EZEKIEL

 

and YHWH’s

 

 Judgment

 

 

for the

 

Good News

 

PEOPLE

 

 

 

VOLUME XI

 

The Evil Amalekites

 

 

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

 

 

Judgment for the

 

 

 Good News People

 

 

 

 

Volume XI--The Evil Amalekites

 

 

 

 

 

by

 

an unworthy servant

 

 

 

 

 

 

And you shall know the truth,

 

and the truth will make you free.

 

(John 8:32)

 

 

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho.  The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States.  Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

 

 

Volume XI--The Evil Amalekites

 

 

CHAPTER                                                                              PAGE

 

 

      -                  Cover Page                                                                                                         1

 

      -                  Title Page                                                                                                             2

 

      -                  Contents                                                                                                              3

 

      -                  Publisher’s Preface                                                                                           5

 

 

Part GG--Total Amalekite Depravity 

 

      154             Amalek-Edomite Depravity I                                                                             6

 

      155             Amalek-Edomite Depravity II                                                                          21

 

      156             Amalek-Edomite Depravity III                                                                         36

 

      157             The Amalekites Follow Balaam                                                                     49

 

      158             Amalek-Edomite Path of Evil                                                                         58

 

      159             Amalekite Methodology for Destruction                                                       70

 

      160             The US Change on Race                                                                               82

 

 

Part HH-Amalekite Criminals 

 

      161             Amalek-Edomites and Crime I                                                                       93

 

      162             Amalek-Edomites and Crime II                                                                    104

 

      163             Russian Amalekite Criminals I                                                                    110

 

      164             Russian Amalekite Criminals II                                                                   122

 

 

Part II--More on the Amalekites 

 

      165             Esau Versus Yakov                                                                                       137

 

      166             Amalekites Versus Arab Hatred                                                                   148

 

      167             Amalekite Hate Organizations                                                                     155

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

 

 

Publisher’s Preface

 

Greetings!  The following presentation is volume eleven of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site. 

 

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world.  In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one. 

 

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material.  It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message! 

 

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1.  It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins:  left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers). 

 

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope. 

 

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers.  May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him.  Shalom (peace) to you and yours! 

 

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 154-- Amalek-Edomite Depravity I

 

 

The Liberal Religious Motions 

 

In broaching the bad Ashkenazi Jews of European lineage (many of whom are Amalekite Khazars), it must be said that they have had a tendency for liberalization and the changing of basic Judaism.  This process has created the modern Reform and Conservative movements within Judaism.  The Reform motion is very liberal and much like many Christian Churches, which don’t believe in much of anything. 

 

There is also a Reconstructionist movement among Jews in America which is prompting some analysts to define it as a fourth major branch in Judaism (Jan 25, 2002, “Forward,” p. 1).  This new push seems to be developing among Reform Jews, and it is therefore likely a part of Reform Judaism at present (although it was founded in 1948 by Professor Mordecai Kaplan of a Conservative seminary). 

 

If this motion succeeds, it will be even more liberal and depraved than the case with the Reform movement, because It leans in the direction of denying The ELOHIM and promoting feminism and homosexuality (even ordaining women and queers as “rabbis,” as also seems to be happening in the generic Reform definition, as will be discussed below and in future chapters). 

 

Obviously, Reconstruction Judaism will appeal to the wretched Amalekites who will surely flock to it in numbers (since it is so evil and bad).  This motion will be further mentioned below and in later chapters. 

 

 

More on Reform Judaism 

 

The above comments have addressed Reform Judaism and some of its shortcomings.  Naturally, the Amalekites have flocked to this religious reference.  Not only has the Reform motion largely abandoned any sense of obedience, but they have even chosen in 1999 to welcome homosexuals into open fellowship (Jun 7, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 56). 

 

In March 2000, the North American “Reform Rabbis passed a resolution under which Reform rabbinate officially supports the decision of individual rabbis to officiate at Jewish same-sex (marriage) ceremonies, becoming the first major religious organization to sanction ceremonies for homosexual couples” (May 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 9). 

 

Possibly, the move of the above mentioned Reconstructionist movement has put some fear and concern in the Reform leadership to prompt them to also begin liberalizing in terms of queers and women.  In that sense, maybe the Reconstructionist movement will end up being a part of Reform Judaism (rather than being a separate definition). 

 

These moves are quite logical since so many Amalekites are both queers and Reform Jews (Amalekites are almost synonymous with Reform Jewry in the US--and while all are not queers, almost all approve of homosexuality). 

 

Of course, at some point in time, the evil Reform Jews would openly approve of queer marriages and accept the fags, both as members and as “rabbis” (along with the women “rabbis” that they have been ordaining for years). 

 

 

Amalekite Feminism 

 

With the enormous rush to feminism in the Reform and Reconstructionist movements, it was only time before some of these feminist Amalekites would determine to prepare their own commentary of the Torah in order to reinterpret things in accordance with modern feminism. 

 

The May 24, 2002, “Forward” (p. 15) had a report addressing this motion in a story on “Reform plans All-Woman Commentary on the Torah.”  This article quoted several Reform women “rabbis” and Lori Lefkovitz, academic director of the Kolot:  The Center for Jewish Women’s and Gender Studies at the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College in Philadelphia. 

 

Lefkovitz welcomes the new commentary and adds that “What these new commentaries have shown us is that what women bring to the text is a different sensibility, a different set of experiences and different questions, even if they are not writing as women per se.” 

 

Going on, Lori adds that the women “twist the lens of the material so that we notice different things, we see other emphases, we recover lost traditions and we hear voices that have been quieter.”  Like Yeshayahu wrote, women will destroy the paths of righteousness when they exercise leadership over men (Isa 3:12). 

 

 

Others 

 

Like the Reform Jews, the above mentioned Conservative Jews also have a European basis, but are somewhat between the Reform and Orthodox. 

 

Next, mention must be made of the major differences in attitudes and beliefs over the years between Ashkenazi (European) Jewry and Sephardi Jewry (as broached in previous chapters and to be further described below and in later chapters herein). 

 

Another different group is the previously cited Karaites (which seem to have their roots entirely in old Babylon and thus in the land areas where Sephardi/Oriental Jews dominated).  There is much evidence suggesting that the Karaites (who reject the Talmud) are an outgrowth of the old Essene movement (at least, the theology of the two groups seems to have much in common). 

 

 

Today

 

The “Jerusalem Post” of June 28, 1997, had an article by Jonathan Rosenblum on “America’s do-it yourself Torah” which noted that in place of theology, “American Jews have an attitude; No one--not even God--can tell me what to do.”  Since European Khazars dominate American Jewry, the above news report tells the story of the modern Amalek-Edomite feelings for Judaism and the Torah. 

 

Conversely, let a person in today’s contemporary society say anything that can be construed as criticism about so-called Jews from a racial or ethnic perspective and the Amalek-Edomite Khazars, in particular, go completely crazy and lose their cool. 

 

Many Amalekites (calling themselves Jews) are irrational and paranoid over any discussion about race or ethnicity (especially if it might link to them and their status).  Their immediate response is to start hollering about discrimination, oppression, genocide, racism, anti-Semitism and the holocaust.  Otherwise, it appears that many Oriental and Sephardic Jews are more responsible and sane on this theme. 

 

Many so-called Christian Jews (as well as Moslems and Christians in general) are undoubtedly Edomites racially--because true Jews would be hard pressed to justify Christianity (as will be established in later chapters). 

 

Thus, many of them follow the precedents established by the Marranos when the Catholic Church forced conversion to Christianity on them in the days of the Catholic Inquisition in Spain and Portugal (14th-17th centuries, CE). 

 

In those days, the Protestant Reformation was getting ready to bloom and the Catholic authorities conceived the methodology of the Inquisition to keep so-called heretics and other religious non-conformists (like Jews) in line by torture and punishment, with eventual death by being burned alive at the stake. 

 

Those Jews either converted or they were dead.  Consequently, many faked conversion to Catholicism, but maintained their traditional beliefs.  The Edomites appear to have followed this practice through the years in terms of their participation in Judaism, Christianity or whatever. 

 

 

The Edomite Reichorn

 

Dave Barley, in the April 1998 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 5), quotes an interesting publication entitled “La Ligue Feminine Anti-Communiste de Montreal,” published by Adrien Arcand in Ontario, Canada.  This document allegedly had a section on “A Jewish Plan of World Domination.” 

 

This plan was supposed to represent the contents of a lecture delivered by an obvious Amalek-Edomite named Reichorn in Prague in 1869 over the tomb of one Simeon ben Jehuda.  Reichorn noted that “It is said that numbers of our brothers have been converted and baptized Christians... What does it matter?” 

 

Going on, Reichorn charged that the “Baptized ones can be very useful to us; they can become our auxiliaries to march to new horizons, which are still unknown to us; for those converted ones still belong to us” with the same spirit and soul. 

 

The point of Reichorn’s words is that it doesn’t matter what religious faith an Amalek-Edomite pretends to embrace.  In all cases, the Amalekite remains a wicked, depraved, vile Edomite, spiritually and mentally.  As will be established in later comments, a leopard cannot change his spots. 

 

 

Edomites Pretend or Fake It 

 

Thus, many Edomites publicly pretend to be good Jews or good Christians.  And if so, they normally tend to identify with liberal, permissive Jewish and Christian faiths which really believe in little or nothing in terms of truth. 

 

Therefore, they would probably more often identify themselves with the Reform and Reconstructionist Jewish movements or liberal Christian denominations, as discussed above and elsewhere herein. 

 

Also, as commented upon earlier--historically, a portion of the ruling hierarchy in the Roman Catholic Church appears to have been Edomites.  Of course, there is the obvious link that Catholicism has had with Sicilians and Southern Italians--evidently from the Edomite Zepho, discussed earlier on the murderers of the righteous.  Generic Edomites have been the leaders in Rome. 

 

Moreover, Pope Paul VI was reported to be a secret Amalekite (with the Italian name of Giovanni Battista Montini).  Even today, there is talk that Jewish Cardinal Lustiger of France, another very likely Amalekite, will be the next Pope when John Paul II dies (Aug-Sep 1999 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 79).  There is some speculation that he will take the name of Peter.  But otherwise, a future pope may become Sixtus Six. 

 

The Apr-Jun 2001 “Petah Tikvah” magazine (p. 6) noted that Pope Gregory VI in 1045 and Pope Anaclet II in 1130 were both Jews (correctly Amalekites, ed).  Some of the Italians didn’t approve of a Jewish pope (with Anaclet II), so they appointed a counter-pope (Innocent II).  Yet, it has to be significant that many of the Catholic rulers/leaders (who rejected Amalekite Jews) have been Edomites themselves. 

 

 

Evil Amalekites Persecute Jews 

 

Evil Amalek-Edomites within the Catholic Church have often been responsible for the historic persecution and hatred of Jews and Judaism.  Evil Edomites (like Adolf Schicklgruber and Yuri Vladiminovich Andropov, who will be commented upon at some length in later chapters herein) have been active in Jewish persecutions in the recent 20th century.  This may seem to be quite a paradox.  But it represents reality. 

 

For some strange reason, diabolical Amalek-Edomites have proven to be the greatest of enemies of the collective Jewish people in all of history.  They have launched the most intensive persecutions of all and especially on religious Jews (like with Haman and Herod the Great, as allowed in the Prologue). 

 

This Edomite hatred and persecution of religious (observant) Jews (who more likely would tend to be true racial Jews) is most significant, as will be shortly proven. 

 

Otherwise, the Arabs have claimed for some time now that 30% of Protestant Bishops are Jewish (correctly Amalekites, because it is unfathomable that a true Jewish Israelite would identify with Christianity). 

 

Assuredly, any number of Amalekites have supposedly converted to Christianity in order to use that definition to help them in being parasites to rip off the gullible, stupid goyim (as noted in the Prologue). 

 

 

Why the Edomite Linkage 

 

Why do these Amalek-Edomites link up with established Christendom or Jewry at all?  Why not just be Satanists or Luciferians outright without the secrecy?  The answer is for the obvious economic, political and social benefits which can accrue to an individual (particularly an Edomite) by identifying with publicly accepted religions. 

 

It is quite certain that the depraved and wicked Edomites would prefer the liberal, permissive Christian Churches or Reform (or Reconstructionist) Judaism in the context of the Christian West. 

 

But in those areas where Orthodox Judaism or more conservative Christian Churches prevail in popularity, it must be allowed that some Edomites will flock to these conservative faiths simply to reap any rewards to be had for membership in those groups. 

 

Hence, Amalek-Edomites will gladly join the Ku Klux Klan, the Nazi party, the US Militia organizations, the Christian Identity movement, Orthodox Judaism or anything or everything else if they perceive it as a personal benefit with that affiliation.  They really have no conscience or concern whatsoever with who or what they attach themselves to in order to accomplish their objectives. 

 

 

Name Changes 

 

Amalek-Edomites do the same thing when they change their Edomite names to more common and acceptable names in the host country where they live and draw their sustenance as parasites.  Not only have they habitually changed their names when they arrived in the United States, but they have generally followed this practice wherever they have gone. 

 

Thus, in America--Bernard Schwartz became Tony Curtis, Emmanuel Goldenberg became Edward G. Robinson, Leonard Rosenberg became Tony Randall, Marian Levee became Paulette Goddard, Joseph Levitch became Jerry Lewis, Shirley Schrift became Shelley Winters, Issur Danielovitch became Kirk Douglas, Asa Yoelson became Al Jolson and Joan Persky became Lauren Bacall. 

 

The same phenomenon has occurred with the Amalekites going to the modern state of Israel.  On arrival, they change their Eastern European, Khazar names to Hebrew names (i.e. in Israel, Lauren Bacall’s Persky cousin became Shimon Peres).  In Austria, the Amalekite Schicklgruber adopted the good German name of Hitler and on and on. 

 

Because of this Amalek-Edomite propensity to change their names in the host countries where they live (as parasites), they have often been able to fool much of the public when people fail to check upon them more closely. 

 

This Amalekite name change phenomenon brings to this writer’s mind a situation in the Northern Mariana Islands a few years ago.  There was a family on Rota Island named San Nicolas, as best as now remembered by this writer.  One of the sons decided to move to Saipan Island (a much larger island with a much larger population) and establish himself. 

 

On arriving on Saipan, this man checked around to determine which was the most prominent and successful family there.  He learned that a family named Sablan was the most prominent and successful on Saipan.  Accordingly, he changed his name to Sablan in an expectation that the name Sablan would better help him succeed on Saipan. 

 

Possibly, this is one of the compelling reasons that many Amalekites change their names when they move to a new area to begin anew their work of deception and evil.  Surely, some of them adopt local names of the more successful families so that they can use this linkage in their efforts of deception. 

 

Thus, an Amalekite named Kohn from Eastern Europe moved to Massachusetts.  On arrival he found Irish Catholics to be the main families running things there.  So he changed his name to Kerry and became a Roman Catholic.  US Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts is one of the descendants of this Amalekite family. 

 

An article on the Internet mentioned some of the modern DNA work of trying to determine the validity of Jewish names as being associated with the historic Jewish priesthood--i.e., whether Jews named Cohen (meaning a priest) could be a priest, whether Jews named Levi could be Levites, etc. 

 

One of the problems researchers found in analyzing Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar extraction was that back in the 8th century BCE some of the Khazars who converted to Judaism changed their Khazar names to Levi or one of its cognates in order to try to fool the Jews into thinking that they were Levites. 

 

It is not clear how extensive this Khazar practice was or whether it also reached to adoption of the name Cohen.  But it shows the early depravity of these Amalekite Khazars from the earliest days of their history of pretending to be Jews; when, in fact, they were evil Amalekite children of Satan.  This Khazar propensity of changing their names must go far back in their history. 

 

By the way, the Aug 9, 2002, “Forward” (p. 12) quoted Solomon Lozovsky, a former colleague of Lenin and Stalin, in the pre-Russian Revolution days (before 1917).  Lozovsky (surely an Amalekite, but evidently a man of some wisdom) said that “Anyone who denies his background is a bastard.”  Possibly, Lozovsky is right.  And his words indict all Amalekites who choose to change their historic Amalekite names! 

 

 

Amalekites Will Do Anything 

 

In effect, the typical Amalek-Edomite seems to have no conscience, concern or integrity at all, in terms of what religion, or even what family name that he may be identified with publicly.  He will use anything and everything which may seem to give him an advantage in terms of functioning as a parasite, drawing the life blood out of the host country where he lives. 

 

Thus, the evil Karl Marx and Adam Weishaupt, Amalek-Edomites, were classic examples.  Both were born Jews, but later converted to Christianity.  However, both appeared to have always been supposed atheists and/or secret Satanists. 

 

The previously cited Adolf Schicklgruber, another evident Amalek-Edomite, was born and raised a Catholic.  However, in adulthood, he secretly was deeply involved in the occult and who knows what else. 

 

The wicked Roosevelts were originally Dutch Jews--clearly Amalek-Edomites.  In time, they became Christians (largely Episcopalian or Dutch Reformed).  But certainly, the well known evolutionist Clinton (Roosevelt), Teddy, Eleanor and Franklin were all practical or visible atheists in their public image.  Their histories suggest that they believed in nothing of value. 

 

Alternatively, if one looks carefully at their political records, the evidence is substantial to suggest that virtually all of the Roosevelts were actually secret children of Satan, just like other Amalek-Edomites.  Historically, they have been extremely evil and wicked and have brought much hurt on both the United States; and indeed, on the world at large. 

 

 

More on Slick Clinton 

 

Jewish writer Mona Charen focused upon the American Jewish problem, in an article on “The hollowed spirituality of U.S. Jews,” as appearing in the June 14-20, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 32).  She quoted a recent survey made by the American Jewish Committee. 

 

The survey found that 80% of American Jews approved of Slick Clinton’s acquittal in the Senate over his sodomite debasement of the Jewess Monica Lewinsky, described in other chapters herein. 

 

Some 60% even blamed the Republicans for Clinton’s sodomy scandal, as opposed to 36% who blamed Slick for the crisis.  Otherwise, some 73% of American Jews opposed parental choice in educating their children. 

 

The report said that only 15% of American Jews believed that religious observance was important to their identity while 98% contended that “remembrance of the Holocaust” was important to their identity.  Some 62% believed that so-called “anti-Semitism” is a larger threat to their identity than other factors--to include inter-marriage with non-Jews. 

 

Contrast these numbers with the fact that only 46% think that being a part of the Jewish people is important.  Since Reform Judaism is the backbone (in numbers and influence) of American Jewry, the above findings are most interesting. 

 

Though some will make the case that Reform Judaism (founded in the 19th century in Germany) has been a disaster for Jews, the truth is that it has found its primary acceptance among Amalekites; who, because of genetics, would apparently never be sincere religious Jews under any circumstances (since they are spiritually and physically children of Satan). 

 

 

Amalekite Deceit 

 

There is another fall-out of this Amalekite fanaticism over maintaining beliefs in the so-called “holocaust and anti-Semitism,” as a part of their racial-ethnic identities.  Many Amalekites are so paranoid over these ideas and the need to constantly keep them alive that they will go to any extreme to continually push these issues to the front pages of the Amalekite controlled media. 

 

As the May 10, 2002, “The Week” (p. 4) mentioned, anyone in America “who criticizes anything Israel does--is now called an anti-Semite or ‘self-hating Jew.’” 

 

While “The Week” is correct on this assessment, this writer would like to add that anyone who criticizes any Jew on any matter is subject to the same complaint.  Of course, a Jew who does this (toward fellow Jews) is called a self-hating Jew. 

 

 

John O’Connor 

 

In his video on the “Synagogue of Satan,” Catholic priest John O’Connor mentioned one of the interesting quirks about how this charge of anti-Semitism was successfully used by Ashkenazi Jews (correctly Amalekite Khazars) against the former Czars in old Russia. 

 

Historically, these Khazars constitute a state within a state in whichever countries they have lived.  In pre-1917 Russia, the Ashkenazi Jews were in this arrangement in Czarist Russia. 

 

And around the start of the 20th century (perhaps just after the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” were discovered and made public in Russia), this state within a state had become an almost total Marxist revolutionary and anarchist entity out to destroy the Czar’s government. 

 

Once the Czar tried to oppose them, the Ashkenazi Khazars responded by labeling the Czar and his government anti-Semitic.  In Russia and around the world, the poor Czar was called an evil anti-Semite for daring to oppose the very people who were trying to destroy him and his government. 

 

This seems to be the way the Amalekites work.  If any goy comes along and criticizes them for anything, the immediate Amalekite response (from their money, media and educational powers) is to define the issue as involving anti-Semitism. 

 

No person in the Christian West (not even a Jew) can criticize, oppose or denigrate the Amalekites for fear that he will be immediately branded an anti-Semite.  And now, after working that term to death, the new Amalekite modus operandi is to call such people racists and White supremacists. 

 

 

Amalekite Tricks 

 

If the Amalekite Jew controlled media has no reason to be blaring about the holocaust or anti-Semitism, then many Amalekites will initiate action to cause an outburst from the media from time to time so that the gullible Christian Israelites (goyim) can come under more guilt and have more of their freedoms taken away from them. 

 

One of the favorite tricks which the evil Amalekites use to constantly harass and intimidate stupid Christian Israelites is to set a fire at some synagogue or paint some ugly, inappropriate and ridiculous graffiti and messages on synagogue walls.  Naturally, the media loves any alleged Christian attack on a synagogue.  This gives them a huge, front page story to whine and complain about. 

 

Of course, the controlled media would never suggest that some Amalekite could have or would have deliberately written the bad words on the synagogue or set the fire at the synagogue.  Nazis, right-wing extremists and White supremacists would be immediately blamed and castigated. 

 

Sometimes, efficient law enforcement people can accumulate proof that one of the Amalekites did the deed.  In those cases, the Amalekite controlled media either down-plays the report (placing it in small print on a back page) or ignores it completely. 

 

From the controlled media viewpoint, it is front page news that a White supremacist burned a synagogue.  But there is no news if one of the synagogue’s own Amalekite members set the fire. 

 

Whenever a story surfaces over an alleged right-wing attack on a synagogue, nine chances out of ten, the attack (fire, graffiti or whatever) can be laid at the doorsteps of an evil Amalekite member of the synagogue designed to keep the holocaust and anti-Semitism stories alive.  

 

 

“Spotlight,” Revisited   

 

“Spotlight” of Jan 17, 2000, had a story by James P. Tucker on “Real Truth Censored About ‘Hate’ Crimes,” which noted a case from Maryland of a few years ago.  A Jewish family’s home in an upscale neighborhood was found spray painted with swastikas and hate messages. 

 

The controlled media went wild for days and days with stories about this atrocity to generate sympathy and gifts from the guilt ridden goyim.  Later, it developed that the Jews involved (obvious Amalekites) desecrated their own home and placed the blame on the stupid goyim. 

 

Deceitful Amalekite merchants are notorious for burning down their buildings and stores (especially with inventory that won’t sell) to collect insurance.  If they can blame the fire on the stupid goyim, it really helps the anti-Semitism case. 

 

The “Spotlight” paper of Mar 13, 2000, had another article along the same line.  This one, “Victim Responsible for Supposed Hate Crime,” by William Carmichael, was from Stamford, Connecticut where a supposed hate crime took place at a Jewish synagogue (Temple Beth El) in the summer of 1999 (just one week after the nut Buford Furrow shot up a synagogue in Los Angeles, CA, elsewhere discussed herein). 

 

Per the story, a swastika emblazoned bucket full of medical waste material was left outside of the synagogue.  Some of the waste was scattered on the synagogue’s lawn. Naturally, the controlled national media and Jewish leadership cried out about the great evils of this anti-Semitism and hate crime.  Political leaders whined about needing to do something. 

 

Well, in February 2000, a Jewish man named Alan Jay Lorenz of Weston, CT was arrested for the incident with a federal civil rights violation.  He was charged with obstructing persons in the free exercise of their religious beliefs.  Lorenz is also a suspect in another desecration at a Norwalk synagogue. 

 

 

Amalekite Bombings? 

 

At Passover, in 2002, a minivan blew up in Brooklyn, NY, seriously wounding the driver, the apparent Amalekite Israel Halberstam.  Immediately, the controlled media said that it was an “anti-Semitic attack.”  Now, authorities believe that the bomb belonged to Halberstam and that he was transporting it to some other place (Apr 22, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2). 

 

The remaining question is--what was the evil Amalekite doing with the bomb?  Is it possible that Israel would use the bomb to blow up somebody or something which could be blamed on the Arabs or on alleged White supremacists/anti-Semites?  Of course, it would be easy to murder some innocent people and blame the act on anti-Semites, Arabs or White supremacists. 

 

On Aug 23, 2002, a news report said that one Robert Goldstein had been arrested in Tampa, Florida for possessing bombs and explosive devices.  Allegedly, Goldstein planned on using his bombs to blow up Muslim mosques across America. 

 

Surely, the very evident Amalekite Goldstein would blow up some mosques and stage the acts as coming from so-called right-wing, Christian extremists and White supremacists. 

 

For sure, the controlled national media would have a field day with many slanted reports.  And by all means, new legislation would roll out of Congress and the US president (whomever he is) would write a series of new executive orders to further impede upon the Constitutional rights of the average American citizen. 

 

 

Blacks Too

 

Interestingly, Blacks have picked upon this favorite trick of deception by Amalekite bankers/masters. 

 

Often, there will be a big story and hype about a fire or attack on a Negro Church--especially in the South.  Later, when it develops that an African American set the fire or did the deed, it is no news.  This media hypocrisy will be assessed in subsequent chapters herein. 

 

It looks like the stupid, ignorant, Christian Israelites (goyim) would eventually see how this scam is successfully run against them, time and time again.  But the stupid goyim never seem to catch on. 

 

Let a Negro or Amalekite surreptitiously bomb, burn or damage his own religious meeting place and the Amalekite controlled media will give the right-wing condemnation and hate for days on end.  Yet, when the truth finally comes out about the perpetuator, the story is lost forever.  What is this--hypocrisy? 

 

Incidentally, the fact that an Amalekite will damage or injure his own religious facility is enormous proof of the utter evil and wretchedness of these people.  Like Slick Clinton, they have no conscience or integrity at all.  Their whole lives are built on a sham, deceit and dishonesty.  They are truly sons of Satan.  No wonder that they go to any length to say the Kol Nidre prayer on Yom Kippur (as described previously). 

 

 

The Start of Edomite Deception 

 

It should not surprise anyone that the Amalek-Edomites would be such classic liars and frauds totally dedicated to deception--all the while that they pretend and fake reality in order to hide their true motives and goals.  Actually, this lying and deceiving started with Esau, himself. 

 

As outlined earlier, the Word reflects that Esau was a “cunning hunter” (Gen 25:27).  The “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 142) interprets this remark as meaning that he was “a man understanding how to deceive” --literally how to ensnare his father with his mouth. 

 

Some scholars note that the previously mentioned Oholibamah (Gen 36:2), one of Esau’s wives, was seemingly the exact same person as Judith, who reportedly married Esau (Gen 26:34).  The “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 215) says that Esau changed her name to deceive Yitzhak into believing that she was not an idolatress. 

 

Surely, the name change phenomenon, mentioned above in this chapter, as being common to Edomites, was to characterize Esau’s descendants for the next 3,900 years.  Amalek-Edomites regularly change their names and public religions to deceive and fool people as to their true identity. 

 

With this Esau lying precedent established in the Edomite lineage, it is only natural that Amalek-Edomites will change their names and supposed religions, however often they choose (if they think a change will benefit them), without a whimper or concern at all.  They are very deceptive and dishonest people, genetically. 

 

Despite their propensity for name changes and deception, as to their true identities, there are two curious little facts of identification which may have “possibly” survived over the years to amazingly link many, modern, American Jews specifically to the evil Amalekites. 

 

 

Two Interesting Possibilities 

 

Mark Thomas, Pennsylvania State Chaplain of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, alleges that the popular epithet “Kike,” so often applied to American Jews, is a contraction of the word Amalekite (“Religion and the Racist Right,” p. 131).  Frankly, the origin of this word, so often applied to Jews by their enemies, seems unclear.  But the possibilities of tying it to the Amalekites is enticing based simply on sound if for no other reason. 

 

In his video on the “Synagogue of Satan,” Catholic priest John O’Connor of Pennsylvania says that the Ashkenazi Jews of Germany (who essentially have been and generally are Amalekites) supported Adolf Hitler in his rise to power.  O’Connor notes that the word “nazi” comes from the word “Ashkenazi.” 

 

Thus, is it possible that the Amalekites were the power and brains behind the early German Nazi movement?  Are contemporary American Ashkenazi Jews actually Nazis? 

 

 

More on the Khazars 

 

The Edomite propensity to be evil and wicked, as broached above and in the prior chapters, wasn’t just a phenomenon of ancient ages, nor did it commence in more modern times.  The historic Amalek-Edomite Khazars apparently have always been evil and wicked from their inception.  Since Judaism is a fairly decent religion, one would think that the Khazars would improve on becoming Jews.  But they haven’t. 

 

Amalek-Edomite Khazars have often led the way in being very forward, pushy, demanding and vocal in modern liberalism, Socialism, Communism and humanism--with all of the adverse features which these motions entail (to be covered in future chapters). 

 

As an example, the Spokane, WA City Council held a public meeting around Sep 1, 1998, to discuss extending to homosexual queers its city ordinances which granted minorities extra privileges.  An alleged Amalek-Edomite named Schwartz came to the meeting from the East to promote his concept of special rights for faggots. 

 

During the meeting, a man in the audience, quietly sitting and minding his own business in the public meeting, began sketching some of the participants on a piece of paper.  Somehow Schwartz found out (how?  Did he go and look over the sketcher’s shoulders to see what was being sketched?). 

 

Schwartz publicly interrupted the meeting and demanded that the man be thrown out and/or arrested for drawing alleged anti-Semitic material.  The Council refused to evict the man.  Schwartz continued his apparent pushy, forward, vocal disruption of the meeting and apparently left it in a fit of rage and anger.  One person supposedly touched him briefly on his way out. 

 

Thereupon, the vocal and disruptive Schwartz effectively declared a war of sorts against the city of Spokane for not kicking the innocent artist out the door or having him arrested.  Schwartz claimed that he was starting legal action to get gobs of money from Spokane over the incident.  This is the type of action which evil Amalek-Edomites gladly pursue. 

 

They are very big mouthed, pushy, forward, demanding, hateful, arrogant and disruptive to law, order, decency, honesty and morality.  If anyone tries to oppose their evil and wretchedness, they immediately cry out anti-Semitism.  The Amalek-Edomite controlled press picks up on things like this and society never hears the end of it. 

 

 

The “Forward” 

 

This Amalekite madness in rushing to lawsuits and court actions was demonstrated in several very intriguing lawsuits filed by apparent Amalekites in 2002, per the various issues of the “Forward” newspaper in 2002. 

 

The first story (Apr 19, 2002, “Forward,” p. 3), on “Jewish Reporter Says Marriage to Arab Cost Her Job,” by Nacha Cattan, said that a Jewess named Livi Regenbaum filed a discrimination lawsuit against the “Kansas City Jewish Chronicle” because the paper allegedly fired her because of the ethnicity of her husband.  Regenbaum was married to a Palestinian Arab.  She was a reporter for the Chronicle until she was fired. 

 

A spokesperson for the paper said that the Jewess was fired because of unspecified “job performance issues.” 

 

The second story (ibid, p. 14) was by Marc Perelman on “Jewish Lawyer To Sue Israel for ‘Terrorism.’”  This report concerns the actions of 48-year old Stanley Cohen of New York City who will sue the state of Israel for its “terrorist” actions in the West Bank of Palestine. 

 

The unique thing about both of these lawsuits is that they involve Jews suing other prominent Jewish groups or operations.  Normally, most lawsuit prone Amalekite Jews go out of their way to sue the goyim whom they look down upon as stupid cattle.  It certainly is a unique situation that a Jew would dare sue the state of Israel. 

 

Seemingly, one of the most pathetic illustrations of Amalekite madness for lawsuits and legal terror surfaced in a story by Jeff Zell in the Aug 9, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1) which noted that the “Jews, Gays Suing Methodist Home for Hiring Bias.”  This report demonstrated both the Amalekite propensity for lawsuits and sexual perversion. 

 

Actually, these two forces (the queers and the Amalekites) are not necessarily different because much of the homosexual movement is headed and promoted by the depraved Amalekites (as will be proven in this and succeeding chapters). 

 

The story by Zell said that there were seven plaintiffs (including one faggot Jewish “rabbi”) in the suit against the Decatur, GA United Methodist Children’s Home because the Home refuses to hire Jews, fires qualified workers for being gay, and requires counselors to condemn homosexuality.  The plaintiffs say that these acts constitute discrimination.  

 

The Amalekites are extremely pushy and demanding in their pursuit of life.  They will quickly sue anybody or anything if they see it to their advantage.  Apparently, this lawsuit proneness even extends against fellow Jews. 

 

 

More Palestinian Support   

 

The earlier April 12, 2002, “Forward” (p. 6) had another story by Nacha Cattan on “Leftist Jews Gaining Strength in Support of Palestinians” which also told about the efforts of some leftist Jews in the United States in trying to side with the Palestinians in their conflict with the state of Israel.  Actually, this story and the above cited lawsuits are real flukes because almost all Jews automatically support Israel first and most. 

 

Anyway, Bluma Goldstein, a retired professor from the University of California at Berkeley, and one of the leaders of the American pro-Palestinian movement, signed an ad in the “New York Times” in support of the Palestinians. 

 

In an interview with the “Forward,” Goldstein said that “If a Jew criticizes Israel we’re self hating Jews and if you’re a non-Jew you’re antisemitic.”  This name calling reaction seems normal for Amalekite Jews, as was pointed out above and in the preceding chapters. 

 

Of course, Ms Goldstein is correct, although she did not go far enough.  Any non-Jew criticizing Israel or even Jews in general is automatically called an anti-Semite.  The Jews are always above criticism (evidently, except for the Ultra Orthodox, which the Amalekites passionately hate the most of all). 

 

Incidentally, since the Nazi era and WWII, the use of the word “anti-Semite” has been grossly overworked (by the controlled Amalekite Jew media). 

 

Accordingly, many enlightened Amalekite Jews are beginning to use other catch phrases and words to describe anyone who criticizes a Jew.  As noted earlier, the new approach is to call enemies of the Amalekite Jews--White supremacists or racists. 

 

 

And More Palestinian Support 

 

Incidentally, the May 6, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 4) had a story from New York that eleven Orthodox US “rabbis” had issued a statement on behalf of the Palestinian Arabs at a pro-Palestinian rally in Washington, DC on April 20, 2002.  This group decried the Zionists for their efforts in establishing a Jewish state in Palestine and called upon the US to stop US aid to Israel. 

 

 

Ovadyah, Revisited 

 

Previous chapters herein focused upon the wonderful prophecies of the small book of Obadiah, which are entirely dedicated to the doom and eventual punishment of the evil Edomites.  Verses 2-5 are particularly interesting because they convey an overall appreciation for the incredible depravity and wickedness of these people. 

 

Some of the English translations of Obadiah are a little difficult to deal with in understanding.  But an interpretation in the July 1999 “Destiny Editorial Letter” (entitled “Esau and Jacob in Prophecy”) was very revealing.  It said: 

 

“Comparatively small in number, small in honor, not merely despised, but ‘greatly despised;’ arrogant, ‘Who shall bring me down to the ground?;’  notoriously ambitious for money and power, exalting themselves ‘as an eagle;’ and rapacious beyond all measure or mercy. 

 

“Even gleaners of grapes would leave a few for others.  But the greed of these people is insatiable.  They covet all for themselves.  These are the marks of Esau-Edom.” 

 

Manifestly, the Edomites, generally, and the Amalekites, particularly, are the most evil people of all time.  Their utter depravity and gross wickedness will be further addressed in the succeeding chapters. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 155--Amalek-Edomite Depravity II

 

 

The Edomite Red 

 

A former chapter discussed the linkage of the color red to the Edomites.  For example, the famous Rothschild banking house got its start with a red sign or shield being placed over its building in early Frankfort, Germany (to identify its Amalek-Edomite occupant?). 

 

The previously discussed Mystery Babylon the Great, the mother of harlots, and the beast she rides, are both scarlet colored (Rev 17:3-4).  As Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary” (p. 596) indicates--the scarlet color is “a brilliant red, inclining to orange.  Scarlet is a favorite color in the Roman Catholic Church (Cardinals like to dress in scarlet red at their important functions). 

 

Thus, the color red identifies both Satan and his Edomite servants.  Of course, the flags of Turkey, Albania and various Communist countries have been or are red--the classic Edomite color.  It must be pointed out that the color red has historically been associated with Communism and some of the leftist movements which are all very pushy, forward and demanding.  Red is, of course, the classic color of Edom. 

 

Naturally, the color red has come to signify and identify most or all of the leftist movements (even to include the pro-Palestinian motions).  It may seem like a fluke that the Edomite red can be attached to a pro-Palestinian group, but it seems to be the real world out there as far as the Amalekites are concerned. 

 

 

Edomite Perversion 

 

Assuredly, sexual perversion is big in the red Communist, leftist and liberal motions, cited above and in prior chapters, in the context of the Edomites.  Thus, numbers of Amalek-Edomites are queers, as well as being some of the biggest spokesmen and advocates of perversion.  There are also reasons to believe that sexual perversion is still fairly common in some Edomite lands--like Turkey. 

 

There is some evidence that the famous Lawrence of Arabia was homosexually raped by a Turkish general when he was captured for a spell.  With his literal choice of almost any of the most attractive and appealing women in the area, one would have to wonder how a Turkish official could turn to sodomy.  But perversion seems to be the story of Esau and a huge number of his descendants. 

 

Like other Christians and atheists and the Edomite progenitor Esau, many modern Edomites miscegenate and defile their racial seed lines with anything and everything--just like most Christians do and significantly more in contrast to what some true Jews would tend to do.  The rest of this chapter and succeeding presentations will address their sexual proclivities. 

 

 

A Genetic Problem 

 

Since it takes three generations to breed the evil thinking out of these Edomites, their children and grandchildren continue to function with the mind-set of their wicked Edomite ancestors (Ex 20:5; Deut 23:8).  The miscegenated Herod family is a classic Scriptural example of this phenomenon. 

 

In today’s modern perverted world, where open homosexuality is practiced and no one in leadership seems to condemn it, questions continue to surface over whether homosexuality is an inherited genetic problem; or alternatively, is it simply an acquired empirical habit/practice? 

 

This writer is not prepared to suggest that it is always, sometimes or even infrequently due to genetics.  On the contrary, it probably is an acquired practice of sin (due to a number of environmental factors).  However, in some families, like with the Amalekites, one must wonder to what extent the phenomenon is traceable to genes (since such an inordinate number of Amalekites are practicing queers). 

 

There is a curse in the Torah associated with the second commandment on idolatry--in that the sins of parents are visited upon children (Ex 20:5).  Without being dogmatic, this writer has wondered if in “some” (not necessarily all) instances, homosexuality is traceable to certain sins of a parent.  Is it possible that a homosexual demon attaches to a family or children to introduce perversion? 

 

In early 2002, an explosion ripped through the US Catholic Church when revelations began to surface of the enormous presence of faggot, pedophile priests within the church who have been abusing thousands of children over the years.  This problem will be addressed in a later chapter. 

 

It is unclear how many of these perverts are Edomites; but surely, many or most of them are since the Edomite Irish and Italian peoples are so prevalent in the Roman Catholic Church.  There is also a significant presence of Amalekites in Catholicism, as noted earlier.  Suffice to say, these evil preachers are undoubtedly operating under powerful demonic influence.  Surely, they have many attached demons. 

 

As a minimum, it must be asserted that many of the dedicated homosexual faggots do have attached demons (as was assessed in a prior chapter).  To what extent these demons arise in connection with the sins of a parent versus the sins of the child is uncertain.  Probably, most can be attributed to the sins of the person so hooked.  But the door must be left open in some instances to a parental problem. 

 

 

The Evil Ancestry of the Amalekites

 

This (Amalek-Edomite) Khazar propensity for evil can logically be traced back to Nachash, Cain, Ham, Canaan and Esau.  Historically, in the Tanakh, these five individuals were some of the most evil and depraved beings in all of history.  Esau’s descendants have followed in the same footsteps. 

 

Clearly, the problem with these individuals seems to be genetics!  As ancient Jewish authorities stipulated over 2,000 years ago, the Amalekites, in particular, are totally evil.  If this is true, as learned Jewish sages have believed and taught for ages, then it becomes crystal clear that there must be a genetic factor present in the Amalekite make-up to induce them to be so incredibly wicked and depraved. 

 

The Apostle Shaul well stated the Amalek-Edomite dilemma when he wrote that when people abandon The MOST HIGH and His righteousness, YHWH gives them over to their vile affections and emotions--to include homosexuality (Rom 1:26-27), as is commonly found among the Amalekites.  Maybe Shaul’s remarks tie to the second commandment in some way. 

 

It would seem that homosexuality might could be due to genetics to some extent and certainly in the case of the depraved Amalekites--since such a vast number of Amalekites are queers and since sexual perversion has been a part and parcel of their make-up from the early days of the Exodus (to be next addressed). 

 

 

Piska 3 

 

A previous chapter quoted Piska 3 from “Pesikta De-Rab Kahana” (p. 38) which reported that in Amalek’s first attack on Yisrael during the Exodus, Amalek lured Israelites from their camp so that they would be killed and polluted by pederasty. 

 

While details of these sexual perversions upon Israelites do not seem to be available, a little logic can crystallize the possibilities.  Perhaps the Amalekites engaged in sodomy with helpless captured Israelites or sodomized their dead corpses in some manner.

 

In modern 20th century Satanism and other occult activities, sexual rituals are often associated with human murder and sacrifice.  A later chapter herein will focus on some of these on-going activities.  Suffice to say, Satan’s Amalek-Edomite descendants would be prone for any type of sodomite perversion that could surface as a part of their murdering and killing efforts of Israelites. 

 

 

Sodomite Amalekites 

 

For a Scriptural basis on how the Amalekites tried to pollute Yisrael with pederasty, Piska 3 notes the words “How he met thee by the way” (Deut 25:18), which come from the Hebrew krk (kyrk).  This reference is elsewhere used in the Torah in the situation where a man has a nocturnal emission of semen which makes him unclean, necessitating that he leave the camp (Deut 23:10-11). 

 

R. Judah interpreted “krk” as meaning “he befouled thee with his (Amalek’s) semen (by subjecting thee to sodomy).”  In other words, Judah did not see the problem with the Amalekites as being nocturnal emissions; but rather, as being one of sodomy as practiced by the Amalekites upon the Israelites (“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” p. 51-52). 

 

The gist of this is that there are some possible Scriptural reasons suggesting that very early in the history of the Amalekites, they had a record of sodomy in their ranks.  Also, the evidence seems to be that they tried to teach or impose their sodomite practices on some of the gullible, stupid Israelites. 

 

It must be important to note that the Amalekites and perhaps some of their Canaanite friends dwelt in the Rift vale or valley (Hebrew “emeq”), evidently South of the Dead Sea (Num 14:25).  The Scriptures use this same Hebrew word to describe the place of dwelling of the Sodomites in Avraham’s day (Gen 14:3-17). 

