibid, p. 14-15).

In the 7th Protocol, Jack noted that it cited the power of the Jewish controlled press to stimulate public opinion and force the goyim governments to adopt measures which support the Jewish plans for world conquest. Jack says that since the Zionists control the press, they give out the news they wish--tell the truth, distort it, or omit it. He goes on to say that they found out the power of controlling the press.

Protocol number 12 also tackles the media question by focusing upon Jewish control over the news media and publishing only what the Jews allow. This Protocol also asserts that the Jews already dominate the minds of the goyim and only allow them to see world affairs through colored lenses, which the Jews place before their eyes.

Jack says yes that the Zionists manipulate the minds of the stupid goyim and the average stupid Jew as well. He charges that goyim and Jews will continue in this vacuum as long as they read the Washington Post, New York Times and other Zionist owned publications.

The Effect of This Media Control

The above comments of Rosenthal and Bernstein bring up another subject. A previous chapter discussed the Doctor Laura program and how incredibly deceptive it has turned out to be for the whole American conservative movement--involving both Christians and Jews. As outlined heretofore, Laura is either a racial-ethnic Amalekite; or she, as a minimum, is a janissary robot.

As reported earlier, a man named Richard Hoskins of Lynchburg, Virginia used (and defined) this janissary term in some of his writings long ago--which evidently focused upon Amalek-Edomite Jews or at least upon the controlled media and entertainment industries and how Amalekite Jews and government authorities have been able to completely change American values and beliefs in the last 70 years.

In the context of its use, a janissary is a person who is not an Amalekite racially or ethnically. But he or she has been trained, brainwashed, mesmerized and indoctrinated to blindly believe in, support, teach, advocate and push the Amalekite agenda for the destruction of true Israelites with the same dedication, purpose, resolve and commitment as a real Amalekite.

As established in the previous chapters on this line, a janissary is a robot or zombiized individual who has no mind of his own, but only functions in a state of confusion and daze of blindly following the Amalekites and their agenda--without the foggiest notion of what the result will ultimately be for him and his people.

A preceding chapter on media control, in the context of humanism, assessed more of the several factors at work in the modern House of Yisrael nations to turn the generic Israelite population into janissary robots who blindly follow the evil Amalekites down the road to Israelite destruction. These remarks do not need to be repeated here.

Of course, this motion is propelled primarily by the media and entertainment industries (which today, are essentially in Amalekite Jew hands, as outlined above). However, there are other influences at work as well to also push and prod this condition into being. These were assessed in the former chapters and/or will be addressed in the following presentations.

Dan Israel

In his book on “Christianity Unmasqued” (p. 233), writer Dan Israel quoted a 1928 statement to Americans made by an apparent Amalekite Khazar Jew named Marcus Eli Ravage. Marcus said “You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded.

“But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws, and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day.” Ravage was an honest and perceptive Jew who understood the reality of America--even as early as 1928. Imagine how this influence has accelerated in the early 21st century.

Chapter 451--Amalekites in Many Places

A Surprise

While the economic might and political strength of numerous Jews (like the Rothschilds and Lazards, who are evident Amalek-Edomites) are well known in New York, London and Hollywood, not much of the general public has been cognizant of the fact that many leading, supposed Christians are also Jews of sorts, like the popular Roosevelt (or correctly the Rosenfelds) family as well as George W. Bush and Slick Clinton, all cited earlier.

Even much evidence has surfaced indicating that the original Christian Rockefellers were Jews (if so, clearly Amalek-Edomites because of their great propensity for evil, money and power).

This Amalekite possibility has been borne out in the fact that in his early years old John D. Rockefeller was an agent and partner of the super rich Rothschild in 19th century America (“The Elite Serial killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 76).

Messianic Jew Len Horowitz of Sagle, Idaho (while on a Prophecy Club speaking tour) is quite precise on this linkage in saying that the Rothschilds provided the initial funding for old John D. Rockefeller in his early years.

Manifestly, there was an early connection between the two families.

However, at some point in time, the Rockefellers and Rothschilds drifted apart and actually became opponents and competitors of sorts (as described earlier and as will be further addressed in later comments)--although they may be coming back together here in the age end (as elsewhere discussed herein in the merger of Rockefellers’ Chase Manhattan Bank and the Rothschilds’ Morgan Bank).

A Revisit to Adolf Schicklgruber

And most surprising of all people, the hated Adolf Hitler fooled almost all of the world as to his true racial origin. As noted earlier, the well known and hated Adolf Hitler was not, racially, a German named Hitler at all.

As pointed out several times earlier herein, Adolf was a Jew (a Catholic Jew) whose real name was reportedly Adolf Schicklgruber (per articles in the “Encyclopedia Britannica,” the “Universal Jewish Encyclopedia” and other authoritative biographical sources). As noted, there are several reasons to believe that Adolf was totally a Jew with so-called Jewish blood from all directions.

There are manifest reasons to believe that Schicklgruber was an Amalek-Edomite as well and not a true Yehudi at all. He certainly had the marks, signs, fruits and works of the wicked Amalekites. So he must have been one of them. Yes, when something walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck; it must be a duck.

And while it might be impossible for a person to try to ascertain the motives that were present and lurking behind the scenes in the twisted mind of Adolf Schicklgruber to propel him on in his quest for domination over others, the fact of his racial ancestry could be material. What a tragedy it is that the world has come to believe that this "kook" was a German man.

Along with Adolf’s Jewish ancestry, it is fascinating that his personal astrologer, Erik J. Hanussen, was an (Amalekite, ed) Jew who was born in 1889 in Vienna, Austria as Hershel Steinschneider (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 208). Evidently, he, like the Schicklgrubers, decided to change his name (which is a common Amalekite trick, as noted in former chapters herein).

More Surprises

For years, the number two man in George Lincoln Rockwell’s American Nazi Party was a Jew (actually a secret Amalekite).

A number of leading Ku Klux Klan officials have been Jews (correctly Amalek-Edomites)--like the Klan group in Bristol, Virginia in the 1980s and more recently, the neo-Nazi Knights of Freedom, headed by Davis Wolfgang Hawke, who is really an Amalekite Jew named Andy Greenbaum (many Klansmen are also federal agents as a matter of fact).

The Jul 19, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1. 8) had a story by Seamus McGraw on “Supremacist With a Secret Named in Boston Bomb Plot.” The focus of this report was upon the trial of Leo V. Felton, an alleged “White supremacist,” who had spent considerable time in mental hospitals. He was arrested in Boston in 2001 on allegations that he and his girlfriend “conspired” to blow up Jewish targets.

As it turned out, Felton was a son of a Negro man (who must have had many White genes) and a supposedly White Catholic nun who had turned to lesbianism. Besides being part Negro, the “Forward” story revealed that his lesbian mother was part Jewish (surely Amalekite, ed). Poor Felton was born into this world with many curses from his mixed genes--Negro, Amalekite and perhaps even some White majority genes.

This strange presence of evil Amalekites in the American right wing movements was addressed in previous chapters and/or will be further assessed in the following comments. In the case of these persons, just mentioned, one must remember the grant of rulership made to Yehudah’s line many centuries ago, to be assessed in succeeding chapters (Gen 49:10).

Another Surprise

Yuri Vladiminovich Andropov (previously mentioned) was another interesting person who spent much of his life in hatred and persecution of Jews. Andropov was head of the Soviet KGB for years and always seemed to be one of the important people in the USSR to be feared.

In November 1982, the ailing Leonid Brezhnev died as head man (General Secretary) of the Soviet Union. He was succeeded by the sinister Andropov who had made his mark as one of the primary opponents and persecutors of Soviet Jewry over many, many years. The primary benefit to the USSR Jews, on this succession, was that Andropov was old and in failing health.

He died on February 9, 1984--not really having the time in power to cause serious trouble for the Jews, as was anticipated. However, one of the fascinating features of Andropov’s profile paralleled that of Adolf Schicklgruber. Like Adolf, Andropov was ethnically a (supposed) Jew or more correctly an Eastern European, Khazar, Amalek-Edomite.

Arabs or Amalekites?

Beyond the Roosevelts, Rockefellers, some Bushes, Andropov and Schicklgruber, it is also most interesting that Yasser Arafat could correctly be called a Jew--actually a Moslem Jew (as pointed out earlier). Reportedly, Arafat’s mother was Jewish. Hence, by Jewish law, her son would legally be a Jew (at least genetically), but he took the Islamic religion of his Arab father.

Somehow, Arafat has maneuvered the Israeli government into paying him a personal grant of $8 million monthly that is deposited into his personal account with Bank Leumi which transfers it to Paris (Oct 29, 1999, “Forward,” p. 1). The Israelis are not exactly stupid. If they are paying Arafat $8 million monthly, one can be sure that they are getting something in return.

Is it possible that Arafat is double-crossing his Arab colleagues with this Israeli payoff? It could be! Also, despite his recent marriage to a Muslim woman, he is alleged to be a homosexual pervert (besides a first rate terrorist). All of this suggests that he is really an Amalekite, posing as a Muslim.

In 1972, athletes from all over the world congregated in Munich, Germany for the Twentieth Olympiad. While the games were in progress, the Arab terrorist group “Black September” seized some nine Israeli athletes and held them for 21 hours before eventually murdering them when they saw that Israel would not meet their demands and the Germans were moving against them.

The significant thing about this Arab terrorist group is that the head man of the involved team was correctly a Jew of sorts (that is--his mother was a Palestinian Jew and his father was a Moslem Arab). Of course, he identified with his Arab father with a passionate hatred toward the Jews.

Otherwise, serious questions over the Saudi Arabian royalty appear in an article by Vendyl Jones on “Who Was His Majesty King Hussein,” in the Jan-Mar 2000 “Petah Tikvah” magazine (p. 55-57). Mr Jones alleges that the Faisal family of Saudi Arabia was originally Edomite slaves in the ancient Hashemite kingdom which took over the Trans-Jordan in the 20th century.

Jones claims that when Lawrence of Arabia tied with the Arabs, the British created the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and gave it to the Emir Faisal I, who was a slave to the Hashemite ruler, Sharif Hussein bin Ali, Emir of Mecca.

In another interesting observation, Jones suggests that many of the Palestinian people now in the refugee camps are a mixture of the Ishmaelites (Arabs) and Amalekites. He adds that Jordan’s King Hussein knew how treacherous they were. Jones did not explain how or when this mixture took place. Presumably, it could go all of the way back to Second Temple days or it could have surfaced in more modern times.

Chapter 452--The Early Amalekite Push to Rule

Amalek-Edomite Quest to Rule

Having mentioned the Amalek-Edomites’ madness to rule and exercise power over Yisrael, it would be well to review a little history of how incredibly evil that they can be. Manifestly, their genetic makeup translates to the motivation and thinking which propels and pushes them forward to destroy true Israelites at all costs.

Manifestly, they are racially part Canaanite, as previously described. In this sense, they have many of the same genes as Abimelech, the classic bramble bush, as well as those of Kain and his father Nachash (Satan). To appreciate their mad, crazy mentality prodding them on to rule over Yisrael, it is needful to revisit their power over Yehudah in the first century CE.

Previous chapters offered remarks on how crafty, deceptive, dishonest and treacherous Amalek-Edomites have been and can be. Simple words cannot begin to describe their genetic depravity. However, one can see this wickedness in their dominion over Yehudah and now the modern House of Yisrael nations.

As also noted in earlier comments, the evidence is most persuasive that the so-called Jewish community in Jerusalem, in the early first century CE, was largely dominated and controlled (but not completely) by Amalek-Edomites with the ruling Herods and their Herodian lackeys.

