EZEKIEL

and YHWH’s

Judgment

for the

Good News

PEOPLE

VOLUME XXII

The Plutocrats

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

Judgment for the

Good News People

Volume XXII--The Plutocrats

by

an unworthy servant

And you shall know the truth,

and the truth will make you free.

(John 8:32)

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.

Contents

Volume XXII--The Plutocrats

CHAPTER PAGE

- Cover Page 1

- Title Page 2

- Contents 3

- Publisher’s Preface 5

Part PPP--The Super Rich Plutocrats

329 Carroll Quigley 6

330 Politics I 11

331 Politics II 19

332 Royalty 30

333 Foundations 34

334 The Big Pay-Offs and Benefits I 43

335 The Big Pay-Offs and Benefits II 56

336 The Federal Reserve Bank 61

337 Manipulating the Markets 73

338 Plutocratic Control of Nations 89

339 Using the Taxpayers’ Moneys I 97

340 Using the Taxpayers’ Moneys II 106

341 Exploiting the World 118

342 Why War? 131

343 The Role of the Intelligence Services 147

344 The Occult Forces 155

Part QQQ--Making Preparations

345 Protecting Investments 159

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

Publisher’s Preface

Greetings! The following presentation is volume twenty-two of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site.

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

Chapter 329--Carroll Quigley

Some Proverbs

As quoted in the Apr-Jun 2000 “Petah Tikvah” magazine (p. 7), there is a Yiddish proverb which says-- “With money in your pocket, you are wise and you are handsome and you sing well too.”

The wise Shlomo would just add that the rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender (Prov 22:7). This wisdom from Shlomo tells the tale for the totality of all of the different forms of government conceived by modern man. In all cases, the people with money call the shots. In America, this starts at the smallest level (local township or city), and it proceeds all the way up to Washington.

At some point in time (perhaps in 1917), President Woodrow Wilson hit a homerun when he said: “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it” (Dec 2002 “Radio Liberty” newsletter, p. 5).

These three proverbs represent the real world out there, and they introduce the subject of the plutocrats and their (often secret and/or behind the scenes) rule over the masses. Soon, their rule will even extend to the top of man’s coming world government.

Carroll Quigley

In 1966, a most fascinating 1,348-page book was written and produced by Dr Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University. It was “Tragedy and Hope, A History of the World in Our Time.” This book was exceptional. Because, for the first time, it reflected the writings of a man who had inside knowledge on profoundly important facts which had been largely hidden from the public at large for years.

In the 1960s, Quigley was the mentor of a young man named Bill Clinton, from Arkansas, while Carroll was professor of history at the Foreign Service School at Georgetown. Since those days, Slick Willy has acknowledged his debt to Quigley--publicly, before the world, with his presidential acceptance speech at the 1992 Democrat National Convention.

Also, in those days at Georgetown, Quigley was allowed into the inner sanctum and inner workings of the super rich (the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Lazards, Harrimans, DuPonts, Morgans, Whitneys, Vanderbilts, Astors, etc) who really have historically, and do presently, call the shots all over the world.

Some of these plutocrats--like the Bronfmans (who Quigley did not name) and the Rothschilds and Lazards (who were named)--have ties to the Amalekite Jew power structure which will be addressed later herein. Please understand, in assessing the fat cats, almost without exception, they are classic internationalists and their whole focus is on world finance, politics, commercialism, globalism and the New World Order.

The professor was allowed to study this money network for 20 years and for a period of two years in the early 1960s examined its “papers and secret records” (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 950). In effect, Quigley became one of the insiders himself. And as he admitted, he was personally impressed with what the super rich plutocrats were doing and was sympathetic and in agreement with it.

While popular radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh and virtually the entire American establishment and leaders “seem” to have no concept at all about any conspiracy ruling the United States, the Georgetown professor knew about it, and wrote about it in quite some detail in his book (ibid, p. 949-955).

He said without hesitation that there does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act (in a secret conspiracy).

Sometimes this conspiracy is referred to as the Eastern Establishment (even by Quigley himself); and it works through various organizations (which will be examined in later presentations herein).

Dynasties

In any discussion on the super rich plutocrats, who rule many of the nations and activities on-going in the world, the point must be made that these people are essentially a part of family dynasties which simply do not go away with the death of family members.

Actually, as the older people die off in these dynasties, the mantle is passed to younger members who take over and continue the quest for power and control established by the original dynasty founders. Consequently, the rule is more along the line of plutocratic dynasties that never go away with the passing years.

Last, being internationalists, the super rich plutocrats have residences and citizenships around the world. Nationalism and the sovereignty or success of any state are just not on their agenda.

And being totally internationalists, they don’t care one whit if the United States or any other nation goes broke or has problems. With their international passports, the collapse of the US will offer no adverse impact upon the super rich who caused the trouble.

Other Views

Of course, Quigley was not the first person of some reputation to come along and spill the beans about a secret conspiracy among the super rich to coordinate their common goals of profit and world domination. Many have revealed much useful information, either intentionally, or by accident, although their words have effectively fallen on deaf ears when recorded.

This fat cat quest for profits, wealth and rule started long ago. It is not merely a phenomenon of modern times. For example, by the year 1812, the Amalekite Rothschild family owned one-half of the wealth of the then civilized Western world (“The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 9).

In 1852, Gladstone, British Chancellor of the Exchequer, said “The hinge of the whole situation was this: the government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned” (Dec 2002 “Radio Liberty” newsletter, p. 4).

In 1909, Walter Rathenau (an evident Amalekite Jew, who controlled the German General Electric Company), said: “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves” (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 61). Surely, most or many of these 300 rulers were Rothschilds, Rothschild relatives or Rothschild agents.

Incidentally, the famous Haman, the Amalekite, who tried to destroy the true Israelite Jews in the old Medeo-Persian empire, had some 300 followers (evidently Amalekites) in Shushan (as pointed out in previous commentary--Est 9:15). Whether this remark in Esther is relevant to the situation in Europe or not is unclear to this writer. But it is a fascinating number in discussing Amalekite control.

Carroll Quigley suggested that in the 20th century the Morgan (an international bank with links to the Rothschilds) and Rockefeller financial groups were so powerful that by acting in collusion they could wreck the entire American economic system if they so chose (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 72). They caused the 1929 stock market crisis and indeed are behind all of the major movements in the US financial markets.

On September 21, 1921, the London “Financial Times” said “Half a dozen men at the top of the Big Five Banks could upset the whole fabric of government finance by refraining from renewing Treasury Bills” (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 61).

In Jan 1924, Reginald McKenna, chairman of Britain’s Midland Bank and former Chancellor of the Exchequer, told his stockholders that ordinary citizens “will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money... And they control the credit of the nation, direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people” (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 325).

Montague Norman (who headed the privately owned Bank of England) appeared before Britain’s Court of Bank on March 21, 1930, and said “I hold the hegemony of the world” (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 62).

This statement is very logical. Because, many long years earlier, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty, said to permit him to control a nation’s money and he cared not who wrote its laws. In a word, money talks!

Perceptive People

In 1951, Senator William Jenner spoke from the floor of the US Senate and said that America was ruled by a “secret inner coterie” involved in a cancerous conspiracy and a secret invisible government by agents of the USSR (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 977).

On Jun 23, 1959, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev and some of his key people had a meeting at his dacha with Averell Harriman, a member of one of the fat cat families under discussion by Quigley. While apparently drunk and in a light mood, the Communist leader said that America is totally controlled by a tiny group of capitalists (“Origins of the 4th World War,” p. 46).

Harriman pretended to be naive and asked who these capitalists were. The wise and foxy Khrushchev let the cat out of the bag. He pushed a finger against Harriman and said-- “You’re one of them.” Reportedly, Harriman was in a state of shock with this penetrating remark.

As late as Dec 27, 1965, a priest named Pedro Arrupe, head of the Jesuit Order of the Catholic Church, was quoted by UPI as referring to this conspiracy and saying to an ecumenical council: “This...Godless society operates in an extremely efficient manner at least in its higher levels of leadership. It makes use of every possible means at its disposal, be they scientific, technical, social or economic.”

Going on, Arrupe added that “It follows a perfectly mapped-out strategy. It holds almost complete sway in international organizations, in financial circles, in the field of mass communications; press, cinema, radio and television” (“None Dare Call It Conspiracy” by Gary Allen, p. 13-14).

Actually--Control

In the mid 1930s, in America, some 200 of the largest non-financial corporations and fifty of the largest banks owned 34% of the assets of “all” industrial corporations, 48% of the assets of “all” commercial banks, 75% of the assets of “all” public utilities and 95% of the assets of “all” railroads (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 531). It’s even more centralized in fewer and fewer hands today.

To this list of stock ownership, it must be pointed out that actual control is far more extensive. Many of the super rich own and/or control large banks which operate huge trust departments that hold, manage and vote the stock and financial assets of various persons (particularly of dead ones). While the dividends may go to the stock owner or survivor, voting control rests with the banks.

Beyond the obvious, in terms of big banks, the situation with mutual funds and investment banks and consortiums is about the same. Many of these groups raise large sums of money from the general public for capital ventures. The people, in control of these funds, control their uses. If they invest in stocks, they have the voting rights. Many Wall Street firms are heavily involved in these efforts.

Consequently, it isn’t only the number of corporations and business groups and activities that are owned outright by the super rich. It is a bigger issue because they own and/or control many banks, Wall Street firms, mutual funds, foundations, investment banks, consortiums, etc; which, in turn, own and/or control many, many, other corporations and business ventures.

The Gullible Public

Through public participation in stock ownership, much of the public is led to believe that they are the ones (stockholders) calling the shots in terms of corporate management. Because of the way the system works, this is not always true at all for corporations, though the big boys try to promote the concept publicly and educate the masses into believing it.

The voting control in the hands of small individual investors is not only limited, but it is often highly diffused. This allows a few fat cats to rule and manage large and/or multi-national corporations with only small percentages of stock ownership or control (sometimes 1 to 10%). Talk about overall control by the super rich!

In a June 2000 speech to union leaders in Sioux Falls, SD, Green Party presidential candidate Ralph Nader railed against the US government “of the Exxons, by the General Motors and for the DuPonts” (June 19, 2000, “Newsweek,” p. 34). While Nader’s point was well made, there is more to it. The issue is not so much over Exxon, GM or DuPont; but rather, the fat cats who own/control those giant corporations.

Chapter 330--Politics I

Political Control by the Super Rich

Many persons have perceived that the Republican party in the US is dominated by the more affluent Americans and big businesses, while the Democrat party is “ostensibly” the party of the poor and working classes (or at least, this is the perception among many Americans).

In the conduct of their media spin and manipulation campaigns, the Democrats have, of course, always been anxious to paint this picture to the American voting electorate. Obviously, if the gullible voting goyim can be led to believe that the Democrats are the party of the little man, while the Republicans belong to rich people and big business, there is a favorable fall-out for the Democrats in the elections.

Former President Bill “Slick” Clinton has successfully used this strategy in his election campaigns, evidently from day one.

Even Gore came out in the 2000 campaign pretending to be a populist fighting the big corporations. The truth is that both Gore and Bush and both the Democrats and Republicans have been historically financed and owned by the fat cats.

Hence, it is no wonder that these two dominant parties can be and are known as Republicrats or Demopublicans (since there is so little difference between them). The only difference of substance between them is which party gets to name the head man to rule and dominate the country. This is a difference which can cause a conflict in US elections.

All of the Gore talk in 2000 about populism was nothing but lies and deception (as he continued to receive money from the very sources he complained about). His motive was obviously only one of attacking the people’s enemies to get some votes. A column by Kerri Houston and Merrill Matthews Jr on “Republicans must control the spin” in the Feb 7-13, 2000, “Washington Times” (p. 29) addressed this subject.

In terms of the anticipated 2000 elections, Houston and Matthews said that “Mr. Clinton will ‘blackwash’ Republicans with that old Democratic standby--that Republicans are the party of big business.” And that’s the way things were developing in early 2000 (on the premise that there would be elections in Nov 2000 and a Clinton successor would be elected--as happened with George W. Bush).

Incidentally, this mention of the rich, actually controlling both American political parties, needs one more clarification (as provided by a perceptive Catholic priest).

Priest John O’Connor

Per his video on “Come Lord Jesus,” Catholic Priest John O’Connor quoted Benjamin Freedman who said that Ashkenazi Jews took over the US Democrat party in the early 20th century. O’Connor spoke of the Ashkenazim, in the context of Khazar pretenders (correctly Amalekites, as discussed earlier herein).

In this video, O’Connor says that nine out of ten US Jews are in this Ashkenazi category of pretending to be Jews while they are not Jews (Rev 2:9; 3:9). This writer would only clarify O’Connor’s remarks by indicating that most of these Ashkenazi Jews are Amalekites, as discussed in former chapters.

Benjamin Freedman was a colleague of many of the fat cat, plutocratic Amalekite Jews who have taken control of the United States in the 20th century, as outlined heretofore. Apparently, Freedman was in the inner circles of the likes of the plutocrat Bernard Baruch (1870-1965) and others. Freedman had a falling out with them years ago and exposed their plans for plutocratic rule and domination over others.

Bad Thinking

Well, this American thinking on the Democrats being opposed to the fat cats is simply not true at all.

Actually, most of the super rich dynasties that control America here in the early 21st century and their political cronies are liberal Democrats--who particularly push for more and more government in all phases of American life (which is precisely what the super rich want themselves since they control the politicians who control the government).

Party statistics establish this strange condition for any person wanting to look into it. So people with money are in charge of both political parties.

With this plutocratic control of American politics, it is manifest that these same super rich persons control the US government and most of the rest of the Western civilization governments as well, for good or bad. In this sense, these Western sun worship governments are clearly plutocratic (under the control of the plutocrat internationalists).

In November 1933, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Colonel Edward Mandell House (1858-1938) had an exchange of correspondence. House, an Amalekite Jew, had formerly been a close aide and associate of President Woodrow Wilson in his years of ruling America (1913-1921). In terms of pulling strings and initiating actions in the WWI years, House was the man while Wilson was more of a figure head.

In any case, FDR wrote the former power broker House and mentioned a most fascinating thing. In noting that House would agree, Roosevelt made a reference to the fact that the financial elite had controlled America since the presidency of Andrew Jackson, 1829-1837 (per Stan Monteith, in his video “Secrets of the Illuminati”).

FDR used the word “since” (which can mean after or following). So apparently, he said that plutocrats controlled the US from Martin Van Buren forward. This writer cannot dispute that statement for certain one way or the other.

But Some Breaks

There were only a few clear breaks for sure in the plutocratic power over America. As will be addressed in later comments herein, those came with Andy Jackson, John Tyler, Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield and William Howard Taft.

