EZEKIEL

and YHWH’s

Judgment

for the

Good News

PEOPLE

VOLUME XI

The Evil Amalekites

EZEKIEL and YHWH’s

Judgment for the

Good News People

Volume XI--The Evil Amalekites

by

an unworthy servant

And you shall know the truth,

and the truth will make you free.

(John 8:32)

Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.age-end.com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.

Contents

Volume XI--The Evil Amalekites

CHAPTER PAGE

- Cover Page 1

- Title Page 2

- Contents 3

- Publisher’s Preface 5

Part GG--Total Amalekite Depravity

154 Amalek-Edomite Depravity I 6

155 Amalek-Edomite Depravity II 21

156 Amalek-Edomite Depravity III 36

157 The Amalekites Follow Balaam 49

158 Amalek-Edomite Path of Evil 58

159 Amalekite Methodology for Destruction 70

160 The US Change on Race 82

Part HH-Amalekite Criminals

161 Amalek-Edomites and Crime I 93

162 Amalek-Edomites and Crime II 104

163 Russian Amalekite Criminals I 110

164 Russian Amalekite Criminals II 122

Part II--More on the Amalekites

165 Esau Versus Yakov 137

166 Amalekites Versus Arab Hatred 148

167 Amalekite Hate Organizations 155

SHEERIT YISRAEL

PO Box 473

Calder, Idaho 83808, USA

Publisher’s Preface

Greetings! The following presentation is volume eleven of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.age-end.com web site.

This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.

Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!

The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).

For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.

With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!

an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE

Chapter 154-- Amalek-Edomite Depravity I

The Liberal Religious Motions

In broaching the bad Ashkenazi Jews of European lineage (many of whom are Amalekite Khazars), it must be said that they have had a tendency for liberalization and the changing of basic Judaism. This process has created the modern Reform and Conservative movements within Judaism. The Reform motion is very liberal and much like many Christian Churches, which don’t believe in much of anything.

There is also a Reconstructionist movement among Jews in America which is prompting some analysts to define it as a fourth major branch in Judaism (Jan 25, 2002, “Forward,” p. 1). This new push seems to be developing among Reform Jews, and it is therefore likely a part of Reform Judaism at present (although it was founded in 1948 by Professor Mordecai Kaplan of a Conservative seminary).

If this motion succeeds, it will be even more liberal and depraved than the case with the Reform movement, because It leans in the direction of denying The ELOHIM and promoting feminism and homosexuality (even ordaining women and queers as “rabbis,” as also seems to be happening in the generic Reform definition, as will be discussed below and in future chapters).

Obviously, Reconstruction Judaism will appeal to the wretched Amalekites who will surely flock to it in numbers (since it is so evil and bad). This motion will be further mentioned below and in later chapters.

More on Reform Judaism

The above comments have addressed Reform Judaism and some of its shortcomings. Naturally, the Amalekites have flocked to this religious reference. Not only has the Reform motion largely abandoned any sense of obedience, but they have even chosen in 1999 to welcome homosexuals into open fellowship (Jun 7, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 56).

In March 2000, the North American “Reform Rabbis passed a resolution under which Reform rabbinate officially supports the decision of individual rabbis to officiate at Jewish same-sex (marriage) ceremonies, becoming the first major religious organization to sanction ceremonies for homosexual couples” (May 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 9).

Possibly, the move of the above mentioned Reconstructionist movement has put some fear and concern in the Reform leadership to prompt them to also begin liberalizing in terms of queers and women. In that sense, maybe the Reconstructionist movement will end up being a part of Reform Judaism (rather than being a separate definition).

These moves are quite logical since so many Amalekites are both queers and Reform Jews (Amalekites are almost synonymous with Reform Jewry in the US--and while all are not queers, almost all approve of homosexuality).

Of course, at some point in time, the evil Reform Jews would openly approve of queer marriages and accept the fags, both as members and as “rabbis” (along with the women “rabbis” that they have been ordaining for years).

Amalekite Feminism

With the enormous rush to feminism in the Reform and Reconstructionist movements, it was only time before some of these feminist Amalekites would determine to prepare their own commentary of the Torah in order to reinterpret things in accordance with modern feminism.

The May 24, 2002, “Forward” (p. 15) had a report addressing this motion in a story on “Reform plans All-Woman Commentary on the Torah.” This article quoted several Reform women “rabbis” and Lori Lefkovitz, academic director of the Kolot: The Center for Jewish Women’s and Gender Studies at the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College in Philadelphia.

Lefkovitz welcomes the new commentary and adds that “What these new commentaries have shown us is that what women bring to the text is a different sensibility, a different set of experiences and different questions, even if they are not writing as women per se.”

Going on, Lori adds that the women “twist the lens of the material so that we notice different things, we see other emphases, we recover lost traditions and we hear voices that have been quieter.” Like Yeshayahu wrote, women will destroy the paths of righteousness when they exercise leadership over men (Isa 3:12).

Others

Like the Reform Jews, the above mentioned Conservative Jews also have a European basis, but are somewhat between the Reform and Orthodox.

Next, mention must be made of the major differences in attitudes and beliefs over the years between Ashkenazi (European) Jewry and Sephardi Jewry (as broached in previous chapters and to be further described below and in later chapters herein).

Another different group is the previously cited Karaites (which seem to have their roots entirely in old Babylon and thus in the land areas where Sephardi/Oriental Jews dominated). There is much evidence suggesting that the Karaites (who reject the Talmud) are an outgrowth of the old Essene movement (at least, the theology of the two groups seems to have much in common).

Today

The “Jerusalem Post” of June 28, 1997, had an article by Jonathan Rosenblum on “America’s do-it yourself Torah” which noted that in place of theology, “American Jews have an attitude; No one--not even God--can tell me what to do.” Since European Khazars dominate American Jewry, the above news report tells the story of the modern Amalek-Edomite feelings for Judaism and the Torah.

Conversely, let a person in today’s contemporary society say anything that can be construed as criticism about so-called Jews from a racial or ethnic perspective and the Amalek-Edomite Khazars, in particular, go completely crazy and lose their cool.

Many Amalekites (calling themselves Jews) are irrational and paranoid over any discussion about race or ethnicity (especially if it might link to them and their status). Their immediate response is to start hollering about discrimination, oppression, genocide, racism, anti-Semitism and the holocaust. Otherwise, it appears that many Oriental and Sephardic Jews are more responsible and sane on this theme.

Many so-called Christian Jews (as well as Moslems and Christians in general) are undoubtedly Edomites racially--because true Jews would be hard pressed to justify Christianity (as will be established in later chapters).

Thus, many of them follow the precedents established by the Marranos when the Catholic Church forced conversion to Christianity on them in the days of the Catholic Inquisition in Spain and Portugal (14th-17th centuries, CE).

In those days, the Protestant Reformation was getting ready to bloom and the Catholic authorities conceived the methodology of the Inquisition to keep so-called heretics and other religious non-conformists (like Jews) in line by torture and punishment, with eventual death by being burned alive at the stake.

Those Jews either converted or they were dead. Consequently, many faked conversion to Catholicism, but maintained their traditional beliefs. The Edomites appear to have followed this practice through the years in terms of their participation in Judaism, Christianity or whatever.

The Edomite Reichorn

Dave Barley, in the April 1998 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 5), quotes an interesting publication entitled “La Ligue Feminine Anti-Communiste de Montreal,” published by Adrien Arcand in Ontario, Canada. This document allegedly had a section on “A Jewish Plan of World Domination.”

This plan was supposed to represent the contents of a lecture delivered by an obvious Amalek-Edomite named Reichorn in Prague in 1869 over the tomb of one Simeon ben Jehuda. Reichorn noted that “It is said that numbers of our brothers have been converted and baptized Christians... What does it matter?”

Going on, Reichorn charged that the “Baptized ones can be very useful to us; they can become our auxiliaries to march to new horizons, which are still unknown to us; for those converted ones still belong to us” with the same spirit and soul.

The point of Reichorn’s words is that it doesn’t matter what religious faith an Amalek-Edomite pretends to embrace. In all cases, the Amalekite remains a wicked, depraved, vile Edomite, spiritually and mentally. As will be established in later comments, a leopard cannot change his spots.

Edomites Pretend or Fake It

Thus, many Edomites publicly pretend to be good Jews or good Christians. And if so, they normally tend to identify with liberal, permissive Jewish and Christian faiths which really believe in little or nothing in terms of truth.

Therefore, they would probably more often identify themselves with the Reform and Reconstructionist Jewish movements or liberal Christian denominations, as discussed above and elsewhere herein.

Also, as commented upon earlier--historically, a portion of the ruling hierarchy in the Roman Catholic Church appears to have been Edomites. Of course, there is the obvious link that Catholicism has had with Sicilians and Southern Italians--evidently from the Edomite Zepho, discussed earlier on the murderers of the righteous. Generic Edomites have been the leaders in Rome.

Moreover, Pope Paul VI was reported to be a secret Amalekite (with the Italian name of Giovanni Battista Montini). Even today, there is talk that Jewish Cardinal Lustiger of France, another very likely Amalekite, will be the next Pope when John Paul II dies (Aug-Sep 1999 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 79). There is some speculation that he will take the name of Peter. But otherwise, a future pope may become Sixtus Six.

The Apr-Jun 2001 “Petah Tikvah” magazine (p. 6) noted that Pope Gregory VI in 1045 and Pope Anaclet II in 1130 were both Jews (correctly Amalekites, ed). Some of the Italians didn’t approve of a Jewish pope (with Anaclet II), so they appointed a counter-pope (Innocent II). Yet, it has to be significant that many of the Catholic rulers/leaders (who rejected Amalekite Jews) have been Edomites themselves.

Evil Amalekites Persecute Jews

Evil Amalek-Edomites within the Catholic Church have often been responsible for the historic persecution and hatred of Jews and Judaism. Evil Edomites (like Adolf Schicklgruber and Yuri Vladiminovich Andropov, who will be commented upon at some length in later chapters herein) have been active in Jewish persecutions in the recent 20th century. This may seem to be quite a paradox. But it represents reality.

For some strange reason, diabolical Amalek-Edomites have proven to be the greatest of enemies of the collective Jewish people in all of history. They have launched the most intensive persecutions of all and especially on religious Jews (like with Haman and Herod the Great, as allowed in the Prologue).

This Edomite hatred and persecution of religious (observant) Jews (who more likely would tend to be true racial Jews) is most significant, as will be shortly proven.

Otherwise, the Arabs have claimed for some time now that 30% of Protestant Bishops are Jewish (correctly Amalekites, because it is unfathomable that a true Jewish Israelite would identify with Christianity).

Assuredly, any number of Amalekites have supposedly converted to Christianity in order to use that definition to help them in being parasites to rip off the gullible, stupid goyim (as noted in the Prologue).

Why the Edomite Linkage

Why do these Amalek-Edomites link up with established Christendom or Jewry at all? Why not just be Satanists or Luciferians outright without the secrecy? The answer is for the obvious economic, political and social benefits which can accrue to an individual (particularly an Edomite) by identifying with publicly accepted religions.

It is quite certain that the depraved and wicked Edomites would prefer the liberal, permissive Christian Churches or Reform (or Reconstructionist) Judaism in the context of the Christian West.

But in those areas where Orthodox Judaism or more conservative Christian Churches prevail in popularity, it must be allowed that some Edomites will flock to these conservative faiths simply to reap any rewards to be had for membership in those groups.

Hence, Amalek-Edomites will gladly join the Ku Klux Klan, the Nazi party, the US Militia organizations, the Christian Identity movement, Orthodox Judaism or anything or everything else if they perceive it as a personal benefit with that affiliation. They really have no conscience or concern whatsoever with who or what they attach themselves to in order to accomplish their objectives.

Name Changes

Amalek-Edomites do the same thing when they change their Edomite names to more common and acceptable names in the host country where they live and draw their sustenance as parasites. Not only have they habitually changed their names when they arrived in the United States, but they have generally followed this practice wherever they have gone.

Thus, in America--Bernard Schwartz became Tony Curtis, Emmanuel Goldenberg became Edward G. Robinson, Leonard Rosenberg became Tony Randall, Marian Levee became Paulette Goddard, Joseph Levitch became Jerry Lewis, Shirley Schrift became Shelley Winters, Issur Danielovitch became Kirk Douglas, Asa Yoelson became Al Jolson and Joan Persky became Lauren Bacall.

The same phenomenon has occurred with the Amalekites going to the modern state of Israel. On arrival, they change their Eastern European, Khazar names to Hebrew names (i.e. in Israel, Lauren Bacall’s Persky cousin became Shimon Peres). In Austria, the Amalekite Schicklgruber adopted the good German name of Hitler and on and on.

Because of this Amalek-Edomite propensity to change their names in the host countries where they live (as parasites), they have often been able to fool much of the public when people fail to check upon them more closely.

This Amalekite name change phenomenon brings to this writer’s mind a situation in the Northern Mariana Islands a few years ago. There was a family on Rota Island named San Nicolas, as best as now remembered by this writer. One of the sons decided to move to Saipan Island (a much larger island with a much larger population) and establish himself.

On arriving on Saipan, this man checked around to determine which was the most prominent and successful family there. He learned that a family named Sablan was the most prominent and successful on Saipan. Accordingly, he changed his name to Sablan in an expectation that the name Sablan would better help him succeed on Saipan.

Possibly, this is one of the compelling reasons that many Amalekites change their names when they move to a new area to begin anew their work of deception and evil. Surely, some of them adopt local names of the more successful families so that they can use this linkage in their efforts of deception.

Thus, an Amalekite named Kohn from Eastern Europe moved to Massachusetts. On arrival he found Irish Catholics to be the main families running things there. So he changed his name to Kerry and became a Roman Catholic. US Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts is one of the descendants of this Amalekite family.

An article on the Internet mentioned some of the modern DNA work of trying to determine the validity of Jewish names as being associated with the historic Jewish priesthood--i.e., whether Jews named Cohen (meaning a priest) could be a priest, whether Jews named Levi could be Levites, etc.

One of the problems researchers found in analyzing Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar extraction was that back in the 8th century BCE some of the Khazars who converted to Judaism changed their Khazar names to Levi or one of its cognates in order to try to fool the Jews into thinking that they were Levites.

It is not clear how extensive this Khazar practice was or whether it also reached to adoption of the name Cohen. But it shows the early depravity of these Amalekite Khazars from the earliest days of their history of pretending to be Jews; when, in fact, they were evil Amalekite children of Satan. This Khazar propensity of changing their names must go far back in their history.

By the way, the Aug 9, 2002, “Forward” (p. 12) quoted Solomon Lozovsky, a former colleague of Lenin and Stalin, in the pre-Russian Revolution days (before 1917). Lozovsky (surely an Amalekite, but evidently a man of some wisdom) said that “Anyone who denies his background is a bastard.” Possibly, Lozovsky is right. And his words indict all Amalekites who choose to change their historic Amalekite names!

Amalekites Will Do Anything

In effect, the typical Amalek-Edomite seems to have no conscience, concern or integrity at all, in terms of what religion, or even what family name that he may be identified with publicly. He will use anything and everything which may seem to give him an advantage in terms of functioning as a parasite, drawing the life blood out of the host country where he lives.

Thus, the evil Karl Marx and Adam Weishaupt, Amalek-Edomites, were classic examples. Both were born Jews, but later converted to Christianity. However, both appeared to have always been supposed atheists and/or secret Satanists.

The previously cited Adolf Schicklgruber, another evident Amalek-Edomite, was born and raised a Catholic. However, in adulthood, he secretly was deeply involved in the occult and who knows what else.

The wicked Roosevelts were originally Dutch Jews--clearly Amalek-Edomites. In time, they became Christians (largely Episcopalian or Dutch Reformed). But certainly, the well known evolutionist Clinton (Roosevelt), Teddy, Eleanor and Franklin were all practical or visible atheists in their public image. Their histories suggest that they believed in nothing of value.