Assuredly, these very people seem to have sold out the historic Jewish nation to the Romans and Roman rule (which paved the way for the Herods to gain power over Yehudah). Yet, the days did come when these Amalek-Edomites evidently reversed themselves and provided much or all of the impetus for the Jewish-Roman War of 66-70 CE.

Perhaps the Amalek-Edomites believed that they might lose some of their power, control and banking profits by 66 CE. Certainly, something motivated them to promote or at least join in with other Zealot Jews (which probably included some or many Jewish Amalekite proselytes, as noted previously) in the early days of the revolt against Rome.

Amalek-Edomite Treachery

In an article on “Treacherous Edom,” in the Nov 1997 “New Beginnings” (p. 7), Josephus was quoted on his remarks on how the Edomites slew thousands of their Jewish colleagues (evidently true Jewish Israelites) during the Roman siege in order to continue the revolt and their control over the true Jews.

Suffice to say, the last two years of the Jewish-Roman war saw the Amalek-Edomites oppressing, fighting and killing true Jews for the control of the Temple and the citadel. The evil Simon bar Giora was leader of the primary faction at that time, which certainly included the Idumeans. It eventually came out on top in this struggle for control.

Josephus is largely unclear on this Simon, other than noting that he was from Gerasa, a large Hellenistic city in Transjordan (“Encyclopedia Judaica,” v. 4, p. 220). Judaica notes that the word “giora” means proselyte in Aramaic. So he likely was an Amalek-Edomite (who was a Jewish proselyte) and particularly so since the Idumean forces would later join in with him.

Another estimation is that he could have been Simon, a leader in the initial Idumean attack, also mentioned by Josephus (“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p. 318). Josephus said that this first Edomite attack was upon the (true) Jews in control of the Temple.

The Edomites rushed into the city and looted houses and killed all of the Jewish Israelites which they came into contact with (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” p. 319). The Edomites spared none and the dawning day saw the site covered with 8,500 corpses of true Jews.

In this assault, the Amalek-Edomites were allied with the Zealots (which probably also included numbers of Amalekite Jewish proselytes, as noted above and as discussed earlier herein). In fact, it was this Zealot alliance which supposedly prompted the Edomites to initially attack and murder the thousands of true Jews.

Later, these Idumeans and their Zealot allies murdered another 12,000 young Jews (“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p. 319). After these two murdering campaigns, many of the Idumeans seem to have withdrawn temporarily. However, some of them evidently remained in the city to initially ally with the Zealots, before finally double crossing them as well.

Simon Bar Giora

Shortly thereafter, the above cited Simon bar Giora (whether the same as the earlier Idumean leader mentioned by Josephus or a different Simon) assumed command of an army of Jews, who were probably a group of essentially Jewish Edomite proselytes from Judea (perhaps with a mix of a few true Jews).

Very early thereafter, he seemed to have been involved in attacking some of his enemies in Idumea, while in league with some of his Edomite friends in Idumea (“Encyclopedia Judaica,” v. 4, p. 221). The purpose of this Idumean invasion was unclear. But apparently, it was to put down any opposition which Simon may have had from some of his fellow Edomite leaders in that area.

Later, as the Roman War progressed, the Idumean armed forces (especially those still in Jerusalem) came under bar Giora’s direct command. Simon and his army of mainly Edomites (from Idumea and/or Jewish proselytes) turned on and double crossed the Zealot defenders in the city, and murdered them as well as other true Jews (“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p. 326).

Josephus described the three main factions opposing the Romans, but fighting each other inside the city in a civil war (all the while that the Romans were patiently waiting outside to strike).

Simon bar Giora had an army of 10,000 plus another Idumean contingent of 5,000. The Zealots numbered 2,400 and the main Jewish force of 6,000 men was under the command of a man named John (“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p. 339).

This force under John may have largely involved true Jewish Israelites; whereas the other two groups may have had any number of Edomite proselytes--plus the obvious 5,000 Edomites from Idumea under Simon.

Proselytes or Not?

Probably, most scholars would suppose that the Idumean contingent consisted of converts to Judaism. But this writer has some reservations about that theory. Perhaps the soldiers of the Idumean group were not Jewish proselytes.

Although not stated by Josephus, there are reasons to believe that he referred to the Edomite proselytes to Judaism with other definitions. Likely, many of the Edomite proselytes were Zealots in the beginning of the conflict--before joining in with the first mentioned Simon (who made the initial attack on true Jews) or the later Simon bar Giora.

As the Roman siege proceeded, some five of the leading Edomite chiefs met secretly and decided to send delegates to Titus to discuss a secret plan whereby they and some of their Edomite colleagues would surrender to Titus in exchange for his protection. Simon found out about it and killed the emissaries and threw the five chiefs into prison (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” p. 364).

Apparently, many Edomites did eventually surrender, however, before the final fall of the city. Desertions were high and many people (including many Edomites) fled to the Romans for protection. Josephus says that Titus received them, freeing some and selling the rest as slaves (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” p. 364).

When Titus finally conquered the Temple, he found Simon standing in the Temple wearing purple robes (“Who Wrote the New Testament? The Making of the Christian Myth,” p. 148). By then, the Idumeans controlled most of the city. It is unclear to what extent that there was still a Zealot presence in Jerusalem when the Romans finally took the city. Maybe, the Edomites were in total control.

The Bottom Line

The point of this first century CE history is that the Amalek-Edomites have the Canaanite genes. And as bramble bushes, they are dedicated to ruling over the trees of Judges 9. In the Roman War of 66-70 CE, they went mad in trying to rule, much like other later Amalekites (i.e. Adam Weishaupt, Adolf Schicklgruber and Franklin Roosevelt).

Chapter 453--Some Amalekite Successes

The Scepter Phenomenon

In terms of the descendants of Yehudah, Yakov Yisrael had some particularly far reaching prophecies about them when he foretold the future for each of his children--just before his death in Egypt.

The essence of Yisrael’s words was that the collective Israelites would praise Yehudah’s line and bow down before it, and the scepter of rule and the lawgiver’s power and authority would not depart from under Yehudah’s feet until SHILOH comes (Gen 49:8-12). The best view is that SHILOH is a reference to The Coming MESSIAH. Thus, this prophecy is profound.

What it says is that Yehudah would gain the rulership over his brethren in Yisrael and maintain that rulership until The MESSIAH comes. Of course, some persons might try to suppose that this reference to SHILOH was to His coming in the first century CE. However, the prophecy plainly implies that Yehudah’s rule will continue over Yisrael until The MESSIAH establishes His government on earth (which is still future in 2003).

Even when YESHUA’s government is established, Yehudah’s rule will effectively continue because The MESSIAH is of the lineage of Yehudah. Therefore, once Yehudah took over rulership of Yisrael, that rulership would continue.

This same idea was inherent in the context of the enormous prophecies to David (of Yehudah’s line) that his descendants would always rule over Israelites (as discussed in prior chapters herein).

With the elevation of David as King over Yisrael, the rulership of Yehudah continued, certainly over portions of Yisrael (until the fall of the House of Yehudah to the Babylonians). A former chapter discussed the prophecies from Yechezkel and Yirmeyahu over Yirmeyahu’s role of removing David’s throne to another land which contained Israelites. Hence, it has had a continued existence until modern times.

Actually, Yisrael’s prediction was far more than even Yehudah’s rule over Yisrael or parts of Yisrael. As described in former chapters, the evidence from history is that descendants of David eventually became the kings and queens of Europe (which, by the way, are all related and interconnected, as is well known by students of genealogy and history).

Thus, the line of Yehudah-David was to become the royal line of kings over Adamites at large as well as Israelites. This is a most extraordinary fulfillment of the future for the fleshly people of Yehudah, per Moshe’s writings in the Torah.

Another Strange Reality

It has to be significant that not only has Yehudah produced lines of kings all over Europe (as outlined in a prior chapter), but that the Jews historically have always risen to the top at whatever they become involved in. In almost any endeavor that man has pursued in the Western, Christian civilization in the past 2,000 years, Jews have often been at the top and on both sides of an issue.

Thus, Jewish liberals (under Sabbatian influence, as will be later established) have led the way in establishing liberalism in America. But one of the most notable opponents of this Jewish effort was the Jew Barry Goldwater, who became the father of modern conservatism. It was Goldwater’s efforts which propelled Ronald Reagan into the spotlight in the 1960s-1980s.

Unquestionably, Jewish doctors and leaders have contributed enormously to the modern medical profession and the focus on drugs and poisons for healing (like in the case of Dr Simon Flexner and others, as was addressed in preceding chapters herein).

Jews have also led the way in the depravity of the modern petro-chemical fertilizers and pesticides--which are not only producing poisonous foods, but destroying agricultural farm land. Conversely, some of the biggest proponents of organic farming and natural healing methods have been Jews--like the Rodales of Pennsylvania.

A person could go on and on for hours with this enigma of bad Jews doing much evil and good Jews trying to oppose them and bringing good upon man. Truly, the Jewish fig tree has produced both good and bad figs.

This contrast is all around us. It brings to mind Yisrael’s word that the descendants of Yehudah would rule over Yisrael. Manifestly, this rule has been more than just the line of kings. It has been in government leaders (elected politicians, discussed above) and into almost every facet of man’s existence in modern times. Jews seem to be in charge of virtually everything of importance--both for good or for bad.

Now, a Twist

While true Jews genetically have had the preparation, push and prod to excel and rise into leadership roles over Israelites and indeed man at large, there is another fascinating aspect of this issue which ties back to the bramble bush Abimelech, who was described in Judges 9, discussed in the previous chapters.

Abimelech typified and seemed to assume a prophetic role for the evil, mongrel Amalekite descendants of Cain who have come along later and have been usurpers and workers of evil for thousands of years. In Judges 9, Abimelech comes forward as a usurper and takes over Yisrael for three years--obviously, in a way to nullify or destroy the prophetic destiny of Yehudah and his charge to rule over Yisrael.

Thus, the Amalekite children of Satan and Kain have been busy for 3,500 years doing their level best to destroy Yisrael and Yehudah. These Amalekites have typically posed as Jews, although large numbers of them also pretend to be Christians and people of other faiths.

By linking in with the real Jews (as they did starting 2,100 years ago and even until the Khazar conversion in the 8th century CE), the Amalekite thorns have been in a position to share in the general rulership and power of Jews over other Israelites. The evil Amalekites have fully exploited this course. And today, here in 2003, the Amalekites are in essential control of all Yisrael.

Therefore, many of them have been leading doctors, lawyers, popes and you name it. Of course, they have assuredly risen to political power, as is evident with evil people--like the apparent Amalekites Schicklgruber, Roosevelt, Andropov and Weishaupt. Thus, in WWII, Amalekite leaders in Germany, Russia, England and the US did their level best to destroy Europe.

Virtually, all important political motions have come under Amalekite power or influence. Nazism (both in Germany and the US) and Communism (worldwide) were not only founded by Amalekites, but have largely been led by Amalekites.

Several neo-Nazi and Ku Klux Klan groups in the US have been taken over by federal agents and/or Amalekite Jews, as mentioned in prior chapters.

More Amalekite Treachery

Some persons have even suggested that the evil Amalekites have secretly financed and supported the Aryan Nations sect (previously mentioned) in North Idaho so that they could have a bogie man to constantly attack and demean in the Amalekite controlled media. As long as the media concentrates upon the Aryan Nations, more of the goals of Amalekite domination will occur in America.

