EZEKIEL
and YHWH’s
Judgment
for the
Good News
PEOPLE
VOLUME XXIX
Amalekite Conspiracy
EZEKIEL and
YHWH’s
Judgment for
the
Good News People
Volume XXIX--Amalekite Conspiracy
by
an unworthy
servant
And you shall
know the truth,
and the truth
will make you free.
(John 8:32)
Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005
CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho.
The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this
publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property
protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the
United States. Permission is granted to
quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web
site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID
83808, USA.
Contents
Volume
XXIX--Amalekite Conspiracy
CHAPTER
PAGE
- Cover
Page 1
- Title
Page 2
- Contents 3
- Publisher’s
Preface 5
Part KKKK--Judges 9
449 Judges
9 6
450 Media
Control 14
451 Amalekites
in Many Places 25
452 The
Early Amalekite Push to Rule 29
453 Some
Amalekite Successes 33
Part LLLL--The Amalekite
Internationalists
454 The
Amalekite Conspiracy 43
455 The
Modern State of Israel 50
456 Control
of the Israeli Government 58
457 Israeli
Politics and Peace 61
458 The
Amalekites Versus Religious Jews 73
459 The
Secularization of Religious Jews 87
460 Israeli
Intelligence Organizations 97
461 Amalekite
Control in the West 99
Part MMMM--The Cunning Amalekites
462 Amalekite
Plotting in the West 105
463 The
Amalekites Call the US Shots 111
464 Yes,
Amalekites Control US Politics 118
465 Clannish
Edomites 129
466 Double
Crosses and the Amalekites 136
467 Amalekite
Sabbatianism 151
468 Amalekites,
in Conclusion 161
SHEERIT
YISRAEL
PO Box 473
Calder, Idaho
83808, USA
Publisher’s
Preface
Greetings! The following presentation is volume
twenty-nine of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and
YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at
the www.age-end.com web site.
This overall effort provides an
interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to
the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies
relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be
understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its
beginning--from page one of volume one.
Anyone trying to read this volume or
the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion
without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be
read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost
certainly end up missing the essence of the message!
The
effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word
6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point
type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8”
and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).
For
further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks
(IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom;
or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not
available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped,
self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.
With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks,
the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible
(with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE
UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey
Him. Shalom (peace) to you and
yours!
an unworthy
servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE
Chapter
449--Judges 9
Abimelech
Along
the same line of thought from the previous chapters on the allegorical meaning
of the word "tree" in the Scriptures, the book of Judges (chapter 9)
has an interesting parable about a man named Abimelech who decided that he
would take charge and rule over other people at a very early time. He actually came to be one of the OT judges
(a usurper), who ruled Yisrael for three years (Jud 9:22).
The
Judges 9 parable concerns the olive tree, the fig tree, the vine, the bramble
bush and seemingly others. As the story
goes, the olive tree was too busy to rule over the other trees; also, the grape
vine was too busy; and the fig tree was too busy.
But
the bramble bush stepped forward and arrogantly asserted that he would rule the
trees (Jud 9:1-57). And he would have
continued to do so were it not for YHWH’s apparent act to intervene and cause
problems for Abimelech, evidently after three years (Jud 9:22-23). This sounds much like an ante-type of the age
end Beast.
In
explaining the Judges parable, the point was conveyed that Abimelech, an evil
man, who killed 70 of his half brothers, was the bramble bush, which Young's
"Analytical Concordance" says is a low thistle or thorn bush. As a person can quickly discover in an
assessment of this prophecy, it is profoundly important in the scheme of things
if correctly understood.
Identity of the Trees
Elsewhere,
in other Scriptures, the identity of the various trees are stated and made
plain. For example, Yisrael, possibly in
her unified sense, is the olive tree (Ps 52:8; 128:3; Jer 11:16; Hos
14:6). On this, it is also true that
sometimes Yisrael prophetically, is, or will be in the future, a
"green" olive tree--implying one that is fresh and flourishing (per
Young's).
In
fact, this olive tree symbol probably is referring to not only Israelites
generally, but more precisely to Israelites who have been transformed to the
true Hebrew religion or will be so changed in the future with the reality of
the coming New Covenant.
In
the way of preliminary support for this thesis, Moshe wrote that the children
of Yisrael were to be a kingdom of priests and a separated and set apart
(Hebrew kodesh) nation (Ex 19:3-6). With
this background, the Apostle Shaul’s opening remarks on the olive tree allegory
(mentioned in prior chapters) also referred to the olive tree in the context of
being "kodesh" and consecrated (Rom 11:16).
Manifestly,
the words of Moshe and Shaul combine to add a definite religious dimension to
the racial factors associated with the olive tree. Obviously too, in this context, individual
Israelites are olives or olive trees, as the Book also states (Zech 4:3-12; Rev
11:4).
Consequently,
in these cited examples of the "olives," all of the persons involved
in the descriptions are not only Israelites, but they are undoubtedly, more
correctly, Israelites of the true religious faith of YHWH, as observed by
Avraham, Moshe and certain others throughout history. This fact substantiates Shaul’s just
mentioned remarks.
The Vine
Going
on, one finds that the vine is clearly identified as the House of Yisrael (Jer
6:9; Hos 9:10; 10:1; Joel 1:7).
Again,
the prophet Yirmeyahu had some more perceptive comments when he actually went
so far as to say that the House of Yisrael was not only a vine, but one planted
as a choice vine. This choice vine had
went on to become one with degenerate shoots of a wild, strange (nokri)
vine--evidently because of a subsequent transition into a melting pot of
various humans/humanoids (Jer 2:21).
Here,
please note that even though they were degenerate shoots of a wild vine, they
still remained a vine. Therefore, if one
follows the same analogy with the olive tree, which must be done, then it
follows that the wild olive shoots outlined by Shaul are Israelites, regardless
of the fact that they are wild and cut off from the good stem.
The
whole thrust of this reference by Shaul is that the grafting in process has to
address Israelites (who had been divorced and/or cut off from YHWH and thence
"wild"), whomever they might be, and wherever they might be located
(in a new wilderness land). There is
just no way that any other persons could be involved in this message.
The Fig Tree
As
the Scriptures assert, the fig tree is clearly the Jews and/or the House of
Yehudah (broached earlier), as Yirmeyahu so correctly observed--many centuries
ago (Jer 24:1-10). Please note, again,
that by Yirmeyahu's perception, there were both good figs-Jews, as well as bad
figs-Jews.
And
also, as mentioned earlier, it could be that The MESSIAH’s outline of the
parables of the sheep and goats (Matt 25:32-33) and of the wheat and tares
(Matt 13:24-30) both address the situation with the Jews (as well as with
Yisrael generally).
Perhaps
it is because of this exact situation (of good figs and bad figs being present
together) that the fig tree symbolizes the House of Yehudah and/or the Jews,
collectively. After all, the Jews have
undergone a process of miscegenation with nokri/nekar aliens over the
centuries, coupled with an outright amalgamation of numbers of Kenites and
Amalek-Edomites. Truly, the racial Jews
are a product of good and bad.
It
is no wonder then that YESHUA would so often refer to the fig tree when He
sojourned among us (Matt 21:19-21; 24:32; Mk 11:13, 20, 21; 13:28; Lu 13:6-7;
21:29; John 1:48, 50). Not only did He
make these frequent references about the fig tree; but in one instance, He even
placed a curse upon it, as outlined previously (Matt 21:19-20; Mk 11:13-14,
20-21; Lu 13:6-9).
A
question can surface here on "why" for the curse? Assuredly, the fig tree has had some
"bad" qualities and features (perhaps the just noted presence of the
nokri/nekar Amalekites) to probably justify the condemnation and curse. Yet, despite this fact, YESHUA does allow for
its ultimate rebirth and blooming in the age end (Matt 24:32; Mk 13:28). Incidentally, did this curse end in 1948 or
1967? It could be!
James 3:12
Additionally,
on this theme, Yakov (Jas 3:12) elsewhere observes that a grape vine cannot
bring forth figs (so the House of Yisrael could never be the Jews), nor can a
fig tree bear olive berries (hence, the wild olive shoots cannot be Jews from
the House of Yehudah). Here, one might
pause to refresh his/her thinking with the earlier citation of YHWH's act of
pruning off some of the natural, olive branches (Rom 11:23).
Paradoxically,
if a fig tree cannot produce olives, as Yakov clearly said, then it seemingly
cannot bear wild, olive shoots or even natural, olive branches to be pruned
off, as indicated by Shaul. The answer
to this enigma is obviously complex and this writer would dare not attempt to
be dogmatic in interpreting it.
However,
the solution to this dilemma probably lies in the definition of the trees. Perhaps both the vine and fig tree are
addressed from a strictly fleshly viewpoint; while evidently, the olive tree
involves both fleshly and spiritual dimensions, as noted above and as will
shortly be elaborated upon.
Consequently,
it might well be that the broken or pruned off olive branches constitute
"good" Jews, both from a religious and racial perspective. So the place one can come to here is that the
House of Yehudah, collectively (the fig tree), is not responsible for the
production of the good Jews (from both a religious and racial context).
Bad Figs
Incidentally,
on this idea that there was something wrong with the House of Yehudah which did
act to preclude her from totally producing "good" Jews (figs), one
only has to consider Yirmeyahu’s remarks (Jer 24), cited earlier, in
conjunction with Shaul’s comments about the pruning of the olive tree, as
discussed earlier.
Indeed,
it is evident that the House of Yehudah has been extremely responsible for sin
and miscegenation, coupled with her outright acceptance, assimilation and
integration of numbers of Amalek-Edomites and other nokri/nekar strangers into
what should be the true, recognized, legitimate remnant of Yisrael.
Manifestly,
the overall House of Yehudah and/or the collective Jews have been grossly
damaged; though certain, individual, true Jews could maintain their own
personal integrity and religion and remain good figs.
In
support of this possibility, there are a host of good reasons to believe that
the stem and/or root system of the olive tree not only goes back to the
patriarchs and their ability to fleshly produce seed; but also, to them in
terms of their personalities, characters and their true, Scriptural, Hebrew
religion (which played a role in establishing the character of their
progeny).
To
be sure, the House of Yehudah, on her own merit, seems to have produced many
"bad" figs and therefore cannot bring forth olives, as Yakov asserted
(Jas 3:12).
The
good (racial and religious) figs found in the remnant of the House of Yehudah
might be there--not because of the leadership, policies, actions and thinking
of the collective Jews or the House of Yehudah; but rather, are there in spite
of such adversities.
Hence,
it is possible that the Jewish branches, which were broken off of the olive
tree by YHWH, were, in fact, both racially and religiously, good ones drawing
upon their ancestry and the Hebrew religion for sustenance. Truly, it is this Israelite racial and
religious system which has produced the good Jews and not the corrupt practices
of the fig tree House of Yehudah or the Jews collectively.
Admittedly,
in time, and perhaps during the Babylonian exile or later, the true Hebrew or
Israelite faith was contaminated by a few unscriptural Talmudic factors,
probably traceable to the bad figs who had become so entrenched in the House of
Yehudah. But can one condemn the whole
religion of Judaism over the pollution which had crept in? This question was assessed in former
chapters.
The Thorns
However,
in returning to the Judges 9 prophecy, please observe that the bramble bush,
under discussion, is a low life, thorn bush (obviously, producing thorns and
briers). Of most importance for
interpretation, the Canaanite inhabitants of the land of Yisrael and apparently
other nokri/nekar aliens (including the Edomites, who crossed with the line of
Cain) were clearly called thorns (Num 33:55; Jud 2:3).
Moreover,
these very thorns (Amalek-Edomites and/or Canaanites) could well have been the
precise thorn in the flesh which bothered Shaul and possibly others in New
Testament times as well (II Cor 12:7).
As a matter of information, the idea of someone being a thorn in the
side of another person is a very old figure of speech which is still used
today.
For
example, the April 8, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 19) had a news report by
Douglas Waller on “The Thorn in His Side, Part II” with a photograph of
President George W. Bush and his long standing opponent, Senator John McCain. Nothing needed to be said beyond the headline
and the photograph; because, for some years now, McCain has been one of the
primary opponents and critics (yes, a thorn in the side) of GWB.
Manifestly,
it would be easy to see that this expression had some recognition and use in ancient
times. Of course, by letting the
Scriptures define themselves, it is clear that the thorns and briers were
certain racial/ethnic peoples who did cause much trouble and concern to the
various Scriptural people of Yisrael.
Someday,
some, many or all of these thorns and briers will meet their YHWH ordained fate
and judgment--they will be eventually burned up, as was described earlier (Isa
9:18; 27:4).
A Tree is Known by its Fruit
In
the NT, there is an interesting text which also seems relevant here. On this, YESHUA said that you can know men by
their fruits and that men cannot pick grapes from thorns (thorn bushes) or figs
from thistles (Matt 7:16). Moreover, a
good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, nor can a corrupt tree bring forth
good fruit.
Every
tree that does not bring forth good fruit will be cut down and cast into the
fire--in judgment by YHWH (Matt 7:17-19).
Manifestly, grapes (which are House of Yisrael Israelites) cannot come
from a thorn bush; nor can figs (at least true, Jewish, Israelite figs) come
from thistles.
Therefore,
persons of Canaanite, Amalekite and/or Satanic ancestry cannot possibly be
Israelites. Since they cannot be
Israelites, they seemingly cannot be converted or become a part of Yisrael in
any definition. They are corrupt and
evil and will one day be judged by YHWH.
Of
course, this whole discussion on the thorns and bramble bush has to be
significant because it may tie in some way to the genealogy of the Jews, as was
discussed elsewhere in this study in terms of YESHUA's commission which
seemingly omitted the Jews (Matt 10:5-6).
“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” Revisited
This
linkage of thorns to the Amalek-Edomites has support from the Sabbath teachings
of ancient Jewish synagogues.
Specifically, Piska 2 has a commentary on Proverbs 15:19 in the context
of a slothful man being like a hedge of thorns.
The slothful man is supposed to be Esau (in allegory, the Jews evidently
thought that this was Rome in Second Temple days).
Thus,
the Amalek-Edomites are like a prickly hedge to keep jabbing at a man to bring
on the head tax, general tax, agriculture tax, animal tax, etc. When the man cannot pay the excessive taxes,
Esau exacts heavy fines and imposes drastic penalties (“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,”
p. 23).
Does
this sound familiar in terms of the modern House of Yisrael nations, now being
controlled and heavily taxed by Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters?
Edomite Thorns Tie to Idolatry
“The
Book of Legends Sefer Ha-Aggadah,” with legends from the Talmud and Midrash,
links thorns to idolatry in two amazing ancient stories (p. 43).
An
item number 53 offers some comments upon Genesis 25:22, in the vein of
Rebekah’s pregnancy. The story is that
when she would pass a synagogue or house of study, the unborn Yakov was
scurrying in his eagerness to get out.
And when passing houses of idolatry, the evil Esau was scurrying in his
eagerness to get out.
In
a commentary on Genesis 25:27, and the remark on the growth of the two boys,
Yakov and Esau, an item number 55 quotes R. Levi, who said that (at first) the
boys were like a myrtle and a wild rose growing side by side. As they grew up, the former (Yakov) would
yield its characteristic fragrance (reho) and the latter (Esau) its thorns
(hoho).
Going
on, the boys studied and went to school until age 13. At the end of the 13 years, one son (Yakov)
went to houses of study and the other (Esau) went to shrines of idolatry.
Abimelech From Cain?
In
going back to Abimelech and the parable from Judges, please recognize that
though Abimelech was a son of Gideon, he also was a mixed blooded son of a
slave woman from Shechem (Jud 8:31; 9:18).
The question now surfaces--was this woman a Canaanite or Edomite, so
that Abimelech was a nokri/nekar racially?
Well,
as a matter of fact, the Book does link in tandem the presence of the Canaanite
men of Hamor to Shechem, the home and base of support of Abimelech. Possibly, his mother and some or even all of the
other peoples of Shechem were Canaanites and thus nokri/nekar thorns.
Additionally,
on this, an article in the Winter 1992 "Radical Reformation" (p. 30),
by Wayne S. Nelson, on the Book of Judges, discusses this issue and concludes
that the author of Judges “implicitly identifies Abimelech as morally and
spiritually a descendant of Cain and therefore of the seed of the
serpent.”
Though
Nelson does not attempt to link Abimelech to Kain on physical, racial grounds,
this condition must not be overlooked.
If Naamah was the wife of Ham, as Jewish tradition has it, then the
Canaanites (to likely include Abimelech through his mother) were surely of the
lineage of both Kain and Kain’s father (Gen 3:1-4, 12; II Cor 11:3; I Jo
3:12).
Regardless
of Abimelech's true racial background, the writer of this study would have to
agree with Mr Nelson. And this might all
have something to do with why the Jews were not enumerated in YESHUA’s
commission, which was discussed in preceding chapters.
The
very mention of Shechem is relevant because the Talmud says that Shechem is the
place where bad things happen and the place “set aside for punishment” (Sotah
11a, Jan-Feb 2001 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 9).
As noted earlier, Jewish tradition has it that Eliphaz lurked after
Yakov at Shechem. And per Ben Sira, the
evil Edomites dwelt at Shechem. Shechem
is further addressed in other remarks elsewhere herein.
Yeshayahu's Perception
This
presentation on the thorns creates a need here to mention a very important
prophecy by Yeshayahu--which he interestingly saw fit to repeat. Early on, he realized and said that in a
coming time of doom for the House of Yisrael, the vine of Yisrael would be
removed from its inhabited land and only thorns and briers would remain (Isa
5:6; 7:25; 32:13).
It
would appear here that, in effect, these words by Yeshayahu would apply at
least to the ancient House of Yisrael, if not to the ultimate age ending House
of Yisrael. And what remained in the
land (Samaria) after the fall of Yisrael in the 7th and 8th centuries BCE? Why, nokri/nekar Cutheans, Canaanites,
Edomites and others who took the land over (all of whom appear to be thorns and
briers, symbolically in the Book).
Obviously,
Yeshayahu, in prophecy, was not allowing for the Samaritans, Canaanites,
Edomites and other mamzer peoples in the land to be linked to the vine of
Yisrael which was removed. Assuredly, as
Yeshayahu saw it, all of these persons were not Israelites; but were, in fact,
thorns and briers. The essence of this
is that the Samaritans and the others are not of Yisrael, contrary to the
wishes of some who would so argue.
There
is a final consideration on these amazing prophecies by Yeshayahu. Since prophecy is dual and repetitive in
fulfillment and since the House of Yisrael faces a second, coming period of
punishment from YHWH for sin (Ezek 4-7), it is evident that when the House of
Yisrael is once more thrust into captivity for the last time, only thorns and
briers will remain in her then existing land (Isa 5:6; 7:25; 32:13).
The Bramble Bush
Going
back to the Judges allegory under discussion, the bramble bush is clearly
linked to Abimelech. But there has to be
more to this parable than just a focus on Abimelech. Frankly, it would appear that the whole story
is one of far reaching prophetic implications--if one could but understand
it.
Both
Mattityahu (Matt 7:16) and Luke (Lu 6:44) say that a tree is identified by its
fruit and that neither grapes or figs, racially, come from the bramble bush
(which produces thorns, as noted above).
Consequently, it must be surmised that the bramble bush is categorically
not of true Yisrael.
Who
then, ethnically or genetically, is the bramble bush? Elsewhere, in the Word, it is useful to note
that at a described fall of Edom, thorns and brambles surfaced therein (Isa
34:13).
Thus,
could brambles be linked in some way to the Edomites? Evidently, the answer is yes--in view of
their links to Kain (from Esau’s marriages with Canaanite women and possible
other ties to the Kenites) and the bramble bush’s arrogance of power, as
suggested in the Abimelech prophecy.
Hence,
this likelihood intensifies as one considers the situation in the first
centuries BCE and CE when the Herods (Amalek-Idumeans) ruled over the Jewish
remnant, the Temple and part of the Palestine area. One of the several complaints about Herod’s
rule was his devotion to high taxation upon the common people (“Judaism From
Cyrus to Hadrain,” p. 336, 364).
High
and oppressive taxation was also one of the things mentioned about the Edomites
in Piska 2, cited above. Truly, the same
thing has happened today. Thus, in more
modern times, Amalekite Khazars, using their great riches and wealth, are in
enormous positions of strength and influence over the House of Yisrael and
other portions of the globe at large.
They still love high taxes.
Chapter
450--Media Control
The Amalekite Media Power Base
If there is one single definition that
has materially contributed to the incredible success of the Amalekite Jews to
literally steal the Christian West and implement fantastic control measures
(right and left) which are and will utterly destroy Adam in the Christian West
(and particularly, in the House of Yisrael nations and peoples), it is the
media and entertainment industries.
Literally, on the surface, there would
seem to be an incomprehensible array of thousands and thousands of newspapers,
magazines, Internet sources, movie studios, radio and television companies and
so forth in the Christian West. At a
first glance, many observers would believe that this mass of businesses and
activities is totally divided and competitive to the last drop. But that belief is not the truth.
The December 27, 1999, “Spotlight” (p.
12-13) had an article by Michael Collins Piper on “Handful of Families,
Corporations Controlling the Global Media Monopolies,” previously cited, which
got to the heart of the problem by laying out most of the major firms and
interconnections and owners (most of which involve evil Amalekite Jews).
Since whole books have been and can be
written on this theme, the comments herein will be limited. But a few names and connections will be outlined
to prove the point.
AOL-Time-Warner, Revisited
Previous comments herein on Amalekite
crime briefly mentioned the situation with the AOL-Time-Warner Company and
several of its major Amalekite owners, players and controllers over the years (like
the previously described Bronfman family and its vast holdings).
While some persons could lose sight of
the Amalekite presence by becoming impressed with Ted Turner and his ties to
AOL-Time-Warner (actually, Turner’s former ties because the Amalekites moved in
on him and removed him from power in AOL-Time-Warner, as pointed out earlier),
the fact remains that AOL-Time-Warner’s major bosses are largely Amalekite
Jews.
How big is AOL-Time-Warner? It is enormous (a $350 billion
company)--owning many movie and video companies, various cable franchises,
Turner Broadcasting (including CNN), numerous magazines (Time, People, Sports
Illustrated for Kids, Life, Fortune, Money, etc), many major book publishers,
AOL (America On-line, the giant Internet service provider--with the early 2000
merger) and on and on.
The Seagrams (liquor) Company,
mentioned in a prior chapter, is (or has been) also owned and/or controlled by
the Bronfmans. It is another big player
in the media and entertainment industries.
Seagrams is a major stockholder in AOL-Time-Warner--plus Universal
Studios, the Universal Music Group, Polygram and other major music and
television companies across Europe.
More Media Control
The previously mentioned Rupert Murdoch
(Amalekite?) owns or controls a whole assortment of media enterprises all over
the world, through his News Corporation--including the New York Post, the
Weekly Standard and Fox Television.
Another likely Amalekite Jew, Michael
Eisner, runs Disney Corporation; which in turn, owns or controls ABC radio and
television, Miramex Films (under the leadership of the two evident Amalekites
named Harvey and Bob Weinstein) and a whole host of newspapers, other
publishers, television companies, etc (locally and globally).
The VIACOM Company is one more of the
huge media and entertainment companies with major holdings in Paramount
Pictures, MTV and the Blockbuster video chain.
It is also in the process of acquiring CBS radio and television from
Westinghouse.
VIACOM is headed by Sumner Redstone
(whose name doesn’t sound like an Amalekite name; but since he has close ties
to the Israelis and looks like an Amalekite, he probably is one).
General Electric controls NBC, CNBC,
the Bravo cable channel, Arts & Entertainment, the History Channel and
Court TV. It is unclear as to how much
of General Electric is in Amalekite hands.
But one can be sure that much of it is owned/controlled by
Amalekites.
SONY is another large media and
entertainment giant, ostensibly controlled by Japanese billionaire Oboyki Idei
(who is thought to be a front man for the behind the scenes Rockefellers--per
“Spotlight”). As pointed out elsewhere
herein, SONY seems to be an acronym for Standard Oil of New York. The
Rockefellers seem to be Christian Amalekites as well (as noted earlier and to
be addressed in the following chapters).
The German media company Bertelsmann
(established in 1835) is the next major media player. This company owns Random House Publishing and
many other publishing enterprises scattered all over the world.
Still More From “Spotlight”
As is true for General Electric,
“Spotlight” did not spell out the Amalekite ownership and/or control of Bertelsmann. But it is a certainty that Ashkenazi
Amalekites are heavily involved. That’s
why WWII was fought--so that the plutocrats could steal much of Germany and
Japan.
The “Spotlight” article said that there
were eleven major companies which controlled the bulk of the American media
industry in 1989. Today, there are the
nine powers, as described above. As the
“American Free Press” noted in a 2002 article, two of these nine power centers
are owned by one family. This source
also noted that every single supermarket tabloid is owned by just one, single,
super-rich, Wall Street firm.
The “what is happening here” question
can be simply stated. Media power is
being centralized into fewer and fewer hands (mostly Amalekite Jews), which is
the same phenomenon happening in all businesses all over the world.
If all of that wasn’t enough, it is
interesting that the Bush people have a plan afoot which will further
centralize media power into fewer and fewer hands. This story was brought out by Michael Collins
Piper on “Media Giants Crave Absolute Control” in the Dec 16 & 23, 2002,
“American Free Press” (p. 1, 20).
Per Piper, the Federal Communications
Commission (the FCC, under the chairmanship of Colin Powell’s son Michael) is
considering a plan to loosen or do away entirely with regulations that limit
the number of newspapers and radio and television outlets that a single company
can own. This will open the door for a
handful of Amalekite Jew bankers/masters to completely take over the whole
industry.
Amalekite big shots like Mort
Zuckerman, S. I. Newhouse, the Bronfmans and others will quickly move to
consolidate their media powers once the industry is deregulated. They then can more easily control the
political future of the US.
Incidentally, a former chapter briefly
mentioned the situation in Russia where the Amalekite Khazars have been
attempting to take control of the Russian media business. The billionaire Zionist leader and evident
Amalekite, Vladimir Gusinsky (or Gushinsky), has owned much of the Russian
economy, plus one important Moscow TV station (which he may have lost or is
losing).
Vivendi
While the above cited nine major media
players have and still seem to control the essence of the media and
entertainment businesses in modern America, another development surfaced
temporarily in the early 21st century to further complicate the question of
centralization into a few hands.
The basis of this new development was a
Frenchman named Jean-Marie Messier who controlled Vivendi, the world’s largest
drinking water company in France.
Within the last couple of years (in
2000-2001), Messier and his colleagues branched out into the US media and
entertainment market in a big way to form another media giant, appropriately
called Vivendi. Vivendi’s story was told
in the April 29, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 50-51), in an article by Daren
Fonda.
Apparently, the method that Messier
used to get into the US media and entertainment markets was through a major
acquisition of some of the stock of the liquor company Seagram, which was
controlled by the super rich Bronfmans (in a stock trade of Vivendi stock for
Seagrams, which allowed Edgar Bronfman Jr to become the Vice-Chairman of
Vivendi).
Thus, Messier moved in on Seagrams; and
in turn, the process allowed him to take temporary control of various
publishing, music, telecom and Internet operations (in the form of the Vivendi
media empire, per “Time”). In total,
this conglomeration is or was a $55 billion global giant which certainly puts
it in the operations of the other media power houses.
The entire article in “Time” (“The
French Rejection,” by Daren Fonda) failed to clarify at least a couple of
relevant points of concern. Obviously,
in 2000-2001, there had to be a question of the continuing role of the
Bronfmans and AOL-Time-Warner. Was the
Bronfman power block still directly involved with Universal Studios or did they
exit the Hollywood scene with the arrival of Messier?
As 2002 developed, Messier allegedly
didn’t do very well in running the Vivendi media empire or something else
happened to place him at odds with the real Vivendi controllers (who, as it
turns out, were the Bronfmans). So
Messier was kicked out. Another
Frenchman named Jean-Rene Fourtou took over Vivendi as Chairman.
The Jul 15, 2002, “Time” magazine (p.
37-41) had a follow-up story by Daren Fonda on the intrigue in a story on
“French Fiasco.” Apparently, Messier put
together the Vivendi media giant and Edgar Bronfman Jr and some of his
colleagues later joined forces to kick Messier out and replace him with Fourtou
(this action proved who really was running Vivendi).
The essence of these stories from
“Time” seems to be that the Bronfmans were the power players behind the scenes
pulling the strings at the new media giant Vivendi and that people like Messier
and Fourtou have been only front men. In
other words, the Bronfmans and their AOL-Time-Warner giant may still run
things, but in the background and with a much lower profile.
The second big issue that one must
broach in this new look is whether Messier and the later Fourtou were Amalekite
crooks or not. Reportedly, Fourtou’s
real name is Jean Bernard Levy, suggesting that he is indeed an Amalekite Jew
who has changed his name (Jul 21, 2003, “American Free Press,” p. 1). The situation with Messier still remains
unclear. But he too could be an
Amalekite Jew crook.
The fact that that both of the
Frenchmen are probably in the billionaire class makes one be very suspicious
that both of them are Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in order to play games with
the super rich Bronfmans. In which case,
it only means that some new Amalekite faces have arrived on the media
block.
More on the Newspapers
The Washington Post Company is another
major media company in alleged Amalekite hands (the Meyer-Graham group). The Post not only controls the newspaper and
Newsweek magazine, but a 50% interest in the International Herald Tribune and
the Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News Service, plus numerous other
publications and TV stations.
The famous Reuters news service of
Europe was created by and owned by the Rothschild family (“The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK,
RFK & MLK,” p. 21).
Some eight more major media companies
own and/or control almost all other major newspapers in the US, plus a large
number of radio and television companies, magazines, book publishers, etc.
This list includes the New York Times
Co. (owned or controlled by the apparent Amalekite Sulzberger family), Advance
Publications (which includes 26 newspapers, plus the weekly Parade
magazine--owned or controlled by the likely Amalekite Newhouse family), Gannett
Co., Cox Enterprises, E. W. Scripps Co., Hearst Corp., Times Mirror Co. and
Knight-Ridder, Inc.
Besides this list of traditional
newspapers, all of the major super-market tabloids are owned by one single Wall
Street firm (as noted above).
“Spotlight” also quoted a prominent
media analyst and critic named Ben Bagdikian who says that some 50 men and
women (who are chiefs of their corporations) control more than half of the
ideas and information reaching all Americans daily. No wonder it is called the controlled
media.
How many of these 50 are Amalekites was
not stated. As already noted, most of
the American media and entertainment industries are in Amalekite Jew
hands. So clearly, many of the 50 are
Amalekites (who also are likely bankers/masters and leaders within the
Amalekite Jew community). Obviously too,
the Rockefellers also still retain some media power (but not much in comparison
with the European based Rothschilds).
The tragedy of this centralized control
of the media means that a handful of people (apparently all or most all of them
are Amalekites racially or at least janissaries, as cited earlier and to be
further defined below) decide what is and what is not news. They decide which politicians are acceptable
for rule and which are not. They decide
which wars are good and which are not.
They decide what is truth and what is not.
Since this combine is so limited in
numbers and tightly controlled, it is clear that this small group of people can
sit around a table and decide the future of the United States and much of the
world. They are so powerful that the
gullible people (whose source of news, information and thinking comes from this
cabal) is completely mesmerized and controlled by them.
This Amalekite led group almost
completely controls the thinking in the United States and the White British
Commonwealth nations (like Australia, Canada, etc). They are also extremely powerful in South
America and Africa. Though they do have
enormous power in continental Europe, they do not control all of the European
media sources yet. Perhaps their weakest
area is Asia where there is some independence.
More on the Media Stranglehold
The
April 1, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. A-1 and A-2) had a lead story on “The
Media is the Enemy” which illustrated how far this stranglehold has gone. Previous chapters and the above presentation
have already mentioned the enormous Amalekite Jew power over the media and there
is little need to repeat those lines.
The
“American Free Press” said that “In the old Soviet Union, the government
controlled the media. Not a word of
substance would be published without prior approval from the Bolshevik
commissars. Today, in the United States,
the situation is starkly similar. But
most Americans--most sheeple--don’t even know it.
“In
the United States today, it is a select handful of superrich families and
tightly-knit financial interests--a plutocratic elite--who own the Big Media
and who control the government through their ownership of that media.
“Every
single one of the major media outlets is controlled by this powerful
interlocking combine...ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Time,
Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report, The New York Times, The Washington
Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago-Tribune--even such ‘regional’
giants as The New Orleans Times-Picayune,
The Miami Herald, the San Diego Herald Tribune... The list goes on and
on.
“And
these media powerhouses control dozens--actually thousands--of other daily and weekly
newspapers, magazines, and radio and television outlets across America (and
around the globe.) Did you know that
every single supermarket tabloid is owned by just one, superrich Wall Street
banker?
“To
consolidate their influence, the Masters of the Media and their international
corporate allies reward obedient lapdog journalists with membership in the
Council on Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission where they rub
shoulders with others in the international policy-making networks. A handful get promoted to the higher rank of
the secret Bilderberg Group.
“The
so-called ‘mainstream’ media is very much a ‘closed shop’ and only those
willing to do the bidding of the global power elite need apply. Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather and Peter Jennings and
other phonies are just the public faces that the American people see.
“Behind
the scenes are the shadowy owners and corporate power brokers who dictate what
you will (or will not) see in your daily newspaper or on the evening news.
“The
average American has no idea that superrich predators with names like
Rockefeller, Rothschild, Bronfman, Newhouse, Murdoch and Redstone are making
vast profits and achieving immense power through their stranglehold on the
American media (and increasingly, on media around the globe.)
“These
shadowy media controllers decide which politicians are ‘in’ and which
politicians are ‘out.’ (They made Bill
Clinton overnight. They also broke
Richard Nixon overnight.)
“The
Masters of the Media decide which issues can--or cannot--be debated. (Imagine a public debate over the Federal
Reserve system on Ted Koppel’s Nightline. It will never happen!)
“The
Masters of the Media promote the perverse, anti-Christian Cultural Communist
ideology that permeates publishing and broadcasting today. The Masters of the Media decide which are the
‘good wars’ and which are the ‘bad wars.’
The Masters of the Media decide who is the ‘hero’ and who is the
‘villain.’
“If
the Big Media decides that you will be the patsy, then the patsy you will
be. It’s that simple. Ask Lee Harvey Oswald or James Earl Ray or
Gordon Kahl or Randy Weaver or the victims of Waco. As we said:
THE MEDIA IS THE ENEMY.”
Bernie Sanders
The Jul 15, 2002, “American Free Press”
(p. 1) had an article on the controlled US media which quoted US Congressman
Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Sanders
said:
“One of our best-kept secrets is the degree
to which a handful of huge corporations control the flow of information in the
United States. Whether it is television,
radio, newspapers, magazines, books or the Internet, a few giant conglomerates
are determining what we see, hear and read.
“And the situation is likely to become
much worse as a result of radical deregulation efforts by the Bush
administration and some horrendous court decisions.
“Television is the means by which most
Americans get their ‘news.’ Without
exception, every major network is owned by a huge conglomerate that has
enormous conflicts of interest.”
Of course, Sanders is on the mark in
his remarks. The only thing that he left
out is that most of this control is exercised by a handful of Amalekite Jewish
bankers/masters.
Harold Wallace Rosenthal,
Revisited
Some
years ago, US Senator Jacob Javits of New York (a certain, Amalekite Jew)
reportedly had a young, Jewish, administrative assistant named Harold Wallace
Rosenthal (a likely Amalekite, who was discussed in preceding chapters). Rosenthal, age 29, was killed on Aug 12,
1976, in an alleged sky-jacking incident on an Israeli airliner in Istanbul,
Turkey.
In
1976, just before Harold’s death, Walter White Jr, editor of the “Western
Front” magazine, interviewed Rosenthal for a story (per a pamphlet on “The
Hidden Tyranny, the Rosenthal Document,” p. 1-18). Before publishing the report, Rosenthal was
dead and White, himself, was badly beaten.
White thinks Rosenthal was murdered by his own people (the Mossad?) because
he had a big mouth.
In
the interview with White, Harold was most revealing. For instance, he said: “We Jews continue to be amazed with the ease
by which Christian Americans have fallen into our hands. While the naive Americans wait for Khrushchev
to bury them, we have taught them to submit to our every command” (ibid, p.
1).
In
terms of the US money given annually to Israel, Harold noted that “The naive
politicians in Washington are gullible.
Most of them are not too bright so the powerful Jewish lobbyists
influenced this practice years ago and there is no one strong enough to stop
it” (ibid, p. 6).
On
anti-Semitism, Harold suggested that it “does not signify opposition to
Semitism. There is no such thing. It is an expression which we Jews use
effectively as a smear word--used to brand as a bigot like you guys--anyone who
brings criticism against Jews. We use it
against hate mongers” (ibid, p. 6-7).
Regarding
why Jews change their names when moving into various countries--Rosenthal said
that “Jews are the most intelligent people in the world so if it benefits them
to change their names they do so. That’s
all there is to it” (ibid, p. 8).
More From Harold
Going
on, Harold noted that “...We would all have better understanding between each
other--Jews and gentiles--if we spoke out more openly. Your people don’t have guts. We establish your thinking--we even place
within you a ‘guilt complex’ making you afraid to criticize Jewry openly”
(ibid, p. 11).
On
Jewish control of money, Rosenthal said that “At first, by controlling the
banking system we were able to control corporation capital. Through this, we acquired total monopoly of
the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television
media. The printing industry,
newspapers, periodicals and technical journals had already fallen into our
hands. The richest plum was later to
come when we took over the publication of all school materials. Through these vehicles we could mold public
opinion to suit our own purposes. The
people are only stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them,
whether they be truth or lies” (ibid, p. 15).
Regarding
the silent majority, Harold pointed out-- “There is no such thing as the silent
majority because we control their cry and hue.
The only thing that exists is an unthinking majority and unthinking they
will remain, as long as their escape from our rigorous service is the opiate of
our entertainment industry. By
controlling industry, we have become the safety valve of momentary
pleasure. The television and movie
industries furnish the necessary temporary distraction. These programs are carefully designed to
appeal to the sensuous emotions, never to the logical thinking mind. Because of this, the people are programmed to
respond according to our dictates, not according to reason. Silent they are; unthinkable they will remain”
(ibid, p. 15-16).
In
a comment on religion, Harold said “With our control of the text book industry
and the news media, we have been able to hold ourselves up as the authorities
on religion. Many of our rabbis now hold
professorship in supposed Christian theological seminaries. We are amazed by the Christians’ stupidity in
receiving our teachings and propagating them as their own... These deluded
children of the Church defend us to the point of destroying their own
culture... Through our influence of religion we were able to involve the
ignorant white Christians in war against themselves which always impoverished
both sides while we reaped a financial and political harvest. Anytime truth comes forth which exposes us,
we simply rally our forces--the ignorant Christians. They attack the crusaders even if they are
members of their own families” (ibid, p. 18).
Jack Bernstein, Revisited
A
preceding chapter quoted an American Jew named Jack Bernstein. Jack went to the state of Israel before 1970
as an immigrant. Bernstein, an
Ashkenazi, married a Sephardi girl and started a family. In time, he became disillusioned over the
gross evil and wickedness that he found in the Israeli state. He returned to the US and began a program to
inform Americans about conditions in the Israeli state.
Jack
published at least a couple of writings to discuss his findings. One of them, “My Farewell to Israel, The
Thorn in the Mideast,” was quoted extensively in a prior chapter on the Modern
State of Israel. One of the subjects
which Bernstein brought up in his Farewell booklet is the issue of the media
and how the Ashkenazi Zionists control it.
In
the first place, Jack charges that the Zionists and the Zionist oriented
international bankers control the American media, TV, radio, magazines,
newspapers, etc. With this control, they
paint a false picture about the Israeli state which is designed to get America
into one of their planned wars in the Mideast (ibid, p. 2).
Subsequent
chapters and Appendix D will address the 2002 and 2003 moves of the George W.
Bush administration to do precisely this very thing--as the drums of war have
been sounding quite loudly for more Bush wars in the Middle East. For sure, Jack Bernstein’s prediction could
have much merit.
Jack and the Protocols
Jack
Bernstein quoted the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” extensively
(which will be more fully broached herein in a succeeding chapter). While many Jews argue the validity of the
Protocols, Jack wrote in the vein that they represent truth and the efforts of
Zionist and Zionist oriented international bankers to control the world.
As
already noted earlier herein, whether the Protocols are a Jewish writing or not
matters little in the long run--because they have been coming true in the last
100 years.
The
most important Protocol quotations from Bernstein was the 7th and 12th
Protocols which addressed Ashkenazi Jewish control of the media (ibid, p.
14-15).
In
the 7th Protocol, Jack noted that it cited the power of the Jewish controlled
press to stimulate public opinion and force the goyim governments to adopt
measures which support the Jewish plans for world conquest. Jack says that since the Zionists control the
press, they give out the news they wish--tell the truth, distort it, or omit
it. He goes on to say that they found
out the power of controlling the press.
Protocol
number 12 also tackles the media question by focusing upon Jewish control over
the news media and publishing only what the Jews allow. This Protocol also asserts that the Jews
already dominate the minds of the goyim and only allow them to see world
affairs through colored lenses, which the Jews place before their eyes.
Jack
says yes that the Zionists manipulate the minds of the stupid goyim and the
average stupid Jew as well. He charges
that goyim and Jews will continue in this vacuum as long as they read the Washington Post, New York Times and
other Zionist owned publications.
The Effect of This Media Control
The above comments of Rosenthal and
Bernstein bring up another subject. A
previous chapter discussed the Doctor Laura program and how incredibly
deceptive it has turned out to be for the whole American conservative
movement--involving both Christians and Jews.
As outlined heretofore, Laura is either a racial-ethnic Amalekite; or
she, as a minimum, is a janissary robot.
As reported earlier, a man named
Richard Hoskins of Lynchburg, Virginia used (and defined) this janissary term
in some of his writings long ago--which evidently focused upon Amalek-Edomite
Jews or at least upon the controlled media and entertainment industries and how
Amalekite Jews and government authorities have been able to completely change
American values and beliefs in the last 70 years.
In the context of its use, a janissary
is a person who is not an Amalekite racially or ethnically. But he or she has been trained, brainwashed,
mesmerized and indoctrinated to blindly believe in, support, teach, advocate
and push the Amalekite agenda for the destruction of true Israelites with the
same dedication, purpose, resolve and commitment as a real Amalekite.
As established in the previous chapters
on this line, a janissary is a robot or zombiized individual who has no mind of
his own, but only functions in a state of confusion and daze of blindly
following the Amalekites and their agenda--without the foggiest notion of what
the result will ultimately be for him and his people.
A
preceding chapter on media control, in the context of humanism, assessed more of
the several factors at work in the modern House of Yisrael nations to turn the
generic Israelite population into janissary robots who blindly follow the evil
Amalekites down the road to Israelite destruction. These remarks do not need to be repeated here.
Of
course, this motion is propelled primarily by the media and entertainment
industries (which today, are essentially in Amalekite Jew hands, as outlined
above). However, there are other
influences at work as well to also push and prod this condition into
being. These were assessed in the former
chapters and/or will be addressed in the following presentations.
