EZEKIEL

 

and YHWH’s

 

 Judgment

 

 

for the

 

Good News

 

PEOPLE

 

 

 

VOLUME XXI

 

Christian Sociology

 

 

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

 

 

Judgment for the

 

 

 Good News People

 

 

 

 

Volume XXI--Christian Sociology

 

 

 

 

 

by

 

an unworthy servant

 

 

 

 

 

 

And you shall know the truth,

 

and the truth will make you free.

 

(John 8:32)

 

 

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho.  The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States.  Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

 

 

Volume XXI--Christian Sociology 

 

 

CHAPTER                                                                              PAGE

 

 

      -                  Cover Page                                                                                                         1

 

      -                  Title Page                                                                                                             2

 

      -                  Contents                                                                                                              3

 

      -                  Publisher’s Preface                                                                                           5

 

 

Part MMM--Humanistic Problems 

 

      313             Christian Humanism and Feminism                                                               6

 

      314             Christian Humanism and Race I                                                                   12

 

      315             Christian Humanism and Race II                                                                  23

 

      316             Christian Humanism and Race III                                                                 28

 

      317             Christian Humanism and Race IV                                                                41

 

      318             Christian Humanism and Race V                                                                 51

 

 

Part NNN--Humanistic Sodomy 

 

      319             Christian Humanism and Sodomy I                                                              62

 

      320             Christian Humanism and Sodomy II                                                             69

 

      321             A Sodomite President                                                                                      83

 

      322             Christian Acceptance of Sodomy                                                                  91

 

      323             More Sodomy from Christian America                                                          99

 

 

Part OOO--Children 

 

      324             Christian Humanism and Children I                                                           112

 

      325             Christian Humanism and Children II                                                          119

 

      326             Christian Humanism and Children III                                                         131

 

      327             Christian Humanism and Children IV                                                        147

 

      328             Christian Humanism and Children V                                                         158

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

 

 

Publisher’s Preface

 

Greetings!  The following presentation is volume twenty-one of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site. 

 

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world.  In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one. 

 

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material.  It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message! 

 

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1.  It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins:  left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers). 

 

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope. 

 

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers.  May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him.  Shalom (peace) to you and yours! 

 

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 313--Christian Humanism and Feminism

 

 

Some History 

 

The die for what has happened here in the age end on women was actually cast as early as the summer of 1847 in the United States.  That summer, a group of men and women assembled for a convention at Seneca Falls, New York.  On July 19th and 20th of that year, some 68 women and 32 men in the group signed a “Declaration of Principles.” 

 

The statement said:  “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men and women are created equal... The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having a direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her.” 

 

By 1920, the US had guaranteed voting rights for all women in a constitutional amendment.  Surely, the American establishment has changed dramatically for the worse since those days. 

 

 

The Women’s Feminist Movement 

 

Thus, in the new modern way of looking at things, women have supposedly been oppressed and discriminated against for long centuries in the White-male (specifically the WASP, White-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant male), dominated culture.  Per this modern liberal view, women are no longer supposed to be at the home having babies and caring for the children and home. 

 

No!  All of a sudden, women are exactly the same as men (but are they?  The proponents of this nonsense are incredibly stupid and diabolically deranged).  Being the equal of men, women must now be eligible to hold the same jobs and do the same things as men.  There can be no distinction between the sexes in the modern USA (hence, US Naval warships have become floating whorehouses). 

 

 

The Fall-Out 

 

Of course, only an idiot can’t tell what has happened in the United States since the feminist movement has attained success.  This nation is experiencing an explosion in broken homes, divorces, unhappiness, suicides, and numbers of unwanted and/or illegitimate children, who at most may only have one parent, usually the mother, beyond other sad manifestations, to be shortly broached. 

 

The popular TV talk show host Oprah Winfrey endorses and promotes a book club which focuses upon emotional issues of interest to women (Jul 27, 2001, “The Week,” p. 10).  The 43 books sold so far reflect a world where the men lie, cheat and kill; the women are suicidal alcoholics and adulterers; and the children are unloved, abused and kidnapped.  Yes, this is what the modern feminist movement has produced. 

 

The Mar-Apr 2001 “Philadelphia Trumpet” (p. 21) gave these statistics:  Some 45% of new marriages will end in divorce; 68% of remarriages will end in divorce; 40% of married adults have been divorced; 25% of all adults have parents who have been divorced; and over one million children each year see their parents divorce. 

 

In terms of all marriages, currently, the overall divorce rate is now 63% (per the Dec 28, 2001, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 15).  Manifestly, the modern feminist movement and ideology have not been good.  Truly, they have been disasters for women. 

 

In the permissive, welfare, give away state, the broken homes and unwed mothers are supposedly not much of a problem (since the government steps in and gives them monthly checks and welfare aid of all sorts).  Of course, the welfare program only helps to encourage more and more divorces, broken homes and illegitimate babies. 

 

Also, of great concern, girls used to be sugar and spice and everything nice.  But no longer, under the new feminism.  All of a sudden, there has developed “problem girls,” who will grow up to look like butches and be tough as nails. 

 

“US News & World Report” of May 14, 2001 (p. 10), had an array of percentage changes in various levels of crime and violence from 1990 to 1999 by gender for children under age 18. 

 

In all categories (drug abuse, curfew and loitering, assault, weapons and vandalism), the increases were substantially higher for girls than boys.  The overall arrest rate for girls in 1990 went from 70 per 100,000 up to 122 per 100,000 in 1999.  Of the 150,700 arrests for juveniles running away, some 59% were girls.  Of the total 2.47 million juvenile arrests in 1999, some 27.2% were of girls (up from 22.7% in 1990). 

 

 

Working Women 

 

In the current sun worship culture, all kinds of women have to enter the work-force to help the family with income to survive.  Actually, this is wrong.  All women should have men in some capacity in their lives to provide, protect and support them with love, care and concern.  In the case of married women, they are furthermore due their conjugal rights, per YHWH’s Torah. 

 

Thus, women should not be in the work-force beyond those situations where they are alone and have no man to provide for them.  Obviously, some have to work to live.  And for those women working, they should be fairly paid and treated vis-à-vis men.  Working women should not be adversely discriminated against. 

 

They should be recognized as the weaker sex and accordingly so treated.  The Scriptural reality of gender separation has been established in prior chapters.  There is no need to repeat it here.  Suffice to say, it is Scriptural for women to be separated from men and to fulfill their role in life in being a helpmate to men and the mother of children.  This is a good thing. 

 

Conversely, there is a great tragedy in some circles (among almost all Colored peoples, and tragically even among so-called Whites who have heavy Colored genes).  Negroes and White people with evident Black genes are particularly abusive and oppressive with their women. 

 

Of course, this condition is wrong and represents sin.  As it has been described at length in previous chapters on culture, nothing further needs to be said here. 

 

Suffice to say, women historically (at least, in Caucasian lands, and among Caucasian peoples) were never treated as equals or just one of the boys.  They should be (and used to be) treated  better than one of the boys.  But all that has changed in modern America.  Today’s woman is one of the boys. 

 

Upon divorce (which comes regularly and often in today’s culture), women should receive alimony and financial support if they are illegally divorced (by their husbands) without a proper Scriptural cause.  In olden days, men could expect to pay alimony and “wife support” upon divorce.  Now, women are on their own and receive nothing.  Too often, they must work to survive. 

 

 

More “Progress” by Women 

 

A very pathetic report from the US military surfaced in the fall of 2000 when the Navy reported that it was going to spend $561 million to convert the urinals on Navy warships to gender neutral commodes to accommodate the women on board.  Some 3,000 of them are to be changed at a cost of $187,000 each (Nov 20, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2).  Is this insanity or what? 

 

But there are still more crazy US maneuvers.  Periodically, television cameras pick up on some small, frail, woman, American soldier loaded down with a big gun and heavy military gear headed around the world for deployment in a foreign nation.  Even locally, other, frail, weak women are shown as police officers, carrying guns, which they can hardly lift or carry around, much less use in a real emergency. 

 

These pictures (and their realities) are just too ridiculous to be true.  Yet, they are true.  Only a fool will depend on most of these military and police women in an emergency.  They are badly out of their YHWH created roles and totally incapable of providing any defense to this nation when it is ultimately judged by The HIGHEST for its sins.  Like Yechezkel wrote--when this nation is attacked, no one goes out to fight (Ezek 7:14). 

 

Manifestly, it is absolutely ludicrous for modern Americans to be choosing to send their young women all over the world, carrying guns and personal effects that they can barely lift, much less carry into battle and use. 

 

The whole stupidity of this ridiculous exercise over feminism in the military brings to mind some fascinating observations by J. R. Nyquist, in his book “Origins of the 4th World War” (p. 74), on the wisdom (or rather stupidity) of the Aleksandr Kerensky provisional government in Russia in 1917 (when the Czar was forced out). 

 

As Nyquist tells it, Kerensky organized a women’s battalion of 300 women soldiers to supposedly prop him and his government up.  On the night of the Bolshevik coup, this battalion of women launched a supposed counter-attack.  When the battle was over, the 300 women force was gone.  They all had been captured, raped and/or plundered. 

 

 

More Insanity 

 

Now, that society has went insane over women’s rights and the feminist movement, there has been an enormous push for women to enter into all kinds of competitive sports.  It isn’t only that women are competing against other women, but the push has been on for women to compete with men in rough, contact sports. 

 

Already, there are any number of professional women wrestlers and boxers.  While these have usually involved women against women, there is a move afoot to cast women against men in some instances. 

 

Football is one of the classic illustrations of women wanting to play with men.  Any number of females have come out and tried to get on the men’s teams, although it would be an utter disaster for women to compete with men in such activities. 

 

The fall of 2000 saw a woman named Heather Mercer try out as a place kicker for the Duke University football team.  She and four other place kickers were later cut from the team’s roster for not having the necessary skills.  She sued the school in court, claiming gender discrimination. 

 

At the trial, the coach and several players all testified that she did not have the kicking and playing skills needed to make the team.  Notwithstanding this critical reality of her qualifications, she won her suit in court and was awarded a judgment of $2 million in punitive damages (Nov 12, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 23).  Obviously, America has reached the sick point on this whole theme. 

 

Otherwise, one of the prime reasons why so many married women have to work is because the American sun worship tax structure is so high for all people, except the very rich (as described elsewhere herein).  With taxes at the 60% level for the typical American, wives have to leave home and enter the work-force. 

 

Taxes have been steadily going up ever since Roosevelt came to power back in the 1930s.  The upward spiral only continues with no let-up in sight (as discussed in former chapters).  The point is that the present sun worship taxation system necessitates that both husbands and wives work. 

 

The essence of this is that women should not be in the work-force, except in unusual situations.  In general, they should have a man to take care of them which will allow them to be at home taking care of the children and home.  In a word, they should be publicly “separated” from men as much as possible, as discussed in a former chapter. 

 

 

The Paula Jones Case 

 

A later chapter will elaborate upon the Paula Jones lawsuit against former President Slick Clinton and how this poor woman from a trailer park was shuffled around by the United States court system.  As late as April 1998, the local Arkansas Judge Susan Wright threw the case out of court. 

 

In her decision, Wright said that assuming the facts were all true, as alleged by Jones, the case would still not constitute sexual harassment, although she did allow that perhaps Slick could have been sued or tried in court for assault if Jones and/or the state would have chosen that course.  However, this option was out since the statute of limitations had expired. 

 

The point of this affair is that the women’s lib movement supported Slick all the way throughout this litigation.  The hypocritical women’s motion never gave any support to Jones--apparently because she was a poor woman from a trailer park, rather than being an elite feminist from the Ivy League and/or the Eastern establishment. 

 

Now that Judge Susan Wright joined in with Bill to effectively deny Paula Jones her day in court, it spelled an absolute disgrace and sick condition in the United States when a poor woman who works as a state employee can be accosted, harassed and intimidated by the Governor of that state and have no recourse at law. 

 

This means that male supervisors at all levels can now sexually abuse, hurt, intimidate and harass innocent women under their supervision and control; and at least, by Judge Wright’s decision, nothing will be done about it.  The stupid and ridiculous women’s movement (under Amalekite leadership) suffered a major setback in Wright’s decision. 

 

 

A Final Word on Feminism 

 

Historically, in America, and indeed around the world, certain things have historically been referred to in the feminine gender.  Nations, corporations and organizations of various types are referred to as she or her.  Even in the Scriptures, nations and religious bodies are mentioned in the feminine gender. 

 

Thus, all kinds of things are referred to with female references and/or female names.  For example, hurricanes and typhoons have historically been given the names of women.  Ships at sea and airplanes have routinely been given female names (like the famous Enola Gay that flew off of Tinian Island in the Pacific to drop the first atomic bomb on Japan in 1945). 

 

But all this has been changing--sometimes slowly, but nevertheless deliberately.  The last several years have seen global weather people start using both male and female names for hurricanes and typhoons.  The latest fad is that the shipping industry is ending centuries of tradition to start referring to ships as “it” instead of “her” (Apr 8, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2). 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 314--Christian Humanism and Race I

 

 

Racial Integration and Free Sex 

 

Racial integration and amalgamation are some of the backbone philosophies of Christian humanists which have gained widespread social acceptance throughout the United States during the past 70 years.  The humanists really suppose that all humans/humanoids, of whatever kind or type, descend from Adam and Eve; and that there is a “brotherhood” of all of these different humans/humanoids. 

 

As commented upon elsewhere in this study, this brotherhood of man concept comes from the old sun worship cults where most of them preached it.  It was particularly important among the Chrishna and other Eastern sun worshippers, who have played such an enormous role in the formation and development of Christian theology. 

 

The basis for this Christian thinking was well put by Dr Burton L. Mack when he suggested that Christians have seen themselves as a social construct.  Often, they have believed that they constitute a congregation, a household, a family, a nation, a temple, a city or a kingdom (“Who Wrote the New Testament? The Making of a Christian Myth,” p. 12). 

 

Christian denominationalism and division, since the surfacing of the Protestant Reformation, have altered this thinking somewhat.  While many denominations would never see themselves in a family with collective Christianity, they can and often do relate to that definition for their own individual groups.  And they relate to it in the context that all members are automatically in the brotherhood. 

 

Thus, this concept of a brotherhood of man is pretty prevalent throughout Christian America, as proven by persons like Sydney Cleveland, editor of the Sabbath Sentinel (mentioned earlier), and the secularist Vice President Al Gore (supposedly a Christian) who referred to a brotherhood and sisterhood of Americans at a meeting of the freedom of choice (abortion) people on January 22, 1997 (evidently in Washington, DC). 

 

 

The Christian Attitude 

 

This sun worship thinking has been well prevalent in almost all of Christendom--clearly from its very beginnings (even in the Old South, in its days of slavery and racial segregation). 

 

Perhaps the best statement of this was made by the World Council of Churches when it adopted a miscegenation and amalgamation resolution at its second Assembly in 1954 at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. 

 

Their resolution declared that “Segregation on the grounds of race, colour or ethnical origin in all forms is in conflict with the Gospel and must be regarded as irreconcilable with Christian teaching about man and the essence of the Church of Christ... There can be no objection in principle to intermarriage... No state has the right to prohibit mixed marriages.” 

 

Not wishing to be left out of this modern insanity over racial integration and the destruction of The ELOHIM created, separate races, the National Council of Churches adopted a sun worship creed which proclaims-- “One God and Father, One Race of Men Within the Church.” 

 

 

School Desegregation 

 

In an article on “The Unity of the Church,” appearing in “Essays on Segregation,” Dr George M. Brydon noted that “the opinion rendered by the Supreme Court in May 1954 seems to have introduced into the thinking of Christian America “a new thought which has gone racing into many sections of our country.

 

“It has developed into almost a new item to be placed in the creeds of all churches that the Divine plan is to merge all races of men into one race.” 

 

Of course, this May 1954 decision was the famous one in Brown versus the Board of Education which declared school segregation illegal in the United States, despite the fact that the 10th amendment to the US Constitution clearly left such questions to the individual states and earlier Supreme Court decisions had recognized this condition. 

 

So the court began a process of re-writing the Constitution, on its own terms, by judicial interpretation.  One of the interesting things about this judicial interpretation (to change the US Constitution) is that it demonstrates the limitations, fallacies and shortcomings of human laws as opposed to The ELOHIM’s laws. 