Lincoln was elected by and served the money power in his early days in office. But he eventually turned against them and they (in league with Secretary of War William Stanton) seemingly became his killers. In 1880, James Garfield was elected. It appears that he was never submissive to the plutocrats. So they apparently assassinated him shortly after he took office (to be described in a later chapter).

Taft certainly didn’t toe their line (he was a populist and against the bankers and their plans for a central bank in the form of the Federal Reserve). They constantly attacked him. When he was ready to run a second time, they raised up their Amalekite friend Teddy Roosevelt to run as a third party candidate (with the Bull Moose party) to split the Republican vote and usher in Woodrow Wilson--who was the banker’s man.

The Super Rich Control US Elections

As will be discussed elsewhere herein, this writer takes the position that the Rothschilds did their best in the 19th century to take over America. They largely failed. But an American power, in the form of the Eastern Establishment (referred to as Anglophiles by Carroll Quigley), gradually took over during that century.

It was this big money power in the Eastern Establishment (with the Rockefellers, Harrimans, DuPonts, Morgans, Whitneys, Vanderbilts, etc) who began electing and controlling politicians--certainly, by the time of the Civil War. J. P. Morgan Sr. (1837-1913), an Anglophile, who was identified with the Eastern Establishment, was actually (in time) a colleague of the European Rothschilds.

At a first glance, one may suppose that the European, Amalekite Rothschilds were not a part of the US Eastern Establishment Anglophiles. But this is not really true since the Rothschilds began working, associating and collaborating with a similar power bloc of Anglophiles in England much earlier (clearly, by the Napoleonic Wars, starting in 1805).

The Rothschilds were successful in eventually tying in with and gaining control over the US Morgan banking power in the late 19th century. In the early days of the Morgan Bank, the Morgan bank maintained some independence before finally being taken over by the Amalekite Jews.

The Bankers Take Over

With the arrival in 1913 of Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House (who were the bankers’ allies), the money power received a big boost with the Federal Reserve Act, signed by Wilson. This act did several things (which will be assessed in some detail in later chapters).

For sure, it acknowledged the banking power of the Rockefellers. But it also opened the door to the Rothschilds’ banking interests (which had been scheming a US take-over since 1789 and the early work of the Amalekite Jew Alexander Hamilton to turn the government over to the Rothschild bankers). At last, the diabolical Rothschilds had a firm US presence with the Morgan interests and the Federal Reserve Act.

During most of the 20th century, the Rockefellers pulled the strings in America and especially in association with their super rich, Eastern Establishment allies. As will be discussed later, this reality has been changing in the last 40 years as the Rothschilds have been slowly taking over and winning in their battle with the Rockefellers and the Eastern Establishment, Anglo power.

The Rockefellers and their Eastern Establishment colleagues have generally been Republicans (specifically, liberal Republicans since WWII) while the Rothschild plutocrats have been liberal Democrats. Both of these liberal factions have effectively controlled the government since 1932. Some would argue that Reagan, as a conservative, was an exception. But even under him, the plutocrats called the shots.

The 2000 elections were a good illustration of this conflict between the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds. November 2000 saw the Amalekite Jew controlled Gore being opposed by the Amalekite Christian Rockefellers’ oil colleague Bush (another evident Amalekite Christian, to be later described). The battle was so intense that enormous trouble broke out between the two factions in trying to see who would rule the US.

Quigley’s Political Thinking

This reality, that the super rich fat cats are in charge of both parties, was substantiated and elaborated upon somewhat by Quigley in “Tragedy and Hope” (p. 1247-1248). He outlined the objective of making the two parties more “international” and ridiculed the American ideas that one of them is on the right and the other on the left.

Instead, as Carroll saw it, both parties should be “almost identical” --so that if the voters get mad at the ruling party at a particular time and should throw it out of power in an election, then there would be no profound or extensive shifts in American policies when the other party takes over rulership.

Obviously, this thinking of two parties, which are essentially alike, except for small, insignificant, minor and unimportant details, has ruled the American political scene for many decades now--certainly, since the 1930s and perhaps much earlier. George Wallace had it right in 1968 when he said that there wasn’t a dime’s worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats.

The Sep-Oct 1997 “Prophecy Flash” paper (p. 72) had a reader’s letter which perceptively remarked that “Voting for a Democrat or Republican in America is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.” It’s hard to improve on that!

Thus, when the super rich rulers establish their policies for America (actually, for their profit and power goals of internationalism and world rule), there are no significant differences in the two political parties respecting those objectives. As just noted, Quigley did allow that the two parties could have some minor differences in procedures and methods, providing that they adhered to the overall common scheme.

Another twist to this problem surfaced in more recent years when the “Chicago Tribune” confessed that “the policies of the government today, whether Republican or Democratic, are closer to the 1932 platform of the Communist Party than they are to either of their own party platforms in that critical year” (“None Dare Call It Conspiracy,” p. 27).

Actually Political Control

It is useful to also note that not only are the two parties essentially the same in philosophy, but the super rich fat cats control (effectively own) the major candidates put forth for election by both the Democrats and the Republicans. Quigley pointed out the control exercised by J. P. Morgan in a number of US presidential elections (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 74).

Money talks and it is money which fuels and promotes elections in modern America. For the first 130 to 140 years of US history, most politicians could be elected with little or no money. In those days, the candidates had to make personal contacts with voters and/or speeches and talks at public meetings.

There was no media impact to deal with--beyond getting endorsements from local newspapers. Even newspaper advertising was not big in early America.

But with the arrival of the power of radio and radio advertising in the 1920s and television and television commercials in the early 1950s, everything was to change. With radio and TV, huge audiences could then be reached by candidates with a minimum of effort. The only drawback here was that this media exposure costs money--big money.

The Source of the Money

Hence, this need for big bucks causes virtually all American politicians to be forced into the profile of accepting money from the people who have the big bucks--namely the super rich fat cats.

Most of this fat cat money comes in the form of “soft money” --historically made to the political parties virtually without restraint or limitation. Though this money is made to the parties, it can be illegally diverted and used for individual candidates. Clinton was very successful in using soft money in his campaigns and nothing was done about it.

In any case, the parties can and do use soft money to elect the candidates of their choice. Even when soft money is used for party propaganda, there is a silent, indirect benefit to the various candidates who toe the party line.

In order to get the desired money and have a source of future funds for re-election purposes (re-election is always the primary focus of politicians), politicians become “prostitute politicians” who will sell out their own mothers for money (and certainly, their constituents). The super rich supply this money to American politicians, as well as money to the political left.

Quigley on Wall Street and the Left

Truly, on political influence, Carroll Quigley in “Tragedy and Hope” outlined that early in the 20th century, the J. P. Morgan international banking firm decided to infiltrate the left wing political movements in the United States, as alluded to above and earlier. This was welcomed by the liberals, Socialists and humanists since the Wall Street people had money and media control to aid their left wing political goals.

Morgan’s purpose was not to destroy the left; but to keep abreast of it, to provide it (or them) with a mouth piece (so they could blow off a little steam), and to be able to exercise a final veto on their actions (“Tragedy and Hope,” p. 938). Obviously, Morgan and his later big money colleagues have been able to exercise virtual control over the entire left wing movement with their power of the purse and the media.

One of the most powerful, political institutions in modern America is the left wing Council on Foreign Relations (the CFR--which will be discussed again in a later chapter). The Georgetown professor suggested (ibid, p. 952) that the CFR was nothing but a front organization for J. P. Morgan and Company--international bankers linked to the European (Amalek-Edomite) Rothschilds.

Moreover, the left-wing National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) for years was founded, financed and run by apparent Amalek-Edomite Jews with links to the Rothschilds. As long as the president of the NAACP was one of these Amalekites, the organization had money. But in recent years, Black nationalists have taken over and now the NAACP is broke and a group of little or no importance.

Nothing has changed these past 100 years or so since Morgan linked in with the US political left. The international bankers and super rich are still supplying the money, and though operating in the dark (behind the scenes), are still calling the shots. One can see this plainly in the case of the environmental movement (as was covered in former chapters herein), as well as in the entire Socialist and humanist endeavors.

Big Unions as Well

Big unions (which are also corporations) are another powerful force in American politics, not only with their control over the rank and file, but recently with their big bucks to finance elections. Moreover, many of the union leaders are Amalek-Edomites with links to the Rothschilds or Bronfmans.

Otherwise, even the Christian non-Edomite leaders have also sold out to the big money interests. After all, union bosses, like political leaders, need dollars and media coverage to win their union elections.

Since the big unions and big corporations are getting their money, support and direction from the same super rich sources, there generally is no conflict between American labor and management, although the controlled media tries to paint such an image.

True, the workers always want more money for less work (which is what their union bosses publicly pitch). But when the chips are down, the big boys behind the scenes really call the shots for both management and labor.

If there was a problem with the unions, the fat cats would merely close their American factories and move them overseas--which is what they have been doing regularly as a result of the GATT and NAFTA treaties (that were promoted and financed by the super rich internationalists calling the shots).

The Sell Out

Please note that the big unions didn’t like these treaties (benefiting corporate America, Wall Street and the fat cats), but offered no “real” public opposition to them. Why? Because the big boys calling the shots wanted them, the union bosses and left wing press had little to say in opposition. They knew where their bread was buttered.

By the way, the unions have millions of dollars available to enter the media markets for political advertising in the regular US elections. However, when it came time for the GATT and NAFTA schemes to become law, they turned and looked the other way and refused to spend any appreciable money or launch any colorable union efforts to defeat those treaties.

Why? Well again, the union bosses take orders from the plutocrats, like everybody else in the United States. The money crowd wanted those agreements passed for their own purposes. Consequently, the union bosses had more loyalty to the fat cats than they did to the American workers who elected them and paid their salaries and benefits from union dues.

Other Organizations Too

Beyond the fantastic strength of big business corporations and big unions (all of which are controlled from behind the scenes by the money power), note must be taken of a host of various associations, political action groups (PACs) and on and on for their enormous power.

While all of these various entities are not necessarily controlled directly by the super rich, most assuredly are. But even in those instances where a group is organized as a political power advocacy (like the Christian right), and which theoretically answer to certain private citizens who organized it, the organization must toe the line to the wishes of the super rich (who own and control the national media forces).

Consequently, if a group doesn’t properly mesh with the overall politically correct objectives and goals of the fat cats, rest assured that the national media will crucify it, as often as possible. Though a numbers of examples can be cited to illustrate this point, one can immediately think of the Ku Klux Klan, the Black Muslims and the National Rifle Association.

In the last several years, has anyone ever seen a favorable news report in the national media about any of these politically incorrect organizations? Of course, any news reported on them will be bad news or it will be slanted and twisted in such a way that it will seem to be bad news.

The tragedy is that most organizations (if they are politically correct and are either owned or controlled by the big boys or dance to the tune of the fat cats) wield enormous political power. It is large organizations, corporations, unions, associations, PACs, etc which pretty well call the shots in American politics--both nationally and locally.

Chapter 331--Politics II

The Dilemma

There appears to be a possible solution to the problem of financing American elections, although no politician would dare publicly endorse it or support it since the super rich calling the shots want the status quo to continue. To understand a solution, one must start with some comprehension of the present problem.

The existing dilemma is that the big boys like and support the present democratically elected two party system which allows them to own and control the prostitute politicians of both major parties (because the voting public is easy to manipulate and control).

In fact, they like this present US system, so much so, that they are doing their level best to impose this precise, same system on various foreign governments, as well, all over the world as a prelude to an eventual dictatorial world government (once the pecking order is established among the super rich to see who will be the world’s governor).

Nations and peoples are immediately condemned and attacked by the controlled world press whenever some foreigners want some other system.

The big boys have been working overtime to promote governing democracies which can be elected by an uninformed and gullible public--motivated, influenced and largely focused by persuasive media and educational forces (connected to and controlled by the super rich--to be proven in subsequent comments).

Hypocrite Politicians

The benefits of a controlled democratic government are quite manifest. As long as the voters ignorantly believe that they are the people who determine an election and the election winners, they are far less likely of rising up in rebellion and revolt against those elected leaders, regardless of what those leaders do or who they really serve and answer to.

By having a voting system, voters will be more submissive and accept whatever the politicians dictate. This reality can be demonstrated in many ways. Take the case of big government spending. Traditionally and almost without exception, the collective voters are opposed to big government spending.

Politicians generally run on a platform of reducing or controlling spending. Many come out and label themselves as “fiscal conservatives” to get elected.

Once elected, most politicians ignore their platforms and promises to the voters. They know that the public quickly forgets things and that they will never be held accountable for the lies which they told to get elected (that is, unless the controlled media should decide to constantly point out those lies, shortcomings and failures to the electorate--as happened with Richard Nixon).

Consequently, politicians have one primary fear--and that’s to not upset the media and public education structure (to be discussed more in later comments). Of course, it goes without saying that above all, politicians are just in no mood to take on the people who own and/or control the American media and educational systems.

Media Power of the Super Rich

Robert McChesney, a former publisher and professor at the University of Illinois, confirms the obvious when he said that the US media is owned by “a handful of huge firms controlled by some of the wealthiest individuals in the world. They make billions providing a product that services the needs of the 200 largest advertisers” and report news not for the national interest, but for their bottom line (Dec 4, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2).

In this regard, the giant media corporations (like ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, Gannett Newspapers, Knight Ridder newspapers, Washington Post, etc) are thus largely owned or at least controlled by the super rich dynasties ruling America through corporate stock ownership (to be more fully described in later chapters herein).

Though most persons may not realize it, but many or most of the local radio and TV stations and newspapers are owned and/or controlled by the same big media giants. A few newspaper chains own most of the large US daily newspapers.

The later chapters will assess much of this control in the vein of Amalekite ownership and control in some detail (in the sense of how the Amalekite Jew bankers/masters seem to be the primary block of fat cats controlling America in the early 21st century). Certainly, the Amalekites are in the driver’s seat in terms of the controlled US national media (as will be subsequently proven).

While the average Joe on the street may own some stock in the big corporate media companies, be assured that the controlling stock is essentially held by various bankers, who answer to the super rich dynasties. Stock ownership by the little people is extremely limited, in comparison with what the fat cats own and/or control through their Wall Street investment bankers, bank trust departments, etc.

Of course, the big boys like the ability to use their limited liability corporations to raise vast sums of money from the public and then to go on to influence and focus public opinion which is precisely what has been happening for decades now.

Controlling the Future for Politicians

Not only do the fat cats supply the money and media coverage to elect prostitute politicians, but they also exercise control over the politician’s future re-elections and even ability for incumbent politicians to stay in office at any given moment in time. The media and educational forces wield an inordinate amount of power to influence ignorant and uninformed voters in a democracy.

Therefore, big money forces not only buy politicians outright, as suggested, but they can effectively buy votes and the collective voters through the educational structure and media exploitation of the general public. This has been happening for years now in America and in the sun worshipping West.