Dan Israel
In
his book on “Christianity Unmasqued” (p. 233), writer Dan Israel quoted a 1928
statement to Americans made by an apparent Amalekite Khazar Jew named Marcus
Eli Ravage. Marcus said “You make much
noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie
palaces. Very good; granted your
complaint is well founded.
“But
what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your
schools, your laws, and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every
day.” Ravage was an honest and
perceptive Jew who understood the reality of America--even as early as
1928. Imagine how this influence has
accelerated in the early 21st century.
Chapter
451--Amalekites in Many Places
A Surprise
While
the economic might and political strength of numerous Jews (like the
Rothschilds and Lazards, who are evident Amalek-Edomites) are well known in New
York, London and Hollywood, not much of the general public has been cognizant
of the fact that many leading, supposed Christians are also Jews of sorts, like
the popular Roosevelt (or correctly the Rosenfelds) family as well as George W.
Bush and Slick Clinton, all cited earlier.
Even
much evidence has surfaced indicating that the original Christian Rockefellers
were Jews (if so, clearly Amalek-Edomites because of their great propensity for
evil, money and power).
This
Amalekite possibility has been borne out in the fact that in his early years
old John D. Rockefeller was an agent and partner of the super rich Rothschild
in 19th century America (“The Elite Serial killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK &
MLK,” p. 76).
Messianic
Jew Len Horowitz of Sagle, Idaho (while on a Prophecy Club speaking tour) is
quite precise on this linkage in saying that the Rothschilds provided the
initial funding for old John D. Rockefeller in his early years.
Manifestly,
there was an early connection between the two families.
However,
at some point in time, the Rockefellers and Rothschilds drifted apart and
actually became opponents and competitors of sorts (as described earlier and as
will be further addressed in later comments)--although they may be coming back
together here in the age end (as elsewhere discussed herein in the merger of
Rockefellers’ Chase Manhattan Bank and the Rothschilds’ Morgan Bank).
A Revisit to Adolf Schicklgruber
And
most surprising of all people, the hated Adolf Hitler fooled almost all of the world
as to his true racial origin. As noted
earlier, the well known and hated Adolf Hitler was not, racially, a German
named Hitler at all.
As
pointed out several times earlier herein, Adolf was a Jew (a Catholic Jew)
whose real name was reportedly Adolf Schicklgruber (per articles in the
“Encyclopedia Britannica,” the “Universal Jewish Encyclopedia” and other
authoritative biographical sources). As
noted, there are several reasons to believe that Adolf was totally a Jew with
so-called Jewish blood from all directions.
There
are manifest reasons to believe that Schicklgruber was an Amalek-Edomite as
well and not a true Yehudi at all. He
certainly had the marks, signs, fruits and works of the wicked Amalekites. So he must have been one of them. Yes, when something walks like a duck, quacks
like a duck and looks like a duck; it must be a duck.
And
while it might be impossible for a person to try to ascertain the motives that
were present and lurking behind the scenes in the twisted mind of Adolf Schicklgruber
to propel him on in his quest for domination over others, the fact of his
racial ancestry could be material. What
a tragedy it is that the world has come to believe that this "kook"
was a German man.
Along
with Adolf’s Jewish ancestry, it is fascinating that his personal astrologer,
Erik J. Hanussen, was an (Amalekite, ed) Jew who was born in 1889 in Vienna,
Austria as Hershel Steinschneider (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p.
208). Evidently, he, like the
Schicklgrubers, decided to change his name (which is a common Amalekite trick,
as noted in former chapters herein).
More Surprises
For
years, the number two man in George Lincoln Rockwell’s American Nazi Party was
a Jew (actually a secret Amalekite).
A
number of leading Ku Klux Klan officials have been Jews (correctly
Amalek-Edomites)--like the Klan group in Bristol, Virginia in the 1980s and
more recently, the neo-Nazi Knights of Freedom, headed by Davis Wolfgang Hawke,
who is really an Amalekite Jew named Andy Greenbaum (many Klansmen are also
federal agents as a matter of fact).
The
Jul 19, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1. 8) had a story by Seamus McGraw on “Supremacist
With a Secret Named in Boston Bomb Plot.”
The focus of this report was upon the trial of Leo V. Felton, an alleged
“White supremacist,” who had spent considerable time in mental hospitals. He was arrested in Boston in 2001 on
allegations that he and his girlfriend “conspired” to blow up Jewish targets.
As
it turned out, Felton was a son of a Negro man (who must have had many White
genes) and a supposedly White Catholic nun who had turned to lesbianism. Besides being part Negro, the “Forward” story
revealed that his lesbian mother was part Jewish (surely Amalekite, ed). Poor Felton was born into this world with many
curses from his mixed genes--Negro, Amalekite and perhaps even some White
majority genes.
This
strange presence of evil Amalekites in the American right wing movements was
addressed in previous chapters and/or will be further assessed in the following
comments. In the case of these persons,
just mentioned, one must remember the grant of rulership made to Yehudah’s line
many centuries ago, to be assessed in succeeding chapters (Gen 49:10).
Another Surprise
Yuri
Vladiminovich Andropov (previously mentioned) was another interesting person
who spent much of his life in hatred and persecution of Jews. Andropov was head of the Soviet KGB for years
and always seemed to be one of the important people in the USSR to be
feared.
In
November 1982, the ailing Leonid Brezhnev died as head man (General Secretary)
of the Soviet Union. He was succeeded by
the sinister Andropov who had made his mark as one of the primary opponents and
persecutors of Soviet Jewry over many, many years. The primary benefit to the USSR Jews, on this
succession, was that Andropov was old and in failing health.
He
died on February 9, 1984--not really having the time in power to cause serious
trouble for the Jews, as was anticipated.
However, one of the fascinating features of Andropov’s profile
paralleled that of Adolf Schicklgruber.
Like Adolf, Andropov was ethnically a (supposed) Jew or more correctly
an Eastern European, Khazar, Amalek-Edomite.
Arabs or Amalekites?
Beyond
the Roosevelts, Rockefellers, some Bushes, Andropov and Schicklgruber, it is
also most interesting that Yasser Arafat could correctly be called a
Jew--actually a Moslem Jew (as pointed out earlier). Reportedly, Arafat’s mother was Jewish. Hence, by Jewish law, her son would legally
be a Jew (at least genetically), but he took the Islamic religion of his Arab
father.
Somehow,
Arafat has maneuvered the Israeli government into paying him a personal grant
of $8 million monthly that is deposited into his personal account with Bank
Leumi which transfers it to Paris (Oct 29, 1999, “Forward,” p. 1). The Israelis are not exactly stupid. If they are paying Arafat $8 million monthly,
one can be sure that they are getting something in return.
Is
it possible that Arafat is double-crossing his Arab colleagues with this
Israeli payoff? It could be! Also, despite his recent marriage to a Muslim
woman, he is alleged to be a homosexual pervert (besides a first rate
terrorist). All of this suggests that he
is really an Amalekite, posing as a Muslim.
In
1972, athletes from all over the world congregated in Munich, Germany for the
Twentieth Olympiad. While the games were
in progress, the Arab terrorist group “Black September” seized some nine
Israeli athletes and held them for 21 hours before eventually murdering them
when they saw that Israel would not meet their demands and the Germans were
moving against them.
The
significant thing about this Arab terrorist group is that the head man of the
involved team was correctly a Jew of sorts (that is--his mother was a
Palestinian Jew and his father was a Moslem Arab). Of course, he identified with his Arab father
with a passionate hatred toward the Jews.
Otherwise,
serious questions over the Saudi Arabian royalty appear in an article by Vendyl
Jones on “Who Was His Majesty King Hussein,” in the Jan-Mar 2000 “Petah Tikvah”
magazine (p. 55-57). Mr Jones alleges
that the Faisal family of Saudi Arabia was originally Edomite slaves in the
ancient Hashemite kingdom which took over the Trans-Jordan in the 20th
century.
Jones
claims that when Lawrence of Arabia tied with the Arabs, the British created
the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and gave it to the Emir Faisal I, who was a slave
to the Hashemite ruler, Sharif Hussein bin Ali, Emir of Mecca.
In
another interesting observation, Jones suggests that many of the Palestinian
people now in the refugee camps are a mixture of the Ishmaelites (Arabs) and
Amalekites. He adds that Jordan’s King
Hussein knew how treacherous they were.
Jones did not explain how or when this mixture took place. Presumably, it could go all of the way back
to Second Temple days or it could have surfaced in more modern times.
Chapter
452--The Early Amalekite Push to Rule
Amalek-Edomite Quest to Rule
Having
mentioned the Amalek-Edomites’ madness to rule and exercise power over Yisrael,
it would be well to review a little history of how incredibly evil that they
can be. Manifestly, their genetic makeup
translates to the motivation and thinking which propels and pushes them forward
to destroy true Israelites at all costs.
Manifestly,
they are racially part Canaanite, as previously described. In this sense, they have many of the same
genes as Abimelech, the classic bramble bush, as well as those of Kain and his
father Nachash (Satan). To appreciate
their mad, crazy mentality prodding them on to rule over Yisrael, it is needful
to revisit their power over Yehudah in the first century CE.
Previous
chapters offered remarks on how crafty, deceptive, dishonest and treacherous
Amalek-Edomites have been and can be.
Simple words cannot begin to describe their genetic depravity. However, one can see this wickedness in their
dominion over Yehudah and now the modern House of Yisrael nations.
As
also noted in earlier comments, the evidence is most persuasive that the
so-called Jewish community in Jerusalem, in the early first century CE, was
largely dominated and controlled (but not completely) by Amalek-Edomites with
the ruling Herods and their Herodian lackeys.
Assuredly,
these very people seem to have sold out the historic Jewish nation to the
Romans and Roman rule (which paved the way for the Herods to gain power over
Yehudah). Yet, the days did come when
these Amalek-Edomites evidently reversed themselves and provided much or all of
the impetus for the Jewish-Roman War of 66-70 CE.
Perhaps
the Amalek-Edomites believed that they might lose some of their power, control
and banking profits by 66 CE. Certainly,
something motivated them to promote or at least join in with other Zealot Jews
(which probably included some or many Jewish Amalekite proselytes, as noted
previously) in the early days of the revolt against Rome.
Amalek-Edomite Treachery
In
an article on “Treacherous Edom,” in the Nov 1997 “New Beginnings” (p. 7),
Josephus was quoted on his remarks on how the Edomites slew thousands of their
Jewish colleagues (evidently true Jewish Israelites) during the Roman siege in
order to continue the revolt and their control over the true Jews.
Suffice
to say, the last two years of the Jewish-Roman war saw the Amalek-Edomites
oppressing, fighting and killing true Jews for the control of the Temple and
the citadel. The evil Simon bar Giora
was leader of the primary faction at that time, which certainly included the
Idumeans. It eventually came out on top
in this struggle for control.
Josephus
is largely unclear on this Simon, other than noting that he was from Gerasa, a
large Hellenistic city in Transjordan (“Encyclopedia Judaica,” v. 4, p.
220). Judaica notes that the word
“giora” means proselyte in Aramaic. So
he likely was an Amalek-Edomite (who was a Jewish proselyte) and particularly
so since the Idumean forces would later join in with him.
Another
estimation is that he could have been Simon, a leader in the initial Idumean
attack, also mentioned by Josephus (“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p.
318). Josephus said that this first
Edomite attack was upon the (true) Jews in control of the Temple.
The
Edomites rushed into the city and looted houses and killed all of the Jewish
Israelites which they came into contact with (“Josephus, The Essential
Writings,” p. 319). The Edomites spared
none and the dawning day saw the site covered with 8,500 corpses of true
Jews.
In
this assault, the Amalek-Edomites were allied with the Zealots (which probably
also included numbers of Amalekite Jewish proselytes, as noted above and as
discussed earlier herein). In fact, it
was this Zealot alliance which supposedly prompted the Edomites to initially
attack and murder the thousands of true Jews.
Later,
these Idumeans and their Zealot allies murdered another 12,000 young Jews
(“Josephus The Essential Writings,” p. 319).
After these two murdering campaigns, many of the Idumeans seem to have
withdrawn temporarily. However, some of
them evidently remained in the city to initially ally with the Zealots, before
finally double crossing them as well.
Simon Bar Giora
Shortly
thereafter, the above cited Simon bar Giora (whether the same as the earlier
Idumean leader mentioned by Josephus or a different Simon) assumed command of
an army of Jews, who were probably a group of essentially Jewish Edomite
proselytes from Judea (perhaps with a mix of a few true Jews).
Very
early thereafter, he seemed to have been involved in attacking some of his
enemies in Idumea, while in league with some of his Edomite friends in Idumea
(“Encyclopedia Judaica,” v. 4, p. 221).
The purpose of this Idumean invasion was unclear. But apparently, it was to put down any
opposition which Simon may have had from some of his fellow Edomite leaders in
that area.
Later,
as the Roman War progressed, the Idumean armed forces (especially those still
in Jerusalem) came under bar Giora’s direct command. Simon and his army of mainly Edomites (from
Idumea and/or Jewish proselytes) turned on and double crossed the Zealot
defenders in the city, and murdered them as well as other true Jews (“Josephus
The Essential Writings,” p. 326).
Josephus
described the three main factions opposing the Romans, but fighting each other
inside the city in a civil war (all the while that the Romans were patiently
waiting outside to strike).
Simon
bar Giora had an army of 10,000 plus another Idumean contingent of 5,000. The Zealots numbered 2,400 and the main
Jewish force of 6,000 men was under the command of a man named John (“Josephus
The Essential Writings,” p. 339).
This
force under John may have largely involved true Jewish Israelites; whereas the
other two groups may have had any number of Edomite proselytes--plus the
obvious 5,000 Edomites from Idumea under Simon.
Proselytes or Not?
Probably,
most scholars would suppose that the Idumean contingent consisted of converts
to Judaism. But this writer has some
reservations about that theory. Perhaps
the soldiers of the Idumean group were not Jewish proselytes.
Although
not stated by Josephus, there are reasons to believe that he referred to the
Edomite proselytes to Judaism with other definitions. Likely, many of the Edomite proselytes were
Zealots in the beginning of the conflict--before joining in with the first
mentioned Simon (who made the initial attack on true Jews) or the later Simon
bar Giora.
As
the Roman siege proceeded, some five of the leading Edomite chiefs met secretly
and decided to send delegates to Titus to discuss a secret plan whereby they
and some of their Edomite colleagues would surrender to Titus in exchange for
his protection. Simon found out about it
and killed the emissaries and threw the five chiefs into prison (“Josephus, The
Essential Writings,” p. 364).
Apparently,
many Edomites did eventually surrender, however, before the final fall of the
city. Desertions were high and many
people (including many Edomites) fled to the Romans for protection. Josephus says that Titus received them,
freeing some and selling the rest as slaves (“Josephus, The Essential
Writings,” p. 364).
When
Titus finally conquered the Temple, he found Simon standing in the Temple
wearing purple robes (“Who Wrote the New Testament? The Making of the Christian Myth,” p.
148). By then, the Idumeans controlled
most of the city. It is unclear to what
extent that there was still a Zealot presence in Jerusalem when the Romans
finally took the city. Maybe, the
Edomites were in total control.
The Bottom Line
The
point of this first century CE history is that the Amalek-Edomites have the
Canaanite genes. And as bramble bushes,
they are dedicated to ruling over the trees of Judges 9. In the Roman War of 66-70 CE, they went mad
in trying to rule, much like other later Amalekites (i.e. Adam Weishaupt, Adolf
Schicklgruber and Franklin Roosevelt).
Chapter
453--Some Amalekite Successes
The Scepter Phenomenon
In
terms of the descendants of Yehudah, Yakov Yisrael had some particularly far
reaching prophecies about them when he foretold the future for each of his
children--just before his death in Egypt.
The
essence of Yisrael’s words was that the collective Israelites would praise
Yehudah’s line and bow down before it, and the scepter of rule and the
lawgiver’s power and authority would not depart from under Yehudah’s feet until
SHILOH comes (Gen 49:8-12). The best
view is that SHILOH is a reference to The Coming MESSIAH. Thus, this prophecy is profound.
What
it says is that Yehudah would gain the rulership over his brethren in Yisrael
and maintain that rulership until The MESSIAH comes. Of course, some persons might try to suppose
that this reference to SHILOH was to His coming in the first century CE. However, the prophecy plainly implies that
Yehudah’s rule will continue over Yisrael until The MESSIAH establishes His
government on earth (which is still future in 2003).
Even
when YESHUA’s government is established, Yehudah’s rule will effectively
continue because The MESSIAH is of the lineage of Yehudah. Therefore, once Yehudah took over rulership
of Yisrael, that rulership would continue.
This
same idea was inherent in the context of the enormous prophecies to David (of
Yehudah’s line) that his descendants would always rule over Israelites (as
discussed in prior chapters herein).
With
the elevation of David as King over Yisrael, the rulership of Yehudah
continued, certainly over portions of Yisrael (until the fall of the House of
Yehudah to the Babylonians). A former
chapter discussed the prophecies from Yechezkel and Yirmeyahu over Yirmeyahu’s
role of removing David’s throne to another land which contained
Israelites. Hence, it has had a
continued existence until modern times.
Actually,
Yisrael’s prediction was far more than even Yehudah’s rule over Yisrael or
parts of Yisrael. As described in former
chapters, the evidence from history is that descendants of David eventually
became the kings and queens of Europe (which, by the way, are all related and
interconnected, as is well known by students of genealogy and history).
Thus,
the line of Yehudah-David was to become the royal line of kings over Adamites
at large as well as Israelites. This is
a most extraordinary fulfillment of the future for the fleshly people of
Yehudah, per Moshe’s writings in the Torah.
Another Strange Reality
It
has to be significant that not only has Yehudah produced lines of kings all
over Europe (as outlined in a prior chapter), but that the Jews historically
have always risen to the top at whatever they become involved in. In almost any endeavor that man has pursued
in the Western, Christian civilization in the past 2,000 years, Jews have often
been at the top and on both sides of an issue.
Thus,
Jewish liberals (under Sabbatian influence, as will be later established) have
led the way in establishing liberalism in America. But one of the most notable opponents of this
Jewish effort was the Jew Barry Goldwater, who became the father of modern
conservatism. It was Goldwater’s efforts
which propelled Ronald Reagan into the spotlight in the 1960s-1980s.
Unquestionably,
Jewish doctors and leaders have contributed enormously to the modern medical
profession and the focus on drugs and poisons for healing (like in the case of
Dr Simon Flexner and others, as was addressed in preceding chapters herein).
Jews
have also led the way in the depravity of the modern petro-chemical fertilizers
and pesticides--which are not only producing poisonous foods, but destroying
agricultural farm land. Conversely, some
of the biggest proponents of organic farming and natural healing methods have
been Jews--like the Rodales of Pennsylvania.
A
person could go on and on for hours with this enigma of bad Jews doing much
evil and good Jews trying to oppose them and bringing good upon man. Truly, the Jewish fig tree has produced both
good and bad figs.
This
contrast is all around us. It brings to
mind Yisrael’s word that the descendants of Yehudah would rule over
Yisrael. Manifestly, this rule has been
more than just the line of kings. It has
been in government leaders (elected politicians, discussed above) and into
almost every facet of man’s existence in modern times. Jews seem to be in charge of virtually
everything of importance--both for good or for bad.
Now, a Twist
While
true Jews genetically have had the preparation, push and prod to excel and rise
into leadership roles over Israelites and indeed man at large, there is another
fascinating aspect of this issue which ties back to the bramble bush Abimelech,
who was described in Judges 9, discussed in the previous chapters.
Abimelech
typified and seemed to assume a prophetic role for the evil, mongrel Amalekite
descendants of Cain who have come along later and have been usurpers and
workers of evil for thousands of years.
In Judges 9, Abimelech comes forward as a usurper and takes over Yisrael
for three years--obviously, in a way to nullify or destroy the prophetic
destiny of Yehudah and his charge to rule over Yisrael.
Thus,
the Amalekite children of Satan and Kain have been busy for 3,500 years doing
their level best to destroy Yisrael and Yehudah. These Amalekites have typically posed as
Jews, although large numbers of them also pretend to be Christians and people
of other faiths.
By
linking in with the real Jews (as they did starting 2,100 years ago and even
until the Khazar conversion in the 8th century CE), the Amalekite thorns have
been in a position to share in the general rulership and power of Jews over
other Israelites. The evil Amalekites
have fully exploited this course. And
today, here in 2003, the Amalekites are in essential control of all
Yisrael.
Therefore,
many of them have been leading doctors, lawyers, popes and you name it. Of course, they have assuredly risen to
political power, as is evident with evil people--like the apparent Amalekites
Schicklgruber, Roosevelt, Andropov and Weishaupt. Thus, in WWII, Amalekite leaders in Germany,
Russia, England and the US did their level best to destroy Europe.
Virtually,
all important political motions have come under Amalekite power or
influence. Nazism (both in Germany and
the US) and Communism (worldwide) were not only founded by Amalekites, but have
largely been led by Amalekites.
Several
neo-Nazi and Ku Klux Klan groups in the US have been taken over by federal
agents and/or Amalekite Jews, as mentioned in prior chapters.
More Amalekite Treachery
Some
persons have even suggested that the evil Amalekites have secretly financed and
supported the Aryan Nations sect (previously mentioned) in North Idaho so that
they could have a bogie man to constantly attack and demean in the Amalekite
controlled media. As long as the media
concentrates upon the Aryan Nations, more of the goals of Amalekite domination
will occur in America.
In
the first century CE, the evil Amalekites moved into roles of power over the
good Jewish Israelites. In more modern
times, they have also assumed power roles over the House of Yisrael
Israelites. They are working full time
to destroy these House of Yisrael Israelites--just as they tried to do with the
Jewish Israelites of some 2,000 years ago.
As
part of their destruction plans, they have gone after the true Jewish kings in
Europe. With a diabolical hatred and
frenzy, they have instigated rebellions and coops all over Europe in the last
400 years to try to destroy all of the kings from Yehudah--in France, Germany,
Russia, Greece, and on and on.
Perhaps
the most notable overthrow of a kingdom happened in France in the late, 18th
century, French Revolution which saw the royal family murdered by a crazy mob
infuriated and led by Amalekites who were organized and motivated by Adam
Weishaupt and the Illuminati, founded a few years earlier in Germany.
1917
The
next major overthrow came in Russia in 1917, under the leadership of the
evident Amalekite Khazars Leon Trotsky (whose real name was Laiber Davidovich
Bronstein) and Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (who seems to have been a half breed
Amalekite Khazar, whose real name was Vladimir Ulyanov).
Lenin
was married to a Khazar/Amalekite Jewess.
He and his revolutionary Amalekite comrades proceeded to murder the
Russian Czar Nicholas II and his wife and children in cold blood and commence a
blood bath that raged for years in Russia (ultimately killing millions).
The
Czar was a descendant of Yehudah and
David and a relative of Britain’s monarchy.
He and Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany were relatives of Queen Victoria. Through intermarriages, most or all of
Europe’s royal families were related in one way or another, making them not
only descendants of Yehudah, but also of David with but few exceptions, if
any.
The
only major throne of importance now left is Britain’s monarchy, presently
headed by Elizabeth II. Were it not
because of YHWH’s promises to David, undoubtedly, this throne would have
likewise ended years ago.
For
sure, the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters will make a move toward destroying the
British throne here in the age end. If
YHWH allows this motion to succeed (to a point), it will pave the way for
YESHUA to come and to take this throne, as discussed elsewhere herein.
Other Factors
Manifestly,
the evil Amalekite Jews are proceeding on all fronts to take over rulership and
control of all aspects of the House of Yisrael nations. They are moving their theories and practices
of evil into all facets of national Yisrael from medicine, to law, to politics,
to government, to entertainment, to the media and on and on.
Surely,
the story of Abimelech in Judges 9 must be one of enormous prophetic
significance. The evil Amalekites are
doing their level best to rule collective Yisrael here in the age end--just as
Abimelech so ruled Yisrael many ages ago.
This time, they are having just as much or more success than did
Abimelech in his days.
The
interesting thing about this situation is that just as the trees in Judges 9
did not step forward to provide leadership and rule (which therefore created a
vacuum of leadership in Yisrael--thus, allowing Abimelech to make his move for
power), the same thing has now been happening in the House of Yisrael nations,
as the typical fulfillment of Judges 9.
Instead
of true Yehudahites coming forward to provide leadership, as was their destiny
(like Britain’s royal family), they and the other Israelites have all taken a
back seat and allowed the diabolical Amalekites to rise up to fill that vacuum
and usurp authority over Yisrael. It’s
happening on all fronts and in all Israelite activities.
It’s
not to say that all leadership in all areas is now in Amalekite hands. But much of it is and especially in the House
of Yisrael nations. And if some
non-Amalekite does come forward, he will meet a wall of opposition, not only
from the controlled Amalekite media, but even from his own Israelite brethren
(who are janissary robots). Truly, the
Amalekites are trying to take over everything and destroy Yisrael in the
process.
And
how can a person recognize an Amalekite usurper, in lieu of a legitimate
Yehudahite or other descendant of Yisrael?
As discussed elsewhere herein, the key is in one of works and
deeds. Men can be known by their fruits,
deeds and actions. When one sees a
worker of evil, the first most logical suspicion must be that he is an
Amalekite, whether posing as a Jew or Christian and by whatever name he goes
by.
Far Reaching Evil
As
cited earlier, YESHUA seems to have said that these evil Amalek-Edomite people
bear the guilt for the murder of all of the righteous--past, present and future
(Matt 23:35). Surely, they bear
responsibility for all or almost all wars, revolutions and bloodlettings. Amalekite leaders like Schicklgruber and
Roosevelt caused WWII.
Amalekite
bankers/masters caused WWI, the US Civil War, the Russian Revolution and the
French Revolution and will be behind the coming WWIII (in the slaughter of
billions). In short, the bramble bush
thorns, in the form of the Amalek-Edomites, have had a tremendous measure of
success in fulfilling the Abimelech prophecy, cited earlier from Judges (Jud
9:1-57).
Furthermore,
the Abimelech prediction could have some connection with the age ending
"Beast" man who is to come onto the scene and rule the world under
Satanic power for 3 1/2 years (Rev 13).
We'll just have to wait and see.
The
point being from all of this is that one must be careful about interpreting
these tree symbols in the Book.
Categorically, they are quite complex and fraught with much difficulty
without due care, study, concern and attention.
In short, one must let the Scriptures do the interpretations.
YHWH’s Curse on Yehudah Ended
Despite
the great evil of the bad Edomite, Amalekite, and/or Kenite figs, this writer
categorically believes that The MOST HIGH has been extremely involved in
Zionism and the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948 and the Jewish
conquest of old Jerusalem in the Six Days War of 1967, as was assessed in
former chapters herein.
In
fact, in my chronology, the period of 1966-67 (fall to fall reckoning) seems to
be a Jubilee year which gives the Jews a lot of credit. The things going on in the Middle East for
the past 60 years are happening there with the authority and blessing of
YHWH.
There
are no accidents going on there (or anywhere else for that matter). While some might be sympathetic with the
Arabs with the loss of their lands, the truth is that they are usurpers trying
to occupy land which does not belong to them.
That land belongs to Yisrael--to include every person of true Yehudah,
as well as the lost tribes.
At
the proper time, The ELOHIM will separate the Kenites, Canaanites and
Amalek-Edomites (the goats and tares, as suggested previously) from
Yehudah. He will do this in His good
time. So, for now, a believer in YHWH
YESHUA must just have some patience and allow The HIGHEST to fulfill His
purpose. He will execute judgment on the
bad figs in His good time.
Amalekite Depravity is Unparalleled in
History
Just
as Abimelech planned, plotted and schemed on how he could take over and rule
the trees in Judges 9, there is manifestly no doubt whatsoever that the
Amalek-Edomites genetically spend their whole lives, beings, minds, hopes and
ambitions on how they can take over and rule over Israelites in a scheme
designed to forever destroy Yisrael from the face of the earth.
Since
these depraved people are totally evil, they will pull out all of the stops,
tell all of the lies, murder all of the people necessary and on and on--if they
perceive that it will help in their overall objectives. Their agenda is always first and foremost in
whatever tasks they undertake. As they
are totally evil (genetically), there is nothing they won’t do to further their
cause.
The Herods
The
cases for the murder of the righteous (by Herod and Herod Antipas) and for some
of the sexual depravity and sickness of the Amalekite Herods have been
addressed in former chapters. As
outlined, it was Herod, who murdered the innocent babies at Bethlehem, just
after the birth of YESHUA (Matt 2:13-18), and Herod’s son, Herod Antipas, who
murdered Yohanan the Baptist (Matt 14:1-12).
But
there are some more features of these people which need mentioning in the
context of how crafty, foxy and wretched Abimelech was in his objective of
ruling over the people.
Just
as the bramble bush (Abimelech) was brutal, ruthless and murderous in
attempting to rule over and dominate Israelites, the same charge can be laid to
the Herods generally and to Herod the Great in particular.
Either
because old Herod (the Great) was simply insane and nuts for power or because
he thought some members of his family were plotting against him or because
members of his family were plotting against him, something set him off on
several occasions to go on murdering campaigns against his own family, close
colleagues and others (like the babies at Bethlehem).
For
example, Herod murdered his wife Mariamne, her mother, her 80 year old
grandfather, one of her brothers named Costobarus (in c25 BCE) and one more of
her brothers, 17 year old Aristobulus in c36 BCE (“Oxford Companion to the
Bible,” p. 281). He then turned his
attention to his own children. He
murdered at least three of his own sons--Alexander, Aristobulus and
Antipater.
Before
being murdered by his father, this Antipater supposedly accused his aunt Salome
and two of his own brothers (Archelaus and Philip) falsely of plotting against
Herod (Antipater may also have been one of the accusers against his brothers
Alexander and Aristobulus).
But
before murdering Salome, Archelaus and Philip, Herod decided that his son
Antipater was lying to him. So he
ordered him executed instead (“Davis Dictionary of the Bible,” p. 317).
Otherwise,
old Herod seems to have murdered any and all persons who dared to speak against
him in any fashion--like the 45 friends of his enemy Antigonus (ibid, p.
317-318) and the two “rabbis” just before he died (as mentioned in a former
chapter herein). From history’s
viewpoint, it meant certain death to be an enemy of Herod the Great. He was ruthless in murdering his
opponents.
More on Old Herod
In
c46 BCE, Herod was summoned to come before the Sanhedrin to stand trial for
executing people without the Sanhedrin’s permission. Herod came.
But he came with an armed body guard which intimidated the council
(“Davis Dictionary of the Bible,” p. 317). Needless to say, all charges were dropped
against him.
But
that was not enough to pacify the diabolical Herod. He immediately had the council members all
murdered; and then, he appointed a new Sanhedrin (“Judaism from Cyrus to
Hadrian,” p. 391). From that point
forward, old Herod ruled the priesthood and the Sanhedrin (“Judaism from Cyrus
to Hadrian,” p. 365, 386). No one could
or would dare speak out against him in public.
In
“The Life and Times of Jesus The Messiah” (p. 165), Alfred Edersheim has it
that thereafter, Herod packed the Sanhedrin with Sadducees (including many
Herodians) and priests of his choice.
Manifestly, the collective rulers marched to his tune or they were in
trouble. Edersheim described Herod’s
rule by saying that the people hated him.
They
“detested his semi-heathen reign; they abhorred his deeds of cruelty.” He surrounded himself with “foreign
councillors, and was protected by foreign mercenaries.” As long as he lived, “no woman’s honour was
safe, no man’s life secure.” Moreover,
he employed an “army of spies” to spy upon the people (as elsewhere commented
upon herein).
Upon
Herod’s initial assumption of power over Jerusalem (c46-37 BCE), some, many or
most of the Pharisees (evidently in Judea) refused to swear an oath of loyalty
to him after he had made such demands (either because of religious or political
reasons).
In
“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian” (p. 483), writer Lester L. Grabbe notes this
event and suggests that Herod’s reaction against them was unclear.
However,
this time frame (mentioned by Grabbe) did set the stage for a great religious
revival among the Pharisees, producing the theological schools of Shammai and
Hillel (as described earlier and to be further noted in subsequent
commentary)--perhaps because of Herod’s terror against the Pharisees.
While
not discussed by Grabbe, it is evident in the NT (Matt 23, discussed earlier
herein) that the Amalekite Jews took control of the Shammai
Pharisees--certainly by the first century CE.
Probably, the Amalekite control began happening as early as Herod’s days
(despite the fact of Shammai’s alleged nationalistic feelings which conflicted
with Herod’s reign and ideology).
The Shammai People Goofed
In
fact, it is a good bet that as the Shammai Pharisees were developing (after
Herod took over) that they allowed Amalekite Jews in the area into leadership
positions because of fear of Herod (or maybe, because Herod commanded that the
Pharisees appoint an Amalekite leadership as a condition to not murder them and
destroy their religious movement).
Perhaps
Herod’s clannish connections to these Amalekites pacified him somewhat and
motivated him not to murder all of the Pharisees (or at least the Pharisee
leaders in Jerusalem), as could have otherwise happened with his mentality and
brutality. Obviously, something happened
with the ruling Pharisees in the Jerusalem area (the Shammai Pharisees) to save
them from destruction from Herod.
When
a man is facing torture and death, he will normally go to any extreme to save
his own hide. In the American military’s
code of conduct, it was treason to aid and assist an enemy with military
information (beyond name, rank and serial number). In the Vietnam war, many captured Americans
publicly committed treason in order to save their own lives (including Arizona
Senator John McCain).
Likely,
the Shammai Pharisees did the same thing.
They turned their leadership offices over to Amalekite bankers/masters
in the area. The only question about
this exercise is whether Herod commanded it (as a condition), or they thought
up the idea on their own as a means of survival.
As
a minimum, at some point in time, Herod did successfully impose a loyalty oath
upon some part of the Pharisee definition (“Hillel and Jesus,” p. 141). It is unclear which and/or now many Pharisees
were subjected to this process and finally succumbed to Herod’s pressures and
threats.
It
would be easy to speculate that Herod certainly focused upon the Shammai
leadership in the Jerusalem area. They
either marched to his tune or they were in trouble. It was the Pharisees in the outlying areas
who refused to take the oath to Herod and who suffered the most from his
actions (as allowed by Lester Grabbe, mentioned above). Likely, these Pharisees were of the Hillel
school.
Since
the priesthood was or almost was synonymous with the Sadducees (in the
Jerusalem area), it is manifest that Herod also exercised enormous control over
the Sadducees (and may have required a loyalty oath from them as well). For all purposes, Herod and his Amalekite
allies in the Herodian political sect, controlled much of Judaism in
Jerusalem--but probably not all of it.
While
the Hillel Pharisees obviously still had some influence, there was an internal
struggle within Judaism to see which philosophy would survive--that based upon
the true historical faith of the people or that of the Amalekite usurpers who
had moved in on Yehudah like flies.
Significantly, the Amalekite evil did not capture “all” of Judaism at
that time, despite the efforts displayed (as allowed in former chapters).
More on the Herods
When
Herod was almost 70 years old, he came down with his final illness. While on his death bed, some young religious
Jews (conscious of the Torah) heard that he was dead and went to the Temple and
tore down a large, golden eagle put over the gate of the Temple by Herod in
contempt for YHWH and His Temple. The
men were arrested in the act and brought before Herod. He ordered the ringleaders burned alive.
Josephus
dates this event on the day of an eclipse of the moon (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” by Paul
L. Maier, p. 252). Maier has a footnote
which says that this occurred on March 13, 4 BCE (which, of course, places
YESHUA’s birth before this date).
Josephus went on to note that Herod wanted the people to be sad and show
grief upon his pending death.
Accordingly,
he ordered all of the men of distinction in the land arrested and held captive
inside the hippodrome that he had built.
He then instructed his sister Salome that when he died, all of these
captive people were to be killed so that there would be appropriate grief
throughout the land (“Josephus, The Essential Writings,” p. 252). On his death, Salome reneged on his wishes
and freed the captives.
As
discussed in former comments, Herod was known for high and excessive taxation
efforts which were imposed upon the common people.
When
Herod died and the likelihood that his rule over Judea would continue with his
surviving sons (those that he didn’t murder), a delegation of Jews (probably
real Jews) went to Caesar Augustus to ask for direct Roman rule over Judea, as
noted earlier (“Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 419).
This
happened in 6 CE. With direct Roman rule
under a Roman Governor, it is unclear how much independence the Sanhedrin
exercised (as elsewhere shown herein, the Sanhedrin had very little
independence from the evil Amalekites).
While Rome took over direct rule of Judea, other provinces in Palestine
were turned over to the sons of Herod to rule.
So the Amalekite Herods were ever around to influence decisions.
Still More Herods
Old
Herod’s grandson Marcus Julius Agrippa I (who was popularly called Herod
Agrippa) seems to have been a close friend of the Roman Emperors Caligula and
Claudius. In about 41 CE, he was given a
kingdom in Palestine that even exceeded what Herod the Great ruled (“Judaism
from Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 432). This
grant included Judea and Samaria (thus, temporarily ending direct Roman rule in
Judea).
Probably,
Agrippa began to exercise personal control over the Sanhedrin at that
time. But his rule was limited because
he died in 44 CE. Judea once more came
under direct Roman rule. However,
Agrippa’s son, Herod Agrippa II, was allowed to continue the Herod control of
the appointments of the Jewish high priest and the Sanhedrin (“Judaism from
Cyrus to Hadrian,” p. 436).
There
is much evidence to suggest that from the time of Herod the Great forward to
the fall of Jerusalem to the Romans in 70 CE that the Amalek-Edomites (usually,
in the form of the Herod family) exercised general control of the Jewish priesthood
and the Sanhedrin. This point is
extremely important in the vein of the murderers of YESHUA (as discussed in a
former chapter).
Old
Herod’s son Herod Antipas (who was one-half Edomite and one-half Samaritan
[“Davis Dictionary of the Bible,” p. 318], and who ordered the murder of
Yohanan the Baptist) was referred to as that “fox” by YESHUA (Lu 13:32). So it is clear that this family was clever
and cunning. Antipas’ brother Herod
Agrippa murdered Yakov (Acts 12:1-2) and imprisoned Kefa (Acts 12:3-5).
Herod
the Great’s brother, Pheroras, was accused several times of plotting the murder
of old Herod (ibid, p. 316). So evil,
plotting and conniving was par for the course for this diabolical family of
Amalekites.
Chapter
454--The Amalekite Conspiracy
Amalek-Edomite Masters
Though the generic Amalekites are
collectively masters or experts at sin and evil, as elaborated upon in former
chapters, this is not the theme of this and the next several succeeding
chapters. Masters have been and will be
assessed herein in the sense of being the visible leaders and bosses of events,
organizations and people.
Over the years, a host of students of
internationalism and the quest for world government have looked at the world’s
Amalek-Edomites and have concluded that they operate in a cabal (or more
correctly, a Cabala because it is occultic in nature) and/or conspiracy led by
powerful masters who are largely front men for the more powerful Amalekite
bankers and super rich who often operate in secret in the background (of
course, many of the bankers are themselves the masters who are visibly out
front; but some of them do operate in more clandestine ways).
This was the situation with the
Illuminati, as elsewhere outlined herein.
The Amalekite Rothschild international bankers put up the money,
directed and used any and all benefits from the Illuminati; despite the fact
that other Amalekites, like Adam Weishaupt, visibly organized, managed and
publicly ran the organization.
Weishaupt was not a banker. But he was an Amalekite master working for
the less visible, behind the scenes, Amalekite bankers.
The same is true with international
Communism. It was largely founded,
organized and directed by Amalekites--like Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky and perhaps
Vladimir Lenin (depending upon his ancestry, as previously discussed). These were the front men, directing the
motion, which was secretly financed and run by Amalekite bankers (like the
Warburgs and Jacob Schiff of NY’s Kuhn Loeb & Co, who put up $20
million).
Correctly Sons of Satan
Manifestly, the masters have common
goals of world rule that seem to be established by the Amalekite bankers,
secretly calling the shots.
Mistakenly, many observers think that
the cabal or Cabala is Jewish because so many Amalek-Edomites pretend to be
Jews. But correctly, they are not Jews at all, but are usually publicly
professed atheists and/or real Satanists, operating from behind the scenes in
true beliefs and actions.
On
this topic of discussion, please understand that many Amalek-Edomites also
pretend to be Christians. When they
change their historic Edomite names to Western names, they fool the general
public as to their true identity. But
the best way to distinguish a Christian Edomite is to appreciate NT words which
say that evil people, like the Edomites, are known by their deeds, fruits or
works.
In
the case of Christian, Muslim, Hindu or whatever religious persuasion an evil
Amalek-Edomite may have adopted (and they do adopt all kinds of faiths, but
always maintaining the evil and wickedness of their father Satan), their deeds
effectively distinguish or identify them to the careful and observing student
of truth.
YESHUA
put it well by saying that the evil Amalek-Edomites (always) do the deeds of
the Devil, their father (Jo 8:41, 44).
Therefore,
when one observes a person plainly doing the works of Satan, a suspicion should
immediately surface that the wicked individual could be a racial
Amalek-Edomite; or at least, have some Edomite ancestry (Slick Clinton is a
perfect example of this reality--as will be discussed at length with some
fascinating proof in a later appendix).
Another Feature
There
is another facet of identification of the actual Edomites, by recalling the
words of Ovadyah, discussed heretofore, in the context of them being on high
and exalted as an eagle over the stars of Yisrael (Oba 1:3-4). The point the prophet has made is that
Edomites will be in charge, over the Yisrael nations, in the age end--at least,
as secret rulers from behind the scenes.
There
is a third identifying feature of “some” Edomites, but certainly not all of
them. Some Edomites are distinguished
physically by their distinctive Hittite noses, described previously.
One
must be careful about drawing conclusions on this attribute, however, since
numbers of ethnic groups, besides Edomites, have the Hittite noses. Also, some Edomites have had the Hittite
noses bred out of them through years of miscegenation with other peoples.
A
fourth possible identifying attribute is that Amalek-Edomites generally seem to
have character shortcomings. They are
big mouthed extroverts, pushy, forward, arrogant, often rude and have a strong
propensity for sexual perversion and depravity.
In mentioning these qualities, one must again be careful because other
peoples also have some of these problems--particularly the behemah
humanoids.
Hence,
there are several primary methods of identifying actual, racial Amalek-Edomites
in the House of Yisrael nations. They
will be doing the works of their father Satan; will be leaders and bosses in
charge of the House of Yisrael peoples; “may” have the famous Hittite noses;
and tend to be big mouthed, pushy, forward, rude, arrogant and sexually demented.
The Conspiracy
One
of the things which the gullible Christian Israelites in the West has been
unable to grasp is the presence of a genuine, real conspiracy among the
Amalekite super rich to not only exploit the goyim for profit and gain purposes
presently, but also to destroy them ultimately, as discussed in a former
chapter herein in the context of the theology of Balaam.
Popular
radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh typifies this stupidity. Not only does he refuse to even consider the
possibility of a conspiracy, but he ridicules and makes fun of those persons
who do have that perception. The tragedy
with Limbaugh is that his stupid thinking dominates the right wing motion. Otherwise, the left wing thinking is mute
anyway since left wingers can never understand the word conspiracy.
Winston
Churchill, despite his gross confusion and shortcomings, at least had some
perception of the presence of a Jewish conspiracy because he wrote about it in
his book “Zionism Versus Bolshevism.”
Churchill said that it had steadily grown “From the days of
Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela
Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United
States).”
