EZEKIEL

 

and YHWH’s

 

 Judgment

 

 

for the

 

Good News

 

PEOPLE

 

 

 

VOLUME XXI

 

Christian Sociology

 

 

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

 

 

Judgment for the

 

 

 Good News People

 

 

 

 

Volume XXI--Christian Sociology

 

 

 

 

 

by

 

an unworthy servant

 

 

 

 

 

 

And you shall know the truth,

 

and the truth will make you free.

 

(John 8:32)

 

 

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho.  The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States.  Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

 

 

Volume XXI--Christian Sociology 

 

 

CHAPTER                                                                              PAGE

 

 

      -                  Cover Page                                                                                                         1

 

      -                  Title Page                                                                                                             2

 

      -                  Contents                                                                                                              3

 

      -                  Publisher’s Preface                                                                                           5

 

 

Part MMM--Humanistic Problems 

 

      313             Christian Humanism and Feminism                                                               6

 

      314             Christian Humanism and Race I                                                                   12

 

      315             Christian Humanism and Race II                                                                  23

 

      316             Christian Humanism and Race III                                                                 28

 

      317             Christian Humanism and Race IV                                                                41

 

      318             Christian Humanism and Race V                                                                 51

 

 

Part NNN--Humanistic Sodomy 

 

      319             Christian Humanism and Sodomy I                                                              62

 

      320             Christian Humanism and Sodomy II                                                             69

 

      321             A Sodomite President                                                                                      83

 

      322             Christian Acceptance of Sodomy                                                                  91

 

      323             More Sodomy from Christian America                                                          99

 

 

Part OOO--Children 

 

      324             Christian Humanism and Children I                                                           112

 

      325             Christian Humanism and Children II                                                          119

 

      326             Christian Humanism and Children III                                                         131

 

      327             Christian Humanism and Children IV                                                        147

 

      328             Christian Humanism and Children V                                                         158

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

 

 

Publisher’s Preface

 

Greetings!  The following presentation is volume twenty-one of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site. 

 

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world.  In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one. 

 

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material.  It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message! 

 

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1.  It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins:  left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers). 

 

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope. 

 

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers.  May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him.  Shalom (peace) to you and yours! 

 

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 313--Christian Humanism and Feminism

 

 

Some History 

 

The die for what has happened here in the age end on women was actually cast as early as the summer of 1847 in the United States.  That summer, a group of men and women assembled for a convention at Seneca Falls, New York.  On July 19th and 20th of that year, some 68 women and 32 men in the group signed a “Declaration of Principles.” 

 

The statement said:  “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men and women are created equal... The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having a direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her.” 

 

By 1920, the US had guaranteed voting rights for all women in a constitutional amendment.  Surely, the American establishment has changed dramatically for the worse since those days. 

 

 

The Women’s Feminist Movement 

 

Thus, in the new modern way of looking at things, women have supposedly been oppressed and discriminated against for long centuries in the White-male (specifically the WASP, White-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant male), dominated culture.  Per this modern liberal view, women are no longer supposed to be at the home having babies and caring for the children and home. 

 

No!  All of a sudden, women are exactly the same as men (but are they?  The proponents of this nonsense are incredibly stupid and diabolically deranged).  Being the equal of men, women must now be eligible to hold the same jobs and do the same things as men.  There can be no distinction between the sexes in the modern USA (hence, US Naval warships have become floating whorehouses). 

 

 

The Fall-Out 

 

Of course, only an idiot can’t tell what has happened in the United States since the feminist movement has attained success.  This nation is experiencing an explosion in broken homes, divorces, unhappiness, suicides, and numbers of unwanted and/or illegitimate children, who at most may only have one parent, usually the mother, beyond other sad manifestations, to be shortly broached. 

 

The popular TV talk show host Oprah Winfrey endorses and promotes a book club which focuses upon emotional issues of interest to women (Jul 27, 2001, “The Week,” p. 10).  The 43 books sold so far reflect a world where the men lie, cheat and kill; the women are suicidal alcoholics and adulterers; and the children are unloved, abused and kidnapped.  Yes, this is what the modern feminist movement has produced. 

 

The Mar-Apr 2001 “Philadelphia Trumpet” (p. 21) gave these statistics:  Some 45% of new marriages will end in divorce; 68% of remarriages will end in divorce; 40% of married adults have been divorced; 25% of all adults have parents who have been divorced; and over one million children each year see their parents divorce. 

 

In terms of all marriages, currently, the overall divorce rate is now 63% (per the Dec 28, 2001, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 15).  Manifestly, the modern feminist movement and ideology have not been good.  Truly, they have been disasters for women. 

 

In the permissive, welfare, give away state, the broken homes and unwed mothers are supposedly not much of a problem (since the government steps in and gives them monthly checks and welfare aid of all sorts).  Of course, the welfare program only helps to encourage more and more divorces, broken homes and illegitimate babies. 

 

Also, of great concern, girls used to be sugar and spice and everything nice.  But no longer, under the new feminism.  All of a sudden, there has developed “problem girls,” who will grow up to look like butches and be tough as nails. 

 

“US News & World Report” of May 14, 2001 (p. 10), had an array of percentage changes in various levels of crime and violence from 1990 to 1999 by gender for children under age 18. 

 

In all categories (drug abuse, curfew and loitering, assault, weapons and vandalism), the increases were substantially higher for girls than boys.  The overall arrest rate for girls in 1990 went from 70 per 100,000 up to 122 per 100,000 in 1999.  Of the 150,700 arrests for juveniles running away, some 59% were girls.  Of the total 2.47 million juvenile arrests in 1999, some 27.2% were of girls (up from 22.7% in 1990). 

 

 

Working Women 

 

In the current sun worship culture, all kinds of women have to enter the work-force to help the family with income to survive.  Actually, this is wrong.  All women should have men in some capacity in their lives to provide, protect and support them with love, care and concern.  In the case of married women, they are furthermore due their conjugal rights, per YHWH’s Torah. 

 

Thus, women should not be in the work-force beyond those situations where they are alone and have no man to provide for them.  Obviously, some have to work to live.  And for those women working, they should be fairly paid and treated vis-à-vis men.  Working women should not be adversely discriminated against. 

 

They should be recognized as the weaker sex and accordingly so treated.  The Scriptural reality of gender separation has been established in prior chapters.  There is no need to repeat it here.  Suffice to say, it is Scriptural for women to be separated from men and to fulfill their role in life in being a helpmate to men and the mother of children.  This is a good thing. 

 

Conversely, there is a great tragedy in some circles (among almost all Colored peoples, and tragically even among so-called Whites who have heavy Colored genes).  Negroes and White people with evident Black genes are particularly abusive and oppressive with their women. 

 

Of course, this condition is wrong and represents sin.  As it has been described at length in previous chapters on culture, nothing further needs to be said here. 

 

Suffice to say, women historically (at least, in Caucasian lands, and among Caucasian peoples) were never treated as equals or just one of the boys.  They should be (and used to be) treated  better than one of the boys.  But all that has changed in modern America.  Today’s woman is one of the boys. 

 

Upon divorce (which comes regularly and often in today’s culture), women should receive alimony and financial support if they are illegally divorced (by their husbands) without a proper Scriptural cause.  In olden days, men could expect to pay alimony and “wife support” upon divorce.  Now, women are on their own and receive nothing.  Too often, they must work to survive. 

 

 

More “Progress” by Women 

 

A very pathetic report from the US military surfaced in the fall of 2000 when the Navy reported that it was going to spend $561 million to convert the urinals on Navy warships to gender neutral commodes to accommodate the women on board.  Some 3,000 of them are to be changed at a cost of $187,000 each (Nov 20, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2).  Is this insanity or what? 

 

But there are still more crazy US maneuvers.  Periodically, television cameras pick up on some small, frail, woman, American soldier loaded down with a big gun and heavy military gear headed around the world for deployment in a foreign nation.  Even locally, other, frail, weak women are shown as police officers, carrying guns, which they can hardly lift or carry around, much less use in a real emergency. 

 

These pictures (and their realities) are just too ridiculous to be true.  Yet, they are true.  Only a fool will depend on most of these military and police women in an emergency.  They are badly out of their YHWH created roles and totally incapable of providing any defense to this nation when it is ultimately judged by The HIGHEST for its sins.  Like Yechezkel wrote--when this nation is attacked, no one goes out to fight (Ezek 7:14). 

 

Manifestly, it is absolutely ludicrous for modern Americans to be choosing to send their young women all over the world, carrying guns and personal effects that they can barely lift, much less carry into battle and use. 

 

The whole stupidity of this ridiculous exercise over feminism in the military brings to mind some fascinating observations by J. R. Nyquist, in his book “Origins of the 4th World War” (p. 74), on the wisdom (or rather stupidity) of the Aleksandr Kerensky provisional government in Russia in 1917 (when the Czar was forced out). 

 

As Nyquist tells it, Kerensky organized a women’s battalion of 300 women soldiers to supposedly prop him and his government up.  On the night of the Bolshevik coup, this battalion of women launched a supposed counter-attack.  When the battle was over, the 300 women force was gone.  They all had been captured, raped and/or plundered. 

 

 

More Insanity 

 

Now, that society has went insane over women’s rights and the feminist movement, there has been an enormous push for women to enter into all kinds of competitive sports.  It isn’t only that women are competing against other women, but the push has been on for women to compete with men in rough, contact sports. 

 

Already, there are any number of professional women wrestlers and boxers.  While these have usually involved women against women, there is a move afoot to cast women against men in some instances. 

 

Football is one of the classic illustrations of women wanting to play with men.  Any number of females have come out and tried to get on the men’s teams, although it would be an utter disaster for women to compete with men in such activities. 

 

The fall of 2000 saw a woman named Heather Mercer try out as a place kicker for the Duke University football team.  She and four other place kickers were later cut from the team’s roster for not having the necessary skills.  She sued the school in court, claiming gender discrimination. 

 

At the trial, the coach and several players all testified that she did not have the kicking and playing skills needed to make the team.  Notwithstanding this critical reality of her qualifications, she won her suit in court and was awarded a judgment of $2 million in punitive damages (Nov 12, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 23).  Obviously, America has reached the sick point on this whole theme. 

 

Otherwise, one of the prime reasons why so many married women have to work is because the American sun worship tax structure is so high for all people, except the very rich (as described elsewhere herein).  With taxes at the 60% level for the typical American, wives have to leave home and enter the work-force. 

 

Taxes have been steadily going up ever since Roosevelt came to power back in the 1930s.  The upward spiral only continues with no let-up in sight (as discussed in former chapters).  The point is that the present sun worship taxation system necessitates that both husbands and wives work. 

 

The essence of this is that women should not be in the work-force, except in unusual situations.  In general, they should have a man to take care of them which will allow them to be at home taking care of the children and home.  In a word, they should be publicly “separated” from men as much as possible, as discussed in a former chapter. 

 

 

The Paula Jones Case 

 

A later chapter will elaborate upon the Paula Jones lawsuit against former President Slick Clinton and how this poor woman from a trailer park was shuffled around by the United States court system.  As late as April 1998, the local Arkansas Judge Susan Wright threw the case out of court. 

 

In her decision, Wright said that assuming the facts were all true, as alleged by Jones, the case would still not constitute sexual harassment, although she did allow that perhaps Slick could have been sued or tried in court for assault if Jones and/or the state would have chosen that course.  However, this option was out since the statute of limitations had expired. 

 

The point of this affair is that the women’s lib movement supported Slick all the way throughout this litigation.  The hypocritical women’s motion never gave any support to Jones--apparently because she was a poor woman from a trailer park, rather than being an elite feminist from the Ivy League and/or the Eastern establishment. 

 

Now that Judge Susan Wright joined in with Bill to effectively deny Paula Jones her day in court, it spelled an absolute disgrace and sick condition in the United States when a poor woman who works as a state employee can be accosted, harassed and intimidated by the Governor of that state and have no recourse at law. 

 

This means that male supervisors at all levels can now sexually abuse, hurt, intimidate and harass innocent women under their supervision and control; and at least, by Judge Wright’s decision, nothing will be done about it.  The stupid and ridiculous women’s movement (under Amalekite leadership) suffered a major setback in Wright’s decision. 

 

 

A Final Word on Feminism 

 

Historically, in America, and indeed around the world, certain things have historically been referred to in the feminine gender.  Nations, corporations and organizations of various types are referred to as she or her.  Even in the Scriptures, nations and religious bodies are mentioned in the feminine gender. 

 

Thus, all kinds of things are referred to with female references and/or female names.  For example, hurricanes and typhoons have historically been given the names of women.  Ships at sea and airplanes have routinely been given female names (like the famous Enola Gay that flew off of Tinian Island in the Pacific to drop the first atomic bomb on Japan in 1945). 

 

But all this has been changing--sometimes slowly, but nevertheless deliberately.  The last several years have seen global weather people start using both male and female names for hurricanes and typhoons.  The latest fad is that the shipping industry is ending centuries of tradition to start referring to ships as “it” instead of “her” (Apr 8, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 314--Christian Humanism and Race I

 

 

Racial Integration and Free Sex 

 

Racial integration and amalgamation are some of the backbone philosophies of Christian humanists which have gained widespread social acceptance throughout the United States during the past 70 years.  The humanists really suppose that all humans/humanoids, of whatever kind or type, descend from Adam and Eve; and that there is a “brotherhood” of all of these different humans/humanoids. 

 

As commented upon elsewhere in this study, this brotherhood of man concept comes from the old sun worship cults where most of them preached it.  It was particularly important among the Chrishna and other Eastern sun worshippers, who have played such an enormous role in the formation and development of Christian theology. 

 

The basis for this Christian thinking was well put by Dr Burton L. Mack when he suggested that Christians have seen themselves as a social construct.  Often, they have believed that they constitute a congregation, a household, a family, a nation, a temple, a city or a kingdom (“Who Wrote the New Testament? The Making of a Christian Myth,” p. 12). 

 

Christian denominationalism and division, since the surfacing of the Protestant Reformation, have altered this thinking somewhat.  While many denominations would never see themselves in a family with collective Christianity, they can and often do relate to that definition for their own individual groups.  And they relate to it in the context that all members are automatically in the brotherhood. 

 

Thus, this concept of a brotherhood of man is pretty prevalent throughout Christian America, as proven by persons like Sydney Cleveland, editor of the Sabbath Sentinel (mentioned earlier), and the secularist Vice President Al Gore (supposedly a Christian) who referred to a brotherhood and sisterhood of Americans at a meeting of the freedom of choice (abortion) people on January 22, 1997 (evidently in Washington, DC). 

 

 

The Christian Attitude 

 

This sun worship thinking has been well prevalent in almost all of Christendom--clearly from its very beginnings (even in the Old South, in its days of slavery and racial segregation). 

 

Perhaps the best statement of this was made by the World Council of Churches when it adopted a miscegenation and amalgamation resolution at its second Assembly in 1954 at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. 

 

Their resolution declared that “Segregation on the grounds of race, colour or ethnical origin in all forms is in conflict with the Gospel and must be regarded as irreconcilable with Christian teaching about man and the essence of the Church of Christ... There can be no objection in principle to intermarriage... No state has the right to prohibit mixed marriages.” 

 

Not wishing to be left out of this modern insanity over racial integration and the destruction of The ELOHIM created, separate races, the National Council of Churches adopted a sun worship creed which proclaims-- “One God and Father, One Race of Men Within the Church.” 

 

 

School Desegregation 

 

In an article on “The Unity of the Church,” appearing in “Essays on Segregation,” Dr George M. Brydon noted that “the opinion rendered by the Supreme Court in May 1954 seems to have introduced into the thinking of Christian America “a new thought which has gone racing into many sections of our country.

 

“It has developed into almost a new item to be placed in the creeds of all churches that the Divine plan is to merge all races of men into one race.” 

 

Of course, this May 1954 decision was the famous one in Brown versus the Board of Education which declared school segregation illegal in the United States, despite the fact that the 10th amendment to the US Constitution clearly left such questions to the individual states and earlier Supreme Court decisions had recognized this condition. 

 

So the court began a process of re-writing the Constitution, on its own terms, by judicial interpretation.  One of the interesting things about this judicial interpretation (to change the US Constitution) is that it demonstrates the limitations, fallacies and shortcomings of human laws as opposed to The ELOHIM’s laws. 

 

Human laws change regularly at the whim of evil men while YHWH’s laws never change.  Not only did the court declare racial segregation in the public schools illegal, but later courts and governing administrations forced this concept on all private schools as well (mainly, by manipulating the tax code to force racial integration and miscegenation on them). 

 

Not content with the change in laws, the courts went to work to impose the bussing of children all over large areas to also achieve “racial mixing.”  This stupidity has not only wrecked the schools, it has been a disaster for the students.  Now, children have to spend hours every day on school buses to be sure that they get “integrated” (and may develop cancer from diesel fumes from the buses, per news reports on Feb 12, 2001). 

 

While there have been a host of horrible social fall-outs over school desegregation, one of the most profound, deleterious effects has been the dumbing down of American education (which a few Americans are now beginning to take note of). 

 

It looks like ignorant, sun worshipping liberals would be able to put two and two together and realize that the decline in American education started primarily in the 1950s with racial integration of the schools.  But they never understand.  More will be said on this theme in later remarks. 

 

 

Mother Sardis, Revisited  

 

Of course, collective Christianity is now on this sun worshipping bandwagon which is trying to promote and encourage racial amalgamation at every opportunity.  A good illustration of this insanity was demonstrated in the “Bible Advocate,” church magazine of the Church of God (Seventh Day), mother church of the entire, lethargic, Sardis movement, previously mentioned (Rev 3:1-6). 

 

This mother Sardis group (historically a White church) now has a Black president (evidently under an affirmative action program).  One of her other leading Negro ministers is reportedly married to a White woman. 

 

Of course, the (former) editor of this miscegenated mess (Roy A. Marrs) got on board to do his part in attempting to destroy the separate races which were created as “good” by The MOST HIGH. 

 

It seems that this Sardis magazine for May 1997 published a story (“Prayer for a Mother”) about a single, White woman (referred to as a lady) who gave birth to a Negro baby--out of wedlock.  Quite naturally, there was never a hint or suggestion of anything wrong over this situation in the printed article. 

 

One Spokane, Washington reader of the story was disturbed with the way it was handled editorially and wrote a letter to the editor, suggesting that the tone of the article was that mongrelization was good, and that the woman was held up as a moral lady (thus, a role model of sorts; when, in fact, she was a cheap, White whore). 

 

The Sep 1997 “Bible Advocate” published the short one paragraph reader’s letter, along with an “Editor’s Note” which proceeded to attack the reader (with eight paragraphs of comment) for attitude and unwarranted judgments (effectively, for daring to write in). 

 

The Sardis editor didn’t dispute that she might have been a whore or that mixed race “marriages” might be Scripturally wrong (Marrs did write marriages and not illicit sex).  Instead, he tried to say that the article was “neutral” on those points, but did argue that the woman was a good woman since she did not abort the mongrel child. 

 

Going on, Marrs attacked the reader for judgments which he allegedly didn’t have any proof on--such as she being a whore, while it was possible that she became pregnant through some innocent action, accident or mistake (the rebellious justification for fornication and pregnancy by many unwed mothers). 

 

As Editor Marrs tried to argue, the article teaches “compassion,” the need to assume good things about people and to pray for sinners (but as noted earlier, YHWH wants repentance first and then prayer).  The editor’s bottom line was that he had no reason to apologize for printing the article.  In other words, everything was handled perfectly by his church, despite his uncertainty over whether miscegenation is right or wrong. 

 

 

The Liberal Approach 

 

Marrs followed the established liberal and humanist positions of essentially avoiding the facts; and instead, concentrating upon the person making the complaint.  As always, liberals will not deal with the facts (because of being under demonic powers and influence), but will divert attention to personalities by attempting to ridicule and demean anyone who questions their actions on the basis of fact and logic. 

 

As elsewhere commented upon beforetime, it is virtually impossible to intellectually have dialogue with liberals when they will not deal with logic, facts and evident truth.  Inevitably, they want to immediately shift any argument away from truth and reality and focus it upon personalities.  They especially direct their attacks upon anyone who questions their actions or beliefs. 

 

As a follow-up, after printing the above exchange, the Sardis people at Denver received other pro and con reader’s letters on the issue.  They printed a couple of them in their December 1997 magazine.  One dead, Sardis writer wrote that “I believe that interracial marriage is appropriate” in the eyes of “God,” more than interfaith marriage (Dec 1997 “Bible Advocate,” p. 16). 

 

Another dead, Sardis respondent suggested that after “Christ,” the church was united across language, national and ethnic lines and that “God” is pleased to see His children marry across racial lines (ibid, p. 16).  This one also cited Timothy as being the son of a mixed-race marriage (never understanding that Timothy’s Jew-Greek ancestry, assuredly focused on religion and not race at all). 

 

Editor Marrs, to his credit, did mention Deuteronomy 22:9-11, in defense of how he had handled the original question.  Nevertheless, this resurfacing of the question proves that many Sardis believers are as hoodwinked and Scripturally uninformed as the rest of the American, sun worshipping population. 

 

Of course, this event and the way mother Sardis handled it is a classic illustration of the depravity and sickness in traditional, sun worshipping Christianity which this Sardis church is a part of (they may keep the Sabbath; but otherwise, most of the Sardis doctrines and beliefs are basically sun worship--just as is true with the rest of Christendom). 

 

 

Accuse the Accuser 

 

This tragic and sickening action by a sick, warped, sun worship church in a sun worship culture is important to review and think about because it demonstrates the pathetic state that modern Christianity and the American culture have deteriorated into. 

 

If a person tries to raise a legitimate question about such an obviously controversial article, then the editor merely turns the focus from the article to the reader who would dare write in to complain.  That’s the way the liberals and Christian humanists operate.  Anyone writing a contrary letter to a liberal editor can normally expect to receive a personal attack, if not to be just ignored. 

 

Former President Slick Clinton has been following this modis operandi ever since he entered politics.  Let someone complain publicly or in print over how Slick had abused and misused his office or over how immoral, crooked and dishonest he had been, and the White House reaction was not to deny the charges.  Instead, it attacked the person speaking out (accuse the accuser). 

 

Some years ago, in government service, this writer fired a worthless lawyer (who was an evident Amalekite, although i did not know it at the time).  He immediately sued me for discrimination, claiming that he was fired because of him being a Jew.  From his viewpoint, any disciplinary actions against him would be because of racial and religious discrimination and not because of his job performance. 

 

Instead of a focus being made upon his work and duties which prompted the dismissal, he turned the issue around to focus upon me.  In other words, his conduct became a non-issue and my conduct became the total question in court.  The point of this is that it has become virtually impossible to impose any disciplinary standards upon Blacks, Jews and other so called minorities today in the US. 

 

 

More Sardis Depravity 

 

Early 1998 saw former President Slick Clinton announce a Presidential Commission on Diversity which seemed to be a project of doing nothing, but giving Clinton and his political cronies a forum to publicize their great concern and compassion over Colored Americans and the desire to achieve more and more cultural and racial integration and amalgamation, contrary to the wishes of most people of all races. 

 

Seeing this stupid motion underway, the Black President of the Church of God (Seventh Day) followed up with his own scheme of diversity for the old, mother, Sardis church--built, financed, funded, supported, motivated and directed largely by ignorant White Americans over the last 145 years. 

 

This new Sardis leader launched his own “President’s Commission on Diversity,” as announced in the “Bible Advocate” for July-August 1998 (p. 19).  The Sardis leadership is committed to the task of ministry to all peoples and races in the context of diversity (just like the historic sun worshippers have traditionally done). 

 

The new commission will devise a statement expressing the church’s commitment to diversity; design a plan for diversity training, awareness, and development throughout the church; and help ensure that the ministries, priorities, and programs of the conference reflect diversity. 

 

This new Sardis commission of ten people (headed up by a woman) is clearly diversified--at least, in accordance with affirmative action concepts.  It consists of three Hispanic males and one Hispanic female, one Black male and one Black female, one possibly White male and three possibly White females.  The word “possibly” has been used because one can never be sure about White people. 

 

Often, reported Whites are Amalekites, posing as White majority types.  As a minimum, the one White male would likely be a liberal leftist who would sell his own race and kind out for nothing.  The three supposed White women are surely feminists who are in absolute rebellion against their YHWH ordained roles of silence, humility and submission. 

 

 

More Multi-Culturalism and Integration 

 

The Jul-Aug 2000 “Bible Advocate” followed the precedent established in prior issues with a new blast promoting and encouraging multi-culturalism and racial amalgamation.  This issue was led by a “Love and Let Love” theme.  The front cover had a photo of a supposedly White man “rapping” or dialoging with some tall Black teenagers (with sunglasses, necklaces and baseball caps on backward). 

 

Presumably, the alleged White man was a Christian of some sort (though he did have a very pronounced Hittite nose) who might have been supposedly reaching out for interracial harmony and contact with the Black youths (who appeared to be rappers). 

 

An interior Christian love and relationship article had a picture of a woman with her arms wrapped around a very definite Negro man (Jul-Aug 2000 “Bible Advocate,” p. 8).  Though the article was on marriage, the woman had no wedding band.  So maybe, they were not supposed to be husband and wife (just lovers). 

 

While some would suppose that her dark complexion and long black hair meant that she had African genes, the true was that she appeared to be very European in bone structure and appearance.  Thus, she could well have been a Southern European from Italy, Spain, Portugal or Greece or otherwise a Middle Easterner of some sort.  Clearly, this photo of her hugging a very Negro man sent the wrong message. 

 

Another article on Christian love (ibid, p. 12-13) also had a photo which sent bad vibes to impressionable young children.  This one was of a reasonably dark teenage boy (who appeared to be a Mexican or Hispanic).  He too had a teenage girl with her arms wrapped around him (from behind) and wearing no wedding ring.  But she was very white in color, compared with his dark skin and Hispanic genetic features. 

 

Apparently, the “Bible Advocate” bought these photographs from some agency and merely used them in the magazine to supposedly prove Christian love. 

 

The only problem with the choice of photos is that all three failed on the love angle.  And instead, they promoted multi-culturalism and promiscuous, interracial sex and miscegenation.  They were very poor examples of things to be shown to innocent, gullible, White children. 

 

 

Something Missing 

 

The only thing missing from the Bible Advocate articles about the Sardis efforts in trying to create an interracial and multi-cultural organization is how many of these dead, Sardis people are Pentecostal Holy Rollers who could liven up their interracial meetings and contacts with some wild fanaticism. 

 

Although the article didn’t say, the truth is that historic Sardis has been opposed to this demonism on occasion.  However, having never effectively dealt with the problem, the motion has surfaced from time to time in Sardis churches. 

 

It’s easy to say that this unique new Sardis thinking on racial diversity/multi-racialism (which, by the way, is absolutely and totally unscriptural) will accomplish nothing for Whites.  It will be more humanism and amalgamation of the races to further destroy the White majority that financed, worked and built this rebellious, Sardis church. 

 

Since this wicked, sun worship, Sardis group is so pathetic and so blatant in its sun worship practices, maybe it should be destroyed.  In any case, she likely will soon crumble from her own weight because of her insistence on violating the Words of YHWH. 

 

At the moment, the self destruction process seems to be the path now being followed by mother Sardis, as she integrates and miscegenates herself into oblivion.  The Jun 2003 “Bible Advocate” (p. 19) showed the modern success of Sardis in a photo of a pretty, young, White girl seated next to a Black boy in attendance at a church, youth rally on Apr 12-13, 2003, in Conroe, Texas. 

 

This apparent teen-age couple were wearing similar T-shirts and seemed to be smiling and enjoying themselves at the interracial meeting going on in Texas.  It is stupid moves like this insanity which will manifestly end mother Sardis.  And because of her gross sins and wickedness, mother Sardis should end.  The world will be better off without her influence. 

 

Please be assured that if this wicked, Sardis Church does not self destruct in the present mode, her day is certainly coming when The ELOHIM will intervene to destroy this sick and lacking institution.  Manifestly, as more and more Coloreds integrate and miscegenate, this group will reach a point of being useless for any good purpose.  Self destruction seems inevitable.  YHWH’s justice sometimes works out in strange ways. 

 

 

A Classic 

 

Incidentally, in mentioning the efforts of mother Sardis to destroy herself, it should be noted that she has an internal Hispanic group which had a “Texas Hispanic Convocation” in Texas in Nov 2002 (Jan-Feb 2003 “Bible Advocate,” p. 17).  Can anyone perceive the uproar if the Whites in Texas had held a White people convocation?  An absolute crisis would have resulted.  Truly, it is a hypocrite world! 

 

 

A Final Note on Sardis Depravity 

 

While it would seem that mother Sardis has hit the bottom of the barrel on depravity, there was more to come which must be highlighted.  The Sardis Black President had a “President’s message” in the Oct 1999 “Bible Advocate” (p. 18).  This one was entitled “The Tale of Two Crosses.”  

 

In the article, the Sardis leader said that the cross was the core of Christianity and was central to the Gospel.  He then called the Sardis people to a “radical commitment to the cross.”  He challenged Sardis believers to unwrap it, embrace it and raise it high for all the world to see.  He concluded by saying that the “cross of Christ” offers life.  

 

Of course, this is typical Christian nonsense from people who simply don’t know what the Book is all about.  Its significance, however, is in the fact that vast numbers of Sardis people have correctly understood the evils of the Christian cross over the years.  Historically, Sardis writings did not seem to come out in favor of this pagan symbol of sun worship, as their president advanced in the Oct 1999 magazine. 

 

In any case, the article prompted a reader’s letter who took exception to the church’s advocacy of the Christian cross.  And naturally, the editor (Calvin Burrell) defended his leader in the Mar 2000 issue on readers’ letters (Oct 1999 “Bible Advocate,” p. 17).  He argued that the cross was an appropriate symbol for Christians--like other Christian symbols (dove, light, trumpet, tables of stone, pictures, etc). 

 

The point in bringing up this issue on the cross is not to single out the Church of God (Seventh Day) for paying homage and support to the pagan cross symbol of ancient sun worship (as is proven in this study at hand).  The issue is a bigger one because it demonstrates the level of depravity and wickedness in the mother, Sardis definition. 

 

Sardis, like the rest of Christianity, has grown more wicked and has departed even more from YHWH’s truth over the years.  Because there is so much depravity and wretchedness in this sick organization, judgment will soon strike hard on her when it strikes Christian America. 

 

 

The Effect of Christian Thinking on Race, Revisited  

 

Consequently, being ignorant of what the Scriptures really say, the humanists (secular and Christian) are rushing in to completely destroy all of the separate races and bring about a society of one race (which has been an objective of the Devil for 6,000 years with the hoped for destruction of Adam, who was made in YHWH’s image--not the behemah or chaiyah--see Gen 1:27; 6:1-9; 11:1-9). 

 

It is quite obvious that the entire concept of racial integration and amalgamation is at serious odds with YHWH’s Torah (as discussed earlier) and the whole meaning of the Hebrew word kodesh (also mentioned earlier).  The Hebrew kodesh means separate, set apart and separation (yes, segregation); and its focus is partly on racial considerations (for reasons described earlier). 

 

Therefore, the rebellious humanists were among the first to work on a social plane to end all laws prohibiting miscegenation (yes, almost all US states had such laws until they were declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court a few years ago) and to do everything possible in governments, schools and churches to destroy Adam by miscegenation and mongrelization.

 

Their incredible success is amply demonstrated in just a few statistics on how attitudes have changed since racial integration and amalgamation became acceptable.  In 1958, 4% of US Whites approved of interracial marriages; while in 1997, the figure had risen to 61% (per H. Millard in the Jul-Aug 1997 “Jubilee,” p. 17). 

 

Later statistics from a 2001 survey by the “Washington Post” and others showed that interracial sex was up even more significantly.  As reported in the Jul 27, 2001, “The Week” (p. 10), this survey said that four in ten Americans have dated someone of another race and that 75% of these were serious romances.  Some 86% of Blacks say that they would date Whites and some 90% of Whites say that they would date Blacks. 

 

 

Human Gods? 

 

Since the human being is a type of god (deciding right and wrong), then the humanists have pushed for the removal of all restraints on sex--including homosexuality, premarital fornication; and of course, the just mentioned miscegenation. 

 

This gross, sexual permissiveness was the prevailing situation in most of the old sun worship cults in ancient Greece and Rome and as now evident in modern Christian America. 

 

In other words, each person can decide on his/her own about the morality of different sexual situations.  Amalekite controlled Hollywood has helped put this over with its more and more progressively open display of perverted sex at the movies and on TV. 

 

Interracial sex, homosexuality and sex outside of marriage are now commonly shown as good things on the boob tube.  Sex education and the free distribution of condoms have also helped in this regard.  To have a free sex society, abortions (discussed earlier) are almost mandatory or women would be having all kinds of unwanted children--so abortions have been pushed as well. 

 

 

Age Ending Miscegenation Foretold 

 

It is interesting that YESHUA predicted this sickening time when He noted that there would be a repeat of the times of Noah in the age end with people marrying and giving in marriage--obviously illegal marriages, since legal marriages are both proper and ELOHIM ordained (Matt 24:37-38; Lu 17:26-27). 

 

Of course, a check of the Torah does spell out the prevalent miscegenation of Adamites with other created beings in Noah’s day to precipitate the flood (Gen 6:1-3).  As noted in previous comments, Noah was perfect in his racial genealogy, following this period of massive interracial copulation (Gen 6:8-9). 

 

Daniel likewise had some interesting observations which could also be relevant here.  He wrote that as one observes the iron mixed with the tempered clay (in the revived Roman Empire in the age end), “they will mix themselves with the races of mankind” (Dan 2:43, per the Ferrar Fenton translation). 

 

At a first glance, in terms of the contemporary world, one can immediately recognize Adamites (particularly women) crossing with the behemah, chaiyah and nokri.  But in the broader perspective, it may now or later include Adamic women crossing with fallen angels (from UFOs?), just as happened in Noah’s day. 

 

 

Bigger Things Coming 

 

Consequently, this wide acceptance of interracial sex between racially different humans/humanoids could be just a prelude to introduce and desensitize people to accept more advanced miscegenation--involving fallen angels. 

 

On this, it should be noted that some of the people participating in UFO abductions had been or were practicing interracial sex--like a 1961 New England case involving a Negro named Barney Hill and his White wife Betty.  Often, the alleged UFO abductions involve sex in some manner.  This condition will be assessed in some detail in a later chapter focusing upon UFOs. 

 

In short, the pre-flood Adamite peoples had miscegenated themselves out of existence--except for Noah and his immediate family.  Manifestly, this is precisely what is happening right now all over the world (Jer 31:27, described earlier).  Left unchecked, Adamites (and Israelites) will be completely bred out of existence. 

 

As noted in a prior chapter, this writer recalls a college textbook on anthropology put out in the 1950s which recognized the predictable inevitability of one race across the globe.  This textbook went so far to declare that the Polynesians of the Pacific area best represent what this one race would look like physically since the Polynesians are apparently a certain blend of the three to five major races in the world. 

 

 

Balaam’s Words Recalled 

 

Quite naturally, the people of Yisrael have been the first target of this massive miscegenation campaign, although Satan has the larger objective of destroying the Adam kind completely through miscegenation with the other created humanoids.  The intellectual process of accomplishing this genocide was spelled out by Balaam 3,500 years ago, as elaborated upon in a prior chapter beforetime. 

 

The wicked Amalek-Edomites are the obvious persons leading the way on this assault now in progress on the people of Yisrael, as also described in a previous chapter.  As this publication has established in numerous former presentations, the Amalek-Edomites are genetically born with a basic hatred and animosity toward Israelites. 

 

This mind-set completely dominates the mentality and thinking of the majority of them--obviously unconsciously, as most assuredly are unaware of why they think and act as they do. 

 

Since these Amalek-Edomites have accumulated vast resources of wealth and corporate power; ownership of prostitute politicians and government leaders; and control of the media and entertainment industries in the Christian Yisrael nations; they have had the means to fully implement Balaam’s advice. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 315--Christian Humanism and Race II

 

 

Impact of Immigration 

 

A prior chapter herein focused upon the immigration problem and its linkage to diabolical and evil Amalek-Edomites.  It is this Amalekite control over America and the other White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations which has promoted or at least allowed the massive immigration of Coloreds into these countries that were largely White before WWII. 

 

 

Botswana 

 

The stage was set for more of this Colored immigration to White countries in Botswana, Africa in 1997 at the Southern African Dialogue meeting, when the Malaysian leader Mahathir ben Mohammed said that “If the Third World is not offered its rightful share of global wealth, it should use people mobility as the ultimate weapon.” 

 

Going on, Mohammed added:  “We should migrate North in the millions, legally or illegally... masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America” (Sep 1998 “New Beginnings,” p. 16).  Actually, this immigration started earlier than 1997, but it surely has intensified since then. 

 

Mohammed’s words have certainly been coming true--because the Center for Immigration Studies reported on January 4, 2001, that more than 10% of the US population are now immigrants--mostly Coloreds (Jan 22, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 4).  Most have come here in the last ten years. 

 

One would suppose that if millions of Blacks and Asians could migrate into Europe and America to destroy the White culture and civilization, the White nations would have brains enough to take some action to close their borders and protect themselves.  But generally, they appear to be so stupid and decadent that they never understand that a flood of Colored peoples from the Third World will destroy them for ever. 

 

It is also true that ignorant White people and their ridiculous policies of humanism in their governments have helped to speed up this massive immigration which is slowly destroying the moral and cultural foundations of their own nations (even in the absence of an immediate flood of Coloreds, as envisioned by Mohammed). 

 

 

White Christian Encouragement

 

Since government policies have made it extremely difficult (almost impossible) to hire local American farm hands and laborers (because many Americans are lazy and won’t work, due to the welfare programs), many agricultural producers and companies with nasty jobs are importing and hiring numbers of aliens from the Colored Third World (legally and illegally). 

 

When these people come, they typically stay to integrate and mix with the established residents.  This process actually started in the US in the mid 19th century with the importation of Chinese workers to build railroads.  But it has intensified in the post WWII environment. 

 

Money and profits have always been the name of the game.  And the usual American farm family and/or big corporation (since corporations have taken over American agriculture and almost everything else in the US society) could care less about demographics and the future destruction of their own race and kind because of Colored immigration, coupled with massive miscegenation and interracial sex. 

 

 

Mohammed on Reparations 

 

The just quoted words of Malaysian leader Mahathir ben Mohammed actually revealed a two pronged motion.  In the first place, Mohammed declared that “if” the Colored Third World was not offered (correctly “given”) its supposedly rightful share of global wealth, then the Colored Third World should inundate the White, Christian West with Colored immigrants. 

 

These words (or threats, however one may want to take them) are paving the way for enormous global change in both aspects--the efforts of the ignorant goyim to give their wealth away to impoverished Coloreds and to proceed with massive Colored immigration to completely change the demographics in the White Christian West. 

 

Consequently, Colored people from around the world have been actively pursuing both of these objectives.  As outlined in former chapters, they are receiving not only encouragement from the plutocratic Amalekite bankers/masters, but money and other forms of assistance in the leftist political arena to push both objectives to fruition. 

 

 

The American Dilemma 

 

Consequently, the United States has had a very dedicated and professionally led motion (by plutocratic Amalekite bankers/masters) for the US government to pay reparations to Black Americans for their supposedly former slavery and discrimination at the hands of the majority Whites.  The plan is for America to pay each Black person $10,000 (or more). 

 

“Spotlight” (p. 2) of February 28, 2001, offered the obvious conclusion on this line that modern America will now have to pay reparations and restitution to the American Black descendants of slaves who were in the US some 150 years ago.  Sure enough, Congressman John Conyers has introduced legislation to pay these reparations (the Jul 2001 “American Sentinel,” p. 2, says that this motion is serious and may succeed). 

 

Any number of prominent US newspapers and media sources have endorsed the plan and have begun promotional campaigns to mesmerize and zombiize the gullible American public to accept it.  Here, one can mention the “New York Times,” the “Philadelphia Inquirer,” and the “Hartford, Connecticut Courant.” 

 

 

Extortion 

 

Already, various Black power groups (like Jesse Jackson’s PUSH and the NAACP) are going after private businesses with extortion for alleged wrongs to Negroes.  Jesse Jackson and his PUSH organization have extracted millions of dollars from US companies (which panic and run in absolute fear that Jackson will publicly attack them as racists and White supremacists).  Most gladly pay off to stay in his good graces. 

 

The Feb 11, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A10) had an AP report on “Trial set in use of rhyme that has a racist history” which revealed a Black lawsuit in Kansas City which was about as ridiculous as possible.  The basis for this stupidity surfaced when an airline stewardess with Southwest Airlines said “Eenie, meenie, minie, moe:  pick a seat, we gotta go” as a part of asking people to sit down for the takeoff.  