The Two Party System

Moreover, it is manifest that the super rich fat cats find the two party system the best (since they control both parties). First, two parties are easier to monitor and control than a multiplicity of parties. Hence, the people calling the shots go out of their way to prevent any third party from arising and having any influence in American elections. That’s why voting laws are designed to keep third party candidates off of the ballot.

With only two parties, the big boys are more able to control both of them and to control each of the two opposing candidates in any given election, as noted before.

Furthermore, the presence of two parties makes the voters think that there is a difference and that they are being given a choice--never understanding that there is no difference, conflict or division and the two choices are both pre-determined by the big boys calling the shots.

In the old USSR and other Communist countries, it was public law that all citizens had to vote. In some countries, it was so bad that records were kept and people who did not vote were subject to arrest and persecution. But the dilemma in those nations has been that there was only one party (the Communist party) and one list of candidates to vote for. There was no choice and the one party people always won.

The two party system is virtually the same thing in the modern US. There is no choice since the two parties are almost alike and answer to and serve the exact same plutocrats. Third parties and particularly politically incorrect third parties are purposely kept off of the ballots. The gullible public believes that they have a voting choice--when, in fact, they have no choice at all.

Enormous Power and Control

With their ownership and/or control of the huge media companies and with their vast resources to fund and finance the various PACs (Political Action Committees), the plutocrats are able to completely dominate and control all major American elections from the President, to the Senate, to the Congress, to the Governors and almost all of the others of interest to them.

Consequently, a person elected to the Congress from a rural district in a Southern or Western state is about as indebted to the fat cats as are people in New York. Once in Washington, these persons in Congress must effectively answer to the plutocrats first--before any consideration of their own wishes or the needs of their constituents.

Obviously, many issues are of little or no concern to the super rich. In those instances, it is probably true that the big boys back off and allow a Congressman to vote his conscious or vote the wishes of his constituents. But if there is an important issue facing the Congress, which the plutocrats have a position on, be assured that the collective Congress must deliver or the members will be in trouble.

It is this control feature which insures that when the chips are down, the President and leading members of Congress of both parties are almost always in total agreement when it comes to legislation affecting the fat cats. For example, take former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and the succeeding Republican leadership, all of whom always joined in with Clinton to support legislation for the super rich.

The Republicans have always been in agreement with the Democrats when it comes time to send money all over the world to benefit the ruling plutocrats. They may disagree and argue over petty things of little importance (like automobile speed limit laws on the highways, etc). But when the chips are down, they join together to support the plutocrats who own them.

The Enron Failure

A classic illustration of the subservience of both parties came up in the winter of 2001-2002 and the bankruptcy motion of the Enron Corporation, the seventh largest corporation in America. The problem manifested itself in early 2002 when several members of Congress and the Senate decided to investigate the collapse (where fraud and corruption were in clear evidence).

Perhaps one of the motivational aspects of some of these investigations is the fact that Enron contributed $650,000 to George W. Bush’s political campaign in 2000 (Jan 18, 2002, “The Week,” p. 3). Enron’s CEO Kenneth Lay met privately with Vice President Cheney six times in 2001, in helping to draft the administration’s energy plans. Of course, the donations to Bush and the Republicans in 2000 paid off.

Democrats Too

Some of the Democrats thought that they could attack Bush on these issues and an investigation would help in their attack.

But there were factors which were rarely discussed. Enron was never partial in its distribution of campaign funds. A discussion on the Michael Savage radio talk show noted that besides Bush and Cheney, Enron also donated money to 71 senators and 156 congressmen. Both parties were heavily involved in these bribes and pay-offs.

Enron doled out $2.4 million in the 2000 elections to both parties (Jan 25, 2002, “The Week,” p. 2). The Amalekite Senator Chucky Schumer (D-NY) received huge pay-offs from Enron.

While Slick Clinton was at the White House, Enron donated $100,000 to the Democrats for Clinton’s inaugural party (May 2002 “American Sentinel,” p. 9); and Slick promptly helped to reward the company with a $3 billion contract. Over three years, Enron shelled out $420,000 to the Democrat party (ibid, p. 9).

In fact, Enron’s chairman and CEO (Kenneth Lay) met with President Clinton and Vice President Gore at the Oval Office in the White House and stayed at the White House some eleven times (May 2002 “American Sentinel,” p. 9).

Soon, Enron had access to the Clinton Administration’s highest levels of office--at the US State Department and the US Department of Commerce. Both of these agencies helped Enron get highly lucrative business deals (ibid, p. 9). The Export-Import Bank even gave Enron over $600,000 for one of its deals (ibid, p. 9).

The fraud and corruption involving Enron came about partly because fat cat accounting firms and securities’ companies shelled out millions to Senators and Congressmen in Clinton’s early years to have Congress pass a law to limit the liability of lawyers and accountants (Feb 1, 2002, “The Week,” p. 3). Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT) and the Democrat Party got $868,000 of this money.

Thus, will anything come out of the present investigations in the Enron debacle? No, of course not. The people doing the investigations are crooks themselves. They are not about to have any real disclosures of the skullduggery which went on in the back rooms for all the money that Enron and the other fat cats have shelled out over the years.

Succeeding chapters herein will discuss this Enron debacle further and focus upon the damage control operations initiated to be sure that the public was pacified and that the offices of Enron and Arthur Anderson (Enron’s auditing firm) would not suffer any serious set-backs.

Gore-Lieberman on Hollywood

In the 2000 presidential campaign, the Gore-Lieberman team came out with a barrage of complaints against Hollywood for making so many violent films to sell to children in the past few years. Gore publicly started hollering about laying down an ultimatum to make Hollywood stop this practice if he was elected president.

This is all interesting and especially in view of the fact that the fat cats in Hollywood (like the Amalekite Jews who control Universal Studios, Disney, Time-Warner, etc--to be proven in later chapters) were all major money contributors to the Democrats/Gore. In fact, the Gore-Lieberman people had just collected $13.5 million in contributions from Hollywood fat cats--just before Gore’s assault on Hollywood violence.

Following his verbal attack on Hollywood violence, Gore went to New York City on Sep 14, 2000, and picked up another $6.5 million in contributions from the movie industry. In a time chronology of what happened, it would seem strange that if Gore and Lieberman’s words meant anything--that just before they were uttered, Hollywood dished out $13.5 million and then another $6.5 just after they were spoken.

Like Michael Reagan said on his radio program in early September and again in mid September 2000--does anyone actually believe that Gore would take action to hurt the hands that were feeding him with money (to the tune of $20 million)? Well, the answer is obviously no.

Gore was not going to take any actions against Hollywood which had been putting up the money to try to elect him. The Hollywood people were not stupid. They correctly understood that the Gore-Lieberman words meant nothing. It was all a farce to get votes from the gullible goyim. Nothing would change with Gore’s election. Hollywood understood this. It’s the voters who lacked comprehension about the real world.

A Solution?

A solution on US elections might be really simple. First, it could be mandatory and public law that politicians can only raise money from individual people in the district, state or area where they are running for election.

Soft money should be very limited or outlawed--as the 2002 campaign financing reform bill, signed by Bush in March 2002, will attempt to do. But this bill is not the panacea it was built up to be since many loopholes remain to allow the fat cats to beat the system through personal gifts and the power of the controlled media.

One of the interesting features of this bill was that it will limit any group of individuals from pooling money to use in attack ads against incumbents within 60 days of an election.

While some of this sounds good, the clever people in Congress who wrote this bill stuck this feature in which helps incumbents avoid the problem of facing attack ads just before an election (May 2002 “American Sentinel,” p. 4). Manifestly, this provision protects the incumbents in office--which is precisely what the present incumbents all wanted.

Virtually everyone above the idiot or imbecile level in America understands that the public’s memory span is very limited--certainly no more than three months. This 60-day restriction means that ads exposing the corruption and dishonesty of incumbent politicians will generally be long forgotten by the time of the elections.

Anyway, if some of these simple issues (as cited above, and below) were addressed and dealt with, Congressmen and Senators would be elected by the people of their districts or states and not by fat cat bankers on Wall Street.

More

Second, the idea of using public money to finance political campaigns is ludicrous. The present laws should be scrapped and there should be no further motion to take tax money and funnel it to political candidates. The problem here is that if there is a funneling of tax money to politicians and political parties, only the “politically correct” parties and candidates will get the money. It will always be unfairly administered.

Third, the present purposeful efforts by politicians and government entities to keep third parties off of ballots should end. Any reasonable presence of politically incorrect thinking should have the same opportunities for the ballot box as the politically correct, two major parties.

Fourth, the right to free speech in the US Constitution (as interpreted, in connection with political matters) correctly should not (and does not) apply to PACs, corporations (including labor unions) and/or state created organizations.

In other words, free speech (with the ability to give or spend money on political causes, directly or indirectly) appears to be limited to private individuals (in the US Constitution) and not to corporations or entities artificially created by the state (to include corporate labor unions and non profit entities and foundations).

Even law dictionaries and Supreme Court rulings recognize that the Bill of Rights pertain to natural individual persons and not to artificial persons, like corporations. Consequently, corporations do not have any automatic freedom of speech or freedom of the press of any other so-called freedoms. They are totally subject to the whim of the state (government) for their existence.

Corporations Are Not Natural Citizens

Corporations are not the same thing as private, individual citizens are in terms of the Constitution (although various state laws have attempted to make them the same). Corporations are nothing but pieces of paper artificially created by the state. It is inconceivable that the founders of the US intended for corporations to gain power over America and operate with the same rights and privileges as private, individual citizens.

When Thomas Jefferson wrote about the inalienable rights of a free man in the Declaration of Independence, he certainly did not include corporations as having those inalienable rights. It seems to be total folly for a state to pass a law granting those rights to corporations, as if they were people and human.

Thus, donations and political advertising should be limited to individual citizens living in the district or area where the politician is running for office.

With the big corporations, unions, foundations, organized lobbies, banks, activist groups, political action committees, etc, all out of the picture, the average, private, American citizens would then be the true financiers (electors) of the politicians.

Legally established donation limits of expenditures (single or otherwise and certainly with full disclosure) could also be considered optionally (as they are presently), if they are constitutional. Perhaps some distinction might be necessary between politicians, political parties and issue oriented advertising. But this can be addressed and certainly limited in the case of state created corporations.

Why should giant unions, banks, PACs and multi-national corporations, with their basis in a state authorized charter (a piece of paper), have the same free political speech as individual private citizens do personally or in sole proprietor businesses?

Ostensibly, the 2002 campaign financing reform law will help to rein in the abuse of corporations. However, the way big money operates this hoped for future will never see daylight since the big boys will get around the law some way. And tragically, the law never addressed the giant media corporations which are the most powerful and influential of all in controlling American elections.

Something Can Be Done

Of course, questions must come up over the role of the just mentioned media corporations and the Constitutional freedom of the press. As long as states authorize and charter corporations, it is probable that the big media corporations will be able to exercise some freedom of the press--because of their power and the unwillingness of politicians to take them on or to limit them in any way.

As discussed above, corporations are not natural persons and do not actually possess any of the freedoms in the Bill of Rights. There is correctly no freedom of the press for CBS, ABC, CNN, NBC or any of the other corporate media entities. Yet, they are so powerful that governments will grant them freedom of the press.

However, some legislative action can be taken on this matter to limit their powers. Since the first amendment is focused upon the “Congress of the United States” (in its very wording), one can make the case that actions of the states is not covered. If so, surely the individual states can rein in the power of corporations (to include media corporations).

In all cases, and certainly in terms of the press, opposing views (on any issue currently in the political arena or before Congress) would seem to be entitled to free (equal) media time from any media company which publicly supports or promotes a current political issue in some public fashion. This can be legislated easily enough.

If the giant media companies had to give free time and media coverage to contrary positions when they advocate, suggest, imply or support a position in their programming or reporting, it certainly would open the door for them to exercise some restraint and caution when engaging in their biased and yellow journalism.

More on Corporate Realities

Moreover, there should be some expressed concern over the whole idea of the corporate form of organization which is totally unscriptural (as discussed elsewhere herein). Why should the state allow and authorize these giant corporations (to include unions, businesses, foundations, etc) to exist and particularly in the context of them molding and directing public opinion as they do.

In mentioning the large corporations, one must remember that they are nothing but pieces of paper owned and controlled by behind the scenes, major stockholders or members. Somewhere behind the scenes, a few, rich, powerful people control, manage and direct the whole focus of all large corporations--including media corporations.

Because the super rich fat cats own or control the big media corporations (which are granted freedom of speech and of the press as if they were private, individual citizens), it means that the big boys are able to use their corporate powers to form, mold and manipulate public opinion for their own profit, gain and domination purposes, as noted above.

And they do this every time they engage in yellow “news” reporting and commentary to put over their wicked views (as described in previous chapters).

The Israeli Situation

The political situation in the modern state of Israel is worth looking at to show that even a system with some good points can go wrong and be sadly abused by the cunning and conniving of the super rich.

The “Jerusalem Post” of February 11, 2000 (p. 1, 14), had a story by Larry Derfner on “Cats and Cream” which assessed a case of some alleged skullduggery involving the then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and his administration that had come to power in 1999 on the heels of a defeat for the conservative government of Binyamin Netanyahu.

This corruption story will be assessed below. But first, the article mentioned the Israeli “Party Funding law” which imposes some definite limits on financial giving in the Israeli elections. Per the report, foreigners (outsiders) cannot give anything to candidates. There is a furthermore limit to what individual Israelis can give.

As Derfner points out, fat cat millionaires have to find a way around the law to support their favorite candidates. Evidently, the super rich do find ways around the law just as they do in America and in other nations.

However, this Israeli limitation on foreigners and amounts of campaign contributions is important to look at. Tragically, in the US, a few fat cats on Wall Street (who own or control the nation’s media) pretty well call the shots. It is pathetic that outsiders can elect people in any US state. For sure, there should be limitations on outsiders electing politicians in any democratic election.

The Barak Story

The background for the allegations against Prime Minister Barak arose because the former Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, was a conservative who was not on the team of the Amalekite internationalists who not only control US elections, but have either tried to or do control Israeli elections (the issue of how much control globalist Amalekites exercise in Israel has been debated).

In any case, the leftist, liberal Slick Clinton and his Amalekite handlers and aides decided that Netanyahu must go. So, in 1999, Slick and his buddies pulled out all of the stops to try to impose the views of the Amalekite internationalists upon Israel. The decision was made somewhere in the US (probably by international Amalekites on Wall Street) to get rid of Netanyahu.

So, during the 1999 Israeli elections, Slick Clinton dispatched a team of his political cronies to Israel to help defeat Netanyahu and elect the labor candidate Ehud Barak. Stanley Greenberg, Bob Shrum and James Carville went (a clear gang of Amalekites or Amalek janissary robots).

