EZEKIEL

and YHWH’s

Judgment

for the

Good News

PEOPLE

VOLUME XXV

Police State

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

Judgment for the

Good News People

Volume XXV--Police State

by

an unworthy servant

And you shall know the truth,

and the truth will make you free.

(John 8:32)

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.

Contents

Volume XXV--Police State

CHAPTER PAGE

- Cover Page 1

- Title Page 2

- Contents 3

- Publisher’s Preface 5

Part WWW-Religion

376 Government Control Over Religion 6

Part XXX--The Mark of the Beast

377 Identification Cards and Numbers 19

378 Reaching Out 24

379 Sophistication in Monitoring 33

380 Modern Monitoring Technology I 42

381 Modern Monitoring Technology II 55

382 Modern Monitoring Technology III 59

383 Project Echelon 67

384 Christian Government Tracking I 73

385 Christian Government Tracking II 86

386 Christian Government Tracking III 97

Part YYY--A Police State

387 Christian Police State Tactics I 108

388 Christian Police State Tactics II 121

389 Christian Police State Tactics III 134

390 Christian Police State Tactics IV 141

391 Destroying Political Enemies 153

392 Entrapment 160

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

Publisher’s Preface

Greetings! The following presentation is volume twenty-five of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site.

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

Chapter 376--Government Control Over Religion

All Religious Views are Acceptable?

In the context of the now developing New World Order (for Satan’s coming government, to be discussed later), everybody’s (politically correct) religions and religious rituals and rites are valid and can be observed by them, as long as they respect, tolerate and appreciate other people’s views (as will be described in some detail in subsequent chapters).

For sure, this system will have some role to play in the coming mark of the beast (as will be described in comments to follow). It certainly represents the epitome of the current religious ecumenical movement. In other words, we are all the same and can all get together and hug and kiss each other without being concerned with (supposedly unimportant) different beliefs.

In this sense, all of the 32,000 different forms of Christendom can join hands and worship with other worldly faiths--Moslem, Hindu, Buddhist, Shinto, Reform Judaism, Spiritualism and primitive Black demon worship.

In a way, this is what the entire New Age movement and the New World Order are all about--the joint toleration and acceptance of all worldly religions and faiths.

Thus, the future might entail the creation of a one world state made up of unimportant diversities where all of these divisions are politically correct and pay overall homage and service to the beast power and government. Even Sabbath keeping groups, like the Seventh-day Adventists and Seventh Day Baptists, might fare all right, as long as they are a part of the overall sun worship agenda (as they are largely at this time).

Not Just All, But All Politically Correct!

In allowing that all religious views can be acceptable, some qualifications are in order. Obviously, all views are acceptable provided that they are the politically correct views of the plutocrats who are calling the shots and working on the New World Order.

Any religious groups which do not fall into line on this grand, over-all scheme of political correctness (like the previously mentioned Branch Davidians, the Christian Identity groups and so forth) will be outlawed and destroyed by the government--if government is given a chance (as will happen for the three and one-half years of the great tribulation).

In other words, toleration is the order of the day if your group is on the approved list. If your group is not on the approved list, then it is a cult which must be outlawed, crushed and destroyed. Even now, in 2003, the Big Brother US liberal government is very tolerant, and there are constitutional guarantees when a religion is “right.” But conversely, there are no allowances or freedoms when a religion is wrong.

Religious Issues

A news report in the March 1998 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 23) said that a network of psychiatric, legal, media and Socialist groups are pressuring European governments to outlaw or curtail the activities of certain well known religious organizations--reportedly including Catholic Charismatics, Hasidic Jews, Baptists, Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Quakers, Buddhists and the YWCA.

In the interest of ecumenicalism, it is probable that this present European effort will not proceed on all of the so-called cults or sects listed. Most of those groups surely will become a part of the overall new world religion, now on the horizon, and will present no threat to a dictatorial state.

As a fall out of the 9-11 terrorist attacks in the US, a whole series of new laws have been enacted (as will be assessed in later chapters). But one of the terrifying new measures is that the US government may now monitor religious and political institutions without suspecting any criminal activity (Jan-Feb 2003 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 24). Once Big Brother can do it, he will do it!

But the value of the above reports lies in the revelation that governments are making plans to clamp down on politically unapproved religions. Certainly, it goes to prove that there are agencies and activities right now busy monitoring and checking into the faiths of different groups and sects. If one of them surfaces which does not fit into the approved module, Big Brother will come down hard on the group and its members.

Using Labels

Preceding chapters herein have discussed at some length the situation with the Branch Davidians of Waco and the presence of much evidence which would allow that the federal reaction to them was predicated, at least, in part, upon their politically incorrect religion. Daily, Janet Reno and the FBI called them a cult and something evil and bad.

In a 60 Minutes TV interview in 1994, Reno followed up by defining a religious cultist as “...one who has a strong belief in the Bible and the Second Coming of Christ; who frequently attends Bible studies; who has a high level of financial giving to a Christian cause; who home schools their children; who has accumulated survival foods and has a strong belief in the Second Amendment; and who distrusts government.

“Any of these may qualify (a person as a cultist) but certainly more than one (of these) would cause us (the US Attorney General) to look at this person as a threat, and his family as being in a risk situation that qualified for government intervention” (Jan 1999 “McAlvany Intelligence Advisor,” p. 24, Donald McAlvany, editor).

Donald McAlvany followed up on Reno’s comments by checking with some of his FBI friends. They confirmed that the FBI had developed such a perp (perpetrator) profile to use in their investigation work. McAlvany, in his Jan 1999 newsletter, then asked if these profiles will be used by the FBI to round up undesirables?

US authorities have taken this stance, despite the fact that the Constitution authorizes a thing called freedom of religion. Obviously, the Constitution has become a document with no power to limit, restrict or rein in an abusive, power-mad government. Big Brother is making plans right now to clamp down on all unapproved religions.

More on Curtailing Freedom of Religion

The Project Megiddo joint report and effort, involving the FBI, Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), will be assessed in some detail in a later chapter in that it consisted of making allegations that the Militia, Christian Identity and other religious, right wing groups “might” commit acts of terrorism to help speed up the battle of Armageddon and the return of their Gee-Zeus.

There is no need to broach that material at this time since it will be covered later. But a few points about its message need to be highlighted.

The report was a 1999 focus primarily upon the just noted Militias and other groups (obviously including religious and/or right wing people--like the Christian Identity proponents) fearful of apocalyptic events associated with Armageddon and the New World Order conspiracy theories. Allegedly, they could or would commit acts of violence over the Y2K event and the arrival of the new millennium.

As is always true, the writers of this report followed the normal, routine method of the leftists in never dealing with any facts, logic or truth; but instead, with a focusing upon their politically incorrect enemies in the sense of demonizing the people in the groups and trying to make an unwarranted and unsubstantiated case for the alleged great evil in these non-conformist groups.

This is what happened at Waco. Federal authorities and their leftist colleagues in the press never dealt with any known truths (like the fact that the Waco Sheriff had investigated the Davidians and found no problem with them); but instead, focused upon a personality attack on Koresh about how evil he was and how many guns he and his colleagues owned (as if there was something wrong in owning a gun).

In any case, the whole Project Megiddo report was an attack upon the personalities and people in the Militias and right wing Christian groups (certainly the Christian Identity movement), who were constantly labeled as extremists, hate people and White supremacists who “may possibly” commit acts of violence in connection with Y2K because they believe in coming apocalyptic events at Armageddon and in a New World Order conspiracy.

Some True Facts

The fact is that no Militia organization has ever historically committed an act of violence in the United States in over 200 years (although the case can be made that some Militia units fought the British redcoats in the American Revolutionary War). Furthermore, there is no record of any fundamentalist, right wing, Christian Church organization committing any acts of violence against others in the US.

Some persons might try to claim that the Jim Jones Christian cult was guilty here. But Jones was a leftist, and not a rightist. Some would even dispute the charge that he was a Christian. Plus, Jones did his most famous works of evil in Jonestown in South America and not in the US.

Of course, it is true that some right wing, individual, Christian people, like the nut Buford Furrow and others, have committed acts of violence (just like individual people in all Christian denominations and other religious groups commit acts of crime and violence--to include, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists and on and on).

The few people in the well publicized Order met at the Aryan Nations group. But that reality should not indict the Aryans Nations or its linked Church of Jesus Christ Christian for terrorism.

In any case, the so-called Order was not a Christian group, per se. It was a small, insignificant, political group which apparently undertook some crimes to obtain money and ostensibly further its political objectives. Its leader and likely some of its members were actually Odinists in religion. So they were not even Christians, as is true with the Aryans.

Moreover, some observers (who are really duped by Big Brother and the controlled national media) might try to say that the Davidians were an organization which committed acts of violence, but it appears that the Big Brother government was the perpetuators of violence at Waco and not the Davidians (as proven in former chapters herein).

Not only were the feds busy murdering a huge assortment of women and children at Waco, but they murdered a mother holding her small baby at Ruby Ridge and machine gunned a small, 14 year-old boy in the back. No federal officials have ever stood trial for these murders committed upon innocent women and children (and none will ever stand trial because they are above the law).

The Real Terrorists

So, based upon history and factual truths, it would seem that federal agents are the terrorists who commit acts of violence and crime against innocent Americans (and not the Militia or right wing Christian groups). In other words, the terrorists are the people accusing other innocent parties of terrorism.

This is a classic trick of demon inspired leftists, as discussed previously herein. The objective is to never deal with facts, truth and righteousness. Instead, launch a barrage of complaints and charges against your enemies and demonize them on a personal basis (yes, attack personalities).

As federal agents and media people continue with a barrage of hypocrisy and lies, the public begins believing the lies (the Schicklgruber tactic was to tell a lie, over and over, and finally the people would believe it). With the help of the controlled media, the gullible public is expected to build up hate toward these politically incorrect enemies when there is no factual basis for hate.

More Facts

The very fact that there was a linkage of these persons of alleged evil to a belief in the coming of a New World Order is interesting. It was President George H. W. Bush, himself, who popularized the phrase “the New World Order.” Per analyst David Wegener (in his video on the “American Holocaust”), Bush referred to the New World Order at least some 200 times.

Subsequently, it has been any number of Clinton aides, colleagues and assistants, who continued to refer to the New World Order in the context of a coming world government (like Sandy Berger, Strobe Talbot, etc). While young George W. Bush and his people have not used the New World Order term (they talk about globalism and the international community), the idea is manifestly present in their actions.

The Militias and Christian right never invented any of the talk on the New World Order. All of it started in Washington by the George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton administrations. All that people on the right have done is to quote the Washington politicians and bureaucrats.

Even the Y2K thing cannot be laid to the Militias and Christian right. Certainly, vast numbers of leading government people talked about and speculated on Y2K. In fact, governments and corporations spent billions of dollars in preparing for Y2K. Congressional committees held hearings and Slick Clinton, himself, built an underground bunker at the White House in preparation for Y2K.

So, why try to attach concern over Y2K to the Militia units, Christian right wing and fundamentalist churches which have never committed any acts of violence in the US. That some of these individual persons had some concern, there is no doubt. But also, millions of other people had concern and spent enormous sums of money trying to alleviate that apprehension.

Finally, there is the reference to apocalyptic events and the name of Megiddo being attached to the Y2K project report. Of course, no one bothered to tell the gullible public that the very word apocalyptic connects to the last book in the Scriptures--the book of Revelation (which in the Greek is the word “apokalupsis”). In the Romance languages, the word Apocalypses refers to the book of Revelation.

Moreover, the word Megiddo is a geographical, Scriptural reference in the land of Yisrael. It is repeatedly used in the Tanakh (Josh 12:21; 17:11; Jud 1:27; 5:19 and so forth). Of course, it appears in the NT (in the context of the hill of Megiddo or Armageddon--Rev 16:16).

All Christians and Jews, who have ever read or studied the Scriptures, must broach this word and must wonder and be concerned about its meaning. There cannot be much in the way of study and contemplation on the Scriptures by trying to avoid the word Megiddo.

Michael Bunker, Revisited

In his video on “The Mark of the Beast... The Final Connection,” Michael Bunker raised many of the issues, just highlighted above. Bunker then went on to ask if this reality is evidence that, all of a sudden, the federal authorities are in on the work of offering “Bible studies” since they are the ones quoting and referring to Scriptural terms.

As Bunker concluded, the purpose of the Project Megiddo report was not to warn the nation about any real terrorism from the Militias and right wing Christian groups. Clearly, the people in Washington and the plutocrats calling the shots had other motives.

And that background takes one to the “Anti-Demonization” study, put out by the Christian Identity motion to expose Big Brother’s plans for the Megiddo report (to be described in detail in a later chapter in connection with the Megiddo allegations).

Suffice to say, the FBI and various other hate groups are laying the groundwork for the mass arrest of some right wing Christians on some pretext. As noted elsewhere herein, a hate group, like the Anti-Defamation League, may initiate some act of terrorism and then work with the FBI to blame it on the Militias or Christian Identity people (or now, after 9-11, it would be popular to blame Muslim terrorists).

Britain

The Mar/Apr 2000 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 6) had a news report from Britain on “U.K. Station Fined for Anti-Gay Ad” which demonstrated how far this insanity has progressed in Britain. This story was about visiting US Christian preacher Morris Cerullo and his evangelistic campaign in Britain.

Cerullo or some of his British supporters ran an advertisement on the British Christian TV channel criticizing queers. The ad noted that homosexuality was an abomination and implied that faggots should not be allowed to hold public office. The local British Independent Television Commission said that the ad was found to “prejudice respect for human dignity.”

Thereupon, the Television Commission fined the Christian Channel 20,000 pounds for daring to run the advertisement. What this amounts to, in Britain right now, is that if a station says something critical about faggots, then they will be heavily fined or perhaps closed down, which is apparently an allowable option.

France

A news report from the Jul 10, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 2) noted that the French national Assembly had passed a new law addressing certain religious sects and making “mental manipulation” a crime (in the sense of the cults which manipulate people). A convicted person committing this “crime” can face five years in jail and a fine of $75,000. Judges will have the power to dissolve cults if they repeat certain offenses.

Russia

In 1997, Boris Yeltsin signed into law an act which outlawed numerous religious organizations that had been working in Russia for the past 15 years (Mar 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 6).

Apparently, this focus was upon non-Orthodox religions. Evidently, the Russian Orthodox Church has reasserted itself as the state run church and was obviously exempted from the recent legislation. It is unclear what the ultimate outcome of this move will be. For sure, it means an increasing time of trouble for Protestant Churches which have been busy proselytizing people in Russia.

Belarus

This motion set in place in Russia seems to be spreading to its sister states. For instance, a news report in the Oct 18, 2002, “The Week” (p. 8) said that the Belarusian Parliament had passed a law declaring that the Russian Orthodox faith is the state’s “determining” religion.