 

Well, too bad for the airlines, but there were two Black women on board who immediately said that they were offended because of the alleged “racist” remark.  They filed a lawsuit against the airline seeking millions of dollars in damages. 

 

Thus, many companies are now being forced to pay huge payoffs in extortion to Blacks or face enormous trouble (of course, their customers end up paying these extortion payments). 

 

The NAACP says that it wants money from insurance companies who formally insured slave owners, as well as restitution from companies who once bought cotton from Southern plantation owners.  These companies will either begin paying huge extortion payments or Black lawyers will move in on them like leeches to really extort money in expensive court actions. 

 

 

Lawsuits 

 

O. J. Simpson’s lawyer Johnnie Cochran and some other leading trial lawyers are making preparations to launch a class action lawsuit by 2003 against the US government and various private corporations which they say benefited from slavery.  The Blacks also want a payoff from Washington because they say that slave labor was involved in building the US capitol. 

 

Apparently, this team of lawyers is led by Black Harvard law professor Charles Ogletree (Mar 1, 2002, “The Week,” p. 36).  The group has organized a Reparations Coordinating Committee which has identified several businesses that they will initially go after--like Aetna Insurance, New York Life, AIG, J. P. Morgan Bank and Chase Manhattan Bank (or now, the J. P.  Morgan-Chase Bank, after its merger). 

 

If success is achieved and they are able to rip off huge sums of money from these businesses, this team of lawyers can extend their scope of operations to all kinds of people, businesses and governmental entities.  The sky is the future in this extortion game; because in the big cities, these lawyers will have largely Black juries who will routinely award huge damages to the Blacks. 

 

In time, this motion could spread to the entire Southern states--to include all governments (city, county and state) and almost all private businesses and citizens of the Old South.  The Black lawyers and supporters can accuse virtually the entirety of the US South for slavery practiced 150 years ago. 

 

With public pressure, the entire South can incur such massive restitution payments to the Blacks that it would destroy the Southern economy and White population.  As will be discussed in a later chapter, the Blacks have long had their eyes set upon taking possession of the American South and establishing a Black government there.  This reparation thing could help pave the way in this endeavor. 

 

When Russian and Chinese conquerors enter the US, their Black allies can present their claims to them for resolution.  Surely, they will be sympathetic and gladly turn over the Old South to the Blacks--lock, stock and barrel. 

 

 

The Global Motion 

 

Actually, Mohammed’s counsel on going after reparations and payoffs (as outlined above) has caught on well beyond the United States--actually all around the world. 

 

Colored Third World nations (through the UN and other global outreaches and power structures) are demanding that White, Western, Christian nations shell out grants to them for all their so-called sufferings and deprivations (as if the Coloreds are not responsible for their troubles, but that the White man is responsible). 

 

The far reaching aspects of this plan was pointed out in a “New American” magazine article of February 2001 on “The True Cost of Reparations,” as quoted in the Mar-Apr 2001 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 1, 4). 

 

As “New American” reported-- “The slavery reparations movement is the domestic element of a global campaign demanding that the developed nations of the West can compensate Africa for their unjust enrichment through supposed exploitation of the continent.”  While this article focused upon Africa’s demand for money, the idea can quickly encompass the world. 

 

Already, the UN has conducted a “World Conference Against Racism, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,” in South Africa in the summer of 2001.  This conference focused upon the question of reparations for Black African countries.  Cuba’s Castro reportedly spoke out in favor of it and led the motion in that direction (Jul 2001 “American Sentinel,” p. 3). 

 

 

More 

 

Of course, the Amalekite bankers/masters are not going to be pushing for Black reparations without them somehow getting in on the action.   And they do have a motion underway. 

 

US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright in February 2000 spoke out in favor of requiring monetary compensation for the “slave laborers” used by the Germans in WWII.  Germany has already paid out billions to so-called holocaust survivors.  The Albright scheme is just one more which will open the door for more German pay outs.  This news report of Albright appeared in the just cited Feb 28, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 2). 

 

As stupid as these various reparation schemes appear, they all may reach fruition (unless the money system destructs first before the votes can be tallied).  As things now stand, the German government will probably have to pay reparations to the descendants of the people used in WWII concentration camp work projects.  Surely, the US will entertain the same idea for American Blacks. 

 

 

Tax Credits  

 

In anticipation of ripping off huge sums of money from the gullible US taxpayers, a movement commenced in 2001 and 2002 for Black people to claim a tax credit for reparations on their tax returns (Apr 29, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 4).  Hundreds of Blacks have claimed these credits and the US Treasury has been allowing them.  Some $30 million was paid out (including almost $90,000 to one recipient). 

 

While these tax credits are illegal and probably will be eventually stopped by the IRS, there is little doubt that the improper pay outs will never be collected.  Thus, the people who worked this scam seem to have gotten away with it. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 316--Christian Humanism and Race III

 

 

Some South African History 

 

Several other chapters in this production address the absolute racial crisis that has erupted in the once stable, prosperous, happy land of South Africa.  A few years ago, the internationalists were able to force racial integration and amalgamation upon the White-minority people of South Africa and the result has been an utter disaster. 

 

While many intelligent observers can grasp what has happened and is happening to South Africa (primarily because of the ruling plutocrats, as will be assessed in later chapters), the “why” for this catastrophe seems to largely escape recognition.  To appreciate the why, it is necessary to review some South African history. 

 

At the start, it must be realized that all of the peoples now in South Africa came here over the years since 1500 as immigrants.  Before 1500, even Blacks were located North near the Congo River.  They started moving into East Central Africa in about 1500 (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 790). 

 

The first White, Dutch settlers came to the Southern part of Africa in 1652 and established the Cape Colony (which covered Southern Africa).  When these Whites arrived, they found the area largely uninhabited, though there were a few neighboring, primitive, Black Bushmen (pigmies) and Hottentots (also known as Khokhoi, which inhabited Namibia, a territory to the North of South Africa). 

 

Over the years, these Bushmen and Hottentots have totally vanished from historic South Africa (because of the encroaching civilization of the Whites, the murderous slaughter of other Blacks in Natal by the Zulus [as described in a prior chapter], and for other reasons).  However, some 40,000 of the Khokhoi still live in Namibia today (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 450). 

 

As pointed out in a previous chapter, it seems probable also that the Zulus (a historic Bantu people) inhibited Zululand (in Natal, to the North and East of the Cape Colony), evidently from the 16th century on (they probably arrived in the Natal from the migrations of Bantu Africans from the North, as indicated above). 

 

Besides the early Dutch, other Whites also came to the Cape Colony over the years.  French Huguenot settlers came in the years 1688-1694; and eventually, the British came and took over the colony by force in 1795 (“An Encyclopedia of World History,” p, 884).  Slowly, White settlements to the North in Natal and Botswana began to increase.  

 

 

The Economic Considerations 

 

As early as 1657, the White Dutch began to practice slavery using Black slaves from the North.  But slavery was never a big undertaking in South Africa.  By 1707, there were only 1,100 slaves as compared with 1,780 White freeholders (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 790).  Even when the British abolished slavery in 1834, there were only 34,000 slaves (“An Encyclopedia of World History,” p. 885). 

 

With the abolishment of slavery, it appears that most of the South Afrikaners were Whites.  Even the large Zulu population (to the North) was in the Natal province, which was separate in the early days from South Africa proper (which was effectively the old Cape Colony).  Zululand was annexed to South Africa in 1887. 

 

And this was the prevailing racial climate in South Africa for the next many years.  Black laborers were so short in supply that the fat cat owners of sugar plantations in Natal began to import Indians from India to work the plantations in 1860. 

 

This was the next group of immigrants to impact upon South Africa.  This motion included the famous Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948), a lawyer, who came to South Africa for awhile as a young man to represent the Indians present and to cause trouble (as he did). 

 

In 1886, gold was discovered in the Transvaal and by 1888, diamonds had also become important in Southern Africa.  The famous Cecil Rhodes (founder of the Rhodes Trust and the British round tables, to be later discussed) and various fat cats (mainly Amalekites) rushed in to make all the money that they could from the gold and diamond fields. 

 

The new mining companies (450 of them in the Transvaal by 1890) created a need for huge numbers of laborers and workers.  The small White, Indian and Zulu populations in South Africa could not supply them.  Obviously, money talks and money talked back in the 19th century in South Africa. 

 

 

Greed 

 

Therefore, greed, wealth and profits became the focus of the people in power.  Rhodes, his colleagues and the super rich Amalekites could have cared less about the racial composition and the future of the White people of South Africa.  To obtain the workers which they wanted to help produce their wealth, they began importing Bantus from areas to the North of South Africa. 

 

Once this motion commenced in the late 1880s, the issue of Black Bantu immigration became a reality in order to supply workers to work the gold and diamond mines (to put profits into the pockets of the fat cats--like Rhodes and later the evident Amalekite Oppenheimers who eventually took over most of this business.  The modern role of the Oppenheimers will be addressed in a later chapter). 

 

The 1974 population figures from South Africa (as taken from the “Official Associated Press Almanac” for 1974, p. 616) were as follows: Whites--19%; Asians--3%; mixed blooded Coloreds--10% and Black, Bantu Africans--68% (this included the Zulus, who were in their own independent, tribal homeland called Bantustan or KwaZulu). 

 

Otherwise, most of the 68% of Bantu Africans owed their origins to the gold and diamond fields and the efforts of the fat cat plutocrats to bring them in to work the mines.  They were never a part of historic South Africa.  The super rich who wanted to exploit the South African gold and diamonds brought them in for their own profit and gain purposes. 

 

 

What Happened Next 

 

This was the prevailing situation when the Amalekite plutocrats began putting pressure on the Republic of South Africa to racially integrate and turn her government over to the now, predominant Blacks.  South Africa did this in the late 20th century.  The results of South African racial integration and amalgamation will be described in later chapters herein.  Suffice to say, it has been a disaster! 

 

However, for now, mention must be made to the latest Black innovation in both Rhodesia (of some years ago, but now Zimbabwe) and now South Africa. 

 

Once Blacks took over the governments in Rhodesia and South Africa, a process commenced at once whereby the lands (mainly farm lands, not the gold and diamond fields which were owned by the super rich Amalekites--who worked in league with the Blacks) and developments would be transferred to the Black population. 

 

For the past several years, Blacks in Rhodesia have simply went to White farmers and said “this land is now our land--get out.”  If the White farmer does not abandon his land and leave the country, the Blacks have initiated terrorist actions which eventually lead to the murder of the White farmer and/or his family.  Obviously, most White farmers (1,700 of them) have thrown in the towel and left the country for a safer place to live. 

 

 

The South African Farms 

 

An NPR news report on March 7, 2001, said that some Blacks in South Africa are also coming forward to say that White farmers are living on land which correctly belongs to them.  Since NPR is so totally biased and left-wing in its reporting (and thus, in support of the Blacks), the commentary tried to offer a case where the land once belonged to a Black farmer and the Whites of over 100 years ago came in and stole it. 

 

In this context, the pitch is made that it was the evil Whites who stole the land long ago from wonderful, compassionate, kind, hard-working Blacks.  All that is now happening is that the loving Blacks are showing up and demanding that the land be returned to them.  Yes, it will--because some 5,500 attacks on White farmers have already taken place in South Africa from Black revolutionaries (Jul 2001 “American Sentinel,” p. 5). 

 

In time, the Blacks will seize the land of the White farmers and run them all out of the country.  By the way, in the old days (before the Blacks took over), White farmers made South Africa self sufficient in food.  Today, this is no longer true, as the numbers of commercial farmers have plunged from 60,000 to 40,000.  Land prices in South Africa have now plummeted by 40% and White farmers are leaving the land in droves. 

 

One would suppose that the Blacks would want to go in and seize the goldfields and diamond mines.  But this is not happening and is not on the drawing boards because the Black South African government leaders are working in league with the Amalekite fat cats (like the Oppenheimers and others) who now own the gold and diamond fields.  The Blacks are being paid off to leave the Amalekites alone, as they steal the country. 

 

Of course, this is precisely the reason that the plutocrat Amalekites pressured the stupid White people of South Africa to give up their nation some years ago and turn it over to the Blacks (so the Amalekites could come in and steal the rest of the diamonds and gold). The details of this Black-Amalekite tie and how it came about will be addressed in later chapters.

 

 

The Ultimate Fall Out 

 

The point of this discussion is that this whole motion of Black immigration to the once largely White South Africa was accomplished because the big boys with money wanted cheap, Black labor which could be exploited to make more and more profits for themselves.  Manifestly, the fat cats simply cared not one whit about the future of South Africa or the people of South Africa. 

 

Tragically, the people themselves (who ultimately has lost and will lose their national homeland and identity) sat back and allowed the process to take place.  They could have raised up in rebellion and put their feet down and said “no” to the fat cats.  But they refused to look out for their own interests and future.  Money was always the name of the game. 

 

The White people who controlled the nation for the last several hundred years could have put their feet down and said that their future was far more important than the profits the super rich would make in their exploitation of the land and resources by using imported, cheap, Black labor.  But no, the White people closed their eyes and looked the other way while a motion was underway to destroy themselves. 

 

Incidentally, this same process has happened in any number of lands and among various White peoples.  The American plutocrats brought in Black slaves to work the plantations.  Later, they brought in Edomite Irish and Chinese workers to build the railroads (noted earlier).  During all of this immigration, the people calling the shots completely ignored all aspects of the demographic future of the US.  No one cared! 

 

 

Greed and Profits 

 

Certainly, large corporations have no conscience.  They know only one thing--profits.  While big corporations will gladly import Colored laborers which ultimately will integrate and miscegenate with the existing population, it seems that the ruling fathers at all levels should be concerned with the future of their children. 

 

Being sun worshippers, they are not concerned.  Sun worshippers never care about racial questions and will willingly destroy their own kind in order to enjoy profits now.  Greed, get and acquire completely dominate the entire Christian, sun worship culture.  And the democratic voters and Christian Church goers collectively approve of it. 

 

On this, the May 29, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. B7) had a cartoon with a US Senator holding a press conference on an issue before the Senate.  A reporter asks “So, you endorse the idea of sending all illegal immigrants back where they came from, Senator?”  The Senator replies-- “Right!  As soon as the grass trimming, cleanup, farm picking and fast food work is done.”  And cheap labor tells the tale. 

 

So while the ignorant, dumb, Christian, sun worshipping Americans (and indeed, WASPs at large) are rushing to their own destruction and oblivion, they are doing so under the push, prod, direction, influence and guidance of a pool of Amalek-Edomites, operating in a secret conspiracy directed by Satan. 

 

But in terms of the real world, one cannot blame just the wicked Edomites for their behind the scenes efforts. 

 

The dumb Christians are equally as guilty for their own plight.  The reason why the Christian peoples are so incredibly stupid of this issue is because their religion is sun worship.  If they worked half as hard to obey the Torah as they do to practice sun worship customs, they could see their wickedness and despair and turn to repentance. 

 

 

The United Kingdom 

 

The March 19, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news report which pretty well told the tale about what can happen to a White country which opens its doors to Colored immigration.  The British Isles and particularly England demonstrates this tragedy.  Before WWII, Britain was 100% White for all purposes. 

 

After the war, the Socialists (in the form of the British Labor Party) took over government control (under the watching eyes of Amalekite bankers/masters) and began to implement several Socialist schemes.  First, the British Commonwealth was dismantled and indigenous people took over many of the former British colonies. 

 

Next, the welfare state came to Britain; which, of course, whetted the appetites of Colored people from around the world.  And since the immigration policies of the British Commonwealth allowed people to freely migrate between states, Coloreds from the old Commonwealth began to flock to Britain to take advantage of the free give-aways. 

 

Especially today, in 2003, modern England has an incredible variety of Coloreds who have come there in the last several years from around the world.  Naturally, enormous social problems have developed with this Colored immigration.  Certainly, crime and now terrorism has went up substantially.  Yes, all of a sudden, domestic terrorism is a major problem in Britain--just as it is in the US, Canada, etc. 

 

 

The Swedish Example 

 

One of the most profound cases of all in this insanity of self-destruction is the nation of Sweden.  In geography, Sweden is largely surrounded by water except for a long border with Norway (whose people are essentially the same racially, culturally, etc). 

 

In this secure sense, Sweden has been and is a country which could keep undesirables out.  Sweden has not had nor should it have a particular problem over illegal immigration as some nations have experienced because of their border situations. 

 

Being Scandinavians, some of the truly White Swedes represent some of the few remaining, true, White people left on planet earth.  Most all nations have experienced such massive miscegenation and interracial sex that the once formally 100% White peoples are now history in terms of their culture and civilization.  Over the years, almost all White nations have slowly been coloring--to their own detriment. 

 

In any case, the White Scandinavians are (correctly were) a beautiful people.  The men are handsome and the women are fantastically pretty and desirable.  They are fairly law obedient and crime is no problem.  Truly, they are the closest to what The ELOHIM created in terms of so-called White people.  Despite these desirable physical features, the Swedes, especially, are awful stupid. 

 

In the post WWII environment, they allowed Amalek-Edomite children of Satan to influence their social and economic policies in their governing social democracy.  Their historic, Christian, sun worship Churches went along with this influence without defending the future for the Swedes. 

 

In order to accelerate their movement down the road to self-destruction, the Swedes, in particular, have adopted three very dumb and destructive practices.  In the first place, Sweden became the par excellent example of social welfare programs.  Sweden quickly became one of the most stupid nations on welfarism in the Western, sun worship civilization. 

 

The next practice which surely would not be wise for the future of Sweden or the White, law obedient, Swedish people is that the nation began opening their doors to all kinds of Colored peoples to come and take advantage of the welfare programs.  Quickly, White Swede families began adopting Black and Asian children from around the world. 

 

The third reality which has been absolutely disastrous for the Swedes is that they became extremely sexually permissive--like a bunch of ally cats.  They threw out all restraints over sexual morality.  With Blacks (especially men) pouring into Sweden from Africa, they found a ready haven for free promiscuous sex with beautiful, White, Swedish women. 

 

Many beautiful Scandinavian women have come to the United States from Europe to work in Hollywood movies.  Tragically, many of these women immediately start fornicated with Blacks, once they arrive in California.  The beautiful Stella Stevens and Mae Britt both tied in with Africans (poor Mae married Sammy Davis Jr and had and adopted Black children which she apparently took back to Sweden). 

 

 

The Fallout of Miscegenation 

 

The bottom line on this is that while the Swedes have had some desirable qualities, they have been extremely stupid in choosing to follow the above cited three primary practices which will spell out the ultimate absolute end of the once, largely White Sweden.  Given this path, someday Sweden will look like Egypt, Italy or Greece. 

 

Just as some Swedes are close to the perfection of the handiwork of The CREATOR, it must be acknowledged that the true Black African and the true Red Mongolian also represent the perfection of the handiwork of The CREATOR.  The CREATOR made them marvelous as well. 

 

This writer is just as distressed when miscegenation occurs with true Reds and true Blacks as with true Whites.  YHWH made beautiful people in His creative acts and it is sickening for man to now work overtime to change His creation.  It is criminal for Amalekites, discussed in a former chapter, to change the racial qualities of wonderful Black and Red peoples--just as it is pathetic that they change Whites. 

 

 

The Hispanic Presence 

 

The “Spokesman-Review” paper of Spokane, WA had a “Washington Post” story on Jan 9, 1999, which said that “U.S. immigration rate surges.”  The story noted that the number of foreign born immigrants tripled since 1970.  At this time, there are 26.3 million immigrants living here.  Over half of them are Hispanics with 27% from Mexico.  Today, in California and Texas, the most popular name for a boy baby is “Jose.” 

 

Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies said that “No nation has ever attempted to incorporate over 26 million newcomers into its society.”  He sees trouble down the road. 

 

Contrariwise, Cecilia Munoz, vice-president of a Latino civil rights group, says that “It’s easy to use demographics to alarm people.  But it’s alarming only if you assume immigrants coming in are harmful to Americans, which they are not.” 

 

“Newsweek” magazine of Jul 12, 1999, devoted much of its issue on how Hispanics are changing America.  The cover had a picture of three Hispanic-Americans with a title “Latin U.S.A.”  An article by Brook Larmer on “Latino America” said that Hispanics are hip, hot and making history. 

 

They are shaping pop culture and will change American politics, as well as how the nation looks.  Spanish remains their language of choice.  Religiously, they are overwhelmingly Roman Catholic. 

 

Racially, they are a mixture of Black, White, Red and Yellow-Brown to varying degrees, because of racial integration and amalgamation of the major races--not only in Spain and Portugal; but also, extensively in the Americas when Negro slaves were brought over here for work.  Over the years, miscegenation proceeded almost unabated. 

 

 

Changing Demographics 

 

Brook Larmer noted that by 2005, Latinos will be the largest US minority (replacing the fast breeding Blacks) and before 2050, they will just about constitute the largest segment of the US population. 

 

“The Washington Times” of Oct 11-17, 1999, had a front page story by Robert Stacy McCain on “Rapid growth of minority population transforms U.S.” which suggested that by 2050, the US population of non Hispanic Whites would only be at 53% whereas in 1950, they constituted 87%.  Already, Whites are in a minority in nearly half of America’s largest 100 cites, per 2000 census figures (Jun 25, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 2). 

 

Please understand that this so-called “White” figure includes Italians and mixed blooded Middle Easterners and Southern and Eastern Europeans (including millions of mongrel Amalekites). 

 

In terms of the once, majority, Anglo-Saxon-Celtic and Northwest European populations (which formerly dominated America), they already are a minority in the land that their forefathers founded.  By 2050, there won’t be many of these persons around at all. 

 

Needless to say, the formerly White areas of North America (especially in the US and Canada) are becoming darker and darker over time.  Slowly, the once White majority is vanishing into the wood work and being replaced with a variety of Colored peoples. 

 

 

California 

 

To demonstrate how fast demographics are changing, National Public Radio (NPR) had a news report on March 30, 2001, which noted the latest statistical compilation from the 2000 census for the state of California.  Per the report, White people were in a definite minority in the state of California in the year 2000 with 46.7% of the people. 

 

Hispanics now make up one third of the almost 34 million Californians.  Blacks, Asians and Indians run the non-White population figures up to 53.3%.  Again, as noted above, the word white and the White definition includes huge numbers of people with significant Colored genes--like Amalekites, Middle Easterners, Italians, Greeks and other Southern Europeans. 

 

Already, more than half of the new babies being born in California are Mexicans (Dec 31, 2001, “America Free Press,” p. 2).  When one adds this surge to the fact that huge numbers of Black and Asian babies are also being born in California, the outlook is not very bright for the now minority Whites. 

 

Very clearly, in the early part of the 21st century, the huge Colored population of California is having an enormous impact upon the state and the future of the state.  This condition was readily manifested in California in 2002 and with the state’s reaction to the continuing power problems there. 

 

California deregulated energy costs at the production and wholesale levels some years ago.  However, price controls were held in place for the charges which energy companies could impose upon personal consumers.  Thus, the power companies soon found themselves in a grip between having to pay higher prices for energy which could not be passed along to consumers. 

 

Although the state finally did raise the rates to consumers on March 27, 2001 (by 42-46%), the problem was generally ignored and never really addressed.  To fill the gap, the state rushed in and started to spend state money to subsidize the power costs to consumers.  This process was costing $50 million per day in 2001.  The essence here is that rather than raise rates on people, the state began paying the shortfall. 

 

To top the catch 22 problem off, the governor and leaders proposed a bond issue to pay for the spread between power costs and consumer charges.  Whether this thing will fly or not remains a question mark.  But it demonstrates the insanity of California’s leaders and how they are playing to the Colored voters. 

 

It seems insane that responsible people could even entertain the idea of selling bonds to pay the difference between what consumers pay for power, as opposed to what power costs.  In other words, the state will sell bonds on the good credit of the state to subsidize current power costs of consumers.  The end of this run will be the financial collapse of California. 

 

 

More on Hispanic Thinking 

 

Hispanics traditionally vote Democrat (72% of them voted for Clinton) and are primarily located in eleven states which control 217 electoral votes for the US president (out of a needed 270).  For sure, they will soon control US elections (as they now do in the state of California, as just noted). 

 

Contrary to the estimated 26.3 million immigrants (in the above cited Jan 9, 1999, “Spokesman-Review” story), “Newsweek” (in her article of Jul 12, 1999, cited above) estimates the current Hispanic population at 31 million (which is certainly growing rapidly because they are a young, Catholic population dedicated to having babies and intermarrying with the traditional White population). 

 

One Latino woman, who was mentioned by “Newsweek,” assessed the situation by noting that in the 21st century, the US will belong to the Latinos--again.  For sure, America is becoming Latin.  There is even talk of a resurgence in Latin music--perhaps as it is blended into rock to produce Latin rock. 

 

As noted, salsa sales started exceeding ketchup sales in 1992.  Surely, an enormous revolution is now underway in America.  Most importantly, many Mexicans now have dual citizenship (as will be discussed in a later chapter) and they are strongly committed to a return nationally to Mexico. 

 

Yes, Mexico is taking back the old US Southwest--clearly by immigration and soon by outright conquest, as the Hebrew prophets suggest. 

 

One more Hispanic woman said that this generation of Latinos is going to change the way America looks at itself.  For sure, crime, drugs, street gangs and welfare have increased and will increase commensurate with the increasing Hispanic population. 

 

Of real interest is the fact that many of the organized Hispanic gangsters do not answer (presently) to the traditional Amalekite rulers of organized crime, as mentioned in a former chapter.  Historically, the Edomites have not only been the major gangsters in America, but the Amalek-Edomites have organized and controlled the major gangs. 

 

It will be interesting to watch and see if the Amalekites can bring Hispanic and Asian gangs under their umbrella, as they did with the former Irish and Sicilian gangs.  That process has been under way for some time.  This push has been elaborated upon in former comments and needs no further explanation at this time. 

 

 

More on the Fall Out 

 

Colored immigration into the White, Christian, Western nations has been disastrous for several reasons.  Perhaps, the worst aspect of it has been that it creates a significant increase in crime rates.  When the US made the tragic decision of allowing in Irish Edomites in the 1840s and 1850s and Southern Europeans (with Black and Edomite genes) and Eastern European Amalekites in the post Civil War era, trouble came. 

 

The Edomites from Ireland, Sicily and Eastern Europe introduced far more serious criminal activities into the big US cities.  This was primarily felt when prohibition came.  But it had been present almost from the beginnings of the Colored immigration.  While the Blacks are more prone for petty street crime, the Edomites are far more sophisticated in criminal activities with a focus upon organized crime. 

 

Thus, Irish, Sicilian and Southern Italian criminals eventually came under the control of diabolical Amalekite bankers/masters from Eastern Europe to produce the horrors of modern organized crime--primarily in the big US cites (although it has been branching out into many medium sized US towns in the last 40 years).  Today, organized crime is firmly in place all across America. 

 

So while the Blacks and the Hispanics to some extent are committing murders, muggings, car jackings, teen-age gang assaults, petty drug operations, stealing, looting, and other criminal acts (along with some organized Asian and Hispanic gang activities, as noted elsewhere herein), the more serious criminal activities are being carried on by generic Edomites under the supervision of Amalekite bankers/masters (to produce major drug operations, gambling, prostitution, extortion, bribery and really serious murder and terrorism, when the Mafia chooses to rub out someone). 

 

Obviously, since Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia are allowing their countries to become darker and darker, crime will soon be exploding there and the people will wonder why.   This is tragic because historic Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark and Iceland have had almost no crime.  Their streets have been utterly safe.  And the people were generally law abiding.  But this is changing with the Colored immigrants. 

 

Former great cities like Oslo, Stockholm, Copenhagen and Helsinki are being and will be transformed and changed into modern Lagoses, Nairobis, Calcuttas, Mexico Cities, Cairos and so forth (just as Washington, DC, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and New York have faced significant changes in the past 100 years since they are much further down the road on demographic changes). 

 

 

The Perception of Hollywood 

 

Back in the golden days of Hollywood (the 1930s), the Amalekite owned and managed Warner Brothers used to make many movies dealing with gangsters, street thugs and crime--principally, in the vein of prohibition and the developing organized crime. 

 

In those days, Hollywood, generally, and Warner Brothers, particularly, had a number of Amalekite and Irish and Italian Edomites to play the roles of the tough guys and the bad guys.  The good, tough guys were typified by the Irish Edomite James Cagney and the Amalekites George Raft and Humphry Bogart. 

 

The Amalekite Edward G. Robinson (correctly Emmanuel Goldenberg, discussed in a prior chapter) was the leading bad guy.  But Warner Brothers and the other major studios had a host of very dark Italian and Southern European actors to step into the bad guy roles. 

 

One of the interesting features of these Hollywood criminals and particularly the gang bosses is that almost without exception the casting people produced an “image” of the typical US big city gangster as being a very dark, swarthy Italian with a thick, broken English accent.  Robinson, with his clear behemah genes, fit the model, although he did not have a broken accent as many of these characters produced. 

 

From WWII and forward, this honesty in Hollywood attitude on organized crime began to change.  Dark, swarthy actors with broken accents were no longer gangsters and inner city crooks.  Instead, dark Italians became major stars.  The new crooks were White Germans and US Southern Rednecks (who are almost always shown in bad roles). 

 

This is a paradox in that honorable and law abiding people (White Germans and US Southerners) were shown as bad persons, while the really bad people were shown as good people.  But the American population had been so mesmerized, indoctrinated and confused by the entertainment and media industries that they never knew the difference.  So the change became politically correct and totally American.  

 

 

The Other Problems of Colored Immigration 

 

While crime is certainly the main problem in allowing Third World Coloreds into formerly White countries, this is not the totality of the dilemma.  There are other very serious problems (and especially in terms of illegal immigration). 

 

For example, at least 50% or so of these new Colored immigrants into White Christian nations quickly go on welfare and are supported and financed by the dumb Christian tax payers (the argument is made that these immigrants come to work, but this is not totally true).  Many come because of the existing social welfare programs. 

 

The Colored immigrants, in time, produce Colored children who also typically go on welfare and particularly as the production of illegitimate children takes off among the Third Worlders. 

 

Not only must the US taxpayers fork over money to fund and support many of these aliens, but under US law, hospitals have to treat them when they show up from being sick or injured.  This practice of rendering very expensive medical care and support to the public generally (to include illegal aliens) is pushing many hospitals to the brink of bankruptcy (Apr 8, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2). 

 

Most of these people receiving free medical care at US hospitals rarely make any effort to pay for the help they receive.  The result is that US hospitals continually jack their charges up to cover the losses incurred from treating the public generally and illegal aliens particularly.  In other words, the gullible American public is paying for this waste. 

 

The just quoted April 8, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) also had another fascinating report.  This one came from San Luis, Arizona, a small town of 3,000 residents.  But San Luis has 20,000 active post office boxes at the local post office.  Why? 

 

Mexicans from Mexico come across the border and get a PO box in order to have a permanent US address to collect US welfare and benefits.  Even the US Immigration and Naturalization Service is aware of it, but nothing is ever done about it by US authorities. 

 

The people of California have voted in a referendum to stop welfare payments to illegal aliens, but the courts have declared the vote of the people null and void on this subject.  Thus, illegal aliens continue to get welfare from the taxpayers. 

 

The May 27, 2002, “American Free Press” (p.2) had a news item that the University of California regents had just voted to charge illegal aliens reduced tuition rates to attend the university.  This means that the taxpayers of California will pick up the tab for these illegal aliens. 

 

 

More Problems 

 

While marriage and family values may have some presence among the Colored peoples in the former Colored nations, the Colored immigrants seem to lose all sense of this former morality and stability, as they are displaced and moved to White Christian countries as immigrants. 

 

Perhaps the problem is that these persons once had cultural and racial identification systems in place in the old countries.  But as they move, they lose all sense of their culture and identification. 

 

When they flock into White Western cities, they have to begin a process of finding new cultures/identifications (which slowly evolves, as noted below, and especially as they miscegenate and sexually cross with other racial and ethnic strains in their new lands). 

 

The last tragic reality of Colored immigration is something already highlighted throughout this study.  The stupid White Christians welcome these Coloreds in the vein of the false Christian ideas of the brotherhood of man.  They immediately begin to miscegenate and sexually cross with the Coloreds to produce a whole new population dimension of mongrel peoples, who do not fit into any existing demographic definition. 

 

The problems of crime, welfare and social sickness only increase with the new mongrels.  Since these new mongrel peoples do not fit into the previous cultures and systems of the Whites or the Coloreds (the Blacks, the Hispanics, etc), they are badly out of place for years, until they begin to produce their own civilization and culture (as happened with the “Coloreds” in South Africa from Black-White sexual crosses).  

 

 

UN Commission for Refugees 

 

The “Spotlight” newspaper of Mar 6, 2000 (p. 2), had a news report called “White Flight,” on the fall-out of the massive Colored immigration into the once White Christian nations in the West (including the US, Canada, Australia, South Africa, Britain and Europe). 

 

The essence of the story is that the UN High Commissioner for Refugees has taken note of the enormous flight of White people in the Western, White, Christian nations because of the unbridled immigration of Third World foreigners into their countries.  These Colored immigrants bring with them violence, disease, drugs, crime and ethnic gangs (plus many of them go on welfare to drain the resources of the taxpayers). 

 

The UN High Commissioner, Mrs Sadako Ogata, labeled these “unfortunate whites” as “internally displaced people.”  What will the UN do about them?  Of course, it will do nothing.  The Colored immigration will continue to destroy the White, Christian West (unless YHWH YESHUA comes soon to stop the madness). 

 

While nothing will be done about the plight of White people, the UN is actively looking after Colored refugees.  For example, an NPR news report on Apr 16, 2001, noted that some 3,500 Black Sudanese refugee teenage boys and young men had been resettled in the US--based upon the recommendation of this UN commission.  The Blacks were orphaned by the civil war in process in Sudan. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 317--Christian Humanism and Race IV

 

 

Changing Truth? 

 

The Christian humanists have been upset particularly over the situation with Black people for many long years going back to slavery days.  They are obsessed with the theory that oppressive Whites have abused, hurt and limited the freedom of expression among first Blacks and then later Indians, Hispanics and Asians. 

 

While White Christians have taken the blame for Black slavery, it should be noted that Louis Farrakhan and the Black Muslims have finally awaken and realized that there was a bigger culprit responsible for the slave trade (actually, Amalek-Edomites, posing as Jews)--rather than the publicly criticized and condemned White Christians who had lesser roles in the practice. 

 

All the time that slavery was legal and allowed an opportunity for vast profits, the Amalek-Edomites (using Arab slavers) were the very persons directing and controlling the slave trade.  Now, they are the primary people using Hollywood, the media and the government to accuse White Christians for slavery; and even pushing programs of restitution by Whites for their alleged crimes against the Blacks (as discussed earlier). 

 

 

More on Slavery 

 

There are a few other features about slavery which are not readily known by the gullible and mesmerized public.  Certainly, slavery is a very old activity of man (as bad as it may seem to be).  Of course, Adamic men have practiced slavery (with White, as well as Black slaves).  Moreover, non-Adamites have been not only been guilty, but even more guilty in the practice of slavery among their own peoples. 

 

The situation with slavery among American Indians was outlined in a prior chapter.  It is also tragic that many, many Blacks in the heart of primitive Africa practiced slavery historically and still today.  Yes, as hard as it is for modern humanists and liberals to understand, slavery still goes on in Black Africa today (along with cannibalism). 

 

The Dec 2000 “Internet Vortex” (p. 16-17) had a story by Stephen Archer on “Sudan:  Eyewitness to Tragedy,” which focused upon the work of an American Black man named Joe Madison, who spent some time in the Sudan (which is a mongrelized nation with very heavy Black genes). 

 

Madison explained how Black Muslims in the North would attack and enslave their Black brethren in the South (who were largely Christian Dinkas).  When the Moslems would raid villages in the South, they would customarily kill any of the young men who could cause them trouble and kill all of the elderly (since they were not worth anything in terms of slavery). 

 

The people’s crops and huts and possessions were burned or stolen.  The survivors (young women and children) were carried North into slavery. 

 

In one case, Madison saw a woman who had a terrible scar on her throat.  She said that she was cut because her slave master wanted the baby that she was carrying in her arms.  Another poor woman was hobbling around because she had been gang raped by ten of the Black, Muslim animals so many times that they pulled her hips out of the socket. 

 

 

More on Mongoloids 

 

To show how attitudes have changed over American Indians, one should look at the historical record.  During the Indian wars, US Cavalry troopers almost always saved their last bullets for themselves.  Why?  Because it was a horrible calamity for a White person to fall captive of the Indians. 

 

In the movie “Stagecoach,” as briefly cited in previous remarks on pride and Christian evangelism, the coach riders were under assault from a group of savage Apaches.  John Carradine was a family friend of a young woman traveling on the coach. 

 

As the situation approached the point of seeming to be hopeless (because the Whites had run out of bullets), Carradine checked his derringer and found one bullet left.  He placed it to the head of the woman ready to blow her head off.  Why?  It would have been better for her than if she fell captive to the Apaches. 

 

The last 30 years have seen Hollywood totally change its concepts of reality and begin to make movies that are absolute lies and deceptions.  Now, Indians are shown as civilized, compassionate, good, friendly people--who were abused and hurt by evil Whites (as outlined in the earlier discussion on evangelism).  My, how truth has changed! 

 

Other presentations herein mention the Asian propensity to skin animals alive before eating them.  Manifestly, this is a barbaric and cruel practice which is fairly common with Mongoloids.  Mongolians simply have no compassion or concern for pain and suffering. 

 

In India, some five Dalits (the dark, low-caste people) made the mistake of skinning a cow alive--so a Hindu mob (which worships cows) reacted by beating the five men to death (Nov 8, 2002, “The Week,” P. 9).  So sometimes, there can be an adverse reaction to this brutal practice. 

 

 

The Nips 

 

Interestingly, the same situation existed with the Japanese.  The American public was fed a constant diet on the barbaric evils and brutality of the Japanese during WWII.  While Hollywood may have exaggerated a little on some of these stories, there was much truth to them. 

 

Truly, the Japs were brutal and cruel beyond anything imaginable to the Western mind, as is true with Mongoloids in general (per the above comments and other presentations herein on the Mongoloid race). 

 

Anyway, the changing attitude on race in America in the 1950s actually prompted Hollywood to completely reverse its stance from the WWII days on the role of the Japanese.  All of a sudden, Hollywood started making films which showed how loving, wonderful, kind, intelligent, etc the Japanese were in WWII (the same thing happened respecting the American Indians, as noted above, and Blacks). 

 

So, with the changing attitudes, Columbia Pictures put out an academy award winning movie in 1957 called “Bridge on the River Kwai” (previously mentioned herein).  This film showed the Japanese military as honorable, loving, wonderful people.  The movie was so persuasive that the viewer could be easily transformed into a zombie who would cheer for and support the Japanese and their efforts to build the bridge. 

 

But the real world was considerably different from this Hollywood fiction.  The Jan 25, 2002, “The Week” (p. 33) had a biography statement about a man named Ernest Gordon who had just recently died.  Gordon was a British officer who was captured in WWII and imprisoned by the Nips in Thailand when the Japanese were building their railroad and bridges in Southeast Asia for an invasion route to India. 

 

Specifically, Gordon was imprisoned at the notorious Chungkai camp on the River Kwai.  He was in the heart of the setting for the eventual Columbia movie.  He was to later say that the prisoners were fed a diet of one bowl of rice a day.  They were then made to work naked under a burning sun all day long.  Beatings, executions and brutality were the order of the day and not the image painted in the movie. 

 

Gordon once related a tragic story of Japanese brutality.  In 1942, an Australian POW tried to obtain some medicine for sick friends (evidently, he stole the medicine or misappropriated it in some manner).  The Japs caught him and promptly beheaded him with a samurai sword as it flashed in the sun. 

 

 

More on Mongolian Cruelty 

 

But there is still more to come on this line.  In WWII, the Japanese used prisoners (mainly Chinese, but others as well) to conduct medical experiments upon.  The Nips often made autopsies and surgical examinations and experiments upon living people and without any antiseptics (per Bob Fletcher, in the “Above Top Secret” video). 

 

This fact has been largely forgotten in the Christian West--perhaps because the US government picked upon the idea and is now doing many of the same types of diabolical experiments in America (as will be discussed further in a subsequent chapter). 

 

For sure, the Japs were not as loving and kind as Hollywood would later represent them (following the war and into the 21st century).  They were brutal and evil. 

 

 

The Privileged and Glorified Coloreds 

 

If the Coloreds have problems, it must not be because of them.  But the real villain must be the former, dominating, White class in America.  This thinking parallels the situation with the apparent Amalekite lawyer who sued me for discrimination, as mentioned earlier.  Anyone believing that he had work problems was guilty of racial and religious biases. 

