EZEKIEL

 

and YHWH’s

 

 Judgment

 

 

for the

 

Good News

 

PEOPLE

 

 

 

VOLUME XXIV

 

Government & Tyranny

 

 

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

 

 

Judgment for the

 

 

 Good News People

 

 

 

 

Volume XXIV--Government & Tyranny

 

 

 

 

 

by

 

an unworthy servant

 

 

 

 

 

 

And you shall know the truth,

 

and the truth will make you free.

 

(John 8:32)

 

 

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho.  The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States.  Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

 

 

Volume XXIV--Government & Tyranny

 

 

CHAPTER                                                                              PAGE

 

 

      -                  Cover Page                                                                                                         1

 

      -                  Title Page                                                                                                             2

 

      -                  Contents                                                                                                              3

 

      -                  Publisher’s Preface                                                                                           5

 

 

Part UUU--Christian Government 

 

      361             Sun Worship Government Reality                                                                  6

 

      362             Sun Worship Government Corruption                                                         19

 

      363             The 2000 US Sun Worship Elections                                                          32

 

      364             YHWH’s Sovereignty in Government                                                           45

 

      365             Reacting to Sun Worship Government                                                        51

 

      366             Supporting the Evil?                                                                                        61

 

      367             Sun Worship Governments’ Failures                                                           69

 

      368             Requirements for Public Office                                                                     80

 

 

Part VVV--Government Oppression 

 

      369             The Basis of Tyranny                                                                                      84

 

      370             Christian Government Oppression                                                             100

 

      371             The Branch Davidians I                                                                                109

 

      372             The Branch Davidians II                                                                               115

 

      373             More Classic Cases of Oppression                                                             128

 

      374             Still More Government Oppression                                                             135

 

      375             Conspiracy?                                                                                                    148

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

 

 

Publisher’s Preface

 

Greetings!  The following presentation is volume twenty-four of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site. 

 

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world.  In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one. 

 

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material.  It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message! 

 

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1.  It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins:  left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers). 

 

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope. 

 

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers.  May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him.  Shalom (peace) to you and yours! 

 

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 361--Sun Worship Government Reality

 

 

The Big Lie 

 

The June 2000 “Internet Vortex” had a UPI article on “Court Rejects Ohio’s ‘God’ Motto” (p. 5) which revealed a most important reality of modern attitudes toward human governments.  This article quoted US Senator George Voinovich from Ohio who said that some years earlier, on a trip to India, he saw a sign which read-- “Government Work is God’s Work.” 

 

Admittedly, many people in government and indeed many of the governed people actually believe this nonsense.  This assertion is a bald faced lie, as will be conclusively proven in this and succeeding chapters.  Human government work is not the work of The ELOHIM and certainly not in the generic sense (although some government functions individually can serve The MOST HIGH). 

 

The Scriptures offer a better assessment.  Proverbs 29:2 says that when the righteous are in authority or rule, the people rejoice; but when the wicked rule, people mourn.  So it’s not a question of government.  It is a question of righteousness. 

 

 

The Home 

 

To address the matter of government, it is well to look initially at the home and family because the whole foundation of government starts in the home and immediate family.  As the Scriptures clearly establish, the home is to be governed by the av (Hebrew for father) in an authoritarian and loving manner--from the top down. 

 

The wife and mother is the principle assistant and helper (the queen) to the av in the exercise of his responsibility over the family.  The av is both king and priest of the home.  Hence, he (with the help of his assistant) must exercise authority over both secular and religious affairs. 

 

Despite this authority that the av possesses, he should in all cases exercise it in love and concern for the well being of the overall family.  Where possible and on appropriate occasions, the av should consider input from his wife, in particular, and other family members, in general, so that his authority doesn’t appear to be arbitrary and inconsiderate of the needs of other members of the family. 

 

In terms of the av’s specific duties and responsibilities, in his office of king and priest, the Word has an abundant and extraordinary set of instructions for the av and his helper in terms of their duties to each other and the family at large--all of which involve true Scriptural love. 

 

In a sense, the “immediate” safety, deliverance and salvation of members of the family rest essentially upon the av and his assistant and how well they do their jobs.  There is also much evidence which suggests that some aspects of the wife’s personal future safety may even depend in part on her husband, as well as on her own merits. 

 

For example, previous chapters in this work have mentioned an election of 144,000 Israelite males (age 30 or over) here in the age end, chosen by lot from the foundations of the world. 

 

Probably, out of this 144,000, there will be another selection of a “very elect” class of possibly 7,000 males which will be delivered from the great tribulation and be allowed to live in a place of safety to see the return of YHWH YESHUA in the flesh. 

 

Now, in addition to these elected males (chosen by lot), there is every reason to believe that there will be a comparable number of mature Israelite females.  While the lot “might” could have been used for their choices, it is also very possible that some of the women’s selections could depend to some extent upon their husbands (who are in the very election) and how well they support him in his duties of king and priest. 

 

In other words, if a particular man is in that 7,000 very elect class and has a loyal, supporting wife, then it “might be” that her elect preference is predicated upon the fact of their marriage and her willingness to be a good wife and support and help him in being king and priest over the family.  When the very elect move to safety, it seems plausible that such a good wife would accompany her husband. 

 

 

Men Should Rule Well in the Here and Now 

 

Since this election of 144,000 Israelites is destined to rule over the people of The ELOHIM (either in the here and now, in terms of a congregation of believers, or certainly in the future in the millennium), the Book is careful to point out that such men must learn to “rule” their own houses well (I Tim 3:4-5).  As Shaul put it, if a man doesn’t know how to rule his own house, how can he rule over the assembly? 

 

While the Word’s requirements for husbands and wives are plain enough, it is tragic that here in the age end, those roles are being either reversed or at least upset in some manner because of the surfacing of Christian humanism (which was discussed in former chapters). 

 

The primary basis for this unnatural development is a prophecy by Yeshayahu about a coming time in Yisrael when children will be oppressors and women will rule over men, as noted before (Isa 3:12).  One can see this repeatedly in modern society where permissiveness toward (rebellious) children and the rise of the feminist movement have completely upset family units. 

 

 

An Example 

 

The writer of this study knows a man who has been making some effort over a number of years to obey The MOST HIGH and is quite proud and convinced in his own mind that he is or will be an age end prophet.  But in terms of his own family, he does not seem to rule them well at all. 

 

One of his daughters (living on her av’s property and in a house/home owned by him) moved a shack up boy friend in with her and on his property.  The av took no action to stop it at all.  He let her do whatever she wanted to do in terms of promiscuous sex.  He did nothing about it until one day she and the boy friend got into a spat (lover’s quarrel). 

 

Her av sided with her and hit the boy friend (who was supposedly a brother in the same faith as his).  But otherwise, her av made no effort to stop the harlotry.  He justified the sock with--well, he had to do it to protect his daughter, never realizing that he should have never allowed this conduct to take place in the first place. 

 

From the beginning, he should have put his foot down and ran the shack up boy friend (and her as well, if she objected) off of his property at once.  Yet, this man thinks that he is or will be an age end prophet who is going to rule over YHWH’s people. 

 

While such happenings are often acceptable in a humanistic sun worship culture (and evidently took place in the ancient Greek and Roman sun worship societies, as well as today), it is hard to justify them per the Word.  As just observed, any person expecting to rule over The ELOHIM’s people will have to learn how to rule over his own family as a starter. 

 

Too, the principles of good rule to be found in a home and family unit should extend to human government forms above the family.  But for sure, one does not find good rulership in any human government organizations (built on Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, or whatever).  More often, they are guided by the carnality of leaders who are filled with pride, vanity, greed, envy, jealousy, selfishness and lust. 

 

 

The United States 

 

The United States was founded and established in the late 18th century with the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation and finally the Constitution (which has ruled since c1788). 

 

From the beginning, the US was supposed to be a “republic” --specifically a representative republic whereby the people would essentially select other people to make the actual decisions on running the government, and on who the governmental leaders would be. 

 

This condition is what one finds in the Constitution in its provision for an electoral college to choose a president (on the premise that the best brains of the land should be in the electoral college to “independently” elect the best president) and in the selection of senators by the state legislatures.  There was no such thing as universal voting laws.  It was left up to each state to establish her own rules. 

 

But not content with a republic, powerful forces began to work to convert and change this republic into a “democracy.”  Actually, some persons now argue that America has become or is becoming a “social democracy” where the government is responsible for the welfare of its citizens (Jul-Aug 1998 “Intelligence Newsletter,” p. 1).  And this has happened over the years. 

 

But even here, the United States is still not a true democracy.  As the Oct-Dec 2002 “Hebrew Roots” (p. 3) noted, the pure form of democracy does not exist in the United States; because, in that condition, the voters would have to vote and decide all issues of government. 

 

In the US, such a method is found only at the local (township) level in a few states (like New England, where the citizens of a local township meet in Town meetings and participate in and vote on the issues facing the local government.  Thus, in some respects, the US is technically a blend of a democracy and a republic. 

 

The control over establishing laws is in the hands of the representatives of the people (as in a republic); yet, the choice of those representatives is like a total democracy in granting the vote to every conceivable form and part of the population. 

 

 

Political Parties and Choosing Representatives  

 

Almost from the beginning, political parties developed and they began selecting fields of candidates for the electoral college.  These political choices were “committed” to vote for the various parties’ choices for president. 

 

Too, from the beginning, the big money interests would never allow much diversity in political parties (the more parties, the harder they are to control).  So America has ended up with essentially two parties, whereby the electoral candidates are chosen by the parties.  Consequently, the electors are never “independent” and free to choose the best man for president. 

 

Then, in 1870, the 15th amendment to the Constitution was passed to grant the vote to all humans/humanoids of the US, without regard to race or Scriptural classification.  In 1913, the 17th amendment was passed which provided for the direct election of the senators by the people.  In 1920, the 19th amendment became law which granted the vote to women (and laid the groundwork for much of the depravity now in evidence). 

 

In 1964, the 24th amendment surfaced which abolished all taxation, as associated with voting.  Finally, in 1971, the 26th amendment arrived to extend the vote to 18 year old children (yes, 18 year olds are still children and are not mature adults--per the Book).  At last, an effective democracy had taken over the US. 

 

 

The Resulting Conflict or Paradox in the Constitution

 

The prevailing theory in the late 18th century was that the “people” in the different states could elect “free” and independent” people to form the electoral college which would have the best brains in the land to choose a president.  This probably sounded good in the context of the then formed US republic.  It certainly did away with the dangers of a democracy and helped to install a republic. 

 

But the framers certainly never had any perception that the Constitution would be amended over the years to gradually and systematically change the republic into a democracy (which is precisely what has happened since 1788). 

 

In a democracy (and especially one which allows giant corporations, owned by a few fat cats, to control the entire media, entertainment and educational institutions), the electoral college scheme simply doesn’t work out for the benefit of the people (as it did before the establishment of political parties and with the presence of the republic).  

 

There are several important drawbacks to the electoral college provision in a prevailing democracy, as has evolved in the United States since 1788.  First of all, it is a sham in that the electors are committed to political party candidates, as outlined above.  Thus, why have electors if they are already committed?  Why not just allow a popular vote for president without wasting time with electors? 

 

Since all that is required to be elected president is a majority of the votes of the electors and since each state gives all of its electoral votes to the presidential candidate winning the vote (with two exceptions), it means that a person can be elected president without winning a majority of the popular vote (as happened twice with Bill Clinton). 

 

Also, in 1888, Benjamin Harrison was elected president, but Grover Cleveland won the popular vote (“The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 257).  This appears to be the situation with the 2000 elections with the ultimate selection of George W. Bush as US President. 

 

While this winner takes all of the electoral vote in each state, it should be noted that state law can allow a situation where electoral votes can be prorated (as occurs in Maine and one more state in the West--evidently Nebraska). 

 

With a true and fair apportionment of the electors along the lines of the state’s votes, the system could become more reasonable and allow a candidate to get elector votes, effectively based upon the balloting.  For sure, a proration of each state’s votes to electors would just about insure that the person with the popular vote would get the electoral votes (which is a deficiency in the present arrangement). 

 

In any case, if a person does not win the majority of electoral votes, then the issue goes to the House of Representatives where it will choose the president from the top three candidates.  This has happened twice in history--in 1800 with Thomas Jefferson and in 1824 with John Quincy Adams. 

 

 

The Big Problem 

 

But these are not the big problem with the electoral college scheme.  The real difficulty surfaces because the prevailing two party system (Republicans and Democrats) tie up the ballots in most of the states and allow no other candidates to be considered.  Even when a third party candidate gets on a ballot, he must win a majority of the votes in the state involved to have any impact at all upon the election. 

 

This means that if a third party candidate fails to win many or any electoral votes, his position is completely drowned out by the two major party candidates.  Thus, all candidates and voters, beyond the prevailing two parties, have no voice unless they vote for and support the two parties.  In other words, either support one of the two parties--or your position and vote is out, and of no effect nationally. 

 

 

A Run-Off? 

 

In many democratic elections, there should be a provision for a run-off when one candidate does not receive a simple majority.  Possibly, a run off provision could be implemented in individual states, under the present electoral arrangement; if the Constitution would allow it, and if states would pass the required legislation.  Certainly, if presidents were elected by popular vote, a run-off allowance would be practical. 

 

A run-off provision would mean that all voters can vote for the candidates of their choice.  If there is no majority winner, then a run-off occurs between the two top vote getters.  With the electoral system, this might be possible by state.  But with a Constitutional change, it could be done nationally.  Thus, a person voting for a loser in the first cut, gets a chance to still have some impact on the final run-off election. 

 

This is a good system because it allows a person to vote his conscience and not be concerned about throwing his vote away.  If the voter’s candidate doesn’t win, and if there is a run-off, the voter can still get a shot at choosing between the two top vote getters.  So, if a voter votes for a losing third party and there is a run-off between the primary two parties, the voter will have a later opportunity to choose between the two. 

 

In the electoral system, the candidate with most of the votes in a given state gets all, 100%, of the electoral votes for that state presently (except as noted above). 

 

Many voters are constantly told that they cannot support their party or candidate because they then lose any chance to have any input between the two major party candidates, who will usually end up with the electoral votes for a given state. 

 

In other words, the voters are told to not waste their votes on the Reform, Libertarian, Green or other third party candidates.  Instead, they are persuaded to go ahead and vote against their consciences by voting for the Republican or Democrat candidate.  Hence, the voters only get one shot on the presidential question. 

 

 

No Impacts on Elections 

 

This sad condition means that no third party has much of a chance to have any impact upon an election.  The voters either vote for one of the two party candidates (who are bought and controlled by a handful of super rich people, who control the media, entertainment and educational industries in corporate holding companies or foundations)--or they lose out completely. 

 

If there was a run off election between the two top vote getters (in the usual Republican and Democrat parties), one would see these two major parties scrambling for some support from some of the third party positions.  In other words, it would help insure that all ideas and positions have some impact on the election and that plutocrats do not buy the election by buying the candidates of the two major parties. 

 

Obviously, the electoral college system simply means that it is incompatible with the very idea of a democracy.  A democracy implies popular vote of the masses.  With the electoral college and winner takes all by state, it is impossible to have a popular vote of the voters.  Voters either vote for the approved and controlled candidates (controlled by the super rich plutocrats, calling the shots) or they lose out. 

 

Truly, in  a true democracy (as America has almost become since 1788), the president should be elected by pro-rated electoral votes by state or by popular vote.  All viable candidates should be in the voting, and there should be a run-off between the two top vote getters if one of them does not get a majority of the votes nationally. 

 

The person ultimately elected logically should be elected by a majority of the voters (in a democracy). 

 

Everybody should have some input and no voter should have to be forced to vote against his conscience (to avoid throwing his vote away) simply because of an inappropriate electoral system which is incompatible with a democracy.  By the way, the 2000 debacle has opened the door for a Constitutional change or perhaps even a new Constitution (which would be a tragedy, as liberals would really change things). 

 

 

 The Big Issues 

 

Consequently, America has become largely a democracy, of sorts, whereby all the people (18 or over) directly elect its governors and leaders (to include the president through the tarred electoral system, as just assessed).  However, there are some very inherent problems with democracies because man does not have it in himself to direct his own footsteps (Prov 16:9; 20:24; Jer 10:23). 

 

Importantly, there is still another primary problem in a democracy which is largely unrecognized by Christianity and Judaism, although it is part and parcel of the system.  Perhaps this condition, above all else, is one of the reasons that the true believer should not participate in democratic elections.  The people of faith must be apolitical, as will be established in subsequent comments herein. 

 

But this major problem remains for all of the persons who do participate in the so-called democratic elections.  This dilemma occurs in the sense that the people (theoretically at least) vote for and elect their rulers.  In this sense, every person who votes for the winner becomes a party to the resulting good or bad emanating from that winner. 

 

In this context, the people who voted for the diabolical and evil Slick Clinton chose the resulting evil of his administration.  As commented upon in other presentations herein, the voters not only voted for him in 1992, but again in 1996; and effectively, again in 1998.  Every person who voted for Clinton in any one of those elections is responsible for the sin and evil that he did to people in the US and abroad. 

 

 

Bearing Responsibility 

 

What this means is that a voter must logically bear some moral responsibility for the person he elects in governmental roles.  Voters can’t back off and claim it’s not their fault.  It is the voter’s fault.  Each and every person who voted for an evil leader must bear some responsibility for the resulting evil.  The winning block of voters are a part and parcel of the coming government administration. 

 

If it is evil, then the voters (who voted for it) must not only be responsible, but would perhaps be morally responsible in a sin or righteous role for the resulting good or bad that the leader will impose on the collective people. 

 

In other words, the persons who voted for Clinton may possibly bear the moral responsibility for his actions (lies, murder, hate, sodomy, etc).  Every person who voted for Clinton badly needs to repent and be sorry and ashamed for his action. 

 

This is a hard pill for many people to swallow.  Voters want to continually vote for cruds and depraved politicians who will lie, cheat, murder, deceive and practice sin and evil in Washington, but yet want to believe that they bear no responsibility for the ensuing evil and depravity. 

 

Conversely, are not the voters themselves sinners in this instance?  Yes, every time Clinton bombed and murdered people (at Waco, in the Balkans, in the Sudan, in Washington or whenever and wherever), the voters who elected Clinton themselves also seem responsible for the murders and deaths.  Just as he needs to repent of his evil, the voters who voted for him need to repent as well. 

 

Manifestly, the voters who choose, vote for and elect a liar, crook or immoral person to office must assume the responsibility for electing such a person.  Americans want to vote for such cruds, but then not accept any personal responsibility for making such a choice.  The Scriptural evidence is that these voters are probably in sin and will one day have to repent for their sinful choices. 

 

The same situation surfaced in ancient Yisrael when the people rejected the theocracy and demanded a human king (like the other nations).  These people who made this choice were surely in sin in rejecting the government of YHWH.  They bore the responsibility for the repressive actions of the subsequent kings of Yisrael.  The same is true with modern voters.  They must bare the responsibility for their votes. 

 

 

More on the US Democracy 

 

One more note, from the United States, needs mention before proceeding on in this study.  Despite all the prevailing evils and troubles in American politics, the nation is theoretically now a democracy--with its leaders chosen by the popular vote of the generic people.  But is this belief the real truth? 

 

In a 1996 video presentation on “America in Peril III,” noted intelligence analyst Mark Koernke of Michigan observed that in the beginning, this nation was formed as a Constitutional republic.  In time, it became a Constitutional dictatorship (under Lincoln) and more recently an unconstitutional dictatorship (under FDR).  Clearly, it is now a dictatorship which no informed person can argue. 

 

Dr Stan Monteith, in the Nov 2002 “Radio Liberty” newsletter (p. 4), quoted Plato who said:  “Democracy passes into despotism.”  And that’s certainly what we have become in America in the early 21st century (with the passage of a whole host of laws supposedly against terrorism). 

 

The existence of the so-called US democracy doesn’t mean much of anything in the present environment since people are so ignorant, uninformed and gullible that they are nothing but an irresponsible mob coordinated and controlled by the super rich fat cats who own the entertainment, media and educational activities (by corporate holding companies, foundations, etc) which motivate and exercise virtual control over the voting public. 

 

Consequently, the US democracy is not really a true democracy.  It is one only in theory and something for school textbooks and gullible teachers to put into the minds of small children. 

 

As the perceptive Mark Koernke correctly noted, America is an unconstitutional dictatorship--right now! 

 

 

The American Presidents 

 

Most US presidents have been bad--either because they were personally sorry, were bought and paid for by America’s ruling plutocrats, got some tough breaks during their tenure in office, or were outright liberals and Socialists. 

 

All during the 20th century, the common problem has been that the plutocrats took over America and started electing deceitful, dishonest men to the presidency--men who had no personal loyalty to America or its people, but were instead motivated by personal gain and greed (which the plutocrats willingly provided).  The last true, pro-American president was William Howard Taft, elected in 1908. 

 

Starting with Woodrow Wilson, the money power has owned all of them outright to various degrees.  Some of them might not have fully understood how well they were controlled (like perhaps Eisenhower and Reagan).  But they were controlled and did perform as they were programmed to do.  Assuredly, Eisenhower and Reagan were very naive men in terms of what all was going on under them. 

 

As noted earlier herein, it must be said that Kennedy and Nixon both eventually woke up and tried (unsuccessfully) to break free of their bondage (as did Lincoln, in his day).  But these were isolated incidents. 

 

Otherwise, the plutocrats also elected some presidents before Taft--for example, Abe Lincoln, Ulysses Grant and others.  Teddy Roosevelt was a banker’s man, just as was FDR.  However, the 19th century presidents were not totally owned by the fat cats, as was true, starting with Wilson. 

 

Although he was personally sorry and was owned by the ruling plutocrats, one must give some credit to Warren Harding who was elected in 1920.  He came in during prohibition which was a bad break.  But to his credit, he signed the only immigration bill in American history which imposed some restrictions on the type of people flooding into this nation (in the form of the old quotas act). 

 

 

How It Works 

 

One of the best illustrations of how powerful the US plutocrats are in American politics was told by a Nixon aide at the 1968 Republican presidential nominating convention. 

 

Sometime after Richard Nixon was nominated for president, David Rockefeller had a meeting with Nixon, at Nixon’s hotel suite.  One of the points of discussion was the composition of Nixon’s cabinet on the premise that he would be elected president of the United States (as indeed did subsequently happen). 

 

The story was that Rockefeller laid out a list of certain people who he wanted in certain roles in the Nixon cabinet. 

 

The subsequent revelation of this meeting and the discussion apparently did not reflect what Nixon’s reaction was to this demand from Rockefeller.  However, it is not hard to see that in 1968-1969 Nixon obeyed the Rockefeller plutocrat and did as he was told.  In other words, the Rockefeller selected people were placed in the presidential cabinet. 

 

There always has to have been some question about the input of the Rothschild plutocrats in the Nixon election.  Manifestly, Richard Nixon was a Rockefeller Republican and was surely controlled by the Rockefeller money interests.  It is true that by 1972 Nixon had made the Amalekite Jew plutocrats mad enough that he had to go. 

 

He closed the gold window on the exchange of US paper money for gold by foreign banks (this upset the Rothschilds who are the world’s leading owners of gold); and tragically, for him, he harbored plans to move against the Jewish (correctly the Amalekite--ed) control of the US media (this point is discussed elsewhere herein). 

 

In any case, the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in the United States began moving against Nixon in early 1973, just after his installation as US president for a second term.  The Amalekites used their media powers to completely do Nixon in over the petty burglary at the Watergate complex and his efforts to lie about it. 

 

Nixon never had a chance as the “Washington Post” and other Amalekite controlled media powers constantly bombarded the public about the evils of Richard Nixon.  Soon, he was on the way out. 

 

As noted elsewhere herein, Nixon’s nickname was Tricky Dick--in comparison with the nickname Slick Willy as used for Bill Clinton.  The difference between the two was that Nixon’s evils were in the minor leagues and child’s play compared to the diabolical Clinton (who always answered to the Amalekite plutocrats). 

 

 

More History 

 

From Lincoln, and on to Taft, most of the presidents not only had ties to the money power (except for James Garfield, who was elected in 1880 and assassinated in 1881), but were not really good people.  Perhaps all of these persons were not totally subservient to the money power, as happened after the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 under Woodrow Wilson, but they had shortcomings or failures. 

 

Before Abraham Lincoln (who manifestly was deceptive and dishonest, and the first, real, live, American politician who had no personal scruples or integrity), there were a few good presidents.  Certainly, Andrew Jackson, William Henry Harrison, John Tyler and James Buchanan were good men. 

 

The Virginians (Jefferson, Madison and Monroe) were likewise good people, though they failed in dealing with the immigration problem.  Many persons persist on believing that George Washington was a good president.  And he did have some good points.  He evidently was a man of honor and integrity, but very weak as a president. 

 

Howbeit, Washington’s mistake was in letting the Amalekite Alexander Hamilton (correctly Levine) take over much of the leadership in the executive branch.  Hamilton and pro banker people in the Congress (like Vice President John Adams, who ran the Senate) were an infectious evil, which started the American path to plutocratic rule. 

 

Washington stupidly sat by and allowed the establishment of the First US Bank, plus other nefarious schemes to benefit the bankers and fat cats (some of which are described elsewhere herein). 

 

In this writer’s assessment of the bad presidents, clearly Bill Clinton was number one in being the absolute worst.  Franklin Roosevelt was number two and Abraham Lincoln was number three.  Then comes Lyndon Johnson, Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, Woodrow Wilson, “Useless” Grant, Teddy Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower--in that order. 

 

 

A February 2000 Survey 

 

A news report on Feb 21, 2000, said that one of the polling groups surveyed Americans on the best and worst presidents in American history.  The report was brief and did not go into the specifics of the sample.  Logically, it must have been a stratified sample of some sort because most Americans know nothing about any presidents, beyond the last few (who ruled while they were alive). 

 

In any case, the survey said that the number one, best president of all was Abraham Lincoln--as might be expected since Americans have been taught and programmed for years that he was virtually on the god level.  Franklin Delano Roosevelt was number two and George Washington was number three. 

 

Teddy Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Woodrow Wilson, Thomas Jefferson, John Kennedy, Dwight Eisenhower and Lyndon Johnson were next in sequence of the alleged good ones.  Tragically, James Buchanan came in last as the worst president of all.  This is quite a fluke because Buchanan was hands down far superior to most of the others rated ahead of him. 

 

Except for Washington and Jefferson, the ones rated as being the best were actually all not only political liberals (who were owned by or linked to the money power), but they were outright Socialists who were (ignorantly) dedicated to the destruction of the United States.  Moreover, the so-called “best” presidents (especially Lincoln, Wilson and FDR) were the war presidents, responsible for the death of millions. 

 

The essence of this report is that the American viewpoint is so warped that most Americans have no sense of right and wrong at all.  They look at the past histories of some of the biggest scoundrels and evil men in American history and choose them to be the best presidents.  And of the truly better presidents, they rate them at the bottom.  The American perception of right and wrong is totally warped. 

 

 

Yes, the Fight Was Lost in 1932 

 

Quite naturally, the so-called patriots (as will be discussed in a later chapter), who have had visions of “saving” America and the American people, are all just wet behind the ears.  They are almost all alone in this since the total general public is completely in favor of the status quo.  As noted throughout this publication, these would-be patriots lost their fight in 1932 with the election of Franklin Roosevelt. 

 

The liberals have had 70 years to educate little children and they have succeeded.  The modern generation is entirely different from the earlier ones at Concord, at Valley Forge, at the Alamo, at Bull Run, at Manila Bay and so forth.  The moderns know little or nothing about anything.  They don’t know, aren’t interested and don’t want to know. 

 

It’s really all over for the patriots grasping at straws since they have already lost their fight.  Yes, the fight seems to have been lost by the carnal, unconverted Americans back in 1932 with the election of the depraved Amalekite Roosevelt. 

 

So, what can one do who is concerned with the liberalism, Socialism and humanism that completely dominates modern American life? 

 

The only possible answer is education (which will be addressed in chapters to follow). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 362--Sun Worship Government Corruption

 

 

The Greeks 

 

“The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia” notes that democracies (first) flourished in the early Greek city states before finally giving way to imperialism (thus, before Alexander the Great).  Obviously, a democracy, as a form of human government, has its origin in ancient Grecian sun worship (and may link to the evolutionist Democritus, c400 BCE, cited earlier).  Naturally, they fit well into the modern, Western, sun worship culture. 

 

 

More Problems in Democracies 

 

On the surface, a democracy sounds good in the sense of man having to govern himself (outside the bounds of a legitimate theocracy).  As the January-February 2000 “Tzemach Letter” (p. 1) noted, the word democracy is based upon two Greek words--demos, meaning common people, and krateo, meaning strength or power. 

 

Thus, democracy theoretically means the empowerment of the common people.  Surely, this definition and idea would appeal to most of the common people.  But tragically, there are serious problems in the vein of what can very easily happen in a democracy.  In other words, things don’t really work out as well as they theoretically should in a democracy. 

 

Conversely, a US War Department Training Manual (No 2000-25, p. 91) defined a democracy as a “government of the masses; authority derived from mass meetings or other forms of direct expression; results in mobocracy; communistic attitude toward property (negating property rights); presence of the will of the majority to regulate whether by deliberation or passion, prejudice or impulse without regard to restraint or consequence; and results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent and anarchy.” 

 

This same War Department TM went on to discuss citizenship and a republic which is what the United States was originally organized as being.  The production date for this TM was Nov 30, 1928.  Shortly after Franklin Roosevelt took over in 1933, this 156 page manual was canceled and all copies in the US Government were ordered to be destroyed. 

 

 

And More Problems 

 

The just quoted “Tzemach Letter” (p. 1) goes on to recognize some of the same problems which were broached in the War Department Training Manual. 

 

“Tzemach” says that “The difficulty with the democratic process is that the masses are easily swayed by ungodly leaders.  This is especially true today when the media provides the possibility of cultivating an image that in no way reflects the true character and views of the individual in question.  Unscrupulous leaders make unrealistic promises to gain public support and power.  This results in the observed trend to evil in the nations.” 

 

Therefore, problems inevitably become reality in a democracy.  Collectively, people are extremely gullible and manipulative by corrupt and dishonest leaders.  Joe Six Pack and Sally Soap Opera are not exactly capable of choosing the best of anything. 

 

The failure to take action against Slick Clinton was the result of the democratic public opinion polls (and Clinton blackmail operations against members of Congress, as discussed elsewhere herein).  The prevailing love of Clinton in the democratic polls caused a fear in the Senate--precluding them from taking action against the corrupt Clinton. 

 

For sure, democracies promote “mob” rule without the restrains of right and wrong, even from the law, as just noted.  Yes, the famous lynch parties and wild mobs have always been democratic. 

 

The Scriptures have records of mob rule--when the people clamored for Aaron to make them gods to worship during the Exodus (Ex 32:1), and when the people demanded a human king to replace the theocracy (I Sam 8:4-7, 9).  A democracy is tantamount to mob rule. 

 

 

Still More Problems 

 

Since democracies are designed so that the governing politicians occasionally must shell out some benefits/dole to the voting public (in the way of jobs, money, etc), they have a tendency of promoting vast bureaucracies which grow in size over time.  The United States is a classic illustration of the continuing growth and expansion of the federal bureaucracy. 

 

Even when the people theoretically elect a conservative government to reign in the expanding bureaucracy, the result usually backfires. 

 

A good sample of this problem was highlighted in a news report in the Jan 24, 2003, “The Week” (p. 12), which focused upon the US government after two years of George W. Bush.  As this report noted-- “after two years in the Oval Office, Bush is presiding over the biggest, most expansive, federal government in history." 

 

Perhaps the biggest Bush effort to expand the US bureaucracy came in 2002 and 2003 with the new US Department of Homeland Security.  Instead of cutting bureaucratic offices, Bush has merely added new ones.  As “The Week” asked-- “What happened to conservatism?” 

 

Beyond the above obviously bad features of a democracy, there are still some more glaring problems. 

 

Tragically, democracies allow corrupt governmental administrations to materialize (as has happened in the US).  And furthermore, they allow the big money interests (who really call the shots) to take over--which means that the government becomes a type of a plutocratic democracy. 

 

 

Canada 

 

Canada, to the North of the United States, has set the pace for what has been happening all over the Christian West in terms of its human governments. 

 

The April 26, 2002, “The Week” (p. 5) had a news report from Ottawa, Canada on a poll taken to address how Canadians feel about their government.  The latest finding is that 69% of Canadians believe that their government is corrupt.  This poll followed the dumping of Alfonso Gagliano (a mixed blooded Italian?) from the Cabinet for his efforts at forcing a private company to hire his friend.  

 

The Canadian Auditor General Sheila Fraser said in her annual report that the government’s accounting practices and standards are so loose that auditors are ill-equipped to catch the government crooks operating in Canada. 

 

Former parliament member Lee Morrison said that Canadians have grown accustomed to seeing their leaders get mixed up in scandals.  He added that  politics is a waste of time.  He noted that people expect to “just see this and shrug... They expect to be screwed.” 

 

 

American Government 

 

While things are grossly bad in Canada, in fairness, the Canadians are now in the minor leagues on corruption, in comparison with how things take place South of the border in the United States. 

 

As “Prophecy Flash” observed-- “Can you imagine working at the following company?  It has a little over 500 employees with the following statistics:  29 have been accused of spousal abuse.  7 have been arrested for fraud.  19 have been accused of writing bad checks.  117 have bankrupted at least two businesses.  3 have been arrested for assault.  71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit.  14 have been arrested on drug-related charges. 

 

“8 have been arrested for shoplifting.  21 are current defendants in law suits.  In 1998 alone, 84 were stopped for drunk driving.  Can you guess which organization this is?  Give up?  It’s the members of the United States Congress.  The same group that perpetually cranks out hundreds upon hundreds of new laws designed to keep the rest of us in line” (Mar-Apr 2000 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 76). 

 

 

Corrupt and/or Sorry Politicians 

 

The power of the super rich to elect political leaders was discussed in previous chapters.  The handful of the super rich who own the giant media corporations are making a play for world government.  The only question about this motion is that there is some internal conflict in establishing the pecking order (since each person or force wants to be the world’s governor). 

 

In any case, the super rich, and almost without exception through their ownership and/or control of powerful media companies, pretty well call most of the shots of importance in laws emanating from legislatures or other branches of government. 

 

Thus, many supposedly honest legislators will ultimately bend and fail to deliver as they should for their people. 

 

Hence, this brings up another point worth considering, in the case of either a republic or limited democracy.  While it is unthinkable, the truth seems to be that many elected leaders are either corrupt or just sorry and lazy in terms of legislation that they will willingly agree to and approve. 

 

In modern America, part of the problem is that all men and women (and certainly, those men and women elected to public office) are extremely busy with multitudes of things to do (usually, in the sense of a pursuit of their personal idols and gods in life). 

 

Apparently, it is this situation which also goes to help the super rich plutocrats establish their control over a nation.  In other words, the official leaders are either corrupt and won’t stop this control or they are simply incompetent and lazy about its existence. 

 

In any case, most American legislators sit back today and do nothing about being responsible in their offices.  As will be covered in later chapters, the legal profession has taken over many legislatures and they seem to thrive upon the theory of many, many, complicated laws which only lawyers can read and interpret.  So this is part of the problem.  

 

Otherwise, there is the realty that most laws now passed by the US Congress are enormously large in size (sometimes, literally many inches thick with thousands of pages).  Obviously, the legislators that pass these laws and the presidents who sign them never read them.  This should be a clue that something is fundamentally wrong with the US system as it now operates. 

 

 

A Sample 

 

This point was well demonstrated in the Apr 3-16, 1998, “Trade N’ Save” paper in an article on “Who Controls the Idaho State Legislature” by Bill Denman.  Bill wrote that one Idaho legislator publicly reported that 25% of the bills introduced in the ID Legislature were written by legislators.  The other 75% all come from the bureaucracy and various associations. 

 

Actually, much of the governing bureaucracy is now organized (i.e. school teachers have their own unions, etc) so that there often is some overlap in this area.  But the point must be made that legislators do not prepare most of the bills.  Instead, vested interests prepare the bills and provide the push to get them enacted. 

 

When one adds in the influence of the super rich and the organizations which they dominate, coupled with their media control, it is evident that the typical person on the street has little or no influence on legislation at any level.  The politicians are all bought and paid for by special interest groups (most or all of which are controlled directly or indirectly by the plutocrats). 

 

 

Another Example 

 

The Mar-Apr 2002 “Prophecy Flash” (p. 76) had a reader’s letter and some commentary which told a most fascinating tale from the Texas legislature in the 1960s.  It seems that one of the Texas legislators became annoyed with his fellow legislators and their practice of passing bills without even reading them. 

 

Therefore, he introduced a bill “commending Mr. Albert DiSalvo for his outstanding work in population control.”  The story is that this bill passed the Texas legislature unanimously. 

 

At the time of this bill, Mr DiSalvo was on trial for a series of murders.  He was better known under his nickname-- “The Boston Strangler.” 

 

 

Alexander Fraser Tytler 

 

Before the American Revolutionary War of over 200 years ago, Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler analyzed the existing situation in the decline and fall of the Athenian Republic of some 2,000 years earlier.  He concluded that a democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government (per the “Freeman” magazine). 

 

Tytler also said that a democracy can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury.  From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury; with the result that the democracy collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a dictatorship. 

 

If there was ever a time when Tytler’s remarks struck home, it has been in the presidential campaign of 2000 where the American populous and candidates all had hopes of a victory in November 2000 to elect a successor to Bill Clinton and a successor who would restore some honor and integrity to the US government (the 2000 elections will be discussed below and in later chapters). 

 

 

More on the American Reality 

 

Since Christian Socialism and humanism took over in America with Franklin Roosevelt in 1933, most American politicians have talked good to get elected.  Most of them talk about being fiscal conservatives, and being persons frugal with the taxpayers’ moneys.  But in 2000, all of this talk changed, and especially with the Democrat candidates Al Gore and Bill Bradley. 

 

These two jokes went regularly in January, February and March 2000 to the nation’s minorities with their special appeals for votes (and it is these minorities who generally benefit the most from the welfare state and other government actions to grant privileges and special rights).  

 

Whenever Gore and Bradley debated, they each tried to outdo the other in the give-aways and in promises of more give-aways if elected.  At Black gatherings, Gore would cry and moan about what all he had done in Black welfare and special rights--like in affirmative action.  Bradley came on to brag about how much he had voted for Black welfare and/or affirmative action. 

 

At a largely Black rally in Harlem on February 21, 2000, both Gore and Bradley were trying to outdo each other on Black benefits.  When neither could subdue his opponent on Black give-aways, one of them brought up gun control (as if liberal and permissive Blacks were in favor of gun control laws). 

 

Bradley accused Gore of having a pro-gun position when he was a Senator years ago.  Of course, Gore called Bradley a liar and argued that even this year, he rushed back to Washington to break a tie breaking vote on more gun control laws. 

 

Tragically, for America, things have changed over the years (as just noted, with the Gore-Bradley tactics).  Now, the politicians are tripping all over themselves in trying to outdo their opponents in give-aways and special benefits and privileges for specific groups of minorities (Blacks, queers, women, Hispanics, etc).  The days of talking about fiscal conservatism in America are over. 

 

 

Slick Manipulated the Blacks 

 

One of the things which propelled Slick Clinton’s enormous political success, first in Arkansas and subsequently across the United States, was how he shrewdly and carefully manipulated Black people.  Very early, in his career, he recognized that Black voters would be his base of support. 

 

To be sure that the generic Africans delivered at the polls, Slick apparently realized that two things would be needed.  First, he had to be a true, liberal Democrat who would promise and deliver, where possible, massive amounts of welfare, jobs and benefits for Negroes.  The second need was huge sums of money to pay off the Black leaders (principally preachers) in order for them to get the Negro vote out. 

 

As discussed elsewhere herein, Slick turned to organized crime to provide him with a significant portion of his needed money.  Otherwise, he was always receptive to bribes, both in Arkansas and nationally.  For example, the Chinese payments of money to him during the 1996 political campaign were made for obvious later benefits to them.  Some called this treason.  But the American public didn’t care. 

 

With these huge blocks of campaign money to pay off Black preachers, and by periodically going to the Negro community to offer encouragement, speeches and talks, Slick successfully manipulated the Africans the most of any American president in history.  Bill Clinton, per his own words, says that he was the first Black president (Oct 4, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 9).  Many Blacks believed him. 

 

This Black support paid off early in 1998 during his sodomite troubles.  About the only persons who remained solidly behind Slick was his primary Black base of support.  A poll of African-Americans around Sep 1, 1998, indicated that 87% of them approved of both Slick’s job performance and morals, as opposed to 7% who disapproved. 

 

With the upcoming 1998 elections, Clinton again turned to the Negroes for them to deliver some liberal Democrat victories at the polls, which would penalize the Republicans and deter the talk of impeachment.  Clinton had the money for the necessary payoffs and the Blacks responded. 