Sure enough, this team of Clinton’s political manipulators and crooks was able to mesmerize the voting public and bring in the Barak administration. But the change came at a price. “The Washington Times” of Feb 7-13, 2000 (p. 16), quoted the “Wall Street Journal” which said that Barak has learned firsthand how dangerous it is to get too close to the politics of Clintonism.

Now, revelations inside Israel reveal that Barak and his team of election year associates (including the Clinton “advisors”) were guilty of election skullduggery which has brought on fines of $3.2 million. Barak and some of his associates now face criminal charges.

Not only did Slick use his influence to get rid of Netanyahu, but it appears that his team of advisors (mostly or all Amalekites, although Carville may just be a janissary robot) may have advised Barak on illegal methods (commonly used in the US to get elected). Barak fell into their trap and now will likely have to pay the piper.

How?

The “Jerusalem Post” story described some of the methodology used by fat cat foreigners to influence Israeli elections (as perhaps used in the 1999 defeat of Netanyahu). A fat cat outsider who wants to influence the election cannot give money to the candidate.

But the fat cat can put up financial guarantees allowing the candidate to borrow money or give money outright to an organization which supports the candidate’s ideology and plans. Once the organization gets the money, it can benefit the candidate by spreading the candidate’s goals and plans around as being good for the mesmerized voting public.

Though the article did not disclose the racial or ethnic origin of these reported outsiders, it would seem logical that they are primarily super rich Amalekite internationalists in North America and Europe, who try to control the Israeli elections.

The Russian Khazar billionaire Vladimir Gusinsky and the super rich Bronfman family (all previously discussed herein as evident Amalekite Jews) were offered as illustrations of outsiders who use their enormous wealth to try to influence Israeli elections. The Bronfmans are big supporters of Israel’s Labor Party.

Chapter 332--Royalty

Amalekite Bankers and Royalty

A former chapter discussed the linkage of the color red to the Edomites and the fact that the famous Rothschild banking house got its start with a clear link to the Edomite color of red. Per “Encyclopaedia Judaica” (v. 14, p. 334), the modern Rothschild family descend from a Jew named Isaac Elhanan (who died in 1585).

Old Isaac showed his Amalek-Edomite colors when he placed a red sign or shield over his building in Frankfort, Germany. In time, one of his apparent descendants named Mayer Amschel Bauer arrived on the scene (born on Feb 23, 1744), and reportedly occupied the building with the red sign on it (“The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 8).

From this red sign/shield, Mayer Bauer eventually adopted the name of Rothschild (ibid, p. 8). Since the Amalekites are notorious for name changes, perhaps Mayer must have thought that Rothschild would be a better name in Germany to fool the German people.

By the time of Mayer Amschel Rothschild (who died in 1812), the family was in the banking and money changing business--to include handling old coins and antiques. By 1764, old Amschel had gained the confidence of the future Landgrave, William IX of Hesse-Kassel, and was William’s court agent in 1769.

In the old days, kings were notorious for being able to spend money on lavish, rich living. William was like the others. So, in his hours of need for more and more money (to throw away), old Amschel stepped in to help his friend out--but of course, with strings attached. After all, Amschel said to give him control of the money in a country, and he cared not who wrote its laws.

During those early times, much wealth was represented in gold. But gold was hard to carry around and to store and safeguard. So people with gold would take their gold to local goldsmiths (usually Amalekite money lenders) and receive a written receipt for their gold. These receipts were as good as gold. Hence, people used them for money and traded them in commercial transactions.

Goldsmiths (like old Amschel) discovered that once written receipts were given for gold, they rarely ever were turned in for the gold they represented. Accordingly, cunning Amalekite bankers started issuing receipts which were not covered by gold in their vaults. Call this inflation or whatever--but money changers, like Amschel, quickly became quite wealthy.

Soon, William told his friends how they too could get money from the bankers. As Amschel and his Amalekite colleagues loaned out their money to the local kings and royalty (with strings attached), the governments became indebted to the money lenders. Since the debtor is servant to the lender, the bankers gradually took over much of the various kingdoms in Germany.

The International Rothschilds

By the arrival of the 19th century, the Rothschild family was clearly in charge and calling the shots in Germany. But Amschel had bigger plans of international banking and world rule (in part, in the form of the Illuminati, which will be addressed in a later chapter herein). So the patriarch dispatched his five sons in five different directions to put the Rothschild banking house into the big leagues.

Son Salomon went to Vienna and established a Rothschild bank there. Son Nathan went to London and started a bank. Son Karl went to Naples and set up an Italian bank. Son James (Jacob) went to Paris and started the Rothschild Bank of France. Finally, son Amschel Mayer stayed in Frankfort to help his dad run the German branch.

A later chapter will describe how Nathan and James worked in collusion to steal much of the British empire during the Napoleonic wars. Soon, the Rothschilds were knighted as Sirs and they became the fat cats of the British empire. Old King Edward I (1272-1307) had run the Jews out of England much earlier. But under Oliver Cromwell, they were allowed back in (1648-1660).

By 1815 and with Wellington’s victory at Waterloo, Nathan Rothschild and his Amalekite cousins almost owned Great Britain. They were in the driver’s seat and pretty well called most of the major political shots from thereafter.

The Sassons

Another evident Amalekite family, that seems to have arrived on the scene in British prominence, was the Sasson family which originally was from Baghdad. This family descends from Sheikh Sasson ben Salah (1750-1830), who was chief treasurer of the Ottoman pashas of Baghdad (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 14, p. 896). So the Sassons were tied in with the Ottoman’s money pouches at a very early time.

Sheikh had a son named David (1792-1864) who moved his family to Bombay, India by 1832 where they became international businessmen and somehow some or all of them gained British citizenship. Soon, there was a Rothschild-Sasson marriage which gave them both further connections.

From Bombay, the Sasson family quickly established business operations in Canton, China. It appears that this Sasson family was one of the first international drug dealers. They brought Middle Eastern and Indian opium to China where they got the Chinese hooked on the drug. They then sold or traded opium for Chinese goods (silk, tea, etc) which could be peddled in Britain.

From this opium trade with China, the Sassons made a barrel of money. However, the Chinese emperor didn’t like what was going on with the opium trade. Either he wasn’t getting a slice of the action or he was an honest man who was just upset with the imposition of the narcotics trade in China.

In any case, the so-called opium wars between China and Britain occurred in 1839-1842. The British wanted the privilege of peddling opium in China and the Chinese were opposed to it.

By 1842, the Chinese were defeated and the Sassons won the right to continue selling opium to the Chinese people. Furthermore, the Chinese ceded Hong Kong Island to the British, as a part of the punishment imposed upon China.

Once Britain gained possession of Hong Kong, the Sassons set up their trading operations there and pretty well took over the Hong Kong colony. From then on, the Sasson drug trade was firmly in place, until the Communists came in after WWII to shut it down.

Britain’s Royal Family

This background then takes one to Britain’s royal family. The formerly cited Queen Victoria came to the British throne in 1837 as an 18 year old girl. At that time, her big spending predecessors had left her a legacy of nothing but debt (she owed $250,000, per Andrew Morton in “The Wealth of the Windsors,” p. 31). Her kingdom was noted more for sexual and financial excesses than for prudence and dignity.

But under Victoria, there was a change. She was frugal and perhaps even tight and stingy (with evil eyes). And she made the right connections. The evidence is massive that one of the most important linkages which took place was with the Sassons and the operation of the British approved drug pipeline into China.

Apparently, the royal family began getting a slice of the action once Hong Kong was securely in the hands of the drug running Sassons. From the time of Victoria forward, the financial condition of the British royal family changed dramatically.

Victoria’s son Edward (who became King Edward VII in 1901) was born in 1841. Since his mother persevered for many years on the British throne, he was always just in waiting. But Edward was the Prince of Wales and had the run of the palace for all purposes. After the death of brother Albert in 1861, young Edward linked in with a number of prominent Jewish fat cats.

In “The Wealth of the Windsors” (p. 51-57), Edward began entertaining several, mostly Jewish, fat cats, like Baron Hirsch, Louis Bischoffsheim, Sir Blundell Maple, Sir Thomas Lipton, Sir Ernest Cassel (a German Jew, who became Edward’s principle financial advisor); and of course, the Rothschilds and the Sassons. Soon, Edward began spending money and his ties increased with the Amalekite bankers.

In any case, the royal family, under Victoria, did well and this increasing wealth continued on until today where the present Queen Elizabeth’s holdings are estimated to possibly be in the range of $15 billion (“The Wealth of the Windsors,” p. 4-5). She takes in over a million dollars a day in interest. Besides all of the stocks, real estate, automobiles, horses, yachts, etc, the Queen has some $53 million in jewelry.

Other members of the royal family are also quite wealthy. Prince Charles has several hundred million dollars in assets and so it goes. Despite all of this wealth, the royal family paid no taxes, until in recent years when Elizabeth agreed to pay taxes. Also, she gets a free grant from the British government each year of $11.85 million.

The point of this is that any discussion about the plutocrats must include the most important royal family of all--the Windsors of Great Britain. They are also in the super rich category, along with some of the other mentioned fat cats. They tied in long ago with Amalekite Jew bankers and drug dealers and it has been profitable for all parties.

Chapter 333--Foundations

Education and the Foundations

In his book on “Tragedy and Hope” (p. 952), Carroll Quigley suggested that the enormous Wall Street contacts with the American academic world surfaced originally because of J. P. Morgan’s influence and handling of large academic endowments.

Consequently, it is quite manifest that early on the fat cats on Wall Street began influencing the American educational institutions through their power over money and the media. But this is only a part of the super rich control over education.

Having said in previous comments that the super rich are themselves outright hypocrites when it comes to spending their own money on social welfare programs, all the while that they advocate, push and propel government spending for such efforts (from taxation or from money printing and the resulting inflation), someone will come forward and point out the work of many of the super rich in plowing money into giant foundations (and naturally, getting tax write-offs).

Yes, the big boys have and do put a lot of money into the giant, tax-exempt foundations (Carnegie, Ford, etc). But what few people seem to understand is that these tax exempt foundations often have been created specifically to serve the political and profit objectives of the super rich who established them.

These corporate non-profit foundations use the money from the fat cats to carry out the power and profit objectives of their benefactors by using the donated money to control and manipulate the public or persons who might oppose them. Usually, that control is effected through the forces of educational institutions (now under discussion) and the media (discussed previously).

American Education, Revisited

Quite frequently, the foundations formed by the super rich spend money on grants for educational institutions with a goal of making profits, expanding market controls or of influencing the schools to educate students to accept the power of the super rich governors of planet earth as being good for society.

No wonder US schools are almost all on the Socialist and liberal bandwagon of internationalism. This reality is now being accomplished through outcome based education, described in a prior chapter.

In other words, the educational institutions, which above all else should be intellectually advanced and should be informing their students, are not informed and do not teach their students much of anything in terms of what all is going on.

College students can study the Federal Reserve Banking system (to be discussed in succeeding chapters), international trade, commercial establishments and operations, and on and on and they can never put two and two together to realize that a super conspiracy is at work behind the scenes to ensure that the plutocrats will remain in control and continue to call the shots.

Certainly, most of this ignorance is traceable to the teachers and professors who are equally as uninformed as their students.

Beyond the obvious in respect to the foundations and their huge investments in the public education system (on behalf of the super rich fat cats), it is well to note that the ignorant sun worshipping preachers, teachers and leaders are as guilty or more so in terms of the dumb sheep under their care.

These secular and religious leaders have had a moral duty to impart something of value to their followers. Instead, it is manifest that they largely have done nothing of help for their people. And as suggested in the former comments on the churches, they actually have gotten on the Socialist and humanist bandwagons to help promote the moral sickness and depravity one sees throughout the Western civilization.

The Rockefeller Foundation, Revisited

A former chapter herein on health and alternative healing methods described the process of using Rockefeller Foundation funds to finance a pro-drug position in the American medical schools to benefit the giant pharmaceutical companies owned by the Rockefeller family (per the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio talk show program, as hosted by Hilly Rose on Jan 17, 2000).

As discussed by C. Edward Griffin, a Coast to Coast program guest, John D. Rockefeller commissioned a so-called “scientific” study in about 1908 by Dr Simon Flexner (a likely Amalekite) to attack and demean alternative healing efforts and promote pharmaceutical drugs (because Rockefeller had substantial financial investments in various pharmaceutical companies which were making piles of dollars from the sick public).

When old John D. Rockefeller went into the petroleum business, back in the 19th century, he found that he could use some of his petroleum by-products as alleged healing medicines which could be sold by traveling snake doctors at circuses, fairs, side shows and other drummer functions.

Old John D. quickly was becoming a major producer of pharmaceutical drugs and a primary player in the petrochemical industry by the turn of the century.

With the development and promotion of medical schools on college campuses in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Rockefeller was obviously concerned about maintaining his profit position. As far as his pocketbook and profits, it could have been an absolute disaster if the new medical schools discovered alternative treatments to Rockefeller’s poisonous drugs.

He had to move quickly and he did so. It was easy for him to make a payoff to a deceitful Amalekite doctor (Simon Flexner) to produce a so-called scientific study touting the benefits of Rockefeller’s pharmaceutical drugs (which, by the way, are very unscriptural, as outlined in former chapters).

The Power of Rockefeller Money, Revisited

Thereafter, the Rockefeller Foundation made huge grants of money to the important medical schools with the stipulation that they put Rockefeller people on their boards of directors (who would promote the pro-drug and supposedly scholarly position of Simon Flexner).

As briefly outlined in a former chapter, Simon Flexner, his brother Abraham and similar Rockefeller persons were put into positions of power over medical schools because of the Rockefeller funding (yes, money talks and decides who will be in charge and running things).

By providing large grants to the medical schools and by having Rockefeller people (mainly Amalekites) in charge, medical school curriculum took the direction of teaching students the benefits of drugs prepared and sold by the pharmaceutical companies owned and/or controlled by Rockefeller.

These Rockefeller grants were called efficiency grants because each give away was designed to ultimately bring back far more in profits than the amount in the grant. Since then, any number of foundations have been organized by the super rich plutocrats who have followed Rockefeller’s lead in making efficiency grants (to ultimately make money or exercise control over the stupid goyim).

Thus, the Rockefeller scheme was to use his foundation to promote a study on healing which advocated the use of pharmaceutical drugs for healing. Rockefeller then made grants of money and funding to the big medical schools in the US on the premise that these schools would put Rockefeller approved people on their boards of directors.

These school directors and managers pushed the results of the study on using pharmaceutical drugs as proven “science.”

The schools concentrated their educational focus upon drugs in the context of “supposed” scientific knowledge. Young graduating doctors were thoroughly trained and brainwashed on pharmaceutical drugs for healing (that’s about all that they were taught, although surgery has also been popular over the years). These graduating doctors went back home and followed their teachings.

This meant that the Rockefeller owned pharmaceutical companies would sell huge amounts of drugs and Rockefeller would make gobs and gobs of money from the gullible goyim that he was manipulating and controlling. That’s why the Rockefeller Foundation grants were called efficiency grants. They were efficient in making money for Rockefeller.