 

Not content with just having an end to believed discrimination and social injustice, the humanists and their liberal and Socialist counterparts (under Amalek-Edomite leadership) have led the way in establishing affirmative action programs to automatically grant all Colored peoples a privileged status in America. 

 

An Editorial, in the “Weekly Standard” magazine of Feb 28, 2000 (p. 7), claimed that the Constitution commands that US laws be scrubbed clean of race consciousness in all but the very rarest and narrowest of circumstances; yet “our laws stink with thousands of programs, large and small, that reward or disfavor us according to our skin color--and our sex and what continents our great grandfathers lived on.  What a sad, enormous ball of hypocrisy and incoherence the whole thing is.” 

 

In this pathetic state of hypocrisy and social sickness, the White majority males (especially the so-called WASPs--White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) are the primary underdogs who get absolutely nothing in this government dole out of privileges, benefits and rewards.  Racial minorities get the first big share.  Homosexual faggots get the next slice.  Finally, women get the rest of the pie. 

 

And since Amalek-Edomites are classified as Whites, they generally receive all of the White allocations in this scheme of diversity.  This means that the majority of true Whites get virtually nothing.  In terms of diversity for any benefits given society, the gratuities go to the various Colored races and the Amalekites posing as Whites. 

 

Therefore, colleges and universities must have so many people of the different classifications.  Jobs and employment must be regulated and controlled along racial lines.  The president’s cabinet must reflect a certain level of racial diversity.  The police, the court system and the jails need to be overhauled because too many Blacks are ending up in prison (never mind that they are responsible for most of the crime). 

 

And if any person or group questions this insanity in America, they are immediately branded and chastised as racists and as being prejudiced by the controlled media.  If Blacks and Hispanics can’t improve their lot in life through hard work and personal achievement, then the Christian humanists are dedicated to guaranteeing them success by governmental fiat. 

 

 

More Stupidity 

 

Beyond affirmative action and the priority which Blacks and other Coloreds have in employment (which will be addressed in some detail in later commentary), it is useful to recognize that the federal government has been using vast sums of money to give to Negroes and Hispanics to supposedly grant them better opportunities.  One sees this in housing, in education, in small business grants and on and on. 

 

Besides the outright grants to these privileged, Colored peoples, the federal government also gives gobs of money to states and other organizations to establish laws, rules and regulations to grant Coloreds with special rights and privileges, which are used to bring about their racial integration, amalgamation and miscegenation with White people. 

 

For example, almost all grants to educational institutions are predicated not only on racial integration, but also upon affirmative action programs to insure that Coloreds are present in numbers in the various institutions and programs.  One finds a focus on racial diversity and amalgamation in most of the grant funds coming out of Washington. 

 

With Blacks and Whites thoroughly mixed physically in the secular society, racial mixing, mongrelization and amalgamation is inevitable.  It’s been happening this way for thousands of years in the sun worship cultures because the name of the game is to destroy the separate races created by The CREATOR and amalgamate them all into one new, man-made or rather man created, mongrel, mulatto race. 

 

Paul Hall, in the Jul-Aug 1997 “Jubilee” paper (p. 2), in comments on “The Way I See It,” said that more “whites are dying everyday through interracial offspring than all the wars, abortions, accidents and natural deaths put together.”  In terms of the US, Hall added that that is the reason why we have “bussing, affirmative action and all the rest of the social engineering...to integrate whitey out of existence...” 

 

 

One More Consideration 

 

There is another fallout of making community wide efforts to move behemah, chaiyah and nokri/nekar males into positions of authority over Adamites and the general population and of moving women into positions of authority over men (as is happening all over modern America). 

 

In each case, these individuals are being pushed and propelled into jobs and duty positions which they were not created for, as proven in previous chapters.  The existing Christian sun worship culture is utterly lost on race and sex distinctions. 

 

Perhaps the best explanation of what can happen with this motion to elevate and lift up non-Adamic peoples into leadership positions in society at large was illustrated in a comment made by Malaysian Prime Minister Lee some years ago on the reality in the Third World.  Lee correctly perceived that the Third World is grossly incompetent and corrupt. 

 

If a White Westerner had made this remark, he would have been called a racist and White supremacist.  But these words of a Chinese leader could not be challenged.  Truly, Lee hit the nail on the head.  This condition will be elaborated upon in some detail in a later chapter.  For now, this reality must be recognized in this present discussion on humanism.  Certainly, the remark surely applies to Blacks. 

 

 

Black Voting Powers 

 

In 1865, the United States adopted the 13th amendment to the Constitution to abolish slavery, the 14th amendment in 1868 to grant citizenship to Negroes and the 15th amendment in 1870 to grant the vote to all US citizens (including Blacks). 

 

Since all three of these amendments became law because the South was forced/coerced to adopt them under a state of military occupation and force, maybe they were not legal additions to the US Constitution (to be later discussed in subsequent chapters). 

 

In any case, they have been accepted by most Americans as lawful since those days.  Therefore, the fall-out from their adoption can be measured--as will now be done in the following presentation. 

 

 

Florida, Revisited 

 

In the US presidential elections in November 2000, a crisis developed which was still on-going in 2002 (even after Bush was sworn in).  The essence of the problem finally devolved to the state of Florida and alleged voting irregularities and problems there.  This issue has been broached in a former chapter and will be covered in more detail in later chapters.  Hence, there is no intent to cover it extensively here. 

 

However, there was an interesting fall-out on the crisis in Florida which is especially related to the question of race and general Black incompetence. 

 

As soon as the November 7th elections were over and it looked like Bush had won, Jesse Jackson (“the reverend” father of an illegitimate daughter) and the NAACP rushed into the state of Florida to see if something could be done to help Gore.  To appreciate this motion, it is necessary to understand a little of reality. 

 

First, the Blacks are bloc voters for the liberal Democrats.  Not all Negroes vote for liberal Democrats, but assuredly most do (perhaps around 90%).  Next, many or most Negroes are very susceptible to Black voter fraud (this reality will be discussed in later chapters dealing with government and politicians).  Finally, Blacks generally are extremely incompetent. 

 

Since so many Blacks are incompetent (although this condition was never stated as such by anyone in power in the US), the NAACP claimed that many African votes in Florida were not properly recorded.  In other words, many Blacks allegedly voted for Gore.  But somehow, their votes were not recorded properly or counted correctly. 

 

 

The Crux 

 

The essence of this problem focused upon two definitions.  First, there were complaints from Palm Beach County that the ballot used there was confusing and that voters (especially Black voters) could not understand it.  Negroes and some Amalekites came forward to charge that their votes were not properly recorded, because of this ballot problem (involving a so-called “butterfly” ballot). 

 

The second cited Black problem came up in several places in Florida over allegations that the punch card system was somehow confusing so that Blacks could not or did not properly punch out the chads for the candidates of their choice. 

 

Both of these issues have involved enormous lawsuits in the state of Florida and ultimately even the US Supreme Court.  Some of these have been mentioned earlier.  Others will be commented upon in a later chapter herein addressing the 2000 elections. 

 

Since these two issues gained so much media notoriety so quickly, a number of elementary school teachers across the US decided that they would test their students on the ability to understand and correctly use the butterfly ballot.  Many classes of first, second, third and fourth grade students were so tested. 

 

One class of second graders in Virginia used this exact same type of ballot for a check.  All students in the class were successful in understanding and using this type of ballot.  The same general findings occurred elsewhere in America.  It was a very rare, small child in school who could not use these ballots.  However, Negroes in Florida could not do so (allegedly). 

 

The interesting thing about the Florida mess is that sample ballots and instructions were published in newspapers before the elections.  The punch card system has been in use in Florida for years and there never was an alleged prior problem over them.  Even the voting precincts had people on hand to help explain the ballots to anyone who did not understand them. 

 

Finally, if a voter did mess a ballot up, then nearby election people would void the ballot and let the voter try again with a new ballot.  Clearly, there was no logical excuse of why Blacks could not handle this simple voting task.  Yet, they allegedly could not (per Jesse Jackson and the NAACP). 

 

 

Black Voter Fraud 

 

As will be discussed in the later presentations on this problem, Black voter fraud is a real world type of thing.  So the case can be made that indeed maybe the whole complaint from the Negroes was only one of lies and an attempt to somehow swing support to Gore. 

 

However, this writer would allow that truly some Blacks were confused and maybe did incorrectly cast their ballots.  Even the controlled media did report that in some Black precincts, rejected votes (because they were not properly punched) could run up to 37%; while most rejected ballots in White precincts only ran around 7% (per a study made by the leftist “Washington Post”). 

 

The Feb 19, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news report from the Feb 2001 issue of “School Reform News,” which said that some 49% of the adult people in Florida’s 17th congressional district were functionally illiterate, per the 1992 National Adult Literary Survey (this area included the large Black neighborhoods in Southern Florida, where the votes were in dispute). 

 

Hence, the Florida problem is that general Black IQ levels are quite low.  It would be very reasonable that indeed many Blacks were too stupid or could not handle a ballot or process that second grade White children could master (the assumption has to be made that most of the classroom efforts using the ballots involved White children with some brains and not incompetent Africans). 

 

Beyond the Blacks, there were also a number of Amalekites coming forward in Southern Florida charging that they too had problems with the ballots.  This writer believes that most Amalekites are fairly intelligent people.  But they are grossly evil and deceptive.  So, perhaps their complaints were effectively fraudulent efforts to get a vote recount or a new election for Gore. 

 

 

The Word Prejudice 

 

In today’s warped culture, which has been completely mesmerized and brainwashed on the subject of race by the ruling Amalekites (especially in the media and entertainment industries), it is virtually impossible to have any discussion on certain, privileged, social groups (like on Blacks, Jews, etc).  Whenever a person broaches one of these privileged groups, the immediate response is prejudice, racist etc. 

 

For example, this writer is acquainted with a Sardis Sacred Name and Christian Identity believer who simply does not like Blacks. 

 

As briefly mentioned in prior commentary, the man is interesting because he has B type blood which must raise genuine questions about his own genealogy.  In fact, his demeanor, actions and attitude is such that the African genes really surface and seem very apparent in his contact with others (though supposedly White, he thinks and acts like a Black).  Yet, he does not like Negroes. 

 

However, the thing which really stands out about this man is his lack of intellectual reasoning and objectivity in his dislike of Negroes (like other people with B blood, he manifestly does not understand the significance of his B blood).  He cannot intelligently discuss the race issue because he is grossly uninformed.  In his situation, the case can be made that he is a very prejudiced person on the subject of Africans. 

 

 

Informed People 

 

Conversely, this writer knows all kinds of people who also do not like Blacks, but can spend hours and hours on why they carry such feelings.  They can cite IQ, crime, welfare and statistical data and discuss to some length the genetic implications of race.  Of most importance, many of these persons are intimately familiar with the Scriptures on the subject of race. 

 

In this sense, they can lay out truth--the way it is.  For such individuals, there is no way that they can be accused of being prejudiced, White Supremacists, racists or anything else.  Their positions are founded upon facts and truth.  They are intellectually informed and can fairly, objectively, logically and coherently discuss their beliefs with anyone. 

 

In this discussion, the relevant truth of the above remarks is predicated upon the historic meaning of the word “prejudice.”  Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary” (p. 520) gives the historic meaning of prejudice as “1. A judgment or opinion formed before the facts are known; esp., an unfavorable, irrational opinion.  2. The act or state of holding preconceived, irrational opinions.” 

 

This used to be the reality and essence of the word prejudice (in the old US before FDR and the Amalekites took over total control with their push of the racial ideas of old Balaam).  But then, in the post WWII, a new meaning was attached to the word which has come to completely dominate all modern thinking on the subject. 

 

Funk & Wagnalls gives this more recent meaning as number “3. Hatred of or dislike for a particular group, race, religion, etc.” 

 

Nevertheless, in a further discussion on the syn., this dictionary adds that “prejudice, bias and partiality are compared as they denote an attitude of mind that interferes with fair judgment.  Only prejudice is necessarily a term of opprobrium; literally, it signifies prejudgment without adequate hearing or consideration, but it is chiefly used to refer to a strong emotional bias.” 

 

 

Reality 

 

Thus, the point being is that if a person chooses separation from Blacks because they commit most of the crime and are generally sexually promiscuous and tend to gravitate to the US welfare and give away programs, then that choice of separation is predicated upon factual knowledge and understanding.  No one can possibly be accused of pre-judging when they are informed and operating on facts and truths. 

 

Please understand here that this writer is not accusing all, 100% of Blacks automatically of incompetence and/or corruption, per Malaysian Prime Minister Lee’s words, as cited above and to be discussed at some length in a later chapter. 

 

Truly, all Negroes are not criminals or on welfare.  Truly, there probably are some Negroes of some intelligence, honor and integrity (not many, but a few).  But the charges are being made in the context of a statistical probability. 

 

In other words, the “average, usual or normal” Black person is fairly stupid and tends to be incompetent and/or corrupt in his work habits.  That’s just the way “most” of them are (but not all, 100% of them).  Since Blacks also tend to be extroverts, feelers and perceiving in personality, they talk good and fool many, gullible observers.  But in the end, the incompetence and/or corruption surfaces.  That’s the way it is. 

 

 

Whites Must Pay 

 

Now, should an objective, intelligent, honest person make a judgment upon a third party based upon the statistical probability of how that person will react in life?  Years ago, most life insurance companies would rate or charge an extra premium to insure Blacks.  The reason why was the statistical certainty of their attributes and likelihood of dying earlier than Whites (the same condition is true today). 

 

Insurers have had to stop this practice because of political correctness.  Now, the premiums charged Whites have been upped to offset the drain of more losses incurring from Blacks (who no longer pay an extra premium for the increased risk). 

 

Moreover, stores with Black customers or employees must routinely increase their retail prices in order to offset Black losses, theft and crime.  Thus, Whites now pay for Black crime and inefficiency. 

 

Frankly, it makes perfect sense that if something looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quakes like a duck, it must be a duck.  It is sheer stupidity and insanity to operate in the secular world in any other way.  However, most Whites now seem perfectly happy to pay increased insurance premiums and retail prices in stores because of Black incompetence and/or corruption.  But this writer has a different view! 

 

It seems grossly unfair and ridiculous to make people like me to have to pay higher prices for goods and services simply because the higher prices have to be charged to offset Negro incompetence, dishonesty and corruption. 

 

The conclusion here is that the dictionary’s item number 3 (which is the modern new attitude toward the word prejudice) is inconsistent with the other two definitions.  If a person has a factual basis for disliking and/or choosing to separate from Negroes (in the generic sense), how can he be prejudice in the vein of definition number 3? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 318--Christian Humanism and Race V

 

 

Hate Crimes, Revisited 

 

A preceding chapter discussed at length the reality of so-called hate crimes in the modern sun worship culture--in the vein of speech and thought crimes.  In view of the US Constitutional authorizations for freedom of speech (and certainly, a presumed level of freedom of thought), it is absolutely incredible that modern America has so-called hate crimes on the books because of speech or thoughts. 

 

Yet, this is the real world in the early 21st century.  It is fast becoming illegal to speak a word or have a thought which goes against the modern politically correct thinking, primarily in the context of sociology.  Therefore, this focus on alleged hate crimes has taken the direction of zeroing in on adverse speech or thoughts as may be directed at so-called minorities and privileged groups. 

 

With this attention, it has become or is becoming illegal to carry an adverse thought about women, Jews, all Coloreds and non-Whites of whatever description, homosexuals and all forms of other sexual deviations, and so forth.  About the only people that it is proper and good to criticize are the WASP (White, Angle-Saxon Protestant) males. 

 

In America, it seems to be perfectly allowable to criticize, condemn or oppose WASPs in any and all situations.  The WASPs (though now in a profoundly significant minority) are the only people who are not covered in so-called hate crime laws. 

 

 

Further Goyim Insanity over Black Heroes 

 

Black heroes like Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods were addressed in a former chapter.  There is no cause to repeat those words of stupidity from the gullible American goyim.  But there is still more to come on this theme. 

 

Moreover, in other endeavors, the dumb, White, Christian, sun worshipping majority is about as crazy and insane as is possible to build up and inflate any real or supposed achievements of Black people.  Thus, Oprah Winfrey has become the nation’s leading daytime entertainer. 

 

Both Bill Cosby and “the reverend” Jesse Jackson were the greatest of heroes (yes, Black heroes for dumb, stupid Whites)--even after the exposure of their illicit sexual activities and reported illegitimate children. 

 

With the murder of Cosby’s son Dennis, the media went wild for days and days reporting on this death.  With the arrest of the alleged killer and his trial, most all of the national news reports carried the very latest news regularly, as if this event was the most extraordinary in American history. 

 

Colin Powell received recognition and promotions, not on merit, but on obvious affirmative action programs.  This writer spent some years in the military and is acquainted with saluting and how to salute.  It was always fascinating to watch Powell salute with his sloppy, half hearted, lazy salutes.  This was classic proof that he was not much of a professional soldier. 

 

Non West Point officers generally don’t get to be four star generals in the US Army and Powell was not West Point.  Of most importance, it is inconceivable that a non Service Academy general could ever become Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  Yet, Powell reached this pinnacle for some strange reason. 

 

And now, he is US Secretary of State in line to the presidency (with all the problems of health and living facing Bush and Cheney, Powell could easily become US president--if Slick Clinton does not immediately regain power under a Hillary presidency or a new constitution).  But Powell is Black (of sorts), and there has been the gross stupidity of affirmative action. 

 

 

Politics 

 

In politics, the Republicans constantly brag and boast about former Oklahoma Congressman J. C. Watts because he is a Black Republican (a rarity in today’s world).  Whether Watts has any qualifications or not and whether he has ever done anything constructive or not matters very little.  What is important to the stupid goyim is that he, like Powell, is an African-American. 

 

The latest media insanity in 2003 has been the great surge in popularity of Condoleezza Rice, George W. Bush’s National Security Adviser.  The controlled media is just absolutely crazy over this Black woman.  The July 2001 “Internet Vortex” (p. 16) said that Ms Rice is “emerging as the most popular and most admired woman in America right now.”  She is being touted as a California candidate for the US Senate.  

 

Later chapters will discuss the incredible incompetence and gross stupidity in Washington among the Black advisors to George W. Bush on the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in Washington and New York.  Surely, of all people in Washington, Condoleezza Rice had primary responsibility for advising Bush on these coming attacks (which she had much intelligence about). 

 

Rice dropped the ball.  But since Rice is both Black and a woman, she was never held accountable for her major goofs.  Instead, the naive and gullible George W. Bush has taken most the blame and suffered most of the heat. 

 

Washington state is interesting because it only has a small minority population.  Furthermore, Washington is an ultra liberal state which goes out of its way to pacify, praise and bestow privileges and blessings upon its minority population.  Seattle elected a Black Mayor and the state elected a Chinese governor. 

 

Despite this love and push for minorities, the newspapers, government entities at all levels and the liberal, leftist peoples (who are in a majority statewide) constantly cry and badger the public about prejudice and racial bias of the people. 

 

Obviously, with the election of minorities into key government posts, it is totally impossible for the collective people (who are mostly White) to have ever used race or any racial criteria in the state elections and voting booths.  Yet, the papers and liberals whine and cry constantly about the discrimination against minorities.  Something is fundamentally wrong on this subject. 

 

 

The Great Mandela 

 

The last several years has seen an absolute explosion about the grand and glorious attributes of the supposedly fabulous Nelson Mandela, former President of South Africa.  No one seems to care or dare mention the fact that Mandela was historically a Communist, revolutionary terrorist and murderer. 

 

Mandela had a birthday party in Pretoria in late July 1998 and proceeded to marry Graca Machel, the widow of the former President of Mozambique (after Nelson had gotten rid of former wife Winnie for her murder and terrorism of South African Whites and Blacks).  Graca was a recent Mandela girl friend and shack up mate. 

 

The week of July 20th (of 1998) saw the US press go crazy over this marriage.  News broadcasts on the hour (which run about 3 1/2 minutes after commercials, as noted earlier) had this Mandela story on for days.  Again, as with Tiger Woods, this is most extraordinary (because the hourly news casts are extremely limited and abridged--simply because of the few minutes available). 

 

Surely, an honest observer would suppose that only the most profoundly important and significant pieces of news would dare receive mention on these short broadcasts of news on the hour. 

 

Yet, the Mandela marriage story was repeated, over and over, as if this was the most welcomed news to so-called humanity in all of history.  Other national news sources also went wild with ecstasy.  Surely, there must have been more significant and important news to focus on, rather than on a marriage of a Black revolutionary terrorist and murderer with his recent shack mate. 

 

In one case, a reporter had Mandela’s granddaughter on for a short spiel.  She remarked how grand Nelson was and how happy she was to see him as President of South Africa, after his years in jail.  The reporter was just goo-goo eyed to be able to talk to this girl. 

 

Of course, no one would dare criticize or complain about Mandela’s terrorism and how many persons he murdered or his recent adultery or shack up affair with Graca--nor was there any mention of his poor wife Winnie, who he successfully got rid of. 

 

 

Puff Diddy Combs and Jennifer Lopez 

 

It seems that the Western Christian society must have some Colored heroes to worship and be obsessed with from time to time.  Consequently, the last several years have seen the gullible Christians completely engulfed with O. J. Simpson, then Bill Cosby, then Tiger Wood, then Nelson Mandela, then Elian Gonzalez and then it looked like the Christians might be faced with a rest from this mass of Colored worship. 

 

Apparently, the media looked the field of entertainment and pleasure over in the American Christian world and came up with a strange pair of Colored heroes that the gullible Whites could be completely mesmerized and obsessed over. 

 

All of a sudden, in the year 2000, the Puerto Rican singer and entertainer Jennifer Lopez and the Black rapper, Sean “Puff Diddy” Combs (also known as “Puff Daddy), both began to receive media recognition (and obsession). 

 

Periodically, the controlled media began showing revealing and sexually enticing pictures of Lopez.  “Newsweek” had a large color picture of Lopez in a slinking low-cut, split dress which showed her breasts stuck out and much of her legs and other enticements.  Pictures also began to appear of Puff Daddy and his assortment of jewelry, diamonds and wealth. 

 

 

Puff Daddy and Jennifer Joined Together 

 

The world of gullible Christians, obsessed with the brotherhood of man, got a real charge of happiness and joy when it was revealed that Puff Daddy and Jennifer were courting and shacking.  This really excited the White Christians. 

 

However, things began to look bad for Puffy in late 2000 when he was arrested and charged with carrying a gun in his super rich limousine (in New York City--while he and Jennifer were on an outing).  Allegedly, Puff Daddy tried to get his chauffeur to take the blame for the gun because it was illegal to carry a concealed gun in New York City.  The chauffeur said no.  So Puffy faced a prosecution. 

 

This story was just the thing needed to completely mesmerize, obsess and dominate the total and complete thinking of the White Christian Americans because it had all of the ingredients which they sought and cherished so dearly--to include an illegal gun, a Black fat-cat hero and a supposedly sexy and attractive Hispanic girl. 

 

Of course, the media regularly bombarded the public with everything Puffy and Jennifer were doing.  The gullible White American public just loved the antics and reports on Puff Daddy and Jennifer. 

 

Eventually, Puffy’s trial took place the week of March 11, 2001.  The media covered this event as if it was one of the most important things in American history.  There was constant speculation about whether Jennifer would testify and what would she say, and whether Puffy would testify and what would he say, and on and on. 

 

It ended up that Jennifer did not testify, but Puff Daddy did.  And as could be expected, the multi-cultural jury found for Puffy and he beat the complete rap.  He was acquitted!  Naturally, the controlled media went wild with great joy and happiness.  Daily, the gullible Christian Israelites were blasted with the news that Puffy had completely beat the charges.  He was innocent. 

 

The story played on for days and days, as if all of modern America could not rest or sleep until it learned exactly each move, thought, word and anticipation of Puff Daddy and Jennifer.  When the news people finally began to quit talking about the famous interracial pair, there was some question about what the media could come up with to replace them and keep the gullible Christians mesmerized with frivolous nothings. 

 

 

A Contrasting Illustration 

 

For many decades now, Christian sun worshippers have realized that they had better not use the word “Jew” or say anything about the Amalek-Edomites (Jews or Christians), unless they use words of praise, flattery and greatness (just as is now true with Black people around the world). 

 

As shown in former comments, the typical Christian sun worshipper can speak evil of Judaism and the Talmud and there is no problem.  But say something bad about Amalek-Edomite Jews in a racial or ethnic vein--watch out for “fear of the Jews” or correctly the Judeans (Jo 7:13). 

 

Now, this absolute stupidity has reached the plateau that the last 50 years has seen the public arrive at the place where they can no longer speak or utter a word or phrase which can be construed to be criticism, complaint, condemnation or derogatory about any Coloreds in general and Blacks and racial Jews (Amalek-Edomites) in particular. 

 

Obviously, White people in public are not allowed to have such politically incorrect speech.  But the dilemma extends far beyond that stage. 

 

For example, most American people (especially under age 50) have been so trained, mesmerized and zombiized by outcome based education (to be described later) and the entertainment and media industries that their brains cannot listen to any criticism leveled against Coloreds.  When they hear this politically unapproved speech, they literally go to pieces. 

 

 

A Classic Example 

 

Recently, this writer was visiting with a young woman with a child in the public schools.  She was aware of the fact that the schools have gone to pot, and she offered no contest on that reality. 

 

But when this writer mentioned some of the primary things that had happened in US education since 1954 to bring on the crisis, she couldn’t handle it at all and went and blurted out very stupid, hateful and misinformed statements at me for mentioning the truth.  Like other liberals, she attacked me, rather than deal with the facts being stated. 

 

This writer was born in the depression and was raised and educated in a state where racial segregation prevailed until 1954 and Brown versus the Board of Education (which completely changed American education).  The point was made that with the Supreme Court decision, the US government took over the public schools and subsequently the private schools as well. 

 

In the days of racial segregation, the South used to pour a lot of White taxpayers’ money (and some too from Blacks, although not that much proportionately) into bottomless black pits called Negro schools.  Several things typically happened in Black schools.  First, the Negroes literally tore them up, requiring constant infusions of new cash to maintain them in some usable order. 

 

Next, the Black teachers were generally incompetent and academic standards plunged to the point that there was often little or no standards.  Actually, this had to be the situation because a highly significant portion of Africans are fairly stupid and thus they are passed in school without any recognizable academic achievements. 

 

With racial integration of the schools, all of these problems were transferred to the formally White schools with one more feature which perhaps existed to a lesser extent in the old, segregated, Black schools. 

 

Under the new permissive humanist attitudes that now govern society (no more whippings or physical disciplining of students, as outlined in a prior chapter), crime and violence proned Blacks are more likely to rape, assault and intimidate naive, weak, White teachers. 

 

Obviously, all of these factors came together with the federal take-over of the schools (and the loss of local control) to utterly destroy American education.  This writer was an adult and lived through the 1950s and observed and experienced what happened in the schools and particularly while going on for higher education at the local state university, after it was integrated. 

 

 

More Black Problems 

 

In mentioning some of this reality to the woman under discussion, she didn’t like it at all.  She couldn’t and wouldn’t believe that Black students used to literally tear up the old, Black, segregated schools (and still do so in the now integrated schools).  In trying to further make the case, the situation was brought up over the large public housing projects in Black urban areas. 

 

For 40 years, the US government has plowed literally billions of dollars into building large apartments for so-called poor people--usually Blacks, in the inner cities like Chicago, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Atlanta, etc. 

 

The one thing that has typically happened in these projects (where they largely have involved Black residents) is that the new buildings are quickly degraded and ruined by destruction and crime.  It has been like throwing billions of dollars into another bottomless black pit. 

 

Not only do the Africans tear up and destroy much of these physical facilities; but in many of them, Black residents use the stairways and halls for breeding purposes and to urinate in and have their bowel movements.  The stench from the semen, urine and feces matter is sometimes quite bad. 

 

Moreover, gangs, criminals, sexual perverts, pedophiles and druggies often predominate in using these buildings.  These housing projects, which Big Brother has spent billions of dollars on, are not only sick; but they are a joke because of the stupid sun worshipping society that has allowed them to surface and to remain. 

 

Not only have Christian sun worshippers permitted these pathetic projects to start and exist, but they have stupidly continued to plow billions of dollars more into them in efforts to upgrade and retain them.  For these many years, a person would have to be extremely stupid, ignorant, misinformed and blind to not have “some” understanding about the situation with these housing projects. 

 

The controlled and useless media industry even has run specials and programs revealing some truth about them on a number of occasions.  One can’t count on much good coming from ABC, NBC, CNN or CBS.  But they have had numerous revelations of the social sickness in the federal housing projects. 

 

In fact, things have been so bad in these housing projects that the controlled and useless media has been unable to slant, twist and color the news on them to make out that they are good programs.  Inevitably, the media has had to reveal some information on how incredibly corrupt, sorry and pathetic these sick federal programs have become. 

 

In trying to make this point to the ignorant, rebellious, sun worshipping woman under discussion, she refused to accept the obvious.  She could not accept or believe that significant numbers of Blacks would tear up their free schools and their free public housing projects.  She really believed that the remarks were racist lies and distortions and attacked me for saying them. 

 

 

Black History 

 

As sorry as Hollywood people have been for many decades now, they did generally present Blacks in a true perspective in movies made before WWII.  With the 1950s, they began a process of change. 

 

Significantly, Blacks had virtually no role in American history--other than being largely maids, shoeshine men and field hands. 

 

Yet, movies are now being made to show Blacks leading the American Revolution and being the top gun fighters and gamblers in a racially integrated Old West (a few were cowboys, but not much else).  This whole insanity is absolutely ludicrous.  The same is true with all this hype about the Black civilization in ancient Egypt. 

 

The truth is that Blacks were slaves and/or servants of ruling Whites in ancient Egypt (early Egypt was inhabited by White Nordic and Hamitic peoples, as proven from archaeology).  There was never a Black civilization in Egypt or any other place for that matter.  Blacks have never produced a civilization.  In Africa, they have always been the most primitive and backward people in world history. 

 

 

Source of the Modern Vulgar Speech 

 

Some few people are beginning to understand that the current English vernacular in modern America is exceedingly sick and depraved.  The vulgar, crude, cursing speech now seen regularly on television and in Hollywood movies has come to be part and parcel of the modern, Western, Christian, sun worship culture.  The fall 1999 TV programs were the most vulgar of all time. 

 

Many Americans now talk that way--including small children.  But what most Americans seem totally oblivious to is why or how the United States came to adopt this depraved language as its own.  For this explanation, this writer will share some background. 

 

After a couple of years in a National Guard unit in the late 1940s, this writer entered active duty with the US Army in August 1950 because of the Korean War.  Being on active military duty when the US military began effectively integrating in 1951, i was a first hand observer of what happened. 

 

Initially, it must be admitted that the young men in the military have surely been guilty of a lot of barracks talk over the years and particularly in the context of girls and sexual encounters.  Before racial integration, this was true.  But even the barracks talk was never on the vulgar, sewer level that it has become in recent years. 

 

Today, a person can go back and watch some old WWII movies and especially those of John Wayne or one like “Wake Island,” made in 1942.  Categorically, the way those actors spoke and acted did resemble the White US military in those days.  The movies were not remarkably different from the real world in terms of speech and soldier talk. 

 

In 1951, this writer had the first incident ever of close contact with Blacks.  For the first time in my life, i heard the expression “mother f-ck-r.”  In fact, with Negroes, many of them cannot even speak a sentence or a few words without using that expression or at least the “f” word in some capacity. 

 

By staying in the Army until 1954 and later in the 1960s coupled with Reserve and National Guard service in the intervening years, this writer was in a prime position to observe the reality of racial integration in the US military.  Categorically, with integration, the barracks talk changed.  In just a few months, the Whites began picking up on the same, vulgar, sewer talk of the Blacks. 

 

 

The Transition 

 

A person can watch more recent movies of the Vietnam era and later and be immediately saddened by the sickening, vulgar talk of the military.  Well, that’s the way it really has been in the last 50 years.  The barracks talk is now vulgar and dirty beyond description. 

 

Before integration, White men would not dare use bad language in front of women.  After integration, all people (Whites, Blacks, men and women) use the same, historic, Black sewer talk.  Not only do adults talk like drunken sailors in an Asian prostitute house; but tragically, the whole society now talks the same way.  As noted above, it’s all over television and little children have picked it up as well. 

 

Some Christian sun worshippers will complain on and on about the modern, vulgar language.  If a person tries to tell them “why” this has happened, they will not listen.  They will get mad and either disbelieve it or will label the whole thing lies and distortions and attack the person making the charge. 

 

 

The Hypocrite Society 

 

Please understand that all of this modern, Black, vulgar, sewer talk is now politically correct.  A person can speak on and on using these pathetically sick words and they are protected 100% by the first amendment.  This is politically correct free speech, totally proper and totally allowable in the modern, American, sun worship culture. 

 

No one in government, politics or US leadership has shown any interest in having the FBI and other federal police agencies to start monitoring and spying on people who talk on the sick, sewer level.  The FBI doesn’t tape record people’s words when they say “mother f-ck-r.” 

 

The reason that no one is interested in this vulgar, Black talk is because it is politically correct.  It is perfectly allowable and correct according to the US Constitution.  But conversely, speech (and thoughts) that are not politically correct are evil, wicked and bad and must be stopped.  Politically incorrect speech (and thoughts) are contrary to the US Constitution, per the new thinking. 

 

The public media, society and leaders all support the use of this vulgar, dirty, Black, sewer talk and it is normal and right.  Ignorant humanists, liberals, Socialists, etc all love this vulgar, Black, sewer talk and defend it 100% as being proper and politically correct language in the current, American, sun worship culture and society. 

 

This allowance is in sharp contrast to the situation described earlier where White people had better not use politically incorrect words for Blacks and minorities.  Such White talk is not allowable by the society or its modern leaders.  It is wrong and Big Brother is doing everything possible to stamp it out. 

 

Yes, it is politically incorrect for a White person to use the “n” word (though it appears at Acts 13:1) or to condemn sodomites as queers.  Yet, it is politically correct, proper and normal for all people to use the popular Black expression “mother f-ck-r.” 

 

Obviously, the modern sun worshipping culture and society is pretty warped with enormous problems in defining right and wrong.  It is a classic hypocrite society! 

 

 

The General Reality and Not 100% of All 

 

Please understand that in mentioning this reality with language and the tearing up of schools and buildings (as outlined in prior comments), this writer is not suggesting that all 100% of Negroes tear up their schools and use vulgar, sewer talk.  There may be a few out there who are responsible and act like most, historic, White people (not many, but perhaps a few). 

 

All Black Africans are not automatically stupid.  A few have some capacity for intellectual thought (not many, but a few).  All “small” Black children are not sexually active (actually, 25% of eleven year old Negroes are, per a Philadelphia survey released on March 20, 1998, as announced on the Rush Limbaugh radio talk show program that day). 

 

Clearly all, 100% of Negro children are not born illegitimately (actually, 69.2% are, per a 1997 survey, Feb 28, 2000, “Weekly Standard,” p. 29).  All young Negro males are not in jail or on parole (actually over half are).  But these problems are typical ones and are indicative of the Black community.  These conditions are so prevalent and general that they become illustrative of Africans in the contemporary society. 

 

Incidentally, this issue of Negro illegitimacy and Blacks in jail was briefly commented upon in the Michael Reagan talk show of Aug 1, 2000. 

 

The point was made by a caller that in the 1950s (before racial integration became US public policy), the illegitimacy rate among Blacks was at 13%.  Most Negro homes had a father at home rather than a father who was unknown, away or in jail.  All of this changed dramatically after racial integration. 

 

 

The Ridiculous 

 

People are in no mood to be told bad things about Negroes.  They will not listen to any statements about the Black crime rate, the high illegitimacy birth rate among Negroes, the dilemma over Negro sexual permissiveness, the problem over Black talk, and on and on. 

 

A person can have a conversation with a modern politically correct White and as long as Blacks are praised, glorified and bragged on with lies and distortions about the real world, the conversation will be all right.  But if any comments are made about the questions of Black morality and character, watch out because the talker has just made an enemy. 

 

Modern Americans under the age of 50 have been lied to so many years and deceived and misled so greatly that they are largely mesmerized zombies and robots who don’t have the foggiest notion of what has happened or is happening to them in terms of race.  And if the race subject comes up, they can’t handle it at all.  The speaker will merely make an enemy. 

 

It is significant that when this writer was young (pre WWII), the general American society looked down on Negroes (as typified by Amos n’ Andy) and would have never bragged and boasted about their attributes.  Certainly, most of America’s political leaders before 1932 and even the Oregon State Constitution, mentioned earlier, would be politically incorrect by modern standards. 

 

My, how times have changed.  The dead grandparents of people living today could never have perceived how their grandchildren would become so ignorant about racial truths they knew and understood in pre WWII days.  It’s a wonder that Thomas Jefferson, George Washington and even Abraham Lincoln don’t try to turn over in their graves over the hypocrisy and stupidity that have set in. 

 

Truly, modern Americans already have a speech controlled society.  Everything said has to be politically correct because anything said that is not politically correct will invoke opposition and hatred and an FBI investigation (if not an extended jail term).  Obviously, some real questions must be raised over whether modern White Americans have freedom of speech or not.  The evidence says no! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 319--Christian Humanism and Sodomy I

 

 

The Modern Sodom and Gomorrah 

 

One of the phenomenons of our modern contemporary society is the explosion and wide public acceptance of homosexuality, lesbianism, masochism, sadism, pedophilia, masturbation and on and on in the context of the degeneracy and depravity of current promiscuity and permissiveness. 

 

Clearly, the liberal Christian humanistic society is contributing to this extraordinary motion--although the primary impetus for the present phenomenon is ruling Amalek-Edomites.  As outlined formerly, many Amalek-Edomites are themselves perverts and queers.  So it is only natural that they would push and prod stupid, Christian sun worshippers on and on in this direction. 

 

What the Amalekites have been doing to modern Christian Israelites is an almost repeat of what they did to Israelites during the Exodus, as discussed in former chapters. 

 

Per Piska 3 of “Pesikta De-Rab Kahana” (p. 38), the Amalekites lured some Israelites away from their camps so that they could be killed and/or polluted by pederasty.  They have been doing almost the same thing for years now with the gullible, Christian, sun worshipping goyim. 

 

 

Sodomy is Sin 

 

At the outset in this discussion, it is important to observe that Scripturally, sodomy is one of the most depraved and wretched sins of all.  It is so condemned and so terribly bad that The MOST HIGH has judged all sodomites as being deserving of the death sentence (Gen 18:20-33; 19:1-29; Lev 18:22; 20:13; Deut 22:5; 23:17; 29:23; Jud 19:22-23; Jer 49:18; 50:40; Rom 1:21-32; I Cor 6:9; I Tim 1:10). 

 

It is absolutely a certainty.  The Word has the greatest of condemnation for queers, sodomites, homosexual faggots and all other sexual perverts, who misuse one of The ELOHIM’s most precious gifts to man--sex and its right and proper use. 

 

Any fag that tries to justify his sickness and perversion with the Word is both depraved and stupid.  The only thing the Book teaches about sodomites and queers is that secular society should impose the death penalty on them immediately (Lev 20:13).  By the way, even the Christian sun worship culture in early America once had laws on the books making sodomy illegal. 

 

While many of these sodomite laws have been rescinded, others still remain on the books.  With the recent revelations about the Sodomite Slick Clinton, to be later described, a number or state legislatures and courts have been changing their historic stands on sodomy--to effectively abolish the definition.  The Georgia State Supreme Court threw her law out on Nov 20, 1998. 

 

 

Changing Attitudes 

 

Although many laws have been on the books and still remain on the books, the problem in the current Christian sun worship civilization is that much of the public ignores its own laws (except for laws dealing with politically incorrect people, who are always fully prosecuted), as well as the laws of The CREATOR. 

 

In other words, modern Americans do not get prosecuted for sodomy any longer, regardless of the presence or lack of secular laws on the subject.  Literally, no one cares because much of the population has been doing it, from the US president on down to middle school children (as will soon be proven). 

 

Not only is this progressively more and more open public acceptance of homosexual activities as being normal and good in America and the Christian West, but even the power of the Orthodox Jewish authorities is being shaken in Palestine (in their opposition to the ideology of the ruling Amalekite Satanists). 

 

These on-going changes of the secularization of the modern state of Israel will be discussed in some detail in later chapters on the role of the Amalekite bankers/masters in internationalism and globalism. 