 

Actually, the vale involved with the Sodomites was apparently at the Southern or Southeastern edge of the Dead Sea.  It appears that some of the Amalekites lived in this same precise area which was probably a part of the greater definition of Edom.  Is it not significant that the Amalekites inhabited the same area where the homosexual fags lived in Sodom and Gomorrah?  Yes, it seems like it is!   

 

 

A Line of Queers 

 

Incidentally, this sexual depravity and social sickness of the Amalek-Edomites goes back a long way in their genealogy and long before their likely homosexual escapades at the Exodus.  It clearly started early with their ancestors Nachash, Kain, Ham and Esau. 

 

In the Greek sun worship theology and polytheistic religion, the father god Zeus was a representation of Satan, the real sun god in mythology.  In the worship of Zeus and the other Greek gods as well, there were attempts to conceptionalize them and see many of them in a human form in various situations. 

 

Hence, paintings, pictures and representations of the long haired, effeminate Zeus became objects of worship in the Greek sun worship civilization.  The interesting thing about Zeus is that he was a queer--a bi-sexual faggot.  Since Zeus was a type of personification of the real sun god Satan, the reality of homosexuality is well established.  

 

Obviously, Nachash or Satan was the classic queer of all time.  He was the original Curious (Greek “Kurious”), recognized as the “Lord or Baal” in the OT (“The Last Warning to Man,” p. B).  He probably was the first male character to wear long hair, shave and be effeminate.  Apparently, he became proud over his rebellious long hair (even today, the presence of long hair on a man is symbolic of rebellion). 

 

Satan’s pride has been well known.  But its cause has escaped the minds of most students.  Perhaps The CREATOR made woman to be feminine with long hair (in Satan’s image) to demonstrate how she can achieve reconciliation by learning humility and submission, which were the qualities absent from the effeminate Adversary (ibid, p. B). 

 

Satan’s son Kain also had sexual problems, as discussed in prior chapters. 

 

Specifically, previous chapters focused on Cain who advocated the worshipping of the sensual powers (“Mystery Babylon The Great,” p. 9).  Over time, sex worship became an inherent part of sun worship, as will be assessed in subsequent chapters herein.  This pagan worship extended on down to Ham and certainly his son Canaan.  Allegations of Ham being a bisexual were assessed in a prior chapter. 

 

Suffice to say, the line of Cain had problems and Esau had the propensity of mixing his seedline with these various fallen peoples, as noted in the previous chapters.  No wonder homosexuality is so common among the Edomites and particularly with Amalekites.  Surely, the Amalekites are right in the ball park with the gross depravity present in ancient Sodom and Gomorrah. 

 

 

The General Indictment   

 

But there is more to come on this from the “Jewish Chumash” (quoted in the Mar 1998 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 31), which indicates from the genealogies of Genesis and Chronicles that many of Esau’s descendants were products of incest and illegitimacy. 

 

Actually, according to the famous Rashi (Rav Solomon bar Isaac, who was born in France in 1040 and lived until 1105), in his commentary on Genesis 36, all of Esau’s children were (are) sons of incest, adultery and illicit sex (Apr 2001 “End Time News,” p. 2). 

 

Whether all of Esau’s descendants are/were born of perverted sex or just many of them is not totally clear in history.  But manifestly, many were, as the Scriptures outline! 

 

 

Some Specifics on the Problems 

 

Former chapters have discussed the situation with Esau and his several wives and the resulting deception associated with these women and their children with Esau.  As previously noted, one of Esau’s wives was Oholibamah, perhaps a mixed Hivite and Horite (Gen 36:2-5,19-21).  She used the alias of Judith in order to try to deceive various people (as reported in a former chapter). 

 

As pointed out in the previous discussion, it seems to have been Esau who promoted this name change by Oholibamah.  As previously quoted, the “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 215) said that Esau changed her name to deceive Yitzhak into believing that she was not an idolatress. 

 

In any case, this business of changing names has come to completely characterize the descendants of Esau.  The Amalekite descendants of Esau are particularly notorious about changing their names.  They do this regularly wherever they go or relocate around the world (as described in previous comments). 

 

 

More on Oholibamah 

 

Otherwise, this Oholibamah is an extremely complicated person, as will now be shown.  She is first mentioned in Genesis 36:2 as the daughter of Anah, who was the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite.  Yet, Anah is elsewhere shown to be the “son” of Zibeon and not a daughter at all (Gen 36:24).  But there are more problems on this confused family. 

 

Specifically, a commentary on the “Jewish Chumash” says that Genesis 36:2 actually “implies that Oholibamah was the daughter of two fathers, Anah and Zibeon, an obvious impossibility.  Furthermore, verse 24 describes Anah as Zibeon’s son (as just noted above--ed).  Consequently, our verse implies that Zibeon cohabited with his own daughter-in-law, Anah’s wife, and Oholibamah was the product of their adultery.  Thus, she and all her offspring were illegitimate.” 

 

But there are more complications here because I Chronicles 1:38 indicates that Anah and Zibeon were brothers and sons of Seir (the Horite).  This peculiarity suggests that Zibeon actually cohabited with his own mother (wife of Seir) to produce Anah (who was, thus, both his brother and his son--Apr 2001 “End Time News,” p. 3).   

 

An earlier discussion on Esau’s wives allowed that Oholibamah could have been a mixed Hivite-Horite.  Her actual racial status seems confused in the Genesis remarks.  In any case, the Word seems to indicate that Anah was a Horite (Gen 36:20), while Zibeon was both a Hivite (Gen 36:2) and a Horite (Gen 36:20). 

 

The question then arises to ask if the Horites were, in fact, Hivites?  Or were they a mixture of some sort?  This dilemma was discussed in a previous chapter with remarks from the book of Jasher--which suggested that Seir was the son of Hur (the Horite), who was the son of Hivi, who was the son of Canaan, who was the son of Ham. 

 

Still other problems seem to also materialize with Oholibamah.  She had a son named Korah, implying Esau was the father (Gen 36:5).  However, Korah is identified as a son of Eliphaz (Gen 36:15-16).  Yet, the Tanakh list of the sons of Eliphaz does not mention Korah (Gen 36:11-12; I Chron 1:36).

 

The “Jewish Chumash” (p. 215) explains this dilemma by noting that Korah was born illegitimately to Oholibamah from an affair she had with Eliphaz, her husband’s oldest son.  Apparently, Korah was brought up by and lived with his father Eliphaz, certainly by the time of his maturity. 

 

 

Still More 

 

But there is still some more potential problems with this Esau marriage to Oholibamah, also apparently known as Judith, as mentioned previously (Gen 26:34).  The Word seems to say that this woman gave Esau three sons--Jeush, Jaalam and possibly Korah.  With the problems over Korah, what about the other two?  This question must surface when one looks at some comments in the book of Jasher. 

 

This source suggests that Judith had no sons, but daughters only (Jasher 30:21).  If Judith was Oholibamah, she apparently did have three sons (Gen 36:5).  While Jasher is not authoritative Scripture, as is Genesis, one must still wonder about this obvious conflict.  If the book of Jasher was written after the Torah, surely its writer would have had access to Moshe’s writings and would hardly have written a direct contradiction. 

 

It might be that just as Korah was illegitimate and did not belong to Esau, so also maybe Jeush and Jaalam were illegitimate and were not sons of Esau.  Thus, it could be that Jasher has it right in the context that Oholibamah had no sons, but only daughters with Esau. 

 

 

Further Edomite Depravity 

 

Another dilemma surfaces when one focuses on Timna, the concubine of Eliphaz (Gen 36:12).  Elsewhere, she is identified as a sister of Lotan (son of Seir) and thus, an aunt of Oholibamah (Gen 36:20-22).  Yet, Timna does not seem to be reckoned as a daughter of Seir.  I Chronicles 1:36 mentions that Eliphaz had a child named Timna. 

 

While it is certainly possible that Seir had a daughter named Timna, who became concubine to Eliphaz or that Seir’s wife had Timna by another man, and while it is also surely reasonable that Eliphaz could have had a daughter whom he named Timna, the Jewish Chumash otherwise raises some concern over this situation. 

 

The Chumash (p. 216) allows that Eliphaz may have cohabited with Seir’s wife and had Timna; thus making her his daughter.  Hence, she could have been a half-sister to Lotan and yet not be counted as a child of Seir.  On maturing, the Chumash (p. 216) suggests that Eliphaz then took Timna, his own daughter, as concubine to have Amalek. 

 

While this unique approach to Timna could have some merit and deserves study, this writer believes that the Timna in I Chronicles 1:36 was, in fact, a son, since the context so reads.  “Young’s Analytical Concordance” (p. 990) agrees on the son definition. 

 

Admittedly, it would be questionable that a man would name a son after the mother, but it cannot be ruled out in the situation with the wicked Edomites.  Perversion and deception both characterize the evil Edomites. 

 

 

New Testament Times 

 

Even in NT times, the moral depravity of the Edomites continued to surface.  This reality is pathetically present in the evil, Amalekite, Herod family. 

 

The trouble started with Herod the Great himself and persisted for generations.  For example, old Herod had ten beautiful wives and a number of concubines.  But this wouldn’t satisfy him because the Amalekite Herod also turned to “boy lovers” (Mar-Apr 2002 “Biblical Archaeology Review,” p. 30).  Here is clearly one of the most notorious homosexual pedophiles of all history. 

 

But there is more on Herod.  New research suggests that old Herod suffered from chronic kidney disease and a rare illness that causes gangrene of the genitalia (Feb 8, 2002, “The Week,” p. 18).  He had an array of bizarre symptoms, including a decaying stomach, putrid breath, intestinal problems, intense itching and gangrene of the penis. 

 

Previous research suggested that Herod died from either gonorrhea or Hodgkin’s disease.  But this latest work by Dr Jan Hirschmann of the University of Washington suggests that Herod had a multitude of problems.  Truly, he was a madman, as indicated elsewhere herein. 

 

Otherwise, the best known and most publicized instance of evil in the miscegenated Amalekite Herod’s family probably occurred when Herod’s son, Herod Antipas (also known as Herod the tetrarch), married his niece, who had been married to his still alive, brother Philip.  Since this whole arrangement was Scripturally illegal, Yohanan the Baptist spoke against it and was accordingly murdered (Matt 14:3-12). 

 

The sexual perversion was so predominant in this Amalek-Edomite family that it quickly occurred again.  The next NT reference is to Herod Agrippa II and his shack-mate and sister Bernice.  They heard the plea of Shaul in Caesarea (Acts 25:13). 

 

Bernice had been married to two other men before her affair with Agrippa--first to her uncle Herod of Chalcis and next to King Polemon of Cilicia.  She soon abandoned Polemon and moved into shameful incest with her brother Agrippa II (“Word Pictures in the New Testament,” v. III, p. 433).  Later, she became mistress to Vespasian and Titus, father and son, and successive emperors of Rome. 

 

 

The Scriptures   

 

Just as the OT prophets often mention the great hatred which the Edomites have had for Yisrael, the NT offered a very revealing remark on people who YESHUA allegorically described as dogs and swine (Matt 7:6). 

 

The connection of the word dog to the generic Edomites and other nokri/nekar peoples and the more explicit tie of the Amalek Khazars to swine have been established in former chapters herein. 

 

In the Word, dirty, filthy swine are the symbolic enemies of Yisrael.  No wonder they have the genetic hatred for Yisrael and the genetic push to destroy Yisrael at all costs. 

 

The Book notes that Avraham died near the time when Esau’s true character was revealed (Gen 25:7).  The “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 142) says that Avraham died when he did, so that he would not have to see his grandson Esau enter upon a career of wickedness (as noted earlier).  If he would have seen this happen, he would not have enjoyed the good old age promised by The ELOHIM. 

 

 

Adolf Schicklgruber 

 

Throughout this study, the point is made from time to time that the evil Adolf Hitler (an alleged bisexual) was not a German named Hitler at all.  Instead, he was something else who merely was pretending to be a good racial German.  Even with his marriage to Eva Braun, in his underground bunker, in Berlin in 1945, Adolf had the gall to try to claim that he was of pure Aryan blood (which was simply a lie). 

 

Surprisingly, in fact, Adolf was a Jew (a Catholic Jew who undoubtedly was a racial Amalekite) whose real name was reportedly Adolf Schicklgruber (per articles in the “Encyclopedia Britannica,” the “Universal Jewish Encyclopedia” and other authoritative biographical sources).  In fact, there are reasons to believe that Adolf had so-called Jewish (actually Amalekite) blood from several directions. 

 

In “To Eliminate the Opiate” (p. 207), R. Marvin S. Antelman mentions this connection in noting a supposed liaison that a Jew (surely an Amalekite) named Frankenberger had with Adolf’s paternal grandmother Maria Anna Schicklgruber.  Interestingly, the very name Schicklgruber seems to be a Jewish (correctly an Amalekite) name. 

 

In an Internet arcile by Dr Henry Makow (quoting Greg Hallett’s book “Hitler Was A British Agent”), the case is made that Maria Anna worked as a maid in the household of the Rothschild mansion in Vienna, Austria and that Nathan Meyer Rothschild got to her and fathered Alois Schicklgruber (who was alleged to be Adolf’s father).  Regardless, whether it was Frankenberger or Rothschild, Alois had a Jewish father. 

 

So there is the strong likelihood that Adolf had so-called Jewish ancestry from two directions on his paternal side.  While Antelman did not buy the Frankenberger connection, he did mention one more linkage that another supposed Jew (who was surely an Amalekite) had with Adolf’s mother Klara Polzl (thus, meaning that Adolf was Jewish, certainly from his paternal side). 

 

On Adolf’s maternal side, his grandmother (the mother of Klara Polzl) was a Stronnes.  The Stronnes family had converted from Judaism to Catholicism in Vienna in the 1850s (per a story in 1933 in the “New York Times”).  This means that even Adolf’s mother was a Jew (therefore making Adolf a Jew by Jewish law). 

 

The interesting thing about Adolf’s several connections to so-called Jews is the incredible reality that many or most of them came about through illicit and illegal sex. 

 

The story about the apparent Amalekite Frankenberger (or Rothschild) and Maria Schicklgruber (who was undoubtedly an Amalekite Jewess as well) involved an illegal affair.  Maria Anna produced the above cited son from this reported illegal encounter whom she named Alois Schicklgruber (per an article on “Hitler,” from “The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia”). 

 

Alois in 1876 changed his name in Austria to Hitler (ibid, p. 400).  Hitler was the maiden name of his first wife.  Reportedly, Alois did marry his bed partner, Klara Polzl (who was reportedly Alois’ niece, per Henry Makow), as wife number three.  It is unclear who number two was in his quest.  It is also said that Adolf had a particular liking for his 17-year old half-niece Geli whom he murdered in 1931 when she tried to escape. 

 

In any case, there is the rumor that poor Adolf was not even the son of Alois; but was, in fact, the son of an adulterous affair that Klara had with another reported Jew (who would have surely been an Amalekite Jew). 

 

Pathetically, there seems to be some similar skullduggery in the family of Klara.  Klara’s father (another apparent Amalekite Jew) got to an Amalekite Stronnes girl (the maternal grandmother of Adolf) and fathered Klara out of wedlock.  

 

The essence of this presentation is that Adolf himself and both his mother and supposed father were all conceived out of wedlock.  The amazing thing about this tangled story of name changes, deception, fornication and adultery is that all of the participants seem to have been Amalekite Jews.  In the case of Adolf, this depravity seems to go back to his Edomite ancestors. 

 

 

Still More Modern Edomite Perversion 

 

With the Edomite propensity for evil and perversion, as laid out in the preceding chapters, it is manifest why a probable Amalekitess, like Monica Lewinsky, would be so willing to engage in sodomy with Slick Clinton (to be later discussed) and why her father had no problems with it at all. 

 

Instead of being angry and upset over Slick’s sodomite debasement of his daughter, Barnard Lewinsky continued to support Clinton, regardless of what he had done to Monica. 

 

Obviously, the evident Amalekitess girl Monica was never concerned about her sodomy with President Slick.  The Mar 21, 2003, “The Week” (p. 12) had a picture of Monica with a report that she had lost some weight (she has historically been on the fat side).  Monica was quoted as saying-- “I’ve learned not to put things in my mouth that are bad for me.” 

 

With a public abasement of a young woman in an recognized ethnic group in the US, one would suppose that all of the Amalek-Edomites in America would come out in defense of their girl and publicly condemn the morally corrupt Slick Clinton for what he had done to her.  But no, not so! 

 

The collective Amalekites are themselves morally depraved and have no concern at all over the debasement of one of their women.  In a sense, sodomy and depravity is a part of the morals of huge numbers of Amalek-Edomites. 

 

Obviously, they don’t get upset when their girls are publicly sodomized, corrupted, humbled and debased.  If they collectively had an ounce of integrity and honour, they would have been outraged.  But they were not concerned.  No leading Amalekite showed any interest whatsoever in condemning the evil Slick Clinton for humiliating Monica. 

 

 

Levy-Condit 

 

Just after the Clinton-Lewinsky sodomite scandal died down, another problem erupted in early 2001 when one more evident Amalekitess likewise took over the headlines for her sexual encounters with US Congressman Gary Condit, a married man from California (Condit is also a depraved Democrat, the same as Clinton).  The young woman, Chandra Levy, was similarly from California. 

 

Like Monica, Chandra went to Washington as an intern (for the US Bureau of Prisons) and vanished in April 2001 (either after or while she was having her affair with the married Condit).  Suspicion fell on Condit.  But allegations also shifted to the possibility of her committing suicide.  So, what did happen? 

 

While many questions still remain on what happened to Chandra, at least some of the mystery was solved.  On May 22, 2002, a man walking a dog in a Washington, DC park stumbled upon Chandra’s skeletonized remains under some leaves in a wooded section of the park.  For sure, Chandra was murdered! 

 

Importantly, it seems clear enough that Amalekites have a strange propensity for illicit and/or perverted sex.  They are simply very immoral and depraved people. 

 

 

Morituri    

 

In 1965, Twentieth Century Fox released a most interesting movie called “Morituri.”  Apparently, it didn’t sell satisfactorily under that name--so the film was renamed “Saboteur:  Codename Morituri; The Saboteur.”  The movie had a top flight cast with Marlon Brando, Yul Brynner and other leading stars. 

 

It was produced and put out by an apparent Amalekite Jew named Aaron Rosenberg.  Rosenberg’s effort received a couple of nominations for Academy Awards.  As an old-time black and white, it was a fairly good movie, with no profanity and generally a story of interest involving the trials of a decent German captain of a freighter trying to take his cargo from Japan to Germany in WWII. 

 

There was only one important woman in the script and she was a very pretty, sexually appealing, German Jewess who had escaped Nazi Germany. 

 

After surviving the sinking of the ship she was on, she was picked up in the Pacific Ocean with some Americans by a Japanese submarine.  The Nipponese submarine turned these captured prisoners (several American men and this Jewess) over to the German freighter.   

 

In the few scenes which this girl was in, she inevitably was offering herself in sex in return for some supposed benefit to her or for something that she simply wanted from various men. 

 

As just noted, the captain was a decent sort of fellow and he proposed to change her Jewish name of Levy to Goddard, a more Western appearing name.  He simply did not want his German crew (some of whom were dedicated Nazis) to know that she was Jewish.  He offered her a private state room with privileges and asked nothing in return.  

 

Yet, she immediately laid it on the line that she was available to get in the sack with him and supply his needs or wishes, whatever.  Another occasion arose when she wanted to induce the several American prisoners on board to participate in a mutiny.  Some five of the Americans were not interested in this adventure. 

 

Sure enough, she contacted them and offered herself as an inducement to get them to go ahead with the scheme she was busy trying to promote.  Thus, she was simply a whore or slut who used her sexual equipment to either give herself more status and privileges from people in authority or induce or seduce men to do her bidding.  She was a very morally depraved young woman. 

 

The thing that struck this writer when viewing this film was the willingness of an evident Amalekite Hollywood producer to put out a production which showed one of his own women in such a bad and pathetic light.  Surely, her role could have been more positive.  But then the idea came to me that this is the way that the Amalekite mind thinks.  This is reality.   

 

They are not interested in presenting morality.  In this case, probably the film depicted the real world and how an attractive, desirable Amalekite Jewess would constantly be using her sexual appeal and equipment to further her own selfish interests in obtaining benefits or in putting over her will to others.  Surely, this is the way the depraved Amalekite mind works. 

 

 

Some Fiction 

 

While this production was perhaps based upon a lot of fact, in terms of how a German ship in WWII would have enormous threats (from allied submarines in the area and/or from British saboteurs on board) in any movement from Japan to Europe, there likely was a lot of fiction introduced to keep the plot moving. 

 

In truth, it would be very improbable that a Japanese sub would pick up a German Jewess survivor from a sunken ship in the Pacific.  A sub might and perhaps would pick up American military survivors from a sunken ship (to become prisoners of war).  But the Jewess idea has to be largely fiction. 

 

Yet, the producer showed this message and carried forward the incredible reality of how the depraved and sick Amalekite mind works.  Based upon the situation with Monica Lewinsky and Chandra Levy, the evidence is massive that a pretty Amalekite Jewish girl will willingly hit the sack with anybody and anything if it will promote her status or fulfill her wishes in any manner. 

 

 

Another Report 

 

Many years ago (perhaps 35 years or so), this writer read a magazine article by an apparent Amalekite Jewish man on the life of a Jewish girl in America (evidently New York, as best as can now be remembered).  This writer remembers almost nothing from this article except the gist of the life of this girl.  Whether it was published in “Playboy” or some other trashy magazine escapes me at this time. 

 

Anyway, little thought was given to this story of long ago until it came time for me to write the above remarks on the film “Morituri.”  In thinking about this likely Amalekite Jewess in Morituri, my memory recalled this magazine article of many, many years ago. 

 

Anyway, the essence of this magazine story, by a very evidently depraved Amalekite Jewish man, was an attractive and appealing Jewish girl and her struggles in life and how she used her sexual equipment to persevere.  This girl was always on the make to bed down with men in authority (for the obvious benefits that their position, money and power might have and how those assets might benefit her). 

 

She was not particular of who she hit the sack with in her quest for gain.  It mattered not whether she was making out with a fat, ugly, old, Black, White, pink or green man as long as the exercise benefited her in some way.  Always, if some man had something she wanted, she was ready and willing to engage in promiscuous and/or perverted sex. 

 

This very old magazine article about an apparent Amalekite Jewess is much like the situation with the just cited Monica Lewinsky and Chandra Levy.  These evident Amalekite Jewish girls were evidently regularly on the look out of how they could engage in demented, evil sex just to be with powerful, influential men.   

 

 

Still One More Case From History 

 

President Bill “Slick” Clinton was one of the most depraved, evil and sorry men of all time who have ever lived in the US White House.  His pathetic and wretched story is told throughout this publication (mainly in chapters and appendices hereafter).  Bill’s sordid sodomy affair with Monica Lewinsky is well known.  But there is another instance of Bill and an Amalekitess hitting it off. 

 

Once Slick was in the US White House, he used it and his office of US president for his personal sexual pleasures and desires.  Besides Monica, there were many others (as will be described in later commentary).  One of the most interesting ones was screen star Barbra Streisand, who Bill tied in with for an affair (as will be discussed in a later presentation herein). 

 

If there ever was a true Amalekite Jewess, it is Barbra.  She has the classic Hittite nose of all time (plus plenty of talent since this fact cannot be denied).  Possibly, in payment for getting to bed down with Barbra, she and one of her shack-up boy friends were allowed to stay in the Lincoln bedroom of the US White House. 

 

Along with the very obvious Amalekite linkage that Barb has, there is much evidence that the former President Slick has some Amalekite genes in his own pathetic and wrapped genealogy (this possibility will be further explored in a later appendix). 

 

So while the Streisand-Slick Clinton liaison gave her and her shack-mate a chance to enjoy the Lincoln bedroom, it gave Slick even more.  It’s highly questionable whether anyone could beat Slick out in a transaction (not even the Amalekite Jewess Barbra Streisand could get the best of him). 

 

Thus, Slick got Barb with a small payoff (the Lincoln bedroom).  And in return, poor Barb and her liberal, leftist Hollywood crowd gave Slick multiplied millions of dollars in campaign contributions (as also will be addressed in later chapters). 

 

The point of this is that sex means nothing to an evil Amalekite.  It is just one more thing which the evil Amalekite will use to try to destroy Yisrael. 

 

Amalekite women, especially attractive and desirable Amalekite women, willingly use their sexual equipment for any perceived purpose and/or benefit if given a chance.  They generally seem to have no sense of morality, integrity, honesty or character.  They will hit the sack with anyone if they can expect a pay-back. 

 

 

More Recent Cases of Amalekite Evil 

 

In another classic illustration of Amalekite morality, the “Jerusalem Post” of July 14, 2000 (p. 5), had a story by Eli Muller on “Israeli diplomat ran child-porn ring” which focused upon accusations that Israel’s vice-consul, Aryeh Scher, ran a child pornography ring in Rio Janeiro, Brazil. 

 

Scher was able to escape back to Israel before he could be arrested by Brazilian authorities (one of the fall-outs of the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 was that Amalekite criminals from around the world would have a place of safety, a sanctuary, to flee to when they risk being caught and prosecuted for their crimes and evil.  The state of Israel will not allow the extradition of these Amalekite criminals). 

 

A search of Scher’s apartment by Brazilian police disclosed some pornographic photos and material which confirmed allegations.  Another Israeli linked to Scher, George Schteinberg, was also accused of child pornography activities--including the distribution of porno material over the Internet.   He was arrested before he could make good on an escape to safety and protection in Israel. 

 

In a classic illustration of the incredible depravity of a very demented Amalekite, the “Jerusalem Post” of Aug 18, 2000, had a news report about one Zion Cohen, a self styled healer, who was indicted in Tel Aviv for raping and committing indecent acts on six of his clients. 

 

In one case, Cohen told a woman client to take her clothes off.  He then placed a plastic covered parchment in her vagina.  Next, he told her that she was cursed and that her cleansing would take six months.  To remove the curse, she would have to drink the seman of a “God-fearing man” (apparently, to make her sodomize him orally). 

 

Obviously, this Amalekite propensity for sexual depravity has laid the groundwork for Amalekites to be some of the leaders in producing and distributing the tragic “snuff” films of sex acts linked in with live murders on the screen.  These snuff movies and Amalekite involvement in making them will be addressed in a later chapter. 

 

 

Behemah Problems 

 

Besides the evil Amalekites, as discussed above and hereafter, the behemah humanoids (both Christians and non Christians) are also generally very immoral and sexually depraved.  Thus, the Amalekites do not have a monopoly on depravity and decadence. 

 

In general, the behemah humanoids have no problem with perversion, sodomy and/or homosexuality (as will be proven in later chapters herein).  Like other (behemah) domesticated animals, they generally will breed each other, anything and everything without much concern over morality. 

 

Manifestly, Christianity has had little or no impact upon the character of behemah humanoids.  Behemah Christians are often just as promiscuous and perverted as behemah non-Christians. 

 

In terms of sexual depravity, the behemah humanoids are very closely akin (almost as bad, but not quite) to the wicked Amalekites.  The difference between them is that the Amalekites have brains while the behemah humanoids are fairly stupid.  Manifestly, the Amalekites are extremely intelligent people in the present culture. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 156--Amalek-Edomite Depravity III

 

 

More on Amalekite Morality 

 

Assuredly, it is manifest that the Amalek-Edomites, from a genetic viewpoint, are different from almost all other ethnic or racial groupings of peoples on planet earth.  Their closest cousins in depravity probably were the previously mentioned fags in Sodom and Gomorrah (who racially seem to be related to the Amalekites, as well as being connected geographically). 

 

Therefore, many of the leading homosexuals and leaders in the queer movement appear to be Amalek-Edomites.  Many of these Amalekites are acknowledged as atheists or agnostics--though the Reform and Reconstructionist Jewish movements have huge numbers of queers in them. 

 

Some of these warped faggots like Roy Cohn, Barney the Fag Frank and NY Mayor Koch have become important government leaders in the United States (along with Henry Kissinger, who also seems to be a closet queer).  Cohn, Koch, Kissinger and Barney the Fag and his warped sister (close aide and public spokesperson for Slick Clinton) were/are all probable Amalekites. 

 

 

Other Famous Amalekite Queers 

 

The Amalekite gangster Jacob Rubenstein (alias Jack Ruby), who gunned down Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas in 1963 (to be later described, along with the John F. Kennedy killing), was a homosexual, a pimp and a distributor of pornographic literature (“The Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 137). 

 

The famous Anne Frank (who died at age 15 at the Bergen Belsin concentration camp) of Holland and WWII fame appears to have had some teenage lesbian feelings, as outlined in her diary, per Professor R. Amy Elman of Kalamazoo College (Oct 22, 1999, “Forward,” p. 1, 16).  Apparently, Anne (a likely Amalekitess) was never allowed circumstances or time to pursue these feelings.  But they are interesting. 

 

The previously discussed Karl Marx, not only was a real, live Satanist, but a biographical write up on him by J. R. Nyquist, in his book on “Origins of the 4th World War” (p. 148), indicates that in a play written by Marx, the leading characters were Satanic, corrupt and overspilling with curses, homosexual fantasies and other dark passions.  Perhaps Marx had some latent homosexual tendencies. 

 

The well known Jewish poet, Allen Ginsberg, was a queer.  The depraved Ginsberg, of the pathetic hippie days, seems to personify what one would expect to find among modern Jewish Amalekites. 

 

Fat cat Louis Rosenstiel (to be assessed later), composer Aaron Copeland, painter Tobias Schneebaum, author Joel Rothschild (who now has AIDS) and politician Joseph Lieberman were/are all fags and evident Amalekites.  Even Nightline host and newsman Ted Koppel, an Amalekite, is allegedly queer (though he apparently denies it). 

 

Reports have even surfaced claiming that the famous Los Angeles Dodgers left-handed pitcher Sandy Koufax (a likely Amalekite Jew--ed) was a fag--perhaps a bisexual, as he was married a couple of times (Mar 7, 2003, “The Week,” p. 10).  The same bisexuality is reportedly true with the Amalekites Yasser Arafat and Adolf Schicklgruber (reportedly, one of Adolf’s favorite passions was having women defecate on him). 

 

The famous American pianist Liberace is another interesting person.  While his race, ethnicity and/or religion were evidently not publicly discussed, it is fascinating that he had both enormous musical talent and some semblance of a Hittite nose.  When his blatant homosexuality is added in (he died of AIDS a few years ago), the evidence suggests that he had, at least, Edomite (if not Amalekite) genes. 

 

 

Hollywood

 

As a boy in the late 1930s and 1940s, this writer liked Western movies--especially those of Gene Autry, Roy Rogers, John Wayne, and perhaps one of the biggest Western stars of all, Randolph Scott. 

 

But one of the tragedies of the sickness called Hollywood was the huge presence of Amalekites and especially Amalekite queers involved in the film industry.  This problem is still gross today. 

 

For years, a number of the queers have been identified and made known--especially after they started coming down with AIDS--like with Rock Hudson and Liberace (as cited above).  But one of the most famous enduring queers of all was a surprise and disappointment to me--the Western actor Randolph Scott.  In view of his macho Westerns, he never seemed to be the type. 

 

In recent years, celebrities John Stamos and his wife Rebecca bought a house in Calabasas, CA, which had some notoriety attached to it (Nov 1, 2002, “The Week,” p. 10).  It used to be a famous house of prostitution; and back in the 1950s, it was the home of Hollywood star Randolph Scott. 

 

Reportedly, Scott used it as a “little gay love nest,” per Mrs Stamos.  She has photographs of Scott, and of all people, Cary Grant, at the house (cooking together in the kitchen) during one or more of their private get-togethers at Scott’s home.  Of course, Cary Grant was a British Amalekite Jew actor who scored big in Hollywood. 

 

Grant was a top star for years and many American women idolized him as one of the most handsome men in Hollywood.  He had several wives over his life, including the Woolworth heiress Barbara Hutton.  But what was not commonly known about the depraved star was that the Amalekite Grant was a queer--perhaps a bisexual, in view of his several marriages (or it might be that his marriages were all fronts). 

 

 

Amalekite Queer Marriages 

 

Subsequent chapters herein will broach the new media push on the promotion of homosexual marriages.  One of the facets of this depravity came up in the summer of 2002 when various newspapers began running stories on “same-sex” commitments and marriages. 

 

A couple of Amalekite Jewish queers named Steven Goldstein and Daniel Gross were apparently the first pair of faggots to receive this huge outpouring of publicity. 

 

In August 2002, these queers were thrust onto the front page of the “Montreal Gazette,” into the wedding section of the “New York Times,” and prominently on CNN and NBC’s “Today Show,” which followed up with live interviews of the two faggots (Sep 6, 2002, “Forward,” p. 2). 

 

 

The Outreach

 

The February 15, 2002, “Forward” paper (p. 17) had a lengthy report by Jade Chang on “Between Heaven and Earth:  A New Home for L.A. Congregation” which told the story of a Reform synagogue in Los Angeles that is made up of gay, lesbian and bisexual Reform Jews (surely Amalekites because it is hard to fathom that true Israelite Jews would be a part of this depraved mess). 

 

The head rav is a woman named Denise Eger.  Reportedly, this queer group (called the Congregation Kol Ami), headed by Eger, broke off in 1992 from another queer Reform synagogue in Los Angles called the Beth Chayim Chadashim (House of New Lives).  The Kol Ami queers have recently moved into a huge new building which cost $750,000 for the lot, $1.3 million for construction and $200,000 for furnishings. 

 

One of the strange features of this faggot synagogue is the presence of “interlocking seats.”  From the article, it was unclear what interlocking seats are and how they are used.  But since they seem to be some type of a new innovation for homosexual worshippers, it is easy to speculate that they must allow queer worshipers to connect in some fashion. 

 

But there is still more to come on this Jewish (Amalekite) depravity.  A Reform “rabbi” once told a class on Jewish faith and practice at a liberal Georgia college that “God is not against homosexuality,” that “It’s okay for women to be to be rabbis,” and that some “50% of women rabbis are lesbians” (Apr-Jun 2001 “Petah Tikvah,” p. 56).   

 

 

More Amalekite Reports 

 

In August 2000, some seven Israeli teenage boys molested, raped and sodomized a girl classmate in Israel while three of their buddies watched (Aug 11, 2000, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 5).  When these boys added sodomy to their gang rape, it spelled out the likelihood that the boys were depraved Amalekites. 

 

“Spotlight” of Apr 30, 2001 (p. 2), had a news item which reported that a “respected associate rabbi,” named Jerald M. Levy, was caught in Boca Raton, Florida, working the Internet trying to contact small boys for sex.  Levy was released from jail after posting a $10,000 bond.  As with other sex predators in this category, he will probably beat the rap or only face a short sentence. 

 

The Dec 14, 2001, “Forward” (p. 2) had a news report of the arrest of Los Angeles area “rabbi” Mordechai YomTov on ten felony counts of allegedly molesting three small boys, ages eight to ten.  YomTov was a teacher at the Cheder Menachem School.  Apparently, the children molested were students of YomTov at the Jewish school. 

 

The Feb 22, 2002, “Forward” (p. 2) had another pathetic report about a prominent Amalekite queer named Howard Nevison.  Nevison was the cantor for a Reform synagogue in Manhattan, New York.  Per the story, the Amalekite Nevison began sexually abusing his own three-year old nephew in 1973.  The queer cantor continued sodomizing the child up until 1997. 

 

In 1998, the boy’s mother signed an affidavit that Stewart Nevison, the son of Howard’s brother Lawrence, also had abused her daughter.  It appears that sodomy and the abuse of small children run strong in this Amalekite family of queers and perverts. 

 

By the way, Howard was arrested and is to be tried.  If found guilty, he could be given 5 to 15 years in prison (which means that he will soon be back on the streets sodomizing small boys).  The May 17, 2002, “Forward” (p. 5) said Nevison’s trial was to start June 13, 2002.  In the meantime, his synagogue has placed the cantor on “paid leave.” 

 

 

So-called Religious Jews Too 

 

Early 2002 saw the news sources ablaze with stories about how bad pedophilia has been in the Roman Catholic Church.  Tragically, Judaism has come under the same fire in 2002 (as noted above).  One could expect that the depraved Amalekites hanging out in the Reform persuasion would be exposed as homosexual queers and pedophiles; but surely, the Orthodox would not have the problem. 

 

Well, as things erupted in 2001 and 2002, there was a problem in the American Orthodox entity.  The trouble apparently first surfaced in 2001 with allegations made against Baruch Lanner, who served as a “rabbi” and the youth leader of the Orthodox Union’s National Conference of Synagogue Youth (Apr 26, 2002, “Forward,” p. 1, 3). 

 

Lanner was in this position over many years and now allegations have arose that he abused dozens of young people/children over a thirty-year period.  Evidently, the so-called “rabbi” resigned in 2001 under pressure.  It is unclear how many of these young people or children have come forth to make the allegations, but there were at least two girls who told about Lanner’s fondling of them (ibid, p. 3). 

 

A trial for Baruch Lanner was scheduled to take place in 2002.  The Orthodox youth leader maintained his innocence which was to be settled in the trial.  But apparently, there has been sufficient evidence of his misconduct that the organization does not want him in charge of children any longer. 

 

So far, the Orthodox Union has tried to keep a low profile and apparently has not wanted any publicity or acknowledgment of how bad Lanner may have been simply because of fears that the organization will be faced with massive lawsuits, as is happening presently in the Roman Catholic Church (ibid, p. 1). 

 

This writer does not have the particulars on the charges against Lanner.  The “Forward” article merely reported upon his coming sex abuse trial and said little about the allegations.  The students who have come forward have been girls.  So it would appear that maybe Lanner was only a pedophile and not a homosexual faggot bothering small boys. 

 

This type of criminal activity is indicative of the depraved and evil Amalekite mind.  Therefore, there has to an assumption that Lanner is an Amalekite hiding out and pretending to be an Orthodox Jew (as is also true with the previously mentioned Joseph Lieberman).  So even Amalekites can become Orthodox Jews.  It is not an impossibility. 

 

In one more report, the Aug 16, 2002, “Forward” (p. 2) noted that David Schwartz, a supervisor at a Los Angeles area Orthodox day camp, was charged with six felony counts and one misdemeanor count of sexually abusing children--including two boys as young as four and five years old. 

 

Finally, this same “Forward” (p. 2) had a report that Yeshiva University, a well known Jewish religious college, has approved a plan to allow gay and lesbian couples to live together in the married student housing facilities at its medical school.  In fairness, this decision was reached after some queer students brought a lawsuit demanding the open sodomy. 

 

 

Rebecca Walker 

 

The Feb 26, 2001, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 46-47) had an enlightening story by Judith Solomon on “Child of the Movement.”  The focus of this report was upon a biracial woman named Rebecca Walker.  Her mother was the famous Black writer Alice Walker and her father was a Jew named Mel Leventhal (an Amalekite?). 

 

Alice Walker gained some fame and prominence when she wrote the book “The Color Purple” in 1982 and won a Pulitzer Prize for it the next year.  Alice’s story was about a poor, illiterate, backward, Black woman who lived in the rural South during the so-called Great Depression.  Hollywood producer Steven Spielberg picked upon it in 1985 and made it into a Academy Award winning movie. 

 

Black heroes (like Whoopi Goldberg, Oprah Winfrey and Danny Glover) starred in it--which should have pleased the US leftists.  But as the production was underway, there was a massive protest and uproar from the liberals and Blacks across America--because Walker’s work portrayed Negro men in a very unfavorable light (since they regularly beat and abuse their women terribly). 

 

Goldberg played the abused and mistreated Black woman Celie.  But Celie got back at her abusive and hateful Black father-in-law when she spit in his glass of water.  Black servants have always used this popular Black trick to get even with their White masters/employers.  They often spit in the food going to Whites to show their disdain.  

 

In any case, Alice Walker met the likely Amalekite Leventhal in Mississippi in the 1960s when Mel was there as a civil rights-activist lawyer trying to cause trouble for the people of Mississippi. 

 

 

The Marriage 

 

In 1967, Mel and Alice went to New York and got married.  By 1969, the Leventhals had produced the biracial child Rebecca.  However, the interracial marriage did not take and the Leventhals divorced when Rebecca was eight.  Thereafter, the child was split between her Black mother and her Jewish father.   She did not grow up as a religious Jew, but she did absorb much Jewish culture and identified with it. 

 

By the time that Rebecca was 12, she had lost her virginity.  And by age 14, she had had an abortion.  At some point in time, the biracial Rebecca turned to lesbianism (or at least, she became a bisexual).  The gist of Solomon’s story about Rebecca was that the Black Jewish girl was shacked up in a lesbian “partnership” with a shackmate who had an eight-year-old son to raise. 

 

Rebecca’s biracial life as a child must have been horrible because her Jewish grandmother generally rejected her and her Black relatives called her a “cracker.”  Apparently, she grew up bouncing around between being Jewish, White and Black and never fitting into any of the definitions correctly (although the power of the Black genes surfaced in her looks and Black rhythm). 

 

Needless to say, Rebecca’s life was shattered from her childhood because of her dysfunctional, interracial family.  And seemingly, she and her lesbian friend are raising the small boy in the same state of confusion.  She says that her present lesbian family is part Jewish, part Buddhist and much “love” (per her words). 

 

If her father Mel was a true Amalekite, as seems highly likely, it probably accounts for much of her pathetic, wretched life.  Amalekite genes would hurt her and especially as they are mixed with primitive African genes with all of their fall-outs. 

 

Certainly, Rebecca showed evidence of the Amalekite mentality because she legally changed her name from Leventhal to Walker when she was in high school.  Amalekites are notorious for changing their names (as noted earlier). 

 

 

Isaiah 3:9 

 

It must be significant that Yeshayahu the prophet predicted the sins of Sodom would one day enter into Yehudah, as happened when Yehudah absorbed the Amalekites (Isa 3:9).  Some students might try to read into that text the destruction of Yehudah, like Sodom.  But that’s not the question. 

 

The issue in Isaiah 3:9 is manifestly homosexuality because the prophet says that the people allow it to be openly displayed and won’t even try to hide it.  And this has been one of the tragedies in Yehudah. 

 

Not only did Jewish authorities allow the integration of the perverted Amalekites into Yehudah and Judaism, but they have silently sat back and allowed them to become the biggest purveyors of sodomy, perversion and filth which the world has ever known. 

 

 

The Worst Feature of Amalekite Depravity 

 

It’s bad enough that so many of the Amalekites are queers themselves and that they openly display their perversion and wretchedness within Yehudah and Judaism, but there is another more horrible feature of this whole sordid sickness.  As outlined in previous comments, the Amalekites have for centuries been trying to defile Yisrael with pederasty (sexual perversion). 

 

These Amalekite efforts to pollute Yisrael by pederasty started during the Exodus (per Piska 3, discussed earlier) and have obviously continued over the years wherever the Amalekites have had power (historically over Yehudah and now over the modern House of Yisrael nations). 

 

Therefore, the wicked, pushy Amalekites have played a very important role in advocating, teaching, leading and inducing the dumb Christian Israelites in the House of Yisrael nations to become homosexuals and perverts (yet, they strangely don’t try to push the same perversion upon Jews in the Israeli state--perhaps because of fear of the Jewish religious authorities who carry big sticks in the state of Israel). 

 

Yes, the Amalekites have been extremely busy promoting, teaching, encouraging and prompting open homosexuality in the national House of Yisrael nations where they now control the media and entertainment industries, the government, and assuredly the collective peoples. 

 

For example, Barney the Fag Frank ran a homosexual call service out of his home and may still be doing so.  Who knows how many stupid, gullible Israelites that Barney has induced to become fags like himself. 