The Fall Out of the Above Story

An outline of the above presentation was presented on the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio talk show as hosted by substitute host Hilly Rose--first briefly on Jan 8, 2000, and later in more detail on Jan 17, 2000. The fact that Rose chose to air it brings up another “after-effect” story.

The Art Bell talk show program was a late night program which “sometimes” had some very revealing guests and programs on which presented material and information which was just not available anywhere else in the controlled national media. Even Rush Limbaugh, G. Gordon Liddy and the other programs are largely dead with very little beyond the controlled CBS, NBC, ABC or CNN.

Sometimes, the Art Bell program used to break some barriers and bring up some stuff which was really awesome and revealing. However, the nightly program had one primary drawback or limitation. The program frequently had guests on to promote ideas on death, Witchcraft, the occult, psychics, and so forth (which are very dangerous for anyone to be tampering with or considering).

Art Bell, himself, used to host the program “live” three nights a week and used substitute hosts on the other nights or re-runs (Bell took a Sabbatical in late April 2000, so that other persons ran the program until his return in 2001. The program quality deteriorated somewhat with Bell’s absence). In any case, Hilly Rose had been a regular on his program for a long time.

In fact, Rose had become sort of a permanent fixture with one night a week turned over to him exclusively. Like Bell, Rose did a good job and had some splendid guests on the program (along with some bad ones from time to time).

On Jan 8, 2000, Rose had the previously mentioned Dr Robert Beck on for a very brief outline on electro-magnetic healing and the blood purifier or electrifier machine (to nullify bacteria and disease) that a person can build himself from parts bought at a Radio Shack for $30.

As outlined earlier, Beck is a 76 years old, retired, college physics professor who claimed that his primary interest was on bringing hidden information to the public which could be helpful in treating disease and sickness.

Much Interest

The brief presentation by Dr Beck on January 8th created a storm of interest and a big boost in Art Bell’s program on the night it was regularly hosted by Hilly Rose. Apparently, Rose was inundated by e-mail, letters, faxes, telegrams and so forth for more information.

He went to the show’s producer and obtained permission to run a more detailed program on January 17th (which was not his regular night, but was an off night which usually used re-runs)

Rose explained that it was good that he was allowed this different program night because it would permit him to tell usual Art Bell listeners on another night about his regular weekly show. Certainly, from Rose’s remarks, he was trying to create some interest in the program for the night he hosted it. Obviously, he talked in the vein that he planned on being on the program in the future.

So the program took place on January 17th. Rose brought back Dr Beck as well as the above mentioned C. Edward Griffin and a man from Canada who sells these machines (Sota Instruments, Box 20019, Penticton, B.C. Canada V2A 8K3). The whole flow of the message was well organized and professionally presented.

Everybody involved seemed to walk a fine line for fear of antagonizing the organized medical profession (which rules America with an iron hand in health matters). Rose and his guests pointed out several times that they could not make claims about healing because that was against the rules of the establishment.

Of the millions of listeners who heard this program, several called in to validate what was being said--to even include some practicing doctors. One woman medical doctor in particular discussed the medical school curriculum, and how it is controlled by the drug and surgery approach to healing.

A medical school student called in to show his ignorance by strongly opposing the message, but otherwise everything went well. The show ended and it seemed that the American people had benefited by being introduced to some different thinking in order to deal with disease and health questions.

The next week (or possibly two), Hilly Rose came back on his regular night and provided a good show as was his practice. No more was said about Beck and the blood electrifier. Rose continued to talk in the vein of continuing with the program. Certainly, Rose said nothing about leaving the program.

Rose Vanished

Then, all at once and abruptly, Hilly Rose was removed from broadcasting the Art Bell program. He vanished without a word or explanation. Surely, if Rose died or had a heart attack or left voluntarily, the Art Bell show would have said something about it. After all, Rose was a popular and regular host of the program. People would be curious and deserving of some explanation.

For his regular night slot, the program producers used re-run tapes of prior Art Bell shows. No explanation was given for the abrupt and unexpected departure of Rose. Some people called in to say that they missed Rose. But the hosts would only say that he (or she, in the case of guest host Rollye James) could not get into that discussion.

Manifestly, there was never a hint on why Rose left in any public pronouncements (or at least none heard by the writer of this production). This is most unusual. So, why did he leave? Probably, the public will never find out, although there is some strange reason for his departure with all the silence.

But in view of his program on January 17, 2000, which dared to take on the American Medical Association, the FDA and the government, the large pharmaceutical companies and the currently approved methods of treating sick people, it is a good bet that poor Hilly Rose was fired.

Surely, the establishment brought pressure on the program’s producers and threatened them with dire consequences. It would be easy for the government (in the form of the Federal Communications Commission) to intimidate and threaten any radio or TV program with threats of being removed or disbarred from the air if the program did not do as commanded. For sure, Rose made some big enemies and he had to go.

Nikola Tesla, Revisited

In 1856, a man named Nikola Tesla (previously discussed) was born in Croatia in the then old Austrian Hungary empire (possibly of Jewish parents, as some persons have reported). He came to America in 1884 where he was to make history as perhaps the world’s greatest, human inventor. At least, he produced more patents with the US Patent Office than any other person in history.

Tesla’s specialty was electricity. He invented and became the father of the alternating current which today is used all over the United States to power TV sets, computers, clocks and electric kitchen utensils almost to no end (it is the AC system which is carried over electric wire lines).

In the 1890s, his power system was used to power all the facilities and exhibits at the Chicago World Fair. His research laid the groundwork for the development of wireless telegraph and radio communications. He was the prime inventor whom Westinghouse sought out to invent power generators (Westinghouse bought them as fast as Tesla could design and build them).

The famous Thomas Edison also had his hand in the electric field and became acquainted with Tesla. They worked together for a short period. Over time, they had a falling out when Edison supposedly bought one of Tesla’s inventions for $10,000 and then refused to pay for it.

In various experiments, Tesla transmitted electricity without wires for some 25 miles and lighted lamps. Around 1900, he invented and patented a system of utilizing the earth’s natural vibrations to transmit power through the earth without wires (per C. B. Baker, quoted in the Jan 2000 “End Time News,” p. 3).

Dr Tesla was a brilliant man and manifestly ahead of his time in electric theory and application. Over the years, he patented over 900 new processes in the field of energy conversion and received 14 doctorates from universities all over the world (Jan 2000 “End Time News,” p. 3).

Free Energy?

As mentioned in a former chapter, one of the obsessions which dominated Tesla’s great mind for years was his desire to build a device which would extract free energy from out of the atmosphere, both day and night, and make it available for people to use for electric power purposes. He actually started work on such a device.

With his prototype in hand, he went out to the Rocky Mountains in the 1890’s and set up shop on a mountain near Colorado Springs, Colorado. When he was ready for his first test, he hooked up the small town of Colorado Springs for some “free energy.” But his first test was so powerful that it blew all the light bulbs out in the town.

However, Tesla had proven that the concept was valid and could become totally feasible and practical with some further study and modification of his invention. Meanwhile, the super rich J. P. Morgan international banker (who was linked in with the Rothschilds of Europe, as indicated earlier herein) was watching Tesla’s work. He didn’t like what he was seeing.

Morgan was allied with Thomas Edison and they were in the electric power business--commercially for profits, greed and gain by using electric power plants which generate electricity from water power and/or the burning of fossil fuels in coal plants. These traditional power means eventually developed into the modern nuclear power plants used after WWII.

The Power of J. P. Morgan

Obviously, if Tesla could develop and build a contraption which would take free energy out of the heavens (day or night) and make it available to the public free of charge, the profits coming into Morgan and Edison’s pockets would plummet (and lead to the disconnection of meters which charged each house for electricity produced by Morgan’s companies). Something had to be done.

Somehow, Morgan was able to use the controlled media and other means to go to work on Tesla to discredit and literally destroy him (by that time, Morgan and his Amalekite colleagues had taken control of most of America’s media companies, as mentioned earlier and as will be further described in subsequent chapters).

Soon, Tesla found that he was broke, down and out; and no one would give him any financial support to continue his work on free energy. In short, he was out of business which is precisely what both Morgan and Edison wanted.

Per the above discussion, can anyone of us ever begin to comprehend how the world would be if the research of Tesla was carried on to the development and implementation phase of extracting free energy out of the atmosphere and sending it all over the world without using electric power lines to power the electrical needs of the home. For sure, the world today would be a different place.

This section on the plutocrats has assessed their schemes to make money and gain world power through profit and non-profit corporations. In the case of the deception and evil perpetrated by J. P. Morgan and Thomas Edison, it is unclear what all tactics the super rich Morgan used to destroy Tesla and his concepts about free energy.

Certainly, Morgan controlled much of the US media and probably many of the schools of energy and electricity at various major US universities. Rockefeller was heavily involved in the petroleum energy business. So it is plausible that the Morgan and Rockefeller interests worked together on this thing (as the divided money power often works together in collusion in areas of common interest).

The After Effects

The great inventor Tesla died a pauper in 1943. But his work was so extraordinary that the US government sent agents out in WWII to seize all of his writings, books, and other materials produced wherever stored in libraries, businesses and so forth. The Soviet Union did precisely the same thing. They seized everything put out by Tesla.

What all did these governments do with Tesla’s ideas? Certainly, governments operating under the control of the super rich plutocrats made sure that the thinking of Tesla would be forever hid from the public’s view. There was no way that profit centered businesses were going to allow Tesla’s thinking on free energy to prevail when electricity could be sold to the public for a profit.

Others say that some of Tesla’s theories have become the theoretical backbone in the building and equipping of HAARP, discussed in a former chapter. Perhaps the Russians have also used his knowledge in their development of weather alteration projects, using electromagnetic energy and low frequency radio waves. Who knows what all else visible today can be attributed to the brilliance of Nikola Tesla.

There is no question about it, modern urban towns and cities have become utterly dependent upon electricity for functioning--good or bad.

Assuredly, the production of electricity in the present system is a very polluting and destructive process--whether by water power (which completely destroys the ecological systems of rivers), by fossil fuel generations (which causes air pollution) or by nuclear power (with its horrors).

Just think what would have happened if America’s leaders were more interested in truth and righteousness rather than in profits and gains. Today, we perhaps could be enjoying free, non polluting electricity.

It is very logical that if man uses electric power in the world tomorrow, he will use free, non polluting energy. Clearly, Nikola Tesla was ahead of his time.

Chapter 334--The Big Pay-Offs and Benefits I

Li’l Abner

There are many great illustrations of the attitude of the plutocrats toward money. Some years ago, Broadway had a smash play called “Li’l Abner” (later produced as a hit Hollywood movie) which pretty well summarizes the role and attitude of the super rich as they manipulate and use the government for their various purposes.

This hit play had a fat cat named General Bullmoose who was greedy and out to get all of the money and profits that he could. It seems that the government had discovered a secret method from Dogpatch which could turn the average Joe into a physical Li’l Abner.

General Bullmoose decided that he wanted the secret formula so he could make gobs and gobs of money. Often, he would say “what’s good for General Bullmoose is good for America.” In other words, the interests of General Bullmoose and the United States were exactly the same--to make profits for Bullmoose.

This Broadway musical tells the story of greed, get and acquire among the fat cats. It doesn’t matter whether the fat cat is a local fat cat or whether he is a plutocrat sitting in Wall Street, the story is always the same. All of them generally want more and more and believe that they are owed it for the benefit of their local towns, cities and nations.

More on How Big Money Works

Having previously described the observations of insider Carroll Quigley, in terms of the super rich, it would be well to briefly mention some comments made by Colonel Curtis B. Dall, former head of Liberty Lobby (which published “The Spotlight”). Dall was no ignorant uninformed slouch on how big money works in America. He was married to Franklin Roosevelt’s daughter back during the rulership of FDR.

In his book on “F.D.R. My Exploited Father-In-Law,“ Dall outlined some of the incidents in Roosevelt’s rise to power in the early 1930s. In one instance, he described a most revealing event that occurred in January 1933 at Roosevelt’s New York home at 49 East 65th Street.

Roosevelt (a Christian of Jewish [possibly Sephardi--but it could be Ashkenazi] ancestry and with manifest Amalek-Edomite roots) had been elected US president in November 1932 and was waiting to be inaugurated. While in this interim state, FDR had a visit from Bernard Baruch (another clear Amalek-Edomite) one day.

Baruch was one of the true super rich fat cats of his day. He was one of the world’s richest men with close links to Wall Street. As it turned out, Dall was an employee of one of the Wall Street firms and tried to engage Baruch in some conversation while he was waiting to see FDR.

Dall made several comments about stocks and which ones might be good investments. But Baruch was largely uninterested though polite. In time, Roosevelt’s Negro servant Reynolds came into the room and announced that FDR could see Baruch upstairs. As Baruch got up to leave, he looked at Dall and said “Mr. Dall, I think well of silver.” He then left to go up and have one of FDR’s famous martinis.

Dall knew little about the silver market at the time, but mentally reflected that it didn’t seem to be going anywhere and could be bought on 10% margin. So the days passed, and one of the first major acts of the Roosevelt administration was to double the price of silver.

Did Baruch (who owned much of the world’s then supply of silver) know something in advance? Did insider Baruch make a fortune on silver? Assuredly yes!

The Gasoline Rip-Off

Late spring and early summer of 2000 saw gasoline prices at the pump sky rocket up to over $2.00 a gallon in some places. Naturally, Slick Clinton and his cronies (like Al Gore) screamed and hollered about OPEC which generally controls supply, and price of crude. Much anger was heaped upon the Arabs in OPEC for the rip off.

As discussed elsewhere herein, there were some attempts to roll back some of the regressive taxes now on gasoline (which generally run over 50 cents a gallon). But this effort fell through’ and by the arrival of summer, price increases kept coming. Clinton and his cronies then said that they would pressure OPEC for more production. So OPEC agreed to a 3% hike in production which wouldn’t accomplish anything.

In the meantime, the Rush Limbaugh program had an interesting discussion about this problem in its June 23, 2000, program. Limbaugh quoted a May 9, 2000, little known news report on the Internet which disclosed that the Slick Clinton people had specifically contacted OPEC to cut oil production so that oil prices would go up. The story of “why” on this strange turn of events was very interesting.

The plan was that Clinton would pressure OPEC to cut production which would drive up prices. This motion, in turn, would help increase the flow of money to the non-OPEC countries selling oil--like Mexico, Iran, Russia and Indonesia (where oil production is controlled by the Lippo Banking Group, owned by the Riady family, who had been big campaign contributors to Clinton, to be detailed in a later chapter).

The May 9th news report said that some of the loans by the big (international) banks to these four nations were in jeopardy. And while a write-off of these loans would be maneuvered by the super rich so that the US tax payers would pick up most of the tab, the banks still had some concern because they are so greedy that they refuse to accept any losses.