 

However, for now, it must be noted that even in Israel, the media and especially the public broadcasters are free to crusade for their liberal, leftist ideals (which are very typically opposed by Orthodox religious authorities).  Thus, the Amalekite controlled media crusades for gay pride, same-sex marriages and whatever else that strikes their fancy (Sep/Oct 2000 “Believer’s Advocate,” p. 20). 

 

 

Some Statistics 

 

Beyond the fact that laws against sodomy are being stricken from the books or just being ignored, there is another tragic fallout from the whole dilemma.  The modern public no longer looks upon sodomy as being wrong--as once was the case.  This reality was brought out in a recent public poll on homosexuality, as released on March 13, 2000, by “Newsweek” magazine. 

 

News reports said the poll revealed that in a survey of American citizens in 1998, 54% of Americans said homosexuality was a sin.  In the 2000 poll, only 46% said it was a sin.  In fact, some 45% now say that it is not a sin.  Apparently, the other 9% didn’t know or wouldn’t express an opinion on the issue.  The point is that today the majority of the people no longer condemn homosexuality on religious grounds. 

 

“Newsweek” magazine, of March 20, 2000 (p. 46-61), ran the results of its latest poll (which included the above findings) in a series of articles on queers.  This poll was quite extensive and displayed the incredible changing public attitudes on homosexual faggots. 

 

For example, 83% of Americans now believe that queers should have job protection, while only some 56% shared that view in 1977.  This very belief in the generic public will translate into more and more affirmative action programs for queers.  The very idea of having job protection will soon spell out job preferential rights. 

 

Some 54% of Americans believe that homosexual partners should get social security checks the same as heterosexual people.  Some 58% believe that gay spouses are entitled to health insurance.  Amazingly, 56% of the faggots claim that straight, non-homosexual people are becoming more tolerant of them and their life styles.  Only 9% say that straights are less tolerant. 

 

The essence here is that the Satanic efforts to change the attitudes of people are paying off.  The Scriptures condemn the sodomites in the worst case scenario.  But the loving Christians no longer share those Scriptural views. 

 

While all of this outlined change in attitudes is sickening and pathetic, what is even worse is that 41 US states and the District of Columbia have so-called hate crime laws on the books to protect homosexuals and lesbians (in the context of sexual orientation).  Only nine states do not now have those laws (GA, SC, TN, IN, AR, KS, TX, NM and WY).  More will be said about this shortly. 

 

 

Present Depravity 

 

Beyond the public schools and libraries, almost half of America’s households now have personal computers.  And half of these (25% of the total US households) are now on the Internet.  Each day, in America, there are some 37 million new Internet users.  Furthermore, about 32 million Americans use it at work.  Manifestly, it is awesome in size in modern America. 

 

The November-December 1999 “Church of God Progress Journal” (p. 3) had a story by Dr Alfred H. Ellis on “Cybersex, Sex on the Internet.”  Ellis offered some very terrifying statistics on what all is happening on the net in terms of sex. 

 

There are now some 19,542,710 visitors each month to the top five, pay, porn sites and some 98,527,275 visitors to the top five, free, porn sites.  About 200 new porn sites are added daily.  Some 70% of all e-porn traffic occurs during the 9 to 5 workday.  In 1998, the Internet porn industry, with its 100,000 commercial porn sites, generated over $1 billion in business. 

 

Also, all porn sites offer what are called free “teasers” (meaning--free viewing of porn pictures that are intended to allure the user to sign up for more).  Though all porn sites require the user to say that they are at least 18 years of age, any child can very easily click the “yes” button to this question and then proceed on to watch the free teaser. 

 

Ellis perceptively notes that “Internet users, who would normally be unlikely to develop sexually compulsive behavior, do so as a result of their Internet usage.”  In short, people using the Internet can easily be enticed into the world of cybersex.  Once entrapped, the unsuspecting person becomes a compulsive sex addict of some sort. 

 

“The Washington Times” of Jan 31-Feb 6, 2000 (p. 13), had a report by Jim Dyer on “Internet porn said responsible for increase in sex addiction” which indicated that on-line porn sites have sparked a huge jump in sexual addiction.  Many mental health centers are filled by people who have lost jobs, spouses and money, because of on-line sex. 

 

Dyer quoted Dr Robert Weiss, director of the Sexual Recovery Institute.  Weiss says that “cyber-sex is the crack cocaine of sexual addiction.”  He adds that it works quickly and is so instantly intense.  Today, huge numbers of people, who have never had a history of a sex problem, all of a sudden, find themselves addicted and sick for the first time, after being involved with cybersex. 

 

Per Weiss, sex is the number one searched for topic on the Internet and it is the third largest revenue generator on the net.  Some 57 million Americans now use the net and 60% of all Web site visits are sexual in nature.  Some 25 million Americans visit cyber-sex sites between one to ten hours a week.  Another 4.7 million persons view cyber-porn in excess of 11 hours a week.  

 

 

Another Report 

 

The Jun 2000 “National Liberty Journal” (p. 3) offered a more recent survey on the exploding popularity of porn sex.  This source suggested that porn sex figures have been going up substantially in all categories.  For instance, in 1999, pornography sites took in $1.5 billion (up from the $1 billion of 1998, as cited above). 

 

Of the millions of users and sites, some 10% of them (as a minimum) use the net for at least 11 hours a week in on-line sexual activity. 

 

Children’s use of cyber-sex is exploding upward.  Per “National Liberty Journal,” some 31% of children surveyed admit that they have visited porn sites on the net.  Even establishment libraries seem to offer pornography to interested people.  The Journal indicated that in a survey of 2000 library patrons (including children), most accessed hard core pornography. 

 

The report noted that as Internet usage increases, doctors are seeing more and more patients who are presenting problems which stem from or is manifested by on-line sexual compulsivity.  Clearly, there is a growing fall out from all of this fascination and obsession with cyber-sex activities.  The fall out is a massive surge of mental illness and addiction over sex which is acting to destroy lives forever. 

 

The fall out of this explosion in use of the Internet for sex clearly means that a very dangerous trend is in motion.  A perfect example of the great evil that can surface from this use was brought out in a news report from the May 31, 2002, “The Week” (p. 5) on what happened to a 13-year-old girl who had become engrossed with the Internet for sex. 

 

This report came from Danbury, Connecticut where the girl made contact with a 25-year-old, married, Brazilian man through an Internet chat room.  The man, Saul Dos Reis, was likely a mixed blooded mongrel who was living in the US on an expired visa.  He and the girl decided to meet at a shopping mall.  He proceeded to take her to a place for sex and then strangled her to death. 

 

 

No Enforcement 

 

As is true in so many areas, the US government under Slick Clinton called for more laws to regulate the Internet, but then made no real effort to enforce existing laws already on the books.  For example, there are some laws which prohibit obscenity and the sexual abuse of children.  However, the Slick Clinton people generally ignored these laws. 

 

The March 2000 “Adult Video News” (the leading trade publication for the porn industry--per the “National Liberty Journal”) called the US Justice Department’s lack of enforcement “benevolent neglect” and noted that “federal obscenity prosecutions have been on the wane during the Clinton years.”  The six prosecutions in 1997 and eight in 1998 are called a “joke” by some analysts. 

 

US Congressman Steve Largent (R-OK) notes that pornography prosecutions for violations of US laws were down by 75% under Bill Clinton.  Largent raised a question about where the adult entertainment industry has been contributing their campaign financing money.  Was it going to Clinton and the Democrats?  Yes! 

 

This discussion surely opens the door to the process of sexual demonization, as described in a former chapter herein on demonic activity.  When the just cited Dr Ellis uses the words sexually compulsive behavior, the implications of demonization are quite obvious. 

 

It must be relevant to recognize that these millions of American people getting demonized on the Internet typically enter a new world of sexual depravity and sickness.  Both men and women are introduced to adultery and illicit sex.  Sodomy, sexual perversion and sexual wretchedness are all over the Internet to induce people to try and experiment with alternative forms of sex. 

 

 

The Pedophile Explosion 

 

Of perhaps the most significance is the fact that both little children and adults are introduced to the kiddy porn and pedophile business.  This not only leads to the sexual exploitation of children in heterosexual conduct, but it eventually leads to the exploitation of children in homosexual activity.  Truly, the whole mess is one of gross sickness. 

 

Surely, the pedophile explosion is one of the most sickening aspects of the whole sexual revolution.  Though pedophiles have been around for ages, the horrible thing about the present situation is that they have organized and are quite busy promoting their wretchedness in a professionally organized manner over the Internet and other publicly accepted porno mediums. 

 

Yes, much of the cybersex activity over the Internet is promoted by pedophiles, trying to make contact with children.  As late as September 3, 1998, news reports said that a ring of pedophiles called the “Wonderland Club” was discovered operating over the Internet in much of the US and in some 75 foreign countries.  Kiddy porn pictures of children starting at age 2 were being traded over the Internet. 

 

Kiddy porn is reportedly more popular in the US right now than in any other nation in the world.  The most important of the pedophile organizations is the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), founded in 1978.  This sick group is just one part of a larger network of pedophiles operating in various countries around the world.  Their slogan is “Get ‘em before eight, or it’s too late.” 

 

They gained some fame in December 1982 when police raided one of their sex parties in Wareham, Massachusetts and uncovered information showing how extensive and pervasive NAMBLA is in the contemporary American society (per article on “International Perverts Push Queer Ideas In United States,” in the Jan 16, 1984, “Spotlight” paper). 

 

A news report in the May 6, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) said that this North American Man-Boy Association sponsored a female-male transsexual named Patrick Califia Rice to speak to students at Penn State University.  The costs for this presentation on perversion was confiscated from students from student fees.  Thus, NAMBLA is now recruiting on US college campuses. 

 

 

The Worst 

 

Tragically, more and more faggots are gaining possession of children.  Lesbian women are turning to artificial insemination to have children, and adoption is a popular homosexual trick to gain possession of innocent children. 

 

Attitudes are changing in this arena as well.  Per the above quoted “Newsweek” (Mar 20, 2000, p. 46-61), some 39% of the American public favor adoption rights for queers and 34% approve of legally sanctioned, queer marriages.  Thus, to add to the incredible dilemma little children face in today’s world, many faggot adults are, of course, adopting children and using them as sex objects as can be expected. 

 

Serious allegations have been made about popular television host Rosie O’Donnel, a butch lesbian who likes to adopt little girls.  In July 2001, stand up comic Paula Poundstone, another lesbian (butch?), was arrested for sexually abusing one of her adopted girls. 

 

The big news in October 2002 was the sniper in the Washington, DC area who was shooting innocent people at random.  Other comments herein discuss this case more fully.  So there is no intent to broach it here beyond pointing out something largely missed by the gullible American people. 

 

The primary shooter was an older Black Muslim named John Muhammad.  But he had with him a seventeen-year old Black helper who was described as his “step son” (named Lee Malvo, cited earlier).  Later, news reports acknowledged that the 17-year old boy was actually the homosexual lover of Muhammad.  Also, of interest, the 17-year old helper was an illegal alien from Jamaica. 

 

 

More on the Fall-out 

 

Tragically, for young children, homosexuals are forty times more likely to violate children than are heterosexuals (per a study by social researcher Judith Reisman, reported in the Jul-Aug 2001 “Petah Tikvah,” p. 45).

 

Furthermore, it must be noted that Dr Judith Reisman’s study shows that male homosexuals are nine times more likely to abuse boys than male heterosexual pedophiles are in abusing girls (Jun 3, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2). 

 

The point is that pedophiles are bad.  But homosexual pedophiles are even worse (because of their immoral activities and their propensity for perversion).  The conclusion is clear that the faggots are far more likely of abusing children than straight people. 

 

In another recent report, sociologists at the University of Southern California have produced a study showing that children of lesbians and gay men develop with different personalities than those from heterosexual parents (“The Week” of Jul 27, 2001, p. 19).  As a minimum, such children themselves will more likely mature as homosexuals or mentally ill in some way. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

The tone for what is happening on sex was seemingly established by George B. Leonard, in an article on “Why We Need A New Sexuality” in “Look” magazine of January 13, 1970, when he wrote that we “need a world where people can trust their good feelings, where members of the same sex can touch and caress without fear.” 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 320--Christian Humanism and Sodomy II

 

 

Sodomy Is Popular 

 

Quite naturally, Amalek-Edomite controlled Hollywood and the television networks picked upon the need for this new look on perverted sex (as described in the prior chapter) and began making movies and television sit-coms promoting this depravity. 

 

Naturally, it wasn’t long before a lesbian, properly called Ellen “Degenerate,” announced her sexual depravity on her TV program (1996-1997). 

 

The Christian sun worshipping public responded and made her program, unveiling her lesbianism, the most watched one of all in television history.  Starting in the fall of 1997, a whole host of new programs were released to promote homosexuality as being perfectly normal and right for society at large. 

 

By 1999, things were really moving fast in the sexual depravity arena.  The “National Liberty Journal” for October 1999 had a front page story by J. M. Smith on the “Fall Television Season Promises New Lows.”  The article focused upon a recent report from the Parents Television Council (PTC), concerning fall TV programs planned for the so-called family hour (8PM to 9PM). 

 

PTC said that the new network programs would be riddled with foul language, drug use and sexual activity.  The programs would appeal to the lowest denominator and would head for new lows (if that is possible).  Objectionable material would rise 75% over just the prior year and a half.  Sexual references would increase 77% and 68% of all family network programs would have sexual material. 

 

Obviously, homosexual references and activities are being highlighted in these new programs.  The article noted that popular programs have already shown homosexual marriages and other homosexual activities as normal, positive and proper human experiences.  The focus of some new programs will be entirely on or receive major focus upon homosexuals (like “Spin City”) and lesbians (i.e. “Just Shoot Me”). 

 

 

It Continues To Go Up 

 

By the year 2001, the sexual content was up even more.  “US News & World Report” of Feb 19, 2001 (p. 12), noted that sexual material had went up from 56% in 1998 to 68% in 2000 TV (with 9% involving sexual intercourse of children under the age of 18).  Sit-coms were the worst with 84% of them presenting sexual situations in 2000.  Some 90% of the programs presented sex favorably while only 10% showed sexual risks. 

 

By 2002, the depravity on TV had reached higher levels (if that is possible).  The Nickelodeon cable news network offered a children’s program discussing homosexual parents (Jun 24, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).  The show was called:  “Nick News Special Edition:  My Family Is Different.”  Program guests included Baptist leader Jerry Fallwell and the butch Rosie O’Donnel (who is a lesbian parent). 

 

Not only has there been a modern unprecedented explosion in homosexuality and lesbianism, but numbers of single women are increasingly turning to the use of dogs.  It is common knowledge and particularly in California that a woman traveling or living alone with a male, German Shepherd dog typically has the pooch for sodomite purposes.  

 

For sure, man grows more depraved and perverted with every passing day.  While men generally deserve that charge, American men are perhaps the worst of all. 

 

 

The Schools Too 

 

Of course, the schools have proceeded to teach “alternative” lifestyles (of sexual perversion) in favorable ways.  In fact, starting in the fall of 1997, some schools in liberal Massachusetts started teaching alternative sex (homosexuality) in their kindergarten classes (as mentioned earlier).  This ties to the NAMBLA slogan of getting them started when young. 

 

On Jan 1, 2001, the state of California commenced a similar program where all children must be taught about homosexuality and tolerance, starting in kindergarten (Jan 29, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 2).  Another CA law also took effect that involves taxpayer grants to fund field trips to teach diversity and homosexual tolerance (presumably, by allowing small children to visit queer joints to observe the fags in operation). 

 

A news report in the June 10, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) said that the Hayward, California Unified School District is now encouraging its homosexual and lesbian teachers to talk openly with school children about homosexuality during classroom instruction.  All teachers are encouraged to read about homosexual characters and to use homosexuals as role models in classroom instructions.

 

In 1999, the Portland, Oregon school district issued a recommended reading list to students of books which promote the homosexual lifestyle (Jan 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 6).  Six protesting teachers said the action was designed to condone, affirm and encourage homosexual practices among students and adults. 

 

“Just the Facts Coalition,” a group of queers and so-called psychologists, developed a 12 page booklet promoting homosexuality which was mailed by them to all of the public school districts in the US on Nov 23, 1999 (Nov 29-Dec 5, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 13).  The booklet says that homosexuality is not a mental disorder, but is perfectly normal for people to engage in. 

 

The Washington suburb of Fairfax County, Virginia joined the march to depravity in recent years when it commenced a program requiring children in the school system to read a number of books on a reading list which feature detailed rape scenes, the impaling of a male reproductive organ and certain forms of perverted sex (“Spotlight,” Feb 26, 2001, p. 2). 

 

Some of the local parents protested.  But the reading program is proceeding. 

 

Also, in 2001, the Novato County, California school district got into the act when it forced second grade children to watch pro-homosexual plays (Mar 11, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).  One play had a cross-dressing boy in it and another one had a female character who runs off with another female. 

 

 

More Perversion in School 

 

“Spotlight” newspaper of Sep 20, 1999 (p. 2), had a news report that William Pollack, a Harvard Medical School psychologist, has proposed that little boys should be raised as little girls in order to get rid of the traditional male toughness and help prevent the mass shootings at public schools (which sometimes involve male students). 

 

If the warped views of people like Pollack (is he an Amalekite?  His name sounds suspicious) prevail, the schools will undertake the task of publicly teaching homosexuality.  The goal here will be to take away the masculinity of little boys and make them effeminate, in order to be more like little girls. 

 

It appears that the US Department of Education picked upon Pollack’s ideas.  A news report on Aug 4, 2000, noted that the Clinton Administration was pushing grade school curriculum which was specifically designed to eliminate the masculinity of little boys and make them more like little girls.  The plan was to teach things to little boys which were less masculine--like making quilts and playing games without winners. 

 

 

And More 

 

A few years ago, Bill Clinton appointed Jocelyn Elders, a Black woman, as US Surgeon General.  She proposed that children be taught masturbation in school.  Not wanting to be left out of the action, presidential candidate Al Gore appointed feminist author Naomi Wolf in 1999 as one of his campaign advisors.  Ms Wolf is noted for her approach to public education. 

 

Per Andrew Cain, in his article on “Wolf instructs Gore on how to be top dog,” in the Nov 8-14, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 4), Wolf, like Elders, believes that the schools should teach masturbation, as a middle ground between sex and abstinence.  She proposes starting the instruction in Junior High School. 

 

Years ago (before the free sex days now in evidence where children start copulating early), youngsters (boys particularly, but even girls somewhat) learned about masturbation usually from other kids, and especially when staying overnight with a friend or friends--which sometimes resulted in at least two (or more) children masturbating together.  This very practice of masturbation by two or more people (of especially the same sex) in one setting opens the door to a borderline situation or something very near Shaul’s apparent condemnation of homosexuality (I Cor 6:9).  Now that the schools are teaching it, it will certainly happen in joint learning exercises and probably in some schools. 

 

By the way, Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky used to have masturbation parties (as will be described herein in the following chapter).  So it can affect even people of the opposite sex as well as people of the same sex. 

 

Because of the attachment of demons when one is in sin, one must wonder to what extent a person becomes subject to demons in this evil practice?  Surely, demons do attach to people involved in masturbation, as well as in other situations.  Like Shaul wrote, sex sins (out of the whole sin question) involve sins against one’s own body (I Cor 6:18).  They are especially bad and must exact a heavy penalty. 

 

In Britain, the National Health Service began prescribing vibrators to women suffering from a lack of desire (Oct 18, 2002, “The Week,” p. 6).  In America, US District Judge Lynwood Smith struck down a 1998 Alabama law which banned the sale of vibrators and other devices to stimulate human genital organs (Oct 25, 2002, “The Week,” p. 6).  The judge said that women have a constitutional right to own such devices. 

 

Tragically, this depravity promoted by the United States and British governments and people like Pollack, Elders and Wolf is succeeding (just like the popularity of using dogs and behemah humanoids, especially by some Adamic women).  Truly, judgment is on the way for these nations. 

 

 

The Queer Judge 

 

The Nov 6, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news report from Brockton, Massachusetts which proves the modern dilemma.  Per this story, Linda Giles, a lesbian judge in Brockton, recently done her part to try to destroy morality in the nation’s public schools. 

 

The gist of this report was that the queer judge ruled that a 15 year-old “boy” at South Junior High School in Brockton could return to school and continue to wear girls’ clothing--including padded bras, wigs and high heels.  Judge Linda said that the student, identified only as “Pat Doe,” could wear any clothing or accessories that any other male or female student can wear. 

 

The case surfaced because the school had tried to prevent the boy from wearing girls’ clothing and accessories to disrupt classes.  More problems arose because the boy used the girls’ restrooms.  Apparently, some of the parents of children attending the school were upset with the warped, perverted boy’s actions.   

 

In 1999, a so-called therapist diagnosed the student with a “gender identity disorder” and said that requiring him to wear boys’ clothing would damage his mental health. 

 

The woman judge said that students need to be exposed to differences at an early age to learn “tolerance.”  Thereafter, the queer judge refused to remove herself from the case, even though she had her own sexual orientation problems.  The school may have grounds for an appeal from this warped decision. 

 

 

California 

 

A related case surfaced in California in Sep 2002 when the state legislature there passed a law which provided “civil rights” protection to children in foster care situations.  Under the bill, if a foster parent prohibits a boy from dressing like a girl, the parents can be sued for a civil rights violation (Sep 2002 “American Free Press,” p. 2). 

 

The California bill also provides for sensitivity training for foster parents on sexual orientation, gender identity and challenges faced by gays and transgender youths or youths with gender issues. 

 

 

Still More on the Explosion of Perverted Sex in Schools Since WWII 

 

The May 2000 “National Liberty Journal” (p. 1, 8) had a story by Linda P. Harvey on “Gay Clubs:  The Rest of the Story” which also focused upon the enormous success which the homosexual movement has had in the schools.  Harvey reported that as of early 2000, there were some 600 gay clubs formed in American high schools in the prior seven years. 

 

A news report with this Harvey article noted that there was some 700 open gay school teachers nationwide in April 2000.  These 700 are known queers out in the open.  Surely, there are as many or more closet queers, who have not yet revealed their depravity.  No wonder so many school children are becoming queers.  They have queer teachers. 

 

But this flagrant promotion of open homosexuality has come with a price for school children.  Linda Harvey reports that some 50% of reported HIV infections are now among people under 25 years old. 

 

Another recent push in the schools is the allowance for homosexual students to bring their lovers to school dances.  This effort has now reached the stage where some schools now openly sponsor homosexual or bisexual proms.  The first queer prom took place in Boston in 1980.  Since 1996, they have occurred in St Petersburg, Kansas City, Cleveland and Dallas (Jul-Aug 2001 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 59). 

 

Yes, the post WWII environment has seen an absolute explosion in pre-martial and promiscuous sex in the nation’s schools and particularly since sex education was introduced.  As this sex education has continued and as it has branched out into alternative sex styles, many school children are now becoming bisexuals. 

 

This is a problem in the local Spokane, WA public schools, as pointed out to this writer in early 1998.  With this movement into bisexuality, it is manifest that very soon, America’s public schools will be turning out numbers of confirmed homosexuals.  Periodically, one hears of homosexual boys and girls who are only 14 or 15 years old.  This is inconceivable, but true. 

 

Hundreds of thousands of queers descended upon Washington, DC on April 30, 2000, for a “Millennium March on Washington for Equality.” 

 

The focus of this assembly was to place prominence on young gays and school children.  The event included a “pass the torch to high school students.”  One speaker was 13-year-old Sol Kelly-Jones who was being raised by her lesbian mother and her queer lover (May 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 8). 

 

 

Problems Also in Colleges 

 

Washington State University in Eastern Washington scheduled an orientation conference on homosexuality at its campus for Jun 19-21, 1998.  It was supposed to be a “questioning” program sponsored by an alliance of homosexuals, lesbians, bisexuals and their allies.  High school and junior high students were invited from the Pacific Northwest. 

 

Some local conservative groups learned of the plans and caused a fuss in the legislature over funding for the University.  One representative said that the WSU plans to conduct a children’s conference on homosexuality was reprehensible.  At the last moment, the University temporarily canceled the program (“Trade N’ Save” Newspaper for Jun 19-Jul 2, 1998, p. 8). 

 

In a bold move on this front, the University of Michigan now offers a college course on “How to be Gay” --funded, of course, by the taxpayers (Jul-Aug 2000 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 27).  New York’s Columbia University has added information on “how to have safe sex with animals” on their sex education website on the Internet (Jul-Aug 2000 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 28).  So everyone is getting on board on depravity. 

 

 

Politics and Government Support 

 

To promote his pro queer position, former President Clinton established a special office in the White House to be his liaison to the US gay and lesbian community.  As is true with other positions in the White House, one can be sure that the US taxpayers were paying for this special office of faggots. 

 

A faggot named Richard Socarides was appointed to direct this Clinton office.  He resigned in late 1999 and was replaced by a lesbian named Julian (?) Potter.  Potter organized Clinton’s “Lesbian Inaugural Ball” in January 1997, after Slick’s second inauguration. 

 

James Hormel, a well known faggot, was one of Slick’s ambassadorial appointments (to Luxembourg).  He was a wealthy homosexual who contributed money both to Clinton and to establish a homosexual reading room at the San Francisco Public Library, to include pedophile literature on entrapping young children (Oct 1998 “McAlvany Intelligence Advisor,” p. 6). 

 

In 1997, Slick became the first US president in history to address a homosexual conference (Sep 1999 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 6).  In August 1999, he broke ground again by hosting a private summit with eleven leading queer politicians at the White House. 

 

 

More From Slick 

 

In a taped interview with CNN’s “Larry King Live” program on Dec 23, 1999, Clinton said that he believed that the real problem with Americans is that too many heterosexuals lacked “open, personal contact” with homosexuals (Jan 3-9, 2000, “Washington Times,” p. 15).  Thus, Clinton made it clear that he advocated the open acceptance of queers. 

 

On June 2, 2000, Bill Clinton proclaimed the month of June to be “Gay and Lesbian Pride Month.”  His 2000 proclamation included a call for Americans to observe June “with appropriate government programs, ceremonies and activities that celebrate our diversity” and to recall the homosexual Americans, whose “contributions have enriched our national life” (July 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 4).  

 

With his land-mark proclamation, Slick said that he was proud of his administration’s achievements on behalf of homosexual rights and the appointment of more open homosexuals to senior White House posts.  The queers were so happy with a presidentially declared month for faggots that they did proceed with vulgar ceremonies and parades across the US (complete with government approval and support). 

 

Bill had a reputation for years in the gay community as the nation’s first “gay” president, whatever that may entail (Sep 1999 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 6).  He went out of his way to appoint homosexuals and lesbians into many key government positions, including leading cabinet posts. 

 

As outlined in other comments herein, Bill “Slick” Clinton, himself, is an immoral, dishonest, crooked, sorry, depraved liar and druggy, plus being a sodomite, as some students of truth now realize (and perhaps even queer).  No wonder he appointed so many homosexuals and perverts to government offices. 

 

 

Queers in the Military 

 

Moreover, Clinton and his sodomite aides and assistants actively pushed the concept of promoting sodomy and sexual perversion in the US Armed Forces as normal acts and as American as motherhood and apple pie.  If all the other evil acts in America didn’t destroy the US military, for sure the integration of queers within it would help bring about its demise. 

 

Some years ago, Clinton initiated his “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy for queers in the US Armed Forces which allowed faggots to remain in the military if they made no issue of their sexual orientation.  On Oct 7, 1999, Slick followed up by defining acts of violence against queers in the military as “hate crimes” (Oct 18-24, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 18).  Clinton proceeded to change the military’s manual for courts-martial. 

 

The Clinton administration and the Pentagon were openly pandering to the queers and granting them preferential treatment.  This was the essence of an article by Rowan Scarborough in the Oct 25-31, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 1) on “Gays impacting defense policies, opponents say.” 

 

Per the story, “conservatives say that the Pentagon shuts them out during policy reviews of sexual mis-conduct regulations while holding private meetings and conversations with homosexual organizations.”  Elaine Donnely, director of the Center for Military Readiness said that “The Pentagon is catering to homosexual groups that bankrolled the Clinton campaigns so heavily.” 

 

To be sure that faggots got preferential treatment in the US military, the “Washington Times” of Jan 31-Feb 6 and Feb 7-13, 2000, had two articles by Scarborough (p. 18 and p. 1) on US military to get sensitivity training on homosexuals.  These stories detailed the latest Clinton initiative.  The essence here is that the military has ordered “mandatory homosexual sensitivity training” for all of its people. 

 

The military was also busy making surveys of how its different commands view fags and which personnel make jokes or negative remarks about homosexuals.  Cadence calls that refer to fags were then outlawed. 

 

Presumably, this monitoring of the speech of personnel also involved dossiers on what remarks they make (which obviously were to be used in promotion and retention or later court marital when martial law comes).  This monitoring of speech is linked to what police departments are doing, as discussed earlier. 

 

 

More Clinton Initiatives 

 

Open sodomy was so popular under Clinton that the “Washington Times” had a story by Joyce Howard Price on “Homosexual activities proliferate in federal agencies” (Sep 27-Oct 3, 1999, p. 1).  The report centered on the US Department of Interior which conducted a Gay and Lesbian Pride celebration, naturally using tax payers’ moneys. 

 

US Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin, an avowed lesbian, said that the coming out in the Interior Department was an “act of true leadership.” 

 

The US National Security Agency (NSA) also got in on the bandwagon in support of the queers.  Its Dec 1999 newsletter revealed that the NSA has its own homosexual employees group called the Alan Turing chapter of the Gay, Lesbian or Bisexual Employees (Jan 31-Feb 6, 2000, “Washington Times,” p. 18). 

 

In October 1999, Clinton attended a dinner in New York to raise over one million dollars for the Empire State Pride Agenda, the largest gay and lesbian political advocacy group (Nov 1999 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 3).  Slick told the 1,700 assembled queers that he supports the Employment Non-Discrimination and the Hate Crimes Prevention Acts, both designed to protect and promote homosexuality. 

 

Earlier, Slick addressed a Los Angeles Democratic fund raiser at the gay and lesbian community meeting.  He raised some $850,000 from the assembled queers.  He said that he wished that he had been able to do more for homosexuals and lesbians while he had been in office (Nov 1999 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 3). 

 

 

Gore and the Queers 

 

Understanding the vast amount of money that can be tapped from the faggots, candidate Al Gore followed the exact same path of his colleague Slick Clinton.  Gore worked the queers for everything possible. 

 

Elizabeth Birch, executive director of the Human Rights Campaign, the US’s largest gay and lesbian political group, said that Gore’s support of sodomy was “solid and deep” (Jul-Aug 1999 “Jubilee,” p. 6). 

 

Birch was a “gold level” contributor to “Gays and Lesbians for Gore.”  She attended a reception held by Mrs Tipper Gore at Washington’s first fund-raiser by the queers for a presidential candidate.  Mrs Gore was present and received $150,000 from the faggots for her husband’s campaign. 

 

Tipper told the queers that Al would “fight for your dreams” and “our dreams” (does this mean that the dreams of the Gores were the same as the queers?) and that Al would “stand against the forces of hatred.”  Going on, she said that “All people, regardless of sexual orientation, should be able to be a part of a loving relationship in a family without fear of recrimination or discrimination” (Jul-Aug 1999 “Jubilee,” p. 6).   

 

The two queers heading Clinton’s liaison to the gay and lesbian community, mentioned above, were both supporters of Al Gore.  Richard Socarides worked for Gore and Hillary Clinton in 2000 and Julian Potter came to the White House from the Gore campaign. 

 

Moreover, Al Gore quickly came out in favor of a litmus test to impose upon the senior leaders and officers of the US military which would require them to be pro homosexual, before Gore would appoint them.  On Jan 6, 2000, a group of retired military officers spoke out against Gore’s plans and warned that it would diminish the pool of future leaders (Jan 10-16, 2000, “Washington Times,” p. 19). 

 

 

Queer Government Leaders 

 

Although homosexuality is one of the most Scripturally condemned sins, no one seems to care one way or the other about it in the modern liberal United States.  The apparent Amalekite Henry Kissinger is now a senior statesman of sorts, despite his alleged homosexual connections. 

 

And the former mayor of New York City, Homo Koch (another evident Amalek-Edomite), seems as popular as ever.  US Congressman Jim Kolbe of Arizona has come out of the closet to say that he is “gay” (Nov 22, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 2). 

 

The previously cited US Congressman Barney (the Fag) Frank (a certain Amalek-Edomite) continues to get re-elected from his Massachusetts district.  Not only has Barney the Fag continued to get reelected to the US Congress, but he has run a homosexual call service out of his home for several years, before the whole episode blew up in the media (some time ago, when Barney’s queer lover got into trouble). 

 

As late as July 6, 1998, Barney the Fag and one of his regular lovers, Herb Moses (another evident Amalek-Edomite), broke up and caused some discussion, at least on the Rush Limbaugh Radio Talk Show that day. 

 

But one of the leaders of the national gay and lesbian alliance said that the public should not get upset or concerned because homosexual couples have fall-outs just like heterosexuals.  In other words, this perverted view is that faggots are just like normal people and it is to be expected that they will have lover’s quarrels which sometimes leads to separation. 

 

 

Political Leaders Too 

 

Former US Senator and presidential candidate Bill Bradley added his two cents worth by saying that homosexuals should be protected under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.  He went on to suggest that homosexuals should be able to serve openly in the armed services, without fear of retribution (Sep 27-Oct 3, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 9). 

 

Republican presidential candidate John McCain picked upon the popularity of the queers when he had a private meeting with homosexual Republicans in the “Log Cabin” queer group on Nov 9, 1999.  McCain met with them and said he wants their support (Nov 15-21, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 11). 

 

US Senator and Vice Presidential candidate Joe Lieberman (supposedly an Orthodox Jew, but really a closet queer--as noted earlier) attended a homosexual awards dinner in Oct 2000, sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign (Nov 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 6).  On the campaign trail, Lieberman, like his colleague Gore, talked incessantly about family values.  Yet, both of them, in fact, supported faggots and promoted sexual deviation. 

 

 

More From Government 

 

Also, in October 1999, California Governor Gary Davis signed into public law a package of homosexual rights bills which will dramatically alter the future social lives of Californians (Nov 1999 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 4).  Davis said that these new laws would send a message across the nation that Californians are determined to unleash the full potential of the human spirit. 

 

In early March 2001, the City of San Francisco also got on board Governor Davis’ ship and tentatively approved a plan to use taxpayer funds to pay up to $50,000 for a sex change by any interested city employee (Mar 5, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 2).  Officials said that some 35 city employees were expected to convert themselves from men to women in the first year (at a cost of $1.75 million). 

 

Actually, the years 1999, 2000, and 2001 all saw an enormous push for homosexual privileges and benefits under the leadership of the depraved Slick Clinton.  One of the big queer pushes is for crimes against faggots to be defined as hate crimes (as discussed above and in previous chapters herein). 

 

The Jun 18, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a news report on this national trend to protect the queers, in the form of making crimes against a fag a hate crime and requiring a substantially larger jail term for any offenders.  The “Spotlight” report noted that homosexuals are 50,000 times more likely of suffering violence at the hands of their queer lovers than they are at the hands of the heterosexual public. 

 

So while the controlled media is edging the gullible and ignorant public more and more on in the direction of queer rights and privileges, the real problem for the faggots is their own faggot lovers (who can be very jealous and abusive to their faggot partners); and of course, their demented lifestyles which invites hostility from normal people, as well as very deadly sexually transmitted diseases (like AIDS). 

 

 

More Stupidity 

 

Late 1999 saw the Vermont Supreme Court rule that homosexual couples should receive the same health care and property benefits as heterosexual couples.  In the previously cited Larry King interview with Clinton, the president said that he approved of the Vermont ruling (Jan 3-9, 2000, “Washington Times,” p. 15). 

 

In a surprise move in January 2000, Florida Governor Jeb Bush (younger brother of then presidential candidate George W. Bush) appointed lesbian judge Victoria Sigler to the state’s 11th Judicial Circuit Court (Mar 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 4). 

 

On February 1, 2000, the city of Boulder, Colorado extended its 27 year-old Human Rights Ordinance to protect transsexuals--along with homosexuals, racial minorities and women (Feb 7-13, 2000, “Washington Times,” p. 4).  This means that the city will protect all of these categories in terms of any complaints of alleged discrimination.  The Boulder list includes everybody except White, straight males. 

 

In 1994, a homosexual transvestite from Mexico named Geovanni Hernandez-Montiel arrived in California and claimed that he or it was discriminated against and persecuted in Mexico, and therefore should be admitted to the US as a political dissident under persecution (Sep 11, 2000, “Newsweek,” p. 64). 

 

Apparently, there was some US hesitancy.  So the issue went to the federal court in San Francisco, which naturally ruled in Aug 2000 in support of the faggot transvestite.  This means that when demented, perverted, warped queers do have some problems in their home countries, they can now come to the United States and get on public welfare and fully enjoy their perversions in Christian America. 

 

And now, the latest US perversion came fourth in June 2003 when the US Supreme Court effectively outlawed all state laws restricting sodomy.  The court decision came about over a Texas law that made sodomy illegal.  Texas police arrested a couple of faggots engaged in the actual act in their home.  They went to court, claiming their right of  privacy. 

 

The US Supreme Court sided with the queers.  Per some observers, this decision will pave the way for homosexual marriages in the US. 

 

 

Britain and Canada, Plus the US 

 

The May 2, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. B4) had an AP story from Canada that a BC Appeals Court had ruled in favor of homosexual marriages.  This court said that “Canada should change with the times and recognize homosexual marriage.”  The court over-turned a lower court decision restricting marriages to heterosexuals (which the BC court said was discriminatory). 

 

Now, the latest (in June 2003) is that Canada has now legalized homosexual marriages across the board.  Reportedly, numbers of American faggots are flocking to Canada to get married.  Also, in 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that faggot couples are to be legally married in the State of Massachusetts.  So homosexual marriages will soon come to the US. 

 

Not wanting to be left out in the rush to promote homosexuality, Britain’s Prime Minister Tony Blair reportedly appointed or plans on appointing a known homosexual named Peter Mandelson to be Britain’s chief of the armed forces (Sep 6, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 2).  Obviously, this appointment, like those by Slick Clinton, will further erode the morality of the British. 

 

And who or what part of the American or British populations speak out and condemn these appointments?  No one does.  The people are quite happy, content and satisfied with the on-going depravity and sickness.  The people choose their government and leaders in a democracy and they love the present arrangement. 

 

 

Wall Street Follows Suit 

 

A news report in the Mar 6, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 2) said that Wall Street mega-banks and investment firms have begun a policy of aggressively recruiting homosexual business students over heterosexuals.  Recruiters are said to be going all out to find queers who can be recruited and hired. 

 

The apparent Amalekite led Goldman Sachs was one of the Wall Street firms mentioned.  Since homosexuality is so common among Amalekites (as described in former chapters), it seems reasonable that at some point in time they would eagerly seek out and hire faggots.  It is happening right now since the Amalekites have successfully indoctrinated Christian America on the acceptance of queers. 

 

A previous chapter discussed the situation with the apparent Amalekite or janissary robot Dr Laura Schlessinger, who historically loved the queers and promoted their depravity for ages over her radio talk show. 

 

But then, in more recent times, it appears that Laura actually changed her tune somewhat and spoke against the faggots.  Accordingly, the queers became very mad at her.  One of their forms of retaliation was to pressure American businesses to quit advertising on her program. 

 

The September 2000 “National Liberty Journal” (p. 9) had a report on their success with Laura. 

 

The queers enlisted a whole series of American corporations in their fight with Laura.  This list included Sears, Echo-Star, Procter & Gambel, Xerox, AT&T, Toys ‘R’ Us, SkyTel, Kraft, General Foods and Geico Insurance.  Obviously, the queers carry a big stick in the American business world.  

 

As a still later follow-up on Laura, it appears that the loss of advertising income prompted her to amend her position once more on the fags.  She changed her tune and came out in support of them.  She apologized to the queers and did her best to patch up their relationship (as noted in a former chapter on Laura and the Amalekites). 

 

 

Demented Art from the NEA 

 

One of the important purveyors of sexual perversion and depravity has been the US financed and supported National Endowment of the Arts (NEA).  Every year, it gets millions of taxpayer dollars to promote filth and sickness to the American public. 

 

In 1998, the US House Appropriations Committee approved $98 million for them, which included funds for a NEA sponsored theater group to present a play on a homosexual Gee-Zeus. 

 

In prior years, the NEA financed a photograph called “Piss Christ” which depicted a Christian crucifix in a vat of urine and provided money for a “Queer City” publication that featured Christianity’s Gee-Zeus as a pederast. 

 

In the 2000 budget, Congress has authorized some $220 million for the NEA and its sister organization, the National Endowment for the Humanities, which can be used to support their combined agenda of promoting sado-masochistic homosexuality, as has been done in the past. 