 

Human laws change regularly at the whim of evil men while YHWH’s laws never change.  Not only did the court declare racial segregation in the public schools illegal, but later courts and governing administrations forced this concept on all private schools as well (mainly, by manipulating the tax code to force racial integration and miscegenation on them). 

 

Not content with the change in laws, the courts went to work to impose the bussing of children all over large areas to also achieve “racial mixing.”  This stupidity has not only wrecked the schools, it has been a disaster for the students.  Now, children have to spend hours every day on school buses to be sure that they get “integrated” (and may develop cancer from diesel fumes from the buses, per news reports on Feb 12, 2001). 

 

While there have been a host of horrible social fall-outs over school desegregation, one of the most profound, deleterious effects has been the dumbing down of American education (which a few Americans are now beginning to take note of). 

 

It looks like ignorant, sun worshipping liberals would be able to put two and two together and realize that the decline in American education started primarily in the 1950s with racial integration of the schools.  But they never understand.  More will be said on this theme in later remarks. 

 

 

Mother Sardis, Revisited  

 

Of course, collective Christianity is now on this sun worshipping bandwagon which is trying to promote and encourage racial amalgamation at every opportunity.  A good illustration of this insanity was demonstrated in the “Bible Advocate,” church magazine of the Church of God (Seventh Day), mother church of the entire, lethargic, Sardis movement, previously mentioned (Rev 3:1-6). 

 

This mother Sardis group (historically a White church) now has a Black president (evidently under an affirmative action program).  One of her other leading Negro ministers is reportedly married to a White woman. 

 

Of course, the (former) editor of this miscegenated mess (Roy A. Marrs) got on board to do his part in attempting to destroy the separate races which were created as “good” by The MOST HIGH. 

 

It seems that this Sardis magazine for May 1997 published a story (“Prayer for a Mother”) about a single, White woman (referred to as a lady) who gave birth to a Negro baby--out of wedlock.  Quite naturally, there was never a hint or suggestion of anything wrong over this situation in the printed article. 

 

One Spokane, Washington reader of the story was disturbed with the way it was handled editorially and wrote a letter to the editor, suggesting that the tone of the article was that mongrelization was good, and that the woman was held up as a moral lady (thus, a role model of sorts; when, in fact, she was a cheap, White whore). 

 

The Sep 1997 “Bible Advocate” published the short one paragraph reader’s letter, along with an “Editor’s Note” which proceeded to attack the reader (with eight paragraphs of comment) for attitude and unwarranted judgments (effectively, for daring to write in). 

 

The Sardis editor didn’t dispute that she might have been a whore or that mixed race “marriages” might be Scripturally wrong (Marrs did write marriages and not illicit sex).  Instead, he tried to say that the article was “neutral” on those points, but did argue that the woman was a good woman since she did not abort the mongrel child. 

 

Going on, Marrs attacked the reader for judgments which he allegedly didn’t have any proof on--such as she being a whore, while it was possible that she became pregnant through some innocent action, accident or mistake (the rebellious justification for fornication and pregnancy by many unwed mothers). 

 

As Editor Marrs tried to argue, the article teaches “compassion,” the need to assume good things about people and to pray for sinners (but as noted earlier, YHWH wants repentance first and then prayer).  The editor’s bottom line was that he had no reason to apologize for printing the article.  In other words, everything was handled perfectly by his church, despite his uncertainty over whether miscegenation is right or wrong. 

 

 

The Liberal Approach 

 

Marrs followed the established liberal and humanist positions of essentially avoiding the facts; and instead, concentrating upon the person making the complaint.  As always, liberals will not deal with the facts (because of being under demonic powers and influence), but will divert attention to personalities by attempting to ridicule and demean anyone who questions their actions on the basis of fact and logic. 

 

As elsewhere commented upon beforetime, it is virtually impossible to intellectually have dialogue with liberals when they will not deal with logic, facts and evident truth.  Inevitably, they want to immediately shift any argument away from truth and reality and focus it upon personalities.  They especially direct their attacks upon anyone who questions their actions or beliefs. 

 

As a follow-up, after printing the above exchange, the Sardis people at Denver received other pro and con reader’s letters on the issue.  They printed a couple of them in their December 1997 magazine.  One dead, Sardis writer wrote that “I believe that interracial marriage is appropriate” in the eyes of “God,” more than interfaith marriage (Dec 1997 “Bible Advocate,” p. 16). 

 

Another dead, Sardis respondent suggested that after “Christ,” the church was united across language, national and ethnic lines and that “God” is pleased to see His children marry across racial lines (ibid, p. 16).  This one also cited Timothy as being the son of a mixed-race marriage (never understanding that Timothy’s Jew-Greek ancestry, assuredly focused on religion and not race at all). 

 

Editor Marrs, to his credit, did mention Deuteronomy 22:9-11, in defense of how he had handled the original question.  Nevertheless, this resurfacing of the question proves that many Sardis believers are as hoodwinked and Scripturally uninformed as the rest of the American, sun worshipping population. 

 

Of course, this event and the way mother Sardis handled it is a classic illustration of the depravity and sickness in traditional, sun worshipping Christianity which this Sardis church is a part of (they may keep the Sabbath; but otherwise, most of the Sardis doctrines and beliefs are basically sun worship--just as is true with the rest of Christendom). 

 

 

Accuse the Accuser 

 

This tragic and sickening action by a sick, warped, sun worship church in a sun worship culture is important to review and think about because it demonstrates the pathetic state that modern Christianity and the American culture have deteriorated into. 

 

If a person tries to raise a legitimate question about such an obviously controversial article, then the editor merely turns the focus from the article to the reader who would dare write in to complain.  That’s the way the liberals and Christian humanists operate.  Anyone writing a contrary letter to a liberal editor can normally expect to receive a personal attack, if not to be just ignored. 

 

Former President Slick Clinton has been following this modis operandi ever since he entered politics.  Let someone complain publicly or in print over how Slick had abused and misused his office or over how immoral, crooked and dishonest he had been, and the White House reaction was not to deny the charges.  Instead, it attacked the person speaking out (accuse the accuser). 

 

Some years ago, in government service, this writer fired a worthless lawyer (who was an evident Amalekite, although i did not know it at the time).  He immediately sued me for discrimination, claiming that he was fired because of him being a Jew.  From his viewpoint, any disciplinary actions against him would be because of racial and religious discrimination and not because of his job performance. 

 

Instead of a focus being made upon his work and duties which prompted the dismissal, he turned the issue around to focus upon me.  In other words, his conduct became a non-issue and my conduct became the total question in court.  The point of this is that it has become virtually impossible to impose any disciplinary standards upon Blacks, Jews and other so called minorities today in the US. 

 

 

More Sardis Depravity 

 

Early 1998 saw former President Slick Clinton announce a Presidential Commission on Diversity which seemed to be a project of doing nothing, but giving Clinton and his political cronies a forum to publicize their great concern and compassion over Colored Americans and the desire to achieve more and more cultural and racial integration and amalgamation, contrary to the wishes of most people of all races. 

 

Seeing this stupid motion underway, the Black President of the Church of God (Seventh Day) followed up with his own scheme of diversity for the old, mother, Sardis church--built, financed, funded, supported, motivated and directed largely by ignorant White Americans over the last 145 years. 

 

This new Sardis leader launched his own “President’s Commission on Diversity,” as announced in the “Bible Advocate” for July-August 1998 (p. 19).  The Sardis leadership is committed to the task of ministry to all peoples and races in the context of diversity (just like the historic sun worshippers have traditionally done). 

 

The new commission will devise a statement expressing the church’s commitment to diversity; design a plan for diversity training, awareness, and development throughout the church; and help ensure that the ministries, priorities, and programs of the conference reflect diversity. 

 

This new Sardis commission of ten people (headed up by a woman) is clearly diversified--at least, in accordance with affirmative action concepts.  It consists of three Hispanic males and one Hispanic female, one Black male and one Black female, one possibly White male and three possibly White females.  The word “possibly” has been used because one can never be sure about White people. 

 

Often, reported Whites are Amalekites, posing as White majority types.  As a minimum, the one White male would likely be a liberal leftist who would sell his own race and kind out for nothing.  The three supposed White women are surely feminists who are in absolute rebellion against their YHWH ordained roles of silence, humility and submission. 

 

 

More Multi-Culturalism and Integration 

 

The Jul-Aug 2000 “Bible Advocate” followed the precedent established in prior issues with a new blast promoting and encouraging multi-culturalism and racial amalgamation.  This issue was led by a “Love and Let Love” theme.  The front cover had a photo of a supposedly White man “rapping” or dialoging with some tall Black teenagers (with sunglasses, necklaces and baseball caps on backward). 

 

Presumably, the alleged White man was a Christian of some sort (though he did have a very pronounced Hittite nose) who might have been supposedly reaching out for interracial harmony and contact with the Black youths (who appeared to be rappers). 

 

An interior Christian love and relationship article had a picture of a woman with her arms wrapped around a very definite Negro man (Jul-Aug 2000 “Bible Advocate,” p. 8).  Though the article was on marriage, the woman had no wedding band.  So maybe, they were not supposed to be husband and wife (just lovers). 

 

While some would suppose that her dark complexion and long black hair meant that she had African genes, the true was that she appeared to be very European in bone structure and appearance.  Thus, she could well have been a Southern European from Italy, Spain, Portugal or Greece or otherwise a Middle Easterner of some sort.  Clearly, this photo of her hugging a very Negro man sent the wrong message. 

 

Another article on Christian love (ibid, p. 12-13) also had a photo which sent bad vibes to impressionable young children.  This one was of a reasonably dark teenage boy (who appeared to be a Mexican or Hispanic).  He too had a teenage girl with her arms wrapped around him (from behind) and wearing no wedding ring.  But she was very white in color, compared with his dark skin and Hispanic genetic features. 

 

Apparently, the “Bible Advocate” bought these photographs from some agency and merely used them in the magazine to supposedly prove Christian love. 

 

The only problem with the choice of photos is that all three failed on the love angle.  And instead, they promoted multi-culturalism and promiscuous, interracial sex and miscegenation.  They were very poor examples of things to be shown to innocent, gullible, White children. 

 

 

Something Missing 

 

The only thing missing from the Bible Advocate articles about the Sardis efforts in trying to create an interracial and multi-cultural organization is how many of these dead, Sardis people are Pentecostal Holy Rollers who could liven up their interracial meetings and contacts with some wild fanaticism. 

 

Although the article didn’t say, the truth is that historic Sardis has been opposed to this demonism on occasion.  However, having never effectively dealt with the problem, the motion has surfaced from time to time in Sardis churches. 

 

It’s easy to say that this unique new Sardis thinking on racial diversity/multi-racialism (which, by the way, is absolutely and totally unscriptural) will accomplish nothing for Whites.  It will be more humanism and amalgamation of the races to further destroy the White majority that financed, worked and built this rebellious, Sardis church. 

 

Since this wicked, sun worship, Sardis group is so pathetic and so blatant in its sun worship practices, maybe it should be destroyed.  In any case, she likely will soon crumble from her own weight because of her insistence on violating the Words of YHWH. 

 

At the moment, the self destruction process seems to be the path now being followed by mother Sardis, as she integrates and miscegenates herself into oblivion.  The Jun 2003 “Bible Advocate” (p. 19) showed the modern success of Sardis in a photo of a pretty, young, White girl seated next to a Black boy in attendance at a church, youth rally on Apr 12-13, 2003, in Conroe, Texas. 

 

This apparent teen-age couple were wearing similar T-shirts and seemed to be smiling and enjoying themselves at the interracial meeting going on in Texas.  It is stupid moves like this insanity which will manifestly end mother Sardis.  And because of her gross sins and wickedness, mother Sardis should end.  The world will be better off without her influence. 

 

Please be assured that if this wicked, Sardis Church does not self destruct in the present mode, her day is certainly coming when The ELOHIM will intervene to destroy this sick and lacking institution.  Manifestly, as more and more Coloreds integrate and miscegenate, this group will reach a point of being useless for any good purpose.  Self destruction seems inevitable.  YHWH’s justice sometimes works out in strange ways. 

 

 

A Classic 

 

Incidentally, in mentioning the efforts of mother Sardis to destroy herself, it should be noted that she has an internal Hispanic group which had a “Texas Hispanic Convocation” in Texas in Nov 2002 (Jan-Feb 2003 “Bible Advocate,” p. 17).  Can anyone perceive the uproar if the Whites in Texas had held a White people convocation?  An absolute crisis would have resulted.  Truly, it is a hypocrite world! 

 

 

A Final Note on Sardis Depravity 

 

While it would seem that mother Sardis has hit the bottom of the barrel on depravity, there was more to come which must be highlighted.  The Sardis Black President had a “President’s message” in the Oct 1999 “Bible Advocate” (p. 18).  This one was entitled “The Tale of Two Crosses.”  

 

In the article, the Sardis leader said that the cross was the core of Christianity and was central to the Gospel.  He then called the Sardis people to a “radical commitment to the cross.”  He challenged Sardis believers to unwrap it, embrace it and raise it high for all the world to see.  He concluded by saying that the “cross of Christ” offers life.  

 

Of course, this is typical Christian nonsense from people who simply don’t know what the Book is all about.  Its significance, however, is in the fact that vast numbers of Sardis people have correctly understood the evils of the Christian cross over the years.  Historically, Sardis writings did not seem to come out in favor of this pagan symbol of sun worship, as their president advanced in the Oct 1999 magazine. 

 

In any case, the article prompted a reader’s letter who took exception to the church’s advocacy of the Christian cross.  And naturally, the editor (Calvin Burrell) defended his leader in the Mar 2000 issue on readers’ letters (Oct 1999 “Bible Advocate,” p. 17).  He argued that the cross was an appropriate symbol for Christians--like other Christian symbols (dove, light, trumpet, tables of stone, pictures, etc). 

 

The point in bringing up this issue on the cross is not to single out the Church of God (Seventh Day) for paying homage and support to the pagan cross symbol of ancient sun worship (as is proven in this study at hand).  The issue is a bigger one because it demonstrates the level of depravity and wickedness in the mother, Sardis definition. 

 

Sardis, like the rest of Christianity, has grown more wicked and has departed even more from YHWH’s truth over the years.  Because there is so much depravity and wretchedness in this sick organization, judgment will soon strike hard on her when it strikes Christian America. 

 

 

The Effect of Christian Thinking on Race, Revisited  

 

Consequently, being ignorant of what the Scriptures really say, the humanists (secular and Christian) are rushing in to completely destroy all of the separate races and bring about a society of one race (which has been an objective of the Devil for 6,000 years with the hoped for destruction of Adam, who was made in YHWH’s image--not the behemah or chaiyah--see Gen 1:27; 6:1-9; 11:1-9). 

 

It is quite obvious that the entire concept of racial integration and amalgamation is at serious odds with YHWH’s Torah (as discussed earlier) and the whole meaning of the Hebrew word kodesh (also mentioned earlier).  The Hebrew kodesh means separate, set apart and separation (yes, segregation); and its focus is partly on racial considerations (for reasons described earlier). 

 

Therefore, the rebellious humanists were among the first to work on a social plane to end all laws prohibiting miscegenation (yes, almost all US states had such laws until they were declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court a few years ago) and to do everything possible in governments, schools and churches to destroy Adam by miscegenation and mongrelization.

 

Their incredible success is amply demonstrated in just a few statistics on how attitudes have changed since racial integration and amalgamation became acceptable.  In 1958, 4% of US Whites approved of interracial marriages; while in 1997, the figure had risen to 61% (per H. Millard in the Jul-Aug 1997 “Jubilee,” p. 17). 

 

Later statistics from a 2001 survey by the “Washington Post” and others showed that interracial sex was up even more significantly.  As reported in the Jul 27, 2001, “The Week” (p. 10), this survey said that four in ten Americans have dated someone of another race and that 75% of these were serious romances.  Some 86% of Blacks say that they would date Whites and some 90% of Whites say that they would date Blacks. 

 

 

Human Gods? 

 

Since the human being is a type of god (deciding right and wrong), then the humanists have pushed for the removal of all restraints on sex--including homosexuality, premarital fornication; and of course, the just mentioned miscegenation. 