It
is amazing that people can sit on the sidelines and watch and observe meetings,
discussions and agreements between the super rich at the periodic Bilderberger
and Trilateral Commission sessions and never call the result a conspiracy. The simple truth is that anytime two people
get together and agree on anything, they have entered into a conspiracy.
Though
most persons try to understand conspiracy in the sense of something done in
secret and involving an evil act, the dictionary definition also includes just
the “acting together” of any two parties (Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk
Dictionary,” p. 136).
The
oppressive federal state is so hot in pursuit of alleged conspiracies in crimes
against the state that she pulls out all of the stops and goes after people who
merely talk about committing some illegal act.
Whether the parties ever do anything or not is quite irrelevant from the
standpoint of federal prosecutions. The
very fact of discussion is sufficient to bring on an arrest, trial and
imprisonment.
Any
person gullible and stupid enough to believe that fat cats at all levels don’t
get together and discuss things of mutual interest (which they can collaborate
upon) has lost touch with reality. This
writer has had some exposure to the business world and believe me there are all
kinds of conspiracies on-going constantly among business people (to include
cartels, price fixing, avoiding taxes and so forth).
Psalms 2:1-2, Revisited
Nevertheless,
the Psalmist carefully outlined the conspiracy of the Amalekite bankers/masters
some 3,000 years ago by saying that the kings of the earth and the rulers take
counsel together (conspire) against YHWH and His ANOINTED, or correctly--The
MESSIAH (Ps 2:1-2).
Samson
Raphael Hirsch’s commentary on the “Psalms” (v. I, p. 7-9) offers a translation
which says that the kings agree with the rulers (who are obviously separate
persons), “together” against YHWH’s MESSIAH.
Moreover, Hirsch’s commentary makes the case that the indictment applies
to the nations and their rulers in the generic sense.
In
any case, this happened 2,000 years ago when the Amalekite bankers/masters
conspired with the Jewish religious and secular leaders (like the Amalekite
Herod and the Herodians) and the Roman Caesar (the King?) and his governor
Pilate against YESHUA The ANOINTED ONE.
This involved an Amalekite conspiracy.
There is no question about it whatsoever and certainly in this one
single event.
But
Hirsch makes the case that the conspiracy (in Ps 2:1-2) does not involve a
single act. Instead, the great Jewish
scholar implies that the conspiracy actually involves an on-going effort of the
evil nations and their rulers to emancipate themselves from the sovereignty of
the Torah in many actions over time.
Probably, Hirsch has it right or almost right.
Not
only did it involve the single act of the kings of the earth and the rulers
(the Amalekite bankers/masters), operating in collusion against YESHUA some
2,000 years ago (as allowed in prior chapters), but it also has consisted of
continuing actions by the kings of the earth and the Amalekite bankers/masters
in collusion against the purpose of YHWH YESHUA ever since then as well.
Detailed in the NT
Manifestly,
the New Testament describes this conspiracy in some detail. It started with the efforts of the Amalekite
King Herod (who was given power in Judea by the Roman government) when he began
murdering the innocent babies in the Bethlehem area in an effort to kill
YESHUA.
Clearly,
Herod must have conspired even then with the Amalekite bankers and masters in
the Herodian and Shammai Pharisee sects (when he decided to begin his murdering
campaign in Bethlehem). As the Word
says, he was troubled and all Jerusalem with him (including the Amalekite
bankers/masters). So he consulted with
the chief priests and scribes (Matt
2:3-4).
The
conspiracy continued on when the Roman governor Pilate succumbed to the wishes
of the Amalekite bankers and rulers and killed YESHUA. Assuredly, it continued on in the rest of the
NT as Amalekites periodically used their power and influence to persecute and
oppress the election (Phil 3:2). As
Revelation 17:6 demonstrates, it has continued on for the succeeding 1,950
years.
Surely,
this option spells out an Amalekite conspiracy for the last 2,000 years. And upon an examination of Western history
for the last 2,000 years, this prophecy has certainly come true. The Amalekite bankers/masters have conspired
with kings and politicians alike (i.e. American presidents since Woodrow
Wilson) to thwart and destroy YHWH YESHUA’s ultimate purpose for Yisrael.
Some History
In
Second Temple times (before and after the days of Herod the Great), Jewish
government was largely in the hands of the Sanhedrin--which consisted of the
great bet din (court of justice) of 71 scholars and lesser courts of 23 judges
(“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 14, p. 839-840).
These people were the “public” masters or leaders of the Jews (to
include the Amalekite children of Satan) in their day.
In
the main, this body was diametrically opposed to YESHUA and His disciples (Matt
26:59; Jo 11:47-57; Acts 4:5-18).
However, the actual order for His execution surely came from the local,
Amalekite bankers (as established in a former chapter herein). In other words, the secret rulers were the
bankers. But the visible, public rulers
(leaders or masters) were members of the Sanhedrin and the priesthood.
While
the Sanhedrin was apparently composed of Amalekite masters and some of their
Jewish lackeys (as appointed and controlled by the Herods and the Herodians),
in the main, there is some reason to believe that there may have been a few
true Jews and secret followers of YESHUA in this body or its subdivisions--like
Yosef of Arimathea (“Oxford Companion of the Bible,” p. 383).
The
Sanhedrin was organized after the exile and probably addressed religious,
cultural and political questions (since all three issues were combined into the
one government). Manifestly, the
evidence is that by the first century CE, this governing council had been
pretty well taken over by Amalekites.
This was clearly the problem with the Jews and Judaism in the Jerusalem
area.
But
the fall of Jerusalem did not spell out the end of a centralized Jewish
government to dictate rules and conduct for Jews throughout the Diaspora. A secret, unseen Jewish government continued,
as will now be shown.
The Cahilla
The
continuity of a Jewish government over the worldwide dispersion of the Jews was
brought out in a book by Colonel Edwin M. Hadley on “The Cahilla
Unmasked.” Hadley says that instead of
destroying this power, the last Roman dispersals in 135 CE set it (the Kahilla
or Cahilla) on a new and firmer foundation which has continued to exist.
In
1492, Chemor, Chief Rav of Spain, wrote a letter to the Grand Sanhedrin (the
Cahilla), which then had its seat in Constantinople, asking for advice on how
to handle the pending persecution and expulsion of Jews from Spain as a part of
the then Catholic Inquisition (per a letter found in the Toledo Spanish Archives,
as reported by Henry Ford, previously cited).
The
Jewish ruler in Constantinople wrote back and said that the Spanish Jews should
obey the King of Spain and become Christians.
This leader went on to suggest that the Spanish Jews should teach their
children to be merchants (to despoil the Christians), doctors (to take
Christian lives), canons and clerics (to destroy Christian Churches) and
lawyers (to put the Christians under a yoke).
Apparently,
the advice of this leader in Constantinople became the basis for the later
Marranoes, who were public Christians but secret Jews. Moreover, it is evident that the Amalekite
Jews have carefully heeded the admonition to become merchants, doctors and
lawyers in order to destroy Christianity.
Though
the primary leader in the Cahilla is not publicly known among non-Jews, it has
come to light from time to time. Hadley
suggests that in the late 19th century in Odessa, Russia, some documents were
found which were signed by Asher Ginsberg as the Ahad Ha’am. “Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v. 2, p. 440-442)
says that Ginsberg (1856-1927) was the leader of the “Hibbat Zion movement,”
discussed earlier.
Per
Judaica, Ginsberg adopted the pen name of Ahad Ha’am (meaning one of the
people) to write his essays and articles under.
Hadley did not indicate whether Ginsberg signed the documents as Ha Ahad
Ha’am (meaning the number one of the people, as opposed to just one of the
people). But if he signed them as the
number one leader, it might suggest that the words were a title (as Hadley
maintains)
Whether
succeeding Zionist leaders used Ahad Ha’am as a title or not is unclear. Though Ginsberg was a Jewish leader in Russia
in the Zionist movement (and an evident Amalekite), it is unclear whether he
was in a leadership role in the ruling Cahilla or not and whether he signed the
documents in such a capacity or not.
A
previous discussion mentioned the apparent Amalekite Walter Rathenau who said
in 1909 that “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the
economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves”
(“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 61). This band
of rulers were likely all Amalekites.
If
so, it suggests that the total masters and leaders then in Europe perhaps
numbered around 300--which is a much larger figure than just the 71 members of
the likely Cahilla. Perhaps the power of
the 300 leaders mentioned by Rathenau was restricted to economic and commercial
areas--while the Cahilla was a more limited organization in numbers, but with
broader powers over the entire Jewish community.
This
300 number is interesting for at least one more possibly important reason. As indicated in prior chapters, the evil
Amalekite Haman had 300 followers or colleagues in Shushan who were eventually
destroyed by the Jews (Est 9:15). It is
unclear whether all of these 300 were Amalekites, although that is
plausible. After all, they seemed to be
a part of the Haman operation to kill the Jews.
More on the Kahilla
In
1946, a Jewish man named Henry H. Klein published a book on “A Jew Exposes The
Jewish World Conspiracy” which reported upon the still present Cahilla,
directing Jews worldwide in a cohesive conspiracy. Klein suggested that the ruling Cahilla is
the real power and that it exercises that power through the money lords
throughout the world.
In
a sense, one could logically support the idea that the Cahilla rules supreme
and that the bankers are lackeys under them.
However, based upon the NT remarks on the death of YESHUA, discussed
previously, it would seem that the Cahilla answers to the international
Amalekite Jew bankers, like the Rothschilds.
In other words, the men with the money call the shots.
Of
course, in some instances, the bankers are masters themselves, in being the
visible leaders out in front of the pack.
Alternatively, many of the masters are not bankers, per se, but are
merely the front men who work for and obey the behind the scenes bankers (who
often operate in secret).
It’s
questionable how much of a presence true Jews have had in the Cahilla since
YESHUA’s time. Likely, it has continued
to be firmly in the hands of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters over the years
just as it was in NT times. But that
condition could change here in the age end--as will shortly be discussed.
Chapter
455--The Modern State of Israel
Overview
Subsequent chapters herein will address
the state of Israel in some detail in regards to the political and religious
situations there and the Zionist movement (consisting of both political and
religious features) which has influenced the state of Israel extensively.
The most important thing to understand
is that the state of Israel has been under the control of Amalekite Jew
masters/bankers in North America and Britain.
Consequently, the governing political parties there have typically been
controlled by external Amalekites; and in fact, the political leadership in
Israel has consisted largely of Israeli Amalekites (Ariel Sharon may or may not
fit into this mold).
But with the Amalekite control, there
is much present depravity in the state of Israel--just as there is much
depravity and wickedness in the United States (where the Amalekite
masters/bankers rule supreme). The purpose
of this chapter and the following comments is to address some of that depravity
and understand the source of power behind it.
More From Jack Bernstein
While previous presentations have
already described some of the sexual depravity in Palestine, there is more that
needs to be said. Of course, various
observers, including Jewish persons of some intelligence and honesty, have
pointed out many of the problems in Jewish Palestine. But perhaps the most pungent and sharpest
criticism has come from an American Jew named Jack Bernstein, as quoted
earlier.
Bernstein immigrated to Israel (this
process is called making “aliyah”) before 1970.
He initially went to a kibbutz to live for six months and to learn
Hebrew. While at the kibbutz, Bernstein
met a Sephardic Jewess from Iraq named Ziva.
In time, Jack married Ziva and had two children. It was this marriage which first alerted him
to the problems in the state of Israel.
In his words, he says that his eyes were opened.
Jack’s problems, in trying to find
suitable employment, will be cited below.
Suffice to say, this condition led him to eventually open his own
tour-guide service. But Jack was
different from the other tour operators.
He had a tendency to show his clients the real world in the Israeli
state--the world of gross problems, as will be shown below.
Perhaps this exposure made Jack an
enemy of the Israeli state and created still more problems for him in trying to
live and exist in that environment.
After six and a half years of
disillusionment and despair over conditions in Israel, Jack returned to the
United States and began an effort to educate and inform Americans over the
depravity that he had discovered in the Israeli state. He became a leader in a pro-American work
which eventually published at least two writings from Jack which described his
reaction to the Jewish state in Palestine.
Jack’s second work came out in a small
booklet entitled “My Farewell to Israel, the Thorn in the Mideast.” The following presentation will summarize
Jack’s conclusions about the Israeli state.
The Marxist, Socialist and Communist Tie
Early on, in his booklet, Jack
Bernstein makes the charge that the modern Israeli state is a
Marxist-Socialist-Communist state (“My Farewell to Israel, the Thorn in the
Mideast,” p. 2).
This same feeling was echoed by a Jack
Bernstein relative from South Africa, named Brian Singer. In Israel, Singer found it to be a Communist
state. He said “I didn’t come to Israel
to live with a bunch of Commies” (ibid, p. 4).
In the Israeli state, Jack says that
every one of the 150 kibbutzim present are affiliated with one of the Communist
or Socialist parties (ibid, p. 25). The
linkage of the Amalekites to the left wing Socialist and Communist movements
has already been established by this writer.
Jack only confirms the reality.
In talking one day to a couple of East
European Jews, one of them told Jack that Soviet Russia was their ally and that
in 1949 Golda Meir (Ambassador to the old USSR) had made an agreement with
Moscow that Israel would talk peace but would never agree to settle the
Palestinian problem or discontinue her Communist policies.
In return, this Jew told Jack that the
Soviets would adopt a pro-Arab stance to camouflage their true intentions. In 1967, following the Six-Day war,
diplomatic relations between the Soviets and Israelis were severed. But this was all a screen because conditions
have continued as before. As proof, this
Jew said to check the Israeli stores and note the Communist goods (ibid, p.
25-26).
While the Amalekite ties to the left
are well established (in the color red), this remark that Jack picked upon is
interesting. After all, it brings to
mind the situation in the last 20 years where Amalekite Jews in Israel and
North America have shipped vast quantities of technology and military hardware
to Communist China. Is it not clear that
these Amalekites are still Communists?
The reasons why the Amalekites have
been so closely linked to Communism and other left-wing motions have been or
will be explained in some detail in various other chapters herein. In particular, a subsequent chapter will
address an Amalekite Jewish movement, called the Sabbatians (as cited earlier
herein), which has had a profound effect upon the Jews, and of course, world
history for the past four centuries.
Discrimination and Racism
The first big clue on the outright
discrimination and racism practiced by the Ashkenazi Jews in Israel arose when
Jack married Ziva. Since he was an
Ashkenazi Jew and she was a Sephardi Jew, it brought problems to Jack. He could not get work and experienced some of
the same discrimination that she and her Sephardic colleagues faced.
As discussed elsewhere herein, the
Ashkenazi Jews are European in background while the Sephardi are mainly from
the old Spanish and Portuguese countries.
There is a third category of Jews which
are technically known as Oriental Jews (their source is from the Moslem world
of North Africa and the Middle East).
However, over time, both of the Sephardim and the Oriental Jews have
been merged into one definition. They
are both now called Sephardim.
Many of the Sephardi Jews are somewhat
darker in color than the ruling Ashkenazi Jews, and actually have a
considerably different culture (interestingly, the Sephardi culture is closer
to the original Jewish culture; and thus, more Scriptural). Along with Ashkenazi hatred and
discrimination towards the Arabs, the Ashkenazi leaders show the same hostility
towards the Sephardi Jews.
Per Jack, in Israel, Sephardic Jews are
called “kooshim” (the Hebrew word for “niggers”) because they are of darker
skins (ibid, p. 4).
While this Ashkenazi discrimination
against the Sephardim has been great over the years, there are a couple of
points worth mentioning. First, some of
it is changing. The present President of
Israel is a Sephardic Jew from North Africa named Moshe Katsav. While his wife is an Ashkenazi Jew, one must
wonder how this important post slipped from Amalekite control.
The next big issue which must be
highlighted is that the discrimination against dark-skinned Jews is nothing
like the religious discrimination against the Ultra Orthodox Jews-- both
Sephardim and Ashkenazim. The Ultra
Orthodox are extremely religious people who walk the extra mile to try to obey
The ELOHIM. While they may not be
perfect, they are wonderful examples which Christians could learn much
from.
But just like there is much persecution
and discrimination against small Christian fundamentalist sects in the United
States, the same thing is true in Israel with the Ashkenazi hatred and
opposition to the Ultra Orthodox. This
problem will be discussed in detail in a later chapter on this subject.
Sexual Licentiousness and Perversion
The sexual licentiousness and
perversion among the Amalekites have been already outlined by this writer in
former chapters. It is now almost
redundant to begin to cover those problems of moral decay and sickness. However, this reality is one of the key issues
raised by Jack Bernstein.
He charges that in the modern state of
Israel, prostitution is rampant. Because
there is so much Ashkenazi persecution and discrimination against the Sephardic
Jews, many young Sephardic girls (as young as age 14) are forced into
prostitution (ibid, p. 16).
Even more tragic and sickening, the
state of Israel has significant homosexual, transvestite and pornography
problems (ibid, p. 16, 19). AIDS is also
becoming more of an issue-- perhaps largely because of the fact that Israel has
a “large” homosexual population (ibid, p. 19).
Other Social Problems
With its Marxist orientation, it is
clear that the Israeli state would be a welfare state just as is true with the
United States, Canada, Britain and much of Europe. Jack makes this welfare state connection and
charges that Israel is kept afloat by the billions of US dollars supplied
Israelis each year by the US taxpayers (ibid, p. 2).
Apparently, the Israeli Mafia
(organized crime) is powerfully present in much of the Israeli state (ibid, p.
16)--as is true in America. Extortion is
bad and many cafe owners have to make pay-offs to the Mob, police and
government leaders to stay in business.
Comments heretofore have already
described the power of the Amalekite Mob in the United States. Manifestly, that same Amalekite controlled
Mob dominates in Israel and indeed in other parts of the world.
The Israeli Police State
Before coming to Israel, Jack
Bernstein, like other Americans, believed that the Israeli state was a
democracy. But Jack suggests that that
impression is false because, in fact, the Israeli state is a police state
(ibid, p. 5).
Bernstein proves his allegation with a
statement of how prisoners are treated in Israel (ibid, p. 30-31).
Prisoners are forced to stand long
periods of time (in order to exhaust them); are refused toilet privileges to
the point of having to urinate on themselves; have thick bags put over their
heads and their arms handcuffed and tied behind them to put pressure on their
wrists; have their stomachs stomped on and repeatedly kicked; have their
testicles squashed and are beaten on their genitals; have their hair pulled,
their heads beaten against the wall and are left hanging with heads down; have
sticks pushed up their anuses; have cigarette butts put out on their bare skin;
have their relatives brought in and subjected to abuse in front of the
prisoners; have ball point pens forced into prisoners’ penises; and are kept in
cells 28 inches wide by 6 feet long for weeks at a time.
Israeli Influence Overseas
One of the most damaging charges
against Israel is Jack Bernstein’s charge that she “has been instrumental in
aiding the establishment of dictatorships in Africa and to a degree elsewhere
in the world” (ibid, p. 2).
The Israeli support for Communist China
is mentioned above and elsewhere herein.
Suffice to say, the Israelis, under Amalekite control, are doing about
the same thing internationally that the Americans are doing. Both states exist for and serve the Amalekite
plutocrats who really call the shots in both areas and much of the world (as
will be described at length in later chapters herein).
Satan’s Playground
As Jack Bernstein wrote it-- “No
country could become as corrupt and sinful as has Israel through a normal chain
of events. It would seem that there had
to be some evil force at work.
“It would be well to note the evil
history of the leadership of Israel and their followers. For centuries, they (the Bolshevik Jews)
practiced atheistic Socialism/Communism in various European countries,
especially Russia.
“These Bolshevik (Ashkenazic) Jews,
along with the Zionist oriented Jewish International Bankers, succeeded in
overthrowing the Czar of Russia and imposing communist rule on the Russian people. With the aid of Bolshevik Jews who had
migrated from Russia to America, they have been able to spread their evil,
satanic influence throughout America and extending it world-wide.
“Many of these communist Jews from
Russia and other European countries, who migrated to Israel, took with them the
socialist/communist plans of Karl Marx.
With the help of American Bolshevik Jews, they were able to take control
of Israel and impose the socialist/communist plans of Karl Marx.
“Running parallel to the Bolshevik
movement was the Zionist movement, which had basically the same goals--world domination. At some point after the Bolshevik Revolution
in Russia, the Bolsheviks and Zionists meshed together and became one. They are now commonly referred to as Zionists.
“During Biblical times, God promised
the Jews of those days to be His messengers and He gave them special
privileges--if they would obey His word.
The Bible tells how these Jews disobeyed the word and began adoring idols. Frustrated over the disobedience of the Jews,
God said, ‘Ye are of the Synagogue of Satan.’
“The atheistic Zionist leaders of
Israel and their followers have apparently adopted the ‘Synagogue of Satan’ and
through their leadership have made Israel a virtual ‘Satan’s playground.’”
The Talmud and Protocols
The Farewell booklet lists two major
sources of literature which has influenced the Ashkenazi Jews more than
anything else. Jack identifies these two
as the Talmud and the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” (ibid, p. 6-11,
17).
As outlined previously herein, the
Ashkenazi Jews largely stem from the Khazar kingdom in Asia when the king
there, King Butan, wanted a national religion.
Both Islam and Christianity were ruled out. Accordingly, Butan selected Judaism and
imposed it upon his people (in hopes that it would instill some measure of
morality and integrity in his corrupt people--as discussed elsewhere
herein).
Jack says that these Khazars were
forced West and became eventually the Ashkenazi Jews of Europe (ibid, p.
6). One of the most important writings
affecting them was the Talmud, per Bernstein (ibid, p. 6). Jack believes that the Khazars stem from
Japheth and not Shem at all (the writer of this study at hand disagrees with
this conclusion and maintains that they are Amalekites, as noted earlier).
The “Protocols of the Learned Elders of
Zion” was the second major writings affecting the Ashkenazi Jews (ibid, p.
11). Bernstein actually quotes portions
of the Protocols and indicates how they have influenced the modern Ashkenazi
Jews.
Mr Bernstein believes that much of the
racial discrimination found among the Ashkenazim can be traced to both the
Talmud and the Protocols. For sure,
these two writings look down upon all non Jews as goyim cattle and dogs.
This study at hand will discuss both
the Talmud and the Protocols in some detail in later chapters herein. There is no intent to try to cover those
writings at this time. While Jack is
surely correct on the Protocols, he apparently has missed the point on the
Talmud, as was communicated in prior chapters herein and as will be further
addressed in later chapters.
Follow-Up on Jack in America
Jack Bernstein’s booklet on “Farewell
to Israel” offered some remarks on the after-effect of his first writing on
conditions in Israel. He says that after
reading Jack’s words, two Jews contacted the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of
B’nai B’rith (which is more extensively covered in various other chapters of
this study) and asked questions about the findings of Jack.
The immediate reaction of the ADL was
not to attempt to repudiate Jack’s message.
Instead, the ADL started asking intimidating questions of the two Jews
who had contacted them (ibid, p. 1). The
ADL wanted to know-- What’s your name?
What’s your address? Where do you
work?
Naturally, the two Jews became fearful
and hung up the phone without supplying answers to the ADL intimidation. They were fearful that the ADL would begin a
program of harassment, and that they might lose their jobs and face other
troubles from the ADL.
In another follow-up issue, the booklet
on Farewell had a picture of Jack Bernstein (ibid, on the back cover). He had large sun glasses on--obviously to
hide his eyes and some part of his face.
Like other people, who have spoken out, one must be very careful to avoid
being murdered. For sure, the Mossad,
the ADL and other Amalekite Jew hate groups would easily murder a man like Jack
without much provocation.
This Writer’s Views
The findings of Jack Bernstein are
important to address at this time in connection with the conditions in the
Israeli state. Frankly, the evidence is
massive that indeed the words of Bernstein have credible support. After all, the Amalekites rule the United
States just as they rule the state of Israel.
Much of the evil Jack cited in Israel is present in the US.
But in fairness, this writer does have
a few minor differences with Jack’s findings--as pointed out above and in
previous chapters.
While the Bernstein linkage of the
Ashkenazi Jews to Marxism and later their transformation to Zionism seems clear
enough, there is really more to it.
Zionism correctly involves two separate
features. There is political Zionism and
a religious Zionism where deeply religious Jews (who probably are by and large
true Israelite Jews) love the idea of aliyah and living in Israel on religious
grounds. Bernstein does not recognize
this distinction.
Actually, much of the political Zionist
movement to Palestine from 1869 to 1948 involved political Zionists who were
Marxists (as pointed out above). But
since 1948, there has been a decided shift to religious Zionism.
YAH is in Charge
But there is a strange feature which
escapes almost every person who tries to look at this theme. The evidence is massive that The ELOHIM has
been directly in charge of both movements.
True, the political movement has been
inspired and led by extremely bad Amalekite Ashkenazi Jews (who are really
gross workers of evil). Howbeit, people
loose sight of the fact that if it was necessary The MOST HIGH could and would
raise up stones to do His will. While
others may have lagged behind in establishing a Jewish state, the evil
Amalekites were willing to do it.
Obviously, the entire and totality of
religious Zionism hangs upon religious faith and the oversight of The
HIGHEST. Per YHWH’s Word, the people
called the Jews (yes, both good Israelite Jews and evil Amalekite pretenders)
have a job to do in Palestine.
Racially, the Arabs could never have
performed the work of righteousness there as demanded in the Scriptures. Only the Jews, good or bad, could do this
work. And YHWH is now and will in the
future use these Jews for this work of righteousness and truth in the Middle
East.
Subsequent
chapters herein will spell out the Scriptural reasons on why the Jews had to go
to Palestine and establish a Jewish state.
The reader is asked to be patient because everything will come together
on this theme in the later chapters.
Chapter
456--Control of the Israeli Government
Surely the Kahilla Exists Today
Surely,
the Kahilla or Cahilla (as described in a former chapter) is in existence today
somewhere and perhaps under the management of a modern Ha Ahad Ha’am
(logically, in New York City, London or perhaps even in the state of Israel). If it is in Israel, its status must be open
to question because there is an Israeli government there with a parliament and
a Prime Minister (and recently, a modern religious Sanhedrin, as will be
discussed in later comments herein).
It’s
hard to fathom that some other secret Jewish organization could be directing
the Israeli government from behind the scenes (but it seems to be true, as is
manifested in the US and Britain).
Too,
the Israeli government has been largely in the hands of secularist Ashkenazi
Amalekites since 1948. Since the
Amalekite Ashkenazim have controlled the Israeli government, there may be
little need for any Amalekite secret government directly present in Israel (as
it is in the Christian West and especially in North America and Britain).
Barry Chamish
The
previously quoted Israeli author Barry Chamish may have the right insight on
the government of Israel, vis-à-vis the (Amalekite, ed) internationalists
calling the shots in Britain, North America and parts of Europe. Chamish was on the “Dreamland” program on Feb
4, 2001, to offer his insight on several questions (like the Knights Templers
and the brethren of YESHUA, as discussed earlier herein).
Barry
believes that the globalists and internationalists in North America and Europe
are calling the shots in Israel, as well as in America and Europe. He specifically names the Bronfmans, some
other important US Jews, the bankers and the Council on Foreign Relations (the
Rothschilds, Warburgs and Lazards and by all means George Soros must be added to
the mix).
Chamish
suggests that these fat cats control both the Democrats and Republicans in the
US and the Labor and Likud parties in Israel.
Thus, whoever wins in either state answers to the globalists.
“The
Jerusalem Post” of Feb 23, 2001 (p. 6), inadvertently admitted this control
when it acknowledged that the Israeli media has long been seen as a bastion of
the left. The US controlled media has
been discussed in former chapters in the vein that powerful Amalekite Jew
bankers/masters control the Western, Christian press and use it to promote
their agenda on the New World Order (as manifested in the leftist
motions).
Obviously,
these same powerful Amalekite Jew internationalists (some of whom were named by
Barry Chamish, as noted above) do the same thing in the state of Israel, where
they control the media and even much of the population and government.
Per
Barry’s view, the globalists are behind the present Middle East peace
efforts--which will surely become reality in time (as late as Nov 9, 2001,
plutocrat Edgar Bronfman has called for the dismantling of Israeli settlements
and unilateral separation from the Palestinians--per Nov 9, 2001, “Forward,” p.
1).
Barry
says that the globalists need this Middle East peace to proceed with their
plans for world rule. He notes that this
was the very issue which caused the assassination of former Israeli Prime
Minister Yitzhak Rabin (as briefly reported in a prior chapter).
Chamish
charges that the Israeli intelligence people pulled the plug on Rabin when it
appeared that he was going against them in the peace talks (specifically, Barry
says that Shin Bet agents pulled the trigger).
They then set up the patsy who took the fall and was convicted for the murder
(apparently, the Rabin killing was similar to the John F. Kennedy killing in
the US in 1963, where the patsy Oswald took the fall).
Secret Rulers over the Israeli
Government
If
Barry Chamish is correct, as quoted above. it means that the Israeli government
itself (which Chamish says is “corrupt”) is not calling the shots
worldwide.
Instead,
powerful internationalists in Europe and North America are the people calling
the shots and trying to run the world.
Though Chamish did not use the word Amalekite, he did name some of the
Jews involved (like the Bronfmans), who all seem to be Amalekite
bankers/masters.
If
Chamish is right on this, the global Amalekite conspiracy ruling the US,
Britain and certain other nations also rules in Israel. This option opens the door that the
controlling Amalekite Kahilla is located in New York or London and not in
Palestine at all (as some right wingers want to believe).
Frankly,
from this writer’s assessment, Barry Chamish seems to be essentially
correct. The same Amalekite Jew
bankers/masters living in and calling most of the shots in North America and
Europe call most of the shots in Palestine.
But importantly, these bankers/masters do not call all of the shots in
all of these places. There could be some
streaks of local independence (not many, but perhaps some).
More Views
There
is a prevalent opinion among many American right-wingers that the Israeli
government actually rules the United States.
Even some intelligent Jews share this thinking. For example, the Jewish activist Jeffrey
Blankfort claims that instead of Israel being a client state of the US, it is
clear that it is the other way around (Oct 7, 2002, “American Free Press,” p.
11).
While
this idea from Blankfort is interesting, the writer of this study takes the
view that the US is not a client of the state of Israel, nor is Israel a client
of the US. Actually, the evidence is
massive that both the US and Israel (plus the White British Commonwealth) are
puppet states of the super rich Amalekite plutocrats, largely in North America
and Britain. This seems to be the
thinking of Barry Chamish, as well.
That
there is some power or influence over Israeli politics and politicians, there
is no doubt. This option was brought out
in terms of the Likud party by Ayoub Kara, one of the Likud members of
Parliament.
Per
Kara, “There are senior people in the Likud who are sick of all this, but they
are afraid to speak out because of the police investigation. If they’re scared to speak, they must have
something to hide. We have to rid the
Likud of the forces that have taken it over, so that this party doesn’t become
a mafia.”
Kara’s
words were presented merely as a remark in a column entitled “Quote-Unquote” in
the January 13, 2003, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 53). The quotation offered no explanation of what
Kara may have had in mind. Obviously, he
raised questions of the possibility of an Israeli police state managed by someone
other than the Israeli Knesset.
Chapter
457--Israeli Politics and Peace
The Temple Mount, Revisited
The
political ramifications on-going in Israel are closely connected to religious
conflicts which will be addressed in the succeeding chapters. This condition invokes a need to revisit the
question of building a Third Temple on Moriah.
When
religious Jews gain access to the Temple Mount (discussed earlier) and start
rebuilding the Temple, there really will be some major explosions among the
Israelis. Just as Christians
passionately hate the idea of animal sacrifices and a rebuilt Temple, the evil
Amalekites share the same disposition.
They, too, are bitterly opposed to the Temple and the resumption of the
daily sacrifice.
To
demonstrate how incredibly opposed Jewish Amalekites are to the idea of a new
Third Temple on Mount Moriah, all one has to do is spend some time looking at
the record of events over the past few years, as associated with the peace
negotiations between Ehud Barak, Yasser Arafat and President Bill Clinton.
The
peace negotiations in Washington and in the Middle East have been or will be
detailed elsewhere herein. There is no
need to cover those presentations at this stage.
Suffice
to say, there are some subtle features of the negotiations which conclusively
prove how the liberal, leftist Amalekites are utterly opposed to religious Jews
and Judaism (the Judaism, as in evidence in the Orthodox establishment, to be
covered in the following chapters).
As
will be elaborated upon in a later chapter, one of the key negotiating points
back in July 2000 was the question of sovereignty over the Temple Mount. Religious Jews wanted some Jewish access to
the Temple Mount. Barak and his liberal
allies could have cared less. Barak was
even quoted as effectively saying that he didn’t care whose flag flew over the
Dome of the Rock.
Arafat Was Offered Much
In
the July 2000 negotiations, Barak was prepared to offer sweeping concessions if
Arafat would just agree to a peace treaty (Oct 23, 2000, “Time”). Hindsight has proven that Arafat and his Arab
buddies were stupid for turning down the several liberal offers from
Barak.
All
along, the Israelis could have followed the advice, wisdom and perception of some
intelligent and perceptive Israeli leaders and completely liquidated the Arabs
(as will be further discussed in subsequent comments). In fact, if the Arabs keep messing with the
Israelis, this very thing may happen in the coming days. They may all be expelled or killed.
As
a minimum, the liquidation of the Palestinian Arabs would have opened up some
land that Americans and other House of Yisrael Israelites could have fled to
when their nations are destroyed in WWIII.
Regardless, as elsewhere discussed herein, the Palestinian Arabs are not
going to last long in that land. When
YESHUA comes, they are on the way out (to make room for the return of the House
of Yisrael).
As
things turned out, following Arafat’s blunders, the Intifada surfaced to really
disrupt the peace discussions. But
Clinton was on the sidelines pushing for more negotiations and a final peace
settlement (assuredly, he was following the dictates and wishes of the
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters, who ruled his administration).
Despite
this push, religious Jews also were dissatisfied with the prospects of losing
access to the Temple Mount (as noted earlier).
So the Amalekite bankers/masters calling the shots had rebellion on
their hands from religious Jews in Israel--as well as the Palestinians. There were prospects of a total collapse of
the so-called peace talks.
The Fox
But
Barak cleverly entered the arena to play the role of a cunning fox. Seeing trouble on the horizon on his sell out
of the Temple Mount and religious Jews, he resigned and called for new Prime
Minister elections on Feb 6, 2001. He
had three potential opponents to deal with--Ariel Sharon, Binyamin Netanyahu
and Shimon Peres (in his own left wing, Labor party).
With
his resignation and call for new Prime Minister elections, it meant that
Netanyahu could not run against him--unless the Knesset changed the law (which
didn’t happen, since candidates were limited to Knesset members). Netanyahu was not only a popular, local
politician, but he was somewhat of a supporter of religious Jews and Jewish
access to the Temple Mount. He would
never agree to a sell out of the mount.
Peres
was a liberal leftist. But he could not
get support of sufficient left wing Knesset members to run. It is unclear what events took place to
eliminate the Netanyahu and Peres opposition, but it is highly likely that
Barak and his colleagues were behind the moves.
In
any case, this paved the way for Barak to only be faced with Ariel Sharon (who
some believed was a real, hard-line right winger and a person who was not liked
among many of the secular Israelis).
Because Sharon was thought to be unpopular, Barak thought that he could
easily defeat him and get a new mandate for his policies. The outcome of the election will be addressed
shortly below.
The Clinton Plan
With
the end of the year and term facing Clinton and the Amalekite bankers/masters
in late 2000, Slick proposed a new initiation in Dec 2000 to Barak and Arafat
(and one which surely met with the approval of the Amalekite bankers/masters in
league with Slick). Clinton’s plan
involved several features viz:
A
new Palestinian state would be finalized on the West bank of the Jordan, Gaza
and East Jerusalem (including almost all of the Old City--except for the
Western Wall, the Jewish quarter and a part of the Armenian quarter in the
Southwest). Jerusalem could be the
capitol of both the Jewish and Palestinian states in the vein of a divided
Jerusalem--East Jerusalem for the Arabs and West Jerusalem for the Israelis.
In
the land deal, the Arabs would get all of Gaza and around 95% of the West bank
(with land links between the two portions).
The US would give both the Arabs and the Jews massive new sums of money
and federal recognition and support (to include placing two US embassies in the
new capitols in Jerusalem--one for the Jews and one for the Arabs).
The
former Jewish spy Jonathan Pollard would be released from jail and allowed to
emigrate to Israel. Furthermore, Israel
was to receive a new surge of US military technology, including data on the
development of the anti-missile defense system.
Part
of the 800,000 displaced Arab refugees could emigrate to the Palestinian state,
but could not return to the Jewish state.
However, the US and her European and Japanese allies would give these
people (who choose to not return or could not return to the Palestinian state)
vast sums of money to pacify them.
Finally,
the Slick plan called for the Muslim Palestinians to have sovereignty over the
Temple Mount, and the Jews would have guaranteed rights to the Western
Wall. In time, this would be the most
profound point in the whole deal.
The Secret Agreement
According
to the Jan 15, 2001, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 5), Slick and the Israeli Prime
Minister Ehud Barak entered into a private agreement (apparently a secret
understanding) that Israel would accept the plan. Per the secret plan--Barak, Clinton and
Arafat were scheduled to hold a high profiled ceremony and sign the agreement
on Jan 10, 2001, at the US White House with many Arab dignitaries present.
Political
pressure was to build up and force or induce Arafat and the Muslims to accept
the new peace plan which Barak and Clinton had agreed upon. Presumably, some of the other Arab states
would endorse the plan and also put pressure upon Arafat (as did happen in the
succeeding days).
Just
after the pagan Christmas, Barak went on Israeli television and said that he
was prepared to accept Slick’s latest proposal and that he and the Israeli
nation would have to move forward with some new dramatic concessions.
This
was an unprecedented surrender to Arafat and gave him virtually everything he
wanted, except for the full rights of all dispersed Palestinians to return to
the land areas of Israel (that were evacuated by the Arabs in the 1948
war). This became a point of
disagreement for the Palestinians (although Arafat finally came out and said
that he could accept the basic plan).
Obviously,
religious Jews (primarily the Orthodox) were being sold out in order for Barak
to get a peace treaty with the Palestinians.
Of course, the secular Amalekites, both in Israel and out in the world,
could have cared less about the Temple Mount.
They were perfectly happy and content to see it given away. After all, these Amalekites hated the very
idea of a new Jewish Temple.
But
many religious Jews did not sit back and allow Barak to give the mount
away. A NPR news report on Dec 31, 2000,
noted that some Ultra Orthodox said that Barak was a traitor and that his administration
was a criminal government. Much Jewish
opposition arose in Jerusalem, as details of the plan leaked out.
Barak Vacillated
Barak
became a hated man (his popularity plunged in Israeli polls), as many right
wing Jewish protests surfaced to cause him and the secret plan enormous
difficulties--including 400,000 protesting Jews near the Temple Mount on Jan 8,
2001.
Perhaps
religious Jews were able to create such a storm of opposition to the planned
give-away, so much so, that within a few days after saying that he would accept
the Clinton plan, Barak back-stepped and reversed himself by saying that “no,”
he had some problems with the Clinton plan (one report even suggested that he
would also have some opposition to Arab sovereignty over the complete
mount).
Actually,
a reversal like this was almost par for the course for Barak. He had a reputation for being very indecisive
and bouncing around on issues. For
example, upon losing the February 2001 Prime Minister election (to be shortly assessed),
Barak said that he was quitting politics.
However,
in later discussions with Ariel Sharon on serving in a national unity
government, Barak initially agreed to become Defense Minister.
Subsequently,
Barak reversed himself once more and said that he would not serve with Sharon
and that he was “retiring” from politics and government service (as a matter of
information, a national unity government with Likud and Labor did surface in
2001, but it fell apart in Nov 2002 and forced new elections in Jan 2003).
Why?
Ultimately,
the question must be asked why would Barak enter into a secret agreement with
Slick to give up the Temple Mount. For
sure, Barak was and is a politician. The
whole idea that he was willing to sell out so many of the Israelis (at least,
all of those who were religious) to simply get a peace treaty made no sense at
all. For sure, they were voters who
could cause him some trouble. Something
was afoot.
Perhaps
the case can be made that Barak and his Labor colleagues were, by and large,
Amalekites with no sense of honor, integrity or religion. This option could be just one more
manifestation of the Amalekite assault upon truth. Surely, the Amalekite bankers/masters in
America and Britain would be pleased with the sell-out (as indeed, their spokesman
Slick Clinton would, as well, since it could help his legacy).
But
the whole thing was still questionable for Barak to be pursuing. It was such a bad decision that one must take
a second look at what might be behind the why.
A subsequent appendix, discussing the depravity and wickedness of Slick
Clinton, opens the door to some evidence of the payment of a billion dollar
bribe to Slick and his Amalekite handlers by the oil rich Arab states.
The
very mention of a billion dollars opens the door to who all might could share
in this giant pay off. As will be asked
later, is it possible that Barak or some of his leftist colleagues in Palestine
were offered part of this money?
Actually, “Spotlight” of Jan 1 & 8, 2001, had a front page story by
George Nichols on “Secret Slush Fund Buys ‘Peace’?” which suggested this very
thing (to be discussed later).
In
any case, the late Dec 2000 developments made it clear that Barak and his
liberal colleagues ruling the modern state of Israel had no love or appreciation
for the Jewish religion or Jewish religious people. Barak was clearly not on the side of The
ELOHIM. He was a key player who was
actually working to destroy Judaism and its roots here in the age end.
Barak, Clinton and Rich
A
former chapter discussed the Slick Clinton pardon actions in January 2001 just
before he left office. Among the 190 or
so pardons (140 of them on Slick’s last full day in office), Clinton pardoned
an Amalekite crook, swindler, con-man, double crosser and tax evader ($150
million from the United States alone) named Marc Rich (who was then hiding out
with his billions of dollars in Switzerland).
As
outlined in the previous discussion on Rich, the point was made that a number
of influential Amalekite Jews wrote letters to Slick on behalf of Rich (who had
never served a day in jail for his many alleged crimes). In the March 1, 2001, congressional hearings,
information came forth that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak made a personal
telephone call to Slick to urge the Marc Rich pardon.
The
Mar 12, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 11) had a story by Michael Collins Piper on
“Clinton ‘Friend’ Links Blackmail to Rich Affair” which reported that the
Israeli Mossad had highly critical information on Clinton’s illegal activities
in the Whitewater scandal and used it to blackmail Slick into pardoning the
Amalekite Marc.
Piper
quoted Clinton friend and former Under Secretary of the Treasury Roger Altman,
who publishes the “National Enquirer.”
In his paper of Feb 27, 2001, Altman charged that the Mossad actually
blackmailed Slick into making the pardon.
Altman (a probable Amalekite Jew) is a colleague of the Israelis and the
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters who rule America.
So this charge is interesting.
Some
support for this option came from a “New York Times” report of recent which
suggested that Rich had once been a Mossad agent or colleague in some
manner. Actually, this is not unusual
because almost all Jews worldwide work for and support the Mossad whenever they
are asked or needed. So surely, the
Amalekite big shot Rich would collaborate with (or be a boss of) the
Mossad.