In the first century CE, the evil Amalekites moved into roles of power over the good Jewish Israelites. In more modern times, they have also assumed power roles over the House of Yisrael Israelites. They are working full time to destroy these House of Yisrael Israelites--just as they tried to do with the Jewish Israelites of some 2,000 years ago.

As part of their destruction plans, they have gone after the true Jewish kings in Europe. With a diabolical hatred and frenzy, they have instigated rebellions and coops all over Europe in the last 400 years to try to destroy all of the kings from Yehudah--in France, Germany, Russia, Greece, and on and on.

Perhaps the most notable overthrow of a kingdom happened in France in the late, 18th century, French Revolution which saw the royal family murdered by a crazy mob infuriated and led by Amalekites who were organized and motivated by Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati, founded a few years earlier in Germany.

1917

The next major overthrow came in Russia in 1917, under the leadership of the evident Amalekite Khazars Leon Trotsky (whose real name was Laiber Davidovich Bronstein) and Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (who seems to have been a half breed Amalekite Khazar, whose real name was Vladimir Ulyanov).

Lenin was married to a Khazar/Amalekite Jewess. He and his revolutionary Amalekite comrades proceeded to murder the Russian Czar Nicholas II and his wife and children in cold blood and commence a blood bath that raged for years in Russia (ultimately killing millions).

The Czar was a descendant of Yehudah and David and a relative of Britain’s monarchy. He and Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany were relatives of Queen Victoria. Through intermarriages, most or all of Europe’s royal families were related in one way or another, making them not only descendants of Yehudah, but also of David with but few exceptions, if any.

The only major throne of importance now left is Britain’s monarchy, presently headed by Elizabeth II. Were it not because of YHWH’s promises to David, undoubtedly, this throne would have likewise ended years ago.

For sure, the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters will make a move toward destroying the British throne here in the age end. If YHWH allows this motion to succeed (to a point), it will pave the way for YESHUA to come and to take this throne, as discussed elsewhere herein.

Other Factors

Manifestly, the evil Amalekite Jews are proceeding on all fronts to take over rulership and control of all aspects of the House of Yisrael nations. They are moving their theories and practices of evil into all facets of national Yisrael from medicine, to law, to politics, to government, to entertainment, to the media and on and on.

Surely, the story of Abimelech in Judges 9 must be one of enormous prophetic significance. The evil Amalekites are doing their level best to rule collective Yisrael here in the age end--just as Abimelech so ruled Yisrael many ages ago. This time, they are having just as much or more success than did Abimelech in his days.

The interesting thing about this situation is that just as the trees in Judges 9 did not step forward to provide leadership and rule (which therefore created a vacuum of leadership in Yisrael--thus, allowing Abimelech to make his move for power), the same thing has now been happening in the House of Yisrael nations, as the typical fulfillment of Judges 9.

Instead of true Yehudahites coming forward to provide leadership, as was their destiny (like Britain’s royal family), they and the other Israelites have all taken a back seat and allowed the diabolical Amalekites to rise up to fill that vacuum and usurp authority over Yisrael. It’s happening on all fronts and in all Israelite activities.

It’s not to say that all leadership in all areas is now in Amalekite hands. But much of it is and especially in the House of Yisrael nations. And if some non-Amalekite does come forward, he will meet a wall of opposition, not only from the controlled Amalekite media, but even from his own Israelite brethren (who are janissary robots). Truly, the Amalekites are trying to take over everything and destroy Yisrael in the process.

And how can a person recognize an Amalekite usurper, in lieu of a legitimate Yehudahite or other descendant of Yisrael? As discussed elsewhere herein, the key is in one of works and deeds. Men can be known by their fruits, deeds and actions. When one sees a worker of evil, the first most logical suspicion must be that he is an Amalekite, whether posing as a Jew or Christian and by whatever name he goes by.

Far Reaching Evil

As cited earlier, YESHUA seems to have said that these evil Amalek-Edomite people bear the guilt for the murder of all of the righteous--past, present and future (Matt 23:35). Surely, they bear responsibility for all or almost all wars, revolutions and bloodlettings. Amalekite leaders like Schicklgruber and Roosevelt caused WWII.

Amalekite bankers/masters caused WWI, the US Civil War, the Russian Revolution and the French Revolution and will be behind the coming WWIII (in the slaughter of billions). In short, the bramble bush thorns, in the form of the Amalek-Edomites, have had a tremendous measure of success in fulfilling the Abimelech prophecy, cited earlier from Judges (Jud 9:1-57).

Furthermore, the Abimelech prediction could have some connection with the age ending "Beast" man who is to come onto the scene and rule the world under Satanic power for 3 1/2 years (Rev 13). We'll just have to wait and see.

The point being from all of this is that one must be careful about interpreting these tree symbols in the Book. Categorically, they are quite complex and fraught with much difficulty without due care, study, concern and attention. In short, one must let the Scriptures do the interpretations.

YHWH’s Curse on Yehudah Ended

Despite the great evil of the bad Edomite, Amalekite, and/or Kenite figs, this writer categorically believes that The MOST HIGH has been extremely involved in Zionism and the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948 and the Jewish conquest of old Jerusalem in the Six Days War of 1967, as was assessed in former chapters herein.

In fact, in my chronology, the period of 1966-67 (fall to fall reckoning) seems to be a Jubilee year which gives the Jews a lot of credit. The things going on in the Middle East for the past 60 years are happening there with the authority and blessing of YHWH.

There are no accidents going on there (or anywhere else for that matter). While some might be sympathetic with the Arabs with the loss of their lands, the truth is that they are usurpers trying to occupy land which does not belong to them. That land belongs to Yisrael--to include every person of true Yehudah, as well as the lost tribes.

At the proper time, The ELOHIM will separate the Kenites, Canaanites and Amalek-Edomites (the goats and tares, as suggested previously) from Yehudah. He will do this in His good time. So, for now, a believer in YHWH YESHUA must just have some patience and allow The HIGHEST to fulfill His purpose. He will execute judgment on the bad figs in His good time.

Amalekite Depravity is Unparalleled in History

Just as Abimelech planned, plotted and schemed on how he could take over and rule the trees in Judges 9, there is manifestly no doubt whatsoever that the Amalek-Edomites genetically spend their whole lives, beings, minds, hopes and ambitions on how they can take over and rule over Israelites in a scheme designed to forever destroy Yisrael from the face of the earth.

Since these depraved people are totally evil, they will pull out all of the stops, tell all of the lies, murder all of the people necessary and on and on--if they perceive that it will help in their overall objectives. Their agenda is always first and foremost in whatever tasks they undertake. As they are totally evil (genetically), there is nothing they won’t do to further their cause.

The Herods

The cases for the murder of the righteous (by Herod and Herod Antipas) and for some of the sexual depravity and sickness of the Amalekite Herods have been addressed in former chapters. As outlined, it was Herod, who murdered the innocent babies at Bethlehem, just after the birth of YESHUA (Matt 2:13-18), and Herod’s son, Herod Antipas, who murdered Yohanan the Baptist (Matt 14:1-12).

But there are some more features of these people which need mentioning in the context of how crafty, foxy and wretched Abimelech was in his objective of ruling over the people.

Just as the bramble bush (Abimelech) was brutal, ruthless and murderous in attempting to rule over and dominate Israelites, the same charge can be laid to the Herods generally and to Herod the Great in particular.

Either because old Herod (the Great) was simply insane and nuts for power or because he thought some members of his family were plotting against him or because members of his family were plotting against him, something set him off on several occasions to go on murdering campaigns against his own family, close colleagues and others (like the babies at Bethlehem).

For example, Herod murdered his wife Mariamne, her mother, her 80 year old grandfather, one of her brothers named Costobarus (in c25 BCE) and one more of her brothers, 17 year old Aristobulus in c36 BCE (“Oxford Companion to the Bible,” p. 281). He then turned his attention to his own children. He murdered at least three of his own sons--Alexander, Aristobulus and Antipater.

Before being murdered by his father, this Antipater supposedly accused his aunt Salome and two of his own brothers (Archelaus and Philip) falsely of plotting against Herod (Antipater may also have been one of the accusers against his brothers Alexander and Aristobulus).

But before murdering Salome, Archelaus and Philip, Herod decided that his son Antipater was lying to him. So he ordered him executed instead (“Davis Dictionary of the Bible,” p. 317).

Otherwise, old Herod seems to have murdered any and all persons who dared to speak against him in any fashion--like the 45 friends of his enemy Antigonus (ibid, p. 317-318) and the two “rabbis” just before he died (as mentioned in a former chapter herein). From history’s viewpoint, it meant certain death to be an enemy of Herod the Great. He was ruthless in murdering his opponents.

More on Old Herod

In c46 BCE, Herod was summoned to come before the Sanhedrin to stand trial for executing people without the Sanhedrin’s permission. Herod came. But he came with an armed body guard which intimidated the council (“Davis Dictionary of the Bible,” p. 317). Needless to say, all charges were dropped against him.

But that was not enough to pacify the diabolical Herod. He immediately had the council members all murdered; and then, he appointed a new Sanhedrin (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 391). From that point forward, old Herod ruled the priesthood and the Sanhedrin (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 365, 386). No one could or would dare speak out against him in public.

In “The Life and Times of Jesus The Messiah” (p. 165), Alfred Edersheim has it that thereafter, Herod packed the Sanhedrin with Sadducees (including many Herodians) and priests of his choice. Manifestly, the collective rulers marched to his tune or they were in trouble. Edersheim described Herod’s rule by saying that the people hated him.

They “detested his semi-heathen reign; they abhorred his deeds of cruelty.” He surrounded himself with “foreign councillors, and was protected by foreign mercenaries.” As long as he lived, “no woman’s honour was safe, no man’s life secure.” Moreover, he employed an “army of spies” to spy upon the people (as elsewhere commented upon herein).

Upon Herod’s initial assumption of power over Jerusalem (c46-37 BCE), some, many or most of the Pharisees (evidently in Judea) refused to swear an oath of loyalty to him after he had made such demands (either because of religious or political reasons).

In “Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian” (p. 483), writer Lester L. Grabbe notes this event and suggests that Herod’s reaction against them was unclear.

However, this time frame (mentioned by Grabbe) did set the stage for a great religious revival among the Pharisees, producing the theological schools of Shammai and Hillel (as described earlier and to be further noted in subsequent commentary)--perhaps because of Herod’s terror against the Pharisees.

While not discussed by Grabbe, it is evident in the NT (Matt 23, discussed earlier herein) that the Amalekite Jews took control of the Shammai Pharisees--certainly by the first century CE. Probably, the Amalekite control began happening as early as Herod’s days (despite the fact of Shammai’s alleged nationalistic feelings which conflicted with Herod’s reign and ideology).

The Shammai People Goofed

In fact, it is a good bet that as the Shammai Pharisees were developing (after Herod took over) that they allowed Amalekite Jews in the area into leadership positions because of fear of Herod (or maybe, because Herod commanded that the Pharisees appoint an Amalekite leadership as a condition to not murder them and destroy their religious movement).

Perhaps Herod’s clannish connections to these Amalekites pacified him somewhat and motivated him not to murder all of the Pharisees (or at least the Pharisee leaders in Jerusalem), as could have otherwise happened with his mentality and brutality. Obviously, something happened with the ruling Pharisees in the Jerusalem area (the Shammai Pharisees) to save them from destruction from Herod.