 

 

Black Voter Fraud 

 

Many people, particularly in the American South (where significant numbers of Negroes live), have known for years that Blacks vote in blocs and essentially for the Democrats who favor the give-away programs that they benefit from.  But moreover, it is also known in the South that groups of Blacks, under their Negro leaders and preachers, commit gross voting fraud whenever possible in US elections. 

 

The way this works out is that African leaders (preachers) will gather up a busload or carload of Blacks and go to one precinct where they all vote Democrat.  Then the leader takes them to another precinct where they vote again for the same Democrat candidates.  And perhaps a third, fourth or fifth time, this same load of Blacks may get to vote again and again in different precincts. 

 

For this scam, all that is needed is a little money to pay off the Black leaders to get them pepped up to run the bus or car caravans to the polls.  If Southern White politicians speak out and condemn this vote fraud, they are immediately chastised and condemned in the controlled media as racists and White supremacists. 

 

In late October 1998, one district in Georgia proposed a solution.  They would install TV cameras at their precincts to monitor the voters.  With this film, it would have been later possible to see if some voters voted in two or more precincts. 

 

While this sounded good to a few Southern Whites (who were familiar with Black voting habits), it was immediately condemned in the controlled national media as being racist (obviously, since it would reveal Black voter fraud--which must never be allowed to happen in the politically correct, controlled society). 

 

Since Slick Clinton was and is so incredibly dishonest and crooked, there was little doubt but that he has used this Black voter fraud process many times over in his elections in Arkansas. 

 

Actually, a number of White leaders in Arkansas (including a former justice of the Arkansas State Supreme Court) have argued for years that Slick manipulated and used the huge Black population in the Mississippi Delta in Eastern Arkansas to get elected and re-elected (as suggested in the “Clinton Chronicles” video). 

 

 

Stealing Elections 

 

The public is so mesmerized with apathy and indifference that crooks like Slick Clinton have discovered that elections can easily be stolen in heavily Black and Hispanic voting areas and nothing will be done about it.  If any critic speaks out, he is immediately branded by the controlled media as a racist and White supremacist, as just noted. 

 

The public is so gullible and the media is so dishonest that it is impossible to raise any question over the culture and conduct of Blacks and Hispanics in the contemporary American culture (however dishonest and corrupt they may be). 

 

Obviously, this reality is what has been fueling the Democrat leadership in the United States to open America’s borders to as many Colored persons as possible.  The Blacks and Hispanics bloc vote for Democrats (although George W. Bush did get some Hispanic votes in Florida in 2000); and the more that come in (legally or illegally), the better it is for Democrat politicians. 

 

With disinterested officials and a could care less (controlled) media, the die is cast that more and more elections will be stolen by large blocs of particularly Negro voters (and Hispanics to a lesser degree) in the future. 

 

For the interim, it means that White political crooks like Slick Clinton (who are perfectly willing to sell the US out for votes) will benefit.  As the Colored power accelerates, more and more Black (and Hispanic) political leaders will emerge (which means a vast acceleration in Colored incompetence and corruption). 

 

 

The Modern Democrat Propensity for Fraud 

 

While it is manifestly true that both Democrats and Republicans can steal elections, in fairness, there is a difference in degrees of dishonesty and corruption.  As noted in previous comments, the more WASP types among Republicans are just not as prone for dishonesty--as is true with Edomite, Black and Hispanic Democrats.  All of them can be crooks.  It’s just that one definition tends to be worse than the other. 

 

Therefore, in modern America, the Democrats are usually the people who do the short-changing and cheating in elections (and they get away with it because the liberal, leftist, controlled media is on their side).  Primarily, this issue arises because Blacks and Amalekites, in particular (who are mostly Democrats), won’t bat an eye about committing fraud in an election (as noted earlier). 

 

It is also true that in the liberal mentality, stealing an election is no big deal.  Liberals, Socialists and humanists, by and large, are generally very secular and immoral.  Since they seem to have little or no religious scruples (which some WASPs have), and since they are so opposed to righteousness and truth, they will often do anything without any semblance of morality or concern for righteousness. 

 

The Amalekites are obviously the most immoral and dishonest of all forms of the leftist combine.  As the Amalekites are children of Satan (both mentally and spiritually), they have no qualms at all about committing fraud in democratic elections (or anything else for that matter).  In the United States, the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters own the US Democrat party for all purposes. 

 

 

Corruption Prevails 

 

Truly, in the United States, the so-called democracy has turned into a joke where crooked politicians and their plutocratic backers steal elections, right and left, and no one in authority seems to care one way or the other or do anything about it. 

 

Of course, the dilemma starts with the way the nation is set up or how it has evolved to allow powerful, super rich plutocrats to own virtually the entire media and public education systems (as is thoroughly described elsewhere herein, on how the real rulers in America call the shots on almost all questions of importance). 

 

While the above comments have focused upon the Democrats and their propensity for fraud and corruption, the point must be made again that the Republicans are also bad.  It’s just that the Republicans are miles behind the Democrats on dishonesty and stealing elections. 

 

The same conclusion can be applied to particular politicians of the two ruling parties.  Most American politicians are dishonest and will willingly sell their own constituents, family, friends and even their own mothers out to get elected.  There is simply no way to assess modern American politicians (collectively) without being sick and depressed over how utterly sorry and corrupt that they are in reality. 

 

Just as the Democrat party is the worst of the two major parties, the same thing can be generally said about Democrat politicians vis-à-vis Republican politicians.  Both peoples are pathetically evil, sorry and corrupt.  But of the two, one must acknowledge that Democrat politicians are probably the more wretched. 

 

This doesn’t mean that most Republicans are not evil.  It just means that they are not as evil as most Democrats (who are generally liberals with no sense of morality, honesty or integrity at all in their mental make-ups).  Thus, essentially, both types of politicians are bad.  But the liberal Democrats are the worst. 

 

 

Third Parties? 

 

In terms of other political parties, probably the same thing could be said for them if they actually held political power in the United States.  These small third parties are irrelevant to the political destiny of the US and her sub-components.  Since they have no role, there is no point in trying to determine how crooked that they are in comparison with the two ruling parties. 

 

Probably, right now, people of more character and honor would automatically flock to and identify with some of the small third parties (because they are substantially better than the two ruling parties).  But since they are not getting any money and support from the ruling plutocrats, there is simply the reality that most of these third parties have not yet been corrupted by money. 

 

If any of these third parties ever reach the big leagues (which they cannot ever accomplish in the present situation because the plutocrats control the current reality, and they are simply not going to allow a third party to surface and cause an impact on anything of significance), they too would become corrupted.  

 

Hypothetically speaking, if a third party did gain some power and influence, the plutocrats would bring their stacks of money in to corrupt it and its people just as they have done with the Democrats and Republicans. 

 

In the present US democracy, it is simply impossible to avoid the reality that the plutocrats really call the political shots (through their ownership and/or control of the national media and their influence over the education system, primarily by their large tax-exempt foundations). 

 

 

Despotism/Dictatorship in the Oligarchy 

 

This evolution of two powerful primary political parties (which are ruled from behind the scenes by a handful of super rich plutocrats), to rule the destiny of the United States, has created a situation where the United States has become a “oligarchy,” in that rulership exists with the few (Oct-Dec 2002 “Hebrew Roots,” p. 4). 

 

Not only has America sat back and allowed an oligarchy to develop (where rulership is in the hands of a few), but this same system has evolved to be a despotic system, in that the rulership has unlimited and absolute power (ibid, p. 4).  In a sense, the despotism exists in a form of a dictatorship--in that the dictators make the rules and no one can oppose them. 

 

 

Some History 

 

In 1903, a boy was born into the Dillinger family on a farm about 20 miles South of Indianapolis, Indiana.  His given name was John and he was to eventually provide some interesting and valuable insight on how the American system works. 

 

By the time of the roaring twenties, young John Dillinger had turned out to be a petty, small-time, two-bit crook.  With the arrival of the thirties, John Dillinger had graduated into being a higher class thief by becoming a bank robber (and a murderer as well because he did kill two or more people over the years). 

 

In those days in Americana, the previously discussed J. Edgar Hoover, Director of the FBI, developed quite a reputation for focusing the federal operations on these petty bank robbers. 

 

J. Edgar was never concerned with the organized crime syndicates of the real gangsters and criminals--like the Amalekite Jewish, Irish and Sicilian networks (plus, the petty crooks were much easier to catch than the more professional, organized criminals). 

 

As pointed out earlier, Hoover always maintained that there was no organized crime in America (perhaps because the Mob had some revealing photos of him and his companion, Deputy FBI Director Clyde Anderson Tolson, engaged in a homosexual act).  But J. Edgar was not about to let some small time hood (like Dillinger) get away with robbing banks. 

 

As is well known in America, the two most dastardly and horrible crimes of all (nationally) are the murder of a law enforcement officer and the robbing of a bank.   When a person kills a cop, the act demonstrates an action of defiance and rebellion against the Big Brother state. 

 

Obviously, the state is most concerned about throwing the book at people who might become rebellious and oppose its actions (which include the establishment of the New World Order in the present environment). 

 

As far as bank robbers, they have to be vigorously pursued because they would dare presume to rip off the banks that are owned by the plutocrats.   It’s no big deal that a small time hood would rob a local liquor or convenience store.  But it becomes a major criminal transgression when the same hood dares to rob a bank. 

 

 

The End of Dillinger 

 

Thus, J. Edgar Hoover knew where his bread was buttered.  He was in no mood to take on the likes of Meyer Lansky, Carlos Marcello and so forth.  But J. Edgar went after people like Dillinger with a vengeance.  Consequently, Dillinger quickly had the nation’s entire police powers after him when be became a bank robber (as also happened with Bonnie & Clyde, Pretty Boy Floyd, Machine Gun Kelly, etc). 

 

With this enormous police focus on John, it wasn’t long before he was arrested and put in a local Indiana jail.  While there, Dillinger shrewdly used a block of wood, a carving knife and some shoe polish to make himself a toy gun.  He proceeded to use the toy gun and break from jail.  This event caused quite an uproar in the media.  John Dillinger received much notoriety and became public enemy number one (per the FBI). 

 

Some time passed and Dillinger’s bank robbing gang was wiped out. 

 

But John Dillinger, himself, got away and fled to Chicago.  He was in Chicago in 1933 and 1934 when the famous (or infamous, however he was to be characterized) Melvin Purvis was a senior agent in the Chicago FBI office trying to track down Dillinger (like his boss Hoover, Purvis was not concerned with the real big time gangsters.  His effort was on trying to catch petty crooks). 

 

Dillinger was holed up in early 1934 with his girl friend Pauline Hamilton.  It was too bad for Dillinger, but Pauline had a girl friend named Anna Sage, who was in a conflict with US immigration authorities. 

 

Apparently, Anna contacted the FBI in an effort to ameliorate her immigration problems.  She told the bureau that she, Pauline and Dillinger were going to the Biograph Theater on July 22, 1934, and that she would be wearing a red dress.  So Purvis and his gang of FBI agents set up a trap for Dillinger at the Biograph on Lincoln Avenue that hot, steamy, July day. 

 

Whereas Dillinger had been keeping a low profile and staying in his room, he actually ventured out that day to see a movie called “Manhattan Melodrama” with Clark Gable and William Powell.  After watching the film, the three people left the theater and were accosted by Purvis at a near-by alleyway on Lincoln Avenue.  Dillinger was shot dead by a stream of FBI bullets. 

 

This background on the crook John Dillinger brings up the subject of the film that he wanted to see. 

 

 

“Manhattan Melodrama” 

 

The movie was about two men who had been close friends for many years, going back to their childhoods.  Powell was the honest, straight as an arrow, good man while Gable was a petty, two bit crook who ran a gambling hall. 

 

In time, the Gable character murdered a couple of people and was fully prosecuted for the second killing (where the evidence was conclusive, in contrast to a lack of evidence in the first killing) by his boyhood friend Powell (who just happened to be the local District Attorney). 

 

The prosecutor won his case and was elected Governor of New York (perhaps because he was shown to be a man of some integrity when he fully prosecuted his own boyhood friend).  The conviction came down for the friend to die in the Sing Sing electric chair. 

 

After winning the Governor’s race, the question of a commutation of sentence for his boyhood friend came up.  Again, proving that he was as straight as an arrow, the Governor refused to commute the sentence of his life long friend.  His friend was then set to die in the chair. 

 

Later, it developed that some information came to the Governor on why his crooked friend murdered his victim.  As it turned out, the Gable character murdered the guy because he was causing trouble for his best friend, the prosecutor. 

 

Just hours before the convicted murderer was to die in the chair, the Governor went to see his friend and offered to commute the sentence.  The friend turned him down cold and died that night. 

 

The Governor then reacted in a most peculiar way (peculiar by the standards of modern American politicians).  He went before a joint session of the New York legislature and told the background on what all had happened and his willingness, in the end, to use his office to grant a personal favor to his friend (by commuting his death sentence). 

 

Accordingly, the Governor resigned his office as Governor because he felt that he had dishonored his office of trust. 

 

 

The Essence Here 

 

The essence of this fictional story is that it was a contrast between two men--one crooked as a snake and the other straight as a telephone poll.  The straight man routinely pushed all of his personal feelings, wishes and benefits aside to do his duty as required by law. 

 

Yet, the straight man, weakened in a moment of emotion, was prepared to sell his conscious and honor out to help his friend.  As it turned out, this sell-out was avoided.  But instead of letting the event pass him, and in a way that would have been unnoticed by the general public, his conscience surfaced again to make him do a most unusual thing. 

 

In the end, he confessed all and honorably resigned as the Governor of New York.  If he had not made his public declaration, no one would be the wiser (except The MOST HIGH).  In human lingo, he could have easily beat the rap. 

 

While there was nothing in the movie to suggest any real sense of religion in the way that things worked out, it is manifestly clear that if a person was truly religious, he would have had to react just as the good guy did in publicly confessing his sin and failure. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

Now, the question must come up.  Who, among modern American politicians, would react as the good guy did in this 1934 movie?  Frankly, it is inconceivable that any modern American politician would do as this man did in publicly humiliating himself in order to make righteousness prevail. 

 

In truth, most American politicians would have sold out justice in the very beginning.  And certainly, they would never publicly confess their sins and shortcomings. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 363--The 2000 US Sun Worship Elections

 

 

The US Crisis

 

Both of the major US parties are grossly immoral, vulgar and repulsive from the standpoint of righteousness, integrity, honor and character.  Manifestly, the liberal, leftist Democrats are the worst of the two (as they are more directly controlled by the evil Amalekite bankers/masters, who are basically immoral).  Truly, the Democrats are especially reprehensible and depraved (although the Republicans are not far behind). 

 

While most of the candidates in all of the elections are called Christians (or at least, they call themselves Christians), they are far removed from historic Christianity and certainly from the righteousness of YHWH’s Torah.  Most of them (especially the liberals) are about as immoral, depraved and wretched as a bunch of pathetic ally cats.  Yet, they hypocritically claim to be moral and good people. 

 

As has been true for ages in America, the two main parties (the Democrats and the Republicans) froze out all other political alternatives in 2000 so that generally only Bush and Gore were on the ballots and at issue.  The other parties and candidates were essentially non-issues in the American political context. 

 

Thus, Americans really had no choice in the 2000 elections.  But the gullible voters believed that they had a choice.  So this kept the system together until election day on November 7th. 

 

These lines are being written in 2003--after the 2000 election.  Candidates like Bush, Gore, Buchanan, Nader and the others had been off and running for many months.  And as had been the US practice for ages, the two primary parties pretty well wrapped up the election for themselves. 

 

But as noted earlier, a problem developed because Gore won the popular vote and Bush won the electoral vote (because of winning Florida).  With this dilemma, a number of Democrats claimed that there were irregularities in the election and especially in Palm Beach, Florida (with numbers of Amalekite and Black Democrats). 

 

 

The Florida Mess, Revisited

 

The Florida crisis was briefly noted in prior chapters.  But it needs further comment at this time.  After the first count in Florida, the state conducted a second count which made some important changes in the statistics, but did not change the overall Bush win.  Thence, Democrats complained about “voting irregularities” in selected Democrat counties. 

 

Specifically, Gore complainants charged that officials in Palm Beach County (who were Democrats in a largely Democrat county) used a bad ballot form which resulted in a throw out of 19,000 ballots because those ballots reportedly contained presidential votes for two candidates (but Bush proponents noted that this was not unusual because some 15,000 ballots were double voted in the preceding election).  

 

Allegations also persisted that some people there voted mistakenly for Pat Buchanan when they thought that they were voting for Gore (although the question must be asked--how is it possible that people can know that they voted for the wrong man in a de-facto situation without looking at their ballots and the reality that they had a different belief in the voting booth, as they looked at and punched their ballots?). 

 

Next, complications arose because the ballots had been designed for machine counting with the voters instructed to punch out perforated chads.  However, some chads were not punched out by voters.  Some were partially punched or only slightly dimpled, indented, marked or smeared (thus, a question--was the voter incompetent or did he change his mind and decide to not vote for president?). 

 

Thus, Gore and his Democrat supporters decided that the three largely Democrat counties in South Florida should be allowed to recount their votes manually (with the Democrat officials allowed discretionary authority on how they would interpret and count the votes). 

 

Since these chosen counties were overwhelmingly Democrat (with limited Republicans), it meant that Gore statistically stood to pick up a large number of new votes. 

 

Finally, when the overseas ballots came in by mail, it was discovered that many US military post offices (especially Naval ships at sea) had failed to post mark ballots of US service people.  Accordingly, Democrat counties disallowed and threw out some 1,500 of those ballots.  Since most military people were substantially for Bush, the throw out decision benefited Gore significantly. 

 

 

The Fall-Out 

 

The essence of the problem was that the Democrats maintained that Democrat county officials in three heavily Democrat counties reserved the right to manually check all of the ballots and make decisions (speculate) upon the “intent” of the voter.  Naturally, Bush disagreed and the FL Secretary of the State maintained that the counties had to have their vote tallies in within seven days by FL law.  So the issue went to court. 

 

The Democrat appointed Florida Supreme Court held for Gore (as described in a prior chapter).  This allowed the Democrats to have access to the ballots in the three heavily Democrat counties and to massage them--almost however they chose.  FL Secretary of State Katherine Harris was ordered to accept new vote totals from these counties, per a court-designated, new, deadline date. 

 

Thereupon, this problem went to the US Supreme Court (where the decision was vacated temporarily, as discussed in a former chapter). 

 

Of the three Democrat counties, one abandoned its hand recount plans for lack of time; another made its recount, but did not meet the deadline; and the third finished and got its totals to Harris in accordance with the deadline.  With the new totals, Bush was still the winner.  So the Secretary of State certified Bush the winner in Florida.  Gore was unhappy and commenced several new court actions to fight on. 

 

The stream of Democrat complaints made the Republicans take a second look and note that they, too, could complain over the vote count processes in Wisconsin, Oregon, Iowa and New Mexico (though the Republicans later failed to follow-up in those states).  Within days, the whole nation was in a turmoil.  There was even open hostilities and confrontations between many Republicans and Democrats. 

 

After several court actions (going both ways), the FL Supreme Court ruled again for more hand counts (as noted in a prior chapter).  This action also went to the US Supreme Court for a stay (discussed earlier)--because of questions about a lack of a standard for counting votes (as discussed in a prior chapter).  It was remanded back to the Florida Supreme Court (which dropped the matter, after Gore conceded). 

 

While the election seemed settled in mid December of 2000, there were still some potential problems which could devolve it to the US Congress.  The problem there was a mess too because the Republicans controlled the House and the Senate was tied (but was effectively controlled by the Democrats with the ability of Vice President Gore to break any tie breaking votes for the time being while he was still Vice-President). 

 

Slick Clinton got in on the action when his GSA Administrator initially said that she would not recognize the Bush win for purposes of facilities or money for a Republican transition team.  Since the election problem dragged on and on, it meant that Slick would have some opportunity to regain the presidency in the future (by a new constitution, as dissatisfaction over the electoral college spread among the people). 

 

 

More From Florida 

 

It is significant that the complaints in Palm Beach, Florida arose because Democrats believed that they were short-changed (despite the fact that county officials were Democrats themselves).  Naturally, the leftist media went wild to report on this event.  

 

This is interesting because at least one or more witnesses allegedly saw one of the Palm Beach election officials (an activist-Democrat woman, evidently named Ms Roberts, who had worked for Gore) in Palm Beach busy punching out candidate boxes on a stack of Palm Beach ballots just after the election was over.  One of the witnesses actually filed a lawsuit in Palm Beach County over this act of alleged fraud. 

 

A few days later (on Nov 15th), another one of the leading Democrat officials (Irving Slosberg, who was a likely Amalekite and also who just happened to be a Democrat legislator and activist in Palm Beach County) was found to be carrying a “Votamatic” machine in his automobile by the Palm Beach Police (first reported on ABC News and discussed on the Nov 16, 2000, G. Gordon Liddy Radio Talk Show). 

 

The machine was one that was made to punch out the chads on the Florida ballots.  Interestingly, every time Democrat officials gained access to the ballots, a quantity of the small chads would, all of a sudden, appear on the floor.  One Palm Beach, Democrat, woman official was actually accused of eating some chads (to keep them from being found). 

 

It was unclear whether Slosberg had used his machine on the Palm Beach ballots or not (and naturally, the local Democrat officials refused to press charges against him). 

 

A caller on Liddy’s program suggested that maybe Irving was responsible for the 19,000 ballots that had the two votes for president.  Thus, is it possible that Irving used his machine to punch out a vote for Gore on ballots marked for Bush or others to cause the double punches and thus disqualify the ballot?  Of course, this would help Gore.   

 

 

Black Ingenuity in Florida in 2000 

 

The 2000 elections also offered a unique opportunity for Black Democrats to try to steal that election more easily than having to use Black preachers to bus in loads of Black voters to vote at several different precincts.  The just discussed voting mess in Florida revealed that in heavily Democrat areas, a new twist has entered the arena to allow massive Black Democrat vote fraud by easier and more practical methods. 

 

Palm Beach County, Florida has a huge number of Negroes who claimed (after the Bush victory on Nov 7, 2000) that their votes were not counted.  It was unclear how they knew that their votes were not counted.  But the gullible American public was mesmerized by the controlled media to accept that fact.  So Jesse Jackson and the NAACP rushed into Palm Beach to stir up the fire. 

 

Some four days after the voting, a whole box of uncounted votes was allegedly discovered in one of the Black churches.  The Africans alleged that this box of ballots was not picked up by county election authorities for counting.  Of course, the Blacks blamed the White officials (who were, in fact, Democrats) for the neglect. 

 

However, something surfaced in the news reports which disclosed the ridiculous profile which the gullible, stupid, American voters have allowed themselves to get into in the past several years because of the pathetic sick approach that Americans have adopted in addressing any questions over race and Africans. 

 

Per the news reports, some or all areas of Florida allowed county election officials to establish voting booths/precincts in Black churches in Black neighborhoods (this is where one of the alleged “lost” boxes of votes surfaced).  By authorizing Blacks to vote at Black churches (under the supervision of Black officials), the door was opened for massive, new, vote fraud. 

 

With control over the precincts/voting booths, there was no need for Black preachers to bus Blacks all over the county in order to vote at several different precincts.  Things were enormously simplified.  And as always, if White people complained over this new methodology of Black voter fraud, the controlled media could and would holler and scream about the complainants being racists and White supremacists. 

 

The common reality of Black voter fraud should alert anyone with brains above the idiot state that there are inherent problems and fraud chances when Blacks gain political control at the governmental level.  When Negroes are the people in charge of state/county election offices and/or when numbers of Negroes are employed in county election offices, the opportunities for fraud and incompetence grossly accelerate. 

 

Please understand that this writer is not indicting 100% of all Blacks of being dishonest and crooked in US elections.  No!  All Blacks are not corrupt or incompetent.  It’s just that a significant percentage and/or most of them are.  In fact, there are reasons to believe that there are only a very few Negroes who are competent and/or honest.  There aren’t many.  But assuredly, there seems to be a few. 

 

All Blacks are not automatically stupid, born illegitimate, on welfare or in jail.  There are some around who are not (though most Black children are now being born illegitimately and most young Black males are either in jail or on parole). 

 

Conversely, all WASPs (White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants) are not automatically honest and competent.  Some of these people are also duds or crooks.  But the numbers of WASP crooks/duds are much smaller, percentage-wise, in their population, as compared with Blacks, Amalekites, Hispanics and other peoples with heavy Edomite and/or Black genes (like Southern Europeans, Southern Asians, etc).  

 

 

The Problem of Counting the Vote 

 

Besides the outright purchase of Black and Hispanic votes, there were a couple of other issues on voting problems in 2000 which must also be acknowledged (although these occurrences did not necessarily link solely to Blacks and Hispanics, per se, since they were generally controlled and/or promoted by diabolical Amalekites). 

 

Essentially, votes are no longer hand counted at all.  Some use Votamatic tabulators.  Others are counted and compiled by computers equipped with cellular telephony and two way modems and other electronic equipment (most of which today are designed and sold by one company-- “Elections Systems & Software, Inc”). 

 

Theoretically, a machine would produce a more accurate and reliable count than a hand count.  Hand counts can allow unintended arithmetic mistakes and especially open the door to outright fraud and corruption in juggling the results by polling authorities (either on individual ballots or overall results).  The sharp fingernails of election officials can also do wonders on ballots with perforated chads! 

 

Since Blacks and Amalekites are prone to acts of fraud and dishonesty, it is like letting the foxes into the henhouse when the ballots are turned over to them to control and count.  Election officials and vote counters in many Democrat counties are Blacks or Amalekites, who are quite anxious to undertake fraudulent acts to elect a Democrat.  This is much of the problem in Florida in the counties which chose to do hand counts. 

 

Though one might make the case that Republicans can also steal elections, the problem is not so great with hand counts in Republican counties because most of the Republicans are WASPs (White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants).  WASPs are simply not as susceptible to outright mistakes, fraud and corruption, as are Blacks. 

 

Of course, the Amalekites are the most evil of all because they are masters at deception.  It’s not that there are many Amalekites in low level jobs charged with counting votes.  But they often are the people in charge which gives them a definite advantage in fixing elections.  So stealing an election is no big deal for an Amalekite. 

 

 

Machine Count Problems 

 

But there are also problems with machine counts.  The Nov 12, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 1, 21) had a lead story by Christopher Bollyn on “Manufacturers Admit Voting Machines Unreliable” which said that the machine failure rates ranged from 16 to 28%.  Tests of tens of thousands of ballots used in the state of Illinois from 1983 to 1987 indicated that the Illinois error rate was 20%. 

 

One official said that at one time the rate was 28% and nobody cared.  Rick Fulle, assistant director of Illinois voting systems, noted that “Nothing in (Illinois) law required that the count be accurate.”  As Bollyn concluded, US voting officials have been unconcerned about the problem. 

 

Howbeit, mistakes are only part of the machine problem.  There are still other issues in the context of fraud.  An earlier Sep 11, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 1, 10) had a story by Christopher Bollyn on “Votescam Activists Want Honest Elections” which told of the work of a watchdog group which was concerned that US elections could be rigged by manipulating the computer counting process. 

 

The well known Howard Phillips, of the US Constitution Party, has publicly charged that US vote fraud is not now the exception.  Instead, it is the rule.  A private corporation, Voter News Service of New York City, now compiles all of the vote results and reports them to the media.  This company alone could elect the candidate of its choice.  A possible Amalekite named Lee C. Shapiro heads this service. 

 

Furthermore, much election fraud can involve the Mob.  Albeit here, one must remember that the Mob is totally in the hands of powerful Amalekite Jew bankers/masters at the top levels (as outlined earlier). 

 

As outlined in a former chapter, Texe Marrs reports that three private companies do all the maintenance and repairs on all of the voting machines used in the US and that the Mafia owns these three companies.  Who knows when and how it can, does and will alter these machines in some way to produce illegal results.  Since the Mafia is in the hands of the Amalekites, this reality paints a horrible picture for American elections. 

 

One of the major players in the voting machine business is a company called Electronic Systems and Software, as cited above.  This is a Omaha, Nebraska company which, strangely enough, is partly owned by US Senator Chuck Hagel, a Republican who attends many of the super-secret Bilderberg meetings (per Christopher Bollyn, in the Nov 18, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 1, 14-15). 

 

This Omaha outfit claims that it counted 100 million ballots in the 2000 elections and 56% of the vote in the last four presidential elections (ibid, p. 1).  Like Josef Stalin once said--He who votes decides nothing, while he who counts the ballots decides everything (my paraphrase!). 

 

Moreover, as Bollyn reported in his November 12th article, the internal modems in (some) machines “enables anyone with a modern-equipped computer, from hackers and vendors to telephone company personnel and politicians, to access and alter the computer’s tally of the votes.”  As “Spotlight” noted, this is “particularly troubling.”  Palm Beach, Florida actually shut down its Internet site on Nov 10th for fear of hackers. 

 

Former FBI Bureau Chief Ted Gunderson suggests that voter fraud has now become so common and routine in American elections that authorities are no longer interested in investigating it and the controlled media largely ignores it (video “Ted Gunderson Chronicles”).  This is especially true if there is evidence of voter fraud involving Blacks. 

 

Add this condition to the extensive use of voter machines, which can be deceptively manipulated from behind the scenes, and it is evident that major problems have developed in the honesty and integrity of American elections.  Maybe this mess was just waiting to explode.  And perhaps it has exploded, in the context of what happened in the 2000 elections. 

 

 

Routine Democrat Vote Fraud 

 

Per former comments herein, Democrats like Slick Clinton, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson and others absolutely owe their elections to Democrat fraud.  Heavy Democrat areas routinely have numbers of dead people voting in many elections anyway.  It is said that some Democrat precincts hold out their vote results until last in some states so that they will know how many fraudulent votes they need to report. 

 

This is evidently what happened in Illinois in 1960.  The whole state went massively for Richard Nixon.  The Chicago vote was held up until last.  By the time that the Mob and the Democrat machine reported Chicago results, Kennedy won the state of Illinois with 9,000 votes to spare.  Many Republicans argued that once the Chicago Mob knew how many Democrat votes they needed to win Illinois, they illegally produced them. 

 

Chicago vote fraud has continued over the years and was apparently present in 2000.  A story by Fred Lingel on “Head of Reform Group Decries Election Fraud” in the Mar 12, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 3) mentioned the findings of Christopher Bollyn (a “Spotlight” writer, quoted above).  Lingel cited Bollyn’s efforts which suggested that the Cook County votes were manipulated again in 2000 (as has happened in prior years). 

 

Bernalilo County, NM (where Albuquerque is located and the home of many Hispanics) is notorious for always being last in turning in their vote totals.  Voter corruption there is acknowledged by many. 

 

In the 2000 elections, Bush was slightly ahead in the NM state count (by a handful of votes) and another strong Hispanic county got into the act by claiming that they had mistakenly read the number 100 on a Gore tally sheet while the correct number was 600 for Gore.  This alleged “correction” threw Gore ahead in the overall vote tally and gave the Gore-Lieberman team the electoral votes for the state of New Mexico. 

 

Black and Hispanic officials, church leaders and people are notorious for committing voter fraud and getting away it (because the gullible Whites are afraid to speak out for fear of being called racists and White supremacists, as noted earlier). 

 

The fall out of this reality is that once ballots have been turned over to Black, Hispanic or Amalekite Democrat officials, there is a high probability that the ballots will be fraudulently manipulated and altered in some manner to insure a Democrat victory in that county or area.  This racial profile in New York combined in 2000 to insure that Hillary Clinton and the Democrats won there through massive fraud (as is now known). 

 

 

The “American Sentinel” 

 

The Apr 2001 “American Sentinel” (p. 8) had a report on the latest scheme of Blacks and Democrats to produce major acts of fraud to insure the election of people committed to the ideas, aspirations and goals of Colored Americans. 

 

Specifically, the NAACP and the Congressional Black Caucus have been pushing the George W. Bush people to initiate action to federalize vote counting in America.  Such an action would remove any semblance remaining of state authority over the US voting practices.  Once this happens, guess what the Amalekite bankers/masters can do with the votes all over the United States? 

 

Otherwise, there is a push in some states to require a valid form of identification from each prospective voter before allowing the person to vote.  Quite naturally, the Blacks and Democrats are fundamentally opposed to such a scheme (which really would stop some voter fraud--as is commonly done by Blacks, Hispanics and Democrats). 

 

This voter ID plan has drawn sharp fire from the African-American Coalition for Empowerment which charges that the plan is a “white plot” to create a hardship for the poor and people of color in the United States.  As the “American Sentinel” concluded--Democrats are not afraid of voter fraud.  Instead, they are protective of it. 

 

 

The After-Effect in Florida 

 

The fraud and corruption in Florida prompted the Miami-Dade County election authorities to hire poll monitors to watch out for voting irregularities in South Florida during the 2002 elections (Oct 25, 2002, “The Week,” p. 6).  Such poll watchers usually only work in developing countries (yes, in Colored Third World states).  This move shows how incredibly sick things are now in America. 

 

 

Gore Learned From Slick 

 

One of the grossly vile and evil acts of Clinton was to gather critical information upon his opponents and then use the resulting hostile information to intimidate, threaten and blackmail the people opposing him.  Other presentations herein describe this Clinton MO and how successful Slick was able to blackmail and intimidate much of the US Congress during his impeachment and trial. 

 

Now, evidence has surfaced that Gore picked upon this same practice, as discussed on the G. Gordon Liddy radio talk show on Nov 17, 2000, and in various news reports.  Gore spent some time and effort at compiling dossiers of critical information on a number of the Bush electors in various states (if Al should have wanted their votes). 

 

These people could be particularly susceptible to later coercion, blackmail; and if necessary, bribery (if desired by the powers that be).  The option that some Bush electors could vote for Gore was discussed at some length in portions of the media during the days immediately following the Nov 7th election. 

 

And interestingly, there were some telephone calls and feelers sent out to some of the electors, trying to determine if they indeed would abandon Bush for Gore.  These telephone calls and contacts could have been especially revealing in the context of trying to determine who would be a good candidate to accept a bribe to change his/her vote.  Of course, the blackmail threat was the strongest tool of all. 

 

Reports have also surfaced claiming that the Gore people had been busy compiling a dossier on Katherine Harris, Republican Secretary of State of the state of Florida.  She was a strong Bush supporter.  Significantly, she declared that counties would have to abide by state law and turn their vote tallies in before the selected Democrat counties had time to finish their manual recounts. 

 

Accordingly, the Gore camp launched an investigation into her life to gather as much bad information as possible (which could be later used to blackmail or intimidate her).  Thereupon, the Democrat Florida Supreme Court twice stepped in and ruled that Harris would have to accept hand recounts by new court appointed deadlines. 

 

 

The Role of Slick 

 

This backdrop opens the door to the crisis which developed in the US in the 2000 elections.  Did Slick somehow set this mess up so that he could stay on or regain power as US President?  That question will be addressed in later chapters.  For now, the point must be made that Clinton and/or his Amalekite bankers/masters/handlers very likely had a major role to play in what happened in the 2000 elections. 

 

In mentioning this situation, this writer consistently could not believe that Slick Clinton was going to leave office in January 2001.  This man is extremely dangerous.  Even now, he seems to be planning and manipulating events to regain power at the UN or in the US if a new constitution can be enacted or with a Hillary presidency or vice-presidency (as was noted in the Prologue). 

 

 

Politics and the Christian Right 

 

The so-called “Moral Majority,” under the leadership of Jerry Falwell and some of the other big time Christian religious hypocrites, has had some pressure on the Republicans--particularly over the abortion question.  Accordingly, presidential candidate Bush saw fit to try to reach out to some of the Christian leaders to try to solidify them as his supporters. 

 

During the 2000 campaign, Bush spoke at Bob Jones University and put in an appearance at Falwell’s Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia.  Assuredly, Bush had been trying to woo and court the Christian right for some time (just as other important Republican candidates have done the same thing in prior elections for the last 20 years). 

 

The whole question has been virtually moot for decades now, as far as the Democrats are concerned.  Under Amalekite Jew leadership and control, the Democrat party has become so incredibly vile, corrupt and evil (in its strong positions on promoting abortions, homosexuality, fornication and sexual permissiveness, drugs, murder and on and on) that they have largely abandoned the Christian right years ago. 

 

 

Now, the Fluke 

 

Despite this historic profile of the two parties, things seemed to have changed briefly in 2000 for some strange and unclear reason. 

 

True, in 2000, George W. Bush made his anticipated pitch as a good Christian, seeking the votes of the other “good Christians.”  Hence, early on in 2000, Bush went on record and stated that his favorite philosopher and most admired person in history was “Jesus Christ.”  Soon, Bush said he was “born again.” 

 

Something motivated Gore to also decide to go after the Christian votes.  Though Gore has been a New Age, Gaia worshipper (of mother earth) for some years, all of a sudden, he, too, decided that he was a “born again” Christian. 

 

 

The Boy Scouts at the Democrat Convention 

 

At the Democrat convention, in August 2000, the Gore people actually brought a number of Eagle Scouts to the podium to present to the people in the vein that the Democrat party has found some measure of integrity, character, morals, honor and so forth (as historically associated with the Boy Scouts). 

 

However, the Boy Scouts have historically refused to accept homosexual scout masters and turn the pedophile ideas of the faggots loose on a bunch of innocent, young boys.  As outlined in former chapters on sodomy and sodomite Americans, the conflict that the Boy Scouts has had with the queers has been serious (as highlighted and commented upon earlier).

 

So, when the Gore people invited and presented some Eagle Scouts to the Democrat convention, the queer Democrats and their leftist colleagues (under the control of perverted Amalekite bankers/masters) massively booed the Boy Scouts off of the podium (Sep 4, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2).  The Democrat delegates carried signs which said that “We Support Gay Scouts.” 

 

So while the New Age Gore had been trying to strike a new profile of being religious, his buddies in the immoral, dishonest and corrupt Democrat party were still up to their old tactics of immorality and depravity. 

 

 

The Lieberman Choice, Revisited 

 

As discussed earlier, Al Gore selected Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman as his running mate.  The faggot Lieberman is supposedly an Orthodox Jew and a man of religious character, morals and integrity.  Perhaps Gore thought that some of these alleged good attributes would rub off on him and detract from his history of depravity and evil and particularly while a part of the Slick Clinton administration. 

 

However, it does not take much of an examination of the man Lieberman to realize that he is as corrupt, evil and depraved as any other major politician (except perhaps for Slick Clinton who is the most corrupt and wicked of all).  In any case, Lieberman has delivered by constantly talking about “God” and morality, as if he is as good as the Christians in the moral majority. 

 

But even Lieberman’s constant talk about “God” and morality is really quite hypocritical, as far as the left wing, controlled media is concerned.  The Amalekite bosses have worked for ages to get Americans to completely abandon such talk.  And earlier, when Bush tried it, the media bombed him ferociously.  Now, Lieberman came out and talked daily about “God.”  But he is an Amalekite and can get away with it. 

 

Interestingly, the Amalekite bankers/masters and their janissary allies returned to form when John Ashcroft appeared before the Senate for his confirmation hearings on being Attorney General (as noted elsewhere herein).  The leftists did their best to nail him to the wall because of his religious convictions.  Obviously, an Amalekite seeking votes (like Lieberman) could talk about religion and “God,” but not a sincere Christian. 

 

 

Democrats Get Religion? 

 

Jerry Falwell’s paper, the “National Liberty Journal” for September 2000, had a front page story on “The Democrats Get Religion” (p. 1, 3) by J. M. Smith--which assessed Gore’s turn to Christendom and his attempts to put on a Christian face of morality, honor and integrity (which is something that the typical Democrat has little or nothing of). 

 

As Smith wrote, Gore’s extremist agenda on abortion, homosexuality, globalism and other issues would make it very difficult for him to attract conservative voters, despite the efforts of the (controlled--ed) media to present Lieberman as a moderate. 

 

Among the other candidates, perhaps Phillips (of the Constitutional Party) and Buchanan (a fairly religious Catholic of the Reform Party) probably were the most moral of the crowd--and they had plenty of problems in the vein of their Christian religion. 

 

The other Reform candidate, John Hegelin, was supposedly a Christian.  But he was really in the world of Hinduism and the occult.  John was a proponent of Transcendental Meditation which he said is now “mainstream” in America (“Newsweek,” Sep 4, 2000, p. 4). 

 

 

Christians Will Support Them 

 

What it boils down to is that the whole American political crowd was/is a bunch of hypocrites and frauds.  Except for Buchanan and Phillips (who may have had a little character), the rest of them were as sorry as can be.  While they talked and frothed at the mouth about being good Christians, it was hard to imagine that any Christian with any brains at all would support any individual in this group of deceitful crooks. 

 

Yet, the truth is the American Christian population did generally vote for either Bush or Gore (just as they largely voted for Slick Clinton in 1992 and 1996).  It looks like the Christians would have had enough perception to realize that they were being suckered by the major candidates with all of the talk about righteousness and being born again.  But they never seemed to get it at all. 

 

The truth is that all of the major candidates were as sorry as they could be (except for possibly Buchanan and Phillips, to some extent.  But Buchanan and Phillips received very few votes at the polls).  