 

So it isn’t only that many of the Amalekites are themselves queers, but they have been the vocal people who have pushed open homosexuality upon the Christian Israelite society.  Many, gullible, stupid Israelites (plus Adamites generally and the behemah and chaiyah) have succumbed to this Amalekite depravity and have been sucked into pathetic homosexuality. 

 

If Christendom refuses to do anything about this sickness and/or refuses to say “no” to this wretchedness (as is happening currently), Judaism should step forward and take a stand against the Amalekites.  But she won’t (as suggested by Isaiah 3:9).  

 

 

The Power of Money 

 

Not only have many Amalekites been homosexual queers, but they are the primary people who promote and encourage open homosexuality in the Western, Christian civilization, as pointed out above.  It’s not to say that they are the only perverted people in the West.  But they are the leaders and spokesmen for much of the current prevalence of sexual depravity in the Christian West. 

 

They are successful in this direction because of the enormous amount of money which they own or control.  Truly, there is a strange correlation between homosexuality and the Amalekites--just as there is a unique and prevailing correlation between Edomites and crime, to be broached in subsequent chapters. 

 

 

More Edomite Depravity 

 

One of the primary centers of Amalek-Edomite power is in Hollywood, USA.  Today, Hollywood and the movie industry has grown to be one of the most depraved and morally corrupt places in world history (approaching Sodom and Gomorrah).  Most of this wickedness and evil comes from the creative minds of very diabolical Amalek-Edomites. 

 

Of course, true Jews and Judaism (mostly Orthodox, Conservative and Messianic ones) oppose much of this modern, demented wickedness emanating from Amalekite controlled Hollywood and the TV industry--although liberal (non-Edomite) Christians (and particularly behemah Christians) accept it or promote it. 

 

Perhaps this is the reason why so many American Amalek-Edomites abandon any sense of Judaism to become Christians, agnostics, atheists or New Agers; but always, in the context of being secret Satanists/Luciferians, as previously discussed. 

 

 

Further Edomite Deception 

 

The reality that true Jews and the better manifestations of their faith in the Orthodox and Conservative segments of Judaism brings up a need to mention again that it is plausible that some Amalek-Edomites (like Senator Joseph Lieberman) do attach themselves to these more respected branches of Judaism, as noted in previous comments. 

 

Thus, it might not be correct to say or believe that only true Jews are Orthodox or Conservative and only Edomites are Reform/ Reconstructionist Jews (although these correlations may have some general application and particularly in the Christian West).  It can be true that some Edomites do pose as Orthodox or Conservative Jews or fundamentalist Christians on occasion. 

 

The opposite is also true.  It must be allowed that some good, true Jews are out in the world who could get suckered into the Reform/ Reconstructionist movements or the liberal, permissive, Christian denominations.  It would be questionable how many would get seduced by these movements.  But it must not be ruled out. 

 

 

Dr Laura 

 

A clear demonstration of this conflict surfaces when one looks carefully at the popular radio talk show host Dr Laura Schlessinger, now heard over a large portion of the United States.  This Dr Laura, as she likes to be called, is a so-called marriage therapist of some sort who attempts to counsel and advise call-in individuals with personal problems and hang-ups. 

 

This woman has advertised herself as a Conservative Jew (or now, she is alleged to be Orthodox).  But in listening to her counsel to the poor, confused people calling in, one would have to wonder to what extent she could be a true Jew at all.  While she generally talks good in terms of the needs of children to have both a father and a mother, she often deviates from the Torah otherwise. 

 

She is never particularly strong on showing honor to parents.  Her attitude toward children seems to be one of permissiveness with no sense of true disciplining of children (she apparently disapproves of any physical spanking of children).  Laura appears to have absolutely no qualms at all over interracial marriages. 

 

 

Laura and the Queers 

 

More importantly, she has been very pro-queer in her advice and counseling.  This Dr Laura seems to have no condemnation of homosexuality at all, apart from a recognition that children do need a mother and a father.  Consequently, many queers call her for advice and counseling.  The queers clearly like her and many obviously listen to her program.  For some time, she never condemned their wretched practices. 

 

Having made this observation about Laura and her pro-queer attitude, there is some evidence that for awhile, in recent years, she changed her pro-homosexual position somewhat.  Reportedly, she started talking negatively about homosexual activism in some way to even rile up and make various queer groups mad at her (Nov 22-28, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 23).  So maybe, Laura changed briefly on this subject. 

 

But this was all temporary.  Because, in late 2000, she came out with a two pronged assault to gain back the love and support of the faggots.  First, she publicly apologized for any critical remarks and asked for the queers to forgive her (Dec 2000 “Internet Vortex,” p. 4). 

 

Evidently, the second phase of her motion has been to tone down her words to gain back both the queer listeners and various advertisers who had taken offense at her upsetting of the homosexual community.  Since money is the name of the game, Laura probably was terrified when some advertisers sided with the faggots. 

 

Since she is so pro-queer and pro-miscegenation and anti-parent and anti-disciplining of children, one must be suspicious that she could be an Amalek-Edomite genetically from at least her one Jewish parent.  Or perhaps, alternatively, she could be a janissary robot only doing the Amalekite bidding (a janissary will be defined in a subsequent chapter). 

 

 

Doing the Work of Satan 

 

With her large following and reputation among conservative, White Americans, she clearly is doing the Satanic work of the Amalekites in misleading the Whites to their downfall.  In the sense that she is pretending to be a Conservative or Orthodox Jew (whichever it is) with Scriptural values, she seems to be a Satanic plant to further the Amalekite aims of destroying Yisrael. 

 

It isn’t only that she is busy destroying White, Christian Americans, but she seems to be also trying to put the hex sign (figuratively) on whatever remnant of true Israelites there is remaining in the Jewish community of America.  Like White Christians who have been taken in by this Doctor Laura, the same is true with the Jewish community.  Many blindly follow her teachings. 

 

The above observations on Doctor Laura have been made in the context of her early days on talk radio while she was allegedly a Conservative Jew.  She could be a gross hypocrite and have changed some of her views in more recent years in an effort to further deceive and mislead her gullible, conservative audience. 

 

Also, in her early radio days, she was very rude, nasty and discourteous to callers.  But she toned this down considerably with experience.  Maybe, she had to restrain her arrogant and rude attitude or be forced off of the air.  It is all of these qualities, more than anything else, which make her a very dangerous force to be counseling people. 

 

 

The Laura-Walters Feud 

 

Finally, poor Laura took a wrong turn when she made the mistake of criticizing the powerful media voice of Barbara Walters.  Walters seems to be a clear Amalekitess Jew who would be tough to oppose on any playing field.  Poor Laura blundered when she complained about Barbara wearing a bathrobe to make money (the obsession of all true Amalekites). 

 

Apparently, Barbara’s Amalekite colleagues fired back at Laura by publishing a photo of Laura appearing nude (which had floated around the Internet some years ago).  It is true that a couple of evil Amalekites can sometimes get mad at each other and slug it out in the public arena.  Whether this is the case of the Laura-Walters feud or not is unclear at this time.  But for sure, Laura has taken on a tigress with Walters. 

 

 

The Friedman Twins 

 

In 1918, in Sioux City, Iowa, identical twin daughters were born to a couple of Amalekite Khazars from Russia named Friedman.  One girl was named Esther and the other Pauline (who was called “Popo”).  Both were close and grew into adulthood as the best of friends.  They got married and went their own paths, but still maintained contact. 

 

Esther married an apparent Amalekite named Jules William Lederer (who later founded the Budget Rent-a-Car Company).  In time, both of the girls became newspaper columnists to offer the typical Amalekite advice of destruction for the dumb Christian goyim in America.  These two Amalekite women were the real fore-runners to the likes of Dr Laura, who came along later. 

 

Esther died in June of 2002.  Her death received a surge of publicity because she and her sister were both nation-wide columnists with profound followings.  The Jul 5, 2002, “The Week” (p. 34) had almost a full page obituary on Esther because of her fame.  “The Week” called her “America’s mother” and “The columnist who advised a nation.”

 

Per the “Chicago Tribune,” Esther was “the world’s best read and most widely syndicated newspaper column, a fixture in 1,200 newspapers, offering a daily snapshot of a society in transition to an audience of some 90 million readers.”  In somewhat of a similar vein, almost the same thing can be said for sister Popo, who also followed a like path in life. 

 

However, Esther and Popo didn’t reach the big leagues as Amalekite Jews leading the gullible goyim down the road to destruction.  Instead, they both followed the usual Amalekite methodology of using other names to fool the dumb Christians.  Esther became famous as Ann Landers and Popo reached her notoriety as Abigail Van Buren (with a nationwide “Dear Abby” advice column). 

 

In the case of Esther, per “The Week,” she wrote that masturbation was a normal part of growing up, that impotent men get penile implants, and that lonely, sick and bereaved people “get a pet.”  Poor Esther or Ann, whichever, was also known to have at least one time altered a signed letter to her in her column.  Manifestly, she was dishonest. 

 

The writer of this production is not familiar with Abby, but presumably she too offered about the same line of deception and depravity to help speed along the destruction of the gullible goyim.  The importance of mentioning Abby lies in the fact that the once inseparable twin sisters grew into being profound competitors who hated each other.  They wouldn’t even speak for five years. 

 

As can be expected, Esther was a dedicated Democrat and close friend of the ultra liberal William O. Douglas, Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court.  Possibly, Esther’s daughter Margo is following in the same footsteps as her famous mother.  She too writes a newspaper advice column.  It is called “Dear Prudence.” 

 

Now, it is easy to see why America is so fouled up and confused.  American women have been turning to Amalekite workers of deception and evil for advice. 

 

 

Dana International 

 

The conflict or contrast between religious Jews and evil Amalek-Edomites was brought out in a 1998 news report from the Israeli state over its plans to send the trans-sexual singer Dana International to a Eurovision Song Contest as a representative of the state of Israel (Jul 1998 “New Beginnings,” p. 16).  Dana, now an alleged woman, was once a man. 

 

While details of Dana’s genealogy were not stated, it seems certain that this demented aberration is a genuine Amalekite because it is Amalekite genes which make for the most gross kinds of perversion. 

 

The report gave no details on who Dana’s sponsors and supporters were.  But it’s not too difficult to see some diabolical, perverted Amalek-Edomites lurking in the background promoting this pathetic figure to represent Israel. 

 

Conversely, this action has infuriated a number of religious Israelis like Shlomo Ben-Izri, an MP with the Ultra Orthodox Shas party.  Ben-Izri says a sex change is “worse than an act of sodomy” and that it offends him. 

 

The intelligent and perceptive Ben-Izri went on to note that “Jews are supposed to be a light unto the nations, but this thing is a message of darkness.”  Whatever else can be said for Shlomo, he is an honest man with some knowledge and understanding of right and wrong. 

 

 

Fredrich Nietzsche 

 

A book on “The Antichrist” quoted Fredrich Nietzsche on the Jews. 

 

Nietzsche said that “Psychologically considered, the Jewish people are a people endowed with the toughest vital energy, who, placed in impossible circumstances, voluntarily and out of the most profound prudence of self-preservation, take sides with all the instincts of decadence, not as mastered by them, but because they divined a power in these instincts with which one could prevail against ‘the world.’ 

 

“The Jews are the antithesis of all decadents;  they have had to represent decadents to the point of illusion; with a ne plus ultra of histrionic genius they have known how to place themselves at the head of all movements of decadence.” 

 

Although Nietzsche had some perception, it would seem that he confused the decadence and evil of the Amalekites for the collective Jews.  This has been one of the bad fallouts of the wretchedness of the Amalekites.  Because of their evil and presence among the Jews, various people have tried to blame the Jews for Amalekite evils. 

 

Nietzsche may have also missed the point on his assertion that the instincts of decadence were not mastered by them.  The truth is that the Amalekites are truly masters and experts at evil.  The writer of this study at hand believes that indeed they have mastered sin, evil and wickedness.  Furthermore, it is very plainly genetically induced within them. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 157--The Amalekites Follow Balaam

 

 

Balaam Revisited 

 

One of the surest ways of destroying any particular group of people (called genocide in today’s vernacular) is through interracial sex and amalgamation with certain other racial types. 

 

In earlier chapters in this work, data was presented to demonstrate that interracial sex is sin and contrary to YAH’s Word.  Howbeit, this eventuality has not only impacted upon Yehudah and Yisrael, but also upon the whole Adam kind collectively. 

 

To appreciate how sexual misconduct and perversion have been linked to the Edomites, it is necessary to review the situation with old Balaam, the evil seer at the time of the Exodus who was determined to destroy Yisrael.  While Balaam had a lot wrong with himself, the student of truth must not ignore his prophecies and counsel, as recorded in the book of Numbers (after all, he was a true prophet of YHWH). 

 

 

Jasher, Revisited 

 

While otherwise, there has to be some hesitancy about putting too much credence on the book of Jasher, it is true that these ancient writings do have some unusual insight and perception on the Edomites. 

 

This source first mentions Balaam, as a 15 year old boy, who was wise and understood the art of Witchcraft (Jasher 61:8).  At that time, Balaam, the son of Beor, became a servant to the evil Angeas, King of Africa.  Since the Edomite Zepho was an early colleague of Angeas, it is a certainty that Balaam and Zepho were friends or colleagues. 

 

Later Zepho took over the kingdom of Chittim and proceeded to double cross (a common Edomite practice) and defeat his former friend Angeas (Jasher 63:27-35).  Balaam, seeing how Zepho prevailed in the fight, elected to move to Chittim where he was received with great honors (Jasher 64:2). 

 

When Zepho and his Edomite relatives decided to attack Yisrael and Egypt (described in some detail elsewhere herein), he called upon Balaam to reveal the outcome of his planned adventure.  But Balaam’s efforts were blocked by YHWH and he couldn’t deliver the message (Jasher 64:26-29). 

 

As noted earlier, Zepho and his allies failed in this effort and were defeated.  But the point of the whole presentation is that it shows that even as a youth, Balaam became a friend and ally of the evil Edomites. 

 

A feature of the character and mentality of the real Balaam surfaced in Jasher 67:18-53 when the Pharaoh had a strange dream and called upon the wise men and seers to interpret it.  Apparently, none of Egypt’s seers could interpret the dream.  So Balaam came to the Pharaoh to offer his help and advice.  

 

Balaam said that a son would be born in Yisrael who would destroy Egypt and free the Israelite slaves.  The Scriptural record indicates that Pharaoh decided initially to order the Hebrew midwives to kill all of the newborn boy babies.  But the midwives were afraid and did not do so.  Therefore, this plan backfired and the Israelites increased (Ex 1:16-20). 

 

So Balaam once more made an appearance before Pharaoh.  This time, he proposed a different solution (at least, this is the message in the book of Jasher).  He said to drown (kill) all of the Israelite male babies being born by throwing them into the river.  Egypt took his advice.  Thus, this was the background for the Scriptural story of Moshe. 

 

 

More Advice from Balaam 

 

To broach the reality of Balaam’s ultimate counsel of wickedness, one must recall the situation with Balak and Balaam in their contact with Yisrael during her wilderness wanderings.  Balaam was still a diviner and then a resident of Pehor on the Euphrates (having moved years earlier from Africa).  Balak was the king of Moab, which was directly in front of Yisrael on her march to the promise land. 

 

Balak saw what all Yisrael had done to the Amorites.  So he sent a delegation to Balaam to ask Balaam to come to him and put a curse upon the approaching Israelites (Num 22-31).  With his hatred for Yisrael, Balaam was agreeable.  But try as hard as he could, old Balaam could never effect a curse on Yisrael. 

 

Instead, under the authority of YHWH, Balaam actually ended up blessing them three times.  Of course, King Balak was quite angry over the matter in which Balaam blessed the Israelites instead of cursing them, as he was going to be paid for doing. 

 

However, in their parting of company, Balaam did have one key piece of advice for his ally Balak.  His counsel was for the Moabites to induce Israelites to commit illicit sex (specifically miscegenation) to bring about their own downfall (Num 31:16). 

 

The Moabites followed Balaam’s advice and sent their daughters into the Israelite camp for miscegenation purposes--as will be described in some detail in a later chapter in this publication (Num 25:1-18).  While the consequences of this sin was stopped at that time (because of the works of YHWH and Phinehas), Balaam’s counsel did not go away from history. 

 

 

Initial Edomite Successes 

 

Early on, various portions of the Edomite peoples picked upon these teachings of Balaam.  A previous chapter noted that the Phoenicians settled in the Western part of Canaan land at a very early time--perhaps in the range of 1800 to 1460 BCE.  The exact date seems uncertain from present historical records. 

 

The “Zondervan Pictorial Bible Atlas” quotes Josephus who dates the founding of the important Phoenician town of Tyre at 1217 BCE.  But the Atlas (p. 358-359) makes the case that the city was founded much earlier--with a clear reference to its existence in 1430 BCE. 

 

The Phoenicians were certainly Edomites, as attested to by Josephus, mentioned previously.  As noted earlier, the big question seems to be identifying which descendant of Esau fathered the Phoenicians. 

 

Because of the references to some three towns in old Canaan with the place names of Timnah (Josh 15:10, 57) and Timnath (Gen 38:12-14; Jud 14:1-5), a good bet would be Timna, Eliphaz’s apparent son. 

 

However, the citation from Genesis 38 focused on a time frame of around 1700 BCE or earlier, as associated with Yehudah.  It’s hard to imagine that Esau’s grandson could be grown and established in that area at that time, although that might have been the case.  Esau married long before Yakov and lived in old Canaan until Yakov returned from Mesopotamia.  He then moved South. 

 

It is possible that Timna was responsible for the Timnath in Dan--if not all three of those cities in Yisrael.  The town in Dan (Jud 14:1-5) is important because its inhabitants were called Timnites (Jud 15:6) and it was in the territory of Dan.  Anyway, the best estimate is that these Phoenicians were likely from Timna, son of Eliphaz and grandson of Esau. 

 

 

The Problem With Dan? 

 

With this background, it seems apparent that over the years these Edomites followed Balaam’s teachings to the letter.  They quickly began integrating and mixing with the Danites.  Over the years, it appears that this portion of Southern Dan miscegenated greatly with these Phoenician Edomites, either in Canaan or later in Ireland. 

 

Thus, the modern, Southern, Gaelic Irish seem to be a classic mixture of Edomites and Israelites.  Perhaps this is the reason that the tribe of Dan was purposely left out of the election in the age end, as outlined in Revelation 7.  It is also the likely explanation of why the Southern Irish have had such a propensity for the Catholic religion, which will be later assessed. 

 

This propensity of Danites to mix with alien peoples has been one of their long recognized attributes.  Yair Davidy quotes the “Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs,” as saying that Dan prophesied of his sons that they would forget their ELOHIM and be alienated from the land of their inheritance and from the race of Yisrael and from the family of their seed (“Lost Israelite Identity,” p. 187). 

 

 

Another Example 

 

As described in an earlier chapter, the available evidence suggests that the old Ottoman empire essentially involved Turkic peoples from Eliphaz.  As outlined, the scholarly evidence is that the Turks of old Anatolia descend from Teman.  Previous discussions placed these Temanite Turks in Asia Minor at the fall of the old Hittite empire by 1230 BCE. 

 

Because of being on the losing side in WWI, this once great Edomite empire collapsed and came to an end in the early 20th century.  But Turkey remained nationally and still today occupies a key geographical bridge between Asia and Europe. 

 

By the time of the Apostolic Assembly, there were some settlements of Israelites in the Western portions of Asia Minor, as proven in the histories of some of the Messianic assemblies in that area, described earlier.  These Israelites could have settled there almost anytime over the years from 1460 BCE to 30 CE.  So it’s hard to be precise on when, why and how they came to Asia Minor. 

 

While it is possible that some of these Israelites may have moved on, it is also plausible that some of them stayed there to eventually integrate, mix and miscegenate with the Edomites, as locally established.  To whatever extent this assimilation happened, it is one more example of Edomites following Balaam’s advice on how to destroy Yisrael. 

 

This Edomite presence in Anatolia, the former domain of the Hittites, is interesting for another important reason.  The original land grant to Avraham (the land promise) may have included this territory (Gen 15:18-21).  Yair Davidy quotes a Dr Kemelman who studied the grant and concluded that it had to include most of Anatolia or Asiatic Turkey (“Lost Israelite Identity,” p. 189). 

 

If Kemelman’s scholarship has merit, it is interesting that Edomites rushed in to seize this area which they were not entitled to possess.  Later, when some true Israelites showed up, they either eventually miscegenated with the existing Edomite inhabitants or moved on to another territory. 

 

Although these two illustrations of Balaam’s advice from history are significant, there seems to be a different approach on Balaam’s thinking, as will be demonstrated with the Amalek-Edomites, to be next assessed. 

 

 

Amalek-Edomites Have Followed Balaam 

 

Thus, not only have various and sundry peoples and nations followed the Balaam thinking through the centuries, but the Amalek-Edomites have particularly devoted themselves to perpetuating it as the classic method of destroying their hated enemies--the Israelites.  However, they have added a unique twist to it.  The background on this Amalek-Edomite approach is interesting. 

 

An early Jewish sage named R. Keruspedai quoted R. Johanan and said that during the Exodus, the Amalekites consulted with old Balaam because he was a master of advice with a gift for nefarious schemes (“Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation,” v. viii, p. 247).  Balaam advised them to make war on the Israelites and Amalek launched his attack (Ex 17:8). 

 

The famous R. Eliezer (c100 CE) noted for Deuteronomy 25:18 that while this first attack was done openly, the Amalekites would attack Yisrael furtively (in secret, by stealth and/or guerrilla tactics) on all other occasions (“Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation,” v. viii, p. 247). 

 

By following this advice from Balaam, most of the later Edomite efforts to recover the birthright land and promises have been by stealth and clandestine methods, as noted in previous chapters.  They abandoned further plans for open, frontal attacks upon Yisrael, as they tried in the Exodus days. 

 

Previous comments have linked the Amalek-Edomites to the famous Khazars of Southern Russia.  Arthur Koestler wrote that they were a Turkish tribe of the steppes who employed a nomadic mobile strategy and guerrilla warfare to subdue and defeat the more superior Russian forces on occasion (“The Thirteenth Tribe,” p. 125). 

 

 

A Change in Strategy 

 

With a failure to destroy Yisrael in the initial Amalek attack (or attacks, since there seems to have been two of them), at the time of the Exodus, is it not then plausible that Balaam would next suggest his classic, furtive method of destroying Yisrael by interracial sex and miscegenation.  Perhaps this was the catalyst that prompted the Amalekites to change their tactics to something more furtive and discreet. 

 

In the vein that the Amalekites have adopted Balaam’s theology and teachings (as mentioned above and in other commentary herein), they have become followers, students and disciples of Balaam (mentioned in II Pet 2:12-15, in apparent reference to the Amalekites).  In this sense, “The Mishnah” focused upon them and noted that they would have “An evil eye, a haughty spirit, and a proud soul...

 

“The disciples of Balaam the wicked inherit Gehenna and go down to the pit of destruction, as it is written, But thou, O God, shalt bring them down into the pit of destruction; bloodthirsty and deceitful men shall not live out half their days” (“The Mishnah,” Avot 19, p. 458). 

 

This Mishnah quotation is from Psalms 55:23, which Second Temple Judaism obviously linked to the disciples of Balaam.  The destruction idea seems to be a repeat of Obadiah 1:8-9, as discussed in a prior chapter. 

 

 

Balaam Followed Earlier Precedents 

 

Actually, it is entirely logical that Balaam would turn to this methodology to destroy Yisrael because this essential thinking was followed several times in ancient history, as recorded in the book of Genesis when Satan first undertook the destruction of the Adamic line. 

 

In Genesis 3, Satan used interracial sex to commence his attack upon the Adamic race when he seduced Eve.  Later, in Genesis 6, he again introduced excessive interracial sex and miscegenation between the various humans/humanoids, and between the humans/humanoids and angelic powers to produce different mongrel races of people. 

 

There is even evidence that the crisis in Genesis 11 (from the leadership of Nimrod and the building of the tower of Babel) involved interracial sex (to be broached in a later chapter herein).  Nimrod was a son of Cush and grandson of Ham (whose wife was probably Naamah, the descendant of Satan-Kain, discussed earlier herein--Gen 4:22). 

 

In the commencement of Satanic interracial sex in the Garden of Eden and the production of the Satanic Cain line of humanoids (as discussed in prior chapters herein), it ended up that The MOST HIGH placed enmity (the Hebrew ebah, meaning hatred, hostility, variance) between the two seedlines of Eve and Satan, as discussed earlier herein (Gen 3:15). 

 

While this conflict between the lines of Satan and Eve could be and has been far reaching and enormous over the centuries, it is interesting that one of the things which Satan has done in the process is to miscegenate and interracially cross the two lines at every opportunity.  Next, he used the line of Cain to provide the leadership in destroying Adam’s line.  All of this surfaced in Balaam’s advice on destroying Yisrael.

 

 

Jude 1:4-16 

 

Consequently, the historical and Scriptural record is that the Amalek-Edomites picked upon the Balaam scheme (which was based upon the earlier thinking of Satan) and became followers or disciples of Balaam.  Thereafter, this work of the Edomites to destroy Yisrael through illicit sex seems to have been established in the New Testament by the writer Yehudah (Jude 1:4-16). 

 

Yehudah noted that some evil men crept in deceitfully to turn EL’s grace (for Yisrael) to lasciviousness (the Greek aselgeia, which Young’s “Analytical Concordance” defines as licentiousness--thus, lacking in moral restraint, sexual permissiveness, etc) and to turn the election of Yisrael to the iniquity of the ways of Cain, Balaam and Core (Jude 1:4, 11). 

 

Of course, Kain was a product of the wicked one and Eve’s miscegenation, as noted above and earlier.  Esau came along and also miscegenated with the descendants of Cain.  Eventually, Balaam arrived on the scene and advocated miscegenation, in particular, as the ultimate solution to destroy Yisrael. 

 

The Greek name Core (Hebrew Korah) probably refers to the Levite Korah, who instituted rebellion against Moshe (Num 16:1-34), although Esau may have had a son and/or illegitimate grandson named Korah, as pointed out earlier (Gen 36:5, 14, 16, 18; I Chron 1:35). 

 

If this Korah reference is to Korah, the son or more likely the grandson of Esau, it is more evidence of the sexual depravity of the Edomites since this Edomite Korah was likely the illegitimate son of Eliphaz and his father’s wife, as described in previous comments. 

 

It is also relevant to note that the Yehudah account likens this whole episode to the case of the angels who miscegenated with humans before and apparently after the flood (Jude 1:6-7).  Yehudah also ties it to the homosexuality and perversion of Sodom and Gomorrah and the going after of strange flesh (sexual intercourse with the behemah and chaiyah). 

 

It should be noted that a favorite tactic of the Amalekite bankers/masters has been not only their own sexual perversions, but their forward, pushy, persistent and powerful attempts to force the same perversion upon Christian Israelites in the House of Yisrael nations. 

 

The wicked Amalek-Edomites have been doing their best to teach, educate and force Christian Israelites to miscegenate and sexually cross with particularly the behemah which will utterly destroy them forever.  Going on, they have also done their best to advocate, teach and instruct the dumb Israelites on the practice of homosexuality and other forms of perversion. 

 

If there was any record in the Greek New Testament which is absolutely astounding in terms of prophetic fulfillment, it is these writings of Yehudah.  He has laid out the future for Yisrael under the strong grip of powerful ruling Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters and even has identified them and their work in detail. 

 

 

More Scriptures 

 

There is another most fascinating remark in Yohanan’s Revelation which also focused on Balaam and his work of promoting racial miscegenation to destroy Yisrael. 

 

Yohanan wrote to the Pergamos Assembly of believers and pointed out the evil teachings of Balaam, obviously adopted and/or promoted by them (Rev 2:14).  There is no question about it, these remarks have to tie to Balaam’s fornication and miscegenation teachings. 

 

The only problem on interpreting this text is to define or establish “who” Pergamos was historically and presently.  The historical application is fairly easy since history does tell about the city of Pergamos in Asia Minor.  As a part of identifying the seven assemblies of Revelation, it is easy to relate this group to the modern Seventh Day Baptist denomination--which will be broached in later comments. 

 

Any person familiar with the Seventh Day Baptists knows at once that one of their most horrible and depraved sins has been their approach to the race question.  They have had an enormous outreach to Colored peoples and have done their best to amalgamate their membership into one race. 

 

By the way, the book of Romans relates to this Pergamos group.  In assessing the situation in Rome, race immediately gains the limelight.  The secular Romans integrated, miscegenated and amalgamated themselves with others to their own detriment centuries ago. 

 

The Roman Catholic Church (which will be assessed in some detail in later chapters) has always been a force promoting the brotherhood of man--coupled with racial integration, miscegenation and amalgamation.  This theology has become the backbone of virtually all of Christendom. 

 

The Socialist, Communist and leftists movements in general support interracial sex and miscegenation.  The famous or infamous Karl Marx was a teacher of interracial sex.  One of his daughters married a Black man named La Fargue (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” p. 122). 

 

 

Help From the Gullible Goyim 

 

While the Christian West is marching full time to Amalekite leaders and their plans for the destruction of the White Christian Goyim in the West, it must be noted that the Amalekites have carefully and cunningly enlisted the help and assistance of the goyim themselves in their own destruction.  It seems incredible, but it is true.  The stupid goyim are working at this effort almost as much as the Amalekites. 

 

It is precisely this situation which gives rise to an understanding of the descriptive word janissary--mentioned heretofore in other presentations. 

 

Apparently, a man named Richard Hoskins of Lynchburg, Virginia used (and defined) this janissary term in some of his writings long ago--which evidently focused upon Edomite Jews or at least upon the controlled media and entertainment industries and how they and government authorities have been able to completely change American values and beliefs in the last 70 years. 

 

In the context of Hoskins’ use, a janissary is a person who is not an Amalekite racially or ethnically.  But he or she has been trained, brainwashed, mesmerized and indoctrinated to blindly believe in, support, teach, advocate and push the Amalekite agenda for the destruction of true Israelites with the same dedication, purpose, resolve and commitment as a real Amalekite.  

 

In this sense, a janissary is a robot or zombiized individual who has no mind of his own, but only functions in a state of confusion and daze of blindly following the Amalekites and their agenda--without the foggiest notion of what the result will ultimately be for him and his people. 

 

 

Another Word 

 

There is still one more descriptive word needing mention in this context.  This word  is “mattoid.”  The Nov 18, 2002, “American Free Press’ (p. 10), in a discussion by Michael Collins Piper on the thinking of the plutocrat David Rockefeller, the word mattoid was attached to David. 

 

Piper defines it as:  “A mattoid is a person of high intelligence who lacks a conscience.  Mattoids are found in top political and banking positions.  Mattoids will do literally anything to increase their wealth or power.” 

 

Tragically, the mattoid and janissary definitions are sometimes combined into one presentation in terms of describing many of the gullible goyim in the Christian West (who are working full time to help the Amalekites in their work of destruction).  What a paradox this whole thing has been. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 158--Amalek-Edomite Path of Evil

 

 

The Historical Record 

 

When the House of Yehudah began absorbing huge numbers of Edomites in Second Temple days, the Amalek-Edomites gained power and strength over the Jewish population.  In their positions of control, they began a systematic campaign of destroying Yehudah from within rather than from without, as is customarily followed by peoples out to destroy other peoples. 

 

The specific Amalek-Edomite methodology of destruction was the bringing about of Yehudah’s racial miscegenation and integration with other peoples; all to the detriment of Yehudah and the true Jews, as Josephus and other historians confirm ("The Jewish War," V:443, translated by J. Thackeray, described earlier). 

 

In the context of this methodology, it appears that the Amalekites themselves miscegenated with the true Jewish Israelites.  But clearly, over the years, they have also encouraged and promoted peoples of other significantly different races to similarly miscegenate and mix with the true Jews.  Thus, the true Jews were subjected to Balaam’s theology from two directions. 

 

Not only have ruling Amalekites created an environment for promoting and accepting Africans like Sammy Davis Jr. and Whoopi Goldberg into Jewish fellowship, but in the last few years, they have even funded and/or prompted a movement of huge numbers of the dark peoples of India’s Shinlung tribe and Black Falashas from Ethiopia to Yisrael to be integrated into the Israeli society and culture. 

 

 

More on the Ethiopians 

 

The situation with the Black Ethiopians is interesting.  “The Jerusalem Post” of Apr 14, 2000 (p. 2, 32), discussed it in some detail in an article by Elli Wohlgelerner on “Decision time in Ethiopia,”  In 1984, the Israelis brought 8,000 of them to Israel and in 1991, they brought another 14,000. 

 

In the meantime, in 2000, another 26,000 lined up in a special camp site wanting to also go to Israel.  And the numbers kept growing daily.  The Elli Wohlgelerner article suggested that if these 26,000 were allowed to come to Israel, another 26,000 (or more) would line up in the camps in Ethiopia, also wanting to emigrate to Israel.  Thus, it was a catch 22 situation. 

 

The Israeli Interior Minister, Natan Sharansky (a Khazar, originally from Russia), had to make a decision on whether/how these Blacks would be allowed into Palestine.  The article did not specifically report on Sharansky’s personal feelings about the issue.  But from hints given, he was in favor of it--although concerned that it would open a floodgate of more Blacks wanting to come under the pretext that they were Falashas. 

 

It appears that numerous Jewish groups in America (Amalekites?) were much in favor of bringing the Blacks in--like the North American Conference of Ethiopian Jewry, the Rabbinical Council of America and various other American Jewish groups.  Conversely, many of the Israelis were against it.  The gist of the report was that likely the Israelis would allow more Black Ethiopians to come to Israel in the future. 

 

Though Sharansky eventually left the government in 2000 over the Palestinian Intifada and Barak’s moves for peace, the government did finally make a move for substantially more Colored immigration from Ethiopia. 

 

 

Approval Came 

 

The “Jerusalem Report” of Jun 4, 2001 (p. 6), had a news story on “Israel to absorb 6,000 Ethiopians this year” which tells the tale of a decided move to bring the Ethiopians to Israel.  In 1999 and 2000, some 2,000 Ethiopians were brought to Israel.  Some 8,000 to 10,000 are now approved to come.  So they too will be on the way soon.  The only question now about the subject seems to be budgetary constraints. 

 

The evidence is clear that many of these Black Ethiopians have never had any real connections with Judaism.  Their country is in a state of crisis with civil war, famine, poverty and turmoil.  So most of these Ethiopians simply want out and have hope of a better future in Israel. 

 

Even the so-called Falashas were never really dedicated, religious Jews. 

 

Over the years, there was some publicity trying to tie them back to Shlomo and Sheba.  But most of this hype was nonsense since the Blacks were not really religious people (certainly not in the vein of the Orthodox Jews).  Many of these Ethiopians were like the Khazars in Europe.  They both have retained heathen customs from their pasts. 

 

 

Some Possibilities 

 

The “Jerusalem Post” of May 25, 2001, had an interesting report on this situation in Ethiopia and why such massive thousands of Black Ethiopians are lining up to go to Palestine. 

 

In 1984, a Black Ethiopian named Aharon Tagu came to Israel as a part of the Ethiopian migration.  Anyway, this Tagu gained some financial backing and support and returned to Ethiopia to go to work to line up Ethiopian Blacks to immigrate to Israel.  Apparently, Tagu has had a lot of success because thousands of them are now in camps trying to be admitted to Israel. 

 

It is unclear of exactly which Jews are promoting the movement of these Africans to Palestine. 

 

But there is a powerful force probably involving the Amalekite bankers/masters in Europe and North America.  Certainly, leftist media sources like the “Jerusalem Post” and the “Jerusalem Report” seem to be in favor of this immigration.  Reportedly, Tagu has had contact with the Mossad.  So maybe, the Mossad has been involved as well. 

 

Finally, on this movement of Ethiopian Blacks to the state of Israel, it must be noted that the well known Shas Ultra Orthodox spiritual leader Ovadia Yosef has taken a stand in support of the Negroes. 

 

When Yosef was the Chief Rav of the Sephardim sect, he took the position that the Falashas were Jews, and more recently, in the summer of 2002, he has approved a scheme for some 22,000 Ethiopians of the Mura sect (which were supposedly Christians) to come to Israel (Aug 16, 2002, “Forward,” p. 3). 

 

 

Black Hebrews? 

 

Some 25 years ago, a group of 2,000 American Negroes, who called themselves Black Hebrews, came to Israel with temporary visas.  The group settled at Dimona and refused to leave Palestine.  They claimed to be the true descendants of Yehudah.  The Israeli government was unable to get them to leave and has been unsure of what to do with them. 

 

In June 1999, the question over them was effectively settled when the Israeli government granted them a permanent status and Israeli ID cards (Oct 22, 1999, “Forward,” p. 16).  Thus, there will now be some more Blacks for true Jews to assimilate and mix with. 

 

 

Jewish Evangelizing 

 

Just as Christianity has been at work trying to flood the Colored world with evangelizing missionaries for some time now, it appears that organized Jewry has also decided to get into the same proselytizing business (much as the Jews did in the days of John Hyrcanus and his efforts to amalgamate the true Jews with the Amalek-Edomites). 

 

The latest Jewish scheme seems to be one of sending out missionaries to Latin America.  Some Israeli “rabbis” were sent to Peru some ten years ago to put some Peruvians through the conversion process.  In mid 2001, another team of evangelizing Jews headed for Mexico to convert a number of Mexicans (Dec 17, 2001, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 7).  

 

The next Jewish efforts centered once more on some Peruvians in mid November 2001.  This time a team of four “rabbis” (two Ashkenazim and two Sephardim) headed South to convert some 150 Peruvian Indians to Judaism (ibid, p. 6).  Reportedly, the Indians were known as “Inca Indians.”  They had been studying the OT and had adopted much of its outline on righteousness. 

 

The February 22, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1, 7) took a look at this evangelistic effort by noting that a team of Conservative leaders had went to Uganda in the heart of Black Africa in February 2002 to form a beit din (rabbinical court) to convert 600 Blacks to Judaism. 

 

These stories from the “Jerusalem Report” and “Forward” on these recent Jewish (correctly Amalekite) evangelizing and conversion efforts noted the ultimate fall-out of the conversion process.  Once converted, the Indians and Blacks are then allowed to immigrate to Palestine and become a part of the state of Israel; or alternatively, to the US to further pollute America. 

 

 

Yet 

 

Incidentally, while encouraging the conversion of these various Coloreds to Judaism (as cited above), it is fascinating that one White former Mormon in Salt Lake City, Utah, named Helen Radkey, has tried to convert but “the rabbis here (in Utah) don’t want me,” per her words (as quoted in the Dec 20, 2002, “Forward,” p. 2). 

 

Though Ms Radkey has sided with the Jews in protesting the actions of Mormons to baptize dead Jews into Mormonism, Helen’s efforts of conversion have not been welcomed.  It is unclear what all the Jews have against Helen.  But apparently, she is a feminist and tarot card reader who has been a minister in the Universal Life Christian Church. 

 

Of course, true Jews would not be happy with the feminist Radkey in their congregations.  So probably, there is much support for her exclusion from Judaism (though one must wonder why the Reform and Reconstructionist Jews don’t pick her up since they are already so depraved that a woman like Radkey should not affect them).  The question of feminism in Judaism will be further assessed in later chapters. 

 

 

Balaam’s Thinking, Revisited 

 

Of course, this Amalek-Edomite scheme of following Balaam’s advice on using permissive interracial sex and prevalent miscegenation to damage the House of Yehudah seems to have had some powerful support from remarks by Yechezkel, cited earlier, when he charged that Edomites had been guilty of acting revengefully against the House of Yehudah (Ezek 25:12-13). 

 

While it remains to be seen exactly how far this Amalek-Edomite scheme will succeed on bringing Africans and Hispanics to Palestine, in order to miscegenate them with true Jews, there could be some further opposition on the part of true Jewish Israelites.  Regardless, the line of Esau has already damaged and hurt Yehudah enormously. 

 

 

The Edomites Focus on the House of Yisrael 

 

With the passage of the years, these same Amalek-Edomites have moved into positions of power and control over the House of Yisrael nations.  Just as they have controlled the House of Yehudah for most of the last 2,000 years, they are now largely in control over all of the House of Yisrael nations. 

 

Not content with the great damage and hurt they have put on the House of Yehudah and true, good Jews over the centuries, the wicked Edomites turned their sights upon the House of Yisrael nations to destroy or damage them as well.  Their goal (from Esau’s days, 3,900 years ago, to the early 21st century) has always been the same--the destruction of Yisrael. 

 

With their great wealth, strength and resources (particularly with their control over the governments, the media and entertainment industries, and money and banking institutions), the Amalek-Edomites have been instrumental in promoting racial amalgamation with distinctively different races, as the publicly accepted (politically correct) norm and standard. 

 

Of course, the gullible, ignorant, stupid, blind Christians of the Israelite population have gotten on the politically correct band wagon to do everything possible to destroy themselves--just like the true Jews did centuries ago.  It looks like the Christians would have learned something from Yechezkel, Josephus and history.  But they haven’t. 

 

 

Israel Cohen 

 

Over the years, any number of Amalek-Edomites have revealed their plans for the destruction of the White race along with and/or to include Yisrael (depending upon how one might wish to define Yisrael racially). 

 

For example, in 1912, the famous Jewish writer and British Zionist Israel Cohen (1879-1961--an apparent Amalek-Edomite) outlined his thinking for the 20th century.  

 

He wrote that “While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes.  We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. 

 

“With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause” (per “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century”).  Cohen was right on target in his prediction for the future of America. 

 

 

Emanuel Rabinovich 

 

At a special meeting of the “Emergency Council of European Rabbis” in Budapest, Hungary on January 12, 1952, R. Emanuel Rabinovich (an Amalek-Edomite?) reportedly said: 

 

“We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia and Africa.  I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born.  Our Control Commissions will, in the interests of peace and wiping out inter-racial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with whites.” 

 

Going on, Rabinovich noted that “white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with black women.  Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory.” 

 

Rabinovich concluded with “We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world.  Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark peoples.” 

 

 

Some Observations 

 

This prediction, just cited above from Rabinovich, has certainly come true for most of the so-called White and/or Black descendants of mixed sexual crosses. 

 

As long as there is a Negro ancestor in one of these families (to the tenth generation), the children tend to be grossly dullards and even if they are extremely Caucasian in appearance and are taken to be White in the generic population. 

 

These dullards are very easy to manipulate and control.  Assuredly, mind control processes (promoted and controlled by far more intelligent Amalekite bankers/masters) are far easier with these mixed mamzer peoples than would be true with other racial variations.  It just seems that a real curse dramatically comes on any line of people with these Black genes. 

 

Therefore, as more and more people come along in the overall mixed society of Blacks and Whites, the possibilities of Amalekite imposed mind control increase dramatically.  Of course, this precise situation could be one of the reasons why the coming world government of oppression, tribulation and tyranny can be achieved so quickly.  The miscegenated, confused society will lack the perception to stop it. 

 

It is utterly fascinating that this condemnation in children does not appear significantly with White crosses with Mongoloids or Hamitic peoples.  It is primarily a phenomenon of White crosses with Blacks.  Even Hamite crosses with Blacks do not seem to be as bad as White-Black crosses.  And manifestly, the curses last for ten generations! 