When a man is facing torture and death, he will normally go to any extreme to save his own hide. In the American military’s code of conduct, it was treason to aid and assist an enemy with military information (beyond name, rank and serial number). In the Vietnam war, many captured Americans publicly committed treason in order to save their own lives (including Arizona Senator John McCain).

Likely, the Shammai Pharisees did the same thing. They turned their leadership offices over to Amalekite bankers/masters in the area. The only question about this exercise is whether Herod commanded it (as a condition), or they thought up the idea on their own as a means of survival.

As a minimum, at some point in time, Herod did successfully impose a loyalty oath upon some part of the Pharisee definition (“Hillel and Jesus,” p. 141). It is unclear which and/or now many Pharisees were subjected to this process and finally succumbed to Herod’s pressures and threats.

It would be easy to speculate that Herod certainly focused upon the Shammai leadership in the Jerusalem area. They either marched to his tune or they were in trouble. It was the Pharisees in the outlying areas who refused to take the oath to Herod and who suffered the most from his actions (as allowed by Lester Grabbe, mentioned above). Likely, these Pharisees were of the Hillel school.

Since the priesthood was or almost was synonymous with the Sadducees (in the Jerusalem area), it is manifest that Herod also exercised enormous control over the Sadducees (and may have required a loyalty oath from them as well). For all purposes, Herod and his Amalekite allies in the Herodian political sect, controlled much of Judaism in Jerusalem--but probably not all of it.

While the Hillel Pharisees obviously still had some influence, there was an internal struggle within Judaism to see which philosophy would survive--that based upon the true historical faith of the people or that of the Amalekite usurpers who had moved in on Yehudah like flies. Significantly, the Amalekite evil did not capture “all” of Judaism at that time, despite the efforts displayed (as allowed in former chapters).

More on the Herods

When Herod was almost 70 years old, he came down with his final illness. While on his death bed, some young religious Jews (conscious of the Torah) heard that he was dead and went to the Temple and tore down a large, golden eagle put over the gate of the Temple by Herod in contempt for YHWH and His Temple. The men were arrested in the act and brought before Herod. He ordered the ringleaders burned alive.

Josephus dates this event on the day of an eclipse of the moon (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” by Paul L. Maier, p. 252). Maier has a footnote which says that this occurred on March 13, 4 BCE (which, of course, places YESHUA’s birth before this date). Josephus went on to note that Herod wanted the people to be sad and show grief upon his pending death.

Accordingly, he ordered all of the men of distinction in the land arrested and held captive inside the hippodrome that he had built. He then instructed his sister Salome that when he died, all of these captive people were to be killed so that there would be appropriate grief throughout the land (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” p. 252). On his death, Salome reneged on his wishes and freed the captives.

As discussed in former comments, Herod was known for high and excessive taxation efforts which were imposed upon the common people.

When Herod died and the likelihood that his rule over Judea would continue with his surviving sons (those that he didn’t murder), a delegation of Jews (probably real Jews) went to Caesar Augustus to ask for direct Roman rule over Judea, as noted earlier (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 419).

This happened in 6 CE. With direct Roman rule under a Roman Governor, it is unclear how much independence the Sanhedrin exercised (as elsewhere shown herein, the Sanhedrin had very little independence from the evil Amalekites). While Rome took over direct rule of Judea, other provinces in Palestine were turned over to the sons of Herod to rule. So the Amalekite Herods were ever around to influence decisions.

Still More Herods

Old Herod’s grandson Marcus Julius Agrippa I (who was popularly called Herod Agrippa) seems to have been a close friend of the Roman Emperors Caligula and Claudius. In about 41 CE, he was given a kingdom in Palestine that even exceeded what Herod the Great ruled (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 432). This grant included Judea and Samaria (thus, temporarily ending direct Roman rule in Judea).

Probably, Agrippa began to exercise personal control over the Sanhedrin at that time. But his rule was limited because he died in 44 CE. Judea once more came under direct Roman rule. However, Agrippa’s son, Herod Agrippa II, was allowed to continue the Herod control of the appointments of the Jewish high priest and the Sanhedrin (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 436).

There is much evidence to suggest that from the time of Herod the Great forward to the fall of Jerusalem to the Romans in 70 CE that the Amalek-Edomites (usually, in the form of the Herod family) exercised general control of the Jewish priesthood and the Sanhedrin. This point is extremely important in the vein of the murderers of YESHUA (as discussed in a former chapter).

Old Herod’s son Herod Antipas (who was one-half Edomite and one-half Samaritan [“Davis Dictionary of the Bible,” p. 318], and who ordered the murder of Yohanan the Baptist) was referred to as that “fox” by YESHUA (Lu 13:32). So it is clear that this family was clever and cunning. Antipas’ brother Herod Agrippa murdered Yakov (Acts 12:1-2) and imprisoned Kefa (Acts 12:3-5).

Herod the Great’s brother, Pheroras, was accused several times of plotting the murder of old Herod (ibid, p. 316). So evil, plotting and conniving was par for the course for this diabolical family of Amalekites.

Chapter 454--The Amalekite Conspiracy

Amalek-Edomite Masters

Though the generic Amalekites are collectively masters or experts at sin and evil, as elaborated upon in former chapters, this is not the theme of this and the next several succeeding chapters. Masters have been and will be assessed herein in the sense of being the visible leaders and bosses of events, organizations and people.

Over the years, a host of students of internationalism and the quest for world government have looked at the world’s Amalek-Edomites and have concluded that they operate in a cabal (or more correctly, a Cabala because it is occultic in nature) and/or conspiracy led by powerful masters who are largely front men for the more powerful Amalekite bankers and super rich who often operate in secret in the background (of course, many of the bankers are themselves the masters who are visibly out front; but some of them do operate in more clandestine ways).

This was the situation with the Illuminati, as elsewhere outlined herein. The Amalekite Rothschild international bankers put up the money, directed and used any and all benefits from the Illuminati; despite the fact that other Amalekites, like Adam Weishaupt, visibly organized, managed and publicly ran the organization.

Weishaupt was not a banker. But he was an Amalekite master working for the less visible, behind the scenes, Amalekite bankers.

The same is true with international Communism. It was largely founded, organized and directed by Amalekites--like Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky and perhaps Vladimir Lenin (depending upon his ancestry, as previously discussed). These were the front men, directing the motion, which was secretly financed and run by Amalekite bankers (like the Warburgs and Jacob Schiff of NY’s Kuhn Loeb & Co, who put up $20 million).

Correctly Sons of Satan

Manifestly, the masters have common goals of world rule that seem to be established by the Amalekite bankers, secretly calling the shots.

Mistakenly, many observers think that the cabal or Cabala is Jewish because so many Amalek-Edomites pretend to be Jews. But correctly, they are not Jews at all, but are usually publicly professed atheists and/or real Satanists, operating from behind the scenes in true beliefs and actions.

On this topic of discussion, please understand that many Amalek-Edomites also pretend to be Christians. When they change their historic Edomite names to Western names, they fool the general public as to their true identity. But the best way to distinguish a Christian Edomite is to appreciate NT words which say that evil people, like the Edomites, are known by their deeds, fruits or works.

In the case of Christian, Muslim, Hindu or whatever religious persuasion an evil Amalek-Edomite may have adopted (and they do adopt all kinds of faiths, but always maintaining the evil and wickedness of their father Satan), their deeds effectively distinguish or identify them to the careful and observing student of truth.

YESHUA put it well by saying that the evil Amalek-Edomites (always) do the deeds of the Devil, their father (Jo 8:41, 44).

Therefore, when one observes a person plainly doing the works of Satan, a suspicion should immediately surface that the wicked individual could be a racial Amalek-Edomite; or at least, have some Edomite ancestry (Slick Clinton is a perfect example of this reality--as will be discussed at length with some fascinating proof in a later appendix).

Another Feature

There is another facet of identification of the actual Edomites, by recalling the words of Ovadyah, discussed heretofore, in the context of them being on high and exalted as an eagle over the stars of Yisrael (Oba 1:3-4). The point the prophet has made is that Edomites will be in charge, over the Yisrael nations, in the age end--at least, as secret rulers from behind the scenes.

There is a third identifying feature of “some” Edomites, but certainly not all of them. Some Edomites are distinguished physically by their distinctive Hittite noses, described previously.

One must be careful about drawing conclusions on this attribute, however, since numbers of ethnic groups, besides Edomites, have the Hittite noses. Also, some Edomites have had the Hittite noses bred out of them through years of miscegenation with other peoples.

A fourth possible identifying attribute is that Amalek-Edomites generally seem to have character shortcomings. They are big mouthed extroverts, pushy, forward, arrogant, often rude and have a strong propensity for sexual perversion and depravity. In mentioning these qualities, one must again be careful because other peoples also have some of these problems--particularly the behemah humanoids.

Hence, there are several primary methods of identifying actual, racial Amalek-Edomites in the House of Yisrael nations. They will be doing the works of their father Satan; will be leaders and bosses in charge of the House of Yisrael peoples; “may” have the famous Hittite noses; and tend to be big mouthed, pushy, forward, rude, arrogant and sexually demented.

The Conspiracy

One of the things which the gullible Christian Israelites in the West has been unable to grasp is the presence of a genuine, real conspiracy among the Amalekite super rich to not only exploit the goyim for profit and gain purposes presently, but also to destroy them ultimately, as discussed in a former chapter herein in the context of the theology of Balaam.

Popular radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh typifies this stupidity. Not only does he refuse to even consider the possibility of a conspiracy, but he ridicules and makes fun of those persons who do have that perception. The tragedy with Limbaugh is that his stupid thinking dominates the right wing motion. Otherwise, the left wing thinking is mute anyway since left wingers can never understand the word conspiracy.

Winston Churchill, despite his gross confusion and shortcomings, at least had some perception of the presence of a Jewish conspiracy because he wrote about it in his book “Zionism Versus Bolshevism.” Churchill said that it had steadily grown “From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States).”

It is amazing that people can sit on the sidelines and watch and observe meetings, discussions and agreements between the super rich at the periodic Bilderberger and Trilateral Commission sessions and never call the result a conspiracy. The simple truth is that anytime two people get together and agree on anything, they have entered into a conspiracy.

Though most persons try to understand conspiracy in the sense of something done in secret and involving an evil act, the dictionary definition also includes just the “acting together” of any two parties (Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary,” p. 136).

The oppressive federal state is so hot in pursuit of alleged conspiracies in crimes against the state that she pulls out all of the stops and goes after people who merely talk about committing some illegal act. Whether the parties ever do anything or not is quite irrelevant from the standpoint of federal prosecutions. The very fact of discussion is sufficient to bring on an arrest, trial and imprisonment.

Any person gullible and stupid enough to believe that fat cats at all levels don’t get together and discuss things of mutual interest (which they can collaborate upon) has lost touch with reality. This writer has had some exposure to the business world and believe me there are all kinds of conspiracies on-going constantly among business people (to include cartels, price fixing, avoiding taxes and so forth).

Psalms 2:1-2, Revisited

Nevertheless, the Psalmist carefully outlined the conspiracy of the Amalekite bankers/masters some 3,000 years ago by saying that the kings of the earth and the rulers take counsel together (conspire) against YHWH and His ANOINTED, or correctly--The MESSIAH (Ps 2:1-2).

Samson Raphael Hirsch’s commentary on the “Psalms” (v. I, p. 7-9) offers a translation which says that the kings agree with the rulers (who are obviously separate persons), “together” against YHWH’s MESSIAH. Moreover, Hirsch’s commentary makes the case that the indictment applies to the nations and their rulers in the generic sense.