The law also makes a draconian move to oppression by outlawing all religious groups which have been in business in Belarus for less than 20 years. This means that only those religious groups which were operating in the state over 20 years ago would be allowed to continue operating in the state.

The law will be implemented through a state-run registration process. Qualifying religions can be registered and function with government approval. All other religious faiths cannot be registered and cannot pray in groups, publish, organize religious schools or host foreigners (Nov 18, 2002, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 8).

This new law effectively outlaws most or all minority faiths and particularly new ones. Traditional groups (Jews, Muslims, Catholics, and most of the old mainline Protestant Churches that were in Belarus 20 years ago) would be allowed to continue to worship in Belarus. But any of the so-called cults or sects outside the traditional religious definitions are now excluded from Belarus.

Saudi Arabia

The May 23, 2003, “The Week” (p. 9) had a news item on the work of the Saudi Arabian government and its new Internet web site (Hesbah.com) which Saudis can use to anonymously accuse their neighbors of violating religious laws and rules.

Apparently, the Saudis have a government agency, called the Authority for the Promotion of Virtues and Prevention of Vices, set up to monitor religious activities. While the focus of this effort is on Muslims and Moslem beliefs and practices, it is easy to see that the concept can quickly gravitate to other nations and other religions--to include even the US, as will be shown in the following remarks.

US Office of Religious Persecution-Monitoring?

In the US, the Congress has introduced a bill (HR 2431) to create a US Office of Religious Persecution Monitoring, ORPM (Sep-Oct 1998 “Prophecy Club” newsletter, p. 7). The 1998 bill is based upon specifications from the UN Charter on Human Rights. Among other things, it provides that the ORPM will do the following:

“Approve or disapprove licenses for pastors, priests, teachers, leaders and employees; establish national standards of acceptable religious practices; bring sanctions and penalties against individuals and religious organizations that do not comply with federal guidelines; punish persons and groups who commit hate crimes by asserting that ‘their’ religion, scriptures, or deity is exclusive or superior to others;

“Forbid persons from tithing or giving money to religious groups not on the government’s approved list; seize the money and property of persons or groups that engage in unauthorized religious activity; monitor all means of communication and the media to insure compliance; target ‘spiritual defective’ individuals who refuse ecumenical religious unity (with offenders being referred for criminal prosecution under hate crime laws);

“Work closely with other federal law enforcement agencies to insure that religious unity laws are enforced and that all religious groups are registered with the ORPM; and guarantee every American the freedom from all dangerous and radical religious sects and cults unapproved by the ORPM.” While this thing has not yet passed, it is on the drawing boards and will surely become law at some point in time.

Present US Media Censorship

Of course, other US government agencies are now getting on board the wagon to also assert their bureaucratic power over the religious beliefs of the people (contrary to the US Bill of Rights).

For example, the Feb 7, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 6) had a story by P. Samuel Foner on “Fight Looming Over TV Censorship.” Foner noted that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is suppressing religious expressions on TV.

Some members of Congress complained over the FCC discrimination on Jan 11, 2000. The background is that the FCC is trying to restrict the content of programming by religious broadcasters. Critics say that the FCC action amounts to censorship. The idea is that religious broadcasting will have to meet the FCC’s approved list or criteria for broadcasting. By starting with TV, the control can soon include radio as well.

The point of these various government efforts is that religious freedom is about to end--all over the world. Powerful forces are at work right now to terminate the global religious freedom enjoyed throughout the West since 1648 and the Peace of Westphalia. While the coming list of unapproved religions may include a number of faiths, the Christian Identity movement will assuredly be at the top of the page.

More on the Internet Fall-out for the Religious Right

This just noted censorship/control situation brings up another issue for Internet users (besides that of the Saudis, as mentioned above).

The Mayberry Internet service company will be discussed in a subsequent chapter. Significantly, it has a service to screen out undesirable Internet web sites--like those dealing with pornography and hate (per the politically correct definition, that includes all groups which can be called racist or White supremacists--to include the Ku Klux Klan and Christian Identity Churches).

The push to regulate and control the Internet was outlined in a story by Sam Francis on “Globo-Cops Want Internet Censored” in the Jan 17, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 14). This article quoted the Cato Institute, which has released a study on efforts to muzzle the Internet both at federal and state levels. Clearly, work is underway to outlaw hate speech (as defined by Big Brother) and track its purveyors.

Obviously, Congress will soon pass legislation or Big Brother will sign an Executive Order to crack down on a number of right wing Christian groups--with a special focus upon the Christian Identity Churches. This tragedy is coming into reality, despite the US Constitution guaranteeing freedom of religion and speech.

Yes, there will be freedom of religion and speech for those acts which qualify as allowable by the government. Conversely, there will be absolutely no allowance for any speech, thoughts, acts, worship or religions which do not march to the tune of Big Brother.

The Libraries

Actually, in early 2002, this whole subject boiled into the news when Washington began issuing instructions on limiting Internet use to all US libraries that receive US funding. Correctly, this has been the way for 50 years--in that the US government has and can take over all aspects of state and local government, through federal funding.

Within the United States, state and local government units have been anxious to accept federal funding on a host of issues. But once Big Brother provides money for anything, Big Brother then proceeds to issue laws and instructions on how the recipients will function (not always, just in terms of the federal funding; but often, in other aspects as well).

In any case, the US government has been providing money to local libraries (particularly for them to access Internet services). Now, Washington has issued instructions that all library Internet services will include a provision to filter out or restrict sites. Ostensibly, the concern is over pornographic sites.

But with this opening door, it allows Big Brother to control all aspects of all sites (including all of the politically incorrect ones as well, which is the real goal in this entire effort).

Of course, most US libraries could care less about government efforts to restrict politically incorrect sites (yes, most libraries are quite anxious to see the Ku Klux Klan and Christian Identity web sites totally eliminated), but many of the libraries are much concerned over the possibilities of restricting porno, sex and other popular web sites (not only because of the wishes of library patrons, but also library employees).

The new instructions prompted at least one lawsuit from a group of Northeastern US libraries challenging the new federal rules. The outcome of this issue is not completely settled in early 2003, but one can be sure that Big Brother will win. One can also be assured that more of this control is right now on Washington’s drawing board.

The feds announced recently that they had shut down an Internet kiddy porn ring which has seen the arrest of a cop, eight clergymen (including two Catholic priests) and a school-bus driver (Mar 22, 2002, “The Week,” p. 5).

Attorney General John Ashcroft promised more surveillance of the net. While some of this sounds good, it won’t be long before Washington turns its sights on politically incorrect people.

The Mark of the Beast

Almost any presentation on government oppression in the age end eventually leads the student of truth into a focus upon the coming arrangement which might form the basis for the anticipated “mark of the beast,” as mentioned above and as foretold by Yohanan (Rev 13:16-18). Some clarification is now needed on what this mark might be.

The mark of the beast has likely had one or more historical and ante-typical fulfillments (i.e. the sign of the cross, discussed before; and of course, Sunday worship, as many Sabbath keeping groups suggest). However, there remains the strong possibility of a great typical fulfillment which may incorporate some of these earlier types, as well as something new and quite extraordinary.

The focus of this mark or sign on or in a person’s hand and/or forehead has some interesting parallels in the Scriptures. The unleavened bread days of Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread were to be a sign upon people’s hands and a memorial between their eyes (Ex 13:9).

Certain of YHWH’s commandments were to be placed upon a believer’s hand and forehead (as elsewhere discussed) in a manner to serve as a reminder of them and to prompt obedience (Deut 6:8). Of course, a mark was put upon Cain, as noted before, (Gen 4:15) and the Seventh day Sabbath is a sign or mark to know YHWH (Ex 31:12-17).

In a prophetic study on the “Place of Safety” (p. 9), the former Dr Ernest L. Martin of Portland, Oregon cited the above several Scriptures and concluded that the mark of the beast will be a reintroduction of the law of Moshe as a mandatory requirement for people in the kingdom of the so-called “Antichrist.”

As Martin noted, it would take something this profound to even begin to fool the very elect (Matt 24:24-25). He said that Christmas, Easter and Sunday worship services wouldn’t hack it. He suggested that it would take mandatory Seventh day Sabbaths and YHWH’s feast days and observances from the Word to even approach fooling the election.

While his comments were interesting and should be kept in mind, this writer cannot fathom that the beast power would impose righteousness (YHWH’s mitzwot are righteousness) on so-called humanity in any sense of being bad or wrong. Like the Book says, whoever teaches the least of YHWH’s laws will be great in His coming kingdom (Matt 5:19).

The Ante-Type

To whatever extent a sun worshipper or evil person teaches YHWH’s mitzwot correctly, be assured that this motion is good. But the point of the various Scriptural references can have relevance when one looks at the historical record of what happened during the ante-typical great tribulation, imposed upon the civilized world by the Roman Catholic Church--with the rise to power of Constantine (c312-325 CE).

What happened is that Rome imposed her heathen sun worshipping religious beliefs on the world as duties and commandments. This pagan false worship was in the minds of the people as duties and requirements and in the hands of people in the form of obedience. The sign of the cross and mandatory Sunday observances were only visible signs or marks of adherence to this overall sun worship theology and system.

During the coming ministry of the first two prophets/the two final witnesses, the Mosaic code will be taught by them and largely restored among much of the election and perhaps many of the Jews in Palestine. The final two witnesses will seemingly be labeled as the beast and false prophet of Revelation 13 by Satan and the evil worldly rulers. That surely will be the reason that they will be so hated.

It’s hard to fathom that the real beast and false prophet would impose on the world the theology of righteousness which will be taught and advocated by any of YHWH’s coming prophets or witnesses.

More Possibilities

As another alternative, the Adversary might possibly blend the two in some fashion so that the election can almost be fooled. Possibly, both the seventh and first days will be days of worship (which is what Catholicism has been toying with for some time now, in allowing Mass on the Seventh day Sabbaths, as well as on Sundays). Incidentally, this seems to be the new focus of the world’s present ecumenical movement.

Another possibility is that the sun worship culture (under the beast power or as a prelude to it) will successfully disrupt the weekly cycle in some fashion (as elsewhere discussed herein), perhaps by adding a one day world holiday annually. Finally, the beast could impose the Sabbaths and feast days in the context of an altered calendar in some other way to interfere in their proper meanings.

In this context, maybe Martin was correct and so-called Sabbath and feast day observances will then be imposed. While such an alteration may satisfy and indeed fool a lot of people (to include Christendom in general), it’s hard to imagine that real Sabbath and feast day keepers would be taken in by it (like true Jews, Philadelphia, Sardis Sacred Name elements, etc).

For sure, the coming mark of the beast will involve “religious” dispositions, feelings and beliefs which will be manifested in a person’s mind (as a love or devotion) and in their hands (in the context of obedience and duties to the system).

Since the deadly wound of the beast is to be healed, one must not rule out a repeat of the dark ages when Rome did impose the cross, Sunday worship and so forth on the civilized world.

666

The last several years have seen a number of commercial companies start to use product or merchandising bar codes on any number of products. This is becoming very prevalent in grocery stores and retail outlets which now use optical scanners to read these bar codes. Some persons have been quick to point out the incorporation of the number 666 in many of these codes.

The Jul-Aug 2000 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 5) reported a story from Russia that the Russians are now using a 666 bar code in identification numbers and cards being given to each Russian and each, new-born, Russian child. The Russian Orthodox Church has protested this system. But it seems to be in place.

It’s easy to see that a new international ID card or system, to be discussed in the following chapters, will be quite useful in this endeavor. Consequently, it must be allowed that perhaps the number 666 will someway and somehow be incorporated into the mark of the beast system and used for personal identification by the global, human populations.

Chapter 377--Identification Cards and Numbers

National and International ID Cards

One of the primary features of the present oppressive government and its plans for a New World Order is the likelihood of a new international identification card which all citizens of the world will probably have to have and carry at all times.

There is a strong possibility that such a card will allow the attainment of a world situation where no one can buy or sell, unless he has a certain mark or sign of identification, as discussed in the preceding chapter.

As the January 2002 “American Sentinel” (p. 6) noted-- “In the 19th century, it was sufficient to ask who you are, in the 20th century, it was sufficient to show who you are, in the 21st century, you will have to prove who you are.”

Manifestly, a national or international ID card will allow Big Brother to track people, to profile them and to categorize them as being pro-government or anti-government (ibid, p. 11). Once in Big Brother’s computer as a dissident, it will be an easy process for the government to freeze or seize the assets of any citizen who doesn’t march to the tune piped by the New World Order.

This national and/or international ID card scheme has to be a very dangerous sign of our times and one amply anticipated in the age end (Rev 13:16-17). Most nations over the globe have already fallen into place on this need and now have extensive and very mandatory ID card requirements for their populations.

The United States is quickly falling into line on this very thing here in the early 21st century, although there remains the presence of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights (including the 10th amendment) which must be deceitfully overcome.

The last few years have seen a number of possible schemes surface and the current one alive on the Internet and in some conservative papers is the effort of the US government to use the state issued driver’s licenses as national ID cards. The “Jubilee” paper of May-June 1997 had a couple of articles by Cyndee Parker which summarized these motions.

Parker’s first Jubilee article, on “National ID Is Now Federal Law” (p. 1, 11), reveals that the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act mandated that US states begin to use “digital fingerprints” on all driver’s licenses by Oct 1, 2000, according to standards developed by the US Treasury.

Present Developments

These digitized fingerprints will be individualized (numerically) to fit each and every American citizen, and will be placed on each card (via a chip or some other means), along with other biometric information--such as retina scans, DNA prints and similar data (Jul 3-16, 1998, “Trade N’ Save” newspaper, p. 1). The ID cards will then become “smart cards,” capable of being read by any scan machine, anywhere.

Along with all of the other data being stored on the ID cards, one of the most intriguing innovations has been the capability to use electronic data to reproduce a person’s facial features numerically and record it as a part of the biometric data in a digital format (as will be described in a later chapter herein).

Polaroid Corporation seems to be leading the way on this technology. In 1998, she entered into a contract with the state of West Virginia to place this type of data on all of its state issued drivers’ licenses (issue 21, “AIPL Communiqué,” p. 19).

More Planning

As a follow-up on these present “marking” efforts, US Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) has been pushing and has introduced in Congress a bill for a mandatory national ID card for every American which has on it a magnetic strip with personal data and a digitized fingerprint, probably the same as the one now planned for the driver’s licenses.

The Sep 11, 2001, Muslim attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, noted earlier herein, may well be the catalyst to speed up the adoption of a national ID card as envisioned by Feinstein. The Sep 23, 2001, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. 1-2) had a lead article on security by Tim Jones which said that “public opinion polls even reflect support for a national identity card.” So they are on the way!