 

It’s hard to imagine that an Amalek-Edomite would be this revealing (as happened above with Rabinovich).  But if Rabinovich did exist and did speak these words at the reported meeting, it is a fantastic revelation of evil Amalek-Edomite plans. 

 

 

Truth 

 

Christian people in the West, who have been totally mesmerized and zombiized by the Amalekite controlled media and entertainment industries, may argue on and on that these pronouncements never happened.  But the facts of history reveal that they have been precisely on target in the West since WWII. 

 

Since they have been accurate in predicting the future, why should anyone doubt their existence? 

 

This same reasoning can be applied to the so-called “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” which many claim are a forgery.  This production will be assessed in a future chapter (which discusses the power of the Amalekite bankers/masters). 

 

 

Noel Ignatiev 

 

The Dec 30, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 17) had some remarks from Vince Ryan on “Why Does Everybody Hate Whitey?”  Ryan quoted Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev, of Russian Jewish parentage (meaning that he is assuredly an Amalekite Khazar--ed).  Ignatiev openly advocates the genocide of the White race. 

 

Ryan quotes Noel as saying-- “every group within white America... labor unions, ethnic groups, college students, schoolteachers, taxpayers, and white women... has advanced at the expense of the black people as a race.” 

 

Ignatiev further adds:  The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race, which means no more and no less than abolishing the privileges of the white skin.  Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in U.S. society...” 

 

Although Ignatiev evidently did not directly address the issue of racial integration, miscegenation and amalgamation as his solution to the problem he alleged, it is a fact that for 3,500 years (since the days of Balaam), this practice has been the most popular one pushed by the evil Amalekites (as cited below and elsewhere herein). 

 

 

Norman Podhoretz 

 

The Sep/Oct 2000 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 4) quoted the well known liberal Jewish writer and editor Norman Podhoretz (a likely Amalekite), who expressed his desire for racial miscegenation between Whites and Blacks by saying “I share this hope, but I cannot see how it will ever be realized unless color does in fact disappear: and that means not integration, it means assimilation, it means--let the brutal word come out--miscegenation. 

 

“The Black Muslims, like their racist counterparts in the White world, accuse the ‘so-called Negro leaders’ of secretly pursuing miscegenation as a goal.  The racists are wrong, but I wish they were right, for I believe that the wholesale merging of the two races is the most desirable alternative for everyone concerned.” 

 

 

Harold Wallace Rosenthal 

 

The Amalekite Harold Wallace Rosenthal will be discussed to some length in a subsequent chapter.  Suffice to say, he was an administrative assistant to Amalekite Senator Jacob Javits several years ago.  In an interview with Walter White, he said:

 

“We’re smart--we are so powerful and at the proper time we will mix up your Gentile women with the Blacks and in 50 years you’ll be all mixed up.  Niggers love to scr-w (copulate with) your white women and we encourage it by using them to our advantage” (pamphlet “The Hidden Tyranny,” p. 36). 

 

 

James Yaffe 

 

The Mar-Apr 2001 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 1) quoted author James Yaffe, from his book “The American Jews” (p. 245, 256), on the linkage of modern political liberalism with American Jews. 

 

As established elsewhere herein, there is a phenomenal correlation between the “red” leftist, liberal, Communist and Socialist motions and with “red” Amalek-Edomite Jews.  This tie is undeniable. 

 

As discussed previously, the Amalekites early on adopted Balaam’s advice on how to destroy Yisrael.  Racial integration, miscegenation and amalgamation were the essence of Balaam’s thinking--which has been diligently followed by Amalekites for the last 2,100 years (since John Hyrcanus stupidly began the process of tying the Amalekites to the Jews). 

 

Liberalism and leftism in the political arena have paved the way for this racial amalgamation.  Yaffe says “It is often said that liberalism is the American Jews’ lay religion.  The facts bears this out completely.  The climate of opinion in every Jewish organization (with the exception of the American Council for Judaism) is liberal... American Jews have been predominately liberal throughout the country’s history.” 

 

Yaffe adds:  “...we must examine the behavior of the Jewish community in the face of the one crucial test of liberalism in America today--the problem of Negro rights.  The evidence in favor of the Jews has been given many times.  They also began to take an interest in improving the lot of the American Negro. 

 

“In the forties Alexander Pekelis of the American Jewish Congress established its Commission on Law and Social Action, and in collaboration with the NAACP it brought test cases on discrimination to the courts.  In a few years AJC and ADL became involved in the same sort of activity.  AJC was particularly effective in persuading Jewish businessmen around the country to provide jobs for Negroes... 

 

“The National Council of Jewish Women ran strong pro-civil rights articles in the national publications...  There is no question that the Jewish organizations were fighting for Negro rights long before any other white organizations, religious or secular, on the American scene...  For twenty-five years the president of the NAACP has been Jewish...and simply indicates the heavy Jewish financial support which the organization has always received. 

 

“As far back as 1923 Louis Marshall became a director of the NAACP and argued cases for it before the Supreme Court.  And today (1968) the head of its legal defense fund is a Jew, Jack Greenberg.  Jewish activists and Jewish money were, until recently, the mainstay of all the other influential civil rights groups, particularly CORE and SNCC.” 

 

Truly, Amalekites have led the way for racial amalgamation in the US. 

 

 

Yes, Miscegenation Means Genocide 

 

So the House of Yisrael nations are moving fast down the road to the genocide of their own people (under Amalekite leadership). 

 

If YHWH YESHUA does not intervene soon to stop this mad rush to oblivion, no true Israelites will remain alive to enter His millennial kingdom.  In later comments, material will be presented to demonstrate that He will intervene to stop this insanity. 

 

The acceptance of humanoids of any and all races and kinds has led vast hordes of behemah, chaiyah, mamzer and nokri aliens (Scripturally--dogs, thorns and briers) to flood the House of Yisrael nations as immigrants (legal and illegal) here in the age end.  The demographics of these House of Yisrael nations have changed remarkably.  As amalgamation proceeds, there is a dramatic “darkening” of the Israelites. 

 

Any person familiar with world history, current events and the Scriptures can readily identify the House of Yisrael nations because of the power and influence which the present Amalek-Edomites have had in bringing about the racial decline of the Israelite peoples. 

 

Given sufficient time, this whole process will bring about the absolute end of Yisrael--which could never have been achieved in any other way. 

 

Though the possibility does exist for the absolute and total destruction of the Israelite peoples through racial integration, amalgamation and miscegenation with alien races, there are Scriptural reasons to believe that YHWH YESHUA will intervene and cut short the misrule of men over this planet for the last 6,000 years. 

 

While this focus has been on Yisrael and the work of the Amalek-Edomites to destroy her, the truth is that this same reality exists in terms of the Adam-kind creation and the work of the Adversary to destroy it through racial amalgamation and miscegenation with the behemah and chaiyah.  This whole motion will be further discussed in later chapters. 

 

 

Now, for a Paradox 

 

This discussion herein on race and how the Amalekites are doing their level best to destroy the whole House of Yisrael, via interracial sex and miscegenation, opens the door to a strange paradox which this writer has observed for some time now in reading and looking at Jewish periodicals--like the “Jerusalem Post” and the “Jerusalem Report.” 

 

Subsequent chapters herein will discuss the situation with the US controlled media (which is essentially in the hands of plutocratic Amalekites).  Television, radio, the entertainment industry, newspapers, magazines and on and on are either owned outright by Amalekite plutocrats or they are controlled by the Amalekite plutocrats (as will be addressed in some detail in a succeeding chapter). 

 

Of course, the controlled media is working overtime to promote interracial sex and miscegenation--often by very subtle and discreet methods. 

 

Naturally, in the Christian West, the gullible goyim are also doing more than a fair share to destroy themselves.  While the Amalekite bankers/masters are out front leading, the stupid Christian goyim are almost all blindly following behind. 

 

Interracial sex, integration, amalgamation and miscegenation are such popular themes today that not only does the controlled media present stories, right and left, about the benefits of racial amalgamation, but even advertisers follow suit (both Amalekite and goyim advertisers like Microsoft).  Thus, printed advertisements and television commercials are obsessed with Colored peoples. 

 

Negroes only constitute about 12% of the US population.  But one would never know it by looking at TV, radio, magazine and newspaper ads and programming (because today, the American media is flooded with Blacks and Black greatness). 

 

National Public Radio (NPR) frequently has people stories or entertainment and music stories.  Perhaps 50% or more of these presentations are about Blacks.  One would never understand that there are some White people in modern America by looking at these ads and programs. 

 

 

In Israel 

 

So while the Amalekite bankers/masters are working overtime to present these many pictures and views of Colored peoples, this is not the way the game is played in the state of Israel.  It is true that the Israeli media sources have stories and presentations about the Ethiopians and really dark Jews from India (which the Amalekites are pushing upon the true Jews in Israel). 

 

But it is significantly clear that the Israeli Jews in Israel like the color of white and White people.  This strange little quirk surfaces when looking at Jewish ads in these Israeli media sources.  If there is a person in an ad, the Jews like to have a very fair blond person. 

 

For example, the Jan 29, 2001, “Jerusalem Report” (front, inside cover) had a full page ad about the work of the Weizmann Institute of Science.  At the top of the page was a large photo of a fair, blond woman and child.  They looked like White Germans or Scandinavians.  On page 38 of this same magazine, a business special was presented on Israeli cars with a picture of a very blond woman. 

 

This same magazine (p. 26) had a large story with many photographs of very White Russians in Israel who are converting to Judaism (entitled “The Birth of Israel’s New Jews”).  These Russian goyim have immigrated to Israel and the Israelis are making them convert in order to have citizenship.  These people are not hooked nosed Khazar Amalekites.  They are very Adamic White Russians. 

 

While this strange paradox seems inconsistent with the efforts of the Amalekites to promote racial amalgamation, among both White Jews and White Americas, it is interesting that many Jews in Israel have a different perspective on race.  Clearly, this idea is demonstrated in advertisements where being white is popular and shown in favorable terms (in contrast with the US where being white is bad). 

 

 

In the US 

 

Another powerful sample of this paradox/contrast on race surfaced in a lengthy story in the May 12, 2003, Amalekite-owned, “Time” magazine on “Unlocking the Matrix,” also titled as “Secrets of the New Matrix” (p. 64-72) which is being promoted by the parent AOL-Time-Warner Company on behalf of its Warner Brothers movie studio. 

 

Per this report, Warner Brothers has been making what would seem to be the latest fad in occult, race-mixing movies in something called the “The Matrix.”  Reportedly, Warner Brothers has made a trilogy of films on this theme, and has now branched out with the same message to the video culture (apparently all “R” rated). 

 

The “Time” story had a number of pictures and quite a write-up on this newest fad for depraved Americans (which will possibly lead to a TV series on the order of Star Wars).  “The Matrix” ideology seems to involve a team of supposedly good guys and dolls who come from a city called Zion and wear sun glasses (yes, demonized people, especially Blacks, like to wear sun glasses). 

 

This alleged good team is apparently made up of Asians, Negroes and very dark, swarthy, so-called Whites (evidently dark Amalekites, Hispanics, Italians and/or other dark Southern Europeans) who dress in slick, black-colored clothing (the girls’ costumes are, of course, skin-tight) to oppose the forces of evil (a Frenchman, known as the Merovingian, and two, very white, albino-type males, known as the Twins). 

 

Black actor Laurence Fishburne, who is a hero in the films, calls them “a combination of science fiction, Hong Kong kung fu, cyber-punk and classic American action, with heavy doses of spiritualism and philosophy.” 

 

Naturally, the films have evoked popular reviews and raked in stacks of US dollars (because the gullible Christian public loves trash like this). 

 

The only thing missing in these productions is any sense of morality.  Surely, it takes a demented Amalekite mind to put out such fifth as the Matrix over to the gullible goyim. 

 

 

Why? 

 

While the purpose of this study is not to consider and contemplate the past, present or future history of the generic Edomites and/or Kenites, per se, the fact remains that because they both have become so intermixed and intertwined with Yisrael that a minimum of attention has had to be focused on them in the context of trying to determine "why" the Jews were omitted in YESHUA's commission. 

 

Effectively, any meaningful discussion on Yisrael and the Jews must include the Amalek-Edomites and Kenites.  They are all inexorably meshed together.  This combination and linkage in reality appears to surface over a history of perhaps 3,900 years, as has been illustrated here.  It has not been a small thing at all. 

 

 

Modern Hysteria 

 

Frankly, this phenomenon cannot be ignored and bypassed by a bonafide student of the Word here in 2003, simply because modern peoples have become so incredible gullible, misinformed and uninformed on verity and history that even the slightest mention of the word "Jew" immediately throws them into a blind rage or trance of hysteria (on this, see Esther 8:17 and John 7:13--on the fear of the Judeans, as discussed elsewhere herein). 

 

In their confused state of fanaticism, these stupid people frequently cry out in unison against innocent writers and speakers, charging them with being anti-Semitic for daring to mention the topic. 

 

No one can publicly use the word “Jew” in any way which will reflect condemnation, criticism or complaint.  Of course, praise is absolutely OK, regardless of truth and reality. 

 

With Amalekite control of the entertainment and media industries, the Amalekite bankers/masters have been creating a class of zombiized robots in the Western Christian nations (to be later described). 

 

Once the Amalekites start hollering and complaining about anti-Semites, racists, White supremacists and so forth, the media will fill the hearts and minds of the robots with hate. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 159--Amalekite Methodology for Destruction

 

 

The Amalek-Edomite Problem 

 

The preceding chapters have described the incredible Amalekite hatred for Yisrael and their full commitment to the destruction of Yisrael by following the advice and counsel of Balaam.  The New Testament book of Jude lays this scheme out so that no one can miss it. 

 

Please understand that this hatred is genetic.  It is something that the average Amalek-Edomite is born with and may not even understand.  He needs no further impetus in this direction. 

 

So while the destruction option has been amply present in the warped minds of Amalek-Edomites for ages, there have been procedural problems which would have to be addressed so that the gullible, stupid, evil Israelites would succumb and accept and participate in the Amalek-Edomite solution for their demise. 

 

Thus, the question has been and must be--will the Israelites agree to their own self-destruction through miscegenation? 

 

The first group of Israelites subjected to Amalek-Edomite destruction was the House of Yehudah.  As previously described herein, the Yehudahite ruler John Hyrcanus conquered at least the Northern portion of the Amalek-Edomite kingdom to the South of Yehudah (c134-104 BCE) and forced the Amalekite inhabitants there to become religious Jews. 

 

The destruction transition on Yehudah proceeded as the two peoples were “thrust together,” especially in Judea.  Once they were physically mixed and lived side by side and the people collectively worshipped and prayed together, miscegenation and amalgamation were inevitable.  But this was primarily in the Judean province. 

 

 

The Galilee 

 

It seems apparent from the first century BCE and first century CE records available that there probably was little or no Amalek-Edomite assimilation in the Galilee. 

 

The reason that the Galileans were not subjected to this integration and mixing is because there was likely no appreciable presence of Amalek-Edomites in the Galilee.  Certainly, the NT record bears this conclusion out. 

 

In other words, YESHUA and His initial efforts to raise up His band of disciples focused on Jews in Galilee and not those in Judea.  It is true that The MESSIAH had some elected converts in Judea.  But these were few compared with the results of His Galilean ministry. 

 

Even the great work of The RUACH HA KODESH, which occurred on Shavuot (Pentecost) just after the death of YESHUA, was a focus on Jews from outside Palestine, as Luke clearly wrote (Acts 2:9-10).  Why were they in Jerusalem?  Of course, they were there on a pilgrimage to observe Shavuot. 

 

Incidentally, as developed in previous comments herein, these people were not only Jews, Jewish converts or ELOHIM Fearers, but they were likely of the House of Yisrael from a racial perspective.  In the sense that they had come from outside Judea, they had not yet succumbed to Amalekite theology and teaching. 

 

The conclusion is manifest.  YESHUA primarily focused His efforts on religious Jews (and their House of Yisrael converts) in the Galilee and outside Judea. 

 

Like other religious Jews, He went to Jerusalem for the annual festivals prescribed in the Word (Lev 23).  But otherwise, He seems to have largely avoided the Judean territory. 

 

 

The Roman Wars 

 

It has to be significant that when the Roman Wars commenced, the ultimate destructive focus of that effort was the fall of Jerusalem in 70 CE.  The great loss of Jewish life occurred in Judea. 

 

As discussed at length in other chapters herein, the evidence suggests that the Amalek-Edomites in Judea were some of the primary perpetuators of the Roman Wars and particularly as things worked out from 66-70 CE. 

 

In other words, one might build the case that the Jews in Judea assimilated and mixed with Southern Amalekites.  The Roman Wars came along and killed and destroyed much of this miscegenated, mixed mixture.  “Maybe” YHWH was in charge to allow this terrible scourge to come upon the Jews in Palestine, in an effort to racially clean them up. 

 

The work of John Hyrcanus in the South was totally illegal and contrary to the Scriptures, as elsewhere commented upon herein.  Hyrcanus was wrong to do as he did.  He laid the groundwork for enormous hurt and punishment to be put upon his people Yehudah by bringing about conditions for them to mix with the Amalekites. 

 

For people familiar with the Torah and the conclusive need for the people of YHWH to maintain separation (segregation) from others, generally, and the Edomites, particularly, the argument can be made that the Roman Wars cleaned up much of this wickedness promoted by Hyrcanus. 

 

Consequently, surviving Jews out in the Diaspora (who were not subjected to the purification of the Roman Wars) were evidently of better racial Israelite stock in comparison with those who died in Judea.  This is not to say that some Amalek-Edomite Jews didn’t survive in the Diaspora.  Surely, some did. 

 

It is also true that the Romans took many Jewish captives, including both good Jews and evil Amalek-Edomite Jews.  As is the usual practice of conquering armies, captive men are often slain and the women are generally taken as concubines.  So a whole new infusion of blood was added to whatever existed in the pool of the captives. 

 

While the Scriptures are plain that a child’s genealogy or pedigree is reckoned on the basis of the paternal ancestry, the Jews found themselves in a dilemma with the perpetuation of their survivors as children of Jewish mothers and foreign conquerors.  Perhaps this was the motivation for the decision that Jewish mothers produce Jewish children, as elsewhere observed herein. 

 

 

More Recent Yehudahite History 

 

The next big infusion of Amalek-Edomite genes assuredly came about with the conversion of the Khazar kingdom to Judaism, as discussed in preceding chapters herein. 

 

The racial changes between true Jewish Israelites and Khazar Amalek-Edomites have been slow over the last thousand plus years.  But it has happened and particularly in Western Europe and America and now the state of Israel. 

 

Once the Amalek-Edomites mixed in with and gained control over the House of Yehudah, they were able to turn their attention to the real fulfillment of Balaam’s words and advice on miscegenation (by concentrating upon the racial mixing of Jewish Israelites with people of even more profoundly different racial definitions). 

 

In other words, they wanted more destruction than was even feasible with the Jewish Israelite crossings with the Amalek-Edomites.  It must be remembered that as evil as the Amalekites were and are, they do have some presence of the Esau genes from Avraham and Yitzhak (although assuredly mixed in with Kain, the Canaanites and other mongrel Satanic strains). 

 

The Amalekites have always wanted total destruction.  As elsewhere discussed herein, the Amalek-Edomites have been extremely busy in modern Palestine trying to further corrupt the Jewish gene pool by bringing in peoples of other major races in an attempt to further destroy true Yehudahites. 

 

The prior chapter in this study mentions the work of the modern Israelis to bring in the Falashas, who were never racial Jews, and try to assimilate and mix with them in contemporary Palestine.  Not only are these people of a profoundly different racial stock, but there is much doubt that they can legitimately be classified as religious Jews. 

 

Manifestly, the world has arrived to the place that from a human viewpoint, it is extremely difficult if not impossible to distinguish between true Jewish Israelites and Amalek-Edomites in the broad definition of the word “Jew.” 

 

Of course, YHWH will make this distinction someday when He separates the wheat from the tares and the goats from the sheep, as discussed earlier herein (evidently using the Urim and Tummin, per Vendyl Jones, as discussed earlier). 

 

This writer takes the position that presently, in this man governed world (preceding YHWH’s identifying decisions in the world tomorrow), there is only one primary way of distinguishing between the good and the bad. 

 

That one way most likely is that people can be judged by their works.  When observing wicked Jews doing the works of Satan, it is a good bet that they are Amalekites.  When observing good Jews obeying the Torah and producing works of righteousness, they well could be Jewish Israelites. 

 

 

The House of Yisrael 

 

With this historical look at the Jews, one must next turn to the House of Yisrael Israelites who historically were never subjected to massive historic Edomite influence (beyond that as emanating from the Phoenicians in Canaan land in the days of the judges and kings, as elsewhere described herein). 

 

By 700 BCE, most of the true House of Yisrael Israelites were long gone from Palestine.  While the major portion of them were taken by the Assyrians to the Northeast, the others were scattered in groups throughout parts of Europe and Asia. 

 

Although there was some miscegenation and racial mixing (particularly with those enslaved by the Assyrians), these Israelites were able to remain a “fairly” homogenous population for the next 2,600 years. 

 

Even the mixtures with the Assyrians must be put in the proper context that the Assyrians were ger aliens who could legally mix with Yisrael.  Thus, the Assyrians were of the same racial stock as the House of Yisrael Israelites.  The fact that Assyrian men took Israelite women as concubines did not change the basic genetic pool of the people.  They were all Adamites and Shemites. 

 

So, after centuries of Amalekite hurt, punishment and destruction being levied on the House of Yehudah, the Amalek-Edomites were destined to eventually take over and rule over the House of Yisrael in the age end. 

 

The House of Yisrael, Scripturally, was fated to undergo the same process which the House of Yehudah experienced in the first centuries BCE and CE. 

 

 

The Amalekites and the House of Yisrael 

 

So, wherever the House of Yisrael is, the Amalek-Edomites will commence (actually, they already have commenced) their work of destruction by following Balaam’s advice.  The House of Yisrael Israelites will be put through the same ringer that the House of Yehudah went through 2,000 years ago. 

 

Ruling Amalek-Edomites will push, prod, persuade, direct, encourage and promote racial intermarriage, integration and amalgamation as ideal goals of society.  The ignorant and gullible Israelites will never understand that the ruling Amalek-Edomites have a genetic disposition to destroy them. 

 

The Israelites have and will blindly follow this Balaam solution to their own demise.  Be assured that if The MOST HIGH does not intervene and stop this mad pursuit of self destruction, there would be “no” true Israelites found alive in a very few generations.  The Amalekites would have destroyed all of them.  Yisrael is blessed that YHWH YESHUA will ultimately intervene. 

 

Incidentally, the success of the Amalekite sons of Satan to profoundly mix up and amalgamate the House of Yisrael Israelites with the nokri/nekar strangers has created a situation where the House of Yisrael also is full of wheat and tares and goats and sheep, as found in YESHUA’s parables addressing the House of Yehudah (per a discussion on this subject in previous chapters). 

 

Just as Yehudah must be subjected to a cleaning up process (where the sheep and wheat are separated from the goats and tares), the same analogy applies to the House of Yisrael. 

 

Some day, the surviving Israelites (both in Yehudah and in the House of Yisrael) will go through an identification process to determine who among them are sheep and wheat and who are goats and tares. 

 

As noted above and in previous chapters, the March 2002 “Vendyl Jones Research Institutes Researcher” (p. 1-3) suggests that in the world tomorrow, when all of Yisrael is regathered to Palestine, The ELOHIM will use the Urim and Tummin to determine exactly which persons belong to the 12 tribes of Yisrael and which are not true Israelites. 

 

 

The Word “Race” 

 

To assess this age end Amalekite effort, it is prudent to take a look at the word “race,” historically and in the contemporary culture.  In today’s multi-cultural and multi-racial environment, the one word which throws almost everyone into stark panic and terror is “race.” 

 

Race is the taboo word that is no longer allowed to be mentioned.  Any person choosing to write objectively on the subject will be immediately castigated and condemned by the contemporary society.  Therefore, the vast supply of Western scholars avoid the word entirely. 

 

Now, with the development of the concept of hate thinking and hate crimes by former President Slick Clinton, to be elaborated upon later in this study, race is becoming an issue to avoid in thoughts as well as in words.  In essence, the reality and concept of race has been and is being totally removed from the Western Christian civilization. 

 

But this modern fear and panic over race has not always been the case.  For much of the last 2,600 years, before the year 1900, most of so-called humanity had some appreciation of race.  This is not to say that people of the different races and kinds didn’t mix, they did.  It’s just that racial mixing and particularly among the major races was often frowned upon by the generic society. 

 

In the case of the United States, it was always unthinkable for Whites and Blacks to intermarry.  Assuredly, there was some interracial sex.  But even this was condemned and criticized.  In some areas, vigilante groups (like the Ku Klux Klan) were so hostile against interracial couples that the public’s desire for sin was held in check somewhat. 

 

Even when the huge immigration of Southern Europeans commenced in the late 19th century, most historic White Americans looked down upon intermarriages with the darker Italians and Greeks. 

 

Racial mixing was not a popular pursuit in early America and most US states had strong laws prohibiting marriages between the major races. 

 

 

Earl Jones, Revisited 

 

Earl Jones, in the “Intelligence Newsletter” for Nov-Dec 1998, focused upon an interesting discussion of “Race and the Decline and Fall of the American Epic.”  His remarks will be addressed in some detail later on in this presentation. 

 

But for now, it would be well to recall his words about the great thinkers and writers in all of history who had a profoundly different view on race, as opposed to what one finds today. 

 

Jones mentioned people like Edward Gibbon, Madison Grant, James Stoddard, Norman Douglas, Lothrop Stoddard and Oswald Spengler.  Great people in history like these persons would be outcasts in today’s modern world.  They would have no appreciation or audience.  Earl then quoted Henry Osborn who wrote a preface to Madison Grant’s book “The Passing of the Great Race” (p. 2). 

 

Osborn wrote that “European history has been written in terms of nationality and of language, but never before in terms of race; yet race has played a far larger part than either language or nationality in molding the destinies of men; race implies heredity and heredity implies all the moral, social and intellectual characteristics and traits which are the springs of politics and government.” 

 

Going on, Osborn took note of the work of some 19th century scholars like Galton and Weismann which “compelled us to recognize the superior force and stability of heredity, as being more enduring and potent than environment....it proves that environment and in the case of man, education, have an immediate, apparent and temporary influence, while heredity has a deep, subtle and permanent influence on the actions of men.” 

 

 

America’s Founders 

 

Even famous American political leaders like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln would be outcasts in the modern nation they helped to create.  Both Washington and Jefferson were slave-holders.  You can bank on it that they regularly used the common “n” word (to describe Blacks) that throws modern White Americans into a state of panic. 

 

In fact, almost the whole American culture commonly used the “n” word before 1940.  This includes almost all Americans, White or Black.  In today’s hypocrite society, no one can dare use the “n” word--except Blacks and Hollywood movie producers (as elsewhere noted herein). 

 

Manifestly, Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Jackson and even Lincoln had an entirely different philosophy than modern Americans have, as will be established in later chapters herein. 

 

In fact, if these people were alive today and spoke out with their beliefs, they would be immediately branded as racists, White supremacists, bigots, etc.  They would be chastised, condemned and hated in the very country they sacrificed for and created. 

 

Most of the founders of this nation were honest men--right or wrong.  An exception would have to lie with Abraham Lincoln.  As outlined in later comments, Lincoln was an arch segregationist in personal philosophy and a true White supremacist in every sense of the definition.  He expressed his opposition to the assimilation of Blacks in the US, even as he signed the emancipation proclamation. 

 

But he was such a hypocrite that his segregationist views and demeaning positions on Blacks never interfered in his political actions made for political purposes.  Since he looked upon the Blacks as animals or sub-humans, he was a true White supremacist.  However, it must be said that segregationist Lincoln was committed to the hope of returning all Negroes back to Africa.  This was his stated desire. 

 

 

But Change Came  

 

Despite American history and attitudes for over a hundred years, things began to slowly change around 1900 in terms of racial concepts in the United States.  With the election of the diabolical and evil Amalek-Edomite Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 and the after-effects of WWII, all of the former thinking of great Americans was thrown out the window.  America and the West had entered a new era. 

 

This new age said that race could no longer be addressed in the context of any importance whatsoever.  If a White person even uses the word in a politically incorrect context, the public conclusion must be that the speaker is a racist, bigot, prejudiced, evil, wicked person and a White supremacist. 

 

In other discussions herein, the situation with “Encyclopedia Britannica” was outlined.  In the early Britannicas, up through the year 1914, one could find some very interesting and enlightening discussions on race.  But over the succeeding years, the message in Britannica and other encyclopedias, as well, completely changed. 

 

Today, almost all encyclopedias and so-called books of knowledge and learning (in the Western culture) limit any discussion of race to only a consideration of certain outward physical characteristics of no real importance.  This is the prevailing view which has been largely accepted as the so-called “gospel truth” by the American public with virtually no dissent at all. 

 

 

The “Concise Columbia Encyclopedia” View

 

On this theme, the “Concise Columbia Encyclopedia” (p. 702) says that race is a biological grouping of “subspecies of human beings,” distinguished by their traits like skin color, hair type and color, shape of body, head and facial features, and blood traits.  These remarks tell the tale in terms of modern thinking and scholarly research. 

 

In effect, there are no considerations to man in the context of race, beyond the few physical attributes, which supposedly carry no weight and have no meaning.  The Columbia article goes on to justify the different races on the basis of evolution. Colleges, universities, scientists and so-called intellectuals all follow this path down the primrose lane of ignorance. 

 

Please note the Columbia view that the different races are subspecies of a broader classification of so-called human beings. 

 

Thus, the most learned minds came to believe that the different races evolved as they are found today.  Prior chapters herein demonstrate that this ridiculous thinking is hog-wash.  Despite these prevailing views, The ELOHIM has allowed some contrary thinking to (re)surface. 

 

 

Some Recent Views 

 

With this background, almost no modern person would dare speak out for fear of being labeled a “racist.”  Then in 1994, a team of scientists named Herrnstein and Murray actually had the courage to publish a book on the Bell curve and their research on demographics in the United States. 

 

They pointed out the obvious--which earlier Americans largely knew and understood for centuries.  There are vast differences (far beyond a few physical traits) in different racial peoples. 

 

In 1995, Psychology Professor J. Philippe Rushton, quoted before herein, followed up with an excellent presentation on a number of genetic differences in the races (in the context of statistical bell shaped distributions). 

 

Rushton offered scientific studies and evidence to prove that the differences extend to brain size, basic intelligence, personality, temperament, reproductive behavior (sexual permissiveness), sex hormones, twinning rate, health, speed of physical maturation (like animals in nature, Blacks mature much faster than Whites or Asians), family stability, law abidingness, social order and on and on. 

 

Blacks generally fell on the undesirable or adverse spectrum of the findings while Whites and Orientals occupied a more acceptable or socially desirable range of attributes.  Actually, Whites were often in the middle and Asians were at the higher level, although differences between them were sometimes small.  But both were demonstrably different from Blacks. 

 

Rushton’s views are particularly germane to the present discussion because he historically never had had that thinking.  As noted previously, Rushton confesses that he did not always believe in racial differences in society. 

 

In other words, he developed, matured and studied in the context of the prevailing thinking of the Christian West.  But he changed his mind as he grew older and became more learned and knowledgeable about reality. 

 

 

General Population Ranges 

 

Obviously, in assessing this matter, all (100%) Africans personally and individually do not fall at the lowest levels.  For example, all Blacks are not automatically stupid.  There are a “few” Negroes (not many for sure) in society with some brains (perhaps Negroes with White or Asian genes). 

 

Thus, most Blacks rank very low in intelligence (in terms of a bell curve distribution and various statistical averages--mean, medium and mode) and substantially lower than Whites and Asians.  The same is true with propensity for crime.  All Blacks are not automatically criminals or crime prone.  But most young Black males are for sure! 

 

Quoting some recent US Department of Justice statistics, the July 1998 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 2) noted that America’s 12% Black population commits 54% of the murders, 42% of forcible rapes (of those reported), 59% of robberies and 38% of aggravated assaults.  No wonder the jails and prisons are full of Black faces. 

 

All Blacks do not automatically use vulgar sewer language, but many (or rather most?) do!  While it seems impossible to dig up any data on Black propensity for obscene and dirty language, the truth is that it is common among Blacks of almost all persuasions (elderly Black women being a possible exception). 

 

All Black children are not born illegitimately.  But most Negro children are born out of wedlock annually in America (actually 66%, per Walter Williams, a Black man, on the Rush Limbaugh program of Dec 29, 1997).  A more recent survey in the February 28, 2000, “Weekly Standard” (p. 29) put the figure at 69.2%.  And these percentages keep going up year by year. 

 

All Africans are not automatically lazy and on welfare.  But a disproportionate high number of them are. This reality is true in all measurements mentioned in Rushton’s book. 

 

 

Other Issues 

 

The focus on Asians in the statistics used by Rushton seems to have been largely from Japanese and Chinese peoples (both of whom have other genes besides Mongoloid), and essentially those from the American population where Asians are fairly stable and responsible people. 

 

American Indians, true Mongoloids and Hispanics were not always addressed.  In fact, Hispanic data was evidently often included in the White classification to distort that presentation. 

 

Also, it should be noted that while genetics is the major factor in much of the personal attributes and qualities of different peoples, some students of truth do allow for some minor input from environmental factors. 

 

If a student of truth can glean anything about this production and others like it, it is that as the population continues miscegenating, the adverse genes of the Blacks will accelerate or climb in distribution and presence among the public at large. 

 

Hence, undesirable qualities (like sexual permissiveness, abnormal sex, broken homes and families, deteriorating general morality, breakdowns in law and order, irresponsibility and increasing incompetence, corruption and mismanagement in business and government) will increase in the population (in both of the so-called White and Black populations). 

 

 

Personality Changes 

 

Beyond these obvious changes, it is also quite manifest that the personality and temperament aspects will change in the collective population with the increases in undesirable Black genes from miscegenation.  Introversion will decrease in people while irresponsible big talking extroversion increases.  More people will be feelers and perceiving in personality types in contrast to thinkers and judgmental persons. 

 

With these manifest changes, it is clear that the general public (with its increasing Black genes) will increasingly be more and more irresponsible.  Talk to almost anybody in a retail business and ask them how responsible, dependable, and honest their employees are and the public is that they deal with. 

 

Many might not be aware of the social changes here, but talk to an old timer that remembers how things used to be in America before racial integration came in the 1950s.  Years ago, a man’s word was his bond.  But no longer can a man’s word be relied upon for much of anything in today’s warped culture. 

 

 

The SPs, Revisited 

 

A beforehand discussion on personality types mentioned the problem that perceiving people have in borrowing and never returning.  The SP (sensation-perceiving) is probably the worst in this instance.  They are especially notorious for not returning borrowed books.  While many of them hope to eventually read a borrowed book, they just never get a “round tuit.” 

 

Religious people, including Sabbathkeepers, Sacred Namers and Identity types, are just as guilty of borrowing without returning as is the general population.  As outlined heretofore, such borrowings constitute stealing, although most perceiving persons would never understand it in that context. 

 

There is a powerful law that is very specific in this regard.  It is at Leviticus 5:20-21 (Lev 6:2-3 in Christian “Bibles”), which the King James and many English versions do a miserable job at in translating.  Samson Raphael Hirsch’s great work on “The Pentateuch” (v. III, p. 159) offers perhaps the best presentation of this text of all. 

 

Hirsch gives it as sin when a person behaves unfaithfully to The MOST HIGH in that he hath denied to his neighbor concerning that which was entrusted to his keep as a loan or thing taken by violence or he hath kept something back from his neighbor.  Manifestly, this Scripture clearly makes borrowing without returning a sin. 

 

It seems certain that as the Black genes increase in the general population, it becomes more and more unlikely that honest people can expect to get back things loaned.  Already, it is extremely difficult.  The burden is on the loaner to follow up and push and prod to get loaned property back.  The increasing perceiving population is in no mood to return borrowed property without some pushing and prodding. 

 

 

Why the Transformation 

 

Manifestly, since 1900, the United States and indeed the White, Christian, Western civilization have totally changed their entire concept and understanding about race with but few exceptions (i.e. the just mentioned Professor Rushton).  While the pre WWII years did not produce an appreciable change, the transformation was underway, howbeit slowly. 

 

With the coming of Roosevelt and the end of WWII (when powerful Amalekite minds virtually took over much of the West; and certainly, in the US, Britain and White British Commonwealth), the race topic has been completely changed so that there can no longer be any discussion on this theme--beyond the politically approved position that all races are the same, except for a few minor, unimportant, physical characteristics. 

 

So the place one must come to is to pause and wonder why and how this transformation could have taken place and particularly since man theoretically is growing in knowledge and understanding. 

 

The answer to this enigma was deduced and commented upon by the previously mentioned Earl Jones in his Nov-Dec 1998 “Intelligence Newsletter.”  It will be addressed in some detail in the following chapter. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 160--The US Change on Race

 

 

Earl Jones, Revisited

 

The former chapter broached the writings on racial changes in the United States by Earl Jones in his Nov-Dec 1998 “Intelligence Newsletter.”  That theme will now be further assessed to illustrate how subtle and clever Satan was in making the change in racial attitudes in the US.  

 

 

Franz Boas 

 

Jones’ answer to the question of why and how this change occurred went back to the 19th century when an Amalekite Jewish anthropologist named Franz Boas immigrated to the United States from Germany and began one of the most incredible and unbelievable efforts of changing a people in the context of world history. 

 

Boas was born in Prussia in 1858 (and died in 1942).  He came to New York in 1887 and went on in 1899 to become a professor of anthropology at Columbia University.  He established anthropology as an academic discipline (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 4, p. 1152).  Per Judaica, he taught that neither race or geographical settings have a primary role in forming so-called human beings. 

 

Manifestly, he was opposed to so-called racism (that is an acknowledgment that race is important).  He was determined to change Western ideas about race.  Being an evil Amalekite, Boas’ own genes and mental capacity would have motivated and pushed him all of his life to undertake an assault upon the country that would take him in and give him every opportunity and blessing which it had to bestow on people. 

 

Earl Jones noted that Boas set out to expunge the concept of race from all of the literature of the social sciences (to include psychology and sociology).  Instead of addressing race from the viewpoint of its totality, Boas successfully shifted the definition to one of only dealing with physical traits which address a few, minor, insignificant points of no importance. 

 

This is interesting that Boas would attempt this shift in view of Webster’s definition of anthropology as being “The study of the races, physical and mental characteristics, distribution, customs, social relationships, etc; of mankind: often restricted to the study of the institutions, myths, etc. of primitive peoples” (per Jones, p. 3). 

 

Boas was manifestly opposed to this definition; although, as Jones points out, he did seize upon the institutions and myths of primitive peoples.  In any case, Boas and his colleagues over the years completely altered the Webster definition, at least in practice and reality.  

 

The Columbia professor argued that people are determined on the basis of their environment and culture and not on their race.  This is the definition that has completely gained acceptance in the West since WWII.  Very few intellectuals and scholars will question it, since it has to come to be “accepted truth.” 

 

 

More on Boas 

 

Jones reported that Boas’ beginning focus was upon education and his role as a professor of anthropology.  He was able to quickly gather a group of very intelligent and highly motivated students who would be willing participants in a change of American society.  Most of these were Amalekites.  But there were evidently a few non-Amalekites--like the later known anthropologist Margaret Mead. 

 

The Nov-Dec 1998 “Intelligence Newsletter” (p. 6) went on to quote several intellectuals over the years who concluded that Boas and his associates had a very highly developed sense of group identity, a commitment to a common viewpoint and an agenda to dominate the institutional structure of anthropology.  The last point can lead one to perceive a conspiracy. 

 

While such a diabolical conspiracy would be genetically normal and routine for the evil Amalekites involved in this depravity, one must wonder how it was possible to seduce people like Margaret Mead and eventually the whole fabric of American education.  Surely, some one out there had some brains and understood the error of the Amalekite thinking. 

 

Earl quoted Professor Kevin MacDonald of California State University who wrote that by 1915, the followers of Franz Boas controlled the American Anthropological Association and held a two-thirds majority on its executive board. 

 

By 1926, all major Departments of Anthropology at US universities and colleges were headed by Jews (apparent Amalekites) who had been former students of Boas (ibid, p. 6).  America was destined to change! 

 

 

The Second Focus 

 

The second major aspect of Boas’ work, as outlined by Jones, was his efforts to completely alter Western concepts of immigration--first in the US and later in the rest of the Western Christian civilization in Europe. 

 

To appreciate the impact that the racial teachings of Boas have had upon American immigration, a review of history is essential.  It must be noted that from the beginnings of Jamestown in 1607 until the American Revolution and on forward until the late 1840s, US demographics essentially involved Anglo-Saxon and Germanic peoples, coupled with some Scotch-Irish and Celtics from Scotland and Wales. 

 

Early America never was a “melting pot.”  She had an extremely homogenous people from Great Britain and Germany with very little presence of Southern Irish persons (of Catholic, Phoenician stock, as described in former chapters).  In the main, settlers from England and Germany and Scotch-Irish from Northern Ireland settled the early English colonies in North America. 

 

It has come to be intellectually proper to condemn and cast criticism at the historic American people who have been called “WASPs” (meaning--White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants).  Whether anyone likes it or not, the primary early settlers of the North American continent were WASPs (at least, above the Spanish lands). 

 

It is true that some other persons came from France, Germany, Scandinavia, Scotland and Northwest Europe.  But they were essentially of the same racial stock as the White Anglo-Saxons.  Their racial differences were minor and largely undetectable.  Of course, there was a vast Black slave population.  However, their presence impacted upon virtually nothing in the US before 1861. 

 

 

The Mistake 

 

But tragically, for America, the US Constitution never addressed immigration or citizenship (although it did allow Congress the power to legislate naturalization policies).  Otherwise, these issues were left to the states under the 10th amendment. 

 

The fallacy that Madison, Washington and others failed to pick upon was that if New York admitted undesirable people, they became US citizens and could go on to migrate to Ohio and Illinois to change their demographics as well. 

 

Other comments herein have reflected upon the 1859 Oregon state constitution which said that only White persons could be citizens of the state of Oregon.  But words like these were rare in early America--perhaps because of two reasons.  First, the population was Christian in religion with Christendom’s concepts of the brotherhood of man (to be described in later chapters). 

 

And too, one could make the argument that the early founders of the US were extremely naive and had little perception of the dangers of immigration which lay ahead--down the road of time. 

 

In any case, two of the greatest issues of all were neglected--citizenship and immigration. 

 

As noted above, from 1607 until 1845, almost all American immigration was in the form of White Protestants who were either Anglo-Saxons or of the same basic racial stock.  Even the Louisiana and Florida purchases had little impact upon US demographics.  America manifestly was not a multi-racial, multi-cultural, melting pot before the year 1845. 

 

She was extremely homogenous, although there was the large Black slave population which certainly did not mix legally with White Americans.  Admittedly, there was some illegal mixtures.  But these were frowned upon by the collective society. 

 

 

The Commencement of Change 

 

With this prevailing situation, a very bad thing happened starting in the year 1845 in Southern Ireland where a strange blight hit the Irish potato crop and huge numbers of peoples started dying from disease and famine. 

 

It continued on to about the year 1851, forcing multitudes of Phoenician Irish Catholics (mainly Edomites, but perhaps with some Danite genes) to migrate to the US where they settled in some of the large Northeastern US cities. 