 

 

Demented Art in New York 

 

In another matter, some incredibly depraved paintings opened in New York at the Brooklyn Museum of Art on Oct 1, 1999.  One, painted by a Black artist, was supposed to be a painting of the so-called “Virgin Mary” with elephant dung splattered on her. 

 

Other depravities have included a bust of a man frozen in his own blood; a pig, sliced in half and preserved in formaldehyde; and a shark suspended in a tank full of formaldehyde (Sep 27-Oct 3, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 13).  On opening day, the exhibits drew record crowds.  The people of New York loved this sickness and were anxious to see it.  

 

Like the “Piss Christ” exhibit, these depravities have been financed with money from the taxpayers of New York, many of whom surely must have been offended with this sickness--or were they? 

 

While the writer of this production has no interest in protecting or promoting any respect or dignity for Christianity’s Gee-Zeus Chrishna or a painting of an alleged Virgin Mary (which is assuredly a replica of Astarte or Easter of ancient Babylon), it seems strange that a so-called Christian nation and people would publicly finance and support a play which accuses their alleged deity and his disciples of being faggot queers and of insulting the mother of their sun god. 

 

It looks like Christian people in America would rise up in anger to oppose this demeaning ridicule and contempt being placed upon their sun god.  But they don’t seem to care. 

 

 

The Latest Evil in NY 

 

With all of the “piss Christ” social sickness, as described above, it’s hard to imagine that NY could go any lower.  But she has.  The Sep 27, 2002, “Forward” (p. 2) had a story by Max Gross on “Addressing the ‘There’s Not Enough Sex in N.Y.’ Crisis” which really hits home on depravity and sickness. 

 

The essence of this report was on the work of a Jew named Daniel Gluck--to open a new museum in NY called the “Museum of Sex.”  It appears that Gluck’s effort will address the sex subculture in NY--with a focus on sexual permissiveness, perversion, sodomy and so forth.  It’s not hard to look at Gluck’s work and see that he most probably has some very depraved Amalekite genes in his ancestry.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 321--A Sodomite President

 

 

Sodomy in the US White House 

 

Sexual perversion has extended into the United States White House, as briefly allowed in previous comments, and as will now be described.

 

With his mixed up, personal, family history (which will be assessed in a later appendix on Clinton), Slick Clinton likes to have young (largely innocent and naive) girls whisked into his private offices where his modus operandi is to expose his diseased, deformed and bent sex organ (to be established in later comments on the Paula Jones case) and order them to perform oral sex on it. 

 

Early 1998 saw Slick’s womanizing problems explode when his involvement with a girl named Monica Lewinsky (a likely Amalek-Edomite), mentioned earlier, became public knowledge.  However, she was only one of something over 100 conquests which Slick has enjoyed in recent years (per his remarks to Monica). 

 

Reportedly, Slick also had an affair with screen star Barbra Streisand, another evident Amalekite (as was briefly cited in a former chapter).  It appears that Clinton has a special interest in and fondness for Amalekite women, since even Hillary seems to have some of these evil genes in her ancestry (to be described later). 

 

In time, the Monica-Clinton encounters included not only oral sex, but other very kinky, vulgar and sick sex acts as well.  On one occasion, Palestinian leader Arafat was waiting in the Rose Garden for a state visit with Slick.   Meanwhile Slick and Monica were busy masturbating next to the Oval Office (as briefly cited in prior comments).  When Monica finished with the cigar she was using, Slick proceeded to smoke it. 

 

As Governor of Arkansas, Slick used to use Arkansas State Policemen (in the White House, he seems to have used the Secret Service) to bring these girls to one of his private rooms or offices.  Hillary and the gullible voting public seem to have looked the other way.  So Slick has gotten away with it for years (and still does today, here in 2003, in his “retirement” in NY). 

 

 

Other Clinton Encounters 

 

Weeks later, following the Monica Lewinsky news, the name of Juanita Broaddrick surfaced on March 29, 1998, in the Paula Jones lawsuit with allegations from twenty years ago that Slick Clinton raped Juanita in Arkansas in the late 1970s while Slick was the Arkansas Attorney General. 

 

At the time of this reported rape incident, Ms Broaddrick went to medical authorities for a check up.  Some records of this visit and reported rape are apparently still available at the medical agency and/or with medical personnel (like Norma Rogers), but nothing further was done about it at that time.  Perhaps Slick was able to pacify her then with money or a good job in government (as is his normal MO). 

 

Beyond the charges of Slick’s rape of Juanita, the Nov 2000 “Internet Vortex” (p. 7) had a story on evidence against Bill Clinton from prosecutor Ken Starr which the court ordered sealed until the year 2049.  Inside sources said it was “sensational” and “terrible if it was true.” 

 

The basis of the complaint was raised by private investigators used by Paula Jones in her lawsuit which disclosed that Slick had also raped a 14 year old girl at a cocaine party hosted by his drug dealer friend Dan Lasiter (elsewhere discussed herein).  This alleged rape occurred while Slick was Governor of Arkansas. 

 

Much information has persisted for ages that Slick used to visit a Black prostitute in Little Rock and fathered a child with her.  The Oct 1999 “Internet Vortex” (p. 4, 19) gave the specifics of this charge.  The woman was Bobbie Ann Williams.  Slick had paid sexual encounters with her at least some 13 times in the 1980s. 

 

The child, named Danny or Danno Williams, was born in 1985.  Persons who have seen the boy claim that he bears a remarkable resemblance to Clinton (as Clinton has some dominant genes which are readily seen in Chelsea).  Apparently, Slick sent the Williams child “Christmas” gifts at various times and has pacified the mother with pay offs or threats and intimidation. 

 

In 1996, Hillary was on a TV morning show program in which she inadvertently offered that Bill’s sex problems date from Chelsea’s age six (perhaps in the mid 1980s). But based upon the many stories about Slick, his sex problems must surely go back many long years--even before the birth of Chelsea. 

 

Thus, the truth about Slick’s sexual misconduct seems to be something far more extensive and far reaching than what Hillary was willing to first admit.  Actually, in 1999, she finally came clean that Slick had problems going way back to his childhood (as pointed out elsewhere herein). 

 

Maybe, Hillary has been more interested with the power of the Arkansas Governor’s office and the US presidency, instead of having an honorable husband with integrity and reputation.  It is also true that Clinton insiders have suggested that Hillary has had affairs on the side (for example, with Vince Foster, Oct 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 21) and may even be bisexual or a lesbian with interests in women as well. 

 

 

Slick Floated a Trial Balloon 

 

In fact, as late as Jan 27, 1998, close Clinton advisor and confidante Dick Morris (a possible Amalekite) was on a Los Angeles radio station.  He threw out the possibility that Hillary was a lesbian and Slick had to turn to other women.  Either there was some truth in this or it shows the desperation and sleaze of Bill and Hillary in allowing this charge to float around the nation to justify his promiscuity. 

 

Several analysts noted that Morris (a Clinton aide and consultant for years) would never have made such a careless and irresponsible statement without first clearing it with the Clintons.  Consequently, Rush Limbaugh, on his program of Jan 28, 1998, allowed that Morris’ remarks were supposed to be a trial balloon to see how the public would buy this option to support Slick’s actions. 

 

Regardless of the publicly believed adultery implications, oral sex is totally an aberration which is unnatural and contrary to whatever the Scriptures would seemingly allow in the context of YAH’s commands on sex and reproduction.  Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary” says sodomy involves “unnatural sex acts.”  Is it right to define Slick as a sodomite? 

 

 

More Reports 

 

After the Lewinsky case exploded, several other reports of Clinton’s womanizing materialized.  Elsewhere, in this study, some of them are discussed, like the case of Kathleen Willey. 

 

Also, back in 1991, during Slick’s campaign for president, there was a number of reports of Slick fooling around with the airline stewardesses.  One photograph was taken of one girl in his lap and his hand up her dress. 

 

Another stewardess named Cristi Zercher, mentioned earlier, came forward in late March 1998 in a popular tabloid with confirmation of at least what happened with her.  One night while on the campaign plane, Slick got up and came back to sit with this girl and began making advances to her, while other passengers were asleep.  Hillary was snoring a few feet away. 

 

The significance of this encounter in this chapter on sodomy lies in the fact that Slick was not only vulgar in his conduct and conversation, but he told the girl about one of his close friends who liked to have fun copulating with barnyard animals (discussed on the G. Gordon Liddy radio talk show on March 27, 1998). 

 

To demonstrate his technique, Slick “simulated oral sex” while drinking a glass of tea.  In hopes of pushing his vulgar talk into action, he went to the airline restroom door, opened his trousers and pulled his private part out and exposed it to the stewardess.  He then invited her into the restroom with him.  She did not go into the restroom.  So the incident ended there. 

 

The gossip among the stewardesses was that Clinton was “very good” at giving oral sex, apparently as well as receiving it.  Despite the fact that some of this “gossip” was floating around and even the one photograph, mentioned above, of him fondling one of the stewardesses, Slick was elected president of the United States.  In other words, the public wasn’t much concerned with Slick’s sexual activities in 1992 or 1996. 

 

 

Oral Sex is Popular 

 

Oral sex is such a popular vocation with Slick Clinton that it was one of his favorite off the cuff discussions with the White House Secret Service detail while he was president.  Reportedly, Slick liked to buddy up to the agents by speculating about the “oral sex” skills of different women (Dec 1998 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 21). 

 

Admittedly, this oral sex perversion has gained a lot of popularity in today’s warped sun worship society among men like Slick Clinton.  But historically, there is no reason to believe that many men would have insisted that even their women (and certainly not other men) had to go down on them for sex.  Now, Hollywood openly shows this perversion in R rated films regularly. 

 

It’s bad enough that Hollywood is so flippant and flagrant about showing illicit sex acts outside of marriage; but too often, Hollywood shows degenerate actresses performing oral sex on degenerate men.  Of course, Hollywood shows this depravity as perfectly “normal sex acts.”  Well, it’s not normal!  Anyway it is cut, it constitutes sodomy (Funk & Wagnalls “Standard Desk Dictionary,” p. 639)! 

 

While there might be many, many explanations offered to explain this modern craze in oral sex (to include a man and his woman partner), it seems that the wide acceptance and popularity of homosexuality probably has contributed to it, since oral sex is a historic part of the fag world of perverts.  In other words, heterosexual couples are now finding homosexual sex acts common in their bedrooms, as well as in queer dens. 

 

 

Slick is All American 

 

But importantly, Slick Willy reflects the morality, honesty and integrity of the collective, American, sun worshipping people.  He is one of them and/or they are just like him in terms of morality and character.  This is a sad commentary on the American people.  However, it represents reality. 

 

Since Slick is so much like so many other sun worshipping Americans, most of them have just shrugged their shoulders and said that they had no problem at all with Slick’s lies, obstruction of justice, illegal sex and other wicked acts.  It would be very hypocritical of people to complain over their leader when he is one of them--wouldn’t it? 

 

In fact, Slick’s popularity climbed to some of its highest levels of all immediately after his Jan 21, 1998, exposure of sodomy with Monica Lewinsky.  Just before the news broke, Slick’s public opinion acceptance was at 58%. 

 

A poll around Feb 1, 1998, put his public acceptance rating at 72%.  A Wall Street Journal poll on Feb 7, 1998, put Slick’s popularity at 79%.  A related CNN/Time poll said that 79% of Americans believe the country was being governed well by Clinton. 

 

This 21% increase in Slick’s popularity in about two weeks was interesting in view of the fact that well over half of the people (55-70% per different polls) believed that Slick was lying to them about his sexual affairs and Hillary was lying as well in her defense of him. 

 

 

More Polls 

 

An early March 1998 poll was interesting in that it showed that 66% (this is a unique number) of Americans believed that Slick had the affair and that he lied to the public about it.  Nevertheless, they had no problem with it and he should not resign. 

 

A July 29, 1998, poll was made just after the revelations from Monica that she would cooperate and reveal not only the sodomy with Slick (to include the physical evidence from one of her semen stained dresses), but his efforts to have her lie about the affair and cover up his escapades. 

 

Like the former polls, this one revealed that 65% of the American public loved Slick and thought that he was doing a good job.  This was interesting in view of the fact that two-thirds of the public thought that he committed the sex with Monica and that he committed perjury about it in the Jones case and lied about it to the collective American people. 

 

As late as Aug 17, 1998, during Slick’s “partial” or “qualified” admission of guilt at his grand jury testimony, the public continued to love and support the lying Slick.  His limited admission initially changed little of the popular support he had enjoyed (actually, he polled the public in advance before his testimony--so that he knew exactly what he could get away with in court). 

 

Yes, the American public loves the scoundrel Slick Clinton because he is one of them!  Even after Monica’s admissions in late July 1998 and his admissions in August 1998, the public’s love of Slick remained firm. 

 

At that time, the Christian, sun worshipping people continued their support of Slick, although there were signs that it could weaken and might could cause him some future trouble.  The next several weeks saw further signs of some weakness in Slick’s popularity and even among several Democrats. 

 

But all of this was temporary and the 1998 elections effectively proved that the collective American people could care less about what Bill Clinton had done or would do in the White House (although some of the Democratic victories were attributable to apparent voter fraud which will be assessed in detail in a later chapter). 

 

 

Clinton Manipulated and Won 

 

It became evident in Oct 1998 that Slick was again manipulating the Black vote as he has historically done.  And it paid off. 

 

The Democrats who should have lost Congressional seats (since the ruling party usually loses seats in the off year of presidential elections and with the opportunity for a public mandate on the impeachment of Clinton), actually surprised everyone by gaining five seats in the House and holding their own in the Senate. 

 

While Black voter fraud was surely behind some of the Clinton successes (as is elsewhere described herein), it is apparent that otherwise, there was no turnout among Whites, indicating any dissatisfaction with Clinton as president. 

 

In essence, White people were apathetic and indifferent about Slick or they were just not interested in his impeachment (although the House did vote for it on Dec 19, 1998). 

 

It was manifestly clear on Nov 4, 1998, that with the Democrat election victories, Clinton would not be removed, nor would he resign.  The American public had a chance at the polls to demand that something be done about the evil, Sodomite Clinton. 

 

The voters refused to take that step.  By winning five House seats from the Republicans and having no change in the Senate, the voters made it clear that Clinton’s perversion was no issue. 

 

This warped public thinking prevailed as late as the time of the US House of Representatives’ vote for Slick’s impeachment on Dec 19, 1998 (which Slick and his Democratic allies responded to, with a party of arrogance and contempt).  A number of polls taken after Dec 19th showed Bill’s popularity accelerating up, instead of going down with the impeachment vote.  Most had him back up to the 79% approval area. 

 

A year end poll released on December 31, 1998, noted that Bill Clinton was America’s favorite man and Hillary was America’s favorite woman (announced on the Rush Limbaugh program that day).  This poll seems to be too ridiculous to be commented upon.  But apparently, it represents the real world out there. 

 

 

Poor Linda Tripp 

 

While Clinton continued to receive the public’s love, support and accolades, the turn of events backfired for poor Linda Tripp, who just happened to be the person who blew the whistle on Slick when she became a participant with the US Special Prosecutor (who was working for the US Government) to tape record Monica’s admissions of the sodomy with Clinton. 

 

Slick Clinton completely triumphed over the entire scandal.  Thereupon, he induced the state of Maryland to commence a legal action against Linda Tripp on the premise that she had violated a largely unheard of law which had apparently never been used before for prosecution.  The law presumably prevented tape recording a person without the person’s permission. 

 

Linda faced 10 years in jail, a $20,000 fine and the loss of her job at the Pentagon (she did beat the rap, but was fired from her job).  Clinton and his team went after her with a vengeance.  Even the public hates her instead of Clinton (for daring to expose Slick Willy). 

 

As for as Clinton, he got away with lying, cheating, committing sodomy, perjury in court and on and on because the public loved him. 

 

 

The Mossad Connection 

 

A 1999 story in the Mar 8-14, 1999, “Washington Times” (quoted in the Aug-Sep 1999 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 29) noted that Mossad agents intercepted and recorded Slick’s phone sex conversations with Monica over many months starting in 1997.  If the Mossad was listening in on Clinton, any number of other countries could have also been listening in. 

 

One of the fall-outs of this foreign interest in the illicit activities of a US president is quite obvious.  There is always the possibility of blackmail or other attempts at influencing US policy. 

 

With sodomites like Clinton, this is a real possibility and particularly in view of the Mossad links to organized crime, as outlined in a former chapter (the possibility of a Mossad blackmail of Slick over the January 2001 pardon for billionaire Marc Rich will be considered in a later chapter). 

 

In any case, Clinton and his White House aides all denied the Mossad spying report, although a man named Gordon Thomas has written a book about it.  The amazing thing is not so much that this activity could go on; but when it became public, the American people just shrugged their shoulders and said so what.  This public response will one day be held accountable! 

 

 

Public Apathy 

 

Thus, the American people had their chance and they refused to take a stand against the immoral, corrupt and sorry Clinton.  Assuredly, the 1998 elections and the continuing indifference spell out a coming judgment upon America. 

 

When the American public had a golden opportunity to take a clear stand for honor, integrity and righteousness by demanding that the evil Slick Clinton be removed and then proceeded to turn it down cold, it is manifest that trouble is on the horizon.  This attitude and wretchedness of the public spells disaster for the United States of America. 

 

If the American, sun worship culture is so sick and depraved (as it is), judgment day and doom from YHWH is fast approaching.  YAH will not allow this degeneracy and evil to proceed much longer.  The US faces destruction soon--because of sin and wickedness. 

 

America’s willingness to accept and pursue open homosexuality, perversion and demented sex was pungently predicted by YESHUA long ago when He foresaw the age end and said that it would be like the days of Sodom and Gomorrah with open homosexuality, perversion and sexual depravity (Lu 17:28-30). 

 

Surely, YHWH’s judgment will strike soon on this sick, warped, Christian, sun worship society.  It will assuredly be justified when it strikes. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 322--Christian Acceptance of Sodomy

 

 

Billy Graham 

 

The situation with America having a sodomite president (in the form of Bill “Slick” Clinton), was described in the preceding chapter. 

 

Tragically, the actions of America’s presidential role model adversely affected the nation beyond comprehension.  Even America’s leading Christian Churches, preachers and leaders could not see the problem with sodomy in the US White House. 

 

Perhaps the popular Christian evangelist Billy Graham illustrates the dilemma.  Yes, even Christian sun worship preacher Billy Graham came out in support of President Slick Clinton’s sodomy, broached in the former chapter. 

 

It is no wonder that the false preacher Graham would support Slick because Graham has been a supporter of America’s plutocratic rulers, big money powers, globalists and the New Age pushers for much of his career (Oct 14, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 10-11). 

 

Along with Graham’s love of and support for Slick Clinton, Billy has had close ties with numerous other internationalists--like John Foster Dulles, Bernard Baruch, Henry Luce, John Marks Templeton, Henry Kissinger, Winston Lord, etc (ibid, p. 10).  In 1957, Graham was given $50,000 by the Rockefellers for his Madison Square Garden crusade (ibid, p. 10).  

 

To demonstrate how much Graham is and has been tied to the ruling elites, he had an evangelistic meeting in Dallas, Texas in October 2002.  Former President George H. W. Bush attended the meeting at the Dallas Cowboys’ stadium and was quoted as calling the 83-year old Billy Graham a “genuine American hero” (Oct 19, 2002, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. A2). 

 

 

Graham Forgave Slick 

 

On March 5, 1998, Graham again spoke out on an important issue and said that he understood Clinton’s problems, how Clinton was a handsome, young man and how the ladies liked President Bill. 

 

Consequently, Graham said that he forgave Bill Clinton.  But in rendering his forgiveness, Graham followed the traditional mode of the sun worship religion and not the Scriptural position.  Since Graham has taught and advocated the sun worship religion all of his life, one would expect that he would indeed deal with his leader (the US President) from the same sun worship perspective. 

 

In the Christian, sun worship religion (which Graham represents, teaches and advocates), people can be weak and sissified and unilaterally forgive all kinds of things.  According to the Hebrew religion and the Hebrew Scriptures (including both the OT and the NT), forgiveness seems to be in an entirely different ball park. 

 

From The ELOHIM’s perspective, forgiveness certainly necessitates two primary ingredients.  First, there must be true repentance, change and regret in the person seeking forgiveness.  In terms of personal conduct here on earth among so-called human beings, this regret must typically manifest itself in the form of an apology and restitution, as discussed earlier. 

 

And more importantly, the only person that can give or offer forgiveness is the person offended.  In many of the sins arising in interpersonal conflicts, humans offend other humans. 

 

These offended humans are the ones who can forgive when the offender repents, changes and ideally offers regret and apology (which may not always be physically possible because of death, lost contact or inability to have contact--due to distance and time factors, etc). 

 

Obviously, all sin offends The MOST HIGH, Himself.  Consequently, He can and does forgive.  But His forgiveness is categorically predicated upon repentance and change, coupled with appropriate restitution and restoration, to include an appropriate apology to offended persons, as described in a previous chapter. 

 

Categorically, The ELOHIM does not forgive based upon a few meaningless words.  It assuredly takes real repentance and restoration.  YHWH is not stupid.  He will never forgive in order to allow a person to continue in sin without repentance and restoration.  No way, Hose!  In other words, forgiveness involves change. 

 

 

Slick Never Apologized 

 

In the case of President Slick, he had never admitted any wrongs since he had been in office when the sun worshipper Graham came out in defense of him and his sexual misconduct.  Even Clinton’s talk to the public on Aug 17, 1998, was not much of an admission and certainly no real apology or request for forgiveness. 

 

Slick’s modus operandi has traditionally been to deny all charges and to accuse all the people who accuse him.  In his August 17th speech, he spent two minutes mentioning his improper relationship with Monica and almost five minutes attacking the independent prosecutor Ken Starr--as if Starr had caused his sodomy. 

 

Thus, it has always been other people who were guilty and responsible for illegally practicing fraud and corruption in the Whitewater operations in Arkansas, illegally firing people in the travel office, illegally obtaining and using over 900 FBI files of his opponents and collecting illegal campaign funds.  Clearly, he has done nothing in the way of apologizing to the numbers of women he has hurt over the years. 

 

In short, Slick had not yet admitted the sodomy at that time when Graham was so quick to forgive (though he did offer a few later apologies, reluctantly in Sep 1998), nor had he repented over any wrong doings which would prompt Graham to come to his aid.  Clinton had not made any moves suggesting offense toward anyone, nor had he asked for forgiveness from Graham or anyone else. 

 

Hence, one might ask what was there present to prompt sun worship leader Billy Graham to forgive Slick for in March 1998? 

 

 

More Graham Confusion 

 

The second aspect of this Graham confusion and ignorance surfaces because Graham is hardly in any position to forgive Slick for his sodomy habits. 

 

Slick offended and hurt numbers of people in Arkansas over Whitewater, people in the White House travel office, the 900 or so people he collected FBI files on and numerous individual women (Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Monica Lewinsky and hundreds of others).  Graham can’t forgive Slick’s offense against these people. 

 

Also, there are serious questions about the possible 50 to 100 deaths of people who have come into contact with Slick over the years, to be described in a later chapter.  Were all these deaths suicides, accidents and natural deaths, as reported, or could some portion of them have been assassinations and murders by the Mob on orders from Slick or on behalf of Slick? 

 

How can Graham forgive murder?  There is also the bigger problem of Slick’s offenses against the United States of America in terms of all of his lies, actions and deeds.  Clearly, Slick owed the American people an apology and confession of guilt. 

 

In this sense, it is the collective American people who can forgive him (and they could readily do this in an election or opinion poll if Slick would come out and admit his wrong doing and ask for forgiveness).  But Graham does not represent the American people and cannot forgive on behalf of them. 

 

 

The Public Loves the Christian Slick 

 

In short, the public (to include the Christian, sun worship people and their sun worship leaders) knows that both Bill and Hillary lie and deceive them.  But they love Slick even more since he is one of them.  He is just like millions of other Christian, sun worshipping Americans.  He is an all American hero! 

 

Thus, he is not the problem!  The problem is with the American people and their sun worship religion which has promoted and allowed this depravity.  Because he is not the problem and because the American people are the problem, The ELOHIM’s judgment is fast approaching for the fat, arrogant, wicked, gullible, American, sun worshipping public. 

 

It seems that every time Slick gets caught in his lies, deceit, dishonesty and immorality, his popularity goes up (both while he was president and since he has “retired”).  This same strange phenomenon seems to happen routinely whenever Slick has problems. 

 

It happened with the illegal campaign contributions from Red China, the sale of the Lincoln bedroom, the sale of Arlington Cemetery plots, the illegal firing of the White House travel people, the illegal procurement of FBI files, etc. 

 

This American sickness and depravity, in allowing and accepting the sins of their leader, is interesting in view of a poll a few weeks before the sodomy scandal broke which said that 70% of Americans believed “in God” (Jan-Feb 1998 “Sabbath Sentinel,” p. 5). 

 

A different US poll in April 1998 put the “God” believers at 95%, in contrast to 62% who said that they believe in the existence of the Devil (April 1998 “Instauration”).  Another poll suggested that some 75% of American people were concerned about the declining morality in the US. 

 

It is manifest that a majority of America’s “God” believers (certainly 70 to 95% of the public), concerned about declining morality, also believe in and support sodomy, adultery, lying and cheating.  Clinton shares many of the same values as the general population.  Clearly, Slick is a modern American with the same standards and morality, shared by a sizable portion of the public at large. 

 

Popular Christian conservative preacher and teacher, Dr James Dobson, correctly summarized the Slick dilemma by saying that “our greatest problem is not in the Oval Office.  It is with the people of this land!  We have lost our ability to discern the difference between right and wrong” (Oct 1998 “McAlvany Intelligence Advisor,” p. 24). 

 

 

Christian Sun Worshipping Bill

 

Naturally, the depraved Slick and his pathetic wife have continued to attend Christian, sun worship services--all the while that he has been busy accosting young girls and requesting or demanding oral sex from them.  In the Christian, sun worship culture, the sun worshipping public expects its leaders to go to Sunday services whether they are religious or not.  So they go. 

 

The famous crook, former President Lyndon Baines Johnson (who also was a supposed Christian), also liked to go to Christian Church services (as many as he could and wherever he could).  One of his friends said that Lyndon didn’t have a religion but that he went to church because that’s where the voters were on Sundays (“The Texas Connection,” p. 88).  Clinton was of the same mold. 

 

Slick, in particular, likes to have his picture taken while carrying his Bible, attending sun worship services, visiting with the preacher and praying to the Christian sun god.  This helps his image! 

 

Thus, even on Sunday, Jan 25, 1998, just after the recent Monica scandal broke, Slick and Hillary Clinton attended Sunday sun worship services.  He carried his “Bible” and had his picture made with the local sun worship preacher (all for show purposes). 

 

The Sunday (August 16, 1998) before Slick’s testimony at the grand jury also saw him and Hillary attend his local, sun worship, Christian Church.  As was his custom, he carried his “Bible” and had his picture made (for show purposes) with the sun worship preacher who gave him a gift. 

 

That Sunday night, the sun-worshipping “reverend” Jesse Jackson came to the White House to pray with Slick and Hillary, just after the time that “the reverend Jackson” had fathered an illegitimate daughter out of wedlock and before Bill was to lie some more to the grand jury.  Whatever else might be said about preacher Jackson, he, at least, seems to have a grip on the depravity of Slick. 

 

Jackson said:  “I can maybe work with him, but I know now who he is, what he is.  There’s nothing he won’t do.  He’s immune to shame.  Move past all the nice posturing and get really down in there with him, you find absolutely nothing...nothing but an appetite” (Aug-Sep 1999 Prophecy Flash,” p. 31). 

 

It’s amazing how the hypocritical and depraved Christians, like Slick, can pray and moan with sun worship preachers (like his enemy Jackson and the others) and then immediately revert to telling lies.  Slick and the other sun worshippers can publicly pray, moan and worship one day (for show purposes) and then tell some lies, still the next day.  

 

Interestingly, Slick Clinton is allegedly a Southern Baptist Christian.  In this regard, the President of the Southern Baptists, Paige Patterson, said on Dec 22, 1999, that Clinton “has very few convictions” and that his administration has distorted Christian evangelism as religious hatred (Dec 27-Jan 2, 2000, “Washington Times,” p. 1). 

 

 

More Slick Maneuvers with the Blacks 

 

In early April 1998, Slick, a Southern Baptist, was traveling in Black Africa.  In order to show how religious he was, he partook of communion with a local Black, Catholic Church.  This event caused quite an uproar in Catholic circles since their church dogma supposedly precludes non-Catholics from taking Catholic mass. 

 

Not only was this event most unusual from the Catholic Church perspective (in allowing non-Catholics to share in the Mass); but surely, any “good” Baptist (like Slick is supposed to be) would have some moral concern and conscious problems over participating in a Catholic Mass.  However, Sodomite Slick is all show and his act was all for show. 

 

In mid Sep 1998, when it became apparent that the whole Lewinsky affair was public and he could no longer deceive and mislead the public with his attacks on Starr, Slick chose to convey repentance and rehabilitation to the gullible people.  He did this by speaking at a Christian prayer breakfast and acknowledging that he had “sinned.” 

 

A few days later, the White House spin-meisters announced that repentant Bill had selected two popular Christian clerics to meet with him weekly for spiritual counseling and personal rehabilitation (one was Jesse Jackson, as noted above).  Presumably, the resulting image would convey Slick’s sincerity by meeting with the sun worship preachers. 

 

On Dec 19, 1998, as the US House of Representatives was preparing to commence voting on articles of impeachment, Slick called in one of his “spiritual” advisors; so that while the House was voting, the controlled press could carry the news on the progress of Slick’s spiritual counseling (as if someone might be dumb enough to believe in his alleged sincerity).  True, he has had some regrets--regrets over getting caught! 

 

In this sense, he and the other governors of the US resemble the governing leaders and authorities in the sick culture of Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen 19). Consequently, destruction and the end of the United States are at the doorsteps.  America will not get away with allowing their evil leader to get away with his public depravity. 

 

George Washington said that “Of all the depositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.”  James Madison added that “We have staked the whole future of American civilization...upon the capacity of each and every one of us to govern ourselves according to the Ten Commandments” (p 5-8, Mar-Apr 1998 “Philadelphia Trumpet”). 

 

 

Earlier Problems 

 

It is true that in preceding generations of Americans, some of the leaders have seemingly also been sexually promiscuous.  In this context, one can immediately think of John F. Kennedy and Franklin Roosevelt.  Apparently, both of these scoundrels were guilty of gross sexual misconduct in office. 

 

But the difference between them and the former President Slick is that they were extremely discreet and successfully hid their illegal sexual activities from the collective people while president.  They were never caught and their problems never became national issues or points of discussion during their tenures in office. 

 

This writer lived during the terms of both Roosevelt and Kennedy.  If they would have been caught, as Slick Clinton was caught, for a fact, they would have been in serious trouble with the voters and surely would have faced removal.  It’s hard to fathom that even the beloved Roosevelt could have gotten away with public perversion in the White House. 

 

However, there are several features about this whole sordid sodomy business which seem to escape the mentality of modern peoples.  While ignored and bypassed in the public’s eyes, these factors are especially relevant. 

 

First, this sickness is happening because government is pushing it or allowing it to happen.  And government is elected by the people (to be elaborated upon in a later chapter). 

 

In other words, it is happening because the generic Christian public at large votes for the government leaders who either promote or allow this depravity to exist.  In this sense, the problem certainly comes home to the people. 

 

Yes, national leaders like Slick Clinton are not only sodomites themselves, but they have appointed a number of sexual perverts in leadership roles in government and actively worked to push and promote the homosexual agenda across the nation, as was commented upon in preceding chapters. 

 

Howbeit, it is not just a US government issue because even prominent Christian leaders have also taken part in discussions on homosexuality and have given tacit approval to the movement by at least acquiescing to it (as will be shown below). 

 

 

Christian Leaders 

 

Another sorry feature of the present sick society is that the existing religion (Christianity) has created it or allowed it to happen.  In fact, numbers of Christian groups now openly advocate sexual perversion or at least approve of it.  Yes, there are even queer Christian Churches across the world with an approved membership of faggots and sodomites. 

 

The “popular” Baptist preacher Jerry Falwell has also made a loving, Christian outreach to the faggots.  He invited the so-called, “reverend” Mel White, a homosexual, Christian preacher, to bring some of this followers and come to Lynchburg, VA to have dinner with Falwell and some of his followers on October 23, 1999 (Oct 25, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 8). 

 

So the so-called “reverend” faggot came with some 200 of his queer buddies.  Apparently, they shook hands, talked, dined and socialized with Falwell and his followers at Falwell’s Liberty University in Lynchburg. 

 

Falwell and the queers got along so good that the “reverend” queer and his 200 homosexual followers decided to attend Christian sun worship services with Falwell on October 24, 1999, at Falwell’s church--the Thomas Road Baptist Church (Dec 1999 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 1).  Apparently, they were welcomed with outstretched arms by Falwell and his sun worshipping congregation. 

 

The Christian “reverend” White and Falwell must have had so much in common that the faggot Mel and his homosexual lover Gary Nixon decided to later move in across the street from Falwell’s church, per a news report in the Sep 14, 2002, “Spokane Spokesman-Review” (p. A5). 

 

Falwell said that the couple’s action was a publicity stunt, but that the two queers were welcomed at his Christian Church for Sunday worship services. 

 

The two faggots claimed that they were “God’s children too” and that they wanted to show that gay people could lead Christian lives.  The “reverend” queer preacher says that he has known Falwell for fourteen years and that he hopes that his residence near Falwell’s church will “soften Falwell’s stance” (in speaking out against the queers). 

 

Some years ago, the pornographic publisher of Hustler magazine, Larry Flynt, made some harsh charges against the popular Christian leader Falwell.  Flynt claimed that Falwell committed incest with his mother.  Falwell sued Flynt for libel but lost his case. 

 

As a follow-up, the Oct 21, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. B2) had a picture of Falwell and Flynt sitting side by side (showing that Falwell can and will reach out to anyone--queers, pornographers, or whomever).  Apparently, the two adversaries have made up and are now friends.  Reportedly, the pornographer Flynt is now a “Christian.” 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 323--More Sodomy from Christian America

 

 

Christian Failures in Leadership 

 

Many Christian leaders and priests (especially Catholic) are fags themselves and are constantly preying on little boys, as will be proven in comments to follow.  Part of the problem seems to be that the Catholic Church does not take a strong stand against  homosexuality. 

 

This reality was brought out in an article by Amanda Ripley on “Inside the Church’s Closet” in the May 20, 2002, “Time” (p. 60). 

 

Per Ripley, the church teaching is:  “Technically, it is homosexual activity--not the orientation--that is considered sinful.”  Thus, it is all right for the church to have queer priests who believe in homosexuality; and for the church to support these priests if they don’t practice their perversions within the church (or at least, don’t get caught in homosexual acts in the church). 

 

The focus in Ripley’s article was the presence of acknowledged homosexual priests who describe themselves and their beliefs as “gay.”  They are allowed to remain in the priesthood if they don’t engage in homosexual acts.  Jesuit priest William Hart McNicholds of Taos, NM is one such faggot.  Obviously, there are other acknowledged queer priests. 

 

But sometimes, these faggots do get caught when their activities become exposed (and particularly their pedophile activities involving children).  Although the Catholic Church makes secret payoffs and goes to all kinds of lengths to lie, deceive and hide the truth about its faggot priests and their many violations of young children, the news does occasionally leak out to the public or parishioners. 

 

One former Catholic priest was the Black “reverend” George A Stallings Jr who was kicked out of the church by Rome because of his actions (to deserve a kick-out, Stallings must have been exceptionally bad).  He started his own Catholic Church and recently was married to a Korean woman by “the reverend” Syn Myung Moon (Jun 4, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 2). 

 

Conversely, Catholic Cardinal William Henry O’Connell of Boston was a known homosexual who got away with his perversions for years, until his death on April 22, 1944 (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” p. 215). 

 

 

The 2001-2002 News 

 

Historically, as noted above, the Catholic Church has essentially ignored the queer problem.  The usual church response has been to merely transfer the pedophile priest to another parish where he could resume violating small children. 

 

Tragically, however, the Catholic Church is riddled with homosexual priests and some of their evil acts against small boys do periodically make the news, as has been happening recently. 

 

A good illustration of how depraved the Roman Church has been in allowing faggot priests to remain in the ministry surfaced in 2001 with a priest named John J. Geoghan of Boston.  By January 2002, Geoghan was convicted of fondling a ten-year boy and was defrocked by the church (Jan 25, 2002, “The Week,” p. 5). 

 

But this one incident was only the tip of the iceberg for this faggot (called “Father Jack” by his ignorant parishioners).  Another 130 victims have come forward to claim that they too were fondled or raped by Geoghan. 

 

The story said that Geoghan started his activities years ago.  At an early time, allegations of Geoghan’s homosexual activities came before Catholic Cardinal Benjamin F. Law. 

 

Instead of dealing positively with the queer, Law merely transferred him to another parish where he could start all over in his molestations of small boys (over a period of 30 years, Law transferred the faggot Geoghan around from parish to parish to allow him to continue violating young boys). 

 

In this latest episode of Geoghan’s abuse of children, the Cardinal at last acknowledged the problem and apologized to the many victims.  In time, Law said that the church would pay out $100 million to some 86 of the victims raped by the faggot Geoghan (Mar 15, 2002, “The Week,” p. 3). 

 

Later, some opposition to the Law plan developed so maybe the $100 million won’t be paid out to the victims.  There were reports that a pay out of $100 million would bankrupt the diocese (note, it should be bankrupted and run out of business and the guilty priests should be executed by the state--ed). 

 

Of course, this Law plan has been one of the classic Catholic reactions--pay off the victims and let the priests continue. 

 

Law said that henceforth molestation allegations in the future should be reported to the police (and evidently, not to the Catholic hierarchy because the Catholic Church would do nothing except protect the queer priests to allow them to continue on in their evil paths). 

 

 

More Catholic Faggots 

 

Once this Geoghan thing broke, a spreading and exploding sex-sodomy scandal developed rapidly across the American Catholic Church.  Soon, allegations were pouring forth from Florida and Maine in the East all the way West to California.  Numerous priests, bishops and leading Catholic males were found to be pedophiles preying on young children (many were homosexuals pursuing young boys). 

 

The Catholic pedophile and homosexual problems start with young priests and go up the hierarchy of the system, all the way to cardinals and archbishops.  For example, a high ranking Polish prelate, Archbishop Juliusz Pastz, working at the Vatican, came under fire when it was charged that he molested clerics in Rome.  A Vatican investigation reportedly was inconclusive (Apr 8, 2002, “Time,” p. 23). 

 

And in May 2002, the American archbishop in liberal Milwaukee, Rembert Weakland was accused of sexually assaulting a male graduate student some twenty years ago (Jun 3, 2002, “U.S. News & World Report,” p. 46).  Per the report, Weakland was a long time homosexual who paid hush money ($450,000) to his victim. 

 

Another illustration of how the Catholic Church handled the queer priest problem came out in the situation in Palm Beach, Florida.  Apparently, the church found out that its bishop there had violated five small boys.  In 1999, the church transferred him to another diocese and appointed Anthony J. O’Connell as bishop to supposedly restore confidence in the area. 

 

Sure enough, information later surfaced that O’Connell himself violated a boy in the 1970s.  Thus, the church moved out one faggot bishop to be replaced by another faggot bishop.  Once O’Connell was on board as bishop, he went to work at his old game of violating children. 

 

One boy, who was abused by some of the other Palm Beach parish priests (plural, meaning not just one but several of them) came to O’Connell for help and assistance.  Instead of helping the boy, the faggot O’Connell merely proceeded to start in on homosexually violating the already abused boy (Mar 15, 2002, “The Week,” p. 3). 

 

In O’Connell’s case, he was made bishop even when Catholic authorities knew of the earlier sodomy allegations against him.  The March 15, 2002, “The Week” quoted writer E. J. Dionne Jr from the “Washington Post” --This “terrible story only underscores the costs of putting institutional self-protection above service and decency.” 

 

 

The Shanley Rape Charges 

 

In April 2002, news surfaced indicating that a priest named Paul Shanley (also formerly of the diocese headed by Cardinal Law in Boston) was accused of raping small boys while he was the parish priest at St John the Evangelist Church in Newton, Massachusetts (May 13, 2002, “U.S. News & World Report,” p. 14).  Some two dozen small boys have accused Shanley of molestations. 

 

As was true with priest Geoghan, Cardinal Law knew of the accusations, but proceeded to merely transfer Paul to another parish where he still had contact with children.  By the way, Shanley was charged with rape in a court action and was extradited from San Diego, California back to Massachusetts to stand trial.  In a news report, the faggot claimed that he was innocent. 