Along with the new digital fingerprints, it is evident that all of the different identification cards will be connected to the various computer data banks now in existence, probably by the widely used and required Social Security numbers, to be addressed next. For example, banks are now requiring people to be fingerprinted in order to cash a check (which can immediately make a link to a data bank).

The May 2001 “Internet Vortex” (p. 20) indicates that plans are afoot to scan fingerprint images in order to buy groceries or conduct other forms of business. Already, the Kroger food markets in the Houston area have a pilot project underway of checking fingerprints. Obviously, these fingerprint checks can tie back to a data bank to confirm the identity of a person and ascertain his status and purchases.

Of course, it goes without saying that all of these national computer data banks can tie together without any problem at all (probably, they already mesh at the national level).

It should be noted that one of the first acts of totalitarianism is the establishment of mandatory identification cards (for example, in Nazi Germany and various Communist countries around the world). No one can travel or move about without having to frequently show his state issued identification papers.

Now, this practice is gaining acceptance in the so-called, Western, Christian democracies. Today, in Europe, it is a common practice to have to show identification cards or papers. The United States is quickly falling in line on this requirement. When traveling, American citizens now routinely have to show identification papers/cards to periodic police checks on the highways and in order to rent a simple motel room.

Social Security Numbers

As many persons are now aware, there already is a national computer system which monitors all licensed drivers in all states and keeps track of their status and traffic violations--largely, by social security card numbers (which are also being used throughout society for all kinds of purposes; and in most situations, linking back to large computer data banks).

In today’s America, a person typically must present a valid social security number to do almost anything (like getting credit, opening a bank account, getting electric power or telephone service, entering into lease agreements, etc). In almost any dealings with the government, the first thing government bureaucrats ask for is one’s social security number--so that they can run it through their computers for a check upon the person.

Recent years have seen the IRS require that new born babies be issued a social security card before the parents can claim the child as a deduction on their tax return. Once the card is issued, the new born child is now in a federal computer, if not picked up beforehand with the record of a birth certificate.

In the 1996 elections, the state of Louisiana required prospective voters to supply their social security numbers before they could vote (Jul-Aug 1997 “The Prophecy Club” newsletter, p. 12). As late as July 1999, the state of New Mexico attempted to mandate the use of social security numbers for the purchase of state hunting and fishing licenses (Jul 19, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 2).

Some forty years ago, this writer was issued a CPA certificate from the state of Oklahoma. The annual registration and payment of the license fee has been diligently accomplished all of these years. Just recently, the licensing board in Oklahoma sent me a demand for my social security number. They said that they would keep it confidential. The question must be why do they need it?

The truth is that they don’t need it. This writer has had a name and mailing address for communication purposes with them for 40 years. We have had no problems over the arrangement heretofore. After all, my only contact with them is for them to send me a annual registration form to collect some money from me. Otherwise, we really have no mutual business or need for dialogue.

So, if they don’t need my social security number, why do they want it? Is it not quite evident that my number and registration will be tied in by a computer network system in some way to Washington--where all of the social security numbers eventually converge.

In early 1997, Noah W. Hutchings and a colleague of the Southwest Radio Church of Oklahoma City requested a visit to the new Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City (one of the civilian internment camps capable of handling 55,000 inmates annually). News reports said that persons interested in visiting the site for a tour should contact the institution.

Thus, Hutchings and his friend requested a tour. They had to submit their names and social security numbers even for consideration. Both were subsequently disapproved with no real explanation on why (July 1997 “Prophetic Observer,” p. 2-3). Is it not clear that the social security numbers of Hutchings and his friend were run through federal computer files before a determination was made to reject their applications?

Incidentally, the official explanation for these new Federal Transfer Centers (which are going up all over the United States) is that they will be used for the transfer of federal prisoners to other prison camps. A reader’s letter in the Nov-Dec 2001 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 81) suggested that they are to become processing centers for Americans sold to foreign countries. This suggestion may have some merit.

FDR and Social Security Identification Numbers

When FDR forced the social security system on the American public, the people were told that the social security numbers/cards would never be used for identification. In fact, for years, the issued cards stated “not for identification” (as mine so states). But all of this has changed. Social security numbers are now mandated as the identifying numbers for all Americans--in the form of the new drivers’ licenses (in October 2000).

Social Security Numbers in Europe?

In a televised interview with Tony Snow on Jun 17, 2001, Secretary of State Colin Powell made a gaffe that made Snow temporarily freeze. On Russian scientists, who have disappeared, Powell said it could present a problem because Russia does not have a social security system as in America--which allows the US to monitor, track and capture American citizens (Jul 2, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 14).

This little inadvertent slip of the tongue should tell even the biggest dullard something about both America and its social security system. But it won’t be long and Russia will have her social security identification numbers. Indeed, the whole of Europe is now falling in line on this new form of tyranny--thanks to the US.

In the Feb 4, 2001, “Coast to Coast AM” program, Ian Punnett noted that United Europe is implementing a social security numbering system for her member states. These numbers are to be identifying numbers for each person in the EU and be recorded upon the various identification papers. Apparently, there has been some backlash from some people over the plan. But it seems to be proceeding into effect.

The Enum System

The Nov-Dec 2001 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 49) had a prophesy report that the US government has now given approval to a proposal to create a global numbering system called “Enum.” The plan is to give everyone an eleven digit number to facilitate global communications (like with the Internet). This system was developed by Patrik Ealstrom, an engineer at Cisco Systems.

The social security number is eleven digests. Could there be a connection?

The same “Prophecy Flash” (p. 49) also noted that British Prime Minister Tony Blair has given approval for a national ID card for the people of Britain. Polls show that 85% of the British people approve of the cards. Some 70% of the American population has similarly expressed their approval for a national ID card. Maybe the Enum system is on the way globally--with the approval of the people.

Chapter 378--Reaching Out

The Draft Registration Process

Not content with just the social security numbers (outlined previously), the US government has continued the draft registration practices commenced in WWII. Under these procedures, all young men must register with the Selective Service upon reaching age 18. Thereafter, they must keep the Selective Service people informed of address changes.

Unsatisfied with the current status of all young men, Big Brother’s agents publicly declared a new program to register all young women in the Selective Service system in June 1998. The purpose of this scheme is obvious. Now, they can have the names and addresses of all people age 18 or older in their computers.

Naturally, these files mesh together with other files--like the social security, tax and FBI files. All of these files come together nicely in Washington.

Each person in this system is primarily identified and linked together by social security numbers (and not names)--now, at the birth of children with the new IRS requirement for babies to have social security numbers. By punching in this number, the computer can extract all information known about a person from all government levels and files--federal, state and local.

Employment Profile Records

One of the most far reaching new federal rules put into effect in 1998 is a new requirement for US businesses to prepare a report to Big Brother whenever they hire a new employee. Assuredly, these individual employment records and reports will feed into a giant computer somewhere to monitor the status of each person in the American workforce.

The Latest Developments in Banking

Once the public was forced to use social security numbers in order to open a bank account, the banks went to work to see what all they could do with the convenience of an identifying (social security) number for all American citizens.

A news report on Aug 1, 2000, disclosed that the banking establishment has set up a central data base of Americans using banking services who have bounced checks for whatever reason--like insufficient funds, closed accounts or whatever. Of course, this data base is predicated upon social security numbers.

What all the banks will use this data base for is still open to question. For sure, this data base will be consulted when a person applies for a loan or credit. Since the banking industry has access to it, we can be sure that Big Brother in Washington will also have access to it.

Big Brother is intimately involved in spying upon and monitoring the financial activities of all US citizens. He is doing this through the use of social security numbers in the banking system. Remarks to follow will focus on government spying going on in the matter of writing checks and transfers of money (amounts, who to, why and so forth).

New Banking Dossiers

Beyond all of the personal identifying information (including social security numbers, etc) which US banks now require from customers and which are being used for various purposes (as noted above), something far more sinister is on the immediate horizon, as outlined in an article on “Big Brother Banks” in the Dec 1998 “Idaho Observer” (p. 8).

The essence of this report is that the federal government under Clinton launched an effort through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to require banks to begin compiling all types of new data and information on customers which can ultimately be fed into centralized federal computers to compile profiles and data on all Americans having bank accounts.

The specific information is an effort to determine where each customer’s money comes from and where it goes. Once a profile is established, the feds will be in a position to recognize and leap upon any deviation. In other words, if a customer comes up with an unusual deposit, this fact will be immediately highlighted. Any unusual checks will also prompt an immediate inquiry as to why.

From the beginning, banks will be required to make reports to the FDIC on these unique deposits and checks. In time, the system will likely become so sophisticated that data from the banks feed directly (on-line) into monitoring federal computers.

To force all people to have bank accounts (and come under the program), the feds have commenced a policy of depositing all federal checks (social security, retirement, etc) directly to bank accounts. In other words, a person cannot receive a federal check directly and operate on a cash basis. Over time, this program will extend to all payments made to people (i.e. retirement and payroll checks, etc).

Know Your Customer

This just cited FDIC program is called “Know Your Customer.” Already, many member banks have implemented it. Also, the FDIC has proposed regulations to require non-member banks to come under the program and maintain the same type of data. The article said that the objective is to insure that the activities of all bank customers is “supervised” at various levels of rulership and control.

“The American Sentinel” newsletter of April 2001 had a detailed update report on the Clinton Know Your Customer plan. As noted above, this Clinton scheme surfaced in 1998 in the form of Treasury Department regulations. There was a storm of protests over it. So Clinton temporarily withdrew the regulation.

As the Sentinel reports (p. 2), federal bureaucrats (under Clinton’s supervision) continued to find alternative means of implementing the “Know Your Customer” plan. Thus, it was seemingly forced into effect and evidently most US banks have fully adopted the program (apparently, 80% of US banks now comply with it, per the Sentinel).

To add fuel to the scheme, the (international) Committee on Banking Supervision in Basil, Switzerland has adopted guidelines which are very similar to the Clinton Know Your Customer program. They have labeled it a “due diligence” program of identifying customers, monitoring high risk accounts and risk management. But as the Sentinel notes, it is very close to Know Your Customer.

The Committee on Banking Supervision’s guidelines are becoming the global standard for all banks worldwide. Though it lacks the force of law internationally, it appears that most countries and most banks are voluntarily adopting the international regulations.

Enforcement

A July 2001 promotion letter from Sentinel editor Lee Bellinger mentioned the establishment of the US Treasury’s “Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.” Apparently, this new US effort will oversee all of the various new bank monitoring work in league with the IRS and other federal agencies.

The US Treasury Department has had for some time a specific organizational unit devoted to the monitoring of the financial activities of American citizens. It is called FINCIN--meaning the Financial Crimes Investigations unit. This FINCIN organization will probably manage the overall Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and coordinate input and networking with the various federal agencies involved.

Deposit Tracking Records

Analyst Mark Nestmann now predicts that the next move in the financial eavesdropping program will be a “Deposit Tracking System” (Apr 2002 “American Sentinel,” p. 4). The plan will be to establish a procedure to instantly track all US credit card and bank transactions.

With this system, Big Brother can have an on-line process of monitoring all financial transactions of all Americans instantly. An Oct 2002 letter from Lee Bellinger, editor of the “American Sentinel” (p. 3), said that the plan is that FINCIN agents in the Treasury will be able to link all financial information together as applying to people--to include credit card purchases.

Sending Money Overseas

As is documented throughout this study, the US dollar is very close to a total and complete collapse. The US now runs a trade deficit monthly of over $40 billion. Too, George W. Bush is throwing money away all over the world (primarily, in order to support his various wars against the Muslims). This system cannot last much longer. A crash is imminent.

When the fall occurs, the government will make an immediate call in of all gold, silver, and other commodities of value. It’s highly likely that this call will include a demand that anyone holding any foreign currencies in hand turn them over to the government. Who knows, they may also go after foreign bank accounts. So government confiscation of assets could be gigantic in scope.

Any person above the idiot level, who hopes to get anything of value out of the US before the collapse comes, must act soon. Hence, if one plans on fleeing to Israel or Europe and one wants to have some money in Israel or Europe, then the thinking person must start making preparations at once to get funds, assets or whatever out of the country (ideally, before 2005). Soon, Washington will put a stop on this outflow!

Through the years this writer has occasionally sent a little money (in the form of a check) to certain religious ministries in the state of Israel. These have been small checks, generally of less than $100. In past years, these checks cleared my bank rapidly within a few days and there have been no extra charges on them. Never has any of the banks involved ever made a charge to me for clearing these checks.

In more recent years, this writer sent a small check to Europe which was processed by a bank in Europe (a bank dealt with before by me in prior years with no difficulties). All of a sudden, this bank in Europe was required by law to collect certain information on me. It was necessary to send them a certified copy of my passport and fill out an information sheet.

In June 2002, the bank had a form out that there now was a charge of $12 to clear a check to the US. By late 2002, that charge had increased to $22. In Jan 2003, the charge was said to be $75.  I was informed that the European bank was not making the charge but that it was being made to clear my check to the US. Since my bank charges nothing on these checks, it meant that someone else was doing it.

In a later check of the endorsements on the check, it appeared that a large US international bank cleared the check from Europe to the Federal Reserve Bank in Seattle and on to my account. It is almost a surety that the big US bank was making this outrageous charge to clear a check.

The next surprise to me was information that it will now take up to six weeks to clear a check presented in Europe--as drawn on a US bank. This is absolutely incredible. Within the US, the Fed clears these checks within a day or two.

Actually, in the case of this check, it took seven weeks for credit to be given for its clearance. The evidence was massive that either the US bank clearing the check simply kept the money and used it for seven weeks before giving credit, or something else was afoot.

The Relevance

This writer has been unable to completely ascertain the problem with this huge charge and delay in clearing a check from Europe. It completely makes no sense at all that any European bank or banking authority would be taking any action to interfere with any flow of money into Europe (after all, this inflow benefits the European economy). So the problem is likely with the US international bank.

The thought came to me that somebody (possibly someone in the Fed, in collusion with US Treasury agents) was putting a hold on these European checks to do something with them (perhaps a good guess would have been that someone was compiling dossiers on the check writers and other information on the checks as a part of the FINCIN program).

There is no doubt but that someone in the government is recording information on all checks passing through the US banking system. However, it is very doubtful that these government intercepts are responsible for the outrageous charges to clear a check and the huge delay in getting the transfer completed. Frankly, the best guess is that US international bank is the guilty party on both counts.

The purpose in mentioning this situation is to note that the days are now in progress or will soon be in progress where it is becoming more difficult to get money out of the US. If the government authorities were not bad enough, the big Amalekite NY banks are also taking steps to only deal with people with huge sums of money. Small transfers of money are becoming either very costly or impossible.

The point is that the evidence seems to suggest that US authorities will soon be taking action to limit the movement of US money overseas. Undoubtedly, they will work closely with the big international banks to stop this outflow and especially from people writing small checks.