 

 

Bearing Responsibility, Revisited 

 

It looks like the Christian majority in America (who have historically been in a position to elect the American presidents, since George Washington in 1788) would eventually wake up and start voting for righteousness, character and integrity.  But they don’t.  They vote for the status quo under the guidance and leadership of very evil Amalekite bankers/masters (who have been calling the US election shots for years now). 

 

With all these years that the Christian majority has been electing such sorry people, it looks like that the corrupt preachers (who really are the most guilty of all, as discussed herein) would tell their followers about their responsibilities when they vote for sin and sinners, but they don’t (as has been the Christian practice for many, long years). 

 

Yes, the voters seem to carry moral responsibility when they elect an evil man to government leadership (as noted earlier).  Why can’t Christians wake up and accept this responsibility.  If the people they elect are corrupt and sorry (like President Slick Clinton), then the people who voted for them must share in the guilt and sin.  Thus, the people who elect them seem responsible for their wickedness, murder and depravity. 

 

This point should not be too complicated.  But for some reason, Christian Americans never want to take any responsibility for the corrupt political leaders which they choose.  They want to close their eyes and go on about their business, as if it is not their fault that America’s leaders are evil (though they voted for them and elected them).  Why won’t Christians accept reasonability for their mistakes?  But they won’t. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 364--YHWH’s Sovereignty in Government

 

 

The Early Monarchies 

 

While theoretic democracies have prevailed in much of the Christian West nations in the 20th and early 21st centuries, this was not always the case in history in most of the world. 

 

Actually, the present Western democracies are a fairly new phenomenon on the world scene (beyond ancient Greece; and of course, Rome, which was originally a republic before giving way to democratic pressures).  Very early, in time, monarchies became the more prevalent forms of government, long before the world went crazy with the idea of democracy. 

 

The bad features of a human, dictatorial monarchy almost need no explanation--since they are so patently obvious to anyone with a capacity to think and reason. 

 

As this theme relates to the ancient nation of Yisrael, it is useful to remember that on entering Canaan land, Yisrael was a theocracy ruled by YHWH, Himself, using the priesthood and human judges--which He raised up as necessary to accomplish His purposes (as will be discussed below). 

 

Over time, the carnal, unconverted people of Yisrael started clamoring for a human king to rule over them, as was common in the heathen nations of the world (I Sam 8:5-6, 19; 8:7). 

 

On behalf of The SOVEREIGN, Shmuel told them of the great evils and troubles which would come upon them with an abandonment of the theocracy for a human king.  He mentioned the exploitation, abuse and plunder of the people by a monarch and how they would pay excessive taxes and give up their own sons and daughters (I Sam 8:10-17).  But the people wouldn’t listen! 

 

So The HIGHEST gave them the precise type of king they wanted.  He initially gave them Shaul, a tall, handsome, strong and powering young man with a lot of charisma and the typical qualities which humans/humanoids like in their leaders (I Sam 9:1-2).  In other words, Shaul wasn’t much on truth, character, integrity, faith and worship of YHWH.  But he was big on things carnal people appreciate (surely, he talked good). 

 

Of course, the sorry Shaul did not make a good king (because, as noted in other comments herein, sun worship democracy was employed by the people in their choice and selection of him).  With his death, YHWH intervened and made His Own choice of David and his seedline to rule over Yisrael when The ELOHIM ignored outward appearances and made His decision based upon David’s heart (I Sam 16:7, 12-13). 

 

 

A Theocracy 

 

Preceding Yisrael’s entrance into being a monarchy, as just mentioned, the nation functioned under a theocracy, whereby YHWH directly ruled the people (through the use of His appointed judges, priesthood; and of course, a system of elders, as will be addressed below).  But as noted elsewhere herein, the people were rebellious, and they didn’t like YHWH’s direct rule.  So they chose the above mentioned monarchy. 

 

Other than the ancient theocracy in Yisrael, it would seem that truly no human government has existed in 3,000 years as a theocracy.  Admittedly, there have been some attempts to formulate a theocracy in some Muslim nations by Islamic fundamentalists (as has happened in Iran and Afghanistan in recent years). 

 

But as the Oct-Dec 2001 “Hebrew Roots” (p. 2) notes, these attempts at establishing an Islamic theocracy actually have not panned out because the nations have instead developed and formed into a government of despotism or an oligarchy.  So the ideals of a theocracy have simply not been a part of man’s makeup. 

 

 

The Elders 

 

In Yisrael, in both her theocratic and monarchical days, Yisrael did have a system of elders who did much of the ruling--at least, on the local level.  This just quoted “Hebrew Roots” article (ibid, p. 5), above, looked at this issue and suggested that the elders generally consisted of the heads of the tribe, family or clan units. 

 

Strong’s Hebrew Dictionary” identifies the Hebrew word for elder as “zaken” or “zakenim” in the plural (Strong’s #2205).  As “Hebrew Roots” notes, zaken means old, but it also carries the implication of “one having authority.”  Thus, probably the elders in both civil and religious affairs were older men who carried some authority. 

 

While “Roots” did not offer any conclusions on what older meant, it would appear that age 30 in the Book establishes the point of maturity for a man.  And assuredly, the issue with an elder always was one of an older male Israelite.  Women, nokri/nekar aliens and so forth were all out in terms of being elders (as established in former chapters). 

 

“Hebrew Roots” did suggest that the body of elders themselves carried some authority of whom they would allow to sit in their councils as an elder. 

 

Thus, perhaps senile and incompetent people (who would be known as such in the collective body of elders) were probably excluded (just as the collective US Senate and House of Representatives can refuse to seat anyone they choose because of questions of moral turpitude, competence, etc).  Otherwise, the body of elders probably involved all of the older men, age 30 and above. 

 

It appears that there were bodies of elders over the nation (Ex 3:16; Deut 29:10), over the tribes (Deut 31:28), and over individual cities and towns (Deut 19:11-12; Prov 31:23).  And as noted in a prior chapter on understanding, there were elders over synagogues and over the Apostolic Assembly and its components (Acts 14:23; I Tim 5:1, 17; Titus 1:5). 

 

Yes, there was even elders over Egypt and the Egyptian households (Gen 50:7-8).  The presumption must be that older men were commonly banded together in bodies of elders probably in most all of the ancient societies.  What a shame it has been that the presence and role of elders has totally disappeared in the modern Christian sun worship culture and society. 

 

 

YHWH is Sovereign Even in Human Governments 

 

Beyond the obvious in the various remarks made so far on the selection of human governments, there is still one more factor worthy of mention.  This one paramount reality is that irrespective of what type, system or scheme of government that arises on planet earth (and particularly, in association with the nations of Yisrael), the fact is that it arises ultimately with the approval or allowance of The SOVEREIGN. 

 

It may be that The SUPREME makes a choice to give the people what the people want (as He did with Shaul and irrespective of how bad, sorry and corrupt that ruler is).  When the people are evil and desperately wicked (as they are today), perhaps The HIGHEST approves or allows their wicked choices of government. 

 

Yes, Pharaoh and Nebuchadnezzar came to power with YAH’s authorization (to carry out His purposes for Yisrael, as the Book proves). 

 

Slick Clinton is a classic illustration of this process.  His elections and successes (which YHWH has certainly allowed) can be traced entirely to the wickedness, corruption and evil of the American voters who have chosen him.  In truth, he reflects the morality, character, integrity and honesty of the American people, as pointed out in former comments. 

 

NBC’s “Today” program of June 2, 1997, had a guest on who was promoting a national TV show on Slick Willy and his love of music and particularly the saxophone which he plays.  The point was made that preceding presidents seemed to be fatherly or grandfatherly figures.  The guest said that Bill is the “rock n’ roll president” and “he’s one of us.” 

 

Yes, he’s a druggy and philander as well which truly does make him “one of us,” in terms of the modern American, sun worship society.  It is because of this precise condition that judgment is waiting at the doorsteps for the collective US population.  Americans have chosen and continue to support the wicked sodomite Clinton because he is one of them. 

 

For His part, surely The HIGHEST would certainly not exhibit any choice of such a corrupt and sorry individual as the Slick Meister.  But The SUPREME has allowed the American people to have their way in this just as He allowed the evil and diabolical king Tzidkiyahu to assume the throne of David in the early 6th century BCE. 

 

Tzidkiyahu was the man needed to bring about the collapse, downfall and destruction of the House of Yehudah to the Babylonians under (YHWH’s servant) Nebuchadnezzar.  Yehudah was evil and wicked.  She needed punishment, correction and judgment which came while Tzidkiyahu was king. 

 

 

YHWH’s Judgment On America 

 

The exact same situation exists today with the United States.  The people are evil and morally depraved.  The nation is facing her judgment day.  Slick Willy appears to be the man of the hour (if he can regain power) to oversee the end of the United States government and an intervention by YHWH to punish, chastise and correct the people here (or alternatively, Bush certainly could be in that role right now). 

 

In Shmuel’s famous dissertation on what all would happen to the Israelites with their outright rejection of YHWH’s theocracy and government in order to have a human ruler, like the surrounding nations, the message concluded with a most fascinating little remark (I Sam 8:7-18). 

 

As the Book reflects it, the people’s rejection of YHWH meant that they would suffer at the hands of their evil, human rulers.  And during the time of the oppressive, wicked human rulers, the Israelites would cry out in prayer to YHWH.  But in that day, The ELOHIM would not hear them (I Sam 8:18). 

 

In preceding discussions on prayer, the point was made that YHWH will not even listen to or entertain the prayers of people continuing in sin.  So it seems that wicked, evil, sinning people can just about count on being persecuted by their wicked, oppressive human governments (without any help or intervention from The ELOHIM). 

 

And that’s about what has happened to morally depraved, evil and wicked Americans.  Their progressively worse sins have given them perhaps the most dishonest, immoral and wicked politician of all time in the form of the Slick Meister.  Surely, with America’s democratic choice of evil, YHWH’s righteous judgment will now descend on this nation. 

 

This judgment will certainly (and Scripturally) come on the US in the form of an invading foreign army.  The forces that come against this nation will be chosen peoples serving The HIGHEST in His purpose and justice for America and the American people.  Obviously, the prayers of evil Americans will not be heard by YHWH in that day.  He will turn His ear from Christian sun worshippers! 

 

 

YHWH Always Approves or Allows 

 

But whatever comes about, it comes about with The MOST HIGH’s decision to approve or allow it (even in the Scriptural use of the lot--Acts 1:26).  Consequently, however selected or whatever the motivation, the reality is that it occurs with The ELOHIM’s ultimate allowance and/or approval. 

 

Actually, this true condition on earth then allows the presence of a host of Scriptures which affirm the fact that human governments (good and bad) are established or exist with YHWH’s approval or allowance in order to fulfill His ultimate purpose for the creation (Jer 18:1-9; Dan 2:20-21; 4:17, 25, 32; 5:21, 26; Amos 3:6; Jo 19:11; Acts 4:28; Rom 13:1-7; Col 1:16). 

 

 

Role for the Believer 

 

This background, involving YHWH’s ultimate approval and oversight of human governments, gives rise next to the question of how persons among the election should react to such governments. 

 

On this, the Book “seems” to enjoin believers to submit to the established human governments, however bad and sorry that the government rule and rulers might be (Eccl 10:20; Matt 17:24-27; 22:21; I Tim 2:1-3; Titus 3:1-2; I Pet 2:13-14).  Carnal (not spiritual) peoples oppose governments (II Pet 2:10-12). 

 

The Pharisees of Second Temple Judaism seem to have had some interesting ideas on human government.  “Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v.13, p. 364) notes that in contrast to the Zealots, the Pharisees (Hillel Pharisees?) “were willing to submit to foreign domination--so long as it did not interfere with their inner way of life--rather than support an impious government of their own.” 

 

This Pharisee position deserves some analysis.  While it is obvious that they “submitted” and obeyed the human governments in authority, Judaica makes the point that they would not and did not “support” the impious governments of their own.  Submission and obedience does not imply or suggest a requirement to “support” and be an advocacy for that which is evil. 

 

 

Becoming Kodesh 

 

In short, the followers of YHWH YESHUA must become kodesh (separate, segregated and set apart) from this worldly system of corruption and evil (Jo 17:15-16; II Cor 6:17; Eph 2:19; I Pet 1:4) and perhaps emulate the Hillel Pharisees in their separation. 

 

In the state of kodesh, it would seem that elect persons should take no part in sun worship elections or the choosing of sun worship governors, nor offer any advocacy or support for such sun worship practices--since there is no authority for sun worship governments in the Word and since the choices of their establishment will ultimately be with YHWH’s allowance to serve His purpose, however good or bad that they may be. 

 

America, in both 1992 and 1996, went to the polls and made her selection of evil in the form of Slick Clinton.  Manifestly, Clinton would never have been YHWH’s choice for anything.  He simply is too depraved and wicked.  But The MOST HIGH allowed his election because the people themselves are wretched and evil.  Clinton is a reflection of the American people.  So he was elected and YAH allowed it. 

 

 

Justice Will Come 

 

But in time, YHWH will impose justice for this hypocrisy.  There is no question about it.  Judgment is waiting in the wings for American politicians, crooked bureaucrats and officials and by all means, the collective American people who have sat back and allowed this wickedness and evil to persist--even while they had the ability to change it.  Ultimately, it is the people’s fault in this democracy that they have engineered. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 365--Reacting to Sun Worship Government

 

 

Some Considerations 

 

In mentioning the need for a believer to be submissive to human government (mentioned in the prior chapters), there are a few other considerations which would be relevant to consider and incorporate into that submission. 

 

The main surfacing question concerns the matter of the legality or lawfulness of the acts of the government. 

 

In the first place, Kefa and the other apostles stated it well when they declared (after they had disobeyed the order of the high priest and governing council to stop teaching about YESHUA) that they would obey The ELOHIM, rather than man (Acts 5:28-29).  Obviously, the person of faith must and indeed should always obey The MOST HIGH first and human governments second. 

 

But in the absence of a certain and precise command by YHWH which clearly conflicts with some human law or edict, what should the believer otherwise do when a human government imposes duties on its subjects which are either just immoral or perhaps illegal and in contravention of other laws? 

 

 

The US

 

For example, under the United States Constitution, there is a bill of rights (which is the only thing now in existence saving the American people from absolute tyranny) that is very positive and certain.  However, the established political leaders regularly and frequently seem intent on abridging or interfering in those “rights” to some extent. 

 

One sees this particularly in the matter of guns and firearms which are unquestionably addressed in the second amendment that says that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. 

 

Yet, the Washington politicians and courts have assumed the prerogative to establish all kinds of laws and rules which clearly do “infringe” upon this basic right.  Some 20,000 gun restriction laws (infringements) are now on the books. 

 

Once these infringements are in place, the correct legal remedy is to question them in court.  But this costs huge sums of money which the little people simply do not have.  And even if these issues do go to court, the liberal courts typically ignore the Constitution and choose to uphold the illegal laws or write “new” laws by judicial interpretation. 

 

Should these “unconstitutional” and “illegal” laws be obeyed or disobeyed?  Assuredly, this is a most difficult question which is not easy to answer (it will be assessed in the following remarks and succeeding chapters). 

 

But whatever path one chooses, he/she will be held accountable to the state and face the penalties which the state has imposed for violation of its rules (whether legal or not). 

 

 

Questions of Law Morality 

 

Next, there is the question about the morality of a given man-made law.  For years, many state governments had laws imposing racial segregation between Whites and Blacks in much of society.  Liberals, who like to impose unjust laws on others, looked upon these segregation laws as being immoral and therefore laws to be violated and ignored in rebellious sit-ins and demonstrations. 

 

Strangely enough, national religious and political leaders hypocritically looked the other way and ignored such law violations for many years.  This situation was ultimately settled by the US courts when they (illegally) began writing and making laws to overturn the status quo through judicial interpretation. 

 

A more recent example surfaced in early 1997 when the American Civil Liberties Union discovered that Judge Roy Moore of Etowah County, Alabama (Gadsden) routinely opened court with a prayer and had a copy of the Ten Commandments on a display plaque.  The ACLU people filed an ethics complaint and a court case in Circuit Court arguing that Moore’s actions were against US law. 

 

The Circuit Court Judge Price ordered the prayers stopped and the display plague removed.  For this action, the ruling American liberals, quite naturally, were elated and cheered Price on for his stand against the Decalogue.  Soon, they awarded him the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award. 

 

Later, at a prayer breakfast in early February 1997, Alabama Governor Fob James said that no federal or state judge would be allowed to tear down the plaque of the Ten Commandments as long as he could resist with the Alabama State Police and National Guard (per Patrick Buchanan in the Feb 12, 1997, “Washington Times”). 

 

Perhaps the moral aspects of Price’s decision are behind the Governor’s defiance of this court order just as the civil rights advocates used morality as the excuse to violate American segregation laws at will in the 1950s and 1960s, when the push was on for (sun worship) racial integration.  The federal government routinely encouraged and supported civil disobedience by the civil rights people back then. 

 

In other words, if you think a particular law is immoral, you then have a legal right to disobey it as the civil rights advocates have done.  But strangely enough, this thinking does not extend to conservatives, right wingers or politically incorrect people in general.  Since their thinking is unpopular with the ruling liberals, their (so-called) illegal acts are not to be tolerated or even allowed a challenge in court. 

 

Hence, the people who own certain guns or have chosen to blow up abortion clinics on moral grounds have been prosecuted to the full extent of the law by Washington.  Is there a double standard here (hypocrisy)?  Also, would the obedience of these abortion and segregation laws have caused the disobedience of YAH’s laws? 

 

 

Jay Merrill’s Trial 

 

In the March 7-20, 1997, “Trade N’ Save” paper (p 4), an article by Jay Merrill on “I Will Accept No King but Yahshua” addressed the issue of the domination of illegal or immoral human laws.  Merrill was one of the three people (of the Phinehas Priesthood) tried and convicted for bombing an abortion clinic, the local (evil) Spokane, WA newspaper and robbing a couple of banks. 

 

On being arrested, the US authorities decided that they wanted Merrill and the others to give them hand writing samples and certain photographs (obviously, they wanted these things to help them in their prosecution, although such acts would seem to be in conflict with the 5th amendment of the Constitution on prohibiting the need for self incrimination). 

 

Merrill and the others refused.  So the court ordered their compliance by force.  They were forcibly bound and pulled out of their cells in an effort to get the photographs and to try to make them produce handwriting samples. 

 

It seems that the Spokane County jailer came to Merrill (a sincere, religious man) and the others and told them that as Christians they were duty bound to immediately obey whatever the authorities demanded in view of Romans 13 and Shaul’s comments which might make a person suppose that all believers are automatically obligated to do whatever the government demands.  

 

 

Just Authority 

 

In a study of the Word on submission to government officials (when they order people around), Merrill quoted Romans 6:16; 13:1-7; I Cor 7:23; Matt 21:23-27 and other texts he found.  He said that the English word power in Romans 13 comes from the Greek “exousia” which refers to power being derived from a “just” government operating in accordance with the laws of YHWH. 

 

Young’s “Analytical Concordance” (p. 765) says that exousia means a “privilege, authority.”  In a Prophecy Club home video on “Cheque Mate:  The Game of Princes,” Jeff Baker echoes Merrill’s findings by defining exousia as “power derived from just authority.” 

 

In his video on the “American Holocaust,” analyst David Wegener also took note of Romans 13.  Wegener wisely focused upon Romans 13:3 and pointed out the importance of rulers being a terror to works of evil and not a terror to works of good.  Thus, Wegener says that believers are to be in subjection to rulers who are a terror to works of evil and not a terror to works of good. 

 

In relation to Wegener’s findings, it is clear that the George H. W. Bush, Bill “Slick” Clinton and George W. Bush administrations were not terrors to works of evil; but instead, they were/are terrors to works of good. 

 

Therefore, per Wegener’s view, there is no Scriptural demand for believers to be in subjection to such workers of evil (in plain opposition to works of good). 

 

 

The Essence 

 

The point of this is that Romans 13 is certainly not placing believers under an obligation to obey illegal governments or governments which are not exercising their power in accordance with YHWH laws for man (in works of good). 

 

Thus, if a government dictated that people set the first day of the week apart for rest and worship and that people could not work on that day (as happened in the Roman Empire in 321 CE, when Constantine imposed sun worship on the population by force, and later in the various Sunday Blue laws), persons obeying the Decalogue (Ex 20:9, which requires work on that day) would be forced into disobedience of the unjust civil law. 

 

Suppose that a government requires people to perform secular work on the Seventh day Sabbath, in defiance of YHWH’s law at Exodus 20:9-11 (which did happen in the old Roman Empire, as a result of the Catholic Church Council at Laodicea in c364 CE [or perhaps 336 CE], as discussed before).  Certainty, no believer is under any moral obligation to accept such authority.  In fact, a believer is bound to disobey such a law. 

 

Jay Merrill concluded that “until a government officer is working within the laws of Yahweh, and not the commandments of men, he is not an authority to be recognized... When we are placed in situations outside the Word of Yahweh, the...examples (cited from Scripture) show us that we are not bound to obey.”  

 

Of course, Merrill’s comments were being made in the context of himself being a prisoner in jail and the question of how much obedience was required when the authorities issued orders to him while in custody.  Should he have automatically done every thing that they told him to do? 

 

Otherwise, his points could have some possible relevance in any number of other situations involving a “Big Brother” government and its many dictatorial commands over the general public. 

 

Although not addressed by Merrill, there could also be a question over Exodus 22:28 here, as discussed earlier, in the vein of prohibiting the placing of a curse upon secular and religious leaders.  As outlined earlier, there can be a issue here of whether the public official (being cursed or condemned) had acted in his color of office and for the people, in accordance with the Torah (Exodus, “The Pentateuch,” p. 382). 

 

 

Other Examples 

 

This same reasoning by Merrill would apply to the situation with David Koresh and his holdout against Big Brother who ordered Koresh and the others to surrender when a much publicized stalemate developed after an initial ATF attack upon the Davidian compound in Waco, Texas (to be discussed in a later chapter).  Were the Davidians automatically bound to surrender simply because Big Brother commanded it? 

 

A man named Rick Strawcutter is a pastor of a Christian Church in Adrian, Michigan.  In 1996, he produced a video for the “Christian Underground Hotline” on “How Any Idiot Can Beat a Radar Speeding Ticket.”  Strawcutter appears to be an advocate of the Common Law teachings now on-going in a large segment of the right-wing, Christian Patriot movement. 

 

Rick believes that free men have an inalienable right to move or exercise mobility upon the public roadways without interference from the state.  Well, as many people know, Big Brother has progressively moved to the point of requiring a license before a person can operate a motor vehicle on the public roads. 

 

The license becomes a grant of permission from the state, as if the driver does not automatically have this freedom.  Hence, it must be granted by the state.  Therefore, the ability to use the public roadways for driving has become a privilege which the state can grant certain persons who march to the right tune.  The ability to drive on the public roadways becomes--not a right--but a privilege. 

 

This option has been previously discussed in the context that the state probably should grant a certificate of qualifications to drivers.  But the license clearly is in contradistinction to the ideas of freedom and inalienable rights. 

 

In any case, the Adrian man does not believe that the state’s regulations and highway traffic laws are legal and right from the perspective of a free man.  Thus, his video appears to have been prepared on the premise that free men are not duty bound to obey the illegal and unjust highway laws. 

 

In communicating this fact, Strawcutter does advocate that drivers using the public highways exercise care and reasonability.  Is Strawcutter right? 

 

A few years ago, a Baptist preacher named Everett Sileven refused to get a license from the state of Nebraska to operate a church school at his Louisville Baptist Church.  He also refused to hire Nebraska’s certified teachers.  Naturally, Big Brother’s officials came down on him with the full force of law.  They raided his church and hauled him off to jail for 150 days.  Was Sileven bound to obey? 

 

 

Should Righteous Indignation Surface? 

 

The Scriptures appear to communicate several situations which suggest the emergence of some righteous indignation in the hearts and minds of certain people of faith in history whenever they observed and witnessed great evil and wickedness in secular society. 

 

The indignation and concern of these persons turned into such passion and zeal that they seemingly took the law into their own hands (like in the case of a vigilante). 

 

In the first instance, the people of Yisrael began to commit open fornication with the daughters of Moab (and evidently one or more women of Midian) and attach themselves to the (sun god) Baal Peor at Shittim during the Exodus.  This angered YHWH.  So Moshe called the judges of Yisrael together to discuss YHWH’s judgment to kill the Israelites involved in this wickedness (Num 25:1-5). 

 

Seeing the situation and the foot dragging by the authorities, Phinehas, a grandson of Aaron, rose up and personally slew one of the obvious couples engaged publicly in this illegal sex--and evidently, about the same time that YAH began to act and kill 24,000 other Israelites (Num 25:6-11). 

 

In the second instance, Eliyahu the prophet called 850 (Sunday and Easter) preachers up to Mount Carmel for a contest in front of the wicked King Achav.  After The SUPREME demonstrated His powers, Eliyahu raised up and righteously slew at least the 450 sun worship preachers and perhaps the other 400 Easter preachers as well (I Kg 18:1-40). 

 

The third situation came about in Second Temple days when the wicked King Antiochus Epiphanies desecrated the Temple and tried to impose Grecian sun worship on the remnant of Yehudah by “force,” in about 168 BCE. 

 

After great persecution and trouble for the righteous persons rejecting this sun worship, one priest named Mattathias and his sons (principally Judas) raised up and began a revolution for religious freedom and to restore true worship (I Maccabees 2:1-3:2). 

 

A fourth example happened perhaps some three times in the first century CE when YESHUA entered the Temple and drove out the dishonest bankers and money changers (Matt 21:12-13; Mk 11:12-17; Lu 19:45-46; Jo 2:13-17). 

 

These incidents have been elaborated upon in preceding chapters in this work and need no further comment now. 

 

 

Religious Martyrs 

 

Beyond the several illustrations, outlined above, of people who actively opposed the prevailing state/system with righteous zeal, focus can also be directed to a number of religious martyrs and potential martyrs who disobeyed the state in some instances; although they did not seem to actively oppose the state otherwise, for example--Daniel, Shadrakh, Meishakh and Avednego (Dan 3:12; 6:10). 

 

Though their examples are not necessarily recorded in the Scriptures, mention might also be directed at the huge number of Protestants, who historically dared to oppose the Roman Catholic states for many centuries (when Rome ruled the world with an iron hand).  Many of these people violated numerous secular and religious laws in their quest for religious freedom. 

 

The Roman Catholic authorities responded with the Catholic Inquisition and came down on these dissidents with their full power and force of law.  Millions were persecuted, tried, tortured and slaughtered (typically, by being burned alive at the stake) simply over religious conscience.  Did they act righteously in defying the state? 

 

 

Modern Manifestations Surface 

 

These several situations from the history of people who raised themselves up to go against the state have been a motivational force to affect a number of conscientious persons here in America in the age end. 

 

Probably, the individuals most susceptible to this Scriptural influence has been people in the so-called Patriots’ movement and this typically would include the religious Christian Identity people who are often also patriots. 

 

In short, well meaning people become indignant and angry over the great sin and wickedness in modern America; and being unable to do anything about it at the polls, their zealousness and passion inflames them to “take the law” into their own hands to try to right the evident wrongs.  So some of these people decide that they should blow up queer bars and abortion clinics and take other positive actions. 

 

It seems that this was the environment which has given rise to the so-called free (freed) men of Montana, the Phinehas Priesthood operating in North Idaho and Washington state (involving Jay Merrill, as mentioned above), Eric Rudolph (to be later described), and “possibly” even to some of the people behind the Oklahoma City bombing of a few years ago, also to be discussed later (after all, the government did nothing about Waco.  So maybe, some of the OC bombers thought that their actions represented justice). 

 

This matter of an oppressive government will be taken up in later chapters.  But for now, the question arises, should people with concern over the great evil and wickedness present rise up and do things on their own to try to correct the problem and promote justice?  Or alternatively, should people sit back and do nothing--thus allowing the evil to continue with no opposition? 

 

 

The Change in Attitudes 

 

In early America, there is little doubt but that people (collectively) in society would act to protect society if and when government failed to do so.  Hence, if someone opened up a whorehouse or a porno parlor in most towns or if some open fags were to move into some places, the collective people would have run all of them out of town. 

 

But times have changed.  Most Americans today are so mesmerized by the liberal media that they will do nothing about anything.  On the contrary, if modern Americans can’t have their pornography outlets, many of them would rise up in anger and violence to demand that something be done! 

 

The “Washington Times” (p. 17) of Jul 19-25, 1999, had a story by David Germain on “Small video stores rely on pornography to stay in business.”  This report specifically focused upon X-rated films and their popularity in America.  Small video stores have increased the shelf space for these dirty films because they are very popular--accounting for around 40-80% of the small video store rentals. 

 

Besides these X rated movies, the R classification is also typically vulgar and dirty with raw sex scenes.  These R rated films are not only all over America in video stores, but they are regularly shown on TV.  The public loves them! 

 

Many people go out of their way in order to obtain and watch these dirty movies or read similar dirty books (in terms of history, this writer must confess these sins as well, i am ashamed to say). 

 

If a local community tried to outlaw this raw pornographic material, there would be an immediate cry from the public demanding that this stuff be made available publicly and without restraint. 

 

And if by some fluke, a vigilante group tried to forcibly remove this wickedness, the loving, majority public would rise up in hate and opposition to attack and perhaps murder the vigilantes who would dare try to close down their beloved, porno parlors.  People attacking or opposing queers will now have the full forces of the federal government and the controlled media down upon them--with hate and vengeance. 

 

 

Should Big Brother Be Opposed? 

 

However, based upon the several examples cited, is there any Scriptural authority for modern political activists to oppose the oppressive, evil, sun worship state?  And the answer seems to be “possibly” no. 

 

In the first place, Eliyahu and YESHUA took their actions based upon formal commissions and grants of authority for them to act (this was discussed in a prior chapter). 

 

While YESHUA did act against the fat cat bankers operating at the Temple (as was discussed in prior comments), He assuredly never acted against the secular state-rule of the Romans which was oppressive and filled with evil from time to time.  Proof of this condition surfaced when Pilate acknowledged that he could find no fault in Him--obviously, from the standpoint of Roman law (Jo 19:4-6). 

 

The Apostle Shaul received credit for doing and saying a lot of things in his ministry.  But the truth is that he never advocated rebellion toward established secular authority, however good or bad it was.  As outlined beforehand, Shaul always obeyed YHWH’s laws and Jewish customs, as well as not transgressing against the laws of Caesar (Acts 25:7-11). 

 

In the case of Phinehas, he acted in the theocracy after YHWH had made His will known to Moshe and the judges and while they were dragging their feet and not taking immediate action to correct the wickedness. 

 

On this, Dan Gayman of the Church of Israel (“Do All Races Share in Salvation?,” p. 171-172) teaches that Phinehas was steward over the sanctuary and that his action was directed against Zimri (a chief man of the tribe of Shimon) who had actually brought a woman of Midian (Cozbi, a daughter of one of the chiefs of Midian) into the sanctuary to defile it. 

 

As Phinehas was responsible for the sanctuary, he acted in the color of his office.  Too, It seems clear that Phinehas knew YHWH’s will on this.  And he chose to become an instrument to impose it.  But again, this was in the theocracy where YHWH ruled. 

 

The case involving the Maccabees is still different from the others.  Whereas the other three situations did not seem to impede upon personal religious freedoms, the actions of Antiochus clearly did.  He was an evil, Beast dictator, who was forcing sun worship on a collective people who were opposed to it. 

 

So the Maccabees acted with the will of the collective people.  In effect, without acting, the Maccabees and all of their colleagues interested in religious truth were in the position of facing an imminent death because of their choices to refuse to engage in the false sun worship being imposed by the Greeks. 

 

The Protestant martyrs in the 15th and 16th centuries were very similar to the Maccabees in some ways.  Many of the Protestants were being subjected to laws--which the obedience of such would have caused them to have conscience problems.  In short, they wanted religious freedom.  And to have it, many had to die and suffer at the hands of Catholic authorities. 

 

 

Some More Cases 

 

The book of Acts makes mention of a couple of anti-government protest movements which came to nothing in the scheme of things.  For instance, there was Theudas and his 400 followers, and then Judas the Galilean, both of whom created popular uprisings of rebellion against the government in the name of liberty (Acts 5:36-37). 

 

Josephus mentions several of these anti-government motions and particularly Judas who seems to have been a tax protester, trying to instill revolt in the people (“Concordant Commentary on the New Testament,” p. 186). 

 

Even the later Zealots were nationalistic, anti-government people who tried to promote rebellion against Rome.  Certainly, the Zealots accomplished zero.  Most of them died in vain--for nothing! 

 

The point of these two illustrations from Acts 5:36-37 is that these anti-government movements apparently lacked support from The MOST HIGH.  Since they were not sanctioned by The HIGHEST, they came to naught and accomplished nothing--beyond causing the death of many, well-meaning people who could have better served YHWH and truth in other, more productive ways. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 366--Supporting the Evil?

 

 

More From The Church of Israel (Schell City, MO)

 

The “Articles of Faith” of the Church of Israel (p. 31) offers this charge-- “All persons seeking religious affiliation with the CHURCH OF ISRAEL must obey civil authorities unless man-made laws require the breaking of a Scriptural command of God.  If any Christian believes he is being required to violate a Scriptural command of God in following the requirements of a civil magistrate, these steps should be followed: 

 

“Proper appeals and protest to proper civil authorities should be made; efforts should be made to change a particular law through God-ordained structures of government.  The person should flee this persecution or suffer for not doing wrong.  In no case can the individual take the law into his own hands, declare himself autonomous from the government, and resolve the problem outside lawful authority.” 

 

This Church of Israel statement  probably has some merit, although there are obvious questions about what can be or should be done.  Above all else, the believer must pray about the matter and carefully meditate upon it in the context of the Torah before taking action.  For certain, apathy, indifference and don’t care are not the solution for true believers. 

 

 

Definitions 

 

But one of the problems which a believer can sometimes face is a definition of a Scriptural command of The ELOHIM.  In other words when should a believer resist or disobey? 

 

Obviously, if Big Brother dictates work on the Sabbath day, then disobedience is clearly called for.  And if the disobedient believer gets caught, he runs the risk of the penalties prescribed by the state (as happened in the old, Catholic, “Holy Roman Empire”). 

 

Moreover, some things which are illegal, per YHWH’s Word, are legal per the state (like miscegenation and homosexuality) or some things which are Scripturally legal (thus, not sin) might be a criminal act, per Big Brother.  Take the case of the previously discussed polygyny.  Per the Word, it is legal.  Per the state, it becomes bigamy and illegal. 

 

Consequently, if a man does marry two women, he has not sinned.  But he has become a bigamist and subject to being a criminal, per the state.  Being a sinner and a human law criminal are two different things.  They are not synonymous at all. 

 

Question, does a man have to have two wives (legal per YHWH) in a state requiring monogamy?  If a man chooses to obey the state with only one wife, has he violated YHWH’s law?  Of course not.  YHWH’s law doesn’t require a man to have two wives (in fact, some persons are specifically not to have multiple wives--Assembly leaders, etc). 

 

If a man obeys the state and has only one wife, he certainly has not violated YAH’s law.  One does not have to have two wives. Thus, the believer can obey both YHWH and the state in this instance in terms of marriage. 

 

But if the man chooses to have a second wife, he clearly does not sin and transgress YAH’s law.  He would, of course, become a criminal by man’s laws and subject to man-made punishments and penalties if he gets caught.  That’s the risk of violating human laws in a sun worship culture. 

 

The public schools are absolutely horrible and sinful.  No true believer could ever want his children exposed to the sin and corruption in the pathetic public schools. Clearly, the solution is to take one’s children out of the public schools and make other arrangements (alternative education, home school, etc). 

 

However, increasingly, Big Brother is not about to let parents have control of their children.  The dictatorial state wants those children under her control.  And she is moving towards making alternative education methods illegal.  So, if a parent obeys the Word and takes his children out of the corrupt public school, the parent may become a criminal. 

 

In this instance, the parent must disobey the evil state and its corrupt sorry schools.  Righteousness demands it.  Of course, the parent will face the penalties of Big Brother if caught.  To avoid this criminal indictment, the thinking person most often will have to flee (which is what the Church of Israel is suggesting). 

 

 

Take the Law Into Your Own Hands? 

 

The final aspect of assessing the Scriptural position is the matter of how the believer is to react to the on-going great presence of sin and iniquity in the contemporary Christian sun worship culture and society.  Of course, in the theocracy, one can justify “taking the law” into one’s own hands, as Phinehas did. 

 

But no one lives in the theocracy at present on planet earth.  Most Israelites live under the curse of Christian sun worship and Christian sun worship leaders.  Assuredly, this evil situation is about to change with the return of YESHUA.  But for now, one must deal with reality. 

 

Perhaps the best illustration of this course of taking the law into one’s hand (in order to oppose outright evil) has surfaced in the contemporary society when some Christian people got fed up with the on-going infant murder at legal abortion clinics. 

 

The formerly cited Jay Merrill and Eric Rudolph “might” be persons who fit into this category (if the charges against them were actually true).  Many such concerned persons have wanted to go and blow up and destroy abortion clinics in the name of righteousness. 

 

 

How About...? 

 

The just completed discussion on the pathetic public schools is another area of concern.  Should the believer take it upon himself to bomb and destroy the sinful public schools of the sun worship society?  How about the homosexual fag bars that now openly operate all across America?  Should believers rise up and bomb and destroy them? 

 

If a person wishes to address environmental pollution and sin, then a focus could be directed at the vast majority of businesses and business buildings in America.  Almost all of them are powerfully involved in sins directly or indirectly.  Some businesses are just sinful and evil by nature--like banks and insurance companies. 

 

How about the millions of sun worship churches and temples with all of their sun images (steeples, crosses, etc) across the United States.  Should a true believer decide that he should go out and start destroying them, as Yechezkel prophesied of them for the age end when the House of Yisrael faces her judgment from YHWH (Ezek 6:3-6)? 

 

In the theocracy, Sabbath breaking and idolatry were capital crimes demanding the death sentence (by stoning).  Should true believers rise up and start stoning to death the vast multitudes of Christian sun worshippers, who transgress the Sabbaths and practice vain, open idolatry of the worst kind? 

 

Any person wanting to take the law into his or her own hands is forced to make personal judgments of right and wrong (just like the Catholic Church did when she ruled the world with her sword and power over the state). 

 

Furthermore, there is so much blatant sun worship and sinful wrong in the entire, complete, American, sun worship culture and society, it would be impossible to ever begin to deal with it.  It is almost hypocritical to even address any one single aspect of it, while ignoring the rest. 

 

 

The New Testament Situation 

 

Perhaps one of the best written descriptions (remaining extant to our time) of an entire culture and civilization dedicated to deplorable sun worship would have to be the one mentioned in NT remarks, primarily outside Palestine.  Much of the evil sun worship now seen in our contemporary society was visible and apparent throughout the early sun worshipping Roman Empire.  Not much has changed in these last 2,000 years. 

 

Taking the Scriptural examples, it is certain that Kefa, Yakov, Yohanan, Shaul, Bar-Nabba, Luke and on and on lived among such wicked sun worship practices and yet existed with a view of being “kodesh” (separated, set apart or segregated) from it, as much as was possible. 

 

The only apparent exception to this rule was the situation with YESHUA and the bankers (who had moved their evil into the Temple, as previously noted). 

 

These New Testament people never chose to blow up queer hangouts, infant murder clinics, or any of the multitudes of buildings and facilities used by the vast hordes of evil sun worshippers.  They left them alone and merely separated themselves from them and their evil. 

 

The place that one must come to on this line is that perhaps there is no legitimate basis for believers to be involved in overt, physical attacks on the existing sun worship facilities and people in a way contrary to secular law. 

 

This situation with the NT people, the Maccabees and the Protestants gives rise to one of the key messages of the Word--that is that while believers should separate from human governments and be “apolitical” (with no involvement in politics at all), they must always be prepared to obey YHWH first in their own lives in any conflict with governmental decrees (Dan 3:12; 6:11; Acts 4:19) and personally suffer the consequences of their decision (Dan 3:14-23; 6:12-16; Acts 5:4-5). 

 

The former Ernest L. Martin (now deceased), in his prophetic report on the “Place of Safety” (p. 8), elsewhere mentioned, offered this interpretation of Revelation 13:10-- “He that leads (the system) into captivity shall (himself) go into captivity.  He that killeth with the sword (in trying to overcome the system), must be killed with the sword.  Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.” 

 

In other words, believers must exercise patience and faith in the coming days of great trial and tribulation.  

 

 

Patriotism, Revisited  

 

Some remarks on the previously cited patriotism must be shared before proceeding on in this study.  While it would be difficult to generalize all of the likely motives present in the various people’s minds (who have raised up to oppose the wickedness in the modern sun worship state by overt, physical, active means), it does seem that the most prevailing attitude is one of patriotism and love of this country. 

 

There are some very sincere people who love the US and the US as it once was (but no longer).  They really believe that through activism they can reverse the downward spiral in this nation. 