 

 

Accelerating Pay Offs 

 

This problem of faggot priests continued to explode in 2002 and 2003.  The Catholic Church responded by making pay offs to hurt people.  The April 1, 2002, “US News & World Report” (p. 57) said that the church had paid out $400 million dollars in lawsuit settlements over this problem during the last two decades.  This was the publicly acknowledged figure. 

 

The secret undisclosed amount was also estimated to be another $400 million (making a total pay out of $800 million).  The secret undisclosed settlements are the way Catholic lawyers try to settle cases like this.  Everything is hushed up and the faggot priests are transferred to another parish where they can start all over violating children. 

 

 

The Latest Catholic Reaction 

 

As pointed out in the above remarks, the historic Catholic Church position over her homosexual and pedophile priesthood has been to try to hide and cover up the problem.  Accordingly, the church will readily agree to making pay-offs to hush the problem up.  Then the accused priests are merely transferred to another territory where their depravity is unknown.  In the new areas, they can start over. 

 

However, the flare-up in Catholic circles in 2002 was so serious that this traditional Catholic methodology wouldn’t work.  Many of the ignorant and gullible Catholic lay people were getting real concerned; and indeed, even angry over the deplorable acts of their beloved priests. 

 

In June of 2002, the US Catholic bishops took action in a meeting in Dallas, Texas to announce a so-called “zero tolerance” plan whereby priests who have violated children would be permanently removed form the active ministry (but they would not lose their ordination in the Catholic priesthood). 

 

While the bishops approved the immediate severance of accused priests from contact with children, the permanent removal seems to have been contingent upon a later conviction in a court action.  In any case, the pedophile priests would remain priests, but priests without congregations. 

 

In other actions, the US bishops took the stance that sexual misconduct charges against priests were to be reported to law enforcement authorities, rather than to Catholic Church authorities (historically, the Catholic leadership wanted any allegations submitted to Catholic leaders and not to secular law enforcement people.  This process allowed the church to cover-up the actions of its priests). 

 

Naturally, the priests and the liberal Catholic establishment were much concerned on this so-called crack-down, and especially over a provision which bars the church from making secret pay-offs and bribes to hush up the actions of pedophile priests. 

 

 

Rome Enters the Arena

 

Apparently, as is Catholic policy, any actions taken by the bishops in a given territory must be submitted to Rome for final approval by the pope.  Accordingly, the above mentioned actions by the US bishops were referred to Rome. 

 

According to a story by Daniel Williams and Alan Cooperman on “Vatican has issues with abuse policy,” in the Oct 19, 2002, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A1 and A6), there was a feeling among some Catholics that the rules made priests vulnerable to immediate removal without investigation and could lead some of them to stop working with children (out of fear of being falsely accused). 

 

Another complaint was that the rule on requiring the notification of law enforcement people broached “due process.”  One more complaint was over having a review by lay commissions within Catholic dioceses (which was another provision in the US bishops’ statement). 

 

Anyway, the Roman Catholic hierarchy in Rome reviewed the actions of the US bishops and agreed that the US bishops had gone too far.  The church leadership said that the US proposed actions were not harmonious with “church law and practices.” 

 

Accordingly, Rome sent the proposal back to the US bishops for revision in order to comply with the so-called need for “harmonization.”  Apparently, the church was primarily concerned over the immediate action against accused priests and the fact that so-called “canon-law” about due process was being summarily thrown out. 

 

In other words, Rome wanted the status quo to continue--priests were not to be suspended after accusations (even temporarily); and complaints should not be adjudicated by secular law enforcement authorities outside the purview of the church. 

 

Since the US position was effectively rejected by Rome, it forced the bishops to meet again and modify their position to conform to Rome (which is what happened in Nov 2002).  Thus, the actions of the Roman hierarchy effectively killed any action.  In other words, everything will continue as before.  Pedophile priests will be protected and the church will make pay-offs and bribes to hush up allegations. 

 

 

The Faggot Disease Problem 

 

“The Washington Times” of Feb 7-13, 2000 (p. 13), had a bombshell story by Judy L. Thomas on “AIDS exacts a heavy toll on Catholic priests nationwide” which laid out the queer problem among Catholic priests.  Thomas put the deaths in the hundreds and said that priests are dying of AIDS at a rate four times that of the general US population.  Some 400 US priests are now known to carry the HIV virus. 

 

The problem is so serious and growing in the Catholic Church that most dioceses and religious orders now require applicants for the priesthood to take an HIV antibody test before their ordination.  Of course, the church says little about their internal queer and AIDS problems. 

 

While the significant correlation between the queers and AIDS is well known and documented (as just noted above for Catholic priests), the truth is that all sexually transmitted diseases generally are bad among homosexual faggots.  It seems that the acts and actions of perverted freaks spill over into their whole lives. 

 

The Apr 9, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 2) had a fascinating news report on how new drugs and medicines have been giving many faggot AIDS victims a new lease on life.  The result has been that some of these queers are getting careless once more in their demented sexual lives. 

 

Now, the latest trend among queers is that increasing numbers of them are coming down with syphilis.  In one US geographical area, over one-half of the new syphilis cases involved homosexual men who were sexually active with more than one faggot partner.  The report said that this was a 26% increase in 2000 over the prior year. 

 

In commentary to follow below, attention will be directed to young girls who are now coming down with gonorrhea of the throat because of perverted sodomite encounters.  Truly, sodomites and queers face enormous disease problems (because of their sexual depravity). 

 

 

Other Christian Churches Too 

 

While the above comments have focused upon the presently acknowledged sex problems within the Catholic Church, no one should be naive by failing to understand that other Christian denominations also have sex problems internally--to include the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, Baptists, Anglicans, Lutherans, and on and on. 

 

Many of these Protestant groups are not as bad as the Catholic Church, but they too are bad.  In other words, the problem exists throughout Christendom, although some churches are worse than the others. 

 

It’s bad enough that there are sex problems in Christendom (involving illicit and/or perverted sex in some way), but the typical Christian reaction is to do as the Roman Church does--to hide and cover up the incidents, to make pay-offs to victims, and to allow sexual offenders to stay in business (by either being transferred to another church, or by being discharged so that the offender can merely go to another church). 

 

 

The Christian Failures 

 

Generally, the collective, Christian, sun worship preachers, pastors, priests, elders and leaders have the opportunity and obligation (in a sense) to teach and instruct the people at their weekly sun worship services on the theme of righteousness and truth about sexual perversion. 

 

Not only have the religious leaders failed their collective peoples from the standpoint of teaching them against this sickness, but they sit back in silent approval and acquiescence, saying little or nothing about this depravity in the context of their roles of being public leaders and spokesmen (nationally and internationally) to establish and guide the morality of the people. 

 

To show how these hypocritical sun worship preachers act, one can ask if any of them have publicly spoken out and condemned national sins   For example, has anyone ever heard Robert Schuller, Jesse Jackson or any of the other so-called Christian sun worship leaders publicly stand up and condemn Slick or the other national leaders for their roles in promoting sexual depravity in the nation? 

 

In fact, Billy Graham has come out to publicly support and defend the Sodomite Slick, as noted earlier.  Graham and the other sun worship leaders continue to meet with the nation’s leaders, praise them (with flattery), vote for them, pray for and with them, and publicly support them. 

 

 

The Sun Worship Religion 

 

Why not?  After all, the preachers are sun worshippers and the nation’s leaders are also of the same sun worship religion.  Part of the problem is that the sun worship religious leaders have no conception of right or wrong, except from the perspective of their sun worship theology. 

 

Of course, the national political leaders are sun worshippers who follow the sun worship religion and culture and cannot be criticized by their own sun worship preachers.  In a sense, everything effectively comes back to religion, even when the nations and its leaders are supposedly secular. 

 

Has the Methodist sun worship preacher in Washington, caught smiling and shaking hands with Clinton after Sunday sun worship services (attended by Slick, on January 25, 1998, per news reports), ever bothered to publicly condemn the sins and perversions in the US White House?  No way, Hose!  If this hypocrite is supposed to be Clinton’s preacher, why doesn’t he publicly speak out about the White House sin? 

 

By the way, this Washington, DC, sun worship leader is not only pastor of sorts for the Sodomite Clinton (though Slick is supposed to be a Southern Baptist); but he seems to be the pastor for a number of outright homosexuals as well.  Evidently, Slick and his queer friends all worship at the same sun worship church (although Slick may be going to a sun worship church in New York, now that he calls NY home). 

 

This Clinton pastor in Washington is a Methodist sun worshipper, as just noted, and recently his denomination had a scandal when one of their sun worship preachers married a queer lesbian couple and faced a (church?) trial over it. 

 

Slick Clinton’s sun worship preacher took time out from his busy Washington schedule in early March 1998 to come to the trial and testify on behalf of the sun worship preacher involved in the queer marriage ceremonies.  Obviously, Slick’s preacher knows absolutely nothing about what the Word says on sodomy.  Either that, or he is an absolute fraud and hypocrite. 

 

 

Changing Christian Attitudes 

 

Beyond Slick’s sun worship preacher, cited above, who is so busy promoting sodomy and perverted sex, it should be noted that the Methodist denomination itself has been in turmoil for the past couple of years, as many of their other sun worship leaders have been pushing for the acceptance of homosexuality.  This reality will be shortly assessed below in the context of the Boy Scouts. 

 

Of course, there are some openly queer Christian Churches, like the Metropolitan Community Church.  There are other very pro-queer Christian Churches--like the United Church of Christ.  But the Methodist Christian Church, founded by John Wesley, has been slow on getting on board in promoting homosexuality. 

 

But attitudes are changing (yes, even in the Methodist Church), as was discussed in the prior chapters.  The formerly cited “Newsweek” magazine, of Mar 20, 2000, which focused upon the growing public acceptance of faggots, had a story by Lynete Clemetson on “A Search of God’s Welcome,” which told the story of one lesbian couple and the acceptance they found in the Fellowship United Methodist Church. 

 

The several “Newsweek” articles in this magazine were all couched in the liberal bias of promoting homosexuality.  So the comments and slant were all pro queer. 

 

With this bias and yellow journalism, it is uncertain to what extent the Methodist Church has changed in the past.  But it is rapidly changing presently and now seems to be accepting queers. 

 

The “Newsweek” article suggested that the United Methodist Church is certainly addressing the issue head-on and some individual churches and pastors are pro-queer--like the Christian, sun-worship preacher of the Clintons in Washington, DC. 

 

But there is another sinister feature about this whole tragedy.  This publicly accepted sickness is destroying the family unit ordained and established by The ELOHIM at creation.  Because the collective American people and their political and religious leaders promote and/or allow this sickness to exist, judgment is waiting at the door for the United States (and indeed, the world at large). 

 

 

Yes, A Growing Christian Problem 

 

The Christian queers are getting so bold that a group of them seized the Immanuel Baptist Church in Long Beach, California on January 8, 2000, and took control of it from the anti-homosexual pastor Richard Rossi.  The March 2000 “National Liberty Journal” (p. 19) detailed this event in an article by J. M. Smith on “Militant Gays Seize control of Church.” 

 

Per the Smith story, Rossi had refused to perform a homosexual marriage between a couple of faggots.  This act infuriated a portion of his congregation which included a large group of queers.  This group took possession of the church building, changed the locks on the door and forced Rossi out.  Rossi was portrayed as a man of hate.  Thus, there are a few exceptions on the queer problem by some preachers. 

 

 

Young Sodomite Boy Scouts 

 

With all of the depravity present in modern, Christian, sun worship America, it is no wonder that the New Jersey State Supreme Court would rule in early Aug 1999 that the Boy Scouts of America discriminated against homosexual James Dale when they discharged him for being a queer.  This court decision has set a terrible precedent for the future of the United States. 

 

Beyond the Dale case, a number of other law suits are before the courts, as brought by homosexuals against the Boy Scouts of America.  For example, a young man who was an Eagle Scout and a scout camp master in Providence, Rhode Island has been in the news headlines recently (Aug 16-22, 1999, “The Washington Times,” p. 23).   

 

This young man was also an avowed homosexual.  So the Boy Scouts fired him from his camp job on Aug 3, 1999.  He promptly filed a lawsuit on Aug 6th.  Scout officials caved in and surrendered on Aug 9th and restored the man to good standing within the organization. 

 

The present on-going court battles over the presence of homosexual faggots in the Boy Scouts have had an interesting sidelight, as brought out by Frank J. Murphy in “Churches must deal with homosexuals in Boy Scouts,” as appearing in the Aug 16-22, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 1, 23). 

 

Murphy pointed out that some 62% of all Boy Scout troops are sponsored by Christian Churches (the Methodist and Mormon Churches alone sponsor 35% of them). 

 

The Methodist Church itself recently adopted a ban on discrimination against queers (the background on this decision was discussed in former comments in this chapter) which will apparently pave the way for homosexuals to become full fledged members of the Methodist Church. 

 

 

Coming Changes 

 

With this Christian position on non-discrimination, coupled with court decisions in favor of allowing faggots into groups like the Boy Scouts, it is evident that the Boy Scout organization’s historic stand against having queer scout masters and leaders is about all over.  The way is now paved for faggots to take over American scouting. 

 

With all of the pressure on the Scout organization, the Boy Scouts moved on Aug 11, 1999, to change its former position of prohibiting homosexual scout masters.  Now, Boy Scouts of America says that the ban only applies to those persons “who openly self-identify as homosexuals” (ibid, p. 23).  In other words, the Scouts will no longer be concerned with a person’s background in terms of sexual preference. 

 

The Scouts have also received a powerful nudge to allow homosexuality from the Clinton Administration and the US government in the summer of 2000.  For decades, the Scouts have had a contract with the US government to use federal parks, lands and military bases for jamboree meetings and other scouting exercises. 

 

Slick Clinton signed an executive order in 2000 for the Interior Department to terminate this US government contract/compact with the Boy Scouts and prohibit their use of US lands.  “Spotlight” had a news report of this event in its Sep 18, 2000, issue (p. 2) which noted that the goal was to force everybody (including the Scouts) to embrace homosexuality. 

 

There was a great outcry from Congress over this Clinton action.  So Janet Reno conveniently issued an interpretation two days later which said that the Scouts were not automatically excluded from US lands, but that they could only have access to federal lands in the same context as other American people (that is without an exclusive federal agreement). 

 

 

Other Pro Queer Moves 

 

Also, the fall of 2000 saw the “Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network” (a homosexual group) announce that they would begin a lobbying campaign in school districts across America to encourage them to stop sponsoring Boy Scout troops, unless the Scouts repeal their policy against homosexual Scout masters (Nov 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 24).  Some 11,000 schools sponsor Scout groups. 

 

This group seems to be having some success because one New York city school board voted in Oct 2000 to bar its 42 schools from sponsoring Boy Scout troops.  A Manhattan school board voted to prevent Boy Scout recruiting in schools and eliminate Scout activities during school hours. 

 

The “American Civil Liberties Union” (ACLU) similarly entered the fray to fight the Scouts.  This group has been filing law suits and taking other measures to bar schools, military bases and other publicly-funded groups from sponsoring Boy Scout troops.  Perhaps it is logical that the ACLU would choose to fight the Scouts on this issue.  It is a publicly known fact that many of the ACLU lawyers are queers themselves. 

 

A federal lawsuit filed in 1999 claims that because Scouts take a religious oath, all public funding should be disallowed (Nov 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 24). 

 

The latest homosexual, ACLU, Christian Church and Boy Scout innovations and the federal position seem to be designed to bring the Scouts into line with Clinton’s established policy for the US military forces of “don’t ask and don’t tell.”  In any case, it won’t be long before the Scouts will have open faggot Scoutmasters and leaders supervising young boys. 

 

 

Young Sodomite Girls 

 

Just like Sodom and Gomorrah faced their day before YHWH’s tribunal, so will the US and other present nations that are allowing this depravity.  No one will be allowed to get away with this sin indefinitely.  What a tragedy Slick Clinton has been for the children of America.  Since his sodomite debasement of Monica Lewinsky, school children all over the US are following suit. 

 

Many children are dating as young as 8 to 12 years old.  And the boys are following Slick’s example.  Many of them are pushing and demanding that their girl friends go down upon them for sodomite purposes.  Young 11 and 12 year old girls in middle schools are being especially pushed/persuaded into acts of sodomy--either to avoid pregnancy or in order to be popular with the boys (per a news report of Jul 7, 1999). 

 

The G. Gordon Liddy radio talk show of Nov 17, 2000, discussed a more recent story on the oral sodomy practices of young children (in the vein of little girls going down on little boys--in order to remain popular and well liked).  One survey said some 1/3 of middle school kids across the nation have performed oral sex.  Another study said the figure was 25%. 

 

Of course, the practice is common in high schools and now extends on down to kids in elementary schools, as young as eight and nine years old.  Many young children are now catching and transmitting various venereal diseases.  Some girls are coming down with gonorrhea in their throats because of their sodomite activities (as noted above). 

 

These young students have also learned from Clinton on lying about sex.  Most of them don’t believe that oral sex is sex.  In other words, sodomy does not constitute a sexual relationship (in their warped views).  Many girls who have performed such sodomy maintain that they are still virgins. 

 

So, after going out and committing sodomy upon a teenage boy, young girls can go back home and with a straight face say that they have not been involved in sex--when asked by their parents.  Yes, young American children have learned a lot from the nation’s leader and role model. 

 

“Newsweek” magazine (p. 19) of July 19, 1999, had a tragic, short quotation from a young girl who was a middle school student in Arlington, Virginia.  This unidentified girl was active in an “oral sex ring” operating in her middle school which shocked parents and officials alike when it was revealed.  She said “What’s the big deal?  President Clinton did it.”  Yes, Slick is a role model (for evil) among small children. 

 

This new fad among small girls and boys is a growing thing now that Clinton did it and got away with it.  The Nov 1999 “Internet Vortex” (p. 22) had a report from David Limbaugh which noted that 30% of children start oral sex from age 11 to 14, while 56% start from 14 to 17.  Obviously, the younger children are now picking upon the practice since it has been popularized by the US president. 

 

 

Source of Modern Christian Depravity

 

Since the above described sexual perversions have now become so widespread and accepted throughout the Christian West, and particularly in the United States, one has to wonder about their sources.  Actually, it’s quite easy to establish the basis for this sickness. 

 

Obviously, the modern problems of sexual perversions and abnormalities prevailing in the Christian, sun worship culture and civilization can all be traced back to ancient Rome and Greece.  As elaborated upon in a previous chapter, the ancient Grecian sun worship perversions seem to now be totally prevalent and accepted in the current, Christian, sun worship culture. 

 

Although the present Christian religion, culture and civilization can be linked to the sun worship beliefs of ancient Rome and Greece, it must be noted that the sodomy and perversion problems started much earlier.  The classic illustration of sodomy has to be to be found among the ancient sun worshipping people of Sodom and Gomorrah.  They were so vile and depraved that The ELOHIM intervened to destroy them.

 

From what information one can find on the early developing Grecian empire, in the days of the famous philosophers Socrates, Plato and the others (fifth century BCE), it is quite manifest that homosexuality and sexual perversion were commonly accepted practices among the Grecian sun worshippers (of the father god Zeus). 

 

Evidently, much of this wickedness found its way into the later Roman Empire, although it never reached the zenith of ancient Greece.  Of course, the Christian sun worshipping West (of Gee-Zeus) would never deal with it from a correct Scriptural point of view.  Hence, it was inevitable that it would finally become a part of depraved Christianity to duplicate what had happened in ancient Sodom and Gomorrah. 

 

It has to be significant that the Roman Catholic Church and some other fragments of Christendom have taken strong, historic stands against so-called condoms, contraceptives and any type of birth control devices, on the premise that such items are unnatural and sinful.  Yet, Rome and her colleagues have said little about sodomy. 

 

Some denominations have spoken out against homosexuality, but typically with restraint and not in a strong condemnation of it as sin. 

 

In terms of sodomite practices of oral sex (which are becoming culturally popular in today’s depraved sun worship society), apparently no Christian groups condemn it.  Even the Catholics, which holler about birth control devices, seem to say little or nothing about oral sex sodomy. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

It should be pointed out that YESHUA described the presence of the times of Lot (with all of the open homosexuality and perversion) across the world when He outlined that He will intervene to cut short the misrule of this planet by evil, wicked people (Lu 17:28-30, as quoted in prior chapters). 

 

The modern Christian world is surely just as sexually promiscuous, as any one might could have found in the days of the old sun worship cults.  Homosexuality, adultery, perversion, sodomy, fornication, miscegenation, etc all abound throughout the Christian West.  It is all now a part of the collective Christian society and culture. 

 

Of course, broken homes and divorces have skyrocketed unto unbelievable proportions--evidently exceeding anything that was imaginable in the old, open, licentious, sun worship civilizations.  And now, little children are learning to be sodomites and queers.  More will be said on this in later chapters. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 324--Christian Humanism and Children I

 

 

Parental Responsibilities 

 

The last 30 years have seen an increasing motion by the liberal, Socialist and humanist leaders to take away parental responsibility for the raising of children.  One sees this dereliction of duty primarily in the failure of leaders to place responsibility with parents for problem children and instead claim that society at large is responsible. 

 

Since the collective public supposedly (per the humanists) bares responsibility for juvenile delinquency and the multitudes of social and behavior problems found in modern children, the federal government (supposedly) must step in and pass national (and soon international) laws to hopefully clean up the situation with no duty or responsibility by the particular parents for what’s wrong and the taking of corrective action. 

 

This prevailing opinion means that children can smoke, take drugs, practice permissive and perverted sex, carry guns, assault and murder innocent people and on and on with the parents totally relieved of all duties as parents. 

 

The week of Nov 10, 2002, offered a news report of a most unusual event which classically demonstrates how incredibly irresponsible parents can be.  The Nov 22, 2002, “The Week” (p. 4) carried the report of the near death of a six-year old girl in Long Beach, CA.  The girl was with her mother at a laundromat in Long Beach. 

 

Somehow and someway, the girl climbed into a front loading washer.  She either closed the door or it closed itself and locked.  The water started pouring into the machine.  A man named Kloeum Nhem was walking nearby.  He saw what was happening and rushed to the girl’s aid.  He couldn’t get the door opened so he broke the glass front with his arm. 

 

Both the man and the little girl were treated for a few minor cuts.  Otherwise, the girl would have drowned from the incoming water. 

 

The point of this story is where was the mother of this child?  Why was the child so undisciplined and uncontrolled that she could climb into the machine?  For sure, the laundromat owners don’t want wild, uncontrolled children running over their establishment and damaging the equipment or hurting themselves.  As a minimum, the mother of this girl was totally irresponsible about the actions of the child. 

 

 

A Government Take Over 

 

Because parents are not responsible for their children, the government then assumes the prerogative to attempt a resolution of the bad conduct.  Thus, the public schools become forums for the philosophy of the liberals and humanists, which never includes real discipline and correction (called whippings in the old days). 

 

Once Big Brother takes over parental duties, big government can grow larger and larger with far more restrictions on personal liberties.  Coupled with an acceleration of public education at younger and younger levels, the state can indoctrinate and train little minds more and more in the direction of “politically correct” thinking. 

 

This willingness to refuse to accept responsibility and shift the blame for misconduct and sin to someone else or something else is not new here in recent years.  This type of thinking started long ago with Adam and Eve, as discussed in prior chapters.  What is new or different is the willingness of government to accept the responsibility for “correcting” the supposed wrongs. 

 

Though irresponsible people like the idea of someone else accepting or taking over their responsibilities, the truth is that government actually makes things worse and not better, as hoped for.  The historical record of government is not good.  As a minimum, the way is paved for more government bureaucracy and a dictatorship. 

 

 

Paul Harvey 

 

Interestingly, news reporter and commentator Paul Harvey had some perceptive comments on the recent gun subject and responsibility which were printed in an article by him on “Talk Show Host Urges Parents to Take Long Look at Children” in the Nov 15, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. B-2).  Harvey admitted that parents should keep children away from guns to avoid some of the shooting tragedies. 

 

Thus, the shootings must be because of the guns.  But is it?  Next, he went on to say that it couldn’t have been because Americans treat their children as pets and their pets as children.  It couldn’t have been because Americans put their kids into day care operations where they learn Socialism. 

 

It couldn’t have been because American children watch TV (filled with violence and sex) for an average of seven hours a day.  It couldn’t have been because Americans allow their children to play games (video, nintendo, etc) in which one wins by killing as many opponents as possible. 

 

It couldn’t have been because children are now viewed as a mistake from a failed contraconceptive or an inconvenience who parents try to raise in their spare time.  It couldn’t have been because of the American culture which kills (aborts) 20 to 30 million babies a year. 

 

It couldn’t have been because the schools teach children that they are apes who evolved from a bowl of primordial soup.  It couldn’t have been because American children are taught about relativism and actions not meaning consequences (instead of morality).   Since the president gets away with things he does (never facing any consequences), it must have been the guns. 

 

 

The Influence of John Dewey 

 

To begin to understand and appreciate what is happening in the modern education of children (which will be assessed in comments to follow), one must first take a look at a man named John Dewey (1859-1952).  Of all of the modern sick motions now on-going in American education, there are some good reasons to suppose that part of today’s problems in the United States must be laid to the door step of Dewey. 

 

Dewey was born in Burlington, Vermont and gained notoriety for his work as a philosopher and educator.  His views on progressive education have pretty well dominated American education in the post WWII environment. 

 

“The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia” (p. 230) says that “He rejected authoritarian teaching methods” and held that “truth is an instrument used by so-called human beings to solve their problems, and that it must change as their problems change.  Thus, it partakes of no transcendental or eternal reality.” 

 

When the student of truth understands that American public school teachers have been thoroughly taught and trained in Dewey’s progressive and liberal ideas for the last 70 years, then much of the dilemma in American public education since WWII becomes far more clear, recognizable and manifest. 

 

No wonder American children are being graduated from schools daily with no concept at all of the presence of absolutes, truth or reality.  They have been indoctrinated on Dewey’s thinking, so much so, that they really think that what’s wrong for one person can be right for another (i.e. abortion, homosexuality, miscegenation, etc). 

 

Because of Dewey’s considerable influence on modern American education, almost everything in the United States (and indeed, in much of the rest of the world that has tried to imitate and copy the US) is relative or in a gray area with no true black and white or right and wrong conclusions in any given situation.  Certainly, the thinking of John Dewey has contributed to the dilemma of modern education. 

 

 

Public Education 

 

In order to achieve the desired ends, the social planners and activists (under Amalekite leadership) have completely taken over the public schools in America.  This shrewd takeover has been one of their most successful achievements. 

 

Now, little children can be programmed to believe much of the nonsense that they are being taught in school on Socialism, humanism and New Age theology--to be elaborated upon in later chapters. 

 

In “Secular Humanism,” Homer Duncan wrote that the humanists first began “educating the educators (in the schools of education at the various colleges and universities).  Students who themselves later will be the teachers are thoroughly indoctrinated in evolutionary humanism.  Secondly, they do it by controlling the textbooks that are used...”  This has been the pattern for at least the last 70 years or so. 

 

Furthermore, in the controlled environment of the public schools, much engineering and changing of little minds can be accomplished in the many areas--which are of concern to not only Christian humanists, but also to political liberals, Socialists, New Age religious adherents and ruling Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters, as outlined previously. 

 

In this regimented situation, the Amalekite bankers/masters can turn the entire Israelite school population of small children into being at least janissary robots (defined earlier as non-Amalekites who can be trained to adopt and blindly follow the Amalekite agenda with just as much dedication and commitment as any true, racial-ethnic Amalekite). 

 

The Jun 29, 2001, issue of “the Week” (p. 3) quoted Ann Coulter of the “National Review Online” who wrote:  “Liberalism is a religion in itself, and today’s public schools is its temple--a place where kids are inculcated ‘in the catechism of recycling’ and practiced in the ritual of pulling condoms over zucchini.  The time has come to ban liberalism from the schools, not God.” 

 

 

Get Them Young 

 

Not content with merely getting the children at age six and grade one in the controlled public schools, as was historically true in the United States, the Amalekites and humanists have constantly pushed for earlier and earlier control of little children.  Quickly, they figured out that age five was better than age six.  So kindergarten was pushed upon the nation. 

 

Not happy with age five, they have went after smaller children at ages three and four in pre-school operations--quite naturally, as supervised by the state.  And now, with day care operations controlled by Big Brother (with the humanists in charge--under Amalekite leadership), even infants and very small children can be programmed and trained in Socialism, humanism and the New Age religion. 

 

At a Kansas Governor’s Conference on Education in Wichita, in about 1993, former Secretary of Education Lamar Alexander said that the government plan was to “educate” children from age three months to 18. 

 

He was followed by Frank Newman, President of the University of Rhode Island, who was even more bold by proclaiming a goal of public education from birth to adulthood (per a video by James Patrick on “America 2000 Education”).  “Spotlight” of Jul 24, 2000 (p. 14), called the current Washington program a “Cradle to Grave” effort. 

 

 

Progress 

 

Certainly, by the summer of 2001, this program was well underway.  The Jul 2, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. 3) had a report by Christopher Bollyn which noted that the District of Columbia has introduced legislation in its city council for a new program making it mandatory for children to be in school by age two. 

 

Kevin Chavous introduced the measure.  He said that “We have to get every child early” and that “Too many children are entering the first grade not prepared to learn.”  A librarian at the Department of Education said that 97% of the DC children in the fourth grade read at “below basic levels.” 

 

Most children born in DC (who are essentially Blacks) are born out of wedlock.  The US plan is to provide free baby sitting services for such small children at taxpayer’s expense.  Bollyn noted that one of the stated goals of the Communist Party has long been “the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents.” 

 

Too, it’s easier to teach sex education (including interracial sex and homosexuality) and New Age theology to small children and pass out condoms in the manipulated public schools (under National Education Association guidance) than it would be in a truly free environment where parents actually controlled the local teachers and schools. 

 

With sexual and racial integration in full force, and with the teaching of sex education, it is only logical and natural that promiscuous and illegal sex would explode in a dramatic fashion.  And it has.  No wonder YHWH’s Word teaches and advocates a separation of not only the races; but importantly, the sexes as well.  Little boys and little girls should not be mixing in school (as discussed previously). 

 

The “Los Angeles Times” of May 16, 1991, offered some most penetrating statistics since sex education took over in the public schools (as quoted in “Origins of the 4th World War,” p. 179). 

 

The Times said that for every passing day, an average of 7,742 American youngsters become sexually active, 623 contract gonorrhea or syphilis, 2,740 become pregnant, 1,105 have abortions, 1,293 give birth, 369 miscarry, 684 attempt suicide, and 2,989 witness the divorce of their parents.  Since this data was compiled in 1991, one can be sure that it is up substantially in 2003. 

 

 

PTAs Are Largely Useless 

 

And on this dilemma, don’t be so naive to believe that the parent teacher associations (PTAs) accomplish anything of worth. 

 

In a sense, the schools must (and they have been doing so) teach and advocate the dictates of the Amalekite bankers/masters through their liberal and humanist teachers and assistants.  Otherwise, the controlled media would go to work and destroy any schools and educators who try to oppose the nation’s “politically correct” thinking. 

 

The big reason for the parent teacher associations is for show purposes only as they rubber stamp and give support to the diabolical schemes of the humanists and Socialist planners. 

 

Consequently, the newspapers can scream and holler about what they call the public’s participation in the management of the public schools; when, in fact, the public effectively has no voice at all in the public schools. 

 

The PTAs are a big farce which do little or nothing of value except, of course, their existence/presence allows parents (the gullible, voting public) to mentally suppose and believe (ignorantly) that they do have some input and control on the school by being a participant in the PTAs. 

 

 

Modern Educational Prejudices 

 

In the above quoted book on “Origins of the 4th World War” (p. 117), J. R. Nyquist also said that there are some seven educational prejudices.  He identified them as:  (1) There are no moral absolutes.  (2) All prejudices are bad; saving educational prejudices.  (3) Minority studies must be made mandatory for all students. 

 

(4) All persons can be educated.  (5) All persons should be educated.  (6) The failures in education are due to inadequate funding or reactionary influences from home.  (7) Children should undergo a socialization process.  Nyquist has it right.  What more can be said. 

 

 

Modern Educational Programs 

 

Importantly, the schools have been working for the establishment of a one world government (to be later described) as evidenced by various programs--such as Goals 2000 (their original time table) and outcome based education which addresses social issues, family matters, politically correct thinking, inter-personal conflicts, death education, sex education (all kinds to include alternative sex styles), New Age theology, occult practices, etc. 

 

Goals 2000 started in 1989 when President George H. W. Bush and the nation’s governors set some six goals for American education in the year 2000.  In 1994, under Slick Clinton, the “education president,” two more goals were added.  These eight goals were: 

 

All children will start school ready to learn.  Some 90% will graduate from high school.  All will demonstrate competency over challenging subject matter.  The US will be first in the world in science and mathematics.  All adults will be literate.  No schools will have drugs, violence, firearms or alcohol.  Teachers will have needed skills.  And finally, all schools will get parents involved. 

 

Obviously, it can be factually stated that all eight objectives have been colossal failures since 1989--primarily, under the so-called education president, Slick Clinton.  In fact, things have gotten substantially worse on all eight points, rather than improving on any one of them. 

 

Anyway the die is cast, the Goals 2000 program was a totally stupid and ridiculous effort from day one.  As always, it was just one more thing which people could feel well about and which could get a lot of favorable media attention.  But in the end, it turned out to be a total failure. 

 

The “Spotlight” paper of Mar 6, 2000 (p. 6), addressed the dilemma in a story by William Carmichael on “Goals 2000 a Monumental Bust.”  Per Carmichael, there was an obvious problem on these goals with the involvement of federal bureaucrats.  What should have happened is that local people should have set local goals. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 325--Christian Humanism and Children II

 

 

More on Outcome Based Education   

 

Outcome based education, briefly mentioned in the prior chapter, is another move by the humanists to destroy education.  Actually, the thinking of outcome based education started in the 1950s when the federal government began funding and exercising authority over American education--principally, as a result of the government ordered racial integration of the schools. 

 

Ernest Boyer, US Commissioner of Education from 1977-1979, under Jimmy Carter, outlined the outcome changes at a meeting of the Council of Chief State School Officers in Colorado Springs, CO in early August 1981. 

 

He said that the core (educational) curriculum must be changed to address a “human agenda rather than academic disciplines” with a focus on cross cultural subjects like energy and social institutions (“Rocky Mountain News,” Denver, CO, Aug 4, 1981). 

 

 

Second Grade Marriages 

 

A good example of outcome based education surfaced in Dover, Delaware in early November 1997 when a school there put on a mass marriage ceremony for second grade students.  These small children were told to select one of their classmates (of the same sex, interracial or whatever) for marriage. 

 

The ceremony was conducted where the children pledged their love, friendship, etc to their new marriage partner.  Some of the gullible parents thought that it was just wonderful that the school was teaching such depravity, never understanding that it could open the door to interracial sex, homosexuality, a depreciation of marriage values and who knows what else. 

 

It is amazing that the public schools have got time, money and resources for such demented wickedness; yet, they are largely incapable of teaching reading, writing and arithmetic.  Do educators know and understand the differences between right and wrong?  Evidently not so! 

 

 

The Governor’s Conference, Revisited 

 

At the previously mentioned Kansas Governor’s Conference on Education in Wichita, Dr Shirley McCuen, director of the Mid-Continent Education Laboratory, called for a complete “restructuring of American society” through the US education system. 

 

McCuen and the others spoke of using computers to completely track a child all the way through the educational system and on into their future employment.  Obviously, these tracking computer files will perpetually record a complete record on all children for the rest of their lives and on into their jobs, marriages and personal futures. 

 

The speakers at this Governor’s Conference called little children in the public schools “human resources and human capital” in the context of them being fodder in a coming controlled society where everything is managed and controlled by government from the top down (under Amalekite planning and direction). 

 

Schools are stressing racial miscegenation and amalgamation; propriety of alternative sex styles (including homosexuality); acceptance of politically correct religions and philosophies that support the overall liberal agenda (while chastising, criticizing and condemning all other religious faiths and philosophies); concern for the environment; elevating the importance of children to make their own decisions about life (while downplaying the role of parents); etc. 

 

 

The Occult and New Age Theology 

 

As indicated in some previous comments, the occult and New Age theology and thinking are being introduced into the public schools as a part of outcome based education.  This on-going phenomenon will have an enormous impact upon children in the future.  This development is profoundly serious. 

 

A future chapter will assess this subject in some detail in the context of change.  For now, it must be noted that New Age religious teachings are big issues in the US schools.  As a part of outcome based education, five year old children are being made to gather in circles around a teacher to learn about yoga, mediation, trances and channeling with demon spirits. 

 

The Nov-Dec 1999 “Search the Scriptures” (p. 2) offered several pungent illustrations of New Age theology, now being taught in American schools as a part of outcome based education (as, for example, in the Bedford Central School District in New York). 

 

For instance, children at Bedford were instructed to make “worry dolls” out of yarn and toothpicks.  They were then told that if they took their dolls home, and put them under their pillows, the dolls would drive away bad dreams. 

 

One fifth grade teacher taught her students about “Lord Ganesha,” an elephant headed god.  The children then had an activity in which they constructed paper images of their (idol) Ganesha. 

 

In another case, students gave gifts to Mother Earth (Gaia).  Some actually built altars for the Gaia worship ceremony.  The students also recited the Earth Day creed-- “This is what we believe.  The Mother of us all is the Earth.  The father is the Sun.  The Grandfather is the creator who bathed us with his mind and gave life to all things. 

 

“The Brother is the beasts and trees.  The Sister is that with wings.  We are children of the Earth and do it no harm in any way, nor do we offend the Sun by not greeting it at dawn.  We praise our Grandfather for his creation.  We share the same breath together, beasts, the trees, the birds and the man.” 

 

Some parents disapproved of these teachings, but they could not stop them.  So they filed a lawsuit in court.  The school superintendent responded to a question about the prayer to the Mother Earth.  He said that “I don’t have any problem with that.” 

 

In time, the judge finally ordered the New Age teachings stopped.  But they are still going on at thousands of other schools. 

 

 

The Plan 

 

The objective of outcome based education is, of course, to pave the way for the New World Order (world government, which will be addressed in subsequent chapters). 

 

The new focus is entirely on a coming “one world” state of one race (that’s why racial amalgamation is so important), one religion (that’s why Christian ecumenicalism and New Age Spiritualism is stressed while attacking any non-conforming faiths which are labeled as cults), and one social system (allowing and promoting homosexuality, abortion, etc). 

 

Moreover, the plan is for one economic program (allowing the Amalekites and other internationalists to control all wealth and production, thus making a profit on all commercial transactions of the global slave populations), one political system (controlling all political ideology), one world government (ruled from behind the scenes by the super rich, mainly Amalekites, who claim that they love and care for the people whom they rule over and profit from), etc. 

 

Quite naturally, parents who have different values can be an obstacle to this plan, if they are allowed to teach their contrary values to their children.  Consequently, outcome based education strives to remove the role parents have traditionally played in the teaching of their children.  Children are now being taught to ignore parents and turn to the governing state for guidance and particularly for confidence and trust. 

 

 

A Children’s Factory 

 

It is manifest that the planners in this system actually envision a factory approach, whereby parents have one role only--that of breeding human livestock which can be taken over to be taught and trained as janissary robot workers to serve the super rich fat cats who will own and control the future one world state. 

 

Naturally, old people of the controlled masses, who no longer produce children for the state, will be of no further value and will be appropriately liquidated (i.e. euthanasia, etc). 

 

With a commitment to politically correct social, economic and moral issues, as implemented by professional education bureaucrats, all the while that traditional values are ignored and downplayed (such as academic subjects like reading, writing and arithmetic), a class of janissary zombies are being created who will totally conform to the politically correct positions of an all powerful state (this is outcome based education). 

 

Consequently, outcome based education focuses on the molding, developing; and as necessary, the changing of attitudes and behavioral patterns of children to make them politically correct persons when adults. 

 

Much of this Big Brother focus is to teach and train the child to become subservient (without rebellion, disapproval or non-conformity) to the prevailing politically correct thinking of collective society, as determined by the ruling elite. 

 

Outcome based education involves mind development and control in a planned direction.  The goal is not to allow contrary or unapproved behavior or “thinking” in the total collective society. 

 

Contrary opinions, beliefs, attitudes and thinking must be changed.  That’s the purpose of outcome based education--to make sure that little children grow up to be proper, janissary, zombie subjects of a Big Brother dictatorship. 