In any case, this happened 2,000 years ago when the Amalekite bankers/masters conspired with the Jewish religious and secular leaders (like the Amalekite Herod and the Herodians) and the Roman Caesar (the King?) and his governor Pilate against YESHUA The ANOINTED ONE. This involved an Amalekite conspiracy. There is no question about it whatsoever and certainly in this one single event.

But Hirsch makes the case that the conspiracy (in Ps 2:1-2) does not involve a single act. Instead, the great Jewish scholar implies that the conspiracy actually involves an on-going effort of the evil nations and their rulers to emancipate themselves from the sovereignty of the Torah in many actions over time. Probably, Hirsch has it right or almost right.

Not only did it involve the single act of the kings of the earth and the rulers (the Amalekite bankers/masters), operating in collusion against YESHUA some 2,000 years ago (as allowed in prior chapters), but it also has consisted of continuing actions by the kings of the earth and the Amalekite bankers/masters in collusion against the purpose of YHWH YESHUA ever since then as well.

Detailed in the NT

Manifestly, the New Testament describes this conspiracy in some detail. It started with the efforts of the Amalekite King Herod (who was given power in Judea by the Roman government) when he began murdering the innocent babies in the Bethlehem area in an effort to kill YESHUA.

Clearly, Herod must have conspired even then with the Amalekite bankers and masters in the Herodian and Shammai Pharisee sects (when he decided to begin his murdering campaign in Bethlehem). As the Word says, he was troubled and all Jerusalem with him (including the Amalekite bankers/masters). So he consulted with the chief priests and scribes (Matt 2:3-4).

The conspiracy continued on when the Roman governor Pilate succumbed to the wishes of the Amalekite bankers and rulers and killed YESHUA. Assuredly, it continued on in the rest of the NT as Amalekites periodically used their power and influence to persecute and oppress the election (Phil 3:2). As Revelation 17:6 demonstrates, it has continued on for the succeeding 1,950 years.

Surely, this option spells out an Amalekite conspiracy for the last 2,000 years. And upon an examination of Western history for the last 2,000 years, this prophecy has certainly come true. The Amalekite bankers/masters have conspired with kings and politicians alike (i.e. American presidents since Woodrow Wilson) to thwart and destroy YHWH YESHUA’s ultimate purpose for Yisrael.

Some History

In Second Temple times (before and after the days of Herod the Great), Jewish government was largely in the hands of the Sanhedrin--which consisted of the great bet din (court of justice) of 71 scholars and lesser courts of 23 judges (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 14, p. 839-840). These people were the “public” masters or leaders of the Jews (to include the Amalekite children of Satan) in their day.

In the main, this body was diametrically opposed to YESHUA and His disciples (Matt 26:59; Jo 11:47-57; Acts 4:5-18). However, the actual order for His execution surely came from the local, Amalekite bankers (as established in a former chapter herein). In other words, the secret rulers were the bankers. But the visible, public rulers (leaders or masters) were members of the Sanhedrin and the priesthood.

While the Sanhedrin was apparently composed of Amalekite masters and some of their Jewish lackeys (as appointed and controlled by the Herods and the Herodians), in the main, there is some reason to believe that there may have been a few true Jews and secret followers of YESHUA in this body or its subdivisions--like Yosef of Arimathea (“Oxford Companion of the Bible,” p. 383).

The Sanhedrin was organized after the exile and probably addressed religious, cultural and political questions (since all three issues were combined into the one government). Manifestly, the evidence is that by the first century CE, this governing council had been pretty well taken over by Amalekites. This was clearly the problem with the Jews and Judaism in the Jerusalem area.

But the fall of Jerusalem did not spell out the end of a centralized Jewish government to dictate rules and conduct for Jews throughout the Diaspora. A secret, unseen Jewish government continued, as will now be shown.

The Cahilla

The continuity of a Jewish government over the worldwide dispersion of the Jews was brought out in a book by Colonel Edwin M. Hadley on “The Cahilla Unmasked.” Hadley says that instead of destroying this power, the last Roman dispersals in 135 CE set it (the Kahilla or Cahilla) on a new and firmer foundation which has continued to exist.

In 1492, Chemor, Chief Rav of Spain, wrote a letter to the Grand Sanhedrin (the Cahilla), which then had its seat in Constantinople, asking for advice on how to handle the pending persecution and expulsion of Jews from Spain as a part of the then Catholic Inquisition (per a letter found in the Toledo Spanish Archives, as reported by Henry Ford, previously cited).

The Jewish ruler in Constantinople wrote back and said that the Spanish Jews should obey the King of Spain and become Christians. This leader went on to suggest that the Spanish Jews should teach their children to be merchants (to despoil the Christians), doctors (to take Christian lives), canons and clerics (to destroy Christian Churches) and lawyers (to put the Christians under a yoke).

Apparently, the advice of this leader in Constantinople became the basis for the later Marranoes, who were public Christians but secret Jews. Moreover, it is evident that the Amalekite Jews have carefully heeded the admonition to become merchants, doctors and lawyers in order to destroy Christianity.

Though the primary leader in the Cahilla is not publicly known among non-Jews, it has come to light from time to time. Hadley suggests that in the late 19th century in Odessa, Russia, some documents were found which were signed by Asher Ginsberg as the Ahad Ha’am. “Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v. 2, p. 440-442) says that Ginsberg (1856-1927) was the leader of the “Hibbat Zion movement,” discussed earlier.

Per Judaica, Ginsberg adopted the pen name of Ahad Ha’am (meaning one of the people) to write his essays and articles under. Hadley did not indicate whether Ginsberg signed the documents as Ha Ahad Ha’am (meaning the number one of the people, as opposed to just one of the people). But if he signed them as the number one leader, it might suggest that the words were a title (as Hadley maintains)

Whether succeeding Zionist leaders used Ahad Ha’am as a title or not is unclear. Though Ginsberg was a Jewish leader in Russia in the Zionist movement (and an evident Amalekite), it is unclear whether he was in a leadership role in the ruling Cahilla or not and whether he signed the documents in such a capacity or not.

A previous discussion mentioned the apparent Amalekite Walter Rathenau who said in 1909 that “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves” (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 61). This band of rulers were likely all Amalekites.

If so, it suggests that the total masters and leaders then in Europe perhaps numbered around 300--which is a much larger figure than just the 71 members of the likely Cahilla. Perhaps the power of the 300 leaders mentioned by Rathenau was restricted to economic and commercial areas--while the Cahilla was a more limited organization in numbers, but with broader powers over the entire Jewish community.

This 300 number is interesting for at least one more possibly important reason. As indicated in prior chapters, the evil Amalekite Haman had 300 followers or colleagues in Shushan who were eventually destroyed by the Jews (Est 9:15). It is unclear whether all of these 300 were Amalekites, although that is plausible. After all, they seemed to be a part of the Haman operation to kill the Jews.

More on the Kahilla

In 1946, a Jewish man named Henry H. Klein published a book on “A Jew Exposes The Jewish World Conspiracy” which reported upon the still present Cahilla, directing Jews worldwide in a cohesive conspiracy. Klein suggested that the ruling Cahilla is the real power and that it exercises that power through the money lords throughout the world.

In a sense, one could logically support the idea that the Cahilla rules supreme and that the bankers are lackeys under them. However, based upon the NT remarks on the death of YESHUA, discussed previously, it would seem that the Cahilla answers to the international Amalekite Jew bankers, like the Rothschilds. In other words, the men with the money call the shots.

Of course, in some instances, the bankers are masters themselves, in being the visible leaders out in front of the pack. Alternatively, many of the masters are not bankers, per se, but are merely the front men who work for and obey the behind the scenes bankers (who often operate in secret).

It’s questionable how much of a presence true Jews have had in the Cahilla since YESHUA’s time. Likely, it has continued to be firmly in the hands of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters over the years just as it was in NT times. But that condition could change here in the age end--as will shortly be discussed.

Chapter 455--The Modern State of Israel

Overview

Subsequent chapters herein will address the state of Israel in some detail in regards to the political and religious situations there and the Zionist movement (consisting of both political and religious features) which has influenced the state of Israel extensively.

The most important thing to understand is that the state of Israel has been under the control of Amalekite Jew masters/bankers in North America and Britain. Consequently, the governing political parties there have typically been controlled by external Amalekites; and in fact, the political leadership in Israel has consisted largely of Israeli Amalekites (Ariel Sharon may or may not fit into this mold).

But with the Amalekite control, there is much present depravity in the state of Israel--just as there is much depravity and wickedness in the United States (where the Amalekite masters/bankers rule supreme). The purpose of this chapter and the following comments is to address some of that depravity and understand the source of power behind it.

More From Jack Bernstein

While previous presentations have already described some of the sexual depravity in Palestine, there is more that needs to be said. Of course, various observers, including Jewish persons of some intelligence and honesty, have pointed out many of the problems in Jewish Palestine. But perhaps the most pungent and sharpest criticism has come from an American Jew named Jack Bernstein, as quoted earlier.

Bernstein immigrated to Israel (this process is called making “aliyah”) before 1970. He initially went to a kibbutz to live for six months and to learn Hebrew. While at the kibbutz, Bernstein met a Sephardic Jewess from Iraq named Ziva. In time, Jack married Ziva and had two children. It was this marriage which first alerted him to the problems in the state of Israel. In his words, he says that his eyes were opened.

Jack’s problems, in trying to find suitable employment, will be cited below. Suffice to say, this condition led him to eventually open his own tour-guide service. But Jack was different from the other tour operators. He had a tendency to show his clients the real world in the Israeli state--the world of gross problems, as will be shown below.

Perhaps this exposure made Jack an enemy of the Israeli state and created still more problems for him in trying to live and exist in that environment.

After six and a half years of disillusionment and despair over conditions in Israel, Jack returned to the United States and began an effort to educate and inform Americans over the depravity that he had discovered in the Israeli state. He became a leader in a pro-American work which eventually published at least two writings from Jack which described his reaction to the Jewish state in Palestine.

Jack’s second work came out in a small booklet entitled “My Farewell to Israel, the Thorn in the Mideast.” The following presentation will summarize Jack’s conclusions about the Israeli state.

The Marxist, Socialist and Communist Tie

Early on, in his booklet, Jack Bernstein makes the charge that the modern Israeli state is a Marxist-Socialist-Communist state (“My Farewell to Israel, the Thorn in the Mideast,” p. 2).

This same feeling was echoed by a Jack Bernstein relative from South Africa, named Brian Singer. In Israel, Singer found it to be a Communist state. He said “I didn’t come to Israel to live with a bunch of Commies” (ibid, p. 4).

In the Israeli state, Jack says that every one of the 150 kibbutzim present are affiliated with one of the Communist or Socialist parties (ibid, p. 25). The linkage of the Amalekites to the left wing Socialist and Communist movements has already been established by this writer. Jack only confirms the reality.

In talking one day to a couple of East European Jews, one of them told Jack that Soviet Russia was their ally and that in 1949 Golda Meir (Ambassador to the old USSR) had made an agreement with Moscow that Israel would talk peace but would never agree to settle the Palestinian problem or discontinue her Communist policies.

In return, this Jew told Jack that the Soviets would adopt a pro-Arab stance to camouflage their true intentions. In 1967, following the Six-Day war, diplomatic relations between the Soviets and Israelis were severed. But this was all a screen because conditions have continued as before. As proof, this Jew said to check the Israeli stores and note the Communist goods (ibid, p. 25-26).