Books

In another matter, the so-called Patriot Act (passed in the fall of 2001, following the terrorist acts) has another sweeping plan afoot. One of the fallouts of this act is the new plan to monitor the books people buy or read, as will be further assessed in comments to shortly follow below (Apr 2002 “American Sentinel,” p. 4).

Actually, the new financial monitoring system will allow Washington to monitor all purchases of everything. Accordingly, the Maryland-based Sovereign Society is recommending that people buy books and everything else possible by cash because if checks or credit cards are used, the purchase can be traced and analyzed.

Thus, if someone should, by chance, buy a book on Islamic fundamentalism, Big Brother would be interested in the purchase (which would be traceable by check or credit card). Accordingly, for self protection, a wise man should start using cash for purchases which can invite trouble down the road.

Other Agencies

Another fall out of the so-called Patriot Act in 2001 is that public libraries must now surrender information on their book borrowing records to the feds. Thus, Big Brother can now monitor which books a person checks out from his local library. Under the new law, Big Brother can make a demand for these borrowing records from local libraries.

As the federal monitoring of libraries has evolved, the program has grown even bigger with federal plans to prosecute librarians or keepers of any records if they tell anyone that the government had subpoenaed information related to a so-called terrorist investigation (Jan-Feb 2003 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 24). The point is that people under investigation are not to know that they are being investigated.

Even the US Post Office will be involved in the new monitoring and spying programs by reporting upon “suspicious activities of mailers” (under the new PO Eagle Eye program).

In April 2002, the US Treasury Department issued regulations which will require credit card companies, mutual fund brokers, commodity dealers and wire transfer firms to fill out and return to Washington “suspicious activity reports” on their customers (May 2002 “American Sentinel,” p. 12). These new regulations require that these private institutions appoint a compliance officer to make reports to Washington.

The May 2002 “American Sentinel” (p. 12) also quoted the “Wall Street Journal” and noted that the Treasury Department is similarly preparing regulations to require all American travel agents, hedge fund managers, auto dealers, boat dealers and gem and precious metal traders to start making these “suspicious activity reports” on their customers.

Trusted Travelers

Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the US, the Department of Transportation has been preparing a plan to use a “Trusted Traveler Identification Card” for persons who want the card and undergo the required background check. The May-Jun 2002 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 7) assessed this innovation.

The essence of the problem with this new concept is that it may put personnel who do not have the card into a category of being “non-trusted travelers.” Thus, when people show up at an airline, those with the trusted traveler cards can be whisked through security to board the airplane with ease. Those without the cards can be given a thorough going over.

Medical Cards

One of the key pieces of legislation vigorously pushed by Clinton was a national medical care system which would have required each person in the US to have a national medical card that would contain the entire medical history of that individual (in the context of a unique medical identifier code).

This plan was beaten in the US Congress in the early years of Slick’s presidency. But the liberals never give up; so it has continued to surface. Thus, some provisions of Slick’s plan were sneaked into law in 1996.

In the 1998 Congress, Slick’s fellow womanizer, Ted Kennedy, introduced a further modification of Slick’s health care plan to implement the 1996 law. Again, it would require that each American have a national medical card, containing his or her entire medical history. It would, in turn, link to a national computer system.

At some point in time, it is certain that the medical card, driver’s license card, social security card and so forth (to include school ID cards, to be discussed shortly below) will all be combined into one new master identification card which will serve as an internal passport for all US residents. This internal passport will have to be carried at all times. It will be further assessed below.

The MEPHA Plans

The Dec 2001 “American Sentinel” (p. 9) had a story on “Disturbing Trends” which outlined the Bush Administration plans to promote a “Model State Emergency Health Powers Act” (MEPHA) in each US state legislature. The scheme is that each state will be encouraged or forced to enact this legislation. As the report went, if necessary, it can be tied to federal highway funds to force the states to comply.

The act provides these five features. (1) Public health officials can have unfettered access to personal health information without patient’s consent. (2) Public health officials will have sweeping powers to establish quarantine zones in the US or limit the movement of people in an emergency. (3) Public health officials will be granted powers to order mandatory medical examinations of private citizens and make violation of vaccination laws a crime. (4) State health officials will be able to seize and control private property without due process of law. (5) Sweeping emergency powers include control of private media outlets, medicine and food rationing, price quotas and price controls.

It appears that this scheme will grant government officials enormous new powers in their move to impose a dictatorship and one world government.

Shirley McCuen, Revisited

A focus was directed in a prior chapter on outcome based education and comments made by Dr Shirley McCuen on a complete “restructuring” of American society, as the liberals currently plan it. As noted, the planners now want children to begin public education at birth (that’s why children must get social security numbers at birth).

As a part of this program, a computer file will be established on each child which completely monitors the child from all possible aspects--and particularly including the child’s attitudes and beliefs (which are being taught, monitored, tested and evaluated as a part of outcome based education--actually political correctness). Manifestly, this new system will include a school ID card.

This computer file and the new, school, ID cards will track the entire personal history of the child from birth through school; and on into his/her employment, marriage and life experiences. Clearly, the social security, medical and school files will constitute the initial personal background files on a given individual.

Obviously, once all of the above mentioned systems get computerized, they can all be meshed together at the federal level, as allowed above and in former chapters.

While the Big Brother government in Washington has been reluctant to admit it, but the evidence has been overwhelming that computer files on Americans have already been merged into one gigantic system in Washington for quite some time now (and certainly in 2001-2002). Proof of this assertion will be described below and in later chapters discussing the after-effects of 9-11.

On this reality, a later chapter addressing the after-effects of the Sep 11, 2001, terrorist attacks will describe in some detail the implementation of the US Total Information Awareness Program to completely monitor all Americans. While this thing is frightening beyond description, there is even something else about as bad to just focus upon small children.

A Student Information Network

The Jan 9, 2003, Idaho “Spokesman-Review” (p. B1) had a story from Boise, Idaho of the offer of a $35 million dollar grant from the J. A. and Kathryn Albertson Foundation (as supported by the Albertson food markets).

The purpose of this grant is to create a “statewide student information system” which will connect all schools to provide data to parents, teachers, students, administrators, lawmakers and the public. Idaho would become one of the first states to establish such a statewide network and operation (though apparently, some individual school districts now have such a system in place).

The article in the paper said that parents will be able to access the system for their children’s grades, homework, assignments, and attendance records. While at a first impression, one might be suspicious that this thing may not be too individualized, this remark on accessibility of data to parents should completely dispel any such notions.

Manifestly, this system envisions a complete dossier of activities on each child in the public schools in the state of Idaho. Obviously, it will have an abundance of personal data on each child and then the performance and record of each child in school.

Once this type of information is entered into computer files, it can be indefinitely stored and also be made available to any and all interested people at any level of government and supervision from the local school all the way up to Washington and the giant computer in Brussels, Belgium which maintains data on all of the world’s population. This thing will be enormous.

Identifying School Children

While it seems totally incredible to even think about the prospects of these new schemes for school children, one must realize that right now in the real world efforts are being made to commence them fully.

A good illustration of this progress was reported in the March 2002 “America Sentinel” (p. 7) which said that the state of Pennsylvania has now commenced a program in three school districts whereby small children are being fingerprinted and subjected to retina scans. This information is being incorporated in a school biometric identification system (which surely will include ID cards).

Children are able to go to the school cafeteria and buy lunch by merely allowing their fingerprints to be scanned into the computer system. Surely, it will be expanded into a whole array of new uses.

The Jan 9, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A2) had a related story from London, England where the Venerable Bede school with 900 students will use a retina scanning device to identify students who eat.

Supposedly, the idea behind this effort in London was over the concern that poor students would be humiliated when they ate in the school cafeteria without paying. So the school decided to make its cafeteria cashless. Thus, all students will be able to eat in the cafeteria without cash. They will be identified by the retina scanning device. The same process will be used in the school library for checking out books.

Chapter 379--Sophistication in Monitoring

Other New Innovations

Cyndee Parker’s second Jubilee article (mentioned in a preceding chapter on the plans for a national and/or international ID card), on “L.U.C.I.D Net--New Silicon Birdcage” (p. 4), reports on the use of a new US satellite system launched in January 1997.

This system involves a “Universal Computerized Identification Clearinghouse Resources Center” which will be used as “a secure, uniform, interactive and instantaneous tracking system” to interact with worldwide networking computers.

A commercial organization called Universal Biometrics Cards seems to be working on this project. It will involve “personalized data” which can be updated periodically to provide instant background information on any person.

It is envisioned that the personalized data will be “digitized bar-coded fingerprints” which can tie back quite naturally to the drivers’ licenses and ID cards, as discussed in prior chapters. Add this data to digitized pictures and ID cards will almost be complete profiles of a given subject.

The last several years have seen the US Dept of Defense adopt an identification card for its people--which has the usual picture and printed data, but the lower part of the card has a barometric code, containing all kinds of personal data which can be read by various sensors.

Not only will this card permit entrance or denial of the carrier into certain areas, but importantly, sensors strategically placed in society can read and monitor these cards. Obviously they can be read from space by satellites. They are labeled and called “MARC” cards. Whether this name MARC sticks or not, it has to be significant that Big Brother chose it to describe the cards.

Putting all of this together can lead one to easily perceive that Big Brother now has the capability to mandate a national (and eventually an international) ID card which will be magnetically coded with all kinds of personalized data (including fingerprints). These cards can be tracked from satellites in space so that a person can never hide from Big Brother.

While these plans have historically been something only for totalitarian oriented bureaucrats to speculate on and dream about, the truth is that all of this madness is virtually upon Americans right now, in early 2003, under George W. Bush (as will be discussed in the following chapters).

Computer Chips?

The above and previous comments focused upon present government plans to use state issued drivers’ licenses as national identification cards. Plans are already drawn up and being implemented in this direction. But there are even substantial efforts to go beyond the federally mandated laws.

While the public has been told only about the fingerprints, retina scans and a few other identifying features being digitized on the cards (as noted in preceding comments), Big Brother has more far reaching ideas in mind on using state issued drivers’ licenses.

“Spotlight” of Jun 21, 1999 (p. 2), had a report from New Jersey which revealed her present plans to use a computer chip on her drivers’ licenses which would not only have finger prints, but also much personal information about the driver--to include: The driver’s previous contacts with law enforcement and government agencies, a digital image of the driver, a summation of the driver’s historic driving record (driving violations, court appearances, convictions, etc).

Obviously, such cards can be easily linked electronically to bank accounts, tax files and all other government records. By all means, DNA and biometric information can be incorporated (as pointed out earlier herein).

Already, ID cards have been developed and used which allow a chip containing all kinds of data to be implanted/inserted in/on the card (as mentioned earlier). As noted, they are called “smart cards.” They are being used by governments and businesses extensively in Europe (“The Ultimate Privacy Protection Guide,” p. 48).

Many privately issued credit cards are now being prepared with these magnetic chips or strips of digitized data about the card and its holder. Almost everything possible in the current society is moving in the direction of using these so-called smart cards to regulate all kinds of people and purposes.

If there is one significant drawback on the use of these cards currently, it probably arises because of the continuing anthrax scare in the US mails. An August 2002 letter from Donald McAlvany, editor of “McAlvany Intelligence Advisor,” brought out the present dilemma.

McAlvany’s letter (p. 3) disclosed current plans to begin a process of radiating all mail in the US postal system to supposedly kill the anthrax potency. As noted, this radiation will destroy/erase all of these magnetic strips/chips (along with magnetic data on videos, CDs, audio tapes, etc). The radiation will also adversely affect gemstones mailed by jewelers. The fall-out could be enormous.

More on the Latest Plans

The March 2002 “American Sentinel” (p. 1-3) laid out the efforts gaining steam in early 2002 to impose the dictatorial ID system of Big Brother on Americans as soon as possible. As alluded to in Cyndee Parker’s two articles, quoted above and in the previous chapter, this system might materialize in the vein of a national ID card based upon the drivers’ license requirements.

The Sentinel named some of the agencies and entities which are aggressively moving forward with efforts to build this national ID card system in America, starting in 2002 (like the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators [AAMVA] and the Progressive Policy Institute [PPI]).

The AAMVA plan was reportedly broached and discussed in a AAMVA planning conference held in Virginia in February 2002. Per people at the meeting, the Sentinel learned that the plan has devolved to the point of seeking $100 million from the federal government and a federal mandate to require state departments of motor vehicles to phase-in nationally standardized state drivers’ licenses.

In other words, these bureaucratic planners are not coming out with a bold initiative to establish a national driver’s license scheme, per se. What they propose to do is to mandate that state issued drivers’ licenses be standardized across the US. Thus, all drivers’ licenses would be the same in all fifty states and other US jurisdictions.

The beauty of this system is that it will be far easier to sell it to Congress, and indeed even to the American public (since it will not be viewed as a federal takeover or of the implementation of a national ID card-system). Something like this motion can very quickly materialize into reality.

The PPI

The just mentioned PPI outfit seems to have gone even further in this mad scheming. This group has circulated (also evidently, in February 2002) a paper entitled “Modernizing the State Identification System: An Action Agenda” which calls for an even more bold Big Brother effort to establish a national passport system.

Specifically, the PPI wants present state issued drivers’ licenses to be completely phased out and replaced with so-called smart cards (as allowed above and in a previous chapter) that will monitor and control all facets of human existence in America--like travel, employment, financial activity, hunting, fishing, health care, etc.

To accomplish all of these monitoring and regulating goals, the plan is for these smart cards to carry micro-chip data on fingerprints, (eye) retina scans, complete personal dossier (of all financial, tax, medical, criminal, etc histories), a record of travel practices, and so forth.

The uses of such a card would be astronomical. For example, they can be used as drivers’ licenses, credit cards, medical histories or needs, a pass for airport security checks, voter registration, hunting and fishing licenses, a method of linking in with all government based computer files as used to monitor, regulate and control the overall population, and on and on.

The only thing not mentioned by the PPI effort is the matter of guns. As the Sentinel noted, this issue is very sensitive to some people (like the National Rifle Association) and would evoke an immediate negative response. So evidently, the planners and schemers can subtly usher in guns at a later point in time.

Of course, this national identification card can become a gun license. They can even be prepared to state what guns a person owns and especially in the context that the cards will become hunting licenses. In other words, to pacify the NRA, maybe the gun thing can be sneaked onto the cards on the premise that the hunting aspect of the cards makes it mandatory that something be specified about gun ownership.

One of the big features which these cards will address is the question of the status of a subject in terms of the payments of taxes, child support and other mandated issues. This system will allow Big Brother to completely monitor the status of a given person at all points in time.

Effectively, these smart cards would become internal US passports that each person would have to carry at all times.

How

Perhaps the biggest question of all is how Big Brother can sneak this monster into federal law to apply to all Americans. As mentioned above, in the AAMVA plan, the idea is to sell it on the premise of letting the individual states and territories implement it. The role of the federal government will be merely to set the standards that will allow the system to mesh together.