 

There is a super conspiracy involved in promoting this theory and practice of mind control.  This conspiracy is so powerful, so pervasive and so overpowering that it is beyond the limits of mere, limited, humans/humanoids.  It is being directed by powerful Satanic and demonic forces, using mental telepathy, primarily on the controlled public, politicians, media and other key players and servants. 

 

Some of the non-Amalekite super rich and internationalists have joined in with Amalekite bankers/masters in this effort by thinking that they will be able to share in the government, plunder and control of the resulting generic population (for their personal profit and pleasure reasons). 

 

What these gullible, fat cat non-Amalekites don’t understand is that they are being used by the Amalekite bankers/masters and will be appropriately liquidated at the right time (if the Amalekites have their way). 

 

 

Thought Control For Small Children 

 

The New World Order consists of thought control, thought control police and thought control laws that are now surfacing all over America and the Christian West--as elaborated upon previously with Slick Clinton’s new hate crimes agenda which will have a major focus in outcome based education. 

 

For example, in Shirley McCuen’s plans for restructuring American society, outlined above, there are plans to utilize computers to completely monitor all aspects of a child’s development.  Of course, beliefs, attitudes, thinking and ideas of each child will become a part of the computer profile on the child. 

 

McCuen’s ideas clearly link to former President Slick Clinton’s hate crimes program.  This linkage was brought out in the previously quoted remarks by John Loeffler and Berit Kjos in the June 1998 “Personal Update” (p. 6) on hate crimes.  These writers noted that classroom discussion groups will be designed to monitor the child’s resistance to the outcome teachings. 

 

In this context, the school will be able to not only determine the child’s beliefs and thinking, but it allows Big Brother to also be monitoring the beliefs and thinking of the parents.  All this data can be fed into the computer to completely profile both parents and children (ibid, p. 6). 

 

According to the planners, this monitoring process will be linked under the central management of the federal government.  The US Justice Department will prepare its own hate crimes training program to point society in the desired direction.  Already, this department is launching a web site on the Internet where children can learn about “prejudice” and the alleged harm it causes (ibid, p. 6). 

 

Apparently, one objective of this program is called “participatory democracy” which will require each person to serve the community, participate in group discussions and take responsibility for establishing common values--especially social unity and equality (ibid, p. 6). 

 

The whole scheme will allow people to report on and spy upon their neighbors and allow Big Brother to intimidate, harass and arrest resisters to the overall goals of a one world people, one world religion and one world society. 

 

The epitome in spying will be reached when little children can spy on, watch and observe their parents--so that subsequently they can report to school authorities on the words and acts of parents.  This information being collected on parents can be fed into computer files to monitor religious and secular philosophies of parents.  As necessary, parents can be dealt with by authorities. 

 

Please understand, outcome based education is a global matter because the UN and other international agencies and people involved in it are busy promoting its plans and goals all over the world.  It is not just something for the US. 

 

 

Continuously Remedied Students 

 

Thus, children who might grow up to be independent thinkers and who might not conform to the coming, Big Brother, world government on politically correct positions on religion, sociology, race, economics, world government, etc will be subjected to outcome based education until their attitudes, beliefs and behavior change. 

 

For those little children, whose beliefs and thinking won’t change on religious, social, moral, economic, government, etc matters to conform to the outcome based goals, they will be continuously remedied until they change to the approved politically correct positions.

 

If they begin maturing, without change, they will be put into a class with disadvantaged students, on the premise that they are mentally disturbed or retarded and need special attention. 

 

The goal of this program is to instill acceptable thinking (as the liberals, Socialists and humanists define it--under the guidance and leadership of Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters who really call the shots from behind the scenes) in children before they can graduate from school (thus outcome based).  In this system, everybody passes once they have the right attitudes and behavior patterns. 

 

The plans are to get children into outcome based education in pre-school and day care facilities at birth or in infancy when they are quite small and keep them continually exposed to politically correct thinking until they graduate from high school or college. 

 

Children may not be able to read, write or work simple arithmetic, but they will be politically correct on the environment, religious ecumenicalism, racial amalgamation, homosexuality, abortion, global economics and trade, world government, etc. 

 

While some parents may suppose that they can break free of this system by bypassing public schools for private and church schools, such an option does not truly exist.  The problem is that this thinking dominates the schools and colleges of education across America (as described earlier in this chapter).  The school teachers, themselves, have been taught outcome based education. 

 

Most people, educated in politically correct (outcome based) subjects all of their lives, will never be able to later break free of those teachings in this present system.  Even in private schools, the states are requiring “certified” and state approved teachers who have been so trained and will so train their future students. 

 

Moreover, school accreditation typically requires the teaching of outcome based education.  Thus, many private schools are forced into teaching outcome based education whether they want to or not.  So, avoiding the public schools do not always guarantee a break with the evil system. 

 

 

Teaching the Teachers 

 

In order to put outcome based education over successfully, there has been a need to change the thinking of people in authority at all levels.  Leftists, like the previously mentioned John Dewey, learned long ago that the way to change an educational system was to change the teaching of the teachers; and of course, to change the text books used by the teachers. 

 

This tactic has been followed in America very successfully for the last 70 years since FDR came to power and began changing things. 

 

In the furtherance of the objectives of outcome based education, a dedicated and conscientious effort commenced about the time of Roosevelt to completely change the attitudes and thinking of America’s school teachers (who would be called upon to be the front line leaders in this massive shift in education and values). 

 

 

San Diego State 

 

In a demonstration of how far this evil campaign has progressed, G. Gordon Liddy was in San Diego, California on Sep 12, 2000, for his radio broadcast.  He had a discussion with a local guest on activities at San Diego State University. 

 

San Diego State has a School of Education to teach teachers.  One of the mandatory courses for graduating elementary school teachers is called “Introduction to Multi-Culturalism.”  Per the school catalog, it seems to be a fairly relaxed course--consisting of workshops and visits to and study of various segments of the present multi-cultural US. 

 

For example, students must visit certain Black Churches to learn about their worship practices.  One of the workshops is called “Cruising Gay Bars” in the area (evidently, at night).  The idea is to introduce heterosexual teachers to the world of homosexuals and “trans-gender” people (it was unclear what a trans-gender person is, but perhaps it involves transvestites, trans-sexuals or other warped, confused and sick people).  

 

Apparently, the focus is to introduce students to the attitudes, thinking, beliefs and culture of America’s so-called minorities.  Of course, minorities include racial minorities (Blacks, Hispanics, etc) and sexual minorities (faggots, transvestites, trans-sexuals and various other forms of sexual deviants and perverts). 

 

It was unclear from the school catalog how the course will be handled in respect to sadists, sado-masochists, pedophiles and other really warped people.  But these issues must be addressed because numbers of Americans now follow this depravity.  It is almost a certainty that these deviants will be assessed from the liberal point of tolerance, understanding and humanistic love, respect and appreciation. 

 

 

The Religious Focus 

 

There also must be a question if the course will focus upon religious minorities--besides the Black worship practices of Christian Africans (the focus upon the Blacks is probably because of them being a so-called racial minority and not because of their religious practices)? 

 

In any case, many Orientals are Buddhists, India Indians are Hindus and other racial groups are something else (however, this condition is changing as many of these Eastern religions are gaining acceptance among Whites in America and Europe, here in the age end). 

 

There is also the question of introducing teachers to the growing popularity, acceptance and presence of Witchcraft, Satanism the New Age motion and other occultic faiths.  All of these “different” religious practices of these faiths will surely receive some attention--at least, as a part of the study of the racial minorities involved. 

 

With a course like this for school teachers, the goals of outcome based education will more easily become reality.  Concurrently with educating the teachers, textbook producers will generate textbooks on these same multi-cultural subjects.  Once the teachers are properly indoctrinated on these subjects, they will want to teach them to their students.  Of course, they will use the new text books. 

 

One must understand that this particular course at San Diego State is a required course for elementary school teachers (of very small children).  Actually, multi-culturalism has been around for years now for teachers in high school, middle school and college.  With the new focus on elementary teachers, the whole system is being indoctrinated and brainwashed.  Things will only get worse with this new focus. 

 

 

Increasing Behavioral Problems 

 

As briefly mentioned in the above comments in this chapter, there are increasing disciplinary problems in schools and especially in public schools which can no longer whip and/or punish children.  Many of the schools are becoming like the jails and prisons where the cons are in charge.  In some public schools, the children run things. 

 

Drugs, crime, violence, school shootings, rapes, assaults and on and on are becoming commonplace in today’s modern schools.  No one seems to know why and there is a total lack of government ability to deal with the problems (other than pass more and more gun control laws in violation of the US Constitution). 

 

An article by Chris Moeser on “GOP legislator in Arizona proposes arming teachers” in the Nov 1-7, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 21) outlined another more recent theory being bounced around at least in Arizona (of arming teachers).  But this idea won’t go any place in the US because the controlled media would pound it hypocritically into the ground. 

 

In fact, the politically correct society hates it with a passion.  A discussion on the Coast to Coast AM radio program on May 30, 2000, noted that a teacher in Michigan told her students about the evils of guns.  One boy suggested that teachers be armed to protect the children.  The boy was expelled and his parents were cautioned about his violence prone attitude. 

 

This whole issue is just one more of incredible hypocrisy.  In the state of Israel, teachers are armed and the media says nothing about it.  But the same Amalekite controlled media in the US would cry to high heaven if American teachers brought guns to school.  This is just more media bias which Americans now accept as normal. 

 

Incidentally, the expulsion of this boy in Michigan brings up another feature of the modern insanity prevailing in American schools.  The May 27, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news item which noted that two small boys were expelled from a school in Centennial, CO for using their fingers as guns in play and saying “bang, bang.” 

 

Four NJ children were expelled from school for playing cops and robbers and in Jonesboro, AR, a eight-year-old boy was tossed out of school for pointing a chicken bone and saying “pow.”  American educators have gone crazy in expelling students for almost any thing that connects to guns.  It’s too bad that educators don’t get concerned over reading, writing and arithmetic. 

 

 

Some Statistics on the Change 

 

The December 1999 “End Times News” (p. 4) quoted author David Barton, previously cited, on what all has been happening in the schools in the last 40 years. 

 

Barton tried to assess the problem from the time that school prayers were outlawed by the US Supreme Court in 1962.  But the real transition happened in the 1950s and not just over school prayers, but a bigger issue in the US government take over of the schools (as elsewhere described herein). 

 

Anyway, here’s what Barton reported as happening after 1962:  SAT college entrance exam scores dropped sharply for 16 consecutive years--after holding steady for the previous ten.  Illiteracy rates tripled in 15 years.  High school drop-outs and the pursuit of GED education and tests increased 775% between 1963 and 1982. 

 

The former disciplinary problems used to be talking in class, chewing gum, running in the halls, wearing improper clothes, etc.  By 1985, the problems had changed to drug abuse, pregnancies, rape, robbery, assault, absenteeism, vandalism, arson, etc. 

 

From 1962 to 1982, the number of high school seniors who had tried marihuana went up 15 times.  Furthermore, by 1985, some 70,000 teachers were being assaulted annually in the schools. 

 

The percentage of teenage girls who were engaging in pre-martial sex almost tripled in 14 years.  Pregnancies of girls ages 15 to 19 increased 550% from 1963 to 1983.  Pregnancies of girls under 15 went up 400%.  Sexually transmitted diseases went up 350% between 1963 and 1975.  Suicides doubled in the 15 to 24 age bracket. 

 

A 1999 report by the National Center for Health Statistics said that 46.9% of all US teen-age girls had had sex within the prior 12 months and that sexually active teens have a pregnancy rate of 21.9% (Jan 3-9, 2000, “Washington Times,” p. 15). 

 

A later story by Cheryl Wetzstein on “Teen birthrates drop in U.S. as unwed mother totals increase,” in the Jan 24-30, 2000, “Washington Times” (p. 12), noted that the birthrate among teenage mothers had declined, but that the number of unwed teen-agers having children had went up substantially.  Obviously, pregnancies among legally married girls were down while pregnancies among unmarried girls were up. 

 

Wetzstein reported that from 1993 to 1997 the percentage of births among unmarried teens rose in every state in the union, except Rhode Island where it was unchanged.  Nationally, the total number of unwed, teen-age mothers is going up.  

 

 

The Drug Explosion 

 

The above quoted David Barton mentioned the modern drug abuse problem and gave some statistics on an increase of marihuana use in the twenty year period of 1962 to 1982.  But that’s only a small part of the problem. 

 

The post WWII environment (and especially since the 1950s) has seen an absolute explosion in all kinds of drug use among school children.  It started with those in college and high school and then went on further down the line to younger and younger children.  Today, many pre-teen children in elementary school have drug problems. 

 

In an article on “Drug use spreads from cities, explodes in rural U.S.” in the Jan 31-Feb 6, 2000, “Washington Times” (p. 1, 23), the above cited Cheryl Wetzstein quoted Joseph A Califano Jr, president of the National Center on Addition and Substance Abuse who said that drugs are now as available on Main Street (USA) as they are in Manhattan. 

 

Per Califano, eighth-graders who live in areas with less than 50,000 population were “more likely” to have smoked marijuana, snorted cocaine and used inhalants, crack, amphetamines, tranquilizers, alcohol, cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the past year than eighth-graders in big cities of one million or more. 

 

According to Califano and other drug authorities, the drug methamphetamine (or meth) is exploding in popularity in the US West and Midwest.  Meth seems to be easy to manufacture and distribute.  Consequently, meth labs are surfacing all over the nation and especially in rural areas. 

 

“The Washington Times” of Feb 7-13, 2000 (p. 12), had a follow-up story by Fred Reed on “Drugs easily accessible for today’s kids” which focused upon both drug accessibility and the drug IQ level among today’s children. 

 

Reed said that “unless your child goes to an unusual school, almost any drug abuse most people have heard of is available... Kids today know as much about drugs and have as much access, as you did.  And they know this stuff in the 10th grade.” 

 

 

Earlier School Years 

 

The writer of this study at hand went to school in the 1940s and early 1950.  For a fact, i never heard of a drug problem in my life.  Later, in college, there was some drug use among college students, but nothing was publicized in the context of children in grades one to twelve.  Now, children in the fourth and fifth grades are experimenting with drugs. 

 

The problem is addressed elsewhere herein.  There is no intent to get bogged down on it in this discussion of humanism and children.  Suffice to say, the Amalekite gangsters and their cousins in the banks and financial houses have made fortunes in introducing opium into China and in prohibiting alcohol in the US from 1919 to 1933. 

 

Manifestly, these same criminals and plutocrats are now raking the money in from drugs and making payoffs to politicians (like Slick Clinton and others), as necessary to stay in business.  The problem is getting worse and will continue to get worse.  The Amalekites hate Christian Israelites and they are doing their best to destroy them (starting with very small children).  Drug use is just one more tool being used.  

 

 

Racial Integration 

 

This writer lived in Oklahoma in the 1950s when public school integration came as a result of the Supreme Court decision, Brown versus Board of Education (in Kansas).  A friend of mine and his wife were both school teachers in Atoka, OK which had a large Black population (of perhaps 25%).  After a year of racial integration, he outlined reality.

 

He said that it was his understanding that there was hope that with racial integration the levels of African morality, character, integrity, intelligence and so forth would improve once little Black children were mixed in with White children.  In other words, the theory was that White values and thinking would rub off on the more immoral and crime prone Negroes. 

 

As my friend noted, the reverse actually happened.  White children began picking upon African morality, character and social attitudes. This condition has been commented upon elsewhere herein in the sense of the now prevalent Black vulgar talk and sexual permissiveness. 

 

In the Atoka schools, where chewing gum and throwing paper wads were once the disciplinary problems among White children, a shift came with racial integration (which agrees with the “End Time News” report from David Barton, as cited above. 

 

All of a sudden, Black rapes, assaults, vulgarity, petty crime, violence, graffiti on toilet walls and so forth became the order of the day.  Soon, the Whites began picking up on the same behavior from the Blacks.  The schools began coming apart at the seams.  In other words, the Whites began adopting Black values, instead of the Blacks adopting White values. 

 

Many women teachers in the high school (like the wife of my friend) found that they had great fear in even trying to be present in the jungles called schools.  The Black conduct was such an outrage that many women teachers chose to request transfer back to teaching children from kindergarten to the 6th grade where things were safer and not so violent and hostile. 

 

 

Evan Hunter 

 

By 1954, author Evan Hunter must have seen what was happening in the US public schools because he wrote a book which was made into a popular Hollywood film.  The movie, called “Blackboard Jungle,” starred Glenn Ford and introduced Rock music (“Rock Around the Clock” with Bill Halley) for the first time in a major motion picture.  Truly, this effort was about the blackboard jungles of US schools in the big cities. 

 

The tragedy of modern music (especially rock n’ roll) is discussed elsewhere herein, and needs not be addressed in any detail at this time.  Suffice to say, it isn’t only to say that the sound is demonic and evil, but it also must be said that the lyrics are pathetic and vulgar, beyond comprehension. 

 

Recently, a Spokane, Washington “Classic Rock” program played a rock song from an apparent Black male singer with lyrics “Oh baby, I’m gonna give you my love--every inch of it... ugh, ah, oh... every inch of it”  This writer heard it because of just listening to a news report.  Young 13-year old girls (and boys as well) cannot listen to this trash without being aroused, sexually and interracially, from the jungle beat and words. 

 

It looks like parents would wake up and realize that there are powerful forces at work to completely destroy their family and culture.  Permissive and interracial sex by young teenagers (motivated by demonic music) will do this precisely. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 326--Christian Humanism and Children III

 

 

A Teacher’s View 

 

With the growing prevalence of no discipline for students and the acceptance of outcome based education (which is very bad), the schools have rapidly deteriorated into worthless and evil institutions.  Instead of helping students, too many of them actually hurt and damage the future of little, innocent, developing minds.  What a tragedy this whole exercise has been. 

 

J. R. Nyquist, in his book on “Origins of the 4th World War” (p. 120), previously quoted, also had a perceptive comment from a contemporary school teacher.  The teacher said that “I think the students are bright, as long as they receive encouragement from home.  What they lack is discipline.  They don’t show respect.  They are not used to doing what adults tell them.” 

 

Certainly, this is much of the problem.  Children do not receive needed discipline and guidance from their parents.  But this parental failure is no reason to try to place parental responsibilities into the schools with hired school teachers.  This is what has been happening across America.  

 

 

Ancient Greek Sun Worship 

 

The modern dilemma of undisciplined children has an interesting parallel in ancient Grecian sun worship.  Since the contemporary US culture and civilization is so devoted to sun worship (as was ancient Greece), one would expect that there would be a correlation. 

 

And there is one as can be readily seen in a comment from the famous Greek philosopher Socrates in the 5th century BCE.  Socrates wrote:  “Children nowadays are tyrants.  They not only talk back to their parents, teachers and elders, but expect every luxury, gobble their food, chatter incessantly and sneer at any attempt to control them” (May 2000 “Kingdom Digest,” p. 57). 

 

Is it possible that today’s problems can be traced to the same source or cause that the early Greeks faced?  Is there a linkage between the ancient Greek sun worshippers and the modern Christian sun worshippers? 

 

Hence, is it possible that the ancient Greeks and the modern, contemporary Americans have the basic same problems with children because of the prevalence and acceptance of the heathen, sun worship religion, culture and civilization which fails to property train up children in the way that they should go? 

 

Is it not totally logical and sensible that if the ancient Greeks and modern Americans had based their religion, culture and civilization on the truth of the Scriptures that none of these evident problems would have surfaced in either nation?  The obvious decision by both peoples to rebel against YHWH’s Torah spelled inevitable problems. 

 

 

Morality is the Issue 

 

Some of the subjects being covered by outcome based teachers are worthy of instruction for the development of a child, although there are age considerations on when this teaching is called for.  In a sense, many of them, in the context of name and overall subject content, address social and moral themes which are vital issues, needing to be taught to children at the right ages. 

 

But the problem is over “who” will be doing the teaching and the focus of that teaching.  In the first place, the prepared outcome based curriculum is directed to the “wrong” teachings of morality.  In terms of professional educators, they are not qualified to teach morals (since they have been taught bad information on such issues in their own development and outcome based education). 

 

The primary Scriptural agents commissioned to teach morality to little children are the parents. 

 

The secondary source of this teaching and perhaps the most important from the standpoint of YHWH’s judgments are the religious leaders, teachers, preachers, etc who have a duty and obligation to teach Scriptural morality to the collective people (including parents, who then can, in turn, teach those things correctly to their children). 

 

Not only are the secular school teachers ignorant and uniformed on Scriptural morality, but the same indictment applies to the religious leaders and teachers who function in the Western, Christian, sun worship civilization.  In other words, too often, all of the teachers and leaders in the entire culture teach rebellious sun worship and Amalekite lies to little children. 

 

 

Specific Needs 

 

Consequently, children should be taught a type of death education (or the life and death experiences), but the parents should do the teaching and they should teach the Scriptural approach.  The same thing applies to a whole host of subjects. 

 

Sex education is crucial.  But children should be taught abstinence (the Scriptural approach) by parents in contrast to the modern, sun worship position of permissiveness, as taught by outcome based educators.  Parents should teach children about condoms, but not the way the schools teach about them or the way the schools now distribute them to students. 

 

Children should correctly be taught that homosexuality is gross wickedness and sin deserving of death; but by parents, in contrast to the teachings of outcome based education by professional educators who are busy promoting alternative sex styles as perfectly acceptable and normal practices for society. 

 

Questions over interracial sex, racial integration and amalgamation, etc are all issues needing to be taught to children--by parents using the Scriptural approach.  It’s too bad that parents often are ignorant of YHWH’s teachings on race and this is true as well for outcome based educators. 

 

Once the public schools teach race relations, little children will be taught racial integration, amalgamation and miscegenation and not separation and racial purity (the Scriptural approach). 

 

Children need much of YHWH’s teachings about the institution of marriage (and divorce and remarriage as well).  This instruction should be done by parents.  But the nonsense and stupidity being taught in outcome based education by professional educators (like the before described Dover, DE teacher) is totally wrong. 

 

Little developing minds should receive parental instructions on choosing a mate and not the garbage forced on them in Dover, on allowing them to marry whomsoever they want to marry (to include interracial or homosexual marriages) in a cheap ceremony in the public schools. 

 

Children need to be told the truth about marriage--that it is a permanent institution and cannot be severed at will, as the contemporary sun worship society allows. 

 

Correction should include a focus on the adverse affects of pre-martial sex and adultery on a marriage.  This teaching should come from parents from the Scriptural perspective and not the position of the modern, sun worship society, as taught in outcome based education. 

 

 

Children Need Parental Instructions 

 

Environmentalism and pollution are important topics needing to be taught to developing children.  But they need to be taught the Scriptural presentation by parents (as described at some length in former chapters) and not the secular, outcome based, education approach, promoting the worship of a New Age “mother earth” in the public schools. 

 

Honor, integrity, character, etc are all vital topics which little children need much instruction on.  And while secular school teachers need to exhibit and demonstrate those qualities to children under their care, the basic teachings must start at home by the parents.  The one thing that politically correct, outcome based education will never teach is the subject of honor, integrity and character. 

 

The point of this is that children need to be taught morals and related themes of sociology and deportment.  But these teachings must be imparted by parents in accordance with their religious standards and convictions and not the sun worship ideas of a bunch of professional educator bureaucrats sitting in Washington, DC. 

 

This writer acknowledges that there is a fantastic problem in the modern, secular, Western, Christian, sun worship society.  The problem surfaces because the Christian religious institutions have grossly failed to teach the sheep under their care the proper Scriptural positions on personal standards and conduct (and YHWH will hold them accountable). 

 

In too many instances, the dumb sheep have been taught that YHWH’s laws of righteousness, love and good were abolished and done away with, to be replaced by Christian Church definitions--which are sun worship based and too often absolutely contrary to the Word.  No wonder the Christian culture is so willing to accept the diabolical wickedness of modern, outcome based education. 

 

 

Child Protective Services 

 

There is one more contemporary problem in the present sun worship culture.  Now, most states have child protective services (CPS) which will no longer allow parents to enforce discipline on their children or properly teach them morality and the true path of righteousness.  A classic case of this modern insanity surfaced in 1994 in Oregon. 

 

A Oregon news report told about a family living there and the ensuing problems.  The father was a Captain in the Marine Corps and was overseas.  His wife was at home raising their five children which were in the local public schools.  The woman was evidently small--perhaps weighing around a hundred pounds.  She could not have been very tall. 

 

One day, the oldest child, a 14 year old boy, was rebellious towards the mother.  So she spanked him or hit him in some way.  The news reports did not say how big the boy was.  But it is highly likely that he was as big or bigger than she was.  In any case, it’s hard to fathom that he could have been hurt. 

 

The next day, he told one of the school officials that his mother had hit him.  They immediately called child protective services.  The public officials came out to the school and took all five children into “protective custody.”  The family had to prove its innocence in order to be able to get the children back from the government. 

 

Washington state now has a similar child protection law.  Accused parents lose custody  of their children based on simple allegations and the opinion of the local child protection bureaucrat.  The parents must then go to court to prove their innocence if they hope to get their kid(s) back. 

 

Under the Washington law, the accusers do not even have to appear in court to face the accused law violators.  As is becoming increasingly true with a vast host of American laws, the defendants are not automatically innocent until proven guilty.  Instead, the opposite prevails.  The parents are assumed to be guilty, unless they can prove their innocence. 

 

A story on “Feds Finance Breakup of Families” by Nev Moore in the Jul 24, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 14) noted that CPS people now seize 3,000 children per day and the figures are growing.  Only 400 of these seizures are for substantiated acts of abuse or neglect (meaning that the other 2,600 seizures are made based on allegations or suspicions). 

 

Of the substantiated cases, the US Department of Health and Human Service people admit that 68% “do not involve child maltreatment.  “Spotlight” asks-- “what do they involve?” 

 

Apparently, Idaho has a similar law in effect--which says that a parent can be arrested and jailed and children seized, based just on the word of a child protection bureaucrat.  Sandpoint, Idaho had a case like this just after Memorial Day in 2001 when the local Sheriff jailed a poor woman named JoAnn McGuckin (previously mentioned) and seized her children, some three weeks after her husband died. 

 

Actually, there was more to this McGuckin story than just the child protection people (though they played a major role in the oppression and hurt put upon this widow woman and her six orphaned children).  This case will be addressed in some detail in a subsequent chapter. 

 

 

The Navarro Case  

 

One of the areas which child protective people jump onto with a vengeance is any thing which fits into the category of health for children.  Government bureaucrats are fully supportive of the AMA and establishment doctors, drugs and surgery for healing.  Anyone attempting to choose alternative healing methods is immediately an enemy of the state. 

 

In the case of children, if child protective people learn that parents are following some alternative healing method for sick or diseased children, the child protective services will rush in and seize them from the parents.  Cases like this surface from time to time. 

 

One of the most recent incidents (in Feb 2000) involved a family named Navarro from Arizona which was in Houston, Texas for medical treatment.  The family had a small, four year old boy named Thomas, who had a brain tumor. 

 

The approved medical approach to treat these problems is radiation, chemotherapy and drugs.  People either die from the treatment or they are left severely handicapped (at least, mentally retarded) and totally dependent upon continuous use of drugs thereafter (however long they live).  The cancer treatment success rate has not been good with this methodology. 

 

As was discussed on the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio talk show on Feb 21, 2000, the Navarros decided that they did not want to follow the “approved” medical practice for their sick child.  They wanted to address alternative methods for fear the child would die or be permanently retarded (after the AMA approved treatment). 

 

Child protective people in Arizona told the parents to either submit to the establishment’s approved healing practices or the child protective people would seize the child from the parents.  Well, the parents didn’t like this option.  So they took the boy to Texas and went into hiding.  Naturally, Arizona seized the parents’ property and it is doubtful that they will ever get it back. 

 

The controlled media was all aglow with hate and venom that the Navarros had actually escaped the trap set up for them by the government people.  The “Spotlight” paper of Feb 28, 2000 (p. B10), had a story favorable to the plight of the Navarros.  But otherwise, the controlled media went wild with condemnation and hate.  

 

 

Dr Stanislaw Burzynski 

 

The “Spotlight” story mentioned the Dr Stanislaw Burzynski clinic in Houston which has successfully treated small children like Thomas for brain problems.  But the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has disapproved of Burzynski’s methods and have consistently pursued and persecuted him for trying to treat cancer patients by methods which the FDA has not authorized. 

 

The Feb 24, 2001, Coast to Coast AM program with Barbara Simpson had a reporter on from California to discuss Burzynski and his dilemma.  In background, Burzynski is an MD, who was a former Associate Professor of Medicine at Baylor University’s School of Medicine. 

 

Back in the 1970s, he developed a treatment for cancer using a drug which was non-toxic and which would later prove to be highly successful in treating certain forms of cancer (as in the case of the brain tumor which the Navarro boy had.  This treatment has been successful in nine cases out of fifteen people treated for this cancer). 

 

So while his method was not 100% successful, it nevertheless was highly successful.  This condition was in contrast with the situation with the common FDA approved methods of cancer treatment, using the highly poisonous radiation and chemotherapy methods (which have a very high failure rate and poison patients and leave them vegetables, as in the case of brain tumors).   

 

When Dr Burzynski developed his treatment process, the state of Texas had a law in place which allowed any Texas doctor to use any treatment which, in his judgment, could contribute to healing in a sick or diseased person.  This law appealed to Burzynski, as he was not interested in going through a five or ten year process of dealing with laboratory animals and studies to meet the demands of the FDA. 

 

Since the drug he was using was non-toxic and would cause no health problems and since the Texas law granted him the freedom to use the drug, he quit his teaching post at Baylor and moved to Houston, Texas and opened a clinic to treat cancer patients.  He started at once (believing that his job was to try to heal people and he wanted to proceed in this direction in haste).  Over the years, he was highly successful. 

 

In 1983, the FDA found out about his operation and the fact that it had not approved of his methods.  However, there was no apparent legal basis to arrest him and close him down.  So federal officials looked carefully at his operation and found that some of his patients came from out of state. 

 

Some of these out of state people would arrange for a friend in Texas to go to Burzynski’s clinic and buy the medicine and mail it or ship it to them.  The FDA concluded that this created an interstate operation which subjected the doctor’s operation to federal oversight. 

 

Four times from 1983 to 1995, federal authorities went before grand juries to indict Burzynski.  The first three efforts failed; and finally, the fourth one, paid off when the grand jury made the indictment (with 75 counts of wrong doing).  The federal authorities twice had Burzynski arrested and tried.  In the doctor’s first trial, there was a hung jury.  In the second, he was acquitted. 

 

The fall out has been that the feds have not been successful in closing him and his operation down (despite their many efforts).  But with the Navarro case, it appears that the FDA has joined in with Child Protection Operations to simply try to prevent people from being treated at Burzynski’s clinic. 

 

Since the Navarros were from Arizona, the feds and CPS people were able to temporarily stop the Navarros’ efforts to treat the boy in TX. 

 

 

FDA Dishonesty 

 

Barbara Simpson (on the above cited Coast to Coast AM radio program) and her guest discussed the FDA and opened the door that this federal agency operates for and benefits the corporate pharmaceutical industry. 

 

Every time that there is a change in presidential administration in Washington and new officials are appointed at the FDA, the departing FDA people merely transfer to the corporate pharmaceutical companies where they are given high position jobs. 

 

As administrations change again, the people in the pharmaceutical companies are given jobs back in the FDA by the new administration.  The people leaving the FDA merely enter the private field of the pharmaceutical companies. 

 

Therefore, there is a rotating chair situation between the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies that they regulate.  This means that the agency works for and serves the corporate pharmaceutical industry.  Consequently, there is some question about the honesty and integrity of the FDA from the standpoint of serving the public interest. 

 

 

The Navarro Boy, Revisited 

 

Regardless, the FDA and CPS people were not going to let Burzynski treat little Thomas (if they had their way).  So, what was to happen on this Navarro child? 

 

Of course, if the CPS people got their hands on the boy, the child would be subjected to the approved medical ideas on healing.  If the kid died or was permanently injured, there would be no allowance for complaints against the doctors and their bad, AMA approved, healing practices (as described in former chapters). 

 

If the parents did successfully keep the child away from the government bureaucrats, they had better have success with their alternative healing methods.  If the child died or was permanently injured by the alternative methods (which were not approved by the nation’s medical profession), then the state would prosecute the parents and throw the book at them. 

 

Is this reality an issue of hypocrisy?  Of course it is.  We live in a time when almost everyone is a hypocrite.  It starts with government and goes down the line to the collective people (because the people vote for and accept this nonsense).  

 

For a follow-up, it later turned out that US Congressman Dan Burton intervened on behalf of the Navarros--after George W. Bush became president.  The Jun 25, 2001, “Spotlight” (p. B-10) indicated that the boy was to be treated at the Burzynski clinic. 

 

 

Recent Motions 

 

In August 2000, another interesting case surfaced from Albany, NY where a public school placed a small seven year-old boy on Ritalin (per news reports).  The parents didn’t like what the drug was doing to the boy.  So they took him off of it.  The school contacted the local child protection bureaucrats and they filed action against the parents in court.  The court ordered the parents to put the child back on the drug. 

 

Then, to top all things off, the state of California in 2000 introduced legislation to adopt a plan (Policy Paper RE9832) of the American Academy of Pediatrics which would require family doctors to question and report on small children about their parents, their habits, do they spank the child, do they have guns in the house etc (“The Ultimate Privacy Protection Guide,” p. 73). 

 

Obviously, more intrusive spying and controlling measures are on the way. 

 

 

Child Protection Tactics 

 

The Jul-Aug 1999 “Jubilee” (p. 18) had some comments upon the tactics used by various child protective services.  It would be well to acknowledge these techniques because they closely resemble the actions followed in brainwashing and indoctrination programs (to be addressed in a later chapter). 

 

Upon gaining possession of a child, the CPS people will first separate and isolate the child from the parents by refusing or limiting visitations and contacts between the parents and the child.  The CPS goal here is to break the relationship and loving bond between the parents and the child. 

 

Next, CPS begins a program of intimidation against the parents that they are unfit to raise the child.  They also begin to program the child to believe that the child is no longer loved by the parents and that the parents are bad people. 

 

The third tactic is called overload.  It involves keeping parents and the child separated and keeping the parents busy running back and forth to court hearings, parenting classes, therapy sessions, counseling, psychiatric evaluations and other worthless endeavors until the parents are exhausted and beat down. 

 

The destruction phase is next where the CPS people completely destroy the bond between the parents and child.  In this stage, the goal is to make both the parents and the child totally hate each other. 

 

CPS people have a theory of reunification between the child and parents.  But as the “Jubilee” notes, this stage is never reached because the CPS system (social workers, juvenile court employees, juvenile attorneys, therapists, psychiatrists and other contracted employees of the child theft business) need customers/children to stay in business and justify the payrolls they receive. 

 

Thus, the exercise is dragged on for as long as possible so that all the involved people can make as much money out of the system as is possible (the CPS costs are now pegged at $12 billion annually--per the Jul 24, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 14).  With this much money involved, reunification is the last thing in the world this mass of government workers want. 

 

 

And Incompetence 

 

Along with their enormous focus upon getting more money and more employees, the child protection people and agencies are grossly incompetent. 

 

A good illustration of this problem was outlined in the May 10, 2002, “The Week” (p. 3) which noted that a five year old girl was missing from social workers of the Florida Department for Children and Families for over a year before the status of the child was determined. 

 

This Florida CPS operation seized the child and her sister from her mother.  Social workers placed the two girls in a caretaker home.  A social worker filed false reports that the children were OK.  A year passed and finally the Florida child protection people discovered the missing child.  Police expressed fear that the missing child had probably been murdered. 

 

But cases like this one does not really reflect the true mentality and efficiency of most child protection operations.  The most classic case of all will now be presented. 

 

 

Classic Stupidity and Evil 

 

The Rush Limbaugh radio talk show of May 19, 2000, mentioned one of the most grossly stupid and asinine events in American history--as actually happening in modern America in May 2000.  It was tragic beyond description. 

 

There was a couple in Durham, North Carolina who adopted an orphan girl to raise.  Also, there was the Connell Watkins child psychology operation in Evergreen, Colorado which offered its services and wisdom about the new age to presumably adoptive parents. 

 

The adoptive mother involved in NC had the child for awhile and she wished to “bond” the child to her.  So she came into contact with the Colorado company.  

 

The Colorado company had a program for $7,000 to bond an adopted child to the adoptive parents--which consisted of wrapping and binding the child completely in a large blanket and pillows.  Presumably, this exercise would duplicate and simulate the birth of a child and it was called a “rebirthing” procedure for customers (amazingly, plainly stupid people can be conned into believing this nonsense). 

 

So Jeane Newmaker, the mother, paid the money and took the girl (named Candace) to Colorado so that she could be “rebirthed” in order to supposedly bind her to Jeane. 

 

Hence, the girl was tied up and covered with the blanket and pillows. While bound up, the poor girl cried out some nine or ten times that she could not breath and that she was dying.  The brilliant child psychologists ignored her cries of desperation. 

 

All at once, she became silent.  The Colorado company operator left her bound for some thirty more minutes before finally releasing her.  But she was colored blue and covered with vomit.  She had been suffocated.  She was rushed to the hospital and pronounced dead.  The state of CO said that they would file child abuse actions against the company people and mother involved in this exercise. 

 

This whole story is too unbelievable to be true.  But it is true.  Is it possible that there are actually adult humans/humanoids with this mentality who are in business and offering such incredibly irresponsible and stupid services to the public.  Well yes--there are.  There is no limit to what man will do to make money.  And if there are gullible, stupid people out there who will shell the money out, so be it. 

 

 

More on This Case 

 

But there were a couple of other features about this tragic incident which must be acknowledged.  First of all, where was the national media coverage on this event and where were the president of the United States and the leading Christian theologians (like Billy Graham, etc)?  Did the people in charge of this nation believe that this event was significant enough to be told to the public and nationally condemned?  No! 

 

Well, if someone shot a ten year child with a gun, it would be all over the controlled media (unless the shooter was a federal agent).  Slick himself or his press secretary would come out with public proclamations of the evils of guns and how bad the murder was.  Tragically, for truth’s sake, none of the national media or leaders publicly had much at all to say about this calamity.  Most of them kept their mouths shut! 

 

“Newsweek” of June 5, 2000 (p. 65), briefly mentioned this event in a half page article--though it never fully explained what happened.  The focus of this effort was more on discussing the so-called “rebirthing” technique and defending it as an intelligent process with many pro comments (supposedly, the article was balanced since it also offered a “few” con remarks). 

 

Psychologist Ronald Federici says the procedure makes no psychological or neurological sense.  He adds that it is closely akin to Witchcraft.  This writer agrees that it sounds like Witchcraft (by trying to bind a person to someone else, beyond the spheres of what nature provides in the true sense of a mother-child relationship).  In the case of Candace, she was already traumatized in her years as an orphan in hurt. 

 

 

No One Seemed to Care 

 

And where was the child protective services when an event like this can actually take place?  Surely, with all of the money being spent on child protection, someone receiving this money could monitor and keep abreast of what all is going on in the field.  Certainly, the Colorado company must have advertised its stupid and evil services.  The word was out on this business and what they were doing. 

 

If the NC woman found out about the process, why didn’t child protection people in CO, NC or the US at large learn of this stupidity and take some action?  

 

In other words, the Colorado company should have been closed down before it had a chance to murder an innocent, little girl.  But no, everybody in power ignored the company and their process of making money (after all, money is the name of the game in Christendom). 

 

So the great Christian theologians, politicians, government officials, the controlled national media, doctors, health authorities, lawyers, judges, Slick and Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, George W. Bush, and everybody in power in this sick culture and society turned their backs on this whole incident.  Not only did they fail to prevent it in the first place, but they ignored it after it happened.  Limbaugh mentioned it only as a fluke. 

 

Well, what will happen to the Colorado people who dreamed up this insanity.  They hired a mass of smart lawyers who could go into court and ultimately either beat the rap or get them off with very little prison time.  Whereas these people should be tried for murder and executed at the hands of the state, they never faced any serious problems.  Certainly, any jail time served will ultimately be minimal.

 

These murderers can count on being free within a few years (as is true with other murderers, pedophiles, rapists, etc--who normally can count on never being put to death, as the Torah demands).  As an after fact, the two “therapists” involved were found guilty in their trial and given a sentence of 16 years (Jun 29, 2001, “The Week,” p. 5). 

 

With the way prison time is calculated (as just a percentage of actual time), time off for “good behavior” and an early parole, these two murderers will be out in no time at all.  Yes, this is Christian justice and hypocrisy (under the guidance of powerful, plutocratic, Amalekite bankers/masters, of course). 