The Pay-Offs
Since
it is now public knowledge that Rich paid Clinton and the Democrats at least $2
million (actually, the bribes were probably substantially greater than this, if
the truth ever comes out), one must ask what Rich paid Barak and the other
Amalekite Jews to enlist their help in insuring the pardon. Obviously, Rich was a billionaire who could
and would gladly shell out some money to benefit himself.
In
any case, billionaire Marc Rich clearly appears to be one of the powerful,
global, Amalekite masters who pull the strings and make governments and
politicians jump. Either he had power
over Barak and his other Amalekite supporters or he bribed them, along with
Clinton, in order to insure their support for his pardon.
While
logically, the money payoffs (bribes) to Slick Clinton would probably have been
enough of a motivation for Slick to have made the pardon, it must be noted that
there was opposition from Clinton aides on pardoning Rich. Apparently, many of Slick’s White House
associates opposed the Rich pardon (per testimony of Clinton aides at the
congressional hearings on March 1, 2001).
Furthermore,
many or most of the Slick pardons were done without going through the US
Justice Department (as is supposed to be the correct procedure). Above all else, per Justice, no person is to
be pardoned, unless he has done some jail time and shown evidence of rehabilitation
(which Rich never faced since he was a fugitive who completely fled US
justice).
The Israeli Elections
As
discussed above, Ehud Barak tried to play the fox in arranging for new
elections on Feb 6, 2001--which would end up pitting him against the supposedly
unpopular Ariel Sharon. But things
didn’t work out as Barak planned.
Actually,
it turned out that Sharon was far more popular than Barak imagined (or rather,
it was that the Israeli people hated Barak more than he allowed). In any case, Sharon won the election and
became the man in charge in 2001.
Barry
Chamish, quoted earlier, suggests that the globalists ruling Barak would also
rule Sharon. So either way, the status
quo would continue and nothing would change (in terms of the later Jan 2003
elections, Barry would have surely said exactly the same thing).
The
2001 election spelled out a couple of fall outs which may prove to be
especially significant. First of all,
Sharon made it clear that the Arab-Israeli peace talks were back to step one
and presumably would not be resumed until the Arabs stop the violence. He also suggested that he would be the
hard-liner which identified him in the past.
The
“Washington Post” of Feb 7, 2001, noted that a day after his election victory,
Sharon donned a skullcap and went to the Western Wall to say prayers which sent
an unmistakable signal that there would be no more Jewish concessions to the
Palestinians on the control of the old city of Jerusalem.
Sharon
told reporters that “I am visiting Jerusalem, the capital of the Jewish people
for the past 3,000 years and the united and indivisible capital of Israel--with
the Temple Mount as its center--for all eternity” (Mar 2001 “End Time News,” p.
2). But if he was controlled by powerful
Amalekite bankers/masters outside of Israel, Sharon’s stance on the
Arab-Israeli peace talks would change dramatically (as it did somewhat).
In
the coming days, the powerful Amalekite plutocrats in North America and Europe
must have put pressure upon him to be more receptive to peace (which is what
the bankers/masters want because of their push for world government, as
discussed in a former chapter). Students
of truth will have to sit on the sidelines and continue to watch events as they
unfold (and especially, after the Jan 2003 elections).
Sharon
also talked about and eventually was able to obtain a national unity government
with Labor. In the new government, Labor
and some of the other parties have shared power.
Labor’s
leader Shimon Peres was the new Foreign Minister (until Labor pulled out of the
coalition in Nov 2002). Certainly, Peres
is a man in league with the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in the Diaspora to
help push the peace plan in the new government.
Joel Skousen
Joel
Skousen will be further quoted in a later chapter herein. As will be pointed out, this man seems to
have a very good grip on what is happening internationally. In this vein, he is editor of the World
Affairs Brief on the Internet.
The
June 2002 “Believer’s Advocate” (p. 10-11) had an article on Joel Skousen’s
perception, as translated from a Hebrew article in Israel in early 2002 on “B.
USA Against Sovereignty--Ammon Lord in Major Rishon,” pp 10,11-26.10.2001. The article said:
“What
are we fighting for? Not for Greater
Israel but to ensure that Israel remains an independent state. We are struggling for the continuation of
Israel as an independent state-- ‘the third Jewish Commonwealth’, as described
by journalist Rino Rzur in his column in Hair.
“Joel
Skousen, an American friend of Israel and editor of the Internet newspaper,
World Affairs Brief, is sure that Israel’s sovereignty is in danger. His recent visit to Israel was to warn us of
the risk of losing our sovereignty.
Skousen is an expert on the political connections to terrorism. He told me in the lobby of the Crown Plaza
Hotel in Jerusalem that ‘The war in Afghanistan is a false war against
terrorism’. He continued, ‘This does not
look like a real war. America has
another agenda, which is connected to the oil in the region and throughout the
Muslim areas to the south of Russia’.
“Skousen
is very cynical of America under the leadership of President George W.
Bush. He is no less cynical of Israel
under the leadership of Ariel Sharon and, for that matter, of his rival,
Binyamin Netanyahu. Skousen says that
Sharon also has another agenda that is not always in the national self-interest
of Israel. He is working in cahoots with
the international community. Sharon is
conducting the war against terror only half-heartedly. It is not clear how much he is involved with
the international community, but Skousen suspected Sharon as soon as he asked
Ehud Barak to become his Defense Minister and then when he made Peres his
Foreign Minister. Peres is the most
prominent representation of the European Globalists. According to Joel Skousen the most important
goal of the New World Order is to break down national sovereignty. The most recent and powerful example of this
came during the Yugoslavian war when all of Kosovo was placed under
international authority. Joel Skousen
says it will be hard to do the same in Israel but that is the goal, even though
he does not believe that they will succeed.
“I
asked Joel Skousen how the war against terror should be undertaken here in
Israel. Joel Skousen: ‘Israel must go into Area A and confiscate
all the terrorists’ weapons. That is the
main objective. The PA must be stripped
of all its weapons and its armaments industry must be destroyed. There is no difference between the PA and
other terror groups. After all the arms
have been collected there will be an interim, a period in which we have to go
after everyone possessing illegal guns.
After that, a new PA will rise without connections to terrorist
groups. Only then will there be a
possibility for the implementation of the peace process’.
“Skousen
is convinced Sharon is not moving in this direction and neither did
Netanyahu.
“When
asked how the USA could put pressure on Israel, Joel Skousen said: ‘The USA could affect the shipment of arms
and parts to Israel. But even more
effective than that, would be to bring down the government. This was done successfully twice in the past,
when the USA brought down the governments of Shamir and Netanyahu’. Skousen says that it is important that the
Israeli public understands that, although the USA seems to be a big promoter of
Israel, this is not really so. The US
government represents international interests whose purpose is to support a
global [worldwide government], where national governments will be supplanted by
local authorities. Although it seems as
though the US is working for the good of Israel, in fact it is actually
servicing the interests of the globalists.
The globalists target is that no nation will be completely
independent. No nation will have the
right of self-defense, and thus Israel’s fate will be decided in Brussels. Skousen believes that President Bush is a
conservative and as such he should be anti-globalist. However, it seems that it is easier for him to
achieve the interests of the globalists without opposition. [Sentence not clear in Hebrew.]
“The
most important influence on George Bush is George Schultz, seen to be best
suited for involvement in the globalist agenda.
What is more, Schultz is Condeelezza (sic) Rice’s mentor.
“The
Americans are using the Israeli Right to achieve the Globalist agenda in the
Middle East. When Ehud Barak negotiated
under fire, there was a great outcry.
But when Sharon negotiates under fire there is almost no
opposition. In Skousen’s opinion, the
Americans want to weaken Israel to such an extent that it will be forced to beg
for UN intervention to protect Israeli citizens from Arab genocide--which is
what they are now achieving through Palestinian terrorism. According to Joel Skousen, Israel will be
irreparably weakened if the US succeeds in removing Israel from the Golan
Heights. However, this could only happen
when all Arab nations request help from the international community.
“The
American demand that Israel withdraw from Area A--and not go back--is seen by
Skousen, as an American de facto
recognition of Palestinian sovereignty.
Joel Skousen is very much afraid, that Israeli politicians are being
manipulated by the Americans.
“Skousen
foresees Israel facing a difficult war within the next 2 or 3 years.”
This
article goes on to quote Skousen’s advice for Israel. Among several suggestions, Skousen says that
the Israelis must find a new type of political leader (presumably, one not
beholden to the internationalists--ed).
Some Comment
The
above article from Israel with Joel Skousen’s views is important because it
seems to be on track, in terms of the Jewish state. Manifestly, the globalists are the people
calling the shots. They rule America;
and per Skousen, and the earlier comments of Barry Chamish, they are largely in
control in Jewish Israel.
Since
this present “globalist” power in America, Canada, and Britain is essentially
in the hands of Amalekite Jewish bankers/masters (although Amalekites in the
Roman Catholic Church and other definitions in continental Europe and at the UN
are slowly displacing the Western Amalekite power structure as the move to
world government progresses), a paradox or state of confusion over who is
running things may seem to result.
The
earlier question about how or to what extent the Amalekites in North America
and Britain control the Israeli state seems to largely be answered in the above
comments from Barry Chamish and Joel Skousen (although Skousen did not identify
these globalists as Amalekite Jews, per se).
The
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in control of Canada, the US and Britain are
internationalists. They do not care
presently one whit about an independent Jewish state in Palestine (although
they have cared in the past). Their
whole motion and energy is now directed at the establishment of world
government (obviously, these leaders hope to be the world’s governor when that
one world state becomes reality).
True,
these bankers/masters do control the US, Britain and much of the Christian
West. And they have exercised much
control over Jewish Israel. However,
there are questions remaining on the extent of their control of the
Israelis. Probably, the Mossad and most
Israeli governments have answered to the bankers/masters. But there are possibilities for nationalism
and independence among many Israelis.
At
least, this writer sees some eventual independence and even a turn to religion
on the part of many of the Israelis.
These will be good motions--if and when they take place. For sure, the Amalekite bankers now trying to
take over the world will not totally succeed with the Israelis.
For
one more comment on Joel Skousen’s perception, it is interesting that Sharon
has apparently been trying to get rid of the guns in the West Bank with the
Israeli invasions in the spring of 2002.
At one point in time, Bush demanded that Israel withdraw. Sharon largely ignored him and proceeded on
with his task. This event implies that
maybe Sharon did have some independence from the globalists (who rule
GWB).
More on Sharon
But
to whatever extent the Israeli government does or doesn’t do, the fact remains
that the Arabs are not going to get as much from the Likud, as they would have
from Barak. In other words, Barak was
ready to give them almost everything.
Now, this “everything” is off the table.
The Palestinian Arabs have been crying about a new Middle East war. Howbeit, this option seems out of the
question.
For
sure, Sharon (or Netanyahu and/or the Likud in general) has had some links with
and will have even more ties to the religious right in Israel. This reality spells almost a certainty that
the religious Jews are not going to give up the Temple Mount without some
serious intervention by the Roman Catholic Church or international political
powers.
Ariel
and his government may ultimately bow to the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in
North America and Europe. But with his
attachment to the religious right, he may also try to protect their interests
as well. Clearly, it is not cut and
dried that Sharon will automatically sell religious Jews out in Palestine. He may tread carefully on this plan.
So
while Barry Chamish and Joel Skousen project that nothing has changed or would
change under Sharon (as opposed to Barak), this may not be true at all. Manifestly, Sharon did show some sense of
dedication to the religious Jews in Palestine (maybe not a lot, but at least
more than Barak).
For
sure, with Sharon and/or Netanyahu in 2003, religious Jews may be a step closer
to a new Temple on Moriah.
Moreover,
it is possible that the 2001 Israeli election was somewhat of a set back for
the internationalist Amalekites in North America and Europe who are trying to
establish the New World Order (although Skousen seems to believe that the
Israeli right wing will now support the peace motion). Barak was the globalists’ man--but perhaps
not Sharon or, at least, not Sharon fully and completely.
The Possibilities
This
push by the internationalist Amalekites upon the state of Israel may have an
unplanned fallout. Of course, any number
of things can develop in the Israeli state to upset the plans for global rule.
The
January-February 2000 “Tzemach Letter” (p. 1) said that “No one knows what the
end of this ‘peace accord’ will be but it is certainly possible that Israel
could easily degenerate into chaos and civil war.
“If
this occurs, a new Israeli government could be established which would not be
democratic in nature. A military
government suited to meet the rising military emergency is most likely. In Israel, a theocracy controlled by the
leading Rabbis is also possible. In
either case, Israel will have departed from the democratic process.”
This
last option by “Tzemach” might seem highly unlikely, but it must be put on the
table and discussed. Zekharyah the
prophet lays out evidence of a very religious Yehudah in the age end and
certainly preceding the time that the Beast power intervenes in Jerusalem and
defiles the coming Third Temple. The
early 21st century is seeing a move to a more serious approach to religion by a
number of modern Israelis.
While
it is inconceivable that the United States and the other House of Yisrael
nations can break free of the power and control of the Amalekite Jew
bankers/masters in the foreseeable future (before all of these nations are
totally and completely destroyed nationally), the House of Yehudah in Palestine
may do so in the coming days.
As
the Palestinian Jews become religious, they may break completely free of the
globalist Amalekite bankers/masters.
Whether the “rabbis” or the military will take over or something else,
the Word seems clear enough that the state of Israel will become more
religious; and importantly, many of the Israelis do not seem to toe the line
with the internationalists running things in Europe or elsewhere.
A Final Word
The
Jun 3, 2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 32) had an article by Petter-Georg Levin on
“Neutrality on Trial,” as quoted in a former chapter. The essence of this story was an observation
of what is happening in much of continental Europe in terms of media play over
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
In
the presentation, a cartoon was shown as taken from the tabloid
“Dagbladet.” It showed a brutal,
evil-looking Ariel Sharon with a small Bush in his pocket and a small Arafat as
a concentration camp inmate. While this
perception is generally held in much of Europe and especially in parts of the
Christian right-wing in America and Britain, it is far removed from the
truth.
True,
Sharon has a reputation for toughness and as a bulldozer. But in the real world, all three of these
parties (Sharon, Bush and Arafat) are peons in the hands of far more powerful
people--the globalist plutocratic bankers/masters, now largely in North America
and Britain. These plutocrats are mainly
Amalekite Jews at present.
But
the tide is turning and other Amalekites (like in the Catholic Church and
European political movements) are beginning to flex their muscles and assume
center stage.
In
any case, this cited cartoon is simply not the real world in 2003. In truth, Sharon, Bush, Arafat, Tony Blair
and many other world leaders are jointly, at present, in the pockets of the
Amalekite bankers/masters out in the Diaspora.
Chapter
458--The Amalekites Versus Religious Jews
The Sephardi-Ashkenazi Conflict
The
growing conflict which the Israeli government (led by Amalekite usurpers) is
promoting with sincere, good, religious Jews (probably true Israelites) will be
assessed in subsequent comments and chapters.
However, this presently developing situation actually has its origin
much earlier in the state of Israel, in the sense of a battle between the
Ashkenazim and Sephardim.
The
Ashkenazim were European Jews with a heavy presence of Amalekites while the
Sephardim were Spanish and Middle Eastern Jews with roots back to Second Temple
days. The Sephardim have always been the
more religious Jews and particularly in the context of Orthodox Judaism (though
some Ashkenazim are also Orthodox).
In
any case, the Oct-Dec 2000 “Petah Tikvah” (p. 46) had a reader’s letter from
Danny and Hadara Levine, Messianic Jews of Jerusalem. The Levines gave some of the history of the
Ashkenazi-Sephardi conflict by noting that when hundreds of thousands of
Sephardic Jews came to Israel in the 1950s from Arab lands, the elite power
mongers of the secular Ashkenazic Jews saw this immigration as a threat to
their rule.
The
Levines say that they tried to forbid contact from the incoming Sephardim with
the established religious Jews. They
took Yemenite Jews from their religious parents and put them in the HaShomer
HaTzair (the Secular Young Guard).
The
“Forward” paper of Nov 9, 2001 (p. 5), had a story on this event and cited the
popular Israeli belief that the Yemenite children were kidnapped and placed
with childless families in Israel and abroad (evidently secular Ashkenazim).
Per
the Levines, the Ashkenazi authorities began changing the Sephardim to be
secularists. The anti-religious institutions (controlled by Ashkenazim) took
away the morale that maintained the high moral standards of the Sephardim. But the Sephardim have big families (which
was a problem for the Labor and One Israel power mongers in the Barak
government).
The
Aug 5, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-4) quoted R. Yisroel Weiss of the
Ultra Orthodox Neturei Karta group who said that in the Zionist movement to
settle Israel, 95% of its leaders and supporters were irreligious and formed a
path for Jews to leave their faith and that the Zionists strove to make
“religious God-fearing Jews, and especially the youth, into non-religious,
secular Jews.”
Weiss
added that “they were wildly successful.
They wanted to transform Judaism from a spiritual, Godly entity, into a
secular, political entity--with its goal, a land, materialism, etc., acquired
through military means.” R. Weiss and
the Neturei Karta will be further addressed in comments hereafter.
The New Immigrants
Also,
many of the Russian immigrants to Palestine in the early 21st century are
moving to the right, which means that some of them are becoming religious.
While
it would be easy to suppose that supposed Ashkenazi Amalekites from Europe and
especially Russia can never become truly religious or convert to truth, this
very thing is happening in Israel and even in portions of the US and the rest
of the world in terms of the Messianic Jewish motion.
Yes,
it is plainly happening in our time.
This writer has thought much about this strange process in an effort to
try to grasp why it is happening.
At
the moment, the best explanation for this movement (which is a very good one)
is that some of the Amalekite Khazars in Europe have interbred so much with
good Adamic stock (from Shem and Japheth) that the evil and depravity of the
Amalekite genes have been largely bred out of some of them over the years.
Lauren Gelfond
The
Nov 15, 2002, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 22-24) had an in-depth story by Lauren
Gelfond on “The New Israelis’ which discussed this phenomenon. The story took note of the fact that some
890,000 immigrants from the old Soviet Union poured into Israel during the
years 1990-1999, under the law of return (that is those persons who had a
Jewish parent or grandparent).
Besides
those Russians who have come to Israel on the basis of Jewish ancestry, some
number of them have come on the basis of being married to Jews. Sometimes, these marriages broke up after
immigration and the non-Jewish spouses simply stay. Other Russian immigrants have apparently come
to Palestinian Israel without any Jewish connections at all.
Of
this 890,000 immigrants, some 240,000 of them did not even identify themselves
as Jews. The Israeli Interior Ministry
estimates that there are some 400,000 non-Jews from the FSU in Israel
today. Many or most of these 400,000 are
actually Christians or Messianic Jews who believe in YESHUA (the “Maoz Israel
Report,” elsewhere cited herein, mentions some of them).
The
story by Ms Gelfond discusses the problems which these non-Jewish Israelis face
once they arrive in Palestine--in trying to bounce around between being
Christians or Jews. Many have searched
for Russian speaking Christian Churches but have been unsuccessful (although
some number of them end up in Messianic Jewish congregations, as just noted
above).
The
“Jerusalem Post” report by Lauren said that “For the first time, the State of
Israel and the Orthodox Christian Church are being overworked with practicing
Christians who have Jewish ancestry.”
Many
of these new immigrants say that they suffered from anti-Semitism in the old
Soviet Union; and now, in Israel, they encounter hatred and prejudice here from
the local Jews.
The
story cited the case of a woman named Victoria Vakhnisky, age 34, of Arad. She immigrated with her Jewish husband in
1994 and later separated from him. She
said that more than 50% of the people in Arad are Russians and many of them are
Christians (as she is).
She
adds that while her Jewish neighbors ask her about the Christian cross she
wears, most are accepting. She notes
that religious Jews are especially accepting.
Apparently, per Victoria, the problem surfaces with secular,
non-religious Jews, who sometimes have a problem with her and her Christian
cross.
These
comments by Ms Vakhnisky may be particularly relevant in the present discussion
herein. As the point is made throughout
this publication, it is many of the secular Ashkenazi Jews who are Amalekites. There are many good reasons to believe that
many religious Jews (especially Orthodox and Ultra Orthodox) are correctly
Jewish Israelites (and particularly
among the Sephardim).
The
point is that Jewish Israelites are more accepting of the Russian Christians
than atheist Amalekites. This is an
utterly fascinating correlation.
In
any case, an unbiased observer must be impressed with the increasing numbers of
Russian and European Ashkenazi Jews, who have been coming to Israel and who
appear very much like majority type Europeans.
Many have blond hair and blue eyes and attractive noses and faces and
well-proportioned bodies (substantially different from the Hittite noses and
Golda Meir bodies of many Amalekites).
Another Blow to the Amalekites
Another
major set back for the Amalekite bankers/masters came in the summer of 2000
when the Israeli Knesset chose Moshe Katsav, a Sephardi, to be the new
president (as pointed out earlier herein).
The Ashkenazi Shimon Peres fought hard for this post, but lost out. Surely, the Ashkenazim have their hands full
in trying to rule Israel with the growing focus on religion.
The Divisions in Judaism, Revisited
As
discussed in former chapters, Orthodox Judaism sprang from the old Pharisee
sects. But what is not readily known by
the public at large is that even the contemporary Orthodox faith is extremely
divided and diffused (just as there were 24 Jewish sects in Second Temple
days).
First,
there is the reality that most Jews (assuredly most Amalekites) are secularists
with no interest in religion at all (the ultra-secularists are in the Shinui
political definition). In general terms,
almost all Jews (both religious and secularists) can be classified in the broad
definitions of Sephardi (to include most Oriental Jews from the Middle East and
Jews of Spanish origin) and Ashkenazi (European Jewry).
Within
the Ashkenazi religious definition, there are the major divisions in
Judaism--the Orthodox, Reform (which also has numbers of Amalekites, since the
Reform don’t believe in much of anything) and Conservative. Religious/observant Sephardim are usually
Orthodox, although some are Karaites (who seem to be closely akin to the old
Essenes).
The
two major Orthodox segments (Sephardi and Ashkenazi) both have a number of
Ultra Orthodox sects that have deviated from the mainline Orthodox faiths. The case of the Haredi communities, the
Hasidim and the Ultra Orthodox Shas party have been or will be discussed below
and in other commentary herein.
Ultra Orthodox Differences
While
the differences and hard feelings between the general Sephardi and Ashkenazi
populations might be expected (after all, the Sephardim are mostly true Jewish
Israelites while many of the Ashkenazim are Amalekite pretenders), there is
quite some difference between the Sephardi Ultra Orthodox and the Ashkenazi
Ultra Orthodox.
These
two communities logically should be close because they do have much in
common. However, that’s not the way
things are in Israel. Generally, the
ruling Ashkenazim practice gross discrimination against the Sephardim (as
described in a prior chapter discussing Jack Bernstein and his findings in the
Israeli state). And this condition
spills over into the Haredim communities.
The
Dec 21, 2001, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 25-27) had a story by Larry Derfner on “Not
Quite Black and White” which assessed the problem.
Derfner
described the situation in the Bukharan Quarter where many Sephardi Ultra
Orthodox live, along with many Ashkenazim.
Sephardi Ultra Orthodox frequently speak of the discrimination,
patronization, racism and apartheid emanating from the Ashkenazim and even from
the Ashkenazi Ultra Orthodox. The
Ashkenazim are accused of being worse than the Nazis.
Reportedly,
90% of the Ashkenazim don’t even see the Sephardim as equal to so-called human
beings. The Ashkenazim Ultra Orthodox
have been known to say that while the Sephardi Ultra Orthodox have grown
powerful under the Shas movement, this does not justify them as being worthy of
respect. Israel’s poorest neighborhoods
are inevitably Sephardi Ultra Orthodox.
The
Sephardim indicate that the conflict is strong in the case of interfaith
marriages. The story is that an
Ashkenazi would not let his son marry an Sephardim, unless his son was mentally
retarded or crippled. Then it would be
all right for the boy to marry a “frenkina” (which is an ethnic slur for a
Sephardi girl).
Sephardi
leader Avraham Cohen sent his daughter to an Ashkenazi school in his
neighborhood. He said that the Ashkenazi
girls would not let her play with them because she was a Sephardi.
In
this world of discrimination, at the hands of the ruling Ashkenazim, the
Sephardim have developed an interesting philosophy to get along in life. They say “Everyone under his own fig
tree.”
Bar-Ilan
University’s Professor Menachem Friedman, previously quoted, asserts that in the
Diaspora, religion was a unifying factor.
But in modern Israel, it is religion which has made the communities
divisive. The Ashkenazi world of Torah
study dealt with abstract concepts more so than the Sephardi style. Supposedly, the Ashkenazim were more
sophisticated.
Traditionally,
the Ashkenazi Ultra Orthodox has controlled the Ultra Orthodox world. In this vein, they controlled the schools and
would limit Sephardi attendance. But all
of this has been changing since the early 1980s and the rise of the Shas
movement and the fact that the Sephardim have large families.
Unity in Diversity?
The
Sep 1, 2000, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 30) had a story on “Diversity in conformity”
which discussed some of the problems and realities of division within the
Ashkenazi Orthodox community. This
article noted several of the Ashkenazi divisions--the Hassidic, Yeshivish,
Sgtuebek Orthodox, Young Israel Orthodox, Chabad Orthodox and Zionist
Orthodox.
The
Sephardi community also has a host of divisions and sects--many of which are
Ultra Orthodox (like the Shas people, as just noted above). Truly, there seems to be no end in division
within Judaism--both in Second Temple days and in contemporary times.
Finally,
there are Messianic Jewish congregations (now in Israel and indeed around the
world, as discussed in a former chapter) which don’t seem to fit into any of
the Jewish modules because organized Jewry generally treat all religious
Messianic Jews as outcasts.
However,
the Sep 1, 2000, “Jerusalem Post” article under discussion made a good point
about one facet of unity (which goes to give religious Jews some binding
together). Per the Post, they are all
bound together by “belief in the divinity of the Torah and the unwavering faith
in Jewish history and destiny as presented to us in Jewish tradition.”
So
while there are these enormous differences and conflicts between the sects,
there is also a factor of unity which can make them come together on important
points, affecting all of them (especially, in the vein of religion).
More on the Secular Jews
This
same “Jerusalem Post” article also went on to note the attitude of non-Orthodox
Jews.
The
non Orthodox have always held a prime axiom that Jews, the Jewish people and
the Jewish state could never succeed in the modern world if it was burdened by
the commandments (in the Torah), strictness and customs of the Torah and Jewish
tradition. Most of these non Orthodox
are secularists or Reform Jews who believe in little or nothing.
Consequently,
there is a basis for a conflict in the modern state of Israel between the
Orthodox and the non Orthodox. This
division will soon surface its head prominently, as numbers of Orthodox Jews
undertake the resumption of the daily sacrifice and the building of a Third
Temple on Mount Moriah (described in previous chapters).
The
Amalekite bankers/masters calling the shots around the world and in the state
of Israel will have a conflict on their hands that they cannot win. The Amalekites (which are heavily present
among the secularists and Reform Jews) hate the idea of animal sacrifices and a
new Temple, just as they hate the idea of the authority of YHWH’s mitzwot in
the Torah and traditional, Jewish, religious customs.
For
sure, the Amalekites will not prevail against the Orthodox community, as these
issues unravel. They are powerful. But their power is not so strong in the
Israeli state, as many Westerners might suppose.
The Orthodox Religious Power
Furthermore,
on this theme, there is the religious question in Israel where Orthodox Judaism
is extremely influential and powerful today.
As will be broached in subsequent remarks, many or most of the
secularist Jews in Israel (like the Amalekites, who are actually secret sons of
Satan) are much afraid of the Orthodox leadership.
When
the chips are down, the Amalekites are generally reluctant to challenge the
Orthodox leadership (the Sephardi Orthodox is probably made up of true Jews,
though the Ashkenazi Orthodox may have some Amalekite presence in it).
As
noted earlier, a Jew in Israel refused some years ago to obey the Torah and
marry the widow of his deceased brother and raise up a son and name him after
the dead brother (Gen 38:8; Deut 25:5-10).
The
woman demanded the right to remove his shoe and spit in his face in public (Ru
4:7-8, to acquire the property of the dead brother, per the “Soncino Chumash,”
p. 1113). He refused. The issue went to the Israeli courts and the
courts upheld the Orthodox authorities and the Torah. The widow won the right to obey the
Torah.
As
late as September 2000, there was a flare-up in Israel over the insistence of
many Orthodox (especially Ultra Orthodox) that Jewish farmers observe the
Seventh year land rest, which commenced in the fall of 2000 (Arab farmers would
be unaffected, so they could continue to raise and sell produce). The secular government (mainly Amalekites)
and many Jewish farmers were absolutely opposed to this prospect.
But
the Orthodox (to include the Ultra Orthodox, which only numbers about 20-30% of
the population of Jerusalem, as noted earlier) have been very dominant in
Israel. Historically, the Orthodox and
especially the Rabbinic leaders have proven to be so strong that the Amalekite
secularists have been unable to successfully oppose them.
So
there has been a continuing fight over the Sabbath land issue during the summer
and early fall of 2000, although an article in the Sep 15, 2000, “Jerusalem
Post” (p. 5) suggested that Rabbinic authorities have authorized the status quo
to continue with the farmers “selling their lands to non-Jews for the Sabbath
year.” When the Sabbath year ended (fall
of 2001), the non-Jews sold the land back to the Jews.
Secular Jews Are Afraid
Events
like these, as just described, tell the tale in terms of the modern Israeli
state. Secular authorities are usually
afraid to take on the Orthodox leadership.
That’s
why Amalekite Jews may holler and complain about human rights, women’s rights,
feminism, minority rights and racism, homosexual rights, gun ownership and so
forth in America; but they largely keep their mouths shut in the state of
Israel. There are no affirmative action
programs in Israel. There is no talk of
minority rights in Israel. There are no
gay rights programs in Palestine.
There
is no feminism (women in Israel learn to keep their mouths shut and play a
subordinate role to men) or miscegenation with the Arabs. Schools are segregated. And in many of them, there is a segregation
of the sexes. Jews own guns and there is
no talk of gun laws.
American
Amalekite Jews (like Charles Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, and Ruth
Ginsberg) may be big leaders and big mouths in the United States; but in
Israel, they learn to keep their mouths shut or they could be in trouble.
In
many areas in modern Israel, there is even a strict observance of the Sabbath
days and festivals (things not to be found in the Christian West). There are religious expressions in the modern
state of Israel which are simply unheard of in the Christian culture and
civilization.
Hence,
it has to be very questionable to what extent the former Cahilla exists in
Israel. If it is there, it may pull the
strings behind the scenes on the politicians (on political, social and economic
issues); but assuredly, it does not take on the Orthodox leadership in
religious affairs (at least, not in frontal confrontations in 2003).
The Haredim, Revisited
While
the Amalekite secularists seem hesitant or reluctant to take on the prevailing
Orthodox religious authorities, it is interesting that they have not shown this
hesitancy in dealing with the Ultra Orthodox sect at Mea Shearim in Jerusalem. The previously discussed article, by Daniel
Klaidman on “The New Defectors” (Dec 13, 1999, “Newsweek,” p. 52-54), focused
upon a man named Noam who abandoned the sect.
However,
there was a twist in Klaidman’s article which is both interesting and
sorrowful. Per Klaidman, the Israeli
government has taken action to try to undercut and hurt Mea Shearim in very
positive actions. The government has a
program in place to actively help and assist people like Noam who wish to leave
the Ultra Orthodox world.
Since
these people have been largely born and raised in the sheltered, Ultra
Orthodox, Haredi community, they are very naive and limited in trying to move
into the secular Israeli society and exist.
Apparently, to encourage Ultra Orthodox people to abandon their religions
and people, the government has adopted this new plan.
Klaidman
suggests that the government works closely (by providing money and funding)
with a private agency called “Hilel” to supply defectors with everything needed
from “psychological help to a temporary home with a foster family.” In the case of Noam, he was placed in a
kibbutz in Southern Israel and later enrolled at Hebrew University to study the
classics.
Some
Israelis have suggested that with the prospects of a peace treaty with the Arabs,
the government can turn its attention to the wide cultural differences within
the existing Jewish community.
Evidently, they have chosen to commence with a focus on the Haredi
people who are extremely sincere in their faith.
The
insanity of this motion plainly suggests that it is probably the brain child of
evil Amalekites. In fact, the Hilel
leader is a possible Amalekite named Ami Dolev, who was a “passionate liberal”
at Berkeley back in the 1960s. It
appears that Dolev has taken his ideas to Palestine to try to destroy the Ultra
Orthodox sects. What a tragedy it is
that his group uses the respected name of “Hilel.”
A
former chapter herein mentioned the work of Yaron Yadan; who, in 1998,
organized a group called “Da’at Emet” (True Wisdom) with a specific outreach to
the Ultra Orthodox in an effort to have them abandon their faith. It is unclear how much support, money and pay
offs Yadan is getting from the government, but surely some money is coming to
him as is also happening with “Hilel.”
Thus,
it now appears that the Israeli government will try to destroy the Ultra
Orthodox sects. As discussed elsewhere
herein, the destruction of fundamentalist religious groups (Christian, Jewish,
Islamic and so forth) is a primary goal of the New World Order (in order to
bring on a one world religious state).
Just as the US murdered the Branch Davidians, the Israeli state is
opposing the Ultra Orthodox.
More Opposition
Incidentally,
the presence of the deeply religious people at Mea Shearim has caused a number
of problems over the years with the more secularist government
authorities. On Sabbath days, everything
stops in Mea Shearim. The streets are
closed and no automobiles are allowed to be driven into the area. The Ultra Orthodox are so committed that when
cars drive near their area, they come out in force and stone them.
The
Feb 11, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A3) had an AP follow-up on the
Ultra Orthodox passion in a story on “Israeli mailman attacked for un-Orthodox
deliveries.” Per this report, residents
at Mea Shearim attacked a mailman because he was delivering brochures which had
a photo from the Israeli government showing a woman without a head covering in
information on civil defense in Israel.
Actually,
there have been a number of confrontations over the years between the Ultra
Orthodox and the secular police and authorities; perhaps in part, because the
Ultra Orthodox do not recognize the Israeli government, as discussed
earlier. Possibly, this is one of the
contributing reasons to motivate the government to try to destroy the Haredi
community.
The
very secular and obvious Ashkenazi run “Jerusalem Post” regularly runs cartoons
and stories which belittle, ridicule and make fun of the Haredi community and
especially its religious leaders.
Manifestly, the Post treats the Haredim in a very pronounced
disrespectful, contemptible and hateful manner.
Probably, this Israeli media view represents the position of most
secular Israelis.
While
the honorable and sincere Ovadia Yosef (surely a modern Reb, of the Shas group,
to be further discussed below) is frequently ridiculed and made fun of on a
personal basis in the controlled Jewish media.
Tragically, the media attacks upon the Ultra Orthodox are often more
general attacks upon all Ultra Orthodox and not just one person or segment of
the definition.
A
good illustration of this general indictment happened in the April 5, 2002,
“Jerusalem Post” (p. 18-19) in a story of “Going beyond the pale,” by Eeta
Prince-Gibson.” The apparent aim of the
article was to ridicule the Haredim and to make out that many of them want to
leave their traditional religious paths to now go into the Israeli army.
Much
of Gibson’s report hung on the so-called wisdom of an alleged Ultra Orthodox
social critic named Tzvia Greenfield (a photo of her must question her alleged
religious status and invite the possibilities that she is actually a butch
lesbian Amalekitess).
Greenfield
says that Ultra Orthodox Jews are taught to accept the rulings of their
“rabbis.” She adds that that kind of
education “does not provide anyone with the basic tools for the most basic and
natural introspection or self-critique.”
Thus, she says, “most haredi Jews simply don’t learn to think for
themselves--they just trust what the rabbis tell them is right.” Few question their “rabbis.”
Israeli Government Reaction
Israel’s
third largest party is the just noted Ultra Orthodox Shas party. For years, it was headed by a charismatic
leader named Aryeh Deri. Probably, much
of the growth of Shas can be traced to the hard work and determination of
Deri. When the Labor government under
Ehud Barak came to power, it was done so with a coalition government involving
Shas and some of the other, right wing, religious parties.
In
the coalition, Deri became the Interior Minister. In time, he was prosecuted and convicted for
corruption (in apparently trying to promote his party, using government
resources and funds). He entered prison
in early September 2000 to begin serving his time (Sep 8, 2000, “Jerusalem Post,”
p. 1).
However,
his supporters claim that the government prosecution was discriminatory since
his actions were of the same caliber as those routinely done by other Israeli
ministers for their parties. They claim
that he was singled out and persecuted because of his Haredi connections.
In
any case, Shas and the other Haredi people have been able to motivate and
influence thousands of people to protest the jailing of Deri. Regularly, while he was in jail, there were
protests and demonstrations on his behalf (he was released in July 2002).
It
is possible that the Israeli government’s actions against Deri may backfire and
actually make him a martyr and even more of an influential figure in Israeli
politics.
Though
haters of Judaism (consisting of almost all of the world of Christianity--to
include the modern Christian Identity movement) may laugh, cut up and be happy
over this Israeli persecution upon Ultra Orthodox Jews, the truth is that these
people are much like the Davidians and various other small sects in the
Christian West.
Government
authorities all over the world (who are trying to bring in a one world
religion) hate these small, non-conforming, religious entities.
This
writer is certainly not endorsing all of the views of the Ultra Orthodox. But there are some very good reasons to
support them and allow them religious freedom to choose their views without
government interference.
Surely,
in the vein of decency and religious liberty and freedom (which multiplied
millions died for in the Protestant Reformation), the Ultra Orthodox people are
entitled to practice their faith--just as the Davidians should have been
afforded this same basic decency. In
both cases and thousands more like them, there are powerful Satanic forces
which are out to destroy non-conformists.
Whether
anyone agrees or disagrees with these various small religious sects (like the
Davidians and the Ultra Orthodox), they should be allowed religious
freedom. And when governments take on
the stance of oppressing and hurting small non-conforming groups, one can be
sure that all similar small sects can receive the same treatment. No wonder secular governments will hate the
very elect so passionately.
Orthodox Power
As
discussed above, the Orthodox religious authorities do carry a big stick in the
state of Israel. While many or most Jews
in the state of Israel today are totally secularists (and of this number, many
are surely depraved Amalekites), all Jews (even including the Amalekites) are
significantly afraid of the Orthodox religious system and people.
There
are not many Jews who will dare try to take on the Orthodox power
structure. Amalekite Satanists may hate
Judaism and true Jews passionately (as they do), but they are careful about
making any frontal attacks upon religious/observant Jews. This is a strange paradox (just as it is
phenomenal that Judaism could retain so much good--with all of the prevailing
power present of the Amalekite children of Satan).
In
any case, the essence of the cited “Jerusalem Post” stories is that a
confrontation is building up between the Orthodox power structure and the
secularist Jews (mainly Ashkenazi Amalekites--ed) in the coming days. Certainly, the present Ultra Orthodox push
for recognition of the Sabbath year, as noted above, will contribute to
it.
More on Moves by Shas
The
year 2002 also saw a surfacing of a desire and push by religious Jews
(especially the Ultra Orthodox) for a religious state in Israel (Aug 12, 2002,
“Jerusalem Report,” p. 12-13).
The
honorable and respected Ovadia Yosef and other Shas leaders have derided the
Israeli court system which does not always rule according to Jewish religious
law (ibid, p. 12). Yosef the Reb is
working on a halakhic code which could, in time, replace the secular legal
apparatus (ibid, p. 13).
Professor
Hillel Weiss of Bar-Ilan University has proposed a presidential system with a
religious court, a Sanhedrin, which guides all branches of government (ibid, p.
13).
This
plan could be taking shape since the previously noted Jewish religious
Sanhedrin was launched in Tiberias, Isarel on Oct 13, 2004. The new group meets monthly and will play a
key role in the coming Third Temple. The
71 members each serve temporarily with the understanding that he will step down
when a better qualified and more knowledgeable person comes forward to take his
place.
Knesset
member Druckman would like to see Israel run by Jewish law, but says that it can
only come about by democratic processes.
He expects it to eventually happen--because “we are living in the age of
the messiah” (ibid, p.13).
While
the controlled Jewish media in Israel hates and opposes the Ultra Orthodox and
especially Ovadia Yosef, the Shas leader, Ovadia does carry a big stick. Indeed, his plans for the implementation of a
halakhic code of law on Israel may move forward (though the secularist
Amalekites will fight it tooth and nail).
A
powerful demonstration of Shas power was outlined in a story from Israel on
“Arab, Gay, Rabbi Blocked From Jerusalem City Council” in the Nov 15, 2002,
“Forward” (p. 1). The essence of this
report was that the three cited people were selected by local Jerusalem
interests to represent the three different factions in question.
The
Arab was an Israeli Arab, the faggot was Jerry Levinson, head of the Jerusalem
Open House and the so-called “rabbi” was David Lazar, a Conservative
“rabbi.” However, the Jerusalem mayor’s
office and the Israeli Interior Ministry are both controlled by the Shas Ultra
Orthodox people. Thus, they came out and
said “no” to all three proposed council members.
The
nixed three said that they would go to court over the matter since they all
three supposedly meet the qualifications outlined in the city by-laws. But the point of this story is that Shas does
carry a big stick in Israeli politics.
Shas wields that big stick whenever necessary in order to promote its
religious agenda (which does not include queers, Arabs or non-Orthodox
people).
The
present Mayor, Ehud Olmert, apparently is not Ultra Orthodox. But the Deputy Mayor, Uri Lupolianski is (Dec
2, 2002, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 14). If
Olmert should go to the Knesset (the Parliament) or otherwise leave the mayor’s
office, there is a good chance that Lupolianski will take over (actually, this
happened in 2003). If this happens, the
mayor may force city residents to be more respectful of Jewish law.
Another
illustration about the attitude of Shas toward its elected leaders was outlined
in the Dec 27, 2002, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 5) in a news report about a sermon
Shas spiritual leader Ovadia Yosef had just delivered (respecting the coming
Jan 2003 elections). Ovadia declined to
offer Minister-without-Portfolio Eli Suissa a slot on the Shas list for
parliament.
Yosef
claimed that “Suissa is from the world of laziness, not from our world of
action.” Thus, Ovadia believes that
Suissa is a lazy person and should not represent Shas in the Knesset.
Still More From “Forward”
The
Oct 26, 2001, “Forward” had a page one story which demonstrated the growing
antagonism between observant (religious) Jews and secularist Jews (who are
mainly Ashkenazi Amalekites that either practice no religion or label
themselves Reform). This “Forward” story
by Ami Eden noted that a leading Reform “rabbi” activist has publicly compared
the Orthodox to the Islamic fundamentalists.
The
activist said that “There are vicious (Orthodox) attacks on Reform Judaism,
demonizing us as the devils of the Jewish world.” In 1996, Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron, a former Chief
Orthodox Rav, compared the OT account of Pinchas killing an Israelite sinner as
being the justifiable murder of the first Reform Jew. Orthodox call Reform and Conservative Jews
“criminals, destroyers of religion and enemies of ‘God.’”
A
former chapter quoted Anat Hoffman, executive director of the Reform’s Israel
Religious Action Center in Jerusalem. As
pointed out, Anat says that Orthodox compare Reform Jews with the Nazis and
suicide bombers. She has declared that
she will fight the “growing radicalization among the Orthodox.” It was unclear in the “Forward” article what
measures Anat will adopt in her war against the Orthodox.