 

Of course, patriotic Americans effectively lost this fight in 1932 with the election of the Christian Socialist and Amalekite Franklin Roosevelt.  With his election and the seizure of American political and educational systems by the leftists, the public has been slowly mesmerized to accept the resulting evil as being right and normal.  Now, the Christian majority is in favor of it or passively accept it. 

 

 

Some History 

 

The patriots in the American revolution were criminals, per the British.  But they had popular support for their fight with Britain.  And they won.  They were and are called patriotic heroes in American history books.  To the British, they were traitors and rebels. 

 

In terms of the American Civil War, one’s perspective is greatly influenced by the question of which side won.  Therefore, the Southerners have been called rebels.  The war came to be called the War of the Southern Rebellion. 

 

If the South would have gained her independence, the people in the fight would have come to be called patriots and the war would be known as the war for Southern independence--at least, in the South.  History’s perspective on war is always colored by which side won and where the historian owes his loyalty. 

 

In 1940, German troops entered Paris during WWII.  They were called liberators and the people of Paris poured out to welcome them.  The women kissed the soldiers, and the Germans were cheered as loving, kind and wonderful.  In 1944, the Americans entered Paris as liberators.  Again, the people poured out to welcome and cheer them as wonderful, loving and kind.  Women kissed the soldiers and so forth. 

 

Since America and the West won WWII, the role of the Allies in conquering the various cities, towns and nations in Europe has been described as liberators by Western historians.  But when the Germans were taking those same cites, towns and nations, the conquering Germans were called liberators.  The point is that man is grossly hypocritical and cannot be relied upon to be consistent or to tell the truth. 

 

Consequently, how one treats or looks at people involved in so-called patriotic movements, in opposition to the controlling government, depends upon how much public support there is for the movement; and of course, whether the movement eventually prevails and wins in the coming days. 

 

The modern patriots lack popular support.  As noted above, the modern American public has been so thoroughly mesmerized by the educational, entertainment and media systems--as run by the liberals, Socialists and humanists (under Amalekite leadership)--that they are largely incapable of even understanding what the problem is, much less in having an informed position one way or the other on it. 

 

 

The Dilemma 

 

One of the favorite things which the controlled media and government leaders like to cry and complain about is the need for public acceptance of racial integration, amalgamation, miscegenation and assimilation.  This goal of the Amalekites (working for their father Satan) has long been established as one of the social gods, present here in the age end (as will be later discussed). 

 

Any persons who will not accept this new social god (being pushed by the ruling Amalekites and their father Satan) are immediately branded as racists, bigots and White Supremacists.  The controlled media hounds the gullible, mesmerized public with regular and frequent broadcasts about these evil people and their “hate and thought crimes.” 

 

Yes, per the modern view being promoted by the Amalekite bankers/masters, under Satanic direction and supervision, it is a hate crime or hate thought to want to maintain racial separation (segregation) against this onslaught of the alleged good, love and benefits of racial integration and amalgamation (which is one of the current social gods approved and promoted by the state). 

 

In the US and many Western, Christian countries, the Amalekites are in the driver’s seat in terms of governmental control and media domination.  They own Hollywood and the entertainment and media corporations (AOL-Time Warner, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc, as will be proven in later chapters).  They elect politicians and consequently later control the actions of the elected politicians (who are subservient to their owners). 

 

They own and/or control most of the large multi-national corporations that provide employment to the general population (along with governments--which also are massive employers in the new Socialist states).  Since both of these entities are largely controlled by Amalekite bankers/masters (at least, from behind the scenes), the corporations and governments march to the tune of the Satanic Amalekites. 

 

 

Cheap Labor 

 

These multi-national corporations are largely interested in one thing and one thing only--profits.  Therefore, they are focused upon getting cheap labor.  In the US, this means that many of these corporations involved in agriculture are constantly employing Mexican farm labor--either legally or illegally (since most Americans will not do this hard work, due to the availability of the huge US welfare system). 

 

This propensity to hire foreign Colored workers in much of the Christian West has been going on for ages.  In America, it started with the Irish and Chinese gangs brought in to work on the railroads.  Some European countries now have massive Colored guest workers present (like Germany, to be shortly assessed). 

 

Since the Amalekites and their father Satan are directing and managing this whole operation, huge numbers of foreign Colored peoples are pouring into the White Christian West in droves under all kinds of pretexts. 

 

Because most of the voting people have turned their voting powers over to the Amalekite bankers/masters, the sold-out, controlled politicians do nothing to stop this inflow and assault upon the prevailing Western culture.  So the Colored foreigners keep coming--for all kinds of reasons (to include legitimate employment with the multi-national corporations--which could care less about demographics or the future). 

 

 

Some Righteous Indignation Surfaces 

 

There has been a minority of people in most of these Western countries who have not been totally mesmerized and zombiized by the controlled media to accept the change in demographics and the absolute certain destruction of their racial kinsmen and people because of the flood of the Coloreds. 

 

Sometimes, this indignation (and the inability to do anything about it politically at the voting polls--since too much of the population has been mesmerized by the controlled media and continues to vote for the politicians causing the problems) overflows and this minority of concerned people explode in anger and take their frustrations out on some of the Colored immigrants. 

 

In the US, and in a few European countries (especially Britain and Germany), this indignation explodes and particularly so among some of the young people who cannot get jobs while the Colored aliens do have work.  Sometimes, a few of the majority Whites attack and hurt or kill some of these foreigners.  This only causes a massive media assault about so-called hate crimes and hate thoughts. 

 

 

The Modern German Situation 

 

In mid August 2000, some of the German skin-heads became concerned, angry and frustrated over what has been happening for ages now with an inflow of Colored Asians, Turks and Blacks into that nation as guest workers (as arranged, supervised and laid on by prostitute politicians and corporations that work for and serve Amalekite bankers/masters and Satan). 

 

There are now some seven million Colored foreigners in Germany working as guest workers.  There are also some four million unemployed Germans.  So the frustrations and agony of some modern Germans bring up an economic feature. 

 

When some of these Blacks come to Germany, with a little charisma and musical ability, they are able to suck up a lot of the young, White, German girls.  This also makes the skin-heads mad. 

 

Consequently, some of the right wing people have become so angry that they have attacked foreign immigrants from time to time.  A number of cases surfaced in August 2000 which involved young German skinheads who injured or killed some Coloreds in Germany. 

 

Naturally, the controlled media cried out about the hate crimes and the need for acceptance of the status quo.  Of course, the Christian Churches joined in to condemn the hate and the need for Christian love and acceptance of what all is happening.  Too, the controlled politicians and the government headed by the current, liberal, Green party all condemned the (alleged) evil of these right-wingers. 

 

So the few right wingers who were concerned with the destruction of their country, their race, their future and their hopes were all quickly crushed by the Amalekite bankers/masters and Satan--using the controlled media forces, the government powers and the stupid Christian Churches.  No one in leadership and authority was concerned about the future of the White Germans. 

 

The dilemma facing young Germans also faces all White people in the Christian West.  If there is any alternative to this certain destruction, it only exists right now in Iceland where Colored immigration has been prevented (for the time being).  Otherwise, Whites no longer have a future in the world under man’s misrule.  We all need to pray for the coming of YESHUA’s government and the end of this present system. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 367--Sun Worship Governments’ Failures

 

 

A True Story 

 

In the year 1860, the Amalekite Rothschild bankers and their Amalekite cousins were in their counting houses in Europe.  They were busy conniving, conspiring and plotting about what all that they would do about the growing power of the United States in the West. 

 

With the use of the Amalekite Alexander Hamilton (correctly Levine) and the janissary robot John Adams, the Amalekite bankers almost took over complete control of America in the 1790s and especially since George Washington was so extremely weak, naive, and gullible. 

 

But even with the First and Second US Banks, the Amalekite bankers failed--perhaps mainly because of Andy Jackson who ran them out of US power in the 1830s (but only temporarily because they staged a limited comeback under Martin Van Buren in his presidency). 

 

However, with their enormous stacks of money and power over some of the European governments, the Amalekites were not about to sit back and not work on various innovations and schemes to eventually take over the monetary, economic and financial systems of the United States.  In 1860, they were still plotting and conniving. 

 

They had their secret agents in the US (in the form of Amalekite masters like Judah P. Benjamin in the South and August Belmont in the North).  By carefully monitoring and supervising events in the US, they were able to put into power a man whom they believed would do their bidding. 

 

The man they chose was a true politician (with no honor, integrity or scruples at all), and a man who joined in with his wife in dabbling with the occult and Spiritualism.  Abe Lincoln was clearly their choice in 1860.  And they succeeded in putting him into the presidency and the White House. 

 

To be sure that things went right, they used him and their Amalekite agents to foment and create a US Civil War--which occurred on schedule from 1861 to 1865.  But Abe got out of hand.  So they assassinated him and planned on assassinating his successors in order that their next choice, Secretary of War William Stanton, could take over. 

 

But all of these murdering plots fell through the cracks.  Thus, the Amalekite bankers had to be content to wait until the year 1913 to implement their plans with the gullible and evil President Woodrow Wilson.  Like Lincoln, Wilson was a true politician who would sell his own mother out for votes.  So the Amalekite bankers eventually prevailed. 

 

 

The Yadkin River Country   

 

Near the modern town of Blowing Rock, North Carolina, on the edge of the spectacular Blue Ridge Mountains, a small spring becomes the source for the mighty Yadkin River which plunges to the Southeast from Blowing Rock.  As it races out from a little village called Patterson, it makes a sharp turn to the Northeast to flow on to the town of Wilkesboro. 

 

Patterson is in Caldwell County and Wilkesboro is in Wilkes County--which are adjacent counties in Western North Carolina.  So the river covers two counties in its flow after coming out of the Blue Ridge.  In Wilkesboro, it turns back East and eventually Southeast to merge with other rivers and streams in order to reach the Atlantic Ocean to the Southeast. 

 

Starting from Patterson to Wilkesboro, the Yadkin flows through a wide, beautiful, marvelous valley, some 33 miles or so in length, to reach Wilkesboro.  Long ago, some North Carolina fat cats obtained land grants in this valley and either settled there themselves or sold the land to other settlers who came into the area in the late 1700s to farm the rich and beautiful valley. 

 

In time, this valley became known as Happy Valley--perhaps because the people were happy, prosperous and blessed.  But all of the people who came there after 1800 were not quite so well off in being able to acquire the rich bottom land of the Yadkin.  Many were poor, dirt peasants who had to live as sharecroppers on the sides of the protruding mountains bordering the valley. 

 

 

Two Poor Dirt Farmers on the Yadkin

 

One of the early settlers on this mountain land was a Dula family who lived just inside Wilkes County, near a village called Elkville.  Sometime, before 1860, the father of this family died--leaving a widow named Mary (perhaps around 63 years old in 1860) and five children (two girls and three boys). 

 

Mary and the children were really poor people.  They were tenant farmers and/or sharecroppers on land that wouldn’t grow much of anything except thorns and rattlesnakes.  Perhaps other than having a few home spun clothes and some pots and pans, the widow Mary Dula owned nothing but one cow.  You can bank on it that she even had to pay taxes on that one cow (as was the practice in those days). 

 

A few miles back up the river, in adjacent Caldwell County, there was another interesting family--headed by a man named Wilson Foster (in his 50s, in the early 1860s).  Like Mary, Foster was a poor, uneducated, simple, humble man who owned nothing except a few cooking utensils and evidently some homespun clothes.  Wilson did have an old mare horse which was better than the situation with poor Mary. 

 

Too, Wilson had a wife and a number of children.  But things were hard on him as well since he also was a tenant framer or sharecropper.  Poverty and want were the order of the day for both Wilson and Mary. 

 

However, the prevailing evidence of history suggests that both Wilson and Mary were fairly religious, honest, moral and upright people.  Their problem was that they were dirt poor and owned nothing of value. 

 

So the Rothschild planned US Civil War came to Happy Valley (literally, as the federal army, in time, invaded Happy Valley to kill and maim people and destroy crops and possessions).  Quickly, the three Dula boys entered the Confederate Army and left home.  In the next four years, the oldest boy was killed in action and the next boy died in a Yankee prison at Point Lookout, Maryland. 

 

The third son, Tom (who was briefly mentioned in a former chapter herein), returned home in 1865 at age 22, after serving three years in Company K of the 42d NC Infantry Regiment. 

 

Like so many of the other Southern infantry units, the 42d was decimated in the Civil War.  Most of the boys in Company K from Happy Valley never came back.  The Rothschild-Lincoln war murdered them.  The survivor Tom apparently learned how to kill and hate during his tour. 

 

Otherwise, Wilson Foster’s wife and his older children came down with a disease and died (perhaps from typhoid or cholera).  Wilson was left with his daughter Laura (who also was about 22 in 1865) and two younger boys. 

 

 

Tom and Laura 

 

Thus, in 1865, Tom Dula returned to his mountain home in Wilkes County, NC to presumably try to help his widowed mother survive.  One Dula girl was married and soon the second Dula girl married--leaving Tom and his mother and their one old cow. 

 

Young Tom was quite a ladies’ man.  Soon, he was having affairs with several young women along the Yadkin--including a married woman named Ann Melton (who was formerly a Foster) and Ann’s cousin Pauline Foster.  Pauline had come down to Wilkes from Watauga County (in the mountains).  She brought with her the syphilis disease which Tom soon came down with. 

 

Being a paramour of sorts, Tom began looking around for other potential conquests (despite his bout with the syphilis, which he was treated for by a local doctor).  It turned out that the two Foster cousins (Ann and Pauline) had another cousin in Caldwell county--the just mentioned Laura, daughter of Wilson Foster. 

 

Therefore, in time, Tom Dula turned his attentions upon Laura.  She had a good reputation; but otherwise, was a poor girl (she had exactly two dresses to her name--one store bought and one home spun).  She was a pretty girl, but frail and had a observable space between her two front, upper teeth.  

 

Laura was beginning to be past the marriage age.  Thus, she must have looked upon Tom as a potential husband.  With the slaughter of the young American men in the American Civil War (thanks to Rothschild and Abe Lincoln), there was a shortage of eligible young men in NC.  So Laura was likely desperate in her search. 

 

 

Laura Was Murdered 

 

In any case, Laura allegedly became pregnant and must have pushed Tom Dula pretty hard about marriage.  So, in May 1866, Laura Foster left her home one early morning on Wilson Foster’s old mare--to presumably meet Tom Dula and get married.  Instead, she was murdered (stabbed to death) that morning and buried in a shallow grave in Wilkes County. 

 

Later, a search party found her grave and the local sheriff collected enough evidence to arrest Tom Dula for the murder.  As it turned out, Tom had left the country and crossed over into East Tennessee where a man named Grayson helped the Wilkes County posse arrest him and return him to NC to stand trial. 

 

He was indicted by a Wilkes County grand jury.  His lawyer was the famous Zebulon Vance, who was quite prominent in NC politics and served as Governor for a period of time.  Vance pushed the court for a change in venue.  So the actual trial was transferred to Iredell County, NC--some fifty miles to the East. 

 

Tom was found guilty of the murder of Laura Foster in a first trial.  But there was some technical, legal problems with the event.  Thereupon, the appeals court ordered a new trial.  Again, he was found guilty a second time.  This time, the sentence came down.  He was to be hung by the neck until he was dead at the Iredell County seat of Statesville.  And on May 2, 1868, Tom was hung, per the order of the court. 

 

While Tom was in the Iredell County jail for a period of two years or so, his mother Mary “walked” once a week from her home on the Yadkin to Statesville (over 50 miles away) to bring her son clean clothes (per a newspaper account in the “New York Herald” paper in April 1868).  Mary was at least 70 years old. 

 

Thus, for her to make a 100 miles plus walking trip, once a week, it was no small chore.  What 70-year old woman could do it today? 

 

 

We Need YHWH’s Government 

 

This presentation is a sad story of what has went wrong in this nation under man’s misgovernment.  The Word declares that it is not within man’s capability to direct his own footsteps (Prov 16:1-25; 20:24; Jer 10:23).  Yes, this was the great crisis facing America in 1860 and the same today in the year 2003. 

 

We need YHWH to direct our footsteps and paths (Prov 16:9).  This is one of the classic reasons that YESHUA in the NT gave us His model prayer which concludes with a petition for His kingdom to come soon (and replace our human mis-rule and mis-government on this planet). 

 

If we had been just following YHWH’s Torah, Mary Dula and Wilson Foster could have been on their own lands--because of YAH’s law which demanded that the land return to its original owner in the Jubilee.  Their work would have been more productive and returned more to them personally, rather than to rich land owners. 

 

The oppressive and regressive taxation that they faced (and which poor people still face today, in the range of perhaps 60% taxation) would never have occurred.  And if hill people were present and in poverty, the Torah demanded that the rich, successful farmers in the valley leave gleanings in their fields--so poor people could glean and eat. 

 

Importantly, on the Seventh year land rest, all debts would have been forgiven.  Poor people, like Mary and Wilson, would have been able to wipe the slate clean in the year of release.  Of great significance, Mary Dula’s rea (racial kinsmen) living in the area would have been obligated to help her with some charity, if she was in poverty and want because of her widowhood. 

 

Wilson’s family would have never been wiped out from a disease or plague.  With attendance at a weekly synagogue on Sabbaths and instruction in righteousness from the Torah (instead of sun worship theology, from a sun worship church), Tom, Laura and the others would have all been instructed in righteousness, in lieu of evil. 

 

And of most importance, the Amalekite bankers in Europe could never have engineered a US Civil War in the 1860s which killed more American boys and young men than all of the American war dead in total in all of the US wars in all of history.  Tom would have had two older brothers around to help Mary and him and give him some needed guidance. 

 

The poverty, want, need and sorrow associated with the aged Mary Dula and Wilson Foster strike a cord of real sadness in me because their whole lives consisted of tragedy and hurt (as things turned out).  Their pain and suffering were totally unnecessary, if they had been properly educated and raised under YHWH’s Torah and if the prevailing US culture was attuned to that Torah. 

 

 

Common Failures

 

No one should be quick to criticize either Mary Dula or Wilson Foster for failures in child rearing.  Most modern Americans have also failed their children (including this writer).  Please understand that as good as King David seemed (he was a man after YHWH’s Own heart), he failed miserably with his children. 

 

The fact that Wilson and Mary were seemingly honest, good, Christian citizens helped neither of their causes.  They had been raised in a sun worship church and system and the prevailing culture, government and leaders around them were all totally sun worshippers (just as is true today).  Truly, they needed a right education--an education from YHWH’s Torah. 

 

 

The After Story 

 

The tragic story of Tom Dula survived because it became a popular ballad in the late 19th century.  Banjo and guitar pickers played it and sang it for ages.  Then in the 1960s, the well known Kingston Trio popularized it as a hit American folk song.  We’ve all heard the lines-- “Hang down your head Tom Dooley, poor boy you’re bound to die.” 

 

This writer once lived in Western North Carolina.  This area always fascinated me because my own Great-Great-Great-Great Grandfather lived in the Yadkin Valley in the early 1800s near the eventual Dula-Foster places  This same area was home to the famous Daniel Boone in the 1770s. 

 

 

The Dilemma 

 

One of the interesting things about the Old Testament prophets is that they publicly, and with dedication, commitment and force, laid out the sins of the Israelite people.  They called a spade a spade and did not mince any words over political correctness.  The chips always fell where they should fall with these early preachers. 

 

Perhaps the greatest of the condemnations and chastisements of the people over evil was how the Tanakh prophets regularly, frequently and without hesitation condemned the rich Israelites of those days for how they were exploiting, abusing and taking advantage of the poor Israelite “rea.” 

 

As has been true for the last 6,000 years, the rich have always exploited, oppressed and abused the poor.  This was one of the most noticeable evils in both the Houses of Yisrael and Yehudah in ancient days.  This same evil continued in NT times. 

 

Accordingly, the prophets and YESHUA later readily condemned the rich for their evil toward their rea-racial kinsmen. 

 

The historical record described in previous chapters outlines how the true Jews allowed the evil Amalekite bankers to take power over the people in Second Temple days.  The exploitation and wretchedness of the poor by the Amalekites was even worse than the other Israelite Jews.  No wonder YESHUA condemned them so harshly. 

 

Quite naturally, this wickedness has continued on forward from NT days.  And it hasn’t been only the Amalekites.  Historically, the rich of all races and kinds have traditionally ruled over, abused and hurt the poor (Prov 22:7).  That’s been the story of all so-called human beings for the last 6,000 years.  Of course, this was the problem in the Western NC mountains in the 1860s. 

 

Poor people like Mary Dula and Wilson Foster never had a chance in trying to survive against the local fat cats who lived on the better land and had more property and wealth.  The same is verity today.  True, the state has enacted all kinds of welfare programs. 

 

 

The Masses Never Understand 

 

But these give-away schemes are generally contrary to the US Constitution and the Scriptures and accomplish nothing of value. 

 

However, the politicians continue to pass laws granting these small welfare pay-outs to the poor while simultaneously granting huge payoffs and benefits to the super rich (as discussed in former chapters herein). 

 

Of course, the politicians are always quite happy to dole out taxpayer’s funds to support their chances of getting reelected at the next voting time.  The poor, gullible masses who get the small welfare doles are happy and elated in believing that they got something for nothing from the politicians who supposedly cared for them. 

 

Naturally, the plutocrats, who really cash in on the federal give-aways of taxpayer’s funds, are the most happy of all.  And they should be happy because they get the lion’s share of the give-aways.  After all, it is the plutocrats who own the media and educational powers which actually elect the sorry politicians voting for the give-aways. 

 

As discussed in former chapters, the whole purpose of most of these federal give-away programs is in order for the super rich fat cats to really cash in and collect massive pay-offs from Big Brother.  These stupid programs are not designed to really help the poor and needy.  They are specifically designed to help the plutocrats who elect the sorry politicians. 

 

By willingly giving some of the dole to the gullible and uninformed masses (who are both poor and ignorant about how the system works), the poor, ignorant masses continue to go the polls and vote for the status quo (and of course, for the politicians who are doling out the money). 

 

These programs are wrong and they don’t answer the problem.  They destroy the personal integrity of the people and create a worthless welfare state, while helping to destroy the national money system. 

 

What is needed by both the rich and the poor is a focus upon the Torah and its mitzwot, which lay out how Israelites should live, work and survive.  Only the Torah and EL’s government offer true hope. 

 

 

The Evil Has Continued 

 

So the rich have been abusing the poor and needy for ages.  This is reality.  And it is a terrible reality when rich Israelites treat their Israelite racial kinsmen this way. 

 

But in ancient Yisrael, the prophets would call out and condemn the rich and powerful for their exploitation of the poor.  Who was around in 1860 or today in 2003 to take a stand and make the same cry for justice and righteousness, per YHWH’s Torah? 

 

Well, Christianity has been the prevailing religion in the House of Yisrael nations for the last 2,000 years.  In this context, has there ever been an occasion or a time when a Christian Church (of any denomination) or a Christian preacher, pastor, priest or leader (of any denomination or group) has taken a stand publicly to condemn the rich of the day for their exploitation and abuse of the poor and needy? 

 

This writer knows of no instance in recorded history when anyone in Christendom has ever condemned and chastised the rich over the evil use of their powers.  True, some rich persons have supported state welfare programs here in the 20th century (all the while that they maneuvered themselves into hypocritical positions of avoiding personal taxes to support those welfare schemes). 

 

Even workers of evil, like Lyndon Johnson, Bill Clinton and Colin Powell (who have never had a job in their lives, beyond being on the public payroll), have become multi-millionaires, although they never have made much money outright in their government jobs.  Obviously, something has set them apart from the rest of the public.  For sure, they haven’t been paying taxes to accumulate that wealth. 

 

But whatever government workers can obtain through hook or crook is only just part of their payoffs.  Increasingly, many federal workers are now in the early 21st century earning over $100,000 a year.  In addition, huge bonuses are often paid to them under some pretext (the situation with the Postal Corporation making bonus payments is cited elsewhere herein). 

 

Recently, Bush awarded several thousand of his appointees bonuses up to $10,000 each (Jan 6 & 13, 2003, “American Free Press,” p. 2).  So Washington has been and is rolling out the money to the federal employees (while many Americans are at the poverty level). 

 

Hence, the poor and the middle classes end up paying for much of the welfare.  Certainly, if the super rich were paying for welfare, we wouldn’t have any welfare programs in place. 

 

Because taxation is so high on the poor and middle classes (at the 60% level), the middle class is being converted into poverty.  It is only the rich who keep getting richer and richer.  

 

In “The Seventh Dawn” movie, actor William Holden, as a very wealthy land holder in Malaysia, had a fabulous one-liner which really strikes home in this discussion.  Asked about how hard it was to make his wealth, the actor Holden communicated that the problem was making the first million; because, from there on, the rest comes easy--just like multiplying rabbits. 

 

And that’s the reality in the real world for many of the super rich (many of whom never even had to make the first million, as they are born into it). 

 

 

Christianity Has Failed 

 

Has the Catholic, Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Pentecostal, Adventist or any of the other Christian Churches condemned the rich for their abuse of the poor?  If they won’t condemn the local, petty, rich fat-cats, one can just about bank on it that they will not speak out and condemn the super rich, Amalekite plutocrats who now own and control the Christian US and Britain. 

 

Manifestly, the Christian sun worship religion has failed the Israelite people over the past 2,000 years.  This failure has meant that the rich keep getting richer and richer, while everyone else is being redefined as poor.  What a tragedy it has been that Christian leaders turn their faces from the evil in the land and never speak out and condemn the rich who control and run the governments which allow the evil to persist. 

 

Having criticized Christian Churches and leaders for failing to take a stand on one of the great evils of all time, this writer is compelled to offer a brief explanation for this enigma.   Christianity has not been founded, inspired or directed by The MOST HIGH.  It is pagan sun worship to the core.  It must exist and perpetuate itself through the power of demons and men. 

 

To survive, it has had to have money (because money is the name of the game in the entire Adamic society--which is predicated upon false sun worship).  It is the rich and more affluent Christians who give the money to the churches and preachers.  If the preachers condemned the hand that was feeding them, they would quickly be out of business.  They know this. 

 

The same thing is true with the politicians.  That’s why government operations and services are geared to benefit the plutocrats who put up the money and call the shots from behind the scenes.  Politicians and religious leaders do not dare speak out and criticize the rich who are putting up the money and calling the shots. 

 

 

The Right Approach 

 

YESHUA, the NT leaders and the OT prophets were in an entirely different ball park.  They worked for and served The EVERLIVING EL.  Though they were generally poor, they had no need for personal wealth and blessings.  Idols and gods were just not on their agenda.  They were unconcerned with acquiring property, cars, land, women, bank accounts and so forth. 

 

Because they were not running around in a tizzy trying to extort and con money out of the sun worshipping public, they were free to speak out and call a spade a spade.  Whatever money they needed, they worked for it themselves (as was true with Shaul, who was a tent maker).  Since they were not indebted to the rich, they were free men, who were only concerned with serving The EL. 

 

 

The Education Answer, Revisited   

 

The Word proclaims the destruction and end of the White British Commonwealth and America because of a lack of knowledge (and understanding--Hos 4:6).  The future is assuredly coming and cannot now be avoided (because the people are so incredibly evil and will make no effort to obtain knowledge and understanding). 

 

There is manifestly not much of anything that anyone can do in the context of activism to change the wickedness in the land.  But the person who really cares and is concerned can take some action to educate others.  He can spend some of his money on worthwhile educational efforts. 

 

As a minimum, almost everyone should be interested and concerned about educating and informing his own loved ones, friends and racial kinsmen about the present crisis.  He can put money into works and efforts which do describe the sin and wickedness of our time and possible solutions.  Obviously, anything which promotes the Torah and Torah study and lays out the existing sins in the land is a good effort. 

 

While there are limitations upon what impact a caring person will have on the generic population, the truth remains that logically someone out there will take the matter seriously and turn to some forms of righteousness in dealing with the very prevalent evil now so plain in the entire American and British structures. 

 

But tragically, most people and even those that become engrossed in activism (in bombing abortion clinics, etc) are far too weak in terms of knowledge and understanding themselves to really educate others.  So before one can educate and inform others, he must pull his head out of the sand and become informed himself. 

 

 

The Need 

 

This means that apathy, indifference and don’t care (because of the focus of the human heart upon the multitude of idols in this world) must be replaced with passion, dedication and zeal for truth and knowing, understanding and obeying truth.  There aren’t even many (if any) abortion clinic bombers who will make any particular personal effort to obtain truth.  Most everybody could care less about possessing truth. 

 

Of course, this is the prevailing sad state which spells out the reality that the Yisrael nations will be destroyed because of a lack of knowledge (Hos 4:6).  Above all else, the American and British peoples simply aren’t interested in the knowledge and understanding of truth.  It simply is not on their agenda. 

 

For most persons, their agenda is the status quo of loving, enjoying and partaking of their multitude of idols and gods which surround them.  Whatever money they have, they are just not prepared to spend it for truth--for themselves, their children, their friends or their racial kinsmen.  Education about truth has little interest or support from most people.  Thus, they will be destroyed for lack of knowledge. 

 

Well, there is now only one real option and that is for persons of concern to turn to YHWH YESHUA and the study of His Word, in hope that they will be accounted worthy to escape the coming destruction of this present, wicked, sun worship system.  This system is doomed! 

 

But it is not doomed only because the works of men are self destructing in themselves.  More importantly, it is doomed as a part of YHWH’s coming judgment upon evil. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 368--Requirements for Public Office

 

 

US History and the Constitution 

 

Historically, in the United States, one of the most extraordinary failures in government has been the question of requirements for holding public office.  Other than several minor discussions in the United States Constitution, the subject is largely ignored and passed over.  

 

Of course, the Constitution does have these several minor presentations. 

 

For example, Article I Section 2 lays out the need for members of the US House of Representatives to be 25 years old, be a citizen of the US for seven years, and be an inhabitant, when elected, of the state where chosen.  For the Senate, Article I Section 3 specifies that senators shall be 30 years old, a citizen for nine years of the US, and an inhabitant of the state when chosen. 

 

For the US President, Article II Section 1 of the Constitution lays out the requirement that the president be a natural born American citizen (or be one on the day that the Constitution was adopted), be 35 years old and be a resident of the US for fourteen years. 

 

Finally, Article VI stipulates that all Senators, Representatives, members of all state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers of the US and its states are bound to take a oath in support of the Constitution; but no religious test shall be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the US. 

 

 

Neglected Issues 

 

Beyond the few above stipulations, the Constitutional framework of the United States largely neglected any other question about public office holders or even over other representatives and employees of the United States.  Article III of the Constitution discusses the US Judiciary, but fails to lay out any requirement for judges to meet (thereby leaving the issue to the Congress and legislation). 

 

As discussed elsewhere herein, one of the most tragic omissions in the US Constitution was the failure of that document to address citizenship and immigration.  Immigration and naturalization were effectively left up to the Congress/states. 

 

On citizenship, the 14th amendment to the Constitution did provide that citizenship would be to all persons born in or naturalized in the US and who are subject to US jurisdiction (presumably, in the vein of residency in the United States). 

 

In the 1780s, the English speaking colonies in North America were very Christian people in orientation.  More specifically, they were White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants (yes, they were WASPS). 

 

The American tie to Christianity has been outlined in former chapters in that even the US Supreme Court has ruled that the United States is a Christian nation (as indeed is true generally in Europe). 

 

In fact, an article by Fred De Aryan on “Does God Really Have Any Rights?” quotes former Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black as saying that in 1776 eight American colonies had established Christian religions and four more had Christian requirements but in a non-denominational framework. 

 

But with the omission of a real definition of citizenship (other than in the 14th amendment), the Constitution essentially provides that any person (however that word is to be defined--but surely understood by most Americans to be any so-called human being) is a citizen of the US with birth here or via naturalization. 

 

As outlined elsewhere herein, the state of Oregon did establish that only White people could be citizens of Oregon.  And surely, any number of Americans would have wanted that classification limited to Christians.  But in the overall US, these issues have been omitted. 

 

This omission means that virtually any so-called person can be an employee, agent, officer or official of the United States.  Even for members of Congress and the US president, almost the same thing can also be stated since the Constitution has so few stated requirements and since the issue of citizenship is supposedly defined in the 14th amendment, as noted above. 

 

 

The Scriptures 

 

It was too bad for the English speaking colonies that the so-called Christian population did not take the Scriptures seriously in addressing the questions of citizenship, immigration and naturalization, and qualifications for employees, officers, and officials of the United States.  This neglect has caused untold sorrow for the people of this nation. 

 

Of course, even if these subjects were addressed, they would have been assessed in the vein of traditional Christianity and Christian thinking.  In other words, the Scriptural dictates would have been totally ignored. 

 

Thus, one can go to the Book and by study and obedience make some determinations about the questions of citizenship and qualifications for public officials and other employees, officers, and officials of the United States government. 

 

Certainly, there are some statements on age in the Word (and even the Constitution does sort of address the age factor, but not totally from the Scriptural perspective).  And manifestly, there is simply no provision to have women or nokri/nekar aliens in any leadership position over the Israelite people. 

 

Yet tragically, this is precisely what has happened because today’s America is largely in the hands of women and nokri/nekar strangers.  Because of this rebellion to the words of the Book, America has progressively lost all sense of direction and especially in the context of public offices and government leaders.  In short, America is in a mess and approaching a crisis state. 

 

 

Christian Citizens Initiative 

 

This writer has a friend in Caddo Gap, Arkansas, Fred De Aryan (cited above), who has organized a “Christian Citizens Initiative to require that all public officials profess a belief in the Old and New Testament Scriptures.”  If implemented, this idea would require a constitutional amendment--in view of Article VI (which did not seem to be properly addressed in De Aryan’s work). 

 

De Aryan’s articles on “Does God Really Have Any Rights?” and “The Fruit of the Womb” outline the thrust of this effort to require that all elected public officials express a “profession of faith in the divine inspiration of both Old and New Testament.”  Per De Aryan’s effort, the focus initially is on requiring this profession in the state of Arkansas.  Presumably, the plan could extend to other states and the US at large later. 

 

Manifestly, if the US was under this requirement, it would get rid of a few of the more powerful Amalekite Jew masters who have put so much hurt and injury upon this nation and its people.  Yes, evil workers like Jacob Javits, Charles Schumer, Joseph Lieberman, etc should be out. 

 

In fact, if this provision extended to appointed government officials, it would have affected the US Supreme Court and numbers of other officials and officers in the US government. 

 

 

The Problems

 

However, such a provision would not be the panacea hoped for.  First, which presentation of the Old and New Testaments apply in this determination?  Would an English translation suffice?  Or should the requirement go back in some way to the original languages?  Could Greek apply here or should be the focus be on the Hebrew and Aramaic (meaning a Hebrew/Aramaic restored NT)? 

 

Next, any mention of the Old and New Testament opens the door to interpretation.  In other words, rebellious Christians all can claim to believe in the Old and New Testaments, but then be in total rebellion towards the Words found therein.  As long as Christians read the Book, in the vein that part of it has been abolished, there will be problems. 

 

Possibly, the stipulation must start with a focus upon the Torah and then additions from there forward--to the prophets, the writings, and the NT.  Of course, Christians will never agree to this condition. 

 

Finally, there is one more profoundly difficult reality in mentioning this requirement.  In the Christian world, Christians generally can claim belief in both the Old and New Testaments, but yet be in total rebellion toward both writings.  People like George W. Bush, Slick Clinton, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, John F. Kennedy, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, etc could and would all express such a belief. 

 

But we know in the real world that any such stated representations are all pap and nonsense because the people involved are far removed from the righteousness of the Book.  Within the Christian framework, it appears out of the question to really determine what’s in people’s minds (although by the Book, one can get some glimpses into reality in the vein of works and/or deeds). 

 

So while the idea of requiring a belief and acceptance of the Scriptures is a marvelous one, there has to be some further defining and distinguishing features.  But this is not as impossible as it first may seem. 

 

 

The Present Impossibility 

 

The initiative under discussion could have become reality in the 1780s.  It should have been broached at that time and in the context of addressing the problems, as cited above.  But the founders of the United States all ignored this issue. 

 

Frankly, the possibilities of such a requirement was a real world type of thing up until about the time of the Civil War.  But great changes came to America in the 1860s under Abraham Lincoln and his successors.  These changes were not for the good. 

 

Certainly, from the time of the Civil War and on forward until the early 21st century, it has become more and more out of the question for such an initiative.  For sure, it would be impossible today.  But the fact remains that such an undertaking could have been a good thing in a republic or democracy, as developed by man. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 369--The Basis of Tyranny

 

 

The Dilemma 

 

The Adamic peoples and other forms of humanoids have certainly faced absolute tyranny for most of the past 6,000 years of history since Adam was created and placed in the Garden of Eden. 

 

Even when man may not have been living in the absolute, stark terror of tyranny, there have been evil men, alive, who were plotting and planning tyranny over other humans/humanoids. 

 

So man has either been living under tyranny or has been in a process of moving to that posture because intelligent and forceful men were planning tyranny for their fellow citizens.  Hence, we have either had it or have been in the process of getting it, as is true in modern America. 

 

President Bill Clinton, himself, laid out the reality now facing Americans in a speech at the University of Cincinnati on October 15, 1995.  Slick said:  “The road to tyranny, we must never forget, begins with the destruction of the truth” (Jul-Aug 2000 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 23).  And this is the reality of the modern USA. 

 

Truth in Christian America has been rapidly destroyed by all national leaders--starting with Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, Bill Clinton, the Bushes and on down the line to the people.  The same indictment applies against all modern Western Christian leaders in their nations. 

 

YESHUA carefully laid out the whole dilemma of tyranny when He said that the leaders of the nations exercise dominion over the people, but it shall not be so with His disciples, who were to make up the election of the Apostolic Assembly (Matt 20:25-26; Mk 10:42-43).  As The MESSIAH went on to say--His disciples were to learn to be servants and not lords and masters over others. 

 

As Kefa was to later write, the elders in The ELOHIM’s flock (of sheep) were to feed the flock and be an example of righteousness and proper conduct and not “lord over” EL’s people (I Pet 5:3). 

 

 

Lording Over the Sheep

 

The essence here is that in the world out there (apart from the true believers and followers of YESHUA), the leaders “lord over” and dominate the people whom they rule.  Of course, the reference here isn’t only to political and government leaders, but to all leaders--social, economic, religious and so forth.  Conversely, the leaders over YHWH’s people are to be servants and bond slaves of the people. 

 

This is quite a contrast.  And it is totally unreckoned in the world of man for the last 6,000 years (beyond the age of the Apostolic Assembly and YESHUA’s followers from c26 CE to c70 CE). 

 

 

The Effect of This Reality

 

Since YESHUA proclaimed reality, as far as people of the world are concerned, it is clear that man (of all races, kinds and creations) has it in his heart, mind and mentality to rule over, dominate and lord over other men.  That’s the way it is.  Clearly, it has been that way for the past 6,000 years. 

 

Actually, all of this ties back to pride and vanity which have been elaborated upon in former chapters.  Man wants to be a big shot in charge of other men.  He wants to dominate and rule over them and exploit and abuse them for his personal benefit and vanity. 

 

This indictment pertains to all men--save those who have tasted true repentance and have properly dealt with carnality in their lives.  Yes, it affects politicians of all sorts and kinds (all the way from George Washington to Abe Lincoln to Franklin Roosevelt to Bill Clinton to George W. Bush). 

 

Moreover, it affects all government bureaucrats and leaders (however they get into positions of authority), religious leaders (popes, cardinals, pastors, preachers, etc), Amalekite bankers and masters (who are genetically evil), doctors (who live in a vacuum, believing that they are gods on earth), lawyers (who twist and abuse justice to make money and rule over others), Indian chiefs, Voodoo witch-doctors, etc. 

 

Carnal man has a basic desire to rule over, dominate and exploit others for his personal benefit, pleasure, pride and vanity.  And that is the name of the game in the society out there--separate and apart from the true election of YESHUA. 

 

But there is another twist on this theme.  It isn’t only that carnal man has this basic disposition of wanting to rule over and lord over others, man also has another little unique slant on this matter.  Man routinely wants to impose his will, authority and power over others.  Now, the imposition of will and power over others can cover an enormous amount of ground. 

 

 

The Methods for Power 

 

In ancient times, men tended to fight it out on the battleground--either individually or collectively in armies.  The strongest and most brutal man would prevail in the fight.  To him went the spoils of the conflict.  He typically became the king and domineering leader over those he conquered and suppressed.  In modern slang, this is called establishing the pecking order. 

 

As time progressed, man turned to more intellectual methods of achieving lordship over others.  He tended to use brain power, instead of brawn power.  This led to the hereditary rights of kings and eventually to a democracy in ancient sun worshipping Greece--where men could use charisma and charm to con the people into accepting themselves as rulers and lords. 

 

Concurrently with man’s different efforts to obtain rulership over people, governments made up of assistants and hirelings were established to help these principle leaders.  After all, if a man can’t be number one, he will often be happy to be a number two or number three man if there are thousands or millions of subjects to dominate and rule over. 