 

Otherwise, the US-Mexican War of 1846-1847 gave America the great Southwest territory formerly owned by Mexico.  It is true that at that time there was an infusion of some Mexicans and Spaniards in the conquest.  But their numbers were not great and they had little impact on overall US demographics. 

 

The next big change came during the American Civil War of 1861-1865 when the huge Black slave population was freed.  Though there were, assuredly, wicked Amalekites in the background who would have liked to have immediately imposed racial amalgamation on the Whites and Blacks, the two populations remained fairly divided and stable, primarily because of racial separation in much of the nation. 

 

But after the American Civil War, immigration changed dramatically.  Whereas its former reality was from primarily Northwest Europe with a population very close racially to the prevailing WASP type, the flow changed to Southern and Eastern Europeans after the Civil War. 

 

While some of the people coming out of Eastern Europe were very similar racially to the White WASPs, there was at least one primary difference.  Many of the European immigrants (especially those from Eastern Europe) were Khazars of obvious Amalek-Edomite ancestry.  The previously described Franz Boas was in this category.  These people went to work at once to change America. 

 

Being evil Amalekites completely under the power of their father Satan and with the genetic disposition to fulfill the words of Balaam, they commenced their process of introducing Socialism and liberalism and expanding upon Christian ideas of humanism and the brotherhood of man. 

 

But they ran into a road block in 1922 during the Warren Harding administration when Congress passed the immigration quota system, which effectively limited immigration to the national origins of the contemporary American population.  Since most Americans were Northwest Europeans, much of the legal immigration was to continue coming from there after 1922. 

 

 

Amalek-Edomite Successes 

 

The prevailing Edomite hatred and commitment to the destruction of the White American population made Boas and his Amalek-Edomite colleagues focus their sights on various maneuvers to change the 1922 law--legally or illegally.  And they have succeeded, primarily following WWII. 

 

The previously mentioned student of Boas, Margaret Mead, appeared before the US Congress in 1953 and testified on immigration matters by saying: “That all human beings from all groups of people have the same potentialities... Our best anthropological evidence today suggests that the people of every group have about the same distribution of potentialities” (ibid, p. 7). 

 

Another witness from the executive board of the American Anthropological Association said that the Association had unanimously endorsed the proposition that all scientific evidence indicates that all people are inherently capable of acquiring or adapting to our civilization (ibid, p. 8). 

 

By 1965, US Senator Jacob Javits (another clear Amalek-Edomite) declared that the dictates of our consciences as well as the precepts of sociologists tell us that immigration, as it exists in the national origins quota system, is wrong and without any basis in reason or in fact for we know better than to say that one man is better than another because of the color of his skin (ibid, p. 8). 

 

Another possible Amalek-Edomite named Earl Rabb, a social scientist and political activist, said that the Jewish community (correctly the Amalekite component of the Jewish community) had taken a leadership role in changing the Northwestern European bias of the American immigration policy (ibid, p. 8). 

 

Jones again quoted Professor Kevin MacDonald who said that Jewish intellectuals have been at the forefront in changing the United States into a culturally and ethnically pluralistic society (ibid, p. 5).  Manifestly, it has been evil Amalekites who have led the way on multi-culturalism in modern America. 

 

So the tone of American immigration has changed--both legally and illegally.  It is this Amalek-Edomite control over America and the other White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations, as elsewhere discussed herein, which has promoted or at least allowed the massive recent immigration of Colored peoples into these countries that were largely White before WWII. 

 

 

The Beginning of the Change in Attitudes 

 

Before government entered the arena to enforce racial integration and amalgamation arbitrarily and as government fiat in the post WWII era, the groundwork was laid for the transition to one racially amalgamated people in the media and entertainment industries. 

 

While the work of these institutions and activities will be assessed in later chapters addressing humanism, one of the persons most responsible needs mentioning now. 

 

Just as the apparent Amalekite Boas re-defined racial attitudes at the academic and intellectual levels, another apparent Amalekite arrived on the scene in the 1930s to begin the racial integration and amalgamation of the various Coloreds with the prevailing White society.  This man will be shortly discussed below. 

 

The place where this beginning really commenced was seemingly in music.  As elsewhere noted throughout this production, music and dance are two of the most notable attributes of Negroes and persons with Black genes. 

 

Thus, it isn’t only that Blacks are generally born with natural rhythm and a propensity for music and dance, but it is also true that many mixed blooded peoples also surpass in these qualities as well. 

 

Mixed blooded Irish Edomites, Italians and other Southern Europeans early on used their natural born talents to quickly become leading entertainers--especially in music.  The 1930s and 1940s saw persons in this category like Frank Sinatra, the Dorsey brothers, Perry Como, Guy Lombardo, Tony Bennett and so forth--all propelled into the spotlight where they quickly became adored (idolized) by the popular music fans. 

 

If there was an American folk music and if it has any semblance of a remnant, one could probably find it in Bluegrass, as still found in the Southern Appalachian Mountains.  Although the famous Bluegrass bands, like Lester Flatt and Earl Scruggs and Bill Monroe, have faded into history, there is still some Bluegrass around. 

 

But otherwise, the classical music, waltzes, band concerts and sing-alongs were also popular in the late 19th century.  This led to so-called ballroom and nightclub dancing in the 20th century (speakeasies in the roaring 20s). 

 

 

The Change in Music 

 

While this early music was probably a product of the Western, White, Christian civilization generally (although influenced by the Edomites, Italians and others with Black genes), it slowly experienced a change in the early 20th century in the form of ragtime--which likely had some more notable Negro influence. 

 

In any case, ragtime evolved into swing in the 1920s and 1930s, as some of the big dance bands arrived on the scene to popularize ballroom dancing.  In those early days, the bands were all White or all Black.  Sometimes, White businesses would have Black bands, but there was no racial integration within the bands or audiences. 

 

With their propensity for music, the Africans quickly developed what was called jazz--primarily as a fall-out of the popularity of Negro music in New Orleans (which later was mixed with the blues to be called Dixieland Jazz). 

 

Many people called this essentially Black beat “hot” music.  In the main, this hot music was not popular among White Americans, although the allegedly White owned and run Cotton Club in Harlem offered it in the early days, along with the Club’s stock of Negro entertainers for a White, segregated audience. 

 

A man named Ben Pollack came on the scene with his band in the early days of big bands and tried hot music which White Americans simply did not like.  But Pollack was to set the stage for what was later to happen in swing music when he brought into his bands talents like Benny Goodman, Glenn Miller, Jack Teagarden, Charlie Spivak, Harry James and many others (most of whom later formed their own bands). 

 

 

More on Benny Goodman 

 

In any case, many Whites came into early contact with Black music.  Like an earlier apparent Amalekite Jew named Al Jolson (a popular singer in the 1920s), Benny Goodman (another very evident Amalekite Jew) became exposed to Black jazz (“hot” music) early in his life (per Goodman’s various biographies). 

 

Other important musical performers (like Glenn Miller) also had some exposure to Black music when they would go to the Cotton Club or Connie’s Inn to hear the great trumpeter Louie Armstrong.  But they didn’t absorb it like Goodman did. 

 

Importantly, it was Benny Goodman who would go on to help profoundly change the White and Black societies in America (as allowed by George T. Simon in “The Big Bands”).  As history has proven, Goodman was one of the men in the 1930s who did much in bringing about the racial integration and amalgamation of America. 

 

Yes, it was the evident Amalekite Benny Goodman who really took hold of Black “hot” music to use it to an advantage.  He was a star with the Pollack band by the time he was fifteen years old.  He organized his own band by 1934 and showed his partiality to Negro performers and music when he cut some records that year with Black singer Billie Holiday. 

 

By 1935, Goodman was a big success and in the major leagues when he nationally appeared on a weekly radio program (called “Let’s Dance”), sponsored by the National Biscuit Company (NABISCO).  In 1935, he quickly was billed as the king of swing (ibid).  Almost from the start, Goodman chose Black arrangers like Fletcher Henderson to produce his sounds (from behind the scenes). 

 

Also, evidently from the beginning, Goodman (who was surely an Amalekite with his definite Hittite nose which really was quite small by Amalekite standards) decided that he would racially integrate his band (whether his Amalekite genes were propelling him in this direction or not can be disputed).  So, in 1935, he used a Black pianist named Teddy Wilson to cut some records (ibid). 

 

In early 1936, BG formerly brought Wilson on board as a regular band member (ibid).  But Goodman was forewarned that a racially integrated band would not set well with much of the American public.  But the arrogant and moody Goodman told colleagues that he didn’t care whether the public liked it or not.  Effectively, he was a success and he was going to ram racial integration down the public’s throat. 

 

 

Subtle Deception 

 

Anyway, the conniving and plotting Goodman must have been a little concerned over how he would handle his goal of racial integration.  Thus, he added Wilson through some clever maneuvering and slight of hand.  Wilson was at first used in a combo arrangement outside the purview of the band’s main work.  

 

After the combo was subtly sold to the gullible goyim, Goodman slowly integrated Wilson into the band proper.  From thenceforth, in 1937, Goodman began to slowly add other Negro performers and began transitioning his music to even more of a definite Negro Jazz beat. 

 

Soon, he had hired Negro performers, like the popular Lionel Hampton and vocalist Ella Fitzgerald.  Since Goodman was a success with his version of a blend of Black and White music in 1934-1937, the idea of the racial integration of bands slowly gained some acceptance and other big bands would in time adopt the practice. 

 

Incidentally, this clever tactic of Goodman to integrate his band has long been a tactic or part of the methodology of the evil Amalekite bankers/masters in selling racial amalgamation, feminism, and homosexuality to the gullible American people.  The Amalekites start slow with something that can go over.  Later, their methods extend into more definite and open practices. 

 

This work of Benny Goodman in the racial integration of the entertainment industry certainly paved the way mentally and emotionally for Americans to accept integration in the 1950s when the US government began her formal push of racial amalgamation and integration upon the collective American state. 

 

With this background on how a very evident Amalekite named Benny Goodman was able to subtly and carefully help change America’s thinking on race, it would not be fair to proceed on without acknowledging that Goodman also started many able White performers on the road to success, along with Blacks (including Gene Krupa, Harry James and the beautiful and talented Peggy Lee). 

 

 

More on the Good Man 

 

Above all else, it must be recognized that Goodman was a perfectionist on the clarinet and played both jazz and classical music in Carnegie Hall in New York City.  This writer has a live recording of Goodman at the Bluenote in Chicago, Illinois.  On one tune, the announcer announced it by saying that “no man plays it like the good man.” 

 

Contrary to Goodman’s extreme push of Black “hot” music, other famous bands of the 1930s and 1940s were tainted with the Black sounds, though they may have leaned more in the direction of the earlier stock music of ballads, fox-trots and waltzes. 

 

Here, one can mention Glenn Miller who was a majority White who quickly passed Goodman for national popularity (though Miller came on the scene a little later in 1939).  Miller developed his own distinctive sound (with four saxophones and a clarinet lead) and leaned more in the direction of White music with a White band and White arrangers.  He was killed in Europe in 1944 while in the service. 

 

 

The Decline of the So-Called Good Man 

 

While Benny Goodman started off with a bang in 1935 with a national radio broadcast on NBC, he definitely began having problems by late 1937 and 1938.  Literally, in 1939, his work quickly began coming apart and he was replaced in number one popularly by Glenn Miller with his White band and more White music. 

 

Analysts will long look back on the 1930s and try to figure out what set the Goodman decline in place.  But this writer will share some information on possibilities. 

 

As noted above, by 1936, Goodman was beginning to turn more and more Black in both his music and his performers.  And by 1937, he had peaked in popularity and a decline had set in to rapidly bring him down. 

 

Of course, there were White bands around like Guy Lombardo and the Dorsey brothers.  But somehow, these bands did not supplant Goodman and his music at once.  Howbeit, with the arrival of Glenn Miller and his sound in 1939, much of the White public quickly left the ever more Negro music of Goodman. 

 

Glenn Miller became number one very quickly when he opened at Glen Island Casino, out on Long Island on May 17, 1939.  From then on, Goodman was finished as the king. 

 

 

Two Camps 

 

It would appear that the swing music appreciating public begin dividing into two camps in 1939.  The larger segment of the American public sided with the majority White Glenn Miller and his “more” White music.  The other part of the public (actually a much smaller part) loved Negro jazz and stuck with the likes of Benny Goodman and various well known Negro band leaders.   

 

Possibly, in order to appeal to his audience appreciating Negro jazz, Goodman began even more use of Negro music and Negro performers.  In the late thirties, he used the above mentioned Ella Fitzgerald as a vocalist.  In those days, there was a development in Negro jazz called BeBop.  Apparently, Goodman used Ella to try to put over some Negro BeBop. 

 

But with the elevation and promotion of Negro jazz and later BeBop, Goodman was no match for truly talented Negro performers like Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie who took over his remaining audience in order to promote BeBop, starting about the time of WWII. 

 

 

The Irony 

 

There is a certain irony associated with the story of Benny Goodman.  The Amalekites have had a history of raising up some person or people for nefarious purposes in their quest to destroy Yisrael.  Then, after making these parties successful, the raised up parties turn on their Amalekite benefactors. 

 

As will be described in some detail in a later chapter, the Amalekite bankers supported a fellow Amalekite house painter named Adolf Schicklgruber to take over Germany.  Once in power, the Amalekite Schicklgruber turned against his own Amalekite cousins and launched a persecution against them. 

 

Around the time of WWI, the Amalekites created Communism and forced it upon Russia.  In time, Russian nationalists took over in Moscow and began to persecute the Amalekites who had set the whole Communist operation in place in 1917. 

 

In America, the Amalekites have led the way in bringing about racial integration and amalgamation of Whites and Blacks.  Sure enough, this process backfired on the Amalekites as many Blacks have turned against them.  Perhaps the work of Benny Goodman fits into this category. 

 

Goodman used his talents and resources to promote Black music and Black entertainers in a racially integrated atmosphere.  Rapidly, he alienated some large part of his White audience (who left him to turn to White majority band leader Glenn Miller) and was left with only the Whites who could put up with Goodman’s increasingly Black music (though this American attitude of the 1930s was to change twenty years later). 

 

With the arrival of BeBop, Goodman tried to keep pace with the ever more coloring of American music.  Soon the alleged good man was quickly fading out of the picture; simply because, with BeBop, he could never compete with the Negroes who were truly experts in this type of Negro jazz. 

 

With this blending of White and Black music and racially integrating the bands, the stage was set for the epitome of musical evil in the form of rock n’ roll with its demonic Black beat from the jungles of Black Africa (which has eventually degenerated into punk rock, heavy metal, rock rap and so forth). 

 

Just as Black hot music was popularized back in the 1930s by the apparent Amalekite Benny Goodman, modern Amalekite Jews have latched onto African jungle rock to popularize it and put it over to gullible Whites--especially youths.  Many of the modern rock bands involve Amalekite performers and promoters.  Rock and all of its demonic forms will be assessed in subsequent chapters. 

 

 

The Future? 

 

Coming chapters on humanism will assess the immigration and integration problems in detail.  For now, it can be said that with the present motions, it would not be long before the formerly mentioned WASPs would become a minority in their own nation.  Given still more time, they would become totally extinct.  If this were to happen, who would work and pay taxes to support the welfare bill for the Colored majority? 

 

Coupled with all of the massive Colored immigration into America, the controlling Amalek-Edomites (like Benny Goodman) have worked overtime to do their level best to promote and encourage racial amalgamation and miscegenation.  The powerful and ruling Amalekites have now placed this effort into the hands of government.  This motion will be described in later chapters herein. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

Earl Jones, quoted above, offered a couple of conclusions.  First, he said that this work of Franz Boas and his colleagues has been designed to exterminate Western European man and his culture from the face of the earth by the cruelest of all genocides.  That is the mixing of the races (Nov-Dec 1998 “Intelligence Newsletter,” p. 8). 

 

Next, Jones went on to quote an apparent Amalek-Edomite named Maurice Samuels who wrote in his book “You Gentiles” that “we” Jews, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever.  Nothing that you Gentiles can do will meet our needs and demands.  We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own (ibid, p. 8).  Samuels told the truth. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 161--Amalek-Edomites and Crime I

 

 

Organized Crime and the Edomites 

 

This and later chapters will describe in some detail how that organized crime (known as the Mob, Mafia, Syndicate, La Costa Nostra, and/or National Commission) has been in Edomite hands--evidently from day one.  In America, the early gangs were identified mainly as Amalekite Jew, Irish Phoenician, Sicilian and some Southern Italian. 

 

In more recent years, Edomite Albanian and Turkish gangsters have joined in with the other Edomites to dominate America’s crime picture.  In time, the Amalekites took over the whole business at the top--forcing the Irish, Sicilian, Italian and other gangs to answer to Amalekite gang lords. 

 

Many persons erroneously assume that the US Mafia is a Sicilian operation (true, the Sicilian Charles “Lucky” Luciano led the way in organizing the US Mob nationally and much of the Mob was in Sicilian hands at that time).  But the charges of Sicilian control and management are simply not true at all.  Instead, the US Syndicate organization is largely an Amalekite Jew operation and especially at the top. 

 

The Amalekite Meyer Lansky, whose real name was Maier Suchowjansky (“Final Judgment,” p. 73), was one of the most powerful of the mobsters.  He served as Chairman of the Mafia’s Board of Directors in New York from about 1935 to sometime before or by his death in 1983.  Allegedly, Meyer retired before he died.  But with his evil and treachery, the best bet is that Meyer kept control of the Mob until he died. 

 

Other famous Amalekite Jew mobsters have included Arnold Rothstein, Dutch Schultz, Bugsy Siegel (who was a close friend and colleague of Hollywood’s Amalekite actor George Raft), Mickey Cohen, Moe Dalitz, Lepke Buchalter, Gurrah Shapiro, Mendy Weiss, Jake Lansky (the brother of Mob boss Meyer Lansky), Ze’ev “Wolf” Rosenstein (the most powerful mobster in Israel in 2003, per “Jerusalem Report”), etc. 

 

 

The Amalekites Took Over 

 

And although there was some Sicilian influence over the years, much of the leadership of the gangs and gang bosses has been in Amalekite hands.  It is indeed strange that the Sicilian Mafia could be so heavily controlled by Amalekite Jew masters, but this seems to be the real world since 1935. 

 

From almost the very beginnings of the formal organization of the Syndicate, the Amalekite Meyer Lansky served with the Amalekite Bugsy Siegel and the Sicilian Lucky Luciano in a triumvirate of sorts in the early 1930s.  In that combine, Luciano actually came out on top as the Chairman of the Board, while Lansky controlled the Mob’s finances as treasurer. 

 

Just after the Mob was organized and began functioning as the source of power in the US national crime picture, Luciano went to jail in 1935 on charges of white slavery and prostitution.  At that point, the crafty, conniving, clever Meyer Lansky took over as the boss of all bosses. 

 

Though Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky were supposedly close friends and associates (both before and right after Lucky went to jail), Luciano, at some point in time, began to be suspicious (after he was deported to Italy in 1946) that Meyer Lansky actually double crossed and framed him on the white slavery and prostitution charges (“Final Judgment,” p. 75, 77, 79).

 

While the Amalekites were in charge, Lansky deceitfully tried to convey the Sicilian image by naming the Mob “the Union Siciliano” (“Final Judgment,” p. 79).  In later years, Lansky even allowed the Sicilian Joe Bonanno to become a member of the Mob’s governing board in the 1950s and 1960s (May 24, 2002, “The Week,” p. 34).  But the boss of all bosses remained Lansky.

 

With this Amalekite deception, many persons continued to believe that the Sicilian Catholics ran the operation.  Whereas, in fact, Amalekite Jews occupied most of the primary positions of power and were largely calling the shots. 

 

Incidentally, this Joe Bonanno owned a funeral home.  He gained some fame by inventing the idea of using caskets/coffins with concealed bottoms to bury Mob victims (ibid, p. 34).  The top part of the casket would contain a usual body while the hidden lower part held the body of a secret murder victim. 

 

 

More on the Boss of All Bosses 

 

In his enormous power over America (in his role of boss of all bosses in the Mob), Lansky came to pull many political and government strings from behind the scenes.  One of the fascinating findings of Michael Collins Piper in “Final Judgment” (p. 75, 86-92) was that Lansky played a key role in the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. 

 

Piper says that Lansky worked with other powerful Jews (correctly Amalekites--ed) like Rudolph Sonneborn, Louis Bloomfield, Samuel Bronfman, Hank Greenspun, Teddy Kollech (later, a Mayor of Jerusalem), Tibor Rosenbaum and others in providing money, gun running, information, connections and other assistance in the 1940s to help set up the state of Israel. 

 

Michael Collins Piper specifically charges that Lansky played a leading role in the establishment of the Haganah (the Israeli Defense Force), the Mossad (the Israeli intelligence operation) and Irgun (the famous Jewish terrorist organization); and that he became the official “god-father” of the state of Israel. 

 

Because the Amalekite plutocrats and crooks have been so busy stealing everything possible in the Christian West, the establishment of the state of Israel was a bonanza for them and their operations.  Since its inception in 1948, the state of Israel has offered dual citizenship to all Jews--including all Amalekite crooks and gangsters. 

 

This condition has set the stage for Amalekite crooks to have a safe-haven in Israel to flee to whenever they get caught in the Christian West and face the prospects of arrest, trial and jail.  A number of Amalekite Jew criminals have fled there so that they would not be extradited to face criminal charges in other countries around the world. 

 

Meyer Lansky went there in 1970--when US authorities began investigating his criminal activities and at least two grand juries produced indictments.  In Israel, Lansky never would be extradited to face criminal charges in the US or anywhere else.  Israel granted him dual citizenship and protection from all other countries.   

 

In any list of Amalekite mobsters, one must also not forget Jacob Rubenstein (alias Jack Ruby) who gunned down Lee Harvey Oswald.  Jack was both a Dallas nightclub owner and a petty hood who worked for Carlos Marcello, Sicilian boss in New Orleans.  Ruby’s role in the murder of John F. Kennedy will be covered in later chapters herein. 

 

Over the years, many of the Mob’s primary and leading hit men have been Amalekites.  Apparently, the Amalekite gangsters are the most vicious, ruthless and evil of all.  In terms of murder, they seem to be the world’s best murderers (in terms of success, secrecy and avoiding getting caught). 

 

Jews (clearly Amalekite gangsters--ed) get credit for being the pioneers in the process of bringing in out-of-town assassins to kill people (Sep 9, 2002, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 46-47).  Out-of-town contract killers are much harder to identify/trace. 

 

 

Something Interesting 

 

But there is still another strange fact worth mentioning.  For this, one must turn back in time to the Edomite movements out of the Middle East to settle various other countries (as described in a former chapter). 

 

If Zepho or one of the other sons of Eliphas did settle early Sicily (as is probable, per the previous discussion on the Edomites), it is curious that even the Sicilians and some of the Southern Italians would be of the line of Esau, although they would not be Amalekites as most of the leading gangsters have been.  But it still makes the Amalekite-Sicilian Mob alliance a total Edomite operation. 

 

Combine this reality with the truth that the only other significant early mob presence has been with the former Irish (Phoenician) gangs and mobsters (like old Joe Kennedy, father of JFK, Bobby, Teddy and the rest of the Kennedy clan), it becomes crystal clear that organized crime has been essentially in the hands of Edomites from day one--especially in America (although this situation is changing somewhat with the modern Asian and Hispanic gangs, as will be assessed later). 

 

During the years 1919 to 1933, the Kennedy gang of Edomites made their vast fortune in the whiskey business when the United States was ostensibly dry because of prohibition.  But the Kennedy gangsters were not alone.  Those same tragic years saw Amalekite led organized crime figures take over the streets of much of America and particularly in the context of bootleg whiskey operations. 

 

 

How It Happened 

 

Following the US Civil War, petty, Irish, Edomite gangs appear to be some of the first to start functioning (as a fallout of the great Irish immigration to the US in the 1840s and 1850s).  With the commencement of Italian immigration in the 1870s and 1880s, the Sicilian and Southern Italian Edomites also began introducing neighborhood crime. 

 

The Amalekites started coming to the US in earnest in the 1880s and they too joined into local, neighborhood crime. 

 

Thus, before prohibition in 1919, it appears that most of the criminal gangs were petty gangs in the Irish Edomite, Sicilian Edomite, and Jewish Amalekite neighborhoods.  The primary focus of these gangs was upon small time prostitution, extortion, protection and numbers rackets. 

 

As more and more Irish Edomites became policemen and politicians in the Northeast, after the American Civil War, the neighborhood gangs found that these Edomites were “very” susceptible to bribery and extortion.  Hence, the small time, neighborhood, ethnic gangs started making payoffs to the Irish Edomite politicians and policemen to stay in business.  By WWI, the seeds had been sown for more advanced efforts. 

 

 

Arnold Rothstein, Revisited 

 

With the coming of prohibition, the above cited Amalekite Arnold Rothstein was perhaps the earliest major gangster in New York.  During the days of bootleg whiskey, Arnold was known as the King of the Roaring Twenties (and was equally known for treachery and the double crossing of his associates).  He had  a major operation which involved most of the rackets (bootleg whiskey, prostitution, numbers, gambling, etc). 

 

Early on, Arnold found that he could be a prominent, accepted, legal, business man (in the business of the rackets with a front operation in a nightclub) by making pay-offs and bribes to local New York officials and police (again, mainly Irish Edomites who had become established in New York in the years following the Civil War).  This was the real beginnings of organized crime. 

 

What this amounted to is that a crook could be a crook, heavily involved in the most serious elements of criminal activities, and still be a perfectly legal and legitimate business man--per the Christian definition.  Thus, money that a gangster earned from the rackets, murder or whatever was used to buy political and social acceptance in the ruling Christian culture. 

 

Arnold was murdered before he could consolidate his power over the other gangs.  But his operation was a model for the other Amalekites who came to power in the later 1920s. 

 

These more powerful Amalekites included the above mentioned Dutch Schultz and Meyer Lansky.  Lansky was important because by ruthlessness, murder, extortion, bribery and despicable evil, he became the Chairman of the Board of the US Mafia. 

 

Lansky and his Amalekite colleagues literally took over virtually all major criminal activities (involving the rackets) across America--in all cities and areas.  Anyone who tried to oppose this cabal quickly found themselves dead since murder was the Mob’s favorite tactic to keep everyone in line. 

 

 

Looking the Other Way 

 

Importantly, Lansky and the other bosses were routinely “legal” through payoffs and bribes to public officials.  While it has been true that some of the petty subordinates in the crime syndicates did get caught, the bosses always seemed to escape prosecution (although Al Capone went to jail for tax evasion and Lucky Luciano was prosecuted for white slavery and prostitution, as noted above).  That situation still prevails today. 

 

Maybe a local drug pusher on a street corner (especially in Black and Hispanic neighborhoods) may get caught, but never will the big time drug bosses face problems (because of payoffs at the highest levels).  And if one big shot does get arrested, he can always be pardoned (as with drug boss Dan Lasiter in Arkansas, who went to jail only to be pardoned by Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton, as noted in a prior chapter). 

 

Plus, Lansky and the other Amalekite crime bosses were in league with their clannish, Amalekite cousins--who were busy seizing the media and financial and monetary power over America, because of the Federal Reserve Act passed in 1913.  With Amalekite media ownership, it is clear that Amalekite crime bosses will always have good media support. 

 

 

J. Edgar Hoover, Revisited 

 

FBI director J. Edgar Hoover arrived on the scene in the 1920s and 1930s to head up a national police power which logically would have been pursuing these major Edomite gangs (that were literally destroying much of America and the lives of many Americans).  But something was working with Hoover to prevent him from being totally honest in his work (that something will be broached in subsequent chapters). 

 

Rather than focusing the FBI upon the Amalekite led Mafia and its efforts at murder, extortion, bribery, prostitution, gambling, bootleg whiskey, etc, Hoover chose to focus the FBI upon petty, small time hoods who dared to rob a bank.  Of course, the plutocratic rulers of America (who owned the banks) were pleased that Hoover was devoted to the bank robbers while ignoring the Amalekite led, organized crime.  

 

Hoover gained a fantastic reputation with the media and the public by chasing petty crooks like John Dillinger, Pretty Boy Floyd, Bonnie and Clyde and other small time hoods while ignoring the Amalekite led Mafia which was busy making pay offs to important political figures and police, as necessary. 

 

As will be later addressed, even Governors of states (like Bill Clinton of Arkansas), federal prosecutors and other prominent officials were able to get on the Mob’s payroll.  Of course, this environment was precisely what the Mob wanted.  Gang leaders were publicly legitimate business men (often philantrophists), who were readily accepted in the prevailing Christian culture.  This has been American reality for years now! 

 

 

The Bronfmans 

 

One of the most powerful and influential plutocratic families of all in the world today is the Bronfman family of Canada.  This family descends from a pair of apparent Amalekite Jews named Yehiel and Minnie Bronfman, who emigrated from Siroco, Bessarabia to Manitoba, Canada in 1890 (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 4, p. 1405-1407).  Yehiel went into the hotel business. 

 

The significance of Bessarabia is that it is a small geographical province which was historically a part of Moldavia and situated between Russia and Rumania.  While some Sephardi merchants frequented the area in the early days, there is also the certainty that numbers of Amalekite Khazars came into the area over the years to fulfill their role of being business men and merchants--as descendants of Kain. 

 

Per Judaica (v. 4, p. 706), there was 22,130 Jews engaged in commerce in Bessarabia in 1897.  This constituted some 81.4% of the total merchants in the area and 95.8% of the grain dealers.  Whether it was this popularity of being grain dealers or something else, it is interesting that many of the obvious Amalekites in the area quickly turned to the whisky business (“Encyclopaedia Judaica,” v. 4, p, 704). 

 

With this background in Bessarabia, the children (Samuel and Allan Bronfman, both born in the 1890s) and many of the grandchildren of old Yehiel Bronfman eventually turned to the whisky trade as well.  Though it is unclear exactly when Samuel and Allan became whisky merchants, they probably started just about the time that prohibition commenced in America (based upon their ages). 

 

Just as old Joe Kennedy was peddling illegal whisky, the Canadian Bronfmans seem to have gotten in on the bandwagon to peddle illegal Canadian whisky across America and make a bundle of money (enough to propel them into the super rich classification, along with the Rothschilds of Europe). 

 

The “Spotlight” paper of November 22, 1999 (p. 21), had a story on “Mob Family Goes ‘Legitimate’” which focused upon the Bronfman family and their rags to riches story (except there aren’t many Amalekites around who have ever known the rags category). 

 

 

The Bronfmans and Illegal Whiskey 

 

As the report goes, the Bronfmans achieved much of their wealth in prohibition days selling illegal liquor.  Canada was a major supplier of illegal whisky to the US.  Per “Spotlight,” the Bronfmans worked in concert with (the Amalekite) Meyer Lansky, one of the big crime bosses in New York.  This was apparently the beginnings of the Bronfman-Lansky crime syndicate--which seems to have continued over the years. 

 

“Spotlight” goes on to indicate that it was the gangster Lansky who first introduced the idea of laundering criminal proceeds in supposedly legal and state approved banks.  Per the story, Lansky early on began the process of laundering crime syndicate funds in Swiss banks (evidently because of the Swiss bank secrecy laws). 

 

This practice of laundering illegal money in legal banks has caught on in the Amalekite community.  The Amalekites are so powerful and rich that they often buy the banks where they launder their illegal moneys.  This course will be assessed in later remarks in succeeding chapters on some of the Amalekite owned banks. 

 

 

Super Rich 

 

In any case, the Bronfmans made barrels of money in illegal whisky and entered the super rich category of world ruling plutocrats.  Through the years, they have expanded their operations in all directions--even at one time owning 20% of DuPont which is substantial in view of the fact that corporate control can usually be achieved with about 3% of the outstanding stock of the big corporations. 

 

Manifestly, the Bronfman family seems to have enormous investments in most of the large scotch and whisky distillers and distributors (including the global Seagrams Company) and of the Vivendi conglomerate (with acquisitions in 2000-2001, as will be discussed in a later chapter). 

 

Plus, per “Spotlight,” they have a substantial stake in Campbell Soup, Schlitz Brewing, Colgate-Palmolive, Kellogg, Nabisco, Norton Simon, Quaker Oats, Paramount Pictures, Universal Studios, Warrrington Products, AOL-Time-Warner Corporation, the Ernest W. Hahn Co (which operates 27 regional shopping centers in California with plans for 29 more) and the Trizec Corporation (one of the largest US property development companies). 

 

Anyway the pie is cut, the Bronfmans of Canada are truly one of the world’s richest families here in the early 21st century.  They are super rich by almost any definition and probably only slightly behind the European Rothschilds in global power. 

 

The family members are big contributors to both the Republican and Democrat parties in the US--including contributions to Bill Clinton in 1996.  Samuel’s son Edgar was president of the World Jewish Congress which wields a big stick in the Jewish community.  Edgar’s son Edgar Jr was head of Universal Studios and all that that company entails. 

 

 

And Treacherous and Deceptive 

 

In recent years, Edgar Sr. has opened a barrage of complaints against certain Swiss banks by accusing them of confiscating the secret wealth of a number of European Jews who had hid their money in Swiss banks prior to WWII.  Many of these Jews died before they had a chance to extract these funds stored away in secret in those banks. 

 

“Spotlight” suggests that some of this money was money which had been made in illegal activities before WWII by agents and/or representatives of the Bronfmans, the Lanskys and their (Amalekite) friends involved in criminal operations.  The article in question goes on to say that this background has prompted the Bronfmans to become some of the leading players in trying to extort money from Swiss banks. 

 

 

Ted Turner 

 

Another fascinating aspect of the mentality of the Bronfmans surfaced in a news report in the Dec 28, 2001, “The Week” (p. 17), on the bad times that have come to the once fat cat Ted Turner.   As is well known, Ted moved into the big leagues with his success in building up CNN and the Turner entertainment empire (including ownership of the Atlanta Braves baseball team). 

 

But along the way, Ted made at least several errors.  First, he married Hanoi Jane Fonda (who supported the North Vietnamese during the US Vietnam conflict).  She abandoned him, evidently in early 2001, and he has been very gloomy ever since.  However, that was only one of the tragedies that came to Ted in 2001. 

 

The last few years saw Ted agree to a corporate merger with the Amalekite-led Time Warner Company (essentially in the hands of the Bronfmans).  Since Time Warner was the massive big company, the Turner contributions were not particularly significant.  But the merger was supposedly to allow Turner to really enter the big leagues. 

 

Whereas, at Turner Broadcasting, Ted was a big fish in a little pond, he had hopes of being a big fish in a big pond with the merger.  Apparently, the Amalekite bankers/masters in charge of Time Warner did initially come through by making Turner an executive of sorts in the Time Warner complex. 

 

As soon as Ted was on board, the Amalekites moved in on him and stripped him of all rank and authority in the media giant.  His name was even removed as owner of the Atlanta Braves.  His professional wrestling property (WCW) was sold to arch-rival WWF.  While Ted still owned his stock in the merged company, he lost everything else.  He was so depressed that he was ready to kill himself at one time. 

 

Turner has also been working closely with the Amalekite bankers/masters (like the Bronfmans) involved in promoting the New World Order through the United Nations.  Ted was influenced to give massive sums of money to this enterprise.  One has to wonder how long this relationship will last.  After getting Ted’s money, is it possible that the Bronfmans will kick him out of the UN organization as well?  

 

 

Louis Rosenstiel 

 

Another key Amalekite who made millions of dollars peddling bootleg whiskey across America in the roaring 20s was Louis Rosenstiel (mentioned earlier).  Rosenstiel was an ally of the Amalekite Meyer Lansky and a close friend of J. Edgar Hoover, the Duke of Windsor and other big shots of those days (per video, “The Secret File on J. Edgar Hoover”). 

 

Like the Canadian Bronfmans moved in on legitimate whiskey sales, the Amalekite Rosenstiel gained control of the giant Schenley liquor company.  His contacts with Hoover will be assessed in a future chapter. 

 

 

More on the Big Time Amalekites 

 

Otherwise, the “Spotlight,” of Dec 27, 1999 (p. 12-13), had a story by Michael Collins Piper on “Handful of Families, Corporations Controlling the Global Media Monopolies” which focused upon the world’s most powerful people who own and/or control the world’s media, information and entertainment companies.  Of course, the Bronfmans (discussed above) and other Amalekites are the most powerful in this array. 

 

Collins focused on several big shot Amalekites (the Bronfmans and others) who have had criminal ties and/or links to the Amalekite Mafia boss Meyer Lansky. 

 

Bronfmans’ holdings in AOL-Time-Warner are interesting because this giant has historically been in the hands of apparent Amalekites going back to the days of the famous Amalekite Warner Brothers and their Hollywood studio. 

 

In 1967, Warner Brothers was merged with Seven Arts Productions which was then headed by Louis Chesler, a likely Amalekite, who “Spotlight” claims was a front man in Hollywood for Meyer Lansky. 

 

Another key Amalekite stock holder in this operation was the stock swindler and financial crook Bernard Cornfield and his “Investors Overseas Service” which made off with millions of stolen dollars from the goyim. 

 

“Spotlight” suggests that Cornfield was the front man for a Swiss international banker named Tibor Rosenbaum, another likely Amalekite who helped found the state of Israel (as cited above).  Rosenbaum was involved in selling arms and other nefarious activities.  He also owned the Geneva based Banque De Credit Internationale which was actively involved in laundering illegal money from the Lansky crime syndicate. 

 

The point of these remarks is that there has been and is a powerful network of super rich, Amalekite media moguls and bankers who have had enormous ties to the Amalekite run Mafia for many years--going all the way back to prohibition days in the US in the 1920s.  The media and entertainment holdings of these plutocrats will be assessed in subsequent chapters herein. 

 

 

Donald Trump, the CIA and the Amalekites? 

 

While it may seem sensible and logical that the Amalekite Mob would have close ties to the various Amalekite super rich families, like the above discussed Bronfmans, there is another strange twist to this story in terms of the fat cat Donald Trump who was mentioned as a possible presidential candidate in 2000.  On the surface, Trump is not an Amalekite--or is he? 

 

The “Spotlight” of Feb 21, 2000 (p. 16-17), had a revealing story by Michael Collins Piper on “Reform Party Voters Need to Know About Trump’s Link to High-Level Money Laundering by CIA & Mob.”  Piper goes into a little history to give some background on how Trump came into the billionaire class. 

 

Per the story, a CIA front company called “Mary Carter Paint Company” was set up in the 1950s by CIA Director Allen Dulles and his associate Thomas E. Dewey, Governor of New York (who was an associate of the Rockefeller billionaires).  Among other things, this front company was merged with another one and was used to launder CIA money for arming anti-Castro Cuban exiles. 

 

An apparent Amalekite named Alvin Malnik was both a henchman and colleague of the Amalekite crime boss Meyer Lansky.  He was involved in running the CIA sponsored Mary Carter Paint Company. 

 

In 1963, Mary Carter entered the casino business and began developing properties in the Bahamas.  In 1967-68, Mary Carter officially changed her name to Resorts International and began a massive expansion campaign internationally. 

 

Next, the Amalekite crook Bernard Cornfield (a colleague of Lansky), mentioned above, entered the picture with his $2.5 billion Investors Overseas Service (IOS) company which was a front operation for Baron Edmond de Rothschild, William Mellon Hitchcock (one of the heirs to the Mellon fortune) and the above mentioned Tibor Rosenbaum. 

 

By 1970, IOS became one of the leading investors in Resorts.  The Amalekite Mob had virtually taken it over to expand its gambling operations. 

 

At about that time, Mob boss Meyer Lansky called a meeting of the syndicate figures in Acapulco, Mexico where the decision was made to expand gambling operations in Atlantic City, NJ.  Resorts International began a lobbying campaign for this expansion. 

 

“Spotlight” asserts that Resorts was secretly controlled by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds through front men in the Mafia, CIA and Israeli Mossad.  The Mob and the CIA used Resorts to launder much of their illegal moneys. 

 

 

Trump Makes His Play 

 

In 1987, long time CIA agent James Crosby died and young Donald Trump, a local real estate tycoon, gained his shares in Resorts.  Trump began acquiring lucrative casino interests and obtained 93% of the stock of Resorts International. 

 

Although Trump later shed his stock in Resorts, “Spotlight” notes that he could not have had the management position of that company (which he held) unless he had the covert support of the behind the scenes fat cats who were secretly calling the shots. 

 

It is unclear how much of this gambling operation involved Amalekites.  Certainly, much or all of the major US gambling interests and casinos are in Edomite hands.  Probably, most of the players involved with Resorts International were Amalekites.  The name Trump is manifestly unusual and could have been something else years ago.  If there is a name change here, Donald could be an Edomite as well. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 162--Amalek-Edomites and Crime II

 

 

Edomite Crime 

 

As was established in the preceding chapter, the Edomites have given the world organized crime with all of its evil.  Not only have Edomites started organized crime, they have continued to be its primary agents from day one, although there are some modern Hispanic and Asian gangs whose connections to the Amalekites may be a little tenuous, as elsewhere discussed herein. 

 

The Amalekites have had a problem in trying to rule over and extract profits from all of the Asian and Hispanic gangs.  But they are in virtual control over the US and much of the Christian West.  So it won’t be long before the little, petty, Asian and Latin gangs will either come under control of the ruling Amalekites or be run out of business. 

 

Today, organized crime is still essentially owned, managed and controlled by Amalekite bankers/masters.  If there is an exception to this assertion, it exists in the confines of several of the just mentioned Asian and Hispanic gangs which have not yet been forced into accepting Amalekite control. 

 

This course will be assessed in a later chapter which explains what all is being done to bring all of organized crime under Amalekite management.  The Amalekites are the most evil and vile people on the face of the earth.  They are not about to sit back and allow anyone else to be pulling in crime profits which they don’t share in. 

 

 

The Tie to the Money Power 

 

In any case, the Amalekite-Irish-Italian Mafia has been just like all other American corporations and organizations.  Over the years, it has become largely subservient to the money power, mainly on Wall Street, but also present in some of the Amalekite family dynasties, like the Rothschilds, Bronfmans and others. 

 

When one adds in the clannish, ethnic connections and linkages between the Amalek-Edomite masters-bankers (to be described in a later chapter) with all of the halls of money and influence, it’s not hard to see that they all come nicely together and are fairly well controlled at the top. 

 

The primary exceptions might be the previously cited Asian and Hispanic gangs (many of which eventually will come under some Amalekite control since the Amalekites are experts in crime and criminal activities and are in essential control of almost everything else in the Christian West and especially in America). 

 

The linkage of Amalekite-controlled organized crime to the super rich Amalekite masters and bankers running the US financial markets was subtly acknowledged in a news report on Sep 14, 2000.  The FBI said that there was now evidence that organized crime has infiltrated Wall Street and the securities’ markets.  Reportedly, these criminals are involved in securities trading and marketing. 

 

Of course, the FBI would never dare expose the truth that this whole operation is entirely in Amalekite hands.  Obviously, the fat cat Amalekite masters and bankers in charge of Wall Street have been in cahoots with their clannish, racial cousins running organized crime for years.  The thing that is different now is the willingness of the FBI to acknowledge and reveal this truth. 

 

There is no denying that Amalekite criminals have for years worked carefully with Amalekite Wall Street bankers to exploit and rip off the gullible goyim.  This reality of Amalekite gangsters operating on Wall Street with Amalekite bankers will be especially important when assessing operations of Russian Amalekites in the succeeding chapters. 