More on the Haredi
The
Haredi communities (Ultra Orthodox) also carry a great deal of local
autonomy. Hence, they pretty well do
about whatever they want to do, as outlined in the previous comments. They rope off and control their areas (where
they live). Other Jews are hard pressed
to try to enter their compounds and exercise any authority over them (as noted
above, they stone moving cars in their areas on the Sabbaths).
The
Haredim have another little peculiarity which just does not set well with the
other Israelis. The Haredim refuse to
allow their young people to be conscripted into the Israeli military. Other Jews dislike this position and
especially since the Ultra Orthodox people get away with it. The Ultra Orthodox argue that their people
are involved in religious studies and cannot be drafted by the state.
Actually,
this Haredi assertion has merit because most Ultra Orthodox males do devote
their lives to the study of Torah (Sep 10, 2001, “Jerusalem Report,” p.
45). Shas has a particular effort
devoted to the use of schools and charities, designed to bring Sephardi Jews
back to a seriousness on religion. With
this work and the large families that Sephardi Jews produce, Shas will have a
roll to play in Israel in the coming days.
The
previously quoted Aug 5, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-2) had some remarks
from Mark Lane on the formerly mentioned Neturei Karta Ultra Orthodox sect in
Jerusalem. He said that they “do not
recognize the state of Israel, pay no taxes to it, do not attend its schools,
do not register their children at birth with the Israeli regime and above all,
refuse to serve in its military.”
Obviously, the government hates this group.
In
any case, perhaps some of this reality has motivated the government to launch
its attack upon the Ultra Orthodox, as described above, in the “Newsweek”
article on Noam (who was assisted by the government to abandon and leave the
Ultra Orthodox community at Mea Shearim) and with the prosecution and
conviction of Aryeh Deri.
Views of Secular Jews on the Ultra
Orthodox
The
“To Eliminate the Opiate” (v. II, p. 273) had a quotation from the Dec 21,
1999, “Jerusalem Post” which offered the following comments from a letter from
Alan Freishtat of Jerusalem to the Post:
“General
(Res.) Sholomo Gazit said in a public speech that the knitted kippot on the
heads of IDF soldiers remind him of the Iron Cross worn by Nazi soldiers.
“Meretz
founder Shulamit Aloni described the haredi (religious) population as ‘sucking
from the same sinister passions which nurtured the Nazis.’
“‘We
have to storm Mea She’arim with machine guns and mow them down,’ recommends
left-wing darling Uri Avnery.
“‘I
would take all those weird people from Shas, Aguda, and Degel HaTorah, tie
their beards together and light a match,’ says Amnon Dankner.
“Yonatan
Gefen announces his willingness to cast the first stone in the intifada against
haredim, and Professor Uzi Amon tells a Kol
Ha’ir interviewer, ‘Haredim should be suspended from an electric
pole.’
“And
let’s not forget the rally in favor of the Supreme Court at Sacher Park in
which you (“you” here evidently refers to the editor of the “Jerusalem Post”
--ed) personally were an active participant, where the words of ‘war’ and
‘killing’ were used against the haredim.”
Chapter
459--The Secularization of Religious Jews
An Israeli Constitution?
In
another matter, the “Jerusalem Post” (p. 1) of Aug 25, 2000, had a front page
story on “Barak seeking secular constitution within a year” by Amotz
Asa-El. It laid out how serious the move
to secularism is in the modern state of Israel--as is rapidly evolving among
many of the Jews.
Therefore,
the next catalyst to set off a major confrontation between religious and
secular Jews may be the just noted government plan for an Israeli constitution
within the next year or so (as enunciated by former Prime Minister Barak).
Though
it might seem that this new constitution is now off of the table (with the
election of Likud), such may not be the case at all (if the globalist Amalekite
plutocrats in North America and Europe rule both the Labor and Likud parties in
Palestine, as they rule divided parties in the US and in other Anglo-Saxon
lands). Again, Barry Chamish says that
these rich Diaspora Jews call the shots in Israel for both major parties.
When
the state of Israel was established in May 1948, there was a promise of a
coming Israeli constitution to govern the state. Despite this promise and the repeating of it
subsequently, the fact is that no government has taken any steps to implement
it. Perhaps the realties of the conflict
with the Arabs has acted to motivate leaders to back off from the constitution
idea.
Maybe
Barak was trying to gain some popular support presently by bringing up the
matter for discussion at that time. His
meetings with Arafat and the steps taken to adopt a Middle East peace treaty
made some enemies for him and his administration (as noted previously).
Consequently,
the constitution talk may have been pressed to hopefully give him a boost in
the polls which he supposedly needed at that time (although it didn’t help him
much because he lost the later Prime Minister elections).
The Details
Per
the “Jerusalem Post” report, Barak’s plan would permanently abolish the
Religious Affairs Ministry (which was arbitrarily closed by Barak during his
rule), the institution of universal civil service for all conscription-age
Israelis (including Ultra Orthodox), legitimatize civil marriages, and impose
English, math and citizenship studies on the entire educational system
(including the Haredi schools).
Manifestly,
Barak’s plan would be a disaster for Judaism and the Orthodox and especially
Ultra Orthodox people now in Israel.
Presently, the Orthodox controls part of the government through the
Religious Affairs Ministry and its Minister.
The civil marriage question is a reflection upon the power of Orthodox
authorities, who control all Jewish marriages and divorces.
The
secular Israelis don’t like this religious control of marriages and
divorces. Israeli feminists, in
particular, have frequently tried to oppose Orthodox religious authorities on
marriage and divorce questions. So far,
they have not been given the time of day on their wishes. This infuriates Amalekite feminists.
The Move to Secularization
As
briefly touched upon above, the Israeli government announced plans to
arbitrarily close down the Religious Affairs Ministry (at the end of September
2000). Plans were also afoot to allow
public transportation on the Sabbath (including the resumption of El Al airline
flights, which have not flown on the Sabbaths for the past 18 years).
Moreover,
in preparation for the new secularized constitution (cited above) and the
adoption of government practices to separate religion from government, Barak
played up to his opposition party (the Likud) and cut his ties with the
religious parties, which helped give him government control (Sep 15, 2000,
“Jerusalem Post,” p. 1).
Even
the so-called national unity has continued under Likud and Sharon (as noted
above--before finally breaking apart in Nov 2002).
National
Religious Party leader Shaul Yahalom said that Barak was fast establishing
himself as the most anti-religious prime minister in Israeli history (Sep 15,
2000, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 1).
Other
right wing religious groups were also angry at the direction Barak chartered
for the government. Quite naturally, the
Amalekite children of Satan were all excited and happy over what Barak was
doing to sincere religious Jews.
Nissim Dahan and Eli Yishai,
Revisited
A
former chapter discussed some comments from Nissim Dahan and Eli Yishai,
leaders of the Ultra Orthodox Shas party.
Without repeating those comments, the point these men made was that
there is a move in Israel to make the Israeli state a completely secular
state. Yishai blamed Shinui head Yosef
Lapid and Labor leader Amram Mitzra (Jan 3, 2003, “Forward,” p. 4).
For
sure, if Shinui succeeds, things will change for religious Jews, like the Ultra
Orthodox (Shinui wants to knock out the present provisions for Ultra Orthodox
people to avoid military service, the rabbinate monopoly on marriage and
divorce, and the ban on public transport on the Sabbaths--Feb 10, 2003,
“Jerusalem Report,” p. 17).
According
to Yishai, if this secularist motion succeeds, there will be an outburst of
pork, Christmas trees and Christian Churches (Jan 3, 2003, “Forward,” p.
4).
Nissim
Dahan expressed his view that non-religious (non-observant) Jews should not be
allowed to immigrate to Israel (ibid, p. 4).
In other words, all incoming Jews have to be religious (in the vein of
the Orthodox and Ultra Orthodox).
Both
of the Shas leaders ran into a wall of resistance among many of the Amalekites
who are the big promoters of the secularist ideas. While the future of this Shas push will not
likely succeed, it is fascinating that there are some deeply religious Jews
willing to speak out.
A US Rally
The
February 15, 2002, “Forward” (p. 4) had an article by Nacha Cattan on “Chasidic
Rally in N.Y. Charges Israel With Waging ‘Secular Intifada.’” The title of this story pretty well tells the
tale. Per Cattan, 5,000 Hasidic Ultra
Orthodox Jews lined up on the streets near the Israeli Consulate in Manhattan
to protest Israel’s maltreatment of religious Jews.
The
protesters carried signs saying that “We are Jews not Zionists.” One speaker accused the Israeli government of
conducting a “secular intifada” against Orthodox Jews. Several specific incidents were highlighted
in the confrontation.
The
Hasidim were particularly incensed at the death in Israel of Rav Yehuda Samer
who tried to stop a fight between a vendor of pornographic material and
religious Jews in Jerusalem while the Israeli police stood by. Concern was also expressed over present
Israeli plans to make Ultra Orthodox yeshiva students serve in the
military.
One
rav told the crowd that “We are here to protest the State of Israel for its vicious
desecration of the Orthodox Jewish religion.”
Another protester, Michael Lebowitz, said that the protest was in
Israel’s best interest since “So many attacks happen to Jews all over the world
because we don’t follow the Bible, especially in Israel.”
Please
understand that these charges were made against the present Sharon
government--which means that the secularization campaign started under Barak is
going full blast under Sharon. This evil
has involved both major Israeli parties and not just the liberal Labor
party.
Reducing the Role of Religion
Regardless
of whether the planned constitution is adopted or not, the fact remains that
the Israeli government is trying to reduce the role of religion in its society
(which both the Likud and Labor parties generally support). Assuredly, serious religious people are
quickly becoming enemies of the state--just as is true in the Christian
West.
Barry
Chamish’s observations about the plutocratic control of Israel and both of her
major parties has been borne out by the after-effects of Sharon’s take over of
the Israeli government. A good example
of this condition surfaced in the Jan 11, 2002, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 6) which
reported that Sharon is the first Israeli Prime Minister to meet with the Israeli
lesbian-gay-transsexual community.
Both
Sharon and the President of Israel Moshe Katsav have met with representatives
of the Political Council for Gay Rights.
So, like their counterparts in America, even so-called conservative
Israelis are ready to compromise everything in order to march to the tune of
the globalist plutocrats.
More Secular Opposition to
Righteousness
There
is another fall out on this subject. As
outlined in former chapters and in the above comments, everything is moving into
place for religious Jews to gain access to the Temple Mount and build an altar
there (and later the Third Temple) and re-institute animal sacrifices. This will be a profound event which will have
an exceptional impact upon the whole world.
Many
Jews and especially Amalekites will oppose this eventuality. Maybe Barak was (consciously or unconsciously
under Satanic motivation and guidance) trying to head it off with his
secularization attempts.
But
this secularization effort will not succeed in stopping the Third Temple
because The ELOHIM is in charge of this eventuality. It will go forward and cannot be stopped by
man.
The
essence here is that there seems to be a growing problem on religion in the
modern state of Israel. It’s extremely
possible that there is a basic, behind the scenes conflict between the
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters and the true Israeli Jews, in terms of governing
the modern state of Israel (as manifested in the religious conflict).
Despite
the present attacks upon the Ultra Orthodox earlier and now the whole Orthodox
religious community, the evidence is overwhelming that YHWH is preparing the
state of Israel in a right way for a work of righteousness here in the age end.
Whether
The ELOHIM will allow the government to crush the Ultra Orthodox and their
beliefs and reduce the role of the Orthodox is still open to question.
If
He does, it might ultimately work for good because even the Ultra Orthodox (as
obedient and faithful as they are) do have some problems. Amalekite persecution of the Ultra Orthodox
will help clean them up--just as the Amalekite persecution of the Christian
right wing will help to clean them up in America.
Otherwise,
The ELOHIM might could over time purge the evil Amalekites and their wickedness
from the Israeli leadership. And if so,
this will be a wonderful motion when YHWH works out His will among the
Israelis. This is not far fetched at
all.
Certainly,
Germany was under the grip of wicked Amalekites before, during and after
WWI. Under the evil Schicklgruber, this
power ended (although it returned with the American military occupation). In his persecution of Jews, Adolf clearly
destroyed a lot of evil Amalekites (along with some innocent Jews). This view has support from many modern
religious Jews.
The Ultra Orthodox on the Holocaust
As
outlined in a former chapter, many of the Ultra Orthodox Jewish entities look
upon the so-called Holocaust against Ashkenazi, Secular Jews in Europe as a
destruction of evil people. Actually,
this feeling seems to predominate among many of the Ultra Orthodox. It is not a rare belief at all.
The
Haredi press in Israel regularly charges that the WWII Holocaust was a
punishment for Reform Judaism’s religious innovations (Oct 26, 2001, “Forward,”
p. 10). Haredi Jews are simply not
obsessed with the so-called Holocaust, as is true with Ashkenazi Amalekites
(who are mainly atheists, agnostics or Reform Jews).
The
highly respected Rav Ovadia Yosef, spiritual leader of the Ultra Orthodox,
Sephardi, Shas sect in Israel has been more specific by offering his belief
that the Jews who died in the Holocaust were reincarnations of sinners (Aug 11,
2000, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 1). Yosef’s
statement evoked a huge protest in Israel from the Ashkenazi Jews (many
Amalekites).
The
“Jerusalem Post” (p. 13) of May 26, 2000, had an article by Naomi Regan on “A
haredi Holocaust museum?” which noted that Haredi leader Menachem Mendel Taub
believes that the Haredi community should have its own alternative to Vad
Vashem, the Israeli Holocaust museum (which was established in 1953).
As
Regan wrote, the Haredi people do not visit or have any interest in the Vad
Vashem museum (dedicated to Ashkenazi Jews, who died in Europe in WWII). The Haredi claim that their opposition to the
museum stems from the presence in it of pictures of women without their clothes
on. Haredi youth know little about the
WWII Holocaust. Holocaust victims are
not even honored in the Haredi communities.
Naomi
Regan concluded that “The desire of the haredim to even remember and mourn
separately, and to deny their children the experience of sharing in the Jewish
people’s collective memory, is unforgivable.”
Obviously, the Haredi people do not see the WWII Holocaust in the same
way that Ashkenazi, secular Jews (mostly Amalekites) view it.
A
story on “It’s Cold Outside,” in the Apr 7, 2003, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 14),
addressed the 700-student Ultra Orthodox Derekh Tvunah Talmud Torah school in
Jerusalem. At this school, Israeli
Independence Day is not celebrated and the students do not stand still during
the memorial sirens for fallen soldiers or Holocaust victims (as happens with
Israeli students at other schools).
More on the Modern Haredim, Zionism and
the Holocaust
The
previously discussed Neturei Karta sect in Brooklyn, New York and in Jerusalem,
Israel speaks of a Zionist conspiracy as the archenemy of the Jewish people (as
it is against Jewish tradition and law).
The group adds that the WWII Holocaust was punishment upon the Jews for
pushing their ideas of a Jewish state in Palestine.
As
discussed earlier, Neturei Karta leader R. Yisroel David Weiss says that most
people who claim to be Jews are not Jews (apparently, Rav Weiss quoted from Revelation
2:9 and 3:9 of the NT).
One
of the recently important turn of events with this Ultra Orthodox group was
their decision to link in with the Nation of Islam in opposition to the state
of Israel (Mar 20, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2).
The
Jul 8, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-2) had a report on the 2002 “Barnes
Review International Conference on Authentic History and the First
Amendment.” Rav Weiss spoke to this
group and said: “...Ironically, the
Zionist state was supposedly created to protect Jews from anti-Semitism, yet
they are the greatest and main creator of anti-Semitism worldwide.”
In
a follow-up report, the Aug 5, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-4) had another
story by Rav Weiss on “An Orthodox Rabbi Speaks Candidly On the Legitimacy of
the State of Israel” which said that “Zionism encourages Jews to lord over all
non-Jews. This results in endless Jewish
confrontations with all people.”
The
Oct 28, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 3) had another report on Rav Weiss and
the Neturei Karta Ultra Orthodox (from an article by M. Raphael Johnson, as
headlined-- “‘Christians’ Attack Anti-Zionist Jews at Rally”).
In
background, the Christian Coalition held a rally in Washington on Oct 11-12,
2002, in support of the state of Israel.
Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Oliver North, Pat Boone, Roy Innis, former
Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Phyllis Schlafly, Ken Starr and
House Speaker Dennis Hastert and other members of Congress showed up (along
with members of Neturei Karta to protest against Israel).
At
the meeting, Rav Weiss said: “Zionism is
not traditional Judaism. This secular
ideology requires that Jews lord it over non-Jews, attempting to control their
foreign policy and media in the interests of this bandit state (of
Israel). True, Orthodox Judaism says
that we must be loyal and patriotic citizens of whatever nation we reside
in.”
Teaching English, Revisited
A
previous chapter quoted an article on “Teaching English on Mars” by Caley
Ben-David in the Jul 6, 2001, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 27). This work concerned a book by Gerry
Albarelli, a Roman Catholic, brought in by the Satmar community of Brooklyn,
New York to teach English to Ultra Orthodox boys at the Yeshiva.
Apparently,
the children ask their teachers from the outside world about the state of
Israel. On starting to work, Albarelli
was told “No talk about Israel... If the boys ask you about Israel, tell ‘em to
see the rabbi. That’ll be the end of
that question forever.” The Satmar sect
is very anti-Zionist and much opposed to the state of Israel.
More Jewish Thinking
The
well respected and honest Rav Ovadia Yosef (mentioned several times earlier
herein) continues to receive publicity from time to time because he is a person
of integrity and will speak out on important issues without fear of political
correctness or incorrectness.
In
early 2001, Ovadia received much press when he came out and suggested the
genocidal liquidation of the Palestinian Arabs (as briefly cited earlier). Yosef’s conclusions caused quite an uproar
and even in Israel.
Importantly,
it would appear that his beliefs are shared by some Americans. GOP House leader Dick Armey says that the
Palestinians should be removed (expelled) from Palestine to another country
(May 13, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).
Surely, this would constitute a form of genocide.
A
prominent Orthodox Jewish lawyer in Washington named Nathan Lewin has urged
that family members of suicide bombers be executed (Jun 7, 2002, “Forward,” p.
1). Lewin has been mentioned as a
candidate for a federal judgeship. He is
also noted as a Jewish community leader and legal advisor to several Orthodox
organizations. The death of Palestinians
is definitely on the minds of some prominent Jews.
Actually,
if the Israelis do kill them all (per Yosef’s solution) or move them all out (as
Armey has suggested), it would only go to help the many Americans who soon will
have to flee to safety in Palestine (when America is destroyed in WWIII). The removal of these Palestinians will open
up land for the coming Americans.
Too,
when YESHUA returns, the Palestinians will become a subject of history
only. As pointed out in previous
comments, they will either be killed or relocated. For sure, the Palestinian Arabs are on the
way out in old Canaan land. Therefore,
it would seem that whatever actions the present Israelis take in this direction
will only mean that there will be less problems in Palestine for YESHUA when He
comes.
The Wise Yosef
However,
there is still more to come on Ovadia Yosef which many Jews refuse to
recognize.
He
clearly is a man of honor, character and integrity. He surely is a true Israelite, worthy of
respect and support. Incidentally, this
writer would never try to anticipate YHWH’s actions in selecting His people for
a work in the age end. But likely, Yosef
the Reb must be a candidate for the age end high priest, who helps to restore
true worship (as elsewhere described herein).
As
observed in the above comments on the feelings of Ovadia Yosef on the Ashkenazi
Jews in the European Holocaust, there is a sharp distinction between the
Sephardi and Ashkenazi Jews. Many or
most (maybe not 100% of all) Ashkenazim seem to have their ancestral roots with
the Amalekite Khazars (as cited in previous chapters). Accordingly, they are very different people
from the Sephardi Israelite Jews.
Yosef
seems to be cognizant of these differences.
In a possible illustration of the wisdom and incisive understanding that
Ovadia has on this theme, the Dec 13, 2002, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 19) quoted
Yosef and other Shas leaders in a story by Larry Derfner on “Over the
hill.” The essence of Derfner’s article
was an assessment of the role of Shas in the January 2003 Israeli
elections.
One
of the important findings Derfner offered was some advice from Yosef (whom, as
elsewhere described herein, the controlled Israeli media generally dislikes and
takes every opportunity to ridicule and demean).
Perhaps
the most interesting words of Yosef was that whomever votes for Shas will go to
heaven; and whomever doesn’t vote for Shas is collaborating with Amalek. The “Wikipedia.org” website on the Internet
also notes that Ovadia often quotes Obadiah 1:18 on the evil Edomites as
linking to his Jewish opponents in the state of Israel.
In
other words, it would seem at a first glance that Yosef links some of the other
Israeli political parties and people (evidently Ashkenazi) with Amalek (which
is precisely what this publication asserts herein). This is just one more proof that Yosef sees
an Amalek-Edomite linkage to certain Jews.
This
same Internet source also relates that Ovadia accuses the Ashkenazi Jews of
being the source of all evil: “all troubles from the Ashkenazim... You the
Jewish Ashkenazim, you have been in the West, in hell. Why did you come here? What you say or do is little
importance.” Since many or most of the
Amalekite Khazars identify as Ashkenazim, it
is important to note Ovadia’s tie of the two together.
Yes,
some of the people called Jews worldwide are not really Jews; but are, instead
Amalekites. The writer of this study
thinks that these Amalekite Jews are centered in America and the White British
Commonwealth nations. While surely some
of them are in the state of Israel (as acknowledged by Yosef), the better
option is that many or most of the Israeli Jews are not of Amalek.
But
the tragedy surfaces here in Israel in that the few or several Amalekites
(pretending to be Jews) in the Israeli state are in positions of power in the
government and the controlled media (just as is true in America). So while there perhaps aren’t great numbers
of Amalekite Jews in Palestine, there are some there as concluded by Yosef. Truly, Yosef has great wisdom and insight on
this subject in Palestine.
The Religious Yosef
If
there is a Jewish religious figure worthy of being called Reb (meaning a
sincere, religious and pious individual) today, it is Yosef. Among the Sephardim in Israel, Yosef has also
been given the honorary title of “Maran,” meaning “Our Master.”
Therefore,
in May 2001, the honest Ovadia once more arose to the occasion to state his
wisdom and perception as to reality.
This Ovadia outcry concerns the situation in the Israeli military. Though many of the Ultra Orthodox do not
serve in the Israeli army (like the Sephardi Shas people), some do.
Yosef,
like some of the other Sephardi leaders, has been concerned about the situation
with Sephardi Jews--in having to worship and religiously associate with the Ashkenazim
(who are very different people). Thus,
the May 11, 2001, “Jerusalem Post” (p. 4-5) had a news report over one more
important schism within organized Judaism and Jewry.
Ovadia
Yosef the Reb has publicly called for separate Sephardi “rabbis,” prayers and
worship practices for the Israeli military.
He disapproves of the integrated Sephardi and Ashkenazi worship
procedures now followed in the Israeli military. He wants the Ashkenazim and Sephardim
separated. Rav Meir Azari, chairman of
the “Israeli Council of Progressive Rabbis,” has endorsed Yosef’s views.
Israeli
President Moshe Katsav (who is a Sephardi in background, but worships with both
Jewish divisions) says that Yosef is entitled to his opinion, but he
disagrees. He adds that the Israelis
need to get rid of things that divide them.
The
point of this is that there is a sharp demarcation between the Sephardim and
the Ashkenazim, and it is coming into focus, more and more, here in the age
end.
More From Shas
As
outlined earlier, secular Jewish (correctly Amalekite, ed) sexual depravity and
perversion have been publicly criticized by the wise, honest and perceptive
Shlomo Ben-Izri, a Member of Parliament with the Ultra Orthodox Shas party (in
his comments upon an Israeli trans-gender person, as discussed in a prior
chapter).
A
previous chapter noted the situation at the mountain-top grave site of first
century mystic and festival patron, Shimon Bar Yohai. Pilgrims were segregated by gender at the
site, but could walk up the mountain together.
The
above cited Ovadia Yosef of Shas took note of the people coming there “dressed
in a licentious manner” and said that the chastity of the Shas Ultra Orthodox
could be offended (May 18, 2001, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 7).
So
Yosef urged that corrective action be taken.
The government responded by ordering that separate paths up the mountain
be created for men and women. Of course,
many of the butch type Ashkenazi feminists hollered like stuck pigs over the
ruling. The leftist “Jerusalem Post”
didn’t do Yosef any favors with the story (they regularly print cartoons of him
and write words to ridicule and demean Yosef).
The Bottom Line
From
1917 forward, the USSR was ruled by Amalekite masters. But then, in the late 1940s and early 1950s,
this vice was largely broken in the old Soviet Union. So it can happen today in the modern Israeli
state (as is happening in the growing conflict between secular and religious
Jews)--as well as in the US (when its national government is destroyed in
WWIII).
Yet,
despite the presence of a limitation or restriction in Amalekite Cahilla power
in Palestine, the evidence seems most persuasive that the Cahilla exists in
some form and with perhaps a modern Ha Ahad Ha’am in some framework of rule
over much of the goyim, Christian West (at least, in the Diaspora, in
Anglo-Saxon-Celtic lands).
Chapter
460--Israeli Intelligence Organizations
Israeli Intelligence Services
On
Amalekite hatred and evil, one must take note of the Mossad and the Shin Bet
(the Israeli intelligence services).
These are the world’s best intelligence operations because Jews
worldwide (whatever their supposed nationalities) generally support Israel and
her intelligence operations. Both the
Shin Bet and Mossad usually serve the state of Israel well and especially in
her conflict with the Arabs.
But
it is also true that the Amalekite Jew bankers use particularly the Mossad for
evil--just as they use the CIA and several other worldwide intelligence
services (as noted earlier and to be further covered in later chapters).
This
is a tragic reality of the real world and especially in the sense that both the
Mossad and the Shin Bet do often serve the Israeli state for good (but not
always, as will be established in the following remarks).
It
is manifestly clear that many of these Israeli intelligence agents are genetic
Amalekites. Being Amalekites, they tend
to fulfill their roles in life as children of Satan (yes, many of them are
homosexual queers and perverts--per priest John O’Connor, in his video on “Come
Lord Jesus”). With this genetic and
Satanic predisposition, they are like other Amalekites in the US and other
parts of the world.
They
are clannish and have a natural tendency to support the global Amalekite plans
for world rule and the destruction of true Yisrael.
The
Feb 3, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 6) had a story by Joe Sansone on
“Israeli Military Advocates Terrorism on U.S. Soil.” The essence of this report was that the
Mossad has a sub-unit organized called the Kidon which directs assassination
squads around the world to assassinate so-called enemies of Israel
(correctly--to assassinate enemies of the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters).
Reportedly,
plans are underway for Kidon to assassinate people in the US.
Sometimes There Are Differences
Thus,
the ultimate loyalty of the Israeli intelligence services is not always to the
Israeli state (unless the work/objectives of the Israeli state are in harmony
and conformity with the goals of the plutocratic Amalekite Jews in North
America and Europe. These objectives are
often the same, but not always).
Of
course, the internationalist Amalekite Jew bankers/masters “usually” support
the Israeli state. But they do have
their own agendas for world rule and destroying true Yisrael. So while the intelligence agents
theoretically support the modern Israeli state, some of them actually uphold
the globalist Amalekites first (as addressed elsewhere herein, in other
chapters on the International Amalekites).
In
this regard, the agents are much like the Amalekite Jews in the US government,
the CIA, the FBI, etc. Many naive people
actually suppose that these Amalekites serve the US government. No, not so at all. Their first loyalties are always to the
globalist Amalekite Jew power structure.
This reality is important to note as it was pointed out in prior
chapters on the John F. Kennedy assassination.
Anyone
wishing to criticize the Israelis for allowing the Amalekite Jew
bankers/masters to use the Mossad need to back off and realize that this is not
unusual since the Amalekites also use various and sundry other governments and
government agencies to do their will over much of the globe (certainly in
Britain and the US). This use is not
limited to Jewish Israel. People living
in glass houses should not throw stones.
Chapter
461--Amalekite Control in the West
More on the Bankers/Masters and Their
Organizations
Whatever
the number might be of the Amalekite bankers/masters, it is clear enough that
they have worked through various and sundry organizations and entities to
accomplish their goals for world government (like the Illuminati, Communism,
etc, as discussed earlier).
Likely,
the super rich Edgar Bronfman Sr (discussed earlier), as head of the World
Jewish Congress, is one of the masters and perhaps even the head man.
Besides
the World Jewish Congress and various Zionist organizations, it is plain to see
that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters are intimately involved in directing
powerful Amalekite hate groups--like the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish
Defense League, as described and commented upon in preceding chapters. Truly, no one can hate like an Amalekite can
hate.
The
previously discussed Southern Poverty Law Center, another well known hate group
(headed by Morris Dees), evidently receives a lot of Amalekite money.
The
racial and religious status of its leader Morris Dees is largely uncertain,
though some observers think that he is a Christian Amalekite (he does seem to
have an Amalekite-Hittite nose).
Manifestly, he regularly exhibits the works, fruits and deeds of the
evil and diabolical Amalekites.
When
something walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it must
be a duck. Seemingly, Dees is an
Amalekite. But regardless of his actual
status, it appears that he does do the work of the Amalekites and Satan. If he is an Amalekite, then surely he is very
near the masters in directing things in the US.
In Yehudah
The
situation with the House of Yehudah and her evident remaining presence among
modern Jews was discussed in previous chapters.
Suffice to say, the Amalekites took over Yehudah over 2,000 years ago. They still today have a stranglehold on the
true Israelite Jewish people (as was established in the preceding
chapters).
Furthermore,
as discussed in previous chapters on the Amalekite conspiracy, the evidence is
massive that the Amalekite globalists in the Christian West rule all of the
House of Yisrael and House of Yehudah nations (the US, Britain, Canada,
Australia, New Zealand, the modern state of Israel in Palestine, South Africa,
etc).
At
least, well informed Jewish researcher and analyst Barry Chamish (previously
quoted herein) has made this charge and it seems to have merit. Joel Skousen (also quoted earlier herein)
seems to support it as well (at least, in terms of what has happened with Ariel
Sharon).
In
Barry Chamish’s view, it doesn’t matter which party in Israel gains power. The party leaders will and have sold out to
the internationalists. On the surface,
Barry’s perception seems to carry a great deal of weight. Manifestly, powerful strings are being pulled
from behind the stage to control the Israeli government. It’s very questionable to what extent the
Israeli government really serves the Israeli people.
Amalek-Edomite Control
Just
as the Amalek-Edomites took over control of the House of Yehudah, they have
successfully done the same thing with the House of Yisrael. Surely, this control extends over both
secular and religious leaders.
Of
all people, former US President Richard Nixon had much insight into the mentality
and thinking of Amalekites in America, which he incorrectly referred to as Jews
(Oct 18, 1999, “Newsweek,” p. 30).
Nixon
charged that the Jews are all over the government and that the only way to
control them is to put someone in charge who is not Jewish. He also said that most Jews are disloyal and
can’t be trusted and that they will turn on you. Nixon’s chief of staff, H. R. Haldeman, added
that their whole orientation is against you and that they are smart.
The Nixon-Graham Conversation
In
a meeting with Christian leader Billy Graham, both Nixon and Graham had some
major complaints over the Jews. An AP
news report in the March 18, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) outlined one
session between Graham and the president (as revealed from some of the Nixon
tapes).
In
reference to the Jewish domination of the US media, Graham said: “This
stranglehold has got to be broken up or this country’s going down the
drain.” Nixon replied-- “I can’t ever
say it but I believe it.” Billy noted
that “They swarm around me and are friendly to me because they know that I am
friendly to Israel.” Nixon warned Billy
that “You must not let them know.”
The
“American Free Press” news report quoted the present Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon. Reportedly, Sharon
said: “You don’t have to worry about
what America thinks, we totally control it.”
While
this AP news item was focused upon the Jews, this editor must make the point
that the evil comes primarily from the Amalekites rather than the collective Jews.
While
all of America’s leaders (Christians, Jews or whatever) are not personally
Amalekites, most all of them must march to the Amalekite tune to stay in
power. Even Nixon caved into them,
despite his personal feelings. He
appointed a number of Jews (actually Amalekites) into high offices and
consistently gave the state of Israel a priority one in assistance.
What Happened?
However,
Nixon apparently made his mistake by trying to side with the Rockefellers in
their war with the Rothschilds, as discussed previously. This single act, more than anything else,
might have cost him his presidency.
Nixon tried to get the Amalekite Henry Kissinger to protect him. But even Kissinger couldn’t help (perhaps
because Kissinger was ostensibly allied with the Rockefellers).
Finally,
Billy Graham even caved into the Jews and apologized to them in 2002 when his
conversation with Nixon was revealed.
The
revelation of these comments from Graham and Nixon in 1972 brings up another
most fascinating point. The April 8,
2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 50) had a book review assessing Henry Ford and his
works of alleged evil against the Jews.
For some reason, this story mentioned the Graham-Nixon dialogue on the
Jewish control of the US media in the 1970s.
Per
this report, the Graham-Nixon discussion focused upon the stranglehold which
the Jewish media has over America and that this media control and power needed
to be broken. The word from this story
was that an effort would be made in Nixon’s second term (starting in 1973) to
do just that--break the Jewish stranglehold over the American media.
While
it is questionable that any single American politician could break the
Amalekite hold over the American media and Americans, in general, it is
interesting that Nixon actually entertained this idea. The importance of these remarks in 1972 is
that at that time there was no issue over Watergate.
In
fact, Nixon went on to be reelected in the fall of 1972 without a hitch. It was in 1973 that the Amalekite controlled
“Washington Post” pulled out all of the stops and went after Tricky Dick full
blast. There is no arguing that this
effort pitted the Amalekite Rothschilds against the Rockefeller man Nixon. In this war, Nixon had to go (and
particularly when he tried to close the window on sending US gold to
Europe).
Did the Amalekites Know?
But
the Graham-Nixon interview raises the question--is it plausible that the
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters found out about Nixon’s hatred and plans to move
against them and their evil in his second term?
Possibly, they found out in 1973 and decided to use the Watergate fiasco
as the excuse to literally destroy Tricky Dick.
Once the Amalekite press started in on him, he was doomed.
Incidentally,
there seems to be reasons to believe that the famous “Deep Throat” informer in
the Nixon White House (who secretly tipped off “Washington Post” reporters Bob
Woodward and Carl Bernstein and informed on Nixon) was Jewish with a deep,
gravelly voice (Jun 24, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2). Some informed people believe that the
informer was the Amalekite Henry Kissinger.
In
any case, the way the “Jerusalem Report” story and indeed the rest of the media
handled the Graham-Nixon dialogue was that the Jews were surprised when the
revelation of this conversation was made known.
But is it possible that the powerful Amalekite rulers of America had no
inkling of Dick Nixon’s views before 2002 and the revelation of his talk with
Graham? Surely, they knew earlier.
So
while it is possible to appreciate that the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in
1973 decided to do Nixon in because of their long standing battle with the
Rockefellers, there is also reason to believe that they had some knowledge of
Nixon’s plans to do them in (or at least to do something about their control of
the US media).
Of
course, all of this is speculation in an attempt to understand precisely what
brought Nixon down. Certainly, the few,
petty lies which he told were not enough to excite anyone in America. After all, America’s political leaders have
been grossly lying for ages before Nixon came along.
If
this speculation has any merit, there is a good possibility that the background
on the murder of John F. Kennedy was precisely the same thing that brought on
the destruction of Richard Nixon. The
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters were afraid of both men and the possibility that
either of them could have initiated action to curtail Amalekite Jew power over
America.
Kennedy
wanted to go after the Amalekite control of the Federal Reserve and maybe Nixon
wanted to focus upon the Amalekite control of the media. In both the Kennedy and Nixon cases, there
also was the interplay behind the scenes with other issues involving the
plutocrats and the ability of the plutocrats to make money from the gullible
American people.
The
Amalekite control of the US and British media has been discussed at length in a
previous chapter. Suffice to say, it is
the real world out there. Even people
like Kennedy, Nixon and Graham could not withstand it.
Christian Amalekites
Otherwise,
the evidence fully suggests that Presidents Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt, the
Bush presidents and Vice President Nelson Rockefeller were Christian Amalek-Edomites. Manifestly, Catholic John F. Kennedy was
likely a Phoenician Irish Edomite.
Too,
one must be careful and prudent to not lose sight of other wicked leaders like
Abraham Lincoln (who, by the way, was apparently baseborn or illegitimate in the
Western Rutherford County, NC area--from Nancy Hanks and a man named Abraham
Enloe. This must have been the first of
his problems, which intensified with his deformed, physical growth that
suggested a genetic or disease difficulty).
Could
Abe Lincoln have had “some” Edomite genes in his strange background--and
particularly in view of modern allegations that he was a homosexual pervert
(allegations which were suggested in the Jul 5, 1999, “US News & World
Report,” p. 8).
As
a minimum, the alleged “Honest Abe” was an occultist or at least tampered with
the occult and was mentally retarded with Mercury poisoning--while he was in
the White House, as noted earlier.
Even
the present joke, Slick Clinton, an alleged Southern Baptist, must not be
completely ruled out. In addition to his
Indian ancestry, it is highly likely that he has “some” Amalekite blood in his
mongrel veins since he is so incredibly depraved and corrupt (this option will
be assessed in some detail in a later appendix).
Any
number of these evil Western Christian leaders could have some Edomite genes
(as their deeds suggest they were/are children of the Devil). It is ludicrous for right wing Christians to
whine and complain about evil Jews when there are Christian Amalekites out there
who are just as evil or perhaps even more evil.
And Christian Church Leaders
The
same reasoning applies in the case of a host of Christian leaders, preachers
and popes. The situation with Pope Paul
VI was elsewhere commented upon.
Christian sun worship leaders like Robert Schuller, Jimmy Swaggart, Jim
Bakker, Oral Roberts, the just quoted Billy Graham and others must not be
overlooked.
Conceivably,
all of these sun worshipping, Christian leaders may not have Edomite
genes. But the evidence is persuasive
that many of them do have (coupled with a lot of miscegenation) simply because
of the wicked deeds of Satan that characterize their lives and teachings and
their leadership roles in America. Just
think of how much harm, hurt and pain these charlatans have imposed upon the
American people.
If
these sun worship leaders are not Edomites, they have certainly been just as
evil as any Amalek-Edomite could possibly be.
In fact, many Americans would be suspicious and a little hostile toward
Amalekite Jews. But they willingly will
close their eyes and believe in and stupidly follow the teachings of these evil
Christian sun worshippers.
Follow the Amalek-Edomites
The
point of these remarks on Amalek-Edomite Jew bankers/masters is that one must
be careful about getting all excited and filled with Jew hatred since there are
Edomite Christians, out in the world, who are just as evil or more so and who
are just as dedicated to fulfilling the will and guidance of the
bankers/masters in the context of the destruction of the House of Yisrael
peoples (they are janissary robots, as a minimum).
The
problem with almost all of the Amalekites involved in the Amalek-Edomite conspiracy
is that the impetus is genetic and racial.
Therefore, all the Amalekites involved really don’t consciously
understand and comprehend why they have such incredible hatred in their hearts
for Scriptural Yisrael and Israelites.
Consequently,
most of them willingly fall into line behind the bankers/masters--just to
fulfill this overriding hatred. While
the Jewish Amalek-Edomites are more conscious of the bankers/masters (which
appear to be essentially Jewish) and are more likely to follow their lead, the
Christian Edomites also follow them, although often without the awareness of
what all that they are doing.
Moreover,
one must remember that there are now multitudes of people who listen to and
obey the Amalek-Edomite power structure, but who themselves may not be racial
Edomites at all (i.e. true Jews and Christian Israelites). Many persons are janissary robots, as noted
above. This is true in the House of
Yisrael nations and even still true somewhat in the remnant of the House of
Yehudah. Yes, all Jews are not
Edomites!
The Bottom Line
The
point is that actual, racial Amalekites will be both evil and in charge.
Thus,
it is plausible that many of the West’s secular and religious leaders are
Amalek-Edomites since their deeds manifest themselves in the leadership,
teaching and promotion of Satanic wickedness.
Probably, most of the masses are not Edomites--just dumb followers of
Amalekite leaders.
Chapter
462--Amalekite Plotting in the West
The Protocols, Revisited
Some years ago, adherents of the
Amalek-Edomite conspiracy belief uncovered a book from Russia called “Protocols
of the Learned Elders of Zion,” mentioned elsewhere herein, which was first
written possibly as early as the 1770s (with a rewriting or editing of it in
the late 1890s). It purported to be a
Jewish conspiracy to rule the world.
Whether this book was legitimate and
valid or not has been hotly debated and especially by Jewish scholars. Interestingly, the previously mentioned Henry
A. Klein asserts that the Protocols are valid and true. So this is an interesting twist from an
insider who knew and wrote about a Jewish conspiracy.
The only thing that can be said for the
Protocols book is that the objectives and goals stated in it have been coming
true for the last several decades in the sun worshipping, Christian West. In other words, it has proven to be a
complete and accurate blueprint of succeeding world history. It’s hard for an honest person to argue
against evidence like this.
It is also interesting that most of
these so-called Protocols have become part and parcel of various national and
international programs. In other words,
a statement of the goals of the American Communist, Democrat and Republican
parties all reflect a number of the Protocols.
Last, if this work is valid (as the
evidence suggests), one can be sure that it is not Jewish, per se; but rather,
that it is a production of evil Amalekite minds out to destroy the House of
Yisrael nations and peoples, as noted in previous comments.
Some
students of this alleged Cabala have suggested that the obvious Amalek-Edomite
power structure, allowed in the Protocols, represents a portion of the
Illuminati and international banking communities. In other words, the Protocols are a work of
the Illuminists or bankers. This is
essentially the view presented by a Prophecy Club spokesman named Jeff Baker on
“Cheque Mate: Game of Princes,”
discussed before.
Support for the Protocols
There
is some interesting support for the validity of the Protocols as being a Jewish
(correctly Amalekite) conspiracy. It
comes from a letter written many years ago by Baruch Levy (an apparent
Amalekite) to the Amalekite Karl Marx.
Earl Jones, in the Sep-Oct 1999 “Intelligence Newsletter” (p. 1) quoted
Levy’s letter--viz:
“The
Jewish people as a whole will be its own messiah. It will attain world dominion by the
dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of
a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of
citizenship.
“In
this new world order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders
without encountering opposition. The
government of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall
without difficulty into the hands of the Jews.
“It
then will be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and
everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be
fulfilled, in which is said that when the messianic time is come, the Jews will
have all the property of the whole world in their hands.”
While
Levy used the words Jews and Jewish in expressing his views, it must be noted
that in reality his real focus was upon the diabolical Amalekites and not the
Jews, per se. His remarks can only have
a legitimate status and possibility in the context of the evil Amalekites who
have held these views for ages.
The Historic Amalekite Position
As
commented upon in the above presentation, there has been a genuine and
dedicated effort by Jewish Amalekites to claim that the Protocols are, in fact,
fraudulent compositions by alleged anti-Semitic Russians, during the reign of
the czars in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Amalekites even forced the issue into a
European court and was able to get a court judgment that the Protocols were
false.
Yet,
the predictions and discussions in the Protocols have proven to be incredibly
true over the span of the 20th century.
It was easy for the Amalekite bankers/masters to claim that they were
false. But in the real world, they have
proven to be true.