And how can Washington become actively involved in this system? It can be done the same way that Washington has regulated highway speed limits for years now. The federal government will provide the funding (which is also one of the points being pushed by the AAMVA).

Once federal funds are involved, the federal government will mandate how they are spent. In other words, each state will have to pass laws to conform to the federal standards. Since money is the name of the game, it will be easy to force this new madness down the throats of all Americans.

Like the Sentinel said--this system will provide the means whereby the entire American society can be under the perpetual observance of central authorities.

Personal Background Checks

Moreover, it appears that a number of US states are getting on the bandwagon to introduce the practice of conducting personal background investigations on all persons stopped by police in routine traffic checks or violations. The liberal governor of Washington state is pushing this practice, as these lines are being written in the early 21st century.

Naturally, there is little opposition to this thinking since most people are quite willing to give up their freedoms without a whimper, and particularly so when the liberals point out the “need” to catch criminals (correctly, politically incorrect people) in routine traffic operations. To put the idea over, the liberals will cry and whine on and on about the exploding crime problem and offer these traffic investigations as a solution.

In order to fully implement this scheme in the US states, several issues stand out. First, it is certain that this thinking requires a massive, centralized, computer system with an abundance of personal data on people. Second, it is clear that in the US only the federal government is capable of developing and maintaining such a system.

Third, the fact that some states are now putting this practice into effect means that this system is now operational. And last, yes this system is presently functional at the federal level. The reason that it is now in place is because the last several years have seen different factions and segments of the federal government develop all kinds of personal data on private citizens and maintain it in computer banks.

Most of this compiled information was initially used within the various branches and sections of government. For example, tax data was limited to the IRS; bank transfer operations were available to the Treasury Department; personal histories were used in the Social Security Administration; criminal and arrest records and fingerprint data were maintained by the FBI; etc.

In recent years, the US launched a scheme to use a central computer file on persons having drivers’ licenses in the various US states, as discussed earlier. These files apparently have been predicated on the use of social security numbers and the collection of data on traffic violations.

Thus, whenever persons are stopped by the police for a traffic matter, their drivers’ licenses are routinely checked into the master driver license files, and their automobile tag numbers are run through a state file on tags. Obviously, these checks of just driver licenses and automobile licenses are not enough for Big Brother.

By opening the door to running personal, background checks on the entire US population, it means that a traffic policeman can quickly check upon the entire personal history and activities of a given individual who may have been stopped in a petty traffic question.

Since this thinking is now underway, it is a certainty that all of the various computer files are already being meshed together at the federal level (as is manifestly happening right now with the Total Information Awareness Program, to be discussed later herein).

And if the AAMVA plans materialize for nationally standardized drivers’ licenses, discussed above, the work of conducting background investigation by traffic police on stopped vehicles will be greatly simplified.

The only question about this Big Brother system is how long will it take to get all 50 US states on board? Some conservative states (a few in the South and West) will be a little slow on joining. But with the constant media push, all will eventually succumb.

DNA

Besides all of this data now being compiled, a news report on Dec 15, 1998, noted that plans are underway to start making DNA tests of arrested persons in order to maintain them in an DNA data bank. These tests are simple and involve a swab in the mouth to collect a little saliva. While fingerprints are already unique and distinctive for each person, the DNA data can connect relatives and family ties.

Obviously, the results can be computerized and used in trials, etc. But there is another far more subtle purpose behind the DNA plans. As discussed on the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio talk show program on Jan 19, 2000, Dr Nick Begich (previously cited) suggests that plans are afoot to develop DNA profiles for certain types of criminals, like serial killers and so forth.

Presumably, once a massive DNA data bank is established, Big Brother can catalogue and review (with computers) the various profiles and decide upon which persons (with certain DNA types) should be arrested or otherwise monitored, supervised or regulated by government authorities.

Obviously, if this DNA profiling can be used for certain criminal types, it can also be used for all kinds of other purposes (like in politics, religion, family connections, etc). Not only can certain racial peoples be singled out for checking (like genetic Israelites), but even persons who might be predisposed for the Scriptures can be identified. The present plans are far more profound than anything Nazi Germany ever conceived of.

In Oct 1998, the FBI launched its “Combined DNA Index System” with 275,000 genetic fingerprints (Feb 7, 1999, “Spokesman-Review,” p. A14). Great Britain already has a national DNA data base with over 360,000 samples in it.

The Jan-Feb 2001 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 37) had a news report which said that Britain is launching a new program so that when police stop a car in a traffic matter, a DNA sample (hair or saliva) will be obtained on the spot to run it through the British DNA data base. Prime Minister Tony Blair said that “This is an essential tool in the fight against crime.”

Former NY Mayor Rudolph Giuliani has proposed taking a DNA sample from all new born infants. This DNA thing can and will grow into gigantic proportions. In time, the program can extend to the armed forces and ultimately all persons in the US. It will be easy then to place this information on driver’s licenses, medical cards and other identification sources.

This can be done with a computerized bar code across a card; or now, more practically, a computerized chip being implanted in the body of a person or on the driver’s license (as was discussed above for NJ, and as will be further addressed in comments to follow).

National Criminal Database

A May 2002 letter from Lee Bellinger, editor of the “American Sentinel” (p. 5), noted that the federal government is establishing a national criminal database, apparently called “Operation CHAOS” (as will be further discussed in a later chapter herein). It will reportedly gather data on all criminals or criminal suspects in America. Later, per Bellinger, it will allow “Black-bag operations on United States citizens.”

Though not mentioned by Bellinger (in his May 2002 letter), the very presence of this file system allows Washington to define any person or type of a person as a criminal suspect--subject to spying, monitoring and accumulating information on in various computer files. Obviously, this CHAOS system can link to the DNA database.

More on Computer Chips

While the discussion in the preceding comments focused upon the use of a type of a computer chip on drivers’ licenses or other cards, it is manifest that computer chips can also be implanted somewhere in the human body, as just noted. These chips can carry the same personal data and can similarly be read and located from scanners on earth or from satellites in space.

The World Future Society has been predicting the soon coming day when credit card data, passports, driver’s licenses and an abundance of personal information will be stored on a tiny computer chip and implanted in a person’s arm (or hand?) or body to be read by the scanners (Jan 13, 1997, “Spotlight,” p. 2).

Obviously, these implanted chips can be read from strategically placed tracking devices both on earth and in monitoring satellites to completely control a population. The gist of this is that there seems to be a coming day when it will be totally impossible for the typical (or particular) citizen to hide from Big Brother’s watching eyes.

In his video on “Shackles of the New World Order,” Dr Rod Lewis suggests that the plan is now to implant these biometric chips in babies at birth on the premise that they provide “child protection” in this world of child kidnappings. This system will go hand in hand with the government monitoring and spying operation envisioned by Shirley McCuen, as outlined earlier.

Rather than execute child molesters and child kidnappers, liberals and humanists would prefer to implant these chips in each new baby at birth. This then opens the door to government wide totalitarianism against the whole population.

News reports of Nov 23, 1998, mentioned that a convicted child molester in Washington state was arrested because he had removed his biometric chip. A monitoring device somehow eventually detected the removal and alerted authorities. So the process is already in place and starting to be used. Soon, it will be extended to all people on some pretext.

A news report on February 26, 2002, said that a US commercial company now has a patent on such a chip and is making plans to begin selling it to the public.

Apparently, as a preliminary process, this firm has applied for a license, permit or OK of some sort from the US FDA. Presumably, these small chips will be implanted, under the skin, in numbers of Americans, ostensibly for all kinds of good reasons (medical, tracking to prevent child kidnappings, etc). Yes, Orwell’s 1984 is here.

Of course, the US Food and Drug Administration quickly approved the implantation of computer chips in so-called human beings; so the stage is set for the eventuality of computer chip implants in the general population (Jan-Feb 2003 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 26).

Walt Myers, Revisited

In his video on “Technology and the Mark of the Beast,” lay scientist Walt Myers focused upon the use of computer chips the size of a grain of rice (or sand) which can be placed into the bodies of humans, on cards, on animals, in automobiles and/or on anything and everything of will for identification purposes.

These tiny chips or correctly transponders can be read by any scanning device--whether on earth or in a satellite circling the globe. Myers says the government now has a program of orbiting some 840 small satellites which can read these transponders all over the world.

With 840 satellites, Big Brother can scan and read chips in every human and every automobile on earth--apparently all, at about the same time. Scanners in space or on the ground can read hundreds of items almost instantaneously.

Already, plans are being made to do away with checkout people at retail stores. A person can bring a load of groceries in a cart to a scanner which can read a person’s ID number (which can be digitized information on a card or on a chip implant in the body) and all of the items in the grocery cart in a couple of seconds, print out a bill and deduct the amount from a person’s bank account. Workers will become obsolete.

Myers says that the plan is to put these transponder chips into people, automobiles and you name it. In this environment, no one can hide from the ever watchful eyes of a Big Brother government.

In the 1998 Boston Marathon, some 3,000 runners each had one of these chips implanted in his/her shoes. Scanners along the roadways completely monitored all runners who passed by and fed the information to a central computer which compiled the relevant status information on each of the contestants. This information was then piped to the Internet to reach all interested persons and activities.

Speaking Chips

The May-Jun 2002 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 6) mentioned the work of Hewlett-Packard Corporation and the University of California at Berkeley in obtaining a patent on a complex nanochip and the parts that could make a computer smaller than a bacterium.

Apparently, this process involves the making of a nanochip which has zones or girds which would allow the chip to serve many purposes--presumably including being a small computer.

The “Prophecy Club” report focused upon the question of whether this technology will allow a man-made image of the beast to talk (Rev 13:14). Already, transponder chips can send and receive electrical messages anyplace. So adding a speaking capability would not necessarily be a profound development.

This same article noted that the British military is experimenting with implanting chips into her service personnel. It would be useful in precisely locating each soldier at all points in time. Obviously, it would be invaluable for missing people (to include deserters, MIA, POW, etc) and would allow commanders to communicate with each soldier through the chip (if the voice capability is added).

In other sources read by this writer, there are also plans to place these chips in or on policeman so that they can be in instant communications with higher authorities. If the vocal capability is added, a policeman can query a central file at once on the status of any person or suspect.

Chapter 380--Modern Monitoring Technology I

Satellite Monitoring

The Jan/Feb 1999 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 1) had an article on the “Iridium System: The Mark of the Beast?” describing the possible future of computer chips, computers and satellite monitoring systems, mentioned in the prior chapter, all of which can link and monitor every aspect of every person’s life.

Using implanted microchips and various bar code devices, orbiting satellites can monitor every aspect of man including commercial, social, economic, religious and other activities from space. This data can be rapidly funneled into giant computers on the ground which completely profile and correlate all data known on man.

Thus, a person driving along the road will be monitored. If he stops at a store to buy something, his stop and purchase will be monitored. If he goes home and has a discussion with his wife, the discussion will be monitored--using sophisticated listening devices. If he attends a religious meeting, his visit and the discussion will be monitored. These capabilities go on and on into all facets of human existence.

No one should laugh and make fun of the very suggestion that Big Brother is now or will be soon tracking all automobiles--where they go, which roads they travel and how long they stay at a particular destination. The Dec 18, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news report that the US and nine state governments are now working on the plan, using computers which allow satellites to monitor cars at all times.

Microdot computer chips (the size of a grain of sand, 300 feet below the ground level) can be tracked from space to within one foot of geographical accuracy. With this sophistication and the most extraordinary computer capabilities, no one can escape the watching eyes of Big Brother.

Spying Equipment

Of course, powerful and very technologically advanced surveillance cameras are also being used throughout the American society--often, by private businesses, like banks.

The May-Jun 2002 “Prophecy Club” (p. 5) newsletter noted that these cameras are going up all over America in malls and shopping centers. It is unclear where and how the police and FBI will have access to these cameras, but it is on the drawing board under some pretext.

Subsequent comments will address the new facial recognition system in some detail. Once these cameras are in place, it will be very easy to use sophisticated computers to analyze and study all people passing through or in a bank, mall, business, etc. All persons can be readily identified with the facial recognition system.

The Highways and Streets

But more far reaching cameras are also being used by the state--particularly along public highways, where these sophisticated cameras record images of the vehicles, license plates and drivers using the highways. Several states are using cameras at street intersections to snap pictures of automobiles which run red lights. Drivers are then ticketed based upon the pictures.

A recent study by House Majority Leader Dick Armey noted that some local governments are using traffic lights and cameras in an effort to write more tickets and increase local revenues (Jun 2001 “American Sentinel,” p. 6). The lights are deliberately set with shorter times on yellow--to force drivers to either throw on their brakes or run the lights.

The Jun 2001 “American Sentinel” (p. 6) also had a report that the National Park Service has launched a program to use surveillance cameras on Northern Virginia’s George Washington Parkway to catch speeders. The cameras will record the incident and tickets will be sent to violators through the mail. The Park Service is working on this project with Lockheed-Martin (which will receive a commission on tickets issued).

With the payment of the commissions, cameras are now planned along highways across the US to record drivers, vehicle license plates, etc in order to catch speeders. Traffic tickets will be issued based on camera images. Roadway scanners are coming which will not only read this data, but also the chips in automobiles, as well as the biometric codes on drivers’ licenses or human chip implants.

More on Cars

With identification chips implanted into each new automobile coming down the pike, it will theoretically eliminate car theft. In fact, the point can be reached that a car will not even start or run until its computer checks the driver’s chip or card (driver’s license or chip of the driver) out and the registration and relevant data on the car. Only then, can the car be started and used.

In the case of automobiles driving along the highway and being scanned by roadside scanners (which feed into a giant computer), automatic checks can be made of the driver’s license, the chip in the car (showing ownership, etc) and the registration and tag--all automatically.

Per its chip(s), if something is wrong with the car, the driver or the registration, the computer can issue a stop order (via the scanner) to the car. The stop order command will be read by the car’s transponder and shut the engine off automatically. The vehicle cannot be driven until everything is right.

In 1999, GM and presumably other car manufacturers started installing another unique computer chip in each new car, which is much like the black boxes now in aircraft. This car chip monitors vehicle speed, the throttle position, the engine’s RPM and whether the driver had his seatbelt on or not (Nov 22, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 2). More innovations are on the way.

An article on “Britain May Try to Stop Speeders by Satellite Regulation,” in the Mar/Apr 2000 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 7), said that the government there plans on implementing a satellite system to read a new electronic speed regulator chip to be implanted in each British automobile.

If a car is violating British speed laws, a command will be sent to the car to terminate the fuel inflow and stop the vehicle. The article didn’t say; but presumably, the dead car cannot be driven again until a policemen arrives, tickets the driver and takes some notification action to release the emplaced stop. The satellite will have a positioning capability to read the exact location of each car.