 

This gross, sexual permissiveness was the prevailing situation in most of the old sun worship cults in ancient Greece and Rome and as now evident in modern Christian America. 

 

In other words, each person can decide on his/her own about the morality of different sexual situations.  Amalekite controlled Hollywood has helped put this over with its more and more progressively open display of perverted sex at the movies and on TV. 

 

Interracial sex, homosexuality and sex outside of marriage are now commonly shown as good things on the boob tube.  Sex education and the free distribution of condoms have also helped in this regard.  To have a free sex society, abortions (discussed earlier) are almost mandatory or women would be having all kinds of unwanted children--so abortions have been pushed as well. 

 

 

Age Ending Miscegenation Foretold 

 

It is interesting that YESHUA predicted this sickening time when He noted that there would be a repeat of the times of Noah in the age end with people marrying and giving in marriage--obviously illegal marriages, since legal marriages are both proper and ELOHIM ordained (Matt 24:37-38; Lu 17:26-27). 

 

Of course, a check of the Torah does spell out the prevalent miscegenation of Adamites with other created beings in Noah’s day to precipitate the flood (Gen 6:1-3).  As noted in previous comments, Noah was perfect in his racial genealogy, following this period of massive interracial copulation (Gen 6:8-9). 

 

Daniel likewise had some interesting observations which could also be relevant here.  He wrote that as one observes the iron mixed with the tempered clay (in the revived Roman Empire in the age end), “they will mix themselves with the races of mankind” (Dan 2:43, per the Ferrar Fenton translation). 

 

At a first glance, in terms of the contemporary world, one can immediately recognize Adamites (particularly women) crossing with the behemah, chaiyah and nokri.  But in the broader perspective, it may now or later include Adamic women crossing with fallen angels (from UFOs?), just as happened in Noah’s day. 

 

 

Bigger Things Coming 

 

Consequently, this wide acceptance of interracial sex between racially different humans/humanoids could be just a prelude to introduce and desensitize people to accept more advanced miscegenation--involving fallen angels. 

 

On this, it should be noted that some of the people participating in UFO abductions had been or were practicing interracial sex--like a 1961 New England case involving a Negro named Barney Hill and his White wife Betty.  Often, the alleged UFO abductions involve sex in some manner.  This condition will be assessed in some detail in a later chapter focusing upon UFOs. 

 

In short, the pre-flood Adamite peoples had miscegenated themselves out of existence--except for Noah and his immediate family.  Manifestly, this is precisely what is happening right now all over the world (Jer 31:27, described earlier).  Left unchecked, Adamites (and Israelites) will be completely bred out of existence. 

 

As noted in a prior chapter, this writer recalls a college textbook on anthropology put out in the 1950s which recognized the predictable inevitability of one race across the globe.  This textbook went so far to declare that the Polynesians of the Pacific area best represent what this one race would look like physically since the Polynesians are apparently a certain blend of the three to five major races in the world. 

 

 

Balaam’s Words Recalled 

 

Quite naturally, the people of Yisrael have been the first target of this massive miscegenation campaign, although Satan has the larger objective of destroying the Adam kind completely through miscegenation with the other created humanoids.  The intellectual process of accomplishing this genocide was spelled out by Balaam 3,500 years ago, as elaborated upon in a prior chapter beforetime. 

 

The wicked Amalek-Edomites are the obvious persons leading the way on this assault now in progress on the people of Yisrael, as also described in a previous chapter.  As this publication has established in numerous former presentations, the Amalek-Edomites are genetically born with a basic hatred and animosity toward Israelites. 

 

This mind-set completely dominates the mentality and thinking of the majority of them--obviously unconsciously, as most assuredly are unaware of why they think and act as they do. 

 

Since these Amalek-Edomites have accumulated vast resources of wealth and corporate power; ownership of prostitute politicians and government leaders; and control of the media and entertainment industries in the Christian Yisrael nations; they have had the means to fully implement Balaam’s advice. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 315--Christian Humanism and Race II

 

 

Impact of Immigration 

 

A prior chapter herein focused upon the immigration problem and its linkage to diabolical and evil Amalek-Edomites.  It is this Amalekite control over America and the other White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations which has promoted or at least allowed the massive immigration of Coloreds into these countries that were largely White before WWII. 

 

 

Botswana 

 

The stage was set for more of this Colored immigration to White countries in Botswana, Africa in 1997 at the Southern African Dialogue meeting, when the Malaysian leader Mahathir ben Mohammed said that “If the Third World is not offered its rightful share of global wealth, it should use people mobility as the ultimate weapon.” 

 

Going on, Mohammed added:  “We should migrate North in the millions, legally or illegally... masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America” (Sep 1998 “New Beginnings,” p. 16).  Actually, this immigration started earlier than 1997, but it surely has intensified since then. 

 

Mohammed’s words have certainly been coming true--because the Center for Immigration Studies reported on January 4, 2001, that more than 10% of the US population are now immigrants--mostly Coloreds (Jan 22, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 4).  Most have come here in the last ten years. 

 

One would suppose that if millions of Blacks and Asians could migrate into Europe and America to destroy the White culture and civilization, the White nations would have brains enough to take some action to close their borders and protect themselves.  But generally, they appear to be so stupid and decadent that they never understand that a flood of Colored peoples from the Third World will destroy them for ever. 

 

It is also true that ignorant White people and their ridiculous policies of humanism in their governments have helped to speed up this massive immigration which is slowly destroying the moral and cultural foundations of their own nations (even in the absence of an immediate flood of Coloreds, as envisioned by Mohammed). 

 

 

White Christian Encouragement

 

Since government policies have made it extremely difficult (almost impossible) to hire local American farm hands and laborers (because many Americans are lazy and won’t work, due to the welfare programs), many agricultural producers and companies with nasty jobs are importing and hiring numbers of aliens from the Colored Third World (legally and illegally). 

 

When these people come, they typically stay to integrate and mix with the established residents.  This process actually started in the US in the mid 19th century with the importation of Chinese workers to build railroads.  But it has intensified in the post WWII environment. 

 

Money and profits have always been the name of the game.  And the usual American farm family and/or big corporation (since corporations have taken over American agriculture and almost everything else in the US society) could care less about demographics and the future destruction of their own race and kind because of Colored immigration, coupled with massive miscegenation and interracial sex. 

 

 

Mohammed on Reparations 

 

The just quoted words of Malaysian leader Mahathir ben Mohammed actually revealed a two pronged motion.  In the first place, Mohammed declared that “if” the Colored Third World was not offered (correctly “given”) its supposedly rightful share of global wealth, then the Colored Third World should inundate the White, Christian West with Colored immigrants. 

 

These words (or threats, however one may want to take them) are paving the way for enormous global change in both aspects--the efforts of the ignorant goyim to give their wealth away to impoverished Coloreds and to proceed with massive Colored immigration to completely change the demographics in the White Christian West. 

 

Consequently, Colored people from around the world have been actively pursuing both of these objectives.  As outlined in former chapters, they are receiving not only encouragement from the plutocratic Amalekite bankers/masters, but money and other forms of assistance in the leftist political arena to push both objectives to fruition. 

 

 

The American Dilemma 

 

Consequently, the United States has had a very dedicated and professionally led motion (by plutocratic Amalekite bankers/masters) for the US government to pay reparations to Black Americans for their supposedly former slavery and discrimination at the hands of the majority Whites.  The plan is for America to pay each Black person $10,000 (or more). 

 

“Spotlight” (p. 2) of February 28, 2001, offered the obvious conclusion on this line that modern America will now have to pay reparations and restitution to the American Black descendants of slaves who were in the US some 150 years ago.  Sure enough, Congressman John Conyers has introduced legislation to pay these reparations (the Jul 2001 “American Sentinel,” p. 2, says that this motion is serious and may succeed). 

 

Any number of prominent US newspapers and media sources have endorsed the plan and have begun promotional campaigns to mesmerize and zombiize the gullible American public to accept it.  Here, one can mention the “New York Times,” the “Philadelphia Inquirer,” and the “Hartford, Connecticut Courant.” 

 

 

Extortion 

 

Already, various Black power groups (like Jesse Jackson’s PUSH and the NAACP) are going after private businesses with extortion for alleged wrongs to Negroes.  Jesse Jackson and his PUSH organization have extracted millions of dollars from US companies (which panic and run in absolute fear that Jackson will publicly attack them as racists and White supremacists).  Most gladly pay off to stay in his good graces. 

 

The Feb 11, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A10) had an AP report on “Trial set in use of rhyme that has a racist history” which revealed a Black lawsuit in Kansas City which was about as ridiculous as possible.  The basis for this stupidity surfaced when an airline stewardess with Southwest Airlines said “Eenie, meenie, minie, moe:  pick a seat, we gotta go” as a part of asking people to sit down for the takeoff.  

 

Well, too bad for the airlines, but there were two Black women on board who immediately said that they were offended because of the alleged “racist” remark.  They filed a lawsuit against the airline seeking millions of dollars in damages. 

 

Thus, many companies are now being forced to pay huge payoffs in extortion to Blacks or face enormous trouble (of course, their customers end up paying these extortion payments). 

 

The NAACP says that it wants money from insurance companies who formally insured slave owners, as well as restitution from companies who once bought cotton from Southern plantation owners.  These companies will either begin paying huge extortion payments or Black lawyers will move in on them like leeches to really extort money in expensive court actions. 

 

 

Lawsuits 

 

O. J. Simpson’s lawyer Johnnie Cochran and some other leading trial lawyers are making preparations to launch a class action lawsuit by 2003 against the US government and various private corporations which they say benefited from slavery.  The Blacks also want a payoff from Washington because they say that slave labor was involved in building the US capitol. 

 

Apparently, this team of lawyers is led by Black Harvard law professor Charles Ogletree (Mar 1, 2002, “The Week,” p. 36).  The group has organized a Reparations Coordinating Committee which has identified several businesses that they will initially go after--like Aetna Insurance, New York Life, AIG, J. P. Morgan Bank and Chase Manhattan Bank (or now, the J. P.  Morgan-Chase Bank, after its merger). 

 

If success is achieved and they are able to rip off huge sums of money from these businesses, this team of lawyers can extend their scope of operations to all kinds of people, businesses and governmental entities.  The sky is the future in this extortion game; because in the big cities, these lawyers will have largely Black juries who will routinely award huge damages to the Blacks. 

 

In time, this motion could spread to the entire Southern states--to include all governments (city, county and state) and almost all private businesses and citizens of the Old South.  The Black lawyers and supporters can accuse virtually the entirety of the US South for slavery practiced 150 years ago. 

 

With public pressure, the entire South can incur such massive restitution payments to the Blacks that it would destroy the Southern economy and White population.  As will be discussed in a later chapter, the Blacks have long had their eyes set upon taking possession of the American South and establishing a Black government there.  This reparation thing could help pave the way in this endeavor. 

 

When Russian and Chinese conquerors enter the US, their Black allies can present their claims to them for resolution.  Surely, they will be sympathetic and gladly turn over the Old South to the Blacks--lock, stock and barrel. 

 

 

The Global Motion 

 

Actually, Mohammed’s counsel on going after reparations and payoffs (as outlined above) has caught on well beyond the United States--actually all around the world. 

 

Colored Third World nations (through the UN and other global outreaches and power structures) are demanding that White, Western, Christian nations shell out grants to them for all their so-called sufferings and deprivations (as if the Coloreds are not responsible for their troubles, but that the White man is responsible). 

 

The far reaching aspects of this plan was pointed out in a “New American” magazine article of February 2001 on “The True Cost of Reparations,” as quoted in the Mar-Apr 2001 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 1, 4). 

 

As “New American” reported-- “The slavery reparations movement is the domestic element of a global campaign demanding that the developed nations of the West can compensate Africa for their unjust enrichment through supposed exploitation of the continent.”  While this article focused upon Africa’s demand for money, the idea can quickly encompass the world. 

 

Already, the UN has conducted a “World Conference Against Racism, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,” in South Africa in the summer of 2001.  This conference focused upon the question of reparations for Black African countries.  Cuba’s Castro reportedly spoke out in favor of it and led the motion in that direction (Jul 2001 “American Sentinel,” p. 3). 

 

 

More 

 

Of course, the Amalekite bankers/masters are not going to be pushing for Black reparations without them somehow getting in on the action.   And they do have a motion underway. 

 

US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright in February 2000 spoke out in favor of requiring monetary compensation for the “slave laborers” used by the Germans in WWII.  Germany has already paid out billions to so-called holocaust survivors.  The Albright scheme is just one more which will open the door for more German pay outs.  This news report of Albright appeared in the just cited Feb 28, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 2). 

 

As stupid as these various reparation schemes appear, they all may reach fruition (unless the money system destructs first before the votes can be tallied).  As things now stand, the German government will probably have to pay reparations to the descendants of the people used in WWII concentration camp work projects.  Surely, the US will entertain the same idea for American Blacks. 

 

 

Tax Credits  

 

In anticipation of ripping off huge sums of money from the gullible US taxpayers, a movement commenced in 2001 and 2002 for Black people to claim a tax credit for reparations on their tax returns (Apr 29, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 4).  Hundreds of Blacks have claimed these credits and the US Treasury has been allowing them.  Some $30 million was paid out (including almost $90,000 to one recipient). 

 

While these tax credits are illegal and probably will be eventually stopped by the IRS, there is little doubt that the improper pay outs will never be collected.  Thus, the people who worked this scam seem to have gotten away with it. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 316--Christian Humanism and Race III

 

 

Some South African History 

 

Several other chapters in this production address the absolute racial crisis that has erupted in the once stable, prosperous, happy land of South Africa.  A few years ago, the internationalists were able to force racial integration and amalgamation upon the White-minority people of South Africa and the result has been an utter disaster. 

 

While many intelligent observers can grasp what has happened and is happening to South Africa (primarily because of the ruling plutocrats, as will be assessed in later chapters), the “why” for this catastrophe seems to largely escape recognition.  To appreciate the why, it is necessary to review some South African history. 

 

At the start, it must be realized that all of the peoples now in South Africa came here over the years since 1500 as immigrants.  Before 1500, even Blacks were located North near the Congo River.  They started moving into East Central Africa in about 1500 (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 790). 

 

The first White, Dutch settlers came to the Southern part of Africa in 1652 and established the Cape Colony (which covered Southern Africa).  When these Whites arrived, they found the area largely uninhabited, though there were a few neighboring, primitive, Black Bushmen (pigmies) and Hottentots (also known as Khokhoi, which inhabited Namibia, a territory to the North of South Africa). 

 

Over the years, these Bushmen and Hottentots have totally vanished from historic South Africa (because of the encroaching civilization of the Whites, the murderous slaughter of other Blacks in Natal by the Zulus [as described in a prior chapter], and for other reasons).  However, some 40,000 of the Khokhoi still live in Namibia today (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 450). 

 

As pointed out in a previous chapter, it seems probable also that the Zulus (a historic Bantu people) inhibited Zululand (in Natal, to the North and East of the Cape Colony), evidently from the 16th century on (they probably arrived in the Natal from the migrations of Bantu Africans from the North, as indicated above). 

 

Besides the early Dutch, other Whites also came to the Cape Colony over the years.  French Huguenot settlers came in the years 1688-1694; and eventually, the British came and took over the colony by force in 1795 (“An Encyclopedia of World History,” p, 884).  Slowly, White settlements to the North in Natal and Botswana began to increase.  

 

 

The Economic Considerations 

 

As early as 1657, the White Dutch began to practice slavery using Black slaves from the North.  But slavery was never a big undertaking in South Africa.  By 1707, there were only 1,100 slaves as compared with 1,780 White freeholders (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 790).  Even when the British abolished slavery in 1834, there were only 34,000 slaves (“An Encyclopedia of World History,” p. 885). 

 

With the abolishment of slavery, it appears that most of the South Afrikaners were Whites.  Even the large Zulu population (to the North) was in the Natal province, which was separate in the early days from South Africa proper (which was effectively the old Cape Colony).  Zululand was annexed to South Africa in 1887. 

 

And this was the prevailing racial climate in South Africa for the next many years.  Black laborers were so short in supply that the fat cat owners of sugar plantations in Natal began to import Indians from India to work the plantations in 1860. 