 

So governments came into being, and they started growing in size to allow many men to have opportunities to dominate and lord it over other men.  In time, this system produced the government bureaucracy which found its height of success and calling in Communist and Socialist states (to include the modern USA and Britain). 

 

Once the ruler and his system are in place, there is a natural tendency to want to take steps to insure that the people involved in rule and in their system of rule and domination are perpetuated and continued.  Simply stated, they don’t want to give up power.  For certain, they don’t want another system to arise and take over. 

 

When man’s basic desire to lord over others is coupled with his desire to perpetuate his system of rule, there is a routine fall out of the implementation of enormous quantities of laws, rules and procedures to tie up the common people and make them subservient to their lords and masters.  

 

This reality has certainly occurred within the United States which started off with almost no laws, rules and demands of government on the books (in 1788).  Yet, ever since the beginning of the present Constitutional government, the nation’s leaders have been making laws, rules and so forth to completely tie up and regulate every moment of every subject’s life. 

 

 

The Need 

 

Of course, true freedom and liberty would exist when there are absolutely no laws, rules, procedures and demands on the books.  When a person could do whatever he wished, he was a free man.  But since man is basically evil and would abuse and hurt his fellow-man, some laws and rules were obviously necessary in order to prevent man from hurting others. 

 

Many of these laws had their basis originally in YAH’s Torah.  From there, different, civilized, Adamic men have produced laws to keep men from hurting other men. 

 

Even in the backward, primitive lands of the behemah and chaiyah, those people have sometimes had brains enough to try to have enforced rules which prevented people from hurting other people in the clan or group. 

 

Among these primitive behemah and chaiyah, there were limitations on such rules because the strongest and toughest humanoid usually became the king or ruler (who had absolute authority to do whatever he wished).  Thence, the establishment of the pecking order by brutal strength has been the primary factor for government by primitive behemah and chaiyah peoples. 

 

But the idea of law has always went far beyond the simple matter of keeping people from hurting other people (criminal laws).  Soon, laws and rules were put into place to promote the ruler and his system in power.  These laws became dictatorial and oppressive.  They represented tyranny and not freedom. 

 

 

Religion 

 

In this transition from raw, brutal power and strength to more intellectual methods of ruling over others, intelligent man discovered the enormous possibilities of religion to help him to preservere.  In the general sense, probably Adam man has had a propensity and desire for religion ever since the Garden of Eden (on his own terms, of course). 

 

As was pointed out in the prior chapters on humanism, Adamites somehow receive some satisfaction (pride) out of feeling or believing that they are helping other men.  All rulers and despots who lord over and dominate their subjects operate on this premise.  They actually believe that they are instruments of good for their people (the Rockefellers have always made this their position). 

 

In any case, Adam man began discovering that religion offered a type of glue which could be manipulated and used to bind or glue together his subjects so that his rule could be perpetual.  In the case of a king, this would insure that his seedline son would be the next king when he died.  In the case of sun worship democracies (like in Greece), it meant that the prevailing political power and politicians would stay in place. 

 

The use of religion as a glue was very practical and easy even among the primitive behemah and chaiyah--perhaps because they were so subject to demon spirits which found their satisfaction in promoting their “stoich” religious doctrines and ideas. 

 

So, early on, in the jungles of Black Africa, the African king and despot discovered that the medicine man could be his ally, friend and colleague in lording over the other Africans.  So the Shaman arrived on stage to become a type of second ruler over the people. 

 

In fact, some medicine men became so persuasive and powerful (especially, with demonic influence and help) that they became the primary ruler--even ruling over the secular king or big shot.  This was perhaps the essential disadvantage of using religion as a glue to bind and tie the people to their existing kings, princes and leaders. 

 

This same problem surfaced in time in Adamic lands.  It’s questionable to what extent it progressed in ancient Egypt with the religious hierarchy, as opposed to the Pharaoh.  Perhaps the Pharaoh was able to maintain power because he became, in time, a god to rule over the religious affairs, as well as the secular affairs of Egypt.  Thus, even the sun priests had to be careful about opposing the Pharaoh. 

 

Manifestly, this precise question was to surface in Christianity in the early fourth century CE when Constantine came to power and effectively began the process of marrying church and state into one organism. 

 

 

2,000 Years of Christianity 

 

Apparently, in the early years of Christendom, Christianity was just one of many sun worship faiths which existed in the Roman Empire.  This seems to be the prevailing situation in Rome in the years 42 to 67 CE when Catholic Christianity first began (the history of Christendom will be covered in detail in subsequent chapters). 

 

Although some of the Roman emperors tried to use emperor worship (treating the emperor as a god, like in the case of the Pharaoh), it never really gained much ground.  Hence, there were several sun cults in existence which sort of shared religious power over the people.  The most important one of these was Mithraism, which was very popular in the Roman legions. 

 

The work of Constantine the Great will be addressed in a succeeding chapter.  Suffice to say, he came to power in 312 CE and one of his first acts was to “begin” making the Christian religion the state religion.  This situation did not become firmly in place until some later years in the fourth century CE.  But Constantine started the ball rolling in his day (as will be described in a later chapter on Christian history). 

 

Surely, Constantine and his immediate successors understood the potential value of religion (specifically the Christian religion) to hold their empire together.  Whether they understood that Christianity would become the miry clay of Daniel 2:41-43 is open to question.  But they clearly understood the value of religion. 

 

 

Promoting Sun Worship 

 

As discussed elsewhere herein, Constantine and his Christian religious colleagues went to work early on to begin to impose harsh Roman laws on the people to keep them in line and to promote the Christian, sun worship religion. 

 

The first act of importance was the Sunday worship edict of 321 CE.  It was the first Christian Blue Law which demanded rest on Sundays (under penalty of death). 

 

Since Constantine, himself, was an established sun worshiper, this was a favorable law from his own personal viewpoint.  Too, it met with acceptance and enthusiasm among the leadership in the Christian, sun worship faith.  So everyone was happy--even though a form of tyranny and a great loss of freedom had just occurred. 

 

In the Council of Nicea (325 CE), the sun worshipper Constantine presided over the Christian bishops, as they established the religious solemnity of Easter in preference to the Scriptural Passover.  This was another act of Christian tyranny because people who refused to accept this decision were branded as heretics, and murdered by the state.  

 

From 325 CE forward, the Roman Catholic Church, in league with the established secular Roman governments, established a host of laws, rules and practices which were enforced by dictatorial fiat throughout the Roman Empire.  Perhaps one of the worst of all happened in about 364 CE (or in 336 CE, per some authorities) when the Church Council at Laodicea prohibited Judaizing the Seventh day by rest. 

 

Consequently, people, who tried to keep the Seventh day Sabbath as a day of rest and worship, found that they were declared heretics for being Judaizers.  The secular state then imposed the death penalty upon them.  These Sunday promoting laws will be assessed in later chapters. 

 

The point here is that these various laws were tyrannical and took away freedom and manifestly religious freedom from the people.  The secular Roman emperors were using the subject of religion (in the vein of a state religion) as a type of glue to bind and hold the empire together. 

 

 

Christian Wars 

 

At some point in time, the emperors discovered that they could actually fight and conduct warfare on the battlefield in the sense of religious duty (of spreading the Christian gospel--by the sword). 

 

Although this writer does not have the facts on it, but the evidence suggests that early on secular rulers positioned Christian chaplains in their armies to be sure that the men fought their battles in the vein of doing the will of “Christ.”  Clearly, all Christian nations have picked upon this practice. 

 

Today, Christian preachers and priests follow their armies into battle to help promote the murder of other people. 

 

In the case of Europe, these Christian wars of spreading the gospel were unique for another reason.  Since Europe became entirely Christian, it meant that one Christian army (with its Christian chaplains) was busy murdering and killing another Christian army (with its Christian chaplains). 

 

 

Christian American Wars 

 

In the case of the United States, almost all American wars have been conducted against other Christian parties.  The American Revolution involved Americans killing their fellow Christians and genetic cousins in the British army.  The same thing happened in the War of 1812. 

 

The American Civil War again saw Christians and actually brethren and relatives fighting it out and slaughtering each other.  As elsewhere noted herein, the more Christian side of this conflict (at least, the more sincere and devoted Christian soldiers) was found in the Southern Army, which was defeated by the less Christian side.  So, being Christian, did not pay off for the Confederacy. 

 

Even the US wars against Mexico, Spain and Yugoslavia (by Clinton) involved Christians fighting fellow Christians.  The same predicament occurred in WWI and WWII when Christian Americans killed and slaughtered Christian Germans.  In fact, at Dresden, Germany, late in the War, Christian leaders (like Eisenhower and Churchill) ordered the fire bombing of the city. 

 

Dresden was an open city with no military presence or even an armaments industry.  It was a city of ancient treasures, art, architecture and old people, women and children.  So the allied bombers came in and completely destroyed it and killed more Christian  people in that one attack than all of the people killed in England for all of the war (#12 of 1999, “Calling Our Nation,” p. 14). 

 

So Christian armies and Christian chaplains have been busy for at least 1,700 years murdering and killing other Christians.  This seems to be the reality of Christian history and conduct of warfare.  One Christian kills another Christian.  The Christian preachers are an integral and vital part in the war-making machines of all countries that conduct aggressive war against others (to include the US). 

 

 

Smedley Butler, Revisited

 

Retired Marine Corps General Smedley Butler was quoted earlier herein.  In his book “War is a Racket” (p. 32), he wrote of WWI and said, “So vicious was... (the) war propaganda that even God was brought into it.  With few exceptions our clergymen joined in the clamor to kill, kill, kill.  To kill the Germans, God is on our side...it is His will that the Germans be killed.”  

 

These 1935 words of Butler bring to mind the situation with the Bush war against terrorism, launched in the fall of 2001, after the Sep 11th Muslim attacks in Washington and New York.  Yes, Christian leaders like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, etc all joined in with the clamor to kill and murder the Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq (much like Muslim clerics have been urging Moslems to kill Americans). 

 

 

The Hispanics 

 

Spain and Portugal have been Catholic countries for much of the last 2,000 years.  When the new world (the Americas in the West) was discovered and opened up for Christian exploitation, Spanish and Portuguese armies and explorers came in numbers to try to murder the Indians and steal all of the gold and treasures possible from them.  

 

Quite naturally, these Spanish and Portuguese armies came with their Christian chaplains (priests) who had two jobs--provide the Christian religion to the soldiers and impose the Christian religion on the conquered natives.  In those days, the Indians either converted to Catholicism or they were dead.  Most gladly converted. 

 

 

A Change Occurred 

 

However, with the growing power of the Catholic Church and religion, another thing was underway that the secular kings never dreamed of.  All of a sudden, the number one power broker was no longer the king. 

 

Instead, the pope became the number one boy in the empire.  Kings and secular rulers, bankers, merchants, doctors and lawyers all were subservient to the Catholic hierarchy. 

 

Once the pope became the number one boy, there was a shift in the exploitation and abuse of the masses.  Instead of using armies to go in and slaughter other people, so that the king could rule over and dominate those people, it became a question of using the secular armies to go in and conquer other people in order that they could be Christianized and made subjects of the pope. 

 

The famous crusades of a thousand years ago is an example of the Catholic hierarchy in using the Christian armies of Christian Europe in ways to try to take over the Middle East under a religious pretext of Christianizing Palestine (the so-called Holy land). 

 

Not only were multitudes of Christians and Moslems killed in this effort, but the Christians organized groups of children to go on crusades to the East.  Many of these White, Christian boys and girls were captured by the Muslims and sold on the slave markets in Constantinople.  The crusades proved to be a great disaster for most of the people of Europe. 

 

With the church hierarchy clearly in place, the focus became more on Christian laws, rules and edicts, rather than on the wishes of secular rulers to impose their wills on the people.  In this environment, the church became an instrument of terror and tyranny over the people. 

 

The church enacted all kinds of laws and rules which were enforced under the authority of the state and required the torture and murder (by burning people at the stake) of any non-conformists.  It was politically correct to obey every edict of the Catholic Church.  The alternative wasn’t fun to experience. 

 

 

Breaking Away 

 

But through the years, there were mainly fleshly Israelites scattered across Europe who had a problem with religious conscience and liberty.  They began breaking away and trying to move closer to the Scriptural demands of truth.  Some of these peoples and groups were discussed in the prior chapters on the seven assemblies. 

 

There were the Waldensians in the twelfth century, from Britain and France East to the Alps and further on to the Balkans.  Next, there were the Hussites in Bohemia in the early 15th century.  And in time, there arose the Anglicans in Britain (under King Henry VIII--in the early 16th century) and the Lutherans in Germany (also in the early 16th century). 

 

In the case of the Waldensians and the Hussites, the popes did raise armies and invade various countries in a wild slaughter of people trying to stomp out the so-called heresies.  After murdering millions, all of these non-conforming (politically incorrect) groups were either destroyed or went underground to try to survive. 

 

The Roman Church had a certain balance of power in place in Europe for most of her 1,260 years of tyrannical rule.  If one king or group of people got out of line, the pope could call upon other European countries to raise armies and go in and attack the non-conformists.  Once the conquerors took over, everyone who opposed the pope could be tortured and murdered.  Thus, Catholic control was soon back in place. 

 

But in time, the discontent began to spread.  So, in the 13th century, the Catholic Church formally adopted spying and torture as legal and proper methods of dealing with so-called heretics (that is torture, plus death at the stake, which was the historic position).  Soon, the Catholic Inquisition was in place, as perhaps one of the greatest practices of tyranny ever in history. 

 

The church used spies and provocateurs throughout society in an effort to identify the discontents (so-called heretics).  Once people were arrested, they would be tortured until they recanted.  If they tried to maintain their integrity, they would be burned alive at the stake.  The church slaughtered millions in an effort to hold the people in line.  This great tribulation will be discussed further in later chapters herein. 

 

 

The Reformation 

 

This was the prevailing situation in Europe until the Protestant Reformation was successful in England under Henry VIII (who ruled from 1509-1547) and Martin Luther (1517) who was supported by some of the local German kings and rulers (to be discussed in a later chapter).  Soon, the cry of religious freedom and toleration became the focal point of concern in Northwest Europe. 

 

In those days, the pope used to be the man who crowned the kings and ruled over them without opposition.  Everybody marched to his tune or they were dead. 

 

One time, one king (apparently from Germany) got out of line; and in fear, rushed to St. Peter’s at the Vatican in Rome to try to beg forgiveness from the pope.  As an act of penance, the pope made him stand barefooted in St. Peter’s square for over a day in the cold of winter before seeing him. 

 

Charles V (1500-1558) was the king of Spain and was in the process of reestablishing or reviving the Holy Roman Empire with himself as emperor.  But somehow, poor Charles had fell out of favor with the pope, Clement VII.  Though Charles had been crowned king in Spain, he still needed the blessing of the pope to proceed to take over the empire. 

 

In 1529, Charles rushed to Bologna, Italy to see Clement, who had come there from Rome.  The pope was carried on a golden procession chair and under a golden canopy while wearing a triple crown.  He was accompanied by four cardinals who were walking on foot.  Charles came to him and bowed to kiss his dirty toe as an act of penance to gain the favor of the pope (“Hunted Heretic,” p. 18). 

 

In those days, people received an indulgence if they kissed the toe of the pope (ibid, p. 20).  Of course, the indulgence would theoretically be useful to reduce or eliminate the time that would have to be spent in purgatory while awaiting a future of being cast into hell or heaven.  For the good Catholic, the kissing of the pope’s dirty, stinking toe was a great privilege. 

 

By the time of the French Revolution, the tribulation had just about run its course.  Napoleon came to power and in time conquered Rome and the Vatican.  Though he was ostensibly Catholic, he was an independent man. 

 

When he was ready to be crowned emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, in Paris, at the Notre Dame Cathedral, Napoleon called for the pope to come to Paris and perform his usual practice of crowning secular kings in the Holy Roman Empire.  Just as the pope was ready to place the crown on Napoleon, the emperor stopped the ceremony and crowned himself. 

 

 

The Deadly Wound 

 

As will be later discussed, this single act broke the power of Rome over much of the world--at least, for the next 200 or so years.  True, Rome retained some power in the lands of Southern Europe (Spain, Italy and Portugal).  But otherwise, she was wounded (but not totally to death, as will be addressed in later discussions herein). 

 

It has to be significant that with the crushing of the Roman Catholic Church, various Protestant Churches arose in her place and tried to assume the same posture of domination and authority over the people.  In England, the king became both the head of the nation and the head of the church (the Church of England or Anglican Church). 

 

Luther wanted a church-state operation in Germany and the Reform movement in Switzerland (under Calvin) tried to become a church-state institution.  It seems like the people got rid of the tyrant Rome only to have Protestant tyrants step in and try to take over. 

 

However, these various efforts all eventually failed--although not until after they too murdered and slaughtered a lot of people who would not conform to their religious edicts. 

 

So this background takes one to the realization of some measure of religious freedom in much of the so-called Christian West for certainly the last two or three hundred years (or longer if one dates it from the Peace of Westphalia of 1648).  Once religious freedom became the order of the day, a couple of other forms of tyranny developed to be almost as bad as the old Roman Catholic Church’s inquisition.  

 

While these new forms have not yet equaled Rome’s brutality and evil, they are growing and becoming more important in laying the ground work for the coming New World Order or world government which will be the most repressive, diabolical, brutal and evil of all time (even exceeding the former Roman Catholic Church).  This new order will be assessed in subsequent chapters. 

 

 

Demographics 

 

To appreciate where man is now on this issue of tyranny and where he is headed, it would be well to recall some comments from several former chapters on the issue of the Edomites and their great propensity for evil. 

 

As YESHUA laid it out in Matthew 23, there are racial descendants of Satan-Kain out in the world who The MESSIAH identified as being the murderers of the righteous--past, present and future.  This Scripture has been discussed at some length earlier and there is no intent to repeat that presentation. 

 

Suffice to say, these people have existed over the ages in the form of the Kenites, Hamites, Canaanites and the Edomites (mainly, those who descend from Esau, via Eliphaz, whose mother was a Hittite of the Canaanite nation). 

 

The Edomite Eliphaz and his descendants quickly intermarried further with the fallen line of Cain so that within a few generations, this whole lineage was one of essentially descendants of Satan-Cain. 

 

Though Amalek was perhaps the most famous of this depraved line, it must be noted that other Canaanites and Hamites fit almost into the same category.  Thus, the modern peoples of Sicily, most of lower Italy, Spain, Portugal, Southern Ireland and so forth are generally of this lineage. 

 

The evidence is most persuasive that this line of people has given the world organized crime and the Roman Catholic Church.  Again, Christian history will be covered in later chapters.  There is no intent to delve into it here.  But the point must be made that Catholicism has been in the hands of Satan-Kain, from day one of her history.  The murderers of the righteous have been sitting in Vatican City. 

 

Next, the Amalekites have not only controlled much of Judaism and the Jews for the past 2,100 years, and the Catholic Church for the last 2,000 years, but Amalekite bankers have become the super rich plutocrats ruling the US and White British Commonwealth, following the success of the Protestant Reformation of 500 years ago. 

 

Since money talks, the Amalekites have proven to be the most powerful agency of all in modern times. 

 

Along with the people of Satan-Cain, there has been, of course, a host of janissaries who have worked as hard and diligently to further the goals of this group of people as much as anyone else.  So, whatever the fallen line of Satan-Kain lacked, janissaries have stepped in to provide and promote.  It looks like these people would have some brains about tyranny and the loss of freedom but they don’t. 

 

 

A Third Category of People 

 

Since Grecian sun worship democracy became the accepted political system in the House of Yisrael nations (the US and White British Commonwealth), another type of person has become one of the key players in Satan’s objective of installing his age end New World Order. 

 

This third type consists of all of the voters in the general population (who historically have often been racial Israelites).  They are really the people who elect the evil politicians who oversee this system.  These Israelite voters are passive, apathetic, gullible, uninformed, ignorant and blindly vote at each election to continue the status quo.  They simply don’t understand what they are doing. 

 

Truly, it is this third category of people who are the most culpable and evil of all.  We all know the mentality of the depraved Amalekites.  But the Amalekites constitute a very small part of the House of Yisrael populations.  Real, bloodline Israelites have dominated these lands for the past 390 plus years.  It is these Israelites who vote for the politicians to continue the awful depravity now encompassing the Christian West. 

 

Because it is the people themselves who are the guilty party (and not the Amalekite bankers/masters who have the money and supposedly call the shots) that YHWH will soon execute His justice upon the people of Yisrael.  Yes, the people elected Abe Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, Bush Senior, Bush Junior and so forth.  Thus, the people are the guilty band. 

 

If the people had an ounce of honesty and integrity, they would have either not elected these scoundrels; or as a minimum, they would have demanded that their senators and congressmen impeach and remove them.  Yet, the people have never done this.  They have acquiesced and approved of the depravity of their elected leaders. 

 

With this continuing approval from the general population, the politicians and government leaders have continued to wax worse and worse.  Today, they are the worst ever.  The Amalekite Christian Bill Clinton is the epitome of evil (even worse than most Amalekite Jews). 

 

And sure enough, Clinton, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush and their cronies and others like them have been as busy as possible today passing laws, signing executive orders and otherwise taking actions to install the most diabolical and wicked government in the history of the House of Yisrael.  American freedoms are vanishing with regularity.  Already, tyranny is a fact of life in the United States. 

 

This charge will be conclusively proven in the succeeding chapters.  Tyranny is now upon us and most Americans and Britons don’t even understand it at all.  Certainly, they don’t know why things have gotten so bad. 

 

 

Evil American Presidents 

 

Just as Bill “Slick” Clinton regularly obeyed and marched to the plutocrat tune and stood ready to impose a dictatorial state and tyranny whenever the plutocrats so chose, the same charge can be laid to Clinton’s predecessor George H. W. Bush and to his successor George W. Bush. 

 

All of these people are very evil and are totally dedicated to the New World Order and plutocratic rule.  While the depravity and evil of Bill “Slick” Clinton is not debated, there is much evidence showing that both of the Bushes are also extremely evil men.  In their ancestry, they seem to be Amalekites (as is true with Slick) and might be bisexuals or sodomites as well (as is also true with Slick). 

 

Moreover, the Bush family has long been linked in with the plutocrats.  The difference between the Bushes and Bill Clinton is that the Bushes have leaned in the direction of the Amalekite Rockefellers while the evil Clinton has been and is owned by the more powerful Amalekite Jews. 

 

Off and on since Abraham Lincoln, American presidents have been moving in the direction of a tyrannical state under their dictatorship.  Lincoln started it--ostensibly, in a motion to “preserve the union,” as he told the American people (interestingly, the reason that there was a so-called need to save the union was because of Abraham Lincoln, himself, and his election.  Thus, he was the cause of the division and crisis). 

 

Certainly, FDR was tyrannical and also made giant strides to impose the New World Order, starting in the 1930s.  Presidents since FDR have all followed suit with more and more Big Brother and police state tactics.  There has been no turning back from this motion since 1933. 

 

The trial of a number of right wing racialists in Fort Smith, Arkansas in the late 1980s happened under Ronald Reagan’s administration (as noted elsewhere herein).  George H. W. Bush was the president who used the New World Order phrase and made some of the first formal efforts to implement it with his attack upon the innocent Randy Weaver family in North Idaho (as will be addressed in a later chapter). 

 

Yes, tyranny and evil were launched broadside on the American people by the Amalekite Franklin Roosevelt.  It continued on under Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy (actually, it accelerated under JFK), Nixon, Ford, Carter (who also gave it another big boost), Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Clinton (who really pushed it) and under young George W. Bush.  All presidents since 1933 have participated in this motion. 

 

In preceding chapters, and in the following remarks, the point is made that Bill Clinton seems to be waiting in the wings to return to power over the UN or the US (via a new constitution or a Hillary presidency or vice-presidency). 

 

While there may be some uncertainty about when Bill Clinton may regain power over the American people and whether it will be through the UN or the US presidency, for sure, he will be working on it in the coming days. 

 

 

And Now, Bush 

 

In the meantime, the nation is faced with George W. Bush and his Republican successors (Cheney, Powell or whomever), depending upon how long they can keep power before things utterly collapse and usher in the Democrats and a new government with massive changes in the status quo. 

 

Surely, Cheney does not offer much of a future with his bad heart.  As pointed out earlier herein, Bush also could face death since he was elected in the jinxed (figuratively speaking) 20th year (2000).  That puts some other Republican in a good position to take over.  At the moment, it looks like Colin Powell will be the man.  He is loved by the New World Order crowd and will be very dangerous for America. 

 

The thing which one must remember is that this Republican team is fully capable of tyranny--just as is true with the Democrats.  While the Democrats are worse, the Republicans are not far behind.  After all, tyranny occurred under Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush.  Young George is of the same mold (as proven since GWB took over). 

 

In fact, a July 2001 promotion letter from Lee Bellinger, editor of the previously quoted “American Sentinel,” noted that he had been watching for the past six months for signs that the Bush Administration would dismantle the Clinton promoted police state.  Instead, Bellinger says that “The federal police state is alive and well -- and growing!”   

 

Lee then went on to point out how the IRS has been “completely modernized and readied to roar back to life again” and how “a new wave of federal surveillance directives make even an innocent trip to the post office risky -- by placing you under secret scrutiny of the Treasury Department’s dreaded ‘Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’” (which will be more fully described in later chapters). 

 

Going on, Bellinger adds:  “Under the Bush Administration, unelected power seekers continue to enjoy unprecedented power to ruin your life -- the budgets for gun toting federal agents at the DEA, BATF, FBI, Treasury and INS are going up and up ... and the targets aren’t illegal aliens or foreign drug lords.  The targets are American citizens like you and me -- gun owners, home schoolers, Christian conservatives and hard-money investors top the list of suspect ‘profiles.’

 

“Our Constitution is hanging at a thread.  Frankly, we continue to be faced with a federal establishment so powerful, and so pervasive, that I doubt even Ronald Reagan could turn things around. 

 

“Put simply, the hidden hand of federal power has reached historic proportions -- and the momentum toward statism is so great that I’m not sure how we’ll ever dismantle the terrifying citizen surveillance and control apparatus that exists in Washington.  They are beyond the law.”   

 

 

Yet, Clinton Remains

 

So while tyranny can come from GWB and particularly Colin Powell (who has much public support and would be fully acceptable by the plutocrats), the best option remains that somehow Slick Clinton will regain power and be the man of the hour to impose the New World Order--either in the US or at the UN (which the ruling Amalekites will be ready to implement, once America collapses and Bush is blamed). 

 

The essence here is that Bill Clinton is far more dangerous--and even in the vein that he is now theoretically on the outside of political power.  Accordingly, this publication has concentrated upon that option.  The following presentations and later appendices have been prepared on the basis that Clinton remains the most dangerous man in America.  His rule over the US is simply not over yet. 

 

While the Bushes are evil people as well, they are in the minor leagues in comparison with Slick Clinton who is undoubtedly one of the most evil men in America in the early 21st century (Junior’s limitations hangs on the fact that he is fairly stupid and limited intellectually, as will be later discussed herein; while this condition is not true with Clinton). 

 

 

The Kicker 

 

Now, there arises a fact which the Christian Right in America never takes into account for anything.  Even the Christian Identity motion (which does have some perception--not much, but certainly “some” on the questions of demographics and race) falls short in this regard as well. 

 

The truth is that all of these problems of tyranny and evil now in the lands of America and Britain have been allowed to develop and persist because of Christianity.  These nations (as well as almost all of Europe) are Christian nations.  The people are almost all Christians.  Christianity has dominated Europe since Constantine’s time in 312 CE. 

 

In fact, in the world today, there are something approaching two billion Christians (out of the six billion people scattered over the globe).  Many of these Christians are in North America or Europe among so-called White people.  In almost all of their lands, the nations are under so-called democracies where the people vote for their governments and leaders. 

 

Obviously, the Christian people like and approve of what has been happening in the Christian West for the last several hundred years--certainly, since the Protestant Reformation when the back of Rome was broken.  So, what we have in place right now is Christian tyranny.  It will be proven in the following chapters. 

 

Several times in this production, this writer quotes a simple truth.  In 1892, the US Supreme Court ruled that America is a Christian nation.  It has a Christian government and is made up of Christian people.  Yes, both Bill and Hillary Clinton are Christians. 

 

Some two thousand years ago, Catholic Christianity came along and said that the Roman Catholic Church was the “kingdom of God” on earth.  Catholics have believed that ever since.  Yet, YESHUA told His followers to pray that YHWH’s kingdom would come in the long future.  That prayer still applies today.  We need to pray that YHWH’s kingdom will come soon and end everything wrong here for the past 6,000 years. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 370--Christian Government Oppression

 

 

Yes, The Humanists Do Hate--Their Enemies 

 

Do the modern Christian and Amalekite leftists hate anything in the society which they now dominate?  Well, the answer is yes.  The liberals and humanists have a fanatical hatred and animosity toward any and all efforts (particularly organized efforts) to oppose them and their ideology. 

 

As noted before, they want to not only control the actions of people, but even the very speech, thoughts and opinions of people.  Consequently, they passionately hate true conservatives, right wingers, politically incorrect persons, White Germans and White American Southerners, almost without exception (well, except for Slick Willy and his types). 

 

White persons are generally in trouble, unless they get on the liberal bandwagon and throw their personal integrity away to blindly follow Big Brother.  Manifestly, organizations like the Ku Klux Klan and other right wing, White groups throw the leftists into an uncontrolled panic. 

 

And now, in more recent years, the Amalekite bankers/masters have focused their power (of the left wing media and the liberal government) upon the militia and gun lobbies, together with a virtual assault on the Christian Identity movement which they perceive as the most diabolical of all. 

 

 

The Dilemma! 

 

People who act, talk or think in ways that are not “politically correct” can expect the full force of the law if “anything” ever happens to them or with them to allow Big Brother to move against them.  While liberal courts and judges can let real criminals get away with many, many crimes, they are not about to let politically incorrect persons get away with anything! 

 

Murderers, rapists and child molesters can be quickly released from jail or be faced with small sentences of one to five years, but not politically incorrect people.  Politically incorrect persons don’t have to do much of anything in order to face 700 years in jail or two life sentences, plus 64 years, as will be described and commented upon in later chapters. 

 

Why is there this difference in attitude?  The release of murderers, rapists, child molesters and real criminals promotes more and more crime; which in turn, prompts the public to call for more and more gun control laws, restrictions on freedom and police (federal) spying on the general population to bring on still more losses of freedom. 

 

Conversely, right wing, politically incorrect people are essentially of no threat to anyone (except the ruling government that is trying to impose its system of control and oppression on people).  Obviously, there is much motivation on the part of authorities to crush and stomp out immediately any potential threat to their oppressive actions. 

 

Perhaps this is the reason that the murder of a police officer carries far more punishment and is adjudged a far worse crime by government authorities than the murder of any other citizen.  People are being forced to understand that they cannot oppose the oppressive, dictatorial government. 

 

The need to have politically approved thinking also surfaces in the case of alleged “hate” crimes, elsewhere discussed herein, where punishment is not so much predicated on the crime; but rather, on the supposed politically incorrect opinion and thinking in the mind of the accused law violator. 

 

 

A Satanic Conspiracy 

 

But how in the world can the public be so incredibly naive and uninformed over this obvious reality?  The answer is that there is a Satanic conspiracy at work here which promotes all of these evil motions.  There are huge stakes involved in this conspiracy.  It is the Adversary’s goal, job and work to impose a dictatorial police state on the gullible American goyim, as a part of a coming world government. 

 

This goal and objective requires that crime go up--so that the people will be quick to demand that government impose more and more laws and restrictions on freedom.  The overall public is so mentally controlled by the Devil that they can’t understand what’s going on.  The collective public is now a bunch of zombies who are unable to understand that their sins are the problem. 

 

But many of the politically incorrect people do have some understanding on politics.  They are often opposed to what’s happening and sometimes get carried away in active protests (motivations for this reaction were discussed previously, and will be broached again in later comments).  Since they are a threat to Satan’s overall goal and objective, they must be crushed and crushed hard. 

 

The last surfacing question might be on why The MOST HIGH allows this evil to persist?  The answer here is about the same as to why Slick Clinton and Janet Reno were not the problem.  The problem has been with the evil, rebellious, American, sun worshipping public.  The people are the problem. 

 

Of course, Satan and this dictatorial, oppressive government are acting together in collusion to bring The ELOHIM’s justice on these evil people, who are obsessed with doing acts of sin and wickedness.  In this context, both Satan and the oppressive government will fulfill YHWH’s will for His people. 

 

This is a hard concept for many to grasp.  But the truth is manifest.  Satan (knowingly or unknowingly) is working to fulfill the purpose of The CREATOR.  It is clear that his efforts have been approved by or allowed by The ELOHIM. 

 

YHWH is determined to punish this evil, sinning people and rule over them.  That’s why His justice must ultimately be executed.  It is certain that YAH is using and will use Satan, leftists, liberals, Amalekites, this present oppressive government, foreign powers and on and on to accomplish His will. 

 

While Satan might have conscious knowledge and understanding of his role to fulfill YHWH’s will, it is clear that the human actors involved in this drama are ignorant and uninformed over their roles.  If they understood, they would repent and cry for forgiveness. 

 

 

Hatred in Just Conversation 

 

This writer has found through years of experience in dealing with and talking to leftists and liberals that they passionately hate anyone or anything said to oppose their ideology, as noted before.  This hatred and animosity has been brought out in numerous examples; but one, in particular, concerns a brief acquaintance of mine. 

 

This person was a political liberal who believed that everything presently happening was just grand.  If there were problems in the contemporary culture and civilization, they were caused by the politically incorrect right wing and could be solved by more and bigger government to pass more and more laws to crack down on the right wing and other politically incorrect dissidents. 

 

In examples of this man’s anger and hatred, which would arise in conversations with others, he would become visibly angry or blow up for daring to have to hear a politically incorrect opinion he disagreed with.  He couldn’t handle any discussion on politically unapproved thinking. 

 

Once, he blew up in anger and great animosity while accusing this writer with being opinionated and hard to get along with (when, in fact, he hypocritically was the opinionated, hard to get along with person). 

 

On numerous occasions, this leftist man has presented his left wing garbage, as if it was truth and perfectly normal and all right.  It was acceptable for him to have opinions and beliefs about social and cultural questions in the politically approved and correct mode.  But for persons on the right, watch out, because he would not listen or consider their positions at all.  He would react with anger and name calling. 

 

This leftist hypocrite was a great fan of President Slick.  He liked to brag and boast about Slick and what a glorious job Clinton was doing.  If someone came along and criticized Slick and condemned him in any fashion, then the hypocrite would get mad and upset.  He was so mesmerized and zombiized by the politically correct society that he could not handle a contrary position, belief or opinion at all. 

 

 

A Normal Leftist Reaction 

 

As noted in prior chapters, this strange phenomenon seems to hold true with huge numbers of leftists and liberals and especially with the very vocal, pushy and forward Amalekites.  Whenever an intelligent argument is presented to them with facts, supporting a politically incorrect position, the typical leftist goes to pieces.  They simply cannot handle it at all. 

 

They follow the normal liberal methodology by ignoring the facts and focusing their argument on name calling (just as happened in New Testament days when similar people called YESHUA names, rather than deal with the facts--Lu 7:34).  The modern leftists are totally controlled by the present Satanic conspiracy in charge of America. 

 

This amazing situation was discussed on the Rush Limbaugh radio program on July 30, 1998.  Limbaugh outlined his concept of how liberals react to facts, data and reality from conservatives which they disagree with.  Rather than address and deal with the presented facts and have an intelligent discussion on the facts and objective data, most of them become emotional and transfer the discussion to personalities. 

 

In other words, when a person (ostensibly, on the right or presenting data from a conservative viewpoint) attempts to have dialogue with a leftist or liberal, in the context of objectivity and logic based on presented facts, the leftist or liberal will switch the discussion and begin attacking the personality of the individual outlining the politically incorrect position. 

 

This sickness was mentioned in prior chapters and particularly in the context of trying to have dialogue with many so-called religionists who are just as hypocritical as political leftists and liberals. 

 

As discussed in other remarks heretofore on this theme, these people are manifestly demonized by demons who lock in on their minds and feed them ideas (by mental telepathy) on how to attack the person presenting truth. 

 

The whole leftist movement of liberals, humanists, Socialists and so forth are extremely intolerant and inconsiderate of any viewpoint which differs from their politically correct positions (which presently dominate the American society and culture).  Amalekite leftists are the worst of all.  They are the most difficult of all to talk to. 

 

 

Sometimes Just a Switch in the Subject 

 

Before the leftists begin their usual attack on personalities, some few of them may attempt first to just switch the discussion by ignoring the disagreeable point and bringing up, instead, something different to focus upon.  But this option is not always pursued. 

 

More often, the leftists immediately launch into their usual attack upon personalities and particularly upon the person trying to have dialogue and conversation with them.  This writer has seen many of these leftists in action.  They are hard to talk to on the basis of facts and truth. 

 

They typically lose control of themselves and enter a trance state where they begin offering all kinds of irresponsible and uncalled for statements.  Inevitably, they hog the dialogue floor and never allow the other person in the conversation to say much of anything.  They enter a hypnotic state and spit out charges right and left. 

 

As outlined above, such people are demonized.  The demons begin funneling information into their conscious minds and they speak it without rational thought or contemplation. 

 

 

Race 

 

In today’s Christian, sun worship culture and civilization, race is one of the most touchy subjects of all, as outlined in previous comments.  The typical American under age 50 has been so mesmerized and zombiized that he cannot handle an intelligent discussion on race at all. 

 

Rather than deal with objectivity and facts, the typical sun worshipper starts hollering racist, prejudice and White supremacist to a person bringing up the race subject.  Leftists generally want no discussion on race.  They react by getting mad and start using names of derision and disrespect for anyone bringing up the topic. 

 

The outright hypocrisy and double standard (emanating over the 1998 Slick Clinton sexual escapades) also identify the liberals in terms of integrity, character, personality, emotions and mental thinking.  On the one hand, the leftists went wild with the greatest of condemnation, hatred and opposition to Republican Senator Bob Packwood and his record of sexual misconduct, a few years ago (as noted earlier). 

 

Of course, the leftists bombed him out of office.  Thereupon, Slick Clinton came along and far exceeded anything Packwood ever dreamed of.  The leftists constantly came to his aid, comfort and support and even emotionally attacked and denigrated innocent people who dared to speak out against Slick. 

 

The dilemma over these limited, narrow minded, prejudiced bigots is that millions of them are registered voters.  Moreover, if a politically incorrect person gets accused of something and goes before a jury made up of people like this, the outcome is pretty well established.  It is no fun to face ignorant people like these in judgment/court. 

 

 

Mental Alterations 

 

Beyond the liberal government’s push to accuse, arrest, try and jail politically incorrect people for whatever cause possible, there is another sad feature of this motion. 

 

Historically, in dictatorial countries, the worst possible enemies have always been political discontents because these people, left unchecked, can, as a minimum, bring new views to government and sometimes even go to the extreme of creating revolutions and new governments. 

 

Therefore, people in power hate political enemies the worst of all.  To deal with this problem and oppress and crush these people, governments have looked at different approaches.  Apparently, the Nazis tried to do it with raw, brutal force.  The Communist nations (with their controlled press and media) have often found it beneficial to merely accuse the dissidents with being insane or crazy. 

 

USSR dissidents were typically arrested and sent to a prison for the criminally insane in the old days. 

 

If the poor souls were not crazy by the time that they arrived in those jails, they were subjected to various kinds of mental conditioning and behavior alteration to make them insane (that is, if they lived--many, of course, could count on being executed with the controlled media ready to report that they had committed suicide). 

 

Even in more recent years, Communist China still sends political dissidents to psychiatric hospitals.  People in China, who become involved in non-approved religions, are typically sent to mental hospitals.  As late as Dec 15, 2000, a man (named Tao?) tried to organize a union at a silk factory in China.  He was immediately arrested and send to a psychiatric hospital for “treatment.” 

 

In the famous classic movie “Casablanca,” with Humphrey Bogart, the local French police in Morocco arrested a politically incorrect person and murdered him in jail.  Later, the chief of police prepared a written report of the death and remarked that he would have to decide whether the dissident committed suicide or was killed while attempting an escape. 

 

 

JFK, Revisited 

 

While charges have been leveled against the Truman Administration on the death of former Secretary of Defense James Forrestal (a dissident, who allegedly jumped to his suicide death from an upper floor of a US military hospital, while being held in detainment in a mental ward; but the better view is that he was thrown out of the window--murdered), there is some certainty that John F. Kennedy picked up on the Soviet methods during his presidency. 

 

In JFK’s great push to bring about racial integration in the American South, he had some formidable opposition.  Whenever these discontents spoke out or tried to physically oppose his efforts, they typically were arrested and whisked off to a federal mental hospital for “treatment.” 

 

Perhaps the best illustration of this concerned Major General Edwin Walker, Retired, when he tried to oppose Kennedy at the University of Mississippi.  Walker was arrested and taken to a federal mental prison near Springfield, Missouri.  Of course, the government claimed that he was insane. 