Moreover,
evidence has surfaced in the past several years indicating that indeed, the
Protocols were not originally written in the late 19th century, but were
actually first composed back in the 18th century by the Amalekite Adam
Weishaupt and his financial supporter, the Amalekite Mayer Rothschild (as
mentioned above and in previous chapters).
This
seems to be the better explanation for what happened on the Protocols
historically. Admittedly, there is
evidence suggesting that some Amalekites probably reworked them and edited them
in Russia in the late 19th century. But
evidently, they already were an established reality before then.
In
any case, conspiracy researcher Jim Marrs was on the Coast to Coast AM radio
program on Sep 5, 2000, with host Ian Punnett.
At one point in time, the discussion was allowed to get onto the
Protocols (which is a fluke in itself because the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters
and bosses don’t want any discussion being made about any Jewish Amalekite
conspiracy to rule the world).
But
somehow Punnett allowed Marrs to make some comments about the
Protocols--perhaps because Marrs’ words were in his book which had been read by
Punnett and he understood that Marrs had taken the position to steer any
discussion about the Protocols away from the Jews. So Marrs proceeded to offer his latest
interpretation on what happened.
Hurriedly,
he proclaimed that indeed the Protocols were real, but that they were not
written by Russian Jews. Instead, he
traced them back to Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati (founded by Weishaupt and
the Rothschilds) in the late 18th century.
In terms of identifying the conspirators, Marrs only talked about the
super rich and the Illuminati, but never about the racial or ethnic background
of the conspirators.
The
truth is that Weishaupt (though a convert to Catholicism), the Rothschilds and
the primary conspirators in the Illuminati were all Amalekite Jews. As discussed in a former chapter, it is
verity that the Illuminati allowed some janissary goyim robots into the
organization over the years. But these
goyim were never in any positions of power or influence.
Instead,
they were janissaries being manipulated by Amalekite Jew bankers/masters from
behind the scenes to further serve the Amalekite goals of world rule. As a minimum, the non Amalekites have been in
a minor and inconsequential role over the years. Essentially, from day one, the Illuminati was
created by evil Amalekite Jews and designed to serve evil Amalekite Jews.
The Latest Amalekite Twist
Anyway,
Jim Marrs’ mention of the validity of the Protocols (but placing them in a non-Jewish
context) probably is the latest twist and effort of the Amalekite Jew
bankers/masters to deal with this sensitive subject.
In
the old days, the bankers/masters simply said that the Protocols were
false. But competent researchers and
analysts kept proving them to be true (and especially, in the vein of the
unfolding of history).
So
maybe the Amalekites have switched their tactics by allowing that the Protocols
are true, but are not the work of diabolical Amalekite Jews out to rule the
world. The Amalekites are experts at
deception. So it is plausible that they
would change their tactics, if things were going astray with their arguments
(which simply could not hold water upon any careful study and analysis).
But
regardless of whether the Protocols are true or not, the overwhelming evidence
is that there is a collusion or conspiracy among many of the top Amalekite
bankers/masters to impose their secret goals and objectives upon the rest of
the world’s population--which is supported by most Jewish and Christian
Edomites in the general population.
Certainly,
many true Jews are not a part of this conspiracy and indeed some Edomites are
probably not consciously a part of it (although it’s doubtful that they would
publicly oppose it or speak against it).
A Real Amalekite Cabala
Despite arguments on the validity of
the Protocols and confusion over identifying the involved leaders, the better
view is that indeed there is an Amalekite Cabala, involving Amalek-Edomite Jew
bankers/masters. It is seemingly
directed, supervised and controlled by Amalekite international bankers backstage
and from behind the scenes.
In fact, it is evident that key Amalek
bankers are sometimes themselves the masters (as noted in prior comments) who
call the shots out front and publicly for the Jewish and Christian Edomite
populations. In whatever case, the
Amalekite Jew money power is clearly in charge of much of the overall Edomite
community in the West, as also seems to have been true in NT times, described
previously.
There are daily examples that
demonstrate the power of the collective Amalek-Edomites to rule over the United
States and the other White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations (including Great Britain,
Canada, Australia and New Zealand).
South Africa and Rhodesia used to be a part of this system. But Black Nationalists have taken over in those
nations to change the definition somewhat.
In the case of the US, the Amalekite
control of the population has certainly been in place since the days of Woodrow
Wilson and the establishment of the Federal Reserve Banking system (in
1913).
More
In April 1963, an alleged Texan sent a
paper to some Cuban exiles in Miami.
This flyer said that the Zionists had been in control of the US since
1905 (“Contract on America,” p. 187).
While the writer of that document used the word “Zionists,” he may have
confused that definition with the real Amalekite bankers/masters. Certainly, some of the bankers/masters are
Zionists, but not all of them.
If they were true Zionists, they would
pack their bags and immediately move to Israel.
But they don’t. Their only
visible sign of Zionism surfaces whenever they push and prod the US to send
money to the Israeli state. The
bankers/masters are totally committed to that issue (evidently not because of
any concern for the Jews there; but rather, for themselves to have a refuge or
hide out in case of trouble in the US).
While Amalek-Edomite Jew
bankers/masters are largely in control of the US, the other White
Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations, the state of Israel and some parts of Europe, it
must be noted that the Amalek-Edomite Jews do not presently control all of the
world and evidently will not control all of the world in the future.
If they exercised global control right
now, the planet would be faced with an immediate world government. The Amalek-Edomite Jew power structure is
presently just one part of the overall global power community. Perhaps it is one of the most important power
blocs in the world. But it is not the
only one.
As elsewhere discussed herein, the
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters share power with the Roman Catholic Church,
European royalty, Communist and Socialist ideologists, some parts of organized
crime (principally among the Hispanic and Asian gangs, many of which do not
answer to Edomite ganglords), some portion of international banks and
businesses (primarily in Asia where the Edomites have not had extensive
influence), etc.
Presence of the Masters in the
West
The
situation in the largely White, Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations, mentioned earlier,
is that they are all virtually under the control of ruling Amalekite Jew
masters who seem to operate totally in league with or subservient to the just
noted Amalek-Edomite Jew international bankers.
In
the US, there is the power faction of the Rockefellers who originally were
evidently Jewish Amalek-Edomites, as discussed elsewhere herein. If they once were Jewish Amalekites, it
appears that the family has broken somewhat from the Jews over the years and
perhaps cannot be legitimately linked with them at this time, although they
surely have the Amalekite hatred for Yisrael in their genes and hearts.
Beyond
the Rockefellers, most of the rest of the United States and the White
Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations are essentially under the control of Amalekite Jew
bankers/masters. But that condition is
not necessarily true in the balance of the world, except for Western Europe and
the state of Israel where Amalek-Edomite Jew power is somewhat prevalent.
Czarist Russia
The
situation in Czarist Russia (before 1917) was discussed in a previous
chapter. The Amalekites generally
constitute a state within a state wherever they live. This was manifestly the condition in Czarist
Russia around the start of the 20th century, just after the “Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion” were discovered and made public in Russia.
Most
or virtually all of the Amalekite Khazars in Russia were Marxist
revolutionaries and anarchists who were bent on destroying the Czar and his
government. The Czar was not exactly
stupid. He knew and understood who his
enemies were that were working full time to destroy him and the Russian
monarchy.
As
Catholic priest John O’Connor points out in his video on the “Synagogue of
Satan,” whatever action the poor Czar took against these revolutionaries was
immediately labeled as being anti-Semitic.
O’Connor says that the Czar was not anti-Semitic. But he was anti-revolutionary and against his
political opponents out to destroy him.
The Old USSR Empire
In
any case, the revolutionary Amalekites in old Russia succeeded. They ultimately did take over the government
and murdered the Czar and all of his family (including his small children).
Hence,
for years, the Amalekite bankers/masters founded, organized and controlled the
old USSR before Russian nationalists eventually took over after WWII. Eastern Europe, Asia, Black Africa and the
Muslim world do not all seem to be directly ruled by Amalekite bankers/masters,
as is true in the Christian West.
However,
many of these so-called Third World nations have been significantly under
indirect Amalekite power because the Amalek-Edomites have used foreign aid,
give-aways and the military power of the West to force, make or encourage them
to accept the rule of Western Amalekite bankers/masters.
The
supposed breakup of the Eastern European, Communist empire has seen Amalekite
bankers/masters rush into those countries with both armies (as in the Balkans)
and aid money (from the stupid US and Western European taxpayers) to try to
take over direct control of Eastern Europe.
In
the case of the on-going financial crisis in Asia, elsewhere described herein,
it is evident that Amalekite bankers are attempting to take over there as
well. So far, they have not succeeded,
although they have made some obvious inroads with the money give-aways from the
IMF and various nations and central banks.
Prostitute politicians can always be bought with money.
Chapter
463--The Amalekites Call the US Shots
More on Amalekite Political Power
The “Spotlight” of Mar 6, 2000 (p. 15,
17), had a book report, “Special Interests Charted Course of 20th Century” by
Raphael Johnson, on Ivor Benson’s recent book on “The Zionist Factor.” It focused upon how the Rothschild family
vied for control of the world’s finances and reshaped the political environment
of the globe.
One of the important conclusions in
Benson’s work was that while financial capital was divided, local and
politically conservative, in the early years of the 19th century, that profile
was to change, later in the West.
Apparently, there was a battle over the years on Wall Street. It started with a conflict between the J. P.
Morgan people and the Rothschilds, which saw the Morgan interest being absorbed
in time by the Rothschilds.
The writer of this study at hand has
long held the position that the Morgan interests were almost always linked to
the European Rothschilds and that the real conflict was between the US
Rockefellers, as opposed to the European Rothschilds.
Regardless, it is interesting that
Benson saw an early conflict between Morgan and the Rothschilds before the
Morgan opposition collapsed, as it became a part of the Rothschild empire.
Per Johnson’s remarks, it would seem
that any opposition Morgan had to the Rothschilds ended early on. So it would be correct to say that within a
limited time frame, the Morgan banking interest was absorbed by the Rothschilds.
Thereupon, Morgan became a US front organization for the European
Rothschilds. Of course, there has been
the continuing conflict between the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds.
In any case, the report suggests that
the money conflicts between the bankers continued on Wall Street for some
years. In time, the Rothschild
international bankers finally emerged victorious in the United States (which is
where we are at, here in 2003).
The above cited “Spotlight” story
suggested that there has been a preponderance of Jews within the radical
leftist movements which found common cause with the power of the Rothschild led
international banking community. With
the power over money, it was not long before the Rothschilds began to dictate
policy to the leftist political factions.
Per Johnson’s view, the
internationalism of the Zionist banking houses (versus the nationalism of the
older banking powers) is the material backdrop to what is now colloquially
called the “New World Order.” It is the
control emanating from one central source of the world’s economy through the
control of a global currency (which is more powerful than all other
factors).
A Revisit to More of the Amalekite Powers
Preceding chapters have outlined the
wide presence of the Amalekite bankers/masters over much of the world, in the
context of pulling the strings and providing the leadership and direction to
the gullible, ignorant goyim in a whole host of enterprises and activities--all
the way from organized crime to international banks and to the heads of Western
governments.
In the exercise of power over the
Israelite goyim, the Amalekites have completely taken over the media and
entertainment industries in the House of Yisrael nations. This takeover has been demonstrated in prior
chapters and needs no further explanation here beyond acknowledging its
presence.
The Early 1998 Planned Attack on
Iraq
The
best example of the Amalek-Edomite control phenomenon surfaced in a look at the
strange situation that arose when the bankers/masters in the US and the White
British Commonwealth were standing almost alone in trying to oppose Iraq in
early 1998 (as elsewhere described herein).
Other nations in the world were not quite so anxious to attack Saddam.
The
point of this is that in the early 1998 US conflict with Iraq, the US and White
British Commonwealth nations stood virtually alone--along with Israel. Except for France (which is increasingly more
pro-Moslem) and Russia, the rest of Europe appeared to be largely neutral and
not trying to side with either of the two main players.
However,
Russia, China, most of the Muslim World, Black Nationalists, Communists around
the world and on and on were more on the side of Saddam than they were on the
side of the US.
This
suggests that the Amalekite bankers/masters ruling the US and other White,
Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations are finding that they don’t have the clout and power
over the Third World which they have enjoyed in past years (just as they have
been losing their grip over Black Americans--to be shortly profiled
below).
Part
of the dilemma, which the Amalek-Edomites face, is that they depend to a degree
upon aid to foreign countries, as noted earlier (financed by American and
European taxpayers), to dominate and influence those countries. As the sun worshipping US and Christian West
face economic problems and bankruptcy, there is little or no money to give away
to benefit the super rich.
In
any case, it is significant that as this problem with Iraq proceeds, it appears
that Iraq, Russia, Iran and Syria will ally in the context of types of the four
horns of Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome (discussed elsewhere in this
production). The US, Israel and White
British Commonwealth will stand alone in opposition to this hostile
alliance.
Assuredly,
Europe (and particularly a United Europe) will walk the extra mile to try to
stay neutral in this opposing confrontation.
But in view of Clinton’s conflict in the Balkans, even parts of Europe
(like Greece or even Germany) may join the Russian sphere. Certainly, the continuing US presence in the
Balkans is paving the way for an American confrontation with Russia and China,
which are both allies of the Serbs.
What
it boils down to is that as the Amalekite bankers/masters push and prod the US
and her few racial allies, in opposition to those four horns, the coming day of
judgment from those horns is fast approaching.
And it appears that it will be the Amalek-Edomites and their power over
the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations which propel those states into a war that they
will lose (as judgment from YHWH).
It
might be that those four horns, in collaboration with Japan and various Third
World nations (like China, Muslim, Latin American and Black African), will be
the primary adversaries of those Western nations in the age end, although they
collectively may be a part of a larger UN configuration--since the whole world
will (or have) come to hate Israel and the racial Anglo-Saxon-Celtic
peoples.
The Anglo-Saxon-Celtic Nations Stand
Alone
This is a most interesting scenario
when one also looks at the international debts of these same Western Christian
nations in terms of the rest of the world (commented upon in a prior chapter)
and the likely focus of a coming WWIII which will spell the national end of the
historic Anglo Saxon-Celtic nations, while the Israeli state survives with
YHWH’s help.
Please understand that as the United
States and her White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic cousins are destroyed nationally, the
rest of the world will then be in a better position to proceed with real
unification which has been a goal of Satan and the internationalists for
ages.
While the Amalekite masters/bankers
ruling the Christian West have led the way in this internationalism, they may
lose a lot of their power and influence, as the US and White British
Commonwealth nations are crushed and destroyed.
Thus, when the final pecking order is established among the fat cats, it
likely will not be under the direct control of Amalekite Jews, as an observer
may first suppose at this time.
One must understand that while the
White, sun worshipping Christians in the US and British Commonwealth have been
quite happy to subject themselves to ruling Amalekite bankers/masters, other
parts of the world have not shared this enthusiasm (except as the
Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters can use money and armies to impose their wills
upon the rest of the world).
Black nationalists in Africa, mixed
Latinos in South America, Muslims in the Middle East and Mongolians in Asia are
not exactly as stupid as are White Britons and Americans on this issue. True, they have lacked the power to formally
oppose the ruling Amalek-Edomite structure in the West. But these Colored persons hate the Amalekite
Jews, along with Whites in general.
White Europeans have ruled over and
dominated the Colored world for centuries.
But with Amalekite pushing and prodding since WWII, the Colored world
has gained independence and broken free of European domination. The Coloreds passionately hate Whitey and
this includes so-called White Edomites.
Given a chance (which YAH will give them), these Colored persons will
turn upon the supposed White Edomites.
Black Muslims, Revisited
The situation with Negroes in the
United States is most interesting. As
discussed in prior comments, the Amalek-Edomites were the original slavers and
some of the people who have historically oppressed, hurt and harmed Black
people the most of all. While many
Africans have tried to blame collective Whitey for their problems, some (like
the Black Muslims) have finally woken up to some extent.
It has been too bad that the Black
Muslims have not correctly understood heretofore that the Amalekites are the primary
people of evil causing them trouble--along with problems for Whites, Asians,
Arabs, Indians and all other peoples in the world. Like so many persons (Whites, Asians, etc)
have mistakenly done over the years, the Black Muslims are now trying to blame
the collective Jews.
As elsewhere demonstrated in this
publication, the problem of Satanic evil in this world cannot be laid to the
doorsteps of the collective Jews. It
should be placed where it precisely belongs--with the diabolically evil and
Satanically directed Amalek-Edomites who have worked hard for ages to destroy
Yisrael first and oppress all other peoples second, in their quest for world
rule.
Racial integration and amalgamation
(promoted in recent years by the Amalekites) have hurt Black people--just as
much as it has hurt White people.
Perhaps this reality has in some ways acted to motivate the Black
Muslims to preach and teach racial separation and their desires for their own
Black nation.
In any case, the Black Muslims have
broken from the Jews and have, in modern times, demonstrated an enormous hatred
for the Jews (although there is now an alliance of sorts by the Black Muslims
and Brooklyn’s Ultra Orthodox, in opposition to the Israeli state, as noted
earlier).
One of the Black Muslim leaders has
called Jews “Blood Suckers,” even as late as their youth march in New York City
on September 5, 1998.
In late 2001, the new Black Panther
leader, Malik Zulu Shabazz, called the US and Israel the number one and number
two terrorist nations in the world (Jan 7-14, 2002, “American Free Press,” p.
2). Zulu also assailed the
Anti-Defamation League and C-SPAN for collaborating in unfair news
coverage. So the Black Panthers have
joined with the Black Muslims in attacking the Jews.
As trouble (secretly brought on and
caused by the Amalekites) mounts in the United States, the Black hatred for the
Jews will likely accelerate.
Accordingly, the Negroes will persecute the generic Jews given a chance
(which will eventually come for sure when the Russian, Chinese, Iranians and
Third World conquerors take over the US at the end of WWIII).
Martin Luther King Jr, Revisited
Having mentioned the growing break
between the Negroes and the ruling Amalekite bankers/masters, some further
remarks are necessitated about the famous and US beloved Martin Luther King
Jr. Though the revolutionary and trouble
making King was turned into a Black hero by the Amalekite controlled media
after his death, there are reasons to believe that while he was alive, he was
turning against the Jews.
Several books and authors have
attempted to ascertain who killed King and why.
This question has also been discussed herein in a previous chapter (in
the vein that the patsy, James Earl Ray, was possibly a brainwashed zombie who
was set up to be the patsy by the real assassins).
Like the JFK and RFK killings were
somewhat befuddled by the establishment, the same is true with the King
killing. One thing for sure, the King
family itself and numbers of other informed people have come forward to express
doubt that James Earl Ray was the gunman; or if he was involved, that he acted
alone.
In “Final Judgment” (p. 580-584),
Michael Collins Piper briefly assessed the King murder and offered some of his
thinking. Essentially, Piper raises
serious questions about Ray’s involvement and completely discounts any role for
the Ku Klux Klan or any other right wing group.
Piper clearly believes that the King killing was an establishment murder
and probably decided by the Jewish power structure.
To support his beliefs, Piper mentions
some little known facts about King which the establishment leaders and media
never seem to mention when they go wild every year celebrating King’s birthday
and bragging and boasting upon what a great man and humanitarian King was
(when, in fact, he was a man of evil--ed).
King--Pro Arab?
Piper mentions that just as King had
sided with the Vietnamese in the US Vietnam war, King was also becoming
pro-Arab in terms of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East. If this motion would have materialized and
became public knowledge, it would have been an extraordinary event which would
have left the King supporters in a quandary (like Charlton Heston and the other
Hollywood liberals).
While many Americans understand that
the FBI and federal spy agencies were extremely interested in every motion,
movement, word and sexual encounter that the so-called “reverend doctor” had
(including his homosexual encounter with an aide, as discussed in earlier
chapters herein), most of us never understood how extensive that the
Anti-Defamation League was involved in spying upon the “reverend doctor.”
This ADL link to King was covered in
“Final Judgment.” Actually, Michael
Piper mentions one of the strange facts largely missed by a lot of people. King’s push for Black assertion and elevation
in the US-African communities meant that a confrontation was immediately
building up between his leadership and the US Mob, led by Meyer Lansky (and
other Amalekite big shots).
Organized crime was making a bundle of
bucks from drugs, prostitution, gambling and other rackets controlled by the
Mob in the Black communities. Obviously,
King’s talk, about Black pride and Blacks taking over, spelled trouble down the
road if the Negroes became aware of their subservience to Jewish (Amalekite)
crime operations.
In support of Piper’s evidence linking
the MLK murder to the Jews (correctly the Amalekites--ed), the Apr 21, 2003,
“American Free Press” (p. 15) had a story also questioning the King
murder. This AFP report quoted author
William E. Pepper who said that the New Orleans crime boss Carlos Marcello laid
on a contract killer from the Memphis Police Department to kill King (under
obvious orders from Meyer Lansky).
Though not mentioned by Piper, it is
also a truism that the Amalekite controlled, liberal wing of the Democrat party
(under Amalekite control) must have been concerned, as well. Imagine what could have happened if the
Blacks began to independently think on their own, instead of automatically
voting for the liberal Democrat candidates.
The
point is that the Amalekites had many reasons to be concerned with the
“reverend doctor” and his push of Black pride and rights. Thus, the best candidate for the murder
decision on King is the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters.
While
questions have to be asked about how the Amalekite bankers/masters carried this
murder out, the truth remains that their extraordinary control of the US media,
Mob, government, etc, would have made it very easy.
GWB As Well
Since
the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters have long controlled the US government, it
can be expected that both Democrat and Republican politicians are in their
pockets. Actually, because they control
the US media, no American politician can successfully oppose the Amalekite
Jews.
Anyone
of influence trying to stand up to them will be murdered (as happened with JFK)
or crushed in the controlled media (as with Richard Nixon).
A
Jewish man named David Rosenberg of New York wrote a letter to a Mr Rense on
Dec 12, 2001 (the Rense website is at www.rense.com). It became an effective open letter when it
apparently came out on the Internet.
Perhaps Mr Rosenberg or Mr Rense released the letter which may have
first went out as e-mail on Dec 13, 2001, at 1:21 PM from Rosenberg to
Rense.
The
basis of Rosenberg’s letter was a photo of President George W. Bush in front of
an Israeli flag, evidently at a news conference (per Rosenberg, this thing was
shown on the Internet as
“http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/p/nm/20011211/ts/mdf99013.html”).
Mr
Rosenberg was outraged by the photo which was obviously prepped. The flag was standing and carefully unfolded
to show the so-called star of David.
Rosenberg said that that was the first time that he had seen the star of
David on the flag when it was not being blown in a breeze. The way the flag was positioned, Mr Rosenberg
allowed that the revealed star was being held in place by a piece of cardboard
behind it.
Another
problem with this photo, per Mr Rosenberg, was that it seemed to show the US
president swearing to the flag.
Reportedly, Bush gave a four-minute speech during which all one could
see on the video clip was his head and the star of David.
The
conclusion from David Rosenberg was that the message was that “the shadow elite
and zionists” are in total control of America.
He added that the image was done intentionally by the White House to
accelerate hatred by Moslems around the world against America and to stimulate
a Third World War.
Rosenberg
was concerned over possible anti-Semitism against American Jews over this
vulgar display. He added that the
“Jewish lobby” totally controls our Congress and Senate and manipulates America.
This
email was an excellent presentation by a concerned American Jew over how the
Jewish lobby controls America. Of
course, he is correct (though he suggested that it was an invention of elements
in Israel--the writer of this study at hand believes that the Israelis are
victims of this power along with Americans and that both are controlled by
powerful Amalekite bankers and the super rich).
By
the way, the Feb 14, 2003, “The Week” (p. 24) had a cartoon of a US flag with a
display of some of its stars. Among the
several pentagrams, there was a lone hexagram/star of David.
Chapter
464--Yes, Amalekites Control US Politics
The 2000 US Elections, Revisited
Former chapters discussed various
aspects of the 2000 election crisis or mess (depending upon how one might wish
to characterize it). Previously, the
point was made that Slick Clinton and his Amalekite bankers/masters/handlers
probably had a major role to play in what happened during the November
debacle. That likely reality will now be
assessed.
First, it must be recognized that the
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters completely own and control the US Democrat
party. They also have enormous influence
over the Republican party and share some control there with the
internationalist Rockefellers and other Eastern Establishment elites.
But these two parties have been
virtually the same for the last several decades. So it was academic to try to talk about differences. Hence, whichever of the two parties has been
in power at a given moment in time has always worked to install the ideology of
the New World Order (which both the Amalekite Jews and Eastern Establishment Rockefellers
wanted).
Before the year 1960, there were some
possible questions about which party could win in a given election. And it probably did not matter which party
won because the internationalists would gain either way.
However, by the time of Kennedy (and
the stuffing of votes in Chicago in 1960), the Amalekite Jews were beginning to
be the more powerful faction in their long conflict with the Rockefellers (the
merger of the Rockefeller banking flagship [Chase Manhattan] with Rothschilds’
J. P. Morgan is a giant clue that the Rockefeller-Rothschild war is over and
the Rothschilds have won).
True, Ronald Reagan won the US
elections based upon sheer charisma, personal strength and ability to influence
voters in the 1980s. But otherwise,
Nixon and George H. W. Bush were clear Rockefeller people who were allowed to
win because both internationalist factions (the Rockefellers and the
Rothschilds) were satisfied with them.
Young George W. Bush fits into this same profile.
But the election of Bill Clinton in
1992 laid the groundwork for enormous changes in the American electorate. The Amalekite Democrats were in the driver’s
seat with Clinton (who fully and completely supported the Amalekites,
surrounded himself with them and seems to personally have some racial and
genetic connections to them [along with Hillary], as will be addressed in later
appendices).
The evidence suggests that with
Clinton, the Amalekites could instantly declare a dictatorship and martial
law. Frankly, this writer looked for it
to occur in late 2000 to insure the continued presidency of Slick Willy. But it never happened. And why not?
Without attempting to be dogmatic, the following presentation will offer
some possibilities (indeed, probabilities) to account for what did happen.
Slick Clinton
The
most important factor has to be Bill Clinton himself. Surely, he played a pivotal role. And why would Slick agree to a George W. Bush
presidency, instead of his supposed friend and supporter Al Gore? Well, there are probably several reasons for
this phenomenon. First, there is the
situation with Hillary.
Surely,
Bill must have made many promises and pledges to her for her support during the
Monica Lewinsky crisis in 1998-2000.
It’s very possible that he promised her that he would take political steps
to elevate her into the presidency. As
it worked out, she needed a political win in New York and Bill and the
Democrats arranged this (they now control the NY votes).
Obviously,
Hillary would be in no mood to wait for eight years before running for president. This condition dictated that Al Gore must
lose (if he had won, he would be the Democrat nominee in 2004 and Bill would
have had to support him). Thus, Bill was
forced to double cross his friend and colleague Gore in order to pave the way
for Hillary. This is no big deal, as
double crossing is a common Amalekite tactic.
And
as things have turned out, Gore not only lost in 2000, but as things developed
in 2002 Gore found that he had few allies and little hope for 2004. Consequently, he had to withdraw for
2004. Effectively, this move seems to
spell out the end of Gore in US politics.
So the Clinton double-cross has destroyed Gore and left Bill clearly in
charge of the Democrat party (with Amalekite oversight).
There
are also reasons to believe that Bill himself wants more of the US
presidency. Short of declaring a
dictatorship in 2000 (which his backers, the Amalekite bankers/masters, were
not prepared for in 2000), Bill had to back off and agree to wait until a
future time.
Thus,
if he did make an agreement with Hillary, he will soon double cross her, as
well; so that he can regain power (the why and how on this will be shortly
discussed below).
The Reality
Consequently,
Bill had to arrange things, as they worked out.
While one might try to argue that the 2000 elections were so diffused
that Slick could not have manipulated the total vote sufficiently to cause the
crisis which arose, it must be addressed and allowed as a possibility (though
remote) in the real world.
Logically,
from the typical American voter’s perspective, the first explanation for the US
election mess in 2000 would likely be due to sheer chance.
But
one must remember that while Slick (and certainly, the Amalekite
bankers/masters who controlled him) could not totally manipulate the vote, be
assured that he (or they) could manipulate the vote results that were finally
announced to the American people (like Stalin said--he who votes decides
nothing, while he who counts the votes decides everything).
Of
course, the case can always be made that YHWH oversaw the developments
occurring--regardless of what the cause could have been. However, this writer would not write Slick
off. Slick was and is not nicknamed
“Slick” for nothing. The truth is that
he is very slick.
More on Slick
Some
time ago, Slick installed two super computers in the White House basement. With polling data from all of the states
during all of 2000, he had a pretty good grip on how the voters would respond
on Nov 7, 2000. Even on election day, he
had access to the same voter exit polls which the news networks had. He knew precisely how things were progressing
for each of the candidates by state.
If
he deliberately wanted to create a crisis, the best way would have been to see
that the popular vote went one way and the electoral vote the other way. Surely, from his viewpoint, the best scenario
was the one that developed with Bush getting the electoral vote. If Gore won both votes outright, Slick could
not deny him and his Amalekite colleague the presidency (since the Democrats
would demand it).
But
with Bush, Slick could work in the background to motivate and push the Democrats
to precipitate a crisis with continued strife among the media and public and a
call for a constitutional convention (over the shortcomings of the electoral
college). Manifestly, strife in the US
would cause reactions overseas which likewise would give Slick the opportunity
to regain power (with him as a symbol of stability and public acceptance).
While
the Democrats and Republicans were fighting it out, Slick could remain in the
public spotlight as the man of stability and statesmanship and as the president
who gave the US a good economy (supposedly).
This spin could pave the way for him to regain power under a new
constitution.
Importantly,
in any case, Slick and/or his allies and agents could, with time, begin pushing
for a new constitution--which also would assuredly pave the way for him to
regain power. The unpopularity of the
electoral college would be a powerful motivating force for a new
constitution.
Regardless
of what role Slick may have played in the November 2000 election crisis, the
fact remains that this whole thing has marvelously fell into his hands to allow
him several methods of altering history in some manner and regaining the
presidency on some pretext. For sure,
Slick has plans for the future (either in the US or at the UN). The election debacle has played directly into
his hands. He was the winner!
The Bankers/Masters Really Called the
Shots
Beyond
the possibility that Slick and his lieutenants engineered the election crisis
in November, one must be prudent and allow that the Amalekite Jew
bankers/masters must have also planned and implemented the crisis (and
particularly so, if they assuredly worked in league with Slick for the event).
It
would be easy to perceive that the bankers/masters would want their man
Lieberman or some other Amalekite in power.
With Gore, this may or may not have developed (though they theoretically
could assassinate him after the election, which would have allowed Lieberman to
become president).
Furthermore,
there is the question about whether the bankers/masters could successfully
impose their dictatorship without a major US crisis.
As
discussed in previous chapters, there are clear reasons to believe that the
Amalekites foresee a coming economic collapse in the US. In fact, they either see it coming or they
are planning to cause it. Frankly, the
evidence is massive that they will pull the plug and cause it--precisely so
that their hoped for New World Order can be implemented in the US first, before
going global later.
Maybe,
in their wisdom, the best option was to create a constitutional crisis in the
2000 elections, which would see the destruction of the present Constitution and
the implementation of a new US Constitution suitable and compatible with the
New World Order.
Perhaps
later, the bankers/masters can reinsert Clinton or allow Lieberman or some
other Amalekite to take over. While the
Amalekite bankers/masters may tolerate and put up with Slick further in a later
day, he logically can’t be more than a stepping stone to usher in an eventual
Amalekite dictator (which is their ultimate goal). This means that they will ultimately double
cross him (to be described in later comments).
The Beginning Political Crisis
Author
Jim Marrs was on the “Dreamland” radio program on Dec 3, 2000. He suggested that the secret rulers of the US
engineered the Florida vote mess in order to set the stage for a flare up over
the electoral college which would ignite calls for a constitutional convention
and a new constitution. He added that
the whole process is just a manifestation of the Hegelian dialectic in
operation (elsewhere noted herein).
Per
the Hegelian thinking, there is the thesis, then the antithesis (the opposite)
and finally the synthesis (the real objective).
Per Marrs, the plutocrats wanted a new constitution (which would get rid
of the Bill of Rights). This was the
desired synthesis. Bush and Gore were
merely the thesis and antithesis opposites set up to bring about the
synthesis.
A
few days after the Florida crisis developed, another clue on the thinking of
the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters surfaced when their point man, Senator
Charles Schumer, an Amalekite, announced that he will submit to Congress new
legislation calling for the establishment of mandatory computer machines using
two-way modems inside to record the votes automatically and instantaneously, as
the voter makes his choice (Nov 27, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 1).
Many
US voting precincts seem to already be using such machines (as noted
earlier). However, all do not (as in the
case of Florida).
Per
“Spotlight,” this Schumer plan would allow the global establishment to control
elections more simply from a central location by computer fraud. Hence, the bankers/masters calling the shots
could manipulate the computer processing instantly, as votes are cast, to
report the results that they want.
Add
these new computer voting methods in with a new constitution and it means that
the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters will completely control all facets of the
United States--lock, stock and barrel.
In this situation, Amalekite Jew leaders will take over total political
control of America at all levels. Then,
their man Lieberman (or whomsoever) can be installed as president.
Putting This Together
These
possibilities can be put together into some semblance of a plausible whole and
one which makes an awful lot of sense in the vein of what has happened in 2000
and the desires and wishes of both Clinton and the Amalekite
bankers/masters.
As
will be covered in later appendices herein, there are reasons to think that
Clinton could be an Amalekite with a special purpose in life. For sure, he devoted himself fully to the
Amalekite cause during his presidency.
He is either one of them or one of their most trusted goyim agents. In this vein, it is hard to understand why
they might have engineered events to see him leave the US White House in
January 2000.
The
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters control the Democrat party and even the
Republican party and US elections somewhat, as noted above and earlier.
The
Bush family and indeed the present Bush administration are clearly linked to
the left wing Republican element led by the US Rockefellers. It’s hard to see how the Amalekite
Rothschilds and their colleagues could gain much with a Republican-Rockefeller
presidency at this point in time (unless one realizes that indeed the
Rockefeller-Rothschild war is over and the Rothschilds have won).
But
as outlined in the Prologue and in former comments on the stock market control
unit, maybe the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters see that everything is about
ready to collapse and/or maybe they are ready to collapse the entire financial
structure in America which can be blamed upon Bush and the US right-wing (with
a view of bringing on a new constitution and/or the New World Order).
Another Aspect
Along
with the planned collapsing of the US economy to blame on a naive George W.
Bush and the right wing of a very gullible American public, there is another
real reason on why the US Amalekite Jew bankers/masters have found it expedient
to allow the election of GWB in 2000.
This one is also most fascinating because it involves the so-called
terrorist attacks of Sep 11, 2001.
As
a minimum, the terrorist attacks of Sep 11, 2001, could well be events staged,
scripted or set-up events by the US-British Amalekite Jew bankers to also
purposely complete the imposition of tyranny upon the American people (and pave
the way for world government).
As
will be discussed in later chapters, there is a good possibility that the Amalekite
Jew bankers/masters are the real power behind the alleged Muslim terrorist
attacks in 2001.
In
this vein, the major fall-out over these attacks has been the passage of vast,
new, draconian laws which take away the remaining vestiges of freedom in America. The passage of some of these laws would have
been virtually impossible under the tutelage of a liberal Democrat, like Slick
Clinton.
Back
in the 1970s, when the New World Order crowd decided to open the door to
Communist China, the so-called “conservative,” right-winger, Communist fighter
Richard Nixon was chosen to do the deed.
A left-wing Democrat could never have successfully carried this ploy
off, as happened with Richard Nixon.
Possibly,
this is the exact same scenario with George W. Bush and the new tyrannical laws
that have been coming down the pike since Sep 11, 2001, and the terrorist
attacks. Thus, George W. Bush has purposely
been allowed into the US presidency precisely so that he, as a so-called
conservative Republican, could force a whole series of tyrannical laws upon the
American people (which a Democrat could not do).
Another Amalekite Conspiracy
Another
giant Amalekite conspiracy was revealed in the Dec 30, 2002, “American Free
Press” (p. 1, 7), in a story by Christopher Bollyn on “America ‘Pearl
Harbored,’” which focused upon some of the background and intrigue involved in
the Sep 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the after-play in terms of the Bush
wars and military pushes in the Middle East and South-Central Asia.
The
Bush wars in those parts of Asia will be addressed in some detail in later
chapters and Appendix D. There is no
intent to presently cover them--beyond pointing out this strange Amalekite
conspiracy and how GWB has completely engineered things to place this Amalekite
conspiracy into effect.
Christopher
Bollyn’s report notes the presence of a “neo-conservative, Washington-based
organization known as the Project for the New American Century (PNAC, as cited
earlier), funded by three foundations closely tied to Persian Gulf oil and
weapons and defense industries.”
As
Bollyn outlines, the PNAC (founded in 1997) drafted a US war plan for global domination
(starting with the Middle East and South-Central Asia) through military
power.
Per
the AFP story, the PNAC is a part of something called the New Citizenship
Project (NCP) which is a “non-profit educational organization whose goal is to
promote American global leadership.”
From the information available in the AFP report, it is clear that both
the PNAC and NCP have been founded by the Amalekites to promote their rule in a
global outreach (starting in Southern Asia and the Middle East).
PNAC
was founded by the Amalekites Robert Kagan and William Kristol (who owns the
“Weekly Standard”). NCP’s chairman is
also William Kristol.
Per
the AFP report, the Amalekites Richard Perle (known as the Prince of Darkness),
Paul Wolfowitz, and Christopher Meletz have or do play key roles in overseeing
PNAC within the Department of Defense (all three are or have been top officials
of DOD--although Perle was forced to resign on Mar 27, 2003, as chairman of the
Defense Policy Board [but he stayed on the Board], when it was revealed that he
had a conflict of interest with his private businesses. Also, later information developed showing
that Perle had received top secret DOD briefings and had used the information
to profit from in his private business interests and with the
Amalekite-Rothschild firm of Goldman-Sachs--May 7, 2003, Spokane
“Spokesman-Review,” p. A7).
The
Amalekite Paul Wolfowitz and the janissaries/lackeys Dick Cheney, Donald
Rumsfeld and Jeb Bush all signed a PNAC statement of principles on June 3,
1997, which essentially demanded an increase in US defense spending to
challenge regimes hostile to US interests.
A similar outreach for the Middle East occurred in Sep 2000 (as will be
described in later chapters).
The
essence of these two Amalekite founded and led organizations seems to be a plan
to increase defense spending (which had been going down under Bill Clinton) and
exercise hegemony over much or all of the Middle East and Southern Asia in the
guise of US national security (while making vast new profits for the Amalekite
plutocrats).
The Early PNAC Revelations
The
scheme of US military domination was outlined in the PNAC Statement of
Principles which said: “As the 20th
century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world’s preeminent
power... we need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in
preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our
prosperity, and our principles. Such a
Reaganite policy of military strength is to build on the successes of this past
century, and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next” (quoted in
the Mar 2003 “Radio Liberty” newsletter, p. 1-2).
It
would be appropriate here to next look at a 90-page document prepared by the
PNAC in Sep 2000 which set forth its plans for the Middle East and
South-Central Asia.
It
said: “The United States has for decades
sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq
provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force
presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.
“Even
should Saddam pass from the scene,” the plan noted that US military bases in
Saudi Arabia and Kuwait would remain, despite domestic opposition in the Gulf
states to the permanent stationing of US troops. Iran may well provide as large a threat to US
interests as Iraq. A core mission for
the transformed US military is to “fight and decisively win multiple,
simultaneous major theater wars.”
Going
on, the strategic transformation of the US military into an imperialistic force
of global domination would require a huge increase in “defense spending... The
process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic
and catalyzing event-- like a new Pearl Harbor” (as quoted by Christopher Bollyn
in the Dec 30, 2002, American Free Press, p. 7).
Although
not stated by PNAC, the essence of the PNAC plan was a motion in support of the
New World Order, but one which would provide for a world government to be ruled
by the US-British Amalekite plutocrats.
In other words, the US (in league with Israel and the White British
Commonwealth) would become a world ruling empire which was completely owned and
controlled by the Amalekite plutocrats.
Of
course, world rule has always been on the burner for the Amalekites. While they have made much progress in that
direction with their ownership and control of money, there has been some
opposition (and particularly in the UN, as established elsewhere herein). But by using US military power to completely
dominate the world, the Amalekites will be in the driver’s seat in terms of
world government.
Putting It Over
To
set the stage for what was to follow, PNAC wrote President Clinton on Jan 26,
1998, and said: “We are writing you
because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not
succeeding... The policy of ‘containment’ of Saddam Hussein has been steadily
eroding over the past several months... Given the magnitude of the threat, the
current policy...is dangerously inadequate.
In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from
power. That now needs to become the aim
of American foreign policy” (Mar 2003 “Radio Liberty” newsletter, p. 2).
But
for whatever reason, Bill Clinton and the Democrats were not the means of
putting the PNAC plan into operation.
Apparently,
to put this scheme over, the Amalekites decided to use the Republican party and
its image of neo-conservatism and US defense concern to sell this project to
the American people (Bill Clinton, Al Gore and/or the Democrats could not have
successfully put this plan over to the nation because of the push by the Blacks
and Hispanics [who are strong in the Democrat party] for increased welfare
spending and the dove image associated with Clinton, Gore and the liberal
Democrats).
Obviously,
the Bush clan and several of the leading goyim war hawks were included in the
PNAC scheme as lackeys or janissaries (of course, with the promise that these
goyim would be allowed to share in the wealth to be plundered and stolen in the
undertaking).
The
Mar 2003 “Radio Liberty” newsletter (p. 1) also quoted Ted Koppel of
“Nightline” who said on Mar 5, 2003 that “A secret blueprint for U.S. global
domination reveals that President Bush and his cabinet were planning a
premeditated attack on Iraq to secure regime change even before he took power
in January 2001.”
Koppel
added that “It has been called a secret blueprint for U.S. global domination...
A small group of people with a plan to remove Saddam Hussein long before George
W. Bush was elected president... And 9/11 provided the opportunity to set it in
motion. Not since Mein Kampf has a
geopolitical punch been so blatantly telegraphed years ahead of the blow.”
On
Sep 17, 2001, just after 9/11, Bush signed a Top Secret document outlining US
plans to go to war in Afghanistan as a part of a global campaign against
terrorism. This document also directed
the Pentagon to begin planning military options for an invasion of Iraq (ibid,
p. 3, quoting the “New York Times”).
On
Sep 20, 2001, PNAC sent a letter to Bush which said: “We write to endorse your admirable
commitment to ‘lead the world to victory’ in the war against terrorism... We
agree that a key goal, but by no means the only goal, of the current war on
terrorism should be to capture or kill Osama bin Laden, and to destroy his
network of associates... We agree with Secretary of State Powell’s recent
statement that Saddam Hussein ‘is one of the leading terrorists on the face of
the earth’... even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the (9/11)
attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors
must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq”
(ibid, p. 3).
On
Jan 23, 2003, PNAC wrote Bush again and said:
“We write to endorse the bold new course you have charted for American
national security strategy... American strength is key to building the new
world you have envisioned. The victory
over the Taliban in Afghanistan was an essential first step in stabilizing that
chaotic country... The international community and an overwhelming military
coalition are now ready to end the threat of Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq...