 

This was the next group of immigrants to impact upon South Africa.  This motion included the famous Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948), a lawyer, who came to South Africa for awhile as a young man to represent the Indians present and to cause trouble (as he did). 

 

In 1886, gold was discovered in the Transvaal and by 1888, diamonds had also become important in Southern Africa.  The famous Cecil Rhodes (founder of the Rhodes Trust and the British round tables, to be later discussed) and various fat cats (mainly Amalekites) rushed in to make all the money that they could from the gold and diamond fields. 

 

The new mining companies (450 of them in the Transvaal by 1890) created a need for huge numbers of laborers and workers.  The small White, Indian and Zulu populations in South Africa could not supply them.  Obviously, money talks and money talked back in the 19th century in South Africa. 

 

 

Greed 

 

Therefore, greed, wealth and profits became the focus of the people in power.  Rhodes, his colleagues and the super rich Amalekites could have cared less about the racial composition and the future of the White people of South Africa.  To obtain the workers which they wanted to help produce their wealth, they began importing Bantus from areas to the North of South Africa. 

 

Once this motion commenced in the late 1880s, the issue of Black Bantu immigration became a reality in order to supply workers to work the gold and diamond mines (to put profits into the pockets of the fat cats--like Rhodes and later the evident Amalekite Oppenheimers who eventually took over most of this business.  The modern role of the Oppenheimers will be addressed in a later chapter). 

 

The 1974 population figures from South Africa (as taken from the “Official Associated Press Almanac” for 1974, p. 616) were as follows: Whites--19%; Asians--3%; mixed blooded Coloreds--10% and Black, Bantu Africans--68% (this included the Zulus, who were in their own independent, tribal homeland called Bantustan or KwaZulu). 

 

Otherwise, most of the 68% of Bantu Africans owed their origins to the gold and diamond fields and the efforts of the fat cat plutocrats to bring them in to work the mines.  They were never a part of historic South Africa.  The super rich who wanted to exploit the South African gold and diamonds brought them in for their own profit and gain purposes. 

 

 

What Happened Next 

 

This was the prevailing situation when the Amalekite plutocrats began putting pressure on the Republic of South Africa to racially integrate and turn her government over to the now, predominant Blacks.  South Africa did this in the late 20th century.  The results of South African racial integration and amalgamation will be described in later chapters herein.  Suffice to say, it has been a disaster! 

 

However, for now, mention must be made to the latest Black innovation in both Rhodesia (of some years ago, but now Zimbabwe) and now South Africa. 

 

Once Blacks took over the governments in Rhodesia and South Africa, a process commenced at once whereby the lands (mainly farm lands, not the gold and diamond fields which were owned by the super rich Amalekites--who worked in league with the Blacks) and developments would be transferred to the Black population. 

 

For the past several years, Blacks in Rhodesia have simply went to White farmers and said “this land is now our land--get out.”  If the White farmer does not abandon his land and leave the country, the Blacks have initiated terrorist actions which eventually lead to the murder of the White farmer and/or his family.  Obviously, most White farmers (1,700 of them) have thrown in the towel and left the country for a safer place to live. 

 

 

The South African Farms 

 

An NPR news report on March 7, 2001, said that some Blacks in South Africa are also coming forward to say that White farmers are living on land which correctly belongs to them.  Since NPR is so totally biased and left-wing in its reporting (and thus, in support of the Blacks), the commentary tried to offer a case where the land once belonged to a Black farmer and the Whites of over 100 years ago came in and stole it. 

 

In this context, the pitch is made that it was the evil Whites who stole the land long ago from wonderful, compassionate, kind, hard-working Blacks.  All that is now happening is that the loving Blacks are showing up and demanding that the land be returned to them.  Yes, it will--because some 5,500 attacks on White farmers have already taken place in South Africa from Black revolutionaries (Jul 2001 “American Sentinel,” p. 5). 

 

In time, the Blacks will seize the land of the White farmers and run them all out of the country.  By the way, in the old days (before the Blacks took over), White farmers made South Africa self sufficient in food.  Today, this is no longer true, as the numbers of commercial farmers have plunged from 60,000 to 40,000.  Land prices in South Africa have now plummeted by 40% and White farmers are leaving the land in droves. 

 

One would suppose that the Blacks would want to go in and seize the goldfields and diamond mines.  But this is not happening and is not on the drawing boards because the Black South African government leaders are working in league with the Amalekite fat cats (like the Oppenheimers and others) who now own the gold and diamond fields.  The Blacks are being paid off to leave the Amalekites alone, as they steal the country. 

 

Of course, this is precisely the reason that the plutocrat Amalekites pressured the stupid White people of South Africa to give up their nation some years ago and turn it over to the Blacks (so the Amalekites could come in and steal the rest of the diamonds and gold). The details of this Black-Amalekite tie and how it came about will be addressed in later chapters.

 

 

The Ultimate Fall Out 

 

The point of this discussion is that this whole motion of Black immigration to the once largely White South Africa was accomplished because the big boys with money wanted cheap, Black labor which could be exploited to make more and more profits for themselves.  Manifestly, the fat cats simply cared not one whit about the future of South Africa or the people of South Africa. 

 

Tragically, the people themselves (who ultimately has lost and will lose their national homeland and identity) sat back and allowed the process to take place.  They could have raised up in rebellion and put their feet down and said “no” to the fat cats.  But they refused to look out for their own interests and future.  Money was always the name of the game. 

 

The White people who controlled the nation for the last several hundred years could have put their feet down and said that their future was far more important than the profits the super rich would make in their exploitation of the land and resources by using imported, cheap, Black labor.  But no, the White people closed their eyes and looked the other way while a motion was underway to destroy themselves. 

 

Incidentally, this same process has happened in any number of lands and among various White peoples.  The American plutocrats brought in Black slaves to work the plantations.  Later, they brought in Edomite Irish and Chinese workers to build the railroads (noted earlier).  During all of this immigration, the people calling the shots completely ignored all aspects of the demographic future of the US.  No one cared! 

 

 

Greed and Profits 

 

Certainly, large corporations have no conscience.  They know only one thing--profits.  While big corporations will gladly import Colored laborers which ultimately will integrate and miscegenate with the existing population, it seems that the ruling fathers at all levels should be concerned with the future of their children. 

 

Being sun worshippers, they are not concerned.  Sun worshippers never care about racial questions and will willingly destroy their own kind in order to enjoy profits now.  Greed, get and acquire completely dominate the entire Christian, sun worship culture.  And the democratic voters and Christian Church goers collectively approve of it. 

 

On this, the May 29, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. B7) had a cartoon with a US Senator holding a press conference on an issue before the Senate.  A reporter asks “So, you endorse the idea of sending all illegal immigrants back where they came from, Senator?”  The Senator replies-- “Right!  As soon as the grass trimming, cleanup, farm picking and fast food work is done.”  And cheap labor tells the tale. 

 

So while the ignorant, dumb, Christian, sun worshipping Americans (and indeed, WASPs at large) are rushing to their own destruction and oblivion, they are doing so under the push, prod, direction, influence and guidance of a pool of Amalek-Edomites, operating in a secret conspiracy directed by Satan. 

 

But in terms of the real world, one cannot blame just the wicked Edomites for their behind the scenes efforts. 

 

The dumb Christians are equally as guilty for their own plight.  The reason why the Christian peoples are so incredibly stupid of this issue is because their religion is sun worship.  If they worked half as hard to obey the Torah as they do to practice sun worship customs, they could see their wickedness and despair and turn to repentance. 

 

 

The United Kingdom 

 

The March 19, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news report which pretty well told the tale about what can happen to a White country which opens its doors to Colored immigration.  The British Isles and particularly England demonstrates this tragedy.  Before WWII, Britain was 100% White for all purposes. 

 

After the war, the Socialists (in the form of the British Labor Party) took over government control (under the watching eyes of Amalekite bankers/masters) and began to implement several Socialist schemes.  First, the British Commonwealth was dismantled and indigenous people took over many of the former British colonies. 

 

Next, the welfare state came to Britain; which, of course, whetted the appetites of Colored people from around the world.  And since the immigration policies of the British Commonwealth allowed people to freely migrate between states, Coloreds from the old Commonwealth began to flock to Britain to take advantage of the free give-aways. 

 

Especially today, in 2003, modern England has an incredible variety of Coloreds who have come there in the last several years from around the world.  Naturally, enormous social problems have developed with this Colored immigration.  Certainly, crime and now terrorism has went up substantially.  Yes, all of a sudden, domestic terrorism is a major problem in Britain--just as it is in the US, Canada, etc. 

 

 

The Swedish Example 

 

One of the most profound cases of all in this insanity of self-destruction is the nation of Sweden.  In geography, Sweden is largely surrounded by water except for a long border with Norway (whose people are essentially the same racially, culturally, etc). 

 

In this secure sense, Sweden has been and is a country which could keep undesirables out.  Sweden has not had nor should it have a particular problem over illegal immigration as some nations have experienced because of their border situations. 

 

Being Scandinavians, some of the truly White Swedes represent some of the few remaining, true, White people left on planet earth.  Most all nations have experienced such massive miscegenation and interracial sex that the once formally 100% White peoples are now history in terms of their culture and civilization.  Over the years, almost all White nations have slowly been coloring--to their own detriment. 

 

In any case, the White Scandinavians are (correctly were) a beautiful people.  The men are handsome and the women are fantastically pretty and desirable.  They are fairly law obedient and crime is no problem.  Truly, they are the closest to what The ELOHIM created in terms of so-called White people.  Despite these desirable physical features, the Swedes, especially, are awful stupid. 

 

In the post WWII environment, they allowed Amalek-Edomite children of Satan to influence their social and economic policies in their governing social democracy.  Their historic, Christian, sun worship Churches went along with this influence without defending the future for the Swedes. 

 

In order to accelerate their movement down the road to self-destruction, the Swedes, in particular, have adopted three very dumb and destructive practices.  In the first place, Sweden became the par excellent example of social welfare programs.  Sweden quickly became one of the most stupid nations on welfarism in the Western, sun worship civilization. 

 

The next practice which surely would not be wise for the future of Sweden or the White, law obedient, Swedish people is that the nation began opening their doors to all kinds of Colored peoples to come and take advantage of the welfare programs.  Quickly, White Swede families began adopting Black and Asian children from around the world. 

 

The third reality which has been absolutely disastrous for the Swedes is that they became extremely sexually permissive--like a bunch of ally cats.  They threw out all restraints over sexual morality.  With Blacks (especially men) pouring into Sweden from Africa, they found a ready haven for free promiscuous sex with beautiful, White, Swedish women. 

 

Many beautiful Scandinavian women have come to the United States from Europe to work in Hollywood movies.  Tragically, many of these women immediately start fornicated with Blacks, once they arrive in California.  The beautiful Stella Stevens and Mae Britt both tied in with Africans (poor Mae married Sammy Davis Jr and had and adopted Black children which she apparently took back to Sweden). 

 

 

The Fallout of Miscegenation 

 

The bottom line on this is that while the Swedes have had some desirable qualities, they have been extremely stupid in choosing to follow the above cited three primary practices which will spell out the ultimate absolute end of the once, largely White Sweden.  Given this path, someday Sweden will look like Egypt, Italy or Greece. 

 

Just as some Swedes are close to the perfection of the handiwork of The CREATOR, it must be acknowledged that the true Black African and the true Red Mongolian also represent the perfection of the handiwork of The CREATOR.  The CREATOR made them marvelous as well. 

 

This writer is just as distressed when miscegenation occurs with true Reds and true Blacks as with true Whites.  YHWH made beautiful people in His creative acts and it is sickening for man to now work overtime to change His creation.  It is criminal for Amalekites, discussed in a former chapter, to change the racial qualities of wonderful Black and Red peoples--just as it is pathetic that they change Whites. 

 

 

The Hispanic Presence 

 

The “Spokesman-Review” paper of Spokane, WA had a “Washington Post” story on Jan 9, 1999, which said that “U.S. immigration rate surges.”  The story noted that the number of foreign born immigrants tripled since 1970.  At this time, there are 26.3 million immigrants living here.  Over half of them are Hispanics with 27% from Mexico.  Today, in California and Texas, the most popular name for a boy baby is “Jose.” 

 

Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies said that “No nation has ever attempted to incorporate over 26 million newcomers into its society.”  He sees trouble down the road. 

 

Contrariwise, Cecilia Munoz, vice-president of a Latino civil rights group, says that “It’s easy to use demographics to alarm people.  But it’s alarming only if you assume immigrants coming in are harmful to Americans, which they are not.” 

 

“Newsweek” magazine of Jul 12, 1999, devoted much of its issue on how Hispanics are changing America.  The cover had a picture of three Hispanic-Americans with a title “Latin U.S.A.”  An article by Brook Larmer on “Latino America” said that Hispanics are hip, hot and making history. 

 

They are shaping pop culture and will change American politics, as well as how the nation looks.  Spanish remains their language of choice.  Religiously, they are overwhelmingly Roman Catholic. 

 

Racially, they are a mixture of Black, White, Red and Yellow-Brown to varying degrees, because of racial integration and amalgamation of the major races--not only in Spain and Portugal; but also, extensively in the Americas when Negro slaves were brought over here for work.  Over the years, miscegenation proceeded almost unabated. 

 

 

Changing Demographics 

 

Brook Larmer noted that by 2005, Latinos will be the largest US minority (replacing the fast breeding Blacks) and before 2050, they will just about constitute the largest segment of the US population. 

 

“The Washington Times” of Oct 11-17, 1999, had a front page story by Robert Stacy McCain on “Rapid growth of minority population transforms U.S.” which suggested that by 2050, the US population of non Hispanic Whites would only be at 53% whereas in 1950, they constituted 87%.  Already, Whites are in a minority in nearly half of America’s largest 100 cites, per 2000 census figures (Jun 25, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 2). 

 

Please understand that this so-called “White” figure includes Italians and mixed blooded Middle Easterners and Southern and Eastern Europeans (including millions of mongrel Amalekites). 

 

In terms of the once, majority, Anglo-Saxon-Celtic and Northwest European populations (which formerly dominated America), they already are a minority in the land that their forefathers founded.  By 2050, there won’t be many of these persons around at all. 

 

Needless to say, the formerly White areas of North America (especially in the US and Canada) are becoming darker and darker over time.  Slowly, the once White majority is vanishing into the wood work and being replaced with a variety of Colored peoples. 

 

 

California 

 

To demonstrate how fast demographics are changing, National Public Radio (NPR) had a news report on March 30, 2001, which noted the latest statistical compilation from the 2000 census for the state of California.  Per the report, White people were in a definite minority in the state of California in the year 2000 with 46.7% of the people. 

 

Hispanics now make up one third of the almost 34 million Californians.  Blacks, Asians and Indians run the non-White population figures up to 53.3%.  Again, as noted above, the word white and the White definition includes huge numbers of people with significant Colored genes--like Amalekites, Middle Easterners, Italians, Greeks and other Southern Europeans. 

 

Already, more than half of the new babies being born in California are Mexicans (Dec 31, 2001, “America Free Press,” p. 2).  When one adds this surge to the fact that huge numbers of Black and Asian babies are also being born in California, the outlook is not very bright for the now minority Whites. 

 

Very clearly, in the early part of the 21st century, the huge Colored population of California is having an enormous impact upon the state and the future of the state.  This condition was readily manifested in California in 2002 and with the state’s reaction to the continuing power problems there. 

 

California deregulated energy costs at the production and wholesale levels some years ago.  However, price controls were held in place for the charges which energy companies could impose upon personal consumers.  Thus, the power companies soon found themselves in a grip between having to pay higher prices for energy which could not be passed along to consumers. 

 

Although the state finally did raise the rates to consumers on March 27, 2001 (by 42-46%), the problem was generally ignored and never really addressed.  To fill the gap, the state rushed in and started to spend state money to subsidize the power costs to consumers.  This process was costing $50 million per day in 2001.  The essence here is that rather than raise rates on people, the state began paying the shortfall. 

 

To top the catch 22 problem off, the governor and leaders proposed a bond issue to pay for the spread between power costs and consumer charges.  Whether this thing will fly or not remains a question mark.  But it demonstrates the insanity of California’s leaders and how they are playing to the Colored voters. 