Alternatively, if one looks carefully at their political records, the evidence is substantial to suggest that virtually all of the Roosevelts were actually secret children of Satan, just like other Amalek-Edomites. Historically, they have been extremely evil and wicked and have brought much hurt on both the United States; and indeed, on the world at large.

More on Slick Clinton

Jewish writer Mona Charen focused upon the American Jewish problem, in an article on “The hollowed spirituality of U.S. Jews,” as appearing in the June 14-20, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 32). She quoted a recent survey made by the American Jewish Committee.

The survey found that 80% of American Jews approved of Slick Clinton’s acquittal in the Senate over his sodomite debasement of the Jewess Monica Lewinsky, described in other chapters herein.

Some 60% even blamed the Republicans for Clinton’s sodomy scandal, as opposed to 36% who blamed Slick for the crisis. Otherwise, some 73% of American Jews opposed parental choice in educating their children.

The report said that only 15% of American Jews believed that religious observance was important to their identity while 98% contended that “remembrance of the Holocaust” was important to their identity. Some 62% believed that so-called “anti-Semitism” is a larger threat to their identity than other factors--to include inter-marriage with non-Jews.

Contrast these numbers with the fact that only 46% think that being a part of the Jewish people is important. Since Reform Judaism is the backbone (in numbers and influence) of American Jewry, the above findings are most interesting.

Though some will make the case that Reform Judaism (founded in the 19th century in Germany) has been a disaster for Jews, the truth is that it has found its primary acceptance among Amalekites; who, because of genetics, would apparently never be sincere religious Jews under any circumstances (since they are spiritually and physically children of Satan).

Amalekite Deceit

There is another fall-out of this Amalekite fanaticism over maintaining beliefs in the so-called “holocaust and anti-Semitism,” as a part of their racial-ethnic identities. Many Amalekites are so paranoid over these ideas and the need to constantly keep them alive that they will go to any extreme to continually push these issues to the front pages of the Amalekite controlled media.

As the May 10, 2002, “The Week” (p. 4) mentioned, anyone in America “who criticizes anything Israel does--is now called an anti-Semite or ‘self-hating Jew.’”

While “The Week” is correct on this assessment, this writer would like to add that anyone who criticizes any Jew on any matter is subject to the same complaint. Of course, a Jew who does this (toward fellow Jews) is called a self-hating Jew.

John O’Connor

In his video on the “Synagogue of Satan,” Catholic priest John O’Connor mentioned one of the interesting quirks about how this charge of anti-Semitism was successfully used by Ashkenazi Jews (correctly Amalekite Khazars) against the former Czars in old Russia.

Historically, these Khazars constitute a state within a state in whichever countries they have lived. In pre-1917 Russia, the Ashkenazi Jews were in this arrangement in Czarist Russia.

And around the start of the 20th century (perhaps just after the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” were discovered and made public in Russia), this state within a state had become an almost total Marxist revolutionary and anarchist entity out to destroy the Czar’s government.

Once the Czar tried to oppose them, the Ashkenazi Khazars responded by labeling the Czar and his government anti-Semitic. In Russia and around the world, the poor Czar was called an evil anti-Semite for daring to oppose the very people who were trying to destroy him and his government.

This seems to be the way the Amalekites work. If any goy comes along and criticizes them for anything, the immediate Amalekite response (from their money, media and educational powers) is to define the issue as involving anti-Semitism.

No person in the Christian West (not even a Jew) can criticize, oppose or denigrate the Amalekites for fear that he will be immediately branded an anti-Semite. And now, after working that term to death, the new Amalekite modus operandi is to call such people racists and White supremacists.

Amalekite Tricks

If the Amalekite Jew controlled media has no reason to be blaring about the holocaust or anti-Semitism, then many Amalekites will initiate action to cause an outburst from the media from time to time so that the gullible Christian Israelites (goyim) can come under more guilt and have more of their freedoms taken away from them.

One of the favorite tricks which the evil Amalekites use to constantly harass and intimidate stupid Christian Israelites is to set a fire at some synagogue or paint some ugly, inappropriate and ridiculous graffiti and messages on synagogue walls. Naturally, the media loves any alleged Christian attack on a synagogue. This gives them a huge, front page story to whine and complain about.

Of course, the controlled media would never suggest that some Amalekite could have or would have deliberately written the bad words on the synagogue or set the fire at the synagogue. Nazis, right-wing extremists and White supremacists would be immediately blamed and castigated.

Sometimes, efficient law enforcement people can accumulate proof that one of the Amalekites did the deed. In those cases, the Amalekite controlled media either down-plays the report (placing it in small print on a back page) or ignores it completely.

From the controlled media viewpoint, it is front page news that a White supremacist burned a synagogue. But there is no news if one of the synagogue’s own Amalekite members set the fire.

Whenever a story surfaces over an alleged right-wing attack on a synagogue, nine chances out of ten, the attack (fire, graffiti or whatever) can be laid at the doorsteps of an evil Amalekite member of the synagogue designed to keep the holocaust and anti-Semitism stories alive.

“Spotlight,” Revisited

“Spotlight” of Jan 17, 2000, had a story by James P. Tucker on “Real Truth Censored About ‘Hate’ Crimes,” which noted a case from Maryland of a few years ago. A Jewish family’s home in an upscale neighborhood was found spray painted with swastikas and hate messages.

The controlled media went wild for days and days with stories about this atrocity to generate sympathy and gifts from the guilt ridden goyim. Later, it developed that the Jews involved (obvious Amalekites) desecrated their own home and placed the blame on the stupid goyim.

Deceitful Amalekite merchants are notorious for burning down their buildings and stores (especially with inventory that won’t sell) to collect insurance. If they can blame the fire on the stupid goyim, it really helps the anti-Semitism case.

The “Spotlight” paper of Mar 13, 2000, had another article along the same line. This one, “Victim Responsible for Supposed Hate Crime,” by William Carmichael, was from Stamford, Connecticut where a supposed hate crime took place at a Jewish synagogue (Temple Beth El) in the summer of 1999 (just one week after the nut Buford Furrow shot up a synagogue in Los Angeles, CA, elsewhere discussed herein).

Per the story, a swastika emblazoned bucket full of medical waste material was left outside of the synagogue. Some of the waste was scattered on the synagogue’s lawn. Naturally, the controlled national media and Jewish leadership cried out about the great evils of this anti-Semitism and hate crime. Political leaders whined about needing to do something.

Well, in February 2000, a Jewish man named Alan Jay Lorenz of Weston, CT was arrested for the incident with a federal civil rights violation. He was charged with obstructing persons in the free exercise of their religious beliefs. Lorenz is also a suspect in another desecration at a Norwalk synagogue.

Amalekite Bombings?

At Passover, in 2002, a minivan blew up in Brooklyn, NY, seriously wounding the driver, the apparent Amalekite Israel Halberstam. Immediately, the controlled media said that it was an “anti-Semitic attack.” Now, authorities believe that the bomb belonged to Halberstam and that he was transporting it to some other place (Apr 22, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).

The remaining question is--what was the evil Amalekite doing with the bomb? Is it possible that Israel would use the bomb to blow up somebody or something which could be blamed on the Arabs or on alleged White supremacists/anti-Semites? Of course, it would be easy to murder some innocent people and blame the act on anti-Semites, Arabs or White supremacists.

On Aug 23, 2002, a news report said that one Robert Goldstein had been arrested in Tampa, Florida for possessing bombs and explosive devices. Allegedly, Goldstein planned on using his bombs to blow up Muslim mosques across America.

Surely, the very evident Amalekite Goldstein would blow up some mosques and stage the acts as coming from so-called right-wing, Christian extremists and White supremacists.

For sure, the controlled national media would have a field day with many slanted reports. And by all means, new legislation would roll out of Congress and the US president (whomever he is) would write a series of new executive orders to further impede upon the Constitutional rights of the average American citizen.

Blacks Too

Interestingly, Blacks have picked upon this favorite trick of deception by Amalekite bankers/masters.

Often, there will be a big story and hype about a fire or attack on a Negro Church--especially in the South. Later, when it develops that an African American set the fire or did the deed, it is no news. This media hypocrisy will be assessed in subsequent chapters herein.

It looks like the stupid, ignorant, Christian Israelites (goyim) would eventually see how this scam is successfully run against them, time and time again. But the stupid goyim never seem to catch on.

Let a Negro or Amalekite surreptitiously bomb, burn or damage his own religious meeting place and the Amalekite controlled media will give the right-wing condemnation and hate for days on end. Yet, when the truth finally comes out about the perpetuator, the story is lost forever. What is this--hypocrisy?

Incidentally, the fact that an Amalekite will damage or injure his own religious facility is enormous proof of the utter evil and wretchedness of these people. Like Slick Clinton, they have no conscience or integrity at all. Their whole lives are built on a sham, deceit and dishonesty. They are truly sons of Satan. No wonder that they go to any length to say the Kol Nidre prayer on Yom Kippur (as described previously).

The Start of Edomite Deception

It should not surprise anyone that the Amalek-Edomites would be such classic liars and frauds totally dedicated to deception--all the while that they pretend and fake reality in order to hide their true motives and goals. Actually, this lying and deceiving started with Esau, himself.

As outlined earlier, the Word reflects that Esau was a “cunning hunter” (Gen 25:27). The “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 142) interprets this remark as meaning that he was “a man understanding how to deceive” --literally how to ensnare his father with his mouth.

Some scholars note that the previously mentioned Oholibamah (Gen 36:2), one of Esau’s wives, was seemingly the exact same person as Judith, who reportedly married Esau (Gen 26:34). The “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 215) says that Esau changed her name to deceive Yitzhak into believing that she was not an idolatress.

Surely, the name change phenomenon, mentioned above in this chapter, as being common to Edomites, was to characterize Esau’s descendants for the next 3,900 years. Amalek-Edomites regularly change their names and public religions to deceive and fool people as to their true identity.

With this Esau lying precedent established in the Edomite lineage, it is only natural that Amalek-Edomites will change their names and supposed religions, however often they choose (if they think a change will benefit them), without a whimper or concern at all. They are very deceptive and dishonest people, genetically.

Despite their propensity for name changes and deception, as to their true identities, there are two curious little facts of identification which may have “possibly” survived over the years to amazingly link many, modern, American Jews specifically to the evil Amalekites.

Two Interesting Possibilities

Mark Thomas, Pennsylvania State Chaplain of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, alleges that the popular epithet “Kike,” so often applied to American Jews, is a contraction of the word Amalekite (“Religion and the Racist Right,” p. 131). Frankly, the origin of this word, so often applied to Jews by their enemies, seems unclear. But the possibilities of tying it to the Amalekites is enticing based simply on sound if for no other reason.

In his video on the “Synagogue of Satan,” Catholic priest John O’Connor of Pennsylvania says that the Ashkenazi Jews of Germany (who essentially have been and generally are Amalekites) supported Adolf Hitler in his rise to power. O’Connor notes that the word “nazi” comes from the word “Ashkenazi.”

Thus, is it possible that the Amalekites were the power and brains behind the early German Nazi movement? Are contemporary American Ashkenazi Jews actually Nazis?

More on the Khazars

The Edomite propensity to be evil and wicked, as broached above and in the prior chapters, wasn’t just a phenomenon of ancient ages, nor did it commence in more modern times. The historic Amalek-Edomite Khazars apparently have always been evil and wicked from their inception. Since Judaism is a fairly decent religion, one would think that the Khazars would improve on becoming Jews. But they haven’t.

Amalek-Edomite Khazars have often led the way in being very forward, pushy, demanding and vocal in modern liberalism, Socialism, Communism and humanism--with all of the adverse features which these motions entail (to be covered in future chapters).

As an example, the Spokane, WA City Council held a public meeting around Sep 1, 1998, to discuss extending to homosexual queers its city ordinances which granted minorities extra privileges. An alleged Amalek-Edomite named Schwartz came to the meeting from the East to promote his concept of special rights for faggots.

During the meeting, a man in the audience, quietly sitting and minding his own business in the public meeting, began sketching some of the participants on a piece of paper. Somehow Schwartz found out (how? Did he go and look over the sketcher’s shoulders to see what was being sketched?).

Schwartz publicly interrupted the meeting and demanded that the man be thrown out and/or arrested for drawing alleged anti-Semitic material. The Council refused to evict the man. Schwartz continued his apparent pushy, forward, vocal disruption of the meeting and apparently left it in a fit of rage and anger. One person supposedly touched him briefly on his way out.

Thereupon, the vocal and disruptive Schwartz effectively declared a war of sorts against the city of Spokane for not kicking the innocent artist out the door or having him arrested. Schwartz claimed that he was starting legal action to get gobs of money from Spokane over the incident. This is the type of action which evil Amalek-Edomites gladly pursue.

They are very big mouthed, pushy, forward, demanding, hateful, arrogant and disruptive to law, order, decency, honesty and morality. If anyone tries to oppose their evil and wretchedness, they immediately cry out anti-Semitism. The Amalek-Edomite controlled press picks up on things like this and society never hears the end of it.

The “Forward”

This Amalekite madness in rushing to lawsuits and court actions was demonstrated in several very intriguing lawsuits filed by apparent Amalekites in 2002, per the various issues of the “Forward” newspaper in 2002.

The first story (Apr 19, 2002, “Forward,” p. 3), on “Jewish Reporter Says Marriage to Arab Cost Her Job,” by Nacha Cattan, said that a Jewess named Livi Regenbaum filed a discrimination lawsuit against the “Kansas City Jewish Chronicle” because the paper allegedly fired her because of the ethnicity of her husband. Regenbaum was married to a Palestinian Arab. She was a reporter for the Chronicle until she was fired.

A spokesperson for the paper said that the Jewess was fired because of unspecified “job performance issues.”

The second story (ibid, p. 14) was by Marc Perelman on “Jewish Lawyer To Sue Israel for ‘Terrorism.’” This report concerns the actions of 48-year old Stanley Cohen of New York City who will sue the state of Israel for its “terrorist” actions in the West Bank of Palestine.

The unique thing about both of these lawsuits is that they involve Jews suing other prominent Jewish groups or operations. Normally, most lawsuit prone Amalekite Jews go out of their way to sue the goyim whom they look down upon as stupid cattle. It certainly is a unique situation that a Jew would dare sue the state of Israel.

Seemingly, one of the most pathetic illustrations of Amalekite madness for lawsuits and legal terror surfaced in a story by Jeff Zell in the Aug 9, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1) which noted that the “Jews, Gays Suing Methodist Home for Hiring Bias.” This report demonstrated both the Amalekite propensity for lawsuits and sexual perversion.

Actually, these two forces (the queers and the Amalekites) are not necessarily different because much of the homosexual movement is headed and promoted by the depraved Amalekites (as will be proven in this and succeeding chapters).

The story by Zell said that there were seven plaintiffs (including one faggot Jewish “rabbi”) in the suit against the Decatur, GA United Methodist Children’s Home because the Home refuses to hire Jews, fires qualified workers for being gay, and requires counselors to condemn homosexuality. The plaintiffs say that these acts constitute discrimination.

The Amalekites are extremely pushy and demanding in their pursuit of life. They will quickly sue anybody or anything if they see it to their advantage. Apparently, this lawsuit proneness even extends against fellow Jews.

More Palestinian Support

The earlier April 12, 2002, “Forward” (p. 6) had another story by Nacha Cattan on “Leftist Jews Gaining Strength in Support of Palestinians” which also told about the efforts of some leftist Jews in the United States in trying to side with the Palestinians in their conflict with the state of Israel. Actually, this story and the above cited lawsuits are real flukes because almost all Jews automatically support Israel first and most.

Anyway, Bluma Goldstein, a retired professor from the University of California at Berkeley, and one of the leaders of the American pro-Palestinian movement, signed an ad in the “New York Times” in support of the Palestinians.

In an interview with the “Forward,” Goldstein said that “If a Jew criticizes Israel we’re self hating Jews and if you’re a non-Jew you’re antisemitic.” This name calling reaction seems normal for Amalekite Jews, as was pointed out above and in the preceding chapters.