In background, the report suggested that the international banks (with large loan exposures in those four countries) contacted Slick Clinton and asked him to pressure OPEC to cut production which would drive up prices for all of the oil producers (including the several countries in hock to the big banks). Clinton agreed and pressured OPEC which did as he demanded. Oil prices then went up sharply.

When this happened, in early May 2000, a reporter asked Al Gore about it. He was aware of Clinton’s pressure and even acknowledged it at that time. But then prices kept going up and he had to cover his tracks by attacking OPEC and blaming them and the oil companies in the summer for the price increases.

Clearly, this was a scheme to drive oil prices up that would benefit the big banks in recovering money on their bad loans. In this case, the skullduggery was designed so that effectively the American people (who drove cars and used gas and oil) would be the ones who would pay for the wind-fall to the big banks.

The Tobacco Rip-Off

In 1997, the state of Florida filed a lawsuit against the tobacco industry over harm that cigarettes had done to the public at large. In order to pursue the case, the state entered into a contract with some twelve or so law firms to handle the matter in court; despite the fact that the state itself had a whole host of attorneys on their payroll, all the way from the Attorney General to the various offices of government.

As a part of the settlement, the lawyers were to be paid 25% of the proceeds from the tobacco companies. The settlement was around 11 billion dollars--with the law firms to get some $2.8 billion. Each of the several participating law firms were to receive something like $233 million or $182,000 per lawyer man-hour.

Talk about a rip off--is $182,000 per man hour a rip off? Again, the significance of this event is that the state had a whole army of lawyers on the state payroll who could have handled this properly and legally as a part of their job and work as employees of the state of Florida.

Logically, it stands to reason that a state government having a grievance against someone necessitating a law suit would turn to their own lawyers and legal staffs if the matter was proper for pursuit.

Yet, the Governor and powers that be chose to contract with some specifically selected law firms to allow them to handle the suit--and of course end up with a rip-off of billions of dollars from the tobacco companies and/or the people of Florida, however one may choose to define it.

While there was no particular effort on the part of observers to investigate and inquire into the background on this matter, there is every reason to believe that this whole episode was a set up purposely designed to allow a big subsidy to accrue to the specially selected law firms.

Is it possible that these law firms were ones that had made significant financial contributions to the Governor and/or other government politicians? Yes, it could be.

It’s highly plausible that from the beginning the people involved in this scandal were aware that the payoff was ultimately coming from the tobacco companies and not directly from the state treasury. Since the money was not directly coming from the state, it is easy to see that the participants in this scam perceived that it could be carried off without public awareness and protest.

Business Grants

Previous remarks broached the matter of big corporations (owned and/or controlled by the super rich) getting huge grants of the federal give away of free dollars. Most all of the large multi-national corporations qualify for and get billions of dollars annually in all kinds of research, development and marketing grants (but typically, not local small business people). New products are often financed with US grants.

In terms of opening up so-called foreign markets, many of the big US corporations qualify for vast grants of money. For example, if Coca Cola or Pepsi wants to enter China, then the US government will give them enormous sums of money to finance the whole undertaking--free.

The Railroads

Other discussions herein have focused on the reality of the fat cat ownership and control of the early American railroad industry.

This condition led the way to influence the United States government to “give” the railroads vast land grants (involving millions of acres of free land) worth billions of dollars over much of the 19th century (and which propelled the Vanderbilts and Harrimans into the super rich classification).

This vast give away of the public lands to railroads did several things. With the opportunity to get these huge land grants (every other section of land along the railroad right-aways), the fat cats rushed out to build railroads all over America and even in some highly unlikely places. Almost every valley or area where people lived invited the certainty of a railroad line.

A perfect example of this motion is illustrated with the situation directly East of St Maries, Idaho--to the Continental Divide and across into Montana. There is a long valley (perhaps 75 miles deep) which runs from St Maries to the divide. It’s water source is the St Joe River that flows West to the St Maries River.

When the settlement of this area took place, there were a few isolated farmers and eventually (evidently largely after the railroad line was in) a few small villages (like Calder, Marble Creek and Avery) and one town of some size called St Joe.

There never was a large number of people living in this valley (and there still aren’t many people here today in 2003). It truly is isolated and still somewhat primitive. But in order to get the huge land grant pay off, a railroad rushed in and built a line up the valley and across into Montana. It really went almost nowhere and serviced few people comparatively.

Of course, the line closed many years ago because it was unprofitable and could not justify being maintained. But again, the reason for the line was the huge land grants which made the railroad owners extremely wealthy people.

The way this thing worked is that the US government gave these vast land tracts to the railroads if they would build railroad lines across America (evidently almost everywhere possible). The railroad companies agreed, selected the areas, took the land, built the railroad lines and sold the land for huge returns (which were especially facilitated once the railroad line was into an area).

The fat cat investors on this scam (like the Harrimans, the Vanderbilts and others) reaped vast profits. The land sales not only paid off the cost of the railroad lines, but returned astronomical profits to the original investors. Consequently, railroad companies quickly appeared over much of the nation; and they built lines all over the country.

The famous or infamous George Armstrong Custer (cited in a prior chapter) either was involved or was almost involved in one of these railroad companies. His achievements will be more fully discussed in a later appendix.

The Agricultural Programs, Revisited

Since modern history is full of such pay-off stories, a few more recent examples will be cited to drive home the point. For years, America has had a host of agricultural programs, like soil banks, price supports and various agricultural subsidies supposedly designed to help keep the small farmer in business. Not so!

Many of the large agricultural farms today are owned by the giant multi-national corporations which are in turn controlled by the big boys on Wall Street who secretly call the shots.

Correctly, the farm payments are made on their behalf with their thousands of acres of eligible land. In effect, this farm give away scam primarily benefits the “big” land holders and farmers, many of which are large multi-national corporations (which now produce much of America’s food supply).

The May 24, 2002, “The Week” (p. 37) had a news item on the 2002 farm bill signed into law by Bush. It provides $191 billion. Some two-thirds of these pay outs will go to large farms and agribusinesses which typically earn more than $250,000 annually. Writer Brian Riedl in the “National Review” called it America’s “largest and most expensive corporate welfare program.”

For years, Senator John Stennis (Democrat of Mississippi) pushed these farm bills through Congress. After all, he owned over 6,000 acres of land in the soil bank program where he was being paid huge sums of federal money for doing nothing but going to the mail box to pick up his government check.

In the year 2001, David Rockefeller picked up some $146,000 in these farm aid bills and the well known agricultural icon Archer, Daniels Midland Company got a pay-off of $17,793 for playing on the right team (Feb 11, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).

Compare the holdings and the profits going to Stennis, Rockefeller and Archer, Daniels Midland with what the average dirt farmer gets with his ten or twenty acres. While some of these giant government give aways reach poor farmers, most go into the pockets of the fat cats who own the huge farms, as just outlined.

About the only thing small farmers can expect from these programs is that their competition increases and they ultimately will be forced out of business and particularly so when they are unable to get financial support and loans from the big banks, also owned and controlled by the super rich.

The Buy Out of Dairies

In 1985, the US Congress passed a bill to buy out the small and inefficient dairy farmers. Why? Of course--to get rid of them as competitors to the large dairies which were controlled by the fat cats on Wall Street. Big Brother came in and paid these little dairy operators excessive payments for their cattle which were shipped off to the packing plants.

With them out of the way, the big boys could make still more money. Quite naturally, milk and butter fat products started going up in the market place. According to a national news report on June 23, 1998, wholesale butter fat prices were up 73% over the last year. The report said that related retail prices were expected to climb dramatically in the coming months.

There is an ultimate impact in the various US money give aways which helps the big corporations and fat cat land holders and that also eventually helps to contribute to the demise of the small farmers.

What’s happening is that the whole food production and distribution system is being placed into the hands of the super rich who own and/or control the farms, the trucking and shipping means, the wholesale and retail stores and on and on (yes, even Safeway, Kroger, Winn-Dixie, etc).

With the whole food supply placed into the hands of the select super rich (a very limited number of individuals and/or families), the prospects of a coming time when no one can buy or sell (yes, even food) without a certain mark or authorization now becomes far more feasible. It’s clearly on the horizon (Rev 13:16-17).

Incidentally, this appears to be the first time in world history where food production has been placed into so few hands. As long as the world’s population was essentially agrarian, as has been the case for centuries, it would have been inconceivable that a few super rich fat cats could determine whether people eat or not or what restrictions they might wish to impose on the population to allow them to have food.

Corporate Bailouts

A few years ago, the large multi-national corporation Chrysler was in a financial pinch. Naturally, both American political parties rushed to the rescue and bailed Chrysler out with vast financial aid--complements of the US taxpayers. This action set a precedent for something even more profound.

Following the September 11, 2001, Muslim terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, discussed earlier, the US travel industry suffered enormous losses. Some of the resulting problems were directly related to the fact that numbers of Americans, all of a sudden, decided to stay home and cancel travel plans. But that was only part of it because the US government immediately grounded all airplanes.

While virtually all small airplanes and local flights were canceled almost indefinitely (many weeks), the large corporate airline companies were allowed to resume flights within a few days. Nevertheless, the large airline companies reported that they were having financial problems over the crisis. Naturally, Washington politicians responded in support of the giant corporations.

The first legislation the US Congress passed after the attacks was a resolution and money in support of whatever the president wanted to do--in attacking the alleged terrorists.

Interestingly, the next major piece of legislation came out of the Congress on September 21, 2001, in a bill to bail out the large corporate airlines. The airlines were directly granted an infusion of $5 billion in cash and loan guarantees of another $10 billion.

The Post Office (PO)

Actually, almost all actions taken by governments at all levels are designed to somehow benefit and enrich more wealthy people. Even the US Postal Service operates first for the big boys and second for everybody else.

Before organizing the Postal Service Corporation, the US Congress used to appropriate money to the Post Office to subsidize the big business mailers.

This Congressional subsidy has continued somewhat to the Postal Corporation. But it has been phasing out in the last several years. This has changed the picture with the Postal Corporation which still subsidizes and helps the big mailers. But now, the PO must make enough money in house to offset that drain they “give” away to big business mailers and the fat cats.

Many persons know that the American public pays the regular first class mail rate every time it mails a letter. In numbers and first class mailings, the general public consists of primarily the poor and the middle classes.

The PO makes money on this first class mail (which is so often used by the poor and middle class). Since the PO has made money from first class mail for ages, it has been making money from poor and middle class mailers who are also the taxpayers who formerly gave money to Congress to use to subsidize business mailings.

Conversely, the PO provides bulk mail privileges at greatly reduced rates and even reduced first class charges to big mailers (businesses, and of course, large corporations which do big mailings). These bulk mailings cost the PO more than they get back in charges. Thus, the little people (the primary mailers and taxpayers) are actually subsidizing and paying for the bulk mail service of the big mailers.

The tragedy about this whole affair is that many of us don’t want our mailboxes cluttered up with this huge assortment of advertising and bulk mailings that come regularly. If it was just a matter of the customers that trade with these mailers, it would be well and good for them to be paying for this waste that is showered upon the public. But that’s not the way the game is played.

The problem arises in that the bulk mailers don’t pay the proper fees for their mailings since they are being given grossly reduced mailing rates. And it is the little people who buy first class stamps (which is everybody who mails first class letters) that end up subsidizing the post office gratuities given to the big mailers.

More on the Big Mailers

There is another fall out about the big mailers. Many people operate under the delusion that any business can take advantage of the showered benefits of reduced mailing rates for bulk mailers. This is simply not true. By the time that a mailer buys the annual mailing permit and meets the minimum mailing quantities, it is only the big mailers who can take advantage of the reduced mailing rates.

Thus, big retail corporations, like Safeway, Kroger, Walmart, etc, are the mailers who can buy the permit and meet the volume mailing requirements to benefit enormously from the reduced rates. A small mom and pop store in a small town or big city cannot afford the permit, nor can it ever begin to reach mailing quantities needed for the operation to be profitable.

Truly, the entire US mail service is geared up to give rate reductions to the big businesses. The post office is no friend of the little man--not even the little man in business. It’s all for the big boys. Money talks in postal operations--just like in every thing else.

More on the Post Office

This mention of this subsidy, which is showered upon the big mailers, brings up an interesting related point. This writer used to occasionally go to a small, local, post office in Northport, Washington to mail a package or buy some stamps. The post master involved was a fairly arrogant man and this writer had said little to him.

In late December 2000, a package was mailed by me at his post office. Since a postal rate increase had been recently approved, he was asked about its effective date (which was to be Jan 7, 2001). Apparently, other people had asked him about it or perhaps expressed some unhappiness over the rate increase.

He was very clearly on the defensive with me and started in to give me a lecture about how the PO needed the rate increase. His argument was all hogwash because the Clinton administration had been advertising that the US inflation rate was running a little over 2% per annum for the last several years.

Yet, the PO has been getting rate increases of one to two cents almost annually for some years now--from 3-7% each time (and on March 9, 2001, the PO announced that it had a deficit in operations the prior year and would be asking for more increases that year).

Yes, He Was Arrogant

Anyway, this writer made the point that my words were not over the first class mail; but rather, they were over bulk mail which is subsidized by profits on first class mail. My remark called the bulk mail crap and this really upset and blinded him. Instead of dealing with the issue raised, he lashed back at me that bulk mail was not crap and then he went on with his dissertation about how good the PO was.

He started in on how much it would cost to mail a letter if the service was privatized. He projected that it would cost at least 75 cents and postal customers are getting a bargain at (the then) 34 cents. Of course, what he was arguing about may or may not be true at all since there would be many issues and complications involved in establishing mailing rates if the service was privatized.

However, that fact had noting whatsoever to do with my remarks on bulk mail. It was all unjustified babbling about something totally irrelevant. Three times, this writer tried to bring him back to the point of the subsidized bulk mailing costs. He was totally blinded and unable to grasp what the issue was and refused to discuss bulk mail (either he was stupid or so proud that he could not understand what the subject was).

Previous chapters on pride and vanity discussed the horrible situation of proud people talking on and on about things which they simply don’t understand or have little truth on. This man was a classic illustration of arrogantly talking on and on about how cheap first class mail is and what a bargain customers get.

Repeatedly, this writer tried to say that my comment was not over first class mail. But it was over bulk mail (it just fills my mail box up and creates a problem of regular disposals of huge quantities of nothing but paper/junk--in fact, most Americans call it junk mail). Anyway, he finally acknowledged that bulk mail-- “gets a break,” as he characterized it.

More Issues

Besides the constant PO rate increases and the fact that the PO makes a hefty profit on first class mailings, there is another little item which seems largely ignored or simply unknown by the general US public.