 

The “Newsweek” remarks ended by quoting Watkins’ supporters who said the incident was a “tragedy, not a crime.”  Watkins’ attorney said no one should be charged.  Since this case is par for the course in our modern “enlightened” society, the few Americans who learn of it will merely yawn and go back to sleep. 

 

 

Al Gore’s Plans for the Future 

 

Although it must be acknowledged that the US educational system has become worthless because of educators, like the previously mentioned John Dewey (especially, in the context of outcome based education), the nation’s leaders continue to push it upon the gullible, ignorant and uninformed public. 

 

The latest person to come out with a strange stance on US education has been former Vice-President Al Gore who was running for president in 2000.  On Aug 12, 1999, Gore announced his latest thinking, as illustrated in an article by Bill Sammon in “The Washington Times” of Aug 16-22, 1999, on “Gore:  Make it illegal to drop out of high school.” 

 

This Gore position involved passing a new federal law which will further take over the schools and demand that all American children must graduate from high school (obviously, in the context of outcome based education) or be guilty of a federal crime. 

 

Gore did not focus upon questions of academics and whether all students have the brain power to assimilate material.  Of course, this point is moot in the context of outcome based education, which is not teaching academics anyway.  Per the new approach in education, students will be continuously remedied until they adopt the previously described, new, outcome based goals and graduate. 

 

While Gore and the other national leaders have had time and energy to sit around and dream up stupidity, like the above, what a tragedy it is that he and the others never have time to criticize and condemn the hypocrisy, evil and stupidity of real monsters, like the Colorado company that murdered the little NC girl, described above. 

 

 

The Results of Outcome Based Education 

 

Since the teachers and schools have been by-passing the teaching of academic subjects (like reading, writing and arithmetic), school children all over America and particularly in the public schools are being graduated regularly who are virtually dumb robots, incapable of functioning in the intellectual arena. 

 

With the schools coming apart at the seams, professional educators have been in a quandary on what to do to try to correct the dilemma.  They have tried to introduce various new teaching methods (like more participation by students in group studies) and even altering traditional approaches to important subjects like mathematics. 

 

For years now, parents have tried to rationalize how the schools abandoned the historic approach of rote learning in reading (by syllables for a new concept in whole word recognition) and mathematics (with students memorizing their multiplication tables, etc, in preference for a new math). 

 

The latest math scheme involves something called “whole math” which involves a self discovery process, apparently with teachers only being guides.  It is being pushed by the National Science Foundation which receives federal funding.  For an assessment of this new approach, “The Washington Times” of Aug 16-22, 1999 (p. 19), had a report by Joyce Howard Price on “Parents say ‘whole math’ doesn’t add up.” 

 

Price quoted a number of people, including mathematicians and groups like Mathematically Correct and Math Choice, to demonstrate that this new math simply doesn’t make any sense and won’t work. 

 

David Klein, a Professor of Mathematics at California State University at Northridge said the new program “only dumbs down and water down (math education)... From what I’ve seen, they are junk for everybody.” 

 

Obviously, the programs would seem to be the very thing that national leaders are looking for if they will dumb students down.  That seems to be one of the primary focuses of the New World Order, as will be described in later chapters.  No wonder it will soon be possible to impose the mark of the beast on a zombie class of people. 

 

 

The Modern Reaction to Dumbing Down 

 

Whereas student results on various IQ and proficiency tests have been declining rapidly in the last 50 years, the thinkers and shakers on the education scene have been scratching their heads on what to do about the very obvious dumbing down of modern students. 

 

Since IQ and SAT scores could not be increased or even leveled off without cheating, the newest scheme has been to dumb down the tests so that tests/questions common 50 years ago for very small children are now routinely used to test much older children in greatly higher grades (per Peter Kershaw, of the Heal Our Land Ministry of Branson, MO).  Thus, tests are manipulated to show higher scores than reality. 

 

Despite the manipulations, the scores are staying flat or going down.  A news report in the Oct 28, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) noted that recently the Bush Department of Education had bragged about US spending on education going up from 1996 to 2003.  Yet, since 1996, various test scores for children have stayed flat or went down. 

 

 

Some More Perceptive Comments 

 

A reader’s letter from a man (Jim Neal of Florida) in the June 1999 “Idaho Observer” (p. 20) perhaps best illustrated what has happened to education in the US since outcome based education took over the schools.  Neal was a former instructor in the military and a school teacher himself.  So he is a man with some qualifications. 

 

The Florida man asserted that graduating students today cannot assimilate multiple facts to arrive at a workable solution (i.e. they can’t think), cannot (read and) interpret written documentation (instructions and procedures), cannot perform basic math calculations, cannot deal with fractional dimensions on a blueprint and cannot express themselves verbally, other than to gripe and complain. 

 

Going on, he said that failing a student today is out of the question, as the student is crutched to the next higher grade in a hope that remedial sessions will be the student’s salvation (for learning).  Academic barometers and standards have been abandoned (or lowered) to accommodate those who can’t cut it. 

 

Neal noted that important academic subjects and absolutes have been replaced with subjects related to third world cultures and the lifestyles of people in Bongo Bongo land.  American educators have determined that it is their job to make students socially adaptable for the global village. 

 

Finally, he reflected upon his days when he graduated from high school in the 1950s.  He said that US Navy technical manuals were then written at the tenth grade level.  In the 1960s, the same manuals were written at a seventh grade level. 

 

Apparently now, they are written at a fifth grade level with plenty of cartoons.  As Neal concluded, it will only get worse as education is left in the quagmire and the mercy of a doom and eroding system. 

 

Even the US Department of Education now acknowledges that 60% of US high school seniors lack even a basic knowledge of US history (Jun 3, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).  So things are getting worse instead of better. 

 

 

Why? 

 

Another supposedly unrelated reader’s letter in the Jul 5, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 23) actually answered the why for the above deterioration in the public schools.  This one, by a Dr. James J. Famico of Georgia, said that the public schools approve of doctrinaire schooling or simply cannot distinguish the difference between education and indoctrination (possibly ending up with a presence of both).  

 

Famico went on to note the disparity of facts and history.  He said that it is almost criminally negligent for the schools to have programs which suggest a basis of fact with a distortion of history; thus hiding a hidden agenda of mind control. 

 

He added that school children are too inexperienced to discriminate between the true facts of an historical event and those of an exaggerated report of that event.  Even many teachers cannot differentiate between fact and misinformation. 

 

This reader’s letter involved did not specifically mention precise examples.  But the writer of this study can think of several.  Perhaps one of the best illustrations is the push by modern educators to teach that there were ancient Black civilizations--sometimes even more advanced than White civilizations.  The focus is typically on Egypt as fitting into this category. 

 

As elsewhere discussed herein, there never was a Black civilization in world history--anywhere.  Actually, the ancient Egyptians were so called Caucasoids--evidently largely White with some presence of Yellow or Brown genes (because many were descendants of Mitzraim, a son of Ham). 

 

Numerous archeological finds have proven that the early Egyptians were a White race.  Many of them were blond and blue eyed.  Over the years they brought in Black slaves and miscegenated with them.  Today’s modern Egyptians are Arabs with a decided presence of Black genes.  Manifestly, the contemporary, modern, Egyptian people are far removed form the ancient Egyptians. 

 

Ancient Portugal, Rome and Athens all followed the same course when their formerly White inhabitants miscegenated with Blacks, Reds and Browns to produce their modern peoples.  The current Portuguese, Romans and Greeks are entirely different peoples than their ancient counterparts. 

 

 

Altering History 

 

The importance of these remarks on race is that all of a sudden, information like the above, can no longer be found in school textbooks and encyclopedias (though such data was once present--even in the early “Encyclopedia Britannicas”). 

 

With the push for indoctrinating children with political correctness in the post WWII period, truth has been edited out of the books; so that lies and deceptions can be fed into the developing minds of little children (as a part of outcome based education). 

 

Hence, modern American children are given a diet of stories about an ancient, Black civilization in Egypt and the presence of great Black heroes throughout history--like leading patriots in the Revolutionary War, leading gunfighters and citizens of the Old West and on and on.  The truth is that historically Blacks had virtually no role to play in anything except as working slaves and later as shoeshine boys and maids. 

 

 

The Fall-Out of Racial Integration 

 

The writer of this study at hand would go on to add that another, primary, school problem in America arose in the 1950s with school integration and the take-over of the public schools by the US government.  Local people totally lost control.  In order to accommodate Blacks, who could not hack it academically, standards plunged. 

 

Actually, in many of the inner cities, teachers learned that they had better pass their uncontrollable, Black students or otherwise, they would get mugged, assaulted or maybe murdered (and women teachers raped). 

 

In any case, the focus has been on an indoctrination of students to accept and justify the new social views of humanism and the brotherhood of man theology, so prevalent in Christianity. 

 

With the federal take-over of education (first public education and then private education as well), the planners and schemers, under the motivation and direction of evil Amalekites who passionately hate this nation and its people, produced outcome based education which has predominated in American schools for years now. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 327--Christian Humanism and Children IV

 

 

The Thinking of Seventh Graders 

 

In his book, quoted previously, J. R. Nyquist presented some modern thinking by 7th graders in answering some true and false questions (“Origins of the 4th World War,” p. 119).  For instance, the students were asked to answer the following: 

 

(1) I have cheated on a major test this year--15 said false while 6 said true.  (2) Communists are bad--16 said false while 5 affirmed true (with much laughter).  (3) Good and evil are a matter of opinion--4 replied false while 17 responded true.  (4) Cheating is wrong--9 said false while 12 replied true. 

 

Manifestly, something is fundamentally wrong with modern education in America.  The above answers prove it! 

 

 

More Dishonesty in School 

 

While these dishonest 7th graders were bad, there are still more problems in school children.  A November 1997 survey of some 1,200 of the brightest high school students (all of whom planned to enter college) found that 88% of them (98% in public schools and 72% in private schools) said that they cheat on school work and that cheating was rampant in their schools. 

 

Since this 1997 survey, things have only grown worse.  “The Washington Times” of Sep 13-19, 1999 (p. 1, 25), had a story by Andrea Billups on “Student cheating is reaching epidemic proportions” which said that the problem is on the rise among preteens, teens, and college students. 

 

Billups cited several studies which show that 66% of sixth grade students cheat in school.  By the 11th grade, the figure rises to 93%.  In public universities, some 64% admitted to cheating and some 58% acknowledged that they plagiarized material.  Murray Gaylord, Vice-President of the Ad Council said that cheating has become so commonplace that it is now accepted behavior by students. 

 

As another follow-up, the Nov 11, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a summary of recent findings of a Josephson Institute of Ethics which showed that children today are more likely to cheat, steal and lie than kids of ten years ago.  A survey of 12,000 high school students showed that the numbers who have cheated on tests in the past year were up from 61% in 1992 to 74% in 2002.  Shoplifting was up from 31% to 38%. 

 

And why shouldn’t children lie and cheat in school?  The former president of the United States, who was supposed to be not only its leader but the moral example for youths to look up to and follow, was and is himself a known liar, perjurer and cheat (and evidently, a murderer as well).  Quite naturally, American Christian children are following the example set for them by the former national leader of the United States. 

 

 

The Latest 

 

Obviously, morality, ethics and honesty are collapsing in American schools.  Things are going from bad to worse.  To demonstrate this tragedy, the “US News & World Report” magazine of Nov 22, 1999 (p. 54-66), had a report by Carolyn Kleiner and Mary Lord on “the Cheating Game.” 

 

This story had some interesting statistics about college students from a recent USNWR poll.  For instance, 84% of students believe that they need to cheat to get ahead in the world today.  Some 90% say cheaters never pay the price.  Another 90% say that when people see someone cheating, they never turn him in. 

 

In terms of homework, 63% of college students say parents should help in their kids’ homework, while 20% of parents think its fair to do it.  Over 90% say politicians cheat often.  Who else do the 90% think are cheaters?  They believe that the media and high schoolers are cheaters (they should know). 

 

The Internet has revolutionized the cheating game and made plagiarizing a breeze.  Studies, term papers, writings, dissertations, etc are available at $5 a page to anyone who wants them.  Original material can be bought for $17.95 a page and up.  It is now easier than ever to avoid school work. 

 

Before the Internet, cheaters like the beloved Martin Luther King Jr actually had to do some work in order to steal and plunder the writings of other people.  But the “Black reverend” certainly did it successfully in college in Massachusetts when he stole whole papers and writings from others (including his own doctrinal dissertation).  King even stole the words of others to use in his popular speeches.  He was a total thief! 

 

Since the supposedly exemplary preacher never faced any punishment or set backs in his career and since great leaders like John F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton have successfully stolen and cheated during their entire lives, why should anyone get upset with what’s now happening across America. 

 

USNWR suggests that cheating now starts in elementary school and continues with people into their adulthood.  In effect, “Everyone’s doing it, from grade school to graduate school” (and beyond).  After all, the article said that studies show that students who cheat are likely to continue cheating beyond school, as a way of life.  Since 84% of college students now cheat, what does this say for America’s future? 

 

 

The Lying Culture 

 

Incidentally, this practice of lying and deceiving little children, in the context of alleged Black history, achievements and civilizations (now on-going in modern schools, discussed earlier), is a far larger problem today than perhaps anytime heretofore. 

 

Today’s modern culture and society is built on a system of lies, primarily because American politicians and government leaders lie, right and left, without much or any concern for truth.  And they get away with it and are rarely held accountable (except as happened with Richard Nixon, which was a fluke). 

 

Of course, the obvious lies, deceptions and distortions of national leaders (like the president, court justices and leading members of Congress) mean that the whole culture and society will pick upon it and especially young children.  The conduct of national leaders becomes the example or role model for children to emulate. 

 

It’s hard to say exactly when American politicians and government leaders first began lying to the public as public policy.  But certainly, it was full blown during the Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt administrations.  FDR certainly was a classic liar and deceitful fraud. 

 

 

The FDR Lies 

 

For example, Roosevelt began plotting and planning WWII as early as 1934-35 (unintentionally brought out in the Jul 5, 1999, “US News & World Report” story [p. 28] on “The Warrior Class” of West Point and how FDR could see WWII ahead in 1934 when he took action to then double the number of incoming military cadets at the service academies). 

 

Consequently, when Japan signed the tripartite agreement with Germany and Italy in 1940, she sealed her fate for destruction.  From that day forward, the future of all three of them was in jeopardy. 

 

The conniving US President Roosevelt had his sights set upon Germany, primarily, because the Jewish Amalekite Schicklgruber had run FDR’s Amalekite cousin bankers out of Germany and the Amalekites were mad (this was a rare event in history with an Amalekite leader turning against the Amalekite bankers, but it happened when Schicklgruber turned on the very people who financed his rise to power). 

 

It is also manifest that the Amalekite FDR’s hatred toward Germany was prompted, in part, because that Schicklgruber and the Nazi leaders were an obstacle to the racial amalgamation of man--a primary goal of leading Amalekites for 3,500 years.  Leaders like Roosevelt and Churchill were determined to crush the Amalekite Schicklgruber and all that he stood for. 

 

Roosevelt completely engineered the Japanese attack on Peal Harbor by delivering ultimatums to Japan that they would have to comply with his geo-political demands or face the consequences of his embargo (which he had in place on Dec 7, 1941), plus other actions designed to destroy the Japanese economy.  

 

Obviously, Japan decided to strike first.  Importantly, the Americans knew in advance every important Japanese move and plan because of having broken their communications codes. 

 

Not only did FDR and his war mongering buddies in Washington know about the coming Japanese attack (after all, FDR planned, promoted and encouraged it), but they had intelligence which indicated that it probably would be at Pearl Harbor--as various US military review boards and historians now acknowledge (Nov 12, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 8). 

 

Therefore, US leaders in Washington knew about the impending Japanese attack in advance.  It’s just that the military leaders in Hawaii (Admiral Husband Kimmel and General Walter C. Short) were not told.  But then, when the attack came, Roosevelt shrewdly blamed the military people in Hawaii for the debacle and removed them.  FDR was a master at lies and deception and needed a scapegoat for Pearl. 

 

Incidentally, any number of historians have come along and set the record straight that neither Kimmel or Short were really guilty of the Pearl Harbor disaster.  Finally, on May 25, 1999, the US Senate absolved both officers and requested that they be restored to their ranks (although Kimmel is now dead). 

 

The Senate said that the handling of intelligence in Washington was characterized by “ineptitude...limited coordination...ambiguous language and lack of clarification and follow-up, among other serious faults” (Nov 22, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 10, in an article on “Victory for Revisionist History”). 

 

 

Slick is the Same 

 

Slick Clinton is of the same caliber as FDR.  He is one of the most notorious liars in public leadership in American history (even exceeding FDR).  His constant lies about his sexual encounters are only a very small part of his acts of deception.  His lies completely run the whole gauntlet of his life and being.  He is a total liar (both in and out of the White House) and it is questionable that he indeed can tell the truth. 

 

Small children listening to his constant lies are not exactly stupid.  Many of them are well aware that Clinton is a notorious liar and that he gets away of it.  This is pathetic because of the role model impact that he has upon children.  A few of the Clinton lies will be assessed in later appendices herein. 

 

Suffice to say, he is one of the most pathological liars in American history.  Everybody knows he lies at every opportunity.  Obviously, little children have the same perception.  Hence, lying and deceiving are part of the modern, Western, Christian culture and civilization.  Everybody does it! 

 

Just as the FDR engineered lies and deceptions were programmed to engage the US in a World War, Slick has been planning the same strategy for America (as will be addressed in some detail in the later appendices on Clinton).  As will be elaborated upon in later remarks, Slick is not the type of a person to voluntarily give up or turn down power. 

 

Thus, Bill will pull out all of the stops and tell all of the lies necessary to regain power--as soon as he can maneuver it (perhaps from a Hillary presidency, a new constitution or at the UN).  Either in the US or at the UN, Slick plans on resuming power, and surely in the form of tyranny--at least, over all Americans, and maybe even over the whole world if possible. 

 

Tragically, Slick Clinton and his lying predecessors (FDR, JFK, LBJ etc) are/were pathetic examples of liars for American children to learn from and emulate. 

 

Since American politicians and government leaders lie and deceive the public and get away with it, the whole practice of deception has become part and parcel of the modern, American culture.  Obviously, historians and the schools would pick up on and follow the same cultural practice that is accepted and approved by the generic, American population. 

 

 

Cheating and Lying Teachers 

 

Beyond the dishonest and crooked politicians and government leaders, like FDR and Clinton, there is still an even greater problem which these leaders have promoted--sometimes innocently; but also, sometimes in a diabolical act of evil and deception. 

 

One of the things which Slick Clinton seized upon when he came to the US presidency in early 1993 was to use statistics to fool and deceive the American people about reality. 

 

As outlined in several places in this study, the Slick Clinton Administration had been altering, and manipulating statistics about all kinds of things to deceive the people and make them believe that things were good; when, in fact, things were not so good.  There is no question about it, the Clinton team altered statistics about monetary, economic, social and government matters right and left. 

 

Remarks herein have already or will be focused upon Slick’s manipulation of the US inflation rate, alleged budget surpluses, employment and so forth (all of which were being altered by Slick’s people).  Seeing how incredibly gullible and ignorant the voting public really is, Bill even had programs underway to alter social statistics. 

 

Elsewhere herein, there are some words about the alleged “decreasing crime rates.”  Several actions were initiated by Clinton to achieve this.  For one thing, these statistics are supposedly compiled based upon data submitted by police forces across the US.  Learning that promotions and pay increases come when statistics look good, many police chiefs have been altering data which they submit to Washington. 

 

With an obvious view of making schools look better, the Clinton team also compiled statistics on American education.  Much of this raw data came from principals and school administrators around America.  The leadership in Washington and in US state houses came up with financial incentive programs to make school administrators supposedly try to improve the education of children under their control. 

 

In an article by Barbara Kantrowitz and Daniel McGinn on “When Teachers Are Cheaters,” in the June 19, 2000, “Newsweek” (p. 48), there was a remark that some US educators could receive a $25,000 bonus if the educational test scores of students improve under their tenure.  Conversely, some (few) educators could lose their jobs if test scores did not improve. 

 

The Clinton people were pushing for statistics to improve and deceive the public.  Naturally, teachers, principals and school administrators got the message.  And since they were/are the primary people compiling and submitting statistics to higher authorities, they then began altering the statistics which they submitted upstairs. 

 

The “Newsweek” article noted that one elementary school principal in Potomac, MD was forced to resign in May 2000 when parents complained that their children were coached to give the right answers on a state of Maryland test. 

 

In another matter, Slick Clinton came out and publicly praised a school in Columbus, Ohio for alleged improvements.  Later, it was revealed that state officials were investigating charges of cheating by the Columbus teachers to make the statistics look good. 

 

New York City got into the act recently when news surfaced that four dozen teachers from 30 schools stood accused of urging students to cheat on various standardized city and state tests. 

 

It’s bad enough that children are learning to lie, cheat and deceive in order to pass in school, but now school teaches and administrators have picked upon the practice in order to get $25,000 bonuses.  Since Slick himself is a liar and cheat and since he sets the pace for modern American education, it was only natural that everyone in the system would pick up on his leadership. 

 

 

Everybody Lies and Cheats 

 

Thus, just about everybody is now lying and cheating somewhere and somehow.  Clinton and his team lie and cheat.  George W. Bush and his men tell lies and cheat (as will be proven in later chapters herein).  Other government leaders and bureaucrats lie and cheat. 

 

Businesses lie and cheat.  School teachers and administrators lie and cheat.  The police lie and cheat.  Husbands and wives lie and cheat on each other.  Parents and the general public lie and cheat.  And of course, the children are learning in school on how to lie and cheat to get ahead in life.  

 

A University of Massachusetts’ study released to the media on Dec 15, 1999, said that children, ages 11 to 16 in school, say that telling lies is a social skill which helps individuals get along better with other persons.  School children who tell a lot of lies are more popular than those who do not.  The study also found that girls are better liars (more convincing) than boys. 

 

Thus, the practice of lying increases popularity in school.  Hence, children have come to believe that lying pays off.  Possibly, this has been one of the fall-outs of the Bill Clinton presidency.  Students have learned from him and are becoming compulsive liars at a very early age with no concern over the impact of their lies. 

 

Therefore, the whole Western, Christian culture is one of lies, cheating and deception.  And it starts early among children in school.  Lying is as American as motherhood and apple pie, as proven by the nation’s acceptance of the master liar, Slick Clinton.  Surely, YHWH will hold the people accountable for this evil. 

 

 

Another Note on Public Education 

 

It would be unfair to leave these remarks on current public education problems without focusing on just “some” of the most stupid and ridiculous aspects of modern American education.  It must be understood that a fair observer can criticize and condemn modern, American education all day and never really cover the multitude of problems and sicknesses that characterize it. 

 

This writer went to a rural country school in 1940-1943 which had grades one to eight in one room with one teacher.  In 1944, the school added a second teacher and expanded to two rooms.  The school was two miles from my home and like all other students, it was necessary to walk back and forth to school. 

 

There was no indoor plumbing and the stove was an old wood stove.  The teacher built the fire, cleaned the building, taught the classes, disciplined the students, acted as nurse, counselor and all of the rest.  She lived next door to the school and she categorically served at the pleasure of the local parents.  She either hacked it with them or she was fired. 

 

There was a county school superintendent at the county seat some twenty miles away where my teacher’s monthly check was prepared and mailed to her.  But this county school authority had little or no functions beyond writing the checks and buying a few school supplies for the county schools. 

 

However, with the close of WWII and with school integration, particularly in the 1950s, the liberal thinking of FDR finally took over to utterly change the whole fabric of American education.  The first motion was a consolidation of schools.  Small, local, rural schools were all of a sudden out. 

 

The next change was the use of school buses to bus children all over the country to get them into the big consolidated schools or achieve a so-called objective of racial integration and balance.  A third motion was the establishment of a giant bureaucracy at each of these consolidated schools. 

 

Each school had to have a principal, one or more vice principals, one or more deans and counselors, a nurse and health department, many bus drivers, janitors, maintenance people, clerks, secretaries, accountants, time keepers, federal grant coordinators, program managers and assistants, curriculum developers and on and on.  There was a loss in focus upon teachers and student learning. 

 

 

The Taxation Question 

 

To fund this superstructure, taxes have been successively raised on the middle income tax payers, beyond the point of logic and rational.  In order to keep getting gigantic increases in funding, all that the school boards and departments of education need to do is go to the various legislatures and county managers and ask for more money on the premise that the children need it. 

 

Even in those districts where the people tried to oppose the federally mandated education system, the people quickly found out that federal courts would step in and arbitrarily and capriciously order the local school system to comply with the federal demands. 

 

For example, Prince Edward County, VA tried to close their public schools in the 1950-1960s over desegregation rulings.  The federal court said no and that they had to pay taxes and keep the public schools open. 

 

As outlined in former comments, the people in Kansas City, MO tried to oppose the plans of the federal schemers by refusing to vote a local tax increase to fund the federal demands for more and more racial integration.  Of course, the court started with massive bussing.  But even this scheme fell short of federal wishes, since there simply were not enough White children to be bused in. 

 

So the federal judge decided that if the Kansas City schools were built into the newest, the biggest and presumably the best, they would attract White students in the suburbs and bring on the desired level of racial integration and mix.  To accomplish this plan, some $2 billion was needed.  The local people were in no mood to vote tax increases to pay for it. 

 

Thus, the federal court stepped in and ordered the tax increase upon the local citizens arbitrarily.  In 1990, the constitutionality of the court’s action went to the US Supreme court which upheld it as constitutional. 

 

With the success in Kansas City, the liberal judges in New Jersey and Vermont decided in more recent years that they would order tax increases in more rich counties and areas to pay for schools in poorer areas.  This “spread-the-wealth around” scheme will surely be upheld in the courts, which simply have no understanding of what the Constitution actually says. 

 

 

The Busing Problem 

 

With all of this new thinking in busing kids around, no one seemed to bother with the fact that little children need exercise.  In the old days, they got needed exercise by walking back and forth to school.  But with school buses, children no longer walk.  They grow fat and develop health problems because they don’t get needed and appropriate exercise. 

 

Hence, corrupt politicians (from the guidance of the ruling Amalekite bankers/masters operating from behind the scenes) sit around and scheme up methods of having midnight basketball and on and on in attempts to do something to not only keep the kids busy and entertained, but to also give them a desired daily workout. 

 

There is another fallout to this stupid busing scheme which often includes busing to achieve racial integration and amalgamation, in accordance with some federal court order.  Gasoline costs both money and pollutes the atmosphere to help destroy life and health on this planet, as described in a former chapter.  Automobiles have become one of the great scourges on man, as described in prior chapters. 

 

Back in the 1970s, when the so-called Arab oil embargo was underway and when people had to stand in line for sometimes over an hour to buy some gas, guess what?  The schools always had and always would have gasoline to bus children all over the country and for hours every day. 

 

In other words, the stupid sun worship society may not have gasoline to go back and forth to work and children may need exercise, but the schools are going to have first priority on the available gasoline and the busses will run every school day. 

 

No way will the corrupt rulers allow a change in this insanity.  It was designed for certain outcome based purposes--to include the destruction of both the children and the schools. 

 

 

Education Unions 

 

Education unions have sprung up to help in this push to get more and more of the taxpayers’ money.  Coupled with this political action work, these unions have made it almost impossible to fire teachers.  They now have tenure and work less and less for more and more money.  If some required duty is not in their job descriptions, they won’t do it (in contrast to the old days when teachers did it all). 

 

Whenever assessing the pay and benefits of school teachers, one must remember that they typically only work nine months out of the year.  Therefore, their so-called salaries do not represent a full year’s work.  Yet, they always want more and more for less and less work. 

 

Salaries for school teachers now range annually from a low of $30,265 in South Dakota to a high of $53,281 in New Jersey and this is for the just mentioned work year of nine months (Apr 22, 2002, “U.S. News & World Report,” p. 17). 

 

 

Gradualism Revisited 

 

Having mentioned gradualism in a prior chapter, in the context of the process of gun control being levied upon the American public in classic defiance of the United States Constitution and its second amendment, it should be noted that this is the overall procedure being used repeatedly in virtually all aspects of imposing the ideology of the Socialists, humanists and other liberals upon the general American public. 

 

If the Big Brother Socialists were to come out and shove many of their ideas and wishes down the throats of the American people all at once, there would be a rebellion in the streets.  But knowing the benefits of gradualism, these thinkers have been following that concept largely since the Socialist and humanist ideas began to surface in 20th century America. 

 

This gradualism often means two steps forward and one step back, if the stupid people exhibit any opposition to the process.  It’s not to say that the rulers want to necessarily take steps back.  It’s just that they are practical thinkers and realize that this might be the best methodology to eventually bring about the imposition of their warped theories on society at large. 

 

In a sense, this whole process goes back to the 19th century Fabian Socialist Society of Great Britain which adopted the slow moving and homely tortoise as its emblem.  In her book on “Fabian Freeway, High Road to Socialism in the U.S.A.” (p. 1-20), Rose L. Martin wrote about the Fabians and their early philosophy to “make haste slowly.”   

 

Martin said that the Fabians’ once slow and cautious pace has been gradually accelerating to a breakneck speed in the United States in the post WWII environment.  And it is because of this reality that many of the programs that once were theoretical are now becoming reality here in the late 20th century. 

 

 

Cooking a Frog 

 

This whole exercise brings to mind the process of cooking a frog.  The Oct 1997 “Bible Advocate” (p. 12) had some remarks by Richard Cress on “Frog Soup and Foul Sin” which pretty well tell the tale.  He said to take one healthy frog, normally sensitive to outward stimuli and a large saucepan with four quarts of cool water. 

 

Place the unsuspecting frog in the pan of water and put it upon a stove.  Turn the heat on very low and gradually increase the temperature.  Note, the temperature must not change too quickly or too dramatically.  It must start cool and change slowly or otherwise, the unsuspecting frog will jump out of the water and pan. 

 

The unsuspecting frog will adjust to the small temperature changes and never comprehend that he is being cooked (alive).  He will become so desensitized that he will never understand what is happening to himself.  Slowly, he will be boiled to death. 

 

The Fabian tortoise and the illustration with the frog pretty well tell the story about what has been happening in the United States since 1933 when FDR’s ideas on Socialism, liberalism and humanism gained acceptance by the masses. 

 

Today, the American people are being cooked to death with gradualism.  Surely, YHWH’s judgment on this nation is knocking at the door. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 328--Christian Humanism and Children V

 

 

Christian Schools

 

Many Christian Churches operate their own schools which provide general education to children.  Most of these private schools are substantially better than the public schools from an academic point of view.  But they are not the panacea that some persons suppose because of several inherent problems with them. 

 

For example, too many of the teachers and administrators have been trained at humanist colleges and campuses to approach education the same way as the secular public schools. 

 

Consequently, even private schools can be infected with the sicknesses and maladies of public education (to include outcome based education and even occult and New Age teachings). 

 

Next, in order to maintain a tax exempt status from the US IRS (in order to raise the needed money to operate religious schools), private religious institutions have been forced to accept and teach the same Socialist and humanist agendas found in the outcome based educational programs of public schools. 

 

Many private schools were obligated to give up their social bans on interracial dating because Washington has a racial amalgamation focus which demands that children date and have sex across racial lines.  Most schools have succumbed to this pressure because of the need for money. 

 

Bob Jones University in South Carolina resisted this incredible pressure for sometime (before finally succumbing to it in March 2000, just after presidential candidate George Bush spoke at Bob Jones). 

 

 

The Real Problem 

 

Moreover, it is obviously clear that each denominational Christian school or college will present its own denomination preferences and biases as accepted truths.  Students are routinely forced to learn denominational thinking.  For example, children attending an SDA school will get a big dose of Ellen White which can be disastrous for them in the context of learning later truth. 

 

Even when Christian schools are supposedly non-denominational, problems can still surface because the schools will teach and advocate the historic Christian position on many matters.  Usually these teachings take on many of the same humanist positions and historic sun worship practices maintained by traditional Christianity over the ages. 

 

These many problems in Christian schools, attempting to teach secular educational subjects, bring up a need for some remarks on Sunday or Sabbath School classes, Vacation Bible Schools in the summer and similar such religious orientations.  Obviously, most of the teachings in these functions are totally dedicated to Christian sun worship.  They are as deadly as a rattlesnake. 

 

Almost without exception, the teachers in these activities are extremely Scripturally shallow.  They know and understand almost nothing from the Word.  Accordingly, Christian Churches prepare and distribute “Bible Study Guides” and Sunday or Sabbath School quarterlies which teachers use as guides for the classes. 

 

In general, most of these quarterlies and guides are absolutely trash.  The only good thing that can normally be said for them is that they may quote a Scripture or two--which often is misused and misunderstood (if it even is correctly translated from an original Hebrew presentation). 

 

Beyond the few Scriptures, most of the guides or quarterlies are dedicated to presenting the same, old, Christian humanism and sun worship that forms the backbone of Christianity. 

 

For example, all or almost all Christian Churches teach the brotherhood of man (hence, ultimately, racial integration and amalgamation).  These teachings are much like those of secular, outcome based education where the goal is to teach racial integration and amalgamation. 

 

The religious teachings are in some ways even more dangerous than those of the secular public schools because children are told that such emanate from the “Bible” and from the Christian “Gawd” and “Gee-Zeus.”   With this authoritarian background, little children can readily be indoctrinated and programmed in a very wrong way. 

 

 

Jerry Falwell and the Real Danger 

 

Baptist, sun worship, leader Jerry Falwell classically illustrates one of the greatest of the pitfalls of having religious teachings in a school.  In Falwell’s paper, the “National Liberty Journal” (Nov 1999, p. 1) the well known Baptist preacher wrote an article on “The Ten Commandments Go Back To School.” 

 

In it, Falwell declared that he had found a way for the Ten Commandments to go back into the US public schools so that once again students could be taught the “laws of God” while giving hernias to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and their anti-Christian ilk. 

 

While Falwell’s words may sound good to the largely uninformed and gullible Christian person in America, his advice has many obvious problems with it.  At the start, he clearly has it wrong because he has not found any way to get the Ten Commandments back into America’s schools. 

 

Next, neither him or Christianity (collectively) have ever taught and advocated the laws of YHWH, as found in the Torah--to include the Ten Commandments.  Sure, he and his sun worshipping colleagues have hypocritically talked about the “laws of God.”  It’s just that they have never obeyed the laws of The ELOHIM.  Christian theology is at a 180 degree variance from the laws of The MOST HIGH. 

 

The fourth commandment of the Decalogue (as well as the others) proves conclusively that Falwell, the Baptist Church and Christianity are all in conflict with the Torah.  They may talk about it.  But they don’t obey it and there is no way that they would or have ever allowed the Torah to be taught in the public schools. 

 

Of course, such teachings would be the greatest thing that could happen to youngsters in the United States.  It’s just that it has never happened before and never will happen under Christian, sun worship leadership.  Christianity is not in league with the laws, teachings and instructions in the Torah.  They are miles from it. 

 

Obviously, it is this true condition within Christendom which hinders and damages the value and credibility of so-called Christian private schools--to even include those which do display the Ten Commandments in their buildings and facilities.  When it comes time to teach those mitzwot, the Christian teachers will hypocritically teach and advocate lies, deceptions and distortions. 

 

 

The Latest Christian Confusion 

 

A Christian preacher named E. Ray Moore has formed an activist group called “Exodus 2000” (per an article by Robert Stacey McCain on “Activist says it’s time for ‘exodus’ from public schools” in the Aug 30-Sep 5, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 1). 

 

Moore said that Christians have got to come to grips with the fact that the government is not going to fix the public schools since the government is the problem.  He says that each effort only makes things worse.  The problems are “terminal,” as Moore puts it.  Thus, he calls for a Christian exodus from the public schools.  He encourages parents to put their children into Christian education. 

 

Besides Moore’s push for Christian schools, there is apparently quite a home schooling presence in his group since his colleague, Caryl Matrisciana, and her husband have home schooled their children in California.  Caryl is involved with Jeremiah Films, which sells home schooling material. 

 

The article quoted Martin Luther who said: “I am much afraid that schools will prove to be great gates of Hell unless they diligently labor in explaining the Holy Scriptures, engraving them in the hearts of youth.” 

 

To whatever extent the Scriptures used to be in the schools, in the context of prayer, recognition, teaching creation or whatever, the schools have certainly become totally secularized since the government took them over in the 1950s.  The powers that be have done their level best in the last 50 years to take religion and the Scriptures out of the schools.  And they have succeeded. 

 

 

Other Views 

 

Despite the work of Moore and his colleagues, there is quite a contrary position on public education among many leading Christian, sun worship spokespersons.  For example, the well known Dr James Dobson’s monthly magazine (put out by his ministry “Focus on the Family”) had a cover story on “Rebuilding Hope for Public Schools.” 

 

The Dobson article, by Cheri Fuller, said that as more and more Christian parents get involved and pray, rebuilding is taking place in public schools.   Manifestly, Dobson and Fuller are totally asleep at the switch.  Neither of them have the foggiest notion of what all is going on.  They probably still believe in the tooth fairy business. 

 

Even the Christian, sun worshipper Moore has some perception and understanding about reality.  Moore and his group correctly perceive that public education is terminal and that there is no hope, as things continue to deteriorate daily. 

 

Moore wisely noted that the public schools have substantially eroded the faith of Christian students.  He says that public education has become thoroughly humanistic, pagan and anti-Christian.  Yet, many leading Christians, like Dobson and others, continue to support public education and actually believe that things will get better. 

 

 

The Sick American Society 

 

When left to Adam’s own capabilities and wishes, the creation of Adam depreciates every day.  And one cannot miss this reality in the American society, culture and schools.  Surely, judgment is knocking at the door and it will come swiftly one day--maybe very soon (Rom 1:32). 

 

One more note on this subject is called for at this time.  If the left wing radicals leading the motion were just political, it would be one thing.  But with the inclusion of the Christian humanists in their work, the movement has taken a turn to the ridiculous and sick. 

 

It is amazing that persons who carry the Scriptures around (actually, they carry them around for show purposes) can attempt to use them for justification of their false ideas about things which are totally contrary to the Book.  While the Word does have instructions about the poor, race relations, etc, they are clearly different from what the Christian humanists have cooked up in their social ideas. 

 

 

Shaul on Humanism 

 

The Apostle Shaul wrote a most excellent summary of this humanism problem facing man.  In it, he observed that because Adam man has rejected The ELOHIM and His ways, purposes, laws and words in order to worship the created creature (of the different humans/humanoids), The MOST HIGH had given them up to their vile affections and to a reprobate mind (Rom 1:20-32). 

 

Once The SUPREME YHWH gave up on Adam, Adam then has turned from bad to worse.  Of course, this is precisely what has happened in the past 100 years.  The Adam kind has been and is degenerating into the level of the behemah animal with all the attendant degradations to include homosexuality, wickedness and great evil. 

 

As discussed elsewhere herein, Shaul, in his second letter to Timothy, said that in the last days, men would be “lovers of themselves (humanists), covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy” (II Tim 3:1-2).  And that’s precisely what the whole humanistic movement is.  It is a condition where men love themselves. 

 

 

Yes, Ancient Sun Worship 

 

Factually, space is too limited herein for any fair perusal of many of these themes, but suffice to say, much of modern Christian worship and Western culture and civilization is directly linked in tandem to ancient sun worship.  An honest observer can see this overwhelming presence of sun worship in just about every direction possible. 

 

One sees it in public schools, Sunday church services, Christian festivals (again, where do you think Christian Easter, Christmas and Sunday morning worship came from--the answer has been covered in previous chapters), rituals, uniforms, dress, attitudes, thinking, ideas, entertainment, images, icons, pictures, rites, diet and a host of other actions, customs and practices. 

 

The essence of the above presentation is that the public schools are bad and that parents must begin looking in other directions to fulfill their duties and commitments to their children.  In focusing attention in other directions for educating children, some parents end up with “Christian schools,” as if they are the answer. 

 

But as just noted above, Christian schools are not the answer.  Howbeit, they are a substantial improvement over the sick, depraved, pathetic, public schools.  So thinking, loving and concerned parents must look in still other directions.  As elaborated upon in former chapters, that other direction probably is home schooling, in the present context and situation. 

 

 

A Final Note 

 

The short of this topic is that the political Socialists and liberals have joined in with the Christian humanists to determine what is right for not only the American society, but indeed the whole world. 

 

Jointly, their wishes and programs have come to be called what is “politically correct” which everyone is expected to adhere to or suffer the consequences.  For the Christian humanists, this whole movement and ideology have come to be their religion and their “Gospel.” 

 

These humanists are quite serious about their “Gospel” and they could care less whether it is Scriptural or not.  Clearly, it’s a case of Adam man attempting to love his neighbour (not the Hebrew rea, as the Scriptural commandment dictates) on his terms and by his conditions.