Removing Saddam is but the first step toward reconstructing a decent government
in Iraq and carrying out your strategic vision for the Middle East. Other rogue states remain a major
problem. Even as we deploy forces for
war against Iraq, North Korea has abrogated its agreement to terminate its
nuclear weapons development and threatens war... The third member of the ‘axis
of evil,’ Iran, has likewise stepped up its nuclear efforts” (ibid, p.
3-4).
This
whole operation clearly suggests that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were set up by
the Amalekites precisely to implement the goals of PNAC and NCP. This option will be discussed in detail in
later chapters herein. For sure, it is
very possible that the above cited Bollyn article lays out one of the key
reasons to understand why GWB and the Republicans won the White House in
2000.
So Maybe
Maybe
this backdrop has created the environment for the Amalekite Jews to decide to
bring the Rockefeller linked Bush on board--so that first, the US Amalekite Jew
bankers/masters can extend US hegemony over the Middle East and make a barrel
of new profits; and second, when things do collapse (the inevitable US economic
collapse), the US right wing and conservatives can be blamed.
With
the new tyrannical laws in place, this would certainly pave the way for a giant
religious persecution of the Christian Identity people and other right wing
sects (as discussed in former chapters herein) and a complete take-over by the
Amalekite Jew bankers/masters (either through one of their agents, like Joe
Lieberman, or their cousin, Bill Clinton).
And
by all means, this event would forever destroy Rockefeller power over America
(if the Rockefeller power still exists and is in a different framework from the
Rothschilds--although maybe the Rockefellers have now been conquered completely
by the Rothschilds, as noted above and earlier) and allow the Rothschilds to
finally rule supreme (in league with their clannish Amalekite cousins).
In
other words, it could be that Bush has been purposely set up by the Amalekite
Jews (working in league with Clinton) to be the fall guy who is to be blamed
for the collapse of the system (which can be engineered directly by the
Amalekites). Bush will thus be the
Herbert Hoover sucker and will take the fall while Clinton and the leftist
liberals (who primarily caused it, as they pulled the plug on George) will
skate free.
Certainly,
whenever the collapse comes, many Americans will cry for a new constitution and
a dictatorship. Probably, a
constitutional convention will already be underway--simply because of
dissatisfaction over the 2000 elections.
Clinton can work hand in glove with the bankers/masters and the media to
bring this new constitution into play.
It will then be a simple task for him to step forward and take
over.
In
this scenario, it appears that Clinton double crossed Gore first. Next, he might promote a Hillary presidency
and then later double cross her in some manner if she won’t obey him and the
Amalekites. For sure, Bill will either
control Hillary in a Hillary presidency or a new constitution will arrive to
allow him to simply regain power in his own right.
Once
Bill is back in power, the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters will eventually double
cross him, if he does not toe the line correctly (and maybe, he will not
perform correctly, if it develops that he later tries to blame the Jews for the
continuing economic problems).
In
any case, this seems to be where the US is at in early 2003. A tremendous motion is now underway to force
a constitutional convention and one which could get carried away with a new
constitution and a Clinton return to power--especially if Bush and Cheney are
removed (by death or assassination) and/or if serious economic problems
develop/continue.
Colin Powell
Colin
Powell is a New World Order man fully supported by both the Amalekites and the
Eastern Establishment liberals. Powell
has been playing with the super rich for years now (the proof lies in the fact
that he is now a multimillionaire with $18.5 to $67.9 million in assets, Jan
29, 2001, “US News & World Report,” p. 6.
Powell didn’t get this money from his army career where he spent his
entire adult life of work).
With
Bush and/or Cheney dead, it might be that the Big Boys choose to move Colin
into the presidency (after all, he has been on their payroll for some time, as
just noted). He certainly will be a
force to contend with and may get the White House for a spell. But the better option is that the Amalekites
have by now or will soon gain complete control of the Rockefellers and bring
Bill Clinton back to power.
Though
Powell has been groomed to be an important cog in the New World Order, the
Amalekite internationalists may have developed some second thoughts since he
has gained political prominence with George W. Bush. There could be a parting of company between
the Amalekites and Powell if he is not careful--and especially since he is
actually incompetent (though incompetents do make good robot followers).
“Spotlight”
(p. 18) of Feb 12, 2001, had a story by Michael Collins Piper on “Israeli Lobby
Fearful of Secretary of State” which noted that some of the (Amalekite pro)
press has offered some reservations about Powell. The “Washington Post” of Jul 23, 2000, and
the Jewish “Forward” paper of Jan 19, 2001, were quoted with messages about
Powell and isolationism (which Amalekite internationalists bitterly
oppose).
Chapter
465--Clannish Edomites
Yes, Clannish Edomites
In
another matter, Edomites are extremely clannish--especially the Amalekites
among themselves.
Interestingly,
this propensity extends further to encompass even the overall Edomite
definition. Thus, New York’s Phoenician
Irish, Zepho’s Sicilian gangsters and Esau’s Hollywood moguls all have gotten
along well with the Amalek power structure which completely dominates organized
crime and the media and entertainment industries.
Next,
the overall definition of the descendants of Eliphaz are likewise clannish in
their racial clique.
For
instance, the Ottoman Turks were always on good terms with the Amalek
Jews. Even today, Turkey maintains some
distance from the other Moslems who are more opposed to the Jews. The US dominated Amalek power structure and
media has been in total support of their Albanian cousins in the conflict with
the Serbs in old Yugoslavia.
Edomites
may appear to be divided among themselves on issues of little or no
importance. But they typically offer a
solid front against outsiders on significant themes. Apparently, the Cahilla and bankers/masters
allow some disagreement and nonconformity on matters of little importance. But it is consequential issues which are
stressed and which most Edomites support (because of genetic factors).
If
the Amalekites, in particular, cannot personally agree on something being
promoted by their bankers/masters, then those disagreeing tend to keep their
mouths shut. They maintain silence to
not interfere in the work of their leaders.
Thus, some truly religious Edomites might disapprove of the collective
Amalek push of sexual perversion. But
they won’t fight the bankers/masters over it.
It’s
not to say that Amalekite bankers/masters automatically promote their positions
on all political and social issues in the contemporary sun worship
society. Apparently, they only do so on
major issues affecting the overall Amalekite goals (i.e. world rule, the
destruction of Yisrael, etc).
But
again, if the bankers/masters do take a position, the generic Edomites tend to
all get on board or be quiet about it.
One sees this regularly in US politics, the US media, the
Anti-Defamation League, the militant Jewish Defense League, etc.
When
the Amalek-Edomite leaders in these arenas speak out, there is little or no
Edomite opposition. The few, non-Edomite
Christians trying to oppose them are rendered ineffective by being branded as
right wing extremists, racists, anti-Semites and/or White supremacists.
A Clarification
A
point of clarification is needed at this stage in the context of the above
discussion on the clannish nature of the Edomites and the tendency of the
generic Edomite people to go along with the bankers/masters/visible
leaders. While it is verity that the
Amalekite bankers/masters have enormous power over the Amalekites and even much
influence over the generic Edomites, there are other issues involved in this
power.
First,
Edomites generally seem to have a genetic, passionate hatred of racial Yisrael
and Israelites, as discussed above and in former chapters. This hatred is genetic and all Edomites seem
to automatically have it. In this sense,
they want to always choose the worst for Yisrael and Israelites (in a
democracy). And they are very prejudiced
with this preconceived motivation to destroy Yisrael.
Next,
there is the reality of Satan and his associated demonic hosts to use mental
telepathy upon Edomites generally and Amalekites particularly to choose
specific methods to harm, hurt and destroy Yisrael and Israelites and Adamites
in the generic sense.
Therefore,
if a question of gun control comes up in one of the House of Yisrael nations,
the Amalekites are always guided by Satan and his powers to choose gun control,
as a prelude for the establishment of a world dictator who can really go to
work on destroying Yisrael and Adam.
Obviously,
since the days of Balaam and his advice on how to destroy Yisrael, discussed in
former chapters, the prevalent and powerful Satanic force has directed,
influenced, guided and motivated the Amalekites--especially in their management
and direction of promoting racial integration and amalgamation of White
Israelites with the behemah humanoids.
Satan
has always pushed and prodded his Amalekite sons in providing leadership on the
racial amalgamation issue.
The
same thing can be said about the sexual perversion and homosexual
subjects. Many, many Amalekites are
queers, as outlined in chapters heretofore.
It’s hard to say how much of this perversion is genetic and how much of
it is Satanic. Perhaps there is a mix in
the Amalekite profile.
For
sure, the queer Satan has pushed and prodded his sons (descendants of Kain, to
include the Amalek-Edomites) in this same direction. Ever since the days of the Exodus, as
discussed in previous chapters, the perverted and warped Amalekites have been
anxious to spread the same perversion and depravity among the racial
Israelites.
With
this prevailing predisposition for genetic hatred and continuous mental
telepathic messages from Satan and his demon forces, the Amalekite
bankers/masters automatically have part of their battle already won. Naturally, Amalekites in particular are going
to go along with anything which points in the direction of their fleshly ideas
and thinking (regulated by their genes and the Devil).
More Specific Leadership
Otherwise,
the Amalekite masters/leaders are available to provide leadership on other more
complicated issues which the typical Edomite may not readily understand. The masters are very active in providing
direction in support of the Amalekite bankers and their quest for world
government and control.
So,
back in 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was under discussion, the masters
(in an effort to promote world rule, Amalekite profits and satisfy the
Amalekite bankers) went to work to persuade and influence--first, all of the
Amalekites to support this legislation; next, all of the other Edomites; and
finally, many or most of the collective peoples of America as well.
The
twelve-year war against Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi people has been
essentially guided, directed and managed by Amalekite bankers/masters. Of course, there could be questions of
genetics and Satanic influence even in the conduct of this war. But in the main, the leadership and push has
been provided by the bankers/masters.
More aspects of this conflict will be addressed in later comments.
There
is no question about it whatsoever. The
1999 Clinton war against the Serbs in the Balkans was prompted by Amalekite
leaders to benefit the super rich Amalekite bankers (who have been trying to
take over Eastern Europe). As discussed
above and in a prior chapter, there were serious economic and profit issues at
stake in Kosovo for the Edomites.
Obviously, Amalekite bankers/masters pushed this war.
Alan Greenspan
The
selection and push for the acceptance and approval of specific Amalekite
persons for key government positions within the House of Yisrael nations has
had Amalekite input from day one. Thus,
there is little doubt; but that a clear Amalekite, like Alan Greenspan, was
selected by the Amalekite bankers. The
same is true with the selection and approval of the various Amalekite jurists
chosen for the Supreme Court.
This
mention of Alan Greenspan brings up another fascinating fact of reality. As pointed out in a prior chapter, the
Amalekite bankers/masters pretty well call most of the shots in the US. Clearly, the Rockefeller empire is on a
dramatic decline (possibly with the absorption of Chase Manhattan Bank by
powerful Amalekite Jew bankers).
As
noted in former presentations, the Bush family (though formally servants of the
Rockefeller power bloc) have had to toe the line with the Amalekite Jew
bankers/masters or face utter destruction.
Thus, a strange event unfolded in the early summer of 2001, which proved
how manifestly true that observation is with young George W. Bush in the
presidency.
“The
Week” of Jun 29, 2001 (p. 37), had a short news report which read “No dissent
allowed in Greenspanland.” The essence
of the report was that Bush was prepared to nominate Country Bank CEO Terry
Jorde to the Federal Reserve Board.
According to columnist Robert Novak, “She was vetoed by the supremely
powerful Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.”
Apparently,
Bush is in the awful position of having his nominations to the Fed cleared in
advance with Alan Greenspan. Since
Greenspan is a leading Amalekite (and works closely with the Amalekite
bankers/masters), it is absolutely a certainty that the Amalekite bankers are
calling the shots on who can be a member of the Fed. So Bush is following the precedent already
set in place by Clinton, in terms of Amalekite rule.
John Deutch
As
outlined in former chapters, the Amalekites have completely taken over the
national US law enforcement and intelligence operations here in the early 21st
century. One of the CIA’s recent
directors, under Bill Clinton, was an apparent Amalekite Jew named John Deutch.
He
gained some notoriety when he took classified CIA computer files and down
loaded them into his personal computer at home (which was totally
unsecured). While it is not clear how
much of this information was stolen by foreign powers by reading Deutch’s
harddrive (through the Internet or however), it could be staggering.
This
possible compromise of US security information received quite an uproar in
Washington when it was discovered in the summer of 2000. There was a Justice Department investigation
into it, but nothing came of it because the Amalekite Deutch had powerful
political support from the Amalekites in control of the US government.
Even
Deutch’s confirmation in the US Senate was pushed through by Amalekite Senators
like Arlen Specter (R, PA) and Joseph Lieberman (D, CT). Since Slick Clinton was surrounded by
Amalekite aides and assistants, it was manifest that the Amalekite Deutch was
not about to suffer for his incompetence and likely treason.
The
investigation into the activities of Deutch revealed that the former Director
of the CIA was a close confidant and colleague of the Israeli Ambassador Eliahu
Ben-Elissar; who, in time, turned out to be a high ranking member of the
Mossad, instead of a career diplomat (Sep 11, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 1,
11).
Apparently,
Deutch shared US classified information with Ben-Elissar. Again, nothing was done about this treason
since Deutch was a part of the clannish Amalekite cabal. Clearly, the clannish Amalekites share information
and nothing will be done about it because they are so powerful in the US
government. The Clinton Administration
worked hard to protect the Amalekite Deutch.
Ultimately, Slick pardoned him.
In
September 2000, US Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk was also found to have
mishandled classified documents and allegedly allowed security breaches,
corruption and bribery at the US Embassy (Oct 9, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 1). Indyk was suspended. As Indyk was an Amalekite Jew, nothing
further was done and he was soon exonerated.
However,
these cover-ups of Amalekite misdeeds and corruption were a hard task for the
Slick Meister and especially since the US Justice Department chose to arrest,
jail and prosecute the Chinese scientist, Wen Ho Lee, from Los Alamos in 2000
(as discussed earlier). Lee’s record was
certainly similar to that of John Deutch.
Possibly, Lee was spying for China, while Deutch was spying for
Israel.
The
only thing that the government successfully hung on Lee was his supposedly
irresponsible handling of classified information (as discussed earlier herein). As a minimum, this same charge certainly
applies to the deceitful Deutch (who was pardoned).
Ultimate Amalekite Control
Though
it probably is true that the electability futures of various Amalekite
politicians (like the crafty Joseph Lieberman) depend somewhat upon their
personal attributes and abilities, it is also true that if and when the
bankers/masters come out in support of Amalekite candidates, they get a big
boost (as has occurred with Lieberman).
The
decisions of the Israeli state to bring the Falashas to Palestine and to give
identity cards to the Black Hebrews, discussed in a former chapter, surely came
from the Amalekite bankers/masters/leaders.
Likely, there was some serious Jewish opposition to these schemes in the
state of Israel. So the bankers/masters
would have had to push and prod the population into accepting the plans.
Literally,
there are hundreds of issues and things happening from time to time which
require input from the bankers/masters to provide leadership to the generic
Amalekites first, the collective Edomites second and the general population
third. It is these issues that capture
the attention of the bankers/masters.
On
the basis of freedom and free will, some Amalekites may theoretically choose to
go against the bankers/masters on some of these issues. But if they do, they still have the power and
influence of their genes and the Satanic motivation to push them into the
direction of destroying Yisrael and Adam.
The Amalekite Presence in 2003
The
Amalekites are especially involved in several things--like in the international
and central banks, organized crime, Satanic groups, the Illuminati, the Roman
Catholic Church and others.
Additionally, Amalekite Jews have frequently worked with the Anglophiles
in both England and the US (pretending to support their goals, yet be working
secretly to destroy them forever because of genetic hate).
Often
this Amalekite presence is recognized in some of these groups in the sense that
the participants can be identified as historic Amalekite Jews. Thus, Catholic Cardinal Lustiger of France,
previously discussed, and others in a similar position are so clearly
identified with their Jewish heritage that it is not difficult to perceive
their true genetic ancestry and linkage to the evil and depravity of the
Amalekites.
In
any case, in those instances where the connection can be clearly made to the
Amalekites, there is no reason for total confusion and uncertainty in
understanding the Amalekite presence and evil.
However,
because of their propensity for name changes, adoption of different religions
(supposedly) and other clever acts of deception, the Amalekite definition can
be extremely difficult to recognize and evaluate. For instance, one key, likely, Amalekite
agent is the popular Geraldo Rivera (with his own TV program). What few understand is that Rivera is not a
true Hispanic, as he pretends. He is
something else.
Otherwise,
some Amalekites have adopted Christianity or some other non-Jewish faith and
changed their Amalekite names so many years ago that their Amalekite ancestry
is more complicated. In such
situations, it can be awful difficult to identify the subjects as
Amalekites.
Examples
of this deception can be found among persons like Giovanni Battista Montini
(Pope Paul VI), Adolf Schicklgruber, the Roosevelts (Rosenfelds), the
Rockefellers, the Bushes and Bill and Hillary Clinton (to be described in later
comments), etc. If there is a key to
identifying the true Amalekite, it is the matter of his deeds, works and
fruits. In other words, a person’s actions,
if evil and depraved, suggest Amalekite genes.
Using Others
Also,
as elsewhere discussed herein, it is true that some Amalekites are so powerful
that they use janissary robots to do their will. This is particularly true in the US and
Britain where the Amalekites virtually own and control the media and
entertainment industries. Therefore,
they are constantly affecting the beliefs and thinking of any number of local
citizens.
Even
people like Billy Graham and Christian preachers and politicians, in general,
whom are not technically a part of the Amalekite Jew definition, become willing
agents to help the Amalekite Jews and to work with them.
Many
of these Anglophiles in the Eastern Establishment still believe that they are
in charge and calling the shots in the US--never understanding that they have
been slowly losing out in the past 60 years.
Even
when Amalekites themselves lack personal power over an international group,
they often are able to wield power through other entities that they do
control. Hence, the Amalekites are not a
power in the UN themselves. But they
control the US and Britain which are powerful agencies to work for and serve
the Amalekite purpose in the UN.
Of
course, the case can be made that the Amalekites personally are not a big
factor in the Roman Catholic Church, the New Age Movement, the World Council of
Churches and on and on (at least, not in numbers, in terms of the total
membership).
But
once an Amalekite person or persons gain some power and control in these
groups, they can push the Amalekite agenda throughout the organization. Thus, an Amalekite pope or a few Amalekite
cardinals can prevail over the generic Catholic Church (as has happened
historically).
Chapter
466--Double Crosses and the Amalekites
Innocent Jews Suffer
The Jewish dilemma discussed in the
former chapters seems to be a repeat of what happened in Nazi Germany in the
1930s. Innocent Jews were--in the past,
and will be, in the future--oppressed, persecuted, tried and murdered for the
diabolical evil and wickedness of the Amalek-Edomites. This is a real tragedy that has happened
before and will surely happen again.
When will the world wake up and realize
that there is no problem with the collective Jews or the Jewish religion? The problem is with a select group of evil
Amalekite bankers/masters, who infiltrated and took over the circles of power
within the Jewish community.
Yes, through the centuries, good, true
Israelite Jews have had to suffer the scourge of Amalek because their ancestors
in Second Temple days allowed the Amalek-Edomites to become proselytes (just as
the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic peoples have allowed Amalekite bankers/masters and
workers of evil to immigrate to their lands and literally take over their
governments in the last several hundred years).
To demonstrate how the evils and
depravity of the Amalekites have hurt true Jews, there are any number of illustrations
which could be outlined. But for
purposes of discussion, a few will be described to drive home the point.
Amalekite Merchants
First, Amalekite Jew merchants have
developed a reputation for being incredibly tight, stingy and evil in
commercial dealings. In short, the
typical, gullible, goyim Christian is still in bed asleep while the Amalekite
merchants are up plotting and conniving about how they will rip off, steal,
cheat, plunder and exploit the stupid goyim (whom they hate so
passionately).
Since the Amalekites are extremely
intelligent people, they are very swift at bargaining, whether they are buyers
or sellers (it is genetic with them since they are descendants of Cain. They have been programmed to be merchants and
dealers in goods, as discussed in a former chapter).
The Torah was broached in former
chapters in that the true follower of YHWH is dedicated to reaching a fair
exchange, whether in a selling or buying profile. This thinking is totally foreign to the
depraved Amalekite mind.
This Amalekite Jew expertise at
bargaining has created a saying in the Christian West about Jewing somebody
down. When a buyer starts pushing and
prodding the seller to a ridiculous low price, the normal expression to denote
this case is that the buyer Jewed the seller down.
Now comes the really sad feature of
this “bargaining process.” Tragically,
the expression is tied to the collective Jews and is made in the sense of
Jewing down or Jew down. In other words,
the critical remark is made in the context of the Jews and not just the
wretched Amalekites who are posing as Jews and who are the usual people noted
for this ability and conniving.
Real Depravity!
The Nov 18, 2002, “American Free Press”
(p. 6) had a tragic story of how far the Amalekite evil and depravity
extends. This one-- “Top Holocaust
Industry Officer Fired for Embezzling” --was by Michael Collins Piper.
Per Piper’s report, a so-called Jew
named Neal Sher was chief of staff in the Washington office of the
International Commission on Holocaust Era Insurance Claims (ICHEIC). This issue of “American Free Press” showed the
evil Sher in a photo with President Bill Slick Clinton and the then Israeli
leader Shimon Peres at a meeting of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee.
While the ICHEIC was ostensibly in the
business of providing for and helping Holocaust survivors, the Amalekite Sher
decided that he would misappropriate some of this money intended for Holocaust
survivors. The article was not clear on
how much money Sher stole before his acts became known and he was fired. Presumably, the organization will make
further investigations to see how much he stole in total.
As the AFP reported, Sher was one of
the leading stars of the ICHEIC.
Supposedly, he was busy hunting Nazis and protecting the interests of
Israel (while at ICHEIC, and before, when he worked in the Office of Special
Investigations inside the US Justice Department).
What a shock it must have been to the
multitudes of Jews who have contributed money to this group to learn that its
boss was ripping off the organization.
But this is the way the evil Amalekites operate. They have no conscience or concern at
all--not even for each other. Certainly,
any stupid goyim entrapped by one of these Amalekites can expect to be ripped
off totally and completely.
Bringing Hate Upon Good Jews
Next, the Amalekite money power
(masters, bankers, merchants and fat cats) are so incredibly evil that this
propensity for treachery, dishonesty, cheating, lying and evil is so prevalent
that the general goyim population has mistakenly labeled it as a Jewish
trait--never understanding that it is not a problem with the collective Jews,
but something genetically associated with the wicked Amalekites.
This was clearly the situation in
Germany in the 1920s and early 1930s which allowed the evil Adolf Schicklgruber
to come to power on a platform of hating Jews.
It appears that most of the pogroms and campaigns of evil against the
collective Jews are because of this precise reason.
Previous comments herein quoted Rav
Yisroel David Weiss on how the state of Israel was supposedly set up to protect
Jews against anti-Semitism. Yet, per
Weiss, the Jews themselves are the greatest and main creators of anti-Semitism
worldwide (Jul 8, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. B-2). Manifestly, Weiss is right!
Evil Amalekites (as parasites) bring
great harm and hurt upon a goyim population.
The goyim get mad at the hurt which they suffer and blame the collective
Jews for the wickedness and treachery of the Amalekites. The goyim get so fed up with what has
happened to them that they turn their wrath against a lot of good Jews. This whole exercise is indeed tragic.
Amalek-Edomites Double Cross Their Own Peoples
Moreover, it’s quite feasible that some
of the ruling Amalek-Edomite bankers can willingly turn on their own cousins
and particularly true Jews (whom they continue to hate as much as they do the
people of the House of Yisrael).
Historically, Amalekite bankers have been quite willing to persecute and
sell out Jews at large (to include other Amalekite Jews), as happened in the
above mentioned Schicklgruber days.
This is not as far fetched as some may
first suppose. There are many proofs
that the Amalekites can turn on their own without much provocation. The best illustration of this occurred in
1997 when Amalekite internationalists and Bill Clinton jointly worked together
to get rid of the conservative government of Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and
replace it with a liberal government (to be described in a later
appendix).
Clinton had been and was surrounded by
Amalekite aides--manifestly, in his national security, defense and foreign
affairs offices. It would seem that
these Edomites would always look out for the interests of the Israeli
state. But in fact, they did not do
so. Since they were so anxious to sell
the Israeli state and people out to get an Arab peace treaty, a suspicious
person would have to ask why?
Perhaps the argument can be made that
they have been selling Israel out in order to merely obey Slick. But this doesn’t make sense, since Slick
himself had been and is totally subservient to the plutocratic money power and
especially the Amalek-Edomite super rich.
It is clear that the Amalekite aides, surrounding Slick, actually took
their orders from the bankers/masters and influenced, motivated and led Slick
to follow suit.
Obviously, the Amalek-Edomites
surrounding Slick had been and were working to meet the international agenda,
as established and dictated by Amalekite international bankers. Thus, it would seem that the bankers were not
overly concerned about the future of the Israelis, as opposed to their own
futures, power and world influence.
Previous comments noted how clannish
the Edomite Ottoman Turks were toward their Amalek-Edomite cousins in organized
Jewry. The Edomite Turks seem to have
generally treated the Amalekite Jews well.
Yet, when the Amalekite bankers decided
that they wanted to buy Palestine and their Turkish cousins wouldn’t sell it,
the Amalekite bankers/masters in the West created and directed WWI to bring
about the complete collapse of the old Ottoman empire and the Turkish loss of
Palestine.
George Soros, Revisited
The supposed Amalekite Jew, George
Soros, has been discussed in prior chapters.
There is no intent to rehash those presentations--beyond noting that he
is closely tied to the Rothschild family (specifically Jacob Lord Rothschild)
and numbers of clannish Amalekites in the US Federal Reserve, the US Treasury
and key government posts in a number of Western, Christian nations.
Per the Jan 1 & 8, 2001,
“Spotlight” (p. 1, 4-5), Soros was born in 1930 in Budapest, Hungary, the son
of an upper middle class Jewish family.
Soros survived the Nazi war on the Jews by assuming a double
personality, as he tells it.
He says that his father gave him Nazi
credentials which showed that he was one Janos (or Sandor) Kis, the pretended
godson of a local Hungarian government official whose job it was to “deliver
deportation notices to Jews and take possession of their property,” as they
were shipped off to Nazi concentration camps.
Thus, Soros helped loot and apparently share in the possessions of these
Jews.
The Nazi pretender Soros came to the US
in 1956 and became an American citizen some five years later. He graduated to the big leagues in 1969 when
he began raising money from rich Europeans for stock investments. Today, Queen Elizabeth is one of his
clients.
The “Spotlight” story with this
biographical information suggested that initially Soros had trouble trying to
decide whether he was an American, a Jew or a Hungarian. This remark opens the door that he may not
publicly identify with the Jews (although he seems to have Amalekite financial
ties to the Rothschilds and other leading Jewish Amalekite
bankers/masters).
The point of these remarks is that
Soros would appear to be a classic Amalekite, who is fully capable of double
crossing and selling the Jews out for money.
As discussed earlier, he already has a reputation for certain criminal
dealings. With his Nazi background, it
appears that he will do anything for personal gain. Likely, the coming work of the Amalekites to
bring trouble upon the US will involve Soros.
More Sell Outs
The super rich Amalekite Jew Marc Rich
was discussed in previous chapters.
Billionaire Marc was able to bribe and payoff the crooked US President
Slick Clinton and get a pardon for all of his criminal activities in January
2001.
Importantly, fat cat Marc had been
working for years on finding a scam and method which would keep him out of
jail. As described in a former chapter,
one of Rich’s schemes was to squeal upon and double cross his supposed friend
and fellow fugitive Tom J. Billman.
As pointed out earlier, Marc was
prepared to tell US authorities where Billman was hiding out, if a deal could
be worked out on the charges against Marc and one which would go on to keep
Marc out of jail (Mar 12, 2001, “US News & World Report,” p. 32).
The record is plain that Marc is a very
evident Amalekite. It is unclear what
the racial/ethnic status is of Billman.
But the fact that Billman allegedly stole $25 million in a fraud
maneuver (a very common type of a criminal action by a cunning and clever
Amalekite) and successfully fled the US, suggests that Billman is likewise an
Amalekite racially.
The point of this whole discussion is
that probably both of these fugitive fat cats were Amalekite crooks. And being Amalekites, it was no big deal if
one of them (like Marc Rich) would step forward and enter into secret
negotiations with US prosecutors to double cross his so-called friend and
fellow fugitive Billman.
This very sell out by Rich of his
colleague Billman brings to mind the situation with the Al Gore and Joe
Lieberman Democrat ticket in 2000. The
goyim Gore chose the deceptive and evil Amalekite Lieberman to be his running
mate (against all logic). The stupid
Gore went all out to try to tie in with the Amalekite bankers/masters ruling
America (Gore even married one of his daughters off to one of the Amalekite
Schiffs).
For awhile, the diabolical Lieberman
acted like he would never run against his partner in evil, Al Gore. But then, in 2002, Lieberman came out and
started his own campaign for president in 2004, by-passing his former
ally. The Aug 9, 2002, “Forward” had a
story by Eli Kintisch on “Dems Fret Bickering Between Gore, Lieberman.”
The essence of this report by Kintisch
is that the evil Lieberman has double-crossed his former friend and colleague
Gore. Already, there is a noticeable
squabble between the two former friends.
The point is that an Amalekite will gladly double-cross, cheat and
swindle anyone--including his own closest friends and relatives.
When push comes to shove, Amalekites
simply have no honor. They will gladly
double cross and cheat each other, as well as anyone and everyone else. Manifestly, in world history, Amalekites are
the most immoral, dishonest, vile, corrupt, depraved, deceptive and criminal
people of all time. They are unmatched
in evil.
A Paradox for the Amalekites
In other sections of this production,
mention was made of the role of the Amalekites in the destruction of Yehudah at
the hands of the Babylonians in c554 BCE, in support of the Syrians/Greeks in
the Antiochus Epiphanies oppression (c168-163 BCE), and in the destruction of
Jerusalem at the hands of the Romans in 66-70 CE (per Josephus). Amalek-Edomites participated in all of this
oppression against true Jews.
Thus, the Amalekites have historically
had an incredible amount of success in gaining and sustaining their evil rule
and exploitation of good, innocent, true Jews.
They started this in earnest in the second century BCE.
Also, they have had amazing success in
completely taking over the House of Yisrael nations in the last 350 years. So here, in the early 21st century, the
Amalekites rule Yisrael in the generic sense.
But now, a strange paradox surfaces
whenever assessing their roles and efforts to conquer and rule over other
peoples. Frankly, their record hasn’t
been good over other nations in the long term.
True, they have had limited success for some years and even decades over
non Israelite peoples. But this
domination has always proved to be temporary.
Perhaps this strange reality has
materialized and continued--because the Scriptures have been very precise in
indicating that it is the Israelite people who will be subjected to eventual
Amalekite oppression. YHWH allows and in
some instances brings on this Amalekite cruelty and hardship, due to the sins
of the Israelites.
This was the backdrop on the first
Amalekite attack during the Exodus. It
has continued to be the exact reason for the subsequent Amalekite persecutions
against the Israelites. It has been the
sins and wretchedness of the Israelite people which have brought on and caused
the oppression that they are now under in the early 21st century.
Some Amalekite Failures
But other than Yisrael, the Amalekites
have had a string of failures over the ages.
They linked in with Rome in the first century BCE. Rome repaid them by allowing the Herods to
take over rulership of much of Palestine.
However, in time, the Romans, under Nero, turned against them, as
happened in the Jewish-Roman War of 66-73 CE.
Many Amalekites were killed or went
into captivity from this Roman judgment.
If Nero actually had Amalekite genes, as will be addressed in later
comments herein, this would seem most unusual that one racial Amalekite would
turn against other Amalekites. However,
one should not be too surprised because Amalekites have this propensity to
double cross their own kind, as noted above.
In the early 1930s, the Amalekite
bankers financed and set up their Amalekite cousin Adolf Schicklgruber to take
over Germany. Adolf double crossed them
and started a campaign to wipe them out in Europe.
The Colored Approach
In the 20th century, Amalekite
bankers/masters linked up with Black people in America to promote racial
integration and amalgamation (as was their purpose since the days of
Balaam).
But the Africans eventually woke up and
began to understand how evil the Amalekites are to Blacks as well as to Whites
(as noted in a preceding chapter). So
the Blacks double crossed their Amalekite benefactors when the Black Muslims
rose up and began attacking and condemning Jews.
In their evil quest to destroy White
Christian Israelites in the House of Yisrael lands, the Amalekites began the
just noted push on racial integration and amalgamation. As pointed out in a prior chapter on
immigration, the Amalekites have used their money, power and influence to bring
about massive Colored immigration into the White Christian nations of Europe
and North America.
The stupid, decadent, gullible goyim in
Europe and North America quickly joined hands with the evil Amalekite
bankers/masters and opened their borders to Colored immigrants from around the
globe.
The stupid goyim have even adopted
expensive welfare programs to encourage and promote this immigration (and have
even willingly turned their own White daughters over to the Colored immigrants
to miscegenate with to produce mongrel, mixed off-spring). This whole process was thought up by the
Amalekites who have provided the money and leadership to bring it into
fruition.
Now, the Colored Double Cross
After spending vast sums of money (by
the Amalekites, stolen from the stupid, White, Christian goyim) to promote
racial integration and amalgamation, the Blacks have woken up and have led the
way in understanding the evils of the Amalekite Jews. In a sense, the Blacks have been and are now
double crossing their former benefactors.
Actually, this whole paradox is
surfacing all over the White, Christian West.
With the flood of Colored immigrants, visitors, etc into the White
nations, obviously multitudes of mongrel Colored Arabs and Muslims have also come
to the White, Christian West.
Much of France, Germany, Britain and
even the US, which were once owned outright by the Amalekite bankers/masters,
are beginning to have huge Colored populations.
Like the Blacks in America, these Coloreds (and particularly the Colored
Arabs) profoundly hate Jews.
While the ignorant, gullible, White
goyim have been too stupid to see or do anything about their own destruction at
the hands of the Amalekite bankers/masters, many of these Coloreds passionately
hate the Jews who brought about conditions and circumstances for them to
migrate to the White nations where they could have and enjoy White welfare and
White women.
Now, these Colored immigrants are
turning against their benefactors.
Numerous attacks upon Jews and Jewish synagogues are surfacing all over
Europe. In the previously quoted March
2002 letter from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, mention was made that the Arab
promoted “anti-Semitism” is spreading hate not only across the Middle East, but
also into Europe and beyond.
Another prime example of this
phenomenon surfaced in the April 5, 2002 “Forward” paper in a story on “N.Y.
Lubavitchers Attacked in Berlin.” A NY
Hassidic Jew was visiting in Berlin when he and his Hasidic friends were
accosted and attacked by six to eight men who appeared to be Arabs.
With their great hatred of White
Germans, the Amalekites pushed for the flood of Coloreds into Germany. Now, these same Arabs are turning against
innocent, religious Jews (like the Lubavitchers) to take their wrath out on
them. What a shame it is that innocent
Jews must pay for the evil of the Amalekite bankers/masters.
The Real Paradox Here
But there is another real paradox that
surfaces in this present discussion. Of
course, it is quite clear and certain that the flood of the Colored immigrants
from the Third world into White Europe and North America was fueled and
promoted by the evil Amalekites who want to see Whitey thoroughly destroyed
(per the theology of Balaam, as discussed in former chapters).
These Colored immigrants rushing into
White Europe and North America, by and large, passionately hate the Jews above
all people. This is a paradox because
the Amalekite Jews have purposely brought this immigration and the resulting
racial integration and amalgamation on precisely to forever destroy the White
inhabitants in the former White countries in Europe and North America.
One of the most fantastic flukes of all
happened in France in her presidential elections on April 25, 2002. In a stunning upset, the French people chose
the right wing nationalist candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen in the second place on
the balloting. Le Pen faced the present
president Jacques Chirac on May 5, 2002.
No one gave Le Pen any chance of any success in this run off
election.
One of the platforms of Le Pen was for
the return of all illegal aliens to their home countries (in France, this
mostly involves Colored Muslims from North Africa). Surely, Le Pen would like to have seen all of
these African Coloreds sent back home and be out of France. Actually, this whole motion would work for
good for the state of Israel and the Jews.
So, what happened with Le Pen’s
temporary victory? The Amalekite
controlled media in the US went to work on how evil and vile Le Pen was for his
alleged anti-Semitism.
Though Le Pen said nothing about the
Jews in his campaign, the Amalekites discovered that a few years ago he had
raised questions about the so-called Holocaust.
In Amalekite eyes, this is one of the greatest crimes of all
history. Poor Le Pen was portrayed as an
anti-Semite in the US press as well as in much of Europe.
Of course, the Israelis would benefit with
the election of Le Pen. But his election
would not fit the Amalekite agenda for the destruction of Whitey. Thus, the Amalekites have used their media
powers to try to destroy Le Pen because of his alleged anti-Semitism.
For sure, the Colored immigrants in
much of Europe and America all hate the Jews.
Yet, the White populations being destroyed in Europe and America have
generally loved or at least put up with the Jews (not with Judaism because
Christians everywhere hate Judaism, but most gullible Whites are much in favor
of the Jews).
More From Europe
The situation of the Jews in Europe has
been under a strain in 2003 because of the way the Israelis have invaded and
attacked the Palestinians on the West Bank and in Gaza, as noted earlier. In reacting to this European backlash, the
May 6, 2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 32-33) had a story by Eric Silver on
“Target: Jews” which assessed the latest
developments in the West in the vein of so-called “anti-Semitism.”
Silver mentioned a recent case in
Belgium where dozens of North Africans attacked a Jewish synagogue in Antwerp
and tried to burn it down. In the
Ukraine, a synagogue was attacked in Kiev on April 13th and there was some
provocation against the Israeli Embassy in Norway. In Britain, the “Observer” paper called the
Israeli army “the Zionist SS.” In Paris,
a Jewish soccer team was attacked by 15 Muslim youths.
In Australia, a synagogue in Sidney was
attacked and in Western Canada, a fire bomb destroyed the library at a
Conservative synagogue.
The story took note of the fact that
the attacks in Western Europe were almost exclusively the work of Arabs of
North Africa and other Muslim immigrants.
As Silver charged, there was no involvement of the “radical right
racists, who hate the Arabs even more than they hate the Jews.” Even in this acknowledgment, the Amalekites
could not resist charging the right wing people of being “racists.”
A Feb 2003 letter from Marvin Hier of
the Simon Wiesenthal Center went on to outline the latest attacks on Jews in
Europe.
Hier noted that some 1,000 incidents
have occurred in France since Oct 2000; Belgium says that she can no longer
guarantee the safety of her Jews; newspapers in Greece have turned to
stereotypes and Nazi imagery (one paper had a cartoon portraying two Nazi-like
Israeli soldiers, with the star of David on their helmets, slaughtering
Palestinians with knives); in Britain, Muslim leader Sheikh Abu Hamza equated
Jews with Satan and said it is OK to kill them; and in Russia, high profile
hate rallies to skinhead attacks occur.
Friends?
As noted in the above discussion on Le
Pen, any number of right wing Europeans have been and would be friends of the
Jews against the Arabs, if given a chance.
So, how does the controlled Amalekite media powers treat the right
wing? They attack the right wing and
call them names and go on to encourage more and more Colored immigration into
the White countries.
The evil Amalekites cannot perceive
that their destruction of the White people in France, Germany, Britain, America
or wherever (and particularly through the flow of Colored immigrants into those
nations) spells the end to the gullible Whites who have historically supported
the Jews.
The new Coloreds taking over in Europe
hate the Jews more than anything conceived of from White people (who always
hated the religion of Judaism and not racial Jews).
The American South
Also, one can take the example of the
American South which has been historically populated with White Protestant
Christians, most of whom can be characterized as fundamentalists or
evangelicals. These persons by and large
think that the Jews are “God’s chosen people.”
In terms of United States politics,
these people are some of the biggest supporters of Zionism and the Jewish state
in Palestine. Of all Americans, some of
these Christian evangelicals or fundamentalists have led the way for the
payment of billions of dollars annually to the state of Israel. They are very dedicated to the support of
Jews and the state of Israel.
Yet, the evil Amalekite bankers/masters
have hated White people and especially White Southerners the most passionately
of all. In the American South, the
Amalekites have spent huge sums of money and made enormous efforts to integrate
the White and Black populations there expressly so that the gullible, White
goyim in the American South can be fully and completely destroyed forever. Amalekite Jews have done this.
The McKinney Case
While it probably is difficult to
understand, but evil Amalekite Jews have worked overtime in the American South
to destroy the gullible White goyim in the “Bible Belt” who actually have been
some of the biggest supporters of all of Israel and the Jews, as noted
above.
In order to destroy White Southerners,
the Amalekites have pushed for integration and miscegenation with the huge
Negro population in the South. Along
with the integration, the Amalekites have worked diligently to promote Black
politicians in the South into leadership roles over the gullible goyim. A perfect illustration of this push happened
in 1992 DeKalb County, Georgia.
The Jul 19, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1, 4)
had a story by Eli Kintisch on “Leftists Rallying Behind Georgia’s Rep. McKinney.” Per Kintisch, Jewish liberals, like Atlanta’s
Jules Stine, used their money and influence to elect a left-wing Negro woman
named Cynthia McKinney to Congress.
After arriving in Congress, Cynthia turned against her Amalekite
benefactors and started supporting the Palestinians/Arabs.
Now, in 2002, these same Amalekite
bankers/masters were tripping all over themselves trying to get rid of Cynthia
and replace her with a more favorable Black woman who would support the Jews
and Israel. While the Amalekites were
pouring money into Georgia to defeat Cynthia, the Arabs were pouring money in
to help Cynthia. This whole thing
represented quite a paradox.
Another “Forward” Report
The earlier June 14, 2002, “Forward”
had an article by Nacha Cattan on “Shoah Revisionists Feel Emboldened As
Anti-Zionist Rhetoric Gains in the U.S.” (p. 1, 8) which asserted that
“anti-Semitism” is on the rise in America.
As proof for this charge, the article cited a nationwide poll released
by the Anti-Defamation League on June 11, 2002.
Per the ADL survey, 17% of the 1,000
Americans polled hold “hardcore” anti-Semitic views (presumably, this number
includes all Americans--White, Black and Hispanic). In 1998, the figure was 12%, allowing that
indeed the percentage is up. This poll
also indicated that the anti-Semitic numbers for both Black and Hispanic
Americans is substantially higher at 35% for each group.
Since the 17% figure for all Americans
includes the 35% high figures for Blacks and Hispanics, it suggests that very
few White Americans hold these alleged views.
It was unclear in the article what percentage or proportion of the
sample included Blacks and Hispanics as opposed to Whites.
But in order for “Forward” to make its
charges, it would seem likely that substantially less than 17% of Whites polled
held those views (in order to offset the 35% figure for Blacks and Hispanics
that were included in the 17% data).
Thus, it might be that only 10% of White Americans have that
thinking.
This means that for every White person
with those views, there could be up to three or more Blacks and Hispanics with
those views--depending upon the actual proportions of these groups that were in
the ADL sample. In any case, the application
of those percentages to the overall US population does spell out huge numbers
of Coloreds who simply don’t like Jews, Zionism or the state of Israel.