Of course, Ms Goldstein is correct, although she did not go far enough. Any non-Jew criticizing Israel or even Jews in general is automatically called an anti-Semite. The Jews are always above criticism (evidently, except for the Ultra Orthodox, which the Amalekites passionately hate the most of all).

Incidentally, since the Nazi era and WWII, the use of the word “anti-Semite” has been grossly overworked (by the controlled Amalekite Jew media).

Accordingly, many enlightened Amalekite Jews are beginning to use other catch phrases and words to describe anyone who criticizes a Jew. As noted earlier, the new approach is to call enemies of the Amalekite Jews--White supremacists or racists.

And More Palestinian Support

Incidentally, the May 6, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 4) had a story from New York that eleven Orthodox US “rabbis” had issued a statement on behalf of the Palestinian Arabs at a pro-Palestinian rally in Washington, DC on April 20, 2002. This group decried the Zionists for their efforts in establishing a Jewish state in Palestine and called upon the US to stop US aid to Israel.

Ovadyah, Revisited

Previous chapters herein focused upon the wonderful prophecies of the small book of Obadiah, which are entirely dedicated to the doom and eventual punishment of the evil Edomites. Verses 2-5 are particularly interesting because they convey an overall appreciation for the incredible depravity and wickedness of these people.

Some of the English translations of Obadiah are a little difficult to deal with in understanding. But an interpretation in the July 1999 “Destiny Editorial Letter” (entitled “Esau and Jacob in Prophecy”) was very revealing. It said:

“Comparatively small in number, small in honor, not merely despised, but ‘greatly despised;’ arrogant, ‘Who shall bring me down to the ground?;’ notoriously ambitious for money and power, exalting themselves ‘as an eagle;’ and rapacious beyond all measure or mercy.

“Even gleaners of grapes would leave a few for others. But the greed of these people is insatiable. They covet all for themselves. These are the marks of Esau-Edom.”

Manifestly, the Edomites, generally, and the Amalekites, particularly, are the most evil people of all time. Their utter depravity and gross wickedness will be further addressed in the succeeding chapters.

Chapter 155--Amalek-Edomite Depravity II

The Edomite Red

A former chapter discussed the linkage of the color red to the Edomites. For example, the famous Rothschild banking house got its start with a red sign or shield being placed over its building in early Frankfort, Germany (to identify its Amalek-Edomite occupant?).

The previously discussed Mystery Babylon the Great, the mother of harlots, and the beast she rides, are both scarlet colored (Rev 17:3-4). As Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary” (p. 596) indicates--the scarlet color is “a brilliant red, inclining to orange. Scarlet is a favorite color in the Roman Catholic Church (Cardinals like to dress in scarlet red at their important functions).

Thus, the color red identifies both Satan and his Edomite servants. Of course, the flags of Turkey, Albania and various Communist countries have been or are red--the classic Edomite color. It must be pointed out that the color red has historically been associated with Communism and some of the leftist movements which are all very pushy, forward and demanding. Red is, of course, the classic color of Edom.

Naturally, the color red has come to signify and identify most or all of the leftist movements (even to include the pro-Palestinian motions). It may seem like a fluke that the Edomite red can be attached to a pro-Palestinian group, but it seems to be the real world out there as far as the Amalekites are concerned.

Edomite Perversion

Assuredly, sexual perversion is big in the red Communist, leftist and liberal motions, cited above and in prior chapters, in the context of the Edomites. Thus, numbers of Amalek-Edomites are queers, as well as being some of the biggest spokesmen and advocates of perversion. There are also reasons to believe that sexual perversion is still fairly common in some Edomite lands--like Turkey.

There is some evidence that the famous Lawrence of Arabia was homosexually raped by a Turkish general when he was captured for a spell. With his literal choice of almost any of the most attractive and appealing women in the area, one would have to wonder how a Turkish official could turn to sodomy. But perversion seems to be the story of Esau and a huge number of his descendants.

Like other Christians and atheists and the Edomite progenitor Esau, many modern Edomites miscegenate and defile their racial seed lines with anything and everything--just like most Christians do and significantly more in contrast to what some true Jews would tend to do. The rest of this chapter and succeeding presentations will address their sexual proclivities.

A Genetic Problem

Since it takes three generations to breed the evil thinking out of these Edomites, their children and grandchildren continue to function with the mind-set of their wicked Edomite ancestors (Ex 20:5; Deut 23:8). The miscegenated Herod family is a classic Scriptural example of this phenomenon.

In today’s modern perverted world, where open homosexuality is practiced and no one in leadership seems to condemn it, questions continue to surface over whether homosexuality is an inherited genetic problem; or alternatively, is it simply an acquired empirical habit/practice?

This writer is not prepared to suggest that it is always, sometimes or even infrequently due to genetics. On the contrary, it probably is an acquired practice of sin (due to a number of environmental factors). However, in some families, like with the Amalekites, one must wonder to what extent the phenomenon is traceable to genes (since such an inordinate number of Amalekites are practicing queers).

There is a curse in the Torah associated with the second commandment on idolatry--in that the sins of parents are visited upon children (Ex 20:5). Without being dogmatic, this writer has wondered if in “some” (not necessarily all) instances, homosexuality is traceable to certain sins of a parent. Is it possible that a homosexual demon attaches to a family or children to introduce perversion?

In early 2002, an explosion ripped through the US Catholic Church when revelations began to surface of the enormous presence of faggot, pedophile priests within the church who have been abusing thousands of children over the years. This problem will be addressed in a later chapter.

It is unclear how many of these perverts are Edomites; but surely, many or most of them are since the Edomite Irish and Italian peoples are so prevalent in the Roman Catholic Church. There is also a significant presence of Amalekites in Catholicism, as noted earlier. Suffice to say, these evil preachers are undoubtedly operating under powerful demonic influence. Surely, they have many attached demons.

As a minimum, it must be asserted that many of the dedicated homosexual faggots do have attached demons (as was assessed in a prior chapter). To what extent these demons arise in connection with the sins of a parent versus the sins of the child is uncertain. Probably, most can be attributed to the sins of the person so hooked. But the door must be left open in some instances to a parental problem.

The Evil Ancestry of the Amalekites

This (Amalek-Edomite) Khazar propensity for evil can logically be traced back to Nachash, Cain, Ham, Canaan and Esau. Historically, in the Tanakh, these five individuals were some of the most evil and depraved beings in all of history. Esau’s descendants have followed in the same footsteps.

Clearly, the problem with these individuals seems to be genetics! As ancient Jewish authorities stipulated over 2,000 years ago, the Amalekites, in particular, are totally evil. If this is true, as learned Jewish sages have believed and taught for ages, then it becomes crystal clear that there must be a genetic factor present in the Amalekite make-up to induce them to be so incredibly wicked and depraved.

The Apostle Shaul well stated the Amalek-Edomite dilemma when he wrote that when people abandon The MOST HIGH and His righteousness, YHWH gives them over to their vile affections and emotions--to include homosexuality (Rom 1:26-27), as is commonly found among the Amalekites. Maybe Shaul’s remarks tie to the second commandment in some way.

It would seem that homosexuality might could be due to genetics to some extent and certainly in the case of the depraved Amalekites--since such a vast number of Amalekites are queers and since sexual perversion has been a part and parcel of their make-up from the early days of the Exodus (to be next addressed).

Piska 3

A previous chapter quoted Piska 3 from “Pesikta De-Rab Kahana” (p. 38) which reported that in Amalek’s first attack on Yisrael during the Exodus, Amalek lured Israelites from their camp so that they would be killed and polluted by pederasty.

While details of these sexual perversions upon Israelites do not seem to be available, a little logic can crystallize the possibilities. Perhaps the Amalekites engaged in sodomy with helpless captured Israelites or sodomized their dead corpses in some manner.

In modern 20th century Satanism and other occult activities, sexual rituals are often associated with human murder and sacrifice. A later chapter herein will focus on some of these on-going activities. Suffice to say, Satan’s Amalek-Edomite descendants would be prone for any type of sodomite perversion that could surface as a part of their murdering and killing efforts of Israelites.

Sodomite Amalekites

For a Scriptural basis on how the Amalekites tried to pollute Yisrael with pederasty, Piska 3 notes the words “How he met thee by the way” (Deut 25:18), which come from the Hebrew krk (kyrk). This reference is elsewhere used in the Torah in the situation where a man has a nocturnal emission of semen which makes him unclean, necessitating that he leave the camp (Deut 23:10-11).

R. Judah interpreted “krk” as meaning “he befouled thee with his (Amalek’s) semen (by subjecting thee to sodomy).” In other words, Judah did not see the problem with the Amalekites as being nocturnal emissions; but rather, as being one of sodomy as practiced by the Amalekites upon the Israelites (“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” p. 51-52).

The gist of this is that there are some possible Scriptural reasons suggesting that very early in the history of the Amalekites, they had a record of sodomy in their ranks. Also, the evidence seems to be that they tried to teach or impose their sodomite practices on some of the gullible, stupid Israelites.

It must be important to note that the Amalekites and perhaps some of their Canaanite friends dwelt in the Rift vale or valley (Hebrew “emeq”), evidently South of the Dead Sea (Num 14:25). The Scriptures use this same Hebrew word to describe the place of dwelling of the Sodomites in Avraham’s day (Gen 14:3-17).

Actually, the vale involved with the Sodomites was apparently at the Southern or Southeastern edge of the Dead Sea. It appears that some of the Amalekites lived in this same precise area which was probably a part of the greater definition of Edom. Is it not significant that the Amalekites inhabited the same area where the homosexual fags lived in Sodom and Gomorrah? Yes, it seems like it is!

A Line of Queers

Incidentally, this sexual depravity and social sickness of the Amalek-Edomites goes back a long way in their genealogy and long before their likely homosexual escapades at the Exodus. It clearly started early with their ancestors Nachash, Kain, Ham and Esau.

In the Greek sun worship theology and polytheistic religion, the father god Zeus was a representation of Satan, the real sun god in mythology. In the worship of Zeus and the other Greek gods as well, there were attempts to conceptionalize them and see many of them in a human form in various situations.

Hence, paintings, pictures and representations of the long haired, effeminate Zeus became objects of worship in the Greek sun worship civilization. The interesting thing about Zeus is that he was a queer--a bi-sexual faggot. Since Zeus was a type of personification of the real sun god Satan, the reality of homosexuality is well established.

Obviously, Nachash or Satan was the classic queer of all time. He was the original Curious (Greek “Kurious”), recognized as the “Lord or Baal” in the OT (“The Last Warning to Man,” p. B). He probably was the first male character to wear long hair, shave and be effeminate. Apparently, he became proud over his rebellious long hair (even today, the presence of long hair on a man is symbolic of rebellion).

Satan’s pride has been well known. But its cause has escaped the minds of most students. Perhaps The CREATOR made woman to be feminine with long hair (in Satan’s image) to demonstrate how she can achieve reconciliation by learning humility and submission, which were the qualities absent from the effeminate Adversary (ibid, p. B).

Satan’s son Kain also had sexual problems, as discussed in prior chapters.

Specifically, previous chapters focused on Cain who advocated the worshipping of the sensual powers (“Mystery Babylon The Great,” p. 9). Over time, sex worship became an inherent part of sun worship, as will be assessed in subsequent chapters herein. This pagan worship extended on down to Ham and certainly his son Canaan. Allegations of Ham being a bisexual were assessed in a prior chapter.

Suffice to say, the line of Cain had problems and Esau had the propensity of mixing his seedline with these various fallen peoples, as noted in the previous chapters. No wonder homosexuality is so common among the Edomites and particularly with Amalekites. Surely, the Amalekites are right in the ball park with the gross depravity present in ancient Sodom and Gomorrah.

The General Indictment

But there is more to come on this from the “Jewish Chumash” (quoted in the Mar 1998 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 31), which indicates from the genealogies of Genesis and Chronicles that many of Esau’s descendants were products of incest and illegitimacy.

Actually, according to the famous Rashi (Rav Solomon bar Isaac, who was born in France in 1040 and lived until 1105), in his commentary on Genesis 36, all of Esau’s children were (are) sons of incest, adultery and illicit sex (Apr 2001 “End Time News,” p. 2).

Whether all of Esau’s descendants are/were born of perverted sex or just many of them is not totally clear in history. But manifestly, many were, as the Scriptures outline!

Some Specifics on the Problems

Former chapters have discussed the situation with Esau and his several wives and the resulting deception associated with these women and their children with Esau. As previously noted, one of Esau’s wives was Oholibamah, perhaps a mixed Hivite and Horite (Gen 36:2-5,19-21). She used the alias of Judith in order to try to deceive various people (as reported in a former chapter).

As pointed out in the previous discussion, it seems to have been Esau who promoted this name change by Oholibamah. As previously quoted, the “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 215) said that Esau changed her name to deceive Yitzhak into believing that she was not an idolatress.

In any case, this business of changing names has come to completely characterize the descendants of Esau. The Amalekite descendants of Esau are particularly notorious about changing their names. They do this regularly wherever they go or relocate around the world (as described in previous comments).

More on Oholibamah

Otherwise, this Oholibamah is an extremely complicated person, as will now be shown. She is first mentioned in Genesis 36:2 as the daughter of Anah, who was the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite. Yet, Anah is elsewhere shown to be the “son” of Zibeon and not a daughter at all (Gen 36:24). But there are more problems on this confused family.

Specifically, a commentary on the “Jewish Chumash” says that Genesis 36:2 actually “implies that Oholibamah was the daughter of two fathers, Anah and Zibeon, an obvious impossibility. Furthermore, verse 24 describes Anah as Zibeon’s son (as just noted above--ed). Consequently, our verse implies that Zibeon cohabited with his own daughter-in-law, Anah’s wife, and Oholibamah was the product of their adultery. Thus, she and all her offspring were illegitimate.”

But there are more complications here because I Chronicles 1:38 indicates that Anah and Zibeon were brothers and sons of Seir (the Horite). This peculiarity suggests that Zibeon actually cohabited with his own mother (wife of Seir) to produce Anah (who was, thus, both his brother and his son--Apr 2001 “End Time News,” p. 3).

An earlier discussion on Esau’s wives allowed that Oholibamah could have been a mixed Hivite-Horite. Her actual racial status seems confused in the Genesis remarks. In any case, the Word seems to indicate that Anah was a Horite (Gen 36:20), while Zibeon was both a Hivite (Gen 36:2) and a Horite (Gen 36:20).

The question then arises to ask if the Horites were, in fact, Hivites? Or were they a mixture of some sort? This dilemma was discussed in a previous chapter with remarks from the book of Jasher--which suggested that Seir was the son of Hur (the Horite), who was the son of Hivi, who was the son of Canaan, who was the son of Ham.

Still other problems seem to also materialize with Oholibamah. She had a son named Korah, implying Esau was the father (Gen 36:5). However, Korah is identified as a son of Eliphaz (Gen 36:15-16). Yet, the Tanakh list of the sons of Eliphaz does not mention Korah (Gen 36:11-12; I Chron 1:36).

The “Jewish Chumash” (p. 215) explains this dilemma by noting that Korah was born illegitimately to Oholibamah from an affair she had with Eliphaz, her husband’s oldest son. Apparently, Korah was brought up by and lived with his father Eliphaz, certainly by the time of his maturity.

Still More

But there is still some more potential problems with this Esau marriage to Oholibamah, also apparently known as Judith, as mentioned previously (Gen 26:34). The Word seems to say that this woman gave Esau three sons--Jeush, Jaalam and possibly Korah. With the problems over Korah, what about the other two? This question must surface when one looks at some comments in the book of Jasher.

This source suggests that Judith had no sons, but daughters only (Jasher 30:21). If Judith was Oholibamah, she apparently did have three sons (Gen 36:5). While Jasher is not authoritative Scripture, as is Genesis, one must still wonder about this obvious conflict. If the book of Jasher was written after the Torah, surely its writer would have had access to Moshe’s writings and would hardly have written a direct contradiction.