 

It seems insane that responsible people could even entertain the idea of selling bonds to pay the difference between what consumers pay for power, as opposed to what power costs.  In other words, the state will sell bonds on the good credit of the state to subsidize current power costs of consumers.  The end of this run will be the financial collapse of California. 

 

 

More on Hispanic Thinking 

 

Hispanics traditionally vote Democrat (72% of them voted for Clinton) and are primarily located in eleven states which control 217 electoral votes for the US president (out of a needed 270).  For sure, they will soon control US elections (as they now do in the state of California, as just noted). 

 

Contrary to the estimated 26.3 million immigrants (in the above cited Jan 9, 1999, “Spokesman-Review” story), “Newsweek” (in her article of Jul 12, 1999, cited above) estimates the current Hispanic population at 31 million (which is certainly growing rapidly because they are a young, Catholic population dedicated to having babies and intermarrying with the traditional White population). 

 

One Latino woman, who was mentioned by “Newsweek,” assessed the situation by noting that in the 21st century, the US will belong to the Latinos--again.  For sure, America is becoming Latin.  There is even talk of a resurgence in Latin music--perhaps as it is blended into rock to produce Latin rock. 

 

As noted, salsa sales started exceeding ketchup sales in 1992.  Surely, an enormous revolution is now underway in America.  Most importantly, many Mexicans now have dual citizenship (as will be discussed in a later chapter) and they are strongly committed to a return nationally to Mexico. 

 

Yes, Mexico is taking back the old US Southwest--clearly by immigration and soon by outright conquest, as the Hebrew prophets suggest. 

 

One more Hispanic woman said that this generation of Latinos is going to change the way America looks at itself.  For sure, crime, drugs, street gangs and welfare have increased and will increase commensurate with the increasing Hispanic population. 

 

Of real interest is the fact that many of the organized Hispanic gangsters do not answer (presently) to the traditional Amalekite rulers of organized crime, as mentioned in a former chapter.  Historically, the Edomites have not only been the major gangsters in America, but the Amalek-Edomites have organized and controlled the major gangs. 

 

It will be interesting to watch and see if the Amalekites can bring Hispanic and Asian gangs under their umbrella, as they did with the former Irish and Sicilian gangs.  That process has been under way for some time.  This push has been elaborated upon in former comments and needs no further explanation at this time. 

 

 

More on the Fall Out 

 

Colored immigration into the White, Christian, Western nations has been disastrous for several reasons.  Perhaps, the worst aspect of it has been that it creates a significant increase in crime rates.  When the US made the tragic decision of allowing in Irish Edomites in the 1840s and 1850s and Southern Europeans (with Black and Edomite genes) and Eastern European Amalekites in the post Civil War era, trouble came. 

 

The Edomites from Ireland, Sicily and Eastern Europe introduced far more serious criminal activities into the big US cities.  This was primarily felt when prohibition came.  But it had been present almost from the beginnings of the Colored immigration.  While the Blacks are more prone for petty street crime, the Edomites are far more sophisticated in criminal activities with a focus upon organized crime. 

 

Thus, Irish, Sicilian and Southern Italian criminals eventually came under the control of diabolical Amalekite bankers/masters from Eastern Europe to produce the horrors of modern organized crime--primarily in the big US cites (although it has been branching out into many medium sized US towns in the last 40 years).  Today, organized crime is firmly in place all across America. 

 

So while the Blacks and the Hispanics to some extent are committing murders, muggings, car jackings, teen-age gang assaults, petty drug operations, stealing, looting, and other criminal acts (along with some organized Asian and Hispanic gang activities, as noted elsewhere herein), the more serious criminal activities are being carried on by generic Edomites under the supervision of Amalekite bankers/masters (to produce major drug operations, gambling, prostitution, extortion, bribery and really serious murder and terrorism, when the Mafia chooses to rub out someone). 

 

Obviously, since Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia are allowing their countries to become darker and darker, crime will soon be exploding there and the people will wonder why.   This is tragic because historic Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark and Iceland have had almost no crime.  Their streets have been utterly safe.  And the people were generally law abiding.  But this is changing with the Colored immigrants. 

 

Former great cities like Oslo, Stockholm, Copenhagen and Helsinki are being and will be transformed and changed into modern Lagoses, Nairobis, Calcuttas, Mexico Cities, Cairos and so forth (just as Washington, DC, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and New York have faced significant changes in the past 100 years since they are much further down the road on demographic changes). 

 

 

The Perception of Hollywood 

 

Back in the golden days of Hollywood (the 1930s), the Amalekite owned and managed Warner Brothers used to make many movies dealing with gangsters, street thugs and crime--principally, in the vein of prohibition and the developing organized crime. 

 

In those days, Hollywood, generally, and Warner Brothers, particularly, had a number of Amalekite and Irish and Italian Edomites to play the roles of the tough guys and the bad guys.  The good, tough guys were typified by the Irish Edomite James Cagney and the Amalekites George Raft and Humphry Bogart. 

 

The Amalekite Edward G. Robinson (correctly Emmanuel Goldenberg, discussed in a prior chapter) was the leading bad guy.  But Warner Brothers and the other major studios had a host of very dark Italian and Southern European actors to step into the bad guy roles. 

 

One of the interesting features of these Hollywood criminals and particularly the gang bosses is that almost without exception the casting people produced an “image” of the typical US big city gangster as being a very dark, swarthy Italian with a thick, broken English accent.  Robinson, with his clear behemah genes, fit the model, although he did not have a broken accent as many of these characters produced. 

 

From WWII and forward, this honesty in Hollywood attitude on organized crime began to change.  Dark, swarthy actors with broken accents were no longer gangsters and inner city crooks.  Instead, dark Italians became major stars.  The new crooks were White Germans and US Southern Rednecks (who are almost always shown in bad roles). 

 

This is a paradox in that honorable and law abiding people (White Germans and US Southerners) were shown as bad persons, while the really bad people were shown as good people.  But the American population had been so mesmerized, indoctrinated and confused by the entertainment and media industries that they never knew the difference.  So the change became politically correct and totally American.  

 

 

The Other Problems of Colored Immigration 

 

While crime is certainly the main problem in allowing Third World Coloreds into formerly White countries, this is not the totality of the dilemma.  There are other very serious problems (and especially in terms of illegal immigration). 

 

For example, at least 50% or so of these new Colored immigrants into White Christian nations quickly go on welfare and are supported and financed by the dumb Christian tax payers (the argument is made that these immigrants come to work, but this is not totally true).  Many come because of the existing social welfare programs. 

 

The Colored immigrants, in time, produce Colored children who also typically go on welfare and particularly as the production of illegitimate children takes off among the Third Worlders. 

 

Not only must the US taxpayers fork over money to fund and support many of these aliens, but under US law, hospitals have to treat them when they show up from being sick or injured.  This practice of rendering very expensive medical care and support to the public generally (to include illegal aliens) is pushing many hospitals to the brink of bankruptcy (Apr 8, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2). 

 

Most of these people receiving free medical care at US hospitals rarely make any effort to pay for the help they receive.  The result is that US hospitals continually jack their charges up to cover the losses incurred from treating the public generally and illegal aliens particularly.  In other words, the gullible American public is paying for this waste. 

 

The just quoted April 8, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) also had another fascinating report.  This one came from San Luis, Arizona, a small town of 3,000 residents.  But San Luis has 20,000 active post office boxes at the local post office.  Why? 

 

Mexicans from Mexico come across the border and get a PO box in order to have a permanent US address to collect US welfare and benefits.  Even the US Immigration and Naturalization Service is aware of it, but nothing is ever done about it by US authorities. 

 

The people of California have voted in a referendum to stop welfare payments to illegal aliens, but the courts have declared the vote of the people null and void on this subject.  Thus, illegal aliens continue to get welfare from the taxpayers. 

 

The May 27, 2002, “American Free Press” (p.2) had a news item that the University of California regents had just voted to charge illegal aliens reduced tuition rates to attend the university.  This means that the taxpayers of California will pick up the tab for these illegal aliens. 

 

 

More Problems 

 

While marriage and family values may have some presence among the Colored peoples in the former Colored nations, the Colored immigrants seem to lose all sense of this former morality and stability, as they are displaced and moved to White Christian countries as immigrants. 

 

Perhaps the problem is that these persons once had cultural and racial identification systems in place in the old countries.  But as they move, they lose all sense of their culture and identification. 

 

When they flock into White Western cities, they have to begin a process of finding new cultures/identifications (which slowly evolves, as noted below, and especially as they miscegenate and sexually cross with other racial and ethnic strains in their new lands). 

 

The last tragic reality of Colored immigration is something already highlighted throughout this study.  The stupid White Christians welcome these Coloreds in the vein of the false Christian ideas of the brotherhood of man.  They immediately begin to miscegenate and sexually cross with the Coloreds to produce a whole new population dimension of mongrel peoples, who do not fit into any existing demographic definition. 

 

The problems of crime, welfare and social sickness only increase with the new mongrels.  Since these new mongrel peoples do not fit into the previous cultures and systems of the Whites or the Coloreds (the Blacks, the Hispanics, etc), they are badly out of place for years, until they begin to produce their own civilization and culture (as happened with the “Coloreds” in South Africa from Black-White sexual crosses).  

 

 

UN Commission for Refugees 

 

The “Spotlight” newspaper of Mar 6, 2000 (p. 2), had a news report called “White Flight,” on the fall-out of the massive Colored immigration into the once White Christian nations in the West (including the US, Canada, Australia, South Africa, Britain and Europe). 

 

The essence of the story is that the UN High Commissioner for Refugees has taken note of the enormous flight of White people in the Western, White, Christian nations because of the unbridled immigration of Third World foreigners into their countries.  These Colored immigrants bring with them violence, disease, drugs, crime and ethnic gangs (plus many of them go on welfare to drain the resources of the taxpayers). 

 

The UN High Commissioner, Mrs Sadako Ogata, labeled these “unfortunate whites” as “internally displaced people.”  What will the UN do about them?  Of course, it will do nothing.  The Colored immigration will continue to destroy the White, Christian West (unless YHWH YESHUA comes soon to stop the madness). 

 

While nothing will be done about the plight of White people, the UN is actively looking after Colored refugees.  For example, an NPR news report on Apr 16, 2001, noted that some 3,500 Black Sudanese refugee teenage boys and young men had been resettled in the US--based upon the recommendation of this UN commission.  The Blacks were orphaned by the civil war in process in Sudan. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 317--Christian Humanism and Race IV

 

 

Changing Truth? 

 

The Christian humanists have been upset particularly over the situation with Black people for many long years going back to slavery days.  They are obsessed with the theory that oppressive Whites have abused, hurt and limited the freedom of expression among first Blacks and then later Indians, Hispanics and Asians. 

 

While White Christians have taken the blame for Black slavery, it should be noted that Louis Farrakhan and the Black Muslims have finally awaken and realized that there was a bigger culprit responsible for the slave trade (actually, Amalek-Edomites, posing as Jews)--rather than the publicly criticized and condemned White Christians who had lesser roles in the practice. 

 

All the time that slavery was legal and allowed an opportunity for vast profits, the Amalek-Edomites (using Arab slavers) were the very persons directing and controlling the slave trade.  Now, they are the primary people using Hollywood, the media and the government to accuse White Christians for slavery; and even pushing programs of restitution by Whites for their alleged crimes against the Blacks (as discussed earlier). 

 

 

More on Slavery 

 

There are a few other features about slavery which are not readily known by the gullible and mesmerized public.  Certainly, slavery is a very old activity of man (as bad as it may seem to be).  Of course, Adamic men have practiced slavery (with White, as well as Black slaves).  Moreover, non-Adamites have been not only been guilty, but even more guilty in the practice of slavery among their own peoples. 

 

The situation with slavery among American Indians was outlined in a prior chapter.  It is also tragic that many, many Blacks in the heart of primitive Africa practiced slavery historically and still today.  Yes, as hard as it is for modern humanists and liberals to understand, slavery still goes on in Black Africa today (along with cannibalism). 

 

The Dec 2000 “Internet Vortex” (p. 16-17) had a story by Stephen Archer on “Sudan:  Eyewitness to Tragedy,” which focused upon the work of an American Black man named Joe Madison, who spent some time in the Sudan (which is a mongrelized nation with very heavy Black genes). 

 

Madison explained how Black Muslims in the North would attack and enslave their Black brethren in the South (who were largely Christian Dinkas).  When the Moslems would raid villages in the South, they would customarily kill any of the young men who could cause them trouble and kill all of the elderly (since they were not worth anything in terms of slavery). 

 

The people’s crops and huts and possessions were burned or stolen.  The survivors (young women and children) were carried North into slavery. 

 

In one case, Madison saw a woman who had a terrible scar on her throat.  She said that she was cut because her slave master wanted the baby that she was carrying in her arms.  Another poor woman was hobbling around because she had been gang raped by ten of the Black, Muslim animals so many times that they pulled her hips out of the socket. 

 

 

More on Mongoloids 

 

To show how attitudes have changed over American Indians, one should look at the historical record.  During the Indian wars, US Cavalry troopers almost always saved their last bullets for themselves.  Why?  Because it was a horrible calamity for a White person to fall captive of the Indians. 

 

In the movie “Stagecoach,” as briefly cited in previous remarks on pride and Christian evangelism, the coach riders were under assault from a group of savage Apaches.  John Carradine was a family friend of a young woman traveling on the coach. 

 

As the situation approached the point of seeming to be hopeless (because the Whites had run out of bullets), Carradine checked his derringer and found one bullet left.  He placed it to the head of the woman ready to blow her head off.  Why?  It would have been better for her than if she fell captive to the Apaches. 

 

The last 30 years have seen Hollywood totally change its concepts of reality and begin to make movies that are absolute lies and deceptions.  Now, Indians are shown as civilized, compassionate, good, friendly people--who were abused and hurt by evil Whites (as outlined in the earlier discussion on evangelism).  My, how truth has changed! 

 

Other presentations herein mention the Asian propensity to skin animals alive before eating them.  Manifestly, this is a barbaric and cruel practice which is fairly common with Mongoloids.  Mongolians simply have no compassion or concern for pain and suffering. 

 

In India, some five Dalits (the dark, low-caste people) made the mistake of skinning a cow alive--so a Hindu mob (which worships cows) reacted by beating the five men to death (Nov 8, 2002, “The Week,” P. 9).  So sometimes, there can be an adverse reaction to this brutal practice. 

 

 

The Nips 

 

Interestingly, the same situation existed with the Japanese.  The American public was fed a constant diet on the barbaric evils and brutality of the Japanese during WWII.  While Hollywood may have exaggerated a little on some of these stories, there was much truth to them. 

 

Truly, the Japs were brutal and cruel beyond anything imaginable to the Western mind, as is true with Mongoloids in general (per the above comments and other presentations herein on the Mongoloid race). 

 

Anyway, the changing attitude on race in America in the 1950s actually prompted Hollywood to completely reverse its stance from the WWII days on the role of the Japanese.  All of a sudden, Hollywood started making films which showed how loving, wonderful, kind, intelligent, etc the Japanese were in WWII (the same thing happened respecting the American Indians, as noted above, and Blacks). 

 

So, with the changing attitudes, Columbia Pictures put out an academy award winning movie in 1957 called “Bridge on the River Kwai” (previously mentioned herein).  This film showed the Japanese military as honorable, loving, wonderful people.  The movie was so persuasive that the viewer could be easily transformed into a zombie who would cheer for and support the Japanese and their efforts to build the bridge. 

 

But the real world was considerably different from this Hollywood fiction.  The Jan 25, 2002, “The Week” (p. 33) had a biography statement about a man named Ernest Gordon who had just recently died.  Gordon was a British officer who was captured in WWII and imprisoned by the Nips in Thailand when the Japanese were building their railroad and bridges in Southeast Asia for an invasion route to India. 

 

Specifically, Gordon was imprisoned at the notorious Chungkai camp on the River Kwai.  He was in the heart of the setting for the eventual Columbia movie.  He was to later say that the prisoners were fed a diet of one bowl of rice a day.  They were then made to work naked under a burning sun all day long.  Beatings, executions and brutality were the order of the day and not the image painted in the movie. 

 

Gordon once related a tragic story of Japanese brutality.  In 1942, an Australian POW tried to obtain some medicine for sick friends (evidently, he stole the medicine or misappropriated it in some manner).  The Japs caught him and promptly beheaded him with a samurai sword as it flashed in the sun. 