 

 

The US Voting Machines 

 

Texe Marrs, in a video on “Concentration Camps in America,” notes that three private companies do all of the maintenance and repairs on all of the voting machines used to record and tabulate votes in US elections.  Marrs notes that the Mafia owns these three companies.  Now, it is clear why American politics never change and why certain politicians cannot be voted out of office (to be addressed in later chapters). 

 

Obviously, if the Amalekite led Mafia controls the US voting machines, one can be sure that the secret Amalekite rulers of America decide most of the US elections.  When one adds in the influence and power that the Amalekite owned and/or controlled media and entertainment companies exercise over Americans, it is crystal clear that Christian America is under the grip of Amalekite masters/bankers. 

 

If this phenomenon is true, as it is in the United States, one must pause and wonder about the rest of the world where voting machines are used.  Have Amalekite gangsters taken over in some or all of the other nations using voting machines?  Of course, many foreign countries do not use voting machines.  But there is an increasing turn to them.  

 

Former Soviet dictator Josef Stalin understood what all was going on.  He said-- “He who casts the vote decides nothing.  He who counts the vote decides everything” (Jul 10, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2). 

 

 

Wars for Drugs? 

 

Bill Clinton’s war against the Serbs in 1999 will be assessed in some detail in later chapters and needs not be studied presently in any detail.  But for now, there is a interesting feature of that war which deserves some comment. 

 

The April 1999 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 4) quoted Dr John Coleman and the “Wall Street Journal” of September 9, 1985, with remarks on the movement of 25-40% of the US heroin supply from Turkey through the Balkans to Albanian Mafiosi gangsters in New York (who assuredly are subservient to the Amalekite Mob bosses in America). 

 

Clearly, the Edomite Albanians (and these Albanian Muslims certainly seem to be Edomites) have been working with Edomites in Turkey and other Middle Eastern states, Edomite Sicilian gangsters in Italy and the US, and Amalekite Mob bosses in New York to operate this heroin pipeline. 

 

The “Washington Times” (Jun 7-13, 1999, p. 22) had an AP story by Jerry Seper on “KLA buys advanced arms with illicit funds, report says.”  The story focused on a NATO report which revealed that the KLA was pushing Middle East heroin on the US and Western European markets in order to raise large sums of drug money to buy advanced weapons for its war against Yugoslavia. 

 

Yugoslavia President Milosevic had been trying to clean the drug problem up in Kosovo and close the pipeline for his own national interests.  Therefore, the drug running Edomite Albanians have been in a civil war trying to break free of Yugoslavia.  With his close ties to the US drug trade and Amalekite bankers/masters, Slick Clinton naturally chose to act militarily to keep the drug flow intact. 

 

In a related matter, succeeding chapters herein will discuss the US war on Afghanistan in 2001 and the drug fall out of that conflict.  It is important to note that under the Taliban, opium production in Afghanistan was wiped out (Mar 28, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. A4). 

 

Apparently, the most opium produced under the Taliban was 185 tons in total or before being eliminated (Nov 8, 2002, “The Week,” p. 16).  With the arrival of US control, opium exports hit 3,750 tons in 2002, as the Afghanistanians became the world’s number one producer (Mar 28, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. A4).  Now, it is clear why George W. Bush had to launch his war against the Taliban. 

 

 

The New Focus 

 

As outlined above, the Amalekites were able to completely take over the illegal booze business back in the 1920s during US prohibition.  Once alcoholic beverages became illegal, it allowed the Amalekite controlled Mob to take over all aspects of alcohol from production to consumption.  Thus, the Amalekite Mob was able to control the movement of all whisky into the US and its entire distribution (from wholesale to retail). 

 

With the passage of the years, alcoholic beverages came back into style in America.  As noted elsewhere herein, the Amalekite gangsters had to turn to other substances for much of their illegal income.  They chose drugs--like cocaine, heroin, marijuana and so forth.  Today, the bulk of the illegal drug trade is in Amalekite hands (though there is some Hispanic and Asian play on it, as discussed above and earlier). 

 

But the Amalekites are extremely greedy for more profits and gain.  So the situation has progressed to the point that the Amalekite internationalists and super rich need another new illegal substance to make still more money.  And they have found it in the tobacco industry and the fanaticism of the political liberals and Christian humanists to generate public opinion and hype over the bad features of tobacco. 

 

When the Amalekite controlled media starts in on something, the gullible public usually caves in quickly, without a fight.  Consequently, tobacco is on the way out one day--that is legally. 

 

Some observers may wonder why the Amalekite fat cats would allow (actually direct) their controlled media companies to attack tobacco all the while that they also control some of the tobacco companies (or have they bailed their investments out of tobacco by now?).  But this concern can be answered. 

 

The problem for the Amalekite super rich calling the shots is that as long as tobacco is legal, many farmers and middle men can “legally” grow and distribute it, thereby taking a share of the tobacco profits out of the total haul.  Competition (from the little people) keeps prices down which adds to the dilemma. 

 

 

Take Over Everything 

 

Once tobacco has been declared illegal, then all of these small, legitimate businesses can no longer get a slice of the action.  When it is entirely illegal, the Mob will have to take over its growing (production) and total wholesale and retail distributions--internationally. 

 

With all of these activities in the hands of the Mob, there is just more profits to be made which don’t have to be shared with any of the little people who have been getting them in the past.  As noted above, this was the very thing which happened with alcohol during prohibition to allow the Edomite gangsters to make all kinds of money (which they shared with politicians and crooked cops, as necessary). 

 

When anyone and everyone could produce (make) alcohol beverages and be in the distribution business, the booze money (profits) had to be spread out among all of the participants.  Thus, competition kept prices down.  But once it was illegal, then all of the little people were out of business. 

 

The Amalekite Mob (operating under control of the Amalekite super rich) had a monopoly on the whole business.  While some of their small time street people and retailers might run the risk of getting caught by the police, the big boys running the show and operating from behind the scenes have always been insulated and protected from the local police whenever a petty drug bust occurs. 

 

 

Arab Thinking 

 

In a March 2002 money appeal letter from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Center’s Dean and Founder Marvin Hier described what he labeled as “anti-Semitism” spreading hate across the Middle East and into Europe and beyond (actually, the Amalekite bankers/masters have had a war of sort against the Arabs on so-called anti-Semitism for some time now.  But it has now reached a new height). 

 

Hier’s letter listed a whole series of things which the Arabs are proceeding in doing in their war of words against the Jews generally and the Zionists particularly.  This struggle and war between the Jews and the Arabs will be discussed in subsequent chapters herein.  There is no need to broach it now. 

 

However, in the Arab counterattack upon the Jews, the Arabs have mentioned some things about the Jews which are most relevant.  The Simon Wiesenthal Center letter outlined two interesting reports from the Arab world on modern Arab attitudes towards Jews. 

 

Quoting a columnist in the Egyptian government sponsored newspaper “Al-Akhbar,” Hier said that the Egyptian wrote “Thanks to Hitler, blessed memory, who on behalf of the Palestinians, revenged in advance, against the most vile criminals on the face of the earth.  Although we do have a complaint against him for his revenge on them was not enough.” 

 

Marvin Hier interpreted those remarks as being an assault upon all Jews.  And he was probably correct.  Just as the Nazis took their hate out on all Jews, it is clear that the Arabs are doing precisely the same thing.  There is no arguing the reality that the Amalekites are the master criminals across planet earth.  But it is wrong to attack all Jews for the evils of the Amalekites. 

 

In a second quotation, the Simon Wiesenthal Center letter cited a case from Syria where the Damascus-based General Secretariat of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies issued a statement in its publication “Al-Ghad” which said:  “Israelis are the soldiers of the devil, successors of pirates, killers of prophets...they are the promoters of drugs, prostitution, homosexuality and crimes.” 

 

Well, if this Syrian writer would have correctly defined his subject as being Amalekite Jews, he would have been 100% on the mark.  But this allegation against the collective Israelis is ridiculous.  Of all of the Jews in the world today, probably the best and most racially and religiously correct Jews of all are in the state of Israel. 

 

The big problem and certainly the problem cited in Syria lies with the Amalekites who are generally in the Christian West.  Yes, it is Amalekite Jewish masters/bankers in New York, Canada, London and Western Europe who are the soldiers of the Devil that are the primary promoters of drugs, prostitution, homosexuality and crime. 

 

 

Defining the Right People 

 

If these Arabs would have just properly defined their subject targets, they would have been on the mark--because almost all global crime on an organized international level must be laid to the doorsteps of the Amalekites, in particular, and to Edomites, in general, to a lesser extent. 

 

Yes, the Muslim Edomites in Turkey, Afghanistan, Albania, etc must all share in the global crime problem (although the Amalekites are the leaders and masters of it).  It is totally unfair and ridiculous to blame the Israelis for the crime problem.  True, there are some very evil Amalekites in the modern state of Israel (and they generally have ruled in Israel just like they have ruled in the Christian West). 

 

However, there is also a growing movement and presence of sincere and dedicated religious (observant) Jews who are simply in a different world than the crime, drugs, homosexuality, and prostitution existing under the Amalekite control in the Christian West. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

The point of these remarks is that just as this gang of Amalekite robbers and criminals were around making, stealing and extorting money in 30 CE (to be described in later chapters--on the murderers of YESHUA), they are still around in the early 21st century CE and still doing the same thing that they have expertly done for the last 2,500 years--stealing and plundering. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 163--Russian Amalekite Criminals I

 

 

The Russian Problem

 

On the theme of Edomite crime, there is also a rising Russian, Amalekite, Khazar organization here in the age end busy stealing money (since the breakup of the old Soviet empire). 

 

Many persons allege that they are Jews and some, like “Spotlight” (of Sep 6, 1999, p. 5), call them Israelis and Zionists.  This so-called Russian gang has a presence not only in the old USSR, but also in portions of Eastern Europe, the US and the state of Israel. 

 

Colonel Stanislav Lunev has been the highest ranking officer of the GRU (the Russian Military Intelligence Agency) to defect to the US in history.  He defected in 1992, just after the breakup of the old Soviet Union in 1991.  In 1998, he laid out an incredible presentation on Russian organized crime in his book on “Through the Eyes of the Enemy.” 

 

Stanislav told what had happened and was happening before reality began to sink in with news reports and revelations in the summer and fall of 1999.  The GRU Colonel (ibid, p. 14) said that the collapse of the old USSR did not occur because of “reform minded leaders” or because of the Reagan Administration’s defense strategy.  Instead, it was promoted and came about because of the power of the Russian Mafia. 

 

He went on to suggest that the mobsters not only brought down the old USSR, but they now control the Russian government (ibid, p. 14-15).  This Lunev charge is staggering.  But it would seem to have serious merit from events which have been occurring and being reported in the media since September 1999. 

 

 

More From Lunev 

 

Per the book, the Russian gangsters have opened positions as “legitimate” businessmen, industrialists and government leaders.  Lunev says that they have been heavily involved in contract killings in Russia--not because of inter-gang rivalry, but in order to show the Russians who are really in charge (ibid, p. 15). 

 

Lunev goes on to say that some 300 Russian gangs operate internationally with 26 in the US.  These gangs rely upon the large presence of Russian immigrants in large cities--like New York, Chicago, Miami, and so forth (ibid, p. 16).  Lunev also makes the charge that they have now set up major operations in some of the US cities and will become a primary force of organized crime in the West in the future (ibid, p. 161). 

 

The only important point about this whole dilemma is that the Russian Colonel did not specifically link this massive Russian criminal operation to Amalekite Khazars.  Perhaps, he was naive and unaware of it or he could have known and was simply afraid to try to expose it.  Of course, exposure would have ruined his book sales and he would have been totally discredited in the US media as an anti-Semite. 

 

Despite Lunev’s failure to cover this Amalekite Khazar connection, his observations otherwise represent reality, as will be demonstrated persuasively in succeeding comments. 

 

 

Specifics 

 

This criminal operation involves two classes of Amalekite Khazar crooks (as will be shortly described), both of which are busy stealing billions of dollars in wealth from Russia each year (since the old USSR was broken up and after Boris Yeltsin took control of Russia).  While some of the Communist leaders in more recent years have not been friendly to the Khazars, Yeltsin had close links to this gang of thieves. 

 

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was Yeltsin’s successor as Acting President in January 2000.  Though he has a KGB background, it has been uncertain exactly what path he would chart in terms of allowing the Amalekite Khazars to continue their theft and plunder of Russia.  Putin won the presidential elections in March 2000. 

 

It appears that since then, he has been allowing his former KGB friends to crack down on them. 

 

Already, there are increasing cries of anti-Semitism surfacing from Russia, as Russian authorities begin to crack down upon these Amalekite Khazar crooks.  Numbers of them have been leaving for the state of Israel--where, from there, many of them can further transit on to America and Western Europe.  

 

As will soon be shown, much of the theft, plunder and rip-off of Russia has been occurring in the organized crime arena where Russian, Amalekite, Khazar gangsters have established a powerful criminal syndicate in Russia to steal as much wealth as is possible. 

 

These Amalekites are strictly professional mobsters, much like those found in the US and Christian West.  Surely, most of the Amalekite gangs tie closely to the Amalekite mobsters in New York and the Christian West.  They seem to be just one big ball of wax. 

 

 

Stealing Billions 

 

But the bigger theft problem in Russia has been the stealing of billions of dollars in Western aid in the last several years.  These operations have been carried out by white collar, Amalekite, Khazar fat cats and bankers in Russia (called diplomats and business men) working in collusion with the Amalekite super rich in the West to plunder and steal much of the foreign aid coming in from the West. 

 

Under the control of Amalekite plutocrats, the West has been making a number of large loans to Russia on the premise of helping her to establish capitalism and to not revert back to her Communist dictatorial past.  As will be described in later chapters herein, these loans are made on behalf of the plutocrats in order to help them move in and steal whole nations. 

 

In any case, two groups of Amalekite Khazars are busy stealing much of Russia here in the early 21st century.  One involves so-called, white collar criminals and the other consists of organized crime figures.  As will be shown, the evidence is that both groups of Amalekites are closely linked together and coordinate their activities with Amalekite leaders in the West to steal as much as possible and launder it outside the country. 

 

 

The Revelations of Organized Crime 

 

“US News & World Report” (USNWR, p. 34) of Aug 30, 1999, assessed this problem in an article by David Kaplan on “When the Russian mob feels the need to wash.”  This story focused upon the billions of dollars which the Russian gangsters launder each year.  Details on the Amalekite money laundering operations will be assessed in the next chapter.  But for now, this revealing article does point out the crime problem. 

 

Per USNWR, one of the Russian Mob leaders is a man named Semyon Yukovich Mogilevich, who has a $100 million empire built on arms dealing, extortion, prostitution and various other nefarious activities.  He is an ex-felon and a primary leader presently of the Russian Mob. 

 

The name Semyon is enough to identify this big boss at once as an Amalekite Khazar Jew (which also was confirmed by “Spotlight,” Sep 6, 1999, p. 5).  Like some 20 of the other major gangsters, Mogilevich holds dual citizenship in Israel with an Israeli passport.  He says that he feels safe only in Israel and Russia (Sep 17, 1999, “Forward,” p. 2).  Manifestly, he is an Amalekite Khazar posing as a Jew. 

 

In an article on “Major Media Ignores Puppetmasters in Money-Laundering Scam,” in the Nov 15, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 6-7), Gregory Douglas revealed other important Amalekite gangsters linked into the Russian Mafia operation--like Mikhail Fridman, a former Russian trade minister who also just happens to have dual citizenship with the state of Israel, along with the other mobsters. 

 

Besides Mogilevich and Fridman, “Spotlight” has also disclosed a number of other key Amalekite gangsters which include a number of former, common, street criminals, like Mikhail Khodorkovsky, now a billionaire gang leader (Oct 18, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 6).  This Mikhail is another key Amalekite Khazar who holds dual citizenship in the state of Israel (Nov 15, 1999, “Spotlight,” p. 6). 

 

 

More From “Spotlight” 

 

“Spotlight” of December 20, 1999 (p. 5), had an article by Martin Mann on “Major Media Toes Line On Death of Plutocrat” which quoted Ilya Martinov, a reporter who covers the UN for a string of Eastern European newspapers.  Martinov said that some eight out of every ten of the recent Russian billionaires are ethnic “Zionists” who carry Israeli passports. 

 

The April 10, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 18) had another story by Mann on “Outspoken Russian Leader Wants Cash Back--or Else” which quoted Zinovy Molodin, another correspondent for the Russian news organizations.  Molodin covers the UN and works out of New York City.  Molodin echoed the words of Martinov that the majority of the super rich Russian oligarchs are prominent Zionists, carrying Israeli passports. 

 

Obviously, these observations pertain to evil Amalekite Khazars, though most Russians tend to call them Zionists (as “Spotlight” did).  More on these wicked Amalekite billionaires will be addressed in succeeding remarks.  

 

 

Stanislav Lunev, Revisited 

 

Stanislav Lunev’s book (“Through the Eyes of the Enemy,” p. 17-19), discussed above, did not use the words Jew, Amalekite or Khazar in association with the Russian criminals.  But Lunev discreetly let the cat out of the bag when he named some of them.  For example, he identified and detailed some of the work of three other major gangsters--like Grigory Loutchansky, Vadim Rabinovich and Ludwig Feinberg. 

 

It should not be very difficult for even the most gullible, ignorant and uninformed person to understand at once that these three crooks are all Amalekite Khazars.  Their names lay it out (except for Grigory, who could be in doubt).  These three will be shortly assessed. 

 

Russian police (the MVD) estimate that some $9 billion in wealth (from organized crime) leaves the nation annually for places overseas (Swiss bank accounts, the US, Israel and otherwise, as will be shortly addressed). 

 

“Spotlight” of Sep 27, 1999 (p. 4-5), had a story by Gregory Douglas which was very specific in saying that this gang of criminals was involved in theft, drug dealing, prostitution, murder, extortion, child pornography, smuggling, robbery and assault.  Per Douglas, they had banded together to use the money that they were stealing and making in criminal activities to buy up many of the assets of the old USSR. 

 

Using mainly money given Russia from the US taxpayers, Douglas says that this gang purchased control of most major properties and assets of value in Russia.  Now, it’s plain to see how and why Russia has been selling off missiles, nuclear bombs, submarines and airplanes around the world since the demise of the USSR.  These things have been stolen by Amalekite big shots and are being sold abroad for profit. 

 

Stanislav Lunev (“Through the Eyes of the Enemy,” p. 17) demonstrates this situation when he mentioned the work of the Amalekite crook Ludwig Feinberg, mentioned above.  The mobster Feinberg bought a Piranha-class nuclear submarine from a crooked Russian admiral at the Russian Naval Base at Kronstadt for $5.5 million. 

 

The Feinberg plan was to use the submarine for the transportation of cocaine into North American ports.  His scheme fell apart after the FBI arrested him on other charges and discovered his plans.  Lunev indicates that gangsters have been able to buy Russian helicopters at $1 million each from crooked military and government people to use in their drug operations (ibid, p. 17). 

 

 

Another Money Scam 

 

Another Gregory Douglas article in the October 18, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 6) said that the US began issuing new US money to replace old bills in circulation.  Russian people were holding many of these old $100 bills which would have become worthless.  The Russian Mob has been buying these bills up at 50 cents on the dollar.  Yeltsin prevailed upon Clinton to redeem them at full value. 

 

The Amalekite Alexander Hamilton and his Amalekite friends used this same scam after the Revolutionary War.  The paper currency issued by the Continental Congress (called Continentals) became worthless.  The Amalekites went across America and bought up the bills for pennies on the dollar. 

 

Later, Hamilton and his Amalekite colleagues prevailed upon George Washington and the US Congress to pass legislation to redeem them at 100% on the dollar.  The Amalekites made a bundle off of this scam.  Now, they are using the exact same process in Russia. 

 

Incidentally, many Americans have been admirers of George Washington.  Certainly, he was a good general and had some qualities of character and leadership.  However, one of his great mistakes was allowing the Amalekite Alexander Hamilton (or Levine, as will be later proven) to take over the US Treasury and be one of his key advisors.  Hamilton was an evil man who put much hurt upon the developing United States. 

 

Very few people have the perception to understand what all can happen to a nation’s money when an evil Amalekite is allowed into a key position in the national treasury or into its central bank (like the US Federal Reserve Bank in America).  It’s like letting the fox into the henhouse.  Yet, America started this practice in George Washington’s days and it’s still going on today.  No wonder the dollar will soon collapse. 

 

 

The White Collar Thefts 

 

As just noted, a later chapter on the Amalekite bankers will assess how the Amalekites have been stealing and exploiting the Western give aways of foreign aid for their own personal purposes.  Thus, there has been much theft and misuse of foreign aid by Amalekite Khazars in Russia. 

 

The presentation to follow presents some of the facts on much of that theft by so-called Amalekite Russian diplomats and business men linked to organized crime (actually Amalekite Khazar vultures). 

 

“Spotlight” of Jun 28, 1999 (p. 1), had an article by Warren Hough on “Mysterious Financier Brokered Kosovo Deal,” which focused upon an international financier and fat cat named Peter Castenfelt (who is another apparent Amalekite for reasons to be made clear in a future chapter on the internationalist plutocrats). 

 

Per “Spotlight,” this Castenfelt was linked to a gang of four, billionaire, Russian Zionists (all assuredly Amalekite Khazars).  This group included Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich, both of whom have had close ties to Boris Yeltsin.  Berezovsky and Abramovich are both called statesmen and diplomats in the controlled, Western media. 

 

One more important figure mentioned by “Spotlight” is the Russian Zionist leader, Vladimir Gusinsky (or Gushinsky), who is a billionaire and apparent Amalekite Khazar also busy trying to take over much of the Russian economy and media (including one important TV station, as will be elaborated upon in a subsequent chapter). 

 

Future chapters will assess the efforts of Amalekite bankers and fat cats in Russia, who, as plutocrats, have tried to steal and plunder as much of the wealth of Russia as Boris Yeltsin sat back and allowed it to happen (perhaps because he and his two daughters were also busy stealing part of Russia’s wealth, to be discussed in the next chapter). 

 

Assuredly, this flight of money is hurting Russia terribly.  Not only are Amalekites stealing and plundering much of it from the Russian government and taking it overseas (clearly illegally since the government has restrictions on the movement of capital overseas), but much of it is raised inside Russia without paying taxes on it. 

 

 

The Russian Bond Problem 

 

Spotlight” of Sep 6, 1999 (p. 4), followed up with a story by James Harrer on “If Financial House of Cards Falls, What Will Happen to Tax Dollars?”  Harrer notes that some $30 billion in Russian bonds are in default and/or will soon be in default with no Russian ability to pay them off. 

 

Recently, these bonds have been selling for ten cents on the dollar in international money markets.  But the word in New York is that the fat cat George Soros (an apparent Amalekite and close friend and ally of Slick Clinton and the Rothschild family) has been buying up these bonds.  The question is why? 

 

“Spotlight” explains by noting that a secret agreement has been made by top US and Russian officials (correctly Amalekite bankers) to renegotiate the Russian loans (which means a new infusion of Western cash from dumb taxpayers).  Harrer says that either US Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers or Fed chairman Alan Greenspan (both Amalekites) had tipped off Wall Street insiders, like George Soros, on the coming deal. 

 

The efforts of Amalekite insiders to tip off Amalekite plutocrats and internationalists will be assessed in future chapters.  Suffice to say, it is a part of the real world of Amalekite depravity and criminal activity. 

 

Summers is a former CEO with the Wall Street investment banking firm of Goldman Sachs and former US Secretary of the Treasurer.  Sachs and all of the players in this game of ripping off Western taxpayers (through the International Monetary Fund) seem to involve Amalekites with links to the Rothschilds and other Amalekite fat cat bankers, who will be assessed in the subsequent chapters herein on the plutocrats. 

 

Obviously, Soros and the other tipped off Amalekites will make a barrel of money out of this venture as the bonds are renegotiated and effectively paid off by an infusion of new Western cash.  Obviously too, this whole exercise will give Amalekite big shots in Moscow another opportunity to steal billions more of Western money. 

 

 

More on Soros 

 

As just noted, the apparent Amalekite George Soros is a close friend and ally of Bill Clinton, the Rothschilds and any number of powerful Amalekites on Wall Street and at the Federal Reserve.  Besides being called a great “humanitarian,” he is a billionaire financier and money and stock speculator who seems to have an inside track with the evident Amalekite Alan Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve). 

 

According to Wall Street trader Alan Mathison, Soros in 1992 “broke the Bank of England, the Italian government and the entire European currency stabilization system with wrecking-ball raids on the British pound and the Italian lira...” (May 15, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 5).  Per “Spotlight,” Soros reaped a favorable 30% annual return on his investments throughout the 1990s. 

 

Future remarks will assess the plutocratic money power on Wall Street and how this force is able to manipulate and control the financial and stock markets to continuously make barrels of money.  Evil Amalekites in the Federal Reserve, the US Treasury, various international banks and Wall Street firms work in collusion to regularly and systematically steal trillions of dollars from the gullible goyim. 

 

This conspiracy involving super rich Amalekite bankers will also be addressed in subsequent chapters.  But for now, it needs some recognition and especially in the context of the just mentioned, billionaire George Soros, who seems to have close ties to the Russian Amalekite Mafia (as well as having close ties to the Rothschild family of Europe). 

 

 

More From “Spotlight” 

 

The “Spotlight” of Jan 3 & 10, 2000 (p. 1, 9), had a story by Martin Mann on “Spotlight Broke Big Stories of Last Decades,” which specifically focused upon Soros’ role.  He is known to police in several countries as the secret mastermind behind a worldwide web of corruption and money laundering operations.  As late as Dec 21, 2000, he was indicted in France for illegal dealings there (to be described in a later chapter). 

 

Otherwise, federal investigators have identified Soros as the mystery financier who owned and controlled the giant Global Telesystems Inc. which has reportedly paid some $80 million in bribes to buy up control of the Moscow City Telephone Company. 

 

The payoffs were made to Vladimir Lagutin and four of his deputies, along with a sophisticated network of money laundering conduits from Moscow to the Bahamas, Israel and Scandinavia.  Though US investigators have information on this network, no indictments have yet to come from US prosecutors (perhaps because Soros is a close friend and financial supporter of Clinton). 

 

Actually, George Soros is extensively involved in financial, stock and currency manipulations and speculations all over the globe.  These few comments above do not begin to cover his operations.  For example, he has played a major role not only in Russia, but also in the stock and currency market problems in much of Asia in the late 20th century (as will be addressed in the succeeding chapters). 

 

 

More Follow Up 

 

“Spotlight” of September 20, 1999 (p. 1, 3), offered two stories on this enormous theft of Western money in Moscow.  One article, by James Harrer on “Friends Bail on Boris,” put the laundered money figure at $10 billion that went specifically through the Amalekite owned Bank of New York (to be described in the following chapter). 

 

The second “Spotlight” had a story by Gregory Douglas which said that the “Swiss Claim $40 Billion Was Stolen.”  Presumably, this was essentially US money.  The actual thefts are much higher (“Spotlight” of Apr 17, 2000 [p. 17], estimated the total loot at $500 billion which has been stolen and laundered outside Russia). 

 

It appears that various Amalekite aides and colleagues of Yeltsin stole most of the money given Russia by the West in the last 10 years.  Obviously, only part of it was run through the Bank of New York, to be discussed in the succeeding chapter.  Apparently, some of it was laundered in Swiss and Israeli banks, also to be later profiled. 

 

Douglas, in a “Spotlight” article on Sep 27, 1999, quoted Dr. Paul Adler, an international economic consultant, who said that Soros, Rubin and the Israeli mob (correctly the Amalekite mob) have amassed billions by fleecing Russia.  The Rubin reference is to Robert Rubin, former chairman of the Wall Street investment banking firm of Goldman Sachs, prior US Secretary of the Treasurer and a clear Amalekite. 

 

To help pull the scam off, the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in New York has opened a branch office in Moscow.  According to Gregory Douglas, the ADL has been involved in the cover-up operations in America and Moscow. 

 

Though not mentioned by Douglas, it is a fact that if any investigation was made which could possibly expose the Amalekite bankers running this scam, the ADL and similar organizations would go to the media and attack the accusers as racists, White supremacists and anti-Semites.  Once the press starts hounding the public with these allegations, any investigation or inquiry will be crushed. 

 

 

Clinton Knew 

 

The interesting thing about this caper is that the Clinton administration had known about it apparently from day one, per an article in the Oct 4, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 6-7) by James Harrer on “Yeltsin, Clinton Partners in Rampant Looting and Money Laundering.”  Harrer claims that Britain learned of it some time ago and informed the Clinton Administration. 

 

But US authorities were totally uninterested and turned their ears and eyes away to look in other directions.  Perhaps the unconcern at the White House was prompted by the huge assortment of Amalekite aides and managers who ran things for Clinton.  With the involvement of Greenspan, Rubin, Soros (a close friend of Clinton), and other leading Amalekites, nothing would be done. 

 

 

How It’s Done 

 

As will be described in some detail in the later presentation on the plutocrats, Amalekite bankers in the West arrange vast, Western loans (of Christian taxpayer’s moneys) to various countries around the world if they can gain an edge in those countries and/or steal part of the money granted.  This is what has been happening in Russia. 

 

“Newsweek” of October 4, 1999 (p. 50-51), had a story by Bill Powell and Mark Hosenball on “The Incredible Fleecing of Russia” which addressed just one theft of money in Russia.  This story mentioned one International Monetary Fund (IMF) loan of $4.8 billion in emergency funds in July 1998. 

 

Some $1 billion of this was immediately sent to the Russian Finance Ministry to pay some alleged bills.  The rest was deposited in the Republic National Bank of New York (to be profiled later) where it was combined with some other Russian Central Bank funds.  In time, $4.1 billion of this money was withdrawn and deposited in various Russian banks. 

 

Ultimately, $1.2 billion of money from this transfer was apparently used to pay legitimate Russian creditors.  However, the remaining $2.9 billion vanished into thin air and is “unaccounted for,” per the “Newsweek” article. 

 

A second illustration surfaced in 2003 in a story by Oleg Lurie from the “Versiya” Moscow business weekly as reported in the Mar 28, 2003, “The Week” (p. 14).  This one noted in 1998 that the IMF made a $5 billion loan to the Russians to support the Russian ruble.  The money was deposited in the US Bank of New York instead of to the Russian Central Bank.  It immediately vanished. 

 

Per Lurie, the $5 billion was transferred via different routes to Swiss bank accounts owned by Mikhail Kasianov (who was then the Russian Finance Minister and now the Russian Prime Minister) and the Amalekite fat cats Roman Abramovich and Boris Berezovsky. 

 

In another case, the US pushed through a food aid package of $1 billion in donated American grain which was supposed to be sold by Russia to put the revenues into a special account to benefit the nation.  In Oct 1999, a US intelligence report said that the revenues from the sale of the grain to the Russian people had “disappeared” (Oct 1999 “Internet Vortex,” p. 27).  There is no record of the account or the money. 

 

A fourth case was on-going in 2002-2003.  This one actually surfaced some months earlier in 1999 when a group of apparent Amalekite Khazars gained control of most of Russia’s energy reserves.  To exploit these mineral resources, the group arranged for the Export-Import Bank (Eximbank) to loan them $1 billion, as would be guaranteed by the US government (which will pay off in case of default). 

 

Some $500 million of this was earmarked for a Russian oil consortium named TMK which is controlled by Mikhail Teitelboim.  According to James Harrer, in an article on “Russian Prez ‘Retires’ Under Corruption Charges” in the Jan 24, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 6-7), Teitelboim is a Zionist holding an Israeli passport (thus, meaning that he is an Amalekite Khazar--ed). 

 

Per Harrer, Teitelboim was involved in defrauding investors across the US and Europe in his oil schemes.  Some of these investors complained to Washington; so former Secretary of State Albright was forced to put a block on the money going to TMK. 

 

With Yeltsin’s resignation, the World Bank announced that it would loan Russia $750 million to “restructure the oil and coal sector” --whatever that means.  The IMF is expected to chip in another $3 billion shortly.  So the West is continuing to plow billions of dollars into Russia, much of which can be stolen and defrauded by the Amalekite Khazars.  Will the new President Putin stop this theft?  

 

 

$500 Billion Stolen 

 

Of course, the above cases involve only a few transactions over Western aid.  The truth is that Russia is in hock to the West to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars.  As noted in the above comments, “Spotlight” puts the total theft at $500 billion.  No wonder Russia all of a sudden has billionaire Amalekite Khazar bankers and fat cats, as in the case of Berezovsky, Abramovich and Gusinsky. 

 

As these white-collar, criminal Amalekites in Moscow steal this money, they choose to launder it overseas, along with the cash being raised in the more dirty criminal activities (prostitution, the rackets, etc).  The evidence at this stage is that this gang of thieves involve primarily an inner circle of rich, powerful, Amalekite, Khazar fat cats in Moscow working overseas with powerful Amalekite bankers and masters. 

 

The three primary names receiving 1999 media coverage have included the just mentioned Boris Berezovsky, Roman Abramovich and Vladimir Gusinsky.  There probably are others.  But these three so-called Russian statesmen (actually Amalekite crooks) are most important because they all seem to have had the ties with Yeltsin necessary to successfully pull this caper off. 

 

 

The Amalekite Thieves All Tie Together 

 

The Amalekite Khazar Boris Berezovsky is both an ally of former President Boris Yeltsin and a colleague of the previously discussed mobster Semyon Yukovich Mogilevich (Sep 6, 1999, “Newsweek,” p. 36).  Manifestly, the Amalekite white collar criminals in Moscow have definite ties to organized crime Amalekites in Russia (just as is true in the US, as discussed in preceding chapters).  

 

Without having to even state this fact, a future chapter will assess the incredible clannish propensity of the Edomites generally and the Amalekites particularly.  Obviously, they have been working in collusion in Russia to steal everything they can. 

 

It is also evident that these gangs of Amalekite criminals in Russia (both the white-collar types, as well as the more dirty ones) are in collusion in laundering this money overseas with Amalekite bankers.  USNWR of Aug 30, 1999 (p. 34), acknowledged this connection by saying that it is hard to imagine that any looting of Russian wealth is going on without the participation of major organized crime groups. 

 

Beyond this attempt to take over Russia and plunder its wealth by the evil Amalekites, it should be noted that numbers of Amalekite Khazars have fled Russia for the West or Israel.  Many that go to the state of Israel soon pack up their bags and head for the US or some other part of the West. 

 

Many immigrants going to Israel find that they have to work to survive.  It’s not in the Amalekite mentality to work when they can steal and plunder so much from others (as parasites) in order to survive.  Thus, many of the Amalekite Khazars going to the state of Israel use it as a transit point to move on to New York and other popular Amalekite centers of evil, as discussed earlier. 

 

 

Natan Sharansky, Revisited   

 

One of the most noteworthy Russian Jews coming to Israel has been the previously discussed Natan Sharansky (who seems to be a clear Amalekite Khazar).   He came in 1986 and quickly moved up in politics (serving with the Barak Labor government, as mentioned in a former chapter).  In time, Sharansky became a leader in the Yisrael ba-Aliyah political party. 

 

All of this sounds well and good, but another Russian immigrant to Israel named Judi Nudelmann came forward in 1999 and charged that Sharansky was a Russian gangster who had close ties with Grigory Loutchansky, the apparent Russian Amalekite gangster discussed earlier in this chapter (Jan 14, 2002, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 22-23)

 

According to Nudelmann, Sharansky took pay-off money from Loutchansky, another Amalekite crook named Gregory Lerner (who was convicted of bribery and bank fraud in Israel in 1998) and other crooked Mafiosos.   Nudelmann’s charges were publicized in his book on “Sharansky:  Without the Mask,” published in 1999. 

 

In any case, the apparent Amalekite Sharansky did sue Nudelmann for libel, claiming that he was not linked to the Russian mob.  This lawsuit is still pending in an Israeli court in early 2003.  So the outcome is still uncertain.  However, it is interesting that one of the leading Russian immigrants to Israel can be an important part of the Russian organized crime operation. 

 

If this linkage is true, as charged by Nudelmann, it is a certainty that the Russian mob has moved or is trying to move in on the Israeli government to steal everything possible from it. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 164--Russian Amalekite Criminals II

 

 

The Amalekite Money Laundering Operations 

 

The previously quoted “Spotlight” of September 6, 1999 (p. 5), also had an interesting revelation on the Bank of New York, mentioned earlier.  The evidence is massive that the Russian Amalekite crooks (both white collar and mobster) use it to launder much of their stolen money. 

 

According to “Spotlight,” one Itzhak ”Bruce” Rappaport, an alleged “Swiss banker,” but really a Israeli citizen (and another apparent Amalekite), bought up stock in the Bank of New York (founded 200 years ago by the Amalekite Alexander Hamilton). 

 

Evidently, Rappaport and other Amalekites now use it to launder money from various Amalekite bankers and crooks around the world (to certainly include the Amalekite gangster Semyon Yukovich Mogilevich, described previously, and the Amalekite bankers Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich, also both discussed formerly). 

 

As noted in previous remarks, Amalekite thieves have reportedly laundered something like $10 billion alone through the Amalekite owned Bank of New York (per “Spotlight”).  The just mentioned Amalekite, Semyon Yukovich Mogilevich, has been personally washing hundreds of millions annually through Amalekite allies at the Bank of New York (per USNWR of Aug 30, 1999, p. 34). 

 

Of course, Amalekite bankers have not been the only persons involved in illegal money laundering.  The Rockefeller controlled Chase Manhattan Bank in New York had also been getting its share as well, per a Nov 1, 1999, “Spotlight” story (p. 6) by Martin Mann on “Will Reno Investigate Rockefeller’s Bank?”   The answer here was no! 

 

 

Private Banking 

 

Anyway, Mann points out that Chase and numbers of other US banks have gotten in on the Russian action.  They call it “private banking” with no-mail accounts.  Per the story, Chase was caught laundering money from crooked Iranians--just after the demise of the Shah in the 1970s and again in the 1980s, when they linked in with Italian Mafia gangsters to take drug money from alleged pizzeria restaurants. 

 

The big banks use a unique scam to launder trillions of dollars in illegal money annually.  Per an article by Martin Mann on “Congress ignores Dirty Money Laundering” in the Dec 6, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 1, 3), banks set up “fiduciary accounts” which do not even identify the real depositor.  The account is listed with a code name. 

 

Banks then set up a private investment company (PIC) for the depositor in a bank secrecy area (like the Cayman Islands)  The PIC is an offshore shell company with its registered owner in another shell company based in Panama or Switzerland.  The NY bank controls both the PIC and its registered owner company.  Investigators can never tie the money back to its real owner with all of the secrecy and shell company fronts. 

 

 

The Amalekite Citigroup Enterprise 

 

One of the world’s largest corporations is Citigroup which owns Citicorp/Citibank of New York among many other companies.  Citigroup is a public corporation.  But the evidence is that it is 100% controlled by Amalekite bankers.  Subsequent remarks herein will assess the role that the evident Amalekite Robert Rubin has played with Citigroup (which allowed him to become one of its co-chairmen). 

 

The importance of the apparent Amalekite Citicorp/Citibank firm is that this company has been one of the major players in the drug money laundering operation.  Martin Mann’s article outlined the role of Citicorp/Citibank in laundering some $100 million in drug money from Raul Salinas, a Mexican gangster and brother of former Mexican President Carlos Salinas.  

 

As one Citibank official admitted, the bank manages some 40,000 stealthy private banking accounts.  Many of them are reported to be bigger and more active than the $100 million laundered for the Salinas family.  Mann quoted the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development which said that some $21.5 trillion is hid in “deodorized” deposits in Wall Street private banks. 

 

The October 1999 “Internet Vortex” (p. 27) had a news report that Russian organized crime rings (obviously Amalekite Khazars) have been busy placing moles inside major Western banks and securities firms in order to help them launder stolen money and carry out other illegal operations.  Recently, the FBI had found such a person at the Bank Boston Corp. who had been helping Russian crooks launder drug money. 

 

 

The February 2000 Revelations 

 

“Newsweek” magazine of Feb 28, 2000 (p. 42), broke a story by Mark Hosenball and Bill Powell on “The Russian Money Chase” which was not only revealing in terms of the latest of the Amalekite money thefts in Moscow, but even perhaps offering a clue on the future of the Amalekite gangsters in Russia (this future will be more fully assessed in a later chapter). 

 

Per the story, US investigators have been privately pursuing the rip off of Western money by revelations from two former Russian émigrés named Peter Berlin and Lucy Edwards (a husband and wife team).  Berlin appears to be definitely an Amalekite.  But there is uncertainly over Lucy (although she could also be in the fold with her obvious name change). 

 

Anyway, Lucy and Peter have been the primary people in the West who have set up the money laundering pipeline from Moscow to Western banks.  In all, this pair has helped in laundering some $7 billion (out of the alleged $10 billion in total) which went through the Amalekite Bank of New York (discussed above).  For their work, Berlin and his wife received $2 million in commissions and fees. 

 

However, US authorities caught Lucy and Peter and forced them to talk and reveal many of the names of the insiders involved in the theft of Russia.  Apparently, this married couple will cooperate with US officials to avoid a severe prosecution and perhaps deportation.  But still, at this point, Russian officials are hiding data and not cooperating.  So this effort may prove to be a dead-end. 

 

As the story goes, the money was stolen in Russia and reached a couple of Russian banking operations called MDW and Sobinbank which passed the funds on to their sister banks (DKB and Flamingo).  All of these banks had ownership ties to the mostly Amalekite, Russian fat cats Aleksandr Smolensky, Boris Berezovsky, Aleksandr Mamut and others with links to Boris Yeltsin. 

 

In Russia, two young men named Kirill Gusev and Ivan Bronov (both surely Amalekites) were the managers collecting the stolen money.  Once the money reached DKB and Flamingo, Gusev and Bronov would transfer it to the US Amalekite run Bank of New York where it was transferred to other off shore PICs, accounts and banks like Benex, BEGS and Lowland (which had been set up by Berlin). 

 

Berlin was an acquaintance of the Russian Amalekite gangster Semyon Mogilevich (discussed earlier).  Semyon ran something like $500 million through this pipeline.  Presumably, most of the rest of the money came from Russian Amalekite Khazars (alleged businessmen)--like Boris Berezovsky and others, discussed heretofore. 

 

 

Edmond Safra 

 

Another major US bank which has had a significant role in laundering money from the Russian Amalekites has been New York’s Republic National Bank, mentioned earlier, in the vein that the Russian government had deposited some of its money in Republic.  Republic and her owner received quite a write up in the Dec 13, 1999, “Newsweek” (p. 48-50) by Christopher Dickey and Russell Watson in an article on “Death in Monaco.” 

 

Republic was effectively owned and/or controlled by a super rich, billionaire, Jewish, international banker named Edmond Safra (an apparent Amalekite, though of possible Sephardic origin).  Safra lived in Monaco (but had homes and villas around the world, to include New York).  He was a long time banker, having formerly owned much of Switzerland’s Trade Development Bank and American Express. 

 

In the last few years, his focus was upon Republic National Bank and the Safra Republic Holding Company based in Luxembourg.  Apparently, Safra linked in with the Russian Amalekite Mafia some years ago and became one of its primary friends in laundering illegal money. 

 

At one time, Safra was accused by American Express of not only money laundering, but also of drug trafficking and illicit arms dealing.  After a lawsuit, American Express backed off.  But reportedly, the US Drug Administration people have had much information on him laundering drug money through a Republic account in Switzerland.  