 

And quite naturally, the controlled media (which hated Walker and everything he stood for, in the context of his opposition to racial integration) went to work on him in the public opinion arena.  The gullible public was told daily about how crazy Walker was.  The General was eventually released (after “treatment”).  But he was never the same. 

 

In time, he was even accused of being a homosexual (did his federal imprisonment and “treatment” make him a fag?) which effectively destroyed any remaining support that he had among right wingers.  Walker was not the only person Big Brother has arrested and sent to a government mental hospital for “treatment.”  Others have faced the same fate. 

 

 

Shirley Allen 

 

Shirley Allen of Roby, IL is another illustration.  She was under siege by police for five weeks in the fall of 1997 because local authorities tried to arrest her for not maintaining her lawn properly.  In time they did get her in custody and quite naturally whisked her off to a mental hospital where she eventually was released (“Jubilee,” of Nov-Dec 1997, p. 1, 9). 

 

Once an oppressive government gets physical possession of a political enemy, they can do all kinds of things to him in a controlled mental hospital--to include (the use of) brainwashing (to be later discussed), drugs, brain surgery and other physical means of mind alteration, which can completely change people and make them crazy or walking zombies. 

 

If these options don’t work, then the dissident “can” conveniently have a heart attack or commit suicide. 

 

 

Gordon Kahl 

 

One of the most profound cases of misused government power surfaced in the early 1980s with a farmer named Gordon Kahl who lived in the Medina, North Dakota area. 

 

It seems that Kahl adopted a belief that the federal income tax, as assessed on American citizens, was illegal (per a home video on the truth about Kahl with a panel discussion by writer Len Martin, retired Phoenix police officer Jack McLamb and Christian preacher Ron Poch of the Lord’s Covenant Church). 

 

Hence, the politically incorrect Kahl joined the tax protest movement and stopped filing tax returns.  Quickly, the full force and power of government came against him and Big Brother sent him to a federal prison for a term.  He served his full prison sentence in Texas, but refused parole because the feds wanted him to agree to file tax returns as a part of the parole agreement.  He refused! 

 

However, on completion of his full sentence, he was told that he still had to report to a parole officer in his home state of North Dakota upon his release from prison.  Believing that he served his sentence fully without parole, he ignored the federal demand that he report to a parole officer in ND.  Unbeknown to him, the feds prepared a “misdemeanor” warrant and sent a team of federal marshals to arrest him in Medina. 

 

Though he often was in town, and in the area by himself during daylight hours, the marshals waited to carry out their task.  Apparently, in mid February 1983, Gordon attended a night Grange meeting in Medina with his wife, son Yuri and some friends.  The night meeting broke up and his party left town in two vehicles to go home to their farms, some miles away in a rural area. 

 

In the meantime, the marshals had set up a road block and ambush on a country road in the middle of the night to arrest Kahl (or rather, to attack and assault him and his party, however one may wish to define it).  Kahl’s son and wife later stated that the marshals initially opened fire on the party and their first bullet lodged in a gun which the son was carrying. 

 

Allegedly, Kahl returned their fire and killed a couple of marshals and wounded at least one more.  He and two friends escaped.  But his wife and son were arrested.  His friends later gave up.  However, he fled the state and went to Arkansas where he once lived.  The son was eventually tried and convicted for the murder of the marshals. 

 

 

The Arkansas Murders 

 

Upon fleeing North Dakota, Kahl apparently went to the North Ozarks and stayed with a friend named Leonard Ginter, who was living in a concrete house owned by Bill Wade.  In early June 1983, one of Ginter’s friends tipped the feds off in order to get a large reward.  The local Sheriff and some 60 marshals, FBI agents and Arkansas State Policemen surrounded the house one afternoon. 

 

By chance, Ginter came out and started down the road to check his mailbox and maybe go fishing.  He was promptly arrested and told to call his wife out of the house--which he did.  They both were removed from the immediate area so that they could not see what else was to happen.  Supposedly, Kahl was in the house with a 22 rifle (but no shotgun). 

 

The local Sheriff went to the house, knocked on the door and entered.  Gunfire broke out.  The feds claim that it started in the cabin, although agents outside could have started it since they tend to be trigger happy and there were no other witnesses to confirm what happened.  The agents fired a huge number of shells into the house for the next two hours--evidently not knowing what the status was of its occupants. 

 

Reportedly, no fire was returned by the occupants toward the surrounding police.  In fact, it appears that no fire ever came out of the house toward the persons out of doors.  If there were gunshots inside the building, they were from the two men inside and were not made toward people outside.  In time, the feds at last dumped some gasoline down the stovepipe and started a fire.  They then entered the building. 

 

No one knows for sure what happened.  But the Sheriff was dead from two wounds.  He was shot in the back with a shotgun and was shot one time on his side and through his bullet proof vest with a small caliber rifle--perhaps a 22.  The other man (whoever he was) was shot in the back of the head, execution style.  At some point in time, this other man’s body was badly mutilated and burned by the federal agents. 

 

Specifically, his lower legs and feet and his hands and forearms were cut off and destroyed.  His ribcage and jawbone were crushed, his face was mutilated and a portion of his head was destroyed.  The remaining torso of his body was badly burned. 

 

Quite naturally, the feds claimed that the Sheriff and Kahl shot each other.  Thereupon, capital murder charges were filed against poor Ginter--who was never even involved in any of the shootings--as he was outside, under arrest. 

 

 

A Later Investigation 

 

Despite the above official explanation of what happened, a later private investigation suggested some major flaws in the government explanation.  As revealed in the Jun 2, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 3), this investigation suggested that the Sheriff (Gene Matthews) was accompanied into the house by Deputy US Marshal Jim Hall and Arkansas State Policeman Ed Fitzpatrick. 

 

On entering the room, Kahl was seated alone and unarmed at the dinner table, eating his evening meal.  Without attempting to make an arrest, Marshal Hall immediately shot the man in the head from the rear with his 38 revolver, in a downward angle, execution style.  The Sheriff looked at the dead body and told Hall that he had apparently shot Bill Wade, the owner of the house. 

 

After the elapse of a few seconds, the armed murderers fired some five or six rounds, evidently in a diversionary tactic to try to simulate a gun battle inside the house. 

 

Perhaps this shooting prompted agents outside the building to also open fire, in a wild rambo operation (which is one of the often reactions of undisciplined, uncontrolled and irresponsible federal agents as they go wild with guns in their hands).  The Sheriff was accidentally killed in some of the various shootings by his colleagues. 

 

It was then that the feds tried to burn the building down and destroy the evidence.  For quite some time, there was federal concern that Hall had indeed shot Bill Wade. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

This whole episode is quite fantastic for a lot of reasons.  It clearly demonstrates a government gone amuck.  However, many valuable teaching points can be deduced from it--points which will help all American citizens in their dealings with the new federal police forces and government tyranny. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 371--The Branch Davidians I

 

 

The Branch Davidians, Revisited

 

A classic illustration of how the left wing humanists and Socialists view especially religious minorities (except for the New Age cults which no one would dare criticize presently, without experiencing the greatest assault of all from the media and the establishment) was how they collectively reacted to David Koresh (previously mentioned) and the Branch Davidians in early 1993. 

 

Daily, the federal police power (FBI) and its Washington bosses were going to the controlled press with all kinds of stories about how bad and crazy David Koresh was and how he was guilty of many horrible crimes, despite the fact that the Waco sheriff’s office had investigated him and the Davidians beforehand and had given them a clean bill of health. 

 

Koresh and his friends were never tried and convicted of anything.  Thus, they were innocent.  The writer of this paper was no fan of that Waco bunch.  But they did not deserve to be murdered by the establishment, simply because they had an unacceptable religious faith and some guns (both of which are absolutely legal, per the Bill of Rights to the US Constitution). 

 

Other people own guns and almost all of the large, modern Christian Churches were once small outsiders which did not have an acceptable religious faith, as determined by the ruling authorities. 

 

The interesting thing about the guns owned by the Davidians was that some of the Davidians bought, sold and traded them at gun shows (which is perfectly legal) in order to earn some money for the group.  They had several of these guns which constituted their inventory.  In fact, a couple of the Davidian men were trading guns at a gun show when the initial ATF attack began. 

 

 

The Davidians Were Singled Out 

 

Yes, the Anglican, Moravian and Lutheran Churches were all once cults, in terms of the ruling Catholic Church.  And when those “cults” started hundreds of years ago, the Roman Church would have likewise murdered all of them, if they would have had government power over them--just as the US authorities murdered the Davidians. 

 

Otherwise, can one imagine what would happen if the government moved tanks, assault weapons, poison gas and an army in to attack American people present at a Catholic, Methodist or Episcopalian Church?  Incidentally, Attorney General Janet Reno described the 54 ton tank used in the assault as being merely a “good rent-a-car.” 

 

In terms of Waco, that physical facility was to the Davidians exactly the same thing that many other Christian Churches are to their church officials, members and visitors.  In the first instance, it was a place for their worship services; and additionally, a facility for many of them to live in--which is exactly what one often finds in numerous other churches within Christendom. 

 

By the way, it is interesting that like the Ruby Ridge case (to be discussed in a following chapter), Big Brother refused to take any action against the murderous agents at Waco.  In other words, no one in the federal government has been tried for anything in regards to the Waco murders. 

 

And as always happens in cases like this, Washington took steps to throw the book at the surviving victims of the US attack (not the federal criminals).  Surviving victims were tried for manslaughter and possessing illegal firearms.  Four were found guilty and sentenced to 40 years in prison. 

 

 

Christian Churches Do Give Sanctuary 

 

The Roman Catholic Church has historically given physical sanctuary to anyone who goes into a Catholic Church for ages.  The state never bothers them until they leave.  For example, during the Panama invasion, the hated Noriega took refuge in a Catholic Church and he was left there, until he chose to give up to the occupying US military forces. 

 

Back in the 1850s, many Christian Churches joined the underground railroad movement from the South to various destinations in the North. 

 

Consequently, Christian Church leaders (both Protestant and Catholic) involved in the abolition movement would help and assist Black slaves to run away from their Southern homes and masters to find refuge in the various Christian Churches participating in the underground railroad. 

 

Once a run away Black found refuge in a Christian Church, he was virtually free for all purposes--because the secular authorities would not enter the churches, nor would they bother the slaves or churches at all, despite the fact that the Christians were actively engaged in the violations of variously established laws and governments. 

 

In more modern times, a number of Christian Churches have resurrected the old underground railroad to provide a method of securing and moving numbers of illegal aliens from Latin America into various destinations across the United States.  Once illegals are across the border, some Christian humanists will take them to the physical safety of church buildings where the authorities generally will not bother them. 

 

When the illegals continue their movements into the United States, they move illegally from one church to another until they eventually reach their destinations--in Chicago, New York, Seattle or wherever.  The Border Patrol is aware of the problem, but appears to take no real action against the Christian humanists (who are violating US laws to engage in their so-called acts of “love”). 

 

Of course, these humanists are members of the acceptable “mainline” Christian Churches and not in the category or classification of a “cult.”  And who determines what a cult is?  In the case of the assault on the Davidians, the Big Brother government defined them as being a cult. 

 

Once labeled and attacked daily by the FBI and the controlled press, the dumb gullible masses get on the bandwagon to became active haters of people like the Davidians.  The American media has enormous power and influence over ignorant individuals who get worked up when reporters and news persons slant the news a certain way and practice the before mentioned “yellow” journalism. 

 

One must remember that it was the Amalekite leader, Adolf Schicklgruber, who said to tell a lie and keep telling it over and over.  In time, the gullible public will come to believe the lie.  Political leader Slick Clinton has successfully used this methodology for years now. 

 

 

The Seventh-day Adventists 

 

But beyond Big Brother’s brutal slaughter of the Davidians (because they were different), there is another side issue to this story.  This one concerns the Seventh-day Adventist Church (SDA) and the role which she played in the federal assault.  To appreciate the SDA participation, one must understand that “theologically” both the SDA Church and the Davidians were cut from the same deck. 

 

The founder of the Davidians and many of its members (including David Koresh) were what the Adventists call an “offshoot.”  They were generally former SDA people who broke from that organization, primarily over administration (in other words, who was to be in charge and steering the ship), and not over doctrine, per se. 

 

It appears that the Davidians and the Adventists were both dedicated followers of Ellen G. White (previously discussed).  Of course, Ellen White was one of the key founders of the SDA denomination and its church prophetess.  Both the Davidians and Adventists believed that Ellen was an inspired prophet on the level of Yeshayahu or something.  Her doctrinal teachings pretty well summed up both organizations. 

 

However, it turned out that for whatever reason the SDA people did not like their “offshoot” brethren in the Davidians and found an opportunity to “do them in” in collaboration with Big Brother.  It happened in the early spring of 1992, when Shirley Burton, Director of Communications for the SDA Church in Silver Spring, Maryland, focused on the Davidians. 

 

Per an editorial in the Jan-Feb 1996 “Sabbath Sentinel” (p. 3-4), Burton warned federal, state and local government authorities “that something terrible was going to happen at the Waco compound.”  She urged them to go there and take some action against the Davidians. 

 

The fact that the Adventists would contact, conspire and collaborate with the forces of the Big Brother US government has an interesting twist.  The SDA has historically held that the United States is the two horned beast of Revelation 13:11 (which, by the way, the SDA Church seems to be wrong on--since the two horned beast correctly appears to be the pope). 

 

This backdrop spells out the incredible hatred that the SDA people held for their fellow Ellen White brethren at Waco.  Theoretically here, based upon Adventist beliefs, the SDA leadership conspired and collaborated with the two horned beast to persecute, murder and destroy their own fellow believers in Ellen White.  This has to be one of the great flukes of Christian history. 

 

In any case, this initial SDA tip-off against their Ellen G. White brethren seems to have prompted the Big Brother government (specifically the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms--ATF) to begin its eight months investigation of the Waco sect which culminated in the surprise, February 28, 1993, Sunday morning attack on the church compound. 

 

 

Other Aspects 

 

As a years-later follow-up on the Waco disaster, “The Washington Times” of Aug 2-8, 1999, had a story by Jerry Spencer on “Official hints FBI to blame for Waco” (p. 1) which reported on comments made by James B. Francis, the civilian head of the Texas Rangers on July 28, 1999.  Francis is actually chairman of the Texas State Public Safety Commission, which oversees the work of the Texas Rangers. 

 

He said that items and evidence found at the site (shells, shell casings, etc, which fell into the hands of the Texas Rangers before federal agents had a chance to destroy the material) were “problematic or at least questionable” in corroborating FBI claims that its agents did not fire a single shot or use any incendiary devices at the siege (causing the fire that killed 86 Davidians, including 24 children). 

 

The point that Francis was subtly making is that the FBI not only fired shots, but apparently set the fire at the compound (which the feds later conveniently blamed on the Davidians).  Naturally, the feds destroyed all of the evidence possible (beyond that which fell into the hands of the Texas Rangers), and then they lied and deceived the gullible American public (which is not hard to do). 

 

An article by Paul Craig Roberts on “The Waco coverup begins to come undone” in the Aug 9-15, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 33) said that lawyers involved in the wrongful death suits (filed by the relatives of those Davidians murdered by Big Brother) say that they have “powerful evidence that the federal government is guilty of criminal assault, criminal negligence, and reckless endangerment.” 

 

The physical evidence includes material indicating that on the day of the assault, the federal government agents fired incendiary devices into the Davidians’ compound.  As noted earlier, the feds lied about this and tried to blame the Davidians for the fire. 

 

 

More Evidence 

 

A story, in the Aug 16, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 5) on “Rangers Blame Waco Holocaust on FBI,” by Mike Blair, said that the physical evidence included a 40 millimeter projectile, two 40 millimeter incendiary projectiles and a number of “flash-bang” grenades (which have been used in US Special Operations and FBI and ATF training programs). 

 

It appears that there were two different factions of federal agents involved in the siege.  There was a negotiating team in contact with Koresh and some of his people inside.  But there was additionally the attack forces, which acted like a bunch of shoot-em-up cowboys or loose cannons.  Evidently, no one was in control, running both operations. 

 

In late August 1999, the FBI finally did confess that they did fire incendiary devices and military CS gas canisters into the Davidians’ wooden compound, but argued that the devices did not cause the fire (per an article by Jerry Seper on “FBI changes story on attack at Waco,” in the Aug 30-Sep 5, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 9). 

 

To compound the fire problem, the Nov 1999 “Internet Vortex” (p. 33) had a report from some eyewitnesses to Waco events (some of whom had relatives inside the church).  At the first sign of the fire, one of these persons called the nearby Bellmead Fire Station for assistance.  Ten minutes passed and the fire was spreading rapidly.  So the relative called again and asked why the fireman had not responded. 

 

The Bellmead Fire dispatcher replied that the FBI had issued explicit orders for them to not respond to the Waco fire.  The Davidian relative then called Waco Sheriff Harwell who intervened to get the fire trucks on the way.  But it was too late.  The church was already burned to the ground by the time fire trucks reached it. 

 

 

The Gunfire 

 

A Spokane “Spokesman Review” article (p. 1), on “Waco clues suggest sniper fire” of Sep 14, 1999, said that at least a dozen spent rifle cartridges, as used by FBI snipers at the scene, were found. 

 

Actually, the Texas Rangers recovered some 12 shells from a nearby house that the FBI used during the siege, plus 24 other shells at the site which apparently came from foreign guns--possibly Israeli (Oct 4, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 3). 

 

FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi (who shot the Weaver woman, holding a baby at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, to be discussed in a succeeding chapter) was in charge of the sniper post at Waco.  Horiuchi, who claimed that the Ruby Ridge shooting was an accident, now denies firing any shots at Waco (despite the shell casings found at his post).  Manifestly, the FBI has lied about both Waco and Ruby Ridge. 

 

A story, in the Oct 11-17, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 7), by Jerry Seper, on “2nd evidence expert testifies to FBI gunfire at Waco,” noted that special prosecutor John C. Danforth (whose expertise at covering up fraud and corruption will be discussed in comments in the next chapter) had questioned a former Defense Department official who examined an infrared tape which showed that agents did fire into the church. 

 

Carlos Ghigliotti, owner of Infrared Technologies, said the same thing and added “without a doubt.” 

 

But Carlos must have expressed his opinion too conclusively because his badly decomposed body was found in his Laurel, Maryland home on April 28, 2000.  Police are investigating his alleged murder (May 15, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2).  With the strange surge of mysterious deaths associated with Slick Clinton, discussed earlier, and the death of Vince Foster over Waco, one must wonder if Bill put a contract out on Carlos. 

 

“Spotlight” (p. 1, 13) followed up on Oct 25, 1999, with a front page story by Mike Blair on “Inside Information Says Feds Fired First at Waco.” 

 

Blair’s report focused upon more information from the Texas Rangers, suggesting that the feds (either ATF or FBI HRT snipers who were not supposed to be at the scene initially) fired first in the initial ATF attack--which preceded the FBI siege (when the ATF was ostensibly trying to serve a warrant on Koresh). 

 

The possible scenario was that the federal snipers used 50 caliber Barrett rifles to murder two armed guards or sentries at the compound (one in a tower and the other was walking near the building) before the attack began.  Blair said Janet Reno should be asked why it was necessary for the cold blooded murder of two people before even attempting to serve a warrant at the church? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 372--The Branch Davidians II

 

 

Mike McNulty 

 

A few years ago, TV producer Mike McNulty made an academy award nominated, documentary film on the Waco tragedy.  It was called “Waco:  The Rules of Engagement.”  More than anything else, McNulty’s film raised so many questions and interest that pressure was mounted against Reno for clarification on the government’s role. 

 

As a follow-up, McNulty made another film in 1999 called “Waco:  A New Revelation” which outlined much of the material on the gunfire (as mentioned in the prior chapter).  In particular, McNulty focused in on the FBI’s infrared tape which clearly shows gunfire into the church compound as it was going up in flames (Jan-Feb 2000 “Jubilee,” p. 12-13). 

 

McNulty interviewed Dr Edward Allard, formerly of the US government’s Night Vision Directorate in analyzing the infrared film.  

 

On the morning of April 19, 1993, one of the Davidians attempted to leave the building across the roof.  Immediately, an FBI helicopter gunship arrived on the scene and some muzzled flashes could be seen from its port waist guns. 

 

Dr Allard analyzed this event, and said that the film shows at least three, five-shot, machine gun bursts coming from the chopper.  The machine guns fire 600 rounds a minute, which is what Allard detected.  For a long time, the government claimed that these FBI helicopters were unarmed.  But numerous photos and TV film have turned up to show full sized machine guns in cradle mounts. 

 

 

The Davidians Were Murdered 

 

Two Davidians (Phillip Henry and Jimmy Riddle) were shot behind the building--just before the fire broke out (evidently, they were trying to get out of the building).  Part of Riddle’s body was torn away, as if it was run over by a tank tread.  Later the family tried to have the body examined to ascertain the nature of the bullet wounds.  The evidentiary portion of Riddle’s skull was missing. 

 

McNulty believes that both Riddle and Henry were shot behind the building and their bodies were bulldozed back into the dining room of the building--just before the government began its final assault using machine guns and incendiary grenades. 

 

Apparently, the back door in the dining room area was the last exit from the building which was not consumed by fire.  There were some dead Davidians there who had been shot (apparently trying to escape the burning inferno of the building).  The FBI has long contended that they shot themselves.  Dr Allard disputes this government claim. 

 

Dr Allard examined the infrared film and other photos and concluded that what was taking place was a “tank-infantry” type of operation.  As the tank advances into the building, two men would drop out of an escape hatch.  They would then roll over and open up with their automatic weapons--firing indiscriminately into the building. 

 

The film evidence is that the government was firing machine guns into the dining room area (in fact, into the whole church compound) and the Davidians were hit by this government machine gun fire.  Dr Allard says that he cannot “remember anything more sickening” than watching the gunfire in the building’s last exit. 

 

On the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio talk show, McNulty was the guest. He offered some evidence suggesting that US Army Delta Force people present (to be shortly discussed) and/or FBI agents fired automatic weapons into the kitchen area of the facility in conjunction with the tank attack at the entrances. 

 

 

Commit Murder and Get Away With It 

 

As just noted, there were a number of Davidians shot in this dining room/kitchen area during the final assault.  Quite naturally, the feds never bothered to check the rifles of their agents doing the shooting by ballistics to see if the federal government murdered these Davidians. 

 

Instead, the feds claimed (with no evidence or proof) that the Davidians shot themselves and committed suicide.  Despite the government’s claims about suicide, a former FBI forensic expert (who chose to be anonymous in the film) said that the bodies he saw clearly indicated that they were homicide victims (murdered by government agents). 

 

Thus, McNulty’s second film plainly suggests that many of the Davidians attempting to leave the building to get out of the fire were machine-gunned to death.   Is it possible that many of the government agents went absolutely crazy with their guns to shoot in a wild, rambo, unrestrained fashion? 

 

McNulty also suggested that one of the Davidians named Schroeder was not at the compound during the initial ATF attack.  His wife was inside.  He came later to the facility and tried to enter to join his family inside.  ATF agents shot him nine times and evidently twice, execution style--in the back of the head, close range through his cap (which still has the close powder burns). 

 

 

More From McNulty 

 

The government agents collected the dead bodies and were going to supposedly preserve them in a semi-frozen state in two trailers for purposes of autopsy and examination (obviously, it would have been very easy to establish exactly who killed each of the Davidians).  But the intelligent, thinking, concerned, honest and cunning FBI chose to disconnect and/or prevent the electricity from going to the two trailers. 

 

In the hot weather and confined trailers, the bodies deteriorated quickly beyond any hope of being able to do any worthwhile forensic work on them and produce any forensic evidence.  Congressional investigator March Bell said that “We were very disturbed by that.” 

 

As briefly mentioned above, US Army Delta Force people were at the site (though the Clinton team tried to hide this fact from the public initially).  The government claims that they did not do any of the shootings (as they were “observers”).  However, McNulty has produced evidence and statements, suggesting that they too fired into the building. 

 

“The Washington Times” (p. 8) of Oct 4-10, 1999, had a story by Karen Brooks on “Second documentary will re-examine Waco disaster” which focused upon the next film by Mike McNulty (mentioned above). 

 

The Times charges that the Delta Force people did fire on the Davidians and that FBI agents engaged in gunfire and used six Defense Technologies flash-bang devices which spewed flames, smoke and heat inside the compound (at the place where the Rangers said that the fires started). 

 

Apparently, all of this firing was done indiscriminately--just as a crazy man goes wild and starts shooting without purpose or target.  Thus, the feds went wild and crazy in a rambo type assault and shooting operation/exercise at a bunch of innocent people--mostly women and children. 

 

 

The Davidians Were Confined in the Building 

 

Per a Sergeant Steven Barry, a retired Special Forces soldier, military people penetrated the building long before the attack on April 19th.  At one time, they were six feet away from Koresh personally and could have nabbed him on the spot.  But the FBI said no and to leave him alone. 

 

In numerous statements, the FBI on more than one occasion told the Davidian people that they could not leave and had to stay in the building.  This strange quirk was pointed out in previous comments.  Per McNulty, FBI negotiators specifically told the Davidians that no one was authorized to come out for any reason.  If they tried to leave the building, they would be forced back in (presumably by gunfire). 

 

Interestingly, it appears that at one time, one of the men inside (evidently a Davidian named Snider?) came outdoors either to have dialogue with federal agents or to give himself up.  In any case, some feds were in a nearby tank.  They tossed incendiary hand-grenades at him.  This scared him.  So he retreated back into the building. 

 

In a telephone talk with the FBI negotiator, this attack was brought up.  But the negotiator had no explanation for it.  This incident makes one wonder to what extent the Davidians could have come out of the door and surrendered, even if they had a mind to do so.  Thus, the evidence is that the Davidians were not allowed to leave the building--even when it went up in flames. 

 

The then FBI Director, William Sessions, wanted to fly to Waco and personally negotiate with David Koresh.  The Justice Department bosses refused to allow him to go.  Sessions’ wife Alice says that they did not want it negotiated, but wanted to show what the FBI could do with its military-type tactics (in a para-military operation). 

 

Of course, federal authorities continued to lie, deceive, cover-up and try to deflect any attempts to find the truth on what happened.  However, they did acknowledge on Feb 17, 2000, that their infrared tape could disclose gunfire--which is something that they initially denied (Jan-Feb 2000 “Jubilee,” p. 12). 

 

 

Clinton and Reno Say They Didn’t Know 

 

Of course, both Attorney General Reno and President Slick Clinton maintained their ignorance about what all happened at Waco (the buck never stopped with them).  The “Washington Times” (p. 22), of Aug 30-Sep 5, 1999, also had another article by Jerry Seper on “Reno says FBI deceived her on canisters used at Waco” which conveys her feelings. 

 

Eventually, Reno ordered a “so-called” investigation to find out what happened.  She appointed the former US Senator John C. Danforth, noted earlier, to make that investigation.  Though he did commence an investigation into the case, he proved to be a Washington loyalist when he came out in July 2000 and said that he found nothing wrong with the actions of federal authorities in the murder of the Davidians. 

 

This alleged “investigation” came over six years after the incident and after a number of apparently innocent Branch Davidian people were arrested, prosecuted, tried and convicted in federal courts for all kinds of crimes.  Most of these people are still in jail and faced with long prison terms.  This whole debacle is reflective of modern American justice (which is virtually non-existent). 

 

 

“Spotlight” on Danforth 

 

Incidentally, it must be noted that a number of people were very disappointed with John C. Danforth’s very evident efforts to merely continue the cover-up and fraud at the federal level on the murder of the Davidians.  One of the key people in this dissenting class was Mike McNulty, who was the documentary film producer who has made some of the revealing documentary films (as discussed above). 

 

The April 30, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 3) had a story by Mike Blair on “New Documentary Debunks Danforth Probe” which addressed the latest developments in an effort by some people to reopen the Danforth cover-up.  Reportedly, McNulty has been doing continuing research and has now produced a new documentary film called “The FLIR Project.” 

 

Apparently, “The FLIR Project” continues the same type of investigation and research, as was done on McNulty’s two earlier film productions.  However, this one will also delve into the Danforth cover-up and expose it for what it was (an Establishment cover-up). 

 

The Blair article in “Spotlight” outlines again some of the prevailing problems with the lies reportedly told by federal agents and authorities following the federal murder of the 86 or so Davidians.  Moreover, McNulty examines the work of Danforth and how it was mishandled to alter truth and build a case of innocence on the part of the Clinton Administration people and their hired cover-up agent (Danforth). 

 

McNulty’s work calls upon Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Congress to make a new inquiry and new tests of events, as alleged to have happened by the Clinton Administration and Danforth. 

 

The only problem with this whole endeavor is that both the Republicans and Democrats in the Establishment are anxious for the cover-up to continue.  One must remember that the federal attack upon Randy Weaver and his family in North Idaho (to be profiled in the following chapter) came under the auspices of GWB’s father George H. W. Bush.  Clearly, the Bush family has reasons to drop this whole subject. 

 

 

More on Danforth 

 

In early 2002, quite a scandal developed over the bankruptcy motion of one of the largest of the energy companies, the Enron Corporation (this event was mentioned in a previous chapter herein). 

 

Corporate Enron, her chairman and CEO, Kenneth Lay, and her accounting firm, Arthur Anderson, all faced major charges and complaints.  Most of these complaints were discussed in prior commentary.  But here, the name of John Danforth surfaces which necessities a further look at Enron, Lay and Anderson. 

 

From news reports, it appeared that both Enron Corporation and her accounting firm, Arthur Anderson (noted in the previous remarks just cited), were guilty of gross manipulation of records and fraud in the way that financial activities of Enron were carried on (the charges included allegations that both firms shredded numbers of documents which could prove to be adverse and cause trouble for them). 

 

Enron and her former chairman and CEO, Kenneth Lay, were accused of continuously lying to employees and stockholders about the status of the company, as it was going down the tubes.  Arthur Anderson oversaw this whole debacle. 

 

Reportedly, Lay and his colleagues were publicly saying how solvent and well off the company was; when, in fact, it was in the process of declaring bankruptcy.  Lay was known to continuously recommend publicly the buying of Enron stock while he personally was busy selling Enron stock. 

 

In any case, the incident caused quite a scandal because there were numerous allegations that President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney were connected to the mess (as a minimum, these officials and both the Democrat and Republican parties were busy taking pay-offs in the form of campaign contributions from Enron). 

 

 

The Immediate Reaction 

 

With this very deleterious situation, Lay, Enron and Arthur Anderson had to run for cover in early 2002.  Lay, learned from the master crook and manipulator, Bill “Slick” Clinton, and quickly began prayer sessions with “the reverend” Jesse Jackson, who likened the troubled Lay to the OT Iyov (Feb 1, 2002, “The Week,” p. 3). 

 

Lay’s wife Linda took lessons from Hillary Clinton (and her reaction to the Bill Clinton sodomy accusations over Monica Lewinsky).  Linda went on the morning TV news programs to “shed tears” over the crisis and tell about how bad the allegations were on her family (ibid, p. 3). 

 

 

More Damage Control   

 

One of the major fall-outs of the Enron scandal has been the rush to initiate some damage control operations to limit the liability which the major players can face in civil lawsuits from investors who lost money in the collapse.  There has been much talk of putting a legal cap on what can be recovered. 

 

One of the key facets of the Enron failure involved the international CPA firm of Arthur Anderson which did the auditing of Enron for years.  Along with watching the Enron people, who were manipulating and altering Enron’s records and financial reports, Anderson oversaw their fraudulent acts and effectively approved of them in certifying Enron’s periodic financial statements. 

 

Anderson got into trouble when the Enron debacle broke and Anderson proceeded to destroy documents and records which would be reflective of the real world and what happened at Enron.  Anderson didn’t want the truth of the skullduggery to come out and particularly of its role in the fraud.  In time, the Justice Department indicted Anderson for obstruction of justice. 

 

Arthur Anderson was a worldwide accounting firm with major clients all over the globe.  It was a giant partnership operation--with many, many partners.  In a partnership, all the partners can bear some liability for the acts of a partner in the firm’s operations. 

 

Manifestly, this Enron scandal meant the end of Arthur Anderson.  Private businesses would be in no mood to hire an accounting firm which had been indicted for shredding documents and obstruction of justice.   Not only would the employees and partners all have to look for other employment as the firm went down the tubes, but there was the threat of the civil lawsuits from investors who lost money with Enron. 

 

These lawsuits could be astronomical and cause enormous financial losses for the Anderson partners.  Obviously, the partners were more concerned with these lawsuits than the future of themselves or their employees from the standpoint of having to find other work. 

 

 

Paul Volcker 

 

Accordingly, Anderson hired the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker, as a consultant to come in and propose a solution and way out for them.  Of course, Paul, being a Washington insider with many political contacts, at least did what he was paid to do. 

 

Volcker proposed that Anderson revamp its operations and establish an overseeing board to monitor firm operations, that the Justice Department drop its indictment, and that Congress pass a law to cap the losses that the Anderson partners would have to pay out. 

 

 

And More Damage Control 

 

According to news reports on Feb 4, 2002, both Enron and Anderson had to do something further to try to repair their damaged image and possibly cover-up some of their tracks to avoid some possibly bad criminal actions. 

 

These firms went on to hire the most professional and expert cover-up artist in the business (in addition to Paul Volcker, as described above).  The alleged crooks chose John C. Danforth, the former cover-up man on the murder of the Davidians. 

 

The accused companies said that Danforth was being hired to review their operations, determine if there was any wrong-doing and propose changes to be sure that the companies’ operations were entirely legal and proper.  Manifestly, both Enron and Anderson must have observed how expert and successful Danforth was in covering up the murders at Waco. 

 

This history on Danforth must have convinced both Enron and Anderson that Danforth was the man the firms needed to launch the Enron-Arthur Anderson cover-up.  Surely, the companies made the right decision.  Danforth delivered! 

 

 

The After-Effects 

 

These lines are being written in early 2003 and it looks like all of these proposed Enron solutions will not reach fruition.  However, they are being mentioned here because it demonstrates how big money operates.  The influential Volcker and Danforth were bought and paid for to try to save the officials of both companies from having to shell out a huge sum of money in the lawsuits. 

 

But the truth is that the Enron executives and the Anderson partners should all have to pay off in the civil lawsuits.  That’s the way the game is especially played in a partnership operation (as is true with Anderson).  If one partner does an illegal act in the vein of the business, the other partners bear financial liability for the actions of the one. 

 

As for as Enron and Anderson’s future, both firms should go down the tubes.  There is simply no justification in the sense of righteousness, honor or ethics for the government or anyone else for that matter to come in and “save” either Anderson or Enron. 

 

Both firms should be forced out of business and punished severely.  As for the Anderson and Enron people directly involved in the fraudulent operations, they should be indicted and sent to jail. 

 

But all of this will probably prove to be merely wishful thinking.  Enron paid off huge bucks to political leaders over many years.  Otherwise, the fat cats at both Anderson and Enron still have a lot of connections in Washington (as with the use of Paul Volcker and John Danforth).  Obviously, these connections are going to go out of their way to protect the crooks at Enron and Anderson. 

 

 

More on the Davidians-Destroy Evidence and Blame the Innocent 

 

Even the death of the several ATF agents in the initial assault at Waco, Texas can be laid to the ATF (as noted in the preceding commentary), instead of to the Davidians, as the feds claimed.  G. Gordon Liddy, on his program of Oct 15, 1999, noted that the ATF attackers wore bullet proof vests which could not have been penetrated by the weapons held by the Davidians. 

 

It takes high powered rifles to penetrate these bullet proof vests.  Only the 100 or so ATF attackers had those rifles.  Since the ATF agents were firing their guns like irresponsible cowboys and/or loose cannons, the case can easily be made that they shot their own people (evidently by accident). 

 

But as is the normal fed MO, no one ever bothered to check the guns (ballistics) used by the feds to see if they did shoot their own agents.  Of course, Big Brother proceeded to blame the Davidians for the murders and prosecuted and convicted the Davidian survivors on that premise. 

 

Big Brother took photos of the scene (after things were sanitized and prepared--prepped). 

 

For example, General Ben Partin (in his video on “Globalism:  The Program,” as will be addressed in later comments) noted that after the fire had gutted the bunker (which housed women and children) and after the walls were bombed and/or knocked down by tanks, photos were taken of guns perfectly lined up near the windows (suggesting that the site was prepped to make it suitable for the photos). 

 

As Partin concluded, it was an impossible situation for the guns to be lined up as they were in the photos.   Obviously, it should not take too many brains for the average moron to understand that federal authorities lined up the guns and prepared the site (prepped it) for the photo opportunity.  Incidentally, these doctored photos later became part of the evidence to justify in court the federal attack. 

 

 

More Obstruction of Justice 

 

Though the US government tried its best to destroy all evidence at the scene (so federal agents could not be blamed for anything; and instead, so that the US government could blame the Davidians), some of this evidence did fall into the hands of the previously mentioned 40 Texas Rangers, who combed the debris after the fire. 

 

Since they couldn’t or didn’t stop the Texas Rangers from making an investigation, the feds have turned to the old trick of classifying their report as a national security document to keep its information from being assessed by the American public (Oct 4, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 2).  This trick is frequently used by dictatorial governments to hide information from the people. 

 

On Sep 1, 1999, US marshals found a video tape at FBI headquarters proving that they did fire incendiary devices into the compound, thus ending the debate on whether the FBI started the fire or not.  The interesting thing about this exercise is that the FBI tried to hide and destroy evidence and lied to the public for over six years, before the lid finally blew off from the Texas Rangers. 

 

Beyond the ground shootings into the church by federal agents, the evidence is massive that helicopters also fired into the building from the air (as outlined by McNulty).  A number of witnesses who were in the building or went in for consultation with Koresh (like DeGuerin and Zimmerman, lawyers who were preparing to represent the Davidians) saw bullet holes in the ceilings, which must have come from the air. 

 

 

More Serious Implications 

 

On Sep 3, 1999, Joyce Riley, discussed earlier, was on the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio talk show program.  She said that she was in contact with military people at Fort Hood, TX who said that Apache attack helicopters were used in the US war on the Davidians.  Perhaps it was these Apaches which fired into the building, causing the bullet holes in the ceilings, discussed above. 

 

Joyce had a follow-up on the Bell program on Apr 20, 2000.  She produced a soldier named John from Fort Hood who loaded and unloaded the live ordinance.  He verified that an Apache was used at Waco and fired at least one missile at the church.  Riley produced some documentary film which shows the Apache to the back of another helicopter near the Davidians. 

 

In an audio tape of a David Koresh conversation with an FBI negotiator (synchronized to the Apache attack), Koresh said that a helicopter is firing upon us.  The FBI said no it wasn’t.  Koresh responded by saying “you’re a damn liar.” 

 

As noted above, the US Army’s Delta Force had people on the scene, although it is unclear exactly what role they played.  For certain, they were present and were involved in the planning for the final federal attack on the church, according to documents recently released under the freedom of information act (per Betsy Gibson, World Net Daily, Jul-Aug 1999 “Jubilee,” p. 1).  

 

Gibson says that the Delta Force maintained the equipment used in the attack.  As outlined above, military people were also used to infiltrate and enter the building--evidently for reconnaissance purposes.   

 

“Spotlight” of Oct 4, 1999, had a front page story on “Special Forces Placed Explosives at Waco?” which suggested that the Delta force may have also placed explosives at the Davidians church to blow up some part of it.  As noted above, McNulty suggests that they too fired into the building on the day of the federal attack. 

 

The US Posse Comitatus Act prevents the US military from being employed against US civilians.  Yet, the US military was apparently involved, along with British SAS (Special Air Service) military, per columnist Dan Gifford (Sep 20-26, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 31). 

 

“Spotlight” (p. 1, 3) of Sep 27, 1999, was more specific in two stories by Mike Blair.  Not only was the US Army’s Delta Force present, but also the British SAS, German forces and agents from the Israeli Mossad were all also present (who may have used their rifles to produce the 24 shell casings found, as outlined earlier from “Spotlight”). 

 

 

The Clintons’ Role, Revisited  

 

In a “Spotlight”  article on “Clinton Accused of Ordering Delta Force Strike,” Blair says that Clinton gave the order for the employment of the military when the stand-off became an embarrassment to his administration.  The question of this order was mentioned in a former chapter.  Perhaps Blair has it right that the order did come directly from the Clintons, as is very logical. 

 

In the context that Hillary Clinton was actually running the White House Domestic Crisis Center, previously outlined, it might be that the real order to murder the Davidians came from her.  If she did make the decision, it is probable that the order would have been issued to the troops in her husband’s name.  In any case, Bill Clinton would have known about the operation. 

 

Mike Blair presented some evidence suggesting that White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster was drafting a Waco report at the time of his strange death (which apparently would have been a real revelation if it came out). 

 

Blair quoted Foster’s widow Lisa who said that he was much depressed and “was fueled by horror at the carnage at Waco for which the White House had given the ultimate green light.”  Perhaps Foster believed that the White House was to blame.  Clearly, the federal government murdered the Davidians and probably based on orders from the Clintons. 