It might be that just as Korah was illegitimate and did not belong to Esau, so also maybe Jeush and Jaalam were illegitimate and were not sons of Esau. Thus, it could be that Jasher has it right in the context that Oholibamah had no sons, but only daughters with Esau.

Further Edomite Depravity

Another dilemma surfaces when one focuses on Timna, the concubine of Eliphaz (Gen 36:12). Elsewhere, she is identified as a sister of Lotan (son of Seir) and thus, an aunt of Oholibamah (Gen 36:20-22). Yet, Timna does not seem to be reckoned as a daughter of Seir. I Chronicles 1:36 mentions that Eliphaz had a child named Timna.

While it is certainly possible that Seir had a daughter named Timna, who became concubine to Eliphaz or that Seir’s wife had Timna by another man, and while it is also surely reasonable that Eliphaz could have had a daughter whom he named Timna, the Jewish Chumash otherwise raises some concern over this situation.

The Chumash (p. 216) allows that Eliphaz may have cohabited with Seir’s wife and had Timna; thus making her his daughter. Hence, she could have been a half-sister to Lotan and yet not be counted as a child of Seir. On maturing, the Chumash (p. 216) suggests that Eliphaz then took Timna, his own daughter, as concubine to have Amalek.

While this unique approach to Timna could have some merit and deserves study, this writer believes that the Timna in I Chronicles 1:36 was, in fact, a son, since the context so reads. “Young’s Analytical Concordance” (p. 990) agrees on the son definition.

Admittedly, it would be questionable that a man would name a son after the mother, but it cannot be ruled out in the situation with the wicked Edomites. Perversion and deception both characterize the evil Edomites.

New Testament Times

Even in NT times, the moral depravity of the Edomites continued to surface. This reality is pathetically present in the evil, Amalekite, Herod family.

The trouble started with Herod the Great himself and persisted for generations. For example, old Herod had ten beautiful wives and a number of concubines. But this wouldn’t satisfy him because the Amalekite Herod also turned to “boy lovers” (Mar-Apr 2002 “Biblical Archaeology Review,” p. 30). Here is clearly one of the most notorious homosexual pedophiles of all history.

But there is more on Herod. New research suggests that old Herod suffered from chronic kidney disease and a rare illness that causes gangrene of the genitalia (Feb 8, 2002, “The Week,” p. 18). He had an array of bizarre symptoms, including a decaying stomach, putrid breath, intestinal problems, intense itching and gangrene of the penis.

Previous research suggested that Herod died from either gonorrhea or Hodgkin’s disease. But this latest work by Dr Jan Hirschmann of the University of Washington suggests that Herod had a multitude of problems. Truly, he was a madman, as indicated elsewhere herein.

Otherwise, the best known and most publicized instance of evil in the miscegenated Amalekite Herod’s family probably occurred when Herod’s son, Herod Antipas (also known as Herod the tetrarch), married his niece, who had been married to his still alive, brother Philip. Since this whole arrangement was Scripturally illegal, Yohanan the Baptist spoke against it and was accordingly murdered (Matt 14:3-12).

The sexual perversion was so predominant in this Amalek-Edomite family that it quickly occurred again. The next NT reference is to Herod Agrippa II and his shack-mate and sister Bernice. They heard the plea of Shaul in Caesarea (Acts 25:13).

Bernice had been married to two other men before her affair with Agrippa--first to her uncle Herod of Chalcis and next to King Polemon of Cilicia. She soon abandoned Polemon and moved into shameful incest with her brother Agrippa II (“Word Pictures in the New Testament,” v. III, p. 433). Later, she became mistress to Vespasian and Titus, father and son, and successive emperors of Rome.

The Scriptures

Just as the OT prophets often mention the great hatred which the Edomites have had for Yisrael, the NT offered a very revealing remark on people who YESHUA allegorically described as dogs and swine (Matt 7:6).

The connection of the word dog to the generic Edomites and other nokri/nekar peoples and the more explicit tie of the Amalek Khazars to swine have been established in former chapters herein.

In the Word, dirty, filthy swine are the symbolic enemies of Yisrael. No wonder they have the genetic hatred for Yisrael and the genetic push to destroy Yisrael at all costs.

The Book notes that Avraham died near the time when Esau’s true character was revealed (Gen 25:7). The “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 142) says that Avraham died when he did, so that he would not have to see his grandson Esau enter upon a career of wickedness (as noted earlier). If he would have seen this happen, he would not have enjoyed the good old age promised by The ELOHIM.

Adolf Schicklgruber

Throughout this study, the point is made from time to time that the evil Adolf Hitler (an alleged bisexual) was not a German named Hitler at all. Instead, he was something else who merely was pretending to be a good racial German. Even with his marriage to Eva Braun, in his underground bunker, in Berlin in 1945, Adolf had the gall to try to claim that he was of pure Aryan blood (which was simply a lie).

Surprisingly, in fact, Adolf was a Jew (a Catholic Jew who undoubtedly was a racial Amalekite) whose real name was reportedly Adolf Schicklgruber (per articles in the “Encyclopedia Britannica,” the “Universal Jewish Encyclopedia” and other authoritative biographical sources). In fact, there are reasons to believe that Adolf had so-called Jewish (actually Amalekite) blood from several directions.

In “To Eliminate the Opiate” (p. 207), R. Marvin S. Antelman mentions this connection in noting a supposed liaison that a Jew (surely an Amalekite) named Frankenberger had with Adolf’s paternal grandmother Maria Anna Schicklgruber. Interestingly, the very name Schicklgruber seems to be a Jewish (correctly an Amalekite) name.

In an Internet arcile by Dr Henry Makow (quoting Greg Hallett’s book “Hitler Was A British Agent”), the case is made that Maria Anna worked as a maid in the household of the Rothschild mansion in Vienna, Austria and that Nathan Meyer Rothschild got to her and fathered Alois Schicklgruber (who was alleged to be Adolf’s father). Regardless, whether it was Frankenberger or Rothschild, Alois had a Jewish father.

So there is the strong likelihood that Adolf had so-called Jewish ancestry from two directions on his paternal side. While Antelman did not buy the Frankenberger connection, he did mention one more linkage that another supposed Jew (who was surely an Amalekite) had with Adolf’s mother Klara Polzl (thus, meaning that Adolf was Jewish, certainly from his paternal side).

On Adolf’s maternal side, his grandmother (the mother of Klara Polzl) was a Stronnes. The Stronnes family had converted from Judaism to Catholicism in Vienna in the 1850s (per a story in 1933 in the “New York Times”). This means that even Adolf’s mother was a Jew (therefore making Adolf a Jew by Jewish law).

The interesting thing about Adolf’s several connections to so-called Jews is the incredible reality that many or most of them came about through illicit and illegal sex.

The story about the apparent Amalekite Frankenberger (or Rothschild) and Maria Schicklgruber (who was undoubtedly an Amalekite Jewess as well) involved an illegal affair. Maria Anna produced the above cited son from this reported illegal encounter whom she named Alois Schicklgruber (per an article on “Hitler,” from “The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia”).

Alois in 1876 changed his name in Austria to Hitler (ibid, p. 400). Hitler was the maiden name of his first wife. Reportedly, Alois did marry his bed partner, Klara Polzl (who was reportedly Alois’ niece, per Henry Makow), as wife number three. It is unclear who number two was in his quest. It is also said that Adolf had a particular liking for his 17-year old half-niece Geli whom he murdered in 1931 when she tried to escape.

In any case, there is the rumor that poor Adolf was not even the son of Alois; but was, in fact, the son of an adulterous affair that Klara had with another reported Jew (who would have surely been an Amalekite Jew).

Pathetically, there seems to be some similar skullduggery in the family of Klara. Klara’s father (another apparent Amalekite Jew) got to an Amalekite Stronnes girl (the maternal grandmother of Adolf) and fathered Klara out of wedlock.

The essence of this presentation is that Adolf himself and both his mother and supposed father were all conceived out of wedlock. The amazing thing about this tangled story of name changes, deception, fornication and adultery is that all of the participants seem to have been Amalekite Jews. In the case of Adolf, this depravity seems to go back to his Edomite ancestors.

Still More Modern Edomite Perversion

With the Edomite propensity for evil and perversion, as laid out in the preceding chapters, it is manifest why a probable Amalekitess, like Monica Lewinsky, would be so willing to engage in sodomy with Slick Clinton (to be later discussed) and why her father had no problems with it at all.

Instead of being angry and upset over Slick’s sodomite debasement of his daughter, Barnard Lewinsky continued to support Clinton, regardless of what he had done to Monica.

Obviously, the evident Amalekitess girl Monica was never concerned about her sodomy with President Slick. The Mar 21, 2003, “The Week” (p. 12) had a picture of Monica with a report that she had lost some weight (she has historically been on the fat side). Monica was quoted as saying-- “I’ve learned not to put things in my mouth that are bad for me.”

With a public abasement of a young woman in an recognized ethnic group in the US, one would suppose that all of the Amalek-Edomites in America would come out in defense of their girl and publicly condemn the morally corrupt Slick Clinton for what he had done to her. But no, not so!

The collective Amalekites are themselves morally depraved and have no concern at all over the debasement of one of their women. In a sense, sodomy and depravity is a part of the morals of huge numbers of Amalek-Edomites.

Obviously, they don’t get upset when their girls are publicly sodomized, corrupted, humbled and debased. If they collectively had an ounce of integrity and honour, they would have been outraged. But they were not concerned. No leading Amalekite showed any interest whatsoever in condemning the evil Slick Clinton for humiliating Monica.

Levy-Condit

Just after the Clinton-Lewinsky sodomite scandal died down, another problem erupted in early 2001 when one more evident Amalekitess likewise took over the headlines for her sexual encounters with US Congressman Gary Condit, a married man from California (Condit is also a depraved Democrat, the same as Clinton). The young woman, Chandra Levy, was similarly from California.

Like Monica, Chandra went to Washington as an intern (for the US Bureau of Prisons) and vanished in April 2001 (either after or while she was having her affair with the married Condit). Suspicion fell on Condit. But allegations also shifted to the possibility of her committing suicide. So, what did happen?

While many questions still remain on what happened to Chandra, at least some of the mystery was solved. On May 22, 2002, a man walking a dog in a Washington, DC park stumbled upon Chandra’s skeletonized remains under some leaves in a wooded section of the park. For sure, Chandra was murdered!

Importantly, it seems clear enough that Amalekites have a strange propensity for illicit and/or perverted sex. They are simply very immoral and depraved people.

Morituri

In 1965, Twentieth Century Fox released a most interesting movie called “Morituri.” Apparently, it didn’t sell satisfactorily under that name--so the film was renamed “Saboteur: Codename Morituri; The Saboteur.” The movie had a top flight cast with Marlon Brando, Yul Brynner and other leading stars.

It was produced and put out by an apparent Amalekite Jew named Aaron Rosenberg. Rosenberg’s effort received a couple of nominations for Academy Awards. As an old-time black and white, it was a fairly good movie, with no profanity and generally a story of interest involving the trials of a decent German captain of a freighter trying to take his cargo from Japan to Germany in WWII.

There was only one important woman in the script and she was a very pretty, sexually appealing, German Jewess who had escaped Nazi Germany.

After surviving the sinking of the ship she was on, she was picked up in the Pacific Ocean with some Americans by a Japanese submarine. The Nipponese submarine turned these captured prisoners (several American men and this Jewess) over to the German freighter.

In the few scenes which this girl was in, she inevitably was offering herself in sex in return for some supposed benefit to her or for something that she simply wanted from various men.

As just noted, the captain was a decent sort of fellow and he proposed to change her Jewish name of Levy to Goddard, a more Western appearing name. He simply did not want his German crew (some of whom were dedicated Nazis) to know that she was Jewish. He offered her a private state room with privileges and asked nothing in return.

Yet, she immediately laid it on the line that she was available to get in the sack with him and supply his needs or wishes, whatever. Another occasion arose when she wanted to induce the several American prisoners on board to participate in a mutiny. Some five of the Americans were not interested in this adventure.

Sure enough, she contacted them and offered herself as an inducement to get them to go ahead with the scheme she was busy trying to promote. Thus, she was simply a whore or slut who used her sexual equipment to either give herself more status and privileges from people in authority or induce or seduce men to do her bidding. She was a very morally depraved young woman.

The thing that struck this writer when viewing this film was the willingness of an evident Amalekite Hollywood producer to put out a production which showed one of his own women in such a bad and pathetic light. Surely, her role could have been more positive. But then the idea came to me that this is the way that the Amalekite mind thinks. This is reality.

They are not interested in presenting morality. In this case, probably the film depicted the real world and how an attractive, desirable Amalekite Jewess would constantly be using her sexual appeal and equipment to further her own selfish interests in obtaining benefits or in putting over her will to others. Surely, this is the way the depraved Amalekite mind works.

Some Fiction

While this production was perhaps based upon a lot of fact, in terms of how a German ship in WWII would have enormous threats (from allied submarines in the area and/or from British saboteurs on board) in any movement from Japan to Europe, there likely was a lot of fiction introduced to keep the plot moving.

In truth, it would be very improbable that a Japanese sub would pick up a German Jewess survivor from a sunken ship in the Pacific. A sub might and perhaps would pick up American military survivors from a sunken ship (to become prisoners of war). But the Jewess idea has to be largely fiction.

Yet, the producer showed this message and carried forward the incredible reality of how the depraved and sick Amalekite mind works. Based upon the situation with Monica Lewinsky and Chandra Levy, the evidence is massive that a pretty Amalekite Jewish girl will willingly hit the sack with anybody and anything if it will promote her status or fulfill her wishes in any manner.

Another Report

Many years ago (perhaps 35 years or so), this writer read a magazine article by an apparent Amalekite Jewish man on the life of a Jewish girl in America (evidently New York, as best as can now be remembered). This writer remembers almost nothing from this article except the gist of the life of this girl. Whether it was published in “Playboy” or some other trashy magazine escapes me at this time.

Anyway, little thought was given to this story of long ago until it came time for me to write the above remarks on the film “Morituri.” In thinking about this likely Amalekite Jewess in Morituri, my memory recalled this magazine article of many, many years ago.

Anyway, the essence of this magazine story, by a very evidently depraved Amalekite Jewish man, was an attractive and appealing Jewish girl and her struggles in life and how she used her sexual equipment to persevere. This girl was always on the make to bed down with men in authority (for the obvious benefits that their position, money and power might have and how those assets might benefit her).

She was not particular of who she hit the sack with in her quest for gain. It mattered not whether she was making out with a fat, ugly, old, Black, White, pink or green man as long as the exercise benefited her in some way. Always, if some man had something she wanted, she was ready and willing to engage in promiscuous and/or perverted sex.

This very old magazine article about an apparent Amalekite Jewess is much like the situation with the just cited Monica Lewinsky and Chandra Levy. These evident Amalekite Jewish girls were evidently regularly on the look out of how they could engage in demented, evil sex just to be with powerful, influential men.

Still One More Case From History

President Bill “Slick” Clinton was one of the most depraved, evil and sorry men of all time who have ever lived in the US White House. His pathetic and wretched story is told throughout this publication (mainly in chapters and appendices hereafter). Bill’s sordid sodomy affair with Monica Lewinsky is well known. But there is another instance of Bill and an Amalekitess hitting it off.

Once Slick was in the US White House, he used it and his office of US president for his personal sexual pleasures and desires. Besides Monica, there were many others (as will be described in later commentary). One of the most interesting ones was screen star Barbra Streisand, who Bill tied in with for an affair (as will be discussed in a later presentation herein).

If there ever was a true Amalekite Jewess, it is Barbra. She has the classic Hittite nose of all time (plus plenty of talent since this fact cannot be denied). Possibly, in payment for getting to bed down with Barbra, she and one of her shack-up boy friends were allowed to stay in the Lincoln bedroom of the US White House.