While the Amalekite ties to the left are well established (in the color red), this remark that Jack picked upon is interesting. After all, it brings to mind the situation in the last 20 years where Amalekite Jews in Israel and North America have shipped vast quantities of technology and military hardware to Communist China. Is it not clear that these Amalekites are still Communists?

The reasons why the Amalekites have been so closely linked to Communism and other left-wing motions have been or will be explained in some detail in various other chapters herein. In particular, a subsequent chapter will address an Amalekite Jewish movement, called the Sabbatians (as cited earlier herein), which has had a profound effect upon the Jews, and of course, world history for the past four centuries.

Discrimination and Racism

The first big clue on the outright discrimination and racism practiced by the Ashkenazi Jews in Israel arose when Jack married Ziva. Since he was an Ashkenazi Jew and she was a Sephardi Jew, it brought problems to Jack. He could not get work and experienced some of the same discrimination that she and her Sephardic colleagues faced.

As discussed elsewhere herein, the Ashkenazi Jews are European in background while the Sephardi are mainly from the old Spanish and Portuguese countries.

There is a third category of Jews which are technically known as Oriental Jews (their source is from the Moslem world of North Africa and the Middle East). However, over time, both of the Sephardim and the Oriental Jews have been merged into one definition. They are both now called Sephardim.

Many of the Sephardi Jews are somewhat darker in color than the ruling Ashkenazi Jews, and actually have a considerably different culture (interestingly, the Sephardi culture is closer to the original Jewish culture; and thus, more Scriptural). Along with Ashkenazi hatred and discrimination towards the Arabs, the Ashkenazi leaders show the same hostility towards the Sephardi Jews.

Per Jack, in Israel, Sephardic Jews are called “kooshim” (the Hebrew word for “niggers”) because they are of darker skins (ibid, p. 4).

While this Ashkenazi discrimination against the Sephardim has been great over the years, there are a couple of points worth mentioning. First, some of it is changing. The present President of Israel is a Sephardic Jew from North Africa named Moshe Katsav. While his wife is an Ashkenazi Jew, one must wonder how this important post slipped from Amalekite control.

The next big issue which must be highlighted is that the discrimination against dark-skinned Jews is nothing like the religious discrimination against the Ultra Orthodox Jews-- both Sephardim and Ashkenazim. The Ultra Orthodox are extremely religious people who walk the extra mile to try to obey The ELOHIM. While they may not be perfect, they are wonderful examples which Christians could learn much from.

But just like there is much persecution and discrimination against small Christian fundamentalist sects in the United States, the same thing is true in Israel with the Ashkenazi hatred and opposition to the Ultra Orthodox. This problem will be discussed in detail in a later chapter on this subject.

Sexual Licentiousness and Perversion

The sexual licentiousness and perversion among the Amalekites have been already outlined by this writer in former chapters. It is now almost redundant to begin to cover those problems of moral decay and sickness. However, this reality is one of the key issues raised by Jack Bernstein.

He charges that in the modern state of Israel, prostitution is rampant. Because there is so much Ashkenazi persecution and discrimination against the Sephardic Jews, many young Sephardic girls (as young as age 14) are forced into prostitution (ibid, p. 16).

Even more tragic and sickening, the state of Israel has significant homosexual, transvestite and pornography problems (ibid, p. 16, 19). AIDS is also becoming more of an issue-- perhaps largely because of the fact that Israel has a “large” homosexual population (ibid, p. 19).

Other Social Problems

With its Marxist orientation, it is clear that the Israeli state would be a welfare state just as is true with the United States, Canada, Britain and much of Europe. Jack makes this welfare state connection and charges that Israel is kept afloat by the billions of US dollars supplied Israelis each year by the US taxpayers (ibid, p. 2).

Apparently, the Israeli Mafia (organized crime) is powerfully present in much of the Israeli state (ibid, p. 16)--as is true in America. Extortion is bad and many cafe owners have to make pay-offs to the Mob, police and government leaders to stay in business.

Comments heretofore have already described the power of the Amalekite Mob in the United States. Manifestly, that same Amalekite controlled Mob dominates in Israel and indeed in other parts of the world.

The Israeli Police State

Before coming to Israel, Jack Bernstein, like other Americans, believed that the Israeli state was a democracy. But Jack suggests that that impression is false because, in fact, the Israeli state is a police state (ibid, p. 5).

Bernstein proves his allegation with a statement of how prisoners are treated in Israel (ibid, p. 30-31).

Prisoners are forced to stand long periods of time (in order to exhaust them); are refused toilet privileges to the point of having to urinate on themselves; have thick bags put over their heads and their arms handcuffed and tied behind them to put pressure on their wrists; have their stomachs stomped on and repeatedly kicked; have their testicles squashed and are beaten on their genitals; have their hair pulled, their heads beaten against the wall and are left hanging with heads down; have sticks pushed up their anuses; have cigarette butts put out on their bare skin; have their relatives brought in and subjected to abuse in front of the prisoners; have ball point pens forced into prisoners’ penises; and are kept in cells 28 inches wide by 6 feet long for weeks at a time.

Israeli Influence Overseas

One of the most damaging charges against Israel is Jack Bernstein’s charge that she “has been instrumental in aiding the establishment of dictatorships in Africa and to a degree elsewhere in the world” (ibid, p. 2).

The Israeli support for Communist China is mentioned above and elsewhere herein. Suffice to say, the Israelis, under Amalekite control, are doing about the same thing internationally that the Americans are doing. Both states exist for and serve the Amalekite plutocrats who really call the shots in both areas and much of the world (as will be described at length in later chapters herein).

Satan’s Playground

As Jack Bernstein wrote it-- “No country could become as corrupt and sinful as has Israel through a normal chain of events. It would seem that there had to be some evil force at work.

“It would be well to note the evil history of the leadership of Israel and their followers. For centuries, they (the Bolshevik Jews) practiced atheistic Socialism/Communism in various European countries, especially Russia.

“These Bolshevik (Ashkenazic) Jews, along with the Zionist oriented Jewish International Bankers, succeeded in overthrowing the Czar of Russia and imposing communist rule on the Russian people. With the aid of Bolshevik Jews who had migrated from Russia to America, they have been able to spread their evil, satanic influence throughout America and extending it world-wide.

“Many of these communist Jews from Russia and other European countries, who migrated to Israel, took with them the socialist/communist plans of Karl Marx. With the help of American Bolshevik Jews, they were able to take control of Israel and impose the socialist/communist plans of Karl Marx.

“Running parallel to the Bolshevik movement was the Zionist movement, which had basically the same goals--world domination. At some point after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the Bolsheviks and Zionists meshed together and became one. They are now commonly referred to as Zionists.

“During Biblical times, God promised the Jews of those days to be His messengers and He gave them special privileges--if they would obey His word. The Bible tells how these Jews disobeyed the word and began adoring idols. Frustrated over the disobedience of the Jews, God said, ‘Ye are of the Synagogue of Satan.’

“The atheistic Zionist leaders of Israel and their followers have apparently adopted the ‘Synagogue of Satan’ and through their leadership have made Israel a virtual ‘Satan’s playground.’”

The Talmud and Protocols

The Farewell booklet lists two major sources of literature which has influenced the Ashkenazi Jews more than anything else. Jack identifies these two as the Talmud and the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” (ibid, p. 6-11, 17).

As outlined previously herein, the Ashkenazi Jews largely stem from the Khazar kingdom in Asia when the king there, King Butan, wanted a national religion. Both Islam and Christianity were ruled out. Accordingly, Butan selected Judaism and imposed it upon his people (in hopes that it would instill some measure of morality and integrity in his corrupt people--as discussed elsewhere herein).

Jack says that these Khazars were forced West and became eventually the Ashkenazi Jews of Europe (ibid, p. 6). One of the most important writings affecting them was the Talmud, per Bernstein (ibid, p. 6). Jack believes that the Khazars stem from Japheth and not Shem at all (the writer of this study at hand disagrees with this conclusion and maintains that they are Amalekites, as noted earlier).

The “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” was the second major writings affecting the Ashkenazi Jews (ibid, p. 11). Bernstein actually quotes portions of the Protocols and indicates how they have influenced the modern Ashkenazi Jews.

Mr Bernstein believes that much of the racial discrimination found among the Ashkenazim can be traced to both the Talmud and the Protocols. For sure, these two writings look down upon all non Jews as goyim cattle and dogs.

This study at hand will discuss both the Talmud and the Protocols in some detail in later chapters herein. There is no intent to try to cover those writings at this time. While Jack is surely correct on the Protocols, he apparently has missed the point on the Talmud, as was communicated in prior chapters herein and as will be further addressed in later chapters.

Follow-Up on Jack in America

Jack Bernstein’s booklet on “Farewell to Israel” offered some remarks on the after-effect of his first writing on conditions in Israel. He says that after reading Jack’s words, two Jews contacted the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith (which is more extensively covered in various other chapters of this study) and asked questions about the findings of Jack.

The immediate reaction of the ADL was not to attempt to repudiate Jack’s message. Instead, the ADL started asking intimidating questions of the two Jews who had contacted them (ibid, p. 1). The ADL wanted to know-- What’s your name? What’s your address? Where do you work?

Naturally, the two Jews became fearful and hung up the phone without supplying answers to the ADL intimidation. They were fearful that the ADL would begin a program of harassment, and that they might lose their jobs and face other troubles from the ADL.

In another follow-up issue, the booklet on Farewell had a picture of Jack Bernstein (ibid, on the back cover). He had large sun glasses on--obviously to hide his eyes and some part of his face. Like other people, who have spoken out, one must be very careful to avoid being murdered. For sure, the Mossad, the ADL and other Amalekite Jew hate groups would easily murder a man like Jack without much provocation.

This Writer’s Views

The findings of Jack Bernstein are important to address at this time in connection with the conditions in the Israeli state. Frankly, the evidence is massive that indeed the words of Bernstein have credible support. After all, the Amalekites rule the United States just as they rule the state of Israel. Much of the evil Jack cited in Israel is present in the US.

But in fairness, this writer does have a few minor differences with Jack’s findings--as pointed out above and in previous chapters.

While the Bernstein linkage of the Ashkenazi Jews to Marxism and later their transformation to Zionism seems clear enough, there is really more to it.

Zionism correctly involves two separate features. There is political Zionism and a religious Zionism where deeply religious Jews (who probably are by and large true Israelite Jews) love the idea of aliyah and living in Israel on religious grounds. Bernstein does not recognize this distinction.

Actually, much of the political Zionist movement to Palestine from 1869 to 1948 involved political Zionists who were Marxists (as pointed out above). But since 1948, there has been a decided shift to religious Zionism.

YAH is in Charge

But there is a strange feature which escapes almost every person who tries to look at this theme. The evidence is massive that The ELOHIM has been directly in charge of both movements.

True, the political movement has been inspired and led by extremely bad Amalekite Ashkenazi Jews (who are really gross workers of evil). Howbeit, people loose sight of the fact that if it was necessary The MOST HIGH could and would raise up stones to do His will. While others may have lagged behind in establishing a Jewish state, the evil Amalekites were willing to do it.

Obviously, the entire and totality of religious Zionism hangs upon religious faith and the oversight of The HIGHEST. Per YHWH’s Word, the people called the Jews (yes, both good Israelite Jews and evil Amalekite pretenders) have a job to do in Palestine.

Racially, the Arabs could never have performed the work of righteousness there as demanded in the Scriptures. Only the Jews, good or bad, could do this work. And YHWH is now and will in the future use these Jews for this work of righteousness and truth in the Middle East.