The Postal Corporation has been paying huge bonuses to some of its top people for years now (totaling $1.4 billion from 1994 to 2000). In 2001, the corporation shelled out another $200 million in bonuses (Dec 24, 2001, “American Free Press,” p. 2). This shell out was made despite the fact that the PO lost $1.7 billion in the year ending on September 30, 2001.

Along with the huge bonuses paid executives, it is also interesting that there is a postal union; which, of course, continuously pushes for more and more money for postal workers. Already, in early 2003, most postal workers earn from $25,000 to $60,000 per annum.

Since little is required in the way of intelligence, skill or expertise to be a postal worker, the high salaries paid to them are actually ridiculous. It is no wonder that turnover is not the problem with the post office as it once was. There aren’t many people around making $30,000 per year with limited work and virtually no pressure, who are anxious to quit such a job.

Some post masters or employees have very little to do daily once they put the morning mail up (which is not a hard job at all). The post master at the Calder, Idaho Post Office (which this writer is acquainted with) spends about 20 minutes putting up the daily mail. Other than sweeping out the office, selling a few stamps and making a few reports, there is nothing else to be done daily. It’s a racket for the high salary paid.

With this huge amount of time on hand, the PO executives (who are often being paid the fat bonuses) sit around and dream up various exercises to keep themselves busy. The Apr 21, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a fascinating and pathetic news story from the “New York Daily News.”

This report noted that the PO has spent $3.6 million in recent years to send its staff through a series of executive conferences that featured exercises in wrapping each other in toilet paper and aluminum foil, building sand castles at the beach, making animal noises, dressing in cat costumes and asking make-believe wizards for advice.

Based upon the advice of Karla Corcoran (the PO Inspector General), the PO started this program on the premise that these silly exercises would improve job performance and teamwork. Undoubtedly, Karla and/or some of the other stupid executives of the PO were paid giant bonuses for this stupidity.

More Rate Increases

Already, in late 2001, the terrorist attacks in September 2001 have given PO big shots an excuse to go to Congress and ask for a huge subsidy which will surely become reality soon. In the meantime, the public can expect some hefty postal rate increases--certainly, in the profitable first class mail.

Sure enough, in March 2002, the post office announced a rate increase for first class stamps from 34 cents to 37 cents (in view of the fact that before FDR, the first class charge was two cents, it is clear that the rates have went into the sky). The Postal Corporation said that it had negotiated with a group of big mailers to arrive at that first class rate increase.

Since the big mailers use second and third class mailings (bulk mail), they would be very agreeable for first class mailers to pay substantially more money (as long as they continue to get subsidies and breaks on bulk mailings).

With this latest increase, the post office also said that it is loosing business and will commence an advertising campaign (which will cost millions of dollars) to try to gain back customers. In 2001, the PO lost $two billion. Further losses were projected for 2002 and thereafter.

Of course, people who have Internet service (with E-mail privileges) and/or fax services use the mail less and less for first class mailings. Since businesses and generally persons with more money and affluence have E-mail or fax machines, it only leaves the poor and some of the middle class who must routinely use the US mail service and pay the first class rates (which continue to go up, up and away).

So here we have a prefect illustration where the poor and those with less money and affluence suffer at the hands of a government operation which is specifically operated to provide benefits and gratuities to big business. Even more affluent and well off first class mailers can get around the high rates as they switch to E-mail and fax machines.

The post office continues to sock it to the poor people (and middle class people somewhat) who must use first class mailing services. The post office uses this excessive income from poor people to subsidize the big mailers and pay outrageous salaries and bonuses to postal employees. Yes, this whole operation is a rip off.

The Pony Express

Incidentally, this mention of problems in the modern post office operations deserves one more remark. Back in the early 1860s, Alexander Russell operated his pony express service from Missouri to Northern California. The pony express could move the mail on horseback over this 2,000-mile trek in some eight days (“The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 681).

Today, it can sometimes still take eight days to move a letter from the Central US to the West Coast. This is especially true if a person mails a letter just before, during or after a three-day weekend (with a US holiday on the second day of the week). After these long weekends, it takes the PO some time to get back on schedule.

This writer has seen some such letters take eight to ten days to reach my home--then in Eastern Washington (and now, evidently the same in North Idaho). Question--has postal service improved in the last 140 years? Maybe, all of the so-called modern sophistication and technology hasn’t helped service at all--either that or the post office employs too many incompetent Blacks.

Road Improvements

There is a primitive, dirt, mountain road of 16 miles which connects the area of Northport, WA with Ione, WA to the East. The road traverses across the mountains via a place called Smackout Pass.

In the last several years, it seems that county road people (from the two involved country areas--one on the East side and the other on the West side) perhaps grade it once a year in the spring and haul in a little gravel or dirt as fills to cover erosion. When the rains (and later snow) come in the late summer and fall, conditions of the road deteriorate fast and drivers have to finally abandon it until next spring.

With just a little maintenance, the road would be a good road and see much use because it is the shortest way East to West across Northeast Washington.

There is another primitive, dirt road five miles to the South. But it is also across the mountains and doesn’t receive much more maintenance. The next alternative is a paved road far to the South, about 50 miles out of the way (which has to be used in the winter).

In fact, with some paving and care, the Smackout Pass road could easily be an all weather road. Despite the fact that perhaps 100 cars or so use it daily, it apparently has historically received little or no maintenance from road crews over the last several years.

This writer has traveled it many times from 1993 to 1998 and the lack of maintenance has always been obvious. But then, in 1999, things dramatically changed--all of a sudden. Starting in the spring (once the snows melted), road crews went to work grading and caring for the road. They continued on into the fall. The road was maintained in excellent condition until the snows came when maintenance stopped.

What Happened?

The question here would have to be what happened from 1998 to 1999 to cause this shift in work?

Well, the answer is that a logging company came in and started logging trees to the West of the Pass. They used some six or seven logging trucks to haul the timber to the East and on over to a mill in Idaho. They traveled over on the mountain road to the South and came back on the Smackout Pass road twice a day.

From government’s viewpoint, the importance of the road was no big deal for the 100 or so cars of little people who had been using the road over the years. But when a big commercial logging operation wanted to use the road for six or seven trucks, twice a day, the applicable county commissioners sat up and took notice. Manifestly, a few phone calls from the logging company and road crews were at work on the road.

Governments from the lowest levels (city and/or county) and up always respond to the fat cats. Local governments take notice of smaller, local fat cats while larger governments are more responsive to bigger fat cats. Of course, it is only the real big, super rich, fat cats who can usually get the time of day in Washington, DC.

This is one of the tragedies of government. The politicians look after and respond to the people who have the money first. Others are next on down the line based upon money and/or their ability to deliver multiple or bloc votes.

Chapter 335--The Big Pay-Offs and Benefits II

Tax Breaks for the Big Boys

In another matter, tax breaks and tax loopholes for the more wealthy are precisely the situation with the current US Internal Revenue Code and system and state and local taxes as introduced in a previous chapter. At a first glance, it is true that the historic tax rates have “seemed” to be quite high for higher income persons.

But what few realize is that the IRS tax code is full of loopholes which allow the super rich to hire smart lawyers and accountants and end up paying little in terms of what the law seems to say. The tax laws have been prepared with the wealthy in mind (yes, by both parties--Republican and Democrat). The big boys don’t pay those high tax rates.

Large corporations, in particular, have available a number of loopholes, tax breaks and schemes which are specifically designed to grant them huge untaxed profits. The Dec 24, 2001, “American Free Press” (p. 2) specifically mentioned that large multinational corporations saved $50 billion in taxes, evidently in 2001 through a gimmick called transfer pricing.

This practice allows the corporations to fraudulently price material high as it is transferred from an off-shore subsidiary account to a US component. This action deceptively cuts US profits significantly (on the pretext that the cost of the goods was excessively high).

The Rip Off in Sales and Property Taxes

A couple of other notes on taxes need mentioning. In the American tax structure, most state and local governments rely heavily on sales and property taxes--both of which are extremely regressive by striking poor people the hardest. Some states, like California, New York, Washington and several others, have sales tax rates approaching ten percent.

Poor people and smaller income persons spend virtually all of their moneys and incomes just to live. Of course, all of the funds and purchases of the poor face these excessive sales taxes. Furthermore, everyone who owns a home or rents pays high local property taxes (which are a relic of the old sun worshipping Roman Empire-- “The Expositor’s Greek Testament,” v. III, p. 400).

Yes, even home or property renters really pay these high property taxes in the form of higher rents. Automobile tags (actually taxes, though some people erroneously believe automobile tags are just regulatory fees) are quite high in some states as well.

While the fat cats pay some of these high taxes, their tax burden is relatively quite small in comparison with poorer people from the perspectives of overall income and assets. Thus, poor people are hit hard with these taxes while the rich hardly notice them at all in the context of their broad positions of income and accumulated wealth.

Intangibles Rarely Taxed

Moreover, the people who are classified as poor or middle class generally have little or no assets in terms of securities, options, stocks and bonds which more affluent Americans own. In fact, the bulk of the property of the super rich is typically placed in these intangibles.

People, like the previously mentioned billionaire Bill Gates, have most of their wealth tied up in things like the stock of corporations (i.e. Microsoft). But what few persons seem to grasp is that there is little or no taxation on this kind of property in contrast to the type of property most poor Americans buy, consume and hold (food, automobiles, car expenses, homes, furniture, living expenses, etc).

As just noted, sales taxes are customarily assessed whenever these tangibles are sold; and of course, local property taxes and licenses are charged annually on anything physical and tangible which is not consumed.

Conversely, the securities, bonds, stocks, options and intangibles held by the fat cats are typically never assessed property taxes or sales taxes (sometimes, there is a very small and insignificant stock transfer tax of a dollar or two on each transfer, but this is nothing in the scheme of things).

Too, the big boys, who have their wealth tied up in intangibles, have pushed for and constantly push for reduced income tax rates for capital gains to be realized whenever these intangibles are sold at a profit. Thus, the fat cats get a big income tax break when they make a profit on a stock or bond sale.

The small merchant selling retail items in a store pays regular taxes for his profits and gains. Any person of the general public making a profit on the sale of most property in inventories pays the regular tax rate.

But the big boys buying and selling trillions of dollars in intangibles generally never pay sales taxes or property taxes or licenses on their investments in this stuff. Moreover, they are given tax breaks whenever they sell such intangibles at a profit (in the form of reductions for capital gains).

Double Taxation?

To justify all of their tax breaks, the fat cats typically publicize something called double taxation--in that corporation profits and transactions are taxed the same as the general public. Since they, as stockholders, have theoretically paid those taxes, the state should not tax them again to the owners. But this is hogwash!

Corporations and their legal stockholders are totally separate and distinct from each other legally in the state (not morally). Though corporations are merely pieces of paper created by a state, they exist as a person for all purposes. In that sense, they certainly should be fully taxed just like any other person.

As far as their owners, the state grants them many other privileges and benefits--like limited liability (not only on the financial aspects of their investments; but also, on the legal aspects of the functioning of the corporation), ease of stock transfer in a sale or disposal and many other benefits.

Too, it must be understood that though small, local stockholders may own a few shares in some large corporation, it is more probable that the primary stockholders are far away internationalists with an off-shore arrangement or some other legal status that allows them to pay little or nothing in taxes as schemed by the prostitute politicians.

Of course, it makes no sense at all for Standard Oil or British Petroleum service stations to be reaping profits and gains in thousands of communities across America--all the while that the Rockefeller and Rothschild owners of these service stations pay little or no local taxes in these thousands of communities across America.

As a minimum, a person with wealth in pieces of paper (stocks, bonds, debentures, notes, etc) should pay local property taxes just like poor people have to pay whose only assets consist of their homes, cars and furniture. In effect, the argument can be made that property should be assessed on the basis of accumulated wealth and not on the basis of just physical, tangible property.

In early America, almost no one owned any intangible assets. Almost all American wealth held by individuals was in the form of land, houses, furniture, livestock, farm equipment, etc (which was fully taxed, in the context of local property taxes).

But in the 20th century, that whole definition of wealth changed. Today’s wealthy people usually own intangibles (stocks, bonds, notes, options, contracts, etc). Why should all of this wealth be exempt from taxation?

Utility Services

Most utility services across America are regulated and controlled by government authorities. Accordingly, they are granted monopolies--essentially, with no competition. Often, governments themselves operate utilities--like water, sewage and disposal services.

However, the big boys have had their hooks in this field, along with everything else. There is an existing theory (which has some merit) that the rendition of more of a product or service creates a need for a discount or a reduction in prices as the quantity and service levels increase.

The point of this is that the more water and electric power a user uses, costs go down per unit of use. In other words, a large Safeway store pays less per kilowatt hour of electricity used, as opposed to a local, small, mom and pop operation. A super rich fat cat with a huge, 20-room mansion pays less for his electricity than a poor, dirt farmer living in a two-room shack.

Actually, this is a tragic situation for a lot of reasons. First, the very people who could pay more end up paying less. And secondly, the most profoundly important reason of all arises on this condition because there is no sense of conservatism on the part of the fat cats. Simply stated, the super rich (with his large home) has no incentive to cut back on power usage. After all, the more he uses, the less it costs him per unit.

Now, the real insanity of this system arises because the overall culture does not benefit from the increasing uses of electricity, water, sewage and disposal needs. In other words, the collective people do not benefit because more power generators and nuclear power plants are built to handle the increased needs of big electric users. Hence, the whole population suffers.

True, almost every family has a basic need for some power and water at an essential level. But beyond that, why is it that society should pollute its rivers and atmosphere and destroy itself so that some families or businesses can have unlimited power at increasingly lower rates. Because a local fat cat has the money should not give him the privilege and luxury of wasting electricity and water.

The California Problem, Revisited

As briefly mentioned in a prior chapter, the state of California was in a power crisis in 2000-2001 (with rolling power outages). Much of the California problem surfaced precisely because of the above method of handling utility charges.

As utility users get to be bigger and bigger in size, they have historically been given lower rates with their growth and increased consumption. Everything then is geared up to the fat cat and his increasing use of utilities. Conversely, the overall society could be better served with the imposition of limitations on power and water usages.

One classic way of limiting such services would be to impose higher rates for increased usages (in April 2001, some California politicians proposed charging large users a higher rate, which will be interesting if it comes to fruition). Thus, if your home needs more power, then why should you not have to pay a much higher rate for all that extra power for unnecessary lights and appliances.

The same reasoning applies to businesses. Society would benefit if the big Safeways, Walmarts, etc had to pay for all that wasted electricity at their facilities. If someone wants to help small businesses and small farmers, why not stop talking about it and do something by lowering their utility costs, as compared with the big operators.

Incidentally, the famous or infamous Enron Corporation was mentioned in prior comments. Now, the May 10, 2002, “The Week” (p. 2) has a report out on how Enron manipulated the California energy market by buying California power, selling it elsewhere and then buying it back later to sell it to California at greatly increased rates. Apparently, Enron made a bundle of bucks from this scam.