Satellites in space are also heavily used, as noted above. They have the capability to not only read (and track) chips but also almost any visible written message (including 3 by 5 business cards and automobile tags) from far off space. Moreover, they can employ infrared technology, which allows Big Brother to monitor and find any human being almost anywhere (even if trying to hide in a mountainous forest and/or at night).

Satellites are also being used in the US to monitor automobile traffic. The Sep 2001 “American Sentinel” (p. 11) had a report that Acme Rent-A-Car company in Connecticut uses a database and Global Positioning Technology to track the movements of its rented cars. One customer sued the participating companies because the company fined him $450 for speeding three times in a rental car.

Automobile Identification Files

Recent media commercials have been advertising the availability of companies which have access to identification and data files on all automobiles and trucks sold in America. The way this works is that an interested party can go to the Internet and pay a fee for the complete history of a car by supplying the vehicle identification number. There is a company called “Carfax” that apparently does this also by fax.

In order to supply information on all owners, accidents, repairs, etc about a particular vehicle, it means that somewhere and somehow all this data must be coming together in a computer. Likely, the commercial companies involved are gaining access to this merged data by some method (perhaps by paying a fee or just being part of the privileged businesses, which are served free of charge by big government).

Logically, all of this data is being merged and compiled in America by the US government. Probably, the Big Brother bureaucrats would argue that they are trying to keep track of each vehicle in order to cut down on vehicle thefts. But whatever excuse authorities use, the truth is that this operation is just one more excursion into private rights and loss of privacy and freedom.

The presence of this data gathering system and the vehicle spying equipment now being installed all along the highways (discussed above and elsewhere herein) spells out a big need for a lot of tax money. Manifestly, the American people are paying this tax money into the system in the form of the federal and state gasoline taxes (which are now over 50 cents a gallon).

When the gasoline prices exploded upward in the late spring of 2000 (thanks to the efforts of Bill Clinton to pressure OPEC to cut production, as discussed elsewhere herein), several persons began to try to generate some interest in cutting some of these high gas taxes (like the 4.3 cents per gallon established by Clinton in 1993 to ostensibly cut the federal deficit). Now, it is clear why this effort did not succeed.

Usually, these gasoline taxes are not being used to pay for new highway construction or to cut the US deficit. But often, they are being used to install spying and monitoring equipment and computer systems (to not only monitor each highway user, but the entire status of each American automobile). Now, it is clear why Slick Clinton fought ferociously to keep this tax when some persons began to question it in 2000.

Lee Bellinger, Revisited

The previously quoted Lee Bellinger, editor of the “American Sentinel,” focused upon automobiles in a May 2002 promotion letter (p. 4). Bellinger suggests that there is a national trend in place designed to track and restrict the movement of automobiles in America.

Along with the focus now on drivers’ licenses, Lee says that Big Brother is also focusing upon automobiles. The cameras now going up all over America’s highway, streets, etc (as discussed above) will be used more than just for ticketing speeding cars and making money from the public for traffic fines (Lee says the same thing for the portable emission testing equipment and the E-Z traffic checkpoints).

Lee Bellinger suggests that the whole identification and spying processes are actually designed to allow the abolition of the American automobile. Per this perceptive man, the plan is to install a system whereby cars can only be used by approved persons on approved business.

The massive automobile and driver identification systems will limit the availability of cars and the massive spying efforts (with cameras, satellites and check points) can then enforce the no driving privileges.

Iridium Corporation, Revisited

Earlier comments herein mentioned the Iridium Corporation and its strange involvement with Bill Clinton and the possible murder of Ron Brown. As was noted, Iridium is supposedly a global communications company, but the evidence is that Iridium is actually connected to US government work.

Iridium is a $5 billion company formed just a few years ago, with major stockholders in the US, Russia, China, Japan, Korea, Europe, the Middle East and around the world. The Russian and Chinese ownerships tie to the governments. Motorola and several other huge US military-industrial corporations are all big players. The company was to use current and new technology (some of which the US has already developed).

There are also some other strange surprises in Iridium’s ownership and management. One of its owners is the apparent Amalekite Grigori Loutchanski, a Russian, billionaire, criminal, friend and associate of Bill Clinton (discussed in a former chapter). Grigori has dined privately with Clinton and Gore in the White House. Not only is Grigori a major owner, but he also sits on the Board of Directors.

Another most unique major owner and player with Iridium is the Bin Laden family of Saudi Arabia. This family is very wealthy and operates a large construction company in the Middle East which receives many large construction contracts from the US government. One of the key members of this family is the famous terrorist Osama bin Laden. Osama’s brother sits on the Iridium Board of Directors.

Michael Bunker

Michael Bunker points out in his video on Iridium that Osama has been on the payroll of the CIA for years (just as was true with Manuel Noriega of Panama). Yet, for some strange reason, he is now labeled as one of the world’s worse terrorists (as will be covered in some detail in later chapters and appendices).

Osama is regularly accused of bombing US properties--like the World Trade Center, Pentagon, two US embassies and a US base in Saudi Arabia (which was rebuilt by his own construction company). The US ties to the Bin Laden family are so enormous that one must pause and wonder if there is not something unusual going on here.

Thus--is Osama still on the US payroll? If so, is it possible that in his alleged acts of terrorism against the US that he is really working for and serving the US government and plutocrats in some way? Could these alleged acts of terrorism be setting the stage for a US dictatorship under Big Brother? This option will be addressed in subsequent remarks.

To accomplish its objectives, Iridium has had some 66 satellites in continuous orbit around the earth (in low polar orbits) which allow it to have instantaneous contact with all places on earth at any second in time (although some of them may be coming down--to be shortly addressed). Allegedly, this system has been designed to provide communications for people wherever they are.

They can use a small cell-phone like device to make voice telephone calls and send fax messages all over the world at anytime. During Clinton’s 1999 attack on the Serbs in the Balkans, the US government gave some of these phones to the KLA rebels to use in directing air strikes against the Serbs.

Ostensibly, Iridium was organized to make a profit. But it has never made and seems to be taking no action to make a profit. In fact, news reports in the summer of 2000 revealed that Iridium has filed for bankruptcy (in fact, some of its satellites were expected to fall to earth in late 2000). It is unclear whether this bankruptcy is an organizational motion (a reorganization) or a going out of business course.

Even if the corporation does go out of business, one must stop and wonder about the billions of dollars worth of technology developed over the past few years. Who gets it? Surely, the stockholders (like Grigori Loutchanski, the Bin Laden family and various governments around the world) will likely get whatever is left of the company, if it does fold completely.

In this strange set of possible events, it seems highly plausible that this may have been the reason that the company was organized to start with. Perhaps it was specifically designed to fail and then allow the US developed technology to be transferred to foreign powers.

More From Bunker

Per Michael Bunker (in his video on “Nowhere to Hide: Iridium Satellites”), Iridium seems to have been involved in espionage and government surveillance efforts (this system and/or others like it are capable of continuously monitoring and tracking all humans/humanoids on earth all of the time).

So far, this focus has been on behalf of the US government. But it is plausible that the Russians, Chinese, Europeans, Japanese and/or the UN could also have a use for this technology. Certainly, something is motivating the various foreign powers to play a major role in this corporation. As a minimum, they will all share in the US developed technology in some manner.

The implication of Bunker’s talk on the Iridium Corporation is that it has been used for espionage and subversive operations. However, for the long pull, it or its technology is manifestly capable of becoming a global satellite monitoring and spying operation on people all over the world (not only in the US, but also in all other nations).

A previous chapter also discussed the strange tie Iridium has had with the possible Amalekite, Bernard Schwartz, who runs a supposedly Iridium competitor named Globalstar (which also has a number of satellites up, but in a higher earth orbit than Iridium). As noted earlier, Schwartz seems to actually be a friend or colleague of Iridium, rather than a competitor.

Just as Schwartz has been a major supporter and promoter of Iridium, by lobbying for it all over the world, it must be also noted that President Slick Clinton likewise was actively involved in promoting and lobbying for Iridium around the world--for whatever reason (though the company has had financial problems and is now bankrupt).

In any case, it is clear that if Globalstar and Iridium work together, or if Globalstar gets some of Iridium’s technology, the company or companies involved can become agencies to monitor and spy upon all people, all over the globe and all of the time (of course, with the 840 government satellites, mentioned by Walt Myers, there will be no shortage of monitoring equipment).

Bunker implies that this will be the outcome of the present system. These satellites can read the biometric, digitized codes in any type of card (and this includes the new US drivers’ licenses that were effective in all states on October 1, 2000), as well as implanted chips in humans/humanoids, in automobiles and in any other thing or place on earth.

Applied Digital Solutions

The Mar-Apr 2000 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 29) had a news report that a company called “Applied Digital Solutions” had obtained patent rights on a miniature, digital transceiver which is named “Digital Angel.” This transceiver sends and receives data that can be continuously tracked by GPS or Global Positioning Satellite technology.

This means that humans/humanoids can be implanted with this device and be tracked by satellites for location. Even their vital signs can be monitored. The device is unique in that it is electromechanically powered through the movement of human muscles once implanted. Implanted people will be on a electronic leash and privacy will be a thing of the past.

A follow-up report on “Digital Angel” was in a news report in the Jan-Feb 2001 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 30). The plan is that personal identification tags or chips will be used to store vast personal information (dossiers). These chips can be worn externally on the body or implanted under the skin. GPS will continuously monitor each person--wherever he is and whatever he is doing.

Incidentally, this GPS technology was developed some years ago by the US military and used to track airplanes, ships and vehicles. It has become standardized and even commercialized so that the technology is available and can be used by anyone. A similar system is being developed in Europe called the Galileo (per news reports on Apr 12, 2002).

There is also information surfacing that watch manufacturers are developing a process of placing a device in watches which can completely monitor the wearer’s location and bio-sensor information on his state of health--like on the order of the Digital Angel, as just discussed (“The Ultimate Privacy Protection Guide,” p. 64).

The Tattoo

One of the horrible features of the Schicklgruber insanity in the late 1930s and early 1940s was the practice of the Nazi state to tattoo a identification number on the arm of all alleged enemies of the state. The tattoos were permanent. So persons could not simply wash them off at the end of the day.

Apparently, they were identification numbers with a minimum of other classifying information in a numeric code--like race or ethnicity. With the end of WWII, most of so-called humanity supposed that these Nazi practices were all over and things of the past. But the US and other governments have been quite busy picking upon the old Nazi practices (like in gun control laws, and now in identification practices).

The latest innovation was outlined in a news report in the Nov-Dec 1999 “Prophecy Flash” magazine (p. 53) which quoted an article from the Nov 1999 “Last Trumpet Newsletter.” On March 2, 1999, the US Patent Office issued patent #5878.155 to a man in Houston, Texas for a method of marking people with an invisible ink to facilitate sales transactions by electronic means.

The patent abstract reads-- “A method is presented for facilitating sales transactions by electronic media. A bar code or a design is tattooed on an individual. Before the sales transaction can be consummated, the tattoo is scanned with a scanner.

“Characteristics about the scanned tattoo are compared to characteristics about other tattoos stored on the computer database in order to verify the identity of the buyer. Once verified, the seller may be authorized to debit the buyer’s electronic bank account in order to consummate the transaction. The seller’s electronic bank account may be similarly updated.”

More

Per the just cited patent document, the ink to be used is “Invisible Skin Marking Ink #743,” manufactured by Sirchie Finger Print Laboratories, 100 Hunter Place, Youngsville, North Carolina. The writer of the article said that nothing could be plainer. It reads like something out of Revelation 13.

It appears that this inking process could theoretically be removed or later altered if it was something used individually by a single retailer or class of retailers. However, the practice well could be a permanent operation (if mandated by government authorities), as was the case with the tattoos used by the Nazis.

As the article stated, the tattooed bar code can be read from any scanner, although it is invisible to the naked eye. This means that it can be read from any space satellite and from any scanner on earth (along the highways, at the doors of stores, in public buildings, etc).

The bar code can include the person’s identification data to include even a digitized fingerprint, digitized facial picture, height, built, weight, DNA code, bank account data, employer, education, personal history and on and on. There is no practical limit to what can be placed on a bar code tattooed to an individual.

While this ink system is predicated upon something to be used in retail trade (and thus, it can theoretically be temporary, as noted above), there is another system which has been around for years now with the use of lasers. The “Revelation File News Brief” for Nov 18, 1999, quoted the “Oklahoma City Times” of Nov 6, 1975, which had a story on the use of laser tattoos on cattle, livestock, fish, and you name it.

The “Times” article noted that a technician could implant a tattoo (a brand, initial or other identification code) on an animal or fish in thirty-billionths of a second. These tattoos evidently can be put on the skin (or possibly under the skin) by a laser beam and not even be felt or seen by the naked eye. The laser implanted tattoos are permanent and cannot be removed. Assuredly, they can be read by any scanner.

Once a person is subject to this marking, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to hide from Big Brother’s ever watching eyes. Since there are enough space satellites in orbit to track and monitor every human being on the planet (all--at about the same time), it is clear that every movement of a subject person can be continuously checked by satellites and earth scanners and be fed into computers for permanent storage.

Yes, Revelation 13:16-17 is here. It is no longer something to speculate and theorize about. Man now has the capability to put a number on every person’s hand or forehead, which will completely regulate and control every moment of time and everything which each person can or cannot do.

Detecting Money, Guns, Etc.

“The Prophecy Club” newsletter of Jan/Feb 2000 (p. 9) had an article on “The Loss of Freedom, Tracking Our Currency!” which noted that the Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank in Richmond, VA has proposed that US currency be designed to include ink and markings that can be read by scanners on earth or in orbit as satellites.

The proposal has been made on the premise that Americans can be penalized for carrying too much cash. In other words, people can be monitored to regulate and control how much cash they possess. Hoarding of cash will be discouraged and eliminated just as the hoarding of food, gasoline, guns, ammunition and so forth.

Moreover, one of the real purposes of this cash marking plan will be to discourage and indeed even eliminate the use of cash in society at large. People will be forced to use banks where purchases can be scanned and automatically charged to a person’s bank account, based simply upon the scanner reading identifying data on a chip, tattoo or implant.

Truly, man has reached the cashless society position, long talked about; but never fully implemented, nor really ever completely understood, as is possible today. Certainly, Revelation 13:17 is now knocking at the door. Soon, everyone will have to have the right number or identification (on his card or chip) to buy or sell.

Gun-Seek

Obviously, gun and ammunition manufacturers will soon be required to mark their products so that scanners can locate them wherever they are located on planet earth. Conceivably, any product or item can be secretly marked to allow its detection from any place on earth.

Already, there are some new “Gun-seek” electronic equipment available which will disclose the presence of hidden firearms (Sep/Oct 2000 “Prophecy Club” newsletter, p. 10). Someday, when Big Brother calls in the guns and begins house to house searches for unauthorized materials, these gun-seek devices will be used.