 

 

More on Mongolian Cruelty 

 

But there is still more to come on this line.  In WWII, the Japanese used prisoners (mainly Chinese, but others as well) to conduct medical experiments upon.  The Nips often made autopsies and surgical examinations and experiments upon living people and without any antiseptics (per Bob Fletcher, in the “Above Top Secret” video). 

 

This fact has been largely forgotten in the Christian West--perhaps because the US government picked upon the idea and is now doing many of the same types of diabolical experiments in America (as will be discussed further in a subsequent chapter). 

 

For sure, the Japs were not as loving and kind as Hollywood would later represent them (following the war and into the 21st century).  They were brutal and evil. 

 

 

The Privileged and Glorified Coloreds 

 

If the Coloreds have problems, it must not be because of them.  But the real villain must be the former, dominating, White class in America.  This thinking parallels the situation with the apparent Amalekite lawyer who sued me for discrimination, as mentioned earlier.  Anyone believing that he had work problems was guilty of racial and religious biases. 

 

Not content with just having an end to believed discrimination and social injustice, the humanists and their liberal and Socialist counterparts (under Amalek-Edomite leadership) have led the way in establishing affirmative action programs to automatically grant all Colored peoples a privileged status in America. 

 

An Editorial, in the “Weekly Standard” magazine of Feb 28, 2000 (p. 7), claimed that the Constitution commands that US laws be scrubbed clean of race consciousness in all but the very rarest and narrowest of circumstances; yet “our laws stink with thousands of programs, large and small, that reward or disfavor us according to our skin color--and our sex and what continents our great grandfathers lived on.  What a sad, enormous ball of hypocrisy and incoherence the whole thing is.” 

 

In this pathetic state of hypocrisy and social sickness, the White majority males (especially the so-called WASPs--White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) are the primary underdogs who get absolutely nothing in this government dole out of privileges, benefits and rewards.  Racial minorities get the first big share.  Homosexual faggots get the next slice.  Finally, women get the rest of the pie. 

 

And since Amalek-Edomites are classified as Whites, they generally receive all of the White allocations in this scheme of diversity.  This means that the majority of true Whites get virtually nothing.  In terms of diversity for any benefits given society, the gratuities go to the various Colored races and the Amalekites posing as Whites. 

 

Therefore, colleges and universities must have so many people of the different classifications.  Jobs and employment must be regulated and controlled along racial lines.  The president’s cabinet must reflect a certain level of racial diversity.  The police, the court system and the jails need to be overhauled because too many Blacks are ending up in prison (never mind that they are responsible for most of the crime). 

 

And if any person or group questions this insanity in America, they are immediately branded and chastised as racists and as being prejudiced by the controlled media.  If Blacks and Hispanics can’t improve their lot in life through hard work and personal achievement, then the Christian humanists are dedicated to guaranteeing them success by governmental fiat. 

 

 

More Stupidity 

 

Beyond affirmative action and the priority which Blacks and other Coloreds have in employment (which will be addressed in some detail in later commentary), it is useful to recognize that the federal government has been using vast sums of money to give to Negroes and Hispanics to supposedly grant them better opportunities.  One sees this in housing, in education, in small business grants and on and on. 

 

Besides the outright grants to these privileged, Colored peoples, the federal government also gives gobs of money to states and other organizations to establish laws, rules and regulations to grant Coloreds with special rights and privileges, which are used to bring about their racial integration, amalgamation and miscegenation with White people. 

 

For example, almost all grants to educational institutions are predicated not only on racial integration, but also upon affirmative action programs to insure that Coloreds are present in numbers in the various institutions and programs.  One finds a focus on racial diversity and amalgamation in most of the grant funds coming out of Washington. 

 

With Blacks and Whites thoroughly mixed physically in the secular society, racial mixing, mongrelization and amalgamation is inevitable.  It’s been happening this way for thousands of years in the sun worship cultures because the name of the game is to destroy the separate races created by The CREATOR and amalgamate them all into one new, man-made or rather man created, mongrel, mulatto race. 

 

Paul Hall, in the Jul-Aug 1997 “Jubilee” paper (p. 2), in comments on “The Way I See It,” said that more “whites are dying everyday through interracial offspring than all the wars, abortions, accidents and natural deaths put together.”  In terms of the US, Hall added that that is the reason why we have “bussing, affirmative action and all the rest of the social engineering...to integrate whitey out of existence...” 

 

 

One More Consideration 

 

There is another fallout of making community wide efforts to move behemah, chaiyah and nokri/nekar males into positions of authority over Adamites and the general population and of moving women into positions of authority over men (as is happening all over modern America). 

 

In each case, these individuals are being pushed and propelled into jobs and duty positions which they were not created for, as proven in previous chapters.  The existing Christian sun worship culture is utterly lost on race and sex distinctions. 

 

Perhaps the best explanation of what can happen with this motion to elevate and lift up non-Adamic peoples into leadership positions in society at large was illustrated in a comment made by Malaysian Prime Minister Lee some years ago on the reality in the Third World.  Lee correctly perceived that the Third World is grossly incompetent and corrupt. 

 

If a White Westerner had made this remark, he would have been called a racist and White supremacist.  But these words of a Chinese leader could not be challenged.  Truly, Lee hit the nail on the head.  This condition will be elaborated upon in some detail in a later chapter.  For now, this reality must be recognized in this present discussion on humanism.  Certainly, the remark surely applies to Blacks. 

 

 

Black Voting Powers 

 

In 1865, the United States adopted the 13th amendment to the Constitution to abolish slavery, the 14th amendment in 1868 to grant citizenship to Negroes and the 15th amendment in 1870 to grant the vote to all US citizens (including Blacks). 

 

Since all three of these amendments became law because the South was forced/coerced to adopt them under a state of military occupation and force, maybe they were not legal additions to the US Constitution (to be later discussed in subsequent chapters). 

 

In any case, they have been accepted by most Americans as lawful since those days.  Therefore, the fall-out from their adoption can be measured--as will now be done in the following presentation. 

 

 

Florida, Revisited 

 

In the US presidential elections in November 2000, a crisis developed which was still on-going in 2002 (even after Bush was sworn in).  The essence of the problem finally devolved to the state of Florida and alleged voting irregularities and problems there.  This issue has been broached in a former chapter and will be covered in more detail in later chapters.  Hence, there is no intent to cover it extensively here. 

 

However, there was an interesting fall-out on the crisis in Florida which is especially related to the question of race and general Black incompetence. 

 

As soon as the November 7th elections were over and it looked like Bush had won, Jesse Jackson (“the reverend” father of an illegitimate daughter) and the NAACP rushed into the state of Florida to see if something could be done to help Gore.  To appreciate this motion, it is necessary to understand a little of reality. 

 

First, the Blacks are bloc voters for the liberal Democrats.  Not all Negroes vote for liberal Democrats, but assuredly most do (perhaps around 90%).  Next, many or most Negroes are very susceptible to Black voter fraud (this reality will be discussed in later chapters dealing with government and politicians).  Finally, Blacks generally are extremely incompetent. 

 

Since so many Blacks are incompetent (although this condition was never stated as such by anyone in power in the US), the NAACP claimed that many African votes in Florida were not properly recorded.  In other words, many Blacks allegedly voted for Gore.  But somehow, their votes were not recorded properly or counted correctly. 

 

 

The Crux 

 

The essence of this problem focused upon two definitions.  First, there were complaints from Palm Beach County that the ballot used there was confusing and that voters (especially Black voters) could not understand it.  Negroes and some Amalekites came forward to charge that their votes were not properly recorded, because of this ballot problem (involving a so-called “butterfly” ballot). 

 

The second cited Black problem came up in several places in Florida over allegations that the punch card system was somehow confusing so that Blacks could not or did not properly punch out the chads for the candidates of their choice. 

 

Both of these issues have involved enormous lawsuits in the state of Florida and ultimately even the US Supreme Court.  Some of these have been mentioned earlier.  Others will be commented upon in a later chapter herein addressing the 2000 elections. 

 

Since these two issues gained so much media notoriety so quickly, a number of elementary school teachers across the US decided that they would test their students on the ability to understand and correctly use the butterfly ballot.  Many classes of first, second, third and fourth grade students were so tested. 

 

One class of second graders in Virginia used this exact same type of ballot for a check.  All students in the class were successful in understanding and using this type of ballot.  The same general findings occurred elsewhere in America.  It was a very rare, small child in school who could not use these ballots.  However, Negroes in Florida could not do so (allegedly). 

 

The interesting thing about the Florida mess is that sample ballots and instructions were published in newspapers before the elections.  The punch card system has been in use in Florida for years and there never was an alleged prior problem over them.  Even the voting precincts had people on hand to help explain the ballots to anyone who did not understand them. 

 

Finally, if a voter did mess a ballot up, then nearby election people would void the ballot and let the voter try again with a new ballot.  Clearly, there was no logical excuse of why Blacks could not handle this simple voting task.  Yet, they allegedly could not (per Jesse Jackson and the NAACP). 

 

 

Black Voter Fraud 

 

As will be discussed in the later presentations on this problem, Black voter fraud is a real world type of thing.  So the case can be made that indeed maybe the whole complaint from the Negroes was only one of lies and an attempt to somehow swing support to Gore. 

 

However, this writer would allow that truly some Blacks were confused and maybe did incorrectly cast their ballots.  Even the controlled media did report that in some Black precincts, rejected votes (because they were not properly punched) could run up to 37%; while most rejected ballots in White precincts only ran around 7% (per a study made by the leftist “Washington Post”). 

 

The Feb 19, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news report from the Feb 2001 issue of “School Reform News,” which said that some 49% of the adult people in Florida’s 17th congressional district were functionally illiterate, per the 1992 National Adult Literary Survey (this area included the large Black neighborhoods in Southern Florida, where the votes were in dispute). 

 

Hence, the Florida problem is that general Black IQ levels are quite low.  It would be very reasonable that indeed many Blacks were too stupid or could not handle a ballot or process that second grade White children could master (the assumption has to be made that most of the classroom efforts using the ballots involved White children with some brains and not incompetent Africans). 

 

Beyond the Blacks, there were also a number of Amalekites coming forward in Southern Florida charging that they too had problems with the ballots.  This writer believes that most Amalekites are fairly intelligent people.  But they are grossly evil and deceptive.  So, perhaps their complaints were effectively fraudulent efforts to get a vote recount or a new election for Gore. 

 

 

The Word Prejudice 

 

In today’s warped culture, which has been completely mesmerized and brainwashed on the subject of race by the ruling Amalekites (especially in the media and entertainment industries), it is virtually impossible to have any discussion on certain, privileged, social groups (like on Blacks, Jews, etc).  Whenever a person broaches one of these privileged groups, the immediate response is prejudice, racist etc. 

 

For example, this writer is acquainted with a Sardis Sacred Name and Christian Identity believer who simply does not like Blacks. 

 

As briefly mentioned in prior commentary, the man is interesting because he has B type blood which must raise genuine questions about his own genealogy.  In fact, his demeanor, actions and attitude is such that the African genes really surface and seem very apparent in his contact with others (though supposedly White, he thinks and acts like a Black).  Yet, he does not like Negroes. 

 

However, the thing which really stands out about this man is his lack of intellectual reasoning and objectivity in his dislike of Negroes (like other people with B blood, he manifestly does not understand the significance of his B blood).  He cannot intelligently discuss the race issue because he is grossly uninformed.  In his situation, the case can be made that he is a very prejudiced person on the subject of Africans. 

 

 

Informed People 

 

Conversely, this writer knows all kinds of people who also do not like Blacks, but can spend hours and hours on why they carry such feelings.  They can cite IQ, crime, welfare and statistical data and discuss to some length the genetic implications of race.  Of most importance, many of these persons are intimately familiar with the Scriptures on the subject of race. 

 

In this sense, they can lay out truth--the way it is.  For such individuals, there is no way that they can be accused of being prejudiced, White Supremacists, racists or anything else.  Their positions are founded upon facts and truth.  They are intellectually informed and can fairly, objectively, logically and coherently discuss their beliefs with anyone. 

 

In this discussion, the relevant truth of the above remarks is predicated upon the historic meaning of the word “prejudice.”  Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary” (p. 520) gives the historic meaning of prejudice as “1. A judgment or opinion formed before the facts are known; esp., an unfavorable, irrational opinion.  2. The act or state of holding preconceived, irrational opinions.” 

 

This used to be the reality and essence of the word prejudice (in the old US before FDR and the Amalekites took over total control with their push of the racial ideas of old Balaam).  But then, in the post WWII, a new meaning was attached to the word which has come to completely dominate all modern thinking on the subject. 

 

Funk & Wagnalls gives this more recent meaning as number “3. Hatred of or dislike for a particular group, race, religion, etc.” 

 

Nevertheless, in a further discussion on the syn., this dictionary adds that “prejudice, bias and partiality are compared as they denote an attitude of mind that interferes with fair judgment.  Only prejudice is necessarily a term of opprobrium; literally, it signifies prejudgment without adequate hearing or consideration, but it is chiefly used to refer to a strong emotional bias.” 

 

 

Reality 

 

Thus, the point being is that if a person chooses separation from Blacks because they commit most of the crime and are generally sexually promiscuous and tend to gravitate to the US welfare and give away programs, then that choice of separation is predicated upon factual knowledge and understanding.  No one can possibly be accused of pre-judging when they are informed and operating on facts and truths. 

 

Please understand here that this writer is not accusing all, 100% of Blacks automatically of incompetence and/or corruption, per Malaysian Prime Minister Lee’s words, as cited above and to be discussed at some length in a later chapter. 

 

Truly, all Negroes are not criminals or on welfare.  Truly, there probably are some Negroes of some intelligence, honor and integrity (not many, but a few).  But the charges are being made in the context of a statistical probability. 

 

In other words, the “average, usual or normal” Black person is fairly stupid and tends to be incompetent and/or corrupt in his work habits.  That’s just the way “most” of them are (but not all, 100% of them).  Since Blacks also tend to be extroverts, feelers and perceiving in personality, they talk good and fool many, gullible observers.  But in the end, the incompetence and/or corruption surfaces.  That’s the way it is. 

 

 

Whites Must Pay 

 

Now, should an objective, intelligent, honest person make a judgment upon a third party based upon the statistical probability of how that person will react in life?  Years ago, most life insurance companies would rate or charge an extra premium to insure Blacks.  The reason why was the statistical certainty of their attributes and likelihood of dying earlier than Whites (the same condition is true today). 

 

Insurers have had to stop this practice because of political correctness.  Now, the premiums charged Whites have been upped to offset the drain of more losses incurring from Blacks (who no longer pay an extra premium for the increased risk). 

 

Moreover, stores with Black customers or employees must routinely increase their retail prices in order to offset Black losses, theft and crime.  Thus, Whites now pay for Black crime and inefficiency. 

 

Frankly, it makes perfect sense that if something looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quakes like a duck, it must be a duck.  It is sheer stupidity and insanity to operate in the secular world in any other way.  However, most Whites now seem perfectly happy to pay increased insurance premiums and retail prices in stores because of Black incompetence and/or corruption.  But this writer has a different view! 

 

It seems grossly unfair and ridiculous to make people like me to have to pay higher prices for goods and services simply because the higher prices have to be charged to offset Negro incompetence, dishonesty and corruption. 

 

The conclusion here is that the dictionary’s item number 3 (which is the modern new attitude toward the word prejudice) is inconsistent with the other two definitions.  If a person has a factual basis for disliking and/or choosing to separate from Negroes (in the generic sense), how can he be prejudice in the vein of definition number 3? 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 318--Christian Humanism and Race V

 

 

Hate Crimes, Revisited 

 

A preceding chapter discussed at length the reality of so-called hate crimes in the modern sun worship culture--in the vein of speech and thought crimes.  In view of the US Constitutional authorizations for freedom of speech (and certainly, a presumed level of freedom of thought), it is absolutely incredible that modern America has so-called hate crimes on the books because of speech or thoughts. 

 

Yet, this is the real world in the early 21st century.  It is fast becoming illegal to speak a word or have a thought which goes against the modern politically correct thinking, primarily in the context of sociology.  Therefore, this focus on alleged hate crimes has taken the direction of zeroing in on adverse speech or thoughts as may be directed at so-called minorities and privileged groups. 