This whole thing represents quite a
paradox because the Amalekite controlled media and power structure almost never
say anything negative about Blacks and Hispanics. The whole focus and effort of the Amalekites
is to whine, cry and complain about anti-Semitic White people. In the real world, the gullible Whites love
Jews. It is primarily Blacks and
Hispanics who hate or distrust Jews.
This reality shows the incredible
hatred that the Amalekites have had for the White, Christian, Israelite
population in America. The Amalekites
have attacked and done their level best to destroy forever the best friends and
supporters of Jews and Israel. Yet, they
fully support the real enemies of Jews and Israel (namely the Blacks and
Hispanics).
This whole Amalekite motion to destroy
the White goyim will, of course, ultimately backfire for the Amalekites. Once they destroy the White goyim (who love
Jews) and the only people left in the world are Blacks, Hispanics and other
Coloreds (who hate Jews), guess what will happen to the state of Israel and the
collective Jews? The Colored peoples
will rise up and destroy the Jews (including Amalekite Jews).
While it is almost a certainty that the
diabolical Amalekites actually believe that by destroying the White Adamic
people they will be left in the driver’s seat to dominate and rule over the
Coloreds of the world, this is not the way it would work out. At some point in time, the Blacks, Browns,
Hispanics and Muslims would all join together to completely destroy everything
called Jew in the world (including the Amalekites).
And South Africa
Assuredly, the same thing has happened
in the Republic of South Africa. The
gullible, White, Christian Israelites there were largely supporters of the Jews
and the state of Israel. So, what did
the Amalekite bankers/masters do? They
rushed in to completely destroy White rulership in South Africa.
The present Black Marxists passionately
hate the Jews and the state of Israel (as was described in a prior chapter on
the Durban conference on racism). While
the super rich Amalekite plutocrats and bankers will be able to steal much of
the wealth of South Africa (for awhile), with the present Black Marxist rulers,
their days will be limited. Given some
time, the Blacks will wake up and begin an intense persecution of Jews.
Anyway, the essence of the present
Amalekite evil work of destroying the Whites spells out an absolute crisis for
Jews in the coming days if YESHUA does not come soon to terminate the power of
the evil Amalekites and man’s mis-rule of this planet. The present trend is that the world and its
UN governing power is becoming darker and darker with people who hate
Jews.
Were it not for the remaining White
presence and influence, the Coloreds would rise up and totally destroy the Jews
(as they would ultimately do one day once Whitey is completely destroyed). Even in Israel, the Ethiopian Blacks are
there for economic and personal considerations and not for any love of Jews or
Judaism. These Blacks will ultimately
join in with the other Coloreds to destroy Jews and Judaism.
The Russian Problem, Revisited
In 1917, Amalekite bankers financed a
band of evil Amalekites (Trotsky and Lenin, if Lenin was part Amalekite, as
suggested heretofore) to take over Russia.
From 1917 to around 1950, the Amalekites were in tall cotton in ruling
Russia and international Communism. But
then, Stalin turned against them and Russian nationals took over their
nation. The Amalekites were double
crossed once more.
In later years, an evil Amalekite named
Yuri Vladiminovich Andropov took over the USSR.
Some would suppose that at last he would restore the Amalekite rule in
Moscow. But Andropov was much like Karl
Marx and Adolf Schicklgruber. He
passionately hated the Jews. The
Amalekite Khazars were not wiped out in Russia by Andropov, only because he
died first.
When Mikhail Gorbachev came along in
the USSR in the 1980s, Amalekite Khazars saw their chance to perhaps regain
power, since Gorbachev was ready to scuttle the USSR for a more lucrative
future in the New World Order. Amalekite
gangsters began taking over Russia and other parts of the USSR as it
divided.
Boris Yeltsin came to power in the
Russian Federation. He, like Slick
Clinton, was the answer to Amalekite prayers and/or dreams. He was a crook, par excellence, who could be
bought and paid for with Amalekite money.
Since 1992, the Amalekite bankers/masters in Russia worked and supported
Yeltsin all the way, as they were busy stealing every thing possible.
However, just as they have been double
crossed in the past, that seems to be their fate once more in the old Soviet
Union.
As things stand now, with Yeltsin gone,
it seems inevitable that his eventual successor (maybe Vladimir Putin
presently) will probably launch a new wave of cruelty and persecution upon
Amalekite Jews at some point in time.
Surviving Amalekite Khazars will have to flee Russia for Israel and the
West.
Hamas
In a bombshell report, the Jul 8, 2002,
“American Free Press” (p. 12) had a story on “UPI Terrorism Expert Confirms AFP
Exclusive: Israel Helped Create, Funds
Hamas Terror Group,” by Michael Collins Piper.
Piper reported upon a recent revelation from UPI correspondent Richard
Sale, which has confirmed an earlier AFP story that the Israelis have a history
of funding Arab terrorist groups for their own reasons.
This is precisely what happened with
Adolf Schicklgruber and the Nazi movement, which was founded, organized, funded
and promoted by evil Amalekites. Per
Sale and the AFP, apparently some of the same allegations can now be laid
against the Israelis (based upon data Sale obtained through the freedom of
information act and from the CIA).
The background on Sale’s allegation
goes back to the late 1970s when the Israelis were anxious to create a movement
to divide and dilute Arab support for the strong PLO (Palestinian Liberation
Organization). In 1978, Hamas was
organized as an Islamic social and religious entity in Israel (with direct or
indirect support of apparently Amalekite Jews).
Reportedly, Jewish interests funded and
funneled money to Hamas to get it off the ground to divide and oppose the PLO
and Yasser Arafat.
Of course, in time, this Amalekite
effort totally backfired because Hamas has become one of the leading terrorist
organizations in the Middle East. It has
subsequently brought great harm and hurt upon innocent Jews as well as the
PLO. Thus, it appears that the chickens
have come home to roost. The Hamas
Palestinians have now double crossed the Amalekite hands that were feeding
them.
Yes, Amalekites Don’t Fare So Well With Non-Israelites
For sure, there is a most fascinating
phenomenon in this present discussion (as touched upon in the preceding
comments).
Amalekites have done real well in
gaining and holding power over White Israelites and even over other White
people somewhat. Their primary problem
has been in trying to maintain power over non-Whites and particularly
non-Israelites. Historically, their
ability to rule over and exploit others (other than Whites/Israelites) has
always seemed to be limited.
This same paradox will surely continue
here in the age end. They have been
playing a major role in the implementation of world government, in the form of
the New World Order. They may even have
some appreciable input into the selection and choice of the Beast man who
eventually takes over. Now, the paradox
occurs because this coming ruler will turn against them and hate them.
Actually, this condition is already on
the drawing boards. As noted in a former
quote from the May 20, 2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 7), there is now some
Israeli concern that the UN International Criminal Court will indict Ariel
Sharon and some of the Israeli Army leaders for genocide in the way that they
have handled the Palestinians.
This court came into effect on July 1,
2002. In time, it will assuredly focus
on alleged war crimes and crimes against so-called humanity. People like Ariel Sharon, other Israelis,
George W. Bush, and many Americans very easily can be indicted and tried by
this court.
One must remember that the 174-member
UN has 26 Arab votes. Combine this 26
with the other Muslim and Colored members and it is easy to see that the state
of Israel and the US are vastly outnumbered.
Because of this strong Muslim influence
at the UN, the Simon Wiesenthal Center says that the UN blocks any discussion
on anti-Semitism and “has unfortunately become part of the problem and not the
solution” (Nissan/Iyar 5763 “Jerusalem Prayer Mandate,” p. 1).
The May 10, 2002, “The Week” (p. 2) had
some remarks from Ron Rosenbaum of “The New York Observer.” Rosenbaum notes a trend in Europe to liken
the Israelis to the Nazis. Surely, there
will be an international move against some of the Israelis in the future.
Thus, a paradox arises in that powerful
Amalekite Jews (like the Rothschilds, Lazards, and Bronfmans) have set the UN
up. And now the UN will turn against
innocent Israelis and possibly other innocent Jews in the future.
Chapter
467--Amalekite Sabbatianism
A Question
At this point, in this presentation,
the student of truth may want to ask a seemingly incredible question--but yet,
one which will be fantastically revealing once truth is understood and
comprehended.
Question--What does all of the major
forces of evil now present over the globe have in common, besides the obvious
implications of the involvement of Satanic and demonic powers and forces?
In other words, is there a common
thread, link, or connection which will go on to tie together all of the wicked
forces of the Amalekites, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Bronfmans,
Henry Kissinger, and other workers of evil--to include all forms of
Internationalism (or Globalism), Communism, Socialism, Nazism, Liberalism,
Humanism, Rosicrucianism, the mother-earth religion, the brotherhood of man,
racial amalgamation (through integration and miscegenation), sexual
permissiveness and licentiousness, homosexuality, feminism, the destruction of
the family, the British Round Table Groups, the Rhodes Trust (that funds and
promotes the so-called international scholarship program at Oxford which
produces people known as Rhodes scholars), the Skull and Bones Society, the US
Council on Foreign Relations, the Illuminati, the Mafia, the liberal
(non-fundamentalist) Christian Churches (which consists of almost all of the
Christian Churches in today’s modern world), Neoplatonism, Christian
Gnosticism, anti-Torah advocates of all forms (which again includes almost the
totality of Christianity), Reform Judaism, Reconstructionist Judaism, Kabbalists,
B’nai B’rith (to include its organic Anti-Defamation League), the Jewish
Defense League, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Satanists, New Agers,
Occultists of all forms, the United Nations, promoters of the “Learned Elders
of Zion” (or Sion, as Messianic Jew Len Horowitz of Sagle, Idaho suggests), and
on and on?
And the answer is--yes, there is as
will now be established in this chapter.
R. Marvin S. Antelman, Revisited
That question brings up a most
fascinating book by R. Marvin S. Antelman, on “To Eliminate the Opiate,”
published in Jerusalem by the Zionist Book Club and cited in the Prologue and
previous chapters. Rav Antelman seems to
bring most of the sources of evil together into some sense of
understanding.
The focus of Marvin Antelman’s work was
on a so-called Jew named Shabbetai Zevi (1626-1676) who started a Jewish secret
and mystic society, in the old Ottoman empire, known as Shabbatianism (or more
popularly Sabbatianism, as anglicized in English speaking lands).
While this man’s name and his movement
are close in pronunciation to the Hebrew word Shabbat, the two ideas are
totally different and have absolutely nothing in common.
Shabbatianism
“Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v. 14, p.
1219-1247) discusses the Shabbatian movement in some detail and suggests that
it was a messianic and mystic motion founded by Shabbetai Zevi based on the
rise of the new (Lurianic) Kabbalah in the 17th century.
Shabbetai was born in Smyrna (Ismir),
Turkey. His father was believed to be of
Ashkenazi origin (ibid, p. 1222); which would make Zevi an Ashkenazi Jew,
despite the fact that he lived in a possible Sephardi area. Early in life, he became an ascetic and
studied the Kabbalah. Allegedly, he was
pleasant to look at and had some musical abilities which gave him some
popularity and acceptance.
Judaica says that he attracted some
followers and lived in semi-seclusion with periods of cyclothymia or
manic-depressive psychosis (ibid, p. 1222).
These mental problems continued on until his death--meaning that he was
a nut and reportedly had enormous demonic contact.
But With Success
By 1658, Zevi had wandered over Greece,
Thrace and Turkey and was expelled from the Jewish congregation because of his
reported misdeeds. In 1664, he married
an Ashkenazi girl from Italy of questionable virtue (bid, v. 14, p. 1224).
By 1665, he was in Gaza in
Palestine. There, on May 31, 1665,
Shabbetai declared himself to be the coming Jewish Messiah and set June 18,
1666, as the day of the Jewish redemption.
Soon, this crazy man had quite a
following in the old Ottoman empire and in various parts of Europe (like
Holland, Germany and Poland). Important
leaders throughout Europe were known to send ambassadors and agents to visit
with Shabbetai to get his latest advice and revelations (he was known to
levitate in their presence, per Milan Martin, in his video on “Lucifer’s
Children”).
With his date failure in 1666, Zevi
developed several other dates for the final revelation (“Encyclopaedia
Judaica,” v. 14, p. 1239).
Despite his ascetic and often strange
behavior, he violated much Jewish halakhic law, causing himself to be an
outcast from traditional Jews and Judaism (modern Jew haters would have loved
him though truly religious Jews have disdained him). He was known to advocate sexual license and
perversion (which would set him up well with most modern peoples who are
infected with this thinking).
Regardless of his many problems, he did
acquire quite a following which continued and grew in Europe, and even subsequent
to his death in 1676.
By 1756, in the Old Ottoman empire, a
Shabbatian Jew named Jacob Frank (1726-1791) arrived on stage to become one of
the primary leaders of the extreme faction of the mystical Shabbatians. This Jacob Frank was born a Leibowitz (“To
Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 92).
But his Amalekite colors quickly came through and he changed his name to
Frank (to better deceive the gullible goyim).
In time, Frank claimed to be a prophet
and a reincarnation of Shabbetai. The
surfacing of Frank caused some Shabbatians to re-label themselves as Frankists
or Shabbatian Frankists.
Judaica says that when Jacob Frank
arrived on stage a large number of his followers converted to Catholicism
(“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 14, p. 1252).
Judaica concludes by saying that by the early 19th century Shabbatianism
had allegedly disappeared and had been absorbed into Jewish liberalism (ibid,
p. 1253).
Though “Encyclopaedia Judaica” makes
this claim, Marvin Antelman offers some comments suggesting that Shabbatianism
still exists today as a viable entity (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p.
269). In fact, there has recently been a
Sabbatian Frankist web site on the Internet (ibid, p. 270). Otherwise, there remains a host of spin out
and related motions and groups, as allowed above.
So while most or all of the early
Shabbatians were so-called Jews, the movement soon branched out and tolerated
and/or encouraged other religious faiths and peoples (and especially, under
Frank, in his outreach to Catholics).
Directly or indirectly, today, many Ashkenazi Jews, Christians,
Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus and others are all Shabbatians--at least in
mentality, thinking and philosophy.
However, in fairness, it must be said
that most of the big promoters of Shabbatianism remain the Amalekites and
particularly Amalekite Jews. Many of the
other promoters or advocates are merely duped and ignorant janissaries who are
blindly following Amalekite bankers/masters down the primrose lane of
destruction.
More From Marvin Antelman
As allowed by Judaica and as
substantiated in detail by Marvin Antelman in “To Eliminate the Opiate,”
Shabbatianism or Sabbatianism was far from over in the early 19th century
(though it may have “publicly” passed off the visible stage then).
Tragically, as pointed out above, the
movement survived in the sense of other movements, groups, people, ideas,
literature and thinking which developed in the 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th
centuries.
Probably, the biggest feature of
Sabbatianism was the reality that the movement was extremely anti-Torah
(“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 14, p. 1219-1253; v. 15, p. 1246), anti-Judaism
and anti-religion of all types, and was given over to gross sexual
licentiousness, perversion, adultery, homosexuality, lesbianism, wife swapping
and you name it (per Antelman).
The wife swapping and depravity among
the Sabbatian Frankists in Poland became known, and they were excommunicated
from Judaism by the Supreme Rabbinic Court of Europe on Siwan 20 of 1756 (“To
Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, back cover).
The Rabbinic Court said that their “women are whores and their children
are bastards to the tenth generation.”
Antelman quotes various sources to show
that wife swapping and other forms of kinky sex were common among the
Sabbatians. Reportedly, a person could
become very brilliant by watching the act of sexual intercourse (evidently,
even in cases involving one’s own wife).
Watching interracial sex was supposedly even more valuable--allegedly
going all the way back to Moshe (ibid, p. 112).
Anti-religion and sexual promiscuous
attitudes have characterized almost all of the fall out groups and people of
Sabbatianism--as found in other forces at work from the 17th century on
forward. While some of them may have
pretended to be religious and even moral people on occasion, in their hearts
and minds, they were both anti-religious and anti-morality.
In Russia
A previous chapter discussed the Ahad
Ha-am, who was apparently one of the early leaders of the Cahilla in Russia in
the 19th and early 20th centuries. While
it is not clear to this reader that the Ahad Ha-am was definitely a member of
the Sabbatian sect (to the extent that it existed in Russia in his day), as a
minimum, the Ahad Ha-am held Sabbatian views.
Judaica says that the Ahad Ha-am called
for the Torah to be in one’s heart and for this practice to replace the Torah
of Moshe and the “rabbis” (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 15, p. 1246). This nonsense sounds like something coming
from Christianity, rather than Judaism.
But it appears to be a product of the thinking of very evil Jews (surely
Amalekites).
Manifestly, there is no denying that
the Sabbatian philosophy and thinking greatly affected the Khazar Amalekites
and the people behind Russian Communism (like Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels,
Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, etc).
The early Communist leadership
(influenced by Sabbatian philosophy) was so anti-Judaism that it organized a
Jewish Affairs department within the Communist Party (“To Eliminate the
Opiate,” v. II, p. 61).
This section was so successful that
huge numbers of former Khazar Jews abandoned all forms of religion to become
outright atheists (actually, this was no big change for them since they were
never true Jews anyway, but always were sons of Satan).
For sure, the “Protocols of the Learned
Elders of Zion” (or Sion) represent a work of Sabbatian thinking. Since the best evidence is that the Protocols
were developed by Adam Weishaupt and his illuminist colleagues, based on a
commission and financing from the Rothschilds, it becomes crystal clear that
the Protocols represent a Sabbatian blueprint for the destruction of Adam under
a coming world government.
Of course, Weishaupt, the Rothschilds
and much of both the Illuminati and Communism have historically involved
Sabbatian Jews (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 55-56). In this vein, the Protocols are assuredly a
Sabbatian production (and a very accurate presentation of Sabbatian plans to
destroy Yisrael/Adam and rule the world).
And More From Antelman
Antelman builds the case that the
Sabbatians were also heavily influenced by Platonic philosophy (ibid, p. 75.
97) and Gnosticism (ibid, p. 73-75, 80).
In this sense, it is easy to see why the anti-Torah position would be
one of their primary marks of identification (just as the same condition
explains traditional Christianity, which is very anti-Torah [called anomos and
anomia in the Greek NT], based upon Greek philosophy and Gnosticism).
Marvin Antelman not only ties the
Jewish Sabbatian sects to Christian Gnosticism, but he goes on to identify a
whole host of modern evil forces which directly descend from Gnosticism--like
Satanism, Dualism, Orgiastic sex rites, Witchcraft, Esotericism, Self
Immolation, Reincarnation, Astrology, Demonology, Necromancy, Asceticism, Use
of Hallucinogens, Renunciation of property ownership, Self-deification, New
Ageism, etc (ibid, p. 80).
The implications of the linkage of all
these works of evil with Christian Gnosticism is obvious. They all tie back in some way to
Sabbatianism.
And in a surprise move, Antelman goes
on to tie both the Jewish Defense League and the B’nai B’rith organization to
Sabbatianism (ibid, p. 16, 93, 225). This means that Sabbatianism is the
motivational force behind the entire work of the Anti-Defamation League, which
is a sub-component of B’nai B’rith.
With this Sabbatian tie to the JDL and
the ADL, it should not take too many brains to understand that the Southern
Poverty Law Center also belongs to this same crowd.
Because of its profound anti-Torah and
anti-Judaism positions, the remains of the Sabbatian movement has enormous
Jewish hatred and opposition to Orthodox and especially Ultra Orthodox people
and institutions (ibid, p. 273).
The Sabbatian movement is not only
powerful and prevalent among virtually all Christians, but it has had enormous
success among Reform (to obviously include Reconstructionist) Jews--and perhaps
some significant portion of Conservative Judaism is also right at home in the
context of Sabbatianism (ibid, p. 100).
More on Christianity and Other Religions
The Sabbatian tie to Christianity was
mentioned above. Not wanting to lose out
on any possible source of support, Antelman says that the Sabbatians would
circumcise their children to be good Jews; and then, on the same day, the
children were secretly baptized into the Christian Church (ibid, p. 202).
Evidently, either way, the child could
be a Christian or a Jew--whichever option offered the most advantages (the evil
Amalekites have traditionally followed this methodology to destroy Yisrael and
Adam for generations).
Along with the fact that many
Sabbatians are now Jews, Christians, Buddhists or something else, it is also
fascinating that many of the Sabbatian mystics became Islamic Sufi mystics in
the past and Islamic Marxists during the years 1910-1919 (ibid, p. 64,
117).
“The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia” (p.
815) notes that Sufism arose in the 10th century as a philosophical and
literary movement among the Shiite Muslims by borrowing from Neoplatonism, Buddhism
and Christianity. Although not mentioned
by this source, the later 17th century Sabbatianism was influenced by these
same motions--thus, tying the whole conglomeration together.
The terrorist Hizbullal group (run by
the Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran) was established by Sabbatians (“To Eliminate
the Opiate,” v. II, p. 64). Even the
Amalekite Yasser Arafat and some element of the Palestinian establishment are
Sabbatians or exhibit Sabbatian thinking.
This strange background then opens the
door to the possibility or likelihood that some portion of the modern Islamic
fundamentalist motion has ties, directly or indirectly, back to the
Sabbatians.
The Spin Out Movements
Manifestly, Sabbatianism was the
backbone of the early Marxist-Communist movements in Eastern Europe, as pointed
out above and proven by Marvin Antelman (ibid, p. 251). Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin both had links
to the Sabbatians. This demented Sabbatian
thinking was strong in Poland, Russia and Eastern Europe which had large Amalekite
Ashkenazi populations.
Per Antelman, the Sabbatian thinking
motivated, inspired, pushed and/or established early Illuminism (ibid, p. 16,
189, where Antelman calls Sabbatianism the precursor of Illuminism); secular or
socialistic Zionism (ibid, p. 162)--not religious Zionism which is another
subject; internationalism, the UN and world government (ibid, p. 42, 91);
Socialism (ibid, p. 251); Nazism (ibid, p. 75-93); Satanism (ibid, p. 16, 256);
New Ageism (ibid, p. 80); atheistic pantheism (ibid, p. 117); Rosicrucianism
(ibid, p. 177); modern Gnosticism (ibid, 73); Kabbalism (ibid, p. 103);
asceticism (ibid, p. 80); the Gorbachev Foundation in San Francisco (ibid, p.
208); and all forms of sexual perversion.
The Rothschilds, Rockefellers,
Warburgs, Schiffs, Henry Kissinger, Adolf Schicklgruber, Eric J. Steinschneider
(Adolf’s personal astrologer, cited earlier), Karl Marx, Moses Hess (one of the
mentors of Karl Marx--ibid, p. 29) and the historic Esau and many of his
Edomite descendants (ibid, p. 108) were/are all Sabbatians--or at least, they
have been people who have expressed Sabbatian teachings and beliefs.
Antelman states unequivocally that the
Sabbatian Frankist motion is particularly tied to Communism, the US Council on
Foreign Relations (ibid, p. 244, 248)), the Illuminati and the One World
Government-UN circle, per correspondence of the House of Rothschild (ibid, p.
44).
As noted earlier, Wall Street financed
the Sabbatian Hitler/Schicklgruber and the Sabbatian Warburg family
specifically helped Adolf in his rise to power (ibid, p. 155). Actually, this Warburg support for Adolf
makes perfect sense. Adolf’s genealogy
is detailed in a prior chapter. Suffice
to say, it seems to have involved Amalekite Jews from all directions.
However, more specifically, all or most
all of these so-called Jews were, in fact, Sabbatians.
In his book, Marvin Antelman makes the
case that Adolf’s alleged Jewish father and Jewish maternal great-grandfather
both were Sabbatians (ibid, p. 207).
Supposedly, Adolf was conceived on the 9th of Ab (July 20, 1888, with
Adolf born the next Apr 20, 1889). Per
Antelman, the 9th of Ab was a special Sabbatian holiday where incest and
adultery prevailed.
For sure, Adolf and the entire Nazi
movement he directed were manifestly Sabbatian and occultic to the core.
Disfellowshipping Sabbatians
Like his earlier fellow believer,
Shabbetai was kicked out of the Jewish synagogues. Therefore, it is interesting that the
Amalekite and Sabbatian Henry Kissinger has also been disfellowshipped from
Judaism (ibid, p. 1). Religious Jews
don’t like Marx or Kissinger any more than modern right wing Christians like
Marx and Kissinger.
There is even a desire on the part of
many good Jews to also get rid of the wicked Joseph Lieberman, as noted
elsewhere herein. Manifestly, the works
and positions of Lieberman clearly suggest that he is a Sabbatian
Amalekite--thus, a gross worker of evil and a son of Satan.
Sabbatian Works of Evil
Many of the modern social gods and
motions which true conservatives hate so much owe their origins, motivations or
push from Sabbatian Jews--like abortions on demand (ibid, p. 155), open
homosexuality and shame (ibid, p. 155), feminism (ibid, p. 155), the planned
population reduction schemes (ibid, p. 208, discussed elsewhere herein), and
the historic blood libel allegations against true Jews (ibid, p. 208,
262).
This reference to the blood libel
allegation against Jews in the Middle Ages is important to highlight. The complaints that Jews sacrificed Christian
children were, of course, totally ridiculous, as pointed out in previous
comments. It is ludicrous to believe
that a religious Jew would ever engage in such conduct.
However, Antelman allows that Sabbatian
Jews (surely Satanists) were the very people guilty of these outrages. Therefore, it is entirely logical that
Sabbatian Amalekites would be some of the primary people supporting the
population reduction and genocide plans for the future (as elsewhere described
herein).
Marvin Antelman also suggests that the
next big burnt offering program of the Sabbatians will be the murder of
religious Jews and fundamentalist Christians (ibid, p. 208).
Although apparently not directly
addressed by Antelman, one must include some fundamentalist Muslims in this mix
as well (at least, those fundamentalist Muslims not controlled by the
Sabbatians)--since they too are much hated and opposed by the developing New
World Order motion founded on Christian Gnosticism and Jewish
Sabbatianism.
Surely, it will be these religious
people who will be eliminated first in the planned population reduction
programs. As Antelman correctly reports,
one of the big thrusts of the Sabbatian movement has been an opposition to all
religion (certainly any sense of a genuine form of real religion, and not
necessarily the watered-down fake religion known as Reform Judaism and most of
the liberal Christian groups).
The Incredible Connection
There is another facet of this whole
discussion which completely blows the mind of a thinking person. Previous chapters have outlined the reality
that much of the Roman Catholic Church has been in the hands of Amalekite leaders
over the years.
While almost no thinking person could
or would dare suggest a tie between Catholic leaders and the Jews, there seems
to be some strange connections (some of which have been noted earlier herein on
the murderers of the righteous).
In view of the fact that both the Jews
and the Catholic Church have been led and controlled by various Amalekite
bosses over much of the last 2,000 years, it is entirely plausible that indeed
both entities or groups of leaders are actually one and the same.
The Amalekite linkage to the various
and sundry conspiratorial groups pushing for world government is discussed
above. And truly, it is fascinating that
the Amalekites (who control America, Britain, the Israeli state and many of the
modern Jews and Jewish groups) also control many of the groups pushing for
globalism and world government.
But what is missed by many analysts is
the fact that almost all of these groups also come together under the umbrella
of the Roman Catholic Church in some form or the other.
The situation with Adam Weishaupt is
discussed above. As noted in those
remarks, the Amalekite Jew Weishaupt was allegedly a convert to
Catholicism. Importantly, he was a
leader in the German Catholic Church because he was a professor of canon law at
a Catholic university. Furthermore,
Weishaupt was also a Sabbatian Frankist and a Gnostic (ibid, p. 75).
This interesting history ties
Catholicism, Christian Gnosticism, Jewish Sabbatianism, Illuminism, Communism,
Internationalism, and the Rothschilds (who were Sabbatian Amalekites) generally
into one big ball of wax which seems to be held together by the secret
rulers--the Amalekites generally (many of whom are known as Christians as well
as Jews) and Amalekite bankers particularly.
Incidentally, previous comments have
already noted the ties between the Roman Church and the Illuminati-Masonic
orders. So this network is undoubtedly
quite vast and extensive.
A Perceptive Californian
Further insight into this whole
conglomeration was brought together in some comments made by an unidentified
person in California in a reader’s letter found in the Nov-Dec 2002 “Prophecy
Flash” magazine (p. 73). This reader
wrote about the work of author Tupper Saussy (in his book “Rulers of
Evil”).
Saussy suggests a tie between the
Catholic Church and the Masonic order (which is brought out heretofore in this
production). In fact, Saussy argues that
Rome has directed the Masonic order since the time that she (Rome) tortured and
killed Jacques De Molay in 1314 CE.
But more importantly, Saussy shows a
connection between the Catholic Church and the Jews. Saussy apparently goes on to cite
“Encyclopaedia Judaica” on the fact that the Rothschilds are listed as
“Guardians of the Vatican Treasures.”
Thus, per Saussy, the Sabbatian
Amalekite Rothschilds are the bankers and treasurers of the Vatican (the
Rothschilds and other leading Sabbatian Amalekite bankers are also the
treasurers and bankers for the British royal family and assuredly other members
of the elite in Europe and North America--ed).
What this amounts to is that the
Sabbatian Amalekite Rothschilds have had their hands in the pie in Rome--along
with their hands in a number of other places in Britain, North America and
continental Europe.
Makes Sense
Actually, all of this makes perfect
sense. Since much of the leadership of
the Roman Catholic Church has been in Amalekite hands (as allowed in preceding
chapters and to be further described in still later chapters on Christian
history), it is totally logical that very early Rome would have become linked
in close ties to the Amalekite bankers pulling the strings in Europe.
The obvious here is just further
evidence and proof that the Sabbatian Amalekite bankers have consistently shown
their hatred and opposition to innocent Israelite Jews over the centuries. These very Amalekites have a (behind the
scenes) hand in the terrible persecution, hurt, oppression and murder that the
Catholics have heaped upon innocent Israelite Jews over the centuries.
It looks like modern Israelite Jews
would wake up and realize how profoundly evil the Amalekites have been--as
found in the very midst of the modern Jewish people. Yet, they have not done so! Their eyes seem to have been blinded for most
of the last 2,000 years (although one must be suspicious that a few very wise
Jews, like Marvin Antelman, may have properly put two and two together).
Along with the blinding and confusion
persisting among sincere religious Jews, it is also tragic that fundamentalist
Christians are similarly functioning under the same cloud of confusion and
ignorance. What a tragedy it has been
that fundamentalist Christians (like the right-wing Christian Identity
movement) have been so pathetically hostile and filled with hate toward
religious Jews.
These Christians simply don’t
understand what it’s all about. Instead
of working for truth and righteousness to prevail (which is a goal of many of
truly religious Jews--not fakes like Joseph Lieberman), these fundamentalist
Christians join hands with the Sabbatians and Gnostics to oppose truth and
righteousness.
Chapter
468--Amalekites, in Conclusion
Tying the Evil Together, Revisited
Preceding chapters have outlined and
discussed a vast array of evil people, organizations and activities on planet
earth--historically and in modern times.
It is certainly no problem to identify,
recognize and list many of these workers of evil--like the Christian Churches
(particularly the Roman Catholic Church and the liberal, leftist Protestant
Churches), Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism, Islam, all pagan religions of
all types, all racial Edomites, and on and on, as listed in the preceding chapters.
Many informed people in the world today
would agree on the evil with most or perhaps even all of these stated people,
organizations and activities. However,
the one thing that ultimately escapees the mentality and thinking of most
students of truth is how to tie this mass of gross evil and depravity together
into some meaningful whole. Can it be
done and how can it be done (aside from the Satanic overview)?
Answer
The apparent answer to this enigma was
described in the previous chapter in the vein of Sabbatianism--which was
originated, codified and prescribed in the 17th century by very depraved
Amalekite workers of evil. Manifestly,
Sabbatianism has been one of the major forces for evil in the last four
centuries (as described in the preceding chapter).
Although some persons would be
reluctant to put all of the forces of evil into the same pot with the
Sabbatianists, it can be done.
The reason is simply that though the
founders and promoters of Islam and many or most of the rest of the world’s bad
religions were surely not Sabbatianists, the truth is that all of these pagan
religions have come to life and obtained some measure of success in the 20th
and early 21st centuries simply because the Sabbatianists have taken control of
almost the entire world--its people and its ideas, motivations and
thinking.
Of course, the same problem arises in
addressing the presence of Gnosticism, Neoplatonism, the Catholic Church,
humanism, etc among the Sabbatians. Many
of these motions are thousands of years old and were in force long before
Shabbetai Zevi and the Sabbatian movement were ever heard of. So, how can this reality be reconciled to the
findings outlined in this study.
The answer on this dilemma is the same
as is true with the situation with Islam and the other worldly pagan
religions. True, these ideas were in
existence before Shabbetai Zevi came along.
But Zevi and the movement he founded have become the source of new
energy and revitalization of all of these old forms of paganism which were
diametrically opposed to Yisrael particularly and Adam generally.
Thus, Sabbatianism has consolidated
this mass of evil from thousands of years ago and combined it with newly
created Sabbatian forces and motions for evil (like Illuminism, Communism,
liberalism, Reform Judaism, etc) in order to put together a whole new system of
evil in a modern giant conglomeration which has been sold to the gullible,
ignorant world as a good thing.
Clearly, Christianity in the 20th and
early 21st centuries has become a primary component of this system of
evil. Even many of the so-called
Christian fundamentalists have joined into the same motion, never understanding
that the plans of the Sabbatians have always been in existence to destroy all
religion in the vein of destroying Yisrael particularly and Adam generally.
It has been pathetic that right wing
groups like the Christian Identity movement and many of the Orthodox and Ultra
Orthodox Jews have failed to comprehend their common bonds and how the
Sabbatian workers of evil are out to destroy both of these religious forces in
the modern world of today.
But the Crux
But the issue really is not just
Sabbatianism, although this explanation is almost correct. The problem more correctly is Amalekite
Sabbatianism particularly and the Amalekites generally. The Amalekites are extremely evil
people. It is entirely logical that they
could and would conceive of the evils of Sabbatianism; and then, using their
vast powers of money and resources, put this evil over. And they have done so.
Historically
The simplistic approach is merely to
say that this mass of evil and depravity is strictly from Satan and his host of
demons. Of course, no one can deny this
ultimate obvious source, motivation and direction of the numerous groups and
movement to evil in our time. But there
is more to it than this obvious explanation.
In New Testament days, YESHUA was more
precise when He identified a certain racial group of people as being the
murderers of all of the righteous persons who have ever lived from the time of
Adam to the age end when sin is eventually abolished. The MESSIAH did this in Matthew 23, as was
commented upon in some detail in previous chapters.
Yet, the problem comes up in how the
student of truth can move from the first century CE explanation to modern times
here in the early 21st century and ascertain if and how this mass of evil can
be tied together in one coherent motion.
Based on Matthew 23 and the historic
record of the evil Amalekite Khazars of Europe, it also becomes very easy to
say that the Amalekites are behind all of it.
And that is generally true or clearly true in the generic sense.
But that still doesn’t tell the student
of truth how this mass of evil historically came together and what binds the
various factions and divisions together in one meaningful whole today. And the inevitable answer to this enigma
always falls upon the evil, genetic Amalekites.
Directly or indirectly, they have had their hands in virtually all forms
of evil (one way or the other) in the last 3,800 years.
The Essence Here
As discussed in previous chapters of
this production, it is easy to see that Satan has used the Amalekites and the
other descendants of Kain as his primary source of people set up to destroy
Yisrael first and Adam second. This
motion started 3,800 years ago in earnest and has continued through the
years.
In NT days, the Herodians and certain
Shammai Pharisees and Kenite scribes were the most notable persons in this
category of evil and wretchedness.
Based upon the outstanding research of
Rav Marvin Antelman (as outlined in the preceding chapter), the evidence is
massive that the Ashkenazi Jewish Amalekites in the 17th century organized and
promoted the Sabbatian Jewish movement which was to become Satan’s primary
organization to promote evil and wickedness in the age end.
By the 18th and 19th centuries, this
group of evil people had greatly increased its outreach to Christians, Whites,
Blacks, pinks, greens, Asians and you name it in order to become a source of
power and strength all over the world.
From there, the original movement has hatched and birthed a huge number
of other related movements and activities, all of which have the same common
goals (of destroying Yisrael and Adam).
It now appears that Marvin Antelman’s
research (found in his book) opens the lid on this once secret society and
reveals what all it is doing (in its various manifestations and presentations)
to impose world government and destroy Adam generally and Yisrael particularly.
Qumran Revisited
Earlier
chapters herein addressed the believed Essene community at Qumran and its
strong opposition to the Judean Jewish power structure which the Essenes
identified as sons of darkness or children of the Devil (just as the NT also
repeatedly calls the same people sons of Satan or of the synagogue of Satan, as
described previously).
Clearly, these sons of Satan are the
Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters who are in control of the House of Yisrael
nations here in the age end. As described
before, the Qumran people were anticipating the establishment of YHWH’s kingdom
in their day.
They saw this transition to His kingdom
(correctly the Messianic kingdom for the millennium) as involving a great time
of trial in which the children of darkness would persecute the children of
light. The Qumran people actually
expected the conflict to turn into war between the two factions (the sons of
light and the sons of darkness).
In time, the sons of light would
prevail and the power of the sons of darkness would be broken for ever. While this writer certainly could not
anticipate any open conflict between the very elect (alluded to as the sons of
light) and the wicked Amalekite bankers/masters (clearly the sons of darkness)
in the present environment, these Essene beliefs have to be considered.
It is possible that this interpretation
is considerably wrong, although it may have some later relevance. Of course, there was another earlier
mentioned Qumran writing which suggested that The MESSIAH, Himself, might take
the action to expel the Canaanites (probably to include their Edomite cousins)
from Jerusalem, which could clarify the “who” in this coming conflict between
light and darkness.
Since it seems likely that the totality
of the Amalekite power will not be destroyed by the Assyrians and Persians (the
Russians and the Iranians) in their conquest of America and the Anglo-Saxon
West, some will be around (probably in Europe and in the state of Israel) until
YESHUA does return with His election (the sons of light) for the commencement
of the millennium.
Perhaps, this is the time when the
Qumran interpretations will be fulfilled.
What a wonderful day it will be when the Amalekite power is finally
broken.
Coming Judgment Upon the Amalekites
Repeatedly, the Tanakh prophets
proclaim a coming punishment upon the Edomites for their evil acts against both
Yehudah and the House of Yisrael, as outlined earlier. It is quite manifest that the Edomites have
played a major part historically in the previous destructions of Yehudah and
certainly the case is now being built for the Edomites to have a primary role
in the demise of the House of Yisrael nations.
Without attempting to be dogmatic on
this coming Edomite judgment, it is highly plausible that the coming WWIII may
spell the end of much or all of the present power structure of Amalekite
bankers/masters over the US and White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations.
This won’t mean the total end of the
Amalekites. But it will be a major set
back for them. The eventual New World
Order may not be very friendly to the collective, Jewish Amalekite
structure. Surely, groups like the
Anti-Defamation League and Jewish Defense League will quickly pass into
history.
In offering this possible assessment,
it must be observed that some input on the world’s governors in the future
could possibly involve some Amalekites, as things appear to now be
developing. But it is doubtful that they
will have the influence which they now enjoy in the West. Probably, their influence will be in the
sense of being Roman Catholics, Jesuits, or something else (in contrast to
being Jews).
The surviving Amalekite bankers/masters
will just as quickly turn on their own people (to oppress and hurt them) as
they will on true Jews and Israelites (if it will further their own agenda in
the New World Order, as noted in other comments herein). In other words, when the chips are down, the
Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters have no loyalty for anyone--but to
themselves.
Regardless of the exact “who,” the best
view might be that YHWH will raise up some power or force on earth to crush and
totally destroy the Amalekite bankers/masters and their power and control over
Yisrael in the age end--likely in three or more motions and certainly just
before the millennium is ushered into existence.
This eventuality might partly become
reality when the House of Yisrael nations fall to intensify the seven years of
Yakov’s Trouble. Sometime during the
tribulation, the Beast man (as the Assyrian) may turn against those persons in
Europe.
Finally, any remnant of Amalek-Edomites
and Canaanites in Jerusalem could be destroyed by YESHUA when He enters
Jerusalem to defeat the Beast power and commence the millennium.
The Demise of the Amalek-Edomites
A preceding chapter on the Edomites
focused on the ultimate demise of the Edomites and especially the Amalekites in
the context of the role the Assyrians and Persians will play in the age end
(Num 24:22; Isa 9:18; Lam 4:21-22; Oba 1:7-9).
If the age ending Russians (at least
the White Russians and their colleagues in the Baltic states) constitute the
age ending Assyrian power, it could well be that Assyria and Persia (Iran) deal
the major blow to the Jewish Amalekite descendants of Esau (with their Kenite
and Canaanite presence)--all in the context of their conquest of the House of
Yisrael nations where these sons of Satan now rule supreme in the early 21st
century.
Of course, in fairness, it seems highly
plausible that as the evil Amalekites bring on the Anglo conflict and
confrontation with Russia and her Colored allies, some Amalekites with money
will not stay around long to suffer the consequences of the national
destruction of the United States and the other White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic
nations.
Obviously, when it becomes manifest
that these Western nations are going to be destroyed, a portion of the ruling
Amalekite bankers/masters and their henchmen will flee to the state of Israel
to be admitted there in the context that they are innocent Jews making Aliyah
to their homeland, under the current Israeli law of return.
Alternatively, many of them also have
residences in foreign countries around the world and can find a hide-out in
most any of these places, although they obviously will lose much of their power
and influence once America and her racial cousins are crushed. Perhaps this is a part of the meaning of the
various prophets’ words about the end of the Amalek-Edomite power in the age
end.
To whatever extent the American and
Western Amalekites do successfully flee this coming destruction in WWIII, it
might be that they are later punished and destroyed by the age ending Beast man
and power to eventually come on the scene as the world ruler. In that case, perhaps their demise might be
at the hands of “the Assyrian” person (Isa 10:5-6), discussed formerly.
The Bottom Line
Significantly, it is factual that the
Amalekite Jews are currently proving to be the most single, powerful force of
internationalism, now present in the early 21st century in America and the
White British Commonwealth nations (Britain, Canada, Australia and New
Zealand). But they do not carry such a
big stick all over the globe (especially in Asia, Muslim countries and even in
parts of Europe and Africa).
It’s
not to say that Amalekite Jew bankers/masters control the totality of the US
money power and organized crime (as discussed in prior chapters), but they
control most of it. Very clearly, here
in the early 21st century, the Amalekites have almost total control of the
media and entertainment industries and they are working full time to seize
control of everything else in the form of the New World Order with Amalekite
world rulers.
Obviously,
if any one person or group of people controlled everything right now, so-called
humanity would face an immediate implementation of world government. Hence, there still is a lot of division and
conflict out there and especially among the fat cats; although they are slowly
establishing the pecking order.
In the final analysis, it is extremely
doubtful that, as a group, the Amalekite Jews will ever attain world rule, per
se, in the vein of an Amalekite Jew dictatorship. Of course, this does not deny the presence of
evil Amalekites in the Roman Catholic Church and the United Nations, who will
exercise power through those entities, as seems likely to be the case in the
future.
To go to this Home Page, please click here: www.age-end.com