The May 24, 2002, “The Week” (p. 16) followed up with another news story from California on allegations that Enron created California’s energy crisis (at least, this is the pitch of California Governor Gray Davis). Davis has released some Enron memos which describe the company’s rip off of California where the scam was code-named “Death Star,” “Fast Boy,” and “Get Shorty.”

Chapter 336--The Federal Reserve Bank

Stagecoach, Revisited

A former chapter herein discussed the famous John Ford movie “Stagecoach,” which was produced in 1939 and catapulted John Wayne into stardom. The character in that story, who epitomized the question of the pride of life, was a fat cat banker named Ellsworth H. Gatewood.

This mythological Gatewood had some very revealing one liners. For example, just before he decided to take the stage from Tonto, AZ to Lordsburg, NM, a local company brought in their $50,000 payroll to deposit in his bank. Gatewood appropriately reacted with a couple of choice statements.

He said that it was a good practice for local Tonto businesses to deposit their payroll funds in his bank six months in advance of the payroll dates. And then, in a state of banker brilliance, he said that what’s good for the banks is good for the country.

Once this $50,000 was in his hands, the greedy Gatewood proceeded to steal it and abandon his snooty, old hag wife (who must have been a problem to live with) and leave the country with the money. He caught the stagecoach to Lordsburg and planned on getting away with the money.

Geronimo had been on the loose and the telegraph line was down to Lordsburg. But by the time that the stage got to Lordsburg, the telegraph line had been fixed, and the people in Tonto had discovered the Gatewood theft and flight, and had wired ahead. The Sheriff in Lordsburg arrested him.

Radio Liberty

The Dec 2002 “Radio Liberty” newsletter (p. 4) laid out the whole basis of a national privately owned central bank, by quoting Carroll Quigley-- “...the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.

“This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences... Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world...”

More Important Quotes

To further set the tone for what is to follow, the words of Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) must be quoted again. He said to give him control of a nation’s money, and he cared not who wrote its laws.

In an appearance before the US House Banking Committee, former Federal Reserve Banking Chairman Marriner S. Eccles was asked if the Fed had more power than either Congress or the president. Eccles replied-- “In the field of money and credit, yes.”

The April 8, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B-6) quoted President Thomas Jefferson, who long ago recognized reality.

Jefferson said: “If the American people ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied.” In 2003, that day is virtually upon us!

In some later remarks (or in a better quotation more fully explaining the background for the above citation) on the question of renewing the charter for the US Bank, Jefferson stated that “The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched earth with blood, and crushes its inhabitants under burdens of ever accumulating. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks...will deprive the people of all property, until their children wake-up homeless...the issuing power should be taken from the banks, and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs” (“The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 295).

President James Madison followed Jefferson and shared some of the same views. He wrote: “History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent plans possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money, and its issuance” (ibid, p. 296).

Some History

Any discussion of the super rich plutocrats takes one immediately to international banking and the use of privately owned central banks--such as the US Federal Reserve Bank (mentioned above and earlier), commissioned by President Woodrow Wilson in 1913, to be shortly assessed.

Actually, the idea of the privately owned Fed (US central bank) was not new in Wilson’s times, as the big boys had been trying to achieve their hearts desires on this fraud since the days of Alexander Hamilton and the First US Bank. Hamilton evidently was known earlier by the name of Levine, his step parents, in Nevis, West Indies. Alexander and his Levine family were almost certainly Amalek-Edomites.

Under the control and/or influence of the Amalekite Hamilton, the US government (including President George Washington) succumbed and established the First US Bank in 1791, which was privately owned by the Rothschilds (“The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 25). It had a charter for 20 years.

But there was opposition to this scheme from people like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who perceptively spoke against the plan (as discussed in the above comments).

Hence, Congress refused to renew the privately owned US Bank in 1811. So the Rothschilds initiated the War of 1812 to be sure that America would go ahead and charter the Second US Bank--which she did in 1816 for another period of 20 years (ibid, p. 12, 26). This bank was also privately owned by the Rothschilds of Europe.

Andy Jackson

Following these two attempts at a privately owned national bank, the money power was effectively nipped in the bud by President Andrew Jackson (elected in 1828 and again in 1832) when he closed down its operations and temporarily destroyed its power base in Washington (as had been promoted by President John Adams and his son, the later 6th president of the US, John Quincy Adams).

The American patriot Andrew Jackson was totally opposed to the concept of a privately owned central US bank. He said “If Congress has a right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use by themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations” (ibid, p. 25).

Accordingly, Andy proclaimed (to the Rothschild bankers) that “You are a den of thieves-vipers, and I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out” (bid, p. 26). And he did! But the succeeding years saw Rothschild agents continue to work overtime to install a new, Rothschild-owned, central US bank.

But the bankers met a brick wall in the form of President John Tyler (1841-1845); who, like Jackson, was much opposed to their efforts to take over the US (ibid, p. 4). In 1841, Tyler vetoed an act of Congress to re-charter the Second US Bank. This made him an arch-enemy of the Rothschilds. This set the stage for the Civil War.

The Civil War

In 1876, the famous Otto Von Bismarck of Germany said: “The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before the (US) Civil War by the High Financial Power of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial independence, which would upset their (the international bankers) financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds predominated” (ibid, p. 27).

This decision prompted the Rothschilds to organize a secret society in the US called the Knights of the Golden Circle to foment trouble and bring on the division of the United States. Bismarck said that the Knights were financed by the Rothschilds and used to exploit the question of slavery (ibid, p. 27). This brought on the division and the US conflict.

Rothschild agents named Judah P. Benjamin in the South and August Belmont in the North were the primary Rothschild people advocating a civil war.

After the Rothschild money power initiated the American Civil War, through its agents, the decision was made to strike in an attempt to create a new US central bank. The Rothschilds and their colleagues called upon their prostitute politicians in the Congress to pass a new banking bill.

To explain their scheme, the Rothschild Bank in London sent a letter to its New York agents which said: “The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favors that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantages that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without compliant, and perhaps without even suspecting the system is inimical to their interests” (“Kill Zone,” p. 170).

Lincoln Opposition

In 1862, President Lincoln spoke out against the efforts of the bankers and said that “The money power preys upon the nation in times of peace and conspires against it in time of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. I see in the near future a crises approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country.

“Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the republic is destroyed” (“Kill Zone,” p. 169-170).

Lincoln was totally opposed to the power of the bankers to impose a central bank on the US. He fought them every step of the way and eventually in 1865 met his own death, apparently at the hands of the conspiratorial bankers. This eventuality will be explored in later chapters.

Later Efforts

James Garfield took over the presidency in 1881. Just before his assassination, in the summer of 1881, by a likely Rothschild agent (named Charles Guiteau), Garfield said: “Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce...and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation or deflation originate” (“The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 5).

While President William Howard Taft (1909-1913) was opposed to the central bank scheme, the big money boys created a third party in 1912 with the Amalekite Teddy Roosevelt to divide the vote and thus provide the means to elect Woodrow Wilson in 1912 and pave the way for the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913 (as was outlined earlier herein).

A Rothschild banking agent and relative named Paul Warburg (an Amalek-Edomite?) was the primary individual operating from behind the scenes, at the turn of the 20th century, to prepare the Federal Reserve Banking Act (in a secret meeting of big bankers on Jekyl Island, GA in c1910) which Wilson approved in 1913.

Warburg’s purpose was to duplicate what the big money boys had done in Europe with their organization, ownership and control of a number of European central banks (like the Bank of England, the Bank of France, etc).

To be sure that things went right, Warburg quit his $500,000 a year job as a partner with Kuhn Loeb & Company (Wall Street investment bankers) to be Fed Chairman at $12,000 per year. A J. P Morgan banker named Maurice Strong (who was also at Jekyl Island) became Chairman of the powerful New York Branch of the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve System

Over the past 40 years or so, a number of patriotic groups have studied and wrote extensively about the US Federal Reserve Bank and its system of operations. This list would include the John Birch Society, Liberty Lobby (which published the “Spotlight” paper) and many of the Militia and Christian Identity groups. Hence, there is no need to go into the Fed in any detail at this time.

Suffice to say, it is a privately owned central banking system created in 1913 (primarily, by the US Congress and Woodrow Wilson) to control the US monetary and economic systems. The word “federal” was put into its name to fool the dumb, goyim public into thinking that it was and is a government agency.

The Federal Reserve System is made up of 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks and an overall Board of Governors. Each of the Fed’s regional banks has nine directors chosen by their owners. Each nine directors choose a president for their regional bank.

As the 1997 “Encyclopedia Americana” clearly states (in an article on “Federal Reserve System,” p. 74), the regional banks are “privately owned.” It should not be necessary to offer that quotation, but the problem is that most Americans insist on believing that it is a government operation. Rest assured, it is not.

The Real Pay-Off

Actually, private ownership of the US central bank (in the form of the Federal Reserve Bank) was not an entirely new undertaking. As the Amalekite bankers gained power over Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries, one of the provisions of their control of governments was that they were to be given the exclusive power and authority to set up, own and operate the various central banks in Europe.

Central banks are sort of the primary national banks of various countries which control, influence and regulate monetary and fiscal activities in those countries. Too, the central banks are the banks of the bankers. In other words, there could be a hundred or a thousand banks in France, but the privately owned Bank of France controls and oversees all of these smaller, local, French banks.

Along with obtaining the privilege of managing and operating these European central banks, the various nations even stupidly turned their money supplies over to these central bankers. The banks were then accorded the privilege of issuing paper money called bank notes as legal tender in the nations where they existed.

In the old days, before the Protestant Reformation and the rise to power of the Amalekite bankers, the old time Amalekite gold dealers used to issue private script in the form of paper receipts (as was discussed earlier herein). These receipts were traded by the public as a form of legal tender.

With the organization and ownership of central banks, the same bankers could issue the currency to be used in the nation. This reality creates one more fantastic feature of the operating of a central bank.

Unlimited Money

Once a national currency is demonetized (that is, cut from any legal ties to tangible and recognized forms of wealth--like gold, silver, etc), then the central bank can issue unlimited sums of money which never create any liability or shortfalls for the banks or the banks’ owners beyond the nation itself (which assumes the liability for all of the bank notes issued by the central banks).

In the old days, when goldsmiths operated private banks (and issued far more gold certificates than actual gold on deposit), a run on a private bank could literally destroy the bank and bring on enormous problems for the banker involved. However, with the ownership of a central bank for a nation, all of these potential difficulties are eliminated.

A run on a central bank may destroy the currency (the bank notes) of the country involved, but it almost never impacts upon the bank itself or its behind-the-scenes private owners. Ultimately, all of the bank notes issued by the central bank are redeemable from the national wealth of the nation involved.

In other words, the nation’s taxpayers assume the liability for all of the bank notes issued in the name of the nation. Thus, the personal bankers were able to reap all of the benefits of owning the currency (the bank notes), but were never subjected to any liabilities or shortfalls (all of which would be picked up by the national taxpayers). Obviously, this was one of the greatest scams of all time!

The Bankers Benefited

Since the central bank was privately owned, and since it had the privilege of controlling fiscal and monetary policies in the nation, and the privilege of issuing the money to be used in that nation, this was quite a bonanza for the bankers (especially, since the bankers themselves controlled or decided how much or how many of these bank notes that they would issue).

This elasticity of the money supply was one of the features that the Congress turned over to the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.

In other words, the Fed can issue and distribute all of the paper dollars and bank credits it wants to and whenever it wants to do so--seemingly, without any genuine or real restriction or limitation (of course, there are theoretical limitations in reporting to Congress, but these are of no real value since the Federal Reserve is never audited and it is only the word of the Chairman which reveals Fed action).

Of course, this is no big deal in itself because the Fed owns much of the national debt of the United States and collects interest on that debt. So the Fed has huge sums of incoming money annually to play with, and for the most part, spend however it sees fit (since it is unaudited and operates with great freedom of action).

Thus, the privately owned Fed is the effective owner of the United States money supply. No wonder the Amalekite bankers/masters tried so hard for so many years to establish a US central bank. The pay-offs have been astronomical.

Mechanics of the Fed

The US President does appoint (and the Senate confirms) the seven members of the Board of Governors, to include its chairman. But rest assured, he appoints those individuals who are approved by the big banks. Once appointed, board members cannot be relieved until their 14-year terms of office are completed.

Effectively, these members of the Board of Governors answer to no one in government, although they can supposedly be removed for “personal delinquency.” Moreover, the Fed system has never been audited, as just noted, and it collectively answers to no one, beyond its owners and internal managers.

However, the real power of the Fed lies in its Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) which is the most important organizational element in policy making (per “Encyclopedia Americana”). This group is made up of the seven governors plus one each of the presidents of five of the regional banks with the other seven presidents participating in all meetings and discussions.

Beyond the FOMC, the New York regional bank is the next source of power within the overall system. First, the president of the NY bank is automatically a member of the FOMC. Second, an official of the NY bank serves as manager of the System Open Market Account which implements the general directives and decisions of the FOMC (per Americana).

Third, most of the US taxpayer owned gold supply is held by the NY bank (this is inconceivable but true. Under the Federal Reserve Act, the US gold supply was turned over to this group of international bankers to use, exploit and profit from in their manipulations of the various monetary, stock and derivities’ markets).

Fourth, the NY branch handles the Fed’s purchases and sales of securities (this reality allows the Fed to enter, participate and speculate in the various financial markets). Fifth, it seems that the New York branch is a sort of “mother” bank for the rest of the system. And last, the NY bank is certainly the base of operations of the FOMC and the Fed’s Board of Governors.

Fed Operations

When the Fed was set up, one of its purposes was supposedly to provide the US government and banking system with an elastic supply of money, as noted above (in case of a monetary crisis). Based on this concept, the Fed has unlimited powers to create money out of the thin air (either dollar bills with the printing presses or bank credits with bookkeeping entries).

Thus, when the US Government needs money, the Fed will buy all US securities which the Treasury cannot sell on the open market. This practice is called a monetization of the debt. Once the Fed has these securities, it can either sell them on the open market or retain them and draw interest on them from the US taxpayers.

This interest game is supposedly not all that bad because the Fed theoretically operates on the basis of its interest income; and of course, she can use this interest for anything desired. Ostensibly, the Fed returns unspent interest moneys to the US Treasury at the end of the year. In other words, it can spend any or all of this money without any accountability.

Financial Market Manipulations

Besides the Fed’s activities, as discussed above, the Federal Reserve (operating in collusion with the International Monetary Fund, Bank for International Settlements, World Bank, European central banks and the international banking community in general) allows the big bankers to manipulate world currency, financial and futures markets (none of which are truly free, independent or market responsive to supply and demand) from behind the scenes (so that the super rich bankers can continually make gobs of money).

The Fed managers operate by creating money from the printing presses and by bookkeeping entries made on the ledgers of the banking system, as pointed out above (some call this creating money out of thin air).