Along with the very obvious Amalekite linkage that Barb has, there is much evidence that the former President Slick has some Amalekite genes in his own pathetic and wrapped genealogy (this possibility will be further explored in a later appendix).

So while the Streisand-Slick Clinton liaison gave her and her shack-mate a chance to enjoy the Lincoln bedroom, it gave Slick even more. It’s highly questionable whether anyone could beat Slick out in a transaction (not even the Amalekite Jewess Barbra Streisand could get the best of him).

Thus, Slick got Barb with a small payoff (the Lincoln bedroom). And in return, poor Barb and her liberal, leftist Hollywood crowd gave Slick multiplied millions of dollars in campaign contributions (as also will be addressed in later chapters).

The point of this is that sex means nothing to an evil Amalekite. It is just one more thing which the evil Amalekite will use to try to destroy Yisrael.

Amalekite women, especially attractive and desirable Amalekite women, willingly use their sexual equipment for any perceived purpose and/or benefit if given a chance. They generally seem to have no sense of morality, integrity, honesty or character. They will hit the sack with anyone if they can expect a pay-back.

More Recent Cases of Amalekite Evil

In another classic illustration of Amalekite morality, the “Jerusalem Post” of July 14, 2000 (p. 5), had a story by Eli Muller on “Israeli diplomat ran child-porn ring” which focused upon accusations that Israel’s vice-consul, Aryeh Scher, ran a child pornography ring in Rio Janeiro, Brazil.

Scher was able to escape back to Israel before he could be arrested by Brazilian authorities (one of the fall-outs of the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 was that Amalekite criminals from around the world would have a place of safety, a sanctuary, to flee to when they risk being caught and prosecuted for their crimes and evil. The state of Israel will not allow the extradition of these Amalekite criminals).

A search of Scher’s apartment by Brazilian police disclosed some pornographic photos and material which confirmed allegations. Another Israeli linked to Scher, George Schteinberg, was also accused of child pornography activities--including the distribution of porno material over the Internet. He was arrested before he could make good on an escape to safety and protection in Israel.

In a classic illustration of the incredible depravity of a very demented Amalekite, the “Jerusalem Post” of Aug 18, 2000, had a news report about one Zion Cohen, a self styled healer, who was indicted in Tel Aviv for raping and committing indecent acts on six of his clients.

In one case, Cohen told a woman client to take her clothes off. He then placed a plastic covered parchment in her vagina. Next, he told her that she was cursed and that her cleansing would take six months. To remove the curse, she would have to drink the seman of a “God-fearing man” (apparently, to make her sodomize him orally).

Obviously, this Amalekite propensity for sexual depravity has laid the groundwork for Amalekites to be some of the leaders in producing and distributing the tragic “snuff” films of sex acts linked in with live murders on the screen. These snuff movies and Amalekite involvement in making them will be addressed in a later chapter.

Behemah Problems

Besides the evil Amalekites, as discussed above and hereafter, the behemah humanoids (both Christians and non Christians) are also generally very immoral and sexually depraved. Thus, the Amalekites do not have a monopoly on depravity and decadence.

In general, the behemah humanoids have no problem with perversion, sodomy and/or homosexuality (as will be proven in later chapters herein). Like other (behemah) domesticated animals, they generally will breed each other, anything and everything without much concern over morality.

Manifestly, Christianity has had little or no impact upon the character of behemah humanoids. Behemah Christians are often just as promiscuous and perverted as behemah non-Christians.

In terms of sexual depravity, the behemah humanoids are very closely akin (almost as bad, but not quite) to the wicked Amalekites. The difference between them is that the Amalekites have brains while the behemah humanoids are fairly stupid. Manifestly, the Amalekites are extremely intelligent people in the present culture.

Chapter 156--Amalek-Edomite Depravity III

More on Amalekite Morality

Assuredly, it is manifest that the Amalek-Edomites, from a genetic viewpoint, are different from almost all other ethnic or racial groupings of peoples on planet earth. Their closest cousins in depravity probably were the previously mentioned fags in Sodom and Gomorrah (who racially seem to be related to the Amalekites, as well as being connected geographically).

Therefore, many of the leading homosexuals and leaders in the queer movement appear to be Amalek-Edomites. Many of these Amalekites are acknowledged as atheists or agnostics--though the Reform and Reconstructionist Jewish movements have huge numbers of queers in them.

Some of these warped faggots like Roy Cohn, Barney the Fag Frank and NY Mayor Koch have become important government leaders in the United States (along with Henry Kissinger, who also seems to be a closet queer). Cohn, Koch, Kissinger and Barney the Fag and his warped sister (close aide and public spokesperson for Slick Clinton) were/are all probable Amalekites.

Other Famous Amalekite Queers

The Amalekite gangster Jacob Rubenstein (alias Jack Ruby), who gunned down Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas in 1963 (to be later described, along with the John F. Kennedy killing), was a homosexual, a pimp and a distributor of pornographic literature (“The Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 137).

The famous Anne Frank (who died at age 15 at the Bergen Belsin concentration camp) of Holland and WWII fame appears to have had some teenage lesbian feelings, as outlined in her diary, per Professor R. Amy Elman of Kalamazoo College (Oct 22, 1999, “Forward,” p. 1, 16). Apparently, Anne (a likely Amalekitess) was never allowed circumstances or time to pursue these feelings. But they are interesting.

The previously discussed Karl Marx, not only was a real, live Satanist, but a biographical write up on him by J. R. Nyquist, in his book on “Origins of the 4th World War” (p. 148), indicates that in a play written by Marx, the leading characters were Satanic, corrupt and overspilling with curses, homosexual fantasies and other dark passions. Perhaps Marx had some latent homosexual tendencies.

The well known Jewish poet, Allen Ginsberg, was a queer. The depraved Ginsberg, of the pathetic hippie days, seems to personify what one would expect to find among modern Jewish Amalekites.

Fat cat Louis Rosenstiel (to be assessed later), composer Aaron Copeland, painter Tobias Schneebaum, author Joel Rothschild (who now has AIDS) and politician Joseph Lieberman were/are all fags and evident Amalekites. Even Nightline host and newsman Ted Koppel, an Amalekite, is allegedly queer (though he apparently denies it).

Reports have even surfaced claiming that the famous Los Angeles Dodgers left-handed pitcher Sandy Koufax (a likely Amalekite Jew--ed) was a fag--perhaps a bisexual, as he was married a couple of times (Mar 7, 2003, “The Week,” p. 10). The same bisexuality is reportedly true with the Amalekites Yasser Arafat and Adolf Schicklgruber (reportedly, one of Adolf’s favorite passions was having women defecate on him).

The famous American pianist Liberace is another interesting person. While his race, ethnicity and/or religion were evidently not publicly discussed, it is fascinating that he had both enormous musical talent and some semblance of a Hittite nose. When his blatant homosexuality is added in (he died of AIDS a few years ago), the evidence suggests that he had, at least, Edomite (if not Amalekite) genes.

Hollywood

As a boy in the late 1930s and 1940s, this writer liked Western movies--especially those of Gene Autry, Roy Rogers, John Wayne, and perhaps one of the biggest Western stars of all, Randolph Scott.

But one of the tragedies of the sickness called Hollywood was the huge presence of Amalekites and especially Amalekite queers involved in the film industry. This problem is still gross today.

For years, a number of the queers have been identified and made known--especially after they started coming down with AIDS--like with Rock Hudson and Liberace (as cited above). But one of the most famous enduring queers of all was a surprise and disappointment to me--the Western actor Randolph Scott. In view of his macho Westerns, he never seemed to be the type.

In recent years, celebrities John Stamos and his wife Rebecca bought a house in Calabasas, CA, which had some notoriety attached to it (Nov 1, 2002, “The Week,” p. 10). It used to be a famous house of prostitution; and back in the 1950s, it was the home of Hollywood star Randolph Scott.

Reportedly, Scott used it as a “little gay love nest,” per Mrs Stamos. She has photographs of Scott, and of all people, Cary Grant, at the house (cooking together in the kitchen) during one or more of their private get-togethers at Scott’s home. Of course, Cary Grant was a British Amalekite Jew actor who scored big in Hollywood.

Grant was a top star for years and many American women idolized him as one of the most handsome men in Hollywood. He had several wives over his life, including the Woolworth heiress Barbara Hutton. But what was not commonly known about the depraved star was that the Amalekite Grant was a queer--perhaps a bisexual, in view of his several marriages (or it might be that his marriages were all fronts).

Amalekite Queer Marriages

Subsequent chapters herein will broach the new media push on the promotion of homosexual marriages. One of the facets of this depravity came up in the summer of 2002 when various newspapers began running stories on “same-sex” commitments and marriages.

A couple of Amalekite Jewish queers named Steven Goldstein and Daniel Gross were apparently the first pair of faggots to receive this huge outpouring of publicity.

In August 2002, these queers were thrust onto the front page of the “Montreal Gazette,” into the wedding section of the “New York Times,” and prominently on CNN and NBC’s “Today Show,” which followed up with live interviews of the two faggots (Sep 6, 2002, “Forward,” p. 2).

The Outreach

The February 15, 2002, “Forward” paper (p. 17) had a lengthy report by Jade Chang on “Between Heaven and Earth: A New Home for L.A. Congregation” which told the story of a Reform synagogue in Los Angeles that is made up of gay, lesbian and bisexual Reform Jews (surely Amalekites because it is hard to fathom that true Israelite Jews would be a part of this depraved mess).

The head rav is a woman named Denise Eger. Reportedly, this queer group (called the Congregation Kol Ami), headed by Eger, broke off in 1992 from another queer Reform synagogue in Los Angles called the Beth Chayim Chadashim (House of New Lives). The Kol Ami queers have recently moved into a huge new building which cost $750,000 for the lot, $1.3 million for construction and $200,000 for furnishings.

One of the strange features of this faggot synagogue is the presence of “interlocking seats.” From the article, it was unclear what interlocking seats are and how they are used. But since they seem to be some type of a new innovation for homosexual worshippers, it is easy to speculate that they must allow queer worshipers to connect in some fashion.

But there is still more to come on this Jewish (Amalekite) depravity. A Reform “rabbi” once told a class on Jewish faith and practice at a liberal Georgia college that “God is not against homosexuality,” that “It’s okay for women to be to be rabbis,” and that some “50% of women rabbis are lesbians” (Apr-Jun 2001 “Petah Tikvah,” p. 56).

More Amalekite Reports

In August 2000, some seven Israeli teenage boys molested, raped and sodomized a girl classmate in Israel while three of their buddies watched (Aug 11, 2000, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 5). When these boys added sodomy to their gang rape, it spelled out the likelihood that the boys were depraved Amalekites.

“Spotlight” of Apr 30, 2001 (p. 2), had a news item which reported that a “respected associate rabbi,” named Jerald M. Levy, was caught in Boca Raton, Florida, working the Internet trying to contact small boys for sex. Levy was released from jail after posting a $10,000 bond. As with other sex predators in this category, he will probably beat the rap or only face a short sentence.

The Dec 14, 2001, “Forward” (p. 2) had a news report of the arrest of Los Angeles area “rabbi” Mordechai YomTov on ten felony counts of allegedly molesting three small boys, ages eight to ten. YomTov was a teacher at the Cheder Menachem School. Apparently, the children molested were students of YomTov at the Jewish school.

The Feb 22, 2002, “Forward” (p. 2) had another pathetic report about a prominent Amalekite queer named Howard Nevison. Nevison was the cantor for a Reform synagogue in Manhattan, New York. Per the story, the Amalekite Nevison began sexually abusing his own three-year old nephew in 1973. The queer cantor continued sodomizing the child up until 1997.

In 1998, the boy’s mother signed an affidavit that Stewart Nevison, the son of Howard’s brother Lawrence, also had abused her daughter. It appears that sodomy and the abuse of small children run strong in this Amalekite family of queers and perverts.

By the way, Howard was arrested and is to be tried. If found guilty, he could be given 5 to 15 years in prison (which means that he will soon be back on the streets sodomizing small boys). The May 17, 2002, “Forward” (p. 5) said Nevison’s trial was to start June 13, 2002. In the meantime, his synagogue has placed the cantor on “paid leave.”

So-called Religious Jews Too

Early 2002 saw the news sources ablaze with stories about how bad pedophilia has been in the Roman Catholic Church. Tragically, Judaism has come under the same fire in 2002 (as noted above). One could expect that the depraved Amalekites hanging out in the Reform persuasion would be exposed as homosexual queers and pedophiles; but surely, the Orthodox would not have the problem.

Well, as things erupted in 2001 and 2002, there was a problem in the American Orthodox entity. The trouble apparently first surfaced in 2001 with allegations made against Baruch Lanner, who served as a “rabbi” and the youth leader of the Orthodox Union’s National Conference of Synagogue Youth (Apr 26, 2002, “Forward,” p. 1, 3).

Lanner was in this position over many years and now allegations have arose that he abused dozens of young people/children over a thirty-year period. Evidently, the so-called “rabbi” resigned in 2001 under pressure. It is unclear how many of these young people or children have come forth to make the allegations, but there were at least two girls who told about Lanner’s fondling of them (ibid, p. 3).

A trial for Baruch Lanner was scheduled to take place in 2002. The Orthodox youth leader maintained his innocence which was to be settled in the trial. But apparently, there has been sufficient evidence of his misconduct that the organization does not want him in charge of children any longer.

So far, the Orthodox Union has tried to keep a low profile and apparently has not wanted any publicity or acknowledgment of how bad Lanner may have been simply because of fears that the organization will be faced with massive lawsuits, as is happening presently in the Roman Catholic Church (ibid, p. 1).

This writer does not have the particulars on the charges against Lanner. The “Forward” article merely reported upon his coming sex abuse trial and said little about the allegations. The students who have come forward have been girls. So it would appear that maybe Lanner was only a pedophile and not a homosexual faggot bothering small boys.

This type of criminal activity is indicative of the depraved and evil Amalekite mind. Therefore, there has to an assumption that Lanner is an Amalekite hiding out and pretending to be an Orthodox Jew (as is also true with the previously mentioned Joseph Lieberman). So even Amalekites can become Orthodox Jews. It is not an impossibility.

In one more report, the Aug 16, 2002, “Forward” (p. 2) noted that David Schwartz, a supervisor at a Los Angeles area Orthodox day camp, was charged with six felony counts and one misdemeanor count of sexually abusing children--including two boys as young as four and five years old.

Finally, this same “Forward” (p. 2) had a report that Yeshiva University, a well known Jewish religious college, has approved a plan to allow gay and lesbian couples to live together in the married student housing facilities at its medical school. In fairness, this decision was reached after some queer students brought a lawsuit demanding the open sodomy.

Rebecca Walker

The Feb 26, 2001, “Jerusalem Report” (p. 46-47) had an enlightening story by Judith Solomon on “Child of the Movement.” The focus of this report was upon a biracial woman named Rebecca Walker. Her mother was the famous Black writer Alice Walker and her father was a Jew named Mel Leventhal (an Amalekite?).

Alice Walker gained some fame and prominence when she wrote the book “The Color Purple” in 1982 and won a Pulitzer Prize for it the next year. Alice’s story was about a poor, illiterate, backward, Black woman who lived in the rural South during the so-called Great Depression. Hollywood producer Steven Spielberg picked upon it in 1985 and made it into a Academy Award winning movie.

Black heroes (like Whoopi Goldberg, Oprah Winfrey and Danny Glover) starred in it--which should have pleased the US leftists. But as the production was underway, there was a massive protest and uproar from the liberals and Blacks across America--because Walker’s work portrayed Negro men in a very unfavorable light (since they regularly beat and abuse their women terribly).

Goldberg played the abused and mistreated Black woman Celie. But Celie got back at her abusive and hateful Black father-in-law when she spit in his glass of water. Black servants have always used this popular Black trick to get even with their White masters/employers. They often spit in the food going to Whites to show their disdain.

In any case, Alice Walker met the likely Amalekite Leventhal in Mississippi in the 1960s when Mel was there as a civil rights-activist lawyer trying to cause trouble for the people of Mississippi.