 

In any case, Safra was closely linked in with the Russian Amalekites.  Apparently, they stung his Republic Bank when the Kremlin defaulted on some loans which caused a $191 million write-off at Republic.  In any case, Safra got mad at his Russian Amalekite colleagues and retaliated by closing some of their accounts at Republic and squealing on them with US authorities. 

 

 

The Hit 

 

It was then that rumors had it that there was a Mob contract out on his life.  In late November 1999, two masked intruders broke into his home and apparently sought him out to kill him.  His chief bodyguard, Samuel Cohen, was off duty.  Safra and one of his nurses both hid in a bathroom and locked the door. 

 

Another nurse was wounded in a scuffle with the intruders, but got away to notify authorities.  Perhaps because of fear of being caught, the intruders started a fire in the home and left.  The smoke suffocated both Safra and his nurse hiding out in the bathroom. 

 

The “Spotlight” newspaper of December 20, 1999 (p. 5), assessed this Safra death in an article by Martin Mann on “Major Media toes Line On Death of Plutocrat” which quoted financial writer Hermann Waldie (who suggested that Safra was in competition to launder illegal Russian money with the Bank of New York, discussed above). 

 

Per Waldie, the Russians (correctly the Amalekites) were taking more of their tainted moneys to the Bank of New York and Safra was losing out.  Supposedly, this angered him and he tipped off the FBI about some of this money going to the Bank of New York.  This angered the “Zionist Mafia,” who saw his action as a bitter, treacherous blow demanding swift vengeance.  

 

 

Two More Earlier Strange Amalekite Deaths 

 

This same “Spotlight” story by Martin Mann discussed the situation with two earlier deaths of apparent Amalekites which seem to have had some similarities with the Safra case. 

 

The first one involved billionaire Robert Maxwell who built his super rich empire by a string of stock swindles (a very common Amalekite practice--ed.) and patent thefts from a prostrate Germany after WWII (this was one of the fallouts of why the war was fought, so that Amalekite fat cats could rush in and steal everything possible from the defeated Germans and Japanese--ed.). 

 

The Amalekite Maxwell was born Abraham Loeb and later changed his name to Hoch and finally to Robert Maxwell (May 23, 2003, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 24), as it is a common practice for Amalekites to change their names to better deceive the gullible goyim.  Loeb was a secret agent for the Mossad who worked for the emigration of Jews from the old USSR to come to Palestine (ibid, p. 24). 

 

At some point in time, Abe became a loose cannon (ibid, p. 24).  His body was found mysteriously floating in the sea next to his luxurious private yacht in the fall of 1991, just about the time that the old USSR was breaking up.  Anyway, Mann subtly accuses Loeb/Maxwell of being involved in laundering illegal money out of Russia/the old USSR (Dec 20, 2003, Spotlight,” p. 5).   

 

Since Maxwell’s death remains a mystery (even the cause of death was never established), one must wonder whether the Amalekite Mob was involved in some way or not.  Did Maxwell double cross them?  This is a plausible scenario because the Amalekites do double cross each other from time to time. 

 

The above cited “Jerusalem Post” story (p. 24) blamed the Mossad for the murder of Loeb/Maxwell.  So it might be that the Amalekite Mob/masters ordered the murder of Loeb/Maxwell because he was a loose cannon stealing money from the Amalekite fat cats and the Mossad carried out the murder deed.  

 

The next mysterious Amalekite billionaire death occurred on July 8, 1996, when 41 years old Amschel Rothschild died mysteriously in Paris when he allegedly hanged himself with the cord from his bathrobe.  Amschel was said to be participating in laundering illegal money from Russia and in international espionage (perhaps on behalf of the Amalekites generally or his family in particular). 

 

Amschel’s father, Lord Victor Rothschild of Britain, was also involved in intelligence--British Intelligence.  Soviet defector Anatoli Golitsin later testified that Lord Rothschild was actually a double agent for the KGB in WWII, working for both the British and the Soviets.  Perhaps the tie that Victor had in Moscow set the stage for his son Amschel to enter the laundering business for money stolen by Russian Amalekites. 

 

Another alleged Amalekite is billionaire Rupert Murdoch, who has wealth scattered all over the world and especially in the media and publishing fields.  Right after the death of Amschel, Murdoch sent a priority fax to his 600 editors and publishing managers with instructions that they were not to “exploit or sensationalize” Amschel’s death.  Yes, media owners do tell their subordinate editors what to print! 

 

Anyway, the gist of Mann's article does raise questions about the strange deaths of these billionaire Amalekites, who all seem to have been involved in illegal activities with the Russian Amalekite Mafia.  Whether they all double crossed the Mob in some way and were murdered or not remains to be answered. 

 

 

The Laundering Kingpin 

 

Obviously, this enormous money laundering operation involving US banks and financial institutions must tie in some way to the Federal Reserve banking operation since it oversees most US banking operations.  The Apr 10, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 1, 3) had an article by Martin Mann on “Fed Chairman Greenspan Fingered as King of Cashwash” which addressed this prospect. 

 

One of the knowledgeable persons interviewed by Mann was Alan Milinkovich, a former US Treasury enforcement official and now a consultant on Wall Street. 

 

Milinkovich charged that Greenspan “has condoned on occasion even introduced--the tainted practices corrupting the financial services industry from countenancing deceptive accounting standards to churning billions in drug profits through the Federal Reserve system.”

 

While the Fed was certainly a dishonest, crooked organization from day one back in 1913, it has reached the pinnacle of evil under the Amalekite master Alan Greenspan.  With his connections to the large Amalekite banks around the world, he has been in a position to oversee more financial, white-collar crime and corruption than anyone else heretofore. 

 

A congressional investigation in 1999 said that “Cash-washing on such a huge scale (as going on in the US) was inevitably done through the Federal Reserve system.”  Manifestly, it would be impossible to launder the billions (or trillions) of dollars through American banks annually without the active participation of the Fed. 

 

Presently, Congress has been considering a bill proposed by Secretary of the Treasury Lawrence Summers which would designate certain areas as “High Intensity Money Laundering and Related Financial Crime Areas” (HIFCAs).  Presumably, US authorities could monitor and watch these areas more closely.  Since Summers plays on the Amalekite team of evil, it is unclear what he has in mind with these HIFCAs. 

 

The US General Accounting Office (GAO) says the worst offenders in laundering dirty money are Russia, Ukraine, Mexico and Israel (which will be assessed shortly below).  Though GAO would point the finger at these countries, it must be noted that much of the illegal money eventually finds its way into US and Swiss banks. 

 

 

Yes, the Fed is Guilty 

 

The point of these remarks is that the Amalekite controlled Federal Reserve system, under the management of the crafty and foxy Amalekite master Alan Greenspan, has been actively leading the cash washing of illegal money for some time.  Since it involves trillions of dollars, nothing will be done about it until the whole system sinks and becomes history. 

 

By the way, this same “Spotlight” story by Martin Mann mentioned the fact that Greenspan has a record of using US dollars in the hands of the Federal Reserve to bail out or shore up various foreign currencies from time to time. 

 

Clearly, a couple of years ago, Greenspan used something between $20-30 billion dollars (there is still some dispute on the exact amount) to support the Mexican peso which was plunging on the financial markets.  This Mexican bailout will be discussed in some detail in a later chapter on the operations of the Federal Reserve to make money for the ruling plutocrats (who are mostly Amalekites in the US). 

 

But in Mann’s April 10th article, he goes further by indicating that Greenspan has used US dollars at least three times to help stabilize the Israeli currency which has tried to tank a few times.  Since both Mexico and Israel are intimately involved in money laundering operations, one must wonder if this fact had something to do with Greenspan’s concern (beyond the racial factor, in the case of Israel). 

 

 

The Israeli Laundering Efforts 

 

The Jewish “Forward” paper of September 17, 1999 (p. 2), had an article by Michael Arnold on “Israel Preparing a Crackdown on Money Laundering,” which discussed the Israeli money laundering problem in general (as pointed out by GAO, noted above) and its Russian aspects in particular. 

 

Arnold claims that some $20 million to $4 or $5 billion is laundered annually in Israel from around the world with by far most of it coming from crime bosses in Russia.  Hebrew University criminologist Menachem Amir says that it comes from both immigrants and crime figures.  This Israeli center of money laundering is called “colossal” by even Israelis because it is considered safe and secret for criminals. 

 

Though the criminal activities giving rise to the money (drug running, etc) are illegal in Israel, laundering the money from them is not.  Therefore, the problem is real (although there seems to be some attempts by certain Israelis to stop it). 

 

The story indicates that many Jews leaving Russia for Israel, sew $100,000 into their clothes so they can get out of Russia without it being detected.  They come to Israel and deposit the money in Israeli banks.  The article says that all of the Russian Mafiosi gangsters know someone with Jewish roots who can bring the money into Israel and deposit it.  Since the Israeli banks want the money, the report asks “why not?” 

 

This pervasive Amalekite money laundering operation in the state of Israel is interesting for another reason.  In Colonel Lunev’s book, the defector, quoted earlier, also went on record with a prediction that numbers of the Russian crooks would not only immigrate to the Christian West but also to Israel.  These Amalekites come posing as Jews under the law of return. 

 

Obviously, per the above comments on the money laundering operations, they have already had a significant impact upon the Israeli state.  Of course, many of them move on to the West.  But those staying will establish themselves with power because money talks.  All that can be said for them is that YHWH will someday separate the goats from the sheep and the tares from the wheat.  They will meet their Waterloo. 

 

 

The Use of Gold 

 

For centuries (perhaps going all of the way back to Babylon of 2,500 years ago), Amalekites have had a certain propensity for gold.  For years now, the Amalekites (to principally involve the Rothschild family and their agents and colleagues) have controlled gold in the Christian West.  They set the daily price and by using the gold reserves of the Federal Reserve Bank and other central banks, they control it globally. 

 

The “US News & World Report” magazine of Nov 29, 1999 (p. 42-44), had a report by David E. Kaplan on “The golden age of crime” which addressed how international drug traffickers have turned to the use of gold in recent times to launder their illegal profits.  Kaplan cited law enforcement people who say that gold is now being used to wash staggering amounts of dirty cash. 

 

The way this scam works is that the international gangsters use their illegal moneys to purchase gold in one area (jewelry, ingots, or even scrap gold) and then ship it to another area where it is sold to gold dealers who frequently use it for jewelry.  This entails using dirty money to buy gold in one place and selling it in another place to generate clean money. 

 

The sales often generate a profit which is merely a plus for the whole operation.  Even on a break-even transaction, the Mob has come out ahead by being able to launder dirty money into good money. 

 

The article quite naturally made no mention of the Amalekite or Jewish presence in the international criminal syndicates following this practice.  But since the Amalekites rule international crime (other than the few rogue operations among the Latinos and Asians) and since they also control the gold market and much of the jewelry business, it is plain that this operation is mainly carried on by Amalekites.  

 

Kaplan did mention Richard Rubin who heads the Republic Metals Company of the US which handles much of this international gold trade.  Although Kaplan did not mention the race of Rubin, his name and picture (in the magazine) are both very suggestive that he is an Amalekite.  Rubin seems to be an Amalekite name (perhaps originally Rubenstein) and Richard Rubin showed evidence of the Hittite nose. 

 

 

More Edomite Corruption in Russia 

 

Per “Spotlight of Sep 6, 1999 (p. 4), some European investigators allege that Yeltsin’s two married daughters, Helena Okulowa and Taitiana Dyachenko, have extorted huge bribes from various foreign contractors doing business in Russia.  The earlier quoted “Newsweek,” of October 4, 1999, followed up with revelations on how the Yeltsin clan was able to get in on the extortion action. 

 

Per the article, the Russian government entered into a $300 million contract with a Swiss construction firm called Mabetex for the renovation of the Kremlin.  Mabetex is owned by an Albanian Kosovar named Behgjet Pacolli (an obvious Albanian Edomite).  “Newsweek” asserts that Pacolli or his agent paid Yeltsin’s two daughters a commission of $10 million for the deal.  This is correctly bribery and/or extortion. 

 

Swiss investigators have found that Pacolli personally paid some $600,000 in bills run up on credit cards by the two Yeltsin daughters.  In another matter, Pacolli and Kremlin official Pavel Borodin and his daughter opened an account at Switzerland’s Banca del Gottardo.  Some $1 million was deposited and used to pay Yeltsin’s political campaign expenses. 

 

 

Dyachenko 

 

Finally, US investigators have learned that Taitiana’s husband Alexei or Leonid Dyachenko has a bank account with $2.7 million in it at the Bank of New York’s Cayman Islands branch.  Reportedly, he has been busy laundering millions of dollars through the Bank of New York which has eventually ended up in the United Overseas Bank in Switzerland. 

 

In an article on “The mystery man in the Moscow money mess,” USNWR of October 11, 1999, focused upon this Yeltsin son-in-law who now owns millions of dollars worth of businesses in the old USSR.  A reporter once asked his wife what he does and she said “I don’t know exactly.  Something to do with wood processing.” 

 

Reportedly, he is in the export business, but does not pay Russian export taxes (these Russian tax losses run to $40 million annually).  With his success on money, one would have to pause and ask if he could be an Amalekite Khazar?  The USNWR article did not reveal his ethnic origin.  But it did note that in the Kremlin, he is known as Alexei Dyachenko, while in America he is identified as Leonid Dyachenko. 

 

This name change situation is a good clue that he is an Amalekite.  Amalekites are masters at deception and name changes are one of their favorite tricks.  If he is an Amalekite and goes to Israel, he will change his name again, as is a normal Amalekite practice. 

 

In a more recent report, “US News & World Report” of November 29, 1999 (p. 49), had a story by Christine Caryl on “Show me the money” which focused upon some alleged graft personally by Boris Yeltsin. 

 

Per Caryl, Yeltsin’s signature has been found in Switzerland in connection with opening a secret Swiss bank account.  Yeltsin had consistently denied having a secret Swiss bank account.  Perhaps this is a smoking gun which will tie Boris directly into the theft of Russian money and its laundering in overseas banks.  If this find can be pursued, it may not help Vladimir Putin and the Russian Unity party.  

 

 

Russian Government Ties to Organized Crime 

 

Obviously, with Yeltsin’s personal ties to important crime figures, discussed above, the Russian government under his leadership was destined to follow suit, just as has been happening in the United States with former President Slick Clinton and his enormous ties to organized crime (going back to his days as Governor of Arkansas). 

 

This condition proves Stanislav Lunev’s charge that the Mafia controls the Russian government. 

 

Just as Clinton surrounded himself with Amalekite aides favorable to Amalekite organized crime, Yeltsin did the same thing.  Many Russian bureaucrats look the other way or share in the loot themselves in some manner.  The rip off of billions of dollars in Western money has involved some collusion and conspiracy efforts at the top levels in Moscow. 

 

In some of the above comments, reference was made to Amalekite mobster Mikhail Fridman, a former Russian trade minister who has dual citizenship with the state of Israel (article “Major Media Ignores Puppetmasters in Money-Laundering Scam” in the Nov 15, 1999, “Spotlight” [p. 6-7], by Gregory Douglas). 

 

Actually, Fridman is on the low end of the totem pole because more important people are tied into the Russian crime operation. 

 

For instance, “The Washington Times” of Sep 27-Oct 3, 1999 (p. 14), had a news report on the “Moscow mafia watch” which noted that a recent shuffling of Russian government officials had brought to power a key person supported by organized crime groups.  He is Russian Interior Minister Vladimir Rushaylo, who was appointed in the spring of 1999. 

 

US intelligence reports indicate that Russian (correctly Amalekite Khazar) organized crime figures were pleased with Rushaylo and his appointments and activities of closing his eyes to the prevailing crime problem.  The article didn’t assess Rushaylo’s ethnic background.  But it would make one be suspicious that he must be an Amalekite Khazar. 

 

US Government Ties to Russian Amalekite Gangsters 

 

Future chapters will outline the enormous ties which the Bill Clinton Administration had with US organized crime which has been historically in the hands of Amalekite gangsters.  There is no intent to discuss that reality presently.  But mention must be made that even the Russian Amalekite mobsters have seen fit to establish their own connections to the US White House. 

 

For example, Colonel Lunev’s book (“Through the Eyes of the Enemy,” p. 17-19) describes the work of two key Russian criminals, named Grigory Loutchansky and Vadim Rabinovich, mentioned earlier.  These two crooks have had access to Clinton himself. 

 

Lunev says that the Amalekite Rabinovich, a so-called Ukrainian businessman, attended a Clinton fund-raiser in September 1995 and had his picture taken with Slick (ibid, p. 18). 

 

The interesting thing about this Rabinovich-Clinton meeting is that Rabinovich was known to have ties with Russian organized crime (he even had served time in prison for criminal activities) and his visa had been revoked the month before.  Yet, this presidential meeting with a convicted felon never stopped Clinton.  Obviously, Slick got some campaign money or something else out of the meeting. 

 

Loutchansky (another apparent Amalekite) was Rabinovich’s business partner in a US commodities firm (which the US State Department acknowledges as an organized crime operation).  He dined with Clinton in 1993 and was given a “private” (which means a secret) meeting with Clinton and Vice President Al Gore (ibid, p. 18). 

 

Preceding comments have before mentioned three apparent Amalekite crooks named Peter Castenfelt, Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich.  These three evident bandits have played a major role in settling the US war in the Balkans and the secret international financial intrigue associated with it (as will be assessed in some detail in a subsequent chapter). 

 

But for now, something important came up about this operation as revealed in a story by Warren Hough on “Mysterious Financier Brokered Kosovo Deal” in the June 28, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 1). 

 

The importance of this story is that the two most obvious Amalekite Khazars, Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich, both flew to Washington during the Balkans war for secret consultations with senior US White House officials (assuredly Amalekites, who surrounded Clinton).  What happened between these two Khazars and the senior Amalekite aides surrounding Clinton?  What kind of deal was made? 

 

 

The Gore Ties 

 

Not only has Clinton had definite ties to the Amalekite Khazar Mafia in Russia, but former Vice President Al Gore seems to also have opened up contacts in Moscow. 

 

Reportedly, Gore was the architect of the Clinton Administration’s “see-no-evil Russian policy” (Feb 28, 2000, “Newsweek,” p. 42).  So American politicians have been working with Russian crooks to cover up and hide the Moscow thefts of Western money. 

 

The Jun 28, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 6) also had a story by Mike Blair on “Russian Weapons Man Profits from Gore Link” which outlined some strange shenanigans from Gore. 

 

It seems that a Russian weapons firm, named Zvezda-Strela, was about to receive a huge contract from the United States government for ejection seats for the new Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) project.  While the owners of Zvezda-Strela were not disclosed, it is not hard to put two and two together and understand that they are Amalekite Khazars. 

 

Zvezda-Strela was/is backed by IBP International of London, England and Cassidy Associates of Washington, DC, both of which were major campaign contributors to the Al Gore for President campaign.  Cassidy had close ties with the Slick Clinton administration on trade matters (which were handled by Clinton’s Amalekite aides from day one). 

 

IBP was headed by Judith DePaul, who had been a major money contributor to Al Gore.  While the name Judith is not necessarily a Jewish name in all instances, it usually is.  In the context of international trade and linkage to a weapons operation in Russia, it most likely is an indicator of a Jewish Amalekite person.  

 

 

More Than Clinton and Gore 

 

The Clinton ties to illegal drug running operations go way back to Arkansas days.  They are undisputed by anyone with brains above the moron level.  The Gore ties are not quite so established.  But they can be identified and particularly so since they involve powerful Amalekite masters/bankers who rule and call the shots in America. 

 

But what is largely unknown among Americans and almost unbelievable is the extensive power which Edomite gangsters have over politicians in general in Washington.  Perhaps the case can be made that the liberal, permissive Democrats are the worst.  But the Republicans have been getting a big share of the gangster money as well. 

 

“Spotlight” of Jan 3 & 10, 2000 (p. 26), addressed this issue in a story by James Harrer on “U.S. Pols Funded by Russian Mob.”  The essence of this report is that European investigators have discovered the role that one Semyon “Schmel” Kislin, a member of the Russian Mafia, has played in funding US elections. 

 

Though not mentioned, the name Semyon is sufficient to identify this crook at once as an Amalekite Khazar.  In any case, Semyon has been a major financial supporter of both Republican Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Democrat Senator Charles Schumer of New York (a powerful Amalekite master). 

 

A leaked FBI report on Kislin charged that Kislin was involved in getting a US visa for a Russian hit man to enter the US in 1994 (Jan 31, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2).  While it was unclear whether the hit man came specifically to kill someone or not, the linkage to an Amalekite busy financing US elections is interesting. 

 

This same “Spotlight” story of Jan 3 & 10, 2000, had some more information on the Amalekite criminal Semyon “Schlomo” Mogilevich, discussed in prior comments.  it seems that Mogilevich owned a US front company named YBM Magnex Corporation.  Significantly, this company has been a major contributor to the Republican National Committee. 

 

In November 1999, YBM Magnex was found guilty of securities’ fraud and money laundering.  The company was shut down by federal authorities.  Quite naturally, nothing was done to the owner of the company (which is one of the purposes of corporations--to allow crooks to be crooks and not have to personally answer for their crimes since the crimes can be laid on the corporations). 

 

 

The Terrified Republicans 

 

When the news began leaking out in the fall of 1999 of the theft of billions of dollars in US tax payer funds from mainly Amalekite crooks in Russia (with the participation and a share of the action by Boris Yeltsin and his family), the Republican controlled Congress decided that it would make an investigation and hold hearings on the subject. 

 

Now, with the tremendous influence of the Amalekite plutocrats and Amalekite controlled media (which is plainly linked to the Amalekite controlled Mobs through ruling Amalekite plutocrats), this optimistic thinking was doomed for failure from day one. 

 

So, in November 1999, the Senate opened its hearings on the money thefts and money laundering operations in the US, Switzerland and Israel.  This interesting exercise to discover the truth lasted exactly one day.  The next morning, all subsequent meetings were canceled and the subject was laid to rest to be remembered no more by Washington politicians. 

 

Will any of America’s elected leaders stand up and attempt to get to the bottom of one of the greatest outright thefts of American money in history?  The answer is no.  No American politician is going to take on the Amalekite power structure and the Amalekite power over the media.  All of them have and will run in fear and panic of the Amalekite controlled media. 

 

 

More on the Amalekite Israeli Connection 

 

Otherwise, there is the growing Russian, Amalekite, Khazar, gang operation internationally and especially in America, as described by Stanislav Lunev and as commented upon in the prior chapters.  The only thing that can be said for this operation is that it clearly has come under the umbrella of American, Amalekite, gang bosses (or otherwise, it would be run out of business). 

 

As late as August 1999, the Amalekite control over the Mobs and drug running operations was brought out in comments from officials of the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).  With the Amalekite control of the US government, it must have been some fluke that the DEA would dare identify the drug bosses.  But it did so. 

 

The DEA acknowledged that the Jews (Amalek Israeli crime syndicates--ed) are the prime source for the distribution of the party drug “Ecstasy,” a very popular drug at all-night “rave” parties in the Christian West  (Aug 9, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 11).  So far, the DEA has not been accused of anti-Semitism.  But this could easily happen to discredit its remarks. 

 

Per the article, these Israeli (Amalekite) gangs tend to recruit couriers within their own ethnic and religious communities.  Hence, they have been busy recruiting American and European Amalekite Jews to spread their drugs all over Europe and America and even to small towns like Fayetteville, Arkansas and Nashville, Tennessee. 

 

The article did not comment upon the connections between the Israeli Amalekite gangs and the New York Amalekite Mob, although such a connection should not be too difficult or complicated to figure out. 

 

Based upon ethnic grounds and the clannish propensity of the Amalekites, one can be sure that the New York Amalekites are in charge of the Israeli drug running operations.  All of them come together under the umbrella of powerful Amalekites who call all of the shots of importance in organized crime. 

 

 

“The Jerusalem Post” 

 

The Aug 13, 2001, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 14-17) also had a story on this Ecstasy problem-- “The Drug Lords Speak Hebrew.”  This report laid it on a network of Israelis in the US and Europe.  They smuggle the drug into the US, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, etc.  Apparently, the network involves Israelis, Russian Jews and members of the crime syndicates (in other words, the Amalekite Mob). 

 

Yifat Steinberger of the Israeli police says that the drug network succeeds because “they’re smart, creative and nimble.  They don’t get bogged down in their ways.” 

 

Finally, the story said that some traffickers from the Dominican Republic have been trying to elbow in on the action (which is what has been suggested earlier herein--in that Hispanic gangs are trying to move in on the Amalekite Mob’s turf). 

 

 

Amalekites at Work in the UN 

 

Another twist on this theme came out in October 1999 when it was revealed that Russian gangsters have been busy peddling influence in the UN’s International Drug Control Program which is supposed to be fighting the international drug trade (Oct 11, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 11). 

 

With the power that the Amalekite bankers/masters have in some UN affairs, it’s not hard to see that Amalekite mobsters would be able to pretty well control all important decisions made in the UN’s drug agency.  Of course, the Amalekites are not going to sit back and allow anyone to interfere in their operations--all the while that they themselves are the plutocrat bosses calling the shots. 

 

Incidentally, in mentioning this probable Amalekite power over the UN’s drug agency, there is no intent to suggest that the Amalekites now rule or ever will rule the generic UN.  There are simply too many Asians, Blacks and Muslims (who hate the Jews too much) to ever allow much overall Amalekite power in that agency. 

 

Likely, this Amalekite power over the drug agency was a temporary thing--bought by Amalekite money in payoffs, coupled with tremendous US and British pro-Amalekite influence in the UN.  Howbeit, with the enormous hatred which the Blacks, Asians and most Muslims have for the Amalekites, there are definite limits on what Amalekite bankers and masters can do in controlling the UN. 

 

 

The Bottom Line

 

The Amalekites call the shots in the state of Israel, the United States, throughout the White British Commonwealth nations (Canada, Australia and New Zealand) and somewhat in the now Black run Republic of South Africa.  But the days of Amalekite ownership of the rest of the world is in dispute. 

. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 165--Esau Versus Yakov

 

 

The Birthright 

 

Previous chapters have broached the birthright and some of the promises of blessings to come upon the lineage of Avraham through Yitzhak and Yakov Yisrael.  To tackle these issues in some detail at this time, a few definitions are in order. 

 

Funk and Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary” (p. 63) notes that a birthright is “A privilege or possession into which one is born.” 

 

“Davis Dictionary of the Bible” (p. 102) says that a birthright is “A certain privilege considered to belong to the firstborn son in a family and which is not shared by his younger brothers.  The eldest son ordinarily succeeded his father to his father’s rank and position, as head of the family or tribe, and as representative of its prerogatives.  He also inherited a double portion of his father’s property, a right guaranteed to the firstborn even when his mother was the less loved of two wives (Deut. xxi. 17; ep. 2 Kin. ii. 9).  A birthright might be sold to a younger brother, as Esau sold his birthright to Jacob (Gen. xxv. 29, 34; Heb xii. 16).  It might be forfeited on account of misconduct (I Chron. v. 1).” 

 

“Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary” (p. 67) links birthright to the Greek prototokia (in reference to Esau at Heb 12:16) and adds that “The ‘birthright’ involved preeminence and authority.  Gen. 27:29; 49:3.  Another right was that of the double portion.  Connected with the ‘birthright’ was the progenitorship of the Messiah.  Esau transferred his ‘birthright,’ to Jacob for a paltry mess of pottage, profanely despising this last spiritual privilege.  Gen. 25 and 27.  In the history of the nation God occasionally set aside the ‘birthright,’ to show that the objects of His choice depended not on the will of the flesh, but on His own authority.  Thus, Isaac was preferred to Ishmael, Jacob to Esau, Joseph to Reuben, David to his elder brethren, Solomon to Adonijah.” 

 

 

Blessings and Promises 

 

Since the birthright involves blessings and since in the Book the blessings came upon the line of Avraham because of promises made to him, it will now be appropriate to address the concept of blessings and promises. 

 

The just quoted “Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary” (p. 19) says that blessed (from the Hebrew asre) is linked to happy.  Basically, per Vine’s, asre connotes “the state of ‘prosperity’ or ‘happiness’ that comes when a superior bestows his favor (blessing ) on one.  In most passages, the one bestowing favor is God Himself.  The state that the blessed one enjoys does not always appear to be ‘happy’...  (Vine’s goes on to cite the case of a person blessed with The ELOHIM’s concern in chastisements--in that a man is blessed when he is chastened by The HIGHEST--ed). 

 

“One’s status before God (being ‘blessed’) is not always expressed in terms of the individual or social conditions that bring what moderns normally consider to be ‘happiness.’  So although it is appropriate to render asre as ‘blessed,’ the rendering of ‘happiness’ does not always convey its emphasis to modern readers.” 

 

Consequently, being blessed does not constantly translate to being happy from the modern perspective--although anyone blessed by YHWH (even if it involves punishment for sin or trials and tests) should accept trouble and tests in the vein of being happy that one is blessed by YHWH (to receive a call to salvation and the election in this age and life--as was described in previous chapters herein). 

 

In terms of the subject at hand, the blessings which came to Avraham (and which were passed on to his lineage) came in the form of promises in the book of Genesis.  In time, these promises were repeated to Yitzhak and Yakov Yisrael since they were not immediately bestowed upon these progenitors of the later Israelites. 

 

 

The Blessings Tie to the Birthright 

 

Genesis 12-26 outlines the blessings made to Avraham (most of which were never realized by him in his day).  But they were generally unconditional and their eventual fulfillment never depended upon any actions of his descendants thereafter. 

 

In time, they were further stated and summarized to Yitzhak and Yakov Yisrael (and with a few minor additions or modifications). 

 

Actually, the promises of coming blessings included a whole host of things--like growth in numbers of descendants; prosperity and wealth; domination and rulership over others (which was a repeat of the grant of dominion over the earth to Adam); the primary land grant in the Middle East (from the River of Egypt to the Euphrates, which could include Palestine, Asia Minor, the Arabian peninsular, much of Syria and Iraq, part of Egypt, and so forth, as outlined elsewhere herein); other land grants (like the gates of Israel’s enemies); the promise of salvation and an afterlife (with a resurrection from the dead); an elevation of becoming kings and priests over the earth and its population; and so forth. 

 

In a sense, it would appear that indeed all of these promised blessings probably constituted the birthright which Avraham would pass on to his descendants.  Thus, based on the Scriptural proscription for passage of the birthright, all of these blessings (in the form of the promises) would come to Avraham’s first born. 

 

 

Yishmael and Yitzhak

 

At a first glance, one could easily build the case that this host of blessings was destined to Ishmael (Yishmael in the Hebrew), under the Scriptural proscription and the Hebrew custom of those days.  But in fact, they did not pass to Yishmael.  So here, the question must be why? 

 

The ELOHIM was the bestower of the blessings (which formed the birthright).  In that sense, He possessed the privilege of defining the passage of the birthright to Avraham’s descendants.  All along, it was clear from The MOST HIGH that the blessings from EL SHADDAI would come to a seedline from Avraham via his wife Sarah (Gen 17:16, 21; 21:1). 

 

But Sarah was baren.  With the passage of the years, both she and Avraham became apprehensive that there was no descendant from Avraham’s own body to inherit the birthright.  So in Genesis 16, Sarah persuaded her husband to go ahead and raise up a seedline from her maid Hagar.  Thus, Yishmael was born to Avraham and Hagar. 

 

And sure enough, in time, Sarah became pregnant and produced the rightful heir of the promises in the vein of Yitzhak. 

 

According to human standards, one could make the case that the birthright belonged to Yishmael.  But this was simply untrue because YHWH had specifically placed it with the son of Sarah and Avraham.  Since YHWH was the dispenser of the blessings, He manifestly had the power to stipulate their descent.  And He chose Yitzhak before Yitzhak was even born. 

 

With the passage of more time, a conflict developed between the two sons of Avraham and their two mothers (when Yishmael mocked Yitzhak).  The end result of this problem was that Sarah effectively ran Hagar off from Avraham’s household.  Poor Hagar wondered aimlessly and in a great trial for awhile before The ELOHIM visited her and pronounced a blessing upon Yishmael. 

 

 

Yishmael and the Birthright? 

 

This blessing on Yishmael was not a part of the birthright YHWH had already promised the descendants of Sarah (Gen 17:21).  But in itself, it was quite profound and assured her that Yishmael would become a great people of twelve groups or tribes (Gen 17:20; 21:14-20; 25:12-16). 

 

These promises came true in time because the sons of Yishmael produced the modern Arab peoples (who can be grouped together into twelve groupings). 

 

So while it might have appeared to be good that the birthright would pass to Yishmael, this was never in the provision of The MOST HIGH.  YHWH, Himself, decreed how the birthright was to pass in this instance.  Therefore, its passage to Yitzhak was never a question for Avraham and/or the contemporary society of his day. 

 

 

A Revisit to Some History 

 

This background takes one to the question of how the birthright was to descend from Yitzhak.  For this issue, one must revisit some history on Yitzhak, Yisrael and Esau, as outlined in a former chapter. 

 

As discussed previously, the earliest of the beginnings of the twins Esau and Yakov saw them struggle against each other during the pregnancy of their mother Rebekah (Gen 25:21-23).  But even then, the ELOHIM decreed that the elder of the coming twins would serve the younger (who would be the stronger). 

 

In a sense, the case can be made right then that the younger twin would receive some part or all of the birthright.  The only question remaining is how would EL SHADDAI bring this transference into being--and especially with the birth of Esau as the older son. 

 

Thus, time passed and the first born Esau foolishly  and irresponsibly sold his birthright to his younger brother over a bowl of soup (Gen 25:33).  In a sense, the case can be easily made in this instance that truly Esau was a bum to have turned down the promised blessings and the birthright from YHWH to satisfy his immediate flesh. 

 

Frankly, over the years, this writer never thought much about this sale, except it demonstrated the stupidity and weakness of character in Esau.  There is no question about it.  Esau was wrong and the loss of the birthright has to be laid primarily to his account.  Truly, it was his fault. 

 

 

More From Stephen E. Jones 

 

There is another feature of this loss as brought out by Stephen E. Jones in the “Foundation for Intercession” newsletter (issue #155, Dec 2001, p. 2).  Jones makes the case that Yakov took advantage of and gouged his brother in this sale of soup. 

 

Presentations hereafter will address the issue of the modern culture and commercialism, in the vein of over-reaching in the sale of property.  Manifestly, this thing is elevated into the level of sin and righteousness in the Torah because it does become a sin to take advantage of someone else in a transfer of property through a sale.  Very likely, Jones is correct here that Yakov was himself in sin in this sale. 

 

In that sense, the irresponsible, careless, indifferent and stupid Esau was certainly very wrong.  But Yakov was no messenger of light and truthfulness because he took advantage of His brother’s weakness and incompetence. 

 

In a sense, this whole sale was unnecessary because YHWH had already predicted that the older Esau would be a servant to his younger brother.  The question was how this would be brought about by The Great SOVEREIGN of the Universe (of course, He would bring it about in time). 

 

 

Passing the Birthright 

 

So the years pass and it becomes time for the blind and infirm Yitzhak to pass the birthright on to his legal heir--which he obviously maintained and believed Esau to be.  So this situation sets the stage for the conniving, plotting and cunning of Yakov and his mother Rebekah over how to transfer the birthright to Yakov. 

 

Many students of the Book remember how this thing came about.  Yakov put on raiment to fool Yitzhak and went to his blind father to receive the birthright (Gen 27:15-24.  Somehow Yitzhak thought that the voice of his son was Yakov, but the smell and the touch seemed to be Esau.  Hence, Yitzhak passed the birthright and blessings from YHWH to Yakov. 

 

While Yakov and his mother both were convinced of the righteousness of the birthright passing to Yakov (which must have seemed to be the proper path for them to follow at that time), the truth remained that they both entered into sin in order to perpetuate this act of deception.  In other words, if they would have been patient, YHWH would have worked it all out in a legal and right manner. 

 

When the irresponsible Esau returned from his hunt and went into his father to get his blessings, it was effectively too late.  The birthright had already been given to Yakov (Gen 27:30-37).  So, after pleading with his father, Yitzhak did issue a blessing to Esau (Gen 27:39-40). 

 

As the “Amplified Translation” gives it--Yitzhak told Esau:  “By your sword you shall live and serve your brother.  But [the time shall come] when you will grow restive (the Hebrew “rood”) and break loose, and you shall tear his yoke from off your neck.” 

 

 

Dominion? 

 

In the “Foundation for Intercession” newsletter (issue #155, Dec 2001, p. 3), Stephen E. Jones looked at this prophecy and the idea of growing restive (which the KJV gives as gaining dominion) and breaking the yoke of Yakov, and concluded that the day would come when Esau would receive the dominion mandate. 

 

Jones said that since Yakov “had stolen this dominion mandate form Esau, Jacob would have to return it to Esau for a season at some point in the future.”  As pointed out in a prior chapter on this issue, this writer concludes about the same thing. 

 

But actually, it is perhaps just a little broader question than just the matter of Esau gaining dominion over Yakov (which assuredly is involved in this prophecy). 

 

Since the evidence is massive that the dominion in the Avrahamic promises was probably the overall dominion promised Adam over the whole world and all of its inhabitants, the case might be made that this is what is involved in the promise. 

 

In this sense, Yakov would gain dominion over the earth; and at some point in time, Esau would rise up and break Yakov’s power and take over the dominion for a short time.  As discussed in previous chapters, the ultimate fall out of this whole thing is that eventually YESHUA, a promised descendant of Yakov, would come and terminate the dominion of Esau.  Yes, YESHUA will truly rule the world. 

 

Consequently, as a minimum, the case can be made that the dominion coming to Esau is certainly over the children of Yakov (the Israelites), and perhaps, in time, could theoretically extend to the children of Adam and the entire creation of the earth generally. 

 

This writer doubts that this dominion will go this far under Esau.  But assuredly, the question must be put on the table, and it must be allowed that the descendants of Esau will try to achieve it. 

 

 

A Division of the Birthright/Blessings 

 

In tracing the birthright from Avraham to Yitzhak and to Yakov Yisrael, all of the blessings came together in one definition. 

 

However, with the death of Yakov and the passage of the birthright to his lineage, something most interesting happened.  There was actually a split or division of the former birthright into three parts. 

 

Interestingly, the dominion aspects of rulership were given to Yehudah (Gen 49:8-12); the land grant given to Avraham was actually passed to all twelve of the sons of Yisrael (Gen 49; Deut 33); and most importantly, the actual birthright of wealth and prosperity was passed to the sons of Yosef (Gen 28:1-22, with the primary allocation going to Ephraim). 

 

 

Edomite Hatred 

 

Before proceeding on, the actions of Yitzhak in passing the birthright on to Yakov needs a further remark. 

 

Despite the blessing that Easu received from his father, he, nevertheless, hated his brother Yakov from the moment of Yakov’s deception on (Gen 27:41).  With the years, the hatred and animosity only continued and increased (Ezek 35:5; Jasher 58:28). 

 

Therefore, Esau passionately hated his younger brother and has worked long and hard at fulfilling the promised blessings or prophecies coming to him (as decreed by Yitzhak).  That’s the essence of the previous commentary on the Edomites and the Israelites. 

 

Yisrael held the upper hand for centuries.  But here, in the age end, Esau has raised himself up and has been displacing his younger brother’s rule. 

 

Actually, it isn’t just the promised dominion that the Edomites have been diligently working for, they have just as passionately been striving for the entire birthright.  As noted in preceding chapters, they have largely stolen the land grant and have diligently been accumulating vast sums of wealth, property and assets (that once were and should logically be a part of the birthright to Yakov). 

 

 

Some More History 

 

In the methodology of Esau and his Edomite descendants, the path ultimately chosen to obtain this wealth, land, blessings, dominion, etc was to initially focus in on the Israelites collectively. 

 

The student of truth saw this as early as the time of Zepho and his relatives when they tried to destroy Yisrael during the days that Yisrael was in Egypt (as described in a former chapter herein). 

 

With this failure, the Amalekites tried the same thing following the Exodus.  The Amalekites tried to kill the Israelites.  Failing this, they switched to the attempts to sodomize or teach sodomy to the Israelites. 

 

Actually, the surfacing of the Amalekites as the primary enemies of Yisrael had to happen because Esau had given them his personal charge to destroy Yisrael long ago (as outlined in a former chapter herein). 

 

With all of the failures of the Amalekites to destroy Yisrael after the Exodus, they switched tactics once more by adopting the theology of Balaam, as described in preceding chapters herein.  If they couldn’t destroy Yisrael by warfare and turning them into sodomites, then racial integration, miscegenation and amalgamation with the behemah would do the trick (figuratively speaking). 

 

Following the Exodus and continuing on while both the Houses of Yisrael and Yehudah were jointly in the land, the Amalekites in the South of Canaan had the option of trying to gain dominion over Yisrael.  While old King Shaul failed in his charge to destroy the Amalekites, things improved under David as he and his immediate descendants did have a measure of success in subduing them. 

 

But tragically, David and the later kings all failed to totally destroy the Amalekites, as they were commanded.  Some of the Amalekites survived; and over the years, they multiplied and increased in numbers. 

 

 

Amalekite Allies 

 

With the departure of Yisrael from the land (during the Assyrian conquests) and with the rise to power of the Babylonians in the sixth century BCE, it meant that the Amalekites could focus their schemes of evil upon just the House of Yehudah and in league with the Babylonians, as eventually happened. 

 

The Amalekites attached themselves as parasites to the Babylonian army and probably would have completely destroyed all of the remaining House of Yehudah if it had been in their power.  Though they did not destroy Yehudah, they did destroy the Temple (as noted in previous comments).  With the Babylonian removal of Yehudah from the land, this meant that the old Judean territory was vacant. 

 

With this void, the Amalekites poured North to try to steal all of the portion of the land grant which had been held by the House of Yehudah.  Likewise, there was some evidence that the Cuthean Samaritans also tried to take a share of this land.  And in time, many of these Southern Amalekites actually seem to have even moved so far North that they were in the land of the Samaritans (to merge with them). 

 

With the return of the Jews, under Cyrus, the Amalekites and their Cuthean friends stopped work on the Second Temple and tried to implement the Balaam plan for the destruction of Yisrael by promoting racial integration, miscegenation and amalgamation as a great undertaking (as described earlier, in the vein of the books of Ezra and Nehemiah). 

 

However, thanks to Ezra, Nechemyah and other leaders in Yehudah, following the Babylonian exile, this attempted racial amalgamation did not succeed.  Ultimately, it was nipped in the bud.  But tragically, the Amalekites were close geographically to Judea and were ever on the alert of how they could destroy Yehudah forever. 

 

Under the Medes and Persians, the Amalekites clearly laid on plans to use the Amalekite master Haman to destroy the remnant of Yisrael in the form of the Jews (Est 3:1-5).  This effort was described in previous commentary herein.  Suffice to say, the evil Haman lost out in this bid when Mordicai and Esther successfully opposed him. 

 

Clearly, by then, the remnant of Yisrael (the Jews) were in good shape with the Medes and Persians.  Though Haman and his Amalekite cousins had been temporarily defeated, the game was not over at that time. 

 

Tragically, the enhanced position of the Jews allowed numbers of non-Israelite people to attach themselves to Yehudah to become Jews (Est 8:17).  Thus, the theology of Balaam came back to hurt Yehudah. 

 

With the rule of the Medes and Persians in Palestine, the returning Jews finally were able to rebuild the Temple and to obtain some measure of security and blessings--despite the continuing nearby presence and influence of the Cutheans and Amalekites (on all sides of them). 