 

As former Attorney General Ramsey Clark noted, the first civil right is to be free from unlawful and excessive force by your own police.  This, per Clark, is the difference between a free society and a police state (obviously, Americans are now in a police state). 

 

 

The Money Issue 

 

Otherwise, the May 1998 “Personal Update” (p. 2) noted that the ATF “was in a battle for congressional funding.  The ATF raid on the Branch Davidian compound was not staged to enforce the law, it was staged for public relations purposes (which is why the ATF had video cameras on site, filming the attack)--and it was bungled. 

 

“There was no evidence that the Davidians had violated any law.  The ATF used fabricated information to obtain a warrant from a careless magistrate.  Some of the allegations made on the affidavit were fraudulent.” 

 

Rather than allow the truth to come out, the feds have went the extra mile to destroy evidence, hide evidence and alter reality.  Consistently, they have blamed the Davidians for everything.  The surviving Davidians were even arrested and charged with murder for some of the deaths at the scene (as elsewhere outlined herein).  Big Brother pulls all of the punches possible to destroy politically incorrect people. 

 

 

The Chief Prosecutor 

 

The chief prosecutor in the US Attorney’s office on the Waco case, Bill Johnston, believed early on that there was a possible US government cover-up on what had happened with the murder of the Davidians.  He brought it to the attention of his superiors.  Nothing was done and the US government cover-up continued. 

 

So, in 1993, he wrote Attorney General Janet Reno a letter and warned her that the government was lying and that pyrotechnic tear gas was used on the Davidians which could have caused the fire.  Naturally, nothing was done about his letter and Reno proceeded with the cover-up and ignored his warning. 

 

With all of the major revelations in 1999, Johnston became frustrated with his bosses and the continuing lies and deceptions in the Department of Justice.  Accordingly, he resigned his job on Jan 25, 2000, and publicly released his letter to Reno.  He said that US Justice Department officials had been “less than forthright” (Jan-Feb 2000 “Jubilee,” p. 5). 

 

Thereupon, by 2000, the cover-up on using the dangerous tear gas finally came apart and the deceptive US Department of Justice finally had to admit the use of the dangerous tear gas.  Also, by the time of this admission, Reno and the Clinton people had a new name on their enemies’ list--that of former prosecutor Bill Johnston.  He was on the Clinton hate list and ready for a hit. 

 

The opportunity came in late August 2000 when the Clinton administration’s chosen cover-up agent (the former Senator John Danforth--who was the fox chosen to investigate the theft of the chickens) collaborated with Justice officials to indict poor Bill Johnston for alleged criminal activities.  Specifically, he was charged with making false statements. 

 

While President Bill “Slick” Clinton could go into a federal court and commit open perjury and no one was concerned about it, the Clinton presidential administration and the leadership in the US Department of Justice were not going to sit idly by and allow one of their workers to blow the whistle on their skullduggery and get away with it. 

 

In Johnston’s case, they have thrown the book at him for daring to squeal on Reno and reveal what happened at Waco. 

 

This is one of the fall-outs when a person does step forward and tries to tell the truth when his bosses in the US Department of Justice and the White House are lying and deceiving the people.  Instead of being rewarded, the whistle blower runs the risk on being severely punished. 

 

 

Ron Paul 

 

US Congressman Ron Paul says that “The (weapons) stockpiling accusation (by the feds) was an act of projection, for the real stockpiler was the government. 

 

“In the federal attack on Waco, agents used M-113 personnel carriers, M-2 Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Sikorsky Blackhawks, Apache and UH-1 Bell helicopters, Abrams M-1 tanks, 7.62NIM machine guns, FBI SWAT snipers, two varieties of hand grenades and the FBI’s psychological warfare experts” (Oct 18, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 12). 

 

 

Coming Trouble for the Right 

 

The just discussed US government attack and assault upon the Branch Davidians is a classic illustration of what can happen to any religious or other organized group which is unacceptable to the ruling elites of the political Socialist and Christian humanists.  All of these right wing militia and Identity groups need to take fair warning and start developing a low profile. 

 

The government has been accumulating huge computer files of the names of the people in most all of these politically incorrect movements.  It will not take much of a provocation for Big Brother to move in on all of these groups and truck the members off to the now established modern concentration camps. 

 

In a sense, there was an interesting attempt at this in the late 1980s when Big Brother arrested and tried a host of (politically incorrect) Christian Identity people down in Fort Smith, Arkansas on charges of sedition.  It was a blessing for those persons under indictment that there still was a jury system in America.  They were all found not guilty. 

 

The Apr 20, 1998, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news report that the FBI had been investigating over 900 groups which they have labeled as “extremists.”  As Spotlight noted, these groups could more correctly be called “concerned patriots.”  This writer would prefer to call them politically incorrect victims. 

 

The report said that Robert Blitzer, head of the FBI terrorism section, cited the Oklahoma City bombing as making a connection to “radical, right-wing militia groups” and “white supremacists.”  The number one federal worry is “leaderless resistance” activists who cannot be infiltrated.  Clearly, the feds have been busy infiltrating all of the various politically incorrect groups. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 373--More Classic Cases of Oppression

 

 

Ruby Ridge, Revisited 

 

Government infiltration and entrapment is what happened with Randy Weaver at the heretofore mentioned Ruby Ridge.  One of Big Brother’s undercover agents, who was secretly spying on right-wingers in Northern Idaho, met Randy (in a Christian Identity Church being spied upon) and supposedly was his friend. 

 

Over several years, this agent constantly tried to get Weaver to violate a law (obviously, so he would be arrested).  At the request of the government informer and entrapper, the politically incorrect Weaver did eventually sell him a shot gun with the barrel 1/4 inch shorter than legally allowable. 

 

The Big Brother ATF people then arrested Weaver and offered to drop all charges against him if he would become a spy and informer for them against his neighbors and friends.  He refused and failed to make a court appearance; although unbeknown to him and them, the date was wrong on his appearance notice. 

 

So, 18 months later, a group of federal marshals from Washington, DC (without an arrest warrant or search warrant and with no notification of their presence to the Weavers) clandestinely trespassed on his land and surrounded his mountain cabin for a “tactical reconnaissance” in their camouflage uniforms, blackened faces, bullet proof vests and assault rifles.  They threw rocks at Randy’s dogs to see what would happen. 

 

Quite naturally, the dogs barked and one loose dog took after the federal agents.  Weaver’s  small 14 year old son Sammy and a friend named Kevin Harris followed the dog with their hunting rifles, thinking that the dog was after a “deer.”  Carrying a shotgun, Weaver himself went in another direction to also try to intercept the “deer.”  The marshals opened fire and shot the dog. 

 

Seeing his dog shot and killed, the small boy screamed something about his dog being killed.  Allegedly, he then either shot his gun one time in the air or at them hiding in the trees and brush (not knowing who they were or why they were firing at him and his dog).  Wherever the boy shot, his bullet was wild and hit no one. 

 

Weaver himself was some distance away and could not see the boys or the marshals doing the shooting.  But he heard the gunshots and may have seen some of the colleagues of the shooting agents hiding elsewhere in the woods near him in their camouflage uniforms.  Fearing for the boys’ safety, Weaver fired his shotgun in the air to alert them and hollered loudly for them to go home. 

 

In panic and fear, Weaver and the two boys turned their backs to the marshals to run back to the cabin.  Thereupon, the federal killers opened fire on the two boys and machine gunned Sammy in the back as he and Harris were running from them.  Apparently, Harris then fired back at them at least one time. 

 

Significantly, Weaver and the boys were carrying constitutionally authorized guns on Weaver’s land and the federal murderers were there illegally--unannounced, without a warrant, trespassing and unidentified in their camouflage uniforms, bullet proof vests and carrying assault rifles (actually machine guns). 

 

One marshal (Degan) was killed either by Harris or by the marshals in their irresponsible shootings.  An obvious question surfaced over who might have shot the marshal since he was shot in the back with a rifle and the bullet was not recovered.  Certainly, Weaver, some distance away, didn’t kill the marshal with his shotgun. 

 

But allegedly, Harris did fire his rifle at least one time, following the machine gunning of the boy (although it was never proved that Harris fired the fatal shot to Degan). 

 

Since Degan was shot in the back and since the marshals were surely facing the boys to their front, while the feds were firing wildly at the backs of the running boys, it might be that it was a marshal’s bullet which killed Degan from the back--as claimed by Weaver and Harris. 

 

 

Blame the Innocent 

 

Nevertheless, Weaver (who wasn’t even at the scene) and Harris were charged and eventually tried for the murder of Degan, regardless of who may have fired the fatal bullet.  The next day, Big Brother came back in force with some 500 to 800 heavily armed and militarized federal agents to surround Weaver’s cabin. 

 

At no time did Harris or the Weavers fire any gun at this large army of federal agents that had surrounded the cabin.  However, the feds opened fire on Randy as he was preparing to enter into an out building to check the dead body of his boy, lying in the building where the family had placed him the night before. 

 

Weaver’s wife (standing in the cabin door) came into the gun sights of an FBI sniper (the previously mentioned Lon Horiuchi) and he shot her through the head and killed her, as she stood holding her infant baby in her arms.  Harris was also shot in the cabin.  Two other small girls were unhurt in the cabin. 

 

Weaver was guilty of nothing.  He was no criminal and had never been tried and found guilty of any wrong doing.  He was an innocent man.  Of course, with this Ruby Ridge affair, Big Brother tried to throw the book at Weaver and Harris.  But the jury system was still alive in Idaho and both were found innocent of all charges, except that Weaver had failed to appear in court (even with the wrong date). 

 

Naturally, no members of Big Brother’s illegal actions were ever tried by the feds, despite their cruel murder of Weaver’s wife and son.  In fact, one was even promoted and several others (like the marshals) were honored with cash bonuses, awards and commendations for their dastardly crimes against an innocent American citizen (actually, a war veteran who had served his nation honorably in Vietnam). 

 

In a separate matter, one federal agent named E. Michael Kahoe was tried for obstruction of justice when he ordered the destruction of an (apparently adverse) FBI report on the Ruby Ridge shooting (as happened also in the Waco case where FBI people destroyed records and reports). 

 

Kahoe was sent to jail for a little over one year.  But in Dec 2002, Governor Jeb Bush of Florida (son the murdering president George H. W. Bush) restored Kahoe’s civil rights (Dec 13, 2002, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. B4).  So Kahoe suffered little in the long run. 

 

Subsequently, Weaver and his surviving three daughters filed action against the US in a civil suit over the wrongful death of his wife.  Rather than allow the case to go to trial, Washington authorities made a payoff of some $3.1 millions in restitution for their wicked criminal acts. 

 

 

Federal Agents--Above the Law 

 

This is one of the problems in dealing with an oppressive government.  It always has plenty of money to make pay-offs, bribes and on and on--never having to face up to its illegal acts.  Thus, Washington refused to take any action against the despicable federal agents who committed the murders, despite some bad publicity over the affair in a publicized Senate hearing. 

 

In 1997, the local Idaho county prosecutor did file involuntary manslaughter charges against the killer of Mrs Weaver (FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi), along with retrying Harris for murder after he had been found innocent in the federal trial.  The Harris case was thrown out of court for double jeopardy by a local judge. 

 

In terms of the federal sniper who shot Weaver’s wife, he used to brag that he could hit a quarter at 200 yards.  Yet, he had the gall to claim that he shot the poor woman holding an infant baby by accident.  Facing a manslaughter charge, this “marksman,” all of a sudden, quit bragging about his abilities and started talking about an accidental shooting. 

 

Quite naturally, the feds rushed in teams of lawyers with gobs of federal money to tie up the Idaho court in order to prevent any justice from ever being done. 

 

For some incredible reason, the feds were able to move this state crime into a federal court, where the case was dismissed (although a divided appeals court later reinstated it.  But the local prosecutor elected to drop the issue for some strange reason.  Was he intimidated?  Paid off? Or otherwise threatened or obstructed in some way?). 

 

With these federal actions to interfere in and stop the pursuit of justice by the state of Idaho, the tenth amendment to the Constitution was utterly crushed.  Surely, this must be the first instance in American history where a federal agent can kill a person and never have to answer for it in a state court--which Constitutionally is supposed to have power to try murder and manslaughter complaints. 

 

Evidently, a US state can no longer try federal agents for the violation of its laws.  By this Idaho move, they are above state law.  Thus, America is reaching the point that federal agents (in the course of their federal police activities) cannot be prosecuted by a state for violating a state law.  This pretty well gives them an open ticket to violate state laws with no recourse by the state. 

 

This same “above the law” mentality was exhibited in Jan 2000 in the previously cited Elian Gonzalez case.  The US Immigration Service was preparing to send 6 year-old Elian back to his father in Cuba. 

 

A Florida Circuit Court judge imposed a restraining order to keep Elian in the US.  Janet Reno publicly declared that the US government would not abide by a court order from a state court (thus, making the federal government above the law). 

 

 

More Ruby Ridges? 

 

Beyond the manifest illustrations of government oppression against its own citizens, as outlined above in this chapter and in the preceding chapters, there are several other incidents worth mentioning which have offered the possibilities of another Ruby Ridge. 

 

The above mentioned Ruby Ridge is in Boundary County, Idaho.  Near Boundary County, there are two more North Idaho counties with some tragic acts of oppression which must be noted.  First, there is Bonner County, which lies directly South and adjacent to Boundary County. 

 

The year 2001 saw a terrible incident surface there involving a family named Michael and JoAnn McGuckin.  Michael died in May 2001, leaving the widow JoAnn and six children.  As soon as Michael was in the grave, the county rushed in to arrest Mrs McGuckin and lay siege to the home containing the children. 

 

With the family gone, the county seized the property for back taxes in order to turn it over to a New Jersey couple in an alleged conspiracy to steal the property.  The children refused to surrender to the “loving” Sheriff and the incident gained national news coverage. 

 

There is no need to try to tell this McGuckin story here as it is detailed in subsequent chapters herein.  But the incident was so tragic that it deserves mention in this presentation on government oppression.  

 

 

The Maskers 

 

For a time, there was still one more possible Ruby Ridge brewing in North Idaho.  This one concerned a couple named Richard and Deon Masker of Kootenai County (which is adjacent to and directly South of Bonner County). 

 

Like the McGuckins, the Maskers owned some property in North Idaho and the excessive tax rates forced them into the position of being unable to pay the taxes.  The county officials seized the title of the property legally on Jun 4, 2002, and were preparing to take possession of it at the first opportunity (Jul 1, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 5). 

 

The Maskers said that they had no other place to go.  So they decided to stay and defend their home (Jan 21, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 11). 

 

The county could have forgiven the debt or lowered or otherwise negotiated an agreeable settlement with the Maskers.  But apparently, these options were not on the table.  The standoff built up and prompted the “American Free Press” to suggest that “Patriots Fear Yet Another ‘Ruby Ridge’ Is Brewing” (ibid, p. 11). 

 

The Maskers stored 65 gallons of gasoline in their house.  They said that if the county tried to seize the property by an assault, they would burn the house down to keep it from being unlawfully seized. 

 

As is always true in any attempt to stand against the government authorities, the local media branded the Maskers as “uneducated, ill-mannered and disconnected extremists.”  Naturally, the local, controlled media would print nothing which favored the Maskers or said anything favorable about them at all (not even in letters to the editor). 

 

The local media seems to be a conglomerate corporation which owns all of the local newspapers in North Idaho (from Kootenai County North to the Canadian border).  Obviously, this combine is very pro-government. 

 

To further complicate things for the Maskers, the IRS entered the picture and hit them for a back tax delinquency of $12,000 for a year when neither of them worked or had any taxable income.  In the meantime, the federal tax people have proceeded to place a $165 a month levy on the Maskers’ disability income (Apr 29, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 17). 

 

 

The Maskers’ Position 

 

Richard Masker said that “Property taxes promote the continued Marxist objective of confiscation of the property of the people placing it in the control of the state authorities to be used for more control. 

 

“Property taxation is The Communist Manifesto in action.  It confiscates from the poor, the elderly, the disabled and unemployed while claiming the state owns their property.  Then they sell to the highest bidder so that the process can continue to fill the coffers of the state revenuers to support more ‘tax and spend’” (ibid, p. 17). 

 

Masker added that “We have nowhere to go... If they try to steal our home, we intend to fight.  It is now up to the county authorities and their behind-the-scenes ‘advisors’ to determine what course they wish to take” (ibid, p. 17). 

 

In a follow-up report on this case, the Aug 12, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1) noted that a North Carolina man named David Robinson learned of the plight of the Maskers from the “American Free Press” story.  He led a fund raising effort to collect some $11,299.54 to pay Bonner County off.  Thus, for the time being, the county has been satisfied. 

 

It is unclear what the future holds in view of the IRS threats of seizure; and of course, what will happen as the excessive county taxes come due in future years. 

 

 

The Charlie Puckett Case 

 

While it is not in North Idaho, there is still a third case brewing which must be mentioned in the vein of possibly opening the door for another Ruby Ridge.  This one concerns a man named Charlie Puckett, living near Lexington, Kentucky. 

 

Charlie is a fifty-five year old man who is well thought of by neighbors and even by his local sheriff, Joe Walker, of Lancaster, Kentucky.  Reportedly Puckett has been a friend of Walker for some time.  Charlie has even worked with local law enforcement people in various matters.  Walker says that he has nothing negative to say about Puckett. 

 

Yet, the feds don’t like Puckett.  And he is now wanted by federal authorities for obstruction of justice and allegedly possessing certain guns, ammunition and pipe bombs or materials that could be used to make pipe bombs (involving things that have been deemed illegal by federal bureaucrats in federal regulations). 

 

It seems that poor Puckett got into trouble with the federal alphabet police some years ago when he helped to organize the local Kentucky state militia.  As most Americans should have brains enough to understand, any involvement with one of these unorganized militia operations opens one’s personal life to intensive federal investigation. 

 

Charlie’s story was outlined in the April 1, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 6) which raised the question if the feds are setting Charlie up for “legalized murder.”  The ATF offered a $5,000 reward for information on Charlie.  ATF agent Don York said that “We consider him armed and dangerous.” 

 

Apparently, the basis of the federal complaint arose over the fact that as a teenage boy in 1966, Puckett was convicted of stealing some food from a grocery store.  He had no prior or later trouble after that.  In 1997, he passed a federal background check to apply for and receive a state permit to carry a concealed weapon. 

 

But it was too bad for Charlie.  He was a convicted felon who was ineligible to own a gun (per the various laws and regulations now in effect to gradually and slowly disallow gun ownership to more and more of the US population, as was discussed in a preceding chapter on gun laws). 

 

 

More on Puckett 

 

In an early hearing on the Puckett charges, ATF agent Don Young spent 90 minutes on the stand trying to paint a picture that Puckett was dangerous and untrustworthy because he was involved in the Kentucky militia movement. 

 

Defense attorney Gatewood Galbraith asked Young if he believed a member of the militia was automatically untrustworthy and on the fringe.  Young said “yes” and went on to complain that militia people were “anti-government.”  Galbraith then noted that Young had just impugned his own testimony by admitting that he was untrustworthy and on the fringe.  Of course, Young fired back that he was not. 

 

Thereupon, Galbraith read to him Title 10, Section 311 of the US code which says that “All able-bodied male citizens of the United States between the ages of 17 and 45 are members of the militia.”  Galbraith then asked if Young was bothered by having ATF friends who are heavily armed and members of the militia or with the fact that he was appearing before a judge who was a member of the militia? 

 

After the indictments came down, Charlie said that he was innocent of trumped up charges and went into hiding for fear that the feds wanted to kill him.  He claimed that none of the charges against him involved actual federal laws; but rather, they were things stipulated in ATF regulations (made long after his teen age arrest). 

 

Thus, can the ATF adopt a regulation that is ex-post facto in application (which is contrary to Article I, Section 9 of the US Constitution)?  Yes, as will be discussed in later chapters, the US government does this all of the time.  The Executive Branch regularly adopts laws and writes regulations (both without congressional approval and/or which are ex-post facto). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 374--Still More Government Oppression

 

 

Oklahoma City, Revisited 

 

The previously mentioned Oklahoma City bombing, of more recent years, was another situation where the liberals went wild with the passage of more new laws and a crackdown on all of their supposed opponents.  When this thing took place, the federal police power was marshaled into a full review of all of the major right wing groups. 

 

Shortly after the blast, an Oklahoma state policeman arrested Timothy McVeigh, speeding and driving a car, without an automobile tag, on Interstate 35, just north of Oklahoma City.  Later, it developed that McVeigh had left an alleged trail of evidence from an involved rental truck that he had obtained in Junction City, Kansas. 

 

Of course, Big Brother threw the book at him for his alleged motive of revenge for the federal attack and murder of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas.  Though the prosecutors and mesmerized jury at Denver never really got the picture as to who the real culprits were (the federal murderers), McVeigh was found guilty, sentenced to death and quickly executed. 

 

McVeigh’s friend Terry Nichols (who wasn’t even in Oklahoma City at the time of the bombing and who voluntarily went to the feds to tell them what all he knew about McVeigh) was later tried and also convicted.  Numerous witnesses also linked a John Doe #2 (and possible other John Does) to the bombing, but Washington quickly defused those reports by claiming that only McVeigh and Nichols were involved. 

 

Both McVeigh and Nichols were tried for conspiracy and murder of some federal people who died in the blast.  But isn’t murder a state crime?  Why was it tried at the federal level?  Has Washington totally usurped all state powers in defiance of the 10th amendment to the US Constitution?  The answer is yes she has!  However, the state of Oklahoma did open a trial on Nichols in 2003 (in sort of a double jeopardy situation). 

 

As will be later discussed, several independent, third-party, bomb and explosive experts examined the Oklahoma City Federal Building bomb site (as best as they could from outside the area because authorities had roped off and restricted the area to outsiders; and also, because the federal government quickly bulldozed the evidence/building remains and buried all of it elsewhere). 

 

These independent persons (like Ben Partin and Ted Gunderson, to be discussed below) concluded that based upon what they could see from the exterior, an outdoor fertilizer bomb was out of the question (as supposedly used). 

 

 

More Follow-Up 

 

As also will be discussed below, it is significant to note that immediately following the bombing, Oklahoma City news casts reported that second and third bombs were recovered from inside the federal building.  But after the arrest of McVeigh, the status of these recovered bombs was no longer discussed. 

 

As far as the alleged Ryder rental truck involved, the only thing of significance found was a part of a reported axle which allegedly had a manufacturer’s identification number that supposedly linked it back to the truck rented by McVeigh (although various experts claim that these numbers are not found on such truck parts). 

 

Interestingly, this truck part was found over a block away from the federal building--reportedly by Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating who was taking a stroll along the city street involved.  It is truly fascinating that Keating would by chance just discover this truck part. 

 

The whole thing becomes especially intriguing in view of the fact that Keating is not exactly an alert person and “on the ball” in terms of things going on around himself.  The Dec 6, 2002, “The Week” (p. 4) had a news report that Keating lost his briefcase in 1989 on a United Airlines flight from Washington to Tulsa, Oklahoma.  Apparently, United found it in 2002 and returned it to the Governor. 

 

The last thing that can be said for Keating is that he is a former FBI agent who worked hand in glove with Slick Clinton and US authorities to hide and cover-up whatever did happen in the Oklahoma City bombing.  He used the full powers of his office to fight all attempts to have a grand jury and to allow any inquiry into who could have been behind the bombing--other than the patsy, Timothy McVeigh. 

 

 

General Ben Partin, Revisited

 

With this focus on the Oklahoma City bombing, it would be well to review some comments made by the previously mentioned US Air Force General Benton K. Partin (retired).  Like other individuals, discussed elsewhere in this study, Partin has been on the lecture circuit sponsored by the Christian fundamentalist “Prophecy Club” group. 

 

The General has some interesting comments about several recent bombings.  His words carry some weight and consideration because he does have some credentials to back up his reputation of being an explosives expert.  For example, he was extensively involved in Air Force research and development on weapons and weapon systems and their application and effect on various targets. 

 

Specifically, he was the project manager on the US Air Force’s Maverick Missile System with its optical laser and imaging infrared guidance, as well as a number of other highly sophisticated bomb and attack systems.  To document his position on this surge of recent US terrorism, General Partin prepared a video, “Globalism:  The Program” which is available from the “Prophecy Club.” 

 

Partin reviewed the Oklahoma City bombing (as best as he could from photographs and exterior views since the area was off-limits to him) and concluded that it was physically impossible and out of the question for a 4,000 pound fertilizer bomb detonated in front of the building to have caused the extensive resulting damage. 

 

He argues that some four or more charges would have been similarly required inside the building; or alternatively, something far more advanced and sophisticated would have been needed for a blast outside the building. 

 

 

Other OC Bombing Views 

 

This inceptive reasoning by a person with vast experience in explosives and bombs must not be overlooked and particularly in view of similar findings by other responsible individuals.  Here, one might look at the work of retired FBI agent and manager Ted Gunderson, as cited above and as described in a prior chapter herein. 

 

Gunderson and some of his colleagues have likewise studied the Oklahoma City bombing incident.  They came to similar conclusions as Partin (per the video, the “Ted Gunderson Chronicles II”).  While Gunderson may not have the authoritative background in explosives that Partin has, the fact remains he has had some experience and formal training on the subject. 

 

Beyond the conclusions of these experts, there is also some interesting evidence that the ATF and/or other federal agents had some explosives illegally stored in the Oklahoma City Federal Building.  Some persons reviewing the blast have suggested that the small, ineffective fertilizer blast out front did little damage.  But it did activate some of these stored explosives, thus causing the primary damage to the building. 

 

This option gained some support from the July 2001 “Internet Vortex” (p. 24-25) which disclosed that an FBI report presented evidence that the ATF people had illegally stored a deadly arsenal of explosives in Room 3030 in the OC Federal Building (at the time of the fertilizer blast out front)--to include 10 kilograms of plastic explosives, 2.5 kilograms of TNT, 4 pounds of PETN, several 6-inch strips of detonating cord, 10 to 15 rounds of 30mm anti-aircraft ammunition, three rocket-propellant grenades and 45 detonating fuses. 

 

Per the story, the FBI took positive efforts to hide this report--despite the work of the FBI leadership to steadfastly claim that there were no other explosives, beyond the fertilizer out front.  Now, under the Freedom of Information Act, investigative reporters J. D. Cash and Roger Charles have discovered this internal FBI report that was purposely hid and covered up for years by the FBI. 

 

 

Proof of Two or More Blasts 

 

Actually, seismographs at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, OK (40 miles away) clearly recorded at least two blasts about ten seconds apart (and possibly a third one, although that point is not clear on the graphs).  Probably, the blast out front from the fertilizer or something more sophisticated was first.  Ten seconds later, the second and maybe a third blast occurred inside the building to do the real damage. 

 

Whether the second/third explosions came from fixed charges inside the building or secondary explosions of ATF explosive ordinances illegally stored inside the building is not clear. 

 

If the US ATF was storing unauthorized and illegal explosives inside the building, as now charged by various competent analysts, and if much of the interior damage, destruction and killing was attributable to those ordinances, it has to be significant that the US government not only hid this information from the gullible public, but went on to successfully pin the whole crime on McVeigh, the patsy. 

 

 

The Remains 

 

As pointed out above, several OC television news reports immediately following the OC incident reported the presence of evidently three bombs inside the building.  Per the stories, one went off and bomb experts defused the other two bombs (per David Wegener, in his video on “American Holocaust”). 

 

Surely, if bomb experts defused two more bombs inside the building (as reported in the Oklahoma City media), this must have been verifiable information to receive media mention. 

 

To top these reports off, Slick Clinton made a big deal out of rushing FBI bomb experts to Oklahoma to investigate the incident.  As it turned out, these people reportedly never even took samples of the bomb residuals inside the remains of the building or made any attempts to determine exactly what caused the explosions (again, per David Wegener). 

 

Surely, bomb experts would be able to ascertain something of value from these residuals, powder marks, etc.  Yet, no analyses of bomb residuals were ever made (or at least, there was never a later discussion or revelation of what all the residuals may have revealed). 

 

This is strange that no work was made (or at least, no “report” was made) of work to collect and analyze samples of the bomb residuals to determine what kind of explosives were involved. 

 

Apparently, all bomb blasts leave powder marks or other identification residual which can be analyzed and used to determine precisely what explosives were involved.  Either none of this work was done or at least not reported upon by the Slick Clinton team of so-called bomb experts. 

 

There was another interesting fall out of the follow up events associated with Oklahoma City following the attack.  For some strange reason, federal agents combed the site after the blast and removed certain pieces of the steel and concrete structures and buried them at an undisclosed secret site. 

 

Very quickly, in time, the rest of the building was bulldozed down and its remains secretly hidden and buried in undisclosed secret burial sites. 

 

So, instead of taking samples of strategic steel and concrete structures, which might disclose the presence of an internal bomb or bombs, the federal authorities removed all of this stuff and effectively hid it from the public’s eye.  Surely, a maneuver of this sort would raise real questions.  But no one seemed to mind.  After all, the patsy was in custody, so why muddy the waters? 

 

 

Another OC Follow-Up 

 

Incidentally, a Oklahoma Republican state legislator named Charles Key and a Oklahoma City business man named Glenn Wilburn were not happy with the government’s approved version of the OC bombing.  So they pushed for a legitimate, independent investigation. 

 

Naturally, all government authorities from OC to Washington were totally opposed to having any investigation or inquiry.  The patsy was in custody and nothing further was needed.  The official position was “Don’t rock the boat.” 

 

So Key went to work to get a petition of 10,000 names for a grand jury, which finally convened in late 1998.  By then Wilburn was dead from alleged cancer, although he seemed to be only a middle aged man from photographs (plus his grandchildren, killed in the blast, were only ages 2 and 3, which doesn’t necessarily sound like grandchildren of a very old man). 

 

With all of the frequent deaths following the conspiracy and JFK murder in Dallas, one has to wonder whether Wilburn died from natural causes or was he conveniently removed because of his opposition to the officially approved line. 

 

If there was an unidentified conspiracy in OC, it is extremely likely that the perpetrators of such an event would actively murder and/or silence possible adversaries.  In today’s modern world, it is no big deal to induce fatal heart attacks and cancer in people. 

 

In any case, the grand jury members said that they could not affirmatively state that no one else was involved--since they were not presented with evidence sufficient to indict additional conspirators (Dec 31, 1998, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. A4).  Otherwise, they returned a sealed indictment which was not immediately identified. 

 

News reports suggested that the jury had prepared an interim report earlier complaining about “improper and perhaps illegal attempts to exert influence on the outcome of our investigation.”  Thus, it isn’t only that federal and state authorities would not investigate the incident or provide investigatory people and efforts to the grand jury probe, but they actually tried to interfere in the work of the jury. 

 

Manifestly, the sitting grand jury had no funds, investigators or opportunities to conduct lengthy investigations that were opposed by US and Oklahoma state authorities.  This is just about like the situation with Jim Garrison in New Orleans when he tried to investigate the Kennedy killing (all the while that federal authorities gave him no help and actually went out of their way to interfere in, hinder and disrupt his investigation). 

 

The OC grand jury simply did not have the money and resources that the tens of thousands of federal agents had.  Nor did they have the vast horde of FBI and other law enforcement files available to federal and state personnel if federal and state authorities would have just willingly undertook a fair and impartial hearing into the matter. 

 

 

More From “Spotlight” 

 

The April 17, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 12-13) had another fascinating story on the OC bombing.  This one was entitled “Latest Evidence in Oklahoma City Bombing Points to Government Complicity in Massive Cover-Up.”  It presented the radio transcript of an interview by Tom Valentine of Pat Briley, an OC resident who has made an extensive investigation of the bombing. 

 

Briley believes that federal agents and operatives deliberately provoked and encouraged Timothy McVeigh to participate in the bombing (this sounds like something on the order of a sting operation--which will shortly be addressed--or alternatively, it helps build the case of a Hegelian dialectic in operation with McVeigh merely set up to take the blame in the way that the Reichstag fire was set up by Schicklgruber in 1933, as will be discussed in the succeeding chapter). 

 

This Briley interview also mentioned the several credible reports of other persons (multiple John Does) in Oklahoma, along with McVeigh.  Several suggested a Middle East connection (which could involve Arabs or Israeli Mossad people). 

 

According to Briley, many witnesses interviewed by the FBI reported the presence of these various John Does (persons who clearly were not Terry Nichols).  Yet, during the court hearings and subsequent court actions, the FBI denied the existence of evidence about any other alleged participants in the bombing.  Briley said that he had documentary proof of these FBI lies and cover-up actions. 

 

All of this was interesting, but the real revelation from Briley was evidence suggesting that the federal judge, prosecutors and FBI agents all acted to participate and support the cover-up in some fashion.  Many federal officials lied, destroyed evidence, threatened witnesses (like as happened in Dallas with the JFK murder), and attacked persons who would not accept the official line (like Representative Key in Oklahoma). 

 

Going on, Briley also mentioned that three members of Congress also contributed to the cover-up--either through inaction or their deliberate omission of action.  He named Representative Ernest Istook (R-OK), Representative James Saxton (R-NJ, Chairman of the House Task Force on Terrorism) and Senator James Inhofe (R-OK). 

 

The latest bombshell on this case occurred in May 2003 when information surfaced showing that ten days before McVeigh’s execution Attorney General Ashcroft received information indicating that Steven Burmeister, chief of the FBI’s scientific analysis lab, may have given false testimony at the McVeigh trial (May 19, 2003, “American Free Press,” p. 1, 4). 

 

Burmeister privately complained to FBI whistle blower Frederic Whitehurst that he was pressured by prosecutors and FBI people to testify in a certain way in the OC case.  Later, Burmeister corrected and/or retracted his statements to investigators. 

 

Reportedly, Burmeister’s “corrections” were never provided to the defense team in the McVeigh and Nichols’ trials.  McVeigh’s attorney, Stephen Jones, expressed outrage over Burmeister’s corrections and added that “It was not an accident that the letter didn’t surface before the execution” (May 26, 2003, “American Free Press,” p. 2). 

 

 

Still More Follow-Up 

 

The April 2, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news report that former NBC reporter Jayna Davis has confirmed on TV that she presented evidence to the FBI of up to nine alleged Arabs with connections to Osama bin Laden in the bombing.  Former OK representative Charles Key added that that the FBI and ATF people were both running concurrent sting operations to set these supposed Arabs up. 

 

From the beginning, the feds had the chosen patsy in custody for the bombing--Timothy McVeigh.  Therefore, they took all possible measures to convict him for the crime.  Whether anyone else was involved or not quickly became a non-issue.  During McVeigh’s trial, he told his lawyers that the event involved a conspiracy of six to eight people.  His lawyer tried to make this point in court.  But he was unsuccessful. 

 

With a carefully chosen jury, McVeigh was quickly convicted and sentenced to death. 

 

For some reason, McVeigh initially chose to make no further appeals or offer any further effort to delay his death.  He was resigned to die.  Maybe McVeigh was either so programmed by his controllers or he wanted the glory and credit for the deed or simply he wanted to protect his colleagues when he ultimately said that he alone did the bombing. 

 

 

FBI Bungling 

 

In the meantime, one week before McVeigh’s execution was to take place (in mid May 2001), a discovery was made in the FBI that FBI agents and federal prosecutors withheld and hid over 3,100 pages of documents relevant to the case (which should have been made available to McVeigh’s defense). 

 

After several days of searching, the FBI came up with still 900 more pages--to total over 4,000 pages (per a NPR news report on May 25, 2001). These “late” discoveries were like bombshells (along with the still later revelations on the questionable testimony from Steven Burmeister, as discussed above).  Clearly, these acts constituted an obstruction of justice (as will be discussed in a later chapter).

 

Despite the continuous flow of new documents, US Attorney General John Ashcroft decreed that the execution should take place in June 2001 without any further delay (never mind that the defense people did not have time to even read the 4,000 pages, much less digest them). 

 

Perhaps in support of one of the most serious findings of FBI incompetence and/or deliberate obstruction of justice, “Spotlight” of May 28, 2001 (p. 2), had a news report from Britain which said that an FBI memo from its San Francisco field office stated that the investigation into other possible suspects (besides Timothy McVeigh) in the bombing had been called off, after only one month, at the request of the Oklahoma City FBI office. 

 

This bombshell FBI memo said:  “In view of the fact that the Oklahoma Command Post has directed all offices to hold (unidentified suspect) #2 leads in abeyance, San Francisco will conduct no further investigation.”  The reason why the FBI called off its investigation after one month was not stated (although it would seem that Big Brother had the patsy in custody and there was no further need to complicate things). 

 

In the meantime, after the release of the 4,000 new pages, almost everyone in the controlled media and establishment said “so what” --since McVeigh had effectively admitted the crime.  The feds added that it’s “no big deal.”  US prosecutors further pacified the gullible goyim by saying that “none of the evidence withheld would have changed the results of McVeigh’s conviction.” 

 

But in truth, and with the new evidence, maybe McVeigh could have beaten the rap.  Surely, anyone with the mentality above the idiot level should understand that it took far more brains and expertise to carry the OC bombing out than what McVeigh demonstrated.  Someone else was manifestly involved (though the feds maintained that there were no others--after all, they had the patsy). 

 

In the sheer interest of justice, the US courts (the prejudiced judge, jury, prosecutors and FBI people) were never interested in learning the truth of what was behind the bombing.  Instead, the patsy was in custody and the problem was only how to convict him.  And as it later worked out, he aided their cause with his confession (which might have been motivated by pride on his part to take sole credit for the bombing). 

 

 

The 2002 Revelations 

 

With the patsy arrested, convicted and executed, it looked like the ruling plutocrats in America and their controlled media spin-meisters were clearly in the saddle with no threats from anyone.  Manifestly, it seemed like the Oklahoma City bombing was history.  Since the memory span of most mesmerized and zombiized Americans is only about three months, everything looked great for awhile. 

 

Then, in September 2001, New York and Washington were both attacked by alleged Muslim terrorists (these so-called terrorist acts will be covered in some detail in later chapters).  While these reported terrorist actions did grant the liberals, leftists and plutocrats in the New World Order crowd a whole series of new federal laws further limiting US freedoms, something else unforeseen developed. 

 

All of a sudden, in early 2002, new evidence began surfacing that indeed there could have been a John Doe #2 with Middle Eastern ties in the OC bombing (as briefly pointed out in the above comments). 

 

What a mess this was for the ruling plutocrats, the prostitute politicians and the controlled media.  The patsy was already executed and here new evidence was surfacing (beyond the mass of documents and evidence hidden by the FBI, as discussed above). 

 

The May 13, 2002, U. S. News & World Report” (USNWR, p. 8) had a short item on “Back to McVeigh.”  Surely, no thinking person, who has pulled his head out of the sand and looked around, would dare come forward to say that the Amalekite owned and controlled USNWR is anything but a part of the controlled national media.  This rag is clearly a part of the US establishment ruled by the Amalekite bankers/masters. 

 

In any case, the USNWR remarks noted that there just might “be something to the growing circle of investigations into allegations that Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh had ties to Middle East terrorists, maybe even al Qaeda” (supposedly, the evil organization run by Osama bin Laden that George W. Bush used as the scapegoat for the 9-11 incident and his war on terrorism in 2001-2003). 

 

Per USNWR, some people are acknowledging that there is now proof that the FBI ignored key evidence of Iraqi involvement in the OC bombing--evidence which would allow that there was a John Doe #2 who might have been an ex-Iraqi Republican Guardsman (additionally, the case can be made that the Middle Easterners involved were actually Mossad agents and US authorities simply ignored their involvement). 

 

Also, information on this subject apparently came up in a 1995 investigative report on the confession of Abdul Hakim Murad (convicted of trying to down twelve jumbo jets).  The FBI report noted that Murad took responsibility for the Oklahoma City bombing. 

 

However, all of these Middle East possibilities and suggestions fell on deaf ears by the prostitute politicians and their plutocratic controllers and media allies.  The patsy was arrested, convicted and died for the crime.  So, why bring up this new evidence once the whole question was supposedly laid to rest? 

 

 

A Recap of the Unbelievable 

 

As noted elsewhere herein, McVeigh was subjected to experiments (possibly mind control techniques) while he was in the US Army.  It is very possible that Amalekite controlled agents (linked to the Amalekite US Senator Charles “Chucky” Schumer) used McVeigh in some role in the bombing so that he would be set up as the pasty (plus, they could have also used some Middle Easterners in the bombing). 

 

Surely, any person above the idiot level must wonder about a bomber who could pull this caper off and then go on to speed along a US interstate highway without automobile license plates on his car. 

 

Obviously, anyone this stupid and irresponsible was bound to be caught.  So an Oklahoma highway patrolman overtook the speeding McVeigh and pulled him over.  McVeigh, who had allegedly just bombed and murdered a mass of people in Oklahoma City, and who just conveniently had a loaded pistol with him, willingly allowed himself to be arrested. 

 

Does it not seem highly likely that a mass murderer like McVeigh would use his gun to shoot the approaching highway patrolman and avoid the certain arrest?  Of course, anyone above the idiot or imbecile level would have to be very suspicious of this whole operation. 