The Marriage

In 1967, Mel and Alice went to New York and got married. By 1969, the Leventhals had produced the biracial child Rebecca. However, the interracial marriage did not take and the Leventhals divorced when Rebecca was eight. Thereafter, the child was split between her Black mother and her Jewish father. She did not grow up as a religious Jew, but she did absorb much Jewish culture and identified with it.

By the time that Rebecca was 12, she had lost her virginity. And by age 14, she had had an abortion. At some point in time, the biracial Rebecca turned to lesbianism (or at least, she became a bisexual). The gist of Solomon’s story about Rebecca was that the Black Jewish girl was shacked up in a lesbian “partnership” with a shackmate who had an eight-year-old son to raise.

Rebecca’s biracial life as a child must have been horrible because her Jewish grandmother generally rejected her and her Black relatives called her a “cracker.” Apparently, she grew up bouncing around between being Jewish, White and Black and never fitting into any of the definitions correctly (although the power of the Black genes surfaced in her looks and Black rhythm).

Needless to say, Rebecca’s life was shattered from her childhood because of her dysfunctional, interracial family. And seemingly, she and her lesbian friend are raising the small boy in the same state of confusion. She says that her present lesbian family is part Jewish, part Buddhist and much “love” (per her words).

If her father Mel was a true Amalekite, as seems highly likely, it probably accounts for much of her pathetic, wretched life. Amalekite genes would hurt her and especially as they are mixed with primitive African genes with all of their fall-outs.

Certainly, Rebecca showed evidence of the Amalekite mentality because she legally changed her name from Leventhal to Walker when she was in high school. Amalekites are notorious for changing their names (as noted earlier).

Isaiah 3:9

It must be significant that Yeshayahu the prophet predicted the sins of Sodom would one day enter into Yehudah, as happened when Yehudah absorbed the Amalekites (Isa 3:9). Some students might try to read into that text the destruction of Yehudah, like Sodom. But that’s not the question.

The issue in Isaiah 3:9 is manifestly homosexuality because the prophet says that the people allow it to be openly displayed and won’t even try to hide it. And this has been one of the tragedies in Yehudah.

Not only did Jewish authorities allow the integration of the perverted Amalekites into Yehudah and Judaism, but they have silently sat back and allowed them to become the biggest purveyors of sodomy, perversion and filth which the world has ever known.

The Worst Feature of Amalekite Depravity

It’s bad enough that so many of the Amalekites are queers themselves and that they openly display their perversion and wretchedness within Yehudah and Judaism, but there is another more horrible feature of this whole sordid sickness. As outlined in previous comments, the Amalekites have for centuries been trying to defile Yisrael with pederasty (sexual perversion).

These Amalekite efforts to pollute Yisrael by pederasty started during the Exodus (per Piska 3, discussed earlier) and have obviously continued over the years wherever the Amalekites have had power (historically over Yehudah and now over the modern House of Yisrael nations).

Therefore, the wicked, pushy Amalekites have played a very important role in advocating, teaching, leading and inducing the dumb Christian Israelites in the House of Yisrael nations to become homosexuals and perverts (yet, they strangely don’t try to push the same perversion upon Jews in the Israeli state--perhaps because of fear of the Jewish religious authorities who carry big sticks in the state of Israel).

Yes, the Amalekites have been extremely busy promoting, teaching, encouraging and prompting open homosexuality in the national House of Yisrael nations where they now control the media and entertainment industries, the government, and assuredly the collective peoples.

For example, Barney the Fag Frank ran a homosexual call service out of his home and may still be doing so. Who knows how many stupid, gullible Israelites that Barney has induced to become fags like himself.

So it isn’t only that many of the Amalekites are themselves queers, but they have been the vocal people who have pushed open homosexuality upon the Christian Israelite society. Many, gullible, stupid Israelites (plus Adamites generally and the behemah and chaiyah) have succumbed to this Amalekite depravity and have been sucked into pathetic homosexuality.

If Christendom refuses to do anything about this sickness and/or refuses to say “no” to this wretchedness (as is happening currently), Judaism should step forward and take a stand against the Amalekites. But she won’t (as suggested by Isaiah 3:9).

The Power of Money

Not only have many Amalekites been homosexual queers, but they are the primary people who promote and encourage open homosexuality in the Western, Christian civilization, as pointed out above. It’s not to say that they are the only perverted people in the West. But they are the leaders and spokesmen for much of the current prevalence of sexual depravity in the Christian West.

They are successful in this direction because of the enormous amount of money which they own or control. Truly, there is a strange correlation between homosexuality and the Amalekites--just as there is a unique and prevailing correlation between Edomites and crime, to be broached in subsequent chapters.

More Edomite Depravity

One of the primary centers of Amalek-Edomite power is in Hollywood, USA. Today, Hollywood and the movie industry has grown to be one of the most depraved and morally corrupt places in world history (approaching Sodom and Gomorrah). Most of this wickedness and evil comes from the creative minds of very diabolical Amalek-Edomites.

Of course, true Jews and Judaism (mostly Orthodox, Conservative and Messianic ones) oppose much of this modern, demented wickedness emanating from Amalekite controlled Hollywood and the TV industry--although liberal (non-Edomite) Christians (and particularly behemah Christians) accept it or promote it.

Perhaps this is the reason why so many American Amalek-Edomites abandon any sense of Judaism to become Christians, agnostics, atheists or New Agers; but always, in the context of being secret Satanists/Luciferians, as previously discussed.

Further Edomite Deception

The reality that true Jews and the better manifestations of their faith in the Orthodox and Conservative segments of Judaism brings up a need to mention again that it is plausible that some Amalek-Edomites (like Senator Joseph Lieberman) do attach themselves to these more respected branches of Judaism, as noted in previous comments.

Thus, it might not be correct to say or believe that only true Jews are Orthodox or Conservative and only Edomites are Reform/ Reconstructionist Jews (although these correlations may have some general application and particularly in the Christian West). It can be true that some Edomites do pose as Orthodox or Conservative Jews or fundamentalist Christians on occasion.

The opposite is also true. It must be allowed that some good, true Jews are out in the world who could get suckered into the Reform/ Reconstructionist movements or the liberal, permissive, Christian denominations. It would be questionable how many would get seduced by these movements. But it must not be ruled out.

Dr Laura

A clear demonstration of this conflict surfaces when one looks carefully at the popular radio talk show host Dr Laura Schlessinger, now heard over a large portion of the United States. This Dr Laura, as she likes to be called, is a so-called marriage therapist of some sort who attempts to counsel and advise call-in individuals with personal problems and hang-ups.

This woman has advertised herself as a Conservative Jew (or now, she is alleged to be Orthodox). But in listening to her counsel to the poor, confused people calling in, one would have to wonder to what extent she could be a true Jew at all. While she generally talks good in terms of the needs of children to have both a father and a mother, she often deviates from the Torah otherwise.

She is never particularly strong on showing honor to parents. Her attitude toward children seems to be one of permissiveness with no sense of true disciplining of children (she apparently disapproves of any physical spanking of children). Laura appears to have absolutely no qualms at all over interracial marriages.

Laura and the Queers

More importantly, she has been very pro-queer in her advice and counseling. This Dr Laura seems to have no condemnation of homosexuality at all, apart from a recognition that children do need a mother and a father. Consequently, many queers call her for advice and counseling. The queers clearly like her and many obviously listen to her program. For some time, she never condemned their wretched practices.

Having made this observation about Laura and her pro-queer attitude, there is some evidence that for awhile, in recent years, she changed her pro-homosexual position somewhat. Reportedly, she started talking negatively about homosexual activism in some way to even rile up and make various queer groups mad at her (Nov 22-28, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 23). So maybe, Laura changed briefly on this subject.

But this was all temporary. Because, in late 2000, she came out with a two pronged assault to gain back the love and support of the faggots. First, she publicly apologized for any critical remarks and asked for the queers to forgive her (Dec 2000 “Internet Vortex,” p. 4).

Evidently, the second phase of her motion has been to tone down her words to gain back both the queer listeners and various advertisers who had taken offense at her upsetting of the homosexual community. Since money is the name of the game, Laura probably was terrified when some advertisers sided with the faggots.

Since she is so pro-queer and pro-miscegenation and anti-parent and anti-disciplining of children, one must be suspicious that she could be an Amalek-Edomite genetically from at least her one Jewish parent. Or perhaps, alternatively, she could be a janissary robot only doing the Amalekite bidding (a janissary will be defined in a subsequent chapter).

Doing the Work of Satan

With her large following and reputation among conservative, White Americans, she clearly is doing the Satanic work of the Amalekites in misleading the Whites to their downfall. In the sense that she is pretending to be a Conservative or Orthodox Jew (whichever it is) with Scriptural values, she seems to be a Satanic plant to further the Amalekite aims of destroying Yisrael.

It isn’t only that she is busy destroying White, Christian Americans, but she seems to be also trying to put the hex sign (figuratively) on whatever remnant of true Israelites there is remaining in the Jewish community of America. Like White Christians who have been taken in by this Doctor Laura, the same is true with the Jewish community. Many blindly follow her teachings.

The above observations on Doctor Laura have been made in the context of her early days on talk radio while she was allegedly a Conservative Jew. She could be a gross hypocrite and have changed some of her views in more recent years in an effort to further deceive and mislead her gullible, conservative audience.

Also, in her early radio days, she was very rude, nasty and discourteous to callers. But she toned this down considerably with experience. Maybe, she had to restrain her arrogant and rude attitude or be forced off of the air. It is all of these qualities, more than anything else, which make her a very dangerous force to be counseling people.

The Laura-Walters Feud

Finally, poor Laura took a wrong turn when she made the mistake of criticizing the powerful media voice of Barbara Walters. Walters seems to be a clear Amalekitess Jew who would be tough to oppose on any playing field. Poor Laura blundered when she complained about Barbara wearing a bathrobe to make money (the obsession of all true Amalekites).

Apparently, Barbara’s Amalekite colleagues fired back at Laura by publishing a photo of Laura appearing nude (which had floated around the Internet some years ago). It is true that a couple of evil Amalekites can sometimes get mad at each other and slug it out in the public arena. Whether this is the case of the Laura-Walters feud or not is unclear at this time. But for sure, Laura has taken on a tigress with Walters.

The Friedman Twins

In 1918, in Sioux City, Iowa, identical twin daughters were born to a couple of Amalekite Khazars from Russia named Friedman. One girl was named Esther and the other Pauline (who was called “Popo”). Both were close and grew into adulthood as the best of friends. They got married and went their own paths, but still maintained contact.

Esther married an apparent Amalekite named Jules William Lederer (who later founded the Budget Rent-a-Car Company). In time, both of the girls became newspaper columnists to offer the typical Amalekite advice of destruction for the dumb Christian goyim in America. These two Amalekite women were the real fore-runners to the likes of Dr Laura, who came along later.

Esther died in June of 2002. Her death received a surge of publicity because she and her sister were both nation-wide columnists with profound followings. The Jul 5, 2002, “The Week” (p. 34) had almost a full page obituary on Esther because of her fame. “The Week” called her “America’s mother” and “The columnist who advised a nation.”

Per the “Chicago Tribune,” Esther was “the world’s best read and most widely syndicated newspaper column, a fixture in 1,200 newspapers, offering a daily snapshot of a society in transition to an audience of some 90 million readers.” In somewhat of a similar vein, almost the same thing can be said for sister Popo, who also followed a like path in life.

However, Esther and Popo didn’t reach the big leagues as Amalekite Jews leading the gullible goyim down the road to destruction. Instead, they both followed the usual Amalekite methodology of using other names to fool the dumb Christians. Esther became famous as Ann Landers and Popo reached her notoriety as Abigail Van Buren (with a nationwide “Dear Abby” advice column).

In the case of Esther, per “The Week,” she wrote that masturbation was a normal part of growing up, that impotent men get penile implants, and that lonely, sick and bereaved people “get a pet.” Poor Esther or Ann, whichever, was also known to have at least one time altered a signed letter to her in her column. Manifestly, she was dishonest.

The writer of this production is not familiar with Abby, but presumably she too offered about the same line of deception and depravity to help speed along the destruction of the gullible goyim. The importance of mentioning Abby lies in the fact that the once inseparable twin sisters grew into being profound competitors who hated each other. They wouldn’t even speak for five years.

As can be expected, Esther was a dedicated Democrat and close friend of the ultra liberal William O. Douglas, Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court. Possibly, Esther’s daughter Margo is following in the same footsteps as her famous mother. She too writes a newspaper advice column. It is called “Dear Prudence.”

Now, it is easy to see why America is so fouled up and confused. American women have been turning to Amalekite workers of deception and evil for advice.

Dana International

The conflict or contrast between religious Jews and evil Amalek-Edomites was brought out in a 1998 news report from the Israeli state over its plans to send the trans-sexual singer Dana International to a Eurovision Song Contest as a representative of the state of Israel (Jul 1998 “New Beginnings,” p. 16). Dana, now an alleged woman, was once a man.

While details of Dana’s genealogy were not stated, it seems certain that this demented aberration is a genuine Amalekite because it is Amalekite genes which make for the most gross kinds of perversion.

The report gave no details on who Dana’s sponsors and supporters were. But it’s not too difficult to see some diabolical, perverted Amalek-Edomites lurking in the background promoting this pathetic figure to represent Israel.

Conversely, this action has infuriated a number of religious Israelis like Shlomo Ben-Izri, an MP with the Ultra Orthodox Shas party. Ben-Izri says a sex change is “worse than an act of sodomy” and that it offends him.

The intelligent and perceptive Ben-Izri went on to note that “Jews are supposed to be a light unto the nations, but this thing is a message of darkness.” Whatever else can be said for Shlomo, he is an honest man with some knowledge and understanding of right and wrong.

Fredrich Nietzsche

A book on “The Antichrist” quoted Fredrich Nietzsche on the Jews.

Nietzsche said that “Psychologically considered, the Jewish people are a people endowed with the toughest vital energy, who, placed in impossible circumstances, voluntarily and out of the most profound prudence of self-preservation, take sides with all the instincts of decadence, not as mastered by them, but because they divined a power in these instincts with which one could prevail against ‘the world.’

“The Jews are the antithesis of all decadents; they have had to represent decadents to the point of illusion; with a ne plus ultra of histrionic genius they have known how to place themselves at the head of all movements of decadence.”

Although Nietzsche had some perception, it would seem that he confused the decadence and evil of the Amalekites for the collective Jews. This has been one of the bad fallouts of the wretchedness of the Amalekites. Because of their evil and presence among the Jews, various people have tried to blame the Jews for Amalekite evils.

Nietzsche may have also missed the point on his assertion that the instincts of decadence were not mastered by them. The truth is that the Amalekites are truly masters and experts at evil. The writer of this study at hand believes that indeed they have mastered sin, evil and wickedness. Furthermore, it is very plainly genetically induced within them.

Chapter 157--The Amalekites Follow Balaam

Balaam Revisited

One of the surest ways of destroying any particular group of people (called genocide in today’s vernacular) is through interracial sex and amalgamation with certain other racial types.

In earlier chapters in this work, data was presented to demonstrate that interracial sex is sin and contrary to YAH’s Word. Howbeit, this eventuality has not only impacted upon Yehudah and Yisrael, but also upon the whole Adam kind collectively.

To appreciate how sexual misconduct and perversion have been linked to the Edomites, it is necessary to review the situation with old Balaam, the evil seer at the time of the Exodus who was determined to destroy Yisrael. While Balaam had a lot wrong with himself, the student of truth must not ignore his prophecies and counsel, as recorded in the book of Numbers (after all, he was a true prophet of YHWH).

Jasher, Revisited

While otherwise, there has to be some hesitancy about putting too much credence on the book of Jasher, it is true that these ancient writings do have some unusual insight and perception on the Edomites.