 

With this attention, it has become or is becoming illegal to carry an adverse thought about women, Jews, all Coloreds and non-Whites of whatever description, homosexuals and all forms of other sexual deviations, and so forth.  About the only people that it is proper and good to criticize are the WASP (White, Angle-Saxon Protestant) males. 

 

In America, it seems to be perfectly allowable to criticize, condemn or oppose WASPs in any and all situations.  The WASPs (though now in a profoundly significant minority) are the only people who are not covered in so-called hate crime laws. 

 

 

Further Goyim Insanity over Black Heroes 

 

Black heroes like Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods were addressed in a former chapter.  There is no cause to repeat those words of stupidity from the gullible American goyim.  But there is still more to come on this theme. 

 

Moreover, in other endeavors, the dumb, White, Christian, sun worshipping majority is about as crazy and insane as is possible to build up and inflate any real or supposed achievements of Black people.  Thus, Oprah Winfrey has become the nation’s leading daytime entertainer. 

 

Both Bill Cosby and “the reverend” Jesse Jackson were the greatest of heroes (yes, Black heroes for dumb, stupid Whites)--even after the exposure of their illicit sexual activities and reported illegitimate children. 

 

With the murder of Cosby’s son Dennis, the media went wild for days and days reporting on this death.  With the arrest of the alleged killer and his trial, most all of the national news reports carried the very latest news regularly, as if this event was the most extraordinary in American history. 

 

Colin Powell received recognition and promotions, not on merit, but on obvious affirmative action programs.  This writer spent some years in the military and is acquainted with saluting and how to salute.  It was always fascinating to watch Powell salute with his sloppy, half hearted, lazy salutes.  This was classic proof that he was not much of a professional soldier. 

 

Non West Point officers generally don’t get to be four star generals in the US Army and Powell was not West Point.  Of most importance, it is inconceivable that a non Service Academy general could ever become Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  Yet, Powell reached this pinnacle for some strange reason. 

 

And now, he is US Secretary of State in line to the presidency (with all the problems of health and living facing Bush and Cheney, Powell could easily become US president--if Slick Clinton does not immediately regain power under a Hillary presidency or a new constitution).  But Powell is Black (of sorts), and there has been the gross stupidity of affirmative action. 

 

 

Politics 

 

In politics, the Republicans constantly brag and boast about former Oklahoma Congressman J. C. Watts because he is a Black Republican (a rarity in today’s world).  Whether Watts has any qualifications or not and whether he has ever done anything constructive or not matters very little.  What is important to the stupid goyim is that he, like Powell, is an African-American. 

 

The latest media insanity in 2003 has been the great surge in popularity of Condoleezza Rice, George W. Bush’s National Security Adviser.  The controlled media is just absolutely crazy over this Black woman.  The July 2001 “Internet Vortex” (p. 16) said that Ms Rice is “emerging as the most popular and most admired woman in America right now.”  She is being touted as a California candidate for the US Senate.  

 

Later chapters will discuss the incredible incompetence and gross stupidity in Washington among the Black advisors to George W. Bush on the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in Washington and New York.  Surely, of all people in Washington, Condoleezza Rice had primary responsibility for advising Bush on these coming attacks (which she had much intelligence about). 

 

Rice dropped the ball.  But since Rice is both Black and a woman, she was never held accountable for her major goofs.  Instead, the naive and gullible George W. Bush has taken most the blame and suffered most of the heat. 

 

Washington state is interesting because it only has a small minority population.  Furthermore, Washington is an ultra liberal state which goes out of its way to pacify, praise and bestow privileges and blessings upon its minority population.  Seattle elected a Black Mayor and the state elected a Chinese governor. 

 

Despite this love and push for minorities, the newspapers, government entities at all levels and the liberal, leftist peoples (who are in a majority statewide) constantly cry and badger the public about prejudice and racial bias of the people. 

 

Obviously, with the election of minorities into key government posts, it is totally impossible for the collective people (who are mostly White) to have ever used race or any racial criteria in the state elections and voting booths.  Yet, the papers and liberals whine and cry constantly about the discrimination against minorities.  Something is fundamentally wrong on this subject. 

 

 

The Great Mandela 

 

The last several years has seen an absolute explosion about the grand and glorious attributes of the supposedly fabulous Nelson Mandela, former President of South Africa.  No one seems to care or dare mention the fact that Mandela was historically a Communist, revolutionary terrorist and murderer. 

 

Mandela had a birthday party in Pretoria in late July 1998 and proceeded to marry Graca Machel, the widow of the former President of Mozambique (after Nelson had gotten rid of former wife Winnie for her murder and terrorism of South African Whites and Blacks).  Graca was a recent Mandela girl friend and shack up mate. 

 

The week of July 20th (of 1998) saw the US press go crazy over this marriage.  News broadcasts on the hour (which run about 3 1/2 minutes after commercials, as noted earlier) had this Mandela story on for days.  Again, as with Tiger Woods, this is most extraordinary (because the hourly news casts are extremely limited and abridged--simply because of the few minutes available). 

 

Surely, an honest observer would suppose that only the most profoundly important and significant pieces of news would dare receive mention on these short broadcasts of news on the hour. 

 

Yet, the Mandela marriage story was repeated, over and over, as if this was the most welcomed news to so-called humanity in all of history.  Other national news sources also went wild with ecstasy.  Surely, there must have been more significant and important news to focus on, rather than on a marriage of a Black revolutionary terrorist and murderer with his recent shack mate. 

 

In one case, a reporter had Mandela’s granddaughter on for a short spiel.  She remarked how grand Nelson was and how happy she was to see him as President of South Africa, after his years in jail.  The reporter was just goo-goo eyed to be able to talk to this girl. 

 

Of course, no one would dare criticize or complain about Mandela’s terrorism and how many persons he murdered or his recent adultery or shack up affair with Graca--nor was there any mention of his poor wife Winnie, who he successfully got rid of. 

 

 

Puff Diddy Combs and Jennifer Lopez 

 

It seems that the Western Christian society must have some Colored heroes to worship and be obsessed with from time to time.  Consequently, the last several years have seen the gullible Christians completely engulfed with O. J. Simpson, then Bill Cosby, then Tiger Wood, then Nelson Mandela, then Elian Gonzalez and then it looked like the Christians might be faced with a rest from this mass of Colored worship. 

 

Apparently, the media looked the field of entertainment and pleasure over in the American Christian world and came up with a strange pair of Colored heroes that the gullible Whites could be completely mesmerized and obsessed over. 

 

All of a sudden, in the year 2000, the Puerto Rican singer and entertainer Jennifer Lopez and the Black rapper, Sean “Puff Diddy” Combs (also known as “Puff Daddy), both began to receive media recognition (and obsession). 

 

Periodically, the controlled media began showing revealing and sexually enticing pictures of Lopez.  “Newsweek” had a large color picture of Lopez in a slinking low-cut, split dress which showed her breasts stuck out and much of her legs and other enticements.  Pictures also began to appear of Puff Daddy and his assortment of jewelry, diamonds and wealth. 

 

 

Puff Daddy and Jennifer Joined Together 

 

The world of gullible Christians, obsessed with the brotherhood of man, got a real charge of happiness and joy when it was revealed that Puff Daddy and Jennifer were courting and shacking.  This really excited the White Christians. 

 

However, things began to look bad for Puffy in late 2000 when he was arrested and charged with carrying a gun in his super rich limousine (in New York City--while he and Jennifer were on an outing).  Allegedly, Puff Daddy tried to get his chauffeur to take the blame for the gun because it was illegal to carry a concealed gun in New York City.  The chauffeur said no.  So Puffy faced a prosecution. 

 

This story was just the thing needed to completely mesmerize, obsess and dominate the total and complete thinking of the White Christian Americans because it had all of the ingredients which they sought and cherished so dearly--to include an illegal gun, a Black fat-cat hero and a supposedly sexy and attractive Hispanic girl. 

 

Of course, the media regularly bombarded the public with everything Puffy and Jennifer were doing.  The gullible White American public just loved the antics and reports on Puff Daddy and Jennifer. 

 

Eventually, Puffy’s trial took place the week of March 11, 2001.  The media covered this event as if it was one of the most important things in American history.  There was constant speculation about whether Jennifer would testify and what would she say, and whether Puffy would testify and what would he say, and on and on. 

 

It ended up that Jennifer did not testify, but Puff Daddy did.  And as could be expected, the multi-cultural jury found for Puffy and he beat the complete rap.  He was acquitted!  Naturally, the controlled media went wild with great joy and happiness.  Daily, the gullible Christian Israelites were blasted with the news that Puffy had completely beat the charges.  He was innocent. 

 

The story played on for days and days, as if all of modern America could not rest or sleep until it learned exactly each move, thought, word and anticipation of Puff Daddy and Jennifer.  When the news people finally began to quit talking about the famous interracial pair, there was some question about what the media could come up with to replace them and keep the gullible Christians mesmerized with frivolous nothings. 

 

 

A Contrasting Illustration 

 

For many decades now, Christian sun worshippers have realized that they had better not use the word “Jew” or say anything about the Amalek-Edomites (Jews or Christians), unless they use words of praise, flattery and greatness (just as is now true with Black people around the world). 

 

As shown in former comments, the typical Christian sun worshipper can speak evil of Judaism and the Talmud and there is no problem.  But say something bad about Amalek-Edomite Jews in a racial or ethnic vein--watch out for “fear of the Jews” or correctly the Judeans (Jo 7:13). 

 

Now, this absolute stupidity has reached the plateau that the last 50 years has seen the public arrive at the place where they can no longer speak or utter a word or phrase which can be construed to be criticism, complaint, condemnation or derogatory about any Coloreds in general and Blacks and racial Jews (Amalek-Edomites) in particular. 

 

Obviously, White people in public are not allowed to have such politically incorrect speech.  But the dilemma extends far beyond that stage. 

 

For example, most American people (especially under age 50) have been so trained, mesmerized and zombiized by outcome based education (to be described later) and the entertainment and media industries that their brains cannot listen to any criticism leveled against Coloreds.  When they hear this politically unapproved speech, they literally go to pieces. 

 

 

A Classic Example 

 

Recently, this writer was visiting with a young woman with a child in the public schools.  She was aware of the fact that the schools have gone to pot, and she offered no contest on that reality. 

 

But when this writer mentioned some of the primary things that had happened in US education since 1954 to bring on the crisis, she couldn’t handle it at all and went and blurted out very stupid, hateful and misinformed statements at me for mentioning the truth.  Like other liberals, she attacked me, rather than deal with the facts being stated. 

 

This writer was born in the depression and was raised and educated in a state where racial segregation prevailed until 1954 and Brown versus the Board of Education (which completely changed American education).  The point was made that with the Supreme Court decision, the US government took over the public schools and subsequently the private schools as well. 

 

In the days of racial segregation, the South used to pour a lot of White taxpayers’ money (and some too from Blacks, although not that much proportionately) into bottomless black pits called Negro schools.  Several things typically happened in Black schools.  First, the Negroes literally tore them up, requiring constant infusions of new cash to maintain them in some usable order. 

 

Next, the Black teachers were generally incompetent and academic standards plunged to the point that there was often little or no standards.  Actually, this had to be the situation because a highly significant portion of Africans are fairly stupid and thus they are passed in school without any recognizable academic achievements. 

 

With racial integration of the schools, all of these problems were transferred to the formally White schools with one more feature which perhaps existed to a lesser extent in the old, segregated, Black schools. 

 

Under the new permissive humanist attitudes that now govern society (no more whippings or physical disciplining of students, as outlined in a prior chapter), crime and violence proned Blacks are more likely to rape, assault and intimidate naive, weak, White teachers. 

 

Obviously, all of these factors came together with the federal take-over of the schools (and the loss of local control) to utterly destroy American education.  This writer was an adult and lived through the 1950s and observed and experienced what happened in the schools and particularly while going on for higher education at the local state university, after it was integrated. 

 

 

More Black Problems 

 

In mentioning some of this reality to the woman under discussion, she didn’t like it at all.  She couldn’t and wouldn’t believe that Black students used to literally tear up the old, Black, segregated schools (and still do so in the now integrated schools).  In trying to further make the case, the situation was brought up over the large public housing projects in Black urban areas. 

 

For 40 years, the US government has plowed literally billions of dollars into building large apartments for so-called poor people--usually Blacks, in the inner cities like Chicago, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Atlanta, etc. 

 

The one thing that has typically happened in these projects (where they largely have involved Black residents) is that the new buildings are quickly degraded and ruined by destruction and crime.  It has been like throwing billions of dollars into another bottomless black pit. 

 

Not only do the Africans tear up and destroy much of these physical facilities; but in many of them, Black residents use the stairways and halls for breeding purposes and to urinate in and have their bowel movements.  The stench from the semen, urine and feces matter is sometimes quite bad. 

 

Moreover, gangs, criminals, sexual perverts, pedophiles and druggies often predominate in using these buildings.  These housing projects, which Big Brother has spent billions of dollars on, are not only sick; but they are a joke because of the stupid sun worshipping society that has allowed them to surface and to remain. 

 

Not only have Christian sun worshippers permitted these pathetic projects to start and exist, but they have stupidly continued to plow billions of dollars more into them in efforts to upgrade and retain them.  For these many years, a person would have to be extremely stupid, ignorant, misinformed and blind to not have “some” understanding about the situation with these housing projects. 

 

The controlled and useless media industry even has run specials and programs revealing some truth about them on a number of occasions.  One can’t count on much good coming from ABC, NBC, CNN or CBS.  But they have had numerous revelations of the social sickness in the federal housing projects. 

 

In fact, things have been so bad in these housing projects that the controlled and useless media has been unable to slant, twist and color the news on them to make out that they are good programs.  Inevitably, the media has had to reveal some information on how incredibly corrupt, sorry and pathetic these sick federal programs have become. 

 

In trying to make this point to the ignorant, rebellious, sun worshipping woman under discussion, she refused to accept the obvious.  She could not accept or believe that significant numbers of Blacks would tear up their free schools and their free public housing projects.  She really believed that the remarks were racist lies and distortions and attacked me for saying them. 

 

 

Black History 

 

As sorry as Hollywood people have been for many decades now, they did generally present Blacks in a true perspective in movies made before WWII.  With the 1950s, they began a process of change. 

 

Significantly, Blacks had virtually no role in American history--other than being largely maids, shoeshine men and field hands. 

 

Yet, movies are now being made to show Blacks leading the American Revolution and being the top gun fighters and gamblers in a racially integrated Old West (a few were cowboys, but not much else).  This whole insanity is absolutely ludicrous.  The same is true with all this hype about the Black civilization in ancient Egypt. 

 

The truth is that Blacks were slaves and/or servants of ruling Whites in ancient Egypt (early Egypt was inhabited by White Nordic and Hamitic peoples, as proven from archaeology).  There was never a Black civilization in Egypt or any other place for that matter.  Blacks have never produced a civilization.  In Africa, they have always been the most primitive and backward people in world history. 

 

 

Source of the Modern Vulgar Speech 

 

Some few people are beginning to understand that the current English vernacular in modern America is exceedingly sick and depraved.  The vulgar, crude, cursing speech now seen regularly on television and in Hollywood movies has come to be part and parcel of the modern, Western, Christian, sun worship culture.  The fall 1999 TV programs were the most vulgar of all time. 

 

Many Americans now talk that way--including small children.  But what most Americans seem totally oblivious to is why or how the United States came to adopt this depraved language as its own.  For this explanation, this writer will share some background. 

 

After a couple of years in a National Guard unit in the late 1940s, this writer entered active duty with the US Army in August 1950 because of the Korean War.  Being on active military duty when the US military began effectively integrating in 1951, i was a first hand observer of what happened. 

 

Initially, it must be admitted that the young men in the military have surely been guilty of a lot of barracks talk over the years and particularly in the context of girls and sexual encounters.  Before racial integration, this was true.  But even the barracks talk was never on the vulgar, sewer level that it has become in recent years. 

 

Today, a person can go back and watch some old WWII movies and especially those of John Wayne or one like “Wake Island,” made in 1942.  Categorically, the way those actors spoke and acted did resemble the White US military in those days.  The movies were not remarkably different from the real world in terms of speech and soldier talk. 