Subsequent chapters herein will spell out the Scriptural reasons on why the Jews had to go to Palestine and establish a Jewish state. The reader is asked to be patient because everything will come together on this theme in the later chapters.

Chapter 456--Control of the Israeli Government

Surely the Kahilla Exists Today

Surely, the Kahilla or Cahilla (as described in a former chapter) is in existence today somewhere and perhaps under the management of a modern Ha Ahad Ha’am (logically, in New York City, London or perhaps even in the state of Israel). If it is in Israel, its status must be open to question because there is an Israeli government there with a parliament and a Prime Minister (and recently, a modern religious Sanhedrin, as will be discussed in later comments herein).

It’s hard to fathom that some other secret Jewish organization could be directing the Israeli government from behind the scenes (but it seems to be true, as is manifested in the US and Britain).

Too, the Israeli government has been largely in the hands of secularist Ashkenazi Amalekites since 1948. Since the Amalekite Ashkenazim have controlled the Israeli government, there may be little need for any Amalekite secret government directly present in Israel (as it is in the Christian West and especially in North America and Britain).

Barry Chamish

The previously quoted Israeli author Barry Chamish may have the right insight on the government of Israel, vis-à-vis the (Amalekite, ed) internationalists calling the shots in Britain, North America and parts of Europe. Chamish was on the “Dreamland” program on Feb 4, 2001, to offer his insight on several questions (like the Knights Templers and the brethren of YESHUA, as discussed earlier herein).

Barry believes that the globalists and internationalists in North America and Europe are calling the shots in Israel, as well as in America and Europe. He specifically names the Bronfmans, some other important US Jews, the bankers and the Council on Foreign Relations (the Rothschilds, Warburgs and Lazards and by all means George Soros must be added to the mix).

Chamish suggests that these fat cats control both the Democrats and Republicans in the US and the Labor and Likud parties in Israel. Thus, whoever wins in either state answers to the globalists.

“The Jerusalem Post” of Feb 23, 2001 (p. 6), inadvertently admitted this control when it acknowledged that the Israeli media has long been seen as a bastion of the left. The US controlled media has been discussed in former chapters in the vein that powerful Amalekite Jew bankers/masters control the Western, Christian press and use it to promote their agenda on the New World Order (as manifested in the leftist motions).

Obviously, these same powerful Amalekite Jew internationalists (some of whom were named by Barry Chamish, as noted above) do the same thing in the state of Israel, where they control the media and even much of the population and government.

Per Barry’s view, the globalists are behind the present Middle East peace efforts--which will surely become reality in time (as late as Nov 9, 2001, plutocrat Edgar Bronfman has called for the dismantling of Israeli settlements and unilateral separation from the Palestinians--per Nov 9, 2001, “Forward,” p. 1).

Barry says that the globalists need this Middle East peace to proceed with their plans for world rule. He notes that this was the very issue which caused the assassination of former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin (as briefly reported in a prior chapter).

Chamish charges that the Israeli intelligence people pulled the plug on Rabin when it appeared that he was going against them in the peace talks (specifically, Barry says that Shin Bet agents pulled the trigger). They then set up the patsy who took the fall and was convicted for the murder (apparently, the Rabin killing was similar to the John F. Kennedy killing in the US in 1963, where the patsy Oswald took the fall).

Secret Rulers over the Israeli Government

If Barry Chamish is correct, as quoted above. it means that the Israeli government itself (which Chamish says is “corrupt”) is not calling the shots worldwide.

Instead, powerful internationalists in Europe and North America are the people calling the shots and trying to run the world. Though Chamish did not use the word Amalekite, he did name some of the Jews involved (like the Bronfmans), who all seem to be Amalekite bankers/masters.

If Chamish is right on this, the global Amalekite conspiracy ruling the US, Britain and certain other nations also rules in Israel. This option opens the door that the controlling Amalekite Kahilla is located in New York or London and not in Palestine at all (as some right wingers want to believe).

Frankly, from this writer’s assessment, Barry Chamish seems to be essentially correct. The same Amalekite Jew bankers/masters living in and calling most of the shots in North America and Europe call most of the shots in Palestine. But importantly, these bankers/masters do not call all of the shots in all of these places. There could be some streaks of local independence (not many, but perhaps some).

More Views

There is a prevalent opinion among many American right-wingers that the Israeli government actually rules the United States. Even some intelligent Jews share this thinking. For example, the Jewish activist Jeffrey Blankfort claims that instead of Israel being a client state of the US, it is clear that it is the other way around (Oct 7, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 11).

While this idea from Blankfort is interesting, the writer of this study takes the view that the US is not a client of the state of Israel, nor is Israel a client of the US. Actually, the evidence is massive that both the US and Israel (plus the White British Commonwealth) are puppet states of the super rich Amalekite plutocrats, largely in North America and Britain. This seems to be the thinking of Barry Chamish, as well.

That there is some power or influence over Israeli politics and politicians, there is no doubt. This option was brought out in terms of the Likud party by Ayoub Kara, one of the Likud members of Parliament.

Per Kara, “There are senior people in the Likud who are sick of all this, but they are afraid to speak out because of the police investigation. If they’re scared to speak, they must have something to hide. We have to rid the Likud of the forces that have taken it over, so that this party doesn’t become a mafia.”

Kara’s words were presented merely as a remark in a column entitled “Quote-Unquote” in the January 13, 2003, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 53). The quotation offered no explanation of what Kara may have had in mind. Obviously, he raised questions of the possibility of an Israeli police state managed by someone other than the Israeli Knesset.

Chapter 457--Israeli Politics and Peace

The Temple Mount, Revisited

The political ramifications on-going in Israel are closely connected to religious conflicts which will be addressed in the succeeding chapters. This condition invokes a need to revisit the question of building a Third Temple on Moriah.

When religious Jews gain access to the Temple Mount (discussed earlier) and start rebuilding the Temple, there really will be some major explosions among the Israelis. Just as Christians passionately hate the idea of animal sacrifices and a rebuilt Temple, the evil Amalekites share the same disposition. They, too, are bitterly opposed to the Temple and the resumption of the daily sacrifice.

To demonstrate how incredibly opposed Jewish Amalekites are to the idea of a new Third Temple on Mount Moriah, all one has to do is spend some time looking at the record of events over the past few years, as associated with the peace negotiations between Ehud Barak, Yasser Arafat and President Bill Clinton.

The peace negotiations in Washington and in the Middle East have been or will be detailed elsewhere herein. There is no need to cover those presentations at this stage.

Suffice to say, there are some subtle features of the negotiations which conclusively prove how the liberal, leftist Amalekites are utterly opposed to religious Jews and Judaism (the Judaism, as in evidence in the Orthodox establishment, to be covered in the following chapters).

As will be elaborated upon in a later chapter, one of the key negotiating points back in July 2000 was the question of sovereignty over the Temple Mount. Religious Jews wanted some Jewish access to the Temple Mount. Barak and his liberal allies could have cared less. Barak was even quoted as effectively saying that he didn’t care whose flag flew over the Dome of the Rock.

Arafat Was Offered Much

In the July 2000 negotiations, Barak was prepared to offer sweeping concessions if Arafat would just agree to a peace treaty (Oct 23, 2000, “Time”). Hindsight has proven that Arafat and his Arab buddies were stupid for turning down the several liberal offers from Barak.

All along, the Israelis could have followed the advice, wisdom and perception of some intelligent and perceptive Israeli leaders and completely liquidated the Arabs (as will be further discussed in subsequent comments). In fact, if the Arabs keep messing with the Israelis, this very thing may happen in the coming days. They may all be expelled or killed.

As a minimum, the liquidation of the Palestinian Arabs would have opened up some land that Americans and other House of Yisrael Israelites could have fled to when their nations are destroyed in WWIII. Regardless, as elsewhere discussed herein, the Palestinian Arabs are not going to last long in that land. When YESHUA comes, they are on the way out (to make room for the return of the House of Yisrael).

As things turned out, following Arafat’s blunders, the Intifada surfaced to really disrupt the peace discussions. But Clinton was on the sidelines pushing for more negotiations and a final peace settlement (assuredly, he was following the dictates and wishes of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters, who ruled his administration).

Despite this push, religious Jews also were dissatisfied with the prospects of losing access to the Temple Mount (as noted earlier). So the Amalekite bankers/masters calling the shots had rebellion on their hands from religious Jews in Israel--as well as the Palestinians. There were prospects of a total collapse of the so-called peace talks.

The Fox

But Barak cleverly entered the arena to play the role of a cunning fox. Seeing trouble on the horizon on his sell out of the Temple Mount and religious Jews, he resigned and called for new Prime Minister elections on Feb 6, 2001. He had three potential opponents to deal with--Ariel Sharon, Binyamin Netanyahu and Shimon Peres (in his own left wing, Labor party).

With his resignation and call for new Prime Minister elections, it meant that Netanyahu could not run against him--unless the Knesset changed the law (which didn’t happen, since candidates were limited to Knesset members). Netanyahu was not only a popular, local politician, but he was somewhat of a supporter of religious Jews and Jewish access to the Temple Mount. He would never agree to a sell out of the mount.

Peres was a liberal leftist. But he could not get support of sufficient left wing Knesset members to run. It is unclear what events took place to eliminate the Netanyahu and Peres opposition, but it is highly likely that Barak and his colleagues were behind the moves.

In any case, this paved the way for Barak to only be faced with Ariel Sharon (who some believed was a real, hard-line right winger and a person who was not liked among many of the secular Israelis). Because Sharon was thought to be unpopular, Barak thought that he could easily defeat him and get a new mandate for his policies. The outcome of the election will be addressed shortly below.

The Clinton Plan

With the end of the year and term facing Clinton and the Amalekite bankers/masters in late 2000, Slick proposed a new initiation in Dec 2000 to Barak and Arafat (and one which surely met with the approval of the Amalekite bankers/masters in league with Slick). Clinton’s plan involved several features viz:

A new Palestinian state would be finalized on the West bank of the Jordan, Gaza and East Jerusalem (including almost all of the Old City--except for the Western Wall, the Jewish quarter and a part of the Armenian quarter in the Southwest). Jerusalem could be the capitol of both the Jewish and Palestinian states in the vein of a divided Jerusalem--East Jerusalem for the Arabs and West Jerusalem for the Israelis.

In the land deal, the Arabs would get all of Gaza and around 95% of the West bank (with land links between the two portions). The US would give both the Arabs and the Jews massive new sums of money and federal recognition and support (to include placing two US embassies in the new capitols in Jerusalem--one for the Jews and one for the Arabs).

The former Jewish spy Jonathan Pollard would be released from jail and allowed to emigrate to Israel. Furthermore, Israel was to receive a new surge of US military technology, including data on the development of the anti-missile defense system.

Part of the 800,000 displaced Arab refugees could emigrate to the Palestinian state, but could not return to the Jewish state. However, the US and her European and Japanese allies would give these people (who choose to not return or could not return to the Palestinian state) vast sums of money to pacify them.

Finally, the Slick plan called for the Muslim Palestinians to have sovereignty over the Temple Mount, and the Jews would have guaranteed rights to the Western Wall. In time, this would be the most profound point in the whole deal.

The Secret Agreement

According to the Jan 15, 2001, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 5), Slick and the Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak entered into a private agreement (apparently a secret understanding) that Israel would accept the plan. Per the secret plan--Barak, Clinton and Arafat were scheduled to hold a high profiled ceremony and sign the agreement on Jan 10, 2001, at the US White House with many Arab dignitaries present.