This source first mentions Balaam, as a 15 year old boy, who was wise and understood the art of Witchcraft (Jasher 61:8). At that time, Balaam, the son of Beor, became a servant to the evil Angeas, King of Africa. Since the Edomite Zepho was an early colleague of Angeas, it is a certainty that Balaam and Zepho were friends or colleagues.

Later Zepho took over the kingdom of Chittim and proceeded to double cross (a common Edomite practice) and defeat his former friend Angeas (Jasher 63:27-35). Balaam, seeing how Zepho prevailed in the fight, elected to move to Chittim where he was received with great honors (Jasher 64:2).

When Zepho and his Edomite relatives decided to attack Yisrael and Egypt (described in some detail elsewhere herein), he called upon Balaam to reveal the outcome of his planned adventure. But Balaam’s efforts were blocked by YHWH and he couldn’t deliver the message (Jasher 64:26-29).

As noted earlier, Zepho and his allies failed in this effort and were defeated. But the point of the whole presentation is that it shows that even as a youth, Balaam became a friend and ally of the evil Edomites.

A feature of the character and mentality of the real Balaam surfaced in Jasher 67:18-53 when the Pharaoh had a strange dream and called upon the wise men and seers to interpret it. Apparently, none of Egypt’s seers could interpret the dream. So Balaam came to the Pharaoh to offer his help and advice.

Balaam said that a son would be born in Yisrael who would destroy Egypt and free the Israelite slaves. The Scriptural record indicates that Pharaoh decided initially to order the Hebrew midwives to kill all of the newborn boy babies. But the midwives were afraid and did not do so. Therefore, this plan backfired and the Israelites increased (Ex 1:16-20).

So Balaam once more made an appearance before Pharaoh. This time, he proposed a different solution (at least, this is the message in the book of Jasher). He said to drown (kill) all of the Israelite male babies being born by throwing them into the river. Egypt took his advice. Thus, this was the background for the Scriptural story of Moshe.

More Advice from Balaam

To broach the reality of Balaam’s ultimate counsel of wickedness, one must recall the situation with Balak and Balaam in their contact with Yisrael during her wilderness wanderings. Balaam was still a diviner and then a resident of Pehor on the Euphrates (having moved years earlier from Africa). Balak was the king of Moab, which was directly in front of Yisrael on her march to the promise land.

Balak saw what all Yisrael had done to the Amorites. So he sent a delegation to Balaam to ask Balaam to come to him and put a curse upon the approaching Israelites (Num 22-31). With his hatred for Yisrael, Balaam was agreeable. But try as hard as he could, old Balaam could never effect a curse on Yisrael.

Instead, under the authority of YHWH, Balaam actually ended up blessing them three times. Of course, King Balak was quite angry over the matter in which Balaam blessed the Israelites instead of cursing them, as he was going to be paid for doing.

However, in their parting of company, Balaam did have one key piece of advice for his ally Balak. His counsel was for the Moabites to induce Israelites to commit illicit sex (specifically miscegenation) to bring about their own downfall (Num 31:16).

The Moabites followed Balaam’s advice and sent their daughters into the Israelite camp for miscegenation purposes--as will be described in some detail in a later chapter in this publication (Num 25:1-18). While the consequences of this sin was stopped at that time (because of the works of YHWH and Phinehas), Balaam’s counsel did not go away from history.

Initial Edomite Successes

Early on, various portions of the Edomite peoples picked upon these teachings of Balaam. A previous chapter noted that the Phoenicians settled in the Western part of Canaan land at a very early time--perhaps in the range of 1800 to 1460 BCE. The exact date seems uncertain from present historical records.

The “Zondervan Pictorial Bible Atlas” quotes Josephus who dates the founding of the important Phoenician town of Tyre at 1217 BCE. But the Atlas (p. 358-359) makes the case that the city was founded much earlier--with a clear reference to its existence in 1430 BCE.

The Phoenicians were certainly Edomites, as attested to by Josephus, mentioned previously. As noted earlier, the big question seems to be identifying which descendant of Esau fathered the Phoenicians.

Because of the references to some three towns in old Canaan with the place names of Timnah (Josh 15:10, 57) and Timnath (Gen 38:12-14; Jud 14:1-5), a good bet would be Timna, Eliphaz’s apparent son.

However, the citation from Genesis 38 focused on a time frame of around 1700 BCE or earlier, as associated with Yehudah. It’s hard to imagine that Esau’s grandson could be grown and established in that area at that time, although that might have been the case. Esau married long before Yakov and lived in old Canaan until Yakov returned from Mesopotamia. He then moved South.

It is possible that Timna was responsible for the Timnath in Dan--if not all three of those cities in Yisrael. The town in Dan (Jud 14:1-5) is important because its inhabitants were called Timnites (Jud 15:6) and it was in the territory of Dan. Anyway, the best estimate is that these Phoenicians were likely from Timna, son of Eliphaz and grandson of Esau.

The Problem With Dan?

With this background, it seems apparent that over the years these Edomites followed Balaam’s teachings to the letter. They quickly began integrating and mixing with the Danites. Over the years, it appears that this portion of Southern Dan miscegenated greatly with these Phoenician Edomites, either in Canaan or later in Ireland.

Thus, the modern, Southern, Gaelic Irish seem to be a classic mixture of Edomites and Israelites. Perhaps this is the reason that the tribe of Dan was purposely left out of the election in the age end, as outlined in Revelation 7. It is also the likely explanation of why the Southern Irish have had such a propensity for the Catholic religion, which will be later assessed.

This propensity of Danites to mix with alien peoples has been one of their long recognized attributes. Yair Davidy quotes the “Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs,” as saying that Dan prophesied of his sons that they would forget their ELOHIM and be alienated from the land of their inheritance and from the race of Yisrael and from the family of their seed (“Lost Israelite Identity,” p. 187).

Another Example

As described in an earlier chapter, the available evidence suggests that the old Ottoman empire essentially involved Turkic peoples from Eliphaz. As outlined, the scholarly evidence is that the Turks of old Anatolia descend from Teman. Previous discussions placed these Temanite Turks in Asia Minor at the fall of the old Hittite empire by 1230 BCE.

Because of being on the losing side in WWI, this once great Edomite empire collapsed and came to an end in the early 20th century. But Turkey remained nationally and still today occupies a key geographical bridge between Asia and Europe.

By the time of the Apostolic Assembly, there were some settlements of Israelites in the Western portions of Asia Minor, as proven in the histories of some of the Messianic assemblies in that area, described earlier. These Israelites could have settled there almost anytime over the years from 1460 BCE to 30 CE. So it’s hard to be precise on when, why and how they came to Asia Minor.

While it is possible that some of these Israelites may have moved on, it is also plausible that some of them stayed there to eventually integrate, mix and miscegenate with the Edomites, as locally established. To whatever extent this assimilation happened, it is one more example of Edomites following Balaam’s advice on how to destroy Yisrael.

This Edomite presence in Anatolia, the former domain of the Hittites, is interesting for another important reason. The original land grant to Avraham (the land promise) may have included this territory (Gen 15:18-21). Yair Davidy quotes a Dr Kemelman who studied the grant and concluded that it had to include most of Anatolia or Asiatic Turkey (“Lost Israelite Identity,” p. 189).

If Kemelman’s scholarship has merit, it is interesting that Edomites rushed in to seize this area which they were not entitled to possess. Later, when some true Israelites showed up, they either eventually miscegenated with the existing Edomite inhabitants or moved on to another territory.

Although these two illustrations of Balaam’s advice from history are significant, there seems to be a different approach on Balaam’s thinking, as will be demonstrated with the Amalek-Edomites, to be next assessed.

Amalek-Edomites Have Followed Balaam

Thus, not only have various and sundry peoples and nations followed the Balaam thinking through the centuries, but the Amalek-Edomites have particularly devoted themselves to perpetuating it as the classic method of destroying their hated enemies--the Israelites. However, they have added a unique twist to it. The background on this Amalek-Edomite approach is interesting.

An early Jewish sage named R. Keruspedai quoted R. Johanan and said that during the Exodus, the Amalekites consulted with old Balaam because he was a master of advice with a gift for nefarious schemes (“Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation,” v. viii, p. 247). Balaam advised them to make war on the Israelites and Amalek launched his attack (Ex 17:8).

The famous R. Eliezer (c100 CE) noted for Deuteronomy 25:18 that while this first attack was done openly, the Amalekites would attack Yisrael furtively (in secret, by stealth and/or guerrilla tactics) on all other occasions (“Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation,” v. viii, p. 247).

By following this advice from Balaam, most of the later Edomite efforts to recover the birthright land and promises have been by stealth and clandestine methods, as noted in previous chapters. They abandoned further plans for open, frontal attacks upon Yisrael, as they tried in the Exodus days.

Previous comments have linked the Amalek-Edomites to the famous Khazars of Southern Russia. Arthur Koestler wrote that they were a Turkish tribe of the steppes who employed a nomadic mobile strategy and guerrilla warfare to subdue and defeat the more superior Russian forces on occasion (“The Thirteenth Tribe,” p. 125).

A Change in Strategy

With a failure to destroy Yisrael in the initial Amalek attack (or attacks, since there seems to have been two of them), at the time of the Exodus, is it not then plausible that Balaam would next suggest his classic, furtive method of destroying Yisrael by interracial sex and miscegenation. Perhaps this was the catalyst that prompted the Amalekites to change their tactics to something more furtive and discreet.

In the vein that the Amalekites have adopted Balaam’s theology and teachings (as mentioned above and in other commentary herein), they have become followers, students and disciples of Balaam (mentioned in II Pet 2:12-15, in apparent reference to the Amalekites). In this sense, “The Mishnah” focused upon them and noted that they would have “An evil eye, a haughty spirit, and a proud soul...

“The disciples of Balaam the wicked inherit Gehenna and go down to the pit of destruction, as it is written, But thou, O God, shalt bring them down into the pit of destruction; bloodthirsty and deceitful men shall not live out half their days” (“The Mishnah,” Avot 19, p. 458).

This Mishnah quotation is from Psalms 55:23, which Second Temple Judaism obviously linked to the disciples of Balaam. The destruction idea seems to be a repeat of Obadiah 1:8-9, as discussed in a prior chapter.

Balaam Followed Earlier Precedents

Actually, it is entirely logical that Balaam would turn to this methodology to destroy Yisrael because this essential thinking was followed several times in ancient history, as recorded in the book of Genesis when Satan first undertook the destruction of the Adamic line.

In Genesis 3, Satan used interracial sex to commence his attack upon the Adamic race when he seduced Eve. Later, in Genesis 6, he again introduced excessive interracial sex and miscegenation between the various humans/humanoids, and between the humans/humanoids and angelic powers to produce different mongrel races of people.

There is even evidence that the crisis in Genesis 11 (from the leadership of Nimrod and the building of the tower of Babel) involved interracial sex (to be broached in a later chapter herein). Nimrod was a son of Cush and grandson of Ham (whose wife was probably Naamah, the descendant of Satan-Kain, discussed earlier herein--Gen 4:22).

In the commencement of Satanic interracial sex in the Garden of Eden and the production of the Satanic Cain line of humanoids (as discussed in prior chapters herein), it ended up that The MOST HIGH placed enmity (the Hebrew ebah, meaning hatred, hostility, variance) between the two seedlines of Eve and Satan, as discussed earlier herein (Gen 3:15).

While this conflict between the lines of Satan and Eve could be and has been far reaching and enormous over the centuries, it is interesting that one of the things which Satan has done in the process is to miscegenate and interracially cross the two lines at every opportunity. Next, he used the line of Cain to provide the leadership in destroying Adam’s line. All of this surfaced in Balaam’s advice on destroying Yisrael.

Jude 1:4-16

Consequently, the historical and Scriptural record is that the Amalek-Edomites picked upon the Balaam scheme (which was based upon the earlier thinking of Satan) and became followers or disciples of Balaam. Thereafter, this work of the Edomites to destroy Yisrael through illicit sex seems to have been established in the New Testament by the writer Yehudah (Jude 1:4-16).

Yehudah noted that some evil men crept in deceitfully to turn EL’s grace (for Yisrael) to lasciviousness (the Greek aselgeia, which Young’s “Analytical Concordance” defines as licentiousness--thus, lacking in moral restraint, sexual permissiveness, etc) and to turn the election of Yisrael to the iniquity of the ways of Cain, Balaam and Core (Jude 1:4, 11).

Of course, Kain was a product of the wicked one and Eve’s miscegenation, as noted above and earlier. Esau came along and also miscegenated with the descendants of Cain. Eventually, Balaam arrived on the scene and advocated miscegenation, in particular, as the ultimate solution to destroy Yisrael.

The Greek name Core (Hebrew Korah) probably refers to the Levite Korah, who instituted rebellion against Moshe (Num 16:1-34), although Esau may have had a son and/or illegitimate grandson named Korah, as pointed out earlier (Gen 36:5, 14, 16, 18; I Chron 1:35).

If this Korah reference is to Korah, the son or more likely the grandson of Esau, it is more evidence of the sexual depravity of the Edomites since this Edomite Korah was likely the illegitimate son of Eliphaz and his father’s wife, as described in previous comments.

It is also relevant to note that the Yehudah account likens this whole episode to the case of the angels who miscegenated with humans before and apparently after the flood (Jude 1:6-7). Yehudah also ties it to the homosexuality and perversion of Sodom and Gomorrah and the going after of strange flesh (sexual intercourse with the behemah and chaiyah).

It should be noted that a favorite tactic of the Amalekite bankers/masters has been not only their own sexual perversions, but their forward, pushy, persistent and powerful attempts to force the same perversion upon Christian Israelites in the House of Yisrael nations.

The wicked Amalek-Edomites have been doing their best to teach, educate and force Christian Israelites to miscegenate and sexually cross with particularly the behemah which will utterly destroy them forever. Going on, they have also done their best to advocate, teach and instruct the dumb Israelites on the practice of homosexuality and other forms of perversion.

If there was any record in the Greek New Testament which is absolutely astounding in terms of prophetic fulfillment, it is these writings of Yehudah. He has laid out the future for Yisrael under the strong grip of powerful ruling Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters and even has identified them and their work in detail.

More Scriptures

There is another most fascinating remark in Yohanan’s Revelation which also focused on Balaam and his work of promoting racial miscegenation to destroy Yisrael.

Yohanan wrote to the Pergamos Assembly of believers and pointed out the evil teachings of Balaam, obviously adopted and/or promoted by them (Rev 2:14). There is no question about it, these remarks have to tie to Balaam’s fornication and miscegenation teachings.

The only problem on interpreting this text is to define or establish “who” Pergamos was historically and presently. The historical application is fairly easy since history does tell about the city of Pergamos in Asia Minor. As a part of identifying the seven assemblies of Revelation, it is easy to relate this group to the modern Seventh Day Baptist denomination--which will be broached in later comments.

Any person familiar with the Seventh Day Baptists knows at once that one of their most horrible and depraved sins has been their approach to the race question. They have had an enormous outreach to Colored peoples and have done their best to amalgamate their membership into one race.

By the way, the book of Romans relates to this Pergamos group. In assessing the situation in Rome, race immediately gains the limelight. The secular Romans integrated, miscegenated and amalgamated themselves with others to their own detriment centuries ago.

The Roman Catholic Church (which will be assessed in some detail in later chapters) has always been a force promoting the brotherhood of man--coupled with racial integration, miscegenation and amalgamation. This theology has become the backbone of virtually all of Christendom.

The Socialist, Communist and leftists movements in general support interracial sex and miscegenation. The famous or infamous Karl Marx was a teacher of interracial sex. One of his daughters married a Black man named La Fargue (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” p. 122).

Help From the Gullible Goyim

While the Christian West is marching full time to Amalekite leaders and their plans for the destruction of the White Christian Goyim in the West, it must be noted that the Amalekites have carefully and cunningly enlisted the help and assistance of the goyim themselves in their own destruction. It seems incredible, but it is true. The stupid goyim are working at this effort almost as much as the Amalekites.

It is precisely this situation which gives rise to an understanding of the descriptive word janissary--mentioned heretofore in other presentations.