Also, the Jul 9, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news item of the development of a new frisking device to be used by police to make a search of a person’s body or possessions without any physical contact. The device uses electromagnetic waves to disclose hard objects--like guns, keys, wallets, etc. Possibly, this technology can be used to monitor a person’s body, possessions and home at all times.

Furthermore, the previously quoted May-Jun 2002 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 6) indicates that new technology is now available to allow a full body x-ray of people in certain situations instead of a body pat. These x-ray machines can be used at airport boarding stations. Presumably, these machines will reveal everything on a body.

It is uncertain how far off these devices can be used (maybe, there is a distance limitation factor involved in their use). Perhaps they are not yet adaptable for space satellites to detect unauthorized guns or possessions on the ground. In any case, manufacturers will soon be required to mark both guns and ammunitions so that they can be detected from space satellites and other scanning devices.

Religious Marking and Monitoring

The Jan/Feb 2000 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 10) had a story from the Internet on “Malaysia Tracking Religious Beliefs on ID Cards” which noted that the Malaysian government will require that a person’s religion be identified on government identification cards. How many other nations will soon follow suit?

Manifestly, this data can be placed in a bar code, chip, tattoo or whatever which will allow it to be read by scanners along the highway or in space satellites. Obviously, this undertaking will be a logical part of the age ending Beast system which will be very much predicated upon religion.

Once the religion of citizens is marked and identified, the government will immediately know who must be monitored, controlled, arrested, etc.

Soon, all governments will have a religious monitoring and regulation office (the US already has plans for an Office of Religious Monitoring or persecution, as discussed earlier). Of course, it will be no big deal to limit buying and selling in the commercial world to persons of the right religion.

One of the most extraordinary aspects of religious identification occurred just before and during WWII when the German Nazi government required Jews to wear a “star of David” badge on their outer clothing whenever they appeared in public and/or left their homes. Much of the world was indignant over this gross persecution.

Afghanistan

However, one must not suppose that such ideas and thinking are only relics of the past. In an unprecedented move, the former Afghanistan government implemented a similar plan in modern times for the minority Hindus living in Afghanistan (which numbered around 50,000 persons).

As noted earlier, the Afghanistan government was moving to establish an Islamic state in their nation in 2001 (before the US intervened to cut her plans short). Several noteworthy events had occurred to further this aim. The last important scheme occurred around May 25, 2001 (per a NPR news report).

The new Islamic method of dealing with at least the Hindu minority in Afghanistan was to require them to wear a yellow patch on their outer garments whenever they left their homes or appeared in public. This is almost precisely the same thing which Nazi Germany did with the Jews in the WWII era.

There was a huge public outcry around the world over this development. However, the international complaints did not deter the Afghanistanians in destroying statutes of Buddha, nor did it affect their plans for the Hindu peoples. Thus, this identification practice was on track.

There is an enormous deleterious fall out of this practice. It sets a modern precedent. Certainly, other dictatorial states (including the eventual world government when it is in place) will follow suit. For sure, other Islamic states (like Iran) will assuredly implement like schemes against their minorities.

It is very plausible that both Christians and Jews will face similar acts of persecution soon in Muslim and other third world lands. Already, there is some persecution of Christians around the world (as was noted earlier and to be further covered in later commentary). This motion could turn to a visible identification method.

But all of this will be child’s play to what will ultimately arrive on the scene by the New World Order crowd and their colleagues around the world when they probably will impose such an identification practice upon the very elect. And how about the possibilities that physical, fleshly Anglo-Saxon peoples (Israelites) may be so identified based upon race and ethnicity?

The Future is Clear

While government authorities are starting with mandated identification cards (containing extensive personal identification information), there is no reason why that very soon the switch can be made to transponder chip implants or tattooed bar code data (which will likely be mandatory for all new born infants on the premise of protecting them against child kidnappings).

Thus, man is moving in the direction of requiring a chip implant or a tattoo in all humans, all automobiles and vehicles and any and all other desired sources or things, which can be read from these satellite scanners in the heavens or from scanners on any place on earth.

The comments of Walt Myers were mentioned earlier--in that grocery stores can use scanners to read a biometric ID card or a chip (or a tattoo) of digitized bar code data in or on a person and then scan all of the groceries in a cart, and charge the bill to the person. No employees are even necessary.

Obviously, man is moving in the direction of using scanners to identify people at the door who wish to even enter into a particular retail establishment (this can be done on the premise of security and to prevent thefts). In other words, the scanner or sensor can check a person’s card or implanted chip or tattoo and say yes or no on admittance.

In the case of security areas, this system of using identification cards or chips for entrance is already being used. A person’s card or chip is checked by a scanner and if approved, the person can enter the restricted area. The door will remain closed and locked to all persons who try to enter without the proper code. It will only open for people with the right identification data.

The Commercial World

Will all retail stores use this monitoring system or cooperate in its use? Well, everything in the current commercial society is moving into place where this system is totally viable across the board in all businesses.

Man has entered the large corporation era where most retail trade is being placed into the hands of large corporations (yes, retail ownership is being centralized into fewer and fewer hands). The goal is that all persons will either work for the government or one of these giant corporations (owned and/or controlled by behind the scenes, super rich plutocrats).

Probably, man will reach the point that only giant retailers (multi-national corporations) will be authorized by the government to carry on business. Governments can pass laws and regulations which place such demands on retail stores that only large retailers with plenty of money can meet the demands.

Right now, almost all businesses are having to buy scan machines to read and process transactions for a number of cards (VISA, Master Card, bank cards, welfare, etc). Some of these systems are expensive and beyond the reach of small businesses. For many reasons, small, independent retailers are being forced out of business daily (as discussed earlier).

Most food production and distribution processes are already in the hands of a few people. The local employees at large retail stores like Safeway, Kroger, Winn-DIxie, Walmart, K-mart and so forth are going to obey orders coming from corporate headquarters or be fired. The government can also employ roving bands of inspectors and checkers to be sure that the system functions as designed.

In 2000, Motorola Corporation decreed that its dealers were obligated to compile data on their customers and submit it to corporate headquarters, where the company is compiling a huge data bank on customers (“The Ultimate Privacy Protection Guide,” p. 33). Surely, other corporations will join in this endeavor.

Chapter 381--Modern Monitoring Technology II

Biometric Data

In his video on the “Mark of the Beast... The Final Connection,” Prophecy Club spokesman Michael Bunker, discussed earlier, offered a good summary of some of the latest technology being either used or planned to be used to monitor and control all people in the future. Bunker mentioned several different efforts underway.

He outlined the use of fingerprints, retina and iris scans, hand geometry, facial recognition scans, voice prints, signature analysis, DNA profiles and so forth to be used to precisely identify any given person (as mentioned in prior chapters).

Bunker says that any and all of these methods can be digitized (to a numeric code) and/or reduced to a bar code which can be read off of any card or chip. He noted that facial scanning methods now allow Big Brother to pick out any given face in a massive crowd of people.

More Big Brother

In support of plans to use face scanning methods, the US Secret Service entered into a multi-million dollar project with a private company to establish a digitized facial data bank of all US citizens. The company is obtaining access to all pictures used by all of the US states in the issuance of drivers’ licenses and/or identification cards.

By using a scan process, the pictures are digitized and stored in the new federal computer data bank. While the Secret Service is monitoring and funding this massive effort, the data bank can be transferred to or made available to other federal agencies as desired.

At the Jan 27, 2001, Super Bowl football game in Tampa, FL, Big Brother used video cameras to record all of the thousands of attendees. Later, the picture of each person was digitized and compared with a data base of facial features to identify each of the attendees. Ostensibly, the government was trying to determine if the technology could identify wanted criminals in the crowd.

Michael Bunker thinks that this new facial data bank is what is behind the extensive effort to install scanners and monitors along the US Interstate Highway system. He says that the goal is to be able to not only identify each passing car (from the computer chip installed in the car), but to identify each person in the car precisely by name.

This will be possible with the new facial recognition data bank. In the interim, the computer chips in the new drivers’ licenses can obviously be read right now by these scanners. So there is no way to avoid the watching eyes of Big Brother.

The April 2002 “American Sentinel” (p. 5) had a news report on how far this facial recognition idea has traveled. Already, facial recognition cameras are going up all over America.

Comments heretofore mentioned that many private businesses (banks, malls, shopping centers, various stores, etc) and public concerns (the public highways and streets) are using cameras to constantly spy upon and record information on all people seen by the cameras. Tie this extensive presence of cameras in with facial recognition systems and Big Brother can follow the movements of all people.

Sophisticated computers have now or will be soon able to assign an identification signature and/or profile to every face in America. All of this stuff will be computerized. When a camera reports its images on line to the central computer, the computer can convert the pictures to a digital analysis profile that can immediately identify the people in the picture.

Once this system is in place, it will be able to follow and document the presence and virtual functioning of every person in America. Obviously, if a person shows up at a politically incorrect meeting (like at one of the Christian Identity Churches), Big Brother will immediately recognize and record that attendance.

Applications

If someone would dare decide to participate in a peaceful assembly or protest meeting (like with the people that protested Clinton’s plans for war in the Middle East in February 1998 at Ohio State University when Clinton’s aides spoke, or in April 1999 at Kent State University in Ohio when Clinton spoke, or in other places where Clinton or his aides spoke, as was or will be discussed in other comments herein), facial recognition cameras will immediately record the visit to allow federal agents to not only note a particular visit, but to file this information in dossiers for future reference.

The Oct 21, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news report (quoting Indymedia from the Internet) that US military people were seen videotaping protesters on Sep 27-29 who were involved in an anti-globalization protest. While the FBI and other federal agencies have been doing this for ages, it is news that the military is now involved.

The anti-war and pro-life people both announced plans for massive protests in Washington, DC in 2003. The anti-war protests were scheduled for January 18th and the pro-life effort apparently was to come also in January (or maybe in March) as a part of the “March for Life” program sponsored by the Catholic Church.

In connection with these planned protest rallies, the Dec 21, 2002, Idaho “Spokesman-Review (p. A3) had a story by Derrill Holly on “Police to use cameras at demonstrations” which reported on plans for both of these protests in Washington.

Per the story, the Washington police are to use more than a dozen automated surveillance cameras to “keep an eye on large demonstrations” taking place in 2003. The article was not clear on what these cameras are, and how they are to be employed; but surely, they are some type of video camera which will feed into a central data collection point.

The issue of turning this type of information over to the FBI was not mentioned, but this has been the historic practice. We can be sure, that all of the faces in these photos will be digitized and fed into federal computers--probably as a part of the Total Information Awareness Program (which will be described in some detail in later chapters).

Art Spitzer, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Capital Area Chapter, said: “I don’t think the police ought to be taking video of peaceful demonstrators when there’s no hint of lawbreaking.” Of course, the issue is not over law-breaking. The issue concerns the need for Washington to have files on all persons who take part in these protests.

Manifestly, any Americans who protest the abortion practices or the 2003 Iraq war will have their names and pictures filed away in a government computer file. Question, if the Constitution allows such things as freedom of speech and assembly, how is it that government agents can take pictures of people who express those freedoms (with the obvious intent of compiling information on the participating people)?

Other Data Banks

Voice prints of the vocal sounds/speech of each American are also being digitized and placed in a data bank for the National Security Agency--as will be assessed in a subsequent chapter on Project Echelon.

Also, the Jun 2, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news report on the latest technology being used for identification. Per this report, the Pentagon is developing a radar-based device that can identify people by the way they walk. Apparently, people do not walk exactly alike--thus, meaning that there is such a thing as a gait signature.

Otherwise, it is possible to use all of the other biometric methods outlined so far to establish data banks and identify each person in the United States, as desired. Michael Bunker says that the iris/retina scan is the most accurate method of all in identifying a person. Even identical twins present a problem in terms of DNA identification. But retina/iris scans are different for all persons.

In terms of putting these various methods across, cameras are already going up all over America--in both private businesses and government offices. A man can walk into a government office and be recognized immediately. Bunker found this out for himself in the Texas Drivers’ License Office. He walked into one with a view of getting his driver’s license reinstated and paying an outstanding ticket.

While he was talking with the receptionist about what he needed to do, a man came from an office and spoke to him and called him by name. How did this happen? A TV camera picked him up on entering the building. And based upon a facial recognition data bank, he was identified at once. An official came out to talk to him, as soon as he was identified with an outstanding traffic violation.

The Bottom Line

For a bottom line on this developing tyrannical system, Bunker noted that it will be virtually impossible to avoid becoming a part of these many data banks. Any person trying to avoid Big Brother becomes an outcast--who just about cannot live and function in the sun worship society. For example, a person needs a social security card and number to almost do anything right now in America.

This scheme was sold to the American public by the Amalekite Franklin Roosevelt back in the 1930s on the premise that social security numbers would never be used for identification. Under the new federal drivers’ license law (effective on Oct 1, 2000, as discussed earlier), all state drivers’ licenses will have the drivers’ social security numbers on them (which will serve as the drivers’ license numbers).

Chapter 382--Modern Monitoring Technology III

Modern Eavesdropping Methods

Because such extraordinary strides are being made almost daily in sophisticated technology associated with eavesdropping, it is a virtual futility to attempt to survey the field at any one moment in time. Nevertheless, the topic remains one of exceptional importance.

There is no question about it, Big Brother can now use (and often does use) advanced surveillance and listening devices which will allow it to monitor every private conversation a family has inside their home with the listeners stationed far away.

This means that any given married couple cannot have a private conversation in their own, personal bedroom without a risk that Big Brother is listening and recording every word said. American people can thank J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI and the crafty President Franklin Roosevelt for the development of this practice (per the “J. Edgar Hoover” movie).

It seems that FDR liked the idea of monitoring the words of his political enemies. For this effort, Hoover was a willing accomplice. So the FBI began the practice of using the most sophisticated listening devices possible to monitor and record every sound made by selected people back in the 1930s.

Most presidents since FDR followed suit and used the FBI for this purpose (after all, such political intelligence can be useful to many of the evil persons who have become president of the United States in modern times).

On becoming president, John F. Kennedy was prepared to fire Hoover. But wily J. Edgar produced some tapes revealing Jack’s promiscuous womanizing and involvement with the Mob (discussed in a prior chapter). So Kennedy decided to back off and let Hoover keep his job as FBI director.

Hoover and several administrations were interested in Martin Luther King Jr (because of his Communist and subversive connections). Thus, he became a subject of FBI surveillance.

King was also a promiscuous womanizer (especially with White women). So the FBI accumulated all kinds of recordings made of King’s sexual exploits--complete with moans and groans. In one instance, one tape even disclosed that MLK had a sex encounter with a male colleague--indicating that King was actually a bisexual. This is not unusual, as many Blacks are not particular with whom they copulate.