 

 

The Greeks 

 

In time, the Medeo-Persian empire passed off stage to be replaced with the Grecian power--first under Alexander the Great; and then later, with his generals after his death.  Very quickly, the Amalekites still in the area linked in with the Greeks and once more were anxious to destroy the Jewish remnant of Yisrael then in Palestine. 

 

The most famous of these oppressors was the Greek Antiochus Epiphanies. 

 

While it is unclear what role that the Amalekites had in this Grecian oppression and persecution, it is a certainty that they were playing some role, though it was in the background (after all, they hated Yisrael and they were friends with the Greeks).  This Greek oppression was discussed earlier and will be further commented upon in later chapters. 

 

Despite these continuing troubles, the Jewish remnant in Palestine did survive and things were marching along satisfactorily under the Maccabees/Hasmoneans.  

 

 

The Hyrcanus Blunder 

 

But then, one of the most tragic and greatest of mistakes in the history of Yehudah occurred.  John Hyrcanus conquered some part of Edom and forced the Amalekites to become Jews.  This was catastrophic. 

 

No longer were the Amalekites on the outside looking in on ways to destroy Yehudah.  Under John Hyrcanus, before 100 BCE, the Amalekites became a part of the House of Yehudah.  They were then on the inside to work on the destruction of Yehudah.  And they did so! 

 

 

The Herods  

 

Quickly, under the Herods and the Herodians, the Amalekites became the masters of much of Palestine and the Jewish people.  Of course, they oppressed and hurt the people severely.  However, with the Jewish-Roman wars, the Amalekites suffered a set back in that they had to give up rule and many of them fled or abandoned Judaism. 

 

After the Jewish-Roman wars, the surviving Jewish population had been refined and many of the Amalekites were gone.  But Yehudah faced slavery and trouble for the next many centuries. 

 

And again, Yehudah made another mistake.  In the 8th century CE, the Jewish authorities actually allowed a remnant of Edomites (who clearly were Amalekites) to once more become Jews.  This happened with the Khazar conversion, as described in a former chapter herein. 

 

In accordance with the Amalekite pattern for destruction, already in place, the Amalekite Khazars quickly took over much of European Jewry in the context of the Ashkenazi Jews. 

 

True, there was some good Jewish stock remaining in terms of the Sephardim (in the old Spanish lands) and the Oriental Jews found in Muslim countries (but much of this stock was heavily miscegenated with the Colored Muslims). 

 

 

The Return 

 

Aliyah and the return of the Jews to Palestine was described in some detail in preceding chapters.  Right now, the important  thing to note is that the Jews did return.  But tragically, they came back with the Amalekite pretenders.  And still more tragically, the Amalekites assumed control of the newly emerging Jewish state (now called Israel). 

 

Thus, in the Jewish state, the Amalekites are in virtual control of the land and people (some of this is done from behind the scenes in the form of the Rothschilds, the Bronfmans, and other powerful Amalekite fat cats in the Christian West). 

 

And while the Amalekites are not giving anything to the Arabs, they have allowed in massive numbers of other Colored peoples to further miscegenate and destroy the Jewish people. 

 

And while the Amalekites have had some measure of a strangle hold on Yehudah for much of the last 2,100 years, they didn’t have a similar hold on the House of Yisrael or indeed even among the other nations and peoples in the world.  Their primary power and influence had been over Yehudah. 

 

 

The House of Yisrael 

 

But about two hundred years ago, the Amalekites began breaking the dominion which Yakov had over them.  They have slowly taken over the House of Yisrael nations (out in the Diaspora) and are now making a bid to take over the world. 

 

The Amalekite take-over of the House of Yisrael and their attempted take over of all of Adam and the other nations of the world will be described in some detail in the succeeding chapters herein.  It is going on fervently, right now, in the early 21st century. 

 

Though there might be some justification to believe that the prophecy in Genesis 27:40 will allow the Edomites (in the form of the Amalekites, the primary and oldest representatives of Esau) to gain complete power over the globe and all of its people, this writer doubts that this will ever become reality.  True, they control Yehudah and now the entire House of Yisrael nations.  But they don’t control the world yet. 

 

Interestingly, while the birthright and blessings were divided up among the children of Yisrael, the descendants of Esau in their evil have worked at taking all of the entire birthright and all of the blessings away from Yakov Yisrael (yes, they want the whole cake from Yehudah, Ephraim and the other brothers).  They want the wealth, prosperity, land, rulership and so forth. 

 

The only thing left out which they have not totally maneuvered to obtain for themselves is the question of salvation and the after-life. 

 

However, to the extent that these Amalekite workers of evil have tried to seize Judaism, and/or even Christianity, they have in a sense wanted to claim salvation in the after-life from those forms of worship.  Thus, they have wanted the totality of the promises and not just some part of them. 

 

 

YESHUA

 

Subsequent chapters herein will discuss the matter of the murder of YESHUA.  Strangely enough, the Amalekites played perhaps the most important role of all in the murder of The SON OF ADAM which opens the door to the whole theme of salvation and the hereafter. 

 

Suffice to say, the Amalekites tried their best to destroy YESHUA and thereby destroy any hope of salvation and the future. 

 

Since there is some question about whether the Amalekites can ever share in any form of the salvation and after-life promised by YESHUA, the Amalekites wanted to murder YESHUA so that there would be no salvation for anyone. 

 

Though these evil Amalekites will never be able to steal the salvation and future after-life promised Yisrael, it is fascinating that they have successfully stolen the popular Christian definition of the Jews of being “God’s chosen people.”  Almost without exception, the typical Christian goyim believes that the Jews (correctly the Ashkenazi Amalekites) are “God’s chosen people.”  What a joke! 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

The bottom line here is that the student of truth has witnessed the rise to power of the Amalekite Jew masters/bankers in the House of Yisrael lands in the last 200 years or so. 

 

The Amalekites are right now one of the most powerful blocs of power brokers in the world.  They are working diligently and professionally with great strength and cunning to completely rule the globe. 

 

Subsequent chapters herein will broach the long and continuing Amalekite conspiracy to gain dominion over first Yisrael and later the world.  Suffice to say, it is a real fact of life out there. 

 

Stephen E. Jones, in his “Foundation for Intercession” newsletter (Issue #156, Jan 2002, p. 3) offered a most fascinating observation on the linkage of the blindness of Yitzhak to be an ante-type of the later blindness of the children of Yisrael. 

 

Jones said:  “God’s purpose in blinding Jacob’s descendants was to put them into the position of blind Isaac.  This allowed Esau (the Zionists in 1948) to pretend to be Jacob and thus obtain the blessing.  Even as Jacob took advantage of Isaac’s blindness and pretended to be Esau, so also Esau has done the reverse, pretending to be Jacob and taking advantage of the blindness of true Israel.” 

 

Manifestly, this is true.  Just as Yitzhak was blinded to the cunning of Yakov, the Israelites (all of them--Jews and House of Yisrael Israelites) have consistently been blind to the working, treachery and evil of the Amalekites. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 166--Amalekites Versus Arab Hatred

 

 

Yishmael Revisited

 

The preceding chapter discussed the situation with Yishmael and his status versus the Israelites and Edomites and their status in terms of the promises and the promised land.  Of course, it was inevitable that a conflict would develop and persist among these descendants of Avraham.  And that’s precisely what has happened over the ages.  This chapter will address some of these conflicts and the ensuing hatred. 

 

 

Achieving the Ridiculous 

 

Early on, in the US, the powerful Amalekite bankers/masters linked in with the Blacks to promote the concept that any form of White recognition of race constitutes “racism” which has come to be the epitome of evil in the modern Western Christian civilization. 

 

Of course, the goal of the Amalekites was the promotion of the miscegenation ideas of their old friend Balaam (to destroy White Israelites, as was discussed previously). 

 

Apparently, perceiving their great success at completely bewildering and mesmerizing the gullible Christian goyim, the Amalekite bankers/masters also decided early on that they would tie anti-Judaism (which is very common and routine among Christians) to racism and call it anti-Semitism.  They started this process as early as the 1850s (per an Aug 8, 2001, letter from B’nai B’rith). 

 

So while anti-Semitism would correctly be a question over language, and while it is admittedly true that most Christians vehemently hate Judaism, there effectively is no Christian hatred of Jews, per se (if they will just give up Judaism and convert to Christianity). 

 

Anyway, the Amalekites saw an opportunity to use this catch-phrase anti-Semitism against the Christians and in the vein that it was a form of evil racism. 

 

 

The Amalekites Started in on the Arabs 

 

The last several years have seen the Amalekites even accuse the Arabs of anti-Semitism (racism) for daring to criticize the Jews in Palestine. 

 

Admittedly, the Arabs are very anti-Zionist in the context of a political movement (and apparently anti-Jew from a racial perspective).  But certainly, no one with brains above the idiot level could accuse the Arabs of anti-Semitism since Arabic is a Semitic language (nor do the Arabs have a problem with Judaism, per se). 

 

For example, a person at a Palestinian rally in Washington on April 20, 2002, read a poem which spoke of the Israeli state as “A nation of people born of injustice...there are Jews among you that detest what you do...proud, arrogant, malicious and clever...aggressive you’ve been since the day you were born... Israel where will you be when the pages have dried on your history?” (May 2002 “Endtime News,” p. 1). 

 

Christian Colin Deal, editor of the “Endtime News,” said that this poem described Israel in “disturbingly anti-Semitic terms.” 

 

Of course, Deal could not be more wrong.  This poem was very anti-Zionism, but not anti-Semitic since Arabs speak a Semite language.  True, many of the Arabs hate the Jews racially, but this poem was not even anti-Jew.  It was anti-Zionism and anti-Israel. 

 

 

The Arabs Counterattack  

 

Nevertheless, in this war of words charging that the Arabs are anti-Semites, the Arabs have decided to get back at the Jews by charging that Zionism is racism. 

 

They started this effort in 2001 at the UN World Conference on Racism at Durban, South Africa on Aug 31, 2001 (when an alliance of Muslims and Blacks at the conference joined together to condemn the Jews and link Zionism to racism--while the Jews counter-charged that the conference was anti-Semitic). 

 

At the conference, Willy Weisz (an apparent Amalekite Jew from Austria and a student of the so-called Holocaust) tried to speak, and Arab delegates at the conference shouted him down (May 2002 letter from B’nai B’rith, p. 2). 

 

Weisz said:  “It was as though I had been transported back to Vienna in 1938... I have been mortified by the growth of right-wing politics and neo-Nazism in Europe and was looking forward to this conference as a way of explaining the true effects of anti-Semitism.  I never believed that the United Nations would allow anti-Semitism and neo-Nazism to take place within its own Conference Against Racism” (ibid, p. 2). 

 

 

The Amalekites Counterattack 

 

Convinced that the Arabs would successfully sell much of the world on the idea that political Zionism was actually racism, the Amalekite masters in the B’nai B’rith organization (the parent group of the Anti Defamation League) launched their own crusade to simultaneously convince the world that the Arabs were anti-Semites and racists and not the Jews. 

 

Accordingly, B’rith wrote the above cited Aug 8, 2001, and May 2002 letters to Americans in order to raise money to fight the Arabs in the public opinion polls and to pressure the US into opposing the Arab ties of Zionism to racism. 

 

Anyway, the point is that the Amalekites have so successfully sold the gullible goyim on the evils of racism that the whole theme has reached the ridiculous level (as both Jews and Arabs call each other racists). 

 

 

But the Arabs Fight Back 

 

While the Amalekite Jews have led the assault upon the Arabs in this war of words over the situation in the Middle East, as outlined above and in a prior chapter on crime, there is a feature which the Amalekite bankers/masters probably never anticipated.  The Arabs have been somewhat successful in fighting back. 

 

For example, in the May 2002 B’nai B’rith letter (p. 2), as cited above, the writer (Daniel S. Mariaschin) said that at one forum during the Durban conference on racism, an Arab lawyers’ group distributed thousands of copies of what the Associated Press described as “pamphlets depicting Jews with fangs dripping blood and wearing helmets inscribed with Nazi swastikas.” 

 

In another report, the previously mentioned letter from the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Dean and Founder Marvin Hier (a money appeal letter written in about March 2002) outlined some more of the things that the Arabs are doing to fight back at the Jews.  As always, Heir made his attack upon the alleged “anti-Semitism;” which, for Arabs, is ridiculous since they speak Arabic, a Semitic language. 

 

Anyway, Hier’s letter said:  “I’m writing to alert you to a frightening new wave of antisemitism and extremism -- often mixed with outright Holocaust denial and anti-American rhetoric -- that is fueling violence and spreading hate across the Middle East, into Europe and beyond. 

 

“This officially sanctioned hate is everywhere in the Arab world -- on television shows...in children’s school textbooks...in newspapers...even in crossword puzzles.  The wave of hate-filled rhetoric is being promoted in every aspect of daily life by many Arab government leaders, intellectuals and teachers. 

 

“Just one disturbing example is the announcement that ‘The Matzoh of Zion’ -- the virulently antisemitic 1983 book by Syrian defense minister Mustafa Tlass -- will be made into a multimillion dollar Egyptian film.  This outrageous slander is being hailed as the ‘Arab answer to Schindler’s List.’   

 

“This scurrilous work endorses the 19th Century libel accusing the Jewish community in Damascus, Syria of murdering a Christian priest and his servant in order to use the blood in the baking of Passover Matzohs.  The book -- whose cover illustration shows blood gushing into a bowl from the neck of a non-Jew while a blood-thristy Jew applies the knife -- perpetuates one of the most horrific and insidious falsehoods used by antisemites throughout history to validate and promote violence against Jews. 

 

“Countless innocent members of Jewish communities in Europe and the Middle East have been martyred over the past thousand years as a result of this big lie...and who knows how much hate, violence and terrorism will be unleashed in the 21st Century, if this movie reaches millions of people in the Arab and Muslim worlds.”  

 

From there, Hier went on to make his appeal for money to fight the Arabs.  He specifically listed several things now on-going around the world which demonstrate how far this anti-Jew thinking has gone. 

 

 

Some Specifics 

 

Specifically, Hier noted that “since 1967 the United Nations, led by the 21 Arab States in the Arab League, has launched over 1,000 anti-Israel resolutions...but has never once explicitly condemned Arab suicide bombings and other acts of terrorism against the citizens of Israel.  Now, even as Israel reels from the almost daily onslaught of Palestinian terrorism, the U.N. has called on all countries with embassies in Jerusalem to move them out of the city -- effectively paving the way for the complete de-legitimization of the Jewish State. 

 

“...The Saudi government daily, Al-Riyadh published an article by Dr. Umayman Ahmad Al-Jalahma of King Faysal University on ‘The Jewish Holiday of Purim.’  In the article, Dr. Al-Jalahma perpetuates the notorious blood libel that Jews use the blood of non-Jews in the baking of their holiday pastries.  The article then goes on to describe in horrific detail the methods used to obtain this blood, saying, ‘The victim suffers dreadful torment that affords the Jewish vampires great delight.’ 

 

“...Official Palestinian Authority-produced school textbooks deny the existence of Israel and promote hatred of Jews.  ‘One must beware of the Jews for they are treacherous and disloyal,’ says one ninth-grade schoolbook.  And a fourth-grade Arabic language text extols the virtue of martyrdom.  ‘Oh my land, my blood will be sacrificed by you.  I have given my life as a sacrifice, accept it.’” 

 

The April 22, 2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 19) had a related story by Leslie Susser on “Losing the Media Battle” which took note of a video showed to Palestinian children by the Palestinian Authority.  The video is entitled “The Seeds of Hate.”  It shows Palestinian children committing themselves to becoming suicide bombers and killing Israelis. 

 

 

The Protocols 

 

During the Muslim month of Ramadan in 2002 (starting on Nov 6), the Egyptian Arabs showed a television miniseries on the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” which illustrated a reported plan of certain evil Amalekite Jews (at least, those calling themselves Jews) to conquer, exploit and oppress the world (Nov 15, 2002, “The Week,” p. 9). 

 

The television series was called “Horse, Without Horsemen” (ibid, p. 9).  It caused quite a stir in the American Amalekite community as various leading American Amalekites came out in unison to condemn the film, called the effort anti-Semitic and urged the Bush administration to withhold US aid money from Egypt over it’s showing (Nov 8, 2002, “Forward,” p. 1). 

 

The Jan-Mar 2002 “Petah Tikvah” (p. 32-33) took note of the incredible popularity of the Protocols in Moslem lands.  It is a bestseller among the Moslems.  As this source noted, the Iranians have recently completed a new Iranian translation.  There is a new Egyptian version out (which must have come out in some fashion to parallel the above mentioned film) that speaks of a Jewish conspiracy to control the world. 

 

This version indicates that this plan of world conquest is being carried out through the operations of Jewish secret agents around the globe, that the Jews will continue their aggression against mankind until their Messiah comes, and that then the whole world will be subject to the Jews and every Jew will have 2,800 slaves. 

 

While many of these Muslim allegations against the Protocols are totally out of the question for true religious (Israelite) Jews, it does not alter the basic fact of the truth of the Protocols in terms of the evil Amalekites.  The wretched Amalekites are fully capable of thinking, planning and desiring the most awful forms of hurt for Adam imaginable. 

 

The unfolding of history for the past one hundred plus years has produced much credible support for the Protocols.  Therefore, they must not be laughed at or dismissed out of hand.  In any case, the Protocols will be further addressed in later chapters and need no involved explanation at this time.

 

Moreover, the above quoted Simon Wiesenthal Center letter cited cases from Syria and Egypt where Arab authorities accuse the Jews of being master criminals responsible for drugs, prostitution, homosexuality and crime.  These remarks were outlined heretofore in a discussion of Amalekite criminal actions. 

 

 

The Problem 

 

It is tragic that the Muslims cannot distinguish between good Jewish Israelites and evil Amalekite pretenders. 

 

This same indictment pertains to the Nazis and any and all other people who have truly hated Jews.  Most of these Jew haters inevitably link both good and bad Jews together, in the same breath; and this is just not right. 

 

The blood allegations leveled by Christians have been also cited earlier herein.  They will be discussed further in the succeeding chapters.  Suffice to say, they are utterly ridiculous in any sense of applying to religious Jews, the Passover or Purim (although they could have some application to the evil Amalekites, as will be discussed later herein). 

 

 

Race 

 

Of course, this war of words being leveled against the Jews seems to have a racial implication as well as the traditional Arab condemnation of Zionism (in the political vein).  

 

One must take note that the historic Christian assault was upon Judaism and not Jews, per se.  Yet, this Arab assault seems to ignore religion; and instead, focuses upon collective Jews, obviously from a racial perspective. 

 

The above quoted Jan-Mar 2003 “Petah Tikvah” (p. 32) offered a perfect illustration of how this hatred seems to be racial and how it is powerfully indoctrinated into small Muslim children. 

 

“Petah Tikvah” quoted an Egyptian writer named Tareq Fausi who devoted one of his books to his son Self el-Din.  He told the boy-- “I want you to learn to hate the Jews like your father hates the Jews.  You will see what I have seen, and that hatred of Jews will give you honor, an honor the Jews do not deserve.” 

 

Anyway, as things are developing, enormous hate is surfacing on the part of both Jews and Arabs.  It is proving to be most fascinating here in the early 21st century as each side accuses the other of racism and hate. 

 

 

Supposed Gentiles or Goyim 

 

Please understand that the above presentation and linkage to Amalekites or non-Amalekites is made in the context of so-called Jewish people who have been so heavily infiltrated and hurt by the Amalekites.  Obviously, there are also all kinds of good and evil people in other racial/ethnic classifications as well (some of the bad ones are clear Amalekites). 

 

Many of the behemah are very sorry in today’s culture--especially as immoral and petty criminals.  The thing which distinguishes behemah depravity from Amalekite evil is that the Amalekites are extremely intelligent and evil while the behemah are usually stupid and sorry. 

 

Likewise, many of the other non-Amalekite Edomites (discussed earlier) have significant problems and involvement in immorality, crime and evil--like the previously discussed Sicilian Edomites (from Zepho). 

 

Although the Sicilian Edomites are mixed with some behemah genes, they tend to produce somewhat more sophisticated, intelligent and organized criminals, in contrast to the more racially dominant behemah who usually pursue violence and petty crime. 

 

 

The Bottom Line 

 

Thus, there are all kinds of good and bad people out in the world.  It’s just that when assessing good and bad Jews, one must realize that certain Jews (the Ashkenazim) have historically had genetic ties to the most evil people of all--the Amalekites. 

 

Of course, there are also Amalekites found in other racial and religious classifications besides Jews (especially in modern Christian America and the White British Commonwealth of nations).  For that reason, one must always be on the lookout that most any real-bad person could be an Amalekite. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 167--Amalekite Hate Organizations

 

 

More on Hate 

 

Now, for a word on Amalekite Jewish terrorist groups.  In the 1940s, the Jews had some extremely bad terrorist groups--like the Irgun (with Menahem Begin) and the famous Stern gang--which murdered and terrorized both the Arabs and the British.  These groups seem to have been essentially Amalekites and they were very evil. 

 

It has been easy for many critics of modern Zionism to criticize and complain about the fact that some Jewish terrorists attacked and murdered supposedly innocent Arabs.  And it seems true that some Jewish terrorists did so in the early days of the Arab-Israeli conflict. 

 

But what these critics ignore or refuse to recognize is that Arab terrorists were just as bad or worse against the Jews.  Arab terrorists raided, attacked and assaulted Jewish villages and innocent, largely helpless Jews--just as much or more so than Jewish attacks upon innocent Arabs.  The tragedy is that hate prevailed on both sides of the Jewish-Arab conflict. 

 

While it might seem like a modern tragedy, but many innocent peoples of both sides suffered enormously during the days and weeks preceding the outbreak of formal war in May 1948.  Assuredly, terrorism and murder was not a one sided affair.

 

 

Modern Groups 

 

Also, in the Christian West, other Jewish hate groups have come on the scene in the 20th century like the Jewish Defense League (JDL), the Southern Poverty Law Center (the SPLC may not be Jewish, per se, but it gives the appearance of being Amalekite led and/or financed) and the previously mentioned Anti-Defamation League (ADL),  

 

These largely Amalekite entities will be addressed in comments below and at length in later chapters on spying and tyranny.  These Amalekite hate groups are as bad or worse than Irgun or any of the old-time, Amalekite, terrorist organizations. 

 

The new hate groups maintain a constant war against White, Christian, Israelite goyim, and try to do their level best to forever destroy Yisrael.  With their heavy Amalekite leadership, money and supporters, these groups are big in promoting homosexuality, miscegenation, sexual deviation and pornography in their efforts of destruction. 

 

Per the June 12, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 21), pornographer Larry Flynt of the “Hustler” empire is one of the big financial supporters of the ADL (obviously, Larry thinks that the ADL must be serving his interests in some way).  Moreover, in 2000, the ADL gave its annual award to Hugh Hefner of the Playboy empire. 

 

On the ADL, Jewish activist Jeffrey Blankfort says that this group is the unofficial arm of Israel’s propaganda machine and that the ADL is a provider of intelligence to the Mossad (Oct 7, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 11).  For sure, the ADL is a dedicated work to destroy the White Christian Israelites in the West. 

 

So far, the White Christians (as janissary robots) have joined in to help in their own destruction.  The gullible goyim are allies through and through with these Amalekite Jew hate groups in doing every thing humanly possible to destroy themselves, their children and their future. 

 

 

The Real Haters 

 

It may be a paradox of some sort, but these Amalekite purveyors of hate are the very people and organizations who are leading the Christian West in defining and hating their fellow Christians in various right-wing entities. 

 

Interestingly, the Amalekite hate groups define several, primarily Christian groups as hate groups; when, in fact, the Amalekites are the real haters.  The haters define and call other people haters when it is them, the Amalekites, who are the haters. 

 

Per the Jan 4, 2002, “Idaho Observer” (p. 6), the SPLC defines seven categories of American hate groups--Ku Klux Klan, Neo-Nazi, Skinhead, (Christian) Identity, Neo-Confederate, Black Separatist, and other.  Except for the Blacks (evidently, in reference to the Black Muslims), all of the SPLC hate groups are White Christians.  Thus, the real haters call other people haters. 

 

 

More 

 

The Nov-Dec 1999 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 8) quoted a book (“America’s Real War”) by a Jewish scholar and teacher named Daniel Lapin.  In terms of these various hate groups, Rav Lapin perceptively zeroed in on the problem. 

 

He wrote:  “I am appalled by the great injustice being perpetrated by those Jewish organizations that engage in anti-Christian bigotry...today the shrill rhetoric and hate-filled propaganda found in their direct mail is discriminatory and divisive.”  Lapin is an intelligent and honest man (likely a real Jew).  He has hit the mark on the head. 

 

The Jun 3, 2002, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 44) had an article on “Fringe Humor” which was largely a book review of a book which must have had some critical comments on the ADL.  

 

Anyway, the writer, Matt Nesvisky, really was revealing when he said:  “The ADL admittedly is not above criticism.  In recent years the ADL, which after all depends on the existence of anti-Semitism for its own existence, has faced charges of overzealous dossier-building and alarmist reporting.” 

 

ADL spying and dossier building activities are addressed in detail elsewhere herein.  Truly, it is the real world out there. 

 

 

And More 

 

In his video on “Mark of the Beast... The Final Connection,” Michael Bunker mentions that the Prophecy Club is number one on the ADL’s list of enemies.  As Bunker notes, this ADL interest is supposedly on anti-Semites and enemies of the Israeli state.  However, that’s not what it’s all about. 

 

For instance, the Prophecy Club has never uttered one word against Jews, Judaism or the state of Israel.  Instead, the Club has financially supported Hayseed Stephens--who has been in Israel trying to find oil to give the profits to religious Jews to rebuild the Third Temple.  This is hardly an act by Jew haters or enemies of Israel.  Yet, the ADL has the Prophecy Club as the number one enemy.  Why? 

 

Well, Michael Bunker spells out the why.  The “why” has nothing whatsoever to do with Jews, Israel or Judaism.  Instead, the Prophecy Club has been an active agency revealing the coming New World Order.  What the ADL is actually interested in is identifying, accusing and building up hate against persons who oppose the New World Order.  In the view of the writer of this study, Bunker has it right. 

 

The issues are not Jews, Judaism or Israel.  But they are big government and the coming New World Order (both of which are being actively promoted and pushed into reality by many of the leading Amalekite Jews, who now control the United States). 

 

These evil American Amalekites control the ADL and use it to further Amalekite goals and interests--totally with no regard for Jewish and/or Israeli interests (unless the Jewish and/or Israeli interests coincide with Amalekite interests). 

 

 

ADL Infiltration and Subversion 

 

In “Final Judgment” (p. 314-315), Michael Collins Piper makes the case that the Anti-Defamation League has been particularly busy infiltrating right wing groups, starting as early as the 1950s (per quotes by author Eustace Mullins and businessman DeWest Hooker). 

 

Specifically, Piper notes that the Jew Dan Burros (correctly an Amalekite--ed) infiltrated the Nazi party and other right wing groups.  He became national secretary of the American Nazi party and worked directly with George Lincoln Rockwell.  Dan allegedly committed suicide in October 1965 (with multiple gunshot wounds)--when revelations of his Jewish connections were exposed in the “New York Times.” 

 

Clearly, ADL spying probably is the primary reason for the Amalekite infiltration into the right wing (in order to supply intelligence to the Mossad, as pointed out above). 

 

For example, in a court case in San Francisco, evidence was presented that the ADL is the number one spy agency in America--even exceeding the FBI (per John O’Connor in his video on “Come Lord Jesus”).  This ADL and FBI spying and its incredible growth in the last several years are addressed in some detail elsewhere herein.  Suffice to say, it is the real world in 2003. 

 

 

More

 

Beyond the obvious advantages which the ADL and its Amalekite cousins enjoy (operating in other Amalekite hate groups--like the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Jewish Defense League and the Simon Wiesenthal Center), there is substantial reason to believe that these Amalekite crooks infiltrate the American right wing for more nefarious reasons than just spying. 

 

Through the years, one of the tragedies which has come upon a number of the right wing groups is that federal entrapping agents infiltrate them and set members up to violate some law--so that they can be arrested and prosecuted (to be described herein in later chapters).  There is no doubt whatsoever that Amalekite agents in these groups carry out the same wretchedness against their gullible, White, Christian colleagues. 

 

Once Amalekite Jew agents successfully infiltrate and subvert a right wing group (like the Ku Klux Klan, American Nazi party or whatever), they can go to work to completely destroy the group as well as develop extensive dossiers on all members which can be shared with other Amalekite hate groups and federal officials.  There is no question but that the Amalekite deceivers do this regularly and often. 

 

 

Another Amalekite Trick 

 

Moreover, in “Final Judgment” (p. 610), Michael Collins Piper documents one of the most extraordinary cases of deception of all which surfaced from an undercover agent with the Southern Poverty Law Center (the SPLC, an ADL adjunct, as noted above, which seems to be dominated and run by Amalekite bankers/masters and provocateurs--as is true with the ADL and other Amalekite hate groups). 

 

Piper reports that on Dec 21, 1998, he spoke to a group in the Washington, DC area called the Council on Conservative Citizens (the CCC)--where also, numbers of other people have spoken, including members of Congress.  Some opponents of the CCC have charged that it is a “racist” organization (but this charge is routinely attached to any number of people who do not toe the line in respect to political correctness). 

 

In any case, Michael Piper spoke to this group.  And it so happens that the SPLC had an undercover agent in the crowd present, who was serving as a “fact finder” for the SPLC and apparently placed there to play some dirty tricks on Piper and the CCC crowd. 

 

For the benefit of his talk, Piper made a video tape recording of his speech and the later questions and comments from the audience.  After everything was said and done, the SPLC made an attack upon Piper and charged him with all kinds of racist comments and reactions (in his talk on the JFK assassination, as will be covered herein in later chapters). 

 

With his video recording of what did happen, Piper wrote back to blast the SPLC for its lies and distortion of truth at the meeting.  One of the things which was interesting was that the SPLC claimed that a person in the audience made a comment about “the Jews who control Hollywood.”  Of course, the SPLC played up this comment from one of these so-called racists. 

 

As it turned out, Piper was able to identify the SPLC “fact finder.”  And by a startling revelation, it was the SPLC man who made the comment about the Jews and Hollywood.  Of course, Piper called them on the spot for their lies and dirty tricks. 

 

 

The Aryan Nations Dilemma, Revisited 

 

Many of the Amalekites’ tactics of plotting, conspiring and deceiving have already been highlighted heretofore (on synagogue fires) or will be detailed later herein (on Abimelech).  Thus, there is no need to repeat all of that material here at this time. 

 

However, in the vein of the previously cited Aryan Nations, a couple of the favorite tricks used by the Amalekites to manipulate and deceive the gullible Israelites must be mentioned here before moving on to other themes. 

 

Richard Butler and his colleagues in the Aryan Nations sect had a small Christian Church group and a compound of sorts located in North Idaho near Hayden Lake.  Butler’s group is Christian Identity and very pro-Nazi in ideology--complete with Nazi salutes, occult ceremonies, parades and marches in honor of Adolf Schicklgruber (in love and adoration) and so forth. 

 

It is tragic, but the one thing that Butler and his sect seem to be short upon is Scriptural knowledge.  They are a traditional Sunday keeping, Christian Church and very shallow on truth.  It appears that beyond a small amount of basic knowledge on racial identifications, the Aryan Nations sect is otherwise as confused about truth and righteousness, as is traditional Churchianity. 

 

However, to their detriment, they do have this focus upon Schicklgruber, the Nazis and the occult.  If Butler and his colleagues worked half as hard about understanding the Scriptures as they do at promoting Nazism and the occult, they could be a force for good with some of their racial ideas. 

 

 

The “Jubilee” 

 

The Sep-Dec 2000 “Jubilee” (p. 12), a Christian Identity publication, assessed some of the right wing groups in the context of an article by Paul Hall on the “FBI Declares War on Christians” (this reality of coming persecution and tribulation, starting on the Christian right, will be further addressed in later commentary herein). 

 

The “Jubilee” says that Butler’s group is a “magnet of idiots, morons and feds.  It has been arguably the best icon of the so-called hate ‘movement’ the fear mongering Morris Dees (to be shortly commented upon below) and his ilk could have ever asked for.”  Of course, Hall has it right because the Aryan Nations have all kinds of problems (as is mentioned throughout this publication). 

 

They have this pro Nazi position, which attracts a lot of skin heads and kooks on the right (like the famous Buford Furrow, who is elsewhere addressed herein). 

 

It goes without saying that Butler’s organization is also famous for having as many federal agents present as gullible goyim members.  Hall says that the agents are so thick that they unknowingly spy on each other in a Mad Comic style Spy vs. Spy scenario. 

 

Randy Weaver, whose plight will be described in a subsequent chapter, made the mistake back in the 1980s of going to Butler’s church a time or two.  There, a federal undercover agent entrapped him into violating a federal regulation. 

 

Truly, Aryan Nations people have suffered great persecution at the hands of the Big Brother state, despite the Constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and speech. 

 

 

Amalekite Tactics of Hate 

 

Over the years, the Amalekite Jews have stirred up so much hatred and opposition to Butler’s group that so-called “loving, kind, compassionate Christians” have went out of their way to try to inflict hurt and damage upon the Aryan Nations people or their physical facilities. 

 

Periodically, these liberal, Socialist, humanist Christians were prodded, encouraged and promoted by the ruling Amalekite Jews to go to Butler’s compound and take some violent action against its people and facilities. 

 

Apparently, there were, over the years, any number of unprovoked attacks, arsons, assaults and so forth upon the Aryan Nations and its former compound at Hayden Lake, Idaho. 

 

“Loving Christians” and Amalekite agitators liked to sneak into the compound (like at night) and do as much damage as possible.  In the past, they burned the church building down, scattered nails on the driveway and set a fire to the bunk house (“A Dissection of Michael Barkun’s Religion and the Racist Right,” by David Gray, in the Jul-Aug 1999 “America’s Promise Newsletter,” p. 3).  

 

Things were so bad that Butler had to put up a guard or sentry shack on the road into the compound and place a security guard there on occasion and particularly when Butler was holding meetings at the church building.  Since the compound was in open range country, there was already a fence around it to keep cattle out. 

 

The purpose of the guard was not necessarily to keep anyone out, as the group had always been open to anyone interested in attending--including a huge assortment of federal agents, ADL spies and provocateurs of various kinds and shapes. 

 

But the guards were posted to try to cut down on the violence and intimidation from the Christian liberals and humanists who came there to cause trouble (under prodding from the Amalekite bankers/masters, who were and are always busy promoting and agitating trouble for the Christian Identity sects). 

 

 

An Example 

 

During a meeting, a couple of years ago, some “loving” liberals (an Indian woman and her adult son) drove by to cause trouble.  Apparently, they threw some firecrackers or other explosive devices at the compound as they drove by (they later alleged that their car backfired).  There were a couple of Aryan Nations guards on duty at the shack and they jumped into a car to pursue them. 

 

They were armed and caught up with the trouble makers.  What happened next is subject to debate.  But allegedly, the guards ruffed them up somewhat, fired a gun or at least threatened them and scared them considerably.  They left and that was supposedly the end of it.  Later, the pair filed a criminal complaint against the guards and a civil lawsuit asking for a bundle of money in damages. 

 

Whether the lawsuit was promoted by the ADL or Morris Dees and his Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), mentioned above, is unclear.  But in any case, the SPLC quickly entered the fray on the side of the woman to provide money and information (on Butler, his people and their alleged proneness for violence) to pursue the case. 

 

Like other right wing groups, the one thing that can be said for Butler and his crew is that they don’t have any money.  And it takes money to hire lawyers to go into court and battle the huge sums of money and lawyers which the Amalekites can furnish to further their agenda (the SPLC reportedly has $100 million available to use in its legal actions). 

 

In fact, the Amalekites have found that the best way to deal with some of these groups they hate is to tie them up in a legal action and bankrupt them in lawyer fees and/or in an unfair judgment from a prejudiced court. 

 

In any case, the apparently Amalekite SPLC went after Aryan Nations with a vengeance (and won the case and several millions of dollars in a judgment to bankrupt Butler and the Aryan Nations). 

 

Butler is now largely out of business in North Idaho because of the outcome of this case.  At least, he lost his Hayden Lake, Idaho compound and his work is no longer effective. 

 

 

The Lawyer 

 

Anyway, Butler found a local Idaho lawyer, named Edgar J. Steele, to represent Aryan Nations.  The lawyer apparently was neutral on Butler’s religion and the Aryan Nations from a philosophical viewpoint.  But he was friendly to Butler and was not an enemy.  So he took the case on the premise that it involved freedom of speech.  Butler began a campaign to try to raise the needed money. 

 

As soon as public knowledge leaked out that Steele was representing Aryan Nations, his life changed dramatically for the worse.  All of a sudden, he was a hated man in the local, Amalekite controlled media and even among local police officials. 

 

The Jul-Aug 1999 “Jubilee” (p. 10) had an article or write up from Steele which tells what all happened to him after he entered the case.  The most notable thing has been the surge of hateful and threatening telephone calls which he and his wife and children have had to endure with regularity.  Since Steele has a ten year old daughter and a twelve year old son, this has been stark terrorism. 

 

Of course, the telephone callers are always unidentified.  They call and cuss out the Steeles with horrible profanity and vulgarity.  They threaten harm and hurt on whomsoever answers the phone (which has included Steele’s children on occasion).  But there is a strange twist to this. 

 

Rather than say that they are Jews or haters of Butler or Aryan Nations, the callers pretend to be Nazis, White supremacists, racists and anti-Semites.  They call Steele and his family dirty names (using profanity and vulgar expressions).  They attach this profanity to the words “kikes, nigger lovers and dirty Jews” and cuss the Steeles out with violent tirades.  

 

Now, a problem arises.  Why is it or how is it that Nazis and people who hate Jews and Blacks (like those ostensibly identified as being Aryan Nations and their friends and colleagues) would call the Aryan Nations’ lawyer and accuse him of being a Negro and Jew lover (with much profanity and swearing).  Obviously, something smells here. 

 

 

A Common Amalekite Tactic 

 

The article in the “Jubilee” reveals Steele’s opinion on this paradox.  Steele says that this represents the New Left and the way they do business (with terror, hate, lies and innuendoes).  He says these phone messages are designed to strike terror at him and his family while deflecting suspicion away from the callers and generating sympathy for the callers’ patron saints--the Zionists. 

 

But Steele saw through the dilemma when one woman caller accused Steele of being a friend of Randy Weaver and that he (Steele) would meet the same fate as Weaver (presumably meaning that he could watch as federal agents murdered his wife and small son, as they did with the Weavers--as will be addressed in some detail in a later chapter herein).  This call was different in slant from the others. 

 

As Steele suggested, if he really was Jewish, as some of the callers alleged, the FBI would come in and take over the phone company to monitor, trace and bug all incoming phone calls to determine who the callers were.  Identified callers would be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. 

 

But since Steele and his family are not Jews, no one really cares one way or the other.  And that is the tragedy of the whole episode.  He is not going to get a fair shake in the media or from the authorities (who are on the side of the liberal callers and generally prejudiced against Butler and his lawyer). 

 

The writer of this study at hand would like to pick upon Steele’s remarks about deflecting suspicion.  And of course, this is a common Amalekite tactic and MO.  Obviously, in this case, they want the calls to sound like something coming from radical, right wing Nazis, racists, White supremacists and anti-Semites. 

 

If Steele complains to the media and police authorities and if there is any coverage of it, the slant will be on the evil right wingers and not on Amalekite Jews who are making or promoting the calls.  Thus, the people who are behind the hate and terrorism will never be identified by the media or the police.  Any publicity about hate and terror phone calls will be focused on Nazis, racists and so forth. 

 

This may sound strange and unbelievable that an evil Amalekite will call a friend of Butler and pretend to be attacking Steele as a Jew and/or Black lover and supporter.  But this is the way the depraved, Amalekite mind works. 

 

 

The Sly, Crafty, Cunning Amalekite 

 

The Amalekite, knowing full well that the controlled media is on his side, can pretend to be a anti-Semite or White supremacist (so the media and police will record the incident that way).  If there is publicity, it will be directed at these “evil” right wingers who would call up a lawyer, cuss him and his children out and threaten them with violence.  Certainly, an Amalekite will never want this charge leveled at him. 

 

Elsewhere, in this study, the point is made that very often, Amalekite Jews will set fires at a synagogue or otherwise write words and graffiti of hate and vulgarity and threats of terror on the synagogue walls or otherwise.  In fact, in most cases, where the culprit is caught, it involves an Amalekite Jew and not a Israelite right winger at all. 

 

Thus, Slick Clinton (or now George W. Bush) can order in the FBI and tons of other federal agents to investigate the right wing.  The liberal, leftist media, controlled by the Amalekite Jews, can have a field day on all of this evil emanating from White supremacists and anti-Semites. 

 

New laws and new crackdowns can be initiated against the right wing while no suspicion is ever focused upon the Amalekite initiators of the hate and venom.  Instead, as Steele observes, there will only be a public outpouring of sympathy and support for the Zionists. 

 

And as is always true, if anyone tries to reveal the truth behind this Amalekite Jew agenda of deception and evil, the person will be immediately accused in the controlled media as an anti-Semite. 

 

While Amalekites are effectively evil and liars (since it runs in their genes), and if any of them ever have an outbreak of morality (which is doubtful), the Amalekite Jew can always go to synagogue on Yom Kippur and say the Ashkenazi version of the Kol Nidre (which disavows all promises for the coming year).  Thus, he can effectively lie till his heart is content, always claiming that he is religious and is telling the truth. 

 

 

Anti-Semites, Revisited 

 

On the gross Amalekite hate, discussed above and in preceding chapters, there is one more remark on the evil Amalekites which must be acknowledged. 

 

While it is possible for the believer to read, study and contemplate these evil people with understanding and comprehension, some care is called for. 

 

To publicly criticize or condemn an Amalekite Jew in any way now in the Christian West means that the media and all public Christian leaders will commence an attack on the truth with a vengeance. 

 

The media will quickly brand and condemn any person who speaks out and calls a spade a spade in reference to the Amalekites.  People of truth can expect to be immediately identified as racists, bigots, White-supremacists, anti-Semites, etc.  This phenomenon is outlined in detail throughout this publication.  But it is so vast and prevalent, it needs a citation now. 

 

This same tragedy surfaces even in any attempt to identify organized crime operations as involving Amalekite Jew gangsters.  One must be very careful about saying anything that would expose criminals and mobsters as Jewish or Edomites in any way.  Attempts to link organized crime to the Amalekite Jews brings on an instant flood of media complaints about anti-Semites, Neo-Nazis and so forth. 

 

Having mentioned this fact that many, many Amalekite Jews choose to call their opponents or anyone else who would dare criticize them anti-Semites, a factor brought out in earlier chapters needs to be recalled.  The terms Semite and/or Semitic actually relate to language and not to race. 

 

Since many of the modern Amalekite Jews no longer speak Hebrew or any of the Canaanite dialects (as they formerly did in historic times), one would have to pause and ask how is it possible that they can be called Semites if they no longer use Semitic languages?  Evidently, it is not possible!  Thus, how can their opponents properly be called anti-Semites? 

 

Despite this reality of stupidity in modern man, the Scriptures do provide a witness for truth which will eventually prevail in this enigma (if not in this man governed age of wickedness, at least in the world tomorrow).