Apparently, a man named Richard Hoskins of Lynchburg, Virginia used (and defined) this janissary term in some of his writings long ago--which evidently focused upon Edomite Jews or at least upon the controlled media and entertainment industries and how they and government authorities have been able to completely change American values and beliefs in the last 70 years.

In the context of Hoskins’ use, a janissary is a person who is not an Amalekite racially or ethnically. But he or she has been trained, brainwashed, mesmerized and indoctrinated to blindly believe in, support, teach, advocate and push the Amalekite agenda for the destruction of true Israelites with the same dedication, purpose, resolve and commitment as a real Amalekite.

In this sense, a janissary is a robot or zombiized individual who has no mind of his own, but only functions in a state of confusion and daze of blindly following the Amalekites and their agenda--without the foggiest notion of what the result will ultimately be for him and his people.

Another Word

There is still one more descriptive word needing mention in this context. This word is “mattoid.” The Nov 18, 2002, “American Free Press’ (p. 10), in a discussion by Michael Collins Piper on the thinking of the plutocrat David Rockefeller, the word mattoid was attached to David.

Piper defines it as: “A mattoid is a person of high intelligence who lacks a conscience. Mattoids are found in top political and banking positions. Mattoids will do literally anything to increase their wealth or power.”

Tragically, the mattoid and janissary definitions are sometimes combined into one presentation in terms of describing many of the gullible goyim in the Christian West (who are working full time to help the Amalekites in their work of destruction). What a paradox this whole thing has been.

Chapter 158--Amalek-Edomite Path of Evil

The Historical Record

When the House of Yehudah began absorbing huge numbers of Edomites in Second Temple days, the Amalek-Edomites gained power and strength over the Jewish population. In their positions of control, they began a systematic campaign of destroying Yehudah from within rather than from without, as is customarily followed by peoples out to destroy other peoples.

The specific Amalek-Edomite methodology of destruction was the bringing about of Yehudah’s racial miscegenation and integration with other peoples; all to the detriment of Yehudah and the true Jews, as Josephus and other historians confirm ("The Jewish War," V:443, translated by J. Thackeray, described earlier).

In the context of this methodology, it appears that the Amalekites themselves miscegenated with the true Jewish Israelites. But clearly, over the years, they have also encouraged and promoted peoples of other significantly different races to similarly miscegenate and mix with the true Jews. Thus, the true Jews were subjected to Balaam’s theology from two directions.

Not only have ruling Amalekites created an environment for promoting and accepting Africans like Sammy Davis Jr. and Whoopi Goldberg into Jewish fellowship, but in the last few years, they have even funded and/or prompted a movement of huge numbers of the dark peoples of India’s Shinlung tribe and Black Falashas from Ethiopia to Yisrael to be integrated into the Israeli society and culture.

More on the Ethiopians

The situation with the Black Ethiopians is interesting. “The Jerusalem Post” of Apr 14, 2000 (p. 2, 32), discussed it in some detail in an article by Elli Wohlgelerner on “Decision time in Ethiopia,” In 1984, the Israelis brought 8,000 of them to Israel and in 1991, they brought another 14,000.

In the meantime, in 2000, another 26,000 lined up in a special camp site wanting to also go to Israel. And the numbers kept growing daily. The Elli Wohlgelerner article suggested that if these 26,000 were allowed to come to Israel, another 26,000 (or more) would line up in the camps in Ethiopia, also wanting to emigrate to Israel. Thus, it was a catch 22 situation.

The Israeli Interior Minister, Natan Sharansky (a Khazar, originally from Russia), had to make a decision on whether/how these Blacks would be allowed into Palestine. The article did not specifically report on Sharansky’s personal feelings about the issue. But from hints given, he was in favor of it--although concerned that it would open a floodgate of more Blacks wanting to come under the pretext that they were Falashas.

It appears that numerous Jewish groups in America (Amalekites?) were much in favor of bringing the Blacks in--like the North American Conference of Ethiopian Jewry, the Rabbinical Council of America and various other American Jewish groups. Conversely, many of the Israelis were against it. The gist of the report was that likely the Israelis would allow more Black Ethiopians to come to Israel in the future.

Though Sharansky eventually left the government in 2000 over the Palestinian Intifada and Barak’s moves for peace, the government did finally make a move for substantially more Colored immigration from Ethiopia.

Approval Came

The “Jerusalem Report” of Jun 4, 2001 (p. 6), had a news story on “Israel to absorb 6,000 Ethiopians this year” which tells the tale of a decided move to bring the Ethiopians to Israel. In 1999 and 2000, some 2,000 Ethiopians were brought to Israel. Some 8,000 to 10,000 are now approved to come. So they too will be on the way soon. The only question now about the subject seems to be budgetary constraints.

The evidence is clear that many of these Black Ethiopians have never had any real connections with Judaism. Their country is in a state of crisis with civil war, famine, poverty and turmoil. So most of these Ethiopians simply want out and have hope of a better future in Israel.

Even the so-called Falashas were never really dedicated, religious Jews.

Over the years, there was some publicity trying to tie them back to Shlomo and Sheba. But most of this hype was nonsense since the Blacks were not really religious people (certainly not in the vein of the Orthodox Jews). Many of these Ethiopians were like the Khazars in Europe. They both have retained heathen customs from their pasts.

Some Possibilities

The “Jerusalem Post” of May 25, 2001, had an interesting report on this situation in Ethiopia and why such massive thousands of Black Ethiopians are lining up to go to Palestine.

In 1984, a Black Ethiopian named Aharon Tagu came to Israel as a part of the Ethiopian migration. Anyway, this Tagu gained some financial backing and support and returned to Ethiopia to go to work to line up Ethiopian Blacks to immigrate to Israel. Apparently, Tagu has had a lot of success because thousands of them are now in camps trying to be admitted to Israel.

It is unclear of exactly which Jews are promoting the movement of these Africans to Palestine.

But there is a powerful force probably involving the Amalekite bankers/masters in Europe and North America. Certainly, leftist media sources like the “Jerusalem Post” and the “Jerusalem Report” seem to be in favor of this immigration. Reportedly, Tagu has had contact with the Mossad. So maybe, the Mossad has been involved as well.

Finally, on this movement of Ethiopian Blacks to the state of Israel, it must be noted that the well known Shas Ultra Orthodox spiritual leader Ovadia Yosef has taken a stand in support of the Negroes.

When Yosef was the Chief Rav of the Sephardim sect, he took the position that the Falashas were Jews, and more recently, in the summer of 2002, he has approved a scheme for some 22,000 Ethiopians of the Mura sect (which were supposedly Christians) to come to Israel (Aug 16, 2002, “Forward,” p. 3).

Black Hebrews?

Some 25 years ago, a group of 2,000 American Negroes, who called themselves Black Hebrews, came to Israel with temporary visas. The group settled at Dimona and refused to leave Palestine. They claimed to be the true descendants of Yehudah. The Israeli government was unable to get them to leave and has been unsure of what to do with them.

In June 1999, the question over them was effectively settled when the Israeli government granted them a permanent status and Israeli ID cards (Oct 22, 1999, “Forward,” p. 16). Thus, there will now be some more Blacks for true Jews to assimilate and mix with.

Jewish Evangelizing

Just as Christianity has been at work trying to flood the Colored world with evangelizing missionaries for some time now, it appears that organized Jewry has also decided to get into the same proselytizing business (much as the Jews did in the days of John Hyrcanus and his efforts to amalgamate the true Jews with the Amalek-Edomites).

The latest Jewish scheme seems to be one of sending out missionaries to Latin America. Some Israeli “rabbis” were sent to Peru some ten years ago to put some Peruvians through the conversion process. In mid 2001, another team of evangelizing Jews headed for Mexico to convert a number of Mexicans (Dec 17, 2001, “Jerusalem Report,” p. 7).

The next Jewish efforts centered once more on some Peruvians in mid November 2001. This time a team of four “rabbis” (two Ashkenazim and two Sephardim) headed South to convert some 150 Peruvian Indians to Judaism (ibid, p. 6). Reportedly, the Indians were known as “Inca Indians.” They had been studying the OT and had adopted much of its outline on righteousness.

The February 22, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1, 7) took a look at this evangelistic effort by noting that a team of Conservative leaders had went to Uganda in the heart of Black Africa in February 2002 to form a beit din (rabbinical court) to convert 600 Blacks to Judaism.

These stories from the “Jerusalem Report” and “Forward” on these recent Jewish (correctly Amalekite) evangelizing and conversion efforts noted the ultimate fall-out of the conversion process. Once converted, the Indians and Blacks are then allowed to immigrate to Palestine and become a part of the state of Israel; or alternatively, to the US to further pollute America.

Yet

Incidentally, while encouraging the conversion of these various Coloreds to Judaism (as cited above), it is fascinating that one White former Mormon in Salt Lake City, Utah, named Helen Radkey, has tried to convert but “the rabbis here (in Utah) don’t want me,” per her words (as quoted in the Dec 20, 2002, “Forward,” p. 2).

Though Ms Radkey has sided with the Jews in protesting the actions of Mormons to baptize dead Jews into Mormonism, Helen’s efforts of conversion have not been welcomed. It is unclear what all the Jews have against Helen. But apparently, she is a feminist and tarot card reader who has been a minister in the Universal Life Christian Church.

Of course, true Jews would not be happy with the feminist Radkey in their congregations. So probably, there is much support for her exclusion from Judaism (though one must wonder why the Reform and Reconstructionist Jews don’t pick her up since they are already so depraved that a woman like Radkey should not affect them). The question of feminism in Judaism will be further assessed in later chapters.

Balaam’s Thinking, Revisited

Of course, this Amalek-Edomite scheme of following Balaam’s advice on using permissive interracial sex and prevalent miscegenation to damage the House of Yehudah seems to have had some powerful support from remarks by Yechezkel, cited earlier, when he charged that Edomites had been guilty of acting revengefully against the House of Yehudah (Ezek 25:12-13).

While it remains to be seen exactly how far this Amalek-Edomite scheme will succeed on bringing Africans and Hispanics to Palestine, in order to miscegenate them with true Jews, there could be some further opposition on the part of true Jewish Israelites. Regardless, the line of Esau has already damaged and hurt Yehudah enormously.

The Edomites Focus on the House of Yisrael

With the passage of the years, these same Amalek-Edomites have moved into positions of power and control over the House of Yisrael nations. Just as they have controlled the House of Yehudah for most of the last 2,000 years, they are now largely in control over all of the House of Yisrael nations.

Not content with the great damage and hurt they have put on the House of Yehudah and true, good Jews over the centuries, the wicked Edomites turned their sights upon the House of Yisrael nations to destroy or damage them as well. Their goal (from Esau’s days, 3,900 years ago, to the early 21st century) has always been the same--the destruction of Yisrael.

With their great wealth, strength and resources (particularly with their control over the governments, the media and entertainment industries, and money and banking institutions), the Amalek-Edomites have been instrumental in promoting racial amalgamation with distinctively different races, as the publicly accepted (politically correct) norm and standard.

Of course, the gullible, ignorant, stupid, blind Christians of the Israelite population have gotten on the politically correct band wagon to do everything possible to destroy themselves--just like the true Jews did centuries ago. It looks like the Christians would have learned something from Yechezkel, Josephus and history. But they haven’t.

Israel Cohen

Over the years, any number of Amalek-Edomites have revealed their plans for the destruction of the White race along with and/or to include Yisrael (depending upon how one might wish to define Yisrael racially).

For example, in 1912, the famous Jewish writer and British Zionist Israel Cohen (1879-1961--an apparent Amalek-Edomite) outlined his thinking for the 20th century.

He wrote that “While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment.

“With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause” (per “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century”). Cohen was right on target in his prediction for the future of America.

Emanuel Rabinovich

At a special meeting of the “Emergency Council of European Rabbis” in Budapest, Hungary on January 12, 1952, R. Emanuel Rabinovich (an Amalek-Edomite?) reportedly said:

“We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia and Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Our Control Commissions will, in the interests of peace and wiping out inter-racial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with whites.”

Going on, Rabinovich noted that “white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory.”

Rabinovich concluded with “We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark peoples.”

Some Observations

This prediction, just cited above from Rabinovich, has certainly come true for most of the so-called White and/or Black descendants of mixed sexual crosses.

As long as there is a Negro ancestor in one of these families (to the tenth generation), the children tend to be grossly dullards and even if they are extremely Caucasian in appearance and are taken to be White in the generic population.

These dullards are very easy to manipulate and control. Assuredly, mind control processes (promoted and controlled by far more intelligent Amalekite bankers/masters) are far easier with these mixed mamzer peoples than would be true with other racial variations. It just seems that a real curse dramatically comes on any line of people with these Black genes.

Therefore, as more and more people come along in the overall mixed society of Blacks and Whites, the possibilities of Amalekite imposed mind control increase dramatically. Of course, this precise situation could be one of the reasons why the coming world government of oppression, tribulation and tyranny can be achieved so quickly. The miscegenated, confused society will lack the perception to stop it.

It is utterly fascinating that this condemnation in children does not appear significantly with White crosses with Mongoloids or Hamitic peoples. It is primarily a phenomenon of White crosses with Blacks. Even Hamite crosses with Blacks do not seem to be as bad as White-Black crosses. And manifestly, the curses last for ten generations!

It’s hard to imagine that an Amalek-Edomite would be this revealing (as happened above with Rabinovich). But if Rabinovich did exist and did speak these words at the reported meeting, it is a fantastic revelation of evil Amalek-Edomite plans.

Truth

Christian people in the West, who have been totally mesmerized and zombiized by the Amalekite controlled media and entertainment industries, may argue on and on that these pronouncements never happened. But the facts of history reveal that they have been precisely on target in the West since WWII.

Since they have been accurate in predicting the future, why should anyone doubt their existence?

This same reasoning can be applied to the so-called “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” which many claim are a forgery. This production will be assessed in a future chapter (which discusses the power of the Amalekite bankers/masters).

Noel Ignatiev

The Dec 30, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 17) had some remarks from Vince Ryan on “Why Does Everybody Hate Whitey?” Ryan quoted Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev, of Russian Jewish parentage (meaning that he is assuredly an Amalekite Khazar--ed). Ignatiev openly advocates the genocide of the White race.

Ryan quotes Noel as saying-- “every group within white America... labor unions, ethnic groups, college students, schoolteachers, taxpayers, and white women... has advanced at the expense of the black people as a race.”

Ignatiev further adds: The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race, which means no more and no less than abolishing the privileges of the white skin. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in U.S. society...”

Although Ignatiev evidently did not directly address the issue of racial integration, miscegenation and amalgamation as his solution to the problem he alleged, it is a fact that for 3,500 years (since the days of Balaam), this practice has been the most popular one pushed by the evil Amalekites (as cited below and elsewhere herein).

Norman Podhoretz

The Sep/Oct 2000 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 4) quoted the well known liberal Jewish writer and editor Norman Podhoretz (a likely Amalekite), who expressed his desire for racial miscegenation between Whites and Blacks by saying “I share this hope, but I cannot see how it will ever be realized unless color does in fact disappear: and that means not integration, it means assimilation, it means--let the brutal word come out--miscegenation.

“The Black Muslims, like their racist counterparts in the White world, accuse the ‘so-called Negro leaders’ of secretly pursuing miscegenation as a goal. The racists are wrong, but I wish they were right, for I believe that the wholesale merging of the two races is the most desirable alternative for everyone concerned.”

Harold Wallace Rosenthal

The Amalekite Harold Wallace Rosenthal will be discussed to some length in a subsequent chapter. Suffice to say, he was an administrative assistant to Amalekite Senator Jacob Javits several years ago. In an interview with Walter White, he said:

“We’re smart--we are so powerful and at the proper time we will mix up your Gentile women with the Blacks and in 50 years you’ll be all mixed up. Niggers love to scr-w (copulate with) your white women and we encourage it by using them to our advantage” (pamphlet “The Hidden Tyranny,” p. 36).

James Yaffe