No Court Orders Are Needed

While theoretically Big Brother’s agents have had to get a court order to wiretap someone, the reality is that they have had numerous legal authorizations to bug whomever they wanted to. And if lacking legal authority, they have proceeded to pretty well do whatever they want to do without any restraints being placed on them at all.

President Slick signed a new Executive Order (#13045) on April 21, 1997, which opened the door for arbitrary wiretapping and bugging of whomever the feds decide upon without question or limitation. This order says that since “children may suffer from environmental health risks and safety risks” it is necessary to make it a high priority to identify and assess these possible risks.

The order goes on to establish the authority for wide-ranging electronic data collection on every family in America. This action even exceeds the War Powers Act which states that an emergency or crises must exist (”Jubilee” of Nov-Dec 1997, p. 7).

Not only will Big Brother be monitoring every moan or groan of politically incorrect people in their bedrooms, but he will even listen in on their most private, audible, personal prayers to YHWH.

In terms of obtaining a court order for a wire tap, this has turned out to be a fairly simple process. Sometime ago, Congress established a seven member secret court of seven judges in 2000 to oversee the granting of wiretaps. The Jun 25, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 6) noted that in 2000, this court approved 1,012 government requests for electronic surveillance or physical searches of suspected foreign intelligence agents.

Since this secret court was established, it has approved 13,600 wire tap requests without warrants and without notifying the subjects of investigations. It is clear that today there is virtually no problem at all for federal agents to obtain approval from this court for wiretaps and surveillances.

In a May 29, 2002, FBI press statement from FBI Director Robert Mueller, the FBI now acknowledges that henceforth it will investigate and/or wiretap anyone the agency decides upon in America and irrespective of whether a crime has been committed or whether a court has issued a wire tap order. This new FBI process will be addressed in a later chapter commenting upon the 9-11 incident.

The May 13, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news item that the Nevada Supreme Court had recently ruled that law enforcement people could hide electronic monitoring and tracking devices in automobiles without a warrant for as long as desired.

While this Nevada case focused upon using a device to track the movements of a car, the message is clear that either eavesdropping or tracking devices will be allowed. Surely, the use of devices to listen to conversations in cars and/or track the movement of cars is now a standard option for most law enforcement people (to include agents at the federal level).

Telephone Monitoring

Many informed people have been aware for some time now that Big Brother has numerous telephone monitoring methods to allow it to wiretap any conversation wanted. The public has been told that it can’t and doesn’t do this without the just cited court order. These soothing words pacify and comfort the dumb, Christian sun worshippers who continue to approve and vote for the status quo.

The Jul-Aug 1997 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 11) had a story on “Dispute Arises Over Proposal for Wiretaps” which revealed the FBI’s latest actions to monitor private telephone conversations. This report, taken from the Feb 15, 1997, “New York Times,” charges that already Big Brother monitors every phone conversation made. Computers are designed to recognize key words which the feds are interested in.

If the speaker says one of these key (politically incorrect) words, his/her phone is marked for more detail monitoring. Specifically, his phone will be “trapped” where not only his phone conversations are monitored, but even when he hangs up his phone, the technology allows the FBI to continue eavesdropping on every conversation going on in the area around the phone, even after the phone has been hung up.

The technology is now in place for Big Brother to monitor all conversations, vocal expressions and even visual manifestations through the family TV set and particularly when it is hooked up to cable and/or satellite systems. While the media companies would deny that these possibilities are taking place, one must be aware of what all is going on or could be going on in today’s world.

Cell Phones

A news report on Aug 18, 1999, noted that a cellular phone can be used for eavesdropping by simply turning the ringer off and hiding the phone in a place. The person wanting to listen in on conversations can go to a remote location and dial the number and pick up all of the sounds and talk in the vicinity of the phone.

The scheme also is that the FBI is now able to use cell phones and pagers as tracking devices to disclose the physical locations of their users (“The Ultimate Privacy Protection Guide,” p. 40).

In a “Letter from the Founder,” the May-Jun 2002 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 5) had an update on the use of cell phones for tracking purposes. Under current Federal Communications Commission rules, all US carriers are required to make it possible for police to locate certain cell phone users--specifically persons who dial 911 and stranded motorists. All cell phones sold by 2005 will offer this provision.

This same article noted that the FBI has told cell phone companies that it will need access to all voice calls, including those sent over data networks. This provision is supposed to be interference free so that phone users won’t know that their phones are tapped.

Since the feds have a green light to listen to all of these messages, they have a complete profile on the people involved and their messages and now can locate and track them precisely wherever they may be physically present.

International Spying

Not only has Big Brother undertaken the task of spying upon all private conversations in the US; but for years, he has been doing the same thing in the context of international communications between private citizens as well as government officials. Since the spying is supposedly being done in the context of US defense, no one questions it.

The actual project is code-named “Echelon.” It is being run by the US National Security Agency (NSA) and consists of a complex network of strategically placed listening and spying stations placed around the world (of both friendly and enemy countries) to snoop on all private radio and telephone conversations--using signal, communication methods.

Project Echelon is massive and far reaching. It will be assessed in some detail in comments to come in the succeeding chapter.

Beyond the government’s outright efforts to personally eavesdrop on private conversations and messages in the communications world, a very intrusive action was authorized on Aug 18, 2000, when the US Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that phone companies can sell or give consumer proprietary network data to anyone (government or private)--to include location, duration and frequency of calls (“The Ultimate Privacy Protection Guide,” p. 32).

Internet Spying

The Internet seems to be one of the most explosive phenomena of the early 21st century with all kinds of people and groups getting attached to it. “Scriptures for America” (v. 4, 1997, p. 5) had a book review of a book by Bill Lauterbach on “Danger on the Internet.”

Lauterbach notes that a person’s computer gives each website visited and personal information about the owner/user (for example, Internet account data and software and type of computer being used). This type of personal information allows the Internet to become a giant tracking and profiling system which can be used by Big Brother and anyone else with access to the data.

The previously discussed Dr Rod Lewis discussed the situation with “Deep Blue,” one of the world’s largest and fastest super computers. IBM built it a few years ago with US funding (per video “Shackles of the New World Order”). Lewis suggests that it is being used to monitor and track people on the Internet. Reportedly, all people/websites now using the Internet are profiled and tracked.

The computer compiles data on all stations visited by a given user and on all of the websites from the standpoint of all other users who visit them. Furthermore, once a computer hooks onto the Internet, sophisticated programs allow the monitoring and checking of “all” data on the hard-drives of the users. In short, there are no secrets on the Internet.

One should not discount this reality because an AP article on “Internet Security Flaw Found” said that “hackers” can now steal any and all data off of unsuspecting Internet users (Jan 6, 1999, “Spokesman-Review,” p. A8).

The January 2002 “American Sentinel” (p. 7) followed up with a Dec 12, 2001, report from Reuters that the FBI is developing a computer virus capable of looking into the private computer files of any person using the Internet or email. Apparently, this system is now operational in early 2003 and is being used by the FBI as a part of its Carnivore program (to be discussed in later chapters).

Thus, millions of Internet users can have their hard drives entrapped and read. The article outlined this situation for users of Microsoft’s Excel program. Obviously, if it is possible with Excel, it certainly is possible with any other program.

More on Reading All Computers

Another dangerous development was outlined in the Jan 1999 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 4) with comments on the “Administration’s Plan to Bug America.” In 1993, Attorney General Reno appointed Clinton’s Whitewater friend Webster Hubbell to implement a special, top-secret, computer chip program called “Clipper” which was supposedly allowable in legislation then passed.

The background on the Clipper chip was that it contained a “exploitable feature” which would allow the US government to intercept and decode all computer communications, E-mail, etc. To accomplish this effort, the plan in 1996 was for the government to mandate that all computers sold in America have this built in Clipper to provide a “key-recovery” system on all computer messages.

This government key-recovery or key-escrow system is a back door plan to monitor and spy upon all American computers. The article did mention an apparent downside, however. Just as Big Brother in Washington can read everyone’s mail, so can foreign powers tap into the system and perform economic and political espionage around the world.

With these computer capabilities, Big Brother can check upon, monitor and eavesdrop on all politically incorrect people and develop profiles upon them, read their hard-drives, monitor who they visit and who visits them on the Internet and intercept all of their messages, E-mail, faxes, etc.

While there is this Big Brother focus on politically incorrect people; real criminals, like pedophiles and sexual perverts, seem to have some latitude from this scrutiny to carry on their operations.

Government authorities are not particularly concerned about sex deviates (such as former President Slick Clinton). Pedophiles, murderers, rapists, adulterers, sodomites, thieves and so forth are no threat to an oppressive Big Brother government. It is honest people who oppose the wickedness of government that quickly find themselves at odds with government.

Consequently, government’s focus will always zero in on politically incorrect people who disapprove of the way the nation is going in terms of morality, honesty and integrity. Obviously, people who are opposed to the new social gods of the state (racial integration and amalgamation, homosexuality, feminism, etc) will soon become enemies of the state.

It is persons who will not worship these new state gods and who do not fit into the new “approved” mode that will soon find themselves targets of the modern sun worship governments. Big Brother is preparing to crack down upon non-conformists!

Recent Developments

Beyond the obvious Big Brother ability to monitor and read Internet communications and computer hard drives attached to it, there is potentially a far more frightening and terrifying development on going in surveillance technology and the desires of various clandestine government operatives to violate the private lives of as many people as is possible.

The week of May 18, 1998, saw a former Soviet KGB official (now a defector to the US) go before a US Senate committee to explain the USSR development and use of extremely low radio frequencies for clandestine intelligence functions (discussed on the G. Gordon Liddy Radio Talk Show on May 20, 1998).

The particular focus of this testimony was that the Russians had developed the technology to read, sabotage, hurt, damage or interfere in the operations of all or most all computers in existence (both on and off of the Internet). The methodology involves the use of low frequencies to beam in on specific wiring, chips and other electrical devices in a computer and/or a number of computers in a defined geographical area.

Once locked on a computer or computers, the frequencies can attack the target’s electrical wiring or components in some manner (as a minimum, destroying or bugging stored data). This technology has some obvious real values in the case of the conduct of subversive warfare against various targets. Clearly, technology is advancing to unimaginable levels.

In listening to a discussion on this man’s testimony before the US Senate, it became apparent that either by now or very soon in the future, technology would be in place which would allow a surveillance system to alter stored data in some manner and/or monitor computer hard drives by external forces, as is now true with various monitoring devices listening in on private conversations inside a home or building.

More Advances

A Jul 28, 2001, AP report suggests that indeed the US right now has the capability to read keystrokes being made on a keyboard, the screen and indeed the hard drive of computers (Aug 8, 2001, “Idaho Observer,” p. 2). The feds can park a van outside and away from a computer and use a black box and new software to read anything they want to. They can even recreate pictures shown on a screen.

In other words, the capability is surely now in place whereby a van containing certain sophisticated computer monitoring equipment can be parked some distance from a home or office containing a computer. An operator in the van will be able to read and/or conceivably alter data on a distant computer’s hard drive.

The Jan/Feb 2000 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 9) had a story by David Noack on “Is the Government Watching Your Computer?” which focused upon this technology. This report was predicted upon two recently released documents from the National Security Agency which showed that indeed the US government has had the capability for a decade to clandestinely eavesdrop on what someone is typing on his computer.

Noack says that with “the right equipment, the electromagnetic radiation given off from computers can be intercepted from a remote location, and then redisplayed in the case of a monitor screen or recorded and replayed with a printer or keyboard.” The project is called “TEMPEST,” in US government documents.

Computer security consultant Joel McNamara suggests that personal privacy plays a small role in using this equipment. He adds that the real goals are political and economic espionage issues. In other words, this capability will be used by governments internally to spy on politically incorrect people who own and use a computer.

McNamara went on to say that since computer monitors, hard drives, and modems all give off electromagnetic radiation, the right equipment could reconstruct the data from all of these devices. He notes that displays on monitors can be read from a mile away. Present technology will not allow data to be read from satellites because there is too much electromagnetic interference.

This effort may sound far fetched, but it appears to now be reality as was confirmed in a report in the May-Jun 2002 “Prophecy Club” newsletter (p. 5) which said that a secret program can be installed on any computer which will record every keystroke made on a computer and send the message back to an FBI investigator. The FBI effort is a part of the “Cyber Knight” program, involving Magic Lantern technology.

Michael Bunker, Revisited

In his video on the “Mark of the Beast... The Final Connection,” the previously discussed Michael Bunker outlined one of the latest Big Brother innovations. This one is the secret National Infrastructure Protection Center which is ostensibly designed to protect and safeguard the Internet from computer hackers and terrorists.

With all of the so-called computer terrorism on the Internet in late 1999 and early 2000, this new agency will have expanded powers to monitor, spy upon and investigate Internet users. Apparently, it will be made up of people from several different US agencies--like the FBI, NSA, NRO (National Reconnaissance Office) and others.

The way Michael Bunker described it suggests that it probably will be a massive Internet spying effort which involves many US agencies. Perhaps the National Infrastructure Protection Center will be the headquarters and coordinating agency which oversees the entire operation.

At this point in time, it is a certainty that no one knows what all this new agency will do beyond a few key people in government. At the moment, it appears very ominous and threatening to many of the freedoms that people have enjoyed in using the Internet.

Chapter 383--Project Echelon

Margaret Newsham

The Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio talk show program was scheduled to have Margaret Newsham on the program on March 1, 2000. She is a person extremely familiar with the US Government’s “Project Echelon,” which was briefly mentioned in former comments herein.

Sixty Minutes had had a story on this project on Feb 27, 2000, with her on the program. Bell contacted her early on March 1st about coming on his program. She said “yes” and seemed to be fully cooperative.

Bell’s program is a late night program. So he called her that night (per the agreement) and she wasn’t at home. Whereas she had formerly had a telephone answering machine in Bell’s earlier call, there was no answering machine on his several attempts to reach her on the night of March 1st.

Since Art Bell’s telephone lines and programs are fully monitored (entrapped) by US government officials (Art knows this and is even aware of the telephone entrapment sounds and procedures which are detectable if one is familiar with them), he expressed concern on the night of March 1, 2000, for Margaret’s safety.

He was absolutely sure that government agents were aware of his conversation with the woman. In this context, he was fearful that they had gotten to her, threatened her, intimidated her or otherwise removed her from circulation.

Art was able to reach her the next day. She came on his program that night (March 2nd). The problem on March 1st was not really explained. But Margaret implied that federal agents were not involved. The purpose here in mentioning this event is that a man like Art Bell would come to the obvious conclusion that federal agents had intimidated her.

This should give the reader some idea of what all is happening in America. In today’s America, everyone must be concerned that Big Brother listens to and monitors all communications. If a person speaks the wrong word, he can be in trouble. Yes, 1984 is here (as elsewhere noted herein).