Political pressure was to build up and force or induce Arafat and the Muslims to accept the new peace plan which Barak and Clinton had agreed upon. Presumably, some of the other Arab states would endorse the plan and also put pressure upon Arafat (as did happen in the succeeding days).

Just after the pagan Christmas, Barak went on Israeli television and said that he was prepared to accept Slick’s latest proposal and that he and the Israeli nation would have to move forward with some new dramatic concessions.

This was an unprecedented surrender to Arafat and gave him virtually everything he wanted, except for the full rights of all dispersed Palestinians to return to the land areas of Israel (that were evacuated by the Arabs in the 1948 war). This became a point of disagreement for the Palestinians (although Arafat finally came out and said that he could accept the basic plan).

Obviously, religious Jews (primarily the Orthodox) were being sold out in order for Barak to get a peace treaty with the Palestinians. Of course, the secular Amalekites, both in Israel and out in the world, could have cared less about the Temple Mount. They were perfectly happy and content to see it given away. After all, these Amalekites hated the very idea of a new Jewish Temple.

But many religious Jews did not sit back and allow Barak to give the mount away. A NPR news report on Dec 31, 2000, noted that some Ultra Orthodox said that Barak was a traitor and that his administration was a criminal government. Much Jewish opposition arose in Jerusalem, as details of the plan leaked out.

Barak Vacillated

Barak became a hated man (his popularity plunged in Israeli polls), as many right wing Jewish protests surfaced to cause him and the secret plan enormous difficulties--including 400,000 protesting Jews near the Temple Mount on Jan 8, 2001.

Perhaps religious Jews were able to create such a storm of opposition to the planned give-away, so much so, that within a few days after saying that he would accept the Clinton plan, Barak back-stepped and reversed himself by saying that “no,” he had some problems with the Clinton plan (one report even suggested that he would also have some opposition to Arab sovereignty over the complete mount).

Actually, a reversal like this was almost par for the course for Barak. He had a reputation for being very indecisive and bouncing around on issues. For example, upon losing the February 2001 Prime Minister election (to be shortly assessed), Barak said that he was quitting politics.

However, in later discussions with Ariel Sharon on serving in a national unity government, Barak initially agreed to become Defense Minister.

Subsequently, Barak reversed himself once more and said that he would not serve with Sharon and that he was “retiring” from politics and government service (as a matter of information, a national unity government with Likud and Labor did surface in 2001, but it fell apart in Nov 2002 and forced new elections in Jan 2003).

Why?

Ultimately, the question must be asked why would Barak enter into a secret agreement with Slick to give up the Temple Mount. For sure, Barak was and is a politician. The whole idea that he was willing to sell out so many of the Israelis (at least, all of those who were religious) to simply get a peace treaty made no sense at all. For sure, they were voters who could cause him some trouble. Something was afoot.

Perhaps the case can be made that Barak and his Labor colleagues were, by and large, Amalekites with no sense of honor, integrity or religion. This option could be just one more manifestation of the Amalekite assault upon truth. Surely, the Amalekite bankers/masters in America and Britain would be pleased with the sell-out (as indeed, their spokesman Slick Clinton would, as well, since it could help his legacy).

But the whole thing was still questionable for Barak to be pursuing. It was such a bad decision that one must take a second look at what might be behind the why. A subsequent appendix, discussing the depravity and wickedness of Slick Clinton, opens the door to some evidence of the payment of a billion dollar bribe to Slick and his Amalekite handlers by the oil rich Arab states.

The very mention of a billion dollars opens the door to who all might could share in this giant pay off. As will be asked later, is it possible that Barak or some of his leftist colleagues in Palestine were offered part of this money? Actually, “Spotlight” of Jan 1 & 8, 2001, had a front page story by George Nichols on “Secret Slush Fund Buys ‘Peace’?” which suggested this very thing (to be discussed later).

In any case, the late Dec 2000 developments made it clear that Barak and his liberal colleagues ruling the modern state of Israel had no love or appreciation for the Jewish religion or Jewish religious people. Barak was clearly not on the side of The ELOHIM. He was a key player who was actually working to destroy Judaism and its roots here in the age end.

Barak, Clinton and Rich

A former chapter discussed the Slick Clinton pardon actions in January 2001 just before he left office. Among the 190 or so pardons (140 of them on Slick’s last full day in office), Clinton pardoned an Amalekite crook, swindler, con-man, double crosser and tax evader ($150 million from the United States alone) named Marc Rich (who was then hiding out with his billions of dollars in Switzerland).

As outlined in the previous discussion on Rich, the point was made that a number of influential Amalekite Jews wrote letters to Slick on behalf of Rich (who had never served a day in jail for his many alleged crimes). In the March 1, 2001, congressional hearings, information came forth that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak made a personal telephone call to Slick to urge the Marc Rich pardon.

The Mar 12, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 11) had a story by Michael Collins Piper on “Clinton ‘Friend’ Links Blackmail to Rich Affair” which reported that the Israeli Mossad had highly critical information on Clinton’s illegal activities in the Whitewater scandal and used it to blackmail Slick into pardoning the Amalekite Marc.

Piper quoted Clinton friend and former Under Secretary of the Treasury Roger Altman, who publishes the “National Enquirer.” In his paper of Feb 27, 2001, Altman charged that the Mossad actually blackmailed Slick into making the pardon. Altman (a probable Amalekite Jew) is a colleague of the Israelis and the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters who rule America. So this charge is interesting.

Some support for this option came from a “New York Times” report of recent which suggested that Rich had once been a Mossad agent or colleague in some manner. Actually, this is not unusual because almost all Jews worldwide work for and support the Mossad whenever they are asked or needed. So surely, the Amalekite big shot Rich would collaborate with (or be a boss of) the Mossad.

The Pay-Offs

Since it is now public knowledge that Rich paid Clinton and the Democrats at least $2 million (actually, the bribes were probably substantially greater than this, if the truth ever comes out), one must ask what Rich paid Barak and the other Amalekite Jews to enlist their help in insuring the pardon. Obviously, Rich was a billionaire who could and would gladly shell out some money to benefit himself.

In any case, billionaire Marc Rich clearly appears to be one of the powerful, global, Amalekite masters who pull the strings and make governments and politicians jump. Either he had power over Barak and his other Amalekite supporters or he bribed them, along with Clinton, in order to insure their support for his pardon.

While logically, the money payoffs (bribes) to Slick Clinton would probably have been enough of a motivation for Slick to have made the pardon, it must be noted that there was opposition from Clinton aides on pardoning Rich. Apparently, many of Slick’s White House associates opposed the Rich pardon (per testimony of Clinton aides at the congressional hearings on March 1, 2001).

Furthermore, many or most of the Slick pardons were done without going through the US Justice Department (as is supposed to be the correct procedure). Above all else, per Justice, no person is to be pardoned, unless he has done some jail time and shown evidence of rehabilitation (which Rich never faced since he was a fugitive who completely fled US justice).

The Israeli Elections

As discussed above, Ehud Barak tried to play the fox in arranging for new elections on Feb 6, 2001--which would end up pitting him against the supposedly unpopular Ariel Sharon. But things didn’t work out as Barak planned.

Actually, it turned out that Sharon was far more popular than Barak imagined (or rather, it was that the Israeli people hated Barak more than he allowed). In any case, Sharon won the election and became the man in charge in 2001.

Barry Chamish, quoted earlier, suggests that the globalists ruling Barak would also rule Sharon. So either way, the status quo would continue and nothing would change (in terms of the later Jan 2003 elections, Barry would have surely said exactly the same thing).

The 2001 election spelled out a couple of fall outs which may prove to be especially significant. First of all, Sharon made it clear that the Arab-Israeli peace talks were back to step one and presumably would not be resumed until the Arabs stop the violence. He also suggested that he would be the hard-liner which identified him in the past.

The “Washington Post” of Feb 7, 2001, noted that a day after his election victory, Sharon donned a skullcap and went to the Western Wall to say prayers which sent an unmistakable signal that there would be no more Jewish concessions to the Palestinians on the control of the old city of Jerusalem.

Sharon told reporters that “I am visiting Jerusalem, the capital of the Jewish people for the past 3,000 years and the united and indivisible capital of Israel--with the Temple Mount as its center--for all eternity” (Mar 2001 “End Time News,” p. 2). But if he was controlled by powerful Amalekite bankers/masters outside of Israel, Sharon’s stance on the Arab-Israeli peace talks would change dramatically (as it did somewhat).

In the coming days, the powerful Amalekite plutocrats in North America and Europe must have put pressure upon him to be more receptive to peace (which is what the bankers/masters want because of their push for world government, as discussed in a former chapter). Students of truth will have to sit on the sidelines and continue to watch events as they unfold (and especially, after the Jan 2003 elections).

Sharon also talked about and eventually was able to obtain a national unity government with Labor. In the new government, Labor and some of the other parties have shared power.

Labor’s leader Shimon Peres was the new Foreign Minister (until Labor pulled out of the coalition in Nov 2002). Certainly, Peres is a man in league with the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in the Diaspora to help push the peace plan in the new government.

Joel Skousen

Joel Skousen will be further quoted in a later chapter herein. As will be pointed out, this man seems to have a very good grip on what is happening internationally. In this vein, he is editor of the World Affairs Brief on the Internet.

The June 2002 “Believer’s Advocate” (p. 10-11) had an article on Joel Skousen’s perception, as translated from a Hebrew article in Israel in early 2002 on “B. USA Against Sovereignty--Ammon Lord in Major Rishon,” pp 10,11-26.10.2001. The article said:

“What are we fighting for? Not for Greater Israel but to ensure that Israel remains an independent state. We are struggling for the continuation of Israel as an independent state-- ‘the third Jewish Commonwealth’, as described by journalist Rino Rzur in his column in Hair.

“Joel Skousen, an American friend of Israel and editor of the Internet newspaper, World Affairs Brief, is sure that Israel’s sovereignty is in danger. His recent visit to Israel was to warn us of the risk of losing our sovereignty. Skousen is an expert on the political connections to terrorism. He told me in the lobby of the Crown Plaza Hotel in Jerusalem that ‘The war in Afghanistan is a false war against terrorism’. He continued, ‘This does not look like a real war. America has another agenda, which is connected to the oil in the region and throughout the Muslim areas to the south of Russia’.

“Skousen is very cynical of America under the leadership of President George W. Bush. He is no less cynical of Israel under the leadership of Ariel Sharon and, for that matter, of his rival, Binyamin Netanyahu. Skousen says that Sharon also has another agenda that is not always in the national self-interest of Israel. He is working in cahoots with the international community. Sharon is conducting the war against terror only half-heartedly. It is not clear how much he is involved with the international community, but Skousen suspected Sharon as soon as he asked Ehud Barak to become his Defense Minister and then when he made Peres his Foreign Minister. Peres is the most prominent representation of the European Globalists. According to Joel Skousen the most important goal of the New World Order is to break down national sovereignty. The most recent and powerful example of this came during the Yugoslavian war when all of Kosovo was placed under international authority. Joel Skousen says it will be hard to do the same in Israel but that is the goal, even though he does not believe that they will succeed.

“I asked Joel Skousen how the war against terror should be undertaken here in Israel. Joel Skousen: ‘Israel must go into Area A and confiscate all the terrorists’ weapons. That is the main objective. The PA must be stripped of all its weapons and its armaments industry must be destroyed. There is no difference between the PA and other terror groups. After all the arms have been collected there will be an interim, a period in which we have to go after everyone possessing illegal guns. After that, a new PA will rise without connections to terrorist groups.