 

Therefore, maybe new evidence will establish that some Muslims or some other party or parties had a role in the OC bombing (now that the patsy is dead).  Again, McVeigh did tell his lawyer that there were others involved. 

 

 

More Partin Conclusions 

 

In other matters, Ben Partin suggests that a bomb was used on the Davidians’ compound at Waco as well (apparently helicopter delivered) and that he is absolutely assured that a missile (or two) brought the TWA flight 800 to Paris down in 1996 (mentioned in a previous chapter).  A huge number of witnesses reported the sight of something approaching the airliner from the ocean surface. 

 

Some 736 observers (including a National Guard helicopter pilot) said that they had seen a missile, flare or some type of pyrotechnic device fired into the sky from the ocean floor which did intercept the plane. 

 

In a May 2002 promotional letter, Don McAlvany (editor of the “McAlvany Intelligence Advisor”) says that some or all of these 736 witnesses reported two missiles or devices; yet, the government concluded that the crash was due to a defective fuel pump on the plane. 

 

 

More on the NY Airplane Crashes 

 

A prior chapter herein mentioned the situation with Chris Ruddy on Oct 31, 1999, just a few hours after Egypt Air 990 went down in the Atlantic, following its departure from JFK airport in New York.  Ruddy heard remarks from US air traffic control people about rockets being fired in the area.  As Ruddy noted, there was a similar situation with TWA flight 800. 

 

The Nov 1999 “Internet Vortex” (p. 12) had a report from 800 investigator Michael Hull who reported that four months after the 800 crash, US air traffic controllers diverted planes flying out of JFK because of some unstated reason.  Hull mentioned TWA flight 884 to Tel Aviv and Pakistan International Airlines flight 712 to Frankfort, both of which also left Kennedy on Nov 16, 1996. 

 

One of the pilots in the Pakistan plane saw an orange light which he defined as a rocket ascending to his plane’s altitude but to the right side of his craft.  The pilots reported the incident and US government officials dismissed it as a meteorite observation. 

 

Hull’s research also documents a case involving a missile-like object which almost collided with a Swissair flight on Sep 27, 1997, over the US.  The pilots reported the incident and US authorities said it must have been a weather balloon. 

 

On August 9, 1997, another Swissair flight (127) was almost struck by an object near Boston.  And on Mar 5, 1999, still one more Swissair flight was almost hit by a missile, near where TWA 800 went down.  Obviously, there have been a series of problems with possible missiles or something else striking planes in the US. 

 

 

Was the Navy Involved? 

 

The “Strategic Investment” newsletter of Dec 17, 1997, claimed that the shot on 800 came from a US submarine or submersible platform in a top secret test then being conducted in the area.  Numerous allegations have continued to surface that the US Navy fired it. 

 

For sure, Navy personnel were clearly conducting exercises in the area of 800.  So they must not be ruled out.  If they did fire a missile or something else which brought the plane down, would they admit it?  With the 1996 elections coming up, would Slick Clinton have been willing for information to slip out that his administration was responsible for the careless killing of an airplane load of people heading for Paris? 

 

Maybe Slick found himself in the predicament that Bobby Kennedy was in during 1963, over the cover-up of Jack’s assassination.  If the truth would have come out in 1963, it could have been disastrous for Bobby.  If the truth about flight 800 came out in 1996, it could have damaged Slick’s political chances. 

 

Former JFK press secretary Pierre Salinger was one of the first persons of some notoriety in 1996 to come out and take a position that 800 went down by a missile, evidently fired accidentally by the US Navy.  Naturally, the controlled media either ridiculed him or ignored him.  So his perception had little impact on anything. 

 

As a later follow-up, Salinger wrote an article for the Jan 17, 2000, “Spotlight” on “New Information Says TWA Flight 800 Downed by Missile” (p. 1, 4) which quoted insiders who were in a position to know about the crash.  For example, lead FBI agent Jim Kahlsrom in 1996 was daily saying that there was no US Navy ships in the area.  Yet privately, he told three other people that there were three Navy ships there. 

 

In early 1998, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Thomas Moorer said that “All evidence would point to a missile.  All those witnesses who saw a streak that hit the plane--you have to assume it was a missile.  It absolutely deserves more investigation, a lot more.”  In Senate hearings on the issue in May 1999, US Senator Charles Grassley said that the FBI investigation was “a model of failure, not success.” 

 

The Boeing Aircraft Company came out in January 2000 with a statement under oath which said that an “external source” must have downed TWA 800 in July 1996.  Boeing noted that the National Transportation Safety Board has spent over three years investigating the crash and they still have been unable to identify its cause (Jan 2000 “Internet Vortex,” p. 33). 

 

 

Recent Private Investigators 

 

Also, after the crash and the failure of the FBI and National Transportation Safety Board to deal with the missile option, Bill Donaldson, a former combat pilot and now a crash investigator, commenced a private investigation of 800.  He and his team of experts have not only obtained and studied the government facts, but he has talked to eye-witnesses and had many leaks and tips from insiders within the government. 

 

Donaldson reports accumulated evidence that suggests two missiles, as allowed by other investigators, like Ben Partin.  Donaldson points to doctored information from the government and evidence of a cover-up by the Safety Board (Dec 1998 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 21-22).  The questions of who and why remain.  Thus, who was on that plane to either cause the shoot down or the cover-up or both? 

 

The March 12, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 7) had a fascinating report from Donn De Grand Pre (is this a pen name?) on “What Caused Tragic Downing of TWA Flight 800?” which reported upon the findings of some of the important witnesses and recent investigations.  This article mentioned the work of Commander Bill Donaldson, cited above 

 

Moreover, this story noted the investigation of Richard Russell, a retired United Airlines 747 pilot and a 30-year veteran investigator of aircraft crashes.  Russell released a recent report which stated:  “TWA flight 800 was shot down by a U.S. Navy Aegis missile fired from a guided missile ship which was in the area W-105 about 30 miles from where TWA 800 blew up... 

 

“(W105) is used by the military for operations including missile firing.  It is believed that, while (W-105) is a rather large area, budget constraints had dictated that missile firings be done closer to land so that the flight time for the P-3 monitor and tracking aircraft can be reduced.” 

 

“Spotlight” then went on to note that the flight path of the Navy’s P-3 Orion anti-submarine aircraft shows that it had passed about 6,000 feet above TWA 800, just seconds prior to the explosion.  Per Donn, a “Newsday” report of Aug 20, 1996, reported that the P-3 was communicating with a submarine off the coast of Cape May. 

 

If the work of Russell has merit, it is fascinating that the budget limitations for US Navy training operations may have caused the shoot down.  In other words, the Clinton administration had cut back funding and the Navy had to cut corners and work closer to land, than as desired.  This background makes it clear that Slick Clinton would have walked the extra mile to cover up this disaster (caused by him). 

 

It is not far fetched at all to allow that the US Navy (or some other group) fired a missile or pyrotechnic device that brought TWA flight 800 down.  Manifestly, the US Navy did use a missile to shoot down an Iranian passenger plane full of people in the Persian Gulf some years ago during the Gulf War--allegedly by accident, but Iran maintained that it was fired on purpose. 

 

 

One More Story 

 

A news report of Dec 4, 1998, said the Navy had accidentally fired a missile over the Atlantic which was headed for a passenger jet.  A shoot down was adverted when controllers intercepted the missile electronically to destroy it in flight. 

 

The writer of this study at hand first heard this news report briefly on the radio that day and was unable to find any further media mention of the incident.  Why would the US media take action to hide and suppress a story of this significance? 

 

 

Another Option on the NY Plane Crashes 

 

A BBC news report on Nov 4, 2000, had a woman Professor of English on from Harvard who offered still another possibility on the plane crashes off New York--which also was predicated upon the involvement of the US military.  The professor noted that there is much US military activity off of New York and that during the crashes of the TWA and Egypt Air planes, this activity was in progress. 

 

She then advanced a new  theory that these US military operations involved the use of electronic devices and signals--which could have been picked up by the airplane’s antennas.  Someway and somehow, these signals could have been transmitted internally into the planes in a manner to interfere in the planes’ electronic equipment and networking--thus causing the crashes. 

 

It seems to be a true fact that electronic technology is highly sensitive and who knows what can happen in this modern age with such a profuse quantity of this stuff in operation.  However, on the TWA 800 crash, the better option of a missile shot still remains. 

 

This is not to say that man-made electronic and electromagnetic energy fields do not affect other, unintended, near-by equipment--as well as perhaps humans/humanoids (as noted earlier), migratory birds and who knows what all else. 

 

The effect of the explosion in the use of electronics and electromagnetic energy is still not fully understood.  Despite a lack of understanding about consequences, man is proceeding to use it extensively. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 375--Conspiracy?

 

 

More Options 

 

A series of strange bombings, deaths, murders, federal attacks, terrorist attacks, etc have been described in preceding chapters.  Different explanations have ultimately come forth from the government and the controlled media sources to supposedly pacify the dumb Christian goyim in America and make them settle down with the approved explanations. 

 

However, there are other interesting options which should be put on the table and discussed by any person wanting to know the truth.  This chapter will address some of these other possibilities. 

 

 

Ben Partin, Revisited 

 

In terms of the earlier (1993) New York City World Trade Center bombing, General Partin suggests that it involved a counter terrorism sting by federal agents which went wrong.  In other words, the feds had advance knowledge of the Muslims’ plans (from an informer involved in the incident) and delayed an arrest, expecting to set them up. 

 

Actually, this FBI informer and inside man was quickly arrested and the government was prepared to prosecute him for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing that killed six people.  He wisely produced recorded telephone messages between himself and FBI authorities on the coming incident (per David Wegener, “American Holocaust” video). 

 

One of the recorded messages was very specific when the FBI undercover man asked for instructions of what to use in the bomb--the real stuff or a fake substitute.  FBI authorities told him to use the real stuff because it would be hard for the government to get a conviction otherwise.  So real blasting material was used and it killed six people. 

 

If this undercover man had not had the telephone recordings, there is some possibility that he would have been one of the fall guys or patsies set up to take the blame.  For his personal benefit, he wisely made recordings of the messages given him from FBI authorities. 

 

 

The OC Parallel 

 

Some persons have speculated that this is also what happened in Oklahoma City, where most federal agents seemed to have had advance knowledge before the event actually took place. 

 

With this advance knowledge of what was coming down, many of the agents chose to be absent from their OC offices that day.  No one has even bothered to find out why all of these federal agents weren’t in the OC building when the bomb went off. 

 

The possibility that the OC bombing involved the feds in some way (perhaps in a sting operation) has received some support from several different “Spotlight” articles over the years.  For example, “Spotlight” of Jan 3 & 10, 2000 (p. 36), had a note about the alleged involvement of a German character named Andreas Strassmeir. 

 

Well known British journalist Ambrose Evans Pritchard has produced some evidence connecting Strassmeir to the incident and showing that Strassmeir was a US underground informant and agent provocateur (present with a cult called “Elohim City” in Eastern Oklahoma) who reportedly manipulated/influenced Timothy McVeigh. 

 

“Spotlight” of June 25, 2001 (p. 12), had one more story along the same line and quoted a number of investigators and prominent persons (like media figures Robert Novak and Sam Francis) who have expressed concern over the possible role that Strassmeir may have played in the bombing and his links to the US government. 

 

Another possibility surfaced in the Jun 10, 2002, American Free Press” (p. 18) in a story by Michael Collins Piper on “OKC Figure Federal Informant?” which allowed that Strassmeir might be an Israeli agent who was also a federal informant.  The point was made that Strassmeir spoke Hebrew and had a girlfriend who served in the Israeli army.  Strassmeir was reportedly in contact with McVeigh on several occasions. 

 

For sure, both the feds and the ADL had been monitoring McVeigh long before the OC bombing.  One must always wonder why the innocuous nobody McVeigh rated such close scrutiny from both the Anti-Defamation League and federal authorities (note--is it possible that the ADL and/or Mossad was working on this thing with the Amalekite US Senator Charles Schumer?). 

 

 

The Real Why? 

 

The just quoted General Partin went on to add that he prepared documented analyses on many of the events associated with the OC bombing and submitted them to responsible federal officials.  But no one in Washington even bothered to contact him as a follow-up. 

 

The General believes that there is a leftist program underway (since 1928) involving a national (or international) liberation movement to install a Socialist one world government. 

 

He suggests that all of these bombing incidents are somehow connected to this liberation motion and involve the attainment of definite political objectives.  He echoes the findings mentioned before that the US Congress had a terrorism bill before it which was going no place.  So the OC bombing occurred and there was the reaction of pushing this legislation into law.  In other words--cause and effect were in operation. 

 

A former chapter discussed the great hegelian principle of dialectic reasoning--a process whereby thought passes repeatedly in ascending stages from thesis to antithesis to synthesis (Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary,” p. 298).  In essence, dialectic reasoning consists of creating a problem, proposing a solution and then achieving the desired end, which otherwise would not have been attainable. 

 

The plutocrats (especially the Amalekite plutocrats), with their enormous wealth and control over the US media, politicians and government (and its agencies, to include the CIA) and by using unlimited amounts of federal dollars, are most notably in a position to fully implement this scheme whenever they choose. 

 

 

Interesting Possibilities 

 

For sure, every time a bill is in Congress which the liberals want passed, something strange and uncanny happens to arouse public opinion so that the bill can be passed and become law.  That was the situation when the Oklahoma City bombing took place.  Congress had the terrorism bill and there was opposition to it.  The OC incident assured its passage.  Is there a connection?  Could be! 

 

Moreover, Timothy McVeigh claimed that when he was in the army, Big Brother implanted a chip in him (which could be relevant to understand his actions and the OC bombing, to be shortly discussed). 

 

 

1933 

 

The situation with Timothy McVeigh brings to mind a similar situation in Germany in 1933 (as briefly noted in the preceding chapter). 

 

Adolf Schicklgruber came to power as chancellor of  Germany on January 30, 1933.  The German parliament, the Reichstag, refused to pass some of the dictatorial laws which Adolf demanded.  Thereupon, the so-called Fuhrer dissolved parliament and called for new elections.  

 

Since the German Communist Party was a threat to Adolf and his plans for the future, this party had to be dealt with in a manner to eliminate its influence in Germany.   Conveniently, a fire destroyed part of the Reichstag building in Berlin on February 27, 1933. 

 

Immediately, the Nazi government arrested a Communist at the site of the fire and claimed that he set it.  Within a few days, the poor prisoner was tried, convicted and executed. 

 

This event eliminated the Nazi’s political opposition and gave the so-called Fuhrer virtually total power over Germany.  Freedom of speech and freedom of the press were quickly eliminated.  Thus, for the next several years, the Amalekite Adolf ruled Germany with an iron hand. 

 

In his Prophecy Club video on the “American Holocaust,” analyst David Wegener noted this Reichstag fire in the vein of the clever Hegelian dialectic, as mentioned above (and its application to the situation in Oklahoma City and the arrested patsy Timothy McVeigh). 

 

As discussed elsewhere herein, the Hegelian practice comes into play when people in power want something to happen which seems out of the question because of enormous opposition to it.  The solution is simple--manufacture an incident which can motivate the collective population to rise up in righteous indignation and implement the desired solution which was otherwise unattainable. 

 

In 1933, Schicklgruber was anxious to suspend freedom of speech and freedom of the press and to impose his dictatorial power over Germany.  The Communists were his primary enemies and opposition persons.  The Nazi leadership merely insured that the patsy was somehow present at the Reichstag on February 27, 1933, when the fire broke out.  The patsy was arrested and took the fall. 

 

Adolf then got everything that he wanted.  All freedoms and the parliament were eliminated.  He assumed dictatorial control of Germany. 

 

Hitler/Schicklgruber was a very devoted man to architecture and the building of new buildings.  Surely, the fire at the Reichstag was beneficial to him in helping to pave the way for him to exploit these ambitions as well (if the Reichstag would ever come back into play). 

 

Since the Nazi Government controlled press releases and the powers of the state, it was easy to arrest whomsoever it wanted to and blame him or her for the fire.  With the patsy murdered by the state, no one would ever be the wiser. 

 

Wegener believes that this very situation evolved in Oklahoma City.  He displayed some of the evidence available suggesting that the American people were repeatedly lied to by authorities (as will be cited below in the following comments).  With the bombing, the desired pending terrorism bill quickly became law (to further take away the rights and freedoms of the American people). 

 

 

William Colby’s Insight 

 

A prior chapter mentioned the Amalekite murder of William Colby, a former Director of the CIA.  Although not serving long in that slot, he was there long enough to understand the plutocratic control of the United States--mainly by Amalekite bankers/masters.  Colby was a very enlightened individual. 

 

While at the CIA, he assuredly learned much about how the modern world works--where most major events are staged or controlled to produce certain results (like FDR said--if it happens, it was planned).  Colby’s penetrating perception about how events take place in America was brought out in a “Spotlight” article of Aug 2, 1999, on “Is There Some Plan Behind Gun Violence, Y2K?” (p. B18-19). 

 

The “Spotlight” stated the bankers’ modus operandi (MO) as including the 1993 World Trade Center bombing (crisis) and the Oklahoma City bombing (bigger crisis), both of which were engineered to sway the legislative votes necessary to pass the so-called anti-terrorism bill (the solution). 

 

In a reference to the OC bombing, Colby said “If you could get to the bottom of the whole thing, you’d find the money and the same people who put up the money...to blow up the World Trade Center.” 

 

Regarding the Littleton, Colorado school shooting, previously described, Bill Colby said that it is another example.  He said that “to disarm the American people to further their world dictatorship plan, I believe bankers are utilizing mind-controlled gun murders (problem/crises) to pass unconstitutional gun control laws (solutions).” 

 

In October 1996, just before he was murdered, Colby told a reporter that “Terrorism/reaction/solution is a more accurate description being employed against us today.”  He also charged that a “gang in the state FBI...(that is)...hell-bent on creating a condition that would erode all of our constitutional freedoms...for a global police state by the year 2000.” 

 

 

Achieving Results 

 

“Spotlight” of Aug 2, 1999, also focused on several recent terrorist acts which seem to have been precipitated by outside forces bent on pushing certain laws into effect.  The article noted school shooting incidents in Scotland and Australia, which prompted draconian gun control laws. 

 

On the above cited Littleton, CO incident, “Spotlight” reported that the youths involved conveniently committed suicide and that suicide is a part of the programming (because a dead assassin cannot be deprogrammed to reveal the identity of his programmer and possible motives for the event). 

 

The Littleton shooting occurred one day before the Colorado legislature was preparing to vote on a right to carry a gun law in Colorado.  The shooting conveniently scrapped those plans. 

 

There was a shooting by a man named George Hennard at the Lubu Restaurant in Houston, Texas on Oct 18, 1991.  Was it a coincidence that the US Congress had scheduled a vote on Oct 19, 1991, on banning the same type of gun clip (of 17 rounds) which Hennard used? 

 

In California, the state assembly failed to pass an assault rifle ban.  Conveniently, there was a school yard shooting in Stockton, California which involved the same type of a so-called assault rifle.  Almost at once, the legislature passed the previously defeated ban on assault rifles. 

 

Although occurring after the “Spotlight” report on the correlation between the passage of gun laws and strange shootings, another very recent shooting took place in late July 1999 in Atlanta.  This one happened in Atlanta when a nut named Mark Barton went wild and killed 12 people, including his wife and two children, as discussed in a former chapter herein (Aug 9, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 22).   

 

The crazy Barton shot nine people at random in downtown Atlanta with a gun.  The significance of this event was that the US Congress was still debating the gun bill which Slick Clinton wanted after the Littleton, CO shootings. 

 

 

More on Recent Shootings 

 

While Congress still had the gun control subject still on the table, another nut named Buford Furrow Jr went into a Jewish Community Center in the Los Angeles area the week of Aug 10, 1999, to shoot it up and wound five people, including three children, and to later kill a Filipino postman, as outlined in former comments. 

 

This incident caused a barrage of news reports for days and days.  Though Furrow was charged with being a White supremacist, racist and anti-Semite, one must pause and wonder if race was truly his problem.  Or alternatively, was some other factor at work to bring on the shootings?  This alternative will be assessed shortly in remarks to follow. 

 

Two more shootings followed in October 1999.  First, a Xerox employee in Honolulu went into company offices and shot and killed seven.  A few days later, another man walked into a building in Seattle and killed two. 

 

In discussing these two cases, the Nov 15, 1999, “US News & World Report” (p. 36) had an article by Mike Tharp on “First Hawaii, then Seattle” which said that there’s no way to guarantee angry workers won’t one day snap.  If this remark is valid, does it raise questions about why people do “snap” and go crazy?  This issue will be shortly assessed. 

 

On Sep 15, 1999, while Slick Clinton and the media were still complaining about the need for more gun control laws (just after Slick released 14 Puerto Rican terrorists from jail for apparent political reasons), another lone gunman went into the Westwood Baptist Church in Fort Worth, Texas, which was having a meeting for teenagers. 

 

This nut pulled out a gun and started shooting.  He murdered seven persons and injured another seven.  He then used the gun to commit suicide.  As always, Slick, the media and the liberal establishment went wild in condemning guns.  None of them ever said anything about personal responsibility.  And above all else, the question must remain as to “what” factor was at work to bring on this shooting. 

 

The strange shootings continued in 2000-2001.  For example, a nutty, 15-year old boy named Charles Andrew Williams took his father’s 22 pistol and brought it to class and killed two fellow students and wounded 13 others at Santana Highschool in Santee, California in February 2001.  Two days later, a 14-year old girl shot and wounded a classmate at the Bishop Neumann Junior-Senior Highschool in Williamsport, PA. 

 

Obviously, something is happening to stir these persons up to go on shooting rampages.  And importantly, each one of these cases prompts the controlled media to go on a gun attack for weeks on end.  The media completely bombards the public daily over the alleged evils of guns.  They never seem to quit. 

 

 

The Pipe Bombs 

 

Early May 2002 saw a strange surge of pipe bombs being placed in some mailboxes in Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Texas and Colorado that were accompanied by alleged anti-government writings (which were never really released to the public).  Six of them exploded and ten more were found before detonation (May 10, 2002, “The Week,” p. 5). 

 

A 21-year-old college student named Luke John Helder was arrested in Nevada for the bombs.  Helder said that he was trying to place the bombs out in a pattern showing a smiling face.  For sure, the bombs were not extremely dangerous as they only caused minor injuries.  This case was cited in a previous chapter for the way the controlled media reported upon it. 

 

However, the importance of this incident could reach into the present discussion of the actions of federal entrappers and sting operators to set people up for arrest or to allow the controlled media to push and prod the dumb, Christian goyim to enact a whole new series of restrictive and unconstitutional laws to further take the constitutional rights away from the American people. 

 

Even before Helder was arrested, this writer immediately was suspicious that something was wrong with this story. 

 

On the surface, it appeared to me to be the work of a real, genuine kook; or alternatively, something the above cited Senator Charles Schumer and his Amalekite friends (like with the ADL and/or the Mossad) had cooked up to get some more unconstitutional laws passed to erode more of the rights of Americans, and to further pave the way for the US to be a part of the coming world government. 

 

Someone (again, like perhaps the Amalekite Schumer or some of his allies) seem to have been using mind controlled agents for some of these strange bombing and shooting cases that have been occurring across America in the last several years. 

 

CIA mind control operations will be broached in some detail in succeeding chapters.  Suffice to say, they are the real world out there.  Somebody or some agents are working for the Amalekite bankers/masters in the US Congress or at the ivory towers of plutocratic rule to be sure that strange things happen that can be used as fuel by the controlled media to motivate the Christian goyim to pass more laws. 

 

The background on Luke John Helder has not been fully outlined to the public yet.  But as his trial gets underway, it should not surprise any of us that he has been subjected to mind control operations, a chip or something similar in his past.  The only problem here is that the controlled media will hide such information from the public if it does surface.  Hopefully, the alternative press will let it out. 

 

 

Spotlight Revisited 

 

The “Spotlight” article, discussed earlier (Aug 2, 1999, “Is There Some Plan Behind Gun Violence, Y2K?” p. B18-19), observed that the bankers are at the top of the secret government pyramid.  When they desire that a certain unconstitutional law be passed (to further their goals of bringing in the New World Order), something conveniently happens in society to make the public rise up and demand that something be done. 

 

Of course, something will be done.  The people will lose more of their rights!  While “Spotlight” used the word “bankers” to define this secret government, it more correctly seems to be essentially Amalekite bankers and masters (at least in the context of 1999 media and press control, as elsewhere discussed herein). 

 

When assessing these events, one must remember the capabilities of modern man to employ mind control and brainwashing techniques on innocent people.  As elsewhere noted herein, Timothy McVeigh had had a chip inserted into his body, while in the army, and unabomber Theodore Kaczynski underwent mind control experiments, while a student at Harvard University. 

 

In 1794, James Madison, the man who drafted the US Constitution and a later president, spoke of “the old trick of turning every contingency into a resource for accumulating force (power) in the government” (“Our Enemy, the State,” p. 1-1).  Madison perceptively foretold the future for America. 

 

 

Unanswered Questions 

 

There were a lot of unanswered questions about the above mentioned Buford Furrow and what really was involved to precipitate his shootings.  “Spotlight” (p. 10) of Sep 20, 1999, followed up with a story by F. C. Blahut on “Zionist Questions Shooting Motives” which focused upon an interview of author Barry Chamish, an admitted Jewish Zionist (who was quoted in previous chapters herein). 

 

At the start, Chamish charged that various Jewish agencies and organizations, both inside and out of Israel, have been involved in nefarious activities, including assassinations. 

 

He went on to say that he smelled some old fish in the first media reports of the Furrow shootings.  He immediately said that they (referring to the government and/or the Jewish activists) want our guns and they will do anything to confiscate them.  To demonstrate his point, he focused upon some inconsistencies and problems in the shooting incident. 

 

Chamish noted that Furrow had left a lot of ammunition in his van.  And supposedly, per the government line and story, he was on a shooting rampage to kill Jews in a Jewish neighborhood.  Reportedly, Furrow (with a military background) fired some 70 rounds with a semi-automatic weapon at the Jewish Center with children as close as fifteen feet. 

 

Yet, no one was killed at the Center.  Except for one critical child, the others only had superficial wounds. 

 

Other questions were raised about Furrow’s release of a carjack victim (without injury) and why he then went on to shoot the postal worker (which made the whole incident a federal crime).  As “Spotlight” concluded--the Furrow shootings have to be classified as suspicious. 

 

 

A Further Possible Twist on Furrow

 

Of most significance, Buford Furrow was earlier detained and treated in a Washington state psychiatric hospital.  He then spoke of killing others and committing suicide.  At the time, a judge ordered the police to go to his house and seize his guns.  The police failed to do so. 

 

Another report on Furrow came out the week of Aug 22, 1999.  It was discussed on the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio program.  Serious allegations have surfaced that Furrow was experimented upon while he was in the military service (at McChord Air Force Base, near Tacoma, WA). 

 

It appears that Furrow was subjected to psychiatric experiments and drugs in the military (which seem to sometimes happen to service personnel).  In any case, he, like several others, was in a clear position to have had his mind altered in some way in his various contacts with the Establishment. 

 

 

An Amalekite Connection? 

 

Someone looking at this Furrow shooting of the Jewish children might question why Amalekite bankers/masters pulling the strings would entice him (through mental telepathy or however, to be assessed in later chapters) to shoot Jews.  For this, there are certainly several possible answers. 

 

It might be that Furrow was just programmed to shoot people in the generic sense, without any further delineation.  If so, the target selection might not have been in his programming.  He would have been motivated to choose his own target. 

 

Otherwise, it appears true that the Amalekites have been going all out since WWII to keep the so-called Holocaust alive.  For this agenda, they benefit every time something happens to a synagogue or a Jewish person gets shot. 

 

As will be described in a later chapter, the Amalekite bankers/masters have no compulsion or conscience at all about sacrificing innocent Jews in order to achieve their goals of world rule (as they did under Schicklgruber).  This might be the unseen factor alluded to by Barry Chamish, discussed above. 

 

The fact that Furrow may have been a mind altered, deranged nut (who apparently hated Jews) meant that he was clearly a target/personality who could benefit the Amalekite agenda. 

 

Some people have even suggested that the Amalekites secretly finance or help finance the Aryan Nations and certain Ku Klux Klan groups.  In other words, it is in their purpose to have so-called anti-Semitic groups in the newspapers, as often as possible. 

 

The likelihood that Amalekite bankers would be willing to plow money into some of the right wing groups should not surprise anyone.  They financed the rise to power of Adolf Schicklgruber in Germany in the early 1930s.  It is also true that many of these groups have been founded by and led by Amalekite leaders (as outlined in former chapters). 

 

Of course, the existence of these groups (which are incredibly anti-Jewish) ultimately helps the Amalekites and their goals (under Satanic motivation and spiritual supervision) of destroying the White Israelites and bringing in the New World Order (under control of the Amalekite bankers).  Every time, one of these groups tries to march or otherwise makes the news, the Amalekites gain something.  

 

 

The Montana Freemen 

 

The year 1996 saw a federal invasion in Montana when the Big Brother people leveled all kinds of charges against some persons in Montana who called themselves the “Freemen.” 

 

Nobody knows for sure what they did.  But the ruling authorities claimed that they passed $ millions in bad checks or liens (which were largely never honored or used.  Thus, no one actually lost much of anything on them). 

 

But they were politically incorrect right-wingers who disapproved of the direction that the US government has taken in the last several years.  This was enough.  So Washington ordered that they be arrested and tried under federal law for all kinds of “criminal activities” which were never defined beyond the paper allegations. 

 

Thousands of federal agents and pieces of heavy assault equipment were moved into Central Montana to bring these terrible people to justice.  After a lengthy standoff, the Montana political dissidents finally gave up and were whisked away to a federal prison to be tried for their alleged “criminal activities” (whatever they were).  Naturally, they were tried, convicted and given lengthy prison sentences from 4 to 22 years in prison. 

 

 

The Texas Separatists 

 

In April 1997, Big Brother moved against some politically incorrect people in the Fort Davis Mountains for alleged “criminal activities” (evidently, like the Montana patriots).  Persons listening to the daily controlled media broadcasts could never understand what they had done--other than allegedly being involved in passing bad checks and unclassified “criminal activities.” 

 

Finally, the standoff ended when some of them gave up and a couple of others tried to flee and were shot to death by Big Brother.  These killed people were never tried in a court and found guilty of anything. 

 

Their crime seems to have been that collectively they disapproved of the actions of the federal government and wanted Texas to become independent.  Blacks and Mexicans regularly want the US broken up and nobody gets excited.  So, why the big fuss over the Texans?  Maybe, the problem with them is that they were White. 

 

 

Christian Thinking 

 

This whole discussion on government has been presented to allow an assessment of the Christian attitude towards governmental oppression.  In the first place, it is quite apparent that Christians utterly ignore the words of Scripture (as they do in everything else, since they have abolished YAH’s law) and follow their own dictates of sun worship. 

 

For a fact, the modern governments in the Western civilization have been founded and ruled by Christians from day one.  They are Christian governments--good or bad.  These governments are typically led by Christians and it is the general Christian population at large that elect and re-elect these Christian governments and leaders. 

 

In the Western sun worship culture, so prevalent in modern America, Christians seem to delight in their so-called democracy, never realizing that their democracy has its origin in ancient sun worship, as do the other systems. 

 

In short, democratic governments are just another relic of sun worship which Christians blindly follow and give support to--regardless of what the government does in terms of right and wrong.  Thus, American Christians have allowed and do allow government oppression. 

 

To add insult to injury, it is furthermore tragic that most Christians are utterly mesmerized and controlled by the super rich plutocrats, who call the shots from behind the scenes.  Many of these dumb Christian goyim are janissaries, who were assessed and described in previous comments. 

 

As noted heretofore, janissaries are non-Amalekite people who are not racially Amalekites, but who support the Amalekite agenda with the same commitment, dedication and fanaticism and determination as the most evil Amalekite alive. 

 

The reason for this fanaticism is because the people involved have been totally brainwashed and confused by the ruling Amalekite bankers/masters, so much so, that large numbers of them have become janissary robots.   

 

These janissary robots (correctly Christian suckers) never comprehend that they really have little or no choice of anything in the periodic elections.  But they think that they do and that’s what keeps the whole system going and in check. 

 

 

Controlled US Elections 

 

The big boys (the ruling plutocrats) decide on a couple of approved candidates and present them to the gullible public to decide between (yes, this is a democracy--a controlled democracy).  If any other (unapproved) person should come forward as a candidate, the controlled media would destroy him, by swaying the ignorant Christian voters with lies and distortions. 

 

“Spotlight” (p. 23) of Feb 21, 2000, had a reader’s letter from a man named Scott (possibly Scott Snyder) which complained about the gloom and doom articles about government corruption in the “Spotlight” and demanded that his subscription be canceled. 

 

The “Spotlight” editor wrote the following comment:  “Obviously, Mr. Snyder, like many Americans, is suffering from denial.  He’s unwilling to believe that the U.S. government does the same things we condemn--and often kill--others for doing.  He refuses to concede that many of his elected and unelected officials are corrupt, self-serving and controlled by the big money interest...” 

 

 

The Public Reaction 

 

The previous discussion herein on the various bombings, shootings, attacks, etc have disclosed something which just boggles the mind of a student of truth.   As these events happen, there is a particular spin, pitch or explanation by government authorities and the controlled national media on what happened. 

 

When the typical Joe Six Pack settles down in his easy chair to drink some beer and watch the evening news on his TV, he will get this “approved” plutocratic pitch from the government and the controlled media.  Dan Rather of CBS, Tom Brokaw of NBC, Peter Jennings of ABC and so forth will all religiously and conscientiously provide the approved explanation to Joe and his wife Sally Soap Opera. 

 

Joe and Sally are expected to be so stupid and uninformed and filled with so much apathy, indifference and don’t care that it is virtually a foregone conclusion that they will readily accept the approved pitch.  Never will they put two and two together and raise questions about what they have been told. 

 

With such a controlled, mesmerized, zombiized society, there is virtually little or no effective opposition to the plutocratic objectives being put out from Washington, Wall Street in New York or over the controlled national media sources.  Whatever the plutocrats say (in America) becomes the gospel truth. 

 

The plutocrats and their media workers and political prostitutes have fine tuned their program in accordance with the Hegelian principle, as outlined above and in previous chapters.  If they want a law on the books which will take away freedoms from the American people, they seemingly create an event which will assure its passage. 

 

When these things happen, the public simply is unable to wake up and do anything about the tyranny that is being shoved down its throat. 

 

 

More From Ben Partin 

 

In his video on “Globalism:  The Program,” General Partin assessed the dilemma of public apathy and offered a unique analysis of the problem.  Partin recalled the work of the Nobel Prize winning Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (1849-1936) of Russia on conditional reflexes and behaviorism, as cited in a previous chapter herein. 

 

The situation with dogs was mentioned--where a dog is fed (rewarded) when a bell sounds.  The dog becomes attuned to this stimuli and will jump up and down and with flowing saliva when the bell rings. 

 

The same dog was trained by Pavlov to express fear and terror by having him in a room with a light on.  When the light went off, a man entered and beat the dog ferociously.  The dog would run to the corner of the room in fear and terror to get out of the reach of the man and avoid the beating. 

 

In a unique reaction, the exact same dog would enter a state of confusion and crisis when the bell rang and the light went off at the same time.  The dog would freeze up and quiver and shake, not knowing what to do--whether to salivate, expecting food, or to cower in the corner of the room, expecting to be beat. 

 

The early Soviet ruler Vladimir Lenin became fascinated with the work of Pavlov.  Seemingly, Lenin undertook the task of using these methods of behavior alteration upon people.  Evidently, through the years, Lenin and his successors refined and fine tooled the work of Pavlov to a scientific level. 

 

 

Partin’s Work, Revisited 

 

In the case of the Oklahoma City bombing, Ben Partin became immensely impressed with the fact that the approved story from Washington and the controlled media simply did not add up.  Accordingly, the general made a detailed analysis of the bombing and fired it off to all members of Congress, part of the media and other interested people (as was briefly mentioned earlier herein). 

 

His intense effort to try to get an impartial and independent investigation into the OC bombing ultimately failed.  But he did do much work on the issue and created a minimum amount of interest. 

 

Eventually, one of the television networks in Los Angeles decided to do a program on the OC bombing.  Apparently, the network focused its one hour special into an effort merely to sell the approved government position. 

 

But in order to generate a little interest and appear impartial, the network decided to allow an opponent of the approved explanation to actually appear on its program.  Partin was selected to make an appearance. 

 

The general went to LA and was filmed in offering some comments, in opposition to the approved pitch and spin.   Actually, the general made several points.  But when the film editors went to work on his words, they were edited down to just a few remarks (this is the normal way the television people operate--they interview a person for an hour and then edit his remarks down to a couple of minutes). 

 

When the program was shown, the program host took the unusual step of even denigrating Partin after Partin’s few comments.  The host said that Partin was a military man and was not a qualified engineer.  Therefore, he could not know and understand the construction aspects of the building which made it collapse as it did. 

 

As Partin pointed out, this was totally a lie.  He was both an engineer and a military man.   He had two engineering degrees and much of his military work was in the field of research and development.  So the TV program host merely added a few remarks which effectively killed the comments made by Partin. 

 

 

Putting This Together 

 

The way this thing worked out is the way that the news is fed to the American public.  There is a lot of truth out there which anyone with a capacity to think can receive, evaluate and understand to some extent.  Too, there are alternative sources of news which likewise can be very revealing.  

 

So while Joe Six Pack and Sally Soap Opera may have some true facts and information, they are rendered ineffective in trying to use that information by some lies, deception and spin from Washington and the controlled media. 

 

Thence, Joe and Sally sort of become like Pavlov’s dog when it was subjected to both the ringing of the bell and the turning off of the light.  Just as the dog freezes up in confusion, does the average American freeze up upon the receipt of some true information along with some lies and deception?  The answer seems to be yes! 

 

Most people end up in a daze of sorts, not knowing what is truth and what is not and what to do about the confused situation.   Once people are thrust into this state of confusion, they end up by doing nothing.  They rationalize that they don’t know what is the truth. 

 

Thus, the typical John Doe is immensely unable to handle the confusing information that is coming to him from different directions.  He cannot distinguish or differentiate the difference between the truth and lies (this is also the big problem in religion.  Man cannot tell the difference between true and false religious teachings because he will not prove all things by the Book). 

 

In the case of Partin’s appearance on the TV program, he was allowed to briefly offer some comment in a couple of minutes.  Of course, the program had forty-five minutes of the officially approved position.  Then to top it all off, the program host intervened to completely repudiate any validity to Partin’s words.  The person watching this presentation would end up in a state of confusion. 

 

Although the general did not dwell on the work of Lenin in using this approach, that clearly was implied.  Thus, it seems that Lenin understood that if a man was cast into a role of confusion and being frozen up in uncertainty, he would end up doing nothing.  Apparently, this methodology became a key part of the Communist’s efforts to spread their leftist thinking around the globe for the last century. 

 

The leftists and liberals work in just enough lies and deception into their spin of the news to leave the average John Doe in a state of confusion and uncertainty.  In this frozen, zombiized state, the average person will end up doing nothing.  He will become apathetic and indifferent and unable or unwilling to distinguish between truth and lies. 

 

 

The Confrontation With Iraq 

 

The US confrontation with Iraq will be described in detail in later chapters and appendixes. 

 

Suffice to say, many of the techniques used by American presidents in frequently attacking largely helpless people around the globe (like in Afghanistan, Iraq, the Balkans, etc) have been the issuance of lies and deception to deceive, confuse and mislead the American public.  GHWB, Slick Clinton and GWB have all done this. 

 

One of the favorite methods used by American presidents to promote a war has been the use of atrocity stories.  The American media and the gullible public just love to be told stories about the evils of the political opponents of America’s ruling plutocrats.  Though most or many of these stories are nothing but lies, this methodology has been used for ages by US presidents (as will be described in later chapters). 

 

If there ever was a so-called need for war, as built on lies and deception, it has been the George W. Bush assault on Iraq and Saddam Hussein (which crystallized in 2002-2003).  The Jan 2003 “Radio Liberty” (p. 2-3) quoted an article by Victor Marshall on “The Lies We Are Told About Iraq” in the Jan 5, 2003, “Los Angels Times.” 

 

Marshall wrote:  “The Bush administration’s confrontation with Iraq is as much a contest of credibility as it is of military force.  Washington claims that Baghdad harbors ambitions of aggression, continues to develop and stockpile weapons of mass destruction and maintains ties to Al Qaeda.  Lacking solid evidence, the public must weigh Saddam Hussein’s penchant for lies against the administration’s own record.  Based on recent history, that’s not an easy choice. 

 

“The first Bush administration which featured Dick Cheney, Paul D. Wolfowitz and Colin L. Powell at the Pentagon, systematically misrepresented the cause of Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the nature of Iraq’s conduct in Kuwait and the cost of the Persian Gulf War.  Like the second Bush administration, it cynically used the confrontation to justify a more expansive and militaristic foreign policy in the post-Vietnam ear.”