 

In 1951, this writer had the first incident ever of close contact with Blacks.  For the first time in my life, i heard the expression “mother f-ck-r.”  In fact, with Negroes, many of them cannot even speak a sentence or a few words without using that expression or at least the “f” word in some capacity. 

 

By staying in the Army until 1954 and later in the 1960s coupled with Reserve and National Guard service in the intervening years, this writer was in a prime position to observe the reality of racial integration in the US military.  Categorically, with integration, the barracks talk changed.  In just a few months, the Whites began picking up on the same, vulgar, sewer talk of the Blacks. 

 

 

The Transition 

 

A person can watch more recent movies of the Vietnam era and later and be immediately saddened by the sickening, vulgar talk of the military.  Well, that’s the way it really has been in the last 50 years.  The barracks talk is now vulgar and dirty beyond description. 

 

Before integration, White men would not dare use bad language in front of women.  After integration, all people (Whites, Blacks, men and women) use the same, historic, Black sewer talk.  Not only do adults talk like drunken sailors in an Asian prostitute house; but tragically, the whole society now talks the same way.  As noted above, it’s all over television and little children have picked it up as well. 

 

Some Christian sun worshippers will complain on and on about the modern, vulgar language.  If a person tries to tell them “why” this has happened, they will not listen.  They will get mad and either disbelieve it or will label the whole thing lies and distortions and attack the person making the charge. 

 

 

The Hypocrite Society 

 

Please understand that all of this modern, Black, vulgar, sewer talk is now politically correct.  A person can speak on and on using these pathetically sick words and they are protected 100% by the first amendment.  This is politically correct free speech, totally proper and totally allowable in the modern, American, sun worship culture. 

 

No one in government, politics or US leadership has shown any interest in having the FBI and other federal police agencies to start monitoring and spying on people who talk on the sick, sewer level.  The FBI doesn’t tape record people’s words when they say “mother f-ck-r.” 

 

The reason that no one is interested in this vulgar, Black talk is because it is politically correct.  It is perfectly allowable and correct according to the US Constitution.  But conversely, speech (and thoughts) that are not politically correct are evil, wicked and bad and must be stopped.  Politically incorrect speech (and thoughts) are contrary to the US Constitution, per the new thinking. 

 

The public media, society and leaders all support the use of this vulgar, dirty, Black, sewer talk and it is normal and right.  Ignorant humanists, liberals, Socialists, etc all love this vulgar, Black, sewer talk and defend it 100% as being proper and politically correct language in the current, American, sun worship culture and society. 

 

This allowance is in sharp contrast to the situation described earlier where White people had better not use politically incorrect words for Blacks and minorities.  Such White talk is not allowable by the society or its modern leaders.  It is wrong and Big Brother is doing everything possible to stamp it out. 

 

Yes, it is politically incorrect for a White person to use the “n” word (though it appears at Acts 13:1) or to condemn sodomites as queers.  Yet, it is politically correct, proper and normal for all people to use the popular Black expression “mother f-ck-r.” 

 

Obviously, the modern sun worshipping culture and society is pretty warped with enormous problems in defining right and wrong.  It is a classic hypocrite society! 

 

 

The General Reality and Not 100% of All 

 

Please understand that in mentioning this reality with language and the tearing up of schools and buildings (as outlined in prior comments), this writer is not suggesting that all 100% of Negroes tear up their schools and use vulgar, sewer talk.  There may be a few out there who are responsible and act like most, historic, White people (not many, but perhaps a few). 

 

All Black Africans are not automatically stupid.  A few have some capacity for intellectual thought (not many, but a few).  All “small” Black children are not sexually active (actually, 25% of eleven year old Negroes are, per a Philadelphia survey released on March 20, 1998, as announced on the Rush Limbaugh radio talk show program that day). 

 

Clearly all, 100% of Negro children are not born illegitimately (actually, 69.2% are, per a 1997 survey, Feb 28, 2000, “Weekly Standard,” p. 29).  All young Negro males are not in jail or on parole (actually over half are).  But these problems are typical ones and are indicative of the Black community.  These conditions are so prevalent and general that they become illustrative of Africans in the contemporary society. 

 

Incidentally, this issue of Negro illegitimacy and Blacks in jail was briefly commented upon in the Michael Reagan talk show of Aug 1, 2000. 

 

The point was made by a caller that in the 1950s (before racial integration became US public policy), the illegitimacy rate among Blacks was at 13%.  Most Negro homes had a father at home rather than a father who was unknown, away or in jail.  All of this changed dramatically after racial integration. 

 

 

The Ridiculous 

 

People are in no mood to be told bad things about Negroes.  They will not listen to any statements about the Black crime rate, the high illegitimacy birth rate among Negroes, the dilemma over Negro sexual permissiveness, the problem over Black talk, and on and on. 

 

A person can have a conversation with a modern politically correct White and as long as Blacks are praised, glorified and bragged on with lies and distortions about the real world, the conversation will be all right.  But if any comments are made about the questions of Black morality and character, watch out because the talker has just made an enemy. 

 

Modern Americans under the age of 50 have been lied to so many years and deceived and misled so greatly that they are largely mesmerized zombies and robots who don’t have the foggiest notion of what has happened or is happening to them in terms of race.  And if the race subject comes up, they can’t handle it at all.  The speaker will merely make an enemy. 

 

It is significant that when this writer was young (pre WWII), the general American society looked down on Negroes (as typified by Amos n’ Andy) and would have never bragged and boasted about their attributes.  Certainly, most of America’s political leaders before 1932 and even the Oregon State Constitution, mentioned earlier, would be politically incorrect by modern standards. 

 

My, how times have changed.  The dead grandparents of people living today could never have perceived how their grandchildren would become so ignorant about racial truths they knew and understood in pre WWII days.  It’s a wonder that Thomas Jefferson, George Washington and even Abraham Lincoln don’t try to turn over in their graves over the hypocrisy and stupidity that have set in. 

 

Truly, modern Americans already have a speech controlled society.  Everything said has to be politically correct because anything said that is not politically correct will invoke opposition and hatred and an FBI investigation (if not an extended jail term).  Obviously, some real questions must be raised over whether modern White Americans have freedom of speech or not.  The evidence says no! 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 319--Christian Humanism and Sodomy I

 

 

The Modern Sodom and Gomorrah 

 

One of the phenomenons of our modern contemporary society is the explosion and wide public acceptance of homosexuality, lesbianism, masochism, sadism, pedophilia, masturbation and on and on in the context of the degeneracy and depravity of current promiscuity and permissiveness. 

 

Clearly, the liberal Christian humanistic society is contributing to this extraordinary motion--although the primary impetus for the present phenomenon is ruling Amalek-Edomites.  As outlined formerly, many Amalek-Edomites are themselves perverts and queers.  So it is only natural that they would push and prod stupid, Christian sun worshippers on and on in this direction. 

 

What the Amalekites have been doing to modern Christian Israelites is an almost repeat of what they did to Israelites during the Exodus, as discussed in former chapters. 

 

Per Piska 3 of “Pesikta De-Rab Kahana” (p. 38), the Amalekites lured some Israelites away from their camps so that they could be killed and/or polluted by pederasty.  They have been doing almost the same thing for years now with the gullible, Christian, sun worshipping goyim. 

 

 

Sodomy is Sin 

 

At the outset in this discussion, it is important to observe that Scripturally, sodomy is one of the most depraved and wretched sins of all.  It is so condemned and so terribly bad that The MOST HIGH has judged all sodomites as being deserving of the death sentence (Gen 18:20-33; 19:1-29; Lev 18:22; 20:13; Deut 22:5; 23:17; 29:23; Jud 19:22-23; Jer 49:18; 50:40; Rom 1:21-32; I Cor 6:9; I Tim 1:10). 

 

It is absolutely a certainty.  The Word has the greatest of condemnation for queers, sodomites, homosexual faggots and all other sexual perverts, who misuse one of The ELOHIM’s most precious gifts to man--sex and its right and proper use. 

 

Any fag that tries to justify his sickness and perversion with the Word is both depraved and stupid.  The only thing the Book teaches about sodomites and queers is that secular society should impose the death penalty on them immediately (Lev 20:13).  By the way, even the Christian sun worship culture in early America once had laws on the books making sodomy illegal. 

 

While many of these sodomite laws have been rescinded, others still remain on the books.  With the recent revelations about the Sodomite Slick Clinton, to be later described, a number or state legislatures and courts have been changing their historic stands on sodomy--to effectively abolish the definition.  The Georgia State Supreme Court threw her law out on Nov 20, 1998. 

 

 

Changing Attitudes 

 

Although many laws have been on the books and still remain on the books, the problem in the current Christian sun worship civilization is that much of the public ignores its own laws (except for laws dealing with politically incorrect people, who are always fully prosecuted), as well as the laws of The CREATOR. 

 

In other words, modern Americans do not get prosecuted for sodomy any longer, regardless of the presence or lack of secular laws on the subject.  Literally, no one cares because much of the population has been doing it, from the US president on down to middle school children (as will soon be proven). 

 

Not only is this progressively more and more open public acceptance of homosexual activities as being normal and good in America and the Christian West, but even the power of the Orthodox Jewish authorities is being shaken in Palestine (in their opposition to the ideology of the ruling Amalekite Satanists). 

 

These on-going changes of the secularization of the modern state of Israel will be discussed in some detail in later chapters on the role of the Amalekite bankers/masters in internationalism and globalism. 

 

However, for now, it must be noted that even in Israel, the media and especially the public broadcasters are free to crusade for their liberal, leftist ideals (which are very typically opposed by Orthodox religious authorities).  Thus, the Amalekite controlled media crusades for gay pride, same-sex marriages and whatever else that strikes their fancy (Sep/Oct 2000 “Believer’s Advocate,” p. 20). 

 

 

Some Statistics 

 

Beyond the fact that laws against sodomy are being stricken from the books or just being ignored, there is another tragic fallout from the whole dilemma.  The modern public no longer looks upon sodomy as being wrong--as once was the case.  This reality was brought out in a recent public poll on homosexuality, as released on March 13, 2000, by “Newsweek” magazine. 

 

News reports said the poll revealed that in a survey of American citizens in 1998, 54% of Americans said homosexuality was a sin.  In the 2000 poll, only 46% said it was a sin.  In fact, some 45% now say that it is not a sin.  Apparently, the other 9% didn’t know or wouldn’t express an opinion on the issue.  The point is that today the majority of the people no longer condemn homosexuality on religious grounds. 

 

“Newsweek” magazine, of March 20, 2000 (p. 46-61), ran the results of its latest poll (which included the above findings) in a series of articles on queers.  This poll was quite extensive and displayed the incredible changing public attitudes on homosexual faggots. 

 

For example, 83% of Americans now believe that queers should have job protection, while only some 56% shared that view in 1977.  This very belief in the generic public will translate into more and more affirmative action programs for queers.  The very idea of having job protection will soon spell out job preferential rights. 

 

Some 54% of Americans believe that homosexual partners should get social security checks the same as heterosexual people.  Some 58% believe that gay spouses are entitled to health insurance.  Amazingly, 56% of the faggots claim that straight, non-homosexual people are becoming more tolerant of them and their life styles.  Only 9% say that straights are less tolerant. 

 

The essence here is that the Satanic efforts to change the attitudes of people are paying off.  The Scriptures condemn the sodomites in the worst case scenario.  But the loving Christians no longer share those Scriptural views. 

 

While all of this outlined change in attitudes is sickening and pathetic, what is even worse is that 41 US states and the District of Columbia have so-called hate crime laws on the books to protect homosexuals and lesbians (in the context of sexual orientation).  Only nine states do not now have those laws (GA, SC, TN, IN, AR, KS, TX, NM and WY).  More will be said about this shortly. 

 

 

Present Depravity 

 

Beyond the public schools and libraries, almost half of America’s households now have personal computers.  And half of these (25% of the total US households) are now on the Internet.  Each day, in America, there are some 37 million new Internet users.  Furthermore, about 32 million Americans use it at work.  Manifestly, it is awesome in size in modern America. 

 

The November-December 1999 “Church of God Progress Journal” (p. 3) had a story by Dr Alfred H. Ellis on “Cybersex, Sex on the Internet.”  Ellis offered some very terrifying statistics on what all is happening on the net in terms of sex. 

 

There are now some 19,542,710 visitors each month to the top five, pay, porn sites and some 98,527,275 visitors to the top five, free, porn sites.  About 200 new porn sites are added daily.  Some 70% of all e-porn traffic occurs during the 9 to 5 workday.  In 1998, the Internet porn industry, with its 100,000 commercial porn sites, generated over $1 billion in business. 

 

Also, all porn sites offer what are called free “teasers” (meaning--free viewing of porn pictures that are intended to allure the user to sign up for more).  Though all porn sites require the user to say that they are at least 18 years of age, any child can very easily click the “yes” button to this question and then proceed on to watch the free teaser. 

 

Ellis perceptively notes that “Internet users, who would normally be unlikely to develop sexually compulsive behavior, do so as a result of their Internet usage.”  In short, people using the Internet can easily be enticed into the world of cybersex.  Once entrapped, the unsuspecting person becomes a compulsive sex addict of some sort. 

 

“The Washington Times” of Jan 31-Feb 6, 2000 (p. 13), had a report by Jim Dyer on “Internet porn said responsible for increase in sex addiction” which indicated that on-line porn sites have sparked a huge jump in sexual addiction.  Many mental health centers are filled by people who have lost jobs, spouses and money, because of on-line sex. 

 

Dyer quoted Dr Robert Weiss, director of the Sexual Recovery Institute.  Weiss says that “cyber-sex is the crack cocaine of sexual addiction.”  He adds that it works quickly and is so instantly intense.  Today, huge numbers of people, who have never had a history of a sex problem, all of a sudden, find themselves addicted and sick for the first time, after being involved with cybersex. 

 

Per Weiss, sex is the number one searched for topic on the Internet and it is the third largest revenue generator on the net.  Some 57 million Americans now use the net and 60% of all Web site visits are sexual in nature.  Some 25 million Americans visit cyber-sex sites between one to ten hours a week.  Another 4.7 million persons view cyber-porn in excess of 11 hours a week.  

 

 

Another Report 

 

The Jun 2000 “National Liberty Journal” (p. 3) offered a more recent survey on the exploding popularity of porn sex.  This source suggested that porn sex figures have been going up substantially in all categories.  For instance, in 1999, pornography sites took in $1.5 billion (up from the $1 billion of 1998, as cited above). 

 

Of the millions of users and sites, some 10% of them (as a minimum) use the net for at least 11 hours a week in on-line sexual activity. 

 

Children’s use of cyber-sex is exploding upward.  Per “National Liberty Journal,” some 31% of children surveyed admit that they have visited porn sites on the net.  Even establishment libraries seem to offer pornography to interested people.  The Journal indicated that in a survey of 2000 library patrons (including children), most accessed hard core pornography. 

 

The report noted that as Internet usage increases, doctors are seeing more and more patients who are presenting problems which stem from or is manifested by on-line sexual compulsivity.  Clearly, there is a growing fall out from all of this fascination and obsession with cyber-sex activities.  The fall out is a massive surge of mental illness and addiction over sex which is acting to destroy lives forever. 

 

The fall out of this explosion in use of the Internet for sex clearly means that a very dangerous trend is in motion.  A perfect example of the great evil that can surface from this use was brought out in a news report from the May 31, 2002, “The Week” (p. 5) on what happened to a 13-year-old girl who had become engrossed with the Internet for sex. 

 

This report came from Danbury, Connecticut where the girl made contact with a 25-year-old, married, Brazilian man through an Internet chat room.  The man, Saul Dos Reis, was likely a mixed blooded mongrel who was living in the US on an expired visa.  He and the girl decided to meet at a shopping mall.  He proceeded to take her to a place for sex and then strangled her to death. 

 

 

No Enforcement 

 

As is true in so many areas, the US government under Slick Clinton called for more laws to regulate the Internet, but then made no real effort to enforce existing laws already on the books.  For example, there are some laws which prohibit obscenity and the sexual abuse of children.  However, the Slick Clinton people generally ignored these laws. 

 

The March 2000 “Adult Video News” (the leading trade publication for the porn industry--per the “National Liberty Journal”) called the US Justice Department’s lack of enforcement